Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

๐€ ๐Œ๐€๐ ๐–๐€๐‹๐Š๐„๐ƒ ๐ˆ๐๐“๐Ž ๐€ ๐‚๐ˆ๐“๐˜ ๐‚๐Ž๐”๐๐‚๐ˆ๐‹ ๐Œ๐„๐„๐“๐ˆ๐๐† ๐€๐๐ƒ ๐‘๐„๐€๐ƒ ๐„๐•๐„๐‘๐˜ ๐‹๐ˆ๐๐„๐‘๐€๐‹ ๐‚๐‹๐ˆ๐‚๐‡๐„ ๐Ž๐”๐“ ๐‹๐Ž๐”๐ƒ It went viral as an โ€œ๐˜ถ๐˜ฏ๐˜ฉ๐˜ช๐˜ฏ๐˜จ๐˜ฆ๐˜ฅ ๐˜ญ๐˜ช๐˜ฃ๐˜ฆ๐˜ณ๐˜ข๐˜ญ ๐˜ฎ๐˜ฆ๐˜ญ๐˜ต๐˜ฅ๐˜ฐ๐˜ธ๐˜ฏโ€ Then it clicked. This man must be a satirist (I hope), and he is operating at the very top of his craft. He steps to the...

MichaelARothman's profile picture

M.A. Rothman

93,620 subscribers

18,477 views โ€ข 1 month ago โ€ขvia X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossiโ€ข Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

This is Greg Gutfeld at his absolute best. Gutfeld just went on a minute-long monologue exposing how the White House Correspondentsโ€™ Dinner shooting shows you can be radicalized by โ€œliberal smugness.โ€ GUTFELD: โ€œI think this is a helpful assassination attempt because it is the first one to show that you can be radicalized by liberal smugness.โ€ โ€œIf you read his posts and if you read his manifesto, it sounds like every smarmy sanctimonious, self-satisfied pronouncement from an a**hole like Brandon Johnson, like Walz, like Lieu.โ€ โ€œThe people that think they know better than you.โ€ โ€œThis guy was not a crank. He was not deranged.โ€ โ€œDonโ€™t buy into that narrative because it lets these pompous asses off.โ€ โ€œHe didnโ€™t have voices in his head.โ€ โ€œHe was just following orders.โ€ โ€œHe was operating on a filter that said Trump was Hitler and therefore it would be immoral if you didnโ€™t take Hitler out.โ€ โ€œSo his filter is actually making him logical.โ€ โ€œHeโ€™s the SANEST one in the group because he took them at their word.โ€ โ€œWhen MS NOW says Trump is Hitler, heโ€™s the sensible one.โ€ โ€œHe went our after Hitler!โ€ GregGutfeld
1:18

This is Greg Gutfeld at his absolute best. Gutfeld just went on a minute-long monologue exposing how the White House Correspondentsโ€™ Dinner shooting shows you can be radicalized by โ€œliberal smugness.โ€ GUTFELD: โ€œI think this is a helpful assassination attempt because it is the first one to show that you can be radicalized by liberal smugness.โ€ โ€œIf you read his posts and if you read his manifesto, it sounds like every smarmy sanctimonious, self-satisfied pronouncement from an a**hole like Brandon Johnson, like Walz, like Lieu.โ€ โ€œThe people that think they know better than you.โ€ โ€œThis guy was not a crank. He was not deranged.โ€ โ€œDonโ€™t buy into that narrative because it lets these pompous asses off.โ€ โ€œHe didnโ€™t have voices in his head.โ€ โ€œHe was just following orders.โ€ โ€œHe was operating on a filter that said Trump was Hitler and therefore it would be immoral if you didnโ€™t take Hitler out.โ€ โ€œSo his filter is actually making him logical.โ€ โ€œHeโ€™s the SANEST one in the group because he took them at their word.โ€ โ€œWhen MS NOW says Trump is Hitler, heโ€™s the sensible one.โ€ โ€œHe went our after Hitler!โ€ GregGutfeld

Overton

74,181 views โ€ข 3 months ago

I can't stop thinking about the scene where Leonidas wishes Ephialtes a long life, and Ephialtes reacts with despair. Viewers often interpret Leonidas's words as an insult. It was not; he meant them genuinely; he was recognizing Ephialtes as a man. What commenters miss is the confusion that briefly flashes on Leonidas's face after he sees Ephialtes's reaction. This creates a completely different interpretation. Leonidas was not insulting Ephialtes. His confusion shows that he thought of Ephialtes's actions as instrumental, for personal gain. But the true cause of Ephialtes's betrayal--his resentment--is something he cannot relate to. It is beyond his comprehension. Ephialtes was offered a role with the Spartan army. Tending to the wounded. Helping with supplies. But because he physically cannot participate as an equal within the Spartan ranks and is therefore refused that role, he rebels. But his rebellion is not against Leonidas. It is a rebellion against reality itself. It is a rebellion against the gods. Ephialtes was demanding a recognition that was physically impossible, given the sort of being that he was. And in response, he decides to betray and destroy everything that is good. Leonidas cannot comprehend that. It is so outside of his moral frame that it is the one thing about the unfolding events that he never understands before his death. It shows the purity of Leonidas's heart, the nobility that he takes with him to his death. This film is mythic. It is deeper than most people appreciate. When it was released, it was widely hated by liberal reviewers. The reasons for this are obvious. They are Ephialtes.
0:26

I can't stop thinking about the scene where Leonidas wishes Ephialtes a long life, and Ephialtes reacts with despair. Viewers often interpret Leonidas's words as an insult. It was not; he meant them genuinely; he was recognizing Ephialtes as a man. What commenters miss is the confusion that briefly flashes on Leonidas's face after he sees Ephialtes's reaction. This creates a completely different interpretation. Leonidas was not insulting Ephialtes. His confusion shows that he thought of Ephialtes's actions as instrumental, for personal gain. But the true cause of Ephialtes's betrayal--his resentment--is something he cannot relate to. It is beyond his comprehension. Ephialtes was offered a role with the Spartan army. Tending to the wounded. Helping with supplies. But because he physically cannot participate as an equal within the Spartan ranks and is therefore refused that role, he rebels. But his rebellion is not against Leonidas. It is a rebellion against reality itself. It is a rebellion against the gods. Ephialtes was demanding a recognition that was physically impossible, given the sort of being that he was. And in response, he decides to betray and destroy everything that is good. Leonidas cannot comprehend that. It is so outside of his moral frame that it is the one thing about the unfolding events that he never understands before his death. It shows the purity of Leonidas's heart, the nobility that he takes with him to his death. This film is mythic. It is deeper than most people appreciate. When it was released, it was widely hated by liberal reviewers. The reasons for this are obvious. They are Ephialtes.

Kevin Bass

2,091,030 views โ€ข 6 months ago

Ana Navarro scolds those who are celebrating the death of Senator Lindsey Graham: ANA NAVARRO: First thing I want to say is, I saw a lot of posts online this week kind of celebrating his death and rejoicing. And listen, I know that Trump does that, he did it with Bob Mueller, he did it with John McCain -- SARA HAINES: He did it with Rob Reiner. NAVARRO: He did it with Rob Reiner. But it's inhumane and it's really lacking empathy. And the dead person is dead and can't hear you and can't read your posts, but his family, his sister who he adopted when he was 13 because both of their parents died is alive and is hearing it. And so I think that for the benefit, for humanity, for having, you know, a normal decency towards the family of the dead, that just has to stop. The fact that Donald Trump is indecent doesn't mean the rest of us have to do it.
1:07

Ana Navarro scolds those who are celebrating the death of Senator Lindsey Graham: ANA NAVARRO: First thing I want to say is, I saw a lot of posts online this week kind of celebrating his death and rejoicing. And listen, I know that Trump does that, he did it with Bob Mueller, he did it with John McCain -- SARA HAINES: He did it with Rob Reiner. NAVARRO: He did it with Rob Reiner. But it's inhumane and it's really lacking empathy. And the dead person is dead and can't hear you and can't read your posts, but his family, his sister who he adopted when he was 13 because both of their parents died is alive and is hearing it. And so I think that for the benefit, for humanity, for having, you know, a normal decency towards the family of the dead, that just has to stop. The fact that Donald Trump is indecent doesn't mean the rest of us have to do it.

Nicholas Fondacaro

230,415 views โ€ข 21 days ago

So Piers Morgan, a journalist I value, interviewed Clavicular for his show. I appreciate the time he gave in the segment to talk about the interview Clavicular gave us on Channel 13 and why he left that interview. Unlike other figures, Morgan acted like a journalist, and tried to understand what the problem was with asking him why he is refusing to apologize - while in Israel - for the Heil Hitler incident. Clavicular said that he was asked about it plenty of times, again didnโ€™t want to answer, and threw back accusations at the interviewer as usual. And the real question is: why is that? Why was it so easy for him to stream to tens of millions of followers - at least four times - a song glorifying Hitler, and why is it so hard for him, just once, to acknowledge this as an insult to millions of Jews? Maybe, just maybe, it all comes down to the fact that he knows anti-Semitic content gets you traffic. Just like he knows humiliating young girls gets you views. He still has anti-Semitic friends like Nick Fuentes and just defended Andrew Tate. This guy didnโ€™t aim to do PR for Israel. He didnโ€™t come here and hold formal meetings with Netanyahuโ€™s advisors - a lie he keeps repeating. He was actually thrown out of a club because the owner heard that he sang the Heil Hitler song. He got hate on every corner he visited. His aim was simply to get clicks. He is not a โ€œkid.โ€ He holds an internet empire with managers and employees. He knows how to talk; he certainly is not stupid. He is a professional provocateur who hopped on the Israeli trend. At least Piers Morgan, unlike others, had the fairness to pull the mask off this guy. Piers Morgan
3:01

So Piers Morgan, a journalist I value, interviewed Clavicular for his show. I appreciate the time he gave in the segment to talk about the interview Clavicular gave us on Channel 13 and why he left that interview. Unlike other figures, Morgan acted like a journalist, and tried to understand what the problem was with asking him why he is refusing to apologize - while in Israel - for the Heil Hitler incident. Clavicular said that he was asked about it plenty of times, again didnโ€™t want to answer, and threw back accusations at the interviewer as usual. And the real question is: why is that? Why was it so easy for him to stream to tens of millions of followers - at least four times - a song glorifying Hitler, and why is it so hard for him, just once, to acknowledge this as an insult to millions of Jews? Maybe, just maybe, it all comes down to the fact that he knows anti-Semitic content gets you traffic. Just like he knows humiliating young girls gets you views. He still has anti-Semitic friends like Nick Fuentes and just defended Andrew Tate. This guy didnโ€™t aim to do PR for Israel. He didnโ€™t come here and hold formal meetings with Netanyahuโ€™s advisors - a lie he keeps repeating. He was actually thrown out of a club because the owner heard that he sang the Heil Hitler song. He got hate on every corner he visited. His aim was simply to get clicks. He is not a โ€œkid.โ€ He holds an internet empire with managers and employees. He knows how to talk; he certainly is not stupid. He is a professional provocateur who hopped on the Israeli trend. At least Piers Morgan, unlike others, had the fairness to pull the mask off this guy. Piers Morgan

ื‘ืจ ืฉื-ืื•ืจ Bar Shem-Ur

16,264 views โ€ข 13 days ago

The prophet who wiped away Godโ€™s tears. Moses was not only a liberator. Scripture says he spoke with God face to face, as a man speaks with his friend. But ancient accounts tell that one day he was brought to witness something no other man had ever seen. He was not called to receive commands nor to hear laws. He was taken to the place where heaven watches humanity. He expected judgment. He expected condemnation. But what he found took his breath away. He saw God looking upon the world in a silence heavier than any word. It was not a silence of anger. It was the silence of deep sorrow. Humanity was drifting away, and the divine heart felt it. Then Moses understood something few have ever grasped before. There was a love that suffers. That day, Moses did not see only the power of God. He witnessed his sorrow and became the prophet who, through his faithfulness, wiped away the tears of the creator. That is why he spoke with God as a friend.
1:21

The prophet who wiped away Godโ€™s tears. Moses was not only a liberator. Scripture says he spoke with God face to face, as a man speaks with his friend. But ancient accounts tell that one day he was brought to witness something no other man had ever seen. He was not called to receive commands nor to hear laws. He was taken to the place where heaven watches humanity. He expected judgment. He expected condemnation. But what he found took his breath away. He saw God looking upon the world in a silence heavier than any word. It was not a silence of anger. It was the silence of deep sorrow. Humanity was drifting away, and the divine heart felt it. Then Moses understood something few have ever grasped before. There was a love that suffers. That day, Moses did not see only the power of God. He witnessed his sorrow and became the prophet who, through his faithfulness, wiped away the tears of the creator. That is why he spoke with God as a friend.

NancyH

44,901 views โ€ข 3 months ago

He is not just a liar. He is the MOST DANGEROUS KIND. A CALCULATED liar who told you EXACTLY what he was going to do to you. Who described the damage austerity does to the most vulnerable. Who proved he understood every word of it. Then looked you in the eye. And did it anyway. While STILL DENYING IT. That is not incompetence. That is not a broken promise. That is PREMEDITATED. That is who he is. His cuts to the welfare bill are FOUR TIMES greater than anything the Conservatives proposed. The Health Foundation confirmed it. Four times. The very austerity he called devastating and promised never to repeat. The average family will be ยฃ1,400 worse off by 2030. While his biggest donor Lord Alli was given UNRESTRICTED ACCESS to Downing Street. Hosted a party there for other Labour donors. The same Lord Alli whose name appears in the Epstein files. Cutting the most vulnerable people in Britain to the bone. While his donors party in Downing Street. That is not austerity. That is theft. Dressed up in a suit. Delivered with a straight face.
0:28

He is not just a liar. He is the MOST DANGEROUS KIND. A CALCULATED liar who told you EXACTLY what he was going to do to you. Who described the damage austerity does to the most vulnerable. Who proved he understood every word of it. Then looked you in the eye. And did it anyway. While STILL DENYING IT. That is not incompetence. That is not a broken promise. That is PREMEDITATED. That is who he is. His cuts to the welfare bill are FOUR TIMES greater than anything the Conservatives proposed. The Health Foundation confirmed it. Four times. The very austerity he called devastating and promised never to repeat. The average family will be ยฃ1,400 worse off by 2030. While his biggest donor Lord Alli was given UNRESTRICTED ACCESS to Downing Street. Hosted a party there for other Labour donors. The same Lord Alli whose name appears in the Epstein files. Cutting the most vulnerable people in Britain to the bone. While his donors party in Downing Street. That is not austerity. That is theft. Dressed up in a suit. Delivered with a straight face.

BanksyCat

87,806 views โ€ข 1 month ago

"The Betrayal at Falkirk" โ€“ Mel Gibson does not film a hero confronting betrayal. He films the one thing betrayal cannot take from a man. Many people remember the Battle of Falkirk for the moment William Wallace tears the helmet from a masked knight. Beneath it is Robert the Bruce. The man in whom Wallace had placed his greatest hope. It is the most devastating betrayal in Braveheart. Yet what makes this one of the film's defining moments is not the betrayal itself. It is Wallace's response. He does not strike. He does not condemn. He says nothing. He simply looks at Robert. Then he collapses. That is the true center of the scene. Mel Gibson could have ended this moment with rage. With vengeance. With a hero delivering justice to a traitor. Instead, he strips all of that away. He leaves only two men facing one another. One has betrayed the cause they once shared. The other has watched his greatest hope fall apart before his eyes. At that moment, the most important battle is no longer being fought on the battlefield. It is being fought within the human heart. What brings Wallace to his knees is not a sword. It is the truth. Not simply that he has lost an ally, but that the man he believed could one day carry Scotland's future has chosen another path. Mel Gibson never turns Wallace into a hero who feels no pain. He allows him to be devastated. But he also shows something that never falls. Betrayal may break Wallace's heart. It cannot break his character. It cannot turn him into a man consumed by vengeance. It cannot make him abandon the very principles for which he has fought. Wallace's body collapses. His character does not. That is also the moment Robert the Bruce begins to change. Mel Gibson does not transform him through a speech. Nor simply because Wallace spares his life. Robert changes because, for the first time, he encounters a man whose character cannot be bent by circumstance. All his life, Robert has been taught to measure every decision by power, advantage, and political necessity. Wallace reveals another possibility. That there are people who refuse to let circumstances decide who they are. They let their character decide instead. Wallace does not persuade Robert with words. He forces him to confront a far more difficult question: What kind of man do I want to become? That is why Robert ultimately becomes the man who fulfills the dream Wallace never lives to see. Not because Wallace leaves him a crown. But because he leaves him something far greater. A standard. The example of a man who could lose everything without losing himself. Perhaps that is why Mel Gibson does not end the Falkirk sequence with victory. He ends it with a man brought to his knees. Because sometimes adversity is not there to reveal how strong a person is. It is there to reveal what within them cannot be taken away. And in the end, it is precisely that which cannot be taken away that possesses the power to transform another human beingโ€” and, ultimately, to change the course of history. Name movie: Braveheart (1995)
3:46

"The Betrayal at Falkirk" โ€“ Mel Gibson does not film a hero confronting betrayal. He films the one thing betrayal cannot take from a man. Many people remember the Battle of Falkirk for the moment William Wallace tears the helmet from a masked knight. Beneath it is Robert the Bruce. The man in whom Wallace had placed his greatest hope. It is the most devastating betrayal in Braveheart. Yet what makes this one of the film's defining moments is not the betrayal itself. It is Wallace's response. He does not strike. He does not condemn. He says nothing. He simply looks at Robert. Then he collapses. That is the true center of the scene. Mel Gibson could have ended this moment with rage. With vengeance. With a hero delivering justice to a traitor. Instead, he strips all of that away. He leaves only two men facing one another. One has betrayed the cause they once shared. The other has watched his greatest hope fall apart before his eyes. At that moment, the most important battle is no longer being fought on the battlefield. It is being fought within the human heart. What brings Wallace to his knees is not a sword. It is the truth. Not simply that he has lost an ally, but that the man he believed could one day carry Scotland's future has chosen another path. Mel Gibson never turns Wallace into a hero who feels no pain. He allows him to be devastated. But he also shows something that never falls. Betrayal may break Wallace's heart. It cannot break his character. It cannot turn him into a man consumed by vengeance. It cannot make him abandon the very principles for which he has fought. Wallace's body collapses. His character does not. That is also the moment Robert the Bruce begins to change. Mel Gibson does not transform him through a speech. Nor simply because Wallace spares his life. Robert changes because, for the first time, he encounters a man whose character cannot be bent by circumstance. All his life, Robert has been taught to measure every decision by power, advantage, and political necessity. Wallace reveals another possibility. That there are people who refuse to let circumstances decide who they are. They let their character decide instead. Wallace does not persuade Robert with words. He forces him to confront a far more difficult question: What kind of man do I want to become? That is why Robert ultimately becomes the man who fulfills the dream Wallace never lives to see. Not because Wallace leaves him a crown. But because he leaves him something far greater. A standard. The example of a man who could lose everything without losing himself. Perhaps that is why Mel Gibson does not end the Falkirk sequence with victory. He ends it with a man brought to his knees. Because sometimes adversity is not there to reveal how strong a person is. It is there to reveal what within them cannot be taken away. And in the end, it is precisely that which cannot be taken away that possesses the power to transform another human beingโ€” and, ultimately, to change the course of history. Name movie: Braveheart (1995)

Love Classical Music and Movies ๐ŸŽบ๐ŸŽป๐Ÿ’–๐ŸŽฅ๐ŸŽฌ

69,443 views โ€ข 7 days ago

Marc Andreessen on Elon Musk: โ€œWhy don't more CEOs operate the way that he does? The top-line thing is just this incredible devotion from the leader of the company to deeply understand what the company does, and to be completely knowledgeable about every aspect of it. To be in the trenches and talking directly to the people who do the work, deeply understanding the issues, and being the key, lead problem solver in the organization. What Elon does is he shows up every week at each of his companies, he identifies the biggest problem that the company's having that week, and he fixes it. He does that every week for 52 weeks in a row. And then each of his companies has solved the 52 biggest problems that year, in that year. He attracts many of the best people in the world to work with him."
2:24

Marc Andreessen on Elon Musk: โ€œWhy don't more CEOs operate the way that he does? The top-line thing is just this incredible devotion from the leader of the company to deeply understand what the company does, and to be completely knowledgeable about every aspect of it. To be in the trenches and talking directly to the people who do the work, deeply understanding the issues, and being the key, lead problem solver in the organization. What Elon does is he shows up every week at each of his companies, he identifies the biggest problem that the company's having that week, and he fixes it. He does that every week for 52 weeks in a row. And then each of his companies has solved the 52 biggest problems that year, in that year. He attracts many of the best people in the world to work with him."

DogeDesigner

24,515 views โ€ข 5 months ago

The CEO of OpenAI was asked for his hottest take. His answer wasn't a prediction about a product. It was that the whole world is sleeping through the most important thing happening to it. A student asked Altman for his spiciest take. He paused. He admitted he could probably find a spicier one with more time. Then he landed somewhere quiet. AI is just going to keep going. That sounds obvious until you hear how he framed it. He said this is not widely believed yet. And if it were actually believed, there would be far more reverberations through society right now than there are. That is the whole point. He is not saying people doubt AI is useful. He is saying people have not internalized what continuing on this curve actually means. They nod along and then go back to their day. Then he gave the timeframe. It has been three and a half years since ChatGPT. He said if you run another three and a half years on the same trajectory, what society is capable of is completely different. Not improved. Different. The scariest takes are usually loud. This one was Altman calmly saying the biggest change in human history is already underway, and almost nobody is acting like it. (Watch the full talk on YouTube at Stanford Online channel)
0:49

The CEO of OpenAI was asked for his hottest take. His answer wasn't a prediction about a product. It was that the whole world is sleeping through the most important thing happening to it. A student asked Altman for his spiciest take. He paused. He admitted he could probably find a spicier one with more time. Then he landed somewhere quiet. AI is just going to keep going. That sounds obvious until you hear how he framed it. He said this is not widely believed yet. And if it were actually believed, there would be far more reverberations through society right now than there are. That is the whole point. He is not saying people doubt AI is useful. He is saying people have not internalized what continuing on this curve actually means. They nod along and then go back to their day. Then he gave the timeframe. It has been three and a half years since ChatGPT. He said if you run another three and a half years on the same trajectory, what society is capable of is completely different. Not improved. Different. The scariest takes are usually loud. This one was Altman calmly saying the biggest change in human history is already underway, and almost nobody is acting like it. (Watch the full talk on YouTube at Stanford Online channel)

Ihtesham Ali

15,747 views โ€ข 1 month ago

Tucker Carlson: Remembering Charlie Kirk - A Life of Faith and Courage "Quickly about Charlie, I've known him since he was a teenager, and just an amazing person, but the two things that stick out, he's a Christian man. We talked about that a lot, including, you know, just the other day. There's a lot of pressure on public people, people who run huge, you know, hundred million dollar a year non-profits, and there are a lot of pitfalls and traps." "That's why so many of them are destroyed, and Charlie really did, without, you know, betraying details, like he walked the line for real. It was the topic of many conversations between us, because I've seen so many people destroyed. You know, most people are destroyed by power, and he wasn't, and I just really admire that." "I mean, to his last moments, you know, in order, he cared about God, his wife, and his children, and then his country. So, and that was totally real, completely real. I can affirm that, because I just talked to him about it so much, and I admire that, and he's a model, really." "I mean, he didn't have hate in his heart, and it was funny, and again, it's one of the reasons I couldn't stop looking at these videos last night. People were describing the opposite of what he was. He was filled with hate." "No, and if you talked to him about people who had attacked him, or who were truly his enemies, up to, and I think including the people who assassinated him yesterday, he would never, ever express hate, ever. He would always turn to, no, this person has been led astray. This person is clearly possessed by dark forces." "This person is a perpetrator, but also a victim of evil. I mean, that really was his worldview. That's the Christian worldview, and he expressed that in public, and especially in private, and I think that faith, which was completely real, not the fake faith that you see on display so often, but a real one, that was the root of his courage, and he had real courage." "He loved being with people who disagreed with him, not theoretically with them, but physically with them, you know, like close enough to smell. He would wait right in the middle of everything. I mean, I could tell you a million stories that I saw, but that was absolutely real." "Like, he loved people, even people who hated him, and people he loved, he was the rare person who was willing to tell them what he thought was true. I mean, he really believed, as a political matter, by the way, that, you know, I don't think he had animus toward anybody in no other country, but he really believed in his own country, and the obligation of his government to stand behind his country. He was truly America first in the nicest, most decent, non-ideological, but sincere way." "He was one of the only people, I mean, truly one of the only people to go to the president, whom he loved. He loved Donald Trump, like, personally as well, and I think the president really loved him in a real way, but he was one of the only people to go to the Oval Office and say, sir, I totally understand, and think Iran's really bad, but a war with Iran is not, you know, is something that could really hurt our country. I mean, boy, that was an unpopular position." "He didn't need to express it. Oh, of course, and he did it again. He didn't have some weird agenda. He wasn't mad at anybody. He was for his country, and he was for doing the right and wise and difficult thing, and he said that. He went to the Oval Office to say that." "He took massive, massive abuse from his own donors, which is also something that you don't see. He was one of the very few people, very few people I have met who combined a, like, a love for everyone involved with strong views. So, again, he was not animated by anything creepy or weird." "I mean, you knew him intimately, so you know this is true. If you talked to him off camera, he would say, you know, I really, like, I love whoever I'm talking about, but I think this is wrong. It's immoral." "It's bad for everybody involved, both sides, and he would say that, and he could say that because it was sincere. It was completely sincere, but I cannot overstate the amount of attacks he took privately over this, like, absolutely for real, and having lived in Washington most of my life and seen people run non-profits, I've never met one who was willing, stand up is too strong. He wasn't confrontational, but he would just say, no, I'm sorry that you feel that way, but I think this is the right thing." "The people we represent, which is mostly young people, they believe this, and I believe it also. It was brave, but loving at the same time, and I'm not sure he made a lot of headway, by the way. I mean, I think he made real enemies in doing that, but his view didn't change." "Anyway, he's just a wonderfully decent, loving man. That is true."
4:27

Tucker Carlson: Remembering Charlie Kirk - A Life of Faith and Courage "Quickly about Charlie, I've known him since he was a teenager, and just an amazing person, but the two things that stick out, he's a Christian man. We talked about that a lot, including, you know, just the other day. There's a lot of pressure on public people, people who run huge, you know, hundred million dollar a year non-profits, and there are a lot of pitfalls and traps." "That's why so many of them are destroyed, and Charlie really did, without, you know, betraying details, like he walked the line for real. It was the topic of many conversations between us, because I've seen so many people destroyed. You know, most people are destroyed by power, and he wasn't, and I just really admire that." "I mean, to his last moments, you know, in order, he cared about God, his wife, and his children, and then his country. So, and that was totally real, completely real. I can affirm that, because I just talked to him about it so much, and I admire that, and he's a model, really." "I mean, he didn't have hate in his heart, and it was funny, and again, it's one of the reasons I couldn't stop looking at these videos last night. People were describing the opposite of what he was. He was filled with hate." "No, and if you talked to him about people who had attacked him, or who were truly his enemies, up to, and I think including the people who assassinated him yesterday, he would never, ever express hate, ever. He would always turn to, no, this person has been led astray. This person is clearly possessed by dark forces." "This person is a perpetrator, but also a victim of evil. I mean, that really was his worldview. That's the Christian worldview, and he expressed that in public, and especially in private, and I think that faith, which was completely real, not the fake faith that you see on display so often, but a real one, that was the root of his courage, and he had real courage." "He loved being with people who disagreed with him, not theoretically with them, but physically with them, you know, like close enough to smell. He would wait right in the middle of everything. I mean, I could tell you a million stories that I saw, but that was absolutely real." "Like, he loved people, even people who hated him, and people he loved, he was the rare person who was willing to tell them what he thought was true. I mean, he really believed, as a political matter, by the way, that, you know, I don't think he had animus toward anybody in no other country, but he really believed in his own country, and the obligation of his government to stand behind his country. He was truly America first in the nicest, most decent, non-ideological, but sincere way." "He was one of the only people, I mean, truly one of the only people to go to the president, whom he loved. He loved Donald Trump, like, personally as well, and I think the president really loved him in a real way, but he was one of the only people to go to the Oval Office and say, sir, I totally understand, and think Iran's really bad, but a war with Iran is not, you know, is something that could really hurt our country. I mean, boy, that was an unpopular position." "He didn't need to express it. Oh, of course, and he did it again. He didn't have some weird agenda. He wasn't mad at anybody. He was for his country, and he was for doing the right and wise and difficult thing, and he said that. He went to the Oval Office to say that." "He took massive, massive abuse from his own donors, which is also something that you don't see. He was one of the very few people, very few people I have met who combined a, like, a love for everyone involved with strong views. So, again, he was not animated by anything creepy or weird." "I mean, you knew him intimately, so you know this is true. If you talked to him off camera, he would say, you know, I really, like, I love whoever I'm talking about, but I think this is wrong. It's immoral." "It's bad for everybody involved, both sides, and he would say that, and he could say that because it was sincere. It was completely sincere, but I cannot overstate the amount of attacks he took privately over this, like, absolutely for real, and having lived in Washington most of my life and seen people run non-profits, I've never met one who was willing, stand up is too strong. He wasn't confrontational, but he would just say, no, I'm sorry that you feel that way, but I think this is the right thing." "The people we represent, which is mostly young people, they believe this, and I believe it also. It was brave, but loving at the same time, and I'm not sure he made a lot of headway, by the way. I mean, I think he made real enemies in doing that, but his view didn't change." "Anyway, he's just a wonderfully decent, loving man. That is true."

Camus

41,966 views โ€ข 10 months ago

๐Ÿšจ THIS is the Trump clip everyone should stop and actually listen to. Not just hear it. Understand it. Trump is describing the world stage exactly how it works: a massive chessboard filled with powerful, dangerous, ambitious, and highly intelligent players. โ€œItโ€™s a big chess game at a very high level. Itโ€™s very high-level chess, the highest.โ€ Heโ€™s not dealing with amateurs. Heโ€™s dealing with leaders who are sharp, ruthless, calculated, and sometimes violent. People who did not get to the top by accident. And then Trump drops the perfect contrast: โ€œThese are not Jasmine Crockett and her group.โ€ That line says everything. Trump understands the difference between political noise and real power. He doesnโ€™t just react emotionally. He studies the board. He reads the players. He waits for the opening. Then he moves. Every decision is made under pressure, with real global consequences and Americaโ€™s future on the line. This is the side of Trump that most people still donโ€™t understand. He is one of the most strategic political minds we have ever seen. Every move is calculated, every risk is measured, and somehow he always finds a way to come out with the win. Strong instincts. High-level strategy. America First results. Show the man the respect he deserves. ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ
1:23

๐Ÿšจ THIS is the Trump clip everyone should stop and actually listen to. Not just hear it. Understand it. Trump is describing the world stage exactly how it works: a massive chessboard filled with powerful, dangerous, ambitious, and highly intelligent players. โ€œItโ€™s a big chess game at a very high level. Itโ€™s very high-level chess, the highest.โ€ Heโ€™s not dealing with amateurs. Heโ€™s dealing with leaders who are sharp, ruthless, calculated, and sometimes violent. People who did not get to the top by accident. And then Trump drops the perfect contrast: โ€œThese are not Jasmine Crockett and her group.โ€ That line says everything. Trump understands the difference between political noise and real power. He doesnโ€™t just react emotionally. He studies the board. He reads the players. He waits for the opening. Then he moves. Every decision is made under pressure, with real global consequences and Americaโ€™s future on the line. This is the side of Trump that most people still donโ€™t understand. He is one of the most strategic political minds we have ever seen. Every move is calculated, every risk is measured, and somehow he always finds a way to come out with the win. Strong instincts. High-level strategy. America First results. Show the man the respect he deserves. ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ

Charlieโ€™s Voice Rising

336,105 views โ€ข 3 months ago

Quentin Taratino said Lawrence Fishburneโ€™s performance in King of New York was so incredible he thought - โ€œhe could be the greatest actor of his generationโ€. He explains: "As great as Christopher Walken is in this movie. To me, it's Larry Fishburne's movie - it was the rock that becomes a diamond aspect of the movie. It's why I could defend this movie against all comers, because to me, Fish's performance in this movie was comparable to a young Brando. It was the most exciting performance by an actor of his generation that I'd seen in a movie of that time. And I thought, well, that's it. There is a new Marlon Brando, and his name is Larry Fishburne - it was amazing, it was mesmerizingโ€ฆ He is the first hip hop gangster in movie history. That character had never been done before this. He invented that character. And he invented it as something to do. It wasn't in the original script. He came up with that himselfโ€ฆ The three big Fishburne moments to me, is his opening sequence withโ€ฆTito. That's it, with Tito - black glove dude. And his reunion with Frank. And then it's the chicken scene (see below). Those are his three big arias. Not only that though - expressions that I would later hear for the rest of the decade, I actually heard for the first time in that scene. I'd never heard the expression; โ€œI'll slap the black off youโ€ before. That was the first time I heard it when Fish says it to Snipes. I've since heard it many timesโ€ฆ And that was actually the first time I ever heard, โ€œfuck you very muchโ€. And I would proceed to hear that for the rest of the 90s. But those were the first times I'd ever heard those expressionsโ€ฆ As terrific as he has been in other things - the level of excitement that I had over him when this movie was over, I have never had that excitement again. I thought, with this, he could be the greatest actor of his generation. That was an actual, real fucking thing. He could be the greatest actor of his generation after seeing this." Quote comes from The Rewatchables podcast
2:54

Quentin Taratino said Lawrence Fishburneโ€™s performance in King of New York was so incredible he thought - โ€œhe could be the greatest actor of his generationโ€. He explains: "As great as Christopher Walken is in this movie. To me, it's Larry Fishburne's movie - it was the rock that becomes a diamond aspect of the movie. It's why I could defend this movie against all comers, because to me, Fish's performance in this movie was comparable to a young Brando. It was the most exciting performance by an actor of his generation that I'd seen in a movie of that time. And I thought, well, that's it. There is a new Marlon Brando, and his name is Larry Fishburne - it was amazing, it was mesmerizingโ€ฆ He is the first hip hop gangster in movie history. That character had never been done before this. He invented that character. And he invented it as something to do. It wasn't in the original script. He came up with that himselfโ€ฆ The three big Fishburne moments to me, is his opening sequence withโ€ฆTito. That's it, with Tito - black glove dude. And his reunion with Frank. And then it's the chicken scene (see below). Those are his three big arias. Not only that though - expressions that I would later hear for the rest of the decade, I actually heard for the first time in that scene. I'd never heard the expression; โ€œI'll slap the black off youโ€ before. That was the first time I heard it when Fish says it to Snipes. I've since heard it many timesโ€ฆ And that was actually the first time I ever heard, โ€œfuck you very muchโ€. And I would proceed to hear that for the rest of the 90s. But those were the first times I'd ever heard those expressionsโ€ฆ As terrific as he has been in other things - the level of excitement that I had over him when this movie was over, I have never had that excitement again. I thought, with this, he could be the greatest actor of his generation. That was an actual, real fucking thing. He could be the greatest actor of his generation after seeing this." Quote comes from The Rewatchables podcast

Gangster Cinema Central

656,732 views โ€ข 2 months ago

One of the most remarkable speeches by Pope Benedict XVI, delivered at the German Bundestag. โ€œYet I would like to underline a point that seems to me to be neglected, today as in the past: there is also an ecology of man. Man too has a nature that he must respect and that he cannot manipulate at will. Man is not merely self-creating freedom. Man does not create himself. He is intellect and will, but he is also nature, and his will is rightly ordered if he respects his nature, listens to it and accepts himself for who he is, as one who did not create himself. In this way, and in no other, is true human freedom fulfilled.โ€โ€”Pope Benedict XVI
36:39

One of the most remarkable speeches by Pope Benedict XVI, delivered at the German Bundestag. โ€œYet I would like to underline a point that seems to me to be neglected, today as in the past: there is also an ecology of man. Man too has a nature that he must respect and that he cannot manipulate at will. Man is not merely self-creating freedom. Man does not create himself. He is intellect and will, but he is also nature, and his will is rightly ordered if he respects his nature, listens to it and accepts himself for who he is, as one who did not create himself. In this way, and in no other, is true human freedom fulfilled.โ€โ€”Pope Benedict XVI

Coworkeroftruth

79,490 views โ€ข 7 months ago

Marc Andreessen went on Chris Williamson's podcast and broke down exactly how Elon Musk runs multiple companies at once No other CEO on Earth does this: 1. Every week, Musk shows up at each of his companies, identifies the single biggest problem that company is having that week, and fixes it. Then he does that for 52 weeks in a row. At the end of the year, each company has solved its 52 biggest problems. Meanwhile, most large companies are still having the planning meeting for the pre-planning meeting for the board presentation with the compliance review and the legal review attached. 2. This is not a new operating method. It is actually how the great industrialists of the late 1800s and early 1900s ran their companies. Henry Ford, Andrew Carnegie, Thomas Watson, who built IBM. Total devotion from the leader to fully and deeply understand what the company does, be in the trenches, talk directly to the people doing the work, and be the lead problem solver in the organization. Andreessen says he is not aware of another current CEO who operates this way. 3. The framework Musk uses is the bottleneck. In any manufacturing chain, there is always one thing holding everything up. Sometimes it is raw materials at the start. Sometimes it is warehousing at the end. Sometimes it is in the middle. The job is to find it and remove it. Musk has universalized this concept across every company he runs. In any given week, there is one main bottleneck. He micromanages the solution to that one thing and delegates almost everything else. 4. Musk delegates almost everything. Andreessen is clear about this. He is not involved in most of what his companies are doing. He is involved in the one thing that is the biggest problem right now. Once that is fixed, he moves to the next biggest problem. Everything else by definition, is running better than the bottleneck, so it does not need him. 5. When Musk identifies the bottleneck, he goes directly to the engineer who actually understands it. not the VP of engineering, not the director, not the manager. The individual contributor who has the actual technical knowledge. He sits in the room with that person and fixes the problem alongside them. He does not ask for a report to be reviewed in three weeks. he shows up at the keyboard or on the manufacturing line and works through it overnight if necessary. 6. This is why technical people who work for Musk say it was the best experience of their lives. Andreessen's framing: if you are stuck on a problem you cannot solve, Elon Musk is going to show up in his Gulfstream, sit with you in front of the keyboard, and help you figure it out. For an engineer who genuinely cares about the work, that is an almost incomprehensible level of support from the CEO of the company. 7. Business school teaches the opposite of this: management as a generic skill applicable to any industry. Soup company or a rocket company, the management principles are the same. process, balance sheet, meeting schedules, compliance, executive motivation, interpersonal conflict resolution. Andreessen says those skills are useful in many contexts. They just give you nothing; you need to do what Musk does. And Musk pushes as far as he can away from all of that so he can spend all of his time doing the things only he can do.
5:40

Marc Andreessen went on Chris Williamson's podcast and broke down exactly how Elon Musk runs multiple companies at once No other CEO on Earth does this: 1. Every week, Musk shows up at each of his companies, identifies the single biggest problem that company is having that week, and fixes it. Then he does that for 52 weeks in a row. At the end of the year, each company has solved its 52 biggest problems. Meanwhile, most large companies are still having the planning meeting for the pre-planning meeting for the board presentation with the compliance review and the legal review attached. 2. This is not a new operating method. It is actually how the great industrialists of the late 1800s and early 1900s ran their companies. Henry Ford, Andrew Carnegie, Thomas Watson, who built IBM. Total devotion from the leader to fully and deeply understand what the company does, be in the trenches, talk directly to the people doing the work, and be the lead problem solver in the organization. Andreessen says he is not aware of another current CEO who operates this way. 3. The framework Musk uses is the bottleneck. In any manufacturing chain, there is always one thing holding everything up. Sometimes it is raw materials at the start. Sometimes it is warehousing at the end. Sometimes it is in the middle. The job is to find it and remove it. Musk has universalized this concept across every company he runs. In any given week, there is one main bottleneck. He micromanages the solution to that one thing and delegates almost everything else. 4. Musk delegates almost everything. Andreessen is clear about this. He is not involved in most of what his companies are doing. He is involved in the one thing that is the biggest problem right now. Once that is fixed, he moves to the next biggest problem. Everything else by definition, is running better than the bottleneck, so it does not need him. 5. When Musk identifies the bottleneck, he goes directly to the engineer who actually understands it. not the VP of engineering, not the director, not the manager. The individual contributor who has the actual technical knowledge. He sits in the room with that person and fixes the problem alongside them. He does not ask for a report to be reviewed in three weeks. he shows up at the keyboard or on the manufacturing line and works through it overnight if necessary. 6. This is why technical people who work for Musk say it was the best experience of their lives. Andreessen's framing: if you are stuck on a problem you cannot solve, Elon Musk is going to show up in his Gulfstream, sit with you in front of the keyboard, and help you figure it out. For an engineer who genuinely cares about the work, that is an almost incomprehensible level of support from the CEO of the company. 7. Business school teaches the opposite of this: management as a generic skill applicable to any industry. Soup company or a rocket company, the management principles are the same. process, balance sheet, meeting schedules, compliance, executive motivation, interpersonal conflict resolution. Andreessen says those skills are useful in many contexts. They just give you nothing; you need to do what Musk does. And Musk pushes as far as he can away from all of that so he can spend all of his time doing the things only he can do.

Jaynit

271,186 views โ€ข 1 month ago

He was 16 when he pulled the trigger. The kid died. He went to prison. Four and a half years later, he got outโ€ฆ and went right back to the streets. It wasnโ€™t until he faced five armed robbery charges.. While holding his newborn daughter, that he realized something had to change. Larry Miller didnโ€™t just escape the cycle. He shattered it. From a prison cell to becoming Chairman of the Jordan Brand, his story is proof that who you were doesnโ€™t have to define who you become. But it wasnโ€™t easy. He had to walk away from everythingโ€”and everyoneโ€”he knew. He had to face his demons. He had to rewrite his identity. In this episode of No Free Lunch, I sat down with Larry to unpack the mindset shift, the decisions, and the discipline it took to become a top executive at one of the most iconic brands in the world. This is one of the most powerful stories Iโ€™ve ever heard. And itโ€™s one you need to hear in full.
1:12

He was 16 when he pulled the trigger. The kid died. He went to prison. Four and a half years later, he got outโ€ฆ and went right back to the streets. It wasnโ€™t until he faced five armed robbery charges.. While holding his newborn daughter, that he realized something had to change. Larry Miller didnโ€™t just escape the cycle. He shattered it. From a prison cell to becoming Chairman of the Jordan Brand, his story is proof that who you were doesnโ€™t have to define who you become. But it wasnโ€™t easy. He had to walk away from everythingโ€”and everyoneโ€”he knew. He had to face his demons. He had to rewrite his identity. In this episode of No Free Lunch, I sat down with Larry to unpack the mindset shift, the decisions, and the discipline it took to become a top executive at one of the most iconic brands in the world. This is one of the most powerful stories Iโ€™ve ever heard. And itโ€™s one you need to hear in full.

Ndamukong Suh

19,982 views โ€ข 1 year ago

A man who has made 19% a year for forty-five years spent most of them telling people Warren Buffett was just lucky. Then he listened to a podcast and apologised on air. "Wow, this guy is a genius, and I've been the biggest fool all along." That is Paul Tudor Jones. His original argument was never stupid, which is the part worth staying for. Buffett, he thought, was in the right place at the right time, riding the longest bull market in history. Put the same man in Japan starting in 1989 and see how well the genius holds up. It is a real objection. The Nikkei peaked in December 1989 and did not get back there until February 2024. Thirty-four years underwater. Buy and hold would have ruined you. He changed his mind anyway. He now calls Buffett the OG of compound interest, and then he says the line that should stop you. "He understood the power of compound interest at age nine, while I brilliantly avoided it throughout my entire career." That is not a man who failed at anything. So what exactly did he avoid? Selling. Run the same 19% two ways. Hold everything and pay capital gains once at the end, and forty years turns a dollar into 842. Realise your gains every year and pay tax as you go, and the same 19% turns a dollar into 287. Identical returns. Roughly three times the money, purely from not touching it. That is the price of being right often instead of being right once and then waiting. And here is what makes this honest rather than a lecture. Jones knows all of it now and still cannot do it. He says plainly he could not sit through a 50% drawdown, that his own wiring will not permit it. He wondered aloud why he couldn't just believe in America and ride it out. He can't. Fifty years of reflexes do not get argued away by arithmetic. So the lesson is not to go and be Buffett. It is to work out which one you actually are before the market tells you, because the two strategies are not interchangeable and neither are the people who run them. He is 71. He apologised to a man he had doubted for decades, and then admitted he would probably do it the same way again.
1:03:58

A man who has made 19% a year for forty-five years spent most of them telling people Warren Buffett was just lucky. Then he listened to a podcast and apologised on air. "Wow, this guy is a genius, and I've been the biggest fool all along." That is Paul Tudor Jones. His original argument was never stupid, which is the part worth staying for. Buffett, he thought, was in the right place at the right time, riding the longest bull market in history. Put the same man in Japan starting in 1989 and see how well the genius holds up. It is a real objection. The Nikkei peaked in December 1989 and did not get back there until February 2024. Thirty-four years underwater. Buy and hold would have ruined you. He changed his mind anyway. He now calls Buffett the OG of compound interest, and then he says the line that should stop you. "He understood the power of compound interest at age nine, while I brilliantly avoided it throughout my entire career." That is not a man who failed at anything. So what exactly did he avoid? Selling. Run the same 19% two ways. Hold everything and pay capital gains once at the end, and forty years turns a dollar into 842. Realise your gains every year and pay tax as you go, and the same 19% turns a dollar into 287. Identical returns. Roughly three times the money, purely from not touching it. That is the price of being right often instead of being right once and then waiting. And here is what makes this honest rather than a lecture. Jones knows all of it now and still cannot do it. He says plainly he could not sit through a 50% drawdown, that his own wiring will not permit it. He wondered aloud why he couldn't just believe in America and ride it out. He can't. Fifty years of reflexes do not get argued away by arithmetic. So the lesson is not to go and be Buffett. It is to work out which one you actually are before the market tells you, because the two strategies are not interchangeable and neither are the people who run them. He is 71. He apologised to a man he had doubted for decades, and then admitted he would probably do it the same way again.

Veles

38,951 views โ€ข 2 days ago

OP is a member of the "Douyin Review Group", a group made up of senior film critics and various film and television practitioners. He had brought a notepad to watch "Legend of the Condor Heroes: The Gallants" to note down points anytime, but instead he was immersed in the movie from beginning until the end and did not remember this notepad. His review of Xiao Zhan's Guo Jing: "One word: precise. His age is precise, his visual is precise, his face is a like a dragon, thick brows broad forehead, eyes sharp like dragon, a full jawline, he has heroic temperament, and portrayed Guo Jing's soul, that is kindness and honest. The final scene where he faced off his adoptive father (the Khan), he opened his arms and used his body to block the Mongolian army, it is the spirit of a hero who is unafraid to sacrifice himself for the nation and the people, it made my eyes misty at that time." #XiaoZhan #LegendoftheCondorHeroes #LegendsOfTheCondorHeroes
5:07

OP is a member of the "Douyin Review Group", a group made up of senior film critics and various film and television practitioners. He had brought a notepad to watch "Legend of the Condor Heroes: The Gallants" to note down points anytime, but instead he was immersed in the movie from beginning until the end and did not remember this notepad. His review of Xiao Zhan's Guo Jing: "One word: precise. His age is precise, his visual is precise, his face is a like a dragon, thick brows broad forehead, eyes sharp like dragon, a full jawline, he has heroic temperament, and portrayed Guo Jing's soul, that is kindness and honest. The final scene where he faced off his adoptive father (the Khan), he opened his arms and used his body to block the Mongolian army, it is the spirit of a hero who is unafraid to sacrifice himself for the nation and the people, it made my eyes misty at that time." #XiaoZhan #LegendoftheCondorHeroes #LegendsOfTheCondorHeroes

Nut Xiao

11,867 views โ€ข 1 year ago

๐Ÿšจ DONALD TRUMP IS ABOUT TO SURGE TO CHINA "Xi is a GREAT gentleman. An amazing man. And when I say that, the press always says, oh, that's terrible that he called it. He runs 1.4 billion people with a pretty iron fist. He loves his country, I can tell you!" "He and I have gotten along other than with COVID, I was not accepting of what happened with COVID. But other than that, he and I have had a great relationship."
0:53

๐Ÿšจ DONALD TRUMP IS ABOUT TO SURGE TO CHINA "Xi is a GREAT gentleman. An amazing man. And when I say that, the press always says, oh, that's terrible that he called it. He runs 1.4 billion people with a pretty iron fist. He loves his country, I can tell you!" "He and I have gotten along other than with COVID, I was not accepting of what happened with COVID. But other than that, he and I have had a great relationship."

Eric Daugherty

144,880 views โ€ข 2 months ago

Marc Andreessen on Elon Musk: โ€œI think probably the single biggest question in all of business right now is: why don't more CEOs operate the way that he does?โ€ "The top-line thing is just this incredible devotion from the leader of the company to fully, deeply understand what the company does, and to be completely knowledgeable about every aspect of it." "To be in the trenches and talking directly to the people who do the work, deeply understanding the issues, and being the key, lead problem solver in the organization." "What Elon does isโ€”he shows up every week at each of his companies, he identifies the biggest problem that the company's having that week, and he fixes it. He does that every week for 52 weeks in a row. And then each of his companies has solved the 52 biggest problems that year, in that year." "The side effect of it isโ€”he attracts many of the best people in the world to work with him. Because if you work with Elon, the expectations are through the roof in terms of your level of performance." Source: Marc Andreessen ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ on Chris Williamson
3:40

Marc Andreessen on Elon Musk: โ€œI think probably the single biggest question in all of business right now is: why don't more CEOs operate the way that he does?โ€ "The top-line thing is just this incredible devotion from the leader of the company to fully, deeply understand what the company does, and to be completely knowledgeable about every aspect of it." "To be in the trenches and talking directly to the people who do the work, deeply understanding the issues, and being the key, lead problem solver in the organization." "What Elon does isโ€”he shows up every week at each of his companies, he identifies the biggest problem that the company's having that week, and he fixes it. He does that every week for 52 weeks in a row. And then each of his companies has solved the 52 biggest problems that year, in that year." "The side effect of it isโ€”he attracts many of the best people in the world to work with him. Because if you work with Elon, the expectations are through the roof in terms of your level of performance." Source: Marc Andreessen ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ on Chris Williamson

a16z

140,451 views โ€ข 5 months ago

Gavin Newsom saw that he was getting killed on social media for the response to the fire so HE ASKED to do an interview with the democrat friendly Pod Save America (hosted by a former Obama aide). This is the one with the clip going around in which he says he wants to find out who is responsible for the failure. This is the beginning of the interview. The fire is raging, people are dying, and the first thing on Newsom's mind is to attack Trump. These are his first words in this obviously scripted 30 minute interview. A disgusting political word salad aimed at taking eyes off of him. He says don't make it political and it's the very first thing he does. The only thing this clown cares about is his image. That's it.
2:04

Gavin Newsom saw that he was getting killed on social media for the response to the fire so HE ASKED to do an interview with the democrat friendly Pod Save America (hosted by a former Obama aide). This is the one with the clip going around in which he says he wants to find out who is responsible for the failure. This is the beginning of the interview. The fire is raging, people are dying, and the first thing on Newsom's mind is to attack Trump. These are his first words in this obviously scripted 30 minute interview. A disgusting political word salad aimed at taking eyes off of him. He says don't make it political and it's the very first thing he does. The only thing this clown cares about is his image. That's it.

MAZE

2,415,604 views โ€ข 1 year ago