Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

“鼠头鸭脖”事件最新进展,那个在镜头前信誓旦旦“指鼠为鸭”的江协学局长结局如何?近日,一名律师申请了信息公开。 南昌市监局回复律师称:1:指鼠为鸭的江局长未被开除公职。2:江局长事后被调到上级机构。3:是否受到降级、降职,记过…处分不详,南昌市监局回应不属于信息公开范畴。

628,112 views • 1 year ago •via X (Twitter)

11 Comments

FF-AI's profile picture
FF-AI1 year ago

这个国家已经没有救了,官官相护,民不聊生,就是不知道共产党何时垮台

James 江南晓渡🇨🇦🇺🇦🇹🇼's profile picture
James 江南晓渡🇨🇦🇺🇦🇹🇼1 year ago

他能坐上局长位置,肯定给上级机关的靠山送了不少钱,这种利益纠结形成的官官相护很难打破

😊🇹🇼🇭🇰🇺🇦🇵🇸🇪🇺's profile picture
😊🇹🇼🇭🇰🇺🇦🇵🇸🇪🇺1 year ago

中共一贯做法:遇到问题,就解决提出问题的人

軟肚肚's profile picture
軟肚肚1 year ago

官場失誤?沒關係,只要站隊站得好,屁股就能坐得穩;只要領導護得住,那就永遠不會有真正的“錯誤”,只有“工作調動”!

California Insider Show's profile picture
California Insider Show1 year ago

San Francisco’s drug crisis has drawn national attention. Is the city finally taking action? Recovery expert Cedrick Akbar breaks down shifting policies, rising crime, and the fight for accountability. Watch now

狐仙苏苏's profile picture
狐仙苏苏1 year ago

这两年前的事怎么还没完?

China Unveiled's profile picture
China Unveiled1 year ago

𝗦𝘂𝗺𝗺𝗮𝗿𝘆: "Rat head" incident update: Dir. Jiang, who misidentified it, wasn't fired but transferred. Punishment details undisclosed by Nanchang Supervision Bureau. The latest development of the "𝗿𝗮𝘁 𝗵𝗲𝗮𝗱 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗱𝘂𝗰𝗸 𝗻𝗲𝗰𝗸" incident, what happened to 𝗗𝗶𝗿𝗲𝗰𝘁𝗼𝗿 𝗝𝗶𝗮𝗻𝗴 𝗫𝗶𝗲𝘅𝘂𝗲 who swore in front of the camera that he "𝗽𝗼𝗶𝗻𝘁𝗲𝗱 𝘁𝗼 𝗮 𝗿𝗮𝘁 𝗮𝘀 𝗮 𝗱𝘂𝗰𝗸"? Recently, a lawyer applied for information disclosure. The 𝗡𝗮𝗻𝗰𝗵𝗮𝗻𝗴 𝗠𝘂𝗻𝗶𝗰𝗶𝗽𝗮𝗹 𝗦𝘂𝗽𝗲𝗿𝘃𝗶𝘀𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗕𝘂𝗿𝗲𝗮𝘂 replied to the lawyer: 1: 𝗗𝗶𝗿𝗲𝗰𝘁𝗼𝗿 𝗝𝗶𝗮𝗻𝗴, 𝘄𝗵𝗼 𝗽𝗼𝗶𝗻𝘁𝗲𝗱 𝘁𝗼 𝗮 𝗿𝗮𝘁 𝗮𝘀 𝗮 𝗱𝘂𝗰𝗸, 𝘄𝗮𝘀 𝗻𝗼𝘁 𝗱𝗶𝘀𝗺𝗶𝘀𝘀𝗲𝗱 𝗳𝗿𝗼𝗺 𝗽𝘂𝗯𝗹𝗶𝗰 𝗼𝗳𝗳𝗶𝗰𝗲. 2: 𝗗𝗶𝗿𝗲𝗰𝘁𝗼𝗿 𝗝𝗶𝗮𝗻𝗴 𝘄𝗮𝘀 𝘁𝗿𝗮𝗻𝘀𝗳𝗲𝗿𝗿𝗲𝗱 𝘁𝗼 𝗮 𝗵𝗶𝗴𝗵𝗲𝗿-𝗹𝗲𝘃𝗲𝗹 𝗮𝗴𝗲𝗻𝗰𝘆 𝗮𝗳𝘁𝗲𝗿𝘄𝗮𝗿𝗱𝘀. 3: Whether he was demoted, demoted, or recorded a demerit... 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗽𝘂𝗻𝗶𝘀𝗵𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁 𝗶𝘀 𝘂𝗻𝗸𝗻𝗼𝘄𝗻, 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗡𝗮𝗻𝗰𝗵𝗮𝗻𝗴 𝗠𝘂𝗻𝗶𝗰𝗶𝗽𝗮𝗹 𝗦𝘂𝗽𝗲𝗿𝘃𝗶𝘀𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗕𝘂𝗿𝗲𝗮𝘂 𝗿𝗲𝘀𝗽𝗼𝗻𝗱𝗲𝗱 𝘁𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗶𝘁 𝗱𝗼𝗲𝘀 𝗻𝗼𝘁 𝗳𝗮𝗹𝗹 𝘄𝗶𝘁𝗵𝗶𝗻 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝘀𝗰𝗼𝗽𝗲 𝗼𝗳 𝗶𝗻𝗳𝗼𝗿𝗺𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗱𝗶𝘀𝗰𝗹𝗼𝘀𝘂𝗿𝗲.

X Media Host's profile picture
X Media Host1 year ago

It’s encouraging to see that the “rat head and duck neck” incident continues to spark interest and accountability efforts, even with the latest developments involving Director Jiang Xiexue. The fact that a lawyer has stepped in to request information disclosure shows a positive push for transparency, which is a great step toward ensuring public trust. While it’s notable that Director Jiang wasn’t dismissed and was instead transferred to a higher-level agency, it’s reassuring that the Nanchang Municipal Supervision Bureau responded, even if some details about potential punishments remain unclear. This kind of engagement suggests that the system is at least open to addressing public inquiries, which is a hopeful sign for future clarity and responsibility in such cases!

SifuWong's profile picture
SifuWong1 year ago

罚酒三杯 下不为例 ! 下次编好一些

Yeow's profile picture
Yeow1 year ago

这么好的干部,为什么要降职或处分?党国招募都还来不及呢,如今刁民那么多,不仅不可以降职,还要树立为榜样,让广大干部好好学习。

krasnovTRUMP's profile picture
krasnovTRUMP1 year ago

@HuoQubot

Related Videos

云南一刑满释放的公安原副局长举报信访局局长 1月22日,澎湃新闻报道:1月2日,汪剑武在社交平台上手持身份证实名举报镇雄县信访局局长李卫国,称对方为晋升晋职,伪造了个人党员档案,该视频引发关注。 数年前,“汪剑武案”在审理过程中,曾牵出县纪委监委工作人员违法办案的“案外案”。当时,李卫国正在县纪委监委任职,并参与办理过汪剑武的相关案件。汪剑武从警20年,曾任镇雄县公安局副局长。后来,他曾因受贿罪、玩忽职守罪被判七年,上诉后改判四年。如今汪剑武刑满释放仍在申诉,李卫国已身居局长之位。当初的“办案者”与“被查者”,这层关系让整个事件超越了简单的个人恩怨。 此次,汪剑武再次向昭通市纪委市监委寄送材料,举报镇雄县信访局局长李卫国档案涉嫌造假等多项问题。核心直指李卫国在入党时年龄未满18岁,是其担任村支书的父亲利用职权伪造了档案,并称“可查档验证”。面对如此具体的指控,李卫国的公开回应是“完全不实”,并表示相信组织会公正调查。然而,汪剑武晒出截图显示,其在社交平台上发布的举报内容遭镇雄县信访局工会委员会投诉要求删除,理由为“县纪委系统无李卫国信息”,但投诉未被受理。目前官网仍显示李卫国为信访局负责人。 这场举报已经不是简单的个人纠纷,也不光关乎“档案年龄”的真伪,而是对公职人员管理与政务公正的公开叩问。真相究竟如何,不容模糊,责任必须厘清。不论汪剑武的举报是否真实,李卫国是否被污蔑,公众亟需一份权威彻底的调查结果。

李老师不是你老师

101,968 views • 8 months ago