正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

𝐀 𝐰𝐢𝐧 𝐟𝐨𝐫 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐃𝐏𝐏 𝐚𝐬 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐜𝐨𝐮𝐫𝐭 𝐟𝐢𝐧𝐝𝐬 𝐌𝐚𝐜𝐤𝐞𝐧𝐳𝐢𝐞 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝟑𝟎 𝐨𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐫𝐬 𝐰𝐢𝐭𝐡 𝐚 𝐜𝐚𝐬𝐞 𝐭𝐨 𝐚𝐧𝐬𝐰𝐞𝐫 𝐢𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐒𝐡𝐚𝐤𝐚𝐡𝐨𝐥𝐚 𝐦𝐮𝐫𝐝𝐞𝐫 𝐜𝐚𝐬𝐞 The Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP) has received a significant win after the Mombasa Law Court found Pastor Paul Mackenzie and his 30 co-accused with a... case to answer over the 191 counts of murder charges. In a key ruling delivered today, the court, through Justice Diana Kavedza, found that prosecution had established a prima facie case against all the accused persons, placing them on their defence. The prosecution called 121 witnesses in support of its case, including survivors, expert witnesses, and investigating officers, as well as presenting exhibits that included postmortem reports and government analyst findings, amongst others. While delivering the ruling, Justice Kavedza stated that based on the totality of materials placed before her, it is not in dispute that bodies of children were exhumed at Shakahola; some of the remains were identified and released to the relatives for burial. She added that it is not disputed that several relatives of the accused persons testified before court as witnesses, confirming the deaths of their children. Some witnesses placed some of the accused persons at or within the scene of the crimes and described them as village elders, guards, grave diggers, cooks, and others performing different roles within the settlement. The defence told the court they will give sworn testimony and call 12 witnesses, 6 of whom are expert witnesses and the rest are the accused persons. Pastor Paul Machenzie, alias Mtumishi, alias Nabii, and 31 individuals were charged with 191 counts of murder under Section 203 read with Section 204 of the Penal Code. However, one accused person, the 7th accused, Enos Amanya, alias Amos Ngala Amanya, alias Aleluya, entered a guilty plea and is awaiting sentence. The ruling concerns the remaining 30 accused persons. The case is prosecuted by the Deputy Director of Public Prosecutions Mr. Joseph Kimanthi and Mr. Jami Yamina; Assistant Director of Public Prosecutions, Ms. Ngina Mutua; Principal Prosecution Counsels Victor Owiti, Betty Rubia and Alex Ndiema and Prosecution Counsel Yassir Mohamed. #HakiNaUsawashow more

Office of The Director Of Public Prosecutions

600,307 subscribers

22,855 次观看 • 5 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

Lawyer Robert Ishmael Aggrey Amissah, counsel for the second accused, has stated that the second and third accused are being treated unfairly after the judge refused to grant them bail despite the prosecution stating it no longer intends to proceed against them and seeking their discharge. Instead, the case was deferred to the substantive judge. According to the lawyer, the state is acting mischievously by creating the impression that the accused persons are being used as a means of pressuring or facilitating the extradition of the former Finance Minister back. He further disclosed that applications have been filed at the High Court to grant bail to all three accused persons and to quash the proceedings due to alleged illegalities, with the bail application hearing set for January 20, 2026.

Lawyer Robert Ishmael Aggrey Amissah, counsel for the second accused, has stated that the second and third accused are being treated unfairly after the judge refused to grant them bail despite the prosecution stating it no longer intends to proceed against them and seeking their discharge. Instead, the case was deferred to the substantive judge. According to the lawyer, the state is acting mischievously by creating the impression that the accused persons are being used as a means of pressuring or facilitating the extradition of the former Finance Minister back. He further disclosed that applications have been filed at the High Court to grant bail to all three accused persons and to quash the proceedings due to alleged illegalities, with the bail application hearing set for January 20, 2026.

SIKAOFFICIAL🦍

46,407 次观看 • 8 个月前

The ruling by a High Court’ judge in the Mike Chimombe & Moses Mpofu case is very interesting. I encourage everyone in business, every director, Executive, tenderpreneur and every lawyer to watch it. The judge ruled that both accused have a case to answer. This means they must be put to their defence, and explain their conduct. Depriving them of such after the state rested its case would work against them and lead to their conviction. The judge articulated the law in detail and interpreted it clearly at great length explaining how he arrived at that decision. Note that the accused wanted the case dismissed, arguing that their clients had no case to answer since they didn’t award themselves the tender and that the tender was awarded to a company, not them as individuals. The hearing and subsequent ruling is interesting for the following reasons: •The two are accused of deceiving the state by submitting fraudulent documents and winning the tender. •The judge explains in detail the 3 essential elements /rails on which in a criminal case, a person accused of fraud can be acquitted without being put to their defence, that is the accused can apply for discharge at the close of the state’s case. • The first essential element is that there is no evidence presented linking the accused to the offence. The court has no choice but to acquit. •The second element is that there may be no evidence of an ingredient of the crime (there are essential ingredients of the crime), in which case the accused must be acquitted. •The third element is that the state witnesses’ testimony and evidence is so poor that a court cannot rely on it to convict, in which case the accused must be acquitted. •In their application for discharge, Mpofu and Chimombe didn’t raise essential element 3. In other words, they deemed the witnesses credible in their evidence. They didn’t argue that the evidence of the state witness isn’t credible. •Mpofu and Chimombe also didn’t raise element number 1, meaning they didn’t argue that they were not linked at all to the offence, in which case they would have persuaded the court for an acquittal. •The two accused sought to rely, in their application for discharge, on the second element, which is, they argued that an ingredient of the evidence of committing the crime was missing: in other words, they are arguing that indeed fraud, deception and misrepresentation occurred, but was not occasioned by them personally, but by companies that won the tenders. •The accused’s lawyer argued that the accused did not influence the award of the bid, may have participated by signing contracts after the award, but that is neither here nor there, making their involvement post facto. They further argued that the state dealt with a corporate entity, not an individual. The state would have to pierce the corporate veil through an application to that effect to get to Mpofu and Chimombe. This is where it gets more interesting. •The judge delves into the issue of the corporate veil in criminal matters in detail. He explains that the effect of section 277 of the criminal code and reform act is to remove the corporate veil that exists in common law on criminal issues relating to companies. It’s very important for employees and directors to grasp these aspects of the law. The judge also touches on aspects of vicarious liability. •The companies act and criminal code were modified a lot in the last ten years. Most people are not aware of this. •Watch the hearing and ruling and educate yourself. Busisa Moyo Tawanda Nyambirai @tino_chinyoka1 Retired Elder Rex M.E Midzi

The ruling by a High Court’ judge in the Mike Chimombe & Moses Mpofu case is very interesting. I encourage everyone in business, every director, Executive, tenderpreneur and every lawyer to watch it. The judge ruled that both accused have a case to answer. This means they must be put to their defence, and explain their conduct. Depriving them of such after the state rested its case would work against them and lead to their conviction. The judge articulated the law in detail and interpreted it clearly at great length explaining how he arrived at that decision. Note that the accused wanted the case dismissed, arguing that their clients had no case to answer since they didn’t award themselves the tender and that the tender was awarded to a company, not them as individuals. The hearing and subsequent ruling is interesting for the following reasons: •The two are accused of deceiving the state by submitting fraudulent documents and winning the tender. •The judge explains in detail the 3 essential elements /rails on which in a criminal case, a person accused of fraud can be acquitted without being put to their defence, that is the accused can apply for discharge at the close of the state’s case. • The first essential element is that there is no evidence presented linking the accused to the offence. The court has no choice but to acquit. •The second element is that there may be no evidence of an ingredient of the crime (there are essential ingredients of the crime), in which case the accused must be acquitted. •The third element is that the state witnesses’ testimony and evidence is so poor that a court cannot rely on it to convict, in which case the accused must be acquitted. •In their application for discharge, Mpofu and Chimombe didn’t raise essential element 3. In other words, they deemed the witnesses credible in their evidence. They didn’t argue that the evidence of the state witness isn’t credible. •Mpofu and Chimombe also didn’t raise element number 1, meaning they didn’t argue that they were not linked at all to the offence, in which case they would have persuaded the court for an acquittal. •The two accused sought to rely, in their application for discharge, on the second element, which is, they argued that an ingredient of the evidence of committing the crime was missing: in other words, they are arguing that indeed fraud, deception and misrepresentation occurred, but was not occasioned by them personally, but by companies that won the tenders. •The accused’s lawyer argued that the accused did not influence the award of the bid, may have participated by signing contracts after the award, but that is neither here nor there, making their involvement post facto. They further argued that the state dealt with a corporate entity, not an individual. The state would have to pierce the corporate veil through an application to that effect to get to Mpofu and Chimombe. This is where it gets more interesting. •The judge delves into the issue of the corporate veil in criminal matters in detail. He explains that the effect of section 277 of the criminal code and reform act is to remove the corporate veil that exists in common law on criminal issues relating to companies. It’s very important for employees and directors to grasp these aspects of the law. The judge also touches on aspects of vicarious liability. •The companies act and criminal code were modified a lot in the last ten years. Most people are not aware of this. •Watch the hearing and ruling and educate yourself. Busisa Moyo Tawanda Nyambirai @tino_chinyoka1 Retired Elder Rex M.E Midzi

mmatigari

20,172 次观看 • 1 年前

In yesterday’s hearing for Dr. Kizza Besigye, the prosecution arrived nearly two hours late, yet again causing delays in a case that has seen nothing but prosecution-driven delays from the start. Dr. Kizza and his co-accused were already in the dock waiting. The defense asked the court to dismiss the application given the prosecutor's absence, but another date was given instead. The prosecution has failed to meet its own disclosure deadlines and is now asking the court to hide the identities of six key witnesses from the defence. Why delay the course of justice? We will keep asking that question, in that courtroom, outside it and everywhere it needs to be heard. #FreeKizza

In yesterday’s hearing for Dr. Kizza Besigye, the prosecution arrived nearly two hours late, yet again causing delays in a case that has seen nothing but prosecution-driven delays from the start. Dr. Kizza and his co-accused were already in the dock waiting. The defense asked the court to dismiss the application given the prosecutor's absence, but another date was given instead. The prosecution has failed to meet its own disclosure deadlines and is now asking the court to hide the identities of six key witnesses from the defence. Why delay the course of justice? We will keep asking that question, in that courtroom, outside it and everywhere it needs to be heard. #FreeKizza

Martha Karua

106,078 次观看 • 5 个月前

Albert Ojwang Murder Trial: New Details Point to Fatal Assault in Custody, Missing CCTV Footage and Evidence Tampering The murder trial of former Nairobi Central Police Station OCS Samson Talaam and five other accused persons has entered a critical stage after the prosecution presented its opening case, alleging that Albert Omondi Ojwang was deliberately assaulted and killed while in police custody, with the State telling the court it intends to present medical, forensic and witness evidence to challenge the initial explanation that his death resulted from a self inflicted injury. The Director of Public Prosecutions has told the High Court that evidence gathered so far indicates Ojwang died from injuries consistent with a violent assault, including blunt force trauma, neck compression and multiple injuries sustained across his body, with prosecutors arguing that the circumstances surrounding his death point to a deliberate act rather than an accident as previously suggested. The court has also heard testimony from a CCTV technician who examined the Digital Video Recorder at Central Police Station and told the court that the device had been formatted, leaving investigators unable to access footage from the period surrounding Ojwang's death, with the witness further stating that some internal components of the system had been removed before the device was examined by investigators. The prosecution has further outlined a case centred on allegations of an attempted cover-up following Ojwang's death, telling the court it will rely on CCTV analysis, forensic evidence, police records and testimony from officers, family members and medical experts to reconstruct events inside the station and establish what happened after Ojwang was brought into custody alive. Former OCS Samson Talaam and the five co-accused persons have denied the murder charges, with the trial now expected to examine the evidence surrounding Ojwang's arrest, his time in police custody, the circumstances of his death, the handling of evidence afterwards and the individual responsibility of those accused in the case.

Albert Ojwang Murder Trial: New Details Point to Fatal Assault in Custody, Missing CCTV Footage and Evidence Tampering The murder trial of former Nairobi Central Police Station OCS Samson Talaam and five other accused persons has entered a critical stage after the prosecution presented its opening case, alleging that Albert Omondi Ojwang was deliberately assaulted and killed while in police custody, with the State telling the court it intends to present medical, forensic and witness evidence to challenge the initial explanation that his death resulted from a self inflicted injury. The Director of Public Prosecutions has told the High Court that evidence gathered so far indicates Ojwang died from injuries consistent with a violent assault, including blunt force trauma, neck compression and multiple injuries sustained across his body, with prosecutors arguing that the circumstances surrounding his death point to a deliberate act rather than an accident as previously suggested. The court has also heard testimony from a CCTV technician who examined the Digital Video Recorder at Central Police Station and told the court that the device had been formatted, leaving investigators unable to access footage from the period surrounding Ojwang's death, with the witness further stating that some internal components of the system had been removed before the device was examined by investigators. The prosecution has further outlined a case centred on allegations of an attempted cover-up following Ojwang's death, telling the court it will rely on CCTV analysis, forensic evidence, police records and testimony from officers, family members and medical experts to reconstruct events inside the station and establish what happened after Ojwang was brought into custody alive. Former OCS Samson Talaam and the five co-accused persons have denied the murder charges, with the trial now expected to examine the evidence surrounding Ojwang's arrest, his time in police custody, the circumstances of his death, the handling of evidence afterwards and the individual responsibility of those accused in the case.

John Mutongoi

19,497 次观看 • 2 个月前

Before the jury entered the courtroom on Tuesday, Lindsay Clancy agreed to a "stipulation of facts," speaking for the first time in her murder trial. She was sworn in by a court officer and answered questions from the judge, confirming that she and the prosecution agree on certain facts in the case. "This stipulation basically relieves the government of having to bring in dozens, if not more, witnesses to prove chain of custody of blood, fluids, the bands, DNA, all of that," defense attorney Reddington said. "Rather than have days of testimony, the stipulation will avoid that."

Before the jury entered the courtroom on Tuesday, Lindsay Clancy agreed to a "stipulation of facts," speaking for the first time in her murder trial. She was sworn in by a court officer and answered questions from the judge, confirming that she and the prosecution agree on certain facts in the case. "This stipulation basically relieves the government of having to bring in dozens, if not more, witnesses to prove chain of custody of blood, fluids, the bands, DNA, all of that," defense attorney Reddington said. "Rather than have days of testimony, the stipulation will avoid that."

CBS News

31,514 次观看 • 1 个月前

Happening Now 🚨 Murder case of Jo-Ann Ntokoto Mabasa postponed again in Alexandra Magistrate's Court The murder trial of 22-year-old Jo-Ann Ntokoto Mabasa, accused of fatally stabbing her boyfriend Xichavo Ntsanwisi in Midrand, has been postponed once more today, Friday, 10 July 2026. Mabasa is currently appearing in the Alexandra Magistrate's Court, where the matter has been postponed to 7 September 2026. The defence indicated it intends to call seven witnesses, while the prosecution stated that all dockets are now ready. Mabasa, a Wits law student, remains out on R10,000 bail. She faces a charge of murder following the incident on 22 September 2025, when 31-year-old Xichavo Ntsanwisi was found with a fatal stab wound at a residence in Noordwyk, Midrand. She was arrested shortly afterwards and has pleaded not guilty. The case has seen multiple postponements over recent months, previously delayed for forensic evidence (including DNA and fingerprints), a decision on trial venue by the Director of Public Prosecutions, and other procedural matters. Ntsanwisi's family has previously expressed frustration over the repeated delays. The allegations against Mabasa have not been tested in court, and the upcoming trial is expected to examine the full circumstances of the fatal stabbing.

Happening Now 🚨 Murder case of Jo-Ann Ntokoto Mabasa postponed again in Alexandra Magistrate's Court The murder trial of 22-year-old Jo-Ann Ntokoto Mabasa, accused of fatally stabbing her boyfriend Xichavo Ntsanwisi in Midrand, has been postponed once more today, Friday, 10 July 2026. Mabasa is currently appearing in the Alexandra Magistrate's Court, where the matter has been postponed to 7 September 2026. The defence indicated it intends to call seven witnesses, while the prosecution stated that all dockets are now ready. Mabasa, a Wits law student, remains out on R10,000 bail. She faces a charge of murder following the incident on 22 September 2025, when 31-year-old Xichavo Ntsanwisi was found with a fatal stab wound at a residence in Noordwyk, Midrand. She was arrested shortly afterwards and has pleaded not guilty. The case has seen multiple postponements over recent months, previously delayed for forensic evidence (including DNA and fingerprints), a decision on trial venue by the Director of Public Prosecutions, and other procedural matters. Ntsanwisi's family has previously expressed frustration over the repeated delays. The allegations against Mabasa have not been tested in court, and the upcoming trial is expected to examine the full circumstances of the fatal stabbing.

MDN NEWS

147,426 次观看 • 2 个月前

The issue of disclosure has been very persistent in the Molly Katanga case. It’s nice to see the country now talking about ODPPUGANDA and how they think that disclosure is just a favor they do to accused persons. On the contrary, it’s a constitutional requirement and is hugely important in ensuring fair trial. Justice presumes a parity of arms. Back in November 2024, Justice Isaac Muwata had this to say on that issue: “….and coming to the subject of disclosure, this must be strictly observed.” “see the case of Soon Yeon Kong Kim and another Vs the Attorney General, cited in this case as well as Article 28 of the constitution.” “I also find the case of Republic Vs Ward, 1993 (See: R v. Judith Ward, Court of Appeals of England, Criminal Division instructive. The Court of Appeal of England had this to say: “The prosecution’s duty at common law is to disclose to the defence all relevant scientific material, i.e. evidence which tended either to weaken the prosecution case or to strengthen the defence, required the police to disclose to the prosecution all witness statements and the prosecution to supply copies of such witness statements to the defence or to allow them to inspect the statements and make copies unless there were good reasons for not doing so.” Even with that, the state continues to stall on disclosure. These cases are talked about because they somehow have media attention but a question should arise as to how many citizens up and down the criminal justice system are suffering under the weight of prosecutors run rogue? We need comprehensive #DPPReforms

The issue of disclosure has been very persistent in the Molly Katanga case. It’s nice to see the country now talking about ODPPUGANDA and how they think that disclosure is just a favor they do to accused persons. On the contrary, it’s a constitutional requirement and is hugely important in ensuring fair trial. Justice presumes a parity of arms. Back in November 2024, Justice Isaac Muwata had this to say on that issue: “….and coming to the subject of disclosure, this must be strictly observed.” “see the case of Soon Yeon Kong Kim and another Vs the Attorney General, cited in this case as well as Article 28 of the constitution.” “I also find the case of Republic Vs Ward, 1993 (See: R v. Judith Ward, Court of Appeals of England, Criminal Division instructive. The Court of Appeal of England had this to say: “The prosecution’s duty at common law is to disclose to the defence all relevant scientific material, i.e. evidence which tended either to weaken the prosecution case or to strengthen the defence, required the police to disclose to the prosecution all witness statements and the prosecution to supply copies of such witness statements to the defence or to allow them to inspect the statements and make copies unless there were good reasons for not doing so.” Even with that, the state continues to stall on disclosure. These cases are talked about because they somehow have media attention but a question should arise as to how many citizens up and down the criminal justice system are suffering under the weight of prosecutors run rogue? We need comprehensive #DPPReforms

Anthony Natif

18,778 次观看 • 4 个月前

The Arrogance of State Witnesses: Kenya’s Courts Reduced to a Farce I am appalled by the sheer arrogance and delinquency displayed by state/prosecution witnesses in Kenyan courts. From this edited clip alone, it is almost impossible to extract a simple yes or no response. Witnesses engage in endless genuflection, filibustering, and open disdain for the judicial process. This behavior drags court proceedings far beyond reasonable time, wasting taxpayers’ money and clogging an already overburdened justice system. One shudders to imagine the scale of miscarriage of justice that occurs daily against unrepresented accused persons, people tried and convicted on technicalities and deliberate ambiguity created by prosecution malfeasance. The utopic reforms promised under the new constitution were clearly cosmetic. They simply expanded institutions like the Supreme Court to create more looting opportunities, not to deliver genuine justice. By now, every magistrate and judge should enforce a zero-tolerance policy toward this indifference. For instance, in the case involving Herman Manyora , the prosecution witness should have been held in contempt - even for a single day - just to send a strong message against wasting the court’s time with nonsense. This is not an isolated problem. It is a systemic failure. State witnesses treat courts as extensions of executive power rather than independent arbiters of justice. Until this arrogance is punished decisively, Kenya’s judiciary will continue to serve the powerful while failing the ordinary citizen. The theatrics must stop. Justice delayed and diluted is justice denied. Hon. Justice Martha K. Koome, FCIArb, EGH Judicial Service Commission Kenya (JSC) Office of The Director Of Public Prosecutions DCI KENYA

The Arrogance of State Witnesses: Kenya’s Courts Reduced to a Farce I am appalled by the sheer arrogance and delinquency displayed by state/prosecution witnesses in Kenyan courts. From this edited clip alone, it is almost impossible to extract a simple yes or no response. Witnesses engage in endless genuflection, filibustering, and open disdain for the judicial process. This behavior drags court proceedings far beyond reasonable time, wasting taxpayers’ money and clogging an already overburdened justice system. One shudders to imagine the scale of miscarriage of justice that occurs daily against unrepresented accused persons, people tried and convicted on technicalities and deliberate ambiguity created by prosecution malfeasance. The utopic reforms promised under the new constitution were clearly cosmetic. They simply expanded institutions like the Supreme Court to create more looting opportunities, not to deliver genuine justice. By now, every magistrate and judge should enforce a zero-tolerance policy toward this indifference. For instance, in the case involving Herman Manyora , the prosecution witness should have been held in contempt - even for a single day - just to send a strong message against wasting the court’s time with nonsense. This is not an isolated problem. It is a systemic failure. State witnesses treat courts as extensions of executive power rather than independent arbiters of justice. Until this arrogance is punished decisively, Kenya’s judiciary will continue to serve the powerful while failing the ordinary citizen. The theatrics must stop. Justice delayed and diluted is justice denied. Hon. Justice Martha K. Koome, FCIArb, EGH Judicial Service Commission Kenya (JSC) Office of The Director Of Public Prosecutions DCI KENYA

Francis Gaitho

13,244 次观看 • 3 个月前

UPDATE: The Office of the DPP says it will appeal the acquittal of former Bukwo District LC5 chairperson Chelimo Julius Moses, who was cleared by the International Crimes Division of the High Court of charges of aggravated defilement and aggravated trafficking in children, allegedly committed in October 2021. Justice Duncan Gaswaga ruled that the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt, but prosecutors argue it is inconsistent to acquit the alleged prime suspect when two co-accused pleaded guilty and were convicted. Despite the acquittal, Chelimo remains in custody over similar charges before another court. #MonitorUpdates 📹 Juliet Kigongo

UPDATE: The Office of the DPP says it will appeal the acquittal of former Bukwo District LC5 chairperson Chelimo Julius Moses, who was cleared by the International Crimes Division of the High Court of charges of aggravated defilement and aggravated trafficking in children, allegedly committed in October 2021. Justice Duncan Gaswaga ruled that the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt, but prosecutors argue it is inconsistent to acquit the alleged prime suspect when two co-accused pleaded guilty and were convicted. Despite the acquittal, Chelimo remains in custody over similar charges before another court. #MonitorUpdates 📹 Juliet Kigongo

Daily Monitor

26,528 次观看 • 8 个月前

#WATCH | Delhi: On Rouse Avenue Court discharged Arvind Kejriwal and Manish Sisodia, and 21 others in the CBI's Delhi excise policy case, Sidharth Luthra, Senior Advocate and former Additional Solicitor General of India, says, "I am happy that the court has taken a view on the lack of evidence, and it is very important that a decision of this nature has come, which shows that our trial courts apply their mind and take conscious decisions. Now it is to be seen what action the accused take for the period that they had suffered custody..." He adds, "If I were the accused, I would move for discharge or quashment of the ED case. The point is, the ED as an agency, and ED cases, have a life of their own. The ED keeps conjuring up ways to try to justify their existence and justify their investigations. When the basis of the case is gone, this should fall automatically..."

#WATCH | Delhi: On Rouse Avenue Court discharged Arvind Kejriwal and Manish Sisodia, and 21 others in the CBI's Delhi excise policy case, Sidharth Luthra, Senior Advocate and former Additional Solicitor General of India, says, "I am happy that the court has taken a view on the lack of evidence, and it is very important that a decision of this nature has come, which shows that our trial courts apply their mind and take conscious decisions. Now it is to be seen what action the accused take for the period that they had suffered custody..." He adds, "If I were the accused, I would move for discharge or quashment of the ED case. The point is, the ED as an agency, and ED cases, have a life of their own. The ED keeps conjuring up ways to try to justify their existence and justify their investigations. When the basis of the case is gone, this should fall automatically..."

ANI

35,264 次观看 • 6 个月前

Two persons have been taken into police custody for allegedly obstructing police officers, using obscene language, and assaulting them during an incident in #Nagaroor, #Thiruvananthapuram, #Kerala. The accused — CPIM Vellallur local committee secretary Ratheesh and branch secretary Vishnu — surrendered before the Deputy Superintendent of Police (DySP) in #Attingal on Saturday. Police stated that a case has been registered against nine individuals under non-bailable sections in connection with the incident. While two of the accused have surrendered, seven others remain at large. Police have intensified efforts to trace and apprehend the remaining individuals involved in the case.

Two persons have been taken into police custody for allegedly obstructing police officers, using obscene language, and assaulting them during an incident in #Nagaroor, #Thiruvananthapuram, #Kerala. The accused — CPIM Vellallur local committee secretary Ratheesh and branch secretary Vishnu — surrendered before the Deputy Superintendent of Police (DySP) in #Attingal on Saturday. Police stated that a case has been registered against nine individuals under non-bailable sections in connection with the incident. While two of the accused have surrendered, seven others remain at large. Police have intensified efforts to trace and apprehend the remaining individuals involved in the case.

Hate Detector 🔍

14,289 次观看 • 6 个月前

95 Arrested Over Anti-Mnangagwa Protest, Accused Face Public Violence Charges Legal Summary: The State v. 95 Accused Persons (ZRP KOPJE CR 604/03/25) Charge: The accused are charged with Participating in a gathering with intent to promote public violence, breaches of peace, or bigotry in contravention of section 37(1)(a)(i) of the Criminal Law (Codification and Reform) Act [Chapter 9:23]. Factual Allegations: On 31 March 2025, the accused allegedly gathered at Robert Mugabe Square (Freedom Square), Harare, intending to proceed to State House with the objective of removing the sitting President of Zimbabwe by unlawful means. The group is alleged to have chanted inflammatory slogans, thrown stones and other objects at police officers, and posted videos of the incident on social media platforms, including a WhatsApp group named Nyokayemabhunu. Arrests and Identification: •Accused [1] to [94] were arrested at the scene. •Accused [95] was arrested later through identification from digital media. •The accused were allegedly positively identified both in person and through social media evidence. •The WhatsApp group was reportedly administered using a South African number linked to an individual named Knox Chiwer. Police Opposition to Bail: The investigating officer, Detective Sergeant Lovemore Chisi, opposes bail on the following grounds: 1.The offence carries a serious custodial sentence (maximum 5 years). 2.The accused are likely to abscond. 3.Communications retrieved from Nyokayemabhunu indicate threats to police officers, posing a risk to witnesses. 4.The accused may commit further offences. 5.Some accomplices remain at large, and release may jeopardise further arrests. Current Status: •Bail has been formally opposed. •Investigation is expected to conclude by 15 April 2025. •Approximately 20 witnesses are anticipated to testify. This matter is pending remand and further judicial proceedings.

95 Arrested Over Anti-Mnangagwa Protest, Accused Face Public Violence Charges Legal Summary: The State v. 95 Accused Persons (ZRP KOPJE CR 604/03/25) Charge: The accused are charged with Participating in a gathering with intent to promote public violence, breaches of peace, or bigotry in contravention of section 37(1)(a)(i) of the Criminal Law (Codification and Reform) Act [Chapter 9:23]. Factual Allegations: On 31 March 2025, the accused allegedly gathered at Robert Mugabe Square (Freedom Square), Harare, intending to proceed to State House with the objective of removing the sitting President of Zimbabwe by unlawful means. The group is alleged to have chanted inflammatory slogans, thrown stones and other objects at police officers, and posted videos of the incident on social media platforms, including a WhatsApp group named Nyokayemabhunu. Arrests and Identification: •Accused [1] to [94] were arrested at the scene. •Accused [95] was arrested later through identification from digital media. •The accused were allegedly positively identified both in person and through social media evidence. •The WhatsApp group was reportedly administered using a South African number linked to an individual named Knox Chiwer. Police Opposition to Bail: The investigating officer, Detective Sergeant Lovemore Chisi, opposes bail on the following grounds: 1.The offence carries a serious custodial sentence (maximum 5 years). 2.The accused are likely to abscond. 3.Communications retrieved from Nyokayemabhunu indicate threats to police officers, posing a risk to witnesses. 4.The accused may commit further offences. 5.Some accomplices remain at large, and release may jeopardise further arrests. Current Status: •Bail has been formally opposed. •Investigation is expected to conclude by 15 April 2025. •Approximately 20 witnesses are anticipated to testify. This matter is pending remand and further judicial proceedings.

ZimEye

106,929 次观看 • 1 年前

#WATCH | Lucknow | On a woman hit and dragged on the bonnet of a car in Lucknow, UP Women Commission Vice Chairperson Aparna Yadav says, "I assure you that we have taken suo motu cognisance of this matter, and, if found guilty through due legal process, the accused will face stringent punishment in accordance with the law. I do not believe this is the first such case of Love jihad in Uttar Pradesh. Based on the information available so far, the accused initially presented himself as a Hindu man and entered into a relationship with the woman...I will also ensure that any other individuals found to be involved are brought to justice. The accused has already been arrested, and we will take all necessary legal steps to ensure that the investigation proceeds properly and that the law takes its course"

#WATCH | Lucknow | On a woman hit and dragged on the bonnet of a car in Lucknow, UP Women Commission Vice Chairperson Aparna Yadav says, "I assure you that we have taken suo motu cognisance of this matter, and, if found guilty through due legal process, the accused will face stringent punishment in accordance with the law. I do not believe this is the first such case of Love jihad in Uttar Pradesh. Based on the information available so far, the accused initially presented himself as a Hindu man and entered into a relationship with the woman...I will also ensure that any other individuals found to be involved are brought to justice. The accused has already been arrested, and we will take all necessary legal steps to ensure that the investigation proceeds properly and that the law takes its course"

ANI

24,020 次观看 • 5 天前

A longtime worker at Burger King lost her job after 24 years over what management described as unauthorized food. At the end of her shift, she took home a fish sandwich, fries, and a drink. Supervisors claimed she only had permission for the sandwich and accused her of stealing the rest. The case moved to court, where the details were closely examined. The judge found no evidence of premeditation or intent to steal and ruled that immediate dismissal was disproportionate. She was awarded $46,000 in compensation. The ruling sparked broader discussions about workplace fairness, loyalty, and whether discipline should match the severity of the situation. Source: Court ruling reports / Labor and employment coverage

A longtime worker at Burger King lost her job after 24 years over what management described as unauthorized food. At the end of her shift, she took home a fish sandwich, fries, and a drink. Supervisors claimed she only had permission for the sandwich and accused her of stealing the rest. The case moved to court, where the details were closely examined. The judge found no evidence of premeditation or intent to steal and ruled that immediate dismissal was disproportionate. She was awarded $46,000 in compensation. The ruling sparked broader discussions about workplace fairness, loyalty, and whether discipline should match the severity of the situation. Source: Court ruling reports / Labor and employment coverage

Inspirenaire

418,309 次观看 • 6 个月前

#Hyderabad : Six Youngsters were performing Bike Stunts (#BikeStunts) and Dangerous Driving (#DangerousDriving) on Public Roads in #Attapur, by Risking their Lives and Others, Now Apprehended by TASK FORCE, Rajendranagar Zone The sleuths of the Commissioner’s Task Force, #Rajendranagar Zone, in coordination with Attapur Police, of Hyderabad City Police , apprehended six accused persons within the limits of Attapur Police Station for performing illegal bike stunts and dangerous driving on public roads, thereby creating nuisance, causing panic among the public, and endangering the lives of commuters and pedestrians. The accused persons were found indulging in reckless riding activities such as dangerous stunts, triple riding, over-speeding, and rash driving, posing a serious threat to public safety as well as to their own lives. During the operation, two two-wheeler vehicles and 06 mobile phones used in the commission of the offence were seized from their possession. Names of the Accused: 1). Syed Shahed (19) 2). Shaik Naseer Hussain (19) 3). Shaik Junaid (18) 4). Mohammad Bin Isa (17) Previously the above (04) persons are involved in petty case regarding bike stunt of Bahadurpura PS. 5). Abdul Samad (20) 6). Mohammed Arbaz Hussain Khan (22) Previously he is involved in POCSO Case vide Cr. No. 76/2024 U/s 354, 448 IPC & Sec 7 r/w 8 of POCSO Act-2012 of Attapur PS

#Hyderabad : Six Youngsters were performing Bike Stunts (#BikeStunts) and Dangerous Driving (#DangerousDriving) on Public Roads in #Attapur, by Risking their Lives and Others, Now Apprehended by TASK FORCE, Rajendranagar Zone The sleuths of the Commissioner’s Task Force, #Rajendranagar Zone, in coordination with Attapur Police, of Hyderabad City Police , apprehended six accused persons within the limits of Attapur Police Station for performing illegal bike stunts and dangerous driving on public roads, thereby creating nuisance, causing panic among the public, and endangering the lives of commuters and pedestrians. The accused persons were found indulging in reckless riding activities such as dangerous stunts, triple riding, over-speeding, and rash driving, posing a serious threat to public safety as well as to their own lives. During the operation, two two-wheeler vehicles and 06 mobile phones used in the commission of the offence were seized from their possession. Names of the Accused: 1). Syed Shahed (19) 2). Shaik Naseer Hussain (19) 3). Shaik Junaid (18) 4). Mohammad Bin Isa (17) Previously the above (04) persons are involved in petty case regarding bike stunt of Bahadurpura PS. 5). Abdul Samad (20) 6). Mohammed Arbaz Hussain Khan (22) Previously he is involved in POCSO Case vide Cr. No. 76/2024 U/s 354, 448 IPC & Sec 7 r/w 8 of POCSO Act-2012 of Attapur PS

Surya Reddy

11,369 次观看 • 4 个月前

Breaking News: "If you don't move in the next 10 minutes? you will ALL be arrested under section 14 of the Public Order Act. At roughly 3am in Portsmouth last night the local police threaten peaceful protestors under the guise of The Public Order Act Section 14, in response to large crowds of local men and women sick and tired of the invasion of their homelands. Subsection (1A) applies if] [F2a] senior police officer, having regard to the time or place at which and the circumstances in which any public assembly is being held or is intended to be held, reasonably believes that— (a)it may result in serious public disorder, serious damage to property or serious disruption to the life of the community, [F3(aa)in the case of an assembly in England and Wales, the noise generated by persons taking part in the assembly may result in serious disruption to the activities of an organisation which are carried on in the vicinity of the assembly, (ab)in the case of an assembly in England and Wales— (i)the noise generated by persons taking part in the assembly may have a relevant impact on persons in the vicinity of the assembly, and (ii)that impact may be significant, F4...] (b)the purpose of the persons organising it is the intimidation of others with a view to compelling them not to do an act they have a right to do, or to do an act they have a right not to do, [F5or (c)in the case of an assembly in England and Wales, the assembly is in the vicinity of a place of worship and may intimidate persons of reasonable firmness with the result that those persons are deterred from— (i)accessing that place of worship for the purpose of carrying out religious activities, or (ii)carrying out religious activities at that place of worship

Breaking News: "If you don't move in the next 10 minutes? you will ALL be arrested under section 14 of the Public Order Act. At roughly 3am in Portsmouth last night the local police threaten peaceful protestors under the guise of The Public Order Act Section 14, in response to large crowds of local men and women sick and tired of the invasion of their homelands. Subsection (1A) applies if] [F2a] senior police officer, having regard to the time or place at which and the circumstances in which any public assembly is being held or is intended to be held, reasonably believes that— (a)it may result in serious public disorder, serious damage to property or serious disruption to the life of the community, [F3(aa)in the case of an assembly in England and Wales, the noise generated by persons taking part in the assembly may result in serious disruption to the activities of an organisation which are carried on in the vicinity of the assembly, (ab)in the case of an assembly in England and Wales— (i)the noise generated by persons taking part in the assembly may have a relevant impact on persons in the vicinity of the assembly, and (ii)that impact may be significant, F4...] (b)the purpose of the persons organising it is the intimidation of others with a view to compelling them not to do an act they have a right to do, or to do an act they have a right not to do, [F5or (c)in the case of an assembly in England and Wales, the assembly is in the vicinity of a place of worship and may intimidate persons of reasonable firmness with the result that those persons are deterred from— (i)accessing that place of worship for the purpose of carrying out religious activities, or (ii)carrying out religious activities at that place of worship

HIN News🇬🇧🇺🇸

99,246 次观看 • 14 天前