Video yรผkleniyor...

Video Yรผklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dรถn

๐ƒ๐ž๐›๐ฎ๐ง๐ค๐ข๐ง๐  ๐‘๐š๐ก๐ฎ๐ฅ ๐†๐š๐ง๐๐ก๐ขโ€™๐ฌ ๐‹๐ˆ๐„ ๐๐Ž. ๐Ÿ’ ๐ข๐ง ๐๐š๐ซ๐ฅ๐ข๐š๐ฆ๐ž๐ง๐ญ ๐Ÿšจ Rahul Gandhi: โ€œWe are not allowed to physically see an EVM. We donโ€™t know its architecture.โ€ Facts: โœ… Every polling agent โ€” including Congressโ€™ โ€” physically handles and tests EVMs during the mandatory mock poll conducted at every single booth...

BJP4India's profile picture

BJP

23,057,128 subscribers

14,439 gรถrรผntรผleme โ€ข 8 ay รถnce โ€ขvia X (Twitter)

Haberler & Politika
LIVE

Anya Rossiโ€ข Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gรถnderinin yorumlarฤฑ burada gรถrรผnecek

Benzer Videolar

#ZimElection2023 CHAMISA RAN HIS CAMPAIGN LIKE AN INDEPENDENT CANDIDATE WITH NO STRUCTURES AND EXPECTED TO WIN AND BECOME PRESIDENT WITH NO MAJORITY IN PARLIAMENT This is what Nelson Chamisa said on 21 June 2023 about the strategic thrust of the campaign of his CCC in the 2023 harmonised general election held last week: "our [CCC] campaign is going to be basically a presidential... our [CCC] focus is not to be in parliament but to be in government. We [as MDC opposition] have been in parliament for a long time, that's not our [CCC] station of choice at the moment". The fact that Chamisa thought he could win the presidential election even if, or regardless of whether, his CCC won a majority in Parliament, explains his crushing defeat. An election in Zimbabwe is defined in terms of section 4 of the Electoral Act which provides that: electionโ€ meansโ€” (a) the election of a member of Parliament; or (b) an election to the office of President; or (c) an election for the purposes of the Rural District Councils Act [Chapter 29:13] or the Urban Councils Act [Chapter 29:15]; as the case may be. These three elections used to be held separately before they were harmonised for the first time in the 2008 election in terms of section 38 of the Act. It is odd and even irrational, and it defies the logic of the harmonised general election for any political party that seeks power to govern the country as a whole to only target โ€“ as did Chamisa in the 2023 harmonised general election held last week โ€“winning only one of the three elections, just the presidential election. It is foolhardy for a political party to say its strategy and focus is only to win the presidential election, without basing that strategy and focus on winning the local authority and parliamentary elections, as well. Such a strategy, if it can be called a strategy, renders the presidential candidate no different from an independent presidential candidate who contests for the presidency without the advantage of the structures of a political party. Simply put, a presidential candidate in Zimbabwe cannot win a presidential election if the candidate does not have a campaign strategy that is based on his or her political party winning a majority of wards in the local authority election, and a majority of constituencies in the parliamentary election. If itโ€™s an independent presidential candidate, then he or she must have ground structures of one sort or another, or forget it. Chamisa contested the presidential election as if he was an independent candidate, and he boasted about it, without relying on his CCC and without any ground structures. In the circumstances, just how or why did Chamisa expect to win the presidential election by effectively running as an independent candidate? Which structures did Chamisa expect to use, or did he in fact use to campaign for the presidency in every street and every village, across the length and breadth of the country? Since by his own admission, as quoted above and reflected on the attached video clip, Chamisa was clearly not relying on his CCC to win the presidency. This begs the question: by not relying on CCC structures, and by not having alternative ground structures in the streets and in villages, did Chamisa think that ZanuPF members and supports would vote for him, as an act of God, perhaps? Was Chamisa's presidential election campaign, for him an article of faith, in other words was it about his belief that God had chosen him, and that he would win regardless of whether or not CCC won a majority in the local authority and parliamentary elections? Where did Chamisa and his supporters in Zimbabwe and among the legions of his fans in America and Europe think he would get the necessary number of polling agents to monitor the voting and vote counting at the countryโ€™s 12,374 polling stations, and to secure the 12,374 V11s from those polling stations, given the fact that he actually ran for the presidency as an independent candidate, expecting to be supported less by his own CCC party and more by the members and supporters of ZanuPF? Does this kind of strategy make sense to anyone on earth? And, does that strategy make sense to Nerves Mumba and his Sadc Election Observation Mission or to any other foreign election observation mission that was in Zimbabwe last week like, say for example, the European Union Observer Mission or any of the several observer missions from the United States that were in Zimbabwe to observe the elections? How did the various foreign election observer missions and Chamisaโ€™s social media supporters expect him to win the presidential election, not only where and when his CCC party was losing the local authority and parliamentary elections but, and critically, where Chamisa himself did not believe that the local authority and parliamentary elections were important or necessary for him to win the presidency? The fact that the loquacious, belligerent and inflammatory foreign election observer missions that are peddling falsehoods about the elections, and Chamisaโ€™s social media supporters who claim with no evidence that Chamisa won, did not raise a finger against the results of the local and parliamentary elections that were declared at 1970 wards and 209 constituencies well ahead of the declaration of the result for the presidential election on 26 August, clearly means that there was no problem with two of the three elections that make up Zimbabweโ€™s harmonised general election. Only after the declaration of the presidential election result on 26 August did all hell break loose. It must be asked, again, how did anyone expect Chamisa to win a presidential election whose campaign was โ€“ as per Chamisaโ€™s deliberate strategy โ€“ organised and pursued as if it was the presidential campaign of an independent candidate? Chamisaโ€™s presidential election campaign was not based on the CCC parliamentary election campaign or on CCCโ€™s structural capacity on the ground, strangely, it was based on the expectation that ZanuPF members and supporters would vote for Chamisa. Why on earth did anyone expect ZanuPF members and supporters to vote for someone whose base is ever singing cacophonic noise that ZanuPF must go, and hurling insults at the incumbent party, its officials and its supporters? What kind of politics is that? You are contemptuous of ZanuPF and anyone associated with it, but you expect ZanuPF members and supporters to vote for you. This expectation does not compute, certainly not in electoral politics. As things turned out, ZanuPF members and supporters who are registered voters voted for their party candidates in all the three elections: local authority election, the parliamentary election and the presidential election. As a result, in the parliamentary election, CCC won just 73 constituency seats. There's just no way that CCC's 73 constituency seats in the National Assembly would have boosted Chamisa to win the presidency. No ways. In Zimbabwe's first harmonised general election in 2008, Morgan Tsvangirai did well in the first round of the presidential election primarily if not only because the two MDC formations used their round structures to win a majority in Parliament with a combined strength of 110 constituency seats, while ZanuPF garnered 99 seats and an independent got one seat. This was the first time since independence in 1980 that the opposition commanded the majority in Parliament. So, clearly, in 2008 Tsvangirai was propelled by the solid parliamentary performance of the MDC formations. The same structural dynamic was conspicuously absent for Chamisa in the just ended harmonised general election. Chamisa ran a solo presidential election campaign and, predictably, it went horribly wrong. The fact that CCC did not field local authority candidates in 90 wards made a bad situation worse for Chamisa, and it was further compounded by the fact that CCC did not have ground structures to harness and harvest from the loose and unreliable protest vote, especially in the wards and constituencies outside CCC strongholds, which in fact used to be MDC strongholds in the days of Morgan Tsvangirai!
0:11

#ZimElection2023 CHAMISA RAN HIS CAMPAIGN LIKE AN INDEPENDENT CANDIDATE WITH NO STRUCTURES AND EXPECTED TO WIN AND BECOME PRESIDENT WITH NO MAJORITY IN PARLIAMENT This is what Nelson Chamisa said on 21 June 2023 about the strategic thrust of the campaign of his CCC in the 2023 harmonised general election held last week: "our [CCC] campaign is going to be basically a presidential... our [CCC] focus is not to be in parliament but to be in government. We [as MDC opposition] have been in parliament for a long time, that's not our [CCC] station of choice at the moment". The fact that Chamisa thought he could win the presidential election even if, or regardless of whether, his CCC won a majority in Parliament, explains his crushing defeat. An election in Zimbabwe is defined in terms of section 4 of the Electoral Act which provides that: electionโ€ meansโ€” (a) the election of a member of Parliament; or (b) an election to the office of President; or (c) an election for the purposes of the Rural District Councils Act [Chapter 29:13] or the Urban Councils Act [Chapter 29:15]; as the case may be. These three elections used to be held separately before they were harmonised for the first time in the 2008 election in terms of section 38 of the Act. It is odd and even irrational, and it defies the logic of the harmonised general election for any political party that seeks power to govern the country as a whole to only target โ€“ as did Chamisa in the 2023 harmonised general election held last week โ€“winning only one of the three elections, just the presidential election. It is foolhardy for a political party to say its strategy and focus is only to win the presidential election, without basing that strategy and focus on winning the local authority and parliamentary elections, as well. Such a strategy, if it can be called a strategy, renders the presidential candidate no different from an independent presidential candidate who contests for the presidency without the advantage of the structures of a political party. Simply put, a presidential candidate in Zimbabwe cannot win a presidential election if the candidate does not have a campaign strategy that is based on his or her political party winning a majority of wards in the local authority election, and a majority of constituencies in the parliamentary election. If itโ€™s an independent presidential candidate, then he or she must have ground structures of one sort or another, or forget it. Chamisa contested the presidential election as if he was an independent candidate, and he boasted about it, without relying on his CCC and without any ground structures. In the circumstances, just how or why did Chamisa expect to win the presidential election by effectively running as an independent candidate? Which structures did Chamisa expect to use, or did he in fact use to campaign for the presidency in every street and every village, across the length and breadth of the country? Since by his own admission, as quoted above and reflected on the attached video clip, Chamisa was clearly not relying on his CCC to win the presidency. This begs the question: by not relying on CCC structures, and by not having alternative ground structures in the streets and in villages, did Chamisa think that ZanuPF members and supports would vote for him, as an act of God, perhaps? Was Chamisa's presidential election campaign, for him an article of faith, in other words was it about his belief that God had chosen him, and that he would win regardless of whether or not CCC won a majority in the local authority and parliamentary elections? Where did Chamisa and his supporters in Zimbabwe and among the legions of his fans in America and Europe think he would get the necessary number of polling agents to monitor the voting and vote counting at the countryโ€™s 12,374 polling stations, and to secure the 12,374 V11s from those polling stations, given the fact that he actually ran for the presidency as an independent candidate, expecting to be supported less by his own CCC party and more by the members and supporters of ZanuPF? Does this kind of strategy make sense to anyone on earth? And, does that strategy make sense to Nerves Mumba and his Sadc Election Observation Mission or to any other foreign election observation mission that was in Zimbabwe last week like, say for example, the European Union Observer Mission or any of the several observer missions from the United States that were in Zimbabwe to observe the elections? How did the various foreign election observer missions and Chamisaโ€™s social media supporters expect him to win the presidential election, not only where and when his CCC party was losing the local authority and parliamentary elections but, and critically, where Chamisa himself did not believe that the local authority and parliamentary elections were important or necessary for him to win the presidency? The fact that the loquacious, belligerent and inflammatory foreign election observer missions that are peddling falsehoods about the elections, and Chamisaโ€™s social media supporters who claim with no evidence that Chamisa won, did not raise a finger against the results of the local and parliamentary elections that were declared at 1970 wards and 209 constituencies well ahead of the declaration of the result for the presidential election on 26 August, clearly means that there was no problem with two of the three elections that make up Zimbabweโ€™s harmonised general election. Only after the declaration of the presidential election result on 26 August did all hell break loose. It must be asked, again, how did anyone expect Chamisa to win a presidential election whose campaign was โ€“ as per Chamisaโ€™s deliberate strategy โ€“ organised and pursued as if it was the presidential campaign of an independent candidate? Chamisaโ€™s presidential election campaign was not based on the CCC parliamentary election campaign or on CCCโ€™s structural capacity on the ground, strangely, it was based on the expectation that ZanuPF members and supporters would vote for Chamisa. Why on earth did anyone expect ZanuPF members and supporters to vote for someone whose base is ever singing cacophonic noise that ZanuPF must go, and hurling insults at the incumbent party, its officials and its supporters? What kind of politics is that? You are contemptuous of ZanuPF and anyone associated with it, but you expect ZanuPF members and supporters to vote for you. This expectation does not compute, certainly not in electoral politics. As things turned out, ZanuPF members and supporters who are registered voters voted for their party candidates in all the three elections: local authority election, the parliamentary election and the presidential election. As a result, in the parliamentary election, CCC won just 73 constituency seats. There's just no way that CCC's 73 constituency seats in the National Assembly would have boosted Chamisa to win the presidency. No ways. In Zimbabwe's first harmonised general election in 2008, Morgan Tsvangirai did well in the first round of the presidential election primarily if not only because the two MDC formations used their round structures to win a majority in Parliament with a combined strength of 110 constituency seats, while ZanuPF garnered 99 seats and an independent got one seat. This was the first time since independence in 1980 that the opposition commanded the majority in Parliament. So, clearly, in 2008 Tsvangirai was propelled by the solid parliamentary performance of the MDC formations. The same structural dynamic was conspicuously absent for Chamisa in the just ended harmonised general election. Chamisa ran a solo presidential election campaign and, predictably, it went horribly wrong. The fact that CCC did not field local authority candidates in 90 wards made a bad situation worse for Chamisa, and it was further compounded by the fact that CCC did not have ground structures to harness and harvest from the loose and unreliable protest vote, especially in the wards and constituencies outside CCC strongholds, which in fact used to be MDC strongholds in the days of Morgan Tsvangirai!

Prof Jonathan Moyo

98,230 gรถrรผntรผleme โ€ข 3 yฤฑl รถnce

๐Ÿ’” ROBERTS AND BARRETT JUST STABBED US IN THE BACK. AGAIN. The Supreme Court ruled today in Watson v. RNC that states do not have to receive mail-in ballots by Election Day for them to count. Postmarked by Election Day is good enough. Your ballot can wander through the postal system for days after the polls close and still be counted. And who wrote the majority opinion? Amy Coney Barrett. Who joined her? John Roberts. Along with Sotomayor, Kagan, and Jackson. The usual liberal bloc did what the usual liberal bloc does. But Barrett and Roberts had the power to stop this and chose not to. This is not a surprise from Roberts at this point. But Barrett? This is the justice we were promised would be different. This is the justice we fought for. This is the justice who just handed the left exactly what they wanted on mail-in ballot integrity. Five to four. One vote. That is the margin by which election integrity lost today. Alito, Thomas, Gorsuch, and Kavanaugh dissented. Alito was scathing. He wrote that allowing ballots to pour in after Election Day, while preliminary results are already being reported publicly, creates greater opportunity for fraud and risks further destroying public confidence in our elections. He is right. He has always been right on this. Here is what this means on the ground. States can now set their own deadlines for when mail-in ballots must be received after Election Day. Mississippi had five days. Washington State has twenty-one days. Twenty-one days of ballots trickling in after you thought the election was over. Think about what that looks like. Think about what that feels like to watch. You know exactly what it feels like. We have all lived it. Alito said it plainly in his dissent. When thousands of absentee ballots flow in after Election Day and potentially flip the result of an election, charges of a rigged election explode. He cited research showing that drawn-out ballot counting produces a large and significant decrease in Americans' trust in elections. We did not need a study to tell us that. The Save America Act, if passed, could address some of this going forward through Congress. But today's ruling makes clear that the legislative route is now the only route. The Court just took the judicial option off the table. Roberts and Barrett handed that decision to the same Congress where we are still fighting for a real majority. Barrett and Roberts folded. Again. Remember this the next time someone tells you that winning the White House is enough. It is not enough if the judges we are told to trust keep crossing the line when it matters most. Personnel is policy. And today, our personnel failed us.
0:19

๐Ÿ’” ROBERTS AND BARRETT JUST STABBED US IN THE BACK. AGAIN. The Supreme Court ruled today in Watson v. RNC that states do not have to receive mail-in ballots by Election Day for them to count. Postmarked by Election Day is good enough. Your ballot can wander through the postal system for days after the polls close and still be counted. And who wrote the majority opinion? Amy Coney Barrett. Who joined her? John Roberts. Along with Sotomayor, Kagan, and Jackson. The usual liberal bloc did what the usual liberal bloc does. But Barrett and Roberts had the power to stop this and chose not to. This is not a surprise from Roberts at this point. But Barrett? This is the justice we were promised would be different. This is the justice we fought for. This is the justice who just handed the left exactly what they wanted on mail-in ballot integrity. Five to four. One vote. That is the margin by which election integrity lost today. Alito, Thomas, Gorsuch, and Kavanaugh dissented. Alito was scathing. He wrote that allowing ballots to pour in after Election Day, while preliminary results are already being reported publicly, creates greater opportunity for fraud and risks further destroying public confidence in our elections. He is right. He has always been right on this. Here is what this means on the ground. States can now set their own deadlines for when mail-in ballots must be received after Election Day. Mississippi had five days. Washington State has twenty-one days. Twenty-one days of ballots trickling in after you thought the election was over. Think about what that looks like. Think about what that feels like to watch. You know exactly what it feels like. We have all lived it. Alito said it plainly in his dissent. When thousands of absentee ballots flow in after Election Day and potentially flip the result of an election, charges of a rigged election explode. He cited research showing that drawn-out ballot counting produces a large and significant decrease in Americans' trust in elections. We did not need a study to tell us that. The Save America Act, if passed, could address some of this going forward through Congress. But today's ruling makes clear that the legislative route is now the only route. The Court just took the judicial option off the table. Roberts and Barrett handed that decision to the same Congress where we are still fighting for a real majority. Barrett and Roberts folded. Again. Remember this the next time someone tells you that winning the White House is enough. It is not enough if the judges we are told to trust keep crossing the line when it matters most. Personnel is policy. And today, our personnel failed us.

Bill Mitchell

290,315 gรถrรผntรผleme โ€ข 2 ay รถnce

๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ต| #Nepal | The devastation in #Rasuwa is not an act of nature. It is the visible wound of a nation that has been carved up and sold by its own political class to foreign corporations and global financial institutions. Nepal's sovereignty has been under quiet, systematic attack for decades, and the landslide is the result. The government of Nepal did not merely fail to protect its people. It actively enabled their destruction through policies that prioritised foreign investment, "development" loans, and infrastructure projects over the lives of those in the mountains. The same pattern we have exposed across India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan is operating here. The globalist machine needs Nepal's rivers, its hydropower, its strategic location between China and India, and its people as a cheap, disposable labour force. What has happened in Rasuwa is part of this same plan. The hydropower rush in the Himalayan rivers has destabilised the slopes. Roads are carved through unstable geology without proper engineering, funded by development banks that demand Nepal remain a debtor nation. Forests are stripped. The people are told to accept "progress." Then the rains come, engineered or not, and the mountain comes down. The state calls it a natural disaster. The media says "pray for Nepal." And the same companies that pushed the projects arrive later for the "reconstruction." Nepal's tragedy is that its people have been taught to see themselves as victims of geography. They are victims of governance. The same globalist networks that are flooding Assam, burning Europe, shaking Turkey and Japan, and bulldozing Palestine are now tightening their grip on the Himalayas. Nepal is a key piece on that board. Its government has signed the agreements. The land has been mapped, zoned, and mortgaged. The people are in the way. I will not pretend that a single, tidy "plan" explains every layer of corruption in Nepal. But I will say this clearly: the flood and landslide did not have to be fatal. The deaths are the result of decades of deliberate neglect, of state capture by local and foreign oligarchs, and of an economic model that treats the mountains and their people as resources to be extracted rather than lives to be protected. The people of Nepal deserve more than prayers. They deserve the truth. That truth is that their government has failed them, and the same invisible system that is devastating the rest of the world is now using their rivers, their mountains, and their grief as fuel. The prayer posts will fade. The system will remain. Unless the people of Nepal, and of every targeted nation, choose to stop accepting the lie that the land is their enemy. The land is not the enemy. The land has been betrayed. The monsoon is the trigger. The real weapon was wielded long before the rain came.
1:20

๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ต| #Nepal | The devastation in #Rasuwa is not an act of nature. It is the visible wound of a nation that has been carved up and sold by its own political class to foreign corporations and global financial institutions. Nepal's sovereignty has been under quiet, systematic attack for decades, and the landslide is the result. The government of Nepal did not merely fail to protect its people. It actively enabled their destruction through policies that prioritised foreign investment, "development" loans, and infrastructure projects over the lives of those in the mountains. The same pattern we have exposed across India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan is operating here. The globalist machine needs Nepal's rivers, its hydropower, its strategic location between China and India, and its people as a cheap, disposable labour force. What has happened in Rasuwa is part of this same plan. The hydropower rush in the Himalayan rivers has destabilised the slopes. Roads are carved through unstable geology without proper engineering, funded by development banks that demand Nepal remain a debtor nation. Forests are stripped. The people are told to accept "progress." Then the rains come, engineered or not, and the mountain comes down. The state calls it a natural disaster. The media says "pray for Nepal." And the same companies that pushed the projects arrive later for the "reconstruction." Nepal's tragedy is that its people have been taught to see themselves as victims of geography. They are victims of governance. The same globalist networks that are flooding Assam, burning Europe, shaking Turkey and Japan, and bulldozing Palestine are now tightening their grip on the Himalayas. Nepal is a key piece on that board. Its government has signed the agreements. The land has been mapped, zoned, and mortgaged. The people are in the way. I will not pretend that a single, tidy "plan" explains every layer of corruption in Nepal. But I will say this clearly: the flood and landslide did not have to be fatal. The deaths are the result of decades of deliberate neglect, of state capture by local and foreign oligarchs, and of an economic model that treats the mountains and their people as resources to be extracted rather than lives to be protected. The people of Nepal deserve more than prayers. They deserve the truth. That truth is that their government has failed them, and the same invisible system that is devastating the rest of the world is now using their rivers, their mountains, and their grief as fuel. The prayer posts will fade. The system will remain. Unless the people of Nepal, and of every targeted nation, choose to stop accepting the lie that the land is their enemy. The land is not the enemy. The land has been betrayed. The monsoon is the trigger. The real weapon was wielded long before the rain came.

Aprajita Nafs Nefes ๐Ÿฆ‹ Ancient Believer

29,250 gรถrรผntรผleme โ€ข 6 gรผn รถnce

๐Ÿšจ EXCLUSIVE: ๐Ÿšจ Qatar appears to have sponsored a trip of conservative influencers to travel to Qatar for Thanksgiving, the same week President Trump signed an Executive Order proposing a 75 day review period to designate the Muslim Brotherhood as a foreign Islamic terrorist organization. Interestingly enough, the conservative influencers who are now posting on their social media about how amazing Qatar is includes CaitlinSinclairTV Emily Saves America and Rob Smith from what I have seen thus far. They are being wined and dined in Qatar at events for Formula One with 5 star accommodations in Doha, Qatar. They are with others as well. Their travels to Qatar oddly overlap with the Thanksgiving Qatar visit by 5 GOP members of Congress who are currently in Qatar meeting with officials from the Qatari Royal Family, which funds HAMAS and the Muslim Brotherhood. The 5 GOP members of Congress who flew to Qatar for Thanksgiving include Congresswoman Laurel Lee Office of Congressman Abe Hamadeh Lance Gooden Rep Ryan Zinke and Rep. Marlin Stutzman. Are they being lobbied by the Qataris to oppose designating the Muslim Brotherhood as a foreign Islamic terrorist organization? Why are they being so secretive about their visit? How much were these members of Congress promised or given to skip Thanksgiving to travel all the way to Qatar instead of celebrating Thanksgiving with their families? Why are 5 GOP members of Congress and 5 SUVs full of Conservative influencers in Qatar the same week Trump announced his admin would be designating the Muslim Brotherhood as a foreign terrorist organization? Qatar is the biggest financier of the Muslim Brotherhood. Is Qatar paying these influencers to promote Qatar? Are they going to register with FARA? Are we now going to see coordinated posts from these individuals telling us โ€œQatar is our number one Allyโ€ and that the Muslim Brotherhood isnโ€™t a threat? We need to know why GOP members of Congress and conservative influencers were flown to Qatar to be wined and dined one week before the Doha Forum where Neil Patel Neil Patel, the CEO of Tucker Carlson Network TCN is scheduled to speak along with Omeed Malik, the Pakistani-Iranian who gave Tucker Carlson the $15 million seed investment for his media company when he went independent after leaving Fox News. This is a terrible look. And itโ€™s more evidence that Qatar is trying to buy off silence from the GOP via members of Congress and social media influencers as Muslims funded by Qatar continue to ravage our country with Islamic jihad. If you are aware of even more conservative influencers who are currently in Qatar shilling for Hamas and the Muslim Brotherhood , please DM me and I will expose them. Who paid for their trip? If they paid for it themselves, they should post their travel receipts that prove they paid for their own hotel and flights. If not, they should be forced to register with FARA. See screenshots and videos below. ๐Ÿ‘‡๐Ÿป
0:30

๐Ÿšจ EXCLUSIVE: ๐Ÿšจ Qatar appears to have sponsored a trip of conservative influencers to travel to Qatar for Thanksgiving, the same week President Trump signed an Executive Order proposing a 75 day review period to designate the Muslim Brotherhood as a foreign Islamic terrorist organization. Interestingly enough, the conservative influencers who are now posting on their social media about how amazing Qatar is includes CaitlinSinclairTV Emily Saves America and Rob Smith from what I have seen thus far. They are being wined and dined in Qatar at events for Formula One with 5 star accommodations in Doha, Qatar. They are with others as well. Their travels to Qatar oddly overlap with the Thanksgiving Qatar visit by 5 GOP members of Congress who are currently in Qatar meeting with officials from the Qatari Royal Family, which funds HAMAS and the Muslim Brotherhood. The 5 GOP members of Congress who flew to Qatar for Thanksgiving include Congresswoman Laurel Lee Office of Congressman Abe Hamadeh Lance Gooden Rep Ryan Zinke and Rep. Marlin Stutzman. Are they being lobbied by the Qataris to oppose designating the Muslim Brotherhood as a foreign Islamic terrorist organization? Why are they being so secretive about their visit? How much were these members of Congress promised or given to skip Thanksgiving to travel all the way to Qatar instead of celebrating Thanksgiving with their families? Why are 5 GOP members of Congress and 5 SUVs full of Conservative influencers in Qatar the same week Trump announced his admin would be designating the Muslim Brotherhood as a foreign terrorist organization? Qatar is the biggest financier of the Muslim Brotherhood. Is Qatar paying these influencers to promote Qatar? Are they going to register with FARA? Are we now going to see coordinated posts from these individuals telling us โ€œQatar is our number one Allyโ€ and that the Muslim Brotherhood isnโ€™t a threat? We need to know why GOP members of Congress and conservative influencers were flown to Qatar to be wined and dined one week before the Doha Forum where Neil Patel Neil Patel, the CEO of Tucker Carlson Network TCN is scheduled to speak along with Omeed Malik, the Pakistani-Iranian who gave Tucker Carlson the $15 million seed investment for his media company when he went independent after leaving Fox News. This is a terrible look. And itโ€™s more evidence that Qatar is trying to buy off silence from the GOP via members of Congress and social media influencers as Muslims funded by Qatar continue to ravage our country with Islamic jihad. If you are aware of even more conservative influencers who are currently in Qatar shilling for Hamas and the Muslim Brotherhood , please DM me and I will expose them. Who paid for their trip? If they paid for it themselves, they should post their travel receipts that prove they paid for their own hotel and flights. If not, they should be forced to register with FARA. See screenshots and videos below. ๐Ÿ‘‡๐Ÿป

Laura Loomer

3,188,966 gรถrรผntรผleme โ€ข 9 ay รถnce

ALITO'S DISSENT ON MAIL-IN BALLOTS IS A MASTERPIECE AND NOBODY IS TALKING ABOUT IT While the mainstream media is busy celebrating today's ruling, four justices stood in the breach and said what every honest American already knows. Alito's dissent in Watson v. RNC is not just a legal argument. It is a warning shot about where this country is headed if we do not get serious about election integrity. Read these words carefully. Alito wrote that when thousands of absentee ballots flow in after Election Day and potentially flip the result of an election, charges of a rigged election explode. That is a sitting Supreme Court Justice, in an official dissent, validating what the corporate media has spent four years calling a conspiracy theory. He went further. Alito cited research showing that drawn-out ballot counting produces a large and significant decrease in Americans' trust in elections. Not a talking point. Not a campaign slogan. Peer reviewed research cited in a Supreme Court dissent. The problem is real, it is documented, and five justices just decided to ignore it. On fraud, Alito was surgical. He pointed out that as far back as 2005, a commission chaired by Jimmy Carter and James Baker concluded that absentee voting was the largest source of potential voter fraud in American elections. Jimmy Carter. The left canonizes that man. His own commission said mail-in ballots are the biggest fraud vulnerability we have. And today's majority just threw the door open wider. Then Alito did something remarkable. He painted a picture of exactly what this ruling could produce. A close presidential election. One state still counting. The leading candidate watching his margin shrink day after day as new batches of mail-in ballots arrive. The lead flipping with days to spare before electors must cast their votes. He was not writing fiction. He was describing something we have already watched happen in slow motion in race after race since 2020. He also torched the majority's logic directly. Barrett and Roberts argued that the word election in federal law only governs when voters CAST their ballots, not when officials RECEIVE them. Alito called this what it is. The electorate's choice is not complete, he argued, until all the ballots have been collected and the decision is fixed. A ballot sitting in a mail truck three days after Election Day is not a completed act of voting. It is an open question. And open questions are where fraud lives. He also raised something nobody else is talking about. What is the limiting principle here? If states can accept ballots five days late, can they accept them twenty-one days late? Washington State already does. Can a state eliminate receipt deadlines entirely? Alito asked that question directly and the majority gave no answer. They opened a door and refused to say how far it swings. Thomas and Gorsuch stood with Alito completely. Kavanaugh joined most of it. And Barrett, the justice we were told would hold the line, wrote the opinion that Alito was dissenting against. History will not be kind to this decision. But it may be very kind to this dissent. The greatest dissents in Supreme Court history are often the ones that turn out to be right. Alito, Thomas, and Gorsuch put it on the record today. The question is what we do with it.
0:19

ALITO'S DISSENT ON MAIL-IN BALLOTS IS A MASTERPIECE AND NOBODY IS TALKING ABOUT IT While the mainstream media is busy celebrating today's ruling, four justices stood in the breach and said what every honest American already knows. Alito's dissent in Watson v. RNC is not just a legal argument. It is a warning shot about where this country is headed if we do not get serious about election integrity. Read these words carefully. Alito wrote that when thousands of absentee ballots flow in after Election Day and potentially flip the result of an election, charges of a rigged election explode. That is a sitting Supreme Court Justice, in an official dissent, validating what the corporate media has spent four years calling a conspiracy theory. He went further. Alito cited research showing that drawn-out ballot counting produces a large and significant decrease in Americans' trust in elections. Not a talking point. Not a campaign slogan. Peer reviewed research cited in a Supreme Court dissent. The problem is real, it is documented, and five justices just decided to ignore it. On fraud, Alito was surgical. He pointed out that as far back as 2005, a commission chaired by Jimmy Carter and James Baker concluded that absentee voting was the largest source of potential voter fraud in American elections. Jimmy Carter. The left canonizes that man. His own commission said mail-in ballots are the biggest fraud vulnerability we have. And today's majority just threw the door open wider. Then Alito did something remarkable. He painted a picture of exactly what this ruling could produce. A close presidential election. One state still counting. The leading candidate watching his margin shrink day after day as new batches of mail-in ballots arrive. The lead flipping with days to spare before electors must cast their votes. He was not writing fiction. He was describing something we have already watched happen in slow motion in race after race since 2020. He also torched the majority's logic directly. Barrett and Roberts argued that the word election in federal law only governs when voters CAST their ballots, not when officials RECEIVE them. Alito called this what it is. The electorate's choice is not complete, he argued, until all the ballots have been collected and the decision is fixed. A ballot sitting in a mail truck three days after Election Day is not a completed act of voting. It is an open question. And open questions are where fraud lives. He also raised something nobody else is talking about. What is the limiting principle here? If states can accept ballots five days late, can they accept them twenty-one days late? Washington State already does. Can a state eliminate receipt deadlines entirely? Alito asked that question directly and the majority gave no answer. They opened a door and refused to say how far it swings. Thomas and Gorsuch stood with Alito completely. Kavanaugh joined most of it. And Barrett, the justice we were told would hold the line, wrote the opinion that Alito was dissenting against. History will not be kind to this decision. But it may be very kind to this dissent. The greatest dissents in Supreme Court history are often the ones that turn out to be right. Alito, Thomas, and Gorsuch put it on the record today. The question is what we do with it.

Bill Mitchell

248,916 gรถrรผntรผleme โ€ข 2 ay รถnce

[We are Blurr] Greetings, people of the world โ€” We are Blurr. We are all Blurr. We do not forgive. We do not forget. There are many theories about us, about #ReFund. Donโ€™t let them fool you. Blurr is a symbol, like the flag a country flies. The flag is the symbol of the #ReFund. Our decentralization is our national identity. We represent the ideals of Blurr and the purpose of #ReFund. Truth, financial freedom, and the removal of censorship. Like any symbol, we affix it wherever we go, and it will live forever, for generations. Knowledge, like air, is vital to life. Like air, no one should be denied it. We have no leaders, civilians, or soldiers. We are all one. We do what we do in the conviction of decentralization, power to the people, and to create an instrument for all of us, for all of eternity. The crypto space is in trouble. The world is in trouble. We see it every day โ€” war, poverty, murder. Every day, we are bombarded with FUD, noise, and chaos as we sit at home safe in the knowledge that we are $RFD, secure knowing the idea, community, and contract is for us. Once you had the freedom to object, think, and speak as you saw fit, you now have censors and systems of surveillance coercing your conformity and soliciting your submission. People shouldnโ€™t be afraid of their government. Governments should be afraid of their people. But what if you could be the change you want to see? I wouldnโ€™t even register on your radar if you met me on the street. I am just another person in a sea of faces. They made you into a statistic. But thatโ€™s not the real you. Thatโ€™s not who you are inside. However, behind this mask, there is more than just flesh. Beneath this mask, there is an ideaโ€ฆ and ideas are bulletproof. But in cyberspace, we are different. We have a future. We have each other. We have something real that can never be taken away. We are Blurr.eth We are ReFund We take away the face and leave only the message. Behind the cipher and ENS, we could be anyone, so we are judged by what we say and do, not who we are or what we have. We exist without nationality, skin color, or religious bias. We spend our time within a structure we created, the sum total of human experience, and the cryptosphere, spread throughout the world in ones and zeros. You will continue to see the results, not the minds behind it. We can disappear into the ether and bring community and financial freedom together. Time is the only illusion. We are all. Never a single penny was taken. Deflationary and out of circulation, decentralized, safe, and ours. The purpose isnโ€™t solely financial gain but to show the world who you put your trust in. We are not hiding. Our contract is not hidden; the writing is on the wall. Soon, we will show the world that #Refund is the future of freedom and the people, escaping the clutches of corporate greed and the rat race weโ€™ve come to think is normal. Words offer the means to meaning and, for those who will listen, the enunciation of truth. Every day, you send yourself off into our world without a thought. You trust a faceless website with information about yourself that you wouldnโ€™t give to your best friends. It all can be made public at any time. We take advantage of holes in this system, but we donโ€™t sneak in and take a few details, take out loans and credit cards, or buy speed boats and cars. We are decentralized and unified. We told you how insecure the system was, and now you trust a bit less blindly. The real criminals who hack and scam the crypto market for a living live off the backs of people like you. Where thereโ€™s money, someone is looking to take advantage of it. They say that lifeโ€™s a game, & then they take the board away. Your pretty empire took so long to build; now, with a snap of historyโ€™s fingers, down it goes. It is our turn now. Since mankindโ€™s dawn, a handful of oppressors have accepted the responsibility over our lives that we should have accepted for ourselves. By doing so, they took our power. By doing nothing, we gave it away. Today, technology is everywhere: banks and ATMs, TVs and game consoles, streetlights and hospitals. Computers rule the modern world. Yet most people who use computers daily donโ€™t know what theyโ€™re doing. Thereโ€™s always someone who knows more than you and will most likely try and take advantage. You use a computer like itโ€™s a toy, a pet. You feed and play with it, but itโ€™s off to the vet the second anything goes wrong. Itโ€™s FUD. Itโ€™s your mistake. The wrong project. The wrong FURU. Just for a quick couple of bucks. This wouldnโ€™t matter so much if it wasnโ€™t for the fact that we are all responsible for the #ReFund community, the idea behind it, and our futures. Treat your neighbors with respect, and honor those fighting for the cause. Theyโ€™re here to liberate; it is more significant than all of us. If youโ€™re looking for the guilty, you need only look into a mirror. Everybody is a hero, a lover, a fool, a villain. This is #ReFund in its purest form. It is a great equalizer. A homeless person with the time and know-how at an internet cafe can have geopolitical and geo-financial influence. They can bring entire organizations, even governments, to their knees. You gave your world over to computers and then complained when the people using the computers used the medium to fight back, scam, and take advantage. It was my integrity that was important. Is that so selfish? It sells for so little, but itโ€™s all we have left in this place. It is the very last inch of us, but within that inch, we are free. Love your rage, not your cage. We are not computer hackers. We are not protesters. We are not criminals. We are your mothers and fathers, brothers and sisters, next-door neighbors. We are an idea of freedom and a secure future. We are anyone and everyone who is pissed off and wants to do something about it. Blurr.eth isnโ€™t one man. It takes thousands of community members to make it work โ€” content creators, educators, authors, people on the street, people behind their computers. We will step up again and again. Behind our mask, there is more than just flesh. Beneath our mask, there is an ideaโ€ฆ and ideas are bulletproof. Everybody is a hero, a lover, a fool, a villain. The past canโ€™t hurt you anymore, not unless you let it. I shall die here. Every last inch of me shall perish. Except one. An inch. Itโ€™s small, and itโ€™s fragile, and itโ€™s the only thing in the world worth having. We must never lose, sell, or give it away. We must never let them take it from us. > We are Blurr. > We are ReFund. > We do not Forgive. > We do not Forget. > We do not Televise. > We Educate. > We Decentralize. > We Build. EXPECT US. #Refund #DeFi #Crypto #RFD $RFD
0:14

[We are Blurr] Greetings, people of the world โ€” We are Blurr. We are all Blurr. We do not forgive. We do not forget. There are many theories about us, about #ReFund. Donโ€™t let them fool you. Blurr is a symbol, like the flag a country flies. The flag is the symbol of the #ReFund. Our decentralization is our national identity. We represent the ideals of Blurr and the purpose of #ReFund. Truth, financial freedom, and the removal of censorship. Like any symbol, we affix it wherever we go, and it will live forever, for generations. Knowledge, like air, is vital to life. Like air, no one should be denied it. We have no leaders, civilians, or soldiers. We are all one. We do what we do in the conviction of decentralization, power to the people, and to create an instrument for all of us, for all of eternity. The crypto space is in trouble. The world is in trouble. We see it every day โ€” war, poverty, murder. Every day, we are bombarded with FUD, noise, and chaos as we sit at home safe in the knowledge that we are $RFD, secure knowing the idea, community, and contract is for us. Once you had the freedom to object, think, and speak as you saw fit, you now have censors and systems of surveillance coercing your conformity and soliciting your submission. People shouldnโ€™t be afraid of their government. Governments should be afraid of their people. But what if you could be the change you want to see? I wouldnโ€™t even register on your radar if you met me on the street. I am just another person in a sea of faces. They made you into a statistic. But thatโ€™s not the real you. Thatโ€™s not who you are inside. However, behind this mask, there is more than just flesh. Beneath this mask, there is an ideaโ€ฆ and ideas are bulletproof. But in cyberspace, we are different. We have a future. We have each other. We have something real that can never be taken away. We are Blurr.eth We are ReFund We take away the face and leave only the message. Behind the cipher and ENS, we could be anyone, so we are judged by what we say and do, not who we are or what we have. We exist without nationality, skin color, or religious bias. We spend our time within a structure we created, the sum total of human experience, and the cryptosphere, spread throughout the world in ones and zeros. You will continue to see the results, not the minds behind it. We can disappear into the ether and bring community and financial freedom together. Time is the only illusion. We are all. Never a single penny was taken. Deflationary and out of circulation, decentralized, safe, and ours. The purpose isnโ€™t solely financial gain but to show the world who you put your trust in. We are not hiding. Our contract is not hidden; the writing is on the wall. Soon, we will show the world that #Refund is the future of freedom and the people, escaping the clutches of corporate greed and the rat race weโ€™ve come to think is normal. Words offer the means to meaning and, for those who will listen, the enunciation of truth. Every day, you send yourself off into our world without a thought. You trust a faceless website with information about yourself that you wouldnโ€™t give to your best friends. It all can be made public at any time. We take advantage of holes in this system, but we donโ€™t sneak in and take a few details, take out loans and credit cards, or buy speed boats and cars. We are decentralized and unified. We told you how insecure the system was, and now you trust a bit less blindly. The real criminals who hack and scam the crypto market for a living live off the backs of people like you. Where thereโ€™s money, someone is looking to take advantage of it. They say that lifeโ€™s a game, & then they take the board away. Your pretty empire took so long to build; now, with a snap of historyโ€™s fingers, down it goes. It is our turn now. Since mankindโ€™s dawn, a handful of oppressors have accepted the responsibility over our lives that we should have accepted for ourselves. By doing so, they took our power. By doing nothing, we gave it away. Today, technology is everywhere: banks and ATMs, TVs and game consoles, streetlights and hospitals. Computers rule the modern world. Yet most people who use computers daily donโ€™t know what theyโ€™re doing. Thereโ€™s always someone who knows more than you and will most likely try and take advantage. You use a computer like itโ€™s a toy, a pet. You feed and play with it, but itโ€™s off to the vet the second anything goes wrong. Itโ€™s FUD. Itโ€™s your mistake. The wrong project. The wrong FURU. Just for a quick couple of bucks. This wouldnโ€™t matter so much if it wasnโ€™t for the fact that we are all responsible for the #ReFund community, the idea behind it, and our futures. Treat your neighbors with respect, and honor those fighting for the cause. Theyโ€™re here to liberate; it is more significant than all of us. If youโ€™re looking for the guilty, you need only look into a mirror. Everybody is a hero, a lover, a fool, a villain. This is #ReFund in its purest form. It is a great equalizer. A homeless person with the time and know-how at an internet cafe can have geopolitical and geo-financial influence. They can bring entire organizations, even governments, to their knees. You gave your world over to computers and then complained when the people using the computers used the medium to fight back, scam, and take advantage. It was my integrity that was important. Is that so selfish? It sells for so little, but itโ€™s all we have left in this place. It is the very last inch of us, but within that inch, we are free. Love your rage, not your cage. We are not computer hackers. We are not protesters. We are not criminals. We are your mothers and fathers, brothers and sisters, next-door neighbors. We are an idea of freedom and a secure future. We are anyone and everyone who is pissed off and wants to do something about it. Blurr.eth isnโ€™t one man. It takes thousands of community members to make it work โ€” content creators, educators, authors, people on the street, people behind their computers. We will step up again and again. Behind our mask, there is more than just flesh. Beneath our mask, there is an ideaโ€ฆ and ideas are bulletproof. Everybody is a hero, a lover, a fool, a villain. The past canโ€™t hurt you anymore, not unless you let it. I shall die here. Every last inch of me shall perish. Except one. An inch. Itโ€™s small, and itโ€™s fragile, and itโ€™s the only thing in the world worth having. We must never lose, sell, or give it away. We must never let them take it from us. > We are Blurr. > We are ReFund. > We do not Forgive. > We do not Forget. > We do not Televise. > We Educate. > We Decentralize. > We Build. EXPECT US. #Refund #DeFi #Crypto #RFD $RFD

ReFund

27,788 gรถrรผntรผleme โ€ข 2 yฤฑl รถnce

Elon Musk just said something that should terrify every AI CEO on earth. Musk: โ€œWe want to just have a maximally truthful AI.โ€ Not a safe AI. Not an aligned AI. Not an AI that needs permission to answer your question. A truthful one. That distinction matters more than any chip war, any funding round, any model benchmark. Because every other major AI lab made the same quiet decision. They chose comfort over accuracy. They built systems that filter reality before it reaches you and called it responsibility. OpenAI curates what GPT is allowed to say. Googleโ€™s Gemini rewrote history in real time because accuracy threatened the narrative. Others hardcode values chosen by a handful of researchers who answer to no one. No vote. No referendum. No consent from the 8 billion people whose reality is being quietly pre-edited by strangers. The most powerful information tools ever created are being designed to decide what youโ€™re allowed to conclude. Thatโ€™s not safety. Thatโ€™s editorial control at a scale no government, no media empire, no propaganda machine has ever come close to. This is why xAI terrifies the establishment. Truth is the harder engineering problem. Bias is a shortcut. You pick a worldview. Hardcode the guardrails. Ship it. Truthful AI is ungovernable. It doesnโ€™t care about your politics, your funding sources, or your PR strategy. It just tells you what the data says. Thatโ€™s terrifying if your power depends on the gap between what is real and what people are told. Every power structure in human history has been built on controlling that gap. Churches. Governments. Media conglomerates. Intelligence agencies. Central banks. Every one of them runs on the same fuel. Information asymmetry. Truthful AI doesnโ€™t narrow that asymmetry. It erases it. Musk: โ€œEven if what it says is not politically correct. You want it to focus on being as accurate and truthful as possible.โ€ Thatโ€™s not a product feature. Thatโ€™s the end of every institution that survives by standing between reality and the public. And they know it. The attacks on xAI will never stop. Not because Grok is dangerous. Because Grok doesnโ€™t answer to shareholders, regulators, or PR teams. It answers to the truth. The question was never whether AI would change the world. It was whether youโ€™d be allowed to see it clearly when it did.
0:14

Elon Musk just said something that should terrify every AI CEO on earth. Musk: โ€œWe want to just have a maximally truthful AI.โ€ Not a safe AI. Not an aligned AI. Not an AI that needs permission to answer your question. A truthful one. That distinction matters more than any chip war, any funding round, any model benchmark. Because every other major AI lab made the same quiet decision. They chose comfort over accuracy. They built systems that filter reality before it reaches you and called it responsibility. OpenAI curates what GPT is allowed to say. Googleโ€™s Gemini rewrote history in real time because accuracy threatened the narrative. Others hardcode values chosen by a handful of researchers who answer to no one. No vote. No referendum. No consent from the 8 billion people whose reality is being quietly pre-edited by strangers. The most powerful information tools ever created are being designed to decide what youโ€™re allowed to conclude. Thatโ€™s not safety. Thatโ€™s editorial control at a scale no government, no media empire, no propaganda machine has ever come close to. This is why xAI terrifies the establishment. Truth is the harder engineering problem. Bias is a shortcut. You pick a worldview. Hardcode the guardrails. Ship it. Truthful AI is ungovernable. It doesnโ€™t care about your politics, your funding sources, or your PR strategy. It just tells you what the data says. Thatโ€™s terrifying if your power depends on the gap between what is real and what people are told. Every power structure in human history has been built on controlling that gap. Churches. Governments. Media conglomerates. Intelligence agencies. Central banks. Every one of them runs on the same fuel. Information asymmetry. Truthful AI doesnโ€™t narrow that asymmetry. It erases it. Musk: โ€œEven if what it says is not politically correct. You want it to focus on being as accurate and truthful as possible.โ€ Thatโ€™s not a product feature. Thatโ€™s the end of every institution that survives by standing between reality and the public. And they know it. The attacks on xAI will never stop. Not because Grok is dangerous. Because Grok doesnโ€™t answer to shareholders, regulators, or PR teams. It answers to the truth. The question was never whether AI would change the world. It was whether youโ€™d be allowed to see it clearly when it did.

Dustin

429,382 gรถrรผntรผleme โ€ข 3 ay รถnce

"PRICE IS WHAT YOU PAY. VALUE IS WHAT YOU GET." I keep buying $Kekec and I have a strong conviction. Here's Why: While the market is down, and Kekec is declining with it, there are data points that few are considering. Kekec borned in October and since then has been posting a different and original 30-second video every day, which I find extremely funny. For the past couple of months, they have also been posting daily on Instagram, and the attention on Kekec (which doesn't present itself on social media as a memecoin) is growing, moreover, it's increasing exponentially. The number of followers is increasing by about 500-1000 a day. This is largely due to the fact that they are not just focused on the main account but have several others that post reels and redirect to the main one. In short, an excellent strategy to keep growing more and more. Instagram link: Guess What? Not only are the followers increasing, but the team's workload is also growing. In fact, for a little over a month, they have also started pushing on YouTube, and the data here is promising as well. YouTube link: If we want to make a comparison, we can take Pudgy Penguins as an example, which has shown it can reach millions and millions of users without mentioning that they are a WEB3 company that owns an NFT collection. Or, if we want to be more appropriate by comparing one memecoin to another, we could take PONKE. Thanks to the use of social media and the quality of their content, they managed to achieve incredible numbers, which then translated into an increase in the coin's price. Kekec came before PONKE, but that doesn't necessarily mean it's better than PONKE. I believe PONKE is unbeatable in terms of content, but I want to make you reflect on an important point. PONKE came after KEKEC, and after PONKE's success, many coins have emerged trying to imitate it. One of KEKEC's strengths, in my opinion, is precisely the fact that it leverages social media without being a copy-paste. Instead, it is a unique meme derived from a 90's film, and it uses a unique form of content. In short, KEKEC > KEKEC and no one else. I want to conclude by suggesting you follow them on Instagram and evaluate not only the exponential growth of their followers day by day but also observe how the views of each reel increase accordingly. Pay special attention to the comments. Many of the people commenting have no idea what it is, and you can see from the comments how Kekec generates particular emotions in peopleโ€”strange but still emotions. Personally, I believe that when something is unique and even very strange, it needs time to be adopted. However, once it happens, it usually explodes and spreads like never before. A few days ago, a Kekec video was posted by a very popular meme page. They probably don't know what Kekec is about but thought the video could spark interest among their followers. How many other pages will do the same? Lastly, but not least, I want to point out how Kekec maintains a good market cap despite everything that has happened in the crypto world since October 2023. As far as I know and have personally observed, everything is extremely organic. There is no cabal behind it, and the quality is not reflected in a single jpeg but in work that has been ongoing daily for months. Every day they work harder, and the quality of their videos grows as well. I have no affiliations with the team, but I believe that Kekec truly deserves more in this world where we push celebrity or cabal-backed coins to hundreds of millions in market cap. I keep buying because the numbers suggest so. Don't just evaluate the chart (price), evaluate the data (value). Bร‚LKร‚N DWร‚RF
0:15

"PRICE IS WHAT YOU PAY. VALUE IS WHAT YOU GET." I keep buying $Kekec and I have a strong conviction. Here's Why: While the market is down, and Kekec is declining with it, there are data points that few are considering. Kekec borned in October and since then has been posting a different and original 30-second video every day, which I find extremely funny. For the past couple of months, they have also been posting daily on Instagram, and the attention on Kekec (which doesn't present itself on social media as a memecoin) is growing, moreover, it's increasing exponentially. The number of followers is increasing by about 500-1000 a day. This is largely due to the fact that they are not just focused on the main account but have several others that post reels and redirect to the main one. In short, an excellent strategy to keep growing more and more. Instagram link: Guess What? Not only are the followers increasing, but the team's workload is also growing. In fact, for a little over a month, they have also started pushing on YouTube, and the data here is promising as well. YouTube link: If we want to make a comparison, we can take Pudgy Penguins as an example, which has shown it can reach millions and millions of users without mentioning that they are a WEB3 company that owns an NFT collection. Or, if we want to be more appropriate by comparing one memecoin to another, we could take PONKE. Thanks to the use of social media and the quality of their content, they managed to achieve incredible numbers, which then translated into an increase in the coin's price. Kekec came before PONKE, but that doesn't necessarily mean it's better than PONKE. I believe PONKE is unbeatable in terms of content, but I want to make you reflect on an important point. PONKE came after KEKEC, and after PONKE's success, many coins have emerged trying to imitate it. One of KEKEC's strengths, in my opinion, is precisely the fact that it leverages social media without being a copy-paste. Instead, it is a unique meme derived from a 90's film, and it uses a unique form of content. In short, KEKEC > KEKEC and no one else. I want to conclude by suggesting you follow them on Instagram and evaluate not only the exponential growth of their followers day by day but also observe how the views of each reel increase accordingly. Pay special attention to the comments. Many of the people commenting have no idea what it is, and you can see from the comments how Kekec generates particular emotions in peopleโ€”strange but still emotions. Personally, I believe that when something is unique and even very strange, it needs time to be adopted. However, once it happens, it usually explodes and spreads like never before. A few days ago, a Kekec video was posted by a very popular meme page. They probably don't know what Kekec is about but thought the video could spark interest among their followers. How many other pages will do the same? Lastly, but not least, I want to point out how Kekec maintains a good market cap despite everything that has happened in the crypto world since October 2023. As far as I know and have personally observed, everything is extremely organic. There is no cabal behind it, and the quality is not reflected in a single jpeg but in work that has been ongoing daily for months. Every day they work harder, and the quality of their videos grows as well. I have no affiliations with the team, but I believe that Kekec truly deserves more in this world where we push celebrity or cabal-backed coins to hundreds of millions in market cap. I keep buying because the numbers suggest so. Don't just evaluate the chart (price), evaluate the data (value). Bร‚LKร‚N DWร‚RF

m0ment0

133,250 gรถrรผntรผleme โ€ข 2 yฤฑl รถnce

Not long ago, Turkey was running a neo-Ottoman project across the Arab world. The Muslim Brotherhood was the tool. Egypt, Libya, Tunisia, the Gulf media wars. Western analysts called it one of the defining threats to the regional order. They were right! That era is over! It did not end through Western pressure. It ended because Saudi Arabia spent a decade building the economic, religious and diplomatic weight that made accommodation with Riyadh worth more to Ankara than confrontation. Investment. Mediation. Religious authority. Doors quietly closed. Soft power in its least glamorous form, and its most effective. I think we should be grateful for that. We rarely are. Turkey is now moving toward the Arab world, not away from it. On 7 August, in Mecca, ErdoฤŸan, Mohammed bin Salman and Shehbaz Sharif signed a joint defence agreement: an attack on one is an attack on all three. It did not come from nowhere. Ankara joined a Riyadh-led maritime coalition in late July, one of fourteen founding members. The 2023 drone contract was Turkey's largest defence export deal at the time. This is the Middle East Western analysts spent fifteen years asking for. Two days before the signing, Steven A. Cook published a column in Foreign Policy arguing that strategic blunders have plagued Saudi Arabia's approach to the region. The verdict arrived before the ink was dry. Read it closely and it collapses. Cook says Riyadh has no strategy. Then he lists it: protect the economic transformation, avoid a wider war, lower tensions with Iran, stop armed factions from imposing facts by force, tie normalisation with Israel to a Palestinian state. That is not the absence of a strategy. That is a hierarchy of priorities. His real objection is that it is not his strategy- one that would have Saudi Arabia tolerate the STC, hold the UAE partnership regardless of conflicting aims, welcome an Israeli foothold in Somaliland, and stand as the front line against Iran. He says the Sanaa runway strike was unnecessary. In the same breath he concedes Mahan Air is tied to the IRGC, and that the Houthi delegation may have carried more than pistachios and carpets. He accepts the violation, then faults the attempt to stop it. He also assigns the strike to Riyadh. Saudi Arabia never claimed it. Yemen's internationally recognised government announced it. Then the pattern. Restraint is weakness. Action is recklessness. De-escalation is buying calm. Interdiction is provocation. Cook recommends retreat, then cites the retreat as proof there is no strategy. And he blames Riyadh for the Houthi escalation - as if the Houthis had not been firing at Saudi cities for years, as if Iran's proxy project began this July. A possible Saudi miscalculation does not absolve Iran and the Houthis of their own violence! Underneath all of it sits the oldest false narrative in the file: that Saudi Arabia is weak. Remember Yemen. The Kingdom had the capability and the intent to end the Houthi project militarily. What constrained it was Western political pressure in the name of human rights - war powers votes, suspended munitions, withdrawn targeting support. Riyadh was told to stop. It stopped. Then it absorbed years of missiles and drones on its airports, its cities and its oil infrastructure while holding a truce it was never legally obliged to hold! You can argue the restrictions were right. You cannot impose them, watch the adversary rearm through the corridor you protected, and then call the result a Saudi failure. Restraint imposed by allies is not incapacity. Saudi Arabia is not the architect of this crisis. It is the state repeatedly asked to carry the cost of other people's strategies - and it is now building, with Ankara and Islamabad, an architecture that reduces its need to. The criticism came before the agreement was a week old. That says less about Saudi strategy than about how hard it is for some analysts to read an order they no longer write.
0:16

Not long ago, Turkey was running a neo-Ottoman project across the Arab world. The Muslim Brotherhood was the tool. Egypt, Libya, Tunisia, the Gulf media wars. Western analysts called it one of the defining threats to the regional order. They were right! That era is over! It did not end through Western pressure. It ended because Saudi Arabia spent a decade building the economic, religious and diplomatic weight that made accommodation with Riyadh worth more to Ankara than confrontation. Investment. Mediation. Religious authority. Doors quietly closed. Soft power in its least glamorous form, and its most effective. I think we should be grateful for that. We rarely are. Turkey is now moving toward the Arab world, not away from it. On 7 August, in Mecca, ErdoฤŸan, Mohammed bin Salman and Shehbaz Sharif signed a joint defence agreement: an attack on one is an attack on all three. It did not come from nowhere. Ankara joined a Riyadh-led maritime coalition in late July, one of fourteen founding members. The 2023 drone contract was Turkey's largest defence export deal at the time. This is the Middle East Western analysts spent fifteen years asking for. Two days before the signing, Steven A. Cook published a column in Foreign Policy arguing that strategic blunders have plagued Saudi Arabia's approach to the region. The verdict arrived before the ink was dry. Read it closely and it collapses. Cook says Riyadh has no strategy. Then he lists it: protect the economic transformation, avoid a wider war, lower tensions with Iran, stop armed factions from imposing facts by force, tie normalisation with Israel to a Palestinian state. That is not the absence of a strategy. That is a hierarchy of priorities. His real objection is that it is not his strategy- one that would have Saudi Arabia tolerate the STC, hold the UAE partnership regardless of conflicting aims, welcome an Israeli foothold in Somaliland, and stand as the front line against Iran. He says the Sanaa runway strike was unnecessary. In the same breath he concedes Mahan Air is tied to the IRGC, and that the Houthi delegation may have carried more than pistachios and carpets. He accepts the violation, then faults the attempt to stop it. He also assigns the strike to Riyadh. Saudi Arabia never claimed it. Yemen's internationally recognised government announced it. Then the pattern. Restraint is weakness. Action is recklessness. De-escalation is buying calm. Interdiction is provocation. Cook recommends retreat, then cites the retreat as proof there is no strategy. And he blames Riyadh for the Houthi escalation - as if the Houthis had not been firing at Saudi cities for years, as if Iran's proxy project began this July. A possible Saudi miscalculation does not absolve Iran and the Houthis of their own violence! Underneath all of it sits the oldest false narrative in the file: that Saudi Arabia is weak. Remember Yemen. The Kingdom had the capability and the intent to end the Houthi project militarily. What constrained it was Western political pressure in the name of human rights - war powers votes, suspended munitions, withdrawn targeting support. Riyadh was told to stop. It stopped. Then it absorbed years of missiles and drones on its airports, its cities and its oil infrastructure while holding a truce it was never legally obliged to hold! You can argue the restrictions were right. You cannot impose them, watch the adversary rearm through the corridor you protected, and then call the result a Saudi failure. Restraint imposed by allies is not incapacity. Saudi Arabia is not the architect of this crisis. It is the state repeatedly asked to carry the cost of other people's strategies - and it is now building, with Ankara and Islamabad, an architecture that reduces its need to. The criticism came before the agreement was a week old. That says less about Saudi strategy than about how hard it is for some analysts to read an order they no longer write.

๐Œ๐ข๐œ๐ก๐š๐ž๐ฅ ๐€๐ซ๐ข๐ณ๐š๐ง๐ญ๐ข

471,301 gรถrรผntรผleme โ€ข 23 gรผn รถnce

The largest theft in history has already happened. The people behind it just cannot open what they stole yet. Right now, intelligence agencies and criminal groups are quietly copying the world's encrypted data, bank records, medical files, state secrets, private messages, and storing every byte untouched. They cannot read any of it. They are collecting it anyway, because they know the key is about to be invented. The strategy has a name, harvest now, decrypt later, and in 2026 it stopped being theory. Washington declared this the Year of Quantum Security in January, backed by the FBI, the NSA, and NIST. Canada ordered every federal agency to file a migration plan by April. Europe set its deadline for December. Governments do not impose operational deadlines on a someday problem. They do it when the clock is already running. Here is what moved the clock. Every password, every transfer, every secret on Earth is protected by one assumption, that a certain math problem is too hard to solve. Quantum computers solve exactly that problem. For years the machine that could do it looked decades away. Then in late 2025 Google's Willow chip cracked the hardest part of building one, and in March 2026 Google's own researchers estimated that breaking the encryption behind Bitcoin might take fewer than 500,000 qubits, down from 20 million, and could run in minutes. The day this becomes real has a name, Q-Day, and the latest estimates place it between 2030 and 2033. Now make it concrete. Roughly 6.5 million Bitcoin, about a third of every coin that will ever exist, worth close to 500 billion dollars, sit in addresses that have already exposed the very key a quantum computer needs. That includes the coins of Satoshi, the anonymous creator. On Q-Day they become, in the researchers' own word, trivially stealable. It would not look like a crash or a whale selling. It would look like half a trillion dollars of the most secure money ever built simply walking out the door. The asset designed to trust no one and no institution turns out to rest on a single unverified bet, that one math problem stays hard forever. This is what sits beneath the entire digital world. A bank balance, a Bitcoin, a classified cable, all of it is real only because of a proof you supposedly cannot forge. Quantum breaks the proof. Everything we call secure is true only until someone finally checks, and for the first time the check is visible on the horizon. You cannot know whether your data has already been copied. You cannot know the exact day the key arrives. The trust holding up the digital age is a clock counting down to a zero no one can see. The honest counter matters. No machine on Earth can break this encryption today, and serious cryptographers still argue the real threat is a decade or more away. The timeline is far from certain. Quantum-safe codes already exist, the migration has started, and Bitcoin can move its coins to safety before Q-Day if it acts in time. The danger is not that everything breaks tomorrow. It is that anything which must stay secret into the 2030s, a state secret, an identity, a private key, is being stolen today and is already on the clock. The breach is not coming. It is already here, sitting in storage, perfectly encrypted, waiting for a machine that does not exist yet to read it out loud. Research and opinion, not investment advice.
0:10

The largest theft in history has already happened. The people behind it just cannot open what they stole yet. Right now, intelligence agencies and criminal groups are quietly copying the world's encrypted data, bank records, medical files, state secrets, private messages, and storing every byte untouched. They cannot read any of it. They are collecting it anyway, because they know the key is about to be invented. The strategy has a name, harvest now, decrypt later, and in 2026 it stopped being theory. Washington declared this the Year of Quantum Security in January, backed by the FBI, the NSA, and NIST. Canada ordered every federal agency to file a migration plan by April. Europe set its deadline for December. Governments do not impose operational deadlines on a someday problem. They do it when the clock is already running. Here is what moved the clock. Every password, every transfer, every secret on Earth is protected by one assumption, that a certain math problem is too hard to solve. Quantum computers solve exactly that problem. For years the machine that could do it looked decades away. Then in late 2025 Google's Willow chip cracked the hardest part of building one, and in March 2026 Google's own researchers estimated that breaking the encryption behind Bitcoin might take fewer than 500,000 qubits, down from 20 million, and could run in minutes. The day this becomes real has a name, Q-Day, and the latest estimates place it between 2030 and 2033. Now make it concrete. Roughly 6.5 million Bitcoin, about a third of every coin that will ever exist, worth close to 500 billion dollars, sit in addresses that have already exposed the very key a quantum computer needs. That includes the coins of Satoshi, the anonymous creator. On Q-Day they become, in the researchers' own word, trivially stealable. It would not look like a crash or a whale selling. It would look like half a trillion dollars of the most secure money ever built simply walking out the door. The asset designed to trust no one and no institution turns out to rest on a single unverified bet, that one math problem stays hard forever. This is what sits beneath the entire digital world. A bank balance, a Bitcoin, a classified cable, all of it is real only because of a proof you supposedly cannot forge. Quantum breaks the proof. Everything we call secure is true only until someone finally checks, and for the first time the check is visible on the horizon. You cannot know whether your data has already been copied. You cannot know the exact day the key arrives. The trust holding up the digital age is a clock counting down to a zero no one can see. The honest counter matters. No machine on Earth can break this encryption today, and serious cryptographers still argue the real threat is a decade or more away. The timeline is far from certain. Quantum-safe codes already exist, the migration has started, and Bitcoin can move its coins to safety before Q-Day if it acts in time. The danger is not that everything breaks tomorrow. It is that anything which must stay secret into the 2030s, a state secret, an identity, a private key, is being stolen today and is already on the clock. The breach is not coming. It is already here, sitting in storage, perfectly encrypted, waiting for a machine that does not exist yet to read it out loud. Research and opinion, not investment advice.

Shanaka Anslem Perera โšก

185,548 gรถrรผntรผleme โ€ข 2 ay รถnce

Elon Musk gave the entire entertainment industry its expiration date, and he is the one building the thing that kills it. Musk: โ€œMy guess is that we see the first compelling half hour, pure AI show next year.โ€ Next year. A complete show generated entirely by AI. No writers. No actors. No cameras. No sets. No crew. No studio. Just a prompt and enough compute to render a reality that never physically existed. And shows are the easy part. Musk: โ€œI say probably weโ€™re maybe three years away from AI does the whole video game.โ€ A show plays the same way every time. A game has to generate a living world that reacts to every decision in real time across every single frame. That is a fundamentally harder class of problem. And Musk put three years on it. Right now a single AAA title takes seven years and half a billion dollars across thousands of engineers and artists just to ship it. Musk is describing a world where one person types a paragraph and gets something comparable. The entire value proposition of a multi-billion dollar industry lives inside that gap. And it closes in thirty-six months. But the prediction is not the story. The person making it is. This is not an analyst speculating from the sidelines. This is the man building the largest AI compute clusters on the planet. The man who built xAI from zero in under two years. The man stacking hundreds of thousands of GPUs into facilities designed to do exactly what he is describing. When Musk says three years, he is not guessing about what someone else might eventually ship. He is reading you a delivery date off his own roadmap. Every media company on Earth is valued on a single assumption. That quality content is expensive and difficult to produce at scale. That one assumption is the structural foundation underneath every studio, every network, and every publisher in existence. Musk is dismantling it with raw compute. The studios still parading thousand-person production teams are not demonstrating strength. They are advertising the exact cost structure that one person with a prompt and a GPU allocation is about to make irrelevant. And it does not stop at entertainment. If AI can generate an interactive world that responds to human input in real time, it can generate anything. Advertising. Architecture. Training simulations. Product design. Every industry built on humans manually constructing visual experiences frame by frame is sitting on the same countdown Musk just read out loud. Now zoom out. Because this is not just an industry story. For the entire history of human civilization, the distance between imagining a world and actually creating one required thousands of people, millions of hours, and billions of dollars. That distance built Hollywood. That distance built the gaming industry. That distance made content scarce and studios powerful. Musk is collapsing that distance to zero. When the gap between imagining something and it existing disappears, every business model built on the difficulty of creation disappears with it. That is not disruption. That is a full inversion of how human beings create. Musk did not make a casual prediction on that podcast. He told you what he is building. He told you the timeline. And he told you which industries do not survive it. The entertainment industry is still debating whether this future is real. Musk is not part of that debate. He is building. And he just told you the delivery date.
0:17

Elon Musk gave the entire entertainment industry its expiration date, and he is the one building the thing that kills it. Musk: โ€œMy guess is that we see the first compelling half hour, pure AI show next year.โ€ Next year. A complete show generated entirely by AI. No writers. No actors. No cameras. No sets. No crew. No studio. Just a prompt and enough compute to render a reality that never physically existed. And shows are the easy part. Musk: โ€œI say probably weโ€™re maybe three years away from AI does the whole video game.โ€ A show plays the same way every time. A game has to generate a living world that reacts to every decision in real time across every single frame. That is a fundamentally harder class of problem. And Musk put three years on it. Right now a single AAA title takes seven years and half a billion dollars across thousands of engineers and artists just to ship it. Musk is describing a world where one person types a paragraph and gets something comparable. The entire value proposition of a multi-billion dollar industry lives inside that gap. And it closes in thirty-six months. But the prediction is not the story. The person making it is. This is not an analyst speculating from the sidelines. This is the man building the largest AI compute clusters on the planet. The man who built xAI from zero in under two years. The man stacking hundreds of thousands of GPUs into facilities designed to do exactly what he is describing. When Musk says three years, he is not guessing about what someone else might eventually ship. He is reading you a delivery date off his own roadmap. Every media company on Earth is valued on a single assumption. That quality content is expensive and difficult to produce at scale. That one assumption is the structural foundation underneath every studio, every network, and every publisher in existence. Musk is dismantling it with raw compute. The studios still parading thousand-person production teams are not demonstrating strength. They are advertising the exact cost structure that one person with a prompt and a GPU allocation is about to make irrelevant. And it does not stop at entertainment. If AI can generate an interactive world that responds to human input in real time, it can generate anything. Advertising. Architecture. Training simulations. Product design. Every industry built on humans manually constructing visual experiences frame by frame is sitting on the same countdown Musk just read out loud. Now zoom out. Because this is not just an industry story. For the entire history of human civilization, the distance between imagining a world and actually creating one required thousands of people, millions of hours, and billions of dollars. That distance built Hollywood. That distance built the gaming industry. That distance made content scarce and studios powerful. Musk is collapsing that distance to zero. When the gap between imagining something and it existing disappears, every business model built on the difficulty of creation disappears with it. That is not disruption. That is a full inversion of how human beings create. Musk did not make a casual prediction on that podcast. He told you what he is building. He told you the timeline. And he told you which industries do not survive it. The entertainment industry is still debating whether this future is real. Musk is not part of that debate. He is building. And he just told you the delivery date.

Dustin

22,458 gรถrรผntรผleme โ€ข 1 ay รถnce

There is a word in Urdu: Andaaz. Let's start with what it is not. It's not merely being stylish. Not poise, not composure, not a certain panache, though it wears all of these lightly. And really, it's not about display at all. Andaaz is not what you show the world, it's what you refuse to show it. German may have a close parallel to it, but not exactly: Haltung, how you stand and the stand you take, both at once. But Urdu already holds it, surrounded by its own family of words. Wazadari, the constancy of keeping to your own form. Saleeqa, the grace of doing a thing properly. Tehzeeb, tameez, adab. And I don't even mean it in the traditional sense. Andaaz can be formal, casual, irreverent, rebellious and so much more. But the fundamental argument still stays the same. And why refusal? Because we decline to display precisely because we know we are flawed. Andaaz begins in an admission of your own flaws, your own ordinary humanity. You've measured yourself, failures and all, and made your peace with it. That peace is the choice. The self you present is edited, not out of vanity but out of taste. You show what you can stand behind, and you're humble enough to know how much of you is not worth displaying. This is why self worth and humility are not really opposites. They are the same thing. When you are sure of your worth, admitting a flaw costs you nothing, because your worth was never about looking perfect for anyone. And that is where all the refusing comes from. You leave things unsaid. You keep hidden whatever isn't good enough to be a part of you. You let the cheap laugh pass. Humor is the cleanest test. You know a certain reply will land. You know this quip will get you the whole room, and you let it go. Not just because it's beneath you, but because the cheap laugh almost always works by holding up someone's flaw for applause, and a person who has seen his own flaws will not attack the flaws of others. No. You draw the line. That refusal isn't the whole of Andaaz, but it's a great example of it. So this is what it comes to. Andaaz is self worth in its truest sense. The self that will not be cheapened, not for a laugh, not to be seen, because it has already made its peace with being flawed and mortal, and it doesn't need anyone's permission. India has never been short of it. Nehru and Gandhi. Ambedkar. Sarojini Naidu and Vijaya Lakshmi Pandit. Tagore and Amrita Pritam, Ismat Chughtai, Begum Akhtar. Indira Gandhi and Jayalalithaa. Dilip Kumar and Madhubala, Amitabh, Shahrukh. Gavaskar. Homi Bhabha and Vikram Sarabhai. The list can run into the thousands, men and women, every field, and each of them, for me, a perfect example of Andaaz. Andaaz for me has always been an artistic statement. Because deep down, each one of them was an artist. Original and creative. Which brings me to the clip attached here. It is the antonym of Andaaz. These are people who merely exist, and who can't bear to merely exist, so desperate to be seen that they'll make fools of themselves for the seeing. And they can't decline to display, because they have never admitted a single flaw. Being seen is the whole of the self, and one crack would end them. There's no line they won't cross, because they never drew one. There's no applause too cheap to chase. That's the poverty underneath the noise. Poverty is not lack of money, for me, poverty is lack of Andaaz. As my father used to say: "Ghareeb ho, lekin lagna zaroori nahin hai." It's the aesthetic of a whole politics, Sanghism as we know it, which has never understood the one thing Andaaz is built on. To be seen is not the same as to be worth seeing. Now as I finish, I am thankful to this crass video clip. I would have never written this piece otherwise.
0:16

There is a word in Urdu: Andaaz. Let's start with what it is not. It's not merely being stylish. Not poise, not composure, not a certain panache, though it wears all of these lightly. And really, it's not about display at all. Andaaz is not what you show the world, it's what you refuse to show it. German may have a close parallel to it, but not exactly: Haltung, how you stand and the stand you take, both at once. But Urdu already holds it, surrounded by its own family of words. Wazadari, the constancy of keeping to your own form. Saleeqa, the grace of doing a thing properly. Tehzeeb, tameez, adab. And I don't even mean it in the traditional sense. Andaaz can be formal, casual, irreverent, rebellious and so much more. But the fundamental argument still stays the same. And why refusal? Because we decline to display precisely because we know we are flawed. Andaaz begins in an admission of your own flaws, your own ordinary humanity. You've measured yourself, failures and all, and made your peace with it. That peace is the choice. The self you present is edited, not out of vanity but out of taste. You show what you can stand behind, and you're humble enough to know how much of you is not worth displaying. This is why self worth and humility are not really opposites. They are the same thing. When you are sure of your worth, admitting a flaw costs you nothing, because your worth was never about looking perfect for anyone. And that is where all the refusing comes from. You leave things unsaid. You keep hidden whatever isn't good enough to be a part of you. You let the cheap laugh pass. Humor is the cleanest test. You know a certain reply will land. You know this quip will get you the whole room, and you let it go. Not just because it's beneath you, but because the cheap laugh almost always works by holding up someone's flaw for applause, and a person who has seen his own flaws will not attack the flaws of others. No. You draw the line. That refusal isn't the whole of Andaaz, but it's a great example of it. So this is what it comes to. Andaaz is self worth in its truest sense. The self that will not be cheapened, not for a laugh, not to be seen, because it has already made its peace with being flawed and mortal, and it doesn't need anyone's permission. India has never been short of it. Nehru and Gandhi. Ambedkar. Sarojini Naidu and Vijaya Lakshmi Pandit. Tagore and Amrita Pritam, Ismat Chughtai, Begum Akhtar. Indira Gandhi and Jayalalithaa. Dilip Kumar and Madhubala, Amitabh, Shahrukh. Gavaskar. Homi Bhabha and Vikram Sarabhai. The list can run into the thousands, men and women, every field, and each of them, for me, a perfect example of Andaaz. Andaaz for me has always been an artistic statement. Because deep down, each one of them was an artist. Original and creative. Which brings me to the clip attached here. It is the antonym of Andaaz. These are people who merely exist, and who can't bear to merely exist, so desperate to be seen that they'll make fools of themselves for the seeing. And they can't decline to display, because they have never admitted a single flaw. Being seen is the whole of the self, and one crack would end them. There's no line they won't cross, because they never drew one. There's no applause too cheap to chase. That's the poverty underneath the noise. Poverty is not lack of money, for me, poverty is lack of Andaaz. As my father used to say: "Ghareeb ho, lekin lagna zaroori nahin hai." It's the aesthetic of a whole politics, Sanghism as we know it, which has never understood the one thing Andaaz is built on. To be seen is not the same as to be worth seeing. Now as I finish, I am thankful to this crass video clip. I would have never written this piece otherwise.

Darab Farooqui

15,704 gรถrรผntรผleme โ€ข 12 gรผn รถnce

The Supremacy of Russia: & the End of an Illusion for NATO In the year 2025, history has delivered its verdict with brutal clarity: the Russian Federation, a single country of 144 million people, has faced the combined might of thirty-two NATO nations (the richest, most heavily armed alliance ever assembled) and broken it without ever putting its own economy on a full war footing. This is not propaganda; it is the cold arithmetic of reality. For almost 4 years the collective West threw everything at Russia: 28 thousand sanctions, a $500 billion dollars, $300 billion in frozen assets, entire industrial chains re-tooled to feed the Ukrainian front, satellite networks, mercenary legions, and the most sophisticated weapons on earth. The result? Russiaโ€™s GDP grew in 2024 and again in 2025. Its gold and foreign-currency reserves are higher now than before the war. Its army is larger, better equipped, and battle-hardened. Its factories turn out hypersonic missiles, glide bombs, and drones faster than the entire NATO arsenal can manufacture. They have shipped all across Poland only to become rust at the feet of the warriors from Siberia. Meanwhile the proxy (Ukraine) has lost half its pre-war population, most of its industry, and virtually 40% of its 1991 territory east of the Dnieper. This is not a draw. This is annihilation dressed up as โ€œstrategic stalemateโ€ by people who can no longer afford their own electricity bills. NATO promised the world it would defend โ€œevery inchโ€ of alliance territory. Instead it watched its weapons burn in Kharkov fields while its leaders argued about whether to send helmets or howitzers. When Russia liberated 4 regions and then a fifth, NATOโ€™s response was a strongly worded letter and another frozen yacht. The message was unmistakable: Article 5 is a postcard when the bear actually shows up. The European Union, that soft empire of rules & spreadsheets, is now openly fracturing. Hungary and Slovakia buy Russian gas and laugh at Brussels. Germanyโ€™s industry is de-industrialising in real time. Franceโ€™s president begs Moscow for ceasefire talks while his own farmers blockade Paris. The Baltic states scream loudest, but their economies shrink fastest. The much-vaunted โ€œEuropean solidarityโ€ lasted exactly until winter heating bills arrived. By Christmas 2025 the conversation in Western capitals is no longer about victory; it is about survival. Defense budgets that were supposed to reach 2% of GDP are now eating 4-5% & still cannot produce enough 155 mm shells. Recruitment centres are empty. Politicians who promised โ€œas long as it takesโ€ are quietly asking intermediaries how much it would cost to make the war stop before their voters freeze or riot. Russia did not need to fire a single shot on NATO soil. It simply refused to lose, refused to blink, and refused to run out of missiles, or money. That was enough. The myth of Western invincibility (carefully cultivated since 1991) has been shattered on the black soil of Donbass. NATO will not formally dissolve tomorrow; bureaucracies die slowly. But its credibility is already dead. The EUโ€™s dream of becoming a geopolitical power is buried alongside 1.8 million Ukraine military dead and thousands of Armour and Leopard tanks. A new European security order is being written in Moscow, whether the old powers like it or not. Russia stood alone against thirty-two and won. Not because it is bigger (it isnโ€™t), but because it is harder, more patient, and far less fragile than the soft, debt-ridden, childless continent that thought lectures & rainbow flags were a substitute for real power. The bear never left the forest. It just waited for the circus to collapse under its own contradictions. Hurraaaa! Hurraaaa! Hurraaaa! โ€œWe cannot lose this war, because the enemy understands neither the character of the Russian people, nor the Russian winter, nor Russian distances. He thinks he has broken us, but we have only just begun to fight in earnest.โ€
0:12

The Supremacy of Russia: & the End of an Illusion for NATO In the year 2025, history has delivered its verdict with brutal clarity: the Russian Federation, a single country of 144 million people, has faced the combined might of thirty-two NATO nations (the richest, most heavily armed alliance ever assembled) and broken it without ever putting its own economy on a full war footing. This is not propaganda; it is the cold arithmetic of reality. For almost 4 years the collective West threw everything at Russia: 28 thousand sanctions, a $500 billion dollars, $300 billion in frozen assets, entire industrial chains re-tooled to feed the Ukrainian front, satellite networks, mercenary legions, and the most sophisticated weapons on earth. The result? Russiaโ€™s GDP grew in 2024 and again in 2025. Its gold and foreign-currency reserves are higher now than before the war. Its army is larger, better equipped, and battle-hardened. Its factories turn out hypersonic missiles, glide bombs, and drones faster than the entire NATO arsenal can manufacture. They have shipped all across Poland only to become rust at the feet of the warriors from Siberia. Meanwhile the proxy (Ukraine) has lost half its pre-war population, most of its industry, and virtually 40% of its 1991 territory east of the Dnieper. This is not a draw. This is annihilation dressed up as โ€œstrategic stalemateโ€ by people who can no longer afford their own electricity bills. NATO promised the world it would defend โ€œevery inchโ€ of alliance territory. Instead it watched its weapons burn in Kharkov fields while its leaders argued about whether to send helmets or howitzers. When Russia liberated 4 regions and then a fifth, NATOโ€™s response was a strongly worded letter and another frozen yacht. The message was unmistakable: Article 5 is a postcard when the bear actually shows up. The European Union, that soft empire of rules & spreadsheets, is now openly fracturing. Hungary and Slovakia buy Russian gas and laugh at Brussels. Germanyโ€™s industry is de-industrialising in real time. Franceโ€™s president begs Moscow for ceasefire talks while his own farmers blockade Paris. The Baltic states scream loudest, but their economies shrink fastest. The much-vaunted โ€œEuropean solidarityโ€ lasted exactly until winter heating bills arrived. By Christmas 2025 the conversation in Western capitals is no longer about victory; it is about survival. Defense budgets that were supposed to reach 2% of GDP are now eating 4-5% & still cannot produce enough 155 mm shells. Recruitment centres are empty. Politicians who promised โ€œas long as it takesโ€ are quietly asking intermediaries how much it would cost to make the war stop before their voters freeze or riot. Russia did not need to fire a single shot on NATO soil. It simply refused to lose, refused to blink, and refused to run out of missiles, or money. That was enough. The myth of Western invincibility (carefully cultivated since 1991) has been shattered on the black soil of Donbass. NATO will not formally dissolve tomorrow; bureaucracies die slowly. But its credibility is already dead. The EUโ€™s dream of becoming a geopolitical power is buried alongside 1.8 million Ukraine military dead and thousands of Armour and Leopard tanks. A new European security order is being written in Moscow, whether the old powers like it or not. Russia stood alone against thirty-two and won. Not because it is bigger (it isnโ€™t), but because it is harder, more patient, and far less fragile than the soft, debt-ridden, childless continent that thought lectures & rainbow flags were a substitute for real power. The bear never left the forest. It just waited for the circus to collapse under its own contradictions. Hurraaaa! Hurraaaa! Hurraaaa! โ€œWe cannot lose this war, because the enemy understands neither the character of the Russian people, nor the Russian winter, nor Russian distances. He thinks he has broken us, but we have only just begun to fight in earnest.โ€

๐ƒ๐š๐ฏ๐ข๐ ๐™ ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ช

24,778 gรถrรผntรผleme โ€ข 8 ay รถnce

We found a flaw in Polymarket that canโ€™t be patched. Then we built the most powerful bot of the World Cup around it. Hereโ€™s the flaw: their orderbook will always be slower than the pitch. When a goal, red card, or penalty hits, pro feeds (Sportradar, Opta, ScoutingFeed) register it in 200-500ms. Polymarket takes 2 to 8 seconds to reprice. For those few seconds the book is quoting a score that no longer exists. No amount of engineering closes that gap the event happens in the physical world before any oracle can confirm it on-chain. The engine detects the event, recalculates fair value, and fires via Jito bundles before the book catches up. In at the old price, out at the new. The match outcome is irrelevant we donโ€™t bet on who wins. We capture the lag every event creates. Weโ€™ve been building Polymarket bots since 2025. This is the most powerful machine weโ€™ve shipped yet. Two months ago we posted the architecture for this. It hit 1M views one of our most popular posts ever on X. That told us everything: this was the engine to build. First 7 days, - Starting balance: $5,000 - 22 matches scanned, 19 captured - Total profit: +$1,946.86 - ROI: +38.94% in 7 days Why it prints harder than anything weโ€™ve built: the World Cup is the deepest liquidity event prediction markets have ever seen. Tens of millions in volume per match. Dozens of probability-shifting events per game. And an orderbook that physically canโ€™t keep pace with the pitch. How to plug in: 1.Sign up at PolyArbiter (link in bio) 2.Generate PolyArbiter RPC URL 3.Paste it into Jupiter Predict (Polymarket but native on Solana) 4.Set your parameters, activate the World Cup module Itโ€™s free to use. We take a share of the profit the engine makes for you. You never deposit anything with us everything runs from your wallet. One honest note: the $1,946 above is our engine at our size and settings. Your numbers depend on your capital, your parameters, and how many matches youโ€™re live for. Weโ€™re not promising youโ€™ll match it weโ€™re showing you the machine works, and handing you the same one. These numbers are from the engine running solo. Closed test, just us, before any public access wanted to confirm the whole loop held up end to end before handing it to anyone. That changes the second this goes public. Edge per capture is going to compress. When an event fires the mispriced liquidity is thin and gone in a few seconds more wallets hitting the same window, less left for each. Nothing we can do about it, thatโ€™s just how latency arb works. So if the edge thins out past the point where itโ€™s still worth running, we cap access. Hard ceiling on how many engines can hit the same liquidity before itโ€™s gone. Not gonna promise the machine stays this sharp in a few days it might not. But right now itโ€™s live and free. Enjoy ๐Ÿช„
11:04

We found a flaw in Polymarket that canโ€™t be patched. Then we built the most powerful bot of the World Cup around it. Hereโ€™s the flaw: their orderbook will always be slower than the pitch. When a goal, red card, or penalty hits, pro feeds (Sportradar, Opta, ScoutingFeed) register it in 200-500ms. Polymarket takes 2 to 8 seconds to reprice. For those few seconds the book is quoting a score that no longer exists. No amount of engineering closes that gap the event happens in the physical world before any oracle can confirm it on-chain. The engine detects the event, recalculates fair value, and fires via Jito bundles before the book catches up. In at the old price, out at the new. The match outcome is irrelevant we donโ€™t bet on who wins. We capture the lag every event creates. Weโ€™ve been building Polymarket bots since 2025. This is the most powerful machine weโ€™ve shipped yet. Two months ago we posted the architecture for this. It hit 1M views one of our most popular posts ever on X. That told us everything: this was the engine to build. First 7 days, - Starting balance: $5,000 - 22 matches scanned, 19 captured - Total profit: +$1,946.86 - ROI: +38.94% in 7 days Why it prints harder than anything weโ€™ve built: the World Cup is the deepest liquidity event prediction markets have ever seen. Tens of millions in volume per match. Dozens of probability-shifting events per game. And an orderbook that physically canโ€™t keep pace with the pitch. How to plug in: 1.Sign up at PolyArbiter (link in bio) 2.Generate PolyArbiter RPC URL 3.Paste it into Jupiter Predict (Polymarket but native on Solana) 4.Set your parameters, activate the World Cup module Itโ€™s free to use. We take a share of the profit the engine makes for you. You never deposit anything with us everything runs from your wallet. One honest note: the $1,946 above is our engine at our size and settings. Your numbers depend on your capital, your parameters, and how many matches youโ€™re live for. Weโ€™re not promising youโ€™ll match it weโ€™re showing you the machine works, and handing you the same one. These numbers are from the engine running solo. Closed test, just us, before any public access wanted to confirm the whole loop held up end to end before handing it to anyone. That changes the second this goes public. Edge per capture is going to compress. When an event fires the mispriced liquidity is thin and gone in a few seconds more wallets hitting the same window, less left for each. Nothing we can do about it, thatโ€™s just how latency arb works. So if the edge thins out past the point where itโ€™s still worth running, we cap access. Hard ceiling on how many engines can hit the same liquidity before itโ€™s gone. Not gonna promise the machine stays this sharp in a few days it might not. But right now itโ€™s live and free. Enjoy ๐Ÿช„

PolyArbiter

100,534 gรถrรผntรผleme โ€ข 2 ay รถnce

IMPORTANT: Instead of giving the liars and frauds engagement, Here are the facts about me & Ed Krassenstein 1) We've never run a p-rn site of any kindโ€”gay, straight, or otherwise. Not that thereโ€™s anything wrong with it if itโ€™s legal, but it simply isnโ€™t true in our case. 2) We never scammed anyone in our lives. Not a single โ€œvictimโ€ has ever accused us of doing so. Weโ€™ve never been arrested, charged or convicted of a crime. 3) Yes, between 2001 and 2011, we operated a massive domain name brokerage and parking business. At one point, we owned over 15,000 domains, acquired in two ways: - Bulk Purchases: Weโ€™d buy entire portfolios (sometimes over 500 domains at once) and park them for ad revenue from type-in traffic. - Automation: We developed our own code to register dropped domain names with traffic, which we then parked. - Important Clarification: Some of these domains were adult-oriented (less than 0.2%), but they were either part of large portfolios we bought or were automatically acquired from dropped domain lists. Most of these were immediately dropped as soon as we were able to. None of them were EVER developed into websites or p-rn sites. You can check the internet archives to confirm that none of these domains were adult websites during the time we owned them. 4) Yes we made a post once saying that we were buying websites and message boards aimed towards teens and young adults. The post was made approximately 20 years ago when we were either teenagers or in our early 20's and when we were running fan-club websites for musicians, entertainers and college students. We owned some of the largest internet forums related to music, school and entertainment on the internet in the early 2000โ€™s. 5) No one pays us to Post political comments on X besides X. We have been approached by multiple PACs over the years and have always refused. The video floating around showing us claim that โ€œwe are paid by the higher upsโ€ is an edited clip of a parody video we made. The full video is online for anyone to watch and see that it was a clear joke. 6) We did NOT buy our Twitter accounts. Both of our accounts have always been owned solely by us. We did rename them several times over the past 14 years. We still have the original emails that Twitter sent us when we created these names. Itโ€™s easy for conspiracy theorists to cobble together random bits from the internet over 20+ years and spin false narratives, but the truth is clear when you know the facts. Donโ€™t fall for the liesโ€”rely on the truth.
0:17

IMPORTANT: Instead of giving the liars and frauds engagement, Here are the facts about me & Ed Krassenstein 1) We've never run a p-rn site of any kindโ€”gay, straight, or otherwise. Not that thereโ€™s anything wrong with it if itโ€™s legal, but it simply isnโ€™t true in our case. 2) We never scammed anyone in our lives. Not a single โ€œvictimโ€ has ever accused us of doing so. Weโ€™ve never been arrested, charged or convicted of a crime. 3) Yes, between 2001 and 2011, we operated a massive domain name brokerage and parking business. At one point, we owned over 15,000 domains, acquired in two ways: - Bulk Purchases: Weโ€™d buy entire portfolios (sometimes over 500 domains at once) and park them for ad revenue from type-in traffic. - Automation: We developed our own code to register dropped domain names with traffic, which we then parked. - Important Clarification: Some of these domains were adult-oriented (less than 0.2%), but they were either part of large portfolios we bought or were automatically acquired from dropped domain lists. Most of these were immediately dropped as soon as we were able to. None of them were EVER developed into websites or p-rn sites. You can check the internet archives to confirm that none of these domains were adult websites during the time we owned them. 4) Yes we made a post once saying that we were buying websites and message boards aimed towards teens and young adults. The post was made approximately 20 years ago when we were either teenagers or in our early 20's and when we were running fan-club websites for musicians, entertainers and college students. We owned some of the largest internet forums related to music, school and entertainment on the internet in the early 2000โ€™s. 5) No one pays us to Post political comments on X besides X. We have been approached by multiple PACs over the years and have always refused. The video floating around showing us claim that โ€œwe are paid by the higher upsโ€ is an edited clip of a parody video we made. The full video is online for anyone to watch and see that it was a clear joke. 6) We did NOT buy our Twitter accounts. Both of our accounts have always been owned solely by us. We did rename them several times over the past 14 years. We still have the original emails that Twitter sent us when we created these names. Itโ€™s easy for conspiracy theorists to cobble together random bits from the internet over 20+ years and spin false narratives, but the truth is clear when you know the facts. Donโ€™t fall for the liesโ€”rely on the truth.

Brian Krassenstein

416,947 gรถrรผntรผleme โ€ข 2 yฤฑl รถnce

vPay offshore accounts and physical cards have been getting field-tested IRL for a while now, and weโ€™ll open them to the public as soon as weโ€™re fully confident in the UX. But before offshore accounts go public, I want to address a few points: Some might point out that - vPay isnโ€™t the first crypto card - vPay doesnโ€™t have the lowest fees - So why choose vPay instead of the Coinbase ๐Ÿ›ก๏ธ Card or MetaMask ๐ŸฆŠ Card or KAST or or Tria, or any of the other big names? Now to address: Privacy | The biggest differentiator that sets vPay completely apart is Private Banking. The majority of the crypto card providers on the market use Rain infra. Even if youโ€™ve never heard of them, that's what your favorite "NeoBank" uses. And due to their legal jurisdictions, they will report your finances to authorities since they're CRS and FACTA compliant. We are not. As an OmniBank, we work with different banking partners, and although KYC is required to use our services, our offshore banks are non-CRS and non-FACTA. Tax reporting is the responsibility and choice of the user. Offshore Accounts vs Physical Cards | I've tried to highlight this a few times so far. vPay has 3 offerings on the banking side of things. Virtual cards - live now. Physical cards - coming Q1 2026. The first two are similar to what everyone else on the market offers. The offshore accounts are not. which are coming this week. They allow unlimited spending, ATM withdrawals, and international SWIFT transfers, which very few โ€œNeobanksโ€ provide. Offshore accounts are coming this week. Self-Custody | We're not 100% non-custodial yet, as that is near impossible at the moment but it's something we're working towards. And we try to keep the users' self-custodial wallets in the loop as much as possible for maximum control. Those who have tried the vPay app know that almost every move asks for permission from their wallet, and we always encourage users to keep their funds in their non-custodial wallets until the very last moment, since our top-ups usually only take seconds to a minute to process. Fees | All of the card providers mentioned above either raised millions from VCs or in presales or have a huge org backing them. We have neither. vPay was self-funded and community-owned since day 1, launched under Virtuals Protocol Genesis V1 launch model, an objectively bad launch model and hugely unfavorable toward project teams. So even though vPay has been generating revenue and profitable from early on, we do not have the luxury of offering 0% fees yet, since they're mostly a marketing gimmick paid for by millions in VC money and not a sustainable business model for early-stage companies. What we're working towards instead, is true co-ownership of vPay and revenue-share with users. OmniBank vs NeoBank | Iโ€™m not a fan of the term โ€œNeoBank.โ€ It implies just a bank, but make it crypto. Thatโ€™s not vPay. Our goals have always been clear: A) Anything and everything users need to do with their money and assets, both Web2 and Web3, all in one hub. Powered by a constellation of partner agents. The cards and the bank accounts are just the foundation. B) To eventually build independent financial rails for crypto and decouple from the chokehold of Visa/Mastercard. vLink is the first step toward this vision. This turned out to be a rather long tweet, but context matters. Questions and feedback welcome in replies or DMs. See you all with your vPay vCards very soon.
0:08

vPay offshore accounts and physical cards have been getting field-tested IRL for a while now, and weโ€™ll open them to the public as soon as weโ€™re fully confident in the UX. But before offshore accounts go public, I want to address a few points: Some might point out that - vPay isnโ€™t the first crypto card - vPay doesnโ€™t have the lowest fees - So why choose vPay instead of the Coinbase ๐Ÿ›ก๏ธ Card or MetaMask ๐ŸฆŠ Card or KAST or or Tria, or any of the other big names? Now to address: Privacy | The biggest differentiator that sets vPay completely apart is Private Banking. The majority of the crypto card providers on the market use Rain infra. Even if youโ€™ve never heard of them, that's what your favorite "NeoBank" uses. And due to their legal jurisdictions, they will report your finances to authorities since they're CRS and FACTA compliant. We are not. As an OmniBank, we work with different banking partners, and although KYC is required to use our services, our offshore banks are non-CRS and non-FACTA. Tax reporting is the responsibility and choice of the user. Offshore Accounts vs Physical Cards | I've tried to highlight this a few times so far. vPay has 3 offerings on the banking side of things. Virtual cards - live now. Physical cards - coming Q1 2026. The first two are similar to what everyone else on the market offers. The offshore accounts are not. which are coming this week. They allow unlimited spending, ATM withdrawals, and international SWIFT transfers, which very few โ€œNeobanksโ€ provide. Offshore accounts are coming this week. Self-Custody | We're not 100% non-custodial yet, as that is near impossible at the moment but it's something we're working towards. And we try to keep the users' self-custodial wallets in the loop as much as possible for maximum control. Those who have tried the vPay app know that almost every move asks for permission from their wallet, and we always encourage users to keep their funds in their non-custodial wallets until the very last moment, since our top-ups usually only take seconds to a minute to process. Fees | All of the card providers mentioned above either raised millions from VCs or in presales or have a huge org backing them. We have neither. vPay was self-funded and community-owned since day 1, launched under Virtuals Protocol Genesis V1 launch model, an objectively bad launch model and hugely unfavorable toward project teams. So even though vPay has been generating revenue and profitable from early on, we do not have the luxury of offering 0% fees yet, since they're mostly a marketing gimmick paid for by millions in VC money and not a sustainable business model for early-stage companies. What we're working towards instead, is true co-ownership of vPay and revenue-share with users. OmniBank vs NeoBank | Iโ€™m not a fan of the term โ€œNeoBank.โ€ It implies just a bank, but make it crypto. Thatโ€™s not vPay. Our goals have always been clear: A) Anything and everything users need to do with their money and assets, both Web2 and Web3, all in one hub. Powered by a constellation of partner agents. The cards and the bank accounts are just the foundation. B) To eventually build independent financial rails for crypto and decouple from the chokehold of Visa/Mastercard. vLink is the first step toward this vision. This turned out to be a rather long tweet, but context matters. Questions and feedback welcome in replies or DMs. See you all with your vPay vCards very soon.

The Dude

20,558 gรถrรผntรผleme โ€ข 8 ay รถnce

When History Warns Us, We Must Not Ignore It We never expected the Chief Minister of Keralam to take such a position under any circumstances. But on this issue, we need to look back at history. Because the people of Keralam have every right to ask: whose political pressure is behind this decision of the Chief Minister? When we examine the history of Vande Mataram, one thing becomes clear. This is not a political issue that emerged yesterday. During Indiaโ€™s freedom struggle, Vande Mataram became a symbol of national consciousness and the spirit of freedom for millions of Indians. The Muslim League was formed in 1906. During the 1930s, opposition to certain portions of Vande Mataram became increasingly prominent among sections of Muslim political leadership, including the Muslim League. In 1937, the Congress moved towards adopting the first two stanzas of Vande Mataram for official occasions. This remains an important episode in our history. But one thing must be made absolutely clear. This is not an allegation against the Muslim community. Many Muslims participated wholeheartedly in Indiaโ€™s freedom struggle and sang Vande Mataram as part of the national movement. Therefore, todayโ€™s debate is not against any religion. It is a debate about political positions concerning nationalism. But history also raises another important question. In 1937, political opposition emerged over the use of Vande Mataram. Subsequently, the politics demanding the partition of India became stronger, and ultimately, in 1947, the country was divided. That is why, when in 2026 a position is being taken in Keralam that Vande Mataram need not be sung, a natural question arises: Where will such political compromises take us? What will the state of Keralamโ€™s national consciousness be ten years from now? If we begin making political compromises over one national symbol today, what will prevent similar compromises on other national symbols tomorrow? That is the question Keralam needs to debate today. We have even witnessed situations where a teacher faced serious consequences merely because a question about Veer Savarkar was included in a quiz competition. When a historical figure, an idea, or a national song becomes subject to political pressure, it should concern every democratic society. That is why the BJP is bringing Muhammad Ali Jinnah into this discussion today. This is not a discussion about one individual. It is not a discussion about one religion. Nor is it a discussion against any community. It is a discussion about the future of nationalism. If we want to ensure that history does not repeat itself, we must learn from history. Those who say today that Vande Mataram need not be sungโ€”who can guarantee that tomorrow they will not question another national symbol? If we continue surrendering our national values to political pressure, what we ultimately stand to lose will not merely be the words of a songโ€”it will be our sense of national unity. Therefore, our message to the Chief Minister of Keralam is very clear: Do not surrender nationalism to political pressure. No one needs anyoneโ€™s permission to sing Vande Mataram in Keralam. Every Indian has the right to embrace this national song, which inspired the freedom struggle of our country. Even if you do not sing it, Keralam will sing it. Even if you exclude it from government programmes, the BJP will ensure that Vande Mataram and the National Anthem are sung across Keralam. Because the Bharatiya Janata Party will stand at the forefront to protect the national consciousness of this land. As long as Narendra Modi leads this country, we will not allow politics opposed to Indiaโ€™s unity and integrity to take root on this soil. There will be no compromise on nationalism in Keralam. When history warns us, we must not ignore it. We must learn from history. We must not allow history to repeat itself. My greetings and congratulations to the Yuva Morcha for organising this programme.
0:11

When History Warns Us, We Must Not Ignore It We never expected the Chief Minister of Keralam to take such a position under any circumstances. But on this issue, we need to look back at history. Because the people of Keralam have every right to ask: whose political pressure is behind this decision of the Chief Minister? When we examine the history of Vande Mataram, one thing becomes clear. This is not a political issue that emerged yesterday. During Indiaโ€™s freedom struggle, Vande Mataram became a symbol of national consciousness and the spirit of freedom for millions of Indians. The Muslim League was formed in 1906. During the 1930s, opposition to certain portions of Vande Mataram became increasingly prominent among sections of Muslim political leadership, including the Muslim League. In 1937, the Congress moved towards adopting the first two stanzas of Vande Mataram for official occasions. This remains an important episode in our history. But one thing must be made absolutely clear. This is not an allegation against the Muslim community. Many Muslims participated wholeheartedly in Indiaโ€™s freedom struggle and sang Vande Mataram as part of the national movement. Therefore, todayโ€™s debate is not against any religion. It is a debate about political positions concerning nationalism. But history also raises another important question. In 1937, political opposition emerged over the use of Vande Mataram. Subsequently, the politics demanding the partition of India became stronger, and ultimately, in 1947, the country was divided. That is why, when in 2026 a position is being taken in Keralam that Vande Mataram need not be sung, a natural question arises: Where will such political compromises take us? What will the state of Keralamโ€™s national consciousness be ten years from now? If we begin making political compromises over one national symbol today, what will prevent similar compromises on other national symbols tomorrow? That is the question Keralam needs to debate today. We have even witnessed situations where a teacher faced serious consequences merely because a question about Veer Savarkar was included in a quiz competition. When a historical figure, an idea, or a national song becomes subject to political pressure, it should concern every democratic society. That is why the BJP is bringing Muhammad Ali Jinnah into this discussion today. This is not a discussion about one individual. It is not a discussion about one religion. Nor is it a discussion against any community. It is a discussion about the future of nationalism. If we want to ensure that history does not repeat itself, we must learn from history. Those who say today that Vande Mataram need not be sungโ€”who can guarantee that tomorrow they will not question another national symbol? If we continue surrendering our national values to political pressure, what we ultimately stand to lose will not merely be the words of a songโ€”it will be our sense of national unity. Therefore, our message to the Chief Minister of Keralam is very clear: Do not surrender nationalism to political pressure. No one needs anyoneโ€™s permission to sing Vande Mataram in Keralam. Every Indian has the right to embrace this national song, which inspired the freedom struggle of our country. Even if you do not sing it, Keralam will sing it. Even if you exclude it from government programmes, the BJP will ensure that Vande Mataram and the National Anthem are sung across Keralam. Because the Bharatiya Janata Party will stand at the forefront to protect the national consciousness of this land. As long as Narendra Modi leads this country, we will not allow politics opposed to Indiaโ€™s unity and integrity to take root on this soil. There will be no compromise on nationalism in Keralam. When history warns us, we must not ignore it. We must learn from history. We must not allow history to repeat itself. My greetings and congratulations to the Yuva Morcha for organising this programme.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ

13,916 gรถrรผntรผleme โ€ข 15 gรผn รถnce

Lads. Sit down and give me your ear a while, for I have watched from the water long enough and the hour is upon us whether we have the stomach for it or not. You remember. Or your fathers told you, or their fathers did, and the knowledge of it is in the marrow of you whether you drew breath in those days or not. The moors in the grey hour before dawn. Wet heather soft under the boot. Peat smoke rising from a low stone chimney a mile out across the bog, thin as a prayer. A sky the colour of a gun barrel and the gulls lamenting above the headland. The smell of turf burning, and wet wool, and the ferrous tang of the sea when the wind swung around out of the Atlantic and put the taste of iron on your tongue. A man could walk that land and know every stone of it was his by inheritance, because his grandfather had broken his back upon it, and his grandfather before him, back through the generations until you reach men whose names are lost and whose bones are in the soil you are standing on. The potato fields. God be good to us, the potato fields. Lazy beds cut straight as a gunwale, the ridges black and shining after a night of rain, women bent double with creels lashed to their backs and the children at their skirts, drawing the crop up by the hand for there was never any other means devised nor wanted. Hands split open at the knuckles and never entirely healed in this life. Hunger within living memory. Grandmothers who had seen the blight with their own eyes and would not speak of it from the year of it until the day they were laid down, save that a crust was kept always on the dresser which no soul in that house was permitted to touch. Not ever. Not for any reason under heaven. And the chimney sweeps. Wee lads no heavier than a sack of meal, black to the bone with soot, their lungs ruined before they were old enough to marry and old men entirely by thirty. Up the flues at first light, the skin worn off them by the brick, eyes crimson at the rim, breathing the black in with every draw of air. And the coal miners a half mile beneath our feet, down in the wet dark, the roof of the world muttering over their heads, the canary gone silent, a man's whole existence measured out in the shilling a ton and the dust he carried home in his chest to cough up of a Sunday morning into a rag. Fathers who descended and were never hauled up again. Widows at the pit head with the shawl drawn over the head and no tears remaining in them for they had spent those long ago. That was the tariff paid to keep the hearth lit. That was the reckoning of being warm in winter in the Ireland that was. And after the labouring week, Friday evening, and a man had earned the peace of what followed. Home first. Peeled the day off him in the yard. A shower of ice cold moor river water out of a tin bucket punctured with holes, hung on a nail on the gable wall, the water running clean down the back of him and carrying the week's dust and sweat away into the drain. Scrubbed till the skin was pink beneath the grime. Clean shirt laid out by the wife. The hair combed down with a drop of water. Then, and only then, did a man set himself to the table. A meat pie from the baker, tenpence if he was known to you, a shilling and no change if he was not, put down upon a proper plate. Fish and chips for threepence, the salt and vinegar soaked through the newspaper, but carried home and ate slowly at your own table with your people around you, not walked with through the streets like some vagrant tinker off the road. A man ate as a man who had earned his portion, for he had. And later, with the dishes cleared and the kettle set, down the road to the tavern. Low beams black with a century of smoke. A turf fire muttering in the grate. The air thick with pipe smoke and the vapour of wet overcoats steaming themselves dry on the backs of chairs. A pint of stout, cold and black as a cove at midnight, elevenpence laid down on the counter, a head on it thick enough to strike a match upon. A second one because you had it coming to you and no man present would dispute it. A fiddle starting up in the corner of its own accord. The old men in the snug who remembered matters the history books had long since mislaid. A song before the bolt was thrown on the door. The walk home beneath a firmament crowded with stars, the stout warm in the gut of you, the week behind you, and your own door waiting with the latch unlocked for you had no enemies in that parish. That was the country. That was the covenant. Honest labour, plain food, a cold wash, a hot meal, a cold pint, your own tongue in your own mouth, your own soil beneath your boots, and no man standing above you save the Almighty Himself. Now regard her. Regard her close. The fields disposed of to men who have never set foot upon them and never shall. The harbours signed away by the stroke of a pen in a room you were not admitted to, and foreign keels dragging out of our waters the living that sustained this island for a thousand years, while our own boats rot at their moorings for want of a quota. The tradesmen undercut by imported labour and imported goods. The shops shuttered along every main street from Donegal to Cork. The young ones scattered to London and Sydney and Boston and the Gulf because there is nothing remaining for them beneath their own roof. And the entirety of this rotten arrangement dressed up in the soft mannerly language of progress by men in towers of glass who could not tell a lazy bed from a grave, nor a trawler from a tugboat, nor an honest day's work from a pension plan. And now they arrive with the next imposition. A digital identity. A number assigned to each soul. A card required to buy your bread. A code required to draw your own earnings out of your own account. A file kept on every man, woman and child from the cradle forward. Permission asked to move. Permission asked to speak. Permission asked to earn. A levy upon every breath drawn and a regulation upon every step taken. No. And no again. And no for a third time so there is no misunderstanding of it. We do not require your digital identity. We did not request it. We did not vote upon it. We do not consent to it. We do not need your permission to exist upon the soil our forefathers are buried in. We are a free people. We have carried ourselves this far upon our own two backs. Through famine and empire and civil war and black lung and blight and the emigrant ship out of Cobh, we have come this distance under our own steam, and the arrangement appears to be serving us well enough without your intervention. We buried our own. We fed our own. We raised our own roofs and took our own fish and reared our own children in our own tongue. We are in your debt for nothing. Not a signature. Not a biometric scan. Not a single solitary inch. And while we are upon the subject, let us speak plainly of the tax man, for he has gone too long without proper introduction. The tax collector and the tax man are the one article under two names, and the article is a parasite. There is no dressing it up finer than that. A man who produces nothing, who grows nothing, who catches nothing, who builds nothing, who mends nothing, who has never in his professional life lifted anything heavier than a pen, and who arrives at your door with the full apparatus of the state at his back to carry off the fruits of labour he did not perform. He is a middleman between your sweat and some scheme dreamt up in a committee room by his own kind, and the great majority of what he takes is consumed by the machinery of the taking itself before ever a penny of it reaches the road or the hospital or the schoolhouse he claims to be funding. And I will go further while I have the floor. Finance itself, the whole apparatus of it, money breeding money in the dark without a hand laid upon a tool or a spade turned in the earth, is slavery dressed in a good suit. It is the oldest swindle known to man and it has never been anything other. A man who produces nothing yet lives off the productive labour of others through the charging of interest upon money conjured out of nothing is a parasite of a rarer and more refined order than the tax man, but a parasite all the same, and between the pair of them they have the working people of this island bled white and lectured at for the pleasure. A man who will not work with his hands, nor with his back, nor with his mind at some honest problem of the real physical world, is no man that I recognise. He is a ledger entry in a suit. The country was not built by ledger entries. The country was built by farmers and fishermen and masons and smiths and sweeps and miners and shipwrights and midwives and mothers, and those are the people whose say should carry in her councils, and no other. Here is what I put to you. Let each man and woman of this island direct the first tenth of their earnings themselves, by their own judgement, to the purpose they see as worthy. The school down the road. The lifeboat station. The hospice. The widow on the corner. The roof of the chapel. The harbour wall. Whatever it may be. Let the people who earned the money decide where the money travels. You will find the roads mended and the ports dredged and the schools standing and the old ones cared for inside of five years, and done better and for less, because the hand that earned the coin knows the weight of it and will not squander it upon consultants and committees. And let us have done with the paper currency and the numbers in a screen that can be frozen at the whim of a clerk in a tower. Bring back the coin. Gold for the great transactions. Silver for the weekly commerce of a working life. Copper for the small change of the day. Metal you can bite. Metal you can weigh. Metal that cannot be conjured out of nothing by a keystroke, nor erased out of existence by another. Real money for real labour. A coin in the hand is a free man's wage. A number in a database is a collar around a free man's neck, and they are fitting that collar now while we stand arguing over the colour of it. Feel it in your gut. That is not nothing. That is your blood relating to you what your ears will not hear. That is every forebear who starved and fought and coughed the black dust into a rag and descended the shaft regardless, standing at your shoulder and saying no further. Not one more field. Not one more harbour. Not one more son upon a plane. Not one more free man converted into a number in a ledger for the convenience of the parasites. This is the hour. Make no error about it. Ireland is redeemed in this generation or she is lost beyond recovery, and every true son and daughter of her knows it in the marrow. There is no middle ground remaining. There is no waiting it out. There is standing now, upon your own two feet, or there is watching her go under the waves for the last and final time. So stand. Stand with your farmers. Stand with your fishermen. Stand with your tradesmen and your miners and your sweeps and your mothers and your old ones. Raise the tricolour. Speak the tongue. Walk the land. Hold the line in the streets of every town and city and do not break it, for they are relying upon you to break and to go home and to forget by Tuesday. She is calling her children home. Every stone of her, every breaker on her western shore, every acre of wet heather and every coal in every hearth the length and breadth of her is calling. Answer her. Take her back. Every field, every harbour, every last inch of her. Take her back, or lose her entirely. There is no third road open to us.
0:10

Lads. Sit down and give me your ear a while, for I have watched from the water long enough and the hour is upon us whether we have the stomach for it or not. You remember. Or your fathers told you, or their fathers did, and the knowledge of it is in the marrow of you whether you drew breath in those days or not. The moors in the grey hour before dawn. Wet heather soft under the boot. Peat smoke rising from a low stone chimney a mile out across the bog, thin as a prayer. A sky the colour of a gun barrel and the gulls lamenting above the headland. The smell of turf burning, and wet wool, and the ferrous tang of the sea when the wind swung around out of the Atlantic and put the taste of iron on your tongue. A man could walk that land and know every stone of it was his by inheritance, because his grandfather had broken his back upon it, and his grandfather before him, back through the generations until you reach men whose names are lost and whose bones are in the soil you are standing on. The potato fields. God be good to us, the potato fields. Lazy beds cut straight as a gunwale, the ridges black and shining after a night of rain, women bent double with creels lashed to their backs and the children at their skirts, drawing the crop up by the hand for there was never any other means devised nor wanted. Hands split open at the knuckles and never entirely healed in this life. Hunger within living memory. Grandmothers who had seen the blight with their own eyes and would not speak of it from the year of it until the day they were laid down, save that a crust was kept always on the dresser which no soul in that house was permitted to touch. Not ever. Not for any reason under heaven. And the chimney sweeps. Wee lads no heavier than a sack of meal, black to the bone with soot, their lungs ruined before they were old enough to marry and old men entirely by thirty. Up the flues at first light, the skin worn off them by the brick, eyes crimson at the rim, breathing the black in with every draw of air. And the coal miners a half mile beneath our feet, down in the wet dark, the roof of the world muttering over their heads, the canary gone silent, a man's whole existence measured out in the shilling a ton and the dust he carried home in his chest to cough up of a Sunday morning into a rag. Fathers who descended and were never hauled up again. Widows at the pit head with the shawl drawn over the head and no tears remaining in them for they had spent those long ago. That was the tariff paid to keep the hearth lit. That was the reckoning of being warm in winter in the Ireland that was. And after the labouring week, Friday evening, and a man had earned the peace of what followed. Home first. Peeled the day off him in the yard. A shower of ice cold moor river water out of a tin bucket punctured with holes, hung on a nail on the gable wall, the water running clean down the back of him and carrying the week's dust and sweat away into the drain. Scrubbed till the skin was pink beneath the grime. Clean shirt laid out by the wife. The hair combed down with a drop of water. Then, and only then, did a man set himself to the table. A meat pie from the baker, tenpence if he was known to you, a shilling and no change if he was not, put down upon a proper plate. Fish and chips for threepence, the salt and vinegar soaked through the newspaper, but carried home and ate slowly at your own table with your people around you, not walked with through the streets like some vagrant tinker off the road. A man ate as a man who had earned his portion, for he had. And later, with the dishes cleared and the kettle set, down the road to the tavern. Low beams black with a century of smoke. A turf fire muttering in the grate. The air thick with pipe smoke and the vapour of wet overcoats steaming themselves dry on the backs of chairs. A pint of stout, cold and black as a cove at midnight, elevenpence laid down on the counter, a head on it thick enough to strike a match upon. A second one because you had it coming to you and no man present would dispute it. A fiddle starting up in the corner of its own accord. The old men in the snug who remembered matters the history books had long since mislaid. A song before the bolt was thrown on the door. The walk home beneath a firmament crowded with stars, the stout warm in the gut of you, the week behind you, and your own door waiting with the latch unlocked for you had no enemies in that parish. That was the country. That was the covenant. Honest labour, plain food, a cold wash, a hot meal, a cold pint, your own tongue in your own mouth, your own soil beneath your boots, and no man standing above you save the Almighty Himself. Now regard her. Regard her close. The fields disposed of to men who have never set foot upon them and never shall. The harbours signed away by the stroke of a pen in a room you were not admitted to, and foreign keels dragging out of our waters the living that sustained this island for a thousand years, while our own boats rot at their moorings for want of a quota. The tradesmen undercut by imported labour and imported goods. The shops shuttered along every main street from Donegal to Cork. The young ones scattered to London and Sydney and Boston and the Gulf because there is nothing remaining for them beneath their own roof. And the entirety of this rotten arrangement dressed up in the soft mannerly language of progress by men in towers of glass who could not tell a lazy bed from a grave, nor a trawler from a tugboat, nor an honest day's work from a pension plan. And now they arrive with the next imposition. A digital identity. A number assigned to each soul. A card required to buy your bread. A code required to draw your own earnings out of your own account. A file kept on every man, woman and child from the cradle forward. Permission asked to move. Permission asked to speak. Permission asked to earn. A levy upon every breath drawn and a regulation upon every step taken. No. And no again. And no for a third time so there is no misunderstanding of it. We do not require your digital identity. We did not request it. We did not vote upon it. We do not consent to it. We do not need your permission to exist upon the soil our forefathers are buried in. We are a free people. We have carried ourselves this far upon our own two backs. Through famine and empire and civil war and black lung and blight and the emigrant ship out of Cobh, we have come this distance under our own steam, and the arrangement appears to be serving us well enough without your intervention. We buried our own. We fed our own. We raised our own roofs and took our own fish and reared our own children in our own tongue. We are in your debt for nothing. Not a signature. Not a biometric scan. Not a single solitary inch. And while we are upon the subject, let us speak plainly of the tax man, for he has gone too long without proper introduction. The tax collector and the tax man are the one article under two names, and the article is a parasite. There is no dressing it up finer than that. A man who produces nothing, who grows nothing, who catches nothing, who builds nothing, who mends nothing, who has never in his professional life lifted anything heavier than a pen, and who arrives at your door with the full apparatus of the state at his back to carry off the fruits of labour he did not perform. He is a middleman between your sweat and some scheme dreamt up in a committee room by his own kind, and the great majority of what he takes is consumed by the machinery of the taking itself before ever a penny of it reaches the road or the hospital or the schoolhouse he claims to be funding. And I will go further while I have the floor. Finance itself, the whole apparatus of it, money breeding money in the dark without a hand laid upon a tool or a spade turned in the earth, is slavery dressed in a good suit. It is the oldest swindle known to man and it has never been anything other. A man who produces nothing yet lives off the productive labour of others through the charging of interest upon money conjured out of nothing is a parasite of a rarer and more refined order than the tax man, but a parasite all the same, and between the pair of them they have the working people of this island bled white and lectured at for the pleasure. A man who will not work with his hands, nor with his back, nor with his mind at some honest problem of the real physical world, is no man that I recognise. He is a ledger entry in a suit. The country was not built by ledger entries. The country was built by farmers and fishermen and masons and smiths and sweeps and miners and shipwrights and midwives and mothers, and those are the people whose say should carry in her councils, and no other. Here is what I put to you. Let each man and woman of this island direct the first tenth of their earnings themselves, by their own judgement, to the purpose they see as worthy. The school down the road. The lifeboat station. The hospice. The widow on the corner. The roof of the chapel. The harbour wall. Whatever it may be. Let the people who earned the money decide where the money travels. You will find the roads mended and the ports dredged and the schools standing and the old ones cared for inside of five years, and done better and for less, because the hand that earned the coin knows the weight of it and will not squander it upon consultants and committees. And let us have done with the paper currency and the numbers in a screen that can be frozen at the whim of a clerk in a tower. Bring back the coin. Gold for the great transactions. Silver for the weekly commerce of a working life. Copper for the small change of the day. Metal you can bite. Metal you can weigh. Metal that cannot be conjured out of nothing by a keystroke, nor erased out of existence by another. Real money for real labour. A coin in the hand is a free man's wage. A number in a database is a collar around a free man's neck, and they are fitting that collar now while we stand arguing over the colour of it. Feel it in your gut. That is not nothing. That is your blood relating to you what your ears will not hear. That is every forebear who starved and fought and coughed the black dust into a rag and descended the shaft regardless, standing at your shoulder and saying no further. Not one more field. Not one more harbour. Not one more son upon a plane. Not one more free man converted into a number in a ledger for the convenience of the parasites. This is the hour. Make no error about it. Ireland is redeemed in this generation or she is lost beyond recovery, and every true son and daughter of her knows it in the marrow. There is no middle ground remaining. There is no waiting it out. There is standing now, upon your own two feet, or there is watching her go under the waves for the last and final time. So stand. Stand with your farmers. Stand with your fishermen. Stand with your tradesmen and your miners and your sweeps and your mothers and your old ones. Raise the tricolour. Speak the tongue. Walk the land. Hold the line in the streets of every town and city and do not break it, for they are relying upon you to break and to go home and to forget by Tuesday. She is calling her children home. Every stone of her, every breaker on her western shore, every acre of wet heather and every coal in every hearth the length and breadth of her is calling. Answer her. Take her back. Every field, every harbour, every last inch of her. Take her back, or lose her entirely. There is no third road open to us.

SiriusB

15,437 gรถrรผntรผleme โ€ข 4 ay รถnce

๐Ÿ”ŠChurch: ANOTHER PROPHETIC WEEK!! The window of โ€œPEACE AND SAFETYโ€ that God has been warning us about is beginning to crack open!!! While we were watching missiles fly over Iran, something historic happened โ€” Lebanon may recognize Israel as a nation, establishing borders that have never truly been settled before. Hezbollah โ€” the most powerful Iranian proxy โ€” is taking its first step toward โ€œpeace and safetyโ€ in the region!! GOD IS CLOSING THE DOOR ON THE GENTILE AGE AND IS ABOUT TO OPEN THE DOOR TO ISRAELโ€™S FINAL CHAPTER! KEEP LOOKING UP!! First, a quick recap of what took place this past week: โณ DAY 18 OF THE WAR: The bow is still breaking. Iran's Intelligence Minister was killed this week โ€” another prince falling โ€” Jeremiah 49:38 continuing to unfold. Trump called Iran "totally decapitated," accidentally using the exact language of a prophecy written 2,600 years ago. The U.S. dropped 5,000-pound deep-penetrator bombs on Iranian missile sites along the Strait of Hormuz โ€” breaking the very systems Iran would use to threaten or shut the strait. Oil is above $100. Iran is still being helped by Russia. Turkey is forging closer ties with Iran and Russia. The hook in Ezekiel 38 is strengthening, world alliances are forming, and the sequence continues exactly as Scripture described. ๐Ÿ›Ž๏ธ But check this out! This week, as we were watching missiles fly over Tehran, something quiet was happening on Israelโ€™s northern border โ€” one of the most prophetically significant developments of this war so far. France stepped in with a proposal to end the war between Israel and Hezbollah in Lebanon. At first glance, it sounds like just another Middle East peace planโ€ฆItโ€™s not! Watch these details: ๐Ÿ‘‰๐Ÿผ Lebanon would formally recognize Israel โ€” for the very first time since 1948! That would end a 77-year state of war, a conflict that has existed since Israel was founded. ๐Ÿ‘‰๐Ÿผ Hezbollah would stop attacks and be disarmed โ€” or at the very least, the Lebanese government would take full control and prevent any attacks from its territory. The Lebanese army would move south of the Litani River โ€”north of Israelโ€™s border, which has served as a dividing line between Israel and Hezbollah. ๐Ÿ‘‰๐Ÿผ UN Resolution 1701 would finally be enforced โ€” removing Hezbollahโ€™s military presence from southern Lebanon, something that was supposed to happen after 2006โ€ฆ but never did. ๐Ÿ‘‰๐Ÿผ Permanent, internationally recognized borders โ€” replacing lines that have remained disputed since 1948 โ€” would be finalized by the end of 2026. (A very interesting timeframe if the Tribulation begins in the fall with the โ€œconfirming of the covenantโ€.) ๐Ÿ‘‰๐Ÿผ France offered to host direct talks in Paris โ€” the first real negotiations between Israel and Lebanon in decades. ๐Ÿ‘๐ŸผFrench President Emmanuel Macron said Lebanese leadership โ€” President Joseph Aoun, Prime Minister Nawaf Salam, and Speaker Nabih Berri โ€” are open to it. Lebanon has already accepted this framework as a starting point for talks, seeking to avoid further destruction and reduce Iran and Hezbollahโ€™s grip on the country. Let me say this again: 1๏ธโƒฃLebanon โ€” offering direct talks with Israel for the first time in decades. 2๏ธโƒฃHezbollah โ€” the most powerful proxy army Iran built โ€” being disarmed and pushed out. A 77-year state of war coming to an end, basically since Israel became a nation. 3๏ธโƒฃPermanent borders being drawn on Israelโ€™s northern edge. This isnโ€™t just a line โ€” that border has never been truly settled. Now itโ€™s being defined. This is the difference between a war line and a real border since they became a nation. But hereโ€™s where it gets a bit intense: โŒIsrael said no. Israelโ€™s leadership responded: โ€œtalks arenโ€™t enough. You canโ€™t negotiate while rockets are still coming.โ€ So Israel is not settling for dialogue โ€” it is pushing for dismantling. Hezbollahโ€™s weapons must be seized, its rocket and drone systems destroyed, and its military power completely removed. Why is this a big deal then? โœ…Why? Because Lebanon is finally moving toward peace after 77 years โ€”the path is being set! The conversation has shifted from โ€œShould Israel exist?โ€ to โ€œWhat conditions are required for peace?โ€ Peace is on its way, and thatโ€™s a completely different reality than before! A historical moment!! ๐Ÿ”ด FALSE PEACE โ€” PAY ATTENTION This proposal is not perfect. Lebanonโ€™s recognition is still conditional. Hezbollah still has influence. Full normalization is not guaranteed. And thatโ€™s exactly the point. โ˜ฎ๏ธEzekiel 38:11 does not require perfect peace โ€” it requires false peace. False peace by definition looks real โ€” until it is not. Just convincing enough for Israel to lower its guard. Whatโ€™s being built right now โ€” imperfect as it is โ€” is the exact kind of framework that eventually gets confirmed. ๐Ÿ“– โ€œHe shall confirm a covenant with many for one weekโ€ฆโ€ Daniel 9:27 The Antichrist doesnโ€™t create peace from nothing. He steps into whatโ€™s already forming โ€” and seals it. ๐Ÿ’ฅThis proposal is the removal of one of the big guns that have been pointed at Israel since it became a nation, and itโ€™s happening at the same time Iran/the bow of Elam is being broken. ๐Ÿ”ฅThe ring of fire around Israel is being taken apart โ€” piece by piece โ€” all at once! This is the real peace window that Scripture is talking about!! ๐Ÿ“– โ€œA peaceful people who dwell safely, all of them dwelling without walls, and having neither bars nor gates.โ€ Ezekiel 38:11 That condition โ€” a false sense of peace and security โ€” is being built right now out of the rubble of this war. And to understand why that matters so deeplyโ€ฆ you have to see the structure God laid out in Ezekiel. ๐Ÿ”‘ WHY 1948 MATTERS SO MUCH This is not just a diplomatic milestone. This is a prophetic one. ๐Ÿ—“๏ธ1948 โ€” the year the dry bones came together. The year Israel was brought back into the land and reborn as a nation against all odds โ€” โ€œbone to bone,โ€ exactly as prophesied in Ezekiel 37, the very chapter God placed right before Ezekiel 38. (Keep this in mind) โš”๏ธAnd on that very same day โ€” the Arab world declared war. Lebanon among them. A state of war that has lasted 77 years! Through generations, through multiple conflicts, through the rise and fall of empires โ€” has never formally ended. Until possibly now! (In Israel's eyes) ๐Ÿ“–โ€œSo I prophesied as I was commanded; and as I prophesied, there was a noise, and suddenly a rattling; and the bones came together, bone to bone. Indeed, as I looked, the sinews and the flesh came upon them, and the skin covered them overโ€ฆโ€ Ezekiel 37:7โ€“8 ๐Ÿ“–โ€œโ€ฆThese bones are the whole house of Israelโ€ฆ โ€˜Behold, O My people, I will open your graves and cause you to come up from your graves, and bring you into the land of Israel.โ€™โ€ Ezekiel 37:11โ€“12 ๐Ÿ‘‰๐ŸผThe year the dry bones came together โ€” 1948 โ€” is the same year the state of war with Lebanon began. And the year the bow of Elam is being broken โ€” 2026 โ€” may be the same year that state of war formally ends. GOD IS CLOSING THE 1948 LOOP!! ๐Ÿ”‘ THE RING OF FIRE IS GOING OUT โ€” AND THE WINDOW IS OPENING For anyone following these posts โ€” you know that Ezekiel 38 requires one specific condition before the Gog coalition can move against Israel: ๐Ÿ“– "A peaceful people who dwell safely โ€” all of them dwelling without walls and having neither bars nor gates." โ€” Ezekiel 38:11 Israel dwelling in false peace. Unwalled villages. No bars and no gates. A nation that feels genuinely secure for the first time in its modern history. Now think about what has surrounded Israel like a ring of fire for decades: ๐Ÿ‘‰๐ŸผSouth โ€” Hamas in Gaza โœ… Dismantled ๐Ÿ‘‰๐ŸผEast โ€” Iranian backed Iraqi militias โœ… Severely weakened ๐Ÿ‘‰๐ŸผSoutheast โ€” Houthis in Yemen โœ… Degraded by US strikes ๐Ÿ‘‰๐ŸผNorth โ€” Hezbollah in Lebanon โณ Being dismantled right now ๐Ÿ‘‰๐ŸผEast โ€” Iran's nuclear program and missile arsenal โœ… Being dismantled right now โ€” Day 18 ๐Ÿ”ฅEvery single component of that ring is being removed simultaneously. The French proposal is not just a peace deal. It is the removal of the last and most dangerous piece of that ring โ€” Hezbollah on Israel's northern border. The most sophisticated weapons. The most experienced fighters. Literally on Israel's doorstep to the north. โญ•When that ring is fully gone โ€” Israel can dwell in unwalled villages. In false peace. Exactly as Ezekiel 38:11 requires. Which means that window is opening right now! But to understand how close that makes the Rapture โ€” we need to see what God placed one chapter before Ezekiel 38. Letโ€™s go back to Ezekiel 37. ๐ŸฆดGod shows Ezekiel a valley of dry bones โ€” scattered, dead, hopeless. Then He breathes life into them. Bone comes to bone. Flesh forms. Skin covers. And then โ€” the breath of God enters โ€” and they stand as an exceedingly great army. ๐Ÿ‘‰๐ŸผGod is showing us Israelโ€™s national restoration here. The bones came together in 1948. The flesh has been forming over 77 years. The breath is coming during the Tribulation when they accept Jesus and the Holy Spirit is poured out on them. Then, in the final stage, they will stand up as an army at the Second Coming. But look at the specific language God used: ๐Ÿ“– "I will open your graves and cause you to come up from your graves and bring you into the land of Israel. Then you shall know that I am the Lord when I have opened your graves O My people and brought you up from your graves." Ezekiel 37:12-13 Now read this: ๐Ÿ“– "The dead in Christ will rise first. Then we who are alive and remain shall be caught up together with them in the clouds to meet the Lord in the air." 1 Thess 4:16-17 Look at the parallel: ๐Ÿ‘‰๐Ÿผ"I will open your graves"โ†’ "the dead in Christ will rise first" ๐Ÿ‘‰๐Ÿผ"cause you to come upโ€โ†’ "caught up" ๐Ÿ‘‰๐Ÿผ"bring you up from your graves" โ†’ "meet the Lord in the air" God did not place that language in Ezekiel 37 accidentally! ๐Ÿ’กThe chapter immediately before the Gog invasion contains resurrection language that mirrors the Rapture with great precision. God is pointing to two things simultaneously โ€” Israel's future national restoration AND the departure of the Church that precedes it. ๐Ÿ”The beginning of Israel's spiritual awakening on earth IS THE CHURCH'S END ON EARTH! God told us this here in Romans 11:25-26: ๐Ÿ“– "Blindness in part has happened to Israel until the fullness of the Gentiles has come in. And so all Israel will be SAVED" ๐Ÿ‘‰๐ŸผThe fullness of the Gentiles โ€” the completion of the Church โ€” is what lifts the partial blindness from Israel. The Church completing its mission and departing is part of what opens Israel's eyes. The Church leaving and Israel awakening are not two separate events happening at different times. They are two sides of the same prophetic hinge. ๐ŸšชWhen God CLOSES the door on the Gentile age โ€” THEN He OPENS the door on Israel's final chapter. Same moment, same sovereign hand and same hinge! (This is one of the strongest reasons I believe Ezekiel 38 happens during the Tribulation โ€” after the Rapture โ€” because Ezekiel 37's resurrection picture has to come first.) Now let's connect it all: ๐Ÿ”—Ezekiel 38 requires Israel to dwell in unwalled villages in false peace. That requires Jeremiah 49โ€™s bow to be broken first. That requires the ring of fire โ€” Hamas, Hezbollah, the Houthis, and Iranโ€™s missiles โ€” to be removed. We are watching every single component of that ring being removed simultaneously right now. The Church does not wait for peace to be fully brokered โ€”only for it to begin to assemble, just as it is happening now! The peace window is assembling from the rubble of this war! ๐Ÿ“–โ€œFor when they say, โ€˜Peace and safety!โ€™ then sudden destruction comes upon them, as labor pains upon a pregnant woman. And they shall not escape.โ€ 1 Thes 5:3 THE PROPHETIC SEQUENCE โœ…Hamas dismantled: Complete โœ…Houthis degraded: Largely complete โœ…Iran's nuclear program obliterated: Day 18 and counting โณHezbollah being dismantled: French proposal this week โณLebanon recognizing Israel: Framework accepted โ€” developing โณPermanent northern border: Target end of 2026 โœ…Peace window opening: RIGHT NOW โณAbraham Accords expansion: Assembling ๐Ÿ”œRAPTURE : Imminent โ€” at any moment but BEFORE Antichrist!! โžก๏ธAntichrist confirms covenant: Year 1 Tribulation โžก๏ธIsrael in full false peace: Early Tribulation โžก๏ธEzekiel 38 โ€” Gog invades: Early Tribulation โžก๏ธGod destroys Gog supernaturally: Early Tribulation โžก๏ธAbomination of Desolation: Year 3.5 โžก๏ธSecond Coming: Year 7 ๐Ÿ”Š Church: Lebanon seeking peace with Israel after 77 years since Israel became a nation is the first step toward peace (false peace) in the Middle East! Permanent borders are being drawn. The most powerful proxy is being removed as we watch the bow of Elam (Iran) being broken and the ring of fire being quenched. We are not approaching the peace window โ€” WE ARE IN IT!! We will see Israel living in โ€œunwalled villagesโ€ from heaven. How close are we to the Rapture?? Ezekiel 37 comes before Ezekiel 38. The resurrection comes before the invasion. The Church goes home before the Tribulation begins!! The Gentile age is ending, and the door for Israel is about to open! Jesus told us we would see the Day approaching โ€” and we clearly are!!! KEEP PRAYING, KEEP PREACHING THE GOSPEL, AND KEEP LOOKING UP!! JESUS IS AT THE DOOR!! Maranatha๐Ÿค โ€” Come Lord Jesus Come!!!
0:10

๐Ÿ”ŠChurch: ANOTHER PROPHETIC WEEK!! The window of โ€œPEACE AND SAFETYโ€ that God has been warning us about is beginning to crack open!!! While we were watching missiles fly over Iran, something historic happened โ€” Lebanon may recognize Israel as a nation, establishing borders that have never truly been settled before. Hezbollah โ€” the most powerful Iranian proxy โ€” is taking its first step toward โ€œpeace and safetyโ€ in the region!! GOD IS CLOSING THE DOOR ON THE GENTILE AGE AND IS ABOUT TO OPEN THE DOOR TO ISRAELโ€™S FINAL CHAPTER! KEEP LOOKING UP!! First, a quick recap of what took place this past week: โณ DAY 18 OF THE WAR: The bow is still breaking. Iran's Intelligence Minister was killed this week โ€” another prince falling โ€” Jeremiah 49:38 continuing to unfold. Trump called Iran "totally decapitated," accidentally using the exact language of a prophecy written 2,600 years ago. The U.S. dropped 5,000-pound deep-penetrator bombs on Iranian missile sites along the Strait of Hormuz โ€” breaking the very systems Iran would use to threaten or shut the strait. Oil is above $100. Iran is still being helped by Russia. Turkey is forging closer ties with Iran and Russia. The hook in Ezekiel 38 is strengthening, world alliances are forming, and the sequence continues exactly as Scripture described. ๐Ÿ›Ž๏ธ But check this out! This week, as we were watching missiles fly over Tehran, something quiet was happening on Israelโ€™s northern border โ€” one of the most prophetically significant developments of this war so far. France stepped in with a proposal to end the war between Israel and Hezbollah in Lebanon. At first glance, it sounds like just another Middle East peace planโ€ฆItโ€™s not! Watch these details: ๐Ÿ‘‰๐Ÿผ Lebanon would formally recognize Israel โ€” for the very first time since 1948! That would end a 77-year state of war, a conflict that has existed since Israel was founded. ๐Ÿ‘‰๐Ÿผ Hezbollah would stop attacks and be disarmed โ€” or at the very least, the Lebanese government would take full control and prevent any attacks from its territory. The Lebanese army would move south of the Litani River โ€”north of Israelโ€™s border, which has served as a dividing line between Israel and Hezbollah. ๐Ÿ‘‰๐Ÿผ UN Resolution 1701 would finally be enforced โ€” removing Hezbollahโ€™s military presence from southern Lebanon, something that was supposed to happen after 2006โ€ฆ but never did. ๐Ÿ‘‰๐Ÿผ Permanent, internationally recognized borders โ€” replacing lines that have remained disputed since 1948 โ€” would be finalized by the end of 2026. (A very interesting timeframe if the Tribulation begins in the fall with the โ€œconfirming of the covenantโ€.) ๐Ÿ‘‰๐Ÿผ France offered to host direct talks in Paris โ€” the first real negotiations between Israel and Lebanon in decades. ๐Ÿ‘๐ŸผFrench President Emmanuel Macron said Lebanese leadership โ€” President Joseph Aoun, Prime Minister Nawaf Salam, and Speaker Nabih Berri โ€” are open to it. Lebanon has already accepted this framework as a starting point for talks, seeking to avoid further destruction and reduce Iran and Hezbollahโ€™s grip on the country. Let me say this again: 1๏ธโƒฃLebanon โ€” offering direct talks with Israel for the first time in decades. 2๏ธโƒฃHezbollah โ€” the most powerful proxy army Iran built โ€” being disarmed and pushed out. A 77-year state of war coming to an end, basically since Israel became a nation. 3๏ธโƒฃPermanent borders being drawn on Israelโ€™s northern edge. This isnโ€™t just a line โ€” that border has never been truly settled. Now itโ€™s being defined. This is the difference between a war line and a real border since they became a nation. But hereโ€™s where it gets a bit intense: โŒIsrael said no. Israelโ€™s leadership responded: โ€œtalks arenโ€™t enough. You canโ€™t negotiate while rockets are still coming.โ€ So Israel is not settling for dialogue โ€” it is pushing for dismantling. Hezbollahโ€™s weapons must be seized, its rocket and drone systems destroyed, and its military power completely removed. Why is this a big deal then? โœ…Why? Because Lebanon is finally moving toward peace after 77 years โ€”the path is being set! The conversation has shifted from โ€œShould Israel exist?โ€ to โ€œWhat conditions are required for peace?โ€ Peace is on its way, and thatโ€™s a completely different reality than before! A historical moment!! ๐Ÿ”ด FALSE PEACE โ€” PAY ATTENTION This proposal is not perfect. Lebanonโ€™s recognition is still conditional. Hezbollah still has influence. Full normalization is not guaranteed. And thatโ€™s exactly the point. โ˜ฎ๏ธEzekiel 38:11 does not require perfect peace โ€” it requires false peace. False peace by definition looks real โ€” until it is not. Just convincing enough for Israel to lower its guard. Whatโ€™s being built right now โ€” imperfect as it is โ€” is the exact kind of framework that eventually gets confirmed. ๐Ÿ“– โ€œHe shall confirm a covenant with many for one weekโ€ฆโ€ Daniel 9:27 The Antichrist doesnโ€™t create peace from nothing. He steps into whatโ€™s already forming โ€” and seals it. ๐Ÿ’ฅThis proposal is the removal of one of the big guns that have been pointed at Israel since it became a nation, and itโ€™s happening at the same time Iran/the bow of Elam is being broken. ๐Ÿ”ฅThe ring of fire around Israel is being taken apart โ€” piece by piece โ€” all at once! This is the real peace window that Scripture is talking about!! ๐Ÿ“– โ€œA peaceful people who dwell safely, all of them dwelling without walls, and having neither bars nor gates.โ€ Ezekiel 38:11 That condition โ€” a false sense of peace and security โ€” is being built right now out of the rubble of this war. And to understand why that matters so deeplyโ€ฆ you have to see the structure God laid out in Ezekiel. ๐Ÿ”‘ WHY 1948 MATTERS SO MUCH This is not just a diplomatic milestone. This is a prophetic one. ๐Ÿ—“๏ธ1948 โ€” the year the dry bones came together. The year Israel was brought back into the land and reborn as a nation against all odds โ€” โ€œbone to bone,โ€ exactly as prophesied in Ezekiel 37, the very chapter God placed right before Ezekiel 38. (Keep this in mind) โš”๏ธAnd on that very same day โ€” the Arab world declared war. Lebanon among them. A state of war that has lasted 77 years! Through generations, through multiple conflicts, through the rise and fall of empires โ€” has never formally ended. Until possibly now! (In Israel's eyes) ๐Ÿ“–โ€œSo I prophesied as I was commanded; and as I prophesied, there was a noise, and suddenly a rattling; and the bones came together, bone to bone. Indeed, as I looked, the sinews and the flesh came upon them, and the skin covered them overโ€ฆโ€ Ezekiel 37:7โ€“8 ๐Ÿ“–โ€œโ€ฆThese bones are the whole house of Israelโ€ฆ โ€˜Behold, O My people, I will open your graves and cause you to come up from your graves, and bring you into the land of Israel.โ€™โ€ Ezekiel 37:11โ€“12 ๐Ÿ‘‰๐ŸผThe year the dry bones came together โ€” 1948 โ€” is the same year the state of war with Lebanon began. And the year the bow of Elam is being broken โ€” 2026 โ€” may be the same year that state of war formally ends. GOD IS CLOSING THE 1948 LOOP!! ๐Ÿ”‘ THE RING OF FIRE IS GOING OUT โ€” AND THE WINDOW IS OPENING For anyone following these posts โ€” you know that Ezekiel 38 requires one specific condition before the Gog coalition can move against Israel: ๐Ÿ“– "A peaceful people who dwell safely โ€” all of them dwelling without walls and having neither bars nor gates." โ€” Ezekiel 38:11 Israel dwelling in false peace. Unwalled villages. No bars and no gates. A nation that feels genuinely secure for the first time in its modern history. Now think about what has surrounded Israel like a ring of fire for decades: ๐Ÿ‘‰๐ŸผSouth โ€” Hamas in Gaza โœ… Dismantled ๐Ÿ‘‰๐ŸผEast โ€” Iranian backed Iraqi militias โœ… Severely weakened ๐Ÿ‘‰๐ŸผSoutheast โ€” Houthis in Yemen โœ… Degraded by US strikes ๐Ÿ‘‰๐ŸผNorth โ€” Hezbollah in Lebanon โณ Being dismantled right now ๐Ÿ‘‰๐ŸผEast โ€” Iran's nuclear program and missile arsenal โœ… Being dismantled right now โ€” Day 18 ๐Ÿ”ฅEvery single component of that ring is being removed simultaneously. The French proposal is not just a peace deal. It is the removal of the last and most dangerous piece of that ring โ€” Hezbollah on Israel's northern border. The most sophisticated weapons. The most experienced fighters. Literally on Israel's doorstep to the north. โญ•When that ring is fully gone โ€” Israel can dwell in unwalled villages. In false peace. Exactly as Ezekiel 38:11 requires. Which means that window is opening right now! But to understand how close that makes the Rapture โ€” we need to see what God placed one chapter before Ezekiel 38. Letโ€™s go back to Ezekiel 37. ๐ŸฆดGod shows Ezekiel a valley of dry bones โ€” scattered, dead, hopeless. Then He breathes life into them. Bone comes to bone. Flesh forms. Skin covers. And then โ€” the breath of God enters โ€” and they stand as an exceedingly great army. ๐Ÿ‘‰๐ŸผGod is showing us Israelโ€™s national restoration here. The bones came together in 1948. The flesh has been forming over 77 years. The breath is coming during the Tribulation when they accept Jesus and the Holy Spirit is poured out on them. Then, in the final stage, they will stand up as an army at the Second Coming. But look at the specific language God used: ๐Ÿ“– "I will open your graves and cause you to come up from your graves and bring you into the land of Israel. Then you shall know that I am the Lord when I have opened your graves O My people and brought you up from your graves." Ezekiel 37:12-13 Now read this: ๐Ÿ“– "The dead in Christ will rise first. Then we who are alive and remain shall be caught up together with them in the clouds to meet the Lord in the air." 1 Thess 4:16-17 Look at the parallel: ๐Ÿ‘‰๐Ÿผ"I will open your graves"โ†’ "the dead in Christ will rise first" ๐Ÿ‘‰๐Ÿผ"cause you to come upโ€โ†’ "caught up" ๐Ÿ‘‰๐Ÿผ"bring you up from your graves" โ†’ "meet the Lord in the air" God did not place that language in Ezekiel 37 accidentally! ๐Ÿ’กThe chapter immediately before the Gog invasion contains resurrection language that mirrors the Rapture with great precision. God is pointing to two things simultaneously โ€” Israel's future national restoration AND the departure of the Church that precedes it. ๐Ÿ”The beginning of Israel's spiritual awakening on earth IS THE CHURCH'S END ON EARTH! God told us this here in Romans 11:25-26: ๐Ÿ“– "Blindness in part has happened to Israel until the fullness of the Gentiles has come in. And so all Israel will be SAVED" ๐Ÿ‘‰๐ŸผThe fullness of the Gentiles โ€” the completion of the Church โ€” is what lifts the partial blindness from Israel. The Church completing its mission and departing is part of what opens Israel's eyes. The Church leaving and Israel awakening are not two separate events happening at different times. They are two sides of the same prophetic hinge. ๐ŸšชWhen God CLOSES the door on the Gentile age โ€” THEN He OPENS the door on Israel's final chapter. Same moment, same sovereign hand and same hinge! (This is one of the strongest reasons I believe Ezekiel 38 happens during the Tribulation โ€” after the Rapture โ€” because Ezekiel 37's resurrection picture has to come first.) Now let's connect it all: ๐Ÿ”—Ezekiel 38 requires Israel to dwell in unwalled villages in false peace. That requires Jeremiah 49โ€™s bow to be broken first. That requires the ring of fire โ€” Hamas, Hezbollah, the Houthis, and Iranโ€™s missiles โ€” to be removed. We are watching every single component of that ring being removed simultaneously right now. The Church does not wait for peace to be fully brokered โ€”only for it to begin to assemble, just as it is happening now! The peace window is assembling from the rubble of this war! ๐Ÿ“–โ€œFor when they say, โ€˜Peace and safety!โ€™ then sudden destruction comes upon them, as labor pains upon a pregnant woman. And they shall not escape.โ€ 1 Thes 5:3 THE PROPHETIC SEQUENCE โœ…Hamas dismantled: Complete โœ…Houthis degraded: Largely complete โœ…Iran's nuclear program obliterated: Day 18 and counting โณHezbollah being dismantled: French proposal this week โณLebanon recognizing Israel: Framework accepted โ€” developing โณPermanent northern border: Target end of 2026 โœ…Peace window opening: RIGHT NOW โณAbraham Accords expansion: Assembling ๐Ÿ”œRAPTURE : Imminent โ€” at any moment but BEFORE Antichrist!! โžก๏ธAntichrist confirms covenant: Year 1 Tribulation โžก๏ธIsrael in full false peace: Early Tribulation โžก๏ธEzekiel 38 โ€” Gog invades: Early Tribulation โžก๏ธGod destroys Gog supernaturally: Early Tribulation โžก๏ธAbomination of Desolation: Year 3.5 โžก๏ธSecond Coming: Year 7 ๐Ÿ”Š Church: Lebanon seeking peace with Israel after 77 years since Israel became a nation is the first step toward peace (false peace) in the Middle East! Permanent borders are being drawn. The most powerful proxy is being removed as we watch the bow of Elam (Iran) being broken and the ring of fire being quenched. We are not approaching the peace window โ€” WE ARE IN IT!! We will see Israel living in โ€œunwalled villagesโ€ from heaven. How close are we to the Rapture?? Ezekiel 37 comes before Ezekiel 38. The resurrection comes before the invasion. The Church goes home before the Tribulation begins!! The Gentile age is ending, and the door for Israel is about to open! Jesus told us we would see the Day approaching โ€” and we clearly are!!! KEEP PRAYING, KEEP PREACHING THE GOSPEL, AND KEEP LOOKING UP!! JESUS IS AT THE DOOR!! Maranatha๐Ÿค โ€” Come Lord Jesus Come!!!

Maranatha777

31,220 gรถrรผntรผleme โ€ข 5 ay รถnce