ะ—ะฐะณั€ัƒะทะบะฐ ะฒะธะดะตะพ...

ะะต ัƒะดะฐะปะพััŒ ะทะฐะณั€ัƒะทะธั‚ัŒ ะฒะธะดะตะพ

ะะฐ ะณะปะฐะฒะฝัƒัŽ

๐„๐‹๐„๐‚๐“๐ˆ๐Ž๐ ๐‡๐„๐ˆ๐’๐“ ๐Ÿ“ ๐‚๐‘๐Ž๐‘๐„ ๐•๐Ž๐“๐„๐’ ๐’๐“๐Ž๐‹๐„ ๐Œ๐Ž๐ƒ๐ˆ'๐’ ๐“๐‡๐ˆ๐‘๐ƒ ๐“๐„๐‘๐Œ! (The Mystery of 79 Seats) In the 2024 Lok Sabha elections, a staggering discrepancy of nearly 5 crore Votes between initial Polling Day Estimates and Final Figures handed the NDA a flipping 79 Seats in their favor. ๐“๐จ๐ญ๐š๐ฅ ๐•๐จ๐ญ๐ž ๐’๐ฎ๐ซ๐ ๐ž:...

48,959 ะฟั€ะพัะผะพั‚ั€ะพะฒ โ€ข 1 ะณะพะด ะฝะฐะทะฐะด โ€ขvia X (Twitter)

ะšะพะผะผะตะฝั‚ะฐั€ะธะธ: 0

ะะตั‚ ะดะพัั‚ัƒะฟะฝั‹ั… ะบะพะผะผะตะฝั‚ะฐั€ะธะตะฒ

ะ—ะดะตััŒ ะฟะพัะฒัั‚ัั ะบะพะผะผะตะฝั‚ะฐั€ะธะธ ะธะท ะพั€ะธะณะธะฝะฐะปัŒะฝะพะณะพ ะฟะพัั‚ะฐ

ะŸะพั…ะพะถะธะต ะฒะธะดะตะพ

Govt is all set to punish South India The Union government has now signalled that delimitation may be moved ahead without waiting for the Census after 2026, raising the possibility that the 2011 Census could become the base for redrawing Lok Sabha seats. For those who donโ€™t know what delimitation is, it is the process of reallocating parliamentary seats among states in line with population changes It has a stated aim of preserving fair and proportional democratic representation. But this is where the debate becomes serious. Population trends across India have not moved uniformly A major reason is the difference in fertility rates among states. Most southern statesโ€”Kerala, Tamil Nadu, Karnataka, Andhra Pradesh, and Telanganaโ€”have already brought fertility below the replacement level of 2 Meanwhile, states such as Uttar Pradesh and Bihar continue to record comparatively higher fertility levels. If seat redistribution follows these numbers, the political balance could shift sharply The five southern states together may end up with around 164 Lok Sabha seats, whereas Uttar Pradesh and Bihar alone could together command nearly 222. The larger question, then, is philosophical as much as political: Should states that succeeded in stabilising population growth lose representation because of that success? Many in the South see this as a structural disadvantage, almost a democratic penalty for effective population management. The political implications are equally significant Since the ruling partyโ€™s electoral strength has historically been far deeper across northern India than in much of the South, any expansion in seat share in the Hindi belt could naturally reshape the national balance of power in a way that may politically benefit the current establishment We are waiting for Govtโ€™s official version Because if the present documents floating on internet are true, then South India is going to be penalised heavily in their possible future representation in Indian Lok Sabha ๐Ÿ™

Shekhar Dutt

48,640 ะฟั€ะพัะผะพั‚ั€ะพะฒ โ€ข 4 ะผะตััั†ะตะฒ ะฝะฐะทะฐะด

#WATCH | Delhi | On DMK, Congress MP Karti Chidambaram says, "You have to ask the DMK for its reasons why they are doing a flip flop. In my opinion, they are being enticed with this One Nation One Election. They are in a little bit of urgency to have another election. But all I can tell you is if the DMK embarks on that path, their fate in the next elections will be worse than what they faced in this recent Assembly elections." On DMK's stand on Delimitation Bill, Congress MP Karti Chidambaram says, "I don't know what the take of DMK is, you should ask them. They opposed the Bill the last time, I hope they will oppose the Bill this time too. On paper it looks like everybody is getting an equal percentage of increase, in Parliamentary democracy absolute numbers matter. At the moment, Tamil Nadu and Puducherry have 40 seats. Uttar Pradesh has 80 seats. So, the delta between Tamil Nadu, Puducherry and Uttar Pradesh is 40. But if you increase the seats by 50%, Tamil Nadu and Puducherry will go up to 60 and Uttar Pradesh will go to 120. So, the delta will become 60. So, absolute numbers matter in politics. It is not just percentages because in order to catch up with the north of India, there will be a far greater number for the southern states to do. The southern states have reduced population and have contributed more to tax but their number of Parliamentarians in the Lok Sabha will be deminished. Further, with 543 members in the House, we hardly get any time to speak. With 815, we will get less time to speak. The Speaker doesn't know the names of all of us and he will hardly know the name of extra 300 people who will come. So, the House will just become a stamping House like China...A larger Parliament will be an ineffective Parliament..."

ANI

66,958 ะฟั€ะพัะผะพั‚ั€ะพะฒ โ€ข 1 ะผะตััั† ะฝะฐะทะฐะด

The moment the results were declared, Bengalโ€™s business community has been feeling absolutely delighted. Among them, the biggest industrialist Sanjiv Goenka must have been the happiest. Over the years, he has been seen as a vocal supporter of BJP and Narendra Modi, a stance that, in a politically charged environment, has inevitably drawn scrutiny. Especially from the TMC! In Indiaโ€™s federal structure, businesses often have to navigate complex relationships with state governments, regardless of political alignment. For large conglomerates operating across sectors, maintaining this balance is less a choice and more a necessity, unfortunately. What often gets overlooked in the narrative, however, is the sheer scale of the RP-Sanjiv Goenka Groupโ€™s investments outside West Bengal, in NDA rules states. The group currently has a project pipeline of nearly โ‚น72,000 crore under implementation across states like Odisha, Uttar Pradesh, Rajasthan, Gujarat, and Andhra Pradesh, aligned with Indiaโ€™s renewable energy ambitions. Which raises an important question: why is Goenka still largely perceived as a โ€œBengal-onlyโ€ industrialist? West Bengal has, for decades, grappled with the challenge of attracting large-scale industrial investment. The widely discussed Singur Tata Nano controversy involving Tata Motors became emblematic of these concerns, shaping investor sentiment for years. Since then, perceptions around ease of doing business in the state have remained a topic of debate. Iโ€™m sure Goenka, along with many industrialists, must be breathing a sigh of relief now that the BJP is in power in the state. The years of extortion money taken from them as part of 'electoral bonds' will finally end and we will finally get to see the golden phase of West Bengal.

Rishi Bagree

115,416 ะฟั€ะพัะผะพั‚ั€ะพะฒ โ€ข 3 ะผะตััั†ะตะฒ ะฝะฐะทะฐะด

#WATCH | West Bengal Chief Minister Suvendu Adhikari says, "BJP govt of West Bengal is working to fulfil PM Modi's guarantees. Today, Rs 3,000 has been transferred via DBT into the accounts of 1.10 crore women, and another Rs 20 lakh transfers are in process. We received a total of 1.6 crore applications; 26 lakh were rejected for not meeting the criteria, and we are transferring funds to the rest... Today also marks the start of the VB-G RAM G (Viksit Bharat โ€“ Guarantee for Rozgar and Ajeevika Mission)... In WB, 2.56 crore people living in villages will get 125 days of work; the daily wage will be Rs 300 for unskilled labour, Rs 450 for semi-skilled, and Rs 600 for skilled work... Apart from this, we have introduced many schemes in the budget, and we have also been implementing numerous Central govt schemes... Tomorrow we are holding a meeting with all the ministers and HoDs in West Bengal. We will dedicate the entire day to discussing the implementation of our budget and all the schemes of the Central govt. We will formulate a comprehensive roadmap tomorrow regarding the available opportunities and how to ensure that the majority of the people in Bengal receive their benefits..." He adds, "From 1st August, the census is starting in Bengal and across the entire country. Our preparations are in full swing, and you will receive all the details once the census report is released. This time, it is a digital census. This time, there is an option for self-declaration. This time, it includes a caste-based census; everything will become clear, and the absolute truth will be revealed."

ANI

50,444 ะฟั€ะพัะผะพั‚ั€ะพะฒ โ€ข 2 ะผะตััั†ะตะฒ ะฝะฐะทะฐะด

Claims made by Karnataka CM Siddaramaiah on delimitation are misleading and reflect a disregard for established facts. This kind of narrative unfortunately mirrors what the Indian National Congress has increasingly been associated withโ€”distorting facts to suit political agendas. Historically, the southern statesโ€™ share of Lok Sabha seats since 1952โ€”across the first delimitation and subsequent exercises in 1963, 1972, and 2002โ€”has remained broadly around 24% of the total seats. Notably, three of these exercises were conducted during Congress-led governments at the Centre, while the fourth was implemented during their tenure in 2008. The guiding principles for delimitation have remained consistent over time. The same constitutional framework and established norms will continue to govern future exercises, in accordance with the provisions of the Constitution of India. The Honโ€™ble Prime Minister Shri Narendra Modi ji and Home Minister Shri Amit Shah ji have already addressed this issue clearly. Despite this, Congress leaders continue to spread misinformation. Delimitation is a constitutional processโ€”not a political conspiracy. The Congress must take responsibility to inform citizens accurately rather than inflame sentiments. Misleading the public on such a sensitive issue is deeply irresponsible. #Delimitation

Pralhad Joshi

37,969 ะฟั€ะพัะผะพั‚ั€ะพะฒ โ€ข 4 ะผะตััั†ะตะฒ ะฝะฐะทะฐะด

ECI'S SECRET VOTER PURGE IN BENGAL EXPOSED ๐Ÿ.๐Ÿ‘๐Ÿ” ๐‚๐‘๐Ž๐‘๐„ ๐•๐จ๐ญ๐ž๐ฌ ๐’๐ข๐ฅ๐ž๐ง๐œ๐ž๐ ๐๐ฒ ๐€ ๐’๐ข๐ง๐ข๐ฌ๐ญ๐ž๐ซ "๐–๐š๐ฅ๐ฅ" ๐“๐ก๐š๐ญ ๐‰๐ฎ๐ฌ๐ญ ๐†๐จ๐ญ ๐’๐ก๐š๐ญ๐ญ๐ž๐ซ๐ž๐! ๐Ÿ”ฅ The Election Commission built a digital fortress around West Bengal's Electoral Rolls during the 2025-26 Special Intensive Revision (SIR). They invented a brand-new "Logical Discrepancy" category and slapped 1.36 CRORE voters Statewide with "Under Adjudication" tags โ€” freezing their Voting Rights indefinitely with ZERO Explanation or Deadline. To bury the Truth, ECI released the rolls ONLY as massive scanned PDFs (228x larger than digital files), Blocked Automation with CAPTCHA Gates, Limited Downloads to 10 areas at a Time, and Slapped Diagonal "UNDER ADJUDICATION" Watermarks that Obscure Names on 1 in 10 entries. But Alt News just smashed through the Wall. They digitized 558 PDFs from Mamata Banerjeeโ€™s Bhabanipur and neighbouring Ballygunge seats. The Shocking Findings: โ€ข 39,604 voters (11.2% of the entire electorate in these two seats) marked โ€œUnder Adjudicationโ€ โ€ข;Muslims = 39.5% of votersโ€ฆ but 66.5% of those flagged โ€ข A Muslim voter is 3.1 times more likely than a Hindu voter to lose their right to vote โ€ข In Bhabanipur: Muslims (just 21.9% of voters) make up 51.8% of flagged cases โ€” nearly 1 in every 4 Muslims targeted vs fewer than 1 in 17 Hindus This isnโ€™t a Glitch. This is Systematic, Targeted Disenfranchisement ahead of Elections. #ElectionCommission #WestBengal #SupremeCourt

เฆคเฆจเงเฆฎเฆฏเฆผ l Tอžanmoy l

28,207 ะฟั€ะพัะผะพั‚ั€ะพะฒ โ€ข 4 ะผะตััั†ะตะฒ ะฝะฐะทะฐะด

Wim Wenders on 'Bad Day at Black Rock' (1955): "A dusty American colour film by John Sturges where everythingโ€™s so right and correct that it is almost unbearable. You could say of this John Sturges film that it doesnโ€™t show a succession of images, but of sentences. A whole dozen of these sentences are written up in the display cases of the theatres showing 'Bad Day at Black Rock' Stills of old colour films have a peculiar charm, because they seem completely detached from the film and tend to look more like old hand coloured postcards than the actual scenes in the film. You can recognize, though, with surprise, the stills from 'Bad Day at Black Rock' when youโ€™re watching the actual film; you can even spot the precise moment they captured. The film retains the impression that the coloured photographs have left behind. All the way through it looks hand-painted. The backdrops of the landscape that constantly show through windows or doors have more in common with paintings by Magritte than with the real landscape shown in the outdoor scenes. But even these look much more like a mile-wide, sky-high stage-set built in a gigantic studio. This endless artificiality confused me a lot at the beginning of the film, because I could only trace it back to the colours. It was only after a while that I suddenly discovered what was really happening in this film, when I saw the worn-out seats in the foyer of the hotel in Black Rock: these seats didnโ€™t simply stand around there, they stood around as precisely the chairs that had to be there, the ashtray beside them was the only possible ashtray for these seats, the one-armed bandit was the only conceivable slot-machine for a hotel like that in a town in the Mid West. Every thing in this film, by itself, was the most exact and the most right and the most suitable that could be. Every object was so right that it could form a completely self-contained sentence, it could be distinguished from all the others around it, but for precisely this reason it suited everything else perfectly. In this film all details were really details!" ('Re: Bad Day at Black Rock', Wim Wenders, 1970)

DepressedBergman

66,878 ะฟั€ะพัะผะพั‚ั€ะพะฒ โ€ข 9 ะผะตััั†ะตะฒ ะฝะฐะทะฐะด

2026 Fulton County Election Fraud Report finds THOUSANDS of FALSE BALLOTS added to the post-election hand count/audit, which lowered Biden's margin of victory and vote total by about 50,000 to 60,000 votes, indicating that Trump did indeed win Georgia in the 2020 election. This isn't even counting all of the other fraud found GA. As a result of the 36 errors, 6,691 fictitious ballots that do not exist were added to the "Total Ballots Cast" column. After removing the false ballots from the total, because they do not exist, Fulton County's corrected Total Ballots Cast for the hand count/audit is 521,341, or 7,436 ballots less than the certified Nov. 3rd total of 528,777. Of these, candidate Trump received 1,025 false votes that do not exist, while candidate Biden received 5,618 false votes that do not exist. Correcting for the errors from only the absentee ballots of one county, the hand count/audit results yield a margin of victory that is 4,593 votes less than the November 3rd results. 11,779 was the total margin of victory for the entire state. A review of only 3 percent of the ballots yielded errors that falsely inflated the margin of victory for the hand count/audit by one-third. Based on these errors alone, the margin of victory drops to 7,185. The 36 errors mysteriously added a sufficient number of ballots and votes to substantiate the November 3rd results, albeit falsely. Just as the hand count/audit was used as a metric to corroborate the November 3rd results, the errors call those results in to question. First, there was no investigation beyond that which was carried out by Mr. Rossi and the Governor's office as the Secretary of State's investigator did not perform an investigation. Second, the claim that the error were unintentional is refuted by the fact that 35 of the 36 inconsistencies benefited one candidate. Next, the failures were not the product of data entry errors. Lastly, the conclusion and excuse that the errors did not affect the outcome of the presidential contest is irrelevant and not responsive to the allegation, as the race for president extended past the Fulton County line, and so did the "errors" that were found. It gets even better... A total of eight 8 false batch entries are included in the results in which candidate Trump erroneously receives ZERO votes, and almost all are supported with a batch tally sheet. Errors with a batch tally sheet that donโ€™t match the corresponding ballots are not the product of mistake or unintentional error. It is indisputable that the batch tally sheets identified by Mr. Rossi and Governor Kemp were intentionally fabricated to falsely pad the hand-count/audit results in line with the November 3rd results. Georgia law explicitly states that any superintendent or employee who intentionally destroys or alters tally papers, or permits them to be destroyed or altered, shall be guilty of a felony. Fulton County's chaotic, unaccountable curation and processing of cast ballots, cast BMD printout, and electronic records make a true risk-limiting audit impossible. It is unreasonable for voters to trust that their votes were counted at all, much less counted correctly. Voters have good reason to believe that some votes counted more than others, some votes were included twice or 3x in the totals. There is no way to know how many votes were omitted from the tabulation, absent access to the physical ballots and BMD printout and evidence that the chain of custody is intact. From the records produced so far, it Is impossible to determine whether malware, bugs, misconfiguration, or malfeasance disenfranchised voters or altered the election results. The fact that thousands of false ballots and votes were unveiled should have triggered a real investigation, not only of Fulton County's November 3rd election results, but those of the entire state. We can use the same mathematical basis as the Risk Limiting Audit by using Fulton Countyโ€™s rate of error- and extrapolate. Approximately 148,000 absentee ballots were cast in Fulton County, and out of those, 6,691, 4.52%, were found to be false, or in error. A total of 1,311,061 absentee ballots were cast in the state of Georgia for the 2020 General Election. Using the same percentage, 4.52%, of false ballots/votes as that confirmed in Fulton County: 1,311,061 x .0452 = 59,259 false ballots/votes Using the same ratio of distribution of false ballots/votes as that confirmed in Fulton County: Candidate Biden: 83.9% of 59,259 = 49,718 false votes Candidate Trump: 15.3% of 59,259 = 9,066 false votes Therefore, using the Fulton County hand count/audit error rate, as established by the Governor's report on just the absentee ballots cast, the error rate is determinative, and it is possible that the wrong candidate did take office. Ms. McGowan's assertion that the hand count/audit errors did not affect the outcome of the race, is not supported by fact. Given the egregious manipulation in Fulton County, failing and/or refusing to check the hand count/audit results of the other 158 counties constitutes gross negligence, if not willful misconduct and fraud. On top of these findings, Fulton County election officials knew the hand-count/audit results were falsely inflated. There are a confirmed 6,691 fictitious votes that were added to the hand-count/audit results, but were NEVER corrected. An email found corresponds, which is located in this report, establishes the fact that Fulton County election officials knew of the errors at the time, even the same day that the Secretary of State released the results. (PAGE 171 in the video report above contains the email to view.) For some five 5+ years, the hand-count/audit results, known by Fulton County to be materially defective, have been used to falsely substantiate the official results. The same fraudulent results have also been used against those who rightfully questioned Georgia's election results. Lastly, for just this report and presentation, the hand-count tally sheets DO NOT MATCH results from advance voting polling locations. Poll tapes were compared for all tabulators at each polling location to the corresponding batch tally sheets as produced during the hand-count/audit. The fact that such differences between the hand counted audited ballot tallies and the official machine count tallies differs by this much signals that tabulation and auditing processes are flawed and strongly argue for intense objective expert examination and considerable mitigation efforts. It should be the case that such counts are consistent and exact. The fact that such audit discrepancies at a precinct level did not cause precertification investigations of the count variances is unacceptable, it essentially defeats the purpose of an audit if significant discrepancies are ignored and chalked up to human error. As they seem to have been at least in the case of the Fulton County audit. It is irrefutable that the hand count/audit results were indeed the result of intentional human acts, aka, FRAUD. Read full report for all details and visual evidence above in video report. The 2020 Election was stolen.

The SCIF

46,220 ะฟั€ะพัะผะพั‚ั€ะพะฒ โ€ข 1 ะผะตััั† ะฝะฐะทะฐะด

12 years ago today, the Parliament of Ukraine removed Viktor Yanukovych from the office of President and scheduled presidential elections for May 25, 2014. For all these years, Russian propaganda has been pushing the narrative of an "undemocratic coup" and the "illegitimacy" of Ukrainian authorities. But this is very easy to debunk: 1. The Parliament voted with a constitutional majority - 328(!) votes out of 450 (over 72%). A constitutional majority (300+ votes) has the full right to amend the Constitution, call early elections, and remove the President from office. 2. Representatives of all 5 parliamentary parties (including the presidentโ€™s own Party of Regions) and independents voted in favor. It was a complete consensus of the entire parliament. Opposition MPs said they were fulfilling the will of the Ukrainian people. MPs from the ruling coalition explained that the President had fled at the most critical moment - while Russia had already begun the annexation of Crimea. 3. Elections were held, and the next President was democratically elected by the majority of Ukrainians. This was the only correct decision in a situation where Russia had launched aggression and the President had betrayed the country and fled to the aggressor. Russian propaganda searches for controversial legal nuances. But the reality is simple: parliamentary consensus and democratic elections that clearly expressed the will of the people. Let me remind you: a coup is an unconstitutional change of power that lacks support from the majority of society. So how can a decision by the constitutional majority of Parliament to hold elections - which the majority of Ukrainians then won - be called a "coup"? Russians and their fans have called "illegitimate": Turchynov (acting President according to the Constitution of Ukraine), Poroshenko (democratically elected by the majority), and now Zelenskyy (who received a record number of votes). In the end, Russians would call ANY President of Ukraine illegitimate if he refuses to give Russia what it wants - or to turn Ukraine into a Kremlin puppet like Belarus. #RevolutionOfDignity #12YearsOfResistance #StandWithUkraine

Serhii Antonov

70,430 ะฟั€ะพัะผะพั‚ั€ะพะฒ โ€ข 6 ะผะตััั†ะตะฒ ะฝะฐะทะฐะด

A large rally is underway in central Budapest People have taken to the streets amid early signals of a possible opposition victory. Pรฉter Magyar addressed his supporters, saying that more than 6 million people turned out to vote. He thanked everyone who came to the polls and expressed โ€œcautious optimismโ€ about a potential win for his party. Around 7% of ballots have been counted so far. According to early data, the Tisza party is in the lead โ€” 110 seats versus 71 for Fidesz. At the moment, three parties are projected to enter parliament: Fidesz, Tisza, and Our Homeland. The count has only just begun. District results come first, followed by party lists. The full picture will emerge later. Itโ€™s important to understand how the system works. In Hungary, it is tilted in Orbรกnโ€™s favor โ€” he reshaped it between 2011 and 2013. Some MPs are elected in districts, where rural areas carry more weight โ€” and thatโ€™s where Fidesz has strong support. A key factor is the โ€œwinnerโ€™s bonus.โ€ If a party wins a district, it not only gets that seat but also additional seats from โ€œsurplusโ€ votes. In other words, votes are not wasted but instead boost the final result. Because of this, Fidesz can receive less than 50% nationwide and still secure a majority. So even if the opposition is currently ahead, it does not yet mean it will actually win.

NEXTA

242,583 ะฟั€ะพัะผะพั‚ั€ะพะฒ โ€ข 4 ะผะตััั†ะตะฒ ะฝะฐะทะฐะด