Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

𝐂𝐀𝐑𝐃𝐎𝐒𝐎 𝐏𝐔𝐋𝐋𝐒 𝐎𝐔𝐓 𝐇𝐈𝐒 𝐏𝐇𝐎𝐍𝐄: 𝐎𝐅𝐅𝐒𝐈𝐃𝐄 𝐃𝐈𝐒𝐏𝐔𝐓𝐄! 📲👆 Mamelodi Sundowns coach Miguel Cardoso claims Ashley Du Preez's decisive second goal for Kaizer Chiefs – the strike that ended their Nedbank Cup hopes – was offside. He even used his phone to display photographic evidence. #FARPost

FARPostZA's profile picture

FARPost_ZA

251,330 subscribers

14,228 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

8 Yorum

Dr Validat⭕R365 |✌🏾❤️ profil fotoğrafı
Dr Validat⭕R365 |✌🏾❤️1 yıl önce

It seems he is not aware of the history...

Family♣️♦️♠️Man profil fotoğrafı
Family♣️♦️♠️Man1 yıl önce

He can pull out a gun, We dont care..

Estadio Deportes profil fotoğrafı
Estadio Deportes1 yıl önce

NUEVO RAYO ⚡️ Johan Rojas es oficialmente nuevo refuerzo del Necaxa, el jugador llega a préstamo procedente de Rayados y deja libre el espacio de un jugador no formado en México. 😬 ¿Será por la llegada de Ramos? 👀 #LIgaMX #Necaxa #Rayados

THENELSON04🎙️🌟 profil fotoğrafı
THENELSON04🎙️🌟1 yıl önce

We going to that Final!!😤🔥

Lephalale's Finest profil fotoğrafı
Lephalale's Finest1 yıl önce

We are happy to benefit they have been benefiting for long😂😂😂

Family♣️♦️♠️Man profil fotoğrafı
Family♣️♦️♠️Man1 yıl önce

He can pull out a gun, We dont care..

Lesiba profil fotoğrafı
Lesiba1 yıl önce

No offside

Tlou Letebele 🐘 profil fotoğrafı
Tlou Letebele 🐘1 yıl önce

Knowing Sundowns cry babies, this will hurt them for the next 50 years 🙁🙁

Benzer Videolar

𝐂𝐚𝐫𝐝𝐨𝐬𝐨 𝐁𝐫𝐢𝐧𝐠𝐬 𝐇𝐢𝐬 𝐏𝐡𝐨𝐧𝐞 📲: 𝐈𝐭 𝐖𝐚𝐬 𝐎𝐟𝐟𝐬𝐢𝐝𝐞 👆 Mamelodi Sundowns Head Coach Miguel Cardoso says the 2nd goal of Kaizer Chiefs was offside He brought his cellphone 📱 & showed images. 👆 #Sundowns #KaizerChiefs #Nabi #Offside #NedbankCup2025 👆
0:48

𝐂𝐚𝐫𝐝𝐨𝐬𝐨 𝐁𝐫𝐢𝐧𝐠𝐬 𝐇𝐢𝐬 𝐏𝐡𝐨𝐧𝐞 📲: 𝐈𝐭 𝐖𝐚𝐬 𝐎𝐟𝐟𝐬𝐢𝐝𝐞 👆 Mamelodi Sundowns Head Coach Miguel Cardoso says the 2nd goal of Kaizer Chiefs was offside He brought his cellphone 📱 & showed images. 👆 #Sundowns #KaizerChiefs #Nabi #Offside #NedbankCup2025 👆

Karabo Selebalo Phasha

126,660 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

MIGUEL CARDOSO We were robbed of a chance to win the Nedbank Cup in 2025 The trophy was given to people who cheated their way through Kaizer Chiefs was getting dodgy decisions [the 1981 way] to make them win that trophy We lost because of a dodgy 1 metre offside decision. [Cardoso is right. Chiefs must be ashamed of themselves for having Kaizer Chiefs fans who are referees]
2:46

MIGUEL CARDOSO We were robbed of a chance to win the Nedbank Cup in 2025 The trophy was given to people who cheated their way through Kaizer Chiefs was getting dodgy decisions [the 1981 way] to make them win that trophy We lost because of a dodgy 1 metre offside decision. [Cardoso is right. Chiefs must be ashamed of themselves for having Kaizer Chiefs fans who are referees]

Constitution First 🇿🇦

35,625 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

🚨 THE EVIDENCE MAKGOPA "GHOST GOAL" AUDIT: WAS HE OFFSIDE? No, Evidence Makgopa was ONSIDE in this specific buildup. Once again, I used VAR Sytem like to analyze Pirates Sibelebele's Goal which was correct, no Offside. THE "LOCKED IN" REALITY CHECK: THE POSITIONING: In this video, you can see the moment the ball is played toward the edge of the box. Look at Aden McCarthy and Given Msimango (the yellow jerseys). Makgopa is actually positioned behind the ball and level with the second-to-last defender as the cross comes in. The "Special Rule" here is the timing of the run—he stayed in the "Brain" of the defense perfectly. THE EQUALIZER FACTOR: This exact phase of play led to the 75th-minute equalizer by Kamogelo Sebelebele. While Makgopa was the "Thunder" target for the cross, the ball actually fell to Sebelebele after a partial clearance/block. Since Makgopa was onside during the initial pass, the goal was 100% "Masterpiece" legal. THE APPOLLIS CONFUSION: Don't let the "Wind" of the earlier controversy fool you! Many fans are confusing this with the Oswin Appollis goal that was correctly ruled offside in the 19th minute. Makgopa’s positioning throughout the second half was "Locked In" and clinical. THE "PHANTOM" WAS LEGAL. Makgopa might be the "Grootman" of scoring against Chiefs, but in this specific picture and the video, he played by the rules to "Fix The Country" of the scoreline. The goal stood, the points were shared, and the "Project 2026" title race just got even more "Thunder"ous! 🔥 KHOSI NATION & THE GHOST, now that the "Brain" data confirms Makgopa was onside for the equalizer buildup, do you think Chiefs’ defense "dribbled" themselves by dropping too deep, or was the Pirates' pressure simply too "Locked In" to stop? 🇿🇦🤔💭 #EvidenceMakgopa #SowetoDerby #OffsideAudit
1:17

🚨 THE EVIDENCE MAKGOPA "GHOST GOAL" AUDIT: WAS HE OFFSIDE? No, Evidence Makgopa was ONSIDE in this specific buildup. Once again, I used VAR Sytem like to analyze Pirates Sibelebele's Goal which was correct, no Offside. THE "LOCKED IN" REALITY CHECK: THE POSITIONING: In this video, you can see the moment the ball is played toward the edge of the box. Look at Aden McCarthy and Given Msimango (the yellow jerseys). Makgopa is actually positioned behind the ball and level with the second-to-last defender as the cross comes in. The "Special Rule" here is the timing of the run—he stayed in the "Brain" of the defense perfectly. THE EQUALIZER FACTOR: This exact phase of play led to the 75th-minute equalizer by Kamogelo Sebelebele. While Makgopa was the "Thunder" target for the cross, the ball actually fell to Sebelebele after a partial clearance/block. Since Makgopa was onside during the initial pass, the goal was 100% "Masterpiece" legal. THE APPOLLIS CONFUSION: Don't let the "Wind" of the earlier controversy fool you! Many fans are confusing this with the Oswin Appollis goal that was correctly ruled offside in the 19th minute. Makgopa’s positioning throughout the second half was "Locked In" and clinical. THE "PHANTOM" WAS LEGAL. Makgopa might be the "Grootman" of scoring against Chiefs, but in this specific picture and the video, he played by the rules to "Fix The Country" of the scoreline. The goal stood, the points were shared, and the "Project 2026" title race just got even more "Thunder"ous! 🔥 KHOSI NATION & THE GHOST, now that the "Brain" data confirms Makgopa was onside for the equalizer buildup, do you think Chiefs’ defense "dribbled" themselves by dropping too deep, or was the Pirates' pressure simply too "Locked In" to stop? 🇿🇦🤔💭 #EvidenceMakgopa #SowetoDerby #OffsideAudit

MrksPSLClub

17,913 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

What do we know so far about Zimbabwe’s Information Minister, Mr Jenfran Muswere’s Jenfan Muswere, fake qualifications? He claims that he has a PhD in ICT, Performance, Corporate Governance, and Public Management and another one in Strategic Mining PPP Investments. He also claims to have an MBA in International Trade but refuses to name the university that bestowed the degree. He first lied that he had a PhD from Chinhoyi University (Zimbabwe), then changed the story, claiming it was from a nameless South African university. All South African universities have no record of his name, and there is no trace of a doctoral dissertation linked to this supposed PhD. He also claims to have a second PhD from the National University of Science and Technology (NUST Zimbabwe). He got a Zimbabwean academic to do the work in exchange for appointing her to the NetOne board during his time as ICT Minister. NUST is so embarrassed by this academic fraud that they will not release his PhD thesis. Even President Mnangagwa was reportedly upset when he realised how the bogus qualification had been produced after he had already capped him. There is no record of a PhD defence panel, nor is there any evidence of the work he supposedly produced for this so-called second PhD. Insiders at the university (NUST) are saying the university is worried about the scandal and how it will delegitimise its genuine former students and their qualifications! Journalists have hit a brick wall with the spokesperson of NUST, Tabani Mpofu, who used to work for Mr Jenfran Muswere—he refuses to answer questions. Mr Jenfran Muswere’s Wikipedia page was re-edited last night when demands for him to release documentary evidence of his qualifications went public! Google scholar has no record of any of these bogus PhDs. It says; “A search on Google Scholar for “Jenfran Muswere” did not yield any results, indicating that there are no academic publications or citations associated with this name on the platform. This absence suggests a lack of publicly available scholarly work attributed to him.” There is no trace of his work or thesis in the institutional repository of NUST.
2:20

What do we know so far about Zimbabwe’s Information Minister, Mr Jenfran Muswere’s Jenfan Muswere, fake qualifications? He claims that he has a PhD in ICT, Performance, Corporate Governance, and Public Management and another one in Strategic Mining PPP Investments. He also claims to have an MBA in International Trade but refuses to name the university that bestowed the degree. He first lied that he had a PhD from Chinhoyi University (Zimbabwe), then changed the story, claiming it was from a nameless South African university. All South African universities have no record of his name, and there is no trace of a doctoral dissertation linked to this supposed PhD. He also claims to have a second PhD from the National University of Science and Technology (NUST Zimbabwe). He got a Zimbabwean academic to do the work in exchange for appointing her to the NetOne board during his time as ICT Minister. NUST is so embarrassed by this academic fraud that they will not release his PhD thesis. Even President Mnangagwa was reportedly upset when he realised how the bogus qualification had been produced after he had already capped him. There is no record of a PhD defence panel, nor is there any evidence of the work he supposedly produced for this so-called second PhD. Insiders at the university (NUST) are saying the university is worried about the scandal and how it will delegitimise its genuine former students and their qualifications! Journalists have hit a brick wall with the spokesperson of NUST, Tabani Mpofu, who used to work for Mr Jenfran Muswere—he refuses to answer questions. Mr Jenfran Muswere’s Wikipedia page was re-edited last night when demands for him to release documentary evidence of his qualifications went public! Google scholar has no record of any of these bogus PhDs. It says; “A search on Google Scholar for “Jenfran Muswere” did not yield any results, indicating that there are no academic publications or citations associated with this name on the platform. This absence suggests a lack of publicly available scholarly work attributed to him.” There is no trace of his work or thesis in the institutional repository of NUST.

Hopewell Chin’ono

153,446 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Njabulo Blom🔝 Quality player at Kaizer Chiefs❤️✌🏾 ■ How are we struggling for options in midfield? We can't even get Blom to enjoy football? ■ A match unfit Blom is still better than what we partner Cele with constantly there. ■ This boy doesn't want to play RB. Worse, he knows, and we know he's better than our preferred 6s. ■ How does he stay inspired when he's undervalued? We need to be less emotional and pick the best possible 11 with what we have before complaining about lack of quality. ■ Blom can't even have 2 starts because we have the coaches' favorite sons who deserve to play even when they offer nothing! ▪︎ The fans end up hating their own players because the coach forces them into the team even when they aren't helping the team. ■ Ntwari was kept until fans hated him. We could see he's struggling to adapt, but many still believed in him. Instead of limiting his game time in the early days until he adapted, the coach kept him there until fans started to see Ntwari as the only problem, he wasn't protected and now with Bvuma leaking, we can't look at Ntwari with the hope and positively we had in pre-season. ▪︎ Yet, Ntwari will go to his national team next week and pull world-class saves. ■ Same as Lilepo, he can be off for 60 minutes and just show up in a few moments but he will stay in the field, because once the coach trusts you, he doesn't want you to stay a second out even when you're not showing up. The only motivated player currently is Yusuf Maart because he doesn't even need a good performance to be preferred in this team. We need less emotional decisions, more tactical decisions, and support for these players. Let these boys know that a good performance will earn you a place in the team. Not being loved by the coach when you're not adding any quality to our game📝
1:47

Njabulo Blom🔝 Quality player at Kaizer Chiefs❤️✌🏾 ■ How are we struggling for options in midfield? We can't even get Blom to enjoy football? ■ A match unfit Blom is still better than what we partner Cele with constantly there. ■ This boy doesn't want to play RB. Worse, he knows, and we know he's better than our preferred 6s. ■ How does he stay inspired when he's undervalued? We need to be less emotional and pick the best possible 11 with what we have before complaining about lack of quality. ■ Blom can't even have 2 starts because we have the coaches' favorite sons who deserve to play even when they offer nothing! ▪︎ The fans end up hating their own players because the coach forces them into the team even when they aren't helping the team. ■ Ntwari was kept until fans hated him. We could see he's struggling to adapt, but many still believed in him. Instead of limiting his game time in the early days until he adapted, the coach kept him there until fans started to see Ntwari as the only problem, he wasn't protected and now with Bvuma leaking, we can't look at Ntwari with the hope and positively we had in pre-season. ▪︎ Yet, Ntwari will go to his national team next week and pull world-class saves. ■ Same as Lilepo, he can be off for 60 minutes and just show up in a few moments but he will stay in the field, because once the coach trusts you, he doesn't want you to stay a second out even when you're not showing up. The only motivated player currently is Yusuf Maart because he doesn't even need a good performance to be preferred in this team. We need less emotional decisions, more tactical decisions, and support for these players. Let these boys know that a good performance will earn you a place in the team. Not being loved by the coach when you're not adding any quality to our game📝

El Capitano⚪

19,813 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Player Profile: Khanyisa Mayo[27]📝 Position: RW/RF/CF Foot: Left Club: Kaizer Chiefs FC Kaizer Chiefs has made another bold move in adding quality to the teams attack. Khanyisa Mayo provides immediate and long-term attacking solutions for the club on the right. 1. Technical Qualities Mayo is a skillful, left-footed attacker with a profile built for modern, high-intensity attacking football. ■ A very direct winger, always looking to advance play instead of recycling possession. ■ Excellent at carrying the ball through pressure, breaking lines, and forcing defenders into retreat. ■ His dribbling and progressive runs add verticality to the team’s attacking structure. Shooting and Passing: ■ Strong shooting range when cutting inside from the right. He provides that unpredictability to the attack with his quality to strike the ball from range. Consistently attempts to feed the box: goals, assists, and key passes. A finisher and creator between the lines. Positional Versatility: ■ In a 4-3-3/4-2-3-1, his best role is as the right forward or right winger, cutting inside to shoot or combine. He can also be effective stretching play and still carry goal threat and creativity. ■ As a No. 9: While not his best role, he is capable of leading the line. He uses his pace to run in behind. He can compete but lacks the physicality to hold off defenders, though his finishing is good. ■ As a Second Striker[442]: A role that plays better to his strengths than as a 9. He is comfortable operating between the lines, combining with midfielders and a traditional box striker. His mobility, creativity, and shooting ability allow him to function as the link player, collecting the ball, supporting the primary striker, and creating or finishing opportunities. This ability to operate both wide and centrally makes him tactically flexible, giving Chiefs options in various attacking structures. 2. Physical Attributes ■ Pace & Explosiveness: Quick acceleration makes him a constant outlet for balls in behind. ■ Strength & Balance: He is strong enough to hold off fullbacks, sustaining attacking sequences under pressure ■ High Intensity: Matches the tempo of Chiefs’ pressing and counter-pressing game. We do most actions with a lot of intensity, and his explosive nature will be very much welcomed in our attack. 3. Tactical Fit at Chiefs Under Coach Nabi, Chiefs are shaping into a side that plays with directness, intensity, and aggression across all phases of play: ■ Pressing & Counter-Pressing: The team applies immediate pressure after losing the ball. Mayo’s speed, defensive work rate, and forward momentum align seamlessly with this system. ■ High-Tempo Attacking: Chiefs don’t rely on slow possession. Attacks are vertical, sharp, and quick. Mayo’s instinct to drive forward, dribble at defenders, and attack space makes him an ideal fit. ■ Attacking Personality: His ability to provide not just progression but also the final goal, final pass, and decisive action elevates Chiefs’ attacking efficiency. Mayo’s game is inherently aligned with protagonist football: high tempo, forward intent, and productivity. 4. Experiential Value ■ Continental Experience: Spent a season in Algeria with CR Belouizdad, scoring 6 goals from wide positions. Notable not just for the numbers but for adapting to a challenging cultural and tactical environment. ■ Tactical Growth: North African teams are disciplined and organized, with compact defenses and structured pressing. Mayo sharpened his decision-making, spatial awareness, and ability to operate against tight blocks, preparing him for high-level CAF competitions. ■ Mentality: At 27, he blends maturity with hunger. His willingness to take risks reflects confidence and attacking intent. Yet to reach his peak, now is the perfect time to step up, showing the quality glimpsed at Cape Town City. Mayo joins Chiefs as both a system player and a game-changer. A top signing by the Glamour Boys! 📝
2:00

Player Profile: Khanyisa Mayo[27]📝 Position: RW/RF/CF Foot: Left Club: Kaizer Chiefs FC Kaizer Chiefs has made another bold move in adding quality to the teams attack. Khanyisa Mayo provides immediate and long-term attacking solutions for the club on the right. 1. Technical Qualities Mayo is a skillful, left-footed attacker with a profile built for modern, high-intensity attacking football. ■ A very direct winger, always looking to advance play instead of recycling possession. ■ Excellent at carrying the ball through pressure, breaking lines, and forcing defenders into retreat. ■ His dribbling and progressive runs add verticality to the team’s attacking structure. Shooting and Passing: ■ Strong shooting range when cutting inside from the right. He provides that unpredictability to the attack with his quality to strike the ball from range. Consistently attempts to feed the box: goals, assists, and key passes. A finisher and creator between the lines. Positional Versatility: ■ In a 4-3-3/4-2-3-1, his best role is as the right forward or right winger, cutting inside to shoot or combine. He can also be effective stretching play and still carry goal threat and creativity. ■ As a No. 9: While not his best role, he is capable of leading the line. He uses his pace to run in behind. He can compete but lacks the physicality to hold off defenders, though his finishing is good. ■ As a Second Striker[442]: A role that plays better to his strengths than as a 9. He is comfortable operating between the lines, combining with midfielders and a traditional box striker. His mobility, creativity, and shooting ability allow him to function as the link player, collecting the ball, supporting the primary striker, and creating or finishing opportunities. This ability to operate both wide and centrally makes him tactically flexible, giving Chiefs options in various attacking structures. 2. Physical Attributes ■ Pace & Explosiveness: Quick acceleration makes him a constant outlet for balls in behind. ■ Strength & Balance: He is strong enough to hold off fullbacks, sustaining attacking sequences under pressure ■ High Intensity: Matches the tempo of Chiefs’ pressing and counter-pressing game. We do most actions with a lot of intensity, and his explosive nature will be very much welcomed in our attack. 3. Tactical Fit at Chiefs Under Coach Nabi, Chiefs are shaping into a side that plays with directness, intensity, and aggression across all phases of play: ■ Pressing & Counter-Pressing: The team applies immediate pressure after losing the ball. Mayo’s speed, defensive work rate, and forward momentum align seamlessly with this system. ■ High-Tempo Attacking: Chiefs don’t rely on slow possession. Attacks are vertical, sharp, and quick. Mayo’s instinct to drive forward, dribble at defenders, and attack space makes him an ideal fit. ■ Attacking Personality: His ability to provide not just progression but also the final goal, final pass, and decisive action elevates Chiefs’ attacking efficiency. Mayo’s game is inherently aligned with protagonist football: high tempo, forward intent, and productivity. 4. Experiential Value ■ Continental Experience: Spent a season in Algeria with CR Belouizdad, scoring 6 goals from wide positions. Notable not just for the numbers but for adapting to a challenging cultural and tactical environment. ■ Tactical Growth: North African teams are disciplined and organized, with compact defenses and structured pressing. Mayo sharpened his decision-making, spatial awareness, and ability to operate against tight blocks, preparing him for high-level CAF competitions. ■ Mentality: At 27, he blends maturity with hunger. His willingness to take risks reflects confidence and attacking intent. Yet to reach his peak, now is the perfect time to step up, showing the quality glimpsed at Cape Town City. Mayo joins Chiefs as both a system player and a game-changer. A top signing by the Glamour Boys! 📝

El Capitano⚪

87,172 görüntüleme • 10 ay önce

Last night in Kawangware, I met this man whom I initially thought was a security guard. After speaking with him, I later came to learn that he is a Nigerian national currently living on the streets. Whenever I meet someone living on the streets, I always take time to engage with them, understand their story, and learn how they ended up there. My goal is always to see how best I can help them rebuild their lives. During our conversation, he shared that he came to Kenya after receiving a promise of sponsorship from his cousin to continue his education here. However, after only two weeks in the country, his cousin who had promised to support him left for the United States without enrolling him in school, leaving him stranded in Kenya. As we continued talking, he explained how he struggled to survive and eventually ended up living on the streets. He has now been on the streets for about two years. In one of the videos I recorded, a lady reached out to me and said she recognized him. According to her, they once lived in the same apartment building. She narrated how the man had been in a relationship with a lady who allegedly took everything he owned. This incident deeply affected him, pushing him into depression and eventually to the streets. The man also shared that at one point he worked in Dubai, where he used to send money back home to support his parents in Nigeria. However, when he later returned home, he claims he discovered that he had been deceived by the very people he trusted. He gave me his parents’ contact, although we were not able to fully hear their side of the story. Currently, his travel documents have expired, and he expressed that his biggest wish is to renew them so that he can return home to Nigeria and start life again. I offered to use my platform to help fundraise for the renewal of his documents, as he personally requested. He also asked if I could help him secure any form of work so that he could at least sustain himself as he waits to regularize his documents. However, after spending time with him and assessing his situation, it became clear to me that he urgently needs mental health support, as he appears to be struggling with depression. I therefore decided that the following morning I would take him to a private rehabilitation center where professionals could assess him and offer the help he needs. After we agreed on this plan, I took him to a hotel where he could spend the night safely. I paid for his room and food, intending to pick him up the following morning and take him for rehabilitation. Unfortunately, later in the morning I received a call from the hotel attendant informing me that although the man had slept well, he left the guest house very early in a hurry. Later reports indicated that he had been seen back on the streets. Since then, efforts to locate and rescue him have not been successful. I am informed that he rarely accepts help from people, which makes the situation even more challenging. If anyone happens to see or locate him, please kindly contact me through +254707946783 so that we can assist him, take him for rehabilitation, and help facilitate his return to his home country. I am also appealing to his fellow Nigerians living in Kenya, those back in Nigeria, and well-wishers both in Kenya and abroad come through for him and support the effort to give this man a second chance in life. Sometimes, all someone needs is a small opportunity and a caring community to stand with them. Let us help him find his way back home.
33:17

Last night in Kawangware, I met this man whom I initially thought was a security guard. After speaking with him, I later came to learn that he is a Nigerian national currently living on the streets. Whenever I meet someone living on the streets, I always take time to engage with them, understand their story, and learn how they ended up there. My goal is always to see how best I can help them rebuild their lives. During our conversation, he shared that he came to Kenya after receiving a promise of sponsorship from his cousin to continue his education here. However, after only two weeks in the country, his cousin who had promised to support him left for the United States without enrolling him in school, leaving him stranded in Kenya. As we continued talking, he explained how he struggled to survive and eventually ended up living on the streets. He has now been on the streets for about two years. In one of the videos I recorded, a lady reached out to me and said she recognized him. According to her, they once lived in the same apartment building. She narrated how the man had been in a relationship with a lady who allegedly took everything he owned. This incident deeply affected him, pushing him into depression and eventually to the streets. The man also shared that at one point he worked in Dubai, where he used to send money back home to support his parents in Nigeria. However, when he later returned home, he claims he discovered that he had been deceived by the very people he trusted. He gave me his parents’ contact, although we were not able to fully hear their side of the story. Currently, his travel documents have expired, and he expressed that his biggest wish is to renew them so that he can return home to Nigeria and start life again. I offered to use my platform to help fundraise for the renewal of his documents, as he personally requested. He also asked if I could help him secure any form of work so that he could at least sustain himself as he waits to regularize his documents. However, after spending time with him and assessing his situation, it became clear to me that he urgently needs mental health support, as he appears to be struggling with depression. I therefore decided that the following morning I would take him to a private rehabilitation center where professionals could assess him and offer the help he needs. After we agreed on this plan, I took him to a hotel where he could spend the night safely. I paid for his room and food, intending to pick him up the following morning and take him for rehabilitation. Unfortunately, later in the morning I received a call from the hotel attendant informing me that although the man had slept well, he left the guest house very early in a hurry. Later reports indicated that he had been seen back on the streets. Since then, efforts to locate and rescue him have not been successful. I am informed that he rarely accepts help from people, which makes the situation even more challenging. If anyone happens to see or locate him, please kindly contact me through +254707946783 so that we can assist him, take him for rehabilitation, and help facilitate his return to his home country. I am also appealing to his fellow Nigerians living in Kenya, those back in Nigeria, and well-wishers both in Kenya and abroad come through for him and support the effort to give this man a second chance in life. Sometimes, all someone needs is a small opportunity and a caring community to stand with them. Let us help him find his way back home.

Geoffrey Mosiria

14,836 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

Exactly. While this is true, it’s also irrelevant in the grand scheme of things. Ross was at fault, period. Here’s why: First off, it’s against DHS policy & training for an officer to approach a vehicle from the front in this situation, and this “officer-induced jeopardy” negates the officers use of force claim and puts him at fault, period. There’s no debate on this as video evidence from multiple sources clearly show Ross stopping in front of her vehicle, and then taking the time to shift his phone from his right hand to his left so he can draw his weapon…BEFORE she even started moving. THIS is simply reality, and the conversation should end here. Second, it’s against DHS Use of Deadly Force policy (which is codified law) to fire at a moving vehicle that doesn’t pose imminent danger to officers, and even if they ARE in danger, it mandates deescalation before using deadly force, which EXPRESSLY states simply “moving out of the way” of a vehicle as a correct course of action before using deadly force (see attached doc below). Third, there is already well-established legal precedent governing these EXACT types of situations, and this officer would likely be found guilty by any jury in the U.S. For example: Adam’s vs. Speers (2020): “Once Speers was no longer in the path of the vehicle, the justification for the use of deadly force ended.” Orn vs. City of Tacoma (2019): “A reasonable jury could conclude that once Orn was no longer in the car’s trajectory, the threat of serious physical harm to him was eliminated.” Cordova vs Aragon (2009): “Where the officer had moved out of the way of the oncoming vehicle, the use of deadly force was not justified.” Villanueva vs. Cali (2021): “a reasonable jury could conclude that the Officers used excessive force, because they lacked an objectively reasonable basis to fear for their own safety, as they could simply have stepped back or to the side to avoid being injured.” Fifth, the videos/pics below CLEARLY show the officer was NOT in immediate danger, and the woman was moving away from him when he fired his FIRST shot when he was already clear to the left of the vehicle, and he fired the second & third shots point-blank into her face from the SIDE of the vehicle as she passed. That alone is enough to send him to prison, even if his first shot was somehow inexplicably deemed to be justified.
0:28

Exactly. While this is true, it’s also irrelevant in the grand scheme of things. Ross was at fault, period. Here’s why: First off, it’s against DHS policy & training for an officer to approach a vehicle from the front in this situation, and this “officer-induced jeopardy” negates the officers use of force claim and puts him at fault, period. There’s no debate on this as video evidence from multiple sources clearly show Ross stopping in front of her vehicle, and then taking the time to shift his phone from his right hand to his left so he can draw his weapon…BEFORE she even started moving. THIS is simply reality, and the conversation should end here. Second, it’s against DHS Use of Deadly Force policy (which is codified law) to fire at a moving vehicle that doesn’t pose imminent danger to officers, and even if they ARE in danger, it mandates deescalation before using deadly force, which EXPRESSLY states simply “moving out of the way” of a vehicle as a correct course of action before using deadly force (see attached doc below). Third, there is already well-established legal precedent governing these EXACT types of situations, and this officer would likely be found guilty by any jury in the U.S. For example: Adam’s vs. Speers (2020): “Once Speers was no longer in the path of the vehicle, the justification for the use of deadly force ended.” Orn vs. City of Tacoma (2019): “A reasonable jury could conclude that once Orn was no longer in the car’s trajectory, the threat of serious physical harm to him was eliminated.” Cordova vs Aragon (2009): “Where the officer had moved out of the way of the oncoming vehicle, the use of deadly force was not justified.” Villanueva vs. Cali (2021): “a reasonable jury could conclude that the Officers used excessive force, because they lacked an objectively reasonable basis to fear for their own safety, as they could simply have stepped back or to the side to avoid being injured.” Fifth, the videos/pics below CLEARLY show the officer was NOT in immediate danger, and the woman was moving away from him when he fired his FIRST shot when he was already clear to the left of the vehicle, and he fired the second & third shots point-blank into her face from the SIDE of the vehicle as she passed. That alone is enough to send him to prison, even if his first shot was somehow inexplicably deemed to be justified.

Notorious PJB

18,329 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

Since Virat Kohli has announced his retirement from T20is, here something which I had written something for him few months back:(attaching an edit made by Amit Dubey which I found these lyrics fit aptly on Virat) March 2, 2008 This day holds great significance for Indian cricket because, on one hand, India defeated Australia in their own backyard in the first final of the CB series, and at the same time, nearly 6000 kilometers away, India's young brigade had won the Under-19 World Cup. After the World Cup victory, when this team returned to Bangalore from Kuala Lumpur, BCCI gave a grand welcome to the Under-19 team, and Kumble and Dravid were also present there. Dravid congratulated all the young players and imparted some wisdom. He said, "We are proud of you, but I want you to remember that from the Under-19 team that won the World Cup in 2000, only one member was part of the Indian team that won the CB Series." "What you have achieved is not everything, and your goal should be to win the World Cup one day." The young captain of that Under-19 team was listening carefully , and just three years later, he was part of the ODI World Cup-winning team. But the world had yet to witness the prowess of Kohli - the batter in a World Cup... By the next World Cup, Kohli had established himself among the World's best batsmen, but as in life, achieving everything in cricket is not easy. Kohli and the Indian team ended their 2015 World Cup campaign in disappointment. After becoming a regular part of the Indian team, 2015 was the first year when Kohli scored runs at an average of less than 40! Soon after, Kohli was given the responsibility of captaincy, which brought out a new brilliance in his batting. By the next World Cup, Kohli had scored 18 centuries & more than 4000 runs in ODIs at an average of 85 in just three years... Once again, India entered the 2019 World Cup as favorites and justified this tag, entering the semifinals as table toppers. But like in 2015, both Kohli & the Indian team were left with disappointment once again. Whereas the defeat in 2015 had shown us a new level of Kohli, after the loss in 2019, much had changed. In the meantime, there was COVID, a lack of regular games, a century drought, captaincy controversies, and numerous challenges, and another World Cup had arrived... The batsman who had scored more than 11,000 runs and 42 centuries between the 2011 World Cup and the 2023 World Cup (where no one else had even scored 10,000 runs or 30 centuries in ODIs)... I'm not even talking about Tests and T20Is where Kohli has set countless records. Despite all this, the expectation of "Doing even better" from fans and Kohli himself is the true mark of Virat's success. This "excellence" has always defined Virat, which is why a boy from West Delhi, along with Basu Shanker, trained himself like Olympic athletes and influenced not just fellow cricketers but the entire nation's fitness culture. Kohli's competition has never been with any cricketer, but with himself. Nonetheless, this World Cup was special too. Like in 2011, this World Cup was about playing and winning in front of his own people, and it must have reminded Kohli of Dravid's words once again: "What you have achieved is not everything." From winning the first match of this World Cup when India was 2/3 to sealing the victory, to exorcising the ghosts of 5/3 against the Kiwis in the semifinals with a 397/4, and breaking two long-standing records of his idol in front of him, only to get the biggest heartbreak of his career in the final against Australia... Such losses can break your mental toughness & especially in India where experts judges you even on the basis of franchise leagues,Virat too found himself again " evolving himself" in a format which he had already mastered... He came into this T20 World Cup with a new role & responsibility for the Team which supported by the Captain & Coach... He couldn't performed as per his fans expectations but you can see that willingness to prove that I can change myself with the demand of modern T20 even at final stage of my career... Virat is not just a name but a symbol that signifies: if there is truth in your dreams & strength in your resolve, everything is possible...
0:44

Since Virat Kohli has announced his retirement from T20is, here something which I had written something for him few months back:(attaching an edit made by Amit Dubey which I found these lyrics fit aptly on Virat) March 2, 2008 This day holds great significance for Indian cricket because, on one hand, India defeated Australia in their own backyard in the first final of the CB series, and at the same time, nearly 6000 kilometers away, India's young brigade had won the Under-19 World Cup. After the World Cup victory, when this team returned to Bangalore from Kuala Lumpur, BCCI gave a grand welcome to the Under-19 team, and Kumble and Dravid were also present there. Dravid congratulated all the young players and imparted some wisdom. He said, "We are proud of you, but I want you to remember that from the Under-19 team that won the World Cup in 2000, only one member was part of the Indian team that won the CB Series." "What you have achieved is not everything, and your goal should be to win the World Cup one day." The young captain of that Under-19 team was listening carefully , and just three years later, he was part of the ODI World Cup-winning team. But the world had yet to witness the prowess of Kohli - the batter in a World Cup... By the next World Cup, Kohli had established himself among the World's best batsmen, but as in life, achieving everything in cricket is not easy. Kohli and the Indian team ended their 2015 World Cup campaign in disappointment. After becoming a regular part of the Indian team, 2015 was the first year when Kohli scored runs at an average of less than 40! Soon after, Kohli was given the responsibility of captaincy, which brought out a new brilliance in his batting. By the next World Cup, Kohli had scored 18 centuries & more than 4000 runs in ODIs at an average of 85 in just three years... Once again, India entered the 2019 World Cup as favorites and justified this tag, entering the semifinals as table toppers. But like in 2015, both Kohli & the Indian team were left with disappointment once again. Whereas the defeat in 2015 had shown us a new level of Kohli, after the loss in 2019, much had changed. In the meantime, there was COVID, a lack of regular games, a century drought, captaincy controversies, and numerous challenges, and another World Cup had arrived... The batsman who had scored more than 11,000 runs and 42 centuries between the 2011 World Cup and the 2023 World Cup (where no one else had even scored 10,000 runs or 30 centuries in ODIs)... I'm not even talking about Tests and T20Is where Kohli has set countless records. Despite all this, the expectation of "Doing even better" from fans and Kohli himself is the true mark of Virat's success. This "excellence" has always defined Virat, which is why a boy from West Delhi, along with Basu Shanker, trained himself like Olympic athletes and influenced not just fellow cricketers but the entire nation's fitness culture. Kohli's competition has never been with any cricketer, but with himself. Nonetheless, this World Cup was special too. Like in 2011, this World Cup was about playing and winning in front of his own people, and it must have reminded Kohli of Dravid's words once again: "What you have achieved is not everything." From winning the first match of this World Cup when India was 2/3 to sealing the victory, to exorcising the ghosts of 5/3 against the Kiwis in the semifinals with a 397/4, and breaking two long-standing records of his idol in front of him, only to get the biggest heartbreak of his career in the final against Australia... Such losses can break your mental toughness & especially in India where experts judges you even on the basis of franchise leagues,Virat too found himself again " evolving himself" in a format which he had already mastered... He came into this T20 World Cup with a new role & responsibility for the Team which supported by the Captain & Coach... He couldn't performed as per his fans expectations but you can see that willingness to prove that I can change myself with the demand of modern T20 even at final stage of my career... Virat is not just a name but a symbol that signifies: if there is truth in your dreams & strength in your resolve, everything is possible...

Abhishek AB

42,692 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce

🚨 MEET THE 'NEW GARY': TPUSA’s Latest Talking Head Just Accidentally Proved Candace Owens Right.😂🤯 You have to almost feel sorry for Turning Point USA at this point. After their previous disinformation minister, "Gary," humiliated himself so thoroughly on this platform that he had to be memory-holed, Andrew Kolvet and Blake Neff dragged a "New Gary" onto The Charlie Kirk Show today to try and salvage their collapsing narrative. Their mission? To gaslight the American people into believing that the explosive Daily Mail report—which confirmed the bullet found in Charlie’s neck does NOT match the gun found at the scene—is just "misleading garbage." But "New Gary" (Justin Nazarov, CEO of Phoenix Ammunition, who they clearly brought on because he owns a gun company and has "takes") immediately fumbled the ball. In an unparalleled moment of accidental wit, he actually confirmed that Candace Owens was right weeks ago when she reported the bullet was fragmented. Thanks for the assist, Gary 2.0. It’s time to peel back the layers of this desperate, panicky gaslighting session and debunk their claims line-by-line using actual facts and the official court filing they are terrified you will read. THE BIG LIE: SPINNING THE BALLISTICS FAILURE: TPUSA’s entire segment was dedicated to attacking the Daily Mail headline: "Bullet used to kill Charlie Kirk, did not MATCH rifle allegedly used by suspect Tyler Robinson, new court filing claims." Kolvet, Neff, and the New Gary tried to spin this as "completely and utterly misleading," arguing that the only reason it didn't "match" is because it was fragmented, making toolmark analysis "best guess pseudoscience." They are desperately trying to convince you that this is just a spin by the defense team. THE FACT-CHECK: They are lying to you to contaminate the jury pool. If you actually look at the official defense filing (attached below), it doesn't say "the defense claims there is no match." It explicitly states on Page 2, Paragraph 2: "...but his defense attorneys now argue that the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms ATF was unable to identify the bullet recovered at autopsy to the rifle allegedly tied to Mr. Robinson." The ATF—the federal government's own ballistics experts—are the ones who cannot match that fragment to that gun. Period. The New Gary can talk about hollow points all he wants, but he cannot change the fact that the actual physical evidence does not connect the patsy to the alleged murder weapon. THE SECOND LIE: THE DNA EVIDENCE: During the segment, New Gary tried to argue that even without a bullet match, they will have other "conclusions" to present, hinting at DNA. THE FACT-CHECK: Again, read the filing (Page 3, Paragraph 1). The defense explicitly notes that the delay is needed because the FBI and ATF DNA reports indicate that "several different DNAs were found on some items of evidence." It is NOT just Tyler Robinson's DNA. This was a contaminated crime scene with at least five different persons' DNA profiles found on various items recovered. They are trying to pretend it’s a neat "lone gunman" scene when the physical evidence screams that this was a multi-person operation. THE THIRD LIE: THE FAMILY 'BETRAYAL' MYTH: The most disgusting part of the TPUSA segments is their relentless attempt to frame Tyler’s family. Andrew Kolvet smirked about how the prosecution plans to call Tyler’s parents and his boyfriend, Lance Twiggs, to testify. They use this fact to perpetuate the lie that the family suspects Tyler and turned him in. THE FACT-CHECK: This is classic gaslighting. Just because the state calls someone as a witness does not mean they are supporting the state’s narrative. Have these high-paid "political operatives" never heard of a hostile witness? They are trying to imply that the family’s presence in court proves Tyler's guilt, which is an absurd logical fallacy. Let's look at what the family actually says: Tyler Robinson’s grandmother has gone on record stating she does NOT believe Tyler shot Charlie Kirk. She further confirmed Tyler doesn't even own a rifle, is not a "gun guy," had no experience firing weapons, and actively disliked guns. Independent journalists Brandi and Billie from the Brandi & Billie Show on YouTube spoke directly to Tyler's family at a hearing. The family told them they don't think he could have done it and that only 2% of what the mainstream media has reported is actually true. THE REAL STORY: THE VOLUNTARY SURRENDER: Kolvet and Neff are again lying about how Tyler was apprehended, claiming endless documentation proves his parents recognized the gun on the news and turned him in. THE FACT-CHECK: This is another easily debunked lie that TPUSA hopes you won't check. Candace Owens has a source close to the Robinson family who explicitly confirms Tyler's parents did NOT recognize the gun from the news, nor did they turn him in because they suspected him. We know this is fact because the initial gun photo circulating during the manhunt was not even the actual gun found. It was stock footage of a different weapon, not the WWII-era Mauser rifle allegedly recovered. How could his dad have noticed a gun that was never shown? The real reason Tyler surrendered, per Candace’s source, is that he was terrified of armed thugs—aka the SWAT team—busting down his and his parents’ door, destroying their home, and potentially shooting them. He came in voluntarily to clear his name and protect his family. Furthermore, we now know that Tyler Robinson did NOT confess to anything and has officially plead NOT GUILTY! Most damning of all? ALL video footage allegedly showing Tyler Robinson and his parents entering the sheriff's station to turn himself in has mysteriously gone missing or was allegedly destroyed. Multiple news outlets have confirmed that their FOIA requests for this crucial video have been denied because the footage conveniently no longer exists. THE DAMNING ADMISSION: TPUSA’S FEAR The final piece of this storytelling narrative is the most telling. Ask yourself: Why are Andrew Kolvet, Blake Neff, and Jack Posobiec—who claim to have been Charlie's "friends"—actively against the defense’s motion to postpone the preliminary hearing? Why are they trying to rush this trial along and railroad this kid despite overwhelming evidence that he is a patsy? If they were real friends who actually wanted justice for Charlie Kirk, they would welcome more time for a thorough investigation to ensure the correct assassins faced justice. Instead, they are terrified of the six-month delay the defense is asking for to review the 20,000 files and 700 hours of video. This rush to judgment, this attempt to sweep everything under the rug, is in my journalistic opinion, an admission of guilt. They are freaking out because their entire fed-slop narrative is falling apart in real-time. They know that once Tyler Robinson is found not guilty, the spotlight will turn inward—toward the people closest to Charlie, the ones who had significant motive to see him dead. That is what they are truly terrified of.🇺🇸
15:21

🚨 MEET THE 'NEW GARY': TPUSA’s Latest Talking Head Just Accidentally Proved Candace Owens Right.😂🤯 You have to almost feel sorry for Turning Point USA at this point. After their previous disinformation minister, "Gary," humiliated himself so thoroughly on this platform that he had to be memory-holed, Andrew Kolvet and Blake Neff dragged a "New Gary" onto The Charlie Kirk Show today to try and salvage their collapsing narrative. Their mission? To gaslight the American people into believing that the explosive Daily Mail report—which confirmed the bullet found in Charlie’s neck does NOT match the gun found at the scene—is just "misleading garbage." But "New Gary" (Justin Nazarov, CEO of Phoenix Ammunition, who they clearly brought on because he owns a gun company and has "takes") immediately fumbled the ball. In an unparalleled moment of accidental wit, he actually confirmed that Candace Owens was right weeks ago when she reported the bullet was fragmented. Thanks for the assist, Gary 2.0. It’s time to peel back the layers of this desperate, panicky gaslighting session and debunk their claims line-by-line using actual facts and the official court filing they are terrified you will read. THE BIG LIE: SPINNING THE BALLISTICS FAILURE: TPUSA’s entire segment was dedicated to attacking the Daily Mail headline: "Bullet used to kill Charlie Kirk, did not MATCH rifle allegedly used by suspect Tyler Robinson, new court filing claims." Kolvet, Neff, and the New Gary tried to spin this as "completely and utterly misleading," arguing that the only reason it didn't "match" is because it was fragmented, making toolmark analysis "best guess pseudoscience." They are desperately trying to convince you that this is just a spin by the defense team. THE FACT-CHECK: They are lying to you to contaminate the jury pool. If you actually look at the official defense filing (attached below), it doesn't say "the defense claims there is no match." It explicitly states on Page 2, Paragraph 2: "...but his defense attorneys now argue that the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms ATF was unable to identify the bullet recovered at autopsy to the rifle allegedly tied to Mr. Robinson." The ATF—the federal government's own ballistics experts—are the ones who cannot match that fragment to that gun. Period. The New Gary can talk about hollow points all he wants, but he cannot change the fact that the actual physical evidence does not connect the patsy to the alleged murder weapon. THE SECOND LIE: THE DNA EVIDENCE: During the segment, New Gary tried to argue that even without a bullet match, they will have other "conclusions" to present, hinting at DNA. THE FACT-CHECK: Again, read the filing (Page 3, Paragraph 1). The defense explicitly notes that the delay is needed because the FBI and ATF DNA reports indicate that "several different DNAs were found on some items of evidence." It is NOT just Tyler Robinson's DNA. This was a contaminated crime scene with at least five different persons' DNA profiles found on various items recovered. They are trying to pretend it’s a neat "lone gunman" scene when the physical evidence screams that this was a multi-person operation. THE THIRD LIE: THE FAMILY 'BETRAYAL' MYTH: The most disgusting part of the TPUSA segments is their relentless attempt to frame Tyler’s family. Andrew Kolvet smirked about how the prosecution plans to call Tyler’s parents and his boyfriend, Lance Twiggs, to testify. They use this fact to perpetuate the lie that the family suspects Tyler and turned him in. THE FACT-CHECK: This is classic gaslighting. Just because the state calls someone as a witness does not mean they are supporting the state’s narrative. Have these high-paid "political operatives" never heard of a hostile witness? They are trying to imply that the family’s presence in court proves Tyler's guilt, which is an absurd logical fallacy. Let's look at what the family actually says: Tyler Robinson’s grandmother has gone on record stating she does NOT believe Tyler shot Charlie Kirk. She further confirmed Tyler doesn't even own a rifle, is not a "gun guy," had no experience firing weapons, and actively disliked guns. Independent journalists Brandi and Billie from the Brandi & Billie Show on YouTube spoke directly to Tyler's family at a hearing. The family told them they don't think he could have done it and that only 2% of what the mainstream media has reported is actually true. THE REAL STORY: THE VOLUNTARY SURRENDER: Kolvet and Neff are again lying about how Tyler was apprehended, claiming endless documentation proves his parents recognized the gun on the news and turned him in. THE FACT-CHECK: This is another easily debunked lie that TPUSA hopes you won't check. Candace Owens has a source close to the Robinson family who explicitly confirms Tyler's parents did NOT recognize the gun from the news, nor did they turn him in because they suspected him. We know this is fact because the initial gun photo circulating during the manhunt was not even the actual gun found. It was stock footage of a different weapon, not the WWII-era Mauser rifle allegedly recovered. How could his dad have noticed a gun that was never shown? The real reason Tyler surrendered, per Candace’s source, is that he was terrified of armed thugs—aka the SWAT team—busting down his and his parents’ door, destroying their home, and potentially shooting them. He came in voluntarily to clear his name and protect his family. Furthermore, we now know that Tyler Robinson did NOT confess to anything and has officially plead NOT GUILTY! Most damning of all? ALL video footage allegedly showing Tyler Robinson and his parents entering the sheriff's station to turn himself in has mysteriously gone missing or was allegedly destroyed. Multiple news outlets have confirmed that their FOIA requests for this crucial video have been denied because the footage conveniently no longer exists. THE DAMNING ADMISSION: TPUSA’S FEAR The final piece of this storytelling narrative is the most telling. Ask yourself: Why are Andrew Kolvet, Blake Neff, and Jack Posobiec—who claim to have been Charlie's "friends"—actively against the defense’s motion to postpone the preliminary hearing? Why are they trying to rush this trial along and railroad this kid despite overwhelming evidence that he is a patsy? If they were real friends who actually wanted justice for Charlie Kirk, they would welcome more time for a thorough investigation to ensure the correct assassins faced justice. Instead, they are terrified of the six-month delay the defense is asking for to review the 20,000 files and 700 hours of video. This rush to judgment, this attempt to sweep everything under the rug, is in my journalistic opinion, an admission of guilt. They are freaking out because their entire fed-slop narrative is falling apart in real-time. They know that once Tyler Robinson is found not guilty, the spotlight will turn inward—toward the people closest to Charlie, the ones who had significant motive to see him dead. That is what they are truly terrified of.🇺🇸

Project Constitution

242,003 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

‡ The Pacific Classic Result It was unfortunate that Nysos was scratched, but the result was interesting, with Fierceness, the 1.6/1 second-favorite, comfortably handling Journalism, the (overbet) 2/5 choice. That the odds of the remaining five runners ranged between 22/1 and 72/1, underscored the yawning gap in quality between the top pair and the rest. So it was clearly no surprise that the "also-rans" toiled in their wake. What was surprising, at least at first glance, was how well Fierceness appeared to handle less than ideal conditions. But on closer inspection, his trip was actually far less challenging than the vast majority of post-race takes have suggested. His having ducked in soon after the start, almost making contact with the temporary extension rail, could have been a disaster, but it wasn't, and its importance has arguably been overblown. I say that because it was not similar to the trouble that he had encountered early in some of his previous races, in that he was in his own space, and was neither bumped, constricted, nor otherwise intimidated by other runners. This is an important distinction, because the mental weakness that he had previously displayed was related to close encounters with other horses, and his ducking-in after the break did not fall into that category. Inexperienced horses may suffer from that type of self-inflicted event, but given a mature, experienced runner, they are almost always forgotten quickly, which was clearly the case here. The fact that it was a long race also helped to mitigate the event, as there was no need for the rider to panic, or feel pressure to make up ground immediately. It is even possible that the early ground loss actually helped Fierceness, as had he been drawn closer to the pace early, it could have rendered him vulnerable in the late stages of the race. At the same time, due to the inside post, and how the race unfolded, Johnny Velasquez, who has done such a brilliant job keeping Fierceness outside and clear of his rivals in his previous wins, was forced to make the best of racing inside of horses. I understand why some are tempted to argue that Fierceness displayed a new dimension, as there were no obvious signs of him having been intimidated, despite the inside trip. But while I am willing to consider the possibility that he has gained confidence, I remain skeptical of any significant change, in part because it would be highly unusual for a horse to overcome that type of mental weakness midway through its four-year-old season, and/or in its 13th start. I also remain unconvinced for more subtle reasons. First, Fierceness was never bounced around, and with the possible exception of the first turn, he was never forced to race in especially tight quarters. Secondly, the rhythm of the race, after the initial duck-in, was actually smooth, and therefore beneficial to him. To understand why the above points are important, consider that Fierceness was never, so to speak, allergic to racing inside, but was more likely to face contact, be squeezed into a tight space, or have his rhythm thrown off when breaking from an inside post. In contrast, when breaking from an outside post, JV has invariably been able to place him clear of the pack, and in a comfortable, stalking rhythm. Fierceness is also essentially a free-runner, with a "light" mouth, and as such performs best when his rider allows him to dictate his own rhythm and pace. That is why, for example, Johnny V was not at all responsible for his loss in the Breeders' Cup Classic, as he is not the type of horse that a rider can take a strong hold of in order to restrain him further off of the pace, as that would discourage him. And to the great credit of both JV and Todd Pletcher, they picked up on this early on, and have done a superb job mitigating the colt's limitations, and maximizing his potential. In the Pacific Classic, despite racing on the inside, Johnny V remained cool and calm, and gave Fierceness another masterful ride. He and the colt's connections did benefit though, as none of his rivals, either intentionally or not, tightened things up significantly, or otherwise disrupted his rhythm. In fact, quite the opposite. Having tracked comfortably through much of the race, and with space around him, Fierceness displayed his trademark spurt on the final turn. And while the pan shot may suggest that he slipped though a tight opening, it was more like the red sea parting, as the embedded head-on view illustrates. If you are able to view the full head-on replay, you will find that despite racing inside, Fierceness actually enjoyed quite a comfortable trip, after the eventful few strides. A more subtle indication that we were watching the same horse as in his previous races comes :12-14 seconds into the embedded clip. When he was about to take the lead, he cocked his head to the right, as if he may have been worried about the horse outside of him. He was able to draw away from that one so quickly that it was ultimately of no practical consequence, but I would say that it implies that he hasn't suddenly developed the heart of a lion. *** Two qualities that have been crucial to Fierceness' success are his tactical speed, coupled with the separation that he produces on the final turn of his (two-turn) races. His ability to take command at that crucial stage has served him very well, particularly in his narrow win over Thorpedo Anna, and it was again on display in the Pacific Classic. A big part of the reason why that move has been such an important part of his arsenal is that it typically allows his him to take a "breather", before digging deep in an effort to fend off any late dangers. I encourage you to watch the (pan) replay of the Pacific Classic, and focus on Johnny V from around the 3/8th pole to the head of the stretch, as he was sitting like the proverbial statue. So for at least a furlong and a half, Fierceness was on cruise control, while Journalism, his only danger, was under pressure to make up ground, in an attempt to simply reach striking distance. But with all due credit to Fierceness and his rider for having produced fine efforts in the Pacific Classic, was this really an exceptionally outstanding performance, or was it at least partly a reflection of his only serious rival failing to run his best? I'm inclined to argue the latter. Despite Journalism having produced an unusually good 3yo campaign, capped by three Gr. I wins, including a Classic success in the Preakness, and never finishing worse than second, there have been some lingering questions. One of them is whether he is actually as well-suited to 10f. as he is to 8-9f. races. Yes, he was beaten in his two previous tries over 10f. by Sovereignty, a better horse. But in each race he was able to gain first-run on that one, an advantage that is typically difficult to overcome, yet lost ground late to the winner both times, and to Baeza as well, in the KY Derby. Some have suggested that he may have a tendency to loaf when in front, but I haven't seen any compelling evidence of that. And such horses typically dig in when passed, in efforts to re-engage, which we haven't seen, at least overtly, from Journalism. He also drew away from his rivals late in his first three wins. Alex Evers made this interesting comment about the kickback in the Pacific Classic: "I've photographed racing for 20 years, I've never seen kick back knock a jockeys goggles off like this." Here is a link to his supporting photos, which are typically excellent: Could that have discouraged Journalism? I suppose that it could have been an impediment, but he is such a tough and honest horse, that I would be surprised to learn that it was a meaningful factor. By contemporary standards, Journalism has also had a busy campaign, having raced a touch over once per month since March, all but one of which in Grade I events, and four times well away from his home base. So it is possible that he is beginning to feel the effects of those races, and travels. I have also noted that from a Beyer figure standpoint, he hasn't really moved forward, and it's worth noting that in contrast to Sovereignty and Baeza, both of which were late (May) foals, Journalism was a February foal, and may not have had quite as much room to improve. I don't know why he lagged so far behind in the early stages of the Pacific Classic, or if there was any tactical intention behind it. I had previously suggested that it might make sense to ride him more patiently, a tactic that is sometimes adopted when there are questions about a horse staying a trip. But I didn't notice any improved late kick, so it's difficult to interpret the performance. Fierceness earned a 107 Beyer figure for his victory, slower than his best three races last year, and merely equivalent to his comeback victory in the Gr. II Alysheba at Churchill Downs, in May. That doesn't suggest that it was a particularly outstanding performance. Journalism was given a 102, which implies that the return to his home court did not catalyze any notable forward move. *** I would say that there is one relevant pattern that has emerged, namely that Fierceness has an apparent affinity for the faster, high energy return track surfaces in California. He has now contested three races in CA (Beyer): 1st Breeders' Cup Juvenile (105) 2nd Breeders' Cup Classic (111) 1st Pacific Classic (107) It's also interesting to compare the colt's first and last half-mile fractions in his effort in last year's BCC, and the PC, both contested at Del Mar over 10f.: BCC – :45 1/5 • :51 3/5 PC – :46 1/5 • :50 2/5 Predictably, he finished better in the PC, thanks to more manageable early fractions. But would a repeat of that effort be nearly sufficient to win this year's Classic? Given the various points noted above, coupled with Sovereignty's continued improvement, and seemingly bottomless stamina, I would be inclined to say no. And that's before even factoring Sierra Leone, Mindframe, Forever Young, et al, into the conversation. But setting aside all of the fine parsing, I'm happy to congratulate Repole Stable, and Fierceness' other connections, for having shipped to California, and for being rewarded with an exciting, winning effort. Assuming that the colt makes it to the Breeders' Cup Classic in good order, he should minimally add spice to the race, and who knows, perhaps even provide a serious challenge to knock Sovereignty off of his current throne.
0:24

‡ The Pacific Classic Result It was unfortunate that Nysos was scratched, but the result was interesting, with Fierceness, the 1.6/1 second-favorite, comfortably handling Journalism, the (overbet) 2/5 choice. That the odds of the remaining five runners ranged between 22/1 and 72/1, underscored the yawning gap in quality between the top pair and the rest. So it was clearly no surprise that the "also-rans" toiled in their wake. What was surprising, at least at first glance, was how well Fierceness appeared to handle less than ideal conditions. But on closer inspection, his trip was actually far less challenging than the vast majority of post-race takes have suggested. His having ducked in soon after the start, almost making contact with the temporary extension rail, could have been a disaster, but it wasn't, and its importance has arguably been overblown. I say that because it was not similar to the trouble that he had encountered early in some of his previous races, in that he was in his own space, and was neither bumped, constricted, nor otherwise intimidated by other runners. This is an important distinction, because the mental weakness that he had previously displayed was related to close encounters with other horses, and his ducking-in after the break did not fall into that category. Inexperienced horses may suffer from that type of self-inflicted event, but given a mature, experienced runner, they are almost always forgotten quickly, which was clearly the case here. The fact that it was a long race also helped to mitigate the event, as there was no need for the rider to panic, or feel pressure to make up ground immediately. It is even possible that the early ground loss actually helped Fierceness, as had he been drawn closer to the pace early, it could have rendered him vulnerable in the late stages of the race. At the same time, due to the inside post, and how the race unfolded, Johnny Velasquez, who has done such a brilliant job keeping Fierceness outside and clear of his rivals in his previous wins, was forced to make the best of racing inside of horses. I understand why some are tempted to argue that Fierceness displayed a new dimension, as there were no obvious signs of him having been intimidated, despite the inside trip. But while I am willing to consider the possibility that he has gained confidence, I remain skeptical of any significant change, in part because it would be highly unusual for a horse to overcome that type of mental weakness midway through its four-year-old season, and/or in its 13th start. I also remain unconvinced for more subtle reasons. First, Fierceness was never bounced around, and with the possible exception of the first turn, he was never forced to race in especially tight quarters. Secondly, the rhythm of the race, after the initial duck-in, was actually smooth, and therefore beneficial to him. To understand why the above points are important, consider that Fierceness was never, so to speak, allergic to racing inside, but was more likely to face contact, be squeezed into a tight space, or have his rhythm thrown off when breaking from an inside post. In contrast, when breaking from an outside post, JV has invariably been able to place him clear of the pack, and in a comfortable, stalking rhythm. Fierceness is also essentially a free-runner, with a "light" mouth, and as such performs best when his rider allows him to dictate his own rhythm and pace. That is why, for example, Johnny V was not at all responsible for his loss in the Breeders' Cup Classic, as he is not the type of horse that a rider can take a strong hold of in order to restrain him further off of the pace, as that would discourage him. And to the great credit of both JV and Todd Pletcher, they picked up on this early on, and have done a superb job mitigating the colt's limitations, and maximizing his potential. In the Pacific Classic, despite racing on the inside, Johnny V remained cool and calm, and gave Fierceness another masterful ride. He and the colt's connections did benefit though, as none of his rivals, either intentionally or not, tightened things up significantly, or otherwise disrupted his rhythm. In fact, quite the opposite. Having tracked comfortably through much of the race, and with space around him, Fierceness displayed his trademark spurt on the final turn. And while the pan shot may suggest that he slipped though a tight opening, it was more like the red sea parting, as the embedded head-on view illustrates. If you are able to view the full head-on replay, you will find that despite racing inside, Fierceness actually enjoyed quite a comfortable trip, after the eventful few strides. A more subtle indication that we were watching the same horse as in his previous races comes :12-14 seconds into the embedded clip. When he was about to take the lead, he cocked his head to the right, as if he may have been worried about the horse outside of him. He was able to draw away from that one so quickly that it was ultimately of no practical consequence, but I would say that it implies that he hasn't suddenly developed the heart of a lion. *** Two qualities that have been crucial to Fierceness' success are his tactical speed, coupled with the separation that he produces on the final turn of his (two-turn) races. His ability to take command at that crucial stage has served him very well, particularly in his narrow win over Thorpedo Anna, and it was again on display in the Pacific Classic. A big part of the reason why that move has been such an important part of his arsenal is that it typically allows his him to take a "breather", before digging deep in an effort to fend off any late dangers. I encourage you to watch the (pan) replay of the Pacific Classic, and focus on Johnny V from around the 3/8th pole to the head of the stretch, as he was sitting like the proverbial statue. So for at least a furlong and a half, Fierceness was on cruise control, while Journalism, his only danger, was under pressure to make up ground, in an attempt to simply reach striking distance. But with all due credit to Fierceness and his rider for having produced fine efforts in the Pacific Classic, was this really an exceptionally outstanding performance, or was it at least partly a reflection of his only serious rival failing to run his best? I'm inclined to argue the latter. Despite Journalism having produced an unusually good 3yo campaign, capped by three Gr. I wins, including a Classic success in the Preakness, and never finishing worse than second, there have been some lingering questions. One of them is whether he is actually as well-suited to 10f. as he is to 8-9f. races. Yes, he was beaten in his two previous tries over 10f. by Sovereignty, a better horse. But in each race he was able to gain first-run on that one, an advantage that is typically difficult to overcome, yet lost ground late to the winner both times, and to Baeza as well, in the KY Derby. Some have suggested that he may have a tendency to loaf when in front, but I haven't seen any compelling evidence of that. And such horses typically dig in when passed, in efforts to re-engage, which we haven't seen, at least overtly, from Journalism. He also drew away from his rivals late in his first three wins. Alex Evers made this interesting comment about the kickback in the Pacific Classic: "I've photographed racing for 20 years, I've never seen kick back knock a jockeys goggles off like this." Here is a link to his supporting photos, which are typically excellent: Could that have discouraged Journalism? I suppose that it could have been an impediment, but he is such a tough and honest horse, that I would be surprised to learn that it was a meaningful factor. By contemporary standards, Journalism has also had a busy campaign, having raced a touch over once per month since March, all but one of which in Grade I events, and four times well away from his home base. So it is possible that he is beginning to feel the effects of those races, and travels. I have also noted that from a Beyer figure standpoint, he hasn't really moved forward, and it's worth noting that in contrast to Sovereignty and Baeza, both of which were late (May) foals, Journalism was a February foal, and may not have had quite as much room to improve. I don't know why he lagged so far behind in the early stages of the Pacific Classic, or if there was any tactical intention behind it. I had previously suggested that it might make sense to ride him more patiently, a tactic that is sometimes adopted when there are questions about a horse staying a trip. But I didn't notice any improved late kick, so it's difficult to interpret the performance. Fierceness earned a 107 Beyer figure for his victory, slower than his best three races last year, and merely equivalent to his comeback victory in the Gr. II Alysheba at Churchill Downs, in May. That doesn't suggest that it was a particularly outstanding performance. Journalism was given a 102, which implies that the return to his home court did not catalyze any notable forward move. *** I would say that there is one relevant pattern that has emerged, namely that Fierceness has an apparent affinity for the faster, high energy return track surfaces in California. He has now contested three races in CA (Beyer): 1st Breeders' Cup Juvenile (105) 2nd Breeders' Cup Classic (111) 1st Pacific Classic (107) It's also interesting to compare the colt's first and last half-mile fractions in his effort in last year's BCC, and the PC, both contested at Del Mar over 10f.: BCC – :45 1/5 • :51 3/5 PC – :46 1/5 • :50 2/5 Predictably, he finished better in the PC, thanks to more manageable early fractions. But would a repeat of that effort be nearly sufficient to win this year's Classic? Given the various points noted above, coupled with Sovereignty's continued improvement, and seemingly bottomless stamina, I would be inclined to say no. And that's before even factoring Sierra Leone, Mindframe, Forever Young, et al, into the conversation. But setting aside all of the fine parsing, I'm happy to congratulate Repole Stable, and Fierceness' other connections, for having shipped to California, and for being rewarded with an exciting, winning effort. Assuming that the colt makes it to the Breeders' Cup Classic in good order, he should minimally add spice to the race, and who knows, perhaps even provide a serious challenge to knock Sovereignty off of his current throne.

Tinky

10,516 görüntüleme • 10 ay önce

"The point of Brian Tully leaking Lindsey Gaetani's phone was to create a media frenzy and change the narrative. To get everyone to stop looking at other key figures in the Karen Read + TurtleBoy cases. Specifically, friends of Tully's MSP unit like Jen McCabe and PI Kate Peter." "By throwing Gaetani's entire private life out there, they could seize control of the public narrative at a really critical moment (April 2024, the start of the first Karen Read and John O'Keefe trial) and create one heck of a diversion." "You know, this story is so much bigger than just a data leak. It's really about the alleged weaponization of evidence, and it leaves us with a really unsettling question. What happens to justice when evidence isn't being used to find the truth, but is instead being used as a weapon to control a story?" TRANSCRIPT: Alright, let's talk about the Karen Read case. There's this wild story that's been bubbling up and it's not even about the trial itself, it's about the evidence. We're going to dive into a massive data leak that raises some pretty serious questions about how law enforcement is operating here. I mean, just think about this for a second. How on earth does a decade and a half of someone's private phone data—we're talking texts, photos, contacts, everything—end up out in the open, and get this: released by the very people who are supposed to be protecting it? So this all blew up in April of 2024. The complete, totally unredacted phone data of a key person in this whole affair, Lindsey Gaetani, was just leaked. And I'm not just talking about a couple of messages; we're talking about her entire digital life laid bare for everyone to see. 15 years—just let that sink in. Imagine everything on your phone going all the way back to the mid-2000s, just suddenly becoming public information. It's a huge breach of privacy, and it makes you ask one thing right away: How could this possibly happen? Okay, so to figure out how this went down, we really have to look at the people involved. And trust me, it is a complicated web of state troopers, private investigators, and even online operatives, all connected in some really crucial ways. Let's try to untangle this a bit. You've got state police officer Brian Tully, he's the one who allegedly leaked the data, and there's Kate Peter, a private investigator. And what's really weird is that her messages with Gaetani were mysteriously scrubbed from the data before it got out. Trooper Nick Guarino is the one who processed the data. And all of this, this whole handover, happened while the special prosecutor, Ken Mello, was literally in the hospital. The theory is that this was all meant to protect people like Jen McCabe, who's a key witness in the main case. So how did this happen? Well, one story being floated is that it was just a series of clumsy accidents, a real comedy of errors that, whoops, resulted in a massive data breach. As you can probably guess, not a lot of people are buying that one. So the accident theory—and you gotta' hear this—goes something like this. An officer tripped? Okay, and while he was stumbling, he just happened to perfectly edit a cell phone extraction, removing very specific messages. Then, apparently he morphed into a snowball, rolled down the highway, and tumbled right into the defense lawyer's office, delivering the data. You know, a total accident. Yeah, as one source put it, it's just ludicrous. You don't trip and fall and end up in that situation. It makes no sense. So if it wasn't some bizarre accident, what was it? Well, there's a much more compelling argument out there, that this leak was no accident. It was a deliberate, calculated move. And there's actually evidence that points right in that direction. Just consider these points for a minute. A clumsy trip doesn't explain why specific messages from Trooper Tully himself and from PI Kate Peter were surgically removed from the data. It also doesn't explain the timing. Why would Tully hand deliver this package, personally, while the one guy who could provide any oversight, Prosecutor Ken Mello, was out of commission in the hospital? And this isn't just speculation. This is special prosecutor Ken Mello testifying in court. He confirms it. He says that while he was hospitalized, his colleague, Tully, delivered the evidence package. This tells us that someone took it upon themselves to act, while their superior was unavailable. So let's just lay it all out, side by side. In one corner you have the accident theory, which, you know, involves snowballs and doesn't explain any of the key facts, like the edited data. And in the other corner you have the intentional leak theory. This one actually explains the missing messages and is backed up by court testimony and some seriously suspicious timing. So that brings us to the biggest question of all, right? If this was a deliberate act by a member of law enforcement, what was the motive? Why on earth would an officer intentionally leak 15 years of someone's private life? Well, according to the sources we're looking at, the answer is just one word: Distraction. The whole point of this massive data dump was to create a media frenzy, a public circus, and completely change the conversation. And what was the goal of this distraction? It was allegedly to get everyone to stop looking at other key figures in the case. Specifically, people who were friends of the police unit, like Jen McCabe and PI Kate Peter. By throwing Gaetani's entire private life out there, they could seize control of the public narrative at a really critical moment and create one heck of a diversion. You know, this story is so much bigger than just a data leak. It's really about the alleged weaponization of evidence, and it leaves us with a really unsettling question. What happens to justice when evidence isn't being used to find the truth, but is instead being used as a weapon to control a story?
4:59

"The point of Brian Tully leaking Lindsey Gaetani's phone was to create a media frenzy and change the narrative. To get everyone to stop looking at other key figures in the Karen Read + TurtleBoy cases. Specifically, friends of Tully's MSP unit like Jen McCabe and PI Kate Peter." "By throwing Gaetani's entire private life out there, they could seize control of the public narrative at a really critical moment (April 2024, the start of the first Karen Read and John O'Keefe trial) and create one heck of a diversion." "You know, this story is so much bigger than just a data leak. It's really about the alleged weaponization of evidence, and it leaves us with a really unsettling question. What happens to justice when evidence isn't being used to find the truth, but is instead being used as a weapon to control a story?" TRANSCRIPT: Alright, let's talk about the Karen Read case. There's this wild story that's been bubbling up and it's not even about the trial itself, it's about the evidence. We're going to dive into a massive data leak that raises some pretty serious questions about how law enforcement is operating here. I mean, just think about this for a second. How on earth does a decade and a half of someone's private phone data—we're talking texts, photos, contacts, everything—end up out in the open, and get this: released by the very people who are supposed to be protecting it? So this all blew up in April of 2024. The complete, totally unredacted phone data of a key person in this whole affair, Lindsey Gaetani, was just leaked. And I'm not just talking about a couple of messages; we're talking about her entire digital life laid bare for everyone to see. 15 years—just let that sink in. Imagine everything on your phone going all the way back to the mid-2000s, just suddenly becoming public information. It's a huge breach of privacy, and it makes you ask one thing right away: How could this possibly happen? Okay, so to figure out how this went down, we really have to look at the people involved. And trust me, it is a complicated web of state troopers, private investigators, and even online operatives, all connected in some really crucial ways. Let's try to untangle this a bit. You've got state police officer Brian Tully, he's the one who allegedly leaked the data, and there's Kate Peter, a private investigator. And what's really weird is that her messages with Gaetani were mysteriously scrubbed from the data before it got out. Trooper Nick Guarino is the one who processed the data. And all of this, this whole handover, happened while the special prosecutor, Ken Mello, was literally in the hospital. The theory is that this was all meant to protect people like Jen McCabe, who's a key witness in the main case. So how did this happen? Well, one story being floated is that it was just a series of clumsy accidents, a real comedy of errors that, whoops, resulted in a massive data breach. As you can probably guess, not a lot of people are buying that one. So the accident theory—and you gotta' hear this—goes something like this. An officer tripped? Okay, and while he was stumbling, he just happened to perfectly edit a cell phone extraction, removing very specific messages. Then, apparently he morphed into a snowball, rolled down the highway, and tumbled right into the defense lawyer's office, delivering the data. You know, a total accident. Yeah, as one source put it, it's just ludicrous. You don't trip and fall and end up in that situation. It makes no sense. So if it wasn't some bizarre accident, what was it? Well, there's a much more compelling argument out there, that this leak was no accident. It was a deliberate, calculated move. And there's actually evidence that points right in that direction. Just consider these points for a minute. A clumsy trip doesn't explain why specific messages from Trooper Tully himself and from PI Kate Peter were surgically removed from the data. It also doesn't explain the timing. Why would Tully hand deliver this package, personally, while the one guy who could provide any oversight, Prosecutor Ken Mello, was out of commission in the hospital? And this isn't just speculation. This is special prosecutor Ken Mello testifying in court. He confirms it. He says that while he was hospitalized, his colleague, Tully, delivered the evidence package. This tells us that someone took it upon themselves to act, while their superior was unavailable. So let's just lay it all out, side by side. In one corner you have the accident theory, which, you know, involves snowballs and doesn't explain any of the key facts, like the edited data. And in the other corner you have the intentional leak theory. This one actually explains the missing messages and is backed up by court testimony and some seriously suspicious timing. So that brings us to the biggest question of all, right? If this was a deliberate act by a member of law enforcement, what was the motive? Why on earth would an officer intentionally leak 15 years of someone's private life? Well, according to the sources we're looking at, the answer is just one word: Distraction. The whole point of this massive data dump was to create a media frenzy, a public circus, and completely change the conversation. And what was the goal of this distraction? It was allegedly to get everyone to stop looking at other key figures in the case. Specifically, people who were friends of the police unit, like Jen McCabe and PI Kate Peter. By throwing Gaetani's entire private life out there, they could seize control of the public narrative at a really critical moment and create one heck of a diversion. You know, this story is so much bigger than just a data leak. It's really about the alleged weaponization of evidence, and it leaves us with a really unsettling question. What happens to justice when evidence isn't being used to find the truth, but is instead being used as a weapon to control a story?

Grant Smith Ellis

12,028 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce

"I was calling it out a decade before many were even talking about it" - Jim McMahon MP James Ignatius O'Rourke McMahon posted this statement on Facebook. The Oldham MP insisting he is now a champion of victims of the Pakistani Rape Gangs is an outrageous falsehood. Behind the outright lies is a truth he hopes no one examines. McMahon does not mention that his entire defence of his record as Leader of Oldham Council depends on a single blog post from 2014. When he was the most powerful man in the borough, facing systematic failures in child protection, this obscure internal newsletter is all he has to show for it. A Blog Post is Not Leadership This 2014 blog post was internal council fluff. These leader’s blogs were routine internal bulletins. They were never intended as public warnings or policy interventions. They were political padding read by a very small number of staff and party loyalists. It was never promoted to residents, never raised in full council, never linked to any change in policy or practice. McMahon never used it to demand accountability from Greater Manchester Police or his own officers. The blog post proves nothing except his complete failure to act when children needed protection. McMahon now wants people to believe that this forgotten internal memo represents leadership. It is political theatre designed to salvage his reputation a decade too late. McMahon claims he was ahead of everyone. He even claimed that he was calling this out a decade before others were even talking about it. This is false. It insults the residents who fought to expose what he helped to hide. While he now pretends to have sounded early warnings, the record shows the opposite. He denied the truth. He attacked anyone who raised concerns. He smeared whistleblowers as extremists. He worked with officials and broadcasters to control the narrative. His supposed decade of action amounts to nothing more than a single internal memo that no one saw and no one acted upon. Any council leader who genuinely cared about child sexual exploitation had real power available. His failures fall into two categories. 1. What he had the power to do. McMahon could have ordered immediate internal reviews, commissioned independent investigations and demanded full police disclosure. He could have called emergency council meetings, challenged the Multi Agency Safeguarding Hub and required scrutiny committees to take evidence in public. 2. What he had the responsibility to do. He should also have provided moral and political leadership. He had the authority to warn parents, protect whistleblowers and establish specialist CSE task forces. He should have stood with survivors and refused to allow identity politics to silence them. He should have confronted senior officers, raised national alarms, forced council votes and exposed the missing minutes that revealed what officials already knew. McMahon chose to do none of these things. A forgotten newsletter stands in for his leadership because the truth is worse. This was not simply neglect. It was active cooperation in shaping a narrative that hid the truth. Formal reviews and information disclosures have shown how coordinated messaging operated between local leaders and national broadcasters. McMahon worked with the BBC to help conceal what was happening in shisha bars. His team did not stop at hiding these events. They celebrated the fact that they had succeeded. Powerful adults negotiated narratives while children faced the consequences alone. Institutions concealed the truth while the real cost was borne by the children of this town. Children Paid the Price While McMahon was writing newsletters, children in Oldham were being exploited in shisha bars. Offenders approached vulnerable girls outside school gates. When children went missing, teachers had to collect them from addresses already known to the authorities. These failures are now part of the documented record. They have been confirmed in formal reviews and are no longer disputed by any agency. The system failed completely under McMahon's tenure. Agencies refused to intervene. Political leaders discouraged scrutiny at the moments when children most needed protection. The truth emerged in spite of McMahon and his allies. Ordinary residents exposed what happened while those in power tried to silence them. McMahon spent years attacking anyone who spoke out. Even now, McMahon will not allow public scrutiny. He has disabled and deleted comments on his Facebook post. The instinct has not changed. Control who can speak. Shape the narrative. Keep criticism out of sight. If the public does not challenge this behaviour, history will be rewritten by the very people who helped bury it. Children feared coming forward because they knew they would be dismissed, disbelieved or branded racist for telling the truth. This was the culture that kept survivors silent. McMahon and politicians like him created that environment. They found it easier to destroy whistleblowers than confront their own failures. Public trust in Oldham’s institutions has collapsed for this reason. Not because of critics but because leaders put politics above the safety of children. The Evidence Was Always There For years McMahon insisted there was no evidence of a cover up. The scale of the investigations now underway shows how outrageous those denials always were. The evidence is overwhelming. The National Crime Agency is reviewing more than one thousand two hundred files across twenty three police forces going back to 2010. Greater Manchester has two hundred and thirty six cases under reassessment. Operation Beaconpoint is active. Operation Sherwood exists only because even Andy Burnham’s rigged Assurance Review finally accepted the evidence. Sherwood has produced only showcase arrests. There have been no charges, convictions and no form of accountability. The scale of the ongoing review is not progress. It is an indictment of a decade of denial. McMahon’s reaction follows a familiar pattern. When evidence surfaced he denied it. When critics spoke out he attacked them. When survivors came forward he used identity politics to discredit them. When accountability was demanded he shifted blame. Now that the truth cannot be denied he attempts to rebuild his image with selective history and social media spin. Justice, Not Revisionism McMahon is now engaged in an extraordinary attempt at revisionism. He wants to present himself as the hero of a story in which he acted as the villain. He and his allies spent years trying to silence, discredit and destroy anyone who exposed the truth. If they had succeeded the abuse would still be hidden. Survivors would still be voiceless. The cover up would be intact. He attacked those who exposed the truth. He protected the system that failed children. He enabled a culture of silence and intimidation. He did everything except protect the children. The fight is no longer about proving what happened. The evidence is beyond dispute. The fight now is ensuring that McMahon and those like him face consequences for their failures. Children were gang raped while he produced blog posts. Communities were betrayed while he managed his image. Survivors were silenced while he protected his political career. McMahon believes he can escape accountability through Facebook statements and political spin. He believes voters will forget what he did and what he refused to do when children needed him most. What happens next depends on whether the public honours the truth or accepts the rewrite. Oldham deserves the truth and it deserves accountability. That begins by refusing to let politicians rewrite the past. The failures seen in Oldham were repeated across the country. More than one hundred thousand children were affected in towns and cities nationwide. McMahon is not the only political figure involved. There are countless others, all now struggling to rewrite their roles as heroic rather than complicit. The pattern is identical in Rotherham, Rochdale, Telford, Newcastle and many other places. Deny the truth. Attack the critics. Protect reputations. Claim credit when the truth finally emerges. This is not only a CSE scandal. It is a crisis of truth, trust and governance in modern Britain. The country is beginning to wake up. The truth is no longer theirs to control. They will all try to rewrite history to make themselves the heroes. Only if we let them. They'll Rewrite History to Make Themselves the Heroes. Don't Let Them. This inquiry didn't happen because the government suddenly found its moral compass. It was dragged into existence by survivors who wouldn't shut up, whistleblowers who refused to disappear, and a public tired of being lied to. For years, they fought against it. Now they'll fight to control it. Watch how it unfolds. Limited scope. Sanitised language. Politicians rewriting history as if they are the saviours. Meanwhile, evidence will mysteriously vanish, key witnesses will develop sudden memory loss. And when it's over, they'll package it all up as "lessons learned." The whitewash has already begun. The only question is whether we let them get away with it. I am Raja Miah. For seven years, I led a small team that exposed how politicians protected the rape gangs. So now the question is: will you stand with me and help make sure the National Inquiry we have all fought for is not a whitewash? We’re running out of time. Without the numbers, they will win. It’s as simple as that. 🔴 Subscribe to my newsletter – it’s free. Or support the work for just 75p a week (£3/month or £30/year). Whatever you do, please subscribe; 👉 This is the fight. This is the moment. There will not be another 🔴 Prefer a one-off contribution? 👉 👉 No corporate sponsors. No party machine. Just you and thousands of ordinary people who know what’s at stake. We’ve come this far. Help finish it. - Raja Miah MBE
23:32

"I was calling it out a decade before many were even talking about it" - Jim McMahon MP James Ignatius O'Rourke McMahon posted this statement on Facebook. The Oldham MP insisting he is now a champion of victims of the Pakistani Rape Gangs is an outrageous falsehood. Behind the outright lies is a truth he hopes no one examines. McMahon does not mention that his entire defence of his record as Leader of Oldham Council depends on a single blog post from 2014. When he was the most powerful man in the borough, facing systematic failures in child protection, this obscure internal newsletter is all he has to show for it. A Blog Post is Not Leadership This 2014 blog post was internal council fluff. These leader’s blogs were routine internal bulletins. They were never intended as public warnings or policy interventions. They were political padding read by a very small number of staff and party loyalists. It was never promoted to residents, never raised in full council, never linked to any change in policy or practice. McMahon never used it to demand accountability from Greater Manchester Police or his own officers. The blog post proves nothing except his complete failure to act when children needed protection. McMahon now wants people to believe that this forgotten internal memo represents leadership. It is political theatre designed to salvage his reputation a decade too late. McMahon claims he was ahead of everyone. He even claimed that he was calling this out a decade before others were even talking about it. This is false. It insults the residents who fought to expose what he helped to hide. While he now pretends to have sounded early warnings, the record shows the opposite. He denied the truth. He attacked anyone who raised concerns. He smeared whistleblowers as extremists. He worked with officials and broadcasters to control the narrative. His supposed decade of action amounts to nothing more than a single internal memo that no one saw and no one acted upon. Any council leader who genuinely cared about child sexual exploitation had real power available. His failures fall into two categories. 1. What he had the power to do. McMahon could have ordered immediate internal reviews, commissioned independent investigations and demanded full police disclosure. He could have called emergency council meetings, challenged the Multi Agency Safeguarding Hub and required scrutiny committees to take evidence in public. 2. What he had the responsibility to do. He should also have provided moral and political leadership. He had the authority to warn parents, protect whistleblowers and establish specialist CSE task forces. He should have stood with survivors and refused to allow identity politics to silence them. He should have confronted senior officers, raised national alarms, forced council votes and exposed the missing minutes that revealed what officials already knew. McMahon chose to do none of these things. A forgotten newsletter stands in for his leadership because the truth is worse. This was not simply neglect. It was active cooperation in shaping a narrative that hid the truth. Formal reviews and information disclosures have shown how coordinated messaging operated between local leaders and national broadcasters. McMahon worked with the BBC to help conceal what was happening in shisha bars. His team did not stop at hiding these events. They celebrated the fact that they had succeeded. Powerful adults negotiated narratives while children faced the consequences alone. Institutions concealed the truth while the real cost was borne by the children of this town. Children Paid the Price While McMahon was writing newsletters, children in Oldham were being exploited in shisha bars. Offenders approached vulnerable girls outside school gates. When children went missing, teachers had to collect them from addresses already known to the authorities. These failures are now part of the documented record. They have been confirmed in formal reviews and are no longer disputed by any agency. The system failed completely under McMahon's tenure. Agencies refused to intervene. Political leaders discouraged scrutiny at the moments when children most needed protection. The truth emerged in spite of McMahon and his allies. Ordinary residents exposed what happened while those in power tried to silence them. McMahon spent years attacking anyone who spoke out. Even now, McMahon will not allow public scrutiny. He has disabled and deleted comments on his Facebook post. The instinct has not changed. Control who can speak. Shape the narrative. Keep criticism out of sight. If the public does not challenge this behaviour, history will be rewritten by the very people who helped bury it. Children feared coming forward because they knew they would be dismissed, disbelieved or branded racist for telling the truth. This was the culture that kept survivors silent. McMahon and politicians like him created that environment. They found it easier to destroy whistleblowers than confront their own failures. Public trust in Oldham’s institutions has collapsed for this reason. Not because of critics but because leaders put politics above the safety of children. The Evidence Was Always There For years McMahon insisted there was no evidence of a cover up. The scale of the investigations now underway shows how outrageous those denials always were. The evidence is overwhelming. The National Crime Agency is reviewing more than one thousand two hundred files across twenty three police forces going back to 2010. Greater Manchester has two hundred and thirty six cases under reassessment. Operation Beaconpoint is active. Operation Sherwood exists only because even Andy Burnham’s rigged Assurance Review finally accepted the evidence. Sherwood has produced only showcase arrests. There have been no charges, convictions and no form of accountability. The scale of the ongoing review is not progress. It is an indictment of a decade of denial. McMahon’s reaction follows a familiar pattern. When evidence surfaced he denied it. When critics spoke out he attacked them. When survivors came forward he used identity politics to discredit them. When accountability was demanded he shifted blame. Now that the truth cannot be denied he attempts to rebuild his image with selective history and social media spin. Justice, Not Revisionism McMahon is now engaged in an extraordinary attempt at revisionism. He wants to present himself as the hero of a story in which he acted as the villain. He and his allies spent years trying to silence, discredit and destroy anyone who exposed the truth. If they had succeeded the abuse would still be hidden. Survivors would still be voiceless. The cover up would be intact. He attacked those who exposed the truth. He protected the system that failed children. He enabled a culture of silence and intimidation. He did everything except protect the children. The fight is no longer about proving what happened. The evidence is beyond dispute. The fight now is ensuring that McMahon and those like him face consequences for their failures. Children were gang raped while he produced blog posts. Communities were betrayed while he managed his image. Survivors were silenced while he protected his political career. McMahon believes he can escape accountability through Facebook statements and political spin. He believes voters will forget what he did and what he refused to do when children needed him most. What happens next depends on whether the public honours the truth or accepts the rewrite. Oldham deserves the truth and it deserves accountability. That begins by refusing to let politicians rewrite the past. The failures seen in Oldham were repeated across the country. More than one hundred thousand children were affected in towns and cities nationwide. McMahon is not the only political figure involved. There are countless others, all now struggling to rewrite their roles as heroic rather than complicit. The pattern is identical in Rotherham, Rochdale, Telford, Newcastle and many other places. Deny the truth. Attack the critics. Protect reputations. Claim credit when the truth finally emerges. This is not only a CSE scandal. It is a crisis of truth, trust and governance in modern Britain. The country is beginning to wake up. The truth is no longer theirs to control. They will all try to rewrite history to make themselves the heroes. Only if we let them. They'll Rewrite History to Make Themselves the Heroes. Don't Let Them. This inquiry didn't happen because the government suddenly found its moral compass. It was dragged into existence by survivors who wouldn't shut up, whistleblowers who refused to disappear, and a public tired of being lied to. For years, they fought against it. Now they'll fight to control it. Watch how it unfolds. Limited scope. Sanitised language. Politicians rewriting history as if they are the saviours. Meanwhile, evidence will mysteriously vanish, key witnesses will develop sudden memory loss. And when it's over, they'll package it all up as "lessons learned." The whitewash has already begun. The only question is whether we let them get away with it. I am Raja Miah. For seven years, I led a small team that exposed how politicians protected the rape gangs. So now the question is: will you stand with me and help make sure the National Inquiry we have all fought for is not a whitewash? We’re running out of time. Without the numbers, they will win. It’s as simple as that. 🔴 Subscribe to my newsletter – it’s free. Or support the work for just 75p a week (£3/month or £30/year). Whatever you do, please subscribe; 👉 This is the fight. This is the moment. There will not be another 🔴 Prefer a one-off contribution? 👉 👉 No corporate sponsors. No party machine. Just you and thousands of ordinary people who know what’s at stake. We’ve come this far. Help finish it. - Raja Miah MBE

Raja Miah

22,710 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce

🚨 TRENDING: The Charlie Kirk Timeline Is A LIE. The FEDS Got CAUGHT Red-Handed. If They Planned A COVER UP... Common Sense Says They PLANNED The Assassination As Well🎯 Stop what you are doing. The entire "official story" of the Charlie Kirk assassination just went up in smoke. Baron Coleman just dropped a nuclear-level bombshell with verifiable court documents that prove the FBI, the local sheriff, and the media lied to the world about the timeline to frame Tyler Robinson in the court of public opinion. 🕰️ THE TRAP: MIRANDIZED BEFORE HE WAS "CAUGHT" The feds told us they went on a desperate 33-hour manhunt for Tyler Robinson. They said he was a "cold-blooded killer" who refused to talk. That is a verified lie. Baron Coleman found the actual transcript of the arrest. Tyler Robinson was being Mirandized and talking to a cop at 6:25 PM on September 11th. Do the Math: If he was being read his rights at 6:25 PM, that means he was in custody hours before the "manhunt" supposedly ended at 10 PM. The Feds manufactured three extra hours of "terror" to sell the narrative. Cooperation vs. Rights: Tyler didn't "refuse to talk." He cooperatively stated: "I would like to speak with my legal counsel... but until I’ve had an opportunity to speak with someone, I would like to remain silent." He didn’t clam up; he used his Constitutional rights, which the media then spun as "guilt." 🕵️‍♂️ THE FAKE MANHUNT & DOCTORED PHOTOS This is where it gets truly sinister. While Tyler was already in custody and Mirandized, the Feds were still out here pretending he was loose. 7:17 PM (6:17 Utah Time): The FBI releases a second set of "suspect photos" from the stairwell, claiming they are still actively hunting him. Why? They already had him! The "Enhanced" Trap: As Kash Patel accidentally revealed, these were "ENHANCED" (doctored) photos. They released these fake images while he was detained to cement the image of his guilt in the public mind before any defense could be mounted. 🐍 THE SHERIFF’S LIES & THE IMPOSTER CONFESSION The "Fed Slop" doesn't stop there. Sheriff Mike Smith (who resigned!) claimed he was on a phone call coordinating Tyler’s surrender at 8:02 PM. The Catch: There is literal video of Sheriff Mike Smith at the Governor’s press conference at 8:00 PM. He wasn't on a phone call; he was standing behind the Governor. The call never happened. The "Boomer" Confession: The "Discord confession" Tyler supposedly made at 7:57 PM (Utah time) is a total plant. He was already in jail when it was posted! And let’s be real—as the breakdown points out, no Gen Z’er writes a "moral compass" dissertation confession to randoms on Discord. The language is pure Boomer fan fiction. ⚖️ TRIAL-ALTERING EVIDENCE This is it. Case over. The Feds didn’t just make a mistake; they scripted a disaster. They lied on official arrest records, deleted security footage of him turning himself in, and released doctored photos to poison the jury pool. The " ghosts in the machine" aren't a conspiracy—they are a proven fact. The big fish didn't just get caught; they got filleted by their own paper trail. This is trending now, and it’s sending shockwaves across the internet. We need to make sure this ripple hits Tyler Robinson’s defense team. Drop your thoughts on this massive exposure in the comments. Video From: RyanMatta 🇺🇸 🦅, Screenshot From: Travis FOLLOW Them Both!
8:46

🚨 TRENDING: The Charlie Kirk Timeline Is A LIE. The FEDS Got CAUGHT Red-Handed. If They Planned A COVER UP... Common Sense Says They PLANNED The Assassination As Well🎯 Stop what you are doing. The entire "official story" of the Charlie Kirk assassination just went up in smoke. Baron Coleman just dropped a nuclear-level bombshell with verifiable court documents that prove the FBI, the local sheriff, and the media lied to the world about the timeline to frame Tyler Robinson in the court of public opinion. 🕰️ THE TRAP: MIRANDIZED BEFORE HE WAS "CAUGHT" The feds told us they went on a desperate 33-hour manhunt for Tyler Robinson. They said he was a "cold-blooded killer" who refused to talk. That is a verified lie. Baron Coleman found the actual transcript of the arrest. Tyler Robinson was being Mirandized and talking to a cop at 6:25 PM on September 11th. Do the Math: If he was being read his rights at 6:25 PM, that means he was in custody hours before the "manhunt" supposedly ended at 10 PM. The Feds manufactured three extra hours of "terror" to sell the narrative. Cooperation vs. Rights: Tyler didn't "refuse to talk." He cooperatively stated: "I would like to speak with my legal counsel... but until I’ve had an opportunity to speak with someone, I would like to remain silent." He didn’t clam up; he used his Constitutional rights, which the media then spun as "guilt." 🕵️‍♂️ THE FAKE MANHUNT & DOCTORED PHOTOS This is where it gets truly sinister. While Tyler was already in custody and Mirandized, the Feds were still out here pretending he was loose. 7:17 PM (6:17 Utah Time): The FBI releases a second set of "suspect photos" from the stairwell, claiming they are still actively hunting him. Why? They already had him! The "Enhanced" Trap: As Kash Patel accidentally revealed, these were "ENHANCED" (doctored) photos. They released these fake images while he was detained to cement the image of his guilt in the public mind before any defense could be mounted. 🐍 THE SHERIFF’S LIES & THE IMPOSTER CONFESSION The "Fed Slop" doesn't stop there. Sheriff Mike Smith (who resigned!) claimed he was on a phone call coordinating Tyler’s surrender at 8:02 PM. The Catch: There is literal video of Sheriff Mike Smith at the Governor’s press conference at 8:00 PM. He wasn't on a phone call; he was standing behind the Governor. The call never happened. The "Boomer" Confession: The "Discord confession" Tyler supposedly made at 7:57 PM (Utah time) is a total plant. He was already in jail when it was posted! And let’s be real—as the breakdown points out, no Gen Z’er writes a "moral compass" dissertation confession to randoms on Discord. The language is pure Boomer fan fiction. ⚖️ TRIAL-ALTERING EVIDENCE This is it. Case over. The Feds didn’t just make a mistake; they scripted a disaster. They lied on official arrest records, deleted security footage of him turning himself in, and released doctored photos to poison the jury pool. The " ghosts in the machine" aren't a conspiracy—they are a proven fact. The big fish didn't just get caught; they got filleted by their own paper trail. This is trending now, and it’s sending shockwaves across the internet. We need to make sure this ripple hits Tyler Robinson’s defense team. Drop your thoughts on this massive exposure in the comments. Video From: RyanMatta 🇺🇸 🦅, Screenshot From: Travis FOLLOW Them Both!

Project Constitution

255,750 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

🚨NEW: Chairman Jason Smith's opening statement for President Joe Biden's impeachment inquiry. "Yesterday, the Ways and Means Committee released new documents showing President Biden was not just aware of his son's business dealings, but he was connected to them. And a newly released message to a Chinese business executive Hunter Biden mentions preserving the 'keys to my family's only asset,' that asset being Joe Biden. New evidence released in response to questions raised by members of the committee on both sides when Gary Shapley and Joseph Ziegler, the two IRS whistleblowers, testified in July paints a disturbing picture of a revolving door between Joe Biden's office and Hunter Biden's business partners. According to a worksheet provided by IRS whistleblower Ziegler, then Vice President Biden's April 2014 official visit to Ukraine occurred only days after a series of White House meetings with Hunter Biden and his business associates regarding Ukraine. Shortly after Joe Biden returned stateside, the Ukrainian company Burisma announced Hunter Biden's appointment to its board. New evidence provided shows Hunter Biden using his father's position to gain favor with billionaire Miguel Alemán including having Joe Biden host them at the White House in February of 2014 at the Vice President's residence alongside Mexican billionaire Carlos Slim in November of 2015. And then, in 2016, he used Air Force Two to shuttle Hunter Biden and his business associate to Mexico City. Whether it was lunches, phone calls, White House meetings, or official foreign trips, Hunter Biden cashed in by arranging access to Joe Biden, the family brand. The Biden family and their associates received millions in payments from foreign sources, including from Russia, China, Ukraine, and Romania. In one email, Hunter Biden even bragged that he cut a deal for 10 million from just one company for "introductions alone." And yet the DOJ wanted to keep the spotlight as far from Joe Biden as possible. One of the items we released yesterday was an IRS interview with James Biden, the President's brother, in September of 2022. The agency was barred in the interview from asking him about Joe Biden, and about whether Joe Biden was involved in Hunter Biden's deal with a Chinese energy company. And when Hunter Biden had his tax liability of over 2 million, mysteriously paid for by a Democrat Party donor named Kevin Morris, who we barely knew, something IRS investigators saw as a possible campaign finance violation. Assistant US Attorney Lesley Wolf said she did not want any of the agents to look into the allegation... This is the same Attorney Wolf, who, in an email, we released yesterday, responded to IRS investigators seeking approval for a search warrant with 'there should be nothing about Political Figure One in here.' That being a reference to Joe Biden."
3:50

🚨NEW: Chairman Jason Smith's opening statement for President Joe Biden's impeachment inquiry. "Yesterday, the Ways and Means Committee released new documents showing President Biden was not just aware of his son's business dealings, but he was connected to them. And a newly released message to a Chinese business executive Hunter Biden mentions preserving the 'keys to my family's only asset,' that asset being Joe Biden. New evidence released in response to questions raised by members of the committee on both sides when Gary Shapley and Joseph Ziegler, the two IRS whistleblowers, testified in July paints a disturbing picture of a revolving door between Joe Biden's office and Hunter Biden's business partners. According to a worksheet provided by IRS whistleblower Ziegler, then Vice President Biden's April 2014 official visit to Ukraine occurred only days after a series of White House meetings with Hunter Biden and his business associates regarding Ukraine. Shortly after Joe Biden returned stateside, the Ukrainian company Burisma announced Hunter Biden's appointment to its board. New evidence provided shows Hunter Biden using his father's position to gain favor with billionaire Miguel Alemán including having Joe Biden host them at the White House in February of 2014 at the Vice President's residence alongside Mexican billionaire Carlos Slim in November of 2015. And then, in 2016, he used Air Force Two to shuttle Hunter Biden and his business associate to Mexico City. Whether it was lunches, phone calls, White House meetings, or official foreign trips, Hunter Biden cashed in by arranging access to Joe Biden, the family brand. The Biden family and their associates received millions in payments from foreign sources, including from Russia, China, Ukraine, and Romania. In one email, Hunter Biden even bragged that he cut a deal for 10 million from just one company for "introductions alone." And yet the DOJ wanted to keep the spotlight as far from Joe Biden as possible. One of the items we released yesterday was an IRS interview with James Biden, the President's brother, in September of 2022. The agency was barred in the interview from asking him about Joe Biden, and about whether Joe Biden was involved in Hunter Biden's deal with a Chinese energy company. And when Hunter Biden had his tax liability of over 2 million, mysteriously paid for by a Democrat Party donor named Kevin Morris, who we barely knew, something IRS investigators saw as a possible campaign finance violation. Assistant US Attorney Lesley Wolf said she did not want any of the agents to look into the allegation... This is the same Attorney Wolf, who, in an email, we released yesterday, responded to IRS investigators seeking approval for a search warrant with 'there should be nothing about Political Figure One in here.' That being a reference to Joe Biden."

KanekoaTheGreat

184,598 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce

Yoram Hazony, philosopher-king of the Woke Right—a marginal movement of cranks, bigots, and meatheads that wants to roll back the Enlightenment to the sweeter, gentler, more religious Middle Ages, and has probably already doomed the Republicans in 2028—came to the Combatting Antisemitism Conference this week to recite a humble apology. “James Lindsay was right. Obviously, in retrospect, trying to create a nationalist movement on the American right was inevitably going to descend into a mess of white nationalism and Jew-hate. Trying to undo the universalism and rationalism embedded in the American Constitution, in favour of religion and ‘tradition,’ risks everything that made America by far the greatest, freest, wealthiest nation the world has ever seen, and the safest place for Jews in their 2,600 years of exile. I was blinded by ego. It is now time to call out all the white nationalists and bigots on the right, overt and covert—the ones who attack Jews openly, but most of all those who run interference for them and provide them succour. If we on the right don’t defeat these wicked clowns, the right will be defeated by the far-left. Mea culpa, mea maxima culpa.” But that is not what he said. Instead, in an angry and accusatory tone, he upbraided the audience for their failure to prove that Tucker Carlson was actually an antisemite. Why, he demanded, had the “Antisemitism Industrial Complex” not sent him packaged, edited dossiers of evidence for his consideration? “Incredible incompetence,” Hazony declared—this from a man who had nothing at all to say about his very competent friend Kevin Roberts, who managed to turn the Heritage Foundation from the core of conservative thought into a joke by repurposing its mission to support arch Jew-hater Tucker Carlson. Hazony lambasted the assembled activists and philanthropists, telling them what a terrible mistake they were making by not allying with “nationalists”—presumably people he believes are his people. He drew a distinction between the “alt-right,” whom he concedes are antisemites, and the “liberal Republicans” like Ted Cruz, who he says do not need courting because they are already pro-Jewish. The core bulk of the Republican coalition—the evangelicals—was simply magicked away by Hazony’s novel categories, which oh-so-conveniently allow him to play both the moderating force and the good cop to whom Jews should turn if they want to make a difference. It is a total fantasy. But Hazony has form here: he routinely defines categories tendentiously to shoehorn his arguments into reality. He once wrote a book in which, inter alia, he argued that the Third Reich wasn’t really nationalist at all. Why, oh why, won’t Jews just be friends with the “nationalists”? If only Jews could be persuaded to get on board with the post-liberal project—the true future of the Republican Party for the next generation, Hazony promises us. Never mind that this project amounts to unraveling the Constitution and imposing a national religion, like in lovely old Europe, from which the American colonists fled due to—well—religious persecution. Hazony claims these “nationalists” make up 65% of the Republican base, when in reality you could probably barely fill a room with people who truly believe in, understand, or want his kooky, impractical, and undesirable theories. Even Kevin Roberts likely doesn’t understand the plan—he’s more of a sports fan, after all. Who are these “nationalist” senators and congressmen? Marjorie Taylor Greene? Is this supposed legion Jack Posobiec’s Turning Point crowd? So who, exactly? Hazony perhaps hopes it is Vance—Tucker’s mentee and friend. Does he really believe that a man willing to throw his own wife and children under the bus before Nick Fuentes will advance his ideas? It’s all so silly. The good news is that if Vance does get nominated, he will lose—and in no small part because of his association with “nationalists,” which will be kryptonite to the median American voter. The Woke Right and the Woke Left share many of the same tactics—like infiltrating institutions and corrupting them—and many of the same outcomes, including hatred of existing power structures and, accidentally, Jews. They arrive there from the same starting point: the belief that the Enlightenment, and its most powerful product, the American Constitution, binds their hands and therefore must be unravelled to give them freer rein. Every Jew with a brain and the slightest smidgen of humility understands why this would be disastrous—not just for Jews, but for the American people, who are now celebrating 250 years of the greatest nation that has ever existed, a nation built on belief in—and willingness to die for—ideas, not merely kin, clan, and nation. Hazony saved his harshest words for his fellow right-wing Jews, whose actions he called a disgrace, accusing them of “misbehaving.” The insane Jew-hate on the right is mere “agitprop,” insufficiently condemned by his own “nationalist” allies only because Jews and “liberals” have failed to make their case—or because Jews are too shrill in their complaints: “And when they [the 'nationalists'] don’t [condemn right-wing Jew-haters], this drives liberal Republicans, both Jews and non-Jews, to start misbehaving. They lash out at nationalists, accusing them of antisemitism or of protecting antisemites. It’s a disgrace. If the goal is to persuade Trump’s nationalists to build an alliance with Jews on these and other issues, it’s also counterproductive.” In short, Hazony realised that Trump was as good as it was ever going to get on the right—but it wasn’t right enough for him. So he needed to push further, and that meant building a new coalition: evangelicals out, “nationalism” in. It is a hopeless idea—a mere wrecking ball that will come swinging in 2028. But the fact that he now seeks to browbeat the Jewish right into an alliance with nationalists under a post-liberal, pre-Enlightenment banner is honestly reprehensible. It is a total and ongoing failure, hence the rage and condescension. It is all so pitiable.
1:20

Yoram Hazony, philosopher-king of the Woke Right—a marginal movement of cranks, bigots, and meatheads that wants to roll back the Enlightenment to the sweeter, gentler, more religious Middle Ages, and has probably already doomed the Republicans in 2028—came to the Combatting Antisemitism Conference this week to recite a humble apology. “James Lindsay was right. Obviously, in retrospect, trying to create a nationalist movement on the American right was inevitably going to descend into a mess of white nationalism and Jew-hate. Trying to undo the universalism and rationalism embedded in the American Constitution, in favour of religion and ‘tradition,’ risks everything that made America by far the greatest, freest, wealthiest nation the world has ever seen, and the safest place for Jews in their 2,600 years of exile. I was blinded by ego. It is now time to call out all the white nationalists and bigots on the right, overt and covert—the ones who attack Jews openly, but most of all those who run interference for them and provide them succour. If we on the right don’t defeat these wicked clowns, the right will be defeated by the far-left. Mea culpa, mea maxima culpa.” But that is not what he said. Instead, in an angry and accusatory tone, he upbraided the audience for their failure to prove that Tucker Carlson was actually an antisemite. Why, he demanded, had the “Antisemitism Industrial Complex” not sent him packaged, edited dossiers of evidence for his consideration? “Incredible incompetence,” Hazony declared—this from a man who had nothing at all to say about his very competent friend Kevin Roberts, who managed to turn the Heritage Foundation from the core of conservative thought into a joke by repurposing its mission to support arch Jew-hater Tucker Carlson. Hazony lambasted the assembled activists and philanthropists, telling them what a terrible mistake they were making by not allying with “nationalists”—presumably people he believes are his people. He drew a distinction between the “alt-right,” whom he concedes are antisemites, and the “liberal Republicans” like Ted Cruz, who he says do not need courting because they are already pro-Jewish. The core bulk of the Republican coalition—the evangelicals—was simply magicked away by Hazony’s novel categories, which oh-so-conveniently allow him to play both the moderating force and the good cop to whom Jews should turn if they want to make a difference. It is a total fantasy. But Hazony has form here: he routinely defines categories tendentiously to shoehorn his arguments into reality. He once wrote a book in which, inter alia, he argued that the Third Reich wasn’t really nationalist at all. Why, oh why, won’t Jews just be friends with the “nationalists”? If only Jews could be persuaded to get on board with the post-liberal project—the true future of the Republican Party for the next generation, Hazony promises us. Never mind that this project amounts to unraveling the Constitution and imposing a national religion, like in lovely old Europe, from which the American colonists fled due to—well—religious persecution. Hazony claims these “nationalists” make up 65% of the Republican base, when in reality you could probably barely fill a room with people who truly believe in, understand, or want his kooky, impractical, and undesirable theories. Even Kevin Roberts likely doesn’t understand the plan—he’s more of a sports fan, after all. Who are these “nationalist” senators and congressmen? Marjorie Taylor Greene? Is this supposed legion Jack Posobiec’s Turning Point crowd? So who, exactly? Hazony perhaps hopes it is Vance—Tucker’s mentee and friend. Does he really believe that a man willing to throw his own wife and children under the bus before Nick Fuentes will advance his ideas? It’s all so silly. The good news is that if Vance does get nominated, he will lose—and in no small part because of his association with “nationalists,” which will be kryptonite to the median American voter. The Woke Right and the Woke Left share many of the same tactics—like infiltrating institutions and corrupting them—and many of the same outcomes, including hatred of existing power structures and, accidentally, Jews. They arrive there from the same starting point: the belief that the Enlightenment, and its most powerful product, the American Constitution, binds their hands and therefore must be unravelled to give them freer rein. Every Jew with a brain and the slightest smidgen of humility understands why this would be disastrous—not just for Jews, but for the American people, who are now celebrating 250 years of the greatest nation that has ever existed, a nation built on belief in—and willingness to die for—ideas, not merely kin, clan, and nation. Hazony saved his harshest words for his fellow right-wing Jews, whose actions he called a disgrace, accusing them of “misbehaving.” The insane Jew-hate on the right is mere “agitprop,” insufficiently condemned by his own “nationalist” allies only because Jews and “liberals” have failed to make their case—or because Jews are too shrill in their complaints: “And when they [the 'nationalists'] don’t [condemn right-wing Jew-haters], this drives liberal Republicans, both Jews and non-Jews, to start misbehaving. They lash out at nationalists, accusing them of antisemitism or of protecting antisemites. It’s a disgrace. If the goal is to persuade Trump’s nationalists to build an alliance with Jews on these and other issues, it’s also counterproductive.” In short, Hazony realised that Trump was as good as it was ever going to get on the right—but it wasn’t right enough for him. So he needed to push further, and that meant building a new coalition: evangelicals out, “nationalism” in. It is a hopeless idea—a mere wrecking ball that will come swinging in 2028. But the fact that he now seeks to browbeat the Jewish right into an alliance with nationalists under a post-liberal, pre-Enlightenment banner is honestly reprehensible. It is a total and ongoing failure, hence the rage and condescension. It is all so pitiable.

Saul Sadka

35,949 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

0.001% TAX A junior auditor at PwC in Luxembourg is getting ready to leave his job. Before he goes he goes looking for some training documents to take with him. Instead he finds a folder that anyone in the company could open. No password. No warning. Just sitting there. Inside are hundreds of secret deals between the Luxembourg government and some of the biggest companies on the planet. Deals that let them pay next to nothing in tax. His name is Antoine Deltour. He copies 30,000 pages. That is the whole story. He copies a folder. Let me explain what was actually in it, because this is where it gets interesting. Between 2002 and 2010, PwC alone helped broker 548 of these secret tax agreements, known as tax rulings, for over 340 companies. Apple. Ikea. Pepsi. Disney. Deutsche Bank. AIG. Koch Industries. Skype. GlaxoSmithKline. Coach. Abbott Laboratories. Household names, every one of them. The trick was simple. Companies moved profits through Luxembourg shell structures and Luxembourg quietly agreed in writing to look the other way on tax. Some of these companies ended up paying an effective tax rate under 1 percent. In some cases as low as 0.001 percent. On billions of dollars. Who was running Luxembourg for almost 20 years while this machine was built and protected? Jean-Claude Juncker, Prime Minister of Luxembourg until 2013. Deltour did not leak straight to the world. In 2012 he passed the documents to French journalist Edouard Perrin, who used them for a TV documentary. PwC noticed and filed a complaint with the Luxembourg courts. Then in November 2014, ICIJ ICIJ pulled together over 80 journalists across more than 30 media outlets in 26 countries and published the full scale of it as LuxLeaks. The timing could not have been worse for Juncker, or depending how you look at it, could not have been better. He had just been elected President of the European Commission days before the story broke. The man who ran the tax haven for two decades was now running Europe. A month later ICIJ dropped LuxLeaks 2, showing the other Big 4 accounting firms Deloitte, EY and KPMG were running the exact same playbook. This was never one bad apple. It was standard practice. Juncker faced a no confidence vote in the European Parliament over it. He survived. Deltour was not so lucky. December 2014, Luxembourg charges him with theft, violation of trade secrecy and fraudulent access to a computer system. He is facing up to 5 years in prison and a fine of 1,250,000 euros. For opening an unlocked folder on his way out the door. April 2016, the criminal trial. Deltour and his colleague Raphael Halet, another former PwC employee who leaked a second batch of documents, are both convicted. Deltour gets 12 months suspended and a 1,500 euro fine. Perrin the journalist is acquitted. Deltour appeals. Loses. Appeals again. Finally in May 2018 the Luxembourg Court of Appeal fully recognises him as a genuine whistleblower under European Court of Human Rights standards and acquits him completely. Halet's fight took even longer. He lost his Luxembourg appeals and only won at the European Court of Human Rights Grand Chamber in 2023, nearly a decade after he first spoke up. The European Commission that Juncker went on to lead never opened a single formal investigation into a single LuxLeaks tax ruling. Not one. It did chase Starbucks, Fiat and Amazon over separate deals, but the mountain of paperwork Deltour handed over sat there untouched. So that is the LuxLeaks story. Build a tax avoidance machine for 20 years and get promoted to run the continent. Copy the evidence of it and spend most of a decade fighting to stay out of prison. BBC News (UK) · ICIJ · Reuters · Le Monde and others.
1:38

0.001% TAX A junior auditor at PwC in Luxembourg is getting ready to leave his job. Before he goes he goes looking for some training documents to take with him. Instead he finds a folder that anyone in the company could open. No password. No warning. Just sitting there. Inside are hundreds of secret deals between the Luxembourg government and some of the biggest companies on the planet. Deals that let them pay next to nothing in tax. His name is Antoine Deltour. He copies 30,000 pages. That is the whole story. He copies a folder. Let me explain what was actually in it, because this is where it gets interesting. Between 2002 and 2010, PwC alone helped broker 548 of these secret tax agreements, known as tax rulings, for over 340 companies. Apple. Ikea. Pepsi. Disney. Deutsche Bank. AIG. Koch Industries. Skype. GlaxoSmithKline. Coach. Abbott Laboratories. Household names, every one of them. The trick was simple. Companies moved profits through Luxembourg shell structures and Luxembourg quietly agreed in writing to look the other way on tax. Some of these companies ended up paying an effective tax rate under 1 percent. In some cases as low as 0.001 percent. On billions of dollars. Who was running Luxembourg for almost 20 years while this machine was built and protected? Jean-Claude Juncker, Prime Minister of Luxembourg until 2013. Deltour did not leak straight to the world. In 2012 he passed the documents to French journalist Edouard Perrin, who used them for a TV documentary. PwC noticed and filed a complaint with the Luxembourg courts. Then in November 2014, ICIJ ICIJ pulled together over 80 journalists across more than 30 media outlets in 26 countries and published the full scale of it as LuxLeaks. The timing could not have been worse for Juncker, or depending how you look at it, could not have been better. He had just been elected President of the European Commission days before the story broke. The man who ran the tax haven for two decades was now running Europe. A month later ICIJ dropped LuxLeaks 2, showing the other Big 4 accounting firms Deloitte, EY and KPMG were running the exact same playbook. This was never one bad apple. It was standard practice. Juncker faced a no confidence vote in the European Parliament over it. He survived. Deltour was not so lucky. December 2014, Luxembourg charges him with theft, violation of trade secrecy and fraudulent access to a computer system. He is facing up to 5 years in prison and a fine of 1,250,000 euros. For opening an unlocked folder on his way out the door. April 2016, the criminal trial. Deltour and his colleague Raphael Halet, another former PwC employee who leaked a second batch of documents, are both convicted. Deltour gets 12 months suspended and a 1,500 euro fine. Perrin the journalist is acquitted. Deltour appeals. Loses. Appeals again. Finally in May 2018 the Luxembourg Court of Appeal fully recognises him as a genuine whistleblower under European Court of Human Rights standards and acquits him completely. Halet's fight took even longer. He lost his Luxembourg appeals and only won at the European Court of Human Rights Grand Chamber in 2023, nearly a decade after he first spoke up. The European Commission that Juncker went on to lead never opened a single formal investigation into a single LuxLeaks tax ruling. Not one. It did chase Starbucks, Fiat and Amazon over separate deals, but the mountain of paperwork Deltour handed over sat there untouched. So that is the LuxLeaks story. Build a tax avoidance machine for 20 years and get promoted to run the continent. Copy the evidence of it and spend most of a decade fighting to stay out of prison. BBC News (UK) · ICIJ · Reuters · Le Monde and others.

Artur Nadolny

97,611 görüntüleme • 4 gün önce

Kallie Kriel: The Man Who Lost the Referendum and Has Been Fighting Democracy Ever Since Kallie Kriel presents himself abroad as a defender of minorities and freedom. At home, his record tells a very different story: a man who has spent more than three decades opposing South Africa’s democratic project and when he lost, took his grievances overseas. 1. He Opposed Democracy When It Mattered Most In 1992, South Africans were asked a simple question: end apartheid or preserve it. Kallie Kriel was on the wrong side of history. He campaigned against the referendum that paved the way for democracy. He opposed giving Black South Africans political voice. He lost decisively and South Africa chose reconciliation over racial supremacy. That defeat defines everything that followed. This is not speculation. It is historical record. 2. From Political Loser to International Alarmist Unable to win arguments inside South Africa, Kriel changed strategy: export the grievance. Since at least the late 2010s, he has toured foreign capitals particularly the United States selling a narrative that South Africa is collapsing, persecuting minorities, and committing “genocide”. These claims have been: Rejected by South African courts Dismissed by EU officials Publicly contradicted by diplomats Dismissed by the UNO Mocked by fact-checkers and foreign commentators Yet he persists because the goal is no longer truth. The goal is delegitimisation. 3. The “Genocide” Claim: Recycled, Debunked, Repeated Kriel’s genocide narrative has been: •Investigated •Statistically disproven •Rejected by international observers And still he repeats it especially on right-wing U.S. media platforms that profit from outrage, not accuracy. If South Africa were committing genocide, no serious multilateral body would be silent. Instead, what we see is: Nordic ambassadors learning local languages and engaging communities ( they always send us the best) Germany’s ambassador actively promoting South Africa’s culture and economic potential Australia and New Zealand openly stating that racial grievance politics is unwelcome The world is not buying what Kriel is selling. 4. Conspiracy as a Political Weapon When facts fail, Kriel turns to insinuation. He has publicly claimed that unnamed journalists are being paid by “state security” to discredit him yet: •He produced no evidence •He named no individuals •He refused to substantiate the claim when challenged That is not whistleblowing. That is character assassination by rumour. Ironically, the only person discredited by these claims is Kallie Kriel himself 5. The White South Africans He Claims to Represent Don’t Want Him Here is an inconvenient truth Kriel avoids: Most white South Africans do not support him. They live here. They build businesses. They raise families. They participate in democracy. They do not need a professional grievance merchant telling the world their country is a failed state. They understand that criticism is patriotic but sabotage is not.we not saying we a perfect country, every country in the world has issues. 6. A Simple Question He Never Answers If South Africa is irredeemable… If democracy here is illegitimate… If the Constitution offers no protection… Why does he stay? South Africa allows dissent. South Africa allows criticism. South Africa even allows Kallie Kriel to say what he says. What it does not allow and what the world increasingly sees through is bad-faith activism dressed up as human rights. Final Truth Kallie Kriel is not a defender of democracy. He is a man who lost a referendum in 1992 and has never accepted the outcome. History moved on. South Africa moved on. The world moved on. Only Kallie Kriel remains stuck in a past that no longer exists. Apartheid was ended with a 68.2 saying yes end apartheid. Cape Town and Durban had 85% end apartheid. This was the death knell for Kallie Kriel.
1:06

Kallie Kriel: The Man Who Lost the Referendum and Has Been Fighting Democracy Ever Since Kallie Kriel presents himself abroad as a defender of minorities and freedom. At home, his record tells a very different story: a man who has spent more than three decades opposing South Africa’s democratic project and when he lost, took his grievances overseas. 1. He Opposed Democracy When It Mattered Most In 1992, South Africans were asked a simple question: end apartheid or preserve it. Kallie Kriel was on the wrong side of history. He campaigned against the referendum that paved the way for democracy. He opposed giving Black South Africans political voice. He lost decisively and South Africa chose reconciliation over racial supremacy. That defeat defines everything that followed. This is not speculation. It is historical record. 2. From Political Loser to International Alarmist Unable to win arguments inside South Africa, Kriel changed strategy: export the grievance. Since at least the late 2010s, he has toured foreign capitals particularly the United States selling a narrative that South Africa is collapsing, persecuting minorities, and committing “genocide”. These claims have been: Rejected by South African courts Dismissed by EU officials Publicly contradicted by diplomats Dismissed by the UNO Mocked by fact-checkers and foreign commentators Yet he persists because the goal is no longer truth. The goal is delegitimisation. 3. The “Genocide” Claim: Recycled, Debunked, Repeated Kriel’s genocide narrative has been: •Investigated •Statistically disproven •Rejected by international observers And still he repeats it especially on right-wing U.S. media platforms that profit from outrage, not accuracy. If South Africa were committing genocide, no serious multilateral body would be silent. Instead, what we see is: Nordic ambassadors learning local languages and engaging communities ( they always send us the best) Germany’s ambassador actively promoting South Africa’s culture and economic potential Australia and New Zealand openly stating that racial grievance politics is unwelcome The world is not buying what Kriel is selling. 4. Conspiracy as a Political Weapon When facts fail, Kriel turns to insinuation. He has publicly claimed that unnamed journalists are being paid by “state security” to discredit him yet: •He produced no evidence •He named no individuals •He refused to substantiate the claim when challenged That is not whistleblowing. That is character assassination by rumour. Ironically, the only person discredited by these claims is Kallie Kriel himself 5. The White South Africans He Claims to Represent Don’t Want Him Here is an inconvenient truth Kriel avoids: Most white South Africans do not support him. They live here. They build businesses. They raise families. They participate in democracy. They do not need a professional grievance merchant telling the world their country is a failed state. They understand that criticism is patriotic but sabotage is not.we not saying we a perfect country, every country in the world has issues. 6. A Simple Question He Never Answers If South Africa is irredeemable… If democracy here is illegitimate… If the Constitution offers no protection… Why does he stay? South Africa allows dissent. South Africa allows criticism. South Africa even allows Kallie Kriel to say what he says. What it does not allow and what the world increasingly sees through is bad-faith activism dressed up as human rights. Final Truth Kallie Kriel is not a defender of democracy. He is a man who lost a referendum in 1992 and has never accepted the outcome. History moved on. South Africa moved on. The world moved on. Only Kallie Kriel remains stuck in a past that no longer exists. Apartheid was ended with a 68.2 saying yes end apartheid. Cape Town and Durban had 85% end apartheid. This was the death knell for Kallie Kriel.

Goolam

26,609 görüntüleme • 7 ay önce

made a false claim that your government has introduced a pension scheme for cocoa farmers. 2.I corrected you by stating that it was rather the NDC/Mahama government that set aside/allocated and bequeathed to you seed funds of about GHS28 million cedis for a pension scheme for cocoa farmers. decided to call me a liar and even insulted me as being dumb. You then went on to challenge me to tell you my source of information. 4.I cited the 2020 Auditor General’s report as my source. then threw a challenge to me to point to the specific part of the Auditor General’s report which makes the said assertion. And that you will even buy airtime for me to prove my assertion or shut up forever. (See attached video) 6.True to my word, I adduced incontrovertible evidence, specifically pages 253, 254 and 255 (find attached) of the “Report of the Auditor General on the Public Accounts of Ghana- Public Boards, Corporations and Other Statutory Bodies for the year ended 31 December 2020” to buttress my factual assertion. 7.Instead of you to eat humble pie and do the honorable thing by apologizing for advertising your ignorance and arrogance on radio, you decided to send the grossly incompetent CEO of COCOBOD who has recklessly mismanaged and run down the once-pride of the nation to go on Asempa FM to obfuscate the issues. 8.Your CEO now decides to shift the issue from whether or not the fact of my assertion is contained in the 2020 Auditor General’s report which was the actual bone of contention, to the fact that, the said amount of money I referred to, was only a mere ledger entry on paper but that, same was not used to establish any fund. Folks, I will ignore the ignorant but incorrigible attention-seeking arrogant noisemaker and address the ridiculous claims of the grossly incompetent CEO of COCOBOD, Joseph Boahen Aidoo. Now for the information and free education of the grossly incompetent CEO of COCOBOD; I) My factual assertion was to the effect that, the erstwhile NDC/Mahama government set aside/allocated and bequeathed to you, seed funds of GHS28 million for a pension scheme for cocoa farmers. (See the attached 45 seconds video). II) The claim by the grossly incompetent CEO that the amount under reference was a mere ledger entry, betrays his understanding of what a ledger is. No wonder COCOBOD has made huge losses under his leadership for the six (6) consecutive years he has been at the helm of affairs. III) If the said GHS28 million had not been set aside between 2013-2016 as you claim, same would not have been captured by the ledger of the company. IV) *More importantly, the response of the Management of COCOBOD to this matter captured at paragraph 1254 of the 2020 Auditor General’s report completely belies the ridiculous claim of the grossly incompetent CEO to the effect that, the said GHS28.9 million was a mere ledger entry on paper.* Paragraph 1254 of the 2020 Auditor General’s report states as follows; “The amount of GHS28,898,676.88 set aside as Contributory Insurance for the period 2013 to 2016 has been included in total corporate investments. In order to ensure transparency and fairness, management of COCOBOD will ensure that a separate investment is made for the Contributory Insurance under a Fund Manager.” V) If the said amount was a mere ledger entry as claimed by the grossly incompetent CEO, how come the Auditor General found that the amount was set aside from profits of COCOBOD between 2013-2016? More importantly, why did the management of COCOBOD which the grossly incompetent CEO heads, tell the Auditor General that the said amount was included in the “total corporate investments” of the company? Did the management invest a mere paper as part of their total corporate investments? Ridiculous! Now go back and do your homework! The grossly incompetent CEO must stop the lies and resign immediately for collapsing COCOBOD. He has been totally useless so far.
0:45

made a false claim that your government has introduced a pension scheme for cocoa farmers. 2.I corrected you by stating that it was rather the NDC/Mahama government that set aside/allocated and bequeathed to you seed funds of about GHS28 million cedis for a pension scheme for cocoa farmers. decided to call me a liar and even insulted me as being dumb. You then went on to challenge me to tell you my source of information. 4.I cited the 2020 Auditor General’s report as my source. then threw a challenge to me to point to the specific part of the Auditor General’s report which makes the said assertion. And that you will even buy airtime for me to prove my assertion or shut up forever. (See attached video) 6.True to my word, I adduced incontrovertible evidence, specifically pages 253, 254 and 255 (find attached) of the “Report of the Auditor General on the Public Accounts of Ghana- Public Boards, Corporations and Other Statutory Bodies for the year ended 31 December 2020” to buttress my factual assertion. 7.Instead of you to eat humble pie and do the honorable thing by apologizing for advertising your ignorance and arrogance on radio, you decided to send the grossly incompetent CEO of COCOBOD who has recklessly mismanaged and run down the once-pride of the nation to go on Asempa FM to obfuscate the issues. 8.Your CEO now decides to shift the issue from whether or not the fact of my assertion is contained in the 2020 Auditor General’s report which was the actual bone of contention, to the fact that, the said amount of money I referred to, was only a mere ledger entry on paper but that, same was not used to establish any fund. Folks, I will ignore the ignorant but incorrigible attention-seeking arrogant noisemaker and address the ridiculous claims of the grossly incompetent CEO of COCOBOD, Joseph Boahen Aidoo. Now for the information and free education of the grossly incompetent CEO of COCOBOD; I) My factual assertion was to the effect that, the erstwhile NDC/Mahama government set aside/allocated and bequeathed to you, seed funds of GHS28 million for a pension scheme for cocoa farmers. (See the attached 45 seconds video). II) The claim by the grossly incompetent CEO that the amount under reference was a mere ledger entry, betrays his understanding of what a ledger is. No wonder COCOBOD has made huge losses under his leadership for the six (6) consecutive years he has been at the helm of affairs. III) If the said GHS28 million had not been set aside between 2013-2016 as you claim, same would not have been captured by the ledger of the company. IV) *More importantly, the response of the Management of COCOBOD to this matter captured at paragraph 1254 of the 2020 Auditor General’s report completely belies the ridiculous claim of the grossly incompetent CEO to the effect that, the said GHS28.9 million was a mere ledger entry on paper.* Paragraph 1254 of the 2020 Auditor General’s report states as follows; “The amount of GHS28,898,676.88 set aside as Contributory Insurance for the period 2013 to 2016 has been included in total corporate investments. In order to ensure transparency and fairness, management of COCOBOD will ensure that a separate investment is made for the Contributory Insurance under a Fund Manager.” V) If the said amount was a mere ledger entry as claimed by the grossly incompetent CEO, how come the Auditor General found that the amount was set aside from profits of COCOBOD between 2013-2016? More importantly, why did the management of COCOBOD which the grossly incompetent CEO heads, tell the Auditor General that the said amount was included in the “total corporate investments” of the company? Did the management invest a mere paper as part of their total corporate investments? Ridiculous! Now go back and do your homework! The grossly incompetent CEO must stop the lies and resign immediately for collapsing COCOBOD. He has been totally useless so far.

Sammy Gyamfi

213,938 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce