ๆญฃๅœจๅŠ ่ฝฝ่ง†้ข‘...

่ง†้ข‘ๅŠ ่ฝฝๅคฑ่ดฅ

๐™š anastasia karanikolaou ๐™š โ€˜97 baby. west coast. buying anything pink. sarcastic. probably in a bikini. high heel addict. in n out obsessed. kesha is my icon. always vlogging. party girl. never beating the groupie allegations แฐ”

15,999 ๆฌก่ง‚็œ‹ โ€ข 22 ๅคฉๅ‰ โ€ขvia X (Twitter)

0 ๆก่ฏ„่ฎบ

ๆš‚ๆ— ่ฏ„่ฎบ

ๅŽŸๅง‹ๅธ–ๅญ็š„่ฏ„่ฎบๅฐ†ๆ˜พ็คบๅœจ่ฟ™้‡Œ

็›ธๅ…ณ่ง†้ข‘

๐Ÿšจ ZELENSKY: THE HIGH-HEEL DANCING CON-ARTIST WHO SOLD OUT UKRAINE ๐Ÿšจ ๐Ÿ”ด While his soldiers were sent to the frontlines to be slaughtered, Volodymyr Zelensky was busy stuffing his pockets with Western taxpayer cash. ๐Ÿ”ด This so-called โ€œwar heroโ€ has turned out to be nothing more than a corrupt, self-serving fraudโ€”more interested in prancing around in high heels and securing luxury properties than leading his country. ๐Ÿ”ด The truth is out: While Ukraineโ€™s troops were dying by the hundreds of thousands, Zelensky and his cronies were siphoning off BILLIONS in aid, ensuring their families lived in luxury while ordinary Ukrainians paid the ultimate price. ๐Ÿ”ฅ UKRAINE WAS NEVER HIS PRIORITYโ€”IT WAS ALWAYS ABOUT POWER, MONEY, AND FAME. ๐Ÿ”ฅ ๐Ÿ“ข THE FACTS: โš ๏ธ Zelenskyโ€™s inner circle was exposed for buying multimillion-dollar villas in Switzerland and Florida while demanding more money from the West. โš ๏ธ He purged generals and officials who questioned his failed war strategy, all while ensuring his own safety in lavish bunkers far from the battlefield. โš ๏ธ The war is lost, Ukraine is in ruins, but Zelensky walks away a billionaireโ€”his people abandoned, his soldiers used as cannon fodder. ๐Ÿšจ This was never about โ€œdefending democracy.โ€ It was about a corrupt TV actor turned dictator who played the West like fools and walked away RICH. ๐Ÿšจ

Jim Ferguson

48,928 ๆฌก่ง‚็œ‹ โ€ข 1 ๅนดๅ‰

After rounds of 67, 68 and 68 Lee Westwood has a share of the lead at LIV Golf Singapore with Jaoco Niemann and he says a win tomorrow would probably be the best of his career: โ€œI guess at the age of -- I'm 53 on the 24th of April, so at that stage, it would probably be the best win of my career. I get asked that question a lot, and I normally go back to the '97 Australian Open beating Greg Norman in a playoff as certainly my favorite win, and then obviously winning at Sun City with my wife carrying my golf bag, I have to then say that that's one of my favorite wins or she's clips me around the ear. โ€œBut all of my wins have special memories. But to still be competitive at my age and up there and having chances to win tournaments like this is validation for driving myself on and doing all the hard work and practice that nobody sees and still being competitive, like I say, and having a good enough game to compete against them.โ€ He went on to talk about how comfortable he feels playing in Asia: โ€œYeah, I've always loved coming to Asia. I set my stall out the beginning of my career, coming to Malaysia and places like that. I went to Japan very early on in my career, 1994, for the Acom International, and then I played Visa Taiheiyos and Dunlop Phoenix and won three Visa Taiheiyos in a row and a Dunlop Phoenix back-to-back with the Visa. I won the Malaysian Open. One place I haven't won is Singapore, so it would be nice to add that to the list. I came close in 2005. Adam pipped me. โ€œI don't have too much of an issue with the heat for some reason. It's hot, but you just deal with it, right? I'd rather play in the heat than the cold. My body seems to loosen up in these conditions, which is a bonus. โ€œI've always enjoyed coming to Asia, and I class myself as a player that's played a world tour all my career. I never really wanted to stay in one spot. I never really wanted to play the PGA TOUR full time. I think I was a member of that tour for six or seven years but I wanted to go and play all around the world and see what the world is all about.โ€ Lee Westwood has won 44 times around the world in more than 20 different countries. Heโ€™s looking to add to that list on Sunday in Singapore ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ฌ Lee Westwood Majesticks Golf Club LIV Golf

Flushing It

62,396 ๆฌก่ง‚็œ‹ โ€ข 4 ไธชๆœˆๅ‰

โ€œOh yeah, and before I go, let me just give yโ€™all a public service announcement. I hope the Mexicans and everybody else donโ€™t think that youโ€™re safe, baby, because youโ€™re not. Because they donโ€™t like Catholics, they donโ€™t like Jews, they donโ€™t like n****s, they donโ€™t like a motherfucking thing thatโ€™s outside of what the fuck they pushing. If you think Iโ€™m lying, look at the fake-ass, phony-ass, motherfucking smiles Zohran Mamdani always motherfucking has on his fake-ass, phony-ass, diabolical-ass face. You n****s are dumb. Like I said, Iโ€™ve been saying this shit for years upon years upon years, but you never want to listen to a real n****a. But you will sit here and think that this fraudulent ass bitch who prays Fidel Castro, a real motherfucking dictator, motherfuckers like Maduro. Iโ€™ve been telling you n****s, the Democrats have sold your bitch ass out. This is not the Democratic Party that our grandparents once voted for. Baby, this is not them. Since when do you constantly focus on the motherfucking past? Thatโ€™s the devil. He always dangles your motherfucking past over your head. Slavery, n****s. Since when do you divide and motherfucking conquer? Thatโ€™s the devil, n****a. Heโ€™s the author of the confusion and father of lies, motherfucker. And they sit right in your goddamn face and lie to the masses, lie to your motherfucking kids until he kills, steal, and motherfucking destroy. And ainโ€™t none of you bitches safe because you donโ€™t belong to God. Just know that.โ€

Apple Lamps

83,898 ๆฌก่ง‚็œ‹ โ€ข 27 ๅคฉๅ‰

Marc Andreessen explains why the โ€œcurse of the entrepreneurโ€ is being too early โ€œMy experience is the great founders almost always feel like theyโ€™re too late, and youโ€™re almost always too early.โ€ The reason is because the idea seems obvious to the founder: โ€œYouโ€™ve got some idea in your head, and as far as youโ€™re concerned, the world should already work this way, which is why youโ€™re pursuing it. And so itโ€™s a little inexplicable as to why it hasnโ€™t happened to itโ€ฆ It must be just about to happen and I must be too late.โ€ This is how Marc felt at Netscape when he co-authored the first widely used web browser. But in reality, Marc explains, founders are almost always too early: โ€œWe almost never see a qualified founder fail because they were too late to market. Itโ€™s almost always because theyโ€™re too early to market. And I donโ€™t say that critically. When we screw up investments, I think thatโ€™s often the reason as well.โ€ It usually turns out that the world just wasnโ€™t ready yet. Marc points out that when Apple launched the Newton in 1989, it was basically the same thing as the iPad. The world just wasnโ€™t ready yet, and the required technologies werenโ€™t in place (e.g. mobile broadband, high-resolution screens, battery technology, etc.). โ€œIt convinced people for 20 years that tablet computing would never work. And then they did it again with the iPad, and it worked. I think thatโ€™s the permanent curse of the entrepreneur.โ€ In a previous YC talk, Marc told founders that if what youโ€™re working on was the hot thing 3-4 years ago, youโ€™re probably right on time because the infrastructure and consumer behavior has now caught up. Source: Y Combinator (Oct 2016)

Startup Archive

35,941 ๆฌก่ง‚็œ‹ โ€ข 1 ไธชๆœˆๅ‰

Marc Andreessen explains why the โ€œcurse of the entrepreneurโ€ is being too early โ€œMy experience is the great founders almost always feel like theyโ€™re too late, and youโ€™re almost always too early.โ€ The reason is because the idea seems obvious to the founder: โ€œYouโ€™ve got some idea in your head, and as far as youโ€™re concerned, the world should already work this way, which is why youโ€™re pursuing it. And so itโ€™s a little inexplicable as to why it hasnโ€™t happened to itโ€ฆ It must be just about to happen and I must be too late.โ€ This is how Marc felt at Netscape when he co-authored the first widely used web browser. But in reality, Marc explains, founders are almost always too early: โ€œWe almost never see a qualified founder fail because they were too late to market. Itโ€™s almost always because theyโ€™re too early to market. And I donโ€™t say that critically. When we screw up investments, I think thatโ€™s often the reason as well.โ€ It usually turns out that the world just wasnโ€™t ready yet. Marc points out that when Apple launched the Newton in 1989, it was basically the same thing as the iPad. The world just wasnโ€™t ready yet, and the required technologies werenโ€™t in place (e.g. mobile broadband, high-resolution screens, battery technology, etc.). โ€œIt convinced people for 20 years that tablet computing would never work. And then they did it again with the iPad, and it worked. I think thatโ€™s the permanent curse of the entrepreneur.โ€ In a previous YC talk, Marc told founders that if what youโ€™re working on was the hot thing 3-4 years ago, youโ€™re probably right on time because the infrastructure and consumer behavior has now caught up. Video source: Y Combinator (2016)

Startup Archive

226,931 ๆฌก่ง‚็œ‹ โ€ข 10 ไธชๆœˆๅ‰

BATTLE PLAN: Join my registered third party campaign group to fight Mark Carney I've launched a registered third party campaign called For Canada to aggressively oppose Mark Carney in the upcoming April 28 election, using uncapped donations to fund hard-hitting ads and tactics beyond what political parties can do. The election has been called for April 28th. Weโ€™ve got five weeks to expose Mark Carney, to vet him, and to show Canadians who he really is: โšซ๏ธa Canadian in name only who hasnโ€™t lived here in a decade; โšซ๏ธa globalist who carries three passports and calls himself โ€œEuropeanโ€, not Canadian; โšซ๏ธan insider who rigged the Liberal leadership vote to disqualify his opponents and block 250,000 voters; โšซ๏ธan oligarch who pledged his loyalty to the World Economic Forum and the United Nations; and โšซ๏ธa slippery banker who, just weeks ago, voted to move his own company from Canada to New York. So weโ€™ve got our work cut out for us as journalists. But Iโ€™m doing something different this time: Iโ€™ve set up what Elections Canada calls a โ€œthird partyโ€ campaign to fight against Mark Carney directly. By registering my third party group with Elections Canada, I can raise and spend up to $600,000 in this election. Thatโ€™s enough to do everything from renting a billboard truck, to sending out brochures targeting different politicians, to running national TV ads. And the amazing thing about a third party campaign, Iโ€™ve discovered, is that unlike political parties, there is no limit on how much people can donate to it. Canadians can donate a maximum of $1,750 to each registered party, and the same towards each partyโ€™s candidates. Those limits donโ€™t apply to third party groups. So you can donate any amount โ€” and thatโ€™s on top of whatever you might give to a political party. Thereโ€™s going to be a lot of ads out there, including from the Conservative Party. I have no interest in simply repeating their messages: I plan to use my third party group to go further and harder than anything the Conservatives would do, including talking about things the Conservatives might be squeamish about. For example, Mark Carneyโ€™s close family ties with Ghislaine Maxwell, Jeffrey Epsteinโ€™s sex trafficker. The CBC would never talk about that; and Iโ€™m not sure if the Conservatives would, either. But we already are โ€” our billboard truck is literally in Ottawa today with that message. I didnโ€™t plan to do this. The idea actually came to me from the police who were interrogating me for publishing my book โ€œThe Libranosโ€ in the 2019 election. They said all I had to do was โ€œregisterโ€ my book with the government and Iโ€™d be fine. I thought that was an outrageous infringement of my freedom of speech, and I fought it for five years in court. Thatโ€™s banana republic stuff. But then it dawned on me: registering in the election lets me campaign as if I were a political party โ€” including raising and spending money. In some ways, that gives me even more power than a political party โ€” because there are no limits on individual donors. So Iโ€™m doing it. Iโ€™m setting up a campaign group. Weโ€™ve got five weeks to stop Mark Carney. Rebel News will do important work. But this third party group will do other work that Rebel News canโ€™t. Iโ€™ve set up this third party group in my personal capacity, to keep the funds separate from Rebel News. Rebel will do journalism; this third party group (Iโ€™m calling it For Canada) will do the political work. Donations to third party groups like For Canada are unlimited โ€” the only limit is on our spending. But that limit is so high โ€” $600,000 โ€” it really is amazing. Click here to help me reach that goal! Iโ€™ve made the first donation. Will you join me?

Rebel News

173,303 ๆฌก่ง‚็œ‹ โ€ข 1 ๅนดๅ‰

Cรฉline Sciamma on why she made "Portrait of a Lady on Fire" (2019) & on Leonardo Di Caprio being a Lesbian icon: "Sciamma: What I had in mind above all was to make a film about love, with a totally invented story. And when I thought about it, I found that there were few films totally devoted to love, even though they are often the greatest in the history of cinema. It's rare, even though it's the beating heart of our cinephiles. Interviewer: What movies were you thinking of? Sciamma: 'Titanic' (1997), for example. It's a real influence, which I recently revisited. Both films are about the memories of a love affair, almost behind closed doors. I spent a long time looking for a framework and then one day I looked at the script and I thought: "F**k, it's Titanic! It's simply Titanic." There's the prologue, of course, before the flashback, but also the drawing scene, which is very explicit in my film. With this dialogue: "Don't laugh, be seriousโ€ฆ" Interviewer Is it an important film for you? Sciamma: Collectively, it's important. There are different film regimes that count in our cinephilia: those we love and those that are part of a collective phenomenon. It's rare to experience those moments, especially when it's about 'Titanic' and not 'Quโ€™est-ce quโ€™on a fait au bon Dieu?' (2014). Titanic was a cultural moment, and in my life as a cinephile, it's probably the most important one, even more so because of the shared love. And with a real queer dynamic! Leo DiCaprio is a lesbian icon. A very new masculinity at the time, in cinema - with time it deepens enormously, it's exciting to watch. At the time, in that youth and in that body, there was really something hyper queer. And then the love scene is a total inversion of the conventions: she's on top of him, she reassures him, heโ€™s the one whoโ€™s breathless... All that in the back seat of a car, like in any good teen movie. There were great subversive effects in 'Titanic', and that's something James Cameron always did anyway. What it also has in common with my film is the idea that the greatest loves are emancipatory and that the loss of them is the price of our future fulfillment. At the end of 'Titanic', there are three photos of a girl in pants riding a horse! Itโ€™s one of the few films that asserts that love can bring positive things, even when it's over. In my opinion, this is one of the hidden reasons for the incredible success of the film." ("Cร‰LINE SCIAMMA : DiCaprio est une icรดne lesbienne.", Axel Cadieux, Sofilm, 2020) P.S: On this day, 7 years ago, "Portrait of a Lady on Fire" (2019) premiered at the Cannes Film Festival, France.

DepressedBergman

26,533 ๆฌก่ง‚็œ‹ โ€ข 2 ไธชๆœˆๅ‰