Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

๐๐ฎ๐œ๐ฌ๐‚๐š๐ฆ๐ฉ: "๐–๐ž ๐…๐ข๐ ๐ก๐ญ ๐”๐ง๐ญ๐ข๐ฅ ๐“๐ก๐ž ๐„๐ง๐." ๐ŸŽž๏ธ A 3-Part Docuseries ๐ŸŽฌ Part 1: Sun 07 Jun 20h00 ๐ŸŽฌ Part 2: Mon 08 Jun 20h00 ๐ŸŽฌ Part 3: Tue 09 Jun 20h00 ๐Ÿ“บ SuperSport ๐Ÿ† Variety 4 & PiratesTV (YouTube) โšซโšช๐Ÿ”ดโญ #OrlandoPirates #OnceAlways

200,897 views โ€ข 2 months ago โ€ขvia X (Twitter)

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

๐Ÿ‘œ Union Budget 2026 Summary Part-1 by Dr.Mrunal Patel for UPSC & All Competitive Exams Timestamps: 00:00 Intro- Budget 2026 Hype 00:18 Budget Size for UPSC Exams 00:25 Pre-Budget Poll Results 00:42 5 Key Facts for Every Exam 01:00 Fact 1- Top Tax Revenues 01:11 Fact 2- Top Subsidies 01:17 Fact 3- MGNREGA 125 Days 02:11 Fact 4- Fiscal Deficit Targets 02:15 Fact 5- Top Sector Allocations 02:36 What NOT to Rote-Learn for UPSC 03:04 Unacademy 3-Day Free Unlock Promo 03:19 Schedule- Part 2 Tomorrow 04:17 Parliamentary Procedure Basics 04:28 Article 112 05:08 6 Stages of Budget Passage 05:30 Old Delays & Vote on Account 06:25 2017 Reform- First Working Day Budget 06:51 What "Budget" Really Means 07:06 Consolidated Fund & Other Funds 07:57 Economic Survey Gender Budget 08:56 Revenue vs Capital Budget Parts 09:14 Revenue- Income & Expenses 10:14 Capital- Loans Disinvestment Infra 11:42 PYQ- Liability vs Asset in Loans 13:25 Recent Prelims Trend- 4-6 Questions 13:46 Direct vs Indirect Taxes 14:54 Indirect Tax Examples (GST Excise) 15:10 Direct Taxes- Income & Corporation 17:14 MAT & Zero-Profit Companies 18:54 Obsolete Taxes (Google Tax Angel Tax) 19:35 Capital Gains Tax Basics 20:41 PYQ 2025- Agri Income & Gains 21:16 STT on Shares & F&O Hike 23:30 Share Buyback Tax 24:35 Income Tax Regimes (New vs Old) 26:46 TCS/TDS Explained 35:51 TCS on Luxury Cars & Forex 39:56 TDS on Professional Fees 41:46 Advance Tax Instalments 43:58 Black Money & Foreign Assets 45:06 Safe Harbour Rules 46:11 Advance Pricing Agreement 47:52 Revenue Shortfall Reasons 49:56 Indirect Taxes- Customs & Excise 51:22 GST Basics & Destination Rule 53:09 Tobacco & Pan Masala Taxes 54:10 Cess & Surcharge Loophole 55:25 PYQ- State Share on Taxes 56:39 Revenue Part Complete 57:20 Part 2 Teaser- Subsidies & Schemes 57:40 Doordarshan Live Tonight 58:10 YouTube Algorithm Rant - ๐Ÿ”“ 3 DAY Unlock All UPSC Courses- - ๐Ÿ’พ PPT download (Mon-Night) - 5th Jan se Win26 series - ๐ŸŽ 8th Sunday Mock Test on Budget -

Dr. Mrunal Patel (Ph.D.)

22,533 views โ€ข 6 months ago

January 2026 Q&A is now live! I answer 21 questions from listeners and viewers on Instagram, YouTube, X, and LinkedIn. Watch on X, YouTube, Spotify or wherever you get your podcasts. 0:00 January 2026 Q&A 0:35 YouTube joelrelova What are some 2026 recommended โ€œmust-readโ€ books? 1:20 LinkedIn Andre Goersch Why do you advocate crypto, especially given how volatile it is? 2:19 YouTube lindagreen2395 Do you think Trump is showing signs of dementia? If so, what is your prediction of how the last 2 years of his term will be? Do you think his Chief of Staff will cover it up and try to run the country? Will the Republicans in Congress go along with this? 4:08 Instagram rossyyy4142 What is an underrated history book you think more people should know about? 5:06 LinkedIn Carlos Gimeno What would you identify as the most important part of your non-financial legacy to your children and why? 6:32 Instagram a.kerbusch If you have no money, how do you make money? 7:40 Instagram john.nunzio2 How can the Democrats get back to the center instead of moving to the far left? 8:23 YouTube robbocik1891 Where do you think the housing market and the US overall economy be in 6 months? 9:09 X namesnik Can you define why Bitcoin has value for a layman? 10:10 Instagram arunajoe Did you grow up liberal or conservative? 10:51 LinkedIn Peter Koritschan Thoughts on relative growth in importance of the Middle East in contrast to the U.S. and Europe. 11:50 LinkedIn Beata Brandt Do the "bobbleheads" like Scott Bessent and Howard Lutnik truly believe their statements regarding the economy, or do they know better and won't tell the truth? Does Wall Street understand the current economic conditions on Main Street? 13:17 Instagram colinmcberry1 What books do you recommend and gift the most? 14:01 Instagram hzube What have you learned over the years about how to be a good husband? 15:02 Instagram baashfulalpaca What current cabinet member has the best chance to continue a life in politics afterwards? 15:41 LinkedIn Mary Lee Dillon What do you think we can do to eliminate the kleptocracy, graft, and overall government corruption in the US today? 16:55 YouTube normanwoods8844 Do you believe that a policy guided by core principles, one that is principle-driven, has completely vanished from the global and American political landscape, or is there still an opportunity for a leader to have the fortitude to uphold such a stance? 18:30 Instagram lukewebb7 What 3 ways have you been using AI thatโ€™s accelerated your work? 19:51 Instagram jeangilchrist What are your favorite novels? 20:31 YouTube briansmith3836 Do you believe that when we die, itโ€™s lights out, or is there something else? 21:21 YouTube braddavid902 What is your favorite movie about WWII?

Anthony Scaramucci

63,750 views โ€ข 7 months ago

$1.25 billion Unicorn. Only 2 Product Managers. That's Linear, the tool powering OpenAI, Perplexity, Cursor, and all the other new AI companies. Today I'm releasing part 2 of my conversation with the man behind it all, Head of Product Nan Yu. ๐ŸŽฌ Watch Now: We break down all aspects of the Linear Method: 1. How to build products with speed and quality Everyone thinks speed and quality are opposite ends of a spectrum. At Linear, theyโ€™ve learned theyโ€™re actually dance partners. The trick isnโ€™t to move faster by cutting corners. Itโ€™s to design the system so cleanly that you donโ€™t need hacks in the first place. Their framework focuses on strong abstractions and ruthless clarity upfront so they can move quickly and maintain craft. 2. Why the smallest possible scope is your superpower When youโ€™re staring at a big ambitious idea, itโ€™s tempting to swing for the fences immediately. The problem? Big scope creates drag. Theyโ€™ve found that shrinking a feature down to its smallest, clearest version is like cutting a diamond: the smaller it gets, the more precise and valuable it becomes. Ship the smallest version that works, then let reality guide the next cut. Thatโ€™s how they keep velocity without losing control of quality. 3. The truth about OKRs OKRs are like prescription glasses: they work beautifully if you actually need them and give you headaches if you donโ€™t. For huge, multi-layered orgs, they align chaos. But most startups try to wear someone elseโ€™s prescription. You end up contorting obvious priorities into stretch goals and numbers just to check the box. 4. Scaling smart vs. scaling headcount Linear hit a $1.25B valuation with ~40 engineers and 2 PMs. Thatโ€™s not because they were allergic to hiring, itโ€™s because they treated people as force multipliers, not just bodies to throw at problems. Async clarity, small high-leverage teams, and obsessive communication let them get more output per person instead of chasing vanity headcount. 5. Culture that compounds Culture isnโ€™t built in offsites, itโ€™s built in habits. Two of theirs have shaped everything: a. Public change log Every 2โ€“3 weeks they ship a changelog. Itโ€™s their heartbeat. If the changelog is light, they know they lost momentum. Itโ€™s like checking a pulse. b. Feature roasts Before shipping, the whole team tries to break a feature in every way imaginable. Itโ€™s brutal and fun at the same time. - - - - - P.S. You're not going to want to miss Nan Yu's career story, including going from CTO to IC engineer and getting the job at Linear. For readers, the transcript is here:

Aakash Gupta

19,074 views โ€ข 1 year ago

What if your favorite childhood toy had its own story before finding you? ๐Ÿงธ Created with Seedance 2.0 on FlovaAI #Flovaai #Flovacpp FlovaAI_Japan PROMPT: Style: Premium Pixar-quality 3D animation, anime-inspired facial expressions, ultra-detailed fur simulation, cinematic lighting, magical realism, vibrant toy store, expressive eyes, soft bloom, ray-traced reflections, dynamic camera movement, Hollywood animated film quality. Prompt: Open with an ultra-wide cinematic establishing shot of a massive premium toy store during golden hour as families browse colorful aisles. Fast dolly shot through shelves overflowing with plush toys, action figures, trains, dolls, and racing cars. Cut to a low-angle close-up of Oliver, the caramel teddy bear with his blue scarf, sitting proudly on the shelf. His amber eyes sparkle with hope. Match cut to six-year-old Emma running excitedly into frame, stopping directly in front of Oliver. Extreme close-up of her smiling face as she hugs him tightly against her chest. Over-the-shoulder shot from Oliver's perspective as Emma happily says, "Can we get this one?" Her mother reaches toward the shelfโ€”but accidentally grabs another identical teddy from behind him. Quick push-in on Oliver's face as his smile fades. Slow-motion shot of Emma walking away while looking back at him. Rack focus from Oliver's tearful eyes to the closing automatic doors. The store lights dim one by one. A loud CLICK echoes as the final light switches off. ๐ŸŽฌ PART 2 โ€” "When Toys Wake Up" Duration: 0:15โ€“0:30 Prompt: Complete darkness. Oliver's button eyes slowly blink open. Extreme close-up of his eyes reflecting moonlight. Whip pan across the store as hundreds of toys suddenly come alive. RC cars drift through polished floors leaving glowing tire streaks. Toy trains rush along display tracks. Dolls laugh while twirling between shelves. Giant Rex the dinosaur lets out a playful roar that shakes nearby boxes. Titan-X activates with glowing cyan eyes. Fast handheld-style tracking shot follows Oliver sprinting across shelves. He leaps between toy boxes in slow motion. Dynamic overhead shot as Bolt the RC car races underneath him, giving him a boost. Oliver lands perfectly onto Chug the toy train as it speeds around a corner. Dramatic orbit shot around Oliver as he quietly whispers, "I have to find her." The music builds rapidly. ๐ŸŽฌ PART 3 โ€” "The Adventure" Duration: 0:30โ€“0:45 Prompt: High-speed action montage. Oliver jumps off the moving train onto hanging gift ribbons, swinging across the aisle. Fast rotating camera follows him weaving through floating balloons. Rex accidentally crashes through stacked toy boxes, causing colorful blocks to rain everywhere. Oliver slides beneath a closing display shelf in slow motion. Bolt races beside him before launching him off a miniature toy ramp. FPV-style camera flies alongside Oliver as he narrowly avoids spinning helicopters and bouncing rubber balls. Titan-X extends a mechanical arm, catching Oliver just before he falls from a high shelf. Cinematic top-down shot reveals the giant locked entrance doors. Oliver runs with everything he has, but the automatic doors refuse to open. Extreme close-up of his tiny paw pressing against the cold glass. Outside, the first rays of sunrise begin to appear. ๐ŸŽฌ PART 4 โ€” "Meant to Be" Duration: 0:45โ€“1:00 Prompt: Soft emotional piano begins. Low-angle shot of Oliver sitting sadly near the entrance as the toys quietly watch from behind. Suddenly, a restocking employee pushes Mr. Wheels, the shopping cart, through the entrance. Dynamic tracking shot as Mochi nudges Oliver forward. Titan-X gently lifts him while Bolt gives one final speed boost. Oliver jumps through the air in beautiful slow motion, perfectly landing inside the shopping cart filled with new toys. Match cut to the toy display being restocked moments later. The store opens. Bright morning sunlight floods the entrance. Emma runs back inside with her mother. Handheld child-height camera follows her weaving through customers. She suddenly freezes, her eyes widening. Push-in on Oliver sitting exactly at the front of the display. "Mom! It's him!" She hugs Oliver tightly against her chest. Extreme close-up of Oliver's stitched smile as one tiny happy tear forms in his eye. The camera slowly cranes upward as Emma walks toward the glowing exit carrying Oliver. Warm golden sunlight fills the frame. Fade to white. Final Screen Text: "Some friendships are simply meant to be." ๐Ÿงธโœจ

Sophia

126,206 views โ€ข 17 days ago

๐ŸŽฌWHAT IS THIS SCARYNESS??? 1. โ˜‘๏ธ A person who claimed to be a lawyer in Beijing, ๐˜„๐—ต๐—ผ ๐˜‚๐˜€๐—ฒ๐—ฑ ๐˜๐—ผ ๐—น๐—ถ๐˜ƒ๐—ฒ ๐—ถ๐—ป ๐˜๐—ต๐—ถ๐˜€ ๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—ฎ, posted a video sharing his observations. This person stated that they had once lived in Building No. 15, while Yu Menglong passed away in Building No. 18. According to her, the window design there includes a tall frame and sturdy protective grilles. If someone had suddenly jumped out, there would certainly have been signs of damage, yet none were found at the scene. She also emphasized that: - The windows in the apartment open inward rather than outward, making it very difficult for someone to accidentally fall out from a loss of balance. - The height of the window makes the idea of "being drunk and accidentally falling" nearly impossible. - Even under the hypothesis of an intentional suicide, "๐—ผ๐—ป๐—ฒ ๐˜„๐—ผ๐˜‚๐—น๐—ฑ ๐˜€๐˜๐—ถ๐—น๐—น ๐—ป๐—ฒ๐—ฒ๐—ฑ ๐—ฎ ๐—ฟ๐˜‚๐—ป๐—ป๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด ๐˜€๐˜๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐˜ ๐˜๐—ผ ๐—บ๐—ฎ๐—ธ๐—ฒ ๐—ถ๐˜ ๐—ต๐—ฎ๐—ฝ๐—ฝ๐—ฒ๐—ป", which she found even more illogical. After Yu Menglong's death, many people questioned why the neighbors on the night of the incident remained silent none called the police or spoke out to clarify what happened. This only fueled suspicions of an "๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ณ๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—บ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป ๐—ฏ๐—น๐—ผ๐—ฐ๐—ธ๐—ฎ๐—ฑ๐—ฒ". 2.โœ”๏ธ One of the reasons why Song Yiren became the subject of speculation was that she once lived in the same building as Yu Menglong. This was revealed through photos the actress herself had shared on social media. Some online users even pointed out that the room where Yu Menglong fell had a ceiling lamp identical to the one seen in Song Yiren's photos. A wave of rumors then spread, claiming that Song Yiren had also attended the party with Yu Menglong and then she fled to Japan after the incident. ๐—ฆ๐—ผ๐—ป๐—ด ๐—ฌ๐—ถ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—ป ๐—น๐—ถ๐˜ƒ๐—ฒ๐—ฑ ๐—ผ๐—ป ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ 3๐—ฟ๐—ฑ ๐—ณ๐—น๐—ผ๐—ผ๐—ฟ ๐—ผ๐—ณ ๐—•๐˜‚๐—ถ๐—น๐—ฑ๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด 18, ๐˜„๐—ต๐—ถ๐—น๐—ฒ ๐—ฌ๐˜‚ ๐— ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐—ด๐—น๐—ผ๐—ป๐—ด ๐—น๐—ถ๐˜ƒ๐—ฒ๐—ฑ ๐—ผ๐—ป ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ 5๐˜๐—ต ๐—ณ๐—น๐—ผ๐—ผ๐—ฟ ๐—ผ๐—ณ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐˜€๐—ฎ๐—บ๐—ฒ ๐—ฏ๐˜‚๐—ถ๐—น๐—ฑ๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด. 3.๐Ÿ“ž A brave female lawyer publicly said in the video that she was willing to represent this case for free. However, this action had to pay a high price: the female lawyer disappeared and was suspected of being banned and silenced. ๐Ÿ‘‰ speak up to help Yu Menglong's family prepare the proceedings. 4.โ™Ÿ๏ธ Silence anyone who voices opinions about the case and claims it's fabricated or challenges the police from celebrities to ordinary people. ๐—จ๐˜€๐—ฒ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ "๐—ถ๐—ป๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐—ป๐—ฒ๐˜ ๐—ฐ๐—น๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐˜€๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด" ๐—น๐—ฎ๐˜„ ๐˜๐—ผ ๐—ฑ๐—ฒ๐—น๐—ฒ๐˜๐—ฒ ๐—ฎ๐—ฐ๐—ฐ๐—ผ๐˜‚๐—ป๐˜๐˜€ ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฑ ๐—ฝ๐—ผ๐˜€๐˜๐˜€, ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฑ ๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐˜€๐˜ ๐—ฝ๐—ฒ๐—ผ๐—ฝ๐—น๐—ฒ. 5. โšซ๏ธ A police officer who wanted to question and reinvestigate the case (not from the Chaoyang precinct) was also disciplined and dismissed from his position. 6.๐ŸŒซ๏ธ ๐—˜๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐˜€๐—ฒ ๐—ฎ๐—น๐—น ๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ณ๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—บ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป ๐—ฎ๐—ฏ๐—ผ๐˜‚๐˜ ๐—ฎ๐—ฐ๐˜๐—ผ๐—ฟ ๐—ฌ๐˜‚ ๐— ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐—ด๐—น๐—ผ๐—ป๐—ด ๐—ณ๐—ฟ๐—ผ๐—บ ๐˜€๐—ผ๐—ฐ๐—ถ๐—ฎ๐—น ๐—บ๐—ฒ๐—ฑ๐—ถ๐—ฎ. For example, his music releases, song links, MVs, and event posts on Weibo none of the links can be accessed anymore, even though they were part of his professional work. His name has also been removed from film and television projects. 7.โž• People from outside who wanted to come to Beijing to speak up and demand justice were also advised not to go. They were warned that if they did, it would be very dangerous - they might never be seen again. โ€ผ๏ธ ๐Ÿ‘‰ Blacklist๐Ÿ–ค #ไบŽๆœฆๆœงๅขœๆจ“ไบ‹ไปถ #YuMenglongFallingEvent #justiceforyumenglong #ไบŽๆœฆ่ƒงๅ ๆฅผ #YuMenglong #ไบŽๆœฆ่ƒง #AlanYu #YuMenglong #JusticeforYuMenglong #YuMenglongไบŽๆœฆ่ƒง #ไบŽๆœฆ่ƒง

๋ฏธ๋‚˜๋ฌธ๐ŸŒ™ ๐Ÿ‡ฐ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ผ

155,048 views โ€ข 10 months ago

Ron Unz (The Unz Review) discusses his intellectual upbringing and involvement in Holocaust research with Holocaust researcher Germar Rudolf (Germar Rudolf (* 1964)) and free market activist Jorge Besada. 00:28 Jorge introduces German chemist and leading Holocaust researcher Germar Rudolf who spent nearly 4 years in jail for writing a chemistry report that questions the mainstream mass-gassings narrative and thus allegedly โ€œinciting racial hatredโ€. 02:54 Jorge introduces Jewish-born entrepreneur and author Ron Unz who has degrees in Physics and Ancient History from Harvard. Runs 05:00 Jorge briefly explains how from freedom emerges economic and intellectual competition which inadvertently turns mankind into a super-computer as companies innovate and copy each otherโ€™s innovations, as well as superior morals as hard-working people motivate everyone else to be likewise. 05:50 Ron tells us about his life, Jewish cultural influence-identity or lack thereof, early views on Holocaust. 09:15 Ron begins to get suspicious regarding Holocaust due to disastrous-flawed media coverage of Iraq war after 9/11. Mainstream media lost credibility. 10:42 Ron digitizes old publications and discusses ramifications of doing so. 14:20 Ron archives Reason magazine and eventually stumbles upon Holocaust-related issue and controversy surrounding it. 18:04 Ron praises issue and brings up fact that 2 leading editors were Jewish. 21:22 Arthur Butz, another prominent Holocaust mass-gassings doubter has Masters in Electrical Engineering from MIT. 21:50 Ron emphasizes how Libertarians were early prominent leaders in spreading Holocaust-doubt-revisionism. 23:28 Ron speculates that the Reason issue relating to the Holocaust was due to the coming release of Arthur Butzโ€™s โ€˜The Hoax of the Twentieth Centuryโ€™ 26:24 Ron praises Butzโ€™s book and especially so Nicholas Kollerstromโ€™s โ€˜Breaking the Spell. The Holocaust: Myth & Realityโ€™ 30:27 Jorge mentions how since Libertarians are better defenders of freedom, they get the benefits of superior competition of ideas and busting of myths-lies which helps explain why so many are Holocaust revisionists-deniers. Asks Ron a out how important was for him to lear that freedom giant Murray Rothbard, who is likely Mileiโ€™s favorite economist, was a revisiojnist-Denier. Ron elaborates. 34:55 Ron describes how it was books that were pro-mainstream-Holocast that persuaded him the most about the myth-story of the Holocaust. Discusses Deborah Lipstadt. 40:42 Ron brings up how lead soviet prosecutor in Nuremberg Trials , Andrey Vyshinsky, was same fraudulent prosecutor who oversaw Stalinโ€™s bogus โ€˜Great Purge-โ€˜Shows Trialsโ€™. 41:30 Ron brings up how aspects of Holocaust mythology are abandoned with time like alleged mass-gassings or death camps on German soil. 45:05 Ron mentions how Robert Faurisson(french revisionist) stressed how neither Churchillโ€™s, nor, Eisenhowerโ€™s, nor Charles de Gaulโ€™s massive post-war writings mentioned anything about the Holocaust. 48:56 Ron brings up book โ€˜The Jewish Threat: Anti-semitic Politics Of The U.s. Armyโ€™ by Joseph W. Bendersky, and how not a single American intelligence officer or top generals believed in holocaust stories. 50:15 Ron discusses John Beatyโ€™s book โ€˜The Iron Curtain Over Americaโ€™ 1:14:40 Ron argues that the reason why neither Churchill, nor Eisenhower, nor Charles de Gaul mentioned anything about the Holocaust is because they didnโ€™t believe it and didnโ€™t want to be seen as having fallen for war-time propaganda-myths in posterity. 1:17:29 Germar mentions how John Beaty may not have been able to better back his claims about intelligence officers not believing holocaust because it was not until year 2000 that UK finally released secret information about decrypts, so Beaty would have been breaking law. 1:19:18 Jorge brings up how Churchill knew the Soviets had committed the Katyn Forest massacre and introduced fake evidence at Nuremberg Trial blaming Germans for it, thus knew mass-gassings also likely fabrications thus not risk including them in his books to look like a fool in the future. 1:22:08 Ron discusses the Venona project, US spying on soviet spies working high up in Roosevelt admin. Even top American who kept project running and held erroneous anti-Jewish ideas, never believed anything about holocaust. 1:28:09 Jorge, backing Beatyโ€™s claim that Jews were overwhelmingly responsible for bringing about WWII to destroy Hitler, brings up leading Zionist Chaim Weizmann stating that WWII โ€œis our war..We areโ€ฆgiving this war our financial support on which the entire war production is based, we areโ€ฆproviding our full propaganda power which is the moral energy that keeps this war going.โ€ The solution to Hitlerโ€™s anti-Jewish fallacies was NOT a world war that killed 80+ million people. 1:29:39 Ron brings up how an increasing number of books today make similar point, but not as portraying Jews as dragging us into an unnecessary war, but as heroes helping annihilate the evil Hitler. 1:31:07 Ron disagrees with Jorgeโ€™s earlier statement and downplays Jewโ€™s importance compared to Roosevelt's desire to have a war to allegedly get the US out of depression. 1:34:50 Ron brings up importance of Kristallnacht for getting Roosevelt and Jews to push war vs. Germany. 1:38:29 Germar further elaborates on how Nazi governmentโ€™s cruel handling of Kristallnacht (forbade insurance companies to pay Jews, large collective fine on Jews as well) did make it easy for many to further vilify Nazi government and help move to war. 1:43:58 Jorge: โ€˜What are 3-5 major arguments the layperson came make to criticize mainstream holo myths?โ€™ Ron mentions digging where hundreds of thousands of bodies are supposed to be buried. 1:49:12 Germar explains how โ€˜deep penetrating radarโ€™ and other things have been tried and still no evidence to support mainstream claims. 1:52:43 Jorge summarizes simple arguments against mainstream myth discussed: 1) ground checks fail to show mass graves,2) Nuremberg Trial obvious fake evidence introduced by Soviets like brain bashing pedal-driven machine, atomic bomb-like device to blow up 20,000 Jews, etc. 3) Top Soviet prosecutor Andrey Vyshinsky being same liar as in Moscow โ€˜Show Trialsโ€™ 4) All secret communications from Auschwitz reveal nothing about gassings, 5) Nothing in Churchill, Eisenhower, Charles de Gaul writings, 6) Main Russian archivists admit there is nothing in archives supporting Holocaust, 7) Chemical analysis per Germar 8) massive continuous downward revisions of alleged exterminations. 1:58:52 Germar elaborates on history of massive downward revisions on total deaths. 2:05:28 Ron mentions how after creation of Israel and Israelโ€™s pivot to America, Stalin-Soviets no longer pushed Holocaust. 2:10:55 Jorge summarizes how the mainstream Holocaust myth (NOT conspiracy) evolved. Holocaust exaggerations began as way for Poles-Soviets-Communists to punish Germany but understandably attracted and was amplified by Jews, especially Zionist ideology-believing ones. Per Germar, the key leading historian and judges who did most to create mainstream holocaust myth were not even Jewish. 2:13:00 Ron agrees with summary and believes that most of todayโ€™s Holocaust academics are not lying as part of some grand conspiracy by believe their mythical narrative. 2:14:26 Jorge brings up astute ending to Ronโ€™s Holocaust article where he compared Holocaustianity to Socialist mythology and the USSR, both myths similarly superficially examined, sustained by coercion, and that could quickly collapse. 2:16:40 Jorge asks Ron: โ€œWhere do you see things headed?โ€ 2:17:40 Jorge asksโ€ฆ Mahmoud Abbas, Bashar al Assad, Alexander Dugin, Judge Napolitano frequent guest Phil Giraldi all are prominent doubters, Sergey Lavrov loves watching Napolitanoโ€ฆ How much of the Russia-Ukraine war is due to Zionism and are there significant chances that many high up in Russian government are Holocaust doubters-revisionists? 2:22:41 Jorge blames the seeming irrationality of US government looking for conflict with Russia and China as inevitable outgrowth of Holcaustianized Zionism which has made Bibi our Pope getting more than one standing ovation per minute in US congress. Ron mentions how of course everyone is a next Hitler to be militarily destroyed. 2:24:52 Ron sees massive collapse of the West which will bring down Holocaust myths with it. 2:25:55 Germar asks Ron about personal repercussions regarding his open Holocaust skepticism, lost friendships, etc. 2:34:15 Jorge brings up why Ron is such a vital intellectual. Unlike David Duke or Candace Owens who bring up good information about Jewish-related chaos, Ron is a secular Jew who does NOT make many fallacies Candace and David make like in Candaceโ€™s case referring to Bibi being influenced by Satan etc. And hopefully major podcasters like Joe Rogan soon host Ron. 2:36:06 Ron : โ€œMaybe if one of these people had me on it could be the straw that breaks the camels backโ€ 2:36:17 Jorge brings up how we are clearly seeing how similar to CovidMania, AntisemiteMania is about to emerge and fortunately this is leading more and more people to have the urgency and courage to deal with Zionist and Holocaust myths before it is too late. 2:39:30 Germar brings up Ron asking Germar to post his books. Ron explains he wanted to convert them to HTML but realized few were reading them that way to just abandoned the idea, especially since Germarโ€™s site already provides all PDFs and more. 2:42:02 Jorge! โ€œWe almost went 3 hours! We will do this again!โ€

Jorge Besada

16,100 views โ€ข 10 months ago

dave meltzer: youtube enthusiast ๐Ÿ’€ perfect. now we can stop pretending this was ever complicated. the real story is not that wwe is afraid of aew. the real story is not that โ€œhigh level wwe officialsโ€ are whispering scary things to dave meltzer. the real story is not even that tony khan got asked a planted question on a media call with very little distribution about the possibility of aew soon having very little distribution, although that sentence is so stupidly perfect it should be bronzed and placed outside the wrestling observer newsletter office like a war memorial for people who died pretending this was journalism. the real story is that aew is going to lose its wbd distribution deal. either it ends at the expiration of the three-year term in 2027, or it ends earlier if paramount closes wbd and decides aew has no strategic place inside the new company. and based on the board as it exists right now, the most likely landing spot for aew in 2027 is google / youtube. that is the story. everything else is laundering. tony khan wants the story to be: โ€œwhy would wwe say this about us?โ€ that is the whole operation. take my public analysis. run it through dave meltzer. assign it to wwe / tko. then let tony khan answer a canned question on a media call with very little distribution about potentially having very little distribution. a media call for a lightly viewed roh show. a planted story. a planted messenger. a rehearsed answer. a pr flack probably wrote it. tony khan performs hurt. tony khan says โ€œi donโ€™t know why wwe wouldโ€ฆโ€ tony khan denies the obvious. tony khan keeps me minimized. tony khan removes me from the public conversation about the exact thing i have repeatedly said is going to happen to aew. everyone is supposed to pretend this is organic. it is not. it is the most bubble wrapped, manufactured, artificial environment possible. aew is heading toward youtube because the domestic media rights board is closing around them. not as a troll. not as a bit. not as โ€œpr spin.โ€ as a business conclusion. aew is not leverage. wwe is not afraid of aew. the $185 million number was bullshit. the buyer universe was shrinking. paramount / skydance was coming for wbd. wbd was not going to be some permanent aew safe house. youtube was only ever a real โ€œoptionโ€ if someone at google was actually cutting a media rights check and underwriting production. not because every divorced mom with a ring light and a gmail account can upload video to the same platform. that was always the distinction. that is still the distinction. Nick LoPiccolo โ€” February 28, 2025 โ€œYouTube is an option the same way you or I could start a YT channel tomorrow. Is Jon Cruz cutting AEW a media rights check or underwriting a production budget? Hell no. Just the reality. It isnโ€™t the model. Jon is global head of sports over there.โ€ that was february, not last week. not after dave meltzer suddenly discovered youtube prelim numbers like columbus finding the new world. it is becoming inevitable now. Nick LoPiccolo โ€” April 30, 2026 โ€” 11:26 AM โ€” 251.2K Views โ€œto every journalist and every podcast who interviews tony khan from this day forward: please ask tony if wbd told him back in august they would not be renewing aew. wbd told him in august. i confirmed it directly and triple sourced it. please ask why tony has been acting like nothing is wrong for the last 8 months, and then please ask tony what his actual distribution plan is. because the only distributor left that will take aew is google/youtube. the myaew app is not realistic. the my aewapp is a death sentence in 2026 if youtube doesnโ€™t make an mg deal for aew. they started building it too late and there is no realistic way to scale it. also, who is going to sell ads for the platform? kiswe is not the best. they built the myaew app. they are new to the game. hold tonyโ€™s feet to the fire. Paramount is not real for aew. WBD passed back in August. CW/Roku is now off the table. Amazon and Fox do not want AEW. ask Tony why he's been lying to you and to the locker room and to the fans, acting like things are all great with the network? i am sure a lot of people would love to hear his answer.โ€ april 30. 251.2k views. not whispered. not hidden. not vague. not โ€œhigh level wwe officials.โ€ i said it publicly and directly: wbd passed back in august. paramount is not real for aew. cw / roku is off the table. amazon and fox do not want aew. the myaew app is not realistic. google / youtube is the only distributor left on the board that makes sense. that is the actual story tony khan does not want to answer. not โ€œwhy would wwe say this?โ€ ask tony khan if wbd told him in august that wbd would not be renewing aew. ask what his actual distribution plan is. ask who is selling ads for the myaew app. ask how a platform built this late scales in 2026. ask whether youtube is an actual rights partner with an mg, or just the place you go when the real buyers are gone. that is the question. not the fake question dave meltzer laundered into โ€œhigh level wwe officials.โ€ the real question. Nick LoPiccolo โ€” July 9, 2025 โ€” 10:51 AM โ€” 9,565 Views โ€œNo one in Hollywood believes the $185 million number.โ€ Nick LoPiccolo โ€” July 9, 2025 โ€” 11:35 AM โ€” 7,470 Views โ€œThe $185 million figure is inflated. Varietyโ€™s October 2, 2024 article was likely updated after a publicist called on AEWโ€™s behalf, as early reports placed the deal between $140 and $150 million per year. Tony Khan was also included in Varietyโ€™s Dealmakers 2024 list, which, while not officially pay to play, strongly favors those spending significant advertising dollars with the outlet. No one in Hollywood seriously believes WBD, which is in junk bond status, is paying AEW $185 million per year. Clear enough?โ€ clear enough? the number was never clean. the number was never real in the way aew fans and wrestling media pretended it was real. and when the $185 million number started getting laughed out of adult rooms, the number magically became $178 million. that is where the shell game gets funny. because $178 million was not some sacred sourced number either. it was brandon thurston taking the median between $170 million, reported by sports business journal, and $185 million, reported by variety and others. that is literally what wrestlenomics said. Wrestlenomics โ€” October 4, 2024 โ€œWhy use $178 million here for AEWโ€™s new deal when some outlets are reporting the average annual value is $185 million?โ€ Wrestlenomics โ€” October 4, 2024 โ€œI used $178 million here because it is simply the median of $170 million, as reported by Sports Business Journal, and $185 million, reported by Variety and others.โ€ there it is. arithmetic. not an all-cash rights fee. not a clean license number. not proof wbd valued aew like raw. not a finance-department document from warner bros. discovery. a midpoint between conflicting public reports. then wrestling media treated that midpoint like scripture because they needed the story to be โ€œaew is valued like raw,โ€ not โ€œaew pr inflated a number no serious person in hollywood believed.โ€ and by the way, $170 million was not the clean all-cash number either. that is the scam. float the number. repeat the number. launder the number. defend the number with people who do not understand the difference between cash rights fees, in-kind services, equity, marketing commitments, platform value, make-goods, ad inventory, and press release math. then when the number collapses, pretend the next number was always the number. that is not reporting. that is aew state news. Nick LoPiccolo โ€” July 10, 2025 โ€” 5:53 AM โ€” 12.6K Views โ€œAEW isnโ€™t leverage. Itโ€™s not competition. Itโ€™s a niche product with loud fans and limited reach.โ€ Nick LoPiccolo โ€” July 10, 2025 โ€” 8:56 AM โ€” 1,018 Views โ€œWe handle wrestling deals too, but thinking we need AEW for leverage is myopic. The landscape is changing and the game Iโ€™m playing is different.โ€ Nick LoPiccolo โ€” July 15, 2025 โ€” 25.7K Views โ€œAEW isnโ€™t leverage.โ€ that was never emotional. that was never tribal. that was never โ€œi hate aew.โ€ it was market structure. wwe did not need aew as leverage because real leverage was never โ€œanother wrestling show exists.โ€ real leverage is architecture, scale, subscriber churn, platform strategy, sports adjacency, global rights, advertising, sponsorship, live inventory, library value, data, brand safety, executive relationships, and the actual buyer universe of maybe 18-20 companies in the united states that matter for live sports rights. aew fans thought this was a wrestling argument. it was never a wrestling argument. it was a board. and the board was already moving. Nick LoPiccolo โ€” August 11, 2025 โ€” 482 Views โ€œI wasnโ€™t viewing the above in that context (TKO vs AEW counter programming), it was more of this is what Iโ€™m hearing after 2 weeks of big media deals rolling out (Skydance closing, South Park library moving) etc. Which have all been in the works for awhile.โ€ Nick LoPiccolo โ€” August 11, 2025 โ€” 388 Views โ€œBut if you were to look at it from a counter programming perspective (and I donโ€™t think this was a factor in UFC deal) - there are only so many players for these big media rights deals. PARA is likely off the board (via TKO deal) & then what if they acquire WB in 2026/27?โ€ Nick LoPiccolo โ€” August 11, 2025 โ€” 535 Views โ€œYes, of course, that wouldnโ€™t mean the end for AEW. It would make navigating their media rights deal more challenging, I would guess. But this is a hypothetical scenario & I do not believe anyone is paying $7.7b for UFC or a $40b valuation for WB w/ how do we fuck AEW, either.โ€ Nick LoPiccolo โ€” August 11, 2025 โ€œAnd hearing all weekend Paramount is still interested in WBD.โ€ Nick LoPiccolo โ€” August 11, 2025 โ€” 1.3K Views โ€œI think more interesting for what it could mean as the dominoes keep falling in terms of the still evolving landscape. The deals are massive & the number of major players at the top are shrinking as still big push for consolidation & scale.โ€ Nick LoPiccolo โ€” August 11, 2025 โ€” 12:11 PM โ€” 2,588 Views โ€œAnd Iโ€™d view AAA on Google/YouTube as directly competitive. It targets both the CMLL collab & the audience that used to watch AEW Dark on YouTube, & WWE is able to send well known stars to AAA events with an eye towards converting more of the younger, YouTube demo of viewers who donโ€™t watch streamers.โ€ again: august 11. not yesterday. not after dave meltzer tweeted a netflix prelim number. not after anyone had to retrofit the argument. the point was already there: the major players at the top were shrinking, paramount was still interested in wbd, paramount was likely off the board for aew because of the tko deal, google / youtube was becoming directly competitive for the exact audience aew used to reach through dark, and the buyer universe was consolidating around deals much bigger than tony khanโ€™s feelings. this was not mysticism. this was not inside baseball for the sake of sounding smart. this was the board. Nick LoPiccolo โ€” August 24, 2025 โ€œThis isnโ€™t fair. I misread your question. AEW will exist but likely on the Discovery Global app (if it ever launches, I would bet that it doesnโ€™t) and it will continue to do consistent ratings. If Paramount/Skydance buys WBD in a yearโ€ฆโ€ Nick LoPiccolo โ€” September 4, 2025 โ€” 76 Views โ€œNo, thatโ€™s the WBD network division (cable, news, sports) that was already announced as being spun off under Discovery Global. The article youโ€™re citing is about them selling a minority equity stake in that unit to cut debt and boost valuation ahead of the 2026 split.โ€ Nick LoPiccolo โ€” September 16, 2025 โ€” 3.6K Views โ€œThis is not just about Hollywood scale. It is the foundation of a conservative aligned media infrastructure. A Paramount/WBD merger would fold CBS, CNN, HBO, and Warner Bros IP into Ellisonโ€™s orbit under Trumpโ€™s regulatory umbrella.โ€ Nick LoPiccolo โ€” September 16, 2025 โ€” 11K Views โ€œWithin 48 hours of the rumor, WBD stock surged ~55% and Paramount Skydance rose ~24%. That market response itself boxed David Zaslav in; his board, Wall Street, and his own contract now expect movement.โ€ Nick LoPiccolo โ€” September 27, 2025 โ€” 12:16 PM โ€” 3,516 Views โ€œNah homie. Enjoy watching the show on YouTube after Ellison buys WBD and Ari who is advising Ellison and used to represent Trump and runs TKO makes the call.โ€ Nick LoPiccolo โ€” September 28, 2025 โ€” 174 Views โ€œI believe if and when Paramount acquires WBD, TKO will push to lock down a monopoly on combat sports. The long knives are already out for competitors, and the rights deals have likely been spread around town precisely to keep rivals from signing with those streamers.โ€ none of that was random. paramount / skydance, ellison, ari, tko, wbd linear assets, youtube, aaa, the tko deal, the wbd split, the shrinking rights buyer universe โ€” all of it was one connected domestic rights architecture. that is why this conversation was always over the heads of the people screaming โ€œcopeโ€ in my replies. they were arguing like fans. i was reading the cap table. Nick LoPiccolo โ€” December 6, 2025 โ€” 3:07 PM โ€” 41.4K Views โ€œYes, I always believed Paramount would walk away with WBD. I was one of the first to talk about it on here, even if I wasnโ€™t the first to hear it. The Paramount Skydance acquisition closed on August 7. I posted this on August 11, about 1 month before the The Wall Street Journal first broke the news on September 12 that Paramount Skydance was preparing a bid for WBD.โ€ Nick LoPiccolo โ€” December 6, 2025 โ€” 3:07 PM โ€” 41.4K Views โ€œThe bid was always going to be hostile. We are only in this process because it was a hostile bid. Most people in Hollywood believed Ellison long coveted WB and Jack Warnerโ€™s chair. WB was not for sale when Skydance acquired Paramount, which is much smaller in scale.โ€ Nick LoPiccolo โ€” December 6, 2025 โ€” 3:07 PM โ€” 41.4K Views โ€œNearly everyone in town assumed an Ellison acquisition of WBD was inevitable until the Netflix bid shocked everyone. Signs were there for the last two weeks, which is also when I stopped posting about what might happen. Of course, its not over yet. Paramount still has paths to winning this acquisition. The one thing thatโ€™s for certain though is an Ellison-led acquisition of WBD is no longer inevitable.โ€ Nick LoPiccolo โ€” December 8, 2025 โ€œEND CREDITSโ€ space jam is a warner bros. movie. that was the joke. and the joke was the same thing i had been saying the whole time: paramount was winning the bid, for those who did not understand. Nick LoPiccolo โ€” December 19, 2025 โ€” 4:30 PM โ€” 828 Views โ€œHere is another reference to it. So tell me how exactly is Paramount the better outcome for Daveโ€™s argument? Netflix doesnโ€™t touch the WBD linear assets. Gunnar keeps his SpinCo.โ€ Puck excerpt โ€” December 19, 2025 โ€œMany industry insiders are also skeptical about Paramountโ€™s seven-year, $7.7 billion deal for exclusive UFC rights in the U.S. Yes, it can be read as a signal that Ellison came to play. But some people see it more as Ari Emanuel having his way with the person to whom he is ostensibly an (unpaid) advisorโ€ฆโ€ that is the board. that is the relationship map. that is the thing wrestling media either does not understand or pretends not to understand, because understanding it means admitting the story is not โ€œaew has leverage.โ€ the story is that aew is sitting in the middle of a consolidating rights marketplace where the people with leverage are doing much bigger things than worrying about tony khanโ€™s feelings. Nick LoPiccolo โ€” January 21, 2026 โ€” 4:22 PM โ€” 870 Views โ€œi mean get ready to learn youtube buddyโ€ Nick LoPiccolo โ€” February 19, 2026 โ€” 2.8K Views โ€œParamount was always my bet to acquire Warner Bros. Never wavered.โ€ Nick LoPiccolo โ€” February 28, 2026 โ€” 1:27 PM โ€” 118 Views โ€œyou donโ€™t need to look under a hood I AM SAYING THE QUIET PART OUT LOUD ๐Ÿšจ๐Ÿšจ๐Ÿšจ๐Ÿšจ๐Ÿšจ I BEEN SAYING IT SINCE JULY / AUGUST ๐Ÿšจ๐Ÿšจ๐Ÿšจ๐Ÿšจ๐Ÿšจ PARAMOUNT IS COMING FOR WBD AEW WILL LOSE A TV DEAL ๐Ÿšจ๐Ÿšจ๐Ÿšจ๐Ÿšจ๐Ÿšจ GUESS WHO WAS RIGHT ๐Ÿ’€โ€ so no, this is not hindsight. this is not showing up after the fact with a flashlight and pretending i discovered the body. this is a paper trail. february: youtube is not a real rights model unless google is cutting the check. april: wbd passed back in august, the myaew app is not realistic, paramount is not real for aew, cw / roku is off the table, amazon and fox do not want aew, and google / youtube is the only distributor left that makes sense. july: the $185 million number is inflated and aew is not leverage. august: the buyer board is shrinking, paramount is still interested in wbd, and google / youtube becomes directly competitive. september: paramount / wbd folds the board into ellisonโ€™s orbit, and if ellison buys wbd, enjoy youtube. december: paramount was always the bet, the bid was always going to be hostile, and netflix does not solve dave meltzerโ€™s argument because netflix does not touch the linear assets. january: get ready to learn youtube. february: paramount is coming for wbd and aew will lose a tv deal. same board. same thesis. same answer. now here is the part tony khan and dave meltzer do not want to say out loud. tony khan and dave meltzer do not mention me publicly for a reason. because the second they say my name out loud, they admit where this conversation has actually been coming from. not wwe. not some anonymous โ€œhigh level official.โ€ not some shadowy tko whisper campaign. me. that is the problem for them. behind the scenes, ask any real insider what happens when my name comes up around this subject. there is a reaction. not because iโ€™m magic. not because iโ€™m some internet boogeyman. because they know exactly who is saying it, why iโ€™m saying it, what rooms i have been in, what companies i have dealt with, what executives i have spoken to, and why the analysis keeps landing. that is why they keep trying to non-person me publicly while reacting to me privately. they want the argument. they want the benefit of responding to the argument. they just do not want to admit whose argument it is. when i said wbd told aew back in august 2025 they were not exercising the option for the fourth year, tony khan blew up behind the scenes and forced john mcmullen to revise / update his article 2-3 weeks ago after i tweeted it. which is hilarious because that should not even be crazy or damaging โ€œnews.โ€ that is how this business works. when a distributor is not continuing, they tell you early enough so you have time to find a new home. that is not sabotage. that is not wwe. that is not nick lopiccolo hiding inside david zaslavโ€™s air vents with a clipboard. that is corporate courtesy. wbd execs privately whisper and shake their heads at tony khanโ€™s behavior because their view is very simple: why does tony khan act like everything is great and rainbows and sunshine with the studio? we told tony khan as a courtesy so tony khan would have time to find a new home. and no, this has zero to do with paramount looming as an excuse. paramount did not even make its first hostile bid for wbd until september 11 or 12. that was after tony khan was already told there would not be a wbd renewal. so what did tony khan do? tony khan turned the truth into a wrestling angle. tony khan, or one of tony khanโ€™s minions, gets dave meltzer to drop a story assigning my claims and what i have been publicly posting about tony khan to โ€œhigh level wwe officials.โ€ why? because it gives tony khan a safer enemy. tony khan does not want the story to be the actual timeline. because the actual timeline is brutal. on february 28, i said youtube was not a real media rights model unless google was actually cutting the check and underwriting production. on april 30, i said wbd passed in august, the myaew app was not realistic, paramount was not real for aew, cw / roku was off the table, amazon and fox did not want aew, and the only distributor left that made sense was google / youtube. on july 9, i said no one in hollywood believed the $185 million number. on july 10, i said aew was not leverage. on august 11, i said the major players at the top were shrinking, paramount was still interested in wbd, and google / youtube was becoming a directly competitive lane. on september 16, i said a paramount / wbd merger would fold cbs, cnn, hbo, and warner bros. ip into ellisonโ€™s orbit. on september 27, i said enjoy the show on youtube after ellison buys wbd. on september 28, i said if paramount acquires wbd, tko would push to lock down a monopoly on combat sports. on december 6, i said paramount skydance was preparing a bid for wbd long before most people admitted the obvious. on february 19, i said paramount was always my bet to acquire warner bros. and on february 28, i said it in all caps: paramount is coming for wbd. aew will lose a tv deal. that is the part tony khan cannot answer directly, because the direct answer means admitting this was never โ€œwwe is scared of us.โ€ it was always the board closing. tony khan wants the story to be: why would wwe say this about us? that is the laundering operation. take my public analysis. run it through dave meltzer. assign it to wwe / tko. then let tony khan answer a canned question on a media call with very little distribution about potentially having very little distribution. a media call for a show with very little distribution answering a canned question about aew potentially having very little distribution. based on a planted story, from a planted messenger, with a rehearsed answer, after an roh show maybe 8-15k people watched. a pr flack probably wrote it. tony khan performs hurt. tony khan says โ€œi donโ€™t know why wwe wouldโ€ฆโ€ tony khan denies the obvious. tony khan keeps me minimized. tony khan removes me from the public conversation about the very thing i have repeatedly said is going to happen to aew. everyone is supposed to pretend this is organic. it is the most bubble wrapped, manufactured, artificial environment possible. a canned and rehearsed answer at an roh media scrum about a planted dave meltzer story based on my very real and very public analysis of the media rights board. but make no mistake. tony khan was responding to my words. tony khan just laundered them through dave meltzer and assigned them to wwe / tko so tony khan could keep lying about it publicly without ever saying my name. and now, voila. dave meltzer is posting about youtube viewers and prelims. Dave Meltzer โ€” May 16, 2026 โ€œAt this moment there are 340,000 people watching prelims for Netflix on YouTube. Itโ€™s a good number.โ€ yes, dave meltzer. youtube can have good numbers. nobody said youtube cannot have good numbers. that was never the issue. the issue is whether youtube is being used as a funnel into a premium rights ecosystem or as a substitute because the premium rights ecosystem rejected you. that is the difference. that has always been the difference. netflix using youtube prelims as audience acquisition is not the same thing as aew trying to spin youtube as a media rights home because the real buyers are gone. ufc using youtube as a funnel is not the same thing as aew using youtube as a life raft. wwe sending stars to aaa on youtube to convert a younger demo is not the same thing as aew retreating to youtube after the traditional buyer board closes. and the fact that dave meltzer is now suddenly tweeting like the mayor of youtube is the punchline. because the same people who mocked the youtube outcome are now going to spend the next several months explaining why youtube is actually good. of course it can be good. for the right use case. for the right property. inside the right architecture. with the right check attached. but when you spend two years telling everyone you were valued like raw and your next stop is โ€œplease subscribe and smash that bell,โ€ maybe stop pretending this is victory formation? i told yโ€™all where this was going. the record is right there. iโ€™m still right. and tony and dave: you guys are see through translucent. thatโ€™s it for ye ๐ŸŽค๐ŸŽค๐ŸŽค

Nick LoPiccolo

99,106 views โ€ข 3 months ago

โš ๏ธAvis sincรจre requis ! ๐Ÿฅฐ Bon, mauvais, sarcastique ou รฉpique : je prends tout. Pour fรชter mes 20 000 abonnรฉs, j'ai crรฉรฉ ce clip, une faรงon diffรฉrente de marquer le coup. Le "comment" est juste en dessous, sinon, profitez juste : j'y ai mis รฉnormรฉment de cล“ur. MERCI ! โค๏ธ ๐ŸŽฌMAKING OF โ€“ SATAN Lโ€™HABITE ๐ŸŽฌ Pourquoi Satan ? (Parce que la vรฉritรฉ brรปle, apparemment) On va mettre les points sur les "i" et les cornes sur le front tout de suite. Certains se demandent pourquoi jโ€™ai choisi cet alter ego cornu en costume trois-piรจces. Cโ€™est une mรฉtaphore filรฉe, les amis. Dans le marรฉcage de ๐•, quand tu dรฉbarques avec des sources, des faits et une rigueur dโ€™horloger pour dรฉmonter une thรฉorie fumeuse, tu n'es pas perรงu comme un porteur de lumiรจre. Pour celui dont tu viens de piรฉtiner le "doudou" (cette petite croyance confortable qui le rassure), tu es lโ€™Adversaire. Tu es celui qui vient perturber son sommeil dogmatique avec cette insolence quโ€™on appelle la rรฉalitรฉ. Alors, jโ€™ai fini par me dire : "Ok, si pour vous la vรฉritรฉ est diabolique, alors appelez-moi Satan." J'ai donc crรฉรฉ cet avatar pour incarner ce rรดle avec une ironie รฉlรฉgante. Cโ€™est quand mรชme plus fun de dรฉbunker en รฉtant le Boss Final du scepticisme quโ€™en jouant les enfants de chล“ur, non ? La plume : Quand le clavier saigne des vรฉritรฉs Le texte de ce rap, je ne l'ai pas pondu entre deux gorgรฉes de cafรฉ tiรจde. Il vient de mes tripes, de ma plume, pas dโ€™IA derriรจre ces mots, et il est le condensรฉ de ce que je hurle (calmement, mais fermement) ici depuis des mois. Il s'appuie sur mes deux "manifestes" que vous connaissez peut-รชtre : 1. L'Anatomie du dialogue de sourds (billet รฉpinglรฉ ร  mon compte) : J'y explique que dรฉbattre avec un complotiste convaincu, c'est comme jouer aux รฉchecs avec un pigeon. Il va renverser les piรจces, chier sur l'รฉchiquier et se pavaner comme s'il avait gagnรฉ. Mon rap s'adresse aux 90%: ceux qui lisent en silence, qui doutent lรฉgitimement, et pour qui je continue de dresser cette barriรจre de sรฉcuritรฉ intellectuelle. 2. La Table est Bleue : Cโ€™est ma rรจgle dโ€™or. Si un fait est bleu, je ne dirai jamais quโ€™il est noir pour caresser l'ego de qui que ce soit. Ma plume est un scalpel, pas un pinceau ร  maquillage. Le clip cรฉlรจbre cette intransigeance. Le drame vocal : De Pavarotti ร  la PLS Passons aux coulisses, et lร , on entre dans la zone de l'autodรฉrision pure. On s'est chauffรฉs avec mon alliรฉ Gem pour crรฉer une instru qui tabasse sur Suno. On a brainstormรฉ des prompts jusqu'ร  obtenir ce son lourd, sombre et percutant. Jusque-lร , tout allait bien. Le problรจme, cโ€™est quand jโ€™ai dรป poser ma voix. Dans ma tรชte, sous la douche, je suis un mรฉlange de rappeur US et de dieu du stade. J'ai le flow, j'ai la voix, j'ai l'aura. Mais quand j'ai appuyรฉ sur "Record" et que j'ai rรฉรฉcoutรฉ le rรฉsultat... comment dire ? Le micro est un objet froid, cruel et sans aucun remords. Il m'a renvoyรฉ une rรฉalitรฉ que j'aurais prรฉfรฉrรฉ ignorer. J'ai eu envie de me mettre en PLS sous mon bureau pour le restant de mes jours. Mais comme je suis un acharnรฉ, on a sorti l'artillerie lourde pour transformer la catastrophe en quelque chose de potable. Sous la supervision technique de Gem, on a fait de la chirurgie esthรฉtique sonore : ๐Ÿ”น Melodyne 5 Essentialpour remettre les notes lร  oรน elles auraient dรป รชtre (un travail de titan). ๐Ÿ”น Soundtoys Decapitatorpour ajouter du grain et de la saturation (parce que le "sale" cache bien la misรจre). ๐Ÿ”น Universal Audio 1176 pour donner du punch et faire croire que j'ai rรฉellement du coffre. Bref, j'ai bricolรฉ ma voix comme je rรจgle un tourbillon : avec patience et beaucoup de filtres. Le marathon visuel : Le supplice de la 10รจme seconde Si vous pensez qu'il suffit d'appuyer sur un bouton pour sortir un clip pareil, dรฉtrompez-vous. Cโ€™est un travail dโ€™orfรจvre numรฉrique qui nous a pris un temps de dingue. Le scรฉnario รฉtait calรฉ au poil de cul prรจs. On voulait que chaque plan raconte quelque chose : Satan dans son fauteuil, Satan qui pousse un doudou, qui manipule des rouages... Notre mรฉthode ? Un enfer de prรฉcision : 1. On part de lโ€™image de base de mon avatar pour garder une cohรฉrence physique (les cornes, les lunettes, le costume). 2. Gem me gรฉnรจre le prompt parfait pour Grok pour un segment de 10 secondes maximum. Pourquoi 10s ? Car cโ€™est la limite max imposรฉ par Grok. 3. Une fois la vidรฉo gรฉnรฉrรฉe, je lโ€™importe dans Adobe Premiere Pro, je la cale sur le beat. 4. Et cโ€™est lร  que รงa devient drรดle : je fais un screenshot de la toute derniรจre frame de la vidรฉo. Je redonne cette image ร  Gem pour quโ€™il ajuste le prompt suivant afin que Grok reparte de cette base exacte. On a fait รงa, boucle aprรจs boucle, pour que la transition soit la plus fluide possible et que Satan garde la mรชme tรชte du dรฉbut ร  la fin (on utilise dโ€™ailleurs une image de rรฉfรฉrence de Satan, qui le prรฉsente sous tous les angles). Cโ€™est de lโ€™artisanat hybride, une lutte permanente contre lโ€™entropie de lโ€™algorithme pour quโ€™il respecte mon storyboard. Le mot de la fin Ce clip, cโ€™est ma faรงon de marquer ces 20 000 abonnรฉs. Cโ€™est beaucoup de sueur, รฉnormรฉment de cafรฉ, et une dose massive de passion. Cโ€™est une cรฉlรฉbration du sarcasme qui rรฉveille, de la rigueur qui pique et de la libertรฉ de penser sans doudou. Merci ร  tous ceux qui sont lร  pour les faits, pour le rire et pour les dรฉbats musclรฉs. On continue de rรฉgler le tourbillon de la rรฉalitรฉ. La table est bleue, elle le restera, et Satan... bah il l'habite bien. Allez, je retourne au clavier, des dรฉbunks mโ€™attendent et jโ€™ai un gros paquet de sel ร  liquiderโ€ฆ ๐ŸฅฐMERCI POUR VOS RETOURS ! ๐Ÿค˜๐Ÿ”ฅ

Pourton.info

11,300 views โ€ข 3 months ago