Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

๐๐จ๐ฑ ๐Ž๐Ÿ๐Ÿ๐ข๐œ๐ž ๐“๐ซ๐š๐œ๐ค๐ž๐ซ๐ฌ - ๐๐ฅ๐ž๐š๐ฌ๐ž ๐๐จ๐ง'๐ญ ๐ฌ๐ž๐ž ๐ญ๐ก๐ข๐ฌ ๐ฏ๐ข๐๐ž๐จ/Even if you see you won't say the facts. If Producer's word about Box Office figures are FINAL, here's Kamal Haasan, the producer of #Vishwaroopam (2013) giving an interview to Headlines Today News about VISHWAROOPAM ๐‚๐ซ๐จ๐ฌ๐ฌ๐ข๐ง๐  ๐Ÿ๐Ÿ๐ŸŽ ๐‚๐ซ๐จ๐ซ๐ž๐ฌ ๐†๐ซ๐จ๐ฌ๐ฌ ๐ข๐ง ๐“๐...

36,277 Aufrufe โ€ข vor 2 Jahren โ€ขvia X (Twitter)

10 Kommentare

Profilbild von Wolverine
Wolverinevor 2 Jahren

@ikamalhaasan 120 cr only in TN alone ๐Ÿคฏ That too when the film was still running. Final 150cr aachum vandhu irukura chance iruku. Lol Endhiran total WW collection eh 180 cr than. Indha latchanathula mentalaans Endhiran 375 cr nu vada sudunga. Becz 3 idiots collected 375 cr so they raised it๐Ÿ˜‚

Profilbild von ๐Œ๐š๐ฌ๐ฌ ๐Œ๐š๐ก๐š๐ซ๐š๐ฃ๐š
๐Œ๐š๐ฌ๐ฌ ๐Œ๐š๐ก๐š๐ซ๐š๐ฃ๐švor 2 Jahren

@ikamalhaasan ๐Ÿ”ฅ๐Ÿ”ฅ๐Ÿ”ฅ๐Ÿ‘

Profilbild von Freddy Dsouza
Freddy Dsouzavor 2 Jahren

@ikamalhaasan 1+1=2 Kamal and his fans agree the fact . 1+1=11 Rajini and his fans agree BLINDLY .

Profilbild von Sathish
Sathishvor 2 Jahren

@ikamalhaasan Kamal is exceptional, Please don't bring him into the Box office fights.. He is the Real #GOAT..

Profilbild von เฎคเฎ™เฏเฎ•เฎคเฏเฎคเฎณเฎชเฎคเฎฟ โœจโœจ
เฎคเฎ™เฏเฎ•เฎคเฏเฎคเฎณเฎชเฎคเฎฟ โœจโœจvor 2 Jahren

@ikamalhaasan Aandavar sambavam ๐Ÿ”ฅ๐Ÿ”ฅ๐Ÿ”ฅ๐Ÿ”ฅ

Profilbild von ๐Œ๐š๐ฌ๐ฌ ๐Œ๐š๐ก๐š๐ซ๐š๐ฃ๐š
๐Œ๐š๐ฌ๐ฌ ๐Œ๐š๐ก๐š๐ซ๐š๐ฃ๐švor 2 Jahren

@HariharanG40604 @ikamalhaasan ๐Ÿ˜Š๐Ÿ™๐Ÿ‘

Profilbild von ZAK
ZAKvor 2 Jahren

@ikamalhaasan He is real Tier 3 Goat.

Profilbild von MMR
MMRvor 2 Jahren

@rameshlaus @ikamalhaasan Morattu puluvu mootaiya irukan #Koomali ๐Ÿคก. Avanoda 1st 100cr eh vikram than. Aparam yepdi avana aatathula sethupanga ๐Ÿ˜‚

Profilbild von เฎฎเฏเฎฐเฎณเฎฟเฎคเฎฐเฎฉเฏ เฎ•เฎฟเฎฐเฏเฎทเฏเฎฃเฎฎเฏ‚เฎฐเฏเฎคเฏเฎคเฎฟ ๐Ÿค˜๐Ÿค˜๐Ÿค˜
เฎฎเฏเฎฐเฎณเฎฟเฎคเฎฐเฎฉเฏ เฎ•เฎฟเฎฐเฏเฎทเฏเฎฃเฎฎเฏ‚เฎฐเฏเฎคเฏเฎคเฎฟ ๐Ÿค˜๐Ÿค˜๐Ÿค˜vor 2 Jahren

@ikamalhaasan เฎชเฏŠเฎฎเฏเฎชเฎณ เฎชเฏŠเฎฑเฏเฎ•เฏเฎ•เฎฟ เฎ•เฏ‹เฎฎเฎพเฎณเฎฟ เฎ•เฏเฎžเฏเฎšเฏเฎ•เฎณเฏ‹เฎŸ เฎ‰เฎฒเฎ•เฎฎเฏ‡ เฎคเฎพเฎฉเฎฟ..

Profilbild von Venkatesh
Venkateshvor 2 Jahren

@ikamalhaasan Unmai ah @MoviesNation_ ?

ร„hnliche Videos

๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ—ณ๏ธ : Elections Canada claims they secured the 2025 Federal election in Canada. How can that even remotely be true? 44% of Canadian voters had cast their ballot before election day. This partially includedโ€ฆ Voting by mail + overseas mail in votes. Just look at the laws in place to protect us from fraudulent overseas votes.๐Ÿ™ƒ โ€œWhat eligibility criteria must be met to be on the International Register of Electors? To be on the International Register of Electors, you must: be a Canadian citizen and at least 18 years old on polling day be living outside Canada have lived in Canada at some point in your lifeโ€œ โ€œHow does Elections Canada determine my riding? On your application, you must indicate your last address before leaving Canada, which determines the electoral district for which your vote will be counted. You must use a physical address. You cannot use a post office box or rural route, except in areas where no other physical address is available.โ€ This address cannot be changed after your name is added to the International Register of Electors.โ€ With that in mind, why arenโ€™t we told how many votes come in from China, India, Pakistan, Iran, the USA etc? With a breakdown of where those votes are added and which party was supported by those overseas votes? Wouldn't it be nice to know if ridings are being swung by votes coming in from China, India or the USA?

Bruce McGonigal

62,042 Aufrufe โ€ข vor 11 Monaten

Bro, at no point was Matlou a 10 and Ndlovu an 8. Like, at no point. I can even speak on your behalf and say you didn't see such a thing๐Ÿ˜ซ This was not even 1 of those games where we have rotations. It was a clear double pivot of Maboe and Matlou from the beginning of the match with Ndlovu as a 10. โ–  In the 1st 45 minutes, at no point was Ndlovu behind Matlou. Not even once where Matlou was the 10 and Ndlovu an 8 in the double pivot. Even without the ball, Ndlovu would track back until he stood with Silva outside our box while Matlou and Maboe were inside the box fighting for possession. โ–  Ndlovu took the place of Mdu in the system, while Matlou took the place of Maboe as more of the 6 in the double pivot. It was Maboe who played closer to Ndlovu, not even Matlou. So, we had box to box functions performed by Maboe, not Matlou. Look at the Zamalek 1st goal, Ndlovu was jogging while the team was under pressure in a defensive transition. It was Matlou and Maboe trying to recover, not Ndlovu. I can make a compilation of both in and out of possession for Ndlovu just to show you he was the 10. But if you re-watch, you won't even get to 20 minutes before you see he was never behind Matlou. These are terrible tactics we don't want to see continue when we have good players. They left Baartman, Sirino, Vilakazi, Matlou, and Mdu just to use Ndlovu as a 10. Ndlovu who lacks a final pass, and then we wonder why Silva was isolated with no supply. Your argument needs evidence, bafo. These poor tactics were giving you serious headaches. You couldn't tell who's who doing what, where๐Ÿ’”

El Capitanoโšช

24,904 Aufrufe โ€ข vor 6 Monaten

IHOP-KC video megathread ๐Ÿงต 1/25 On Monday Feb 4th, 2013, Blaise Foret , myself and a friend, were summoned to Mikeโ€™s office to meet with Stuart Greaves and (to our surprise) Dave Sliker. After several hours, we were ordered to stop questioning IHOPโ€™s theology, eschatology and prophetic history, or we would be banned from the Missions Base and everyone would be publicly warned about us. Truth is, everyone was already being โ€œprivatelyโ€ warned about us, because Blaise and our friend were challenging peopleโ€™s views on biblical โ€œGraceโ€ and I was challenging the validity of IHOP-KCโ€™s Prophetic Historyโ€ฆ In March, 2013, Mike gave a message on โ€œGraceโ€ with a special Q&A time afterwards for the community to share concerns or ask questions on the topics we were triggering. A number of people were leaving IHOP (helped by us) so they were in damage control mode. Then, in August, 2013, Mike held a private but staff-wide meeting, where he spoke about how God orchestrated divine experiences and events to start IHOP-KC - making it very clear IHOP-KC was not started by human desire or design, but by Divine Will and Authority. At the end, Mike calls Allen Hood to come on stage to validate Mikeโ€™s message and deliver the knockout punch. The message to me and many others was clear: If you abandon IHOP-KC, you abandon God. And if you oppose IHOP-KC, you oppose God Himself. #ihopkc #mikebickle #churchtoo #cult

starcazm

52,830 Aufrufe โ€ข vor 2 Jahren

The current pace of disclosure, "is about as fast as you'd want it to go. And frankly, I wouldn't mind if it went a little little more slow." ~Scafish, 5 Days Ago (I'm sure that will go over well with this community.๐Ÿ˜Ž But hey, at least he was honest with how he feels.") "On that point - I hate to say this - people should REALLY temper their expectations." ~Scafish (Oh boy. ๐Ÿฅด I included more in this transcript than what's in the short clip.) Peter Skafish - Peter Skafish: "Whether [disclosure is] two years from now, or five years from now, or ten years from now... And I know a lot of people in the UAP community will, you know, would slump over if it's going to be ten years. But, you know whatever the time frame, you're going to have direct acknowledgement from the U.S. government. You're going to have media, more importantly, asking hard questions at some point." (I agree. The media will wake up, at SOME point. But will I be alive to see it? ๐Ÿ˜ต ) skafish: "I would say where we are with this is, we're in a place... Let's say this: we're in a process that is moving too quickly for my comfort, and it really should give people pause. Are we really ready for disclosure? Depends on what disclosure is. But if we're really ready for it, then fine, let's barrel ahead. But I would say this is about as fast as you'd want it to go, and frankly, I wouldn't mind if it went a little little more slow." (FYI, Peter is REALLY tuned into what's going on and is part of Professor Avi Loeb's UAP advisory council. Later in this interview he says he KNOWS the crash retrieval program is real. I'm not sure how he could KNOW that unless he saw it in person. At least that's how I see it with the word KNOW. He also said that if the idea of disclosure (credits Greer) means, "the President would have a fireside conversation or press conference and say that aliens, in the sense of extraterrestrials, are real, that they are engaged in...that they constitute some kind of presence here; that Roswell happened; and that the intelligence community knows about it? "If that's what we mean by disclosure, I think that people should temper their expectations about what it would ACTUALLY look like. Which is...it probably would be a pretty minimal acknowledgement, followed by a statement that we're seeking more answers on this. And I think that would actually satisfy a lot of media. I think it would also involve what we're seeing right now, which is a declassification process. Now, on that point - I hate to say this - people should REALLY temper their expectations." (I'll cue it up to that last part with a link in the replies so you can hear why you should be depressed right ow. ๐Ÿ˜ฌ )

Joe Murgia

15,311 Aufrufe โ€ข vor 1 Monat

๐Ÿ‘€ The New Zealand Govt with "Palantir" Spying & The Whistleblower Edward Snowden ๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ฟ NZ is allegedly the first country outside the U.S.A to deploy Palantirโ€™s data analytics software within its government agencies, with contracts reportedly dating back to 2012 โš ๏ธ The U.S.A National Security Agency (NSA) documents disclosed by Snowden included info about the NZ surveillance program detailing spying on millions of citizens incl: Kim Dotcom & overseas officials-which was a joint effort between NZ's Government Communications Security Bureau (GCSB) & the U.S. NSA to covertly tap international undersea cables for mass data collection, for the purpose of spying April 2012- The plan to develop "Speargun" began under the guise of "Initiative 7418" when Cabinet asked the GCSB to develop an advanced cyber protection strategy July 2012 -June 2013 A warrant was sought & granted for "Phase 1" of Speargun. The GCSB confirmed this warrant ensured they could undertake preliminary work as part of the business case Cabinet requested Early 2013- Phase I of Speargun was implemented by the GCSB & the U.S. NSA March 2013- PM Key publicly claimed he cancelled Speargun because it was "too intrusive." A meeting was held with the GCSB over Speargun at this time, & a press release later stated: PM tells GCSB not to bring business case forward. & then Informs the GCSB "it is too broad" April 2013- Cabinet documents show Speargun had its funding extended through to June the following year-directly contradicting Key's claim it was dead, ๐Ÿ‘€ A LIE June 12 2013- In Parliament, Green Party Co-leader Russel Norman accused the government of "conspiring to establish a surveillance state," noting Palantir had opened a Wellington office & was advertising for an "embedded analyst" requiring a government security clearance. June 12 2013- John Key dismissed the claims, saying he had only met Palantir's Peter Thiel a "few times," & denied discussing intelligence matters with him. (โš ๏ธ Key had also given Theil citizenship in 2011 bypassing normal requirements ) June 2013- Snowden revealed that the GCSB was in fact participating in Speargun- a mass surveillance program tapping the Southern Cross cable for US intelligence agencies. Documents explicitly noted "Project Speargun underway." The program's goal: "sniff it all, know it all, collect it all, process it all & exploit it all" via XKEYSCORE (a Five Eyes shared database). Snowden confirmed it contained communications of "millions of New Zealanders" July Bypassing normal requirements coordination. The document stated: "The implementation of Speargun is currently on hold pending clarification of the legislation." Crucially, Key was informed that Speargun details were likely to become public because they could be in the trove of secrets taken by Edward Snowden August 2013 โš ๏ธKey publicly vowed to RESIGN if mass surveillance of New Zealanders was ever proven (The January election was just months away) July 2013- A secret briefing from DPMC's intelligence director told PM Key that Speargun was "on hold pending clarification of legislation," & that Snowden might expose it. The required legislation- the GCSB Amendment Act 2013- passed on Aug 21 legalizing domestic spying for the first time. Key then halted Speargun funding on Sep 2, months after he had publicly claimed the program was dead in Mar 2013 2014- April A business case for the upgraded spyware system "Cortex" (Speargun's replacement) was developed & approved 2014- Sep At Kim Dotcom's "Moment of Truth" event, Snowden called PM Key a liar, stating Key's denial of mass surveillance is "categorically false." He claimed he personally accessed NZ's coms via the XKEYSCORE system & asserted: "If you live in New Zealand, you are being watched" ๐Ÿงต1/2

Neil Edwards

107,844 Aufrufe โ€ข vor 4 Monaten

"'Jacobโ€™s Ladder' (1990) came out at a time when it was just not right for that movie to be seen. We were about to go into the Gulf War, and the country did not want to see a movie about a Vietnam veteran involved in drug experiments" --- Tim Robbins Full Excerpt: "There are many different factors determining whether or not a film reaches a mass audience. How much the studioโ€™s behind it, which other movies the studioโ€™s releasing at the same timeโ€”I think Disney had nine or ten in release at the same timeโ€”how much energy is put into it. Who knows. Itโ€™s always been a mystery to me. 'Jacobโ€™s Ladder' (1990) came out at a time when it was just not right for that movie to be seen. We were about to go into the Gulf War, and the country did not want to see a movie about a Vietnam veteran involved in drug experiments when, as the movieโ€™s playing in theaters, we are inoculating Gulf War soldiers with anthrax. I got a letter from one guy that resistedโ€”he got put in a brig because he would not take the drugs. He said, โ€œThank you, because I saw Jacobโ€™s Ladder before I left, and it gave me the strength to resist.โ€ And now theyโ€™ve found out that a lot of these soldiers got sick from these vaccines, with this Gulf War Syndrome. That movie found its audience in video and cable, and it was huge. And then you see movies that somehow hit the zeitgeist, make tons of money, are huge hits, and then you see them a few years later and you go, โ€œWhat? What did I see in this? Why is this not working?โ€ Certainly you canโ€™t judge the success of a film based on its initial box office. You have to wait ten years, see it again. If it still works, itโ€™s a great film. Thereโ€™s a lot of great films that didnโ€™t do well in their initial release. 'Itโ€™s a Wonderful Life' (1946) was a bomb. 'Citizen Kane' (1941) didnโ€™t do well. 'Shawshank Redemption' (1994)." ('Projection 11: New York Filmmakers on Filmmaking, edited by Tod Lippy, 2000 )

DepressedBergman

70,720 Aufrufe โ€ข vor 7 Monaten