Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

๐„๐‹๐„๐‚๐“๐ˆ๐Ž๐ ๐‡๐„๐ˆ๐’๐“ ๐Ÿ“ ๐‚๐‘๐Ž๐‘๐„ ๐•๐Ž๐“๐„๐’ ๐’๐“๐Ž๐‹๐„ ๐Œ๐Ž๐ƒ๐ˆ'๐’ ๐“๐‡๐ˆ๐‘๐ƒ ๐“๐„๐‘๐Œ! (The Mystery of 79 Seats) In the 2024 Lok Sabha elections, a staggering discrepancy of nearly 5 crore Votes between initial Polling Day Estimates and Final Figures handed the NDA a flipping 79 Seats in their favor. ๐“๐จ๐ญ๐š๐ฅ ๐•๐จ๐ญ๐ž ๐’๐ฎ๐ซ๐ ๐ž:...

tanmoyofc's profile picture

เฆคเฆจเงเฆฎเฆฏเฆผ l Tอžanmoy l

32,532 subscribers

48,944 views โ€ข 11 months ago โ€ขvia X (Twitter)

News & PoliticsEducation
LIVE

Anya Rossiโ€ข Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

Govt is all set to punish South India The Union government has now signalled that delimitation may be moved ahead without waiting for the Census after 2026, raising the possibility that the 2011 Census could become the base for redrawing Lok Sabha seats. For those who donโ€™t know what delimitation is, it is the process of reallocating parliamentary seats among states in line with population changes It has a stated aim of preserving fair and proportional democratic representation. But this is where the debate becomes serious. Population trends across India have not moved uniformly A major reason is the difference in fertility rates among states. Most southern statesโ€”Kerala, Tamil Nadu, Karnataka, Andhra Pradesh, and Telanganaโ€”have already brought fertility below the replacement level of 2 Meanwhile, states such as Uttar Pradesh and Bihar continue to record comparatively higher fertility levels. If seat redistribution follows these numbers, the political balance could shift sharply The five southern states together may end up with around 164 Lok Sabha seats, whereas Uttar Pradesh and Bihar alone could together command nearly 222. The larger question, then, is philosophical as much as political: Should states that succeeded in stabilising population growth lose representation because of that success? Many in the South see this as a structural disadvantage, almost a democratic penalty for effective population management. The political implications are equally significant Since the ruling partyโ€™s electoral strength has historically been far deeper across northern India than in much of the South, any expansion in seat share in the Hindi belt could naturally reshape the national balance of power in a way that may politically benefit the current establishment We are waiting for Govtโ€™s official version Because if the present documents floating on internet are true, then South India is going to be penalised heavily in their possible future representation in Indian Lok Sabha ๐Ÿ™
1:36

Govt is all set to punish South India The Union government has now signalled that delimitation may be moved ahead without waiting for the Census after 2026, raising the possibility that the 2011 Census could become the base for redrawing Lok Sabha seats. For those who donโ€™t know what delimitation is, it is the process of reallocating parliamentary seats among states in line with population changes It has a stated aim of preserving fair and proportional democratic representation. But this is where the debate becomes serious. Population trends across India have not moved uniformly A major reason is the difference in fertility rates among states. Most southern statesโ€”Kerala, Tamil Nadu, Karnataka, Andhra Pradesh, and Telanganaโ€”have already brought fertility below the replacement level of 2 Meanwhile, states such as Uttar Pradesh and Bihar continue to record comparatively higher fertility levels. If seat redistribution follows these numbers, the political balance could shift sharply The five southern states together may end up with around 164 Lok Sabha seats, whereas Uttar Pradesh and Bihar alone could together command nearly 222. The larger question, then, is philosophical as much as political: Should states that succeeded in stabilising population growth lose representation because of that success? Many in the South see this as a structural disadvantage, almost a democratic penalty for effective population management. The political implications are equally significant Since the ruling partyโ€™s electoral strength has historically been far deeper across northern India than in much of the South, any expansion in seat share in the Hindi belt could naturally reshape the national balance of power in a way that may politically benefit the current establishment We are waiting for Govtโ€™s official version Because if the present documents floating on internet are true, then South India is going to be penalised heavily in their possible future representation in Indian Lok Sabha ๐Ÿ™

Shekhar Dutt

48,570 views โ€ข 3 months ago

#WATCH | Mumbai, Maharashtra: On the result of the Assembly elections, Shiv Sena (UBT) leader Sanjay Raut says, "I believe this is not a victory for democracy. It is definitely a victory for PM Modi and Amit Shah. Just like in West Bengal and other states, the names of millions of voters were deleted through SIR, and they did not get the right to vote. There is a difference of 11 lakh votes between victory and defeat. If 9 lakh votes are cut, how can it be a victory for PM Modi and Amit Shah?... I have seen this type of election in Pakistan, Russia, and Azerbaijan. This type of election is not even an election. The results are fixed first, and then the elections are held..."
2:13

#WATCH | Mumbai, Maharashtra: On the result of the Assembly elections, Shiv Sena (UBT) leader Sanjay Raut says, "I believe this is not a victory for democracy. It is definitely a victory for PM Modi and Amit Shah. Just like in West Bengal and other states, the names of millions of voters were deleted through SIR, and they did not get the right to vote. There is a difference of 11 lakh votes between victory and defeat. If 9 lakh votes are cut, how can it be a victory for PM Modi and Amit Shah?... I have seen this type of election in Pakistan, Russia, and Azerbaijan. This type of election is not even an election. The results are fixed first, and then the elections are held..."

ANI

11,436 views โ€ข 2 months ago

Massive CHHAPPA VOTES have been cast even at the POSTAL BALLOT level. The video below shows one professor & one teacher deployed for polling at Ghatal of Purba Medinipur both of whom, post-arrival at the collection centre (DCRC) were refused to cast their own votes and found their votes were already cast. It is at this DCRC level where significant manipulations had been done in general in West Bengal Elections. The DCRC remains full of contractual employees & also State Govt Officers who are no less than the TMC's partymen. Election Commission of India needs to note that West Bengal turned like Syria where the administration & their complete ecosystem is compromised. Given below please find an account in the reply section how the DCRCs appeared prime places of forgery with EVMs. Even in 2026, the election conducting machinery faced the CHHAPPA VOTE menace in nowhere else but DCRC. Cancel the vote CEO West Bengal if forgeries, manipulations & frauds can't be prevented. Syria is no place to conduct a democratic election. Spokesperson ECI
2:35

Massive CHHAPPA VOTES have been cast even at the POSTAL BALLOT level. The video below shows one professor & one teacher deployed for polling at Ghatal of Purba Medinipur both of whom, post-arrival at the collection centre (DCRC) were refused to cast their own votes and found their votes were already cast. It is at this DCRC level where significant manipulations had been done in general in West Bengal Elections. The DCRC remains full of contractual employees & also State Govt Officers who are no less than the TMC's partymen. Election Commission of India needs to note that West Bengal turned like Syria where the administration & their complete ecosystem is compromised. Given below please find an account in the reply section how the DCRCs appeared prime places of forgery with EVMs. Even in 2026, the election conducting machinery faced the CHHAPPA VOTE menace in nowhere else but DCRC. Cancel the vote CEO West Bengal if forgeries, manipulations & frauds can't be prevented. Syria is no place to conduct a democratic election. Spokesperson ECI

Debjani Bhattacharyya ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ

15,380 views โ€ข 2 months ago

In 2002, an SIR was conducted in West Bengal, which resulted in 28 lakh names being struck off. Later in 2005, Mamata Banerjee threw a bundle of papers at the Deputy Speaker in the Lok Sabha, claiming that illegal Bangladeshi immigrants were fraudulently included in West Bengalโ€™s voter list. Then-Speaker and Communist leader Somnath Chatterjee made an even more explosive claim, stating that there were nearly 1.5 crore illegal voters which was supported by another communist leader Indrajit Gupta. Twenty years after those revelations, when the Election Commission of India is working to clean up the voter rolls in order to protect Indiaโ€™s democracy, it is these very political parties that are opposing the effort. Why? Because these parties donโ€™t want to remain in power by respecting the Indian Constitution and the voting rights of Indian citizens, theyโ€™ve realized that their only way to stay in power is through the votes of illegal Bangladeshi Muslims and Rohingyas.
4:09

In 2002, an SIR was conducted in West Bengal, which resulted in 28 lakh names being struck off. Later in 2005, Mamata Banerjee threw a bundle of papers at the Deputy Speaker in the Lok Sabha, claiming that illegal Bangladeshi immigrants were fraudulently included in West Bengalโ€™s voter list. Then-Speaker and Communist leader Somnath Chatterjee made an even more explosive claim, stating that there were nearly 1.5 crore illegal voters which was supported by another communist leader Indrajit Gupta. Twenty years after those revelations, when the Election Commission of India is working to clean up the voter rolls in order to protect Indiaโ€™s democracy, it is these very political parties that are opposing the effort. Why? Because these parties donโ€™t want to remain in power by respecting the Indian Constitution and the voting rights of Indian citizens, theyโ€™ve realized that their only way to stay in power is through the votes of illegal Bangladeshi Muslims and Rohingyas.

BJP West Bengal

109,255 views โ€ข 11 months ago

#WATCH | #DelhiElection2025 | In a video statement, AAP national convener Arvind Kejriwal says, "...I would like to tell the people of Delhi, that I have come to know through sources that they (BJP) can cause discrepancies in 10% of votes through machines. Vote in such large numbers that every vote goes to 'jhaadu' (AAP). So if we have a 15% lead, we will win by 5%. Give us a lead of more than 10% everywhere...This is the only way to tackle machines, that you vote in large numbers. We have developed a website as a precautionary measure. Learning a lesson from the Maharashtra and Haryana elections, we have decided that on the night of 5th February, we will upload 6 details of every polling booth so that the machines can't be tampered with...If they cause any discrepancy on the day of counting, you can match the numbers..." (Video: AAP)
3:19

#WATCH | #DelhiElection2025 | In a video statement, AAP national convener Arvind Kejriwal says, "...I would like to tell the people of Delhi, that I have come to know through sources that they (BJP) can cause discrepancies in 10% of votes through machines. Vote in such large numbers that every vote goes to 'jhaadu' (AAP). So if we have a 15% lead, we will win by 5%. Give us a lead of more than 10% everywhere...This is the only way to tackle machines, that you vote in large numbers. We have developed a website as a precautionary measure. Learning a lesson from the Maharashtra and Haryana elections, we have decided that on the night of 5th February, we will upload 6 details of every polling booth so that the machines can't be tampered with...If they cause any discrepancy on the day of counting, you can match the numbers..." (Video: AAP)

ANI

566,932 views โ€ข 1 year ago

#WATCH | On the announcement of 2024 Lok Sabha election dates, Karnataka Minister and Congress leader Priyank Kharge says, "Just like the last time, the Election Commission seems to have announced the dates in a manner PM Modi can get the maximum mileage to get the party's (BJP) narrative across the states. It is being held in 7 phases...Maharashtra has election in 5 phases, so it is quite evident that this entire election process is to ensure that BJP gets more time to have their star campaigner move around the country much more easily. Though EC has said it is about movement of troops, geographical conditions...but this is not the first time India is going to have election on such a massive scale. We can't do anything, we will have to just go with what EC has declared today"
1:22

#WATCH | On the announcement of 2024 Lok Sabha election dates, Karnataka Minister and Congress leader Priyank Kharge says, "Just like the last time, the Election Commission seems to have announced the dates in a manner PM Modi can get the maximum mileage to get the party's (BJP) narrative across the states. It is being held in 7 phases...Maharashtra has election in 5 phases, so it is quite evident that this entire election process is to ensure that BJP gets more time to have their star campaigner move around the country much more easily. Though EC has said it is about movement of troops, geographical conditions...but this is not the first time India is going to have election on such a massive scale. We can't do anything, we will have to just go with what EC has declared today"

ANI

252,426 views โ€ข 2 years ago

#WATCH | Aurangabad, Bihar: Lok Sabha LoP and Congress MP Rahul Gandhi says, "The Election Commission asks for an affidavit from me. But when Anurag Thakur says the same thing that I am saying, it does not ask for an affidavit from him." "Lok Sabha elections were held in Maharashtra, and INDIA alliance wins. Four months later, Vidhan Sabha elections were held and in the same Maharashtra, BJP alliance sweeps and our alliance was not visible. It disappears. When we investigated, we found out that Election Commission magically created one crore new voters in four months after Lok Sabha elections. Wherever new voters came, BJP won there. Our votes did not decrease. The INDIA alliance got as many votes in the Vidhan Sabha as it had in the Lok Sabha. BJP got all the new voters. So we got suspicious. We told Election Commission to explain this to us. Where did these one crore voters come from? Who are they? Election Commission tells us that we will not explain. We do not need you to explain. Then we told them that you have installed CCTVs. The law is that CCTV cameras will have to be provided to any party asking for CCTV. They say they will not provide CCTV. Then we said give us the voter list. They say they will not provide the electronic voter list...The Election Commission and the BJP together have committed theft in Bengaluru Central. I am telling you this with a guarantee...The Election Commission asks for an affidavit from me. But when Anurag Thakur says the same thing that I am saying, it does not ask for an affidavit from him."
3:35

#WATCH | Aurangabad, Bihar: Lok Sabha LoP and Congress MP Rahul Gandhi says, "The Election Commission asks for an affidavit from me. But when Anurag Thakur says the same thing that I am saying, it does not ask for an affidavit from him." "Lok Sabha elections were held in Maharashtra, and INDIA alliance wins. Four months later, Vidhan Sabha elections were held and in the same Maharashtra, BJP alliance sweeps and our alliance was not visible. It disappears. When we investigated, we found out that Election Commission magically created one crore new voters in four months after Lok Sabha elections. Wherever new voters came, BJP won there. Our votes did not decrease. The INDIA alliance got as many votes in the Vidhan Sabha as it had in the Lok Sabha. BJP got all the new voters. So we got suspicious. We told Election Commission to explain this to us. Where did these one crore voters come from? Who are they? Election Commission tells us that we will not explain. We do not need you to explain. Then we told them that you have installed CCTVs. The law is that CCTV cameras will have to be provided to any party asking for CCTV. They say they will not provide CCTV. Then we said give us the voter list. They say they will not provide the electronic voter list...The Election Commission and the BJP together have committed theft in Bengaluru Central. I am telling you this with a guarantee...The Election Commission asks for an affidavit from me. But when Anurag Thakur says the same thing that I am saying, it does not ask for an affidavit from him."

ANI

40,078 views โ€ข 11 months ago

Sussan Ley is 'Malcolm Turnbull' in a dress.' The NSW Liberal Leftie moderate factional power plays have destroyed the party from within. The moderates are selfish, all about themselves. Don Harwin is still the NSW President, and Matt Kean remains a member who works for Albo.๐Ÿ˜ก Australia urgently needs a UK-style Nigel Farage MP Reform party. Just remember Tony Abbott won in a landslide and that margin was reduced to 1 in a single election cycle. Remember, it was a Lib loss more than a Labor win. We have less than 3 years to get this right. Forget Ley, our focus has to be on how economically hopeless Labor is. Revealed: Albaneseโ€™s โ€˜super safe seatsโ€™ fortress 12:00AM JUNE 28, 2025 Labor holds more seats on double-digit margins after the May 3 ยญelection than the Coalition parties hold altogether, highlighting how the second-term Albanese government not only occupies greater breadth of electoral territory but does so with increased strength as well. Although the Albanese governmentโ€™s post-election seat count is almost identical to those of the newly elected Howard and Abbott governments, its haul of electorates on two-party-preferred margins of 10 per cent or more is greater than either of those predecessors. After the Australian Electoral Commission finalised results in all 150 House of Representative seats this month, the new federal electoral margin tower has a very different structure than the four before it. Laborโ€™s 94-seat tally โ€“ one more than Tony Abbottโ€™s 2013 haul and level with John Howardโ€™s 1996 total in a 148-seat parliament โ€“ has already sparked discussions about the strength of the Albanese governmentโ€™s mandate. But the final vote counts reveal how safe so many of those seats are. The Albanese government holds 48 seats โ€“ just over half ยญof the ALP total ยญโ€“ on two-party-preferred margins of 10 per cent or more. By comparison, the Liberals and Nationals won only 43 seats overall and just 13 (nine Nationals and four Liberal) on double-digit margins. Even before the 2025 election rout, the Coalition notionally held only 55 seats, having won 58 at the 2022 election. Despite Laborโ€™s 2025 win being secured on a historically low ยญvictorious primary vote of 34.6 per cent โ€“ above only its 2022 result (32.8 per cent) โ€“ its seats ยญsecurity after receiving the bulk of preferences is greater than Howard and ยญAbbott enjoyed when they swept to power. After the 1996 election, the ยญCoalition parties held 45 of their 94 seats on double-digit margins, while Abbottโ€™s 2013 victory left 43 Coalition seats on margins of 10 per cent or more. The previous Labor government to hold a comfortable ยญmajority โ€“ Kevin Ruddโ€™s in 2007 โ€“ had just 37 of its 83 seats on double-digit margins. The final election results also highlight how bad the Coalitionโ€™s internal polling was, encouraging it to target seats where it would emerge the Coalition parties had no hope. Laborโ€™s โ€œsafe seatsโ€ set includesseveral the Liberals believed they could win. Boothby in Adelaideโ€™s east, where the Liberals ran high-profile former MP Nicolle Flint in a top-priority campaign, is now a Labor seat on a margin of 11.1 per cent. The rural Tasmanian seat of Lyons, which the Liberals thought they could snatch on the retirement of Brian Mitchell, has jumped from a margin of less than 1 per cent to 11.6 per cent for new MP and former Tasmanian ALP leader Rebecca White. And inner-Brisbane Lilley, a Liberal target held by frontbencher Anika Wells where Laborโ€™s hold had been steadily weakening, has exploded out to a 14.5 per cent margin. Along with Boothby, several Labor seats that were held by Liberal MPs just three years ago are now in the governmentโ€™s โ€œsafe seatsโ€ set. Hasluck in outer eastern Perth, which was held by former Liberal cabinet minister Ken Wyatt heading into the 2022 election, switched allegiances three years ago and has now handed second-term MP Tania Lawrence a super-sized margin of 16 per cent. Swan, closer to the centre of the West Australian capital, was also a Liberal seat two terms of government ago and had been in Laborโ€™s hands since 2007. Now it is safe territory for another of Albaneseโ€™s second-term MPs, Zaneta Mascarenhas, on 14 per cent. Reid in Sydneyโ€™s inner west was Liberal for the three terms of the Abbott-Turnbull-Morrison government but two elections down the track is securely in Laborโ€™s possession, with Sally Sitou securing a margin of 12 per cent on May 3. Perhaps most tellingly, the NSW central coast seat of Robertson โ€“ the nationโ€™s bellwether seat having elected an MP of the winning party overall at every election back to 1983 โ€“ is anything but a close contest now. Laborโ€™s Gordon Reid has extended his margin to 9.4 per cent, the biggest in Robertson since 1931. The demise of the Liberal Party in inner-city seats, aside from those it surrendered to teal independents across the past three elections, is also evident in Adelaide. Labor MP Steve Georganas now holds a seat that has often been marginal and at times held by the Liberals, including from 1993 to 2004, on a margin of 19.1 per cent, Adelaideโ€™s largest at a federal election. As revealed by The Australian in May, the Liberal Party has been pushed so far out of its inner-urban heartlands that its safest seat is now Townsville-based Herbert. For much of the partyโ€™s existence, that mantle was held by Bradfield in Sydneyโ€™s north, which was added to the โ€œteal capturesโ€ list when a recount gave Nicolette Boele a 26-vote win. Five of the Liberalsโ€™ next six safest are in rural areas: Oโ€™Connor and Durack in Western Australia, Barker in southeastern South Australia, Hume in the NSW southern tablelands and Wright in southern Queensland. The Gangster's Ghost The Australian
0:38

Sussan Ley is 'Malcolm Turnbull' in a dress.' The NSW Liberal Leftie moderate factional power plays have destroyed the party from within. The moderates are selfish, all about themselves. Don Harwin is still the NSW President, and Matt Kean remains a member who works for Albo.๐Ÿ˜ก Australia urgently needs a UK-style Nigel Farage MP Reform party. Just remember Tony Abbott won in a landslide and that margin was reduced to 1 in a single election cycle. Remember, it was a Lib loss more than a Labor win. We have less than 3 years to get this right. Forget Ley, our focus has to be on how economically hopeless Labor is. Revealed: Albaneseโ€™s โ€˜super safe seatsโ€™ fortress 12:00AM JUNE 28, 2025 Labor holds more seats on double-digit margins after the May 3 ยญelection than the Coalition parties hold altogether, highlighting how the second-term Albanese government not only occupies greater breadth of electoral territory but does so with increased strength as well. Although the Albanese governmentโ€™s post-election seat count is almost identical to those of the newly elected Howard and Abbott governments, its haul of electorates on two-party-preferred margins of 10 per cent or more is greater than either of those predecessors. After the Australian Electoral Commission finalised results in all 150 House of Representative seats this month, the new federal electoral margin tower has a very different structure than the four before it. Laborโ€™s 94-seat tally โ€“ one more than Tony Abbottโ€™s 2013 haul and level with John Howardโ€™s 1996 total in a 148-seat parliament โ€“ has already sparked discussions about the strength of the Albanese governmentโ€™s mandate. But the final vote counts reveal how safe so many of those seats are. The Albanese government holds 48 seats โ€“ just over half ยญof the ALP total ยญโ€“ on two-party-preferred margins of 10 per cent or more. By comparison, the Liberals and Nationals won only 43 seats overall and just 13 (nine Nationals and four Liberal) on double-digit margins. Even before the 2025 election rout, the Coalition notionally held only 55 seats, having won 58 at the 2022 election. Despite Laborโ€™s 2025 win being secured on a historically low ยญvictorious primary vote of 34.6 per cent โ€“ above only its 2022 result (32.8 per cent) โ€“ its seats ยญsecurity after receiving the bulk of preferences is greater than Howard and ยญAbbott enjoyed when they swept to power. After the 1996 election, the ยญCoalition parties held 45 of their 94 seats on double-digit margins, while Abbottโ€™s 2013 victory left 43 Coalition seats on margins of 10 per cent or more. The previous Labor government to hold a comfortable ยญmajority โ€“ Kevin Ruddโ€™s in 2007 โ€“ had just 37 of its 83 seats on double-digit margins. The final election results also highlight how bad the Coalitionโ€™s internal polling was, encouraging it to target seats where it would emerge the Coalition parties had no hope. Laborโ€™s โ€œsafe seatsโ€ set includesseveral the Liberals believed they could win. Boothby in Adelaideโ€™s east, where the Liberals ran high-profile former MP Nicolle Flint in a top-priority campaign, is now a Labor seat on a margin of 11.1 per cent. The rural Tasmanian seat of Lyons, which the Liberals thought they could snatch on the retirement of Brian Mitchell, has jumped from a margin of less than 1 per cent to 11.6 per cent for new MP and former Tasmanian ALP leader Rebecca White. And inner-Brisbane Lilley, a Liberal target held by frontbencher Anika Wells where Laborโ€™s hold had been steadily weakening, has exploded out to a 14.5 per cent margin. Along with Boothby, several Labor seats that were held by Liberal MPs just three years ago are now in the governmentโ€™s โ€œsafe seatsโ€ set. Hasluck in outer eastern Perth, which was held by former Liberal cabinet minister Ken Wyatt heading into the 2022 election, switched allegiances three years ago and has now handed second-term MP Tania Lawrence a super-sized margin of 16 per cent. Swan, closer to the centre of the West Australian capital, was also a Liberal seat two terms of government ago and had been in Laborโ€™s hands since 2007. Now it is safe territory for another of Albaneseโ€™s second-term MPs, Zaneta Mascarenhas, on 14 per cent. Reid in Sydneyโ€™s inner west was Liberal for the three terms of the Abbott-Turnbull-Morrison government but two elections down the track is securely in Laborโ€™s possession, with Sally Sitou securing a margin of 12 per cent on May 3. Perhaps most tellingly, the NSW central coast seat of Robertson โ€“ the nationโ€™s bellwether seat having elected an MP of the winning party overall at every election back to 1983 โ€“ is anything but a close contest now. Laborโ€™s Gordon Reid has extended his margin to 9.4 per cent, the biggest in Robertson since 1931. The demise of the Liberal Party in inner-city seats, aside from those it surrendered to teal independents across the past three elections, is also evident in Adelaide. Labor MP Steve Georganas now holds a seat that has often been marginal and at times held by the Liberals, including from 1993 to 2004, on a margin of 19.1 per cent, Adelaideโ€™s largest at a federal election. As revealed by The Australian in May, the Liberal Party has been pushed so far out of its inner-urban heartlands that its safest seat is now Townsville-based Herbert. For much of the partyโ€™s existence, that mantle was held by Bradfield in Sydneyโ€™s north, which was added to the โ€œteal capturesโ€ list when a recount gave Nicolette Boele a 26-vote win. Five of the Liberalsโ€™ next six safest are in rural areas: Oโ€™Connor and Durack in Western Australia, Barker in southeastern South Australia, Hume in the NSW southern tablelands and Wright in southern Queensland. The Gangster's Ghost The Australian

Timjbo ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡บ

32,222 views โ€ข 1 year ago

The moment the results were declared, Bengalโ€™s business community has been feeling absolutely delighted. Among them, the biggest industrialist Sanjiv Goenka must have been the happiest. Over the years, he has been seen as a vocal supporter of BJP and Narendra Modi, a stance that, in a politically charged environment, has inevitably drawn scrutiny. Especially from the TMC! In Indiaโ€™s federal structure, businesses often have to navigate complex relationships with state governments, regardless of political alignment. For large conglomerates operating across sectors, maintaining this balance is less a choice and more a necessity, unfortunately. What often gets overlooked in the narrative, however, is the sheer scale of the RP-Sanjiv Goenka Groupโ€™s investments outside West Bengal, in NDA rules states. The group currently has a project pipeline of nearly โ‚น72,000 crore under implementation across states like Odisha, Uttar Pradesh, Rajasthan, Gujarat, and Andhra Pradesh, aligned with Indiaโ€™s renewable energy ambitions. Which raises an important question: why is Goenka still largely perceived as a โ€œBengal-onlyโ€ industrialist? West Bengal has, for decades, grappled with the challenge of attracting large-scale industrial investment. The widely discussed Singur Tata Nano controversy involving Tata Motors became emblematic of these concerns, shaping investor sentiment for years. Since then, perceptions around ease of doing business in the state have remained a topic of debate. Iโ€™m sure Goenka, along with many industrialists, must be breathing a sigh of relief now that the BJP is in power in the state. The years of extortion money taken from them as part of 'electoral bonds' will finally end and we will finally get to see the golden phase of West Bengal.
1:26

The moment the results were declared, Bengalโ€™s business community has been feeling absolutely delighted. Among them, the biggest industrialist Sanjiv Goenka must have been the happiest. Over the years, he has been seen as a vocal supporter of BJP and Narendra Modi, a stance that, in a politically charged environment, has inevitably drawn scrutiny. Especially from the TMC! In Indiaโ€™s federal structure, businesses often have to navigate complex relationships with state governments, regardless of political alignment. For large conglomerates operating across sectors, maintaining this balance is less a choice and more a necessity, unfortunately. What often gets overlooked in the narrative, however, is the sheer scale of the RP-Sanjiv Goenka Groupโ€™s investments outside West Bengal, in NDA rules states. The group currently has a project pipeline of nearly โ‚น72,000 crore under implementation across states like Odisha, Uttar Pradesh, Rajasthan, Gujarat, and Andhra Pradesh, aligned with Indiaโ€™s renewable energy ambitions. Which raises an important question: why is Goenka still largely perceived as a โ€œBengal-onlyโ€ industrialist? West Bengal has, for decades, grappled with the challenge of attracting large-scale industrial investment. The widely discussed Singur Tata Nano controversy involving Tata Motors became emblematic of these concerns, shaping investor sentiment for years. Since then, perceptions around ease of doing business in the state have remained a topic of debate. Iโ€™m sure Goenka, along with many industrialists, must be breathing a sigh of relief now that the BJP is in power in the state. The years of extortion money taken from them as part of 'electoral bonds' will finally end and we will finally get to see the golden phase of West Bengal.

Rishi Bagree

115,416 views โ€ข 2 months ago

Claims made by Karnataka CM Siddaramaiah on delimitation are misleading and reflect a disregard for established facts. This kind of narrative unfortunately mirrors what the Indian National Congress has increasingly been associated withโ€”distorting facts to suit political agendas. Historically, the southern statesโ€™ share of Lok Sabha seats since 1952โ€”across the first delimitation and subsequent exercises in 1963, 1972, and 2002โ€”has remained broadly around 24% of the total seats. Notably, three of these exercises were conducted during Congress-led governments at the Centre, while the fourth was implemented during their tenure in 2008. The guiding principles for delimitation have remained consistent over time. The same constitutional framework and established norms will continue to govern future exercises, in accordance with the provisions of the Constitution of India. The Honโ€™ble Prime Minister Shri Narendra Modi ji and Home Minister Shri Amit Shah ji have already addressed this issue clearly. Despite this, Congress leaders continue to spread misinformation. Delimitation is a constitutional processโ€”not a political conspiracy. The Congress must take responsibility to inform citizens accurately rather than inflame sentiments. Misleading the public on such a sensitive issue is deeply irresponsible. #Delimitation
3:01

Claims made by Karnataka CM Siddaramaiah on delimitation are misleading and reflect a disregard for established facts. This kind of narrative unfortunately mirrors what the Indian National Congress has increasingly been associated withโ€”distorting facts to suit political agendas. Historically, the southern statesโ€™ share of Lok Sabha seats since 1952โ€”across the first delimitation and subsequent exercises in 1963, 1972, and 2002โ€”has remained broadly around 24% of the total seats. Notably, three of these exercises were conducted during Congress-led governments at the Centre, while the fourth was implemented during their tenure in 2008. The guiding principles for delimitation have remained consistent over time. The same constitutional framework and established norms will continue to govern future exercises, in accordance with the provisions of the Constitution of India. The Honโ€™ble Prime Minister Shri Narendra Modi ji and Home Minister Shri Amit Shah ji have already addressed this issue clearly. Despite this, Congress leaders continue to spread misinformation. Delimitation is a constitutional processโ€”not a political conspiracy. The Congress must take responsibility to inform citizens accurately rather than inflame sentiments. Misleading the public on such a sensitive issue is deeply irresponsible. #Delimitation

Pralhad Joshi

37,944 views โ€ข 3 months ago

ECI'S SECRET VOTER PURGE IN BENGAL EXPOSED ๐Ÿ.๐Ÿ‘๐Ÿ” ๐‚๐‘๐Ž๐‘๐„ ๐•๐จ๐ญ๐ž๐ฌ ๐’๐ข๐ฅ๐ž๐ง๐œ๐ž๐ ๐๐ฒ ๐€ ๐’๐ข๐ง๐ข๐ฌ๐ญ๐ž๐ซ "๐–๐š๐ฅ๐ฅ" ๐“๐ก๐š๐ญ ๐‰๐ฎ๐ฌ๐ญ ๐†๐จ๐ญ ๐’๐ก๐š๐ญ๐ญ๐ž๐ซ๐ž๐! ๐Ÿ”ฅ The Election Commission built a digital fortress around West Bengal's Electoral Rolls during the 2025-26 Special Intensive Revision (SIR). They invented a brand-new "Logical Discrepancy" category and slapped 1.36 CRORE voters Statewide with "Under Adjudication" tags โ€” freezing their Voting Rights indefinitely with ZERO Explanation or Deadline. To bury the Truth, ECI released the rolls ONLY as massive scanned PDFs (228x larger than digital files), Blocked Automation with CAPTCHA Gates, Limited Downloads to 10 areas at a Time, and Slapped Diagonal "UNDER ADJUDICATION" Watermarks that Obscure Names on 1 in 10 entries. But Alt News just smashed through the Wall. They digitized 558 PDFs from Mamata Banerjeeโ€™s Bhabanipur and neighbouring Ballygunge seats. The Shocking Findings: โ€ข 39,604 voters (11.2% of the entire electorate in these two seats) marked โ€œUnder Adjudicationโ€ โ€ข;Muslims = 39.5% of votersโ€ฆ but 66.5% of those flagged โ€ข A Muslim voter is 3.1 times more likely than a Hindu voter to lose their right to vote โ€ข In Bhabanipur: Muslims (just 21.9% of voters) make up 51.8% of flagged cases โ€” nearly 1 in every 4 Muslims targeted vs fewer than 1 in 17 Hindus This isnโ€™t a Glitch. This is Systematic, Targeted Disenfranchisement ahead of Elections. #ElectionCommission #WestBengal #SupremeCourt
11:05

ECI'S SECRET VOTER PURGE IN BENGAL EXPOSED ๐Ÿ.๐Ÿ‘๐Ÿ” ๐‚๐‘๐Ž๐‘๐„ ๐•๐จ๐ญ๐ž๐ฌ ๐’๐ข๐ฅ๐ž๐ง๐œ๐ž๐ ๐๐ฒ ๐€ ๐’๐ข๐ง๐ข๐ฌ๐ญ๐ž๐ซ "๐–๐š๐ฅ๐ฅ" ๐“๐ก๐š๐ญ ๐‰๐ฎ๐ฌ๐ญ ๐†๐จ๐ญ ๐’๐ก๐š๐ญ๐ญ๐ž๐ซ๐ž๐! ๐Ÿ”ฅ The Election Commission built a digital fortress around West Bengal's Electoral Rolls during the 2025-26 Special Intensive Revision (SIR). They invented a brand-new "Logical Discrepancy" category and slapped 1.36 CRORE voters Statewide with "Under Adjudication" tags โ€” freezing their Voting Rights indefinitely with ZERO Explanation or Deadline. To bury the Truth, ECI released the rolls ONLY as massive scanned PDFs (228x larger than digital files), Blocked Automation with CAPTCHA Gates, Limited Downloads to 10 areas at a Time, and Slapped Diagonal "UNDER ADJUDICATION" Watermarks that Obscure Names on 1 in 10 entries. But Alt News just smashed through the Wall. They digitized 558 PDFs from Mamata Banerjeeโ€™s Bhabanipur and neighbouring Ballygunge seats. The Shocking Findings: โ€ข 39,604 voters (11.2% of the entire electorate in these two seats) marked โ€œUnder Adjudicationโ€ โ€ข;Muslims = 39.5% of votersโ€ฆ but 66.5% of those flagged โ€ข A Muslim voter is 3.1 times more likely than a Hindu voter to lose their right to vote โ€ข In Bhabanipur: Muslims (just 21.9% of voters) make up 51.8% of flagged cases โ€” nearly 1 in every 4 Muslims targeted vs fewer than 1 in 17 Hindus This isnโ€™t a Glitch. This is Systematic, Targeted Disenfranchisement ahead of Elections. #ElectionCommission #WestBengal #SupremeCourt

เฆคเฆจเงเฆฎเฆฏเฆผ l Tอžanmoy l

28,207 views โ€ข 3 months ago

เคตเคจเคพเคจเคฟ เคœเฅ€เคตเคจเคธเฅเคฏ เค†เคงเคพเคฐเคƒ Forests are the foundation of life. This World Environment Day, we take you into the lush wilderness of the Satpura Tiger Reserve Satpura Tiger Reserve in Madhya Pradesh. In partnership with the Madhya Pradesh State Forest Department Department of Forest, MP, ICICI Foundation for Inclusive Growth (the CSR arm of ICICI Bank) has been supporting ecological management and wildlife conservation across the reserve while helping strengthen the communities living around it. Together, we have contributed to: - A 5x increase in the Barasingha populationโ€”from 16 to 79 in the Matkuli range - Development of a 20-hectare enclosure with 1,800 metres of specialised fencing - Revival of 79 ponds and creation of 74 new ponds, with an annual water storage capacity of nearly 25 crore litres - Donation of 20 fire blowers, helping prevent many forest fires - Rescue of 75 wild animals - Installation of 270 camera traps for wildlife monitoring - Positive impact on over 16,000 lives across 89 villages - Empowerment of 126 women through 13 Self-Help Groups This World Environment Day, let us celebrate and protect our forestsโ€”the foundation of life. Numbers are at March 31, 2026.
3:41

เคตเคจเคพเคจเคฟ เคœเฅ€เคตเคจเคธเฅเคฏ เค†เคงเคพเคฐเคƒ Forests are the foundation of life. This World Environment Day, we take you into the lush wilderness of the Satpura Tiger Reserve Satpura Tiger Reserve in Madhya Pradesh. In partnership with the Madhya Pradesh State Forest Department Department of Forest, MP, ICICI Foundation for Inclusive Growth (the CSR arm of ICICI Bank) has been supporting ecological management and wildlife conservation across the reserve while helping strengthen the communities living around it. Together, we have contributed to: - A 5x increase in the Barasingha populationโ€”from 16 to 79 in the Matkuli range - Development of a 20-hectare enclosure with 1,800 metres of specialised fencing - Revival of 79 ponds and creation of 74 new ponds, with an annual water storage capacity of nearly 25 crore litres - Donation of 20 fire blowers, helping prevent many forest fires - Rescue of 75 wild animals - Installation of 270 camera traps for wildlife monitoring - Positive impact on over 16,000 lives across 89 villages - Empowerment of 126 women through 13 Self-Help Groups This World Environment Day, let us celebrate and protect our forestsโ€”the foundation of life. Numbers are at March 31, 2026.

ICICI Bank

3,379,635 views โ€ข 1 month ago

Wim Wenders on 'Bad Day at Black Rock' (1955): "A dusty American colour film by John Sturges where everythingโ€™s so right and correct that it is almost unbearable. You could say of this John Sturges film that it doesnโ€™t show a succession of images, but of sentences. A whole dozen of these sentences are written up in the display cases of the theatres showing 'Bad Day at Black Rock' Stills of old colour films have a peculiar charm, because they seem completely detached from the film and tend to look more like old hand coloured postcards than the actual scenes in the film. You can recognize, though, with surprise, the stills from 'Bad Day at Black Rock' when youโ€™re watching the actual film; you can even spot the precise moment they captured. The film retains the impression that the coloured photographs have left behind. All the way through it looks hand-painted. The backdrops of the landscape that constantly show through windows or doors have more in common with paintings by Magritte than with the real landscape shown in the outdoor scenes. But even these look much more like a mile-wide, sky-high stage-set built in a gigantic studio. This endless artificiality confused me a lot at the beginning of the film, because I could only trace it back to the colours. It was only after a while that I suddenly discovered what was really happening in this film, when I saw the worn-out seats in the foyer of the hotel in Black Rock: these seats didnโ€™t simply stand around there, they stood around as precisely the chairs that had to be there, the ashtray beside them was the only possible ashtray for these seats, the one-armed bandit was the only conceivable slot-machine for a hotel like that in a town in the Mid West. Every thing in this film, by itself, was the most exact and the most right and the most suitable that could be. Every object was so right that it could form a completely self-contained sentence, it could be distinguished from all the others around it, but for precisely this reason it suited everything else perfectly. In this film all details were really details!" ('Re: Bad Day at Black Rock', Wim Wenders, 1970)
2:40

Wim Wenders on 'Bad Day at Black Rock' (1955): "A dusty American colour film by John Sturges where everythingโ€™s so right and correct that it is almost unbearable. You could say of this John Sturges film that it doesnโ€™t show a succession of images, but of sentences. A whole dozen of these sentences are written up in the display cases of the theatres showing 'Bad Day at Black Rock' Stills of old colour films have a peculiar charm, because they seem completely detached from the film and tend to look more like old hand coloured postcards than the actual scenes in the film. You can recognize, though, with surprise, the stills from 'Bad Day at Black Rock' when youโ€™re watching the actual film; you can even spot the precise moment they captured. The film retains the impression that the coloured photographs have left behind. All the way through it looks hand-painted. The backdrops of the landscape that constantly show through windows or doors have more in common with paintings by Magritte than with the real landscape shown in the outdoor scenes. But even these look much more like a mile-wide, sky-high stage-set built in a gigantic studio. This endless artificiality confused me a lot at the beginning of the film, because I could only trace it back to the colours. It was only after a while that I suddenly discovered what was really happening in this film, when I saw the worn-out seats in the foyer of the hotel in Black Rock: these seats didnโ€™t simply stand around there, they stood around as precisely the chairs that had to be there, the ashtray beside them was the only possible ashtray for these seats, the one-armed bandit was the only conceivable slot-machine for a hotel like that in a town in the Mid West. Every thing in this film, by itself, was the most exact and the most right and the most suitable that could be. Every object was so right that it could form a completely self-contained sentence, it could be distinguished from all the others around it, but for precisely this reason it suited everything else perfectly. In this film all details were really details!" ('Re: Bad Day at Black Rock', Wim Wenders, 1970)

DepressedBergman

66,878 views โ€ข 7 months ago

Senator Bill Hagerty says he has tried to stop illegals from being counted in the Census with legislation and EVERY Democrat voted to BLOCK it He says Democrats are rigging out electoral votes with illegals and thatโ€™s the only reason why Sanctuary Cities exist โ€œYouโ€™ve got these blue states that have situated sanctuary cities inside their states. What are those sanctuary cities designed to do? They serve as magnets. The reason and the motive behind this crime is that the census counts those illegal aliens for the purpose of allocating congressional districts and for the purpose of allocating electoral votes. At the end of the day, this is about power. California has more electoral seats than it deserves because they're able to count these illegals. That gives people who are actually citizens a disproportionate power relative to people that are citizens in my state where we don't have a large illegal population. That is something that is a major flaw in the system. I tried to address it legislatively and every Democrat voted to block me on it.โ€
0:41

Senator Bill Hagerty says he has tried to stop illegals from being counted in the Census with legislation and EVERY Democrat voted to BLOCK it He says Democrats are rigging out electoral votes with illegals and thatโ€™s the only reason why Sanctuary Cities exist โ€œYouโ€™ve got these blue states that have situated sanctuary cities inside their states. What are those sanctuary cities designed to do? They serve as magnets. The reason and the motive behind this crime is that the census counts those illegal aliens for the purpose of allocating congressional districts and for the purpose of allocating electoral votes. At the end of the day, this is about power. California has more electoral seats than it deserves because they're able to count these illegals. That gives people who are actually citizens a disproportionate power relative to people that are citizens in my state where we don't have a large illegal population. That is something that is a major flaw in the system. I tried to address it legislatively and every Democrat voted to block me on it.โ€

Wall Street Apes

100,646 views โ€ข 6 months ago

12 years ago today, the Parliament of Ukraine removed Viktor Yanukovych from the office of President and scheduled presidential elections for May 25, 2014. For all these years, Russian propaganda has been pushing the narrative of an "undemocratic coup" and the "illegitimacy" of Ukrainian authorities. But this is very easy to debunk: 1. The Parliament voted with a constitutional majority - 328(!) votes out of 450 (over 72%). A constitutional majority (300+ votes) has the full right to amend the Constitution, call early elections, and remove the President from office. 2. Representatives of all 5 parliamentary parties (including the presidentโ€™s own Party of Regions) and independents voted in favor. It was a complete consensus of the entire parliament. Opposition MPs said they were fulfilling the will of the Ukrainian people. MPs from the ruling coalition explained that the President had fled at the most critical moment - while Russia had already begun the annexation of Crimea. 3. Elections were held, and the next President was democratically elected by the majority of Ukrainians. This was the only correct decision in a situation where Russia had launched aggression and the President had betrayed the country and fled to the aggressor. Russian propaganda searches for controversial legal nuances. But the reality is simple: parliamentary consensus and democratic elections that clearly expressed the will of the people. Let me remind you: a coup is an unconstitutional change of power that lacks support from the majority of society. So how can a decision by the constitutional majority of Parliament to hold elections - which the majority of Ukrainians then won - be called a "coup"? Russians and their fans have called "illegitimate": Turchynov (acting President according to the Constitution of Ukraine), Poroshenko (democratically elected by the majority), and now Zelenskyy (who received a record number of votes). In the end, Russians would call ANY President of Ukraine illegitimate if he refuses to give Russia what it wants - or to turn Ukraine into a Kremlin puppet like Belarus. #RevolutionOfDignity #12YearsOfResistance #StandWithUkraine
0:45

12 years ago today, the Parliament of Ukraine removed Viktor Yanukovych from the office of President and scheduled presidential elections for May 25, 2014. For all these years, Russian propaganda has been pushing the narrative of an "undemocratic coup" and the "illegitimacy" of Ukrainian authorities. But this is very easy to debunk: 1. The Parliament voted with a constitutional majority - 328(!) votes out of 450 (over 72%). A constitutional majority (300+ votes) has the full right to amend the Constitution, call early elections, and remove the President from office. 2. Representatives of all 5 parliamentary parties (including the presidentโ€™s own Party of Regions) and independents voted in favor. It was a complete consensus of the entire parliament. Opposition MPs said they were fulfilling the will of the Ukrainian people. MPs from the ruling coalition explained that the President had fled at the most critical moment - while Russia had already begun the annexation of Crimea. 3. Elections were held, and the next President was democratically elected by the majority of Ukrainians. This was the only correct decision in a situation where Russia had launched aggression and the President had betrayed the country and fled to the aggressor. Russian propaganda searches for controversial legal nuances. But the reality is simple: parliamentary consensus and democratic elections that clearly expressed the will of the people. Let me remind you: a coup is an unconstitutional change of power that lacks support from the majority of society. So how can a decision by the constitutional majority of Parliament to hold elections - which the majority of Ukrainians then won - be called a "coup"? Russians and their fans have called "illegitimate": Turchynov (acting President according to the Constitution of Ukraine), Poroshenko (democratically elected by the majority), and now Zelenskyy (who received a record number of votes). In the end, Russians would call ANY President of Ukraine illegitimate if he refuses to give Russia what it wants - or to turn Ukraine into a Kremlin puppet like Belarus. #RevolutionOfDignity #12YearsOfResistance #StandWithUkraine

Serhii Antonov

70,430 views โ€ข 4 months ago

Without burdening you with numbers, I urge you look at the Budget Estimates and Revised Estimates for 2024-25 and the proposed Budget Estimates for 2025-26 for the following programmes/schemes. They clearly indicate that (i) the government has lost faith in these programmes announced with fanfare in the previous Budget speeches. (ii) the governmentโ€™s capacity has significantly diminished. Examples are POSHAN, Jal Jeevan Mission, NSAP, PMGSY, Crop Insurance Scheme, Urea Subsidy, and PM Garib Kalyan Anna Yojana. The Railways have been shortchanged. If you examine the Railway specific heads of expenditure, you will find that BE 2024-25 was Rs 2,06,961 crore RE 2024-25 is Rs 2,12,786 crore BE 2025-26 is Rs 2,13,552 crore Railways serve the overwhelming majority of the population. The increase of a paltry Rs 766 crore in 2025-26 will not even account for the inflation. The allocation will be less than last yearโ€™s allocation. On the much-vaunted PLI schemes plus New Employment Generation Scheme plus Skill India programme that were promised to create thousands of jobs, the youth of this country have been deceived. Against a BE 2024-25 of Rs 26,018 crore, the actual expenditure will be only Rs 15,286 crore. Finally, it is evident that neither the FM nor the PM care for the advice of the Chief Economic Adviser. He gave sensible advice in the Economic Survey. โ€œGet out of the wayโ€ was his call to the government. On the contrary, the Budget is full of new schemes and programmes, many of which are beyond the capacity of this government. I counted at least 15 new Schemes or programmes and 4 new Funds. The FM is walking on the worn-out path. She is not willing to break free as we did in 1991 and 2004. She is not willing to de-regulate. She is not willing to get out of the way of the people, especially the entrepreneurs and the MSMEs and the start-ups. The bureaucracy will be happy with this Budget. In closing, I would like to say that the economy will trudge along on the old path and deliver no more than the usual 6 or 6.5 per cent growth in 2025-26. That, in our view, is a government with no new ideas and no will to reach beyond its grasp. : Rajya Sabha MP and Former Finance Minister Shri P. Chidambaram
4:53

Without burdening you with numbers, I urge you look at the Budget Estimates and Revised Estimates for 2024-25 and the proposed Budget Estimates for 2025-26 for the following programmes/schemes. They clearly indicate that (i) the government has lost faith in these programmes announced with fanfare in the previous Budget speeches. (ii) the governmentโ€™s capacity has significantly diminished. Examples are POSHAN, Jal Jeevan Mission, NSAP, PMGSY, Crop Insurance Scheme, Urea Subsidy, and PM Garib Kalyan Anna Yojana. The Railways have been shortchanged. If you examine the Railway specific heads of expenditure, you will find that BE 2024-25 was Rs 2,06,961 crore RE 2024-25 is Rs 2,12,786 crore BE 2025-26 is Rs 2,13,552 crore Railways serve the overwhelming majority of the population. The increase of a paltry Rs 766 crore in 2025-26 will not even account for the inflation. The allocation will be less than last yearโ€™s allocation. On the much-vaunted PLI schemes plus New Employment Generation Scheme plus Skill India programme that were promised to create thousands of jobs, the youth of this country have been deceived. Against a BE 2024-25 of Rs 26,018 crore, the actual expenditure will be only Rs 15,286 crore. Finally, it is evident that neither the FM nor the PM care for the advice of the Chief Economic Adviser. He gave sensible advice in the Economic Survey. โ€œGet out of the wayโ€ was his call to the government. On the contrary, the Budget is full of new schemes and programmes, many of which are beyond the capacity of this government. I counted at least 15 new Schemes or programmes and 4 new Funds. The FM is walking on the worn-out path. She is not willing to break free as we did in 1991 and 2004. She is not willing to de-regulate. She is not willing to get out of the way of the people, especially the entrepreneurs and the MSMEs and the start-ups. The bureaucracy will be happy with this Budget. In closing, I would like to say that the economy will trudge along on the old path and deliver no more than the usual 6 or 6.5 per cent growth in 2025-26. That, in our view, is a government with no new ideas and no will to reach beyond its grasp. : Rajya Sabha MP and Former Finance Minister Shri P. Chidambaram

Congress

40,727 views โ€ข 1 year ago

A large rally is underway in central Budapest People have taken to the streets amid early signals of a possible opposition victory. Pรฉter Magyar addressed his supporters, saying that more than 6 million people turned out to vote. He thanked everyone who came to the polls and expressed โ€œcautious optimismโ€ about a potential win for his party. Around 7% of ballots have been counted so far. According to early data, the Tisza party is in the lead โ€” 110 seats versus 71 for Fidesz. At the moment, three parties are projected to enter parliament: Fidesz, Tisza, and Our Homeland. The count has only just begun. District results come first, followed by party lists. The full picture will emerge later. Itโ€™s important to understand how the system works. In Hungary, it is tilted in Orbรกnโ€™s favor โ€” he reshaped it between 2011 and 2013. Some MPs are elected in districts, where rural areas carry more weight โ€” and thatโ€™s where Fidesz has strong support. A key factor is the โ€œwinnerโ€™s bonus.โ€ If a party wins a district, it not only gets that seat but also additional seats from โ€œsurplusโ€ votes. In other words, votes are not wasted but instead boost the final result. Because of this, Fidesz can receive less than 50% nationwide and still secure a majority. So even if the opposition is currently ahead, it does not yet mean it will actually win.
1:34

A large rally is underway in central Budapest People have taken to the streets amid early signals of a possible opposition victory. Pรฉter Magyar addressed his supporters, saying that more than 6 million people turned out to vote. He thanked everyone who came to the polls and expressed โ€œcautious optimismโ€ about a potential win for his party. Around 7% of ballots have been counted so far. According to early data, the Tisza party is in the lead โ€” 110 seats versus 71 for Fidesz. At the moment, three parties are projected to enter parliament: Fidesz, Tisza, and Our Homeland. The count has only just begun. District results come first, followed by party lists. The full picture will emerge later. Itโ€™s important to understand how the system works. In Hungary, it is tilted in Orbรกnโ€™s favor โ€” he reshaped it between 2011 and 2013. Some MPs are elected in districts, where rural areas carry more weight โ€” and thatโ€™s where Fidesz has strong support. A key factor is the โ€œwinnerโ€™s bonus.โ€ If a party wins a district, it not only gets that seat but also additional seats from โ€œsurplusโ€ votes. In other words, votes are not wasted but instead boost the final result. Because of this, Fidesz can receive less than 50% nationwide and still secure a majority. So even if the opposition is currently ahead, it does not yet mean it will actually win.

NEXTA

242,583 views โ€ข 3 months ago

Analysis of SURE data across 64 Pennsylvania counties identified approximately 205,122 more votes counted than voters on record from the PA 2020 election, leading to illegally certifying the 2020 presidential election. A December 28, 2020 analysis by Pennsylvania House Republicans identified a gross discrepancy of approximately 202,377, with a net unexplained discrepancy of approximately 170,830 votes after accounting for over- and under-votes. This totaled more than double Biden's certified margin of 80,555 votes. The mail in-ballots system for the general election of 2020 in Pennsylvania was so fraught with inconsistencies and irregularities that the reliability of the mail-in votes in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania is impossible to rely upon. Dec 16, 2020: For instance, Over-vote in Philadelphia County. On November 4th at 11:30am, the DOS posted updated mail in vote counts for Philadelphia County. The number of ballots reported to have been counted was an impossible 508,112 ballots despite the fact that only 432,873 ballots had been issued to voters in that county. Later that day, the ballots counted number was reduced but this begs the question, who had the authority to add and subtract votes on the ballot counts reported to the Department of State? Even if this was simply a data entry error, the lack of internal controls over such reporting necessitates a review of the numbers, the process and system access. Additionally, in a data file received on November 4, 2020, the Commonwealthโ€™s PA Open Data sites reported over 3.1 million mail in ballots sent out. The CSV file from the state on November 4 depicts 3.1 million mail in ballots sent out but on November 2, the information was provided that only 2.7 million ballots had been sent out. This discrepancy of approximately 400,000 ballots from November 2 to November 4 has not been explained. Furthermore, a newly available voter dataset available on the state .gov website, which had been offline for weeks indicated that it was last updated on 11/16/2020. The download of 11/16 shows 75,505 more ballots returned on 11/16 than the download from 11/15. Therefore, from 11/15 to 11/16, 75,505 ballots were added to the dataset with no explanation. Mail Date irregularities to include ballots mailed before the ballot was finalized, ballots mailed late and ballots mailed inconsistent with enacted legislation relative to mail in ballots: 154,584 ballots. There was also voter "Date of Birth" irregularities of 1573 ballots, of voters over 100 years old. Documents/Sources: Election Crime Bureau, Patrick Colbeck, Justice .gov, hsgac .senate .gov.
4:36

Analysis of SURE data across 64 Pennsylvania counties identified approximately 205,122 more votes counted than voters on record from the PA 2020 election, leading to illegally certifying the 2020 presidential election. A December 28, 2020 analysis by Pennsylvania House Republicans identified a gross discrepancy of approximately 202,377, with a net unexplained discrepancy of approximately 170,830 votes after accounting for over- and under-votes. This totaled more than double Biden's certified margin of 80,555 votes. The mail in-ballots system for the general election of 2020 in Pennsylvania was so fraught with inconsistencies and irregularities that the reliability of the mail-in votes in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania is impossible to rely upon. Dec 16, 2020: For instance, Over-vote in Philadelphia County. On November 4th at 11:30am, the DOS posted updated mail in vote counts for Philadelphia County. The number of ballots reported to have been counted was an impossible 508,112 ballots despite the fact that only 432,873 ballots had been issued to voters in that county. Later that day, the ballots counted number was reduced but this begs the question, who had the authority to add and subtract votes on the ballot counts reported to the Department of State? Even if this was simply a data entry error, the lack of internal controls over such reporting necessitates a review of the numbers, the process and system access. Additionally, in a data file received on November 4, 2020, the Commonwealthโ€™s PA Open Data sites reported over 3.1 million mail in ballots sent out. The CSV file from the state on November 4 depicts 3.1 million mail in ballots sent out but on November 2, the information was provided that only 2.7 million ballots had been sent out. This discrepancy of approximately 400,000 ballots from November 2 to November 4 has not been explained. Furthermore, a newly available voter dataset available on the state .gov website, which had been offline for weeks indicated that it was last updated on 11/16/2020. The download of 11/16 shows 75,505 more ballots returned on 11/16 than the download from 11/15. Therefore, from 11/15 to 11/16, 75,505 ballots were added to the dataset with no explanation. Mail Date irregularities to include ballots mailed before the ballot was finalized, ballots mailed late and ballots mailed inconsistent with enacted legislation relative to mail in ballots: 154,584 ballots. There was also voter "Date of Birth" irregularities of 1573 ballots, of voters over 100 years old. Documents/Sources: Election Crime Bureau, Patrick Colbeck, Justice .gov, hsgac .senate .gov.

The SCIF

17,151 views โ€ข 8 days ago

CNN analyst Harry Enten warns Democrats they are 'way behind' Republicans | Andrew Chapados, Blaze Media 'Their lead is less than half, less than half of where it was in either 2017 or 2005 in July of those years.' CNN analyst Harry Enten warned Democrats this week they could trail Republicans by the largest margins in decades if they do not turn things around. Enten, the resident stats expert at CNN, told Democrats to "hold the phone" if they think criticizing the Trump administration over the Jeffrey Epstein files is going to save them. Instead, Trump's support has been resilient among likely voters, with the Democrats in danger of taking a monumental backstep in the 2026 midterm elections. Enten delivered the shocking numbers to CNN's John Berman, giving him the grim "bottom line" for the Democrats. "Democrats are behind their 2006 and 2018 paces when it comes to the generic congressional ballot." In Democrat versus Republican congressional ballot margins, the Democrat lead has shrunk by more than two times when compared to July 2005, when it was a +7-point margin. The gap remained the same in 2017, but in July 2025, the margin is now just a +2 for Democrats. "Donald Trump may be unpopular, but Democrats have not come anywhere close to sealing the deal at this particular point," Enten told his colleague. The devastating numbers somehow got way worse for Democrats when breaking down the midterms race by race. When comparing chances for seat changes ahead of previous midterms under Republican presidents, Democrats were favored by +7 in 2005 and a whopping +33 in 2017, CNN showed. The Democrats over performed in both cases, picking up 31 seats in the 2006 midterms and 41 seats in the 2018 midterms. Now, CNN's Enten showed Republicans are up a shocking 12 points at the same time this year ahead of the 2026 midterms. "So it's not just on the generic ballot where Democrats are behind their 2017 and 2005 pace. It's actually when it comes seat by seat, you see that at least at this particular point, Republicans actually have more net pick-up opportunities," Enten stressed. "This doesn't look anything like those wave elections back in 2006 or 2018," he added. The stat guru concluded by showing the congressional ballot margin numbers were the same among voters in October 2024, before the presidential election, as they are now. "Reality check," Enten wrote on his X account. "Dems are way behind their 2006 & 2018 pace ... at this point in the cycle." The analyst emphasized that the numbers he is seeing are indicative of when Republicans have held onto a House majority and appear strikingly similar to the 2024 election cycle. Read more:
9:39

CNN analyst Harry Enten warns Democrats they are 'way behind' Republicans | Andrew Chapados, Blaze Media 'Their lead is less than half, less than half of where it was in either 2017 or 2005 in July of those years.' CNN analyst Harry Enten warned Democrats this week they could trail Republicans by the largest margins in decades if they do not turn things around. Enten, the resident stats expert at CNN, told Democrats to "hold the phone" if they think criticizing the Trump administration over the Jeffrey Epstein files is going to save them. Instead, Trump's support has been resilient among likely voters, with the Democrats in danger of taking a monumental backstep in the 2026 midterm elections. Enten delivered the shocking numbers to CNN's John Berman, giving him the grim "bottom line" for the Democrats. "Democrats are behind their 2006 and 2018 paces when it comes to the generic congressional ballot." In Democrat versus Republican congressional ballot margins, the Democrat lead has shrunk by more than two times when compared to July 2005, when it was a +7-point margin. The gap remained the same in 2017, but in July 2025, the margin is now just a +2 for Democrats. "Donald Trump may be unpopular, but Democrats have not come anywhere close to sealing the deal at this particular point," Enten told his colleague. The devastating numbers somehow got way worse for Democrats when breaking down the midterms race by race. When comparing chances for seat changes ahead of previous midterms under Republican presidents, Democrats were favored by +7 in 2005 and a whopping +33 in 2017, CNN showed. The Democrats over performed in both cases, picking up 31 seats in the 2006 midterms and 41 seats in the 2018 midterms. Now, CNN's Enten showed Republicans are up a shocking 12 points at the same time this year ahead of the 2026 midterms. "So it's not just on the generic ballot where Democrats are behind their 2017 and 2005 pace. It's actually when it comes seat by seat, you see that at least at this particular point, Republicans actually have more net pick-up opportunities," Enten stressed. "This doesn't look anything like those wave elections back in 2006 or 2018," he added. The stat guru concluded by showing the congressional ballot margin numbers were the same among voters in October 2024, before the presidential election, as they are now. "Reality check," Enten wrote on his X account. "Dems are way behind their 2006 & 2018 pace ... at this point in the cycle." The analyst emphasized that the numbers he is seeing are indicative of when Republicans have held onto a House majority and appear strikingly similar to the 2024 election cycle. Read more:

Owen Gregorian

74,992 views โ€ข 1 year ago