ๆญฃๅจๅ ่ฝฝ่ง้ข...
่ง้ขๅ ่ฝฝๅคฑ่ดฅ
โ๐๐ข๐๐๐๐ซ๐๐ง๐๐ ๐ข๐ฌ, ๐๐จ๐๐ข ๐๐ซ๐๐ฐ๐ฌ ๐.๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐ฉ๐๐จ๐ฉ๐ฅ๐, ๐ฐ๐ก๐ข๐ฅ๐ ๐ฒ๐จ๐ฎโ๐ซ๐ ๐ฅ๐ฎ๐๐ค๐ฒ ๐ข๐ ๐๐ ๐ฌ๐ก๐จ๐ฐ ๐ฎ๐ฉ.โ Canadaโs Mark Carney talks about the unmatched popularity of PM Modi, something Opposition leaders can only dream of! ๐ฎ๐ณ๐ฅ
15,187 ๆฌก่ง็ โข 5 ไธชๆๅ โขvia X (Twitter)
0 ๆก่ฏ่ฎบ
ๆๆ ่ฏ่ฎบ
ๅๅงๅธๅญ็่ฏ่ฎบๅฐๆพ็คบๅจ่ฟ้
![At a campaign rally in Hamilton, Ontario, Liberal leader Mark Carney unveiled what can only be described as a coordinated assault on digital freedom in Canada. Behind the slogans, applause lines, and empty rhetoric about unity, one portion of Carneyโs remarks stood out for its implications: a bold, unapologetic commitment to controlling online speech under the guise of โsafetyโ and โmisinformation.โ โWe announced a series of measures with respect to online harmโฆ a sea of misogyny, anti-Semitism, hatred, conspiracy theoriesโthe sort of pollution that's online that washes over our virtual borders from the United States.โ He then made clear his intention to act: โMy government, if we are elected, will be taking action on those American giants who come across [our] border.โ The former central banker, who now postures as a man of the people, made it clear that if the Liberals are re-elected, the federal government will intensify efforts to regulate what Canadians are allowed to see, say, and share online. His language was deliberate. Carney condemned what he called a โsea of misogyny, anti-Semitism, hatred, conspiracy theoriesโ polluting Canadaโs internet spaceโlanguage borrowed directly from the Trudeau-era playbook. But this wasnโt just a moral denunciation. It was a legislative preview. Carney spoke of a future Liberal government taking โaction on those American giants who come across our borders.โ Translation: he wants to bring Big Tech platforms under federal control, or at least force them to play the role of speech enforcers for the Canadian state. He blamed the United States for exporting โhateโ into Canada, reinforcing the bizarre Liberal narrative that the greatest threat to national unity isnโt foreign actors like the CCP or radical Islamistsโitโs Facebook memes and American podcasts. But the most revealing moment came when Carney linked online speech directly to violence. He asserted that digital โpollutionโ affects how Canadians behave in real life, specifically pointing to conjugal violence, antisemitism, and drug abuse. This is how the ground is prepared for censorship: first by tying speech to harm, then by criminalizing what the state deems harmful. What Carney didnโt say is just as important. He made no distinction between actual criminal incitement and political dissent. He offered no assurance that free expressionโa right enshrined in Canadaโs Charter of Rights and Freedomsโwould be respected. He provided no definition of what constitutes a โconspiracy theoryโ or who gets to make that determination. Under this framework, any criticism of government policy, of global institutions, or of the new technocratic order could be flagged, throttled, and punished. And thatโs the point. Mark Carney isnโt interested in dialogue. He wants obedience. He doesn't trust Canadians to discern truth from fiction. He believes itโs the job of governmentโhis governmentโto curate the national conversation, to protect citizens from wrongthink, to act as referee over what is and isnโt acceptable discourse. In short, he wants Ottawa to become the Ministry of Truth. Why They Donโt Actually Care About Antisemitism The Liberal establishment talks a big game about fighting hateโbut when it comes to actual antisemitic violence, theyโve shown nothing but selective enforcement and political cowardice. Letโs look at the facts. In 2023, Bโnai Brith Canada recorded nearly 6,000 antisemitic incidents, including 77 violent attacksโfrom firebombed synagogues to shots fired at Jewish schools in Montreal and Toronto. This wasnโt a marginal increase. It was a 208% spike in violent antisemitism in a single year. Statistics Canada echoed the same alarm bells. Jewsโwho make up just 1% of Canadaโs populationโwere the victims of 70% of all religiously motivated hate crimes. Thatโs nearly 900 recorded incidents, up 71% from the previous year. Then came October 2023, when Hamas launched its attack on Israelโand the wave of hate turned into a tsunami: a 670% increase in antisemitic incidents across the country. Jewish schools, synagogues, and community centers were hit with bomb threats, arson attempts, and intimidation campaigns. This was a national security issue, not just a policing matter. And yet, the government's response? Virtually nonexistent. Case in point: the Montreal Riot, November 2024. A 600-person mob, waving anti-NATO and pro-Palestinian banners, turned violentโsetting fires, smashing windows, and attacking police. Amid this chaos, a man was filmed screaming โFinal Solutionโโa direct reference to the Nazi plan to exterminate the Jews. It went viral. There was no ambiguity, no misunderstanding. It was a public call for genocide. So what happened? Three arrests. None for hate crimes. None related to antisemitism. Montreal Police Chief Fady Dagher insisted there were โno confirmed antisemitic acts,โ and as of early 2025, no hate crime charges have been filed against the individual caught on camera. That man, as it turns out, owned a Second Cup franchise. His punishment? His cafรฉ was shut down by the company. Not by law enforcement. Not by hate crime investigators. A corporate HR department showed more backbone than Canadaโs justice system. And this is what reveals the truth: they donโt care. Theyโll enforce hate speech laws when itโs politically convenientโwhen it can be used to silence critics, crush dissent, or placate woke constituencies. But when Jewish communities are being threatened, attacked, and terrorized? The same laws suddenly go limp. The same political class that claims to protect minorities becomes paralyzed. They wonโt touch it. Because confronting real antisemitism would require standing up to their political allies in activist circles, university campuses, and radical protest movements. This isn't an accident. It's a pattern. The Liberals arenโt weak on antisemitism because theyโre unaware of it. Theyโre weak on it because they donโt see political value in enforcing the law when it conflicts with their ideological allies. Their obsession isnโt with hate speechโitโs with controlling โwrongโ speech. And what qualifies as โwrongโ isnโt defined by law or principle. Itโs defined by what the Liberal establishment deems unacceptable. Their target isnโt violent bigotry. Itโs dissent. Theyโll chase down citizens for questioning carbon taxes or criticizing globalist policyโbut when Jewish schools get shot at, or someone calls for genocide in the street, they shrug. This isnโt leadership. Itโs selective justice. And it proves, beyond any doubt, that their agenda was never about protecting Canadians. It was always about protecting control. The Online Harms Act: Carneyโs Blueprint for Speech Control This isnโt hypothetical. Mark Carneyโs remarks in Hamilton mirror the exact logic and intent behind the Online Harms Act (Bill C-63)โlegislation drafted under the Liberal banner and introduced in 2024 that pushes Canada into territory no free society should accept. At its core, Bill C-63 hands the federal government sweeping powers to police digital speech. It creates a Digital Safety Commission, an unelected bureaucratic authority empowered to monitor, investigate, and punish online platforms and individuals for content deemed "harmful." That wordโharmfulโis never concretely defined. It includes things like โhate speech,โ โconspiracy theories,โ and vague notions of โharm to children,โ but itโs written broadly enough to be used as a political weapon. The most chilling provision? Preemptive imprisonment. Under this law, Canadians could be jailed for up to a yearโwithout having committed a crimeโif a judge believes they might post something harmful in the future. This isnโt law enforcement. This is thought policing. Carney didnโt just echo this approachโhe amplified it. In his Hamilton rally, he described the internet as being flooded with โmisogyny, anti-Semitism, hatred, conspiracy theories,โ and laid blame on foreign content โwashing over our borders from the United States.โ He didnโt argue for open debate or for empowering users to challenge dangerous ideas. He argued for the state to intervene and shut them down. He told Canadians that these ideas are โchanging how people behaveโ and claimed his government will go after โthose American giantsโ that allow this content to circulate. Thereโs no ambiguity here: this is a public declaration that a Liberal government under Mark Carney intends to censor, de-platform, and penalize dissenting views. Not illegal onesโjust ones they don't like. And this isnโt new for him. Back in 2022, during the Freedom Convoy, Carney referred to protesters as committing โseditionโ and demanded the government โthoroughly punishโ them. These werenโt violent rioters or foreign agitatorsโthese were working-class Canadians honking their horns and standing in the cold, protesting vaccine mandates. For Carney, their real crime was disobedience. Carneyโs view of speech is simple: if it challenges the ruling order, itโs dangerous. And now, with Bill C-63 on the table and Carney at the helm, heโs building the legal infrastructure to lock down the digital public squareโnot to protect Canadians from violence, but to protect the Liberal establishment from criticism. That law is real. Carneyโs agenda is real. And if he wins, enforcement is coming. Final thoughts This is the Canada Mark Carney envisionsโone where citizens canโt speak freely online without first checking their views against government guidelines. A country where speech is no longer a right but a privilege granted by bureaucrats. A country where opposition isnโt argued with, itโs labeled harmful and erased. There was a time when Liberals championed civil liberties. That era is over. The new Liberalism is authoritarianโcloaked in the language of safety and inclusion, but animated by control. Carneyโs rally in Hamilton wasnโt a policy rollout. It was a warning to anyone who still thinks they live in a country where dissent is allowed. They donโt want to fight hate. They want to define โwrongโ speechโand then eliminate it. And by โwrong,โ they mean anything the Liberal establishment disapproves of. Criticize the government, question the orthodoxy, challenge the stateโs narrative, and youโll be branded a threat. Not a citizen. Not a participant. A threat. So here we are. The speech laws are written. The censors are waiting. And Mark Carney is ready to pull the trigger. This election isnโt about tax credits or campaign slogans. Itโs about whether Canada remains a free country or slides deeper into soft tyranny, one regulation, one commission, one silenced voice at a time. There is a choice. And the choice is this: bring it homeโrestore freedom, restore sanity, restore this country. Or: hand the keys to the same people who think youโre the problem for having the nerve to think for yourself.](https://image.24vids.com/tw-1911016400912859219/amplify_video_thumb/1911015612068839424/img/frTZBF9wAo75ED79.jpg)
