Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

𝐅𝐢𝐧𝐚𝐥𝐥𝐲! 𝐒𝐨𝐦𝐞 𝐜𝐨𝐦𝐦𝐨𝐧 𝐬𝐞𝐧𝐬𝐞 𝐢𝐧 𝐠𝐨𝐯𝐞𝐫𝐧𝐦𝐞𝐧𝐭! House Bill 279 would stop EBT cards from being used on junk food. Taxpayer dollars should go toward real nutrition, not chips and pop. 𝐈 𝙡𝙤𝙫𝙚 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐢𝐝𝐞𝐚! 𝐘𝐨𝐮? 🤔

𝙲𝚘𝚗𝚜𝚎𝚛𝚟𝚊𝚝𝚒𝚟𝚎 🍁 𝙳𝚒𝚟𝚊™

223,331 subscribers

69,585 views • 1 year ago •via X (Twitter)

News & Politics Health & Wellness Finance

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

11 Comments

Jeannie Baker1 year ago

Absolutely!! It pisses me off when I see a family purchasing steak & lobster on a Chip card. Why should my tax dollars be buying them steak & lobster?!?! I work a full-time job and can’t afford those. Years ago, it was regulated. UNREAL!! @DOGE

Vance Ginn1 year ago

Imagine a government where big government doesn't burden your future with excessive spending, taxes, and regulations. Here's how... 👇

Wayne Lewis1 year ago

Do it! I would also include no steak. Purchased can included basic chicken beef and pork.

A Man Of Memes1 year ago

Good!!!

MK Land1 year ago

Way over due. I don't care if they want a steak but damn they always seem to have a cart full of crap food which is killing them and the tax payers then have to pay for their medical care.

Vazhog1 year ago

How about just removing Food stamps as way of solving the unemployment problem of Missing illegals -Hungry people can discover that working prevents hunger.

Amy Chandler1 year ago

I work in a grocery store that has a Starbucks and the amount of people the use food stamps to pay is CRAZY!

Mz Nunyabizness1 year ago

Who remembers the govt block of cheese? I agree, no taxpayer $ going to junk food.

Arlene Page1 year ago

WIC was all about proper nutrition. Cheese, Milk, Juice, low-sugar breakfast cereal. Why aren’t food stamps/EBT like that already?

TinaChic1 year ago

They have been trying to do this for years, will it finally happen? I hope so.

Thomas1 year ago

Now remove them from school lunches as well

Related Videos

A bill introduced by Rep. Mike Levin (D-CA) on Tuesday would prevent taxpayer money from being used to rebuild Venezuela's oil infrastructure. Levin says he and many colleagues "do not believe that it's a good use of $100 billion or $200 billion, which is what the estimates have been, of taxpayer dollars to go in and rebuild the oil infrastructure, and I don't think it's a good deal for the American taxpayer."

A bill introduced by Rep. Mike Levin (D-CA) on Tuesday would prevent taxpayer money from being used to rebuild Venezuela's oil infrastructure. Levin says he and many colleagues "do not believe that it's a good use of $100 billion or $200 billion, which is what the estimates have been, of taxpayer dollars to go in and rebuild the oil infrastructure, and I don't think it's a good deal for the American taxpayer."

CBS News

28,757 views • 6 months ago

According to this woman, the government forcing people on the EBT program to buy nutritious food is punishing children by preventing them from eating junk food. Let’s not forget that taxpayers are footing the bill not only for their food, but also for their healthcare as a result of their poor diet. If you want your kids to eat cake, stop being lazy and bake it yourself, like most of us do.

According to this woman, the government forcing people on the EBT program to buy nutritious food is punishing children by preventing them from eating junk food. Let’s not forget that taxpayers are footing the bill not only for their food, but also for their healthcare as a result of their poor diet. If you want your kids to eat cake, stop being lazy and bake it yourself, like most of us do.

I Meme Therefore I Am 🇺🇸

44,814 views • 7 months ago

THIS is 1000% true 😂💀 EBT shoppers out here treating their cards like an all-you-can-eat junk buffet while the rest of us pay full price for actual food. Soda? Chips? Cookies? Candy? Monster energy? ABSOLUTELY NOT!! EBT should be locked to the basic food groups only, meat, veggies, fruit, dairy, real staples. Want that sugary trash that rots your teeth and inflates your waistline? Pay for it with your own money like the taxpayers funding your benefits already are. There’s endless videos of people cackling while they rack up carts full of garbage on our dime. It’s not funny, it’s infuriating. Time to slap hard restrictions on this nonsense. SNAP/EBT is for nutrition, not diabetes in a can. Who else is sick of this? Drop your hottest take 👇

THIS is 1000% true 😂💀 EBT shoppers out here treating their cards like an all-you-can-eat junk buffet while the rest of us pay full price for actual food. Soda? Chips? Cookies? Candy? Monster energy? ABSOLUTELY NOT!! EBT should be locked to the basic food groups only, meat, veggies, fruit, dairy, real staples. Want that sugary trash that rots your teeth and inflates your waistline? Pay for it with your own money like the taxpayers funding your benefits already are. There’s endless videos of people cackling while they rack up carts full of garbage on our dime. It’s not funny, it’s infuriating. Time to slap hard restrictions on this nonsense. SNAP/EBT is for nutrition, not diabetes in a can. Who else is sick of this? Drop your hottest take 👇

❥❥❥ᗰoᒪᒪie❥❥❥

16,667 views • 24 days ago

People are scamming the EBT system by bypassing new junk food rules by driving over state lines “When you're from Indiana and the EBT says you can't get sugary drinks or candy, but you're only an hour away from Illinois, so you drive the hour and you spend $365 of EBT on pop. Thanks, Illinois, you're my favorite state” This is a real loophole that actually works and it needs to be closed If your state has placed food restrictions on “ junk foods” like chips, soda, or candy, you can still buy them with your SNAP benefits in a state that hasn’t banned those items. In other words, your home state’s rules don’t follow you or your EBT card; only the SNAP rules of the state where the store is located matter We need to stop this

People are scamming the EBT system by bypassing new junk food rules by driving over state lines “When you're from Indiana and the EBT says you can't get sugary drinks or candy, but you're only an hour away from Illinois, so you drive the hour and you spend $365 of EBT on pop. Thanks, Illinois, you're my favorite state” This is a real loophole that actually works and it needs to be closed If your state has placed food restrictions on “ junk foods” like chips, soda, or candy, you can still buy them with your SNAP benefits in a state that hasn’t banned those items. In other words, your home state’s rules don’t follow you or your EBT card; only the SNAP rules of the state where the store is located matter We need to stop this

Wall Street Apes

125,804 views • 28 days ago

🚨 $405 MILLION A DAY. That’s how much the U.S. is spending on SNAP, and an alarming portion of that is literally buying sugar. RFK Jr. dropped a bombshell yesterday: nearly 17% of SNAP dollars go to sugar-loaded sodas, candy, and junk food. 👉 That’s over $50 million every single day in taxpayer money… …going to products that spike insulin, inflame organs, wreck metabolic systems, and set kids on a path toward diabetes, obesity, and lifelong illness. Let that sink in. “If you want to buy a sugary soda, you ought to be able to do that—but the U.S. taxpayer should not pay for it.” -Secretary Kennedy This isn’t about controlling people’s choices. It’s about stopping federally funded harm. Real health equity starts with real food.

🚨 $405 MILLION A DAY. That’s how much the U.S. is spending on SNAP, and an alarming portion of that is literally buying sugar. RFK Jr. dropped a bombshell yesterday: nearly 17% of SNAP dollars go to sugar-loaded sodas, candy, and junk food. 👉 That’s over $50 million every single day in taxpayer money… …going to products that spike insulin, inflame organs, wreck metabolic systems, and set kids on a path toward diabetes, obesity, and lifelong illness. Let that sink in. “If you want to buy a sugary soda, you ought to be able to do that—but the U.S. taxpayer should not pay for it.” -Secretary Kennedy This isn’t about controlling people’s choices. It’s about stopping federally funded harm. Real health equity starts with real food.

David Mansdoerfer

31,266 views • 1 year ago

Utah Bill to Strip Public Assistance from Undocumented Immigrants, those in the state illegally Passes Committee 7-3 Utah lawmakers are debating House Bill 88, sponsored by Rep. Trevor Lee, a Republican from Layton. This bill would require strict verification of lawful presence in the U.S. before anyone 18 or older can receive most state or locally funded public benefits. It removes many current exceptions, meaning programs like WIC nutrition for women, infants, and children, food assistance, vaccinations, treatment for communicable diseases, housing aid, homeless services, and non-emergency health care could be off-limits to those without legal status. Emergency medical care and short-term disaster relief would still be allowed regardless of immigration status. Bill sponsor Rep. Trevor Lee, calls it a "priority bill to put Utahns first," arguing taxpayer dollars should go to citizens and legal residents, not undocumented immigrants, and that it reduces incentives for illegal immigration. Critics, including the ACLU of Utah, Voices for Utah Children, health departments, and anti-hunger groups, say it's harmful—potentially endangering public health by limiting vaccines and disease treatment, hurting mixed-status families and kids, and creating barriers for nonprofits like food pantries. The bill will now move to the Utah House for debate. The bill does not currently have a Senate sponsor.

Utah Bill to Strip Public Assistance from Undocumented Immigrants, those in the state illegally Passes Committee 7-3 Utah lawmakers are debating House Bill 88, sponsored by Rep. Trevor Lee, a Republican from Layton. This bill would require strict verification of lawful presence in the U.S. before anyone 18 or older can receive most state or locally funded public benefits. It removes many current exceptions, meaning programs like WIC nutrition for women, infants, and children, food assistance, vaccinations, treatment for communicable diseases, housing aid, homeless services, and non-emergency health care could be off-limits to those without legal status. Emergency medical care and short-term disaster relief would still be allowed regardless of immigration status. Bill sponsor Rep. Trevor Lee, calls it a "priority bill to put Utahns first," arguing taxpayer dollars should go to citizens and legal residents, not undocumented immigrants, and that it reduces incentives for illegal immigration. Critics, including the ACLU of Utah, Voices for Utah Children, health departments, and anti-hunger groups, say it's harmful—potentially endangering public health by limiting vaccines and disease treatment, hurting mixed-status families and kids, and creating barriers for nonprofits like food pantries. The bill will now move to the Utah House for debate. The bill does not currently have a Senate sponsor.

Heidi Hatch KUTV

48,011 views • 5 months ago

Under President Donald J. Trump's leadership, we are restoring integrity to SNAP and making sure taxpayer dollars are serving the people who truly need them. 🇺🇸 We’ve already moved 4.3 million people off SNAP as more Americans return to work, cracked down on fraud with nearly 1,000 arrests, and approved 22 state waivers to remove soda and junk food from SNAP purchases. Now, we’re taking the next step to Make America Healthy Again. 🥕🥛🌾 For too long, loopholes allowed jelly to count as a fruit and jerky to count as a protein for stores accepting SNAP dollars. No more loopholes. If retailers want to participate in SNAP, they should be offering real, nutritious food to American families. That’s why USDA is raising the stocking standard minimum from 12 staple food items to 28 real food options on store shelves. We are strengthening nutrition, improving accountability, and ensuring SNAP works the way it was intended to work. This is an amazing start but there is much to still be accomplished!!

Under President Donald J. Trump's leadership, we are restoring integrity to SNAP and making sure taxpayer dollars are serving the people who truly need them. 🇺🇸 We’ve already moved 4.3 million people off SNAP as more Americans return to work, cracked down on fraud with nearly 1,000 arrests, and approved 22 state waivers to remove soda and junk food from SNAP purchases. Now, we’re taking the next step to Make America Healthy Again. 🥕🥛🌾 For too long, loopholes allowed jelly to count as a fruit and jerky to count as a protein for stores accepting SNAP dollars. No more loopholes. If retailers want to participate in SNAP, they should be offering real, nutritious food to American families. That’s why USDA is raising the stocking standard minimum from 12 staple food items to 28 real food options on store shelves. We are strengthening nutrition, improving accountability, and ensuring SNAP works the way it was intended to work. This is an amazing start but there is much to still be accomplished!!

Secretary Brooke Rollins

44,680 views • 2 months ago

Americans are realizing that eating junk food today makes them feel noticeably way worse than it used to make them feel in the past “I'm not sure if I'm the only one that's experienced this, but I really don't think that junk food hits the same way that it used to. I remember when I was young and I would eat junk food — you could eat like a bag of potato chips or like a Reese's Pieces and still feel like a functioning human after that. Now I feel like junk food just feels like irresponsible — like you just did noticeable damage to your body” “I'm pretty sure it's just because like junk food is now just like chemicals. Like, it used to just be like a lot of sugar. Now it's like you're just drinking pesticides — like a science experiment at this point” He’s right, many of our favorite “junk foods” and candies have been reformulated to be cheaper and last longer Here are just a few examples: Real milk chocolate changed to compound coating: Cocoa butter is expensive and temperature-sensitive so it was replaced in some products with vegetable oils mixed with cocoa powder Real peanut butter changed to peanut-butter-style crème. In certain seasonal or mini products, actual peanut butter was swapped for a cheaper, more shelf-stable crème made with vegetable oils and flavorings In Hostess Twinkies the Cream filling: Originally relied more on real dairy/milk components. These were largely replaced with a mixture of palm oil, corn syrup, and emulsifiers, mono- and diglycerides, sodium stearoyl lactylate Sugar changed to high-fructose corn syrup (HFCS): Widespread from the 1970s–2000s because HFCS was cheaper Frying oils have also changed for chips and other foods Our food is a science experiment

Americans are realizing that eating junk food today makes them feel noticeably way worse than it used to make them feel in the past “I'm not sure if I'm the only one that's experienced this, but I really don't think that junk food hits the same way that it used to. I remember when I was young and I would eat junk food — you could eat like a bag of potato chips or like a Reese's Pieces and still feel like a functioning human after that. Now I feel like junk food just feels like irresponsible — like you just did noticeable damage to your body” “I'm pretty sure it's just because like junk food is now just like chemicals. Like, it used to just be like a lot of sugar. Now it's like you're just drinking pesticides — like a science experiment at this point” He’s right, many of our favorite “junk foods” and candies have been reformulated to be cheaper and last longer Here are just a few examples: Real milk chocolate changed to compound coating: Cocoa butter is expensive and temperature-sensitive so it was replaced in some products with vegetable oils mixed with cocoa powder Real peanut butter changed to peanut-butter-style crème. In certain seasonal or mini products, actual peanut butter was swapped for a cheaper, more shelf-stable crème made with vegetable oils and flavorings In Hostess Twinkies the Cream filling: Originally relied more on real dairy/milk components. These were largely replaced with a mixture of palm oil, corn syrup, and emulsifiers, mono- and diglycerides, sodium stearoyl lactylate Sugar changed to high-fructose corn syrup (HFCS): Widespread from the 1970s–2000s because HFCS was cheaper Frying oils have also changed for chips and other foods Our food is a science experiment

Wall Street Apes

57,380 views • 6 days ago

🚨 “Ban Nick Shirley Bill” — AB 2624 A government that moves to limit transparency is a government that has something to hide. AB 2624: the “Ban Nick Shirley Bill” raises serious concerns about the future of investigative journalism in California. This bill would expand restrictions around recording and documenting inside certain facilities, including organizations that receive government funding. In practice, that means journalists and independent investigators could face legal penalties simply for documenting what’s happening inside taxpayer-funded operations. Think about that. The very people trying to expose fraud, abuse, or mismanagement could be the ones punished. This bill is backed by CHIRLA—an organization that has received millions in taxpayer funding over the years while also taking strong and often controversial positions on immigration policy and enforcement. Now the same ecosystem benefiting from public dollars is supporting legislation that could limit scrutiny and reduce transparency. Californians deserve the opposite. If taxpayer money is being spent, the public has a right to know how it’s being used. Journalists should be protected for exposing the truth—not threatened with penalties. Transparency isn’t optional

🚨 “Ban Nick Shirley Bill” — AB 2624 A government that moves to limit transparency is a government that has something to hide. AB 2624: the “Ban Nick Shirley Bill” raises serious concerns about the future of investigative journalism in California. This bill would expand restrictions around recording and documenting inside certain facilities, including organizations that receive government funding. In practice, that means journalists and independent investigators could face legal penalties simply for documenting what’s happening inside taxpayer-funded operations. Think about that. The very people trying to expose fraud, abuse, or mismanagement could be the ones punished. This bill is backed by CHIRLA—an organization that has received millions in taxpayer funding over the years while also taking strong and often controversial positions on immigration policy and enforcement. Now the same ecosystem benefiting from public dollars is supporting legislation that could limit scrutiny and reduce transparency. Californians deserve the opposite. If taxpayer money is being spent, the public has a right to know how it’s being used. Journalists should be protected for exposing the truth—not threatened with penalties. Transparency isn’t optional

David Tangipa

45,088 views • 3 months ago

Governor Gavin Newsom’s $50 million taxpayer dollars set aside to “Trump-Proof” California WILL go to defending CRIMINAL illegal aliens from deportation I’m not kidding, this is real. Also confirms more taxpayer money is about to be funneled to radical NGO groups California State Rep Bill Essayli, “So you're assuring us that none of this money will be used to defend criminal, illegal immigrants facing deportation. You're, gonna assure me of that?” Democrat California Assembly “I don't know that I can give you that level of guarantee” (So yes, they will be funding CRIMINAL illegal migrants fighting deportation) Bill Essayli “The grants that are gonna go to these nonprofit groups — What are they gonna do with the money? Would they use our tax dollars to defend illegal immigrants from deportation proceedings?” “This is incredibly tone deaf to be moving forward with these bills at this time. When we have residents who still are not in their homes, we should be focused on wildfire recovery, relief, and prevention.”

Governor Gavin Newsom’s $50 million taxpayer dollars set aside to “Trump-Proof” California WILL go to defending CRIMINAL illegal aliens from deportation I’m not kidding, this is real. Also confirms more taxpayer money is about to be funneled to radical NGO groups California State Rep Bill Essayli, “So you're assuring us that none of this money will be used to defend criminal, illegal immigrants facing deportation. You're, gonna assure me of that?” Democrat California Assembly “I don't know that I can give you that level of guarantee” (So yes, they will be funding CRIMINAL illegal migrants fighting deportation) Bill Essayli “The grants that are gonna go to these nonprofit groups — What are they gonna do with the money? Would they use our tax dollars to defend illegal immigrants from deportation proceedings?” “This is incredibly tone deaf to be moving forward with these bills at this time. When we have residents who still are not in their homes, we should be focused on wildfire recovery, relief, and prevention.”

Wall Street Apes

625,158 views • 1 year ago

US Taxpayers subsidize Coca Cola $10 BILLION dollars every year Congress has been cleverly hiding the funding in the annual “Farm bill” “Congress subsidizes Coca Cola to the tune of about $10,000,000,000 of taxpayer money every single year — We have this scam, otherwise known as the farm bill, which really should be known as the food stamp and big corporation bill passed by congress. The last one that we passed, the total amount was $428,000,000,000 with a b dollars and $328 billion of that $428 billion went directly to food stamp recipients to SNAP. — The government loads $328 billion of your tax care money on the EBT cards for SNAP recipients, and they go into the stores and they buy Coca Cola products, Frito Lay products, Pepsi products. This $10,000,000,000 is just to Coca Cola every year. Coca Cola gets between 5-20% of their annual revenue from the taxpayer dime. Ding ding ding. That right there is government waste. We could cut because if your products are so great and healthy for everybody. Why don't you stand on your own two feet, Coca Cola? Why don't you just operate without taxpayer money if you're so great? And the cherry on top is how our legislators have figured out they can play this little game and go back to their home voters and tell them how evil the farmers and ranchers are because of the farm bill and the subsidies. Meanwhile, 3/4 of it doesn't even go to the farmers, and it goes to all their buddies in big corporations. That's what your government has done. Congress, men, and women come back home and have the audacity to lie to the American people about what they have done to the American people's food supply.“

US Taxpayers subsidize Coca Cola $10 BILLION dollars every year Congress has been cleverly hiding the funding in the annual “Farm bill” “Congress subsidizes Coca Cola to the tune of about $10,000,000,000 of taxpayer money every single year — We have this scam, otherwise known as the farm bill, which really should be known as the food stamp and big corporation bill passed by congress. The last one that we passed, the total amount was $428,000,000,000 with a b dollars and $328 billion of that $428 billion went directly to food stamp recipients to SNAP. — The government loads $328 billion of your tax care money on the EBT cards for SNAP recipients, and they go into the stores and they buy Coca Cola products, Frito Lay products, Pepsi products. This $10,000,000,000 is just to Coca Cola every year. Coca Cola gets between 5-20% of their annual revenue from the taxpayer dime. Ding ding ding. That right there is government waste. We could cut because if your products are so great and healthy for everybody. Why don't you stand on your own two feet, Coca Cola? Why don't you just operate without taxpayer money if you're so great? And the cherry on top is how our legislators have figured out they can play this little game and go back to their home voters and tell them how evil the farmers and ranchers are because of the farm bill and the subsidies. Meanwhile, 3/4 of it doesn't even go to the farmers, and it goes to all their buddies in big corporations. That's what your government has done. Congress, men, and women come back home and have the audacity to lie to the American people about what they have done to the American people's food supply.“

Wall Street Apes

1,351,531 views • 1 year ago

NIH Director Jay Bhattacharya says he supports White Coat Waste’s mission, but under his leadership, NIH is still funding cruel taxpayer experiments in labs on puppies and other innocent animals. Did you know that your taxpayer dollars are being used to fund Beagles being deliberately infected with pneumonia, bled out, and left to die to study how quickly they will go into septic shock? These experiments are happening right now with federal taxpayer dollars under the current Trump administration. They can easily be ended with a directive from President Trump or Dr. Bhattacharya, demanding the termination of all funding of cruel animal testing and animal abuse in NIH funded labs. Dr. Bhattacharya has the authority to stop this TODAY with the swipe of his pen. We hope he does. Fauci used his power to abuse animals with your taxpayer money. It’s time for a new standard at NIH, one that values and protects LIFE. President Donald J. Trump has already shut down animal testing labs at the VA, USDA, and FDA. NIH should be next! Justin Goodman and I discuss.

NIH Director Jay Bhattacharya says he supports White Coat Waste’s mission, but under his leadership, NIH is still funding cruel taxpayer experiments in labs on puppies and other innocent animals. Did you know that your taxpayer dollars are being used to fund Beagles being deliberately infected with pneumonia, bled out, and left to die to study how quickly they will go into septic shock? These experiments are happening right now with federal taxpayer dollars under the current Trump administration. They can easily be ended with a directive from President Trump or Dr. Bhattacharya, demanding the termination of all funding of cruel animal testing and animal abuse in NIH funded labs. Dr. Bhattacharya has the authority to stop this TODAY with the swipe of his pen. We hope he does. Fauci used his power to abuse animals with your taxpayer money. It’s time for a new standard at NIH, one that values and protects LIFE. President Donald J. Trump has already shut down animal testing labs at the VA, USDA, and FDA. NIH should be next! Justin Goodman and I discuss.

Laura Loomer

64,158 views • 1 year ago

Alcohol industry exposed! Every single food and drink company right from biscuits, noodles, chocolates, chips soft drinks all HAVE TO display a nutrition label. But the alcohol industry does NOT have to display any label. Even though water has 0 calories, it is still mandatory for packaged drinking water to display nutrition label. Then why does alcohol have no nutrition label? The answer is lobbying. Alcohol companies strongly lobby for the government to not have labels be mandatory. I understand that even if there was a label, it wouldn’t stop drinkers, but instead of having 3-4 drinks, they would cut back a little bit. Not only nutrition labels, alcohol industry does not even have clear warning labels. Just the way cigarettes display a clear warning label, there should be one for alcohol outlining its health risks. Alcohol has become a rampage amongst the youth in India and we need to get together to reduce it’s consumption! That’s why I started a petition to have the government make it mandatory for both of these labels to be on every alcohol bottle. Sign, share, and be a part of the movement!

Alcohol industry exposed! Every single food and drink company right from biscuits, noodles, chocolates, chips soft drinks all HAVE TO display a nutrition label. But the alcohol industry does NOT have to display any label. Even though water has 0 calories, it is still mandatory for packaged drinking water to display nutrition label. Then why does alcohol have no nutrition label? The answer is lobbying. Alcohol companies strongly lobby for the government to not have labels be mandatory. I understand that even if there was a label, it wouldn’t stop drinkers, but instead of having 3-4 drinks, they would cut back a little bit. Not only nutrition labels, alcohol industry does not even have clear warning labels. Just the way cigarettes display a clear warning label, there should be one for alcohol outlining its health risks. Alcohol has become a rampage amongst the youth in India and we need to get together to reduce it’s consumption! That’s why I started a petition to have the government make it mandatory for both of these labels to be on every alcohol bottle. Sign, share, and be a part of the movement!

Revant Himatsingka “Food Pharmer”

573,641 views • 1 year ago

There was context: Soyeon being a well-known vegetable hater. Seeing her broccoli IG story should make you go “Wow, she’s trying to eat veggies?!”, not “She has ED.” Unsurprisingly, we were right. She was at a Buddhist temple that only served vegetarian food. She put as little as possible on her plate and swallowed it without chewing just to get through. This is yet another example of why criticisms toward i-dle and Soyeon from stantwt (especially aespa stans who started the hate train) are never valid and should always be dismissed. They’ve proven time and again they just hate her and will always try to make her look bad. If they really cared about EDs, they’d praise her whenever she posts photos of her eating full meals or junk food. The fact that they don’t means it’s all fake concern.

There was context: Soyeon being a well-known vegetable hater. Seeing her broccoli IG story should make you go “Wow, she’s trying to eat veggies?!”, not “She has ED.” Unsurprisingly, we were right. She was at a Buddhist temple that only served vegetarian food. She put as little as possible on her plate and swallowed it without chewing just to get through. This is yet another example of why criticisms toward i-dle and Soyeon from stantwt (especially aespa stans who started the hate train) are never valid and should always be dismissed. They’ve proven time and again they just hate her and will always try to make her look bad. If they really cared about EDs, they’d praise her whenever she posts photos of her eating full meals or junk food. The fact that they don’t means it’s all fake concern.

RainySeason

27,797 views • 3 months ago

“They're giving the middle finger to MAHA.” House Republicans are still planning to slip Section 453 into the upcoming spending bill, which would provide pesticide companies immunity from being sued for the harm they cause. People like Brett Cooper are calling them out directly. “House Republicans are slipping something into our new spending bill.” “It is Section 453, which would give immunity to huge pesticide companies.” “I think it would cover 57,000 different chemicals.” “These are chemicals that have been linked to cancer, Parkinson's, and infertility.” “And House Republicans are just slipping it in.” This should not be a political issue. It doesn’t matter which side of the aisle you usually align with. If a company makes a dangerous product that harms you or your family, you should have the right to sue them and hold them accountable. It’s hard to overstate how important it is that we do not allow this to go through. We need to get loud on this issue now, before it’s too late.

“They're giving the middle finger to MAHA.” House Republicans are still planning to slip Section 453 into the upcoming spending bill, which would provide pesticide companies immunity from being sued for the harm they cause. People like Brett Cooper are calling them out directly. “House Republicans are slipping something into our new spending bill.” “It is Section 453, which would give immunity to huge pesticide companies.” “I think it would cover 57,000 different chemicals.” “These are chemicals that have been linked to cancer, Parkinson's, and infertility.” “And House Republicans are just slipping it in.” This should not be a political issue. It doesn’t matter which side of the aisle you usually align with. If a company makes a dangerous product that harms you or your family, you should have the right to sue them and hold them accountable. It’s hard to overstate how important it is that we do not allow this to go through. We need to get loud on this issue now, before it’s too late.

End Tribalism in Politics

244,998 views • 6 months ago

Bill Ackman Bill Ackman discusses President Trump's battle with Harvard. Bill Ackman: "The wrong thing to do is receive a letter from the Administration and write back saying: we're doing nothing and in fact, we're going to sue you." "What Harvard should have done is say: President Trump - you make some good points. Taxpayer money coming to Harvard is a privilege, not a right." Taxpayer money going to an institution - an institution cannot have massive amounts of administrative bloat, waste, bureaucracy- we're going to eliminate it." Bill Ackman goes further on the culture at Harvard. "There is not viewpoint diversity at Harvard. Students are self-censoring their remarks in classrooms. Faculty are doing the same - people are afraid to have real conversations. You go to college to be exposed to a broad array of ideas - and that's not happening at Harvard. Free speech is not happening." On Trump trying to make a deal with Harvard. "He (President Trump) wants to make a deal. Make a deal with the President. Commit to fix these things, which by the way, your alumni want you to fix - it's in the best interest of Harvard. Treat shareholder taxpayer money as a fiduciary." Fair or unfair to take the tax exempt status away? "I think it's fair. Harvard became over time a political advocacy organization for one party. When a University goes from being a University to effecting and becoming a political activist organization - it doesn't deserve a non-profit status." "Harvard should be a place where students go to learn and the best research gets done. It shouldn't be a place that is allowing pro-terrorist orgs on campus and only allows certain kinds of thinking and speech on campus - that's a political advocacy organization - not a University."

Bill Ackman Bill Ackman discusses President Trump's battle with Harvard. Bill Ackman: "The wrong thing to do is receive a letter from the Administration and write back saying: we're doing nothing and in fact, we're going to sue you." "What Harvard should have done is say: President Trump - you make some good points. Taxpayer money coming to Harvard is a privilege, not a right." Taxpayer money going to an institution - an institution cannot have massive amounts of administrative bloat, waste, bureaucracy- we're going to eliminate it." Bill Ackman goes further on the culture at Harvard. "There is not viewpoint diversity at Harvard. Students are self-censoring their remarks in classrooms. Faculty are doing the same - people are afraid to have real conversations. You go to college to be exposed to a broad array of ideas - and that's not happening at Harvard. Free speech is not happening." On Trump trying to make a deal with Harvard. "He (President Trump) wants to make a deal. Make a deal with the President. Commit to fix these things, which by the way, your alumni want you to fix - it's in the best interest of Harvard. Treat shareholder taxpayer money as a fiduciary." Fair or unfair to take the tax exempt status away? "I think it's fair. Harvard became over time a political advocacy organization for one party. When a University goes from being a University to effecting and becoming a political activist organization - it doesn't deserve a non-profit status." "Harvard should be a place where students go to learn and the best research gets done. It shouldn't be a place that is allowing pro-terrorist orgs on campus and only allows certain kinds of thinking and speech on campus - that's a political advocacy organization - not a University."

Barbie True Blue

712,341 views • 1 year ago

EXTREMELY IMPORTANT 🚨 Our Food Is About To Be Poisoned With NEW “Transgenic Edible Vaccines” They’re Being Funded Right Now BY TAXPAYERS, mRNA Food Vaccine FACTORIES Kamala Harris Administration has been using US Tax Payer money to fund the development “Mr. Chairman, I rise in support of my amendment, which states that none of the funds made available by this act may be used to fund any grant related to any transgenic edible vaccine. Does the term transgenic edible vaccine sound far-fetched? Well, it's not. We're funding it. In fact, scientists from the University of California, Riverside, funded with your taxpayer dollars, have been studying whether they can turn edible plants such as lettuce and spinach into mRNA vaccine factories, thereby creating a transgenic edible vaccine.” “One associate professor at UCR explained that, ideally a single plant would produce enough mRNA to vaccinate a single person.” “We are testing this approach with spinach and lettuce and have long-term goals of people growing it in their own gardens. Farmers could also eventually grow entire fields of it. I don't think this is a good idea.” “I don't think the American people should be funding this.” — “These transgenic edible plant vaccines, are only used for livestock. Well, in fact, they have been used for livestock.” “They're also being used for people. That is the intended outcome of many of these programs that we are funding, funding with money from the USDA.” “I think we need a safe food supply. This is about food safety. Ultimately, the people in this country need to know what's in their food. And if we start contaminating the DNA of our food with DNA from other animals or viruses, the pollen could spread, and we don't know what could happen.”

EXTREMELY IMPORTANT 🚨 Our Food Is About To Be Poisoned With NEW “Transgenic Edible Vaccines” They’re Being Funded Right Now BY TAXPAYERS, mRNA Food Vaccine FACTORIES Kamala Harris Administration has been using US Tax Payer money to fund the development “Mr. Chairman, I rise in support of my amendment, which states that none of the funds made available by this act may be used to fund any grant related to any transgenic edible vaccine. Does the term transgenic edible vaccine sound far-fetched? Well, it's not. We're funding it. In fact, scientists from the University of California, Riverside, funded with your taxpayer dollars, have been studying whether they can turn edible plants such as lettuce and spinach into mRNA vaccine factories, thereby creating a transgenic edible vaccine.” “One associate professor at UCR explained that, ideally a single plant would produce enough mRNA to vaccinate a single person.” “We are testing this approach with spinach and lettuce and have long-term goals of people growing it in their own gardens. Farmers could also eventually grow entire fields of it. I don't think this is a good idea.” “I don't think the American people should be funding this.” — “These transgenic edible plant vaccines, are only used for livestock. Well, in fact, they have been used for livestock.” “They're also being used for people. That is the intended outcome of many of these programs that we are funding, funding with money from the USDA.” “I think we need a safe food supply. This is about food safety. Ultimately, the people in this country need to know what's in their food. And if we start contaminating the DNA of our food with DNA from other animals or viruses, the pollen could spread, and we don't know what could happen.”

Wall Street Apes

2,434,696 views • 1 year ago

SHOCKER: Dr. Oz just EXPOSED the jaw-dropping fraud bleeding America’s healthcare system dry—and says a war room is now hunting down the abusers. The examples he laid out? Absolutely mind-blowing. Every single one is a bombshell: “Almost a quarter million people, American citizens were fraudulently enrolled, without their knowledge, in exchange programs by brokers.” “Tens of millions of dollars… are being spent on illegal immigrants receive Medicaid in California and pushing the bill to us.” “We are spending about a billion dollars on Medicaid programs for dual state eligible patients… we’re paying all three states for services you’re not getting because you don’t live in three states all at once.” And it gets even more outrageous. Medicaid dollars are being funneled into non-medical perks: “Public labor unions are getting childcare through some of this money—Housekeeping! I wish I could get that for my home.” “There’s a big problem with student loan repayments taking place with Medicaid dollars. That’s not where it should be used.” “And we are paying for DEI programs.” Dr. Oz says enough is enough. “We have created a war room at CMS to go after, to catch the fraud in real time before the money leaves the federal coffers.” This isn’t a reform. It’s a reckoning.

SHOCKER: Dr. Oz just EXPOSED the jaw-dropping fraud bleeding America’s healthcare system dry—and says a war room is now hunting down the abusers. The examples he laid out? Absolutely mind-blowing. Every single one is a bombshell: “Almost a quarter million people, American citizens were fraudulently enrolled, without their knowledge, in exchange programs by brokers.” “Tens of millions of dollars… are being spent on illegal immigrants receive Medicaid in California and pushing the bill to us.” “We are spending about a billion dollars on Medicaid programs for dual state eligible patients… we’re paying all three states for services you’re not getting because you don’t live in three states all at once.” And it gets even more outrageous. Medicaid dollars are being funneled into non-medical perks: “Public labor unions are getting childcare through some of this money—Housekeeping! I wish I could get that for my home.” “There’s a big problem with student loan repayments taking place with Medicaid dollars. That’s not where it should be used.” “And we are paying for DEI programs.” Dr. Oz says enough is enough. “We have created a war room at CMS to go after, to catch the fraud in real time before the money leaves the federal coffers.” This isn’t a reform. It’s a reckoning.

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

2,040,198 views • 1 year ago