ะ—ะฐะณั€ัƒะทะบะฐ ะฒะธะดะตะพ...

ะะต ัƒะดะฐะปะพััŒ ะทะฐะณั€ัƒะทะธั‚ัŒ ะฒะธะดะตะพ

ะะฐ ะณะปะฐะฒะฝัƒัŽ

๐†๐€๐ƒ ๐’๐€๐€๐ƒ ๐‚๐Ž๐‘๐‘๐„๐‚๐“๐’ ๐€ ๐‡๐Ž๐’๐“ ๐…๐Ž๐‘ ๐’๐€๐˜๐ˆ๐๐† โ€œ๐‘๐€๐ƒ๐ˆ๐‚๐€๐‹ ๐ˆ๐’๐‹๐€๐Œโ€: โ€œ๐“๐‡๐„๐‘๐„โ€™๐’ ๐‰๐”๐’๐“ ๐ˆ๐’๐‹๐€๐Œโ€ Gad Saad โ€” the Lebanese-born psychologist who grew up amid the Lebanese civil war โ€” stopped a podcast host mid-sentence over two words: โ€œ๐˜ณ๐˜ข๐˜ฅ๐˜ช๐˜ค๐˜ข๐˜ญ ๐˜๐˜ด๐˜ญ๐˜ข๐˜ฎ.โ€ His challenge: name the canonical texts that โ€œ๐˜ณ๐˜ข๐˜ฅ๐˜ช๐˜ค๐˜ข๐˜ญ ๐˜๐˜ด๐˜ญ๐˜ข๐˜ฎโ€ follows that mainstream...

MichaelARothman's profile picture

M.A. Rothman

93,622 subscribers

127,232 ะฟั€ะพัะผะพั‚ั€ะพะฒ โ€ข 2 ะผะตััั†ะตะฒ ะฝะฐะทะฐะด โ€ขvia X (Twitter)

ะะพะฒะพัั‚ะธ ะธ ะฟะพะปะธั‚ะธะบะฐ
LIVE

Anya Rossiโ€ข Live Now

Private livecam show

ะšะพะผะผะตะฝั‚ะฐั€ะธะธ: 0

ะะตั‚ ะดะพัั‚ัƒะฟะฝั‹ั… ะบะพะผะผะตะฝั‚ะฐั€ะธะตะฒ

ะ—ะดะตััŒ ะฟะพัะฒัั‚ัั ะบะพะผะผะตะฝั‚ะฐั€ะธะธ ะธะท ะพั€ะธะณะธะฝะฐะปัŒะฝะพะณะพ ะฟะพัั‚ะฐ

ะŸะพั…ะพะถะธะต ะฒะธะดะตะพ

We never see in scripture Jesus calling Mary โ€œmotherโ€. He never called her mother, but woman. So why should we call Mary something Jesus did not? According to Jewish Custom it was the expectation of the firstborn to care for the welfare of his widowed mother. Jesus chose to leave the welfare of his widowed mother to John, who was a believer and was present, rather than entrusting her to His half brothers, who were not believers at the time and who were not even present at His crucifixion. There is no contextual proof within Scripture itself that would point to Jesus broadening Maryโ€™s role as โ€œmotherโ€ of all Christians. Words have meaning and it is defined by the context. You should understand the overall context before you create meaning and doctrine.
2:31

We never see in scripture Jesus calling Mary โ€œmotherโ€. He never called her mother, but woman. So why should we call Mary something Jesus did not? According to Jewish Custom it was the expectation of the firstborn to care for the welfare of his widowed mother. Jesus chose to leave the welfare of his widowed mother to John, who was a believer and was present, rather than entrusting her to His half brothers, who were not believers at the time and who were not even present at His crucifixion. There is no contextual proof within Scripture itself that would point to Jesus broadening Maryโ€™s role as โ€œmotherโ€ of all Christians. Words have meaning and it is defined by the context. You should understand the overall context before you create meaning and doctrine.

The Bible In Context

46,432 ะฟั€ะพัะผะพั‚ั€ะพะฒ โ€ข 10 ะผะตััั†ะตะฒ ะฝะฐะทะฐะด

Gad Saad warns โ€˜suicidal empathyโ€™ is pushing the West toward collapse | Rachel Wolf, Fox News From reactions to the Oct. 7 Hamas attacks to gender ideology and diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI), author and scholar Gad Saad warns that Western civilization is on the brink of collapse. In his new book, "Suicidal Empathy: Dying to Be Kind," Saad argues that the West has taken compassion to a dangerous place by prioritizing ideological virtue-signaling over truth and common sense. "I'm not in the least bit arguing that empathy is a bad thing, but just like Aristotle explained to us several millennia ago, all good things in moderation," Saad told Fox News Digital. "If you're not in the least bit empathetic, you're likely to be a psychopath, if you are too empathetic, if it hyperactivates, if it targets the wrong people in the wrong circumstances, then that becomes suicidal empathy," he explained. Saad points to the West's reaction after Hamas' Oct. 7 massacre in Israel as an example of the phenomenon, noting that sympathy quickly shifted away from Israeli victims as criticism of Israel's military response in Gaza grew. "You would have thought that the orgiastic depraved killing of 1,200 mainly Jewish people... the worst single day massacre of Jews since the Holocaust would have afforded the world an opportunity to exhibit empathy towards the Jews. Well, alas, as we very quickly found out, October 7th was forgotten," Saad said. For Saad, the backlash against Israel in the aftermath of the Hamas attacks reflected ideological shifts that had been taking place in the West for decades. He argued that misplaced empathy eventually morphs into what he calls "civilizational seppuku," referring to a ritual suicide historically associated with Japanese samurai. According to Saad, many of these ideas began on university campuses and later spread into politics, the media and culture. The result, he said, is a culture that is increasingly uncomfortable with objective definitions of what were once considered to be basic concepts, such as gender. "Once you are fully parasitized, you end up with your most recent addition to the US Supreme Court, not having the self-assuredness to say, โ€˜Oh, of course I know what a woman is,โ€™" he said, referring to an infamous moment from Justice Katanji Brown Jackson's 2022 confirmation hearing. Sen. Marsha Blackburn, R-Tenn., asked Jackson to define the word "woman." Jackson refused, stating that "I'm not a biologist." When speaking with Fox News Digital, Saad mocked Jackson's answer, saying that ordinary people routinely recognize obvious realities without seeking specialized expertise. "By that logic, when I next have to choose which type of Belgian shepherd to bring into my home, I better seek the help of a veterinarian. Because I might simply choose a giraffe to be my Belgian shepherd, because I don't have the expertise to distinguish between the quadrupedal giraffe and the quadrupedal dog." While Saad views the debate as absurd on its face, he believes the worldview behind it can have serious real-world consequences, such as antisemitism. "A society that normalizes Jew hatred is exhibiting huge signs of moral decay," he told Fox News Digital. Saad, who is Jewish, was born in Lebanon but fled the country with his family in 1975 during the civil war and eventually settled in Canada. He told Fox News Digital that while in Canada, he did not experience much antisemitism until 1998, adding that since then "it has been accelerating at a rather breathtaking rate." While working as a professor at Concordia University, Saad announced that he was taking a leave of absence in 2024. "It became very, very difficult for, you know, a high-profile Jewish professor who's outspoken in his defense of the Jewish people to just walk in on campus," Saad said. He added that the atmosphere became serious enough that he felt compelled to "read the warning on the proverbial walls." "If you permit for such open, genocidal hatred of a group, it never results in a good outcome," he said. Saad currently serves as a scholar at the Declaration of Independence Center for the Study of American Freedom at the University of Mississippi and will be a distinguished professor there next year. With the election of President Donald Trump, many thought that the ideas behind DEI and gender theory were dead, but Saad warned there is only so much one president can do and emphasized the importance of medium and long-term solutions. He noted that while political momentum can shift quickly, true cultural change takes time. Even with the apparent backlash against these ideologies, Saad still encounters professors who are afraid to speak out. He told Fox News Digital that he's seen a slight increase in the number of professors who email him praising his work, but many of them end their messages by asking for anonymity if he chooses to share them. "The fact that you write such a cowardly last sentence to your email suggests that very few people are yet willing to pick up the mantle and actually fight this battle," he said.
5:48

Gad Saad warns โ€˜suicidal empathyโ€™ is pushing the West toward collapse | Rachel Wolf, Fox News From reactions to the Oct. 7 Hamas attacks to gender ideology and diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI), author and scholar Gad Saad warns that Western civilization is on the brink of collapse. In his new book, "Suicidal Empathy: Dying to Be Kind," Saad argues that the West has taken compassion to a dangerous place by prioritizing ideological virtue-signaling over truth and common sense. "I'm not in the least bit arguing that empathy is a bad thing, but just like Aristotle explained to us several millennia ago, all good things in moderation," Saad told Fox News Digital. "If you're not in the least bit empathetic, you're likely to be a psychopath, if you are too empathetic, if it hyperactivates, if it targets the wrong people in the wrong circumstances, then that becomes suicidal empathy," he explained. Saad points to the West's reaction after Hamas' Oct. 7 massacre in Israel as an example of the phenomenon, noting that sympathy quickly shifted away from Israeli victims as criticism of Israel's military response in Gaza grew. "You would have thought that the orgiastic depraved killing of 1,200 mainly Jewish people... the worst single day massacre of Jews since the Holocaust would have afforded the world an opportunity to exhibit empathy towards the Jews. Well, alas, as we very quickly found out, October 7th was forgotten," Saad said. For Saad, the backlash against Israel in the aftermath of the Hamas attacks reflected ideological shifts that had been taking place in the West for decades. He argued that misplaced empathy eventually morphs into what he calls "civilizational seppuku," referring to a ritual suicide historically associated with Japanese samurai. According to Saad, many of these ideas began on university campuses and later spread into politics, the media and culture. The result, he said, is a culture that is increasingly uncomfortable with objective definitions of what were once considered to be basic concepts, such as gender. "Once you are fully parasitized, you end up with your most recent addition to the US Supreme Court, not having the self-assuredness to say, โ€˜Oh, of course I know what a woman is,โ€™" he said, referring to an infamous moment from Justice Katanji Brown Jackson's 2022 confirmation hearing. Sen. Marsha Blackburn, R-Tenn., asked Jackson to define the word "woman." Jackson refused, stating that "I'm not a biologist." When speaking with Fox News Digital, Saad mocked Jackson's answer, saying that ordinary people routinely recognize obvious realities without seeking specialized expertise. "By that logic, when I next have to choose which type of Belgian shepherd to bring into my home, I better seek the help of a veterinarian. Because I might simply choose a giraffe to be my Belgian shepherd, because I don't have the expertise to distinguish between the quadrupedal giraffe and the quadrupedal dog." While Saad views the debate as absurd on its face, he believes the worldview behind it can have serious real-world consequences, such as antisemitism. "A society that normalizes Jew hatred is exhibiting huge signs of moral decay," he told Fox News Digital. Saad, who is Jewish, was born in Lebanon but fled the country with his family in 1975 during the civil war and eventually settled in Canada. He told Fox News Digital that while in Canada, he did not experience much antisemitism until 1998, adding that since then "it has been accelerating at a rather breathtaking rate." While working as a professor at Concordia University, Saad announced that he was taking a leave of absence in 2024. "It became very, very difficult for, you know, a high-profile Jewish professor who's outspoken in his defense of the Jewish people to just walk in on campus," Saad said. He added that the atmosphere became serious enough that he felt compelled to "read the warning on the proverbial walls." "If you permit for such open, genocidal hatred of a group, it never results in a good outcome," he said. Saad currently serves as a scholar at the Declaration of Independence Center for the Study of American Freedom at the University of Mississippi and will be a distinguished professor there next year. With the election of President Donald Trump, many thought that the ideas behind DEI and gender theory were dead, but Saad warned there is only so much one president can do and emphasized the importance of medium and long-term solutions. He noted that while political momentum can shift quickly, true cultural change takes time. Even with the apparent backlash against these ideologies, Saad still encounters professors who are afraid to speak out. He told Fox News Digital that he's seen a slight increase in the number of professors who email him praising his work, but many of them end their messages by asking for anonymity if he chooses to share them. "The fact that you write such a cowardly last sentence to your email suggests that very few people are yet willing to pick up the mantle and actually fight this battle," he said.

Owen Gregorian

19,480 ะฟั€ะพัะผะพั‚ั€ะพะฒ โ€ข 2 ะผะตััั†ะตะฒ ะฝะฐะทะฐะด

There was no such thing as Palestine in 1000 BC. In fact, "Palestine" is a word that's made up, and there is some suggestion that Herodotus used the term as a play on words in the Greek period to refer to the Philistine people. The Philistines, by the way, have nothing to do with modern Palestinians, modern Muslim Arabs. They are a non-Semitic people. They are an Indo-European people. They're a Greek people who spoke an Indo-European language, derivative of Greek, and who invaded, not just northern Egypt, but also southwestern Israel, the land we now know as Gaza, at around that time, about 1,000 years before the Romans arrived. The Philistines fought, and this plays out in the Bible, they fought many wars against their rivals. Not just on the western side with the Egyptians, but also on the eastern side with the Jews. And of course, the famous battle with Goliath and David is a battle between the Jews and the Philistines. The point is that by the time of the Greeks, the Philistines had already died out. And Herodotus was playfully making a play on words with the name Israel. The name Israel, as you know, is Hebrew for "He who wrestles with God." And so the Greek word, the ancient Greek word for wrestler, he who wrestles, is "Palaistine." And so since the Philistines were in that land, he had called it Palaistine as a play, a transliteration of the Jewish word or the Hebrew word Israel, He who wrestles with God. The word then disappears from the lexicon, and then there is the Roman conquest of Judea, the land of Israel. Judea, by the way, in Hebrew is just Yehudia. Jew is Yehudi. Yehudia is therefore land of the Jews, the place where the Jews are from. That's the land that the Romans conquered in 63 BC, and the Jews didn't like being conquered by the Romans for a variety of reasons, and they revolted three times. In the third and final revolt of 132 to 135 AD, which we know as the Bar Kokhba revolt, after its leader Simon Bar Kokhba, Simon being the name Shimon, an ancient Jewish name and the second tribe of Israel, but also Bar Kokhba meaning son of the star in Hebrew. In 135 AD, Hadrian, the emperor of Rome, says, "We're done with these Jews. They have rebelled not once, not twice, not three now three times. They do not accept our magnanimity. We have to wipe out any memory of the Jewish presence on this land." And so he does two big things. He first destroys Jerusalem, and he renames it. The Romans like to rename things in order to erase their history. So he changes the name from Yerushalayim, Jerusalem, to Aelia Capitolina. Aelia for his family, the Aelia clan from Spain, and Capitolina for Jupiter Capitolinus, who's the sky god of the Romans. And then he renames the land Judea after the Philistines again and calls it Palestina. And he did that both to punish the Jews and erase any connection between the Jews and their land, but also because he knew that if he named it after a people who had been dead and extinct in the archeological record for a thousand years, there was no risk that they would show up and say, "Hey, the land is our land. You named it after us." So it was a safe way to rename the land. He named it Palestina. I don't think he ever could have imagined just how brilliant the idea would play with young college students in American campuses 2,000 years later.
8:51

There was no such thing as Palestine in 1000 BC. In fact, "Palestine" is a word that's made up, and there is some suggestion that Herodotus used the term as a play on words in the Greek period to refer to the Philistine people. The Philistines, by the way, have nothing to do with modern Palestinians, modern Muslim Arabs. They are a non-Semitic people. They are an Indo-European people. They're a Greek people who spoke an Indo-European language, derivative of Greek, and who invaded, not just northern Egypt, but also southwestern Israel, the land we now know as Gaza, at around that time, about 1,000 years before the Romans arrived. The Philistines fought, and this plays out in the Bible, they fought many wars against their rivals. Not just on the western side with the Egyptians, but also on the eastern side with the Jews. And of course, the famous battle with Goliath and David is a battle between the Jews and the Philistines. The point is that by the time of the Greeks, the Philistines had already died out. And Herodotus was playfully making a play on words with the name Israel. The name Israel, as you know, is Hebrew for "He who wrestles with God." And so the Greek word, the ancient Greek word for wrestler, he who wrestles, is "Palaistine." And so since the Philistines were in that land, he had called it Palaistine as a play, a transliteration of the Jewish word or the Hebrew word Israel, He who wrestles with God. The word then disappears from the lexicon, and then there is the Roman conquest of Judea, the land of Israel. Judea, by the way, in Hebrew is just Yehudia. Jew is Yehudi. Yehudia is therefore land of the Jews, the place where the Jews are from. That's the land that the Romans conquered in 63 BC, and the Jews didn't like being conquered by the Romans for a variety of reasons, and they revolted three times. In the third and final revolt of 132 to 135 AD, which we know as the Bar Kokhba revolt, after its leader Simon Bar Kokhba, Simon being the name Shimon, an ancient Jewish name and the second tribe of Israel, but also Bar Kokhba meaning son of the star in Hebrew. In 135 AD, Hadrian, the emperor of Rome, says, "We're done with these Jews. They have rebelled not once, not twice, not three now three times. They do not accept our magnanimity. We have to wipe out any memory of the Jewish presence on this land." And so he does two big things. He first destroys Jerusalem, and he renames it. The Romans like to rename things in order to erase their history. So he changes the name from Yerushalayim, Jerusalem, to Aelia Capitolina. Aelia for his family, the Aelia clan from Spain, and Capitolina for Jupiter Capitolinus, who's the sky god of the Romans. And then he renames the land Judea after the Philistines again and calls it Palestina. And he did that both to punish the Jews and erase any connection between the Jews and their land, but also because he knew that if he named it after a people who had been dead and extinct in the archeological record for a thousand years, there was no risk that they would show up and say, "Hey, the land is our land. You named it after us." So it was a safe way to rename the land. He named it Palestina. I don't think he ever could have imagined just how brilliant the idea would play with young college students in American campuses 2,000 years later.

Roy K. Altman

28,424 ะฟั€ะพัะผะพั‚ั€ะพะฒ โ€ข 1 ะผะตััั† ะฝะฐะทะฐะด

At a Q&A, John MacArthur is asked about Christian nationalism. The kingdom of God is not of this world. Jesus said that. He said, โ€œMy kingdom is not of this world. If My kingdom were of this world, My servants would [fight].โ€ His kingdom is not of this world. The kingdom of this world is a separate world; theyโ€™re not linked together. Let me say it another way: Nothing that happens in any nation, whether itโ€™s a Communist nation, a Muslim nation, or a โ€œquasi-Christianโ€ nation, or an atheistic nationโ€”nothing in that nation politically, socially has anything to do with the advancement of the kingdom of God, because the kingdom of God is separate from that system. God, in His sovereignty, is building His church, โ€œand the gates of Hades will not prevail against it,โ€ Jesus said. So the idea that you should link up some political effort, some political process, some social process, some gain of power or influence in a culture as part of the advance of Christianity is alien to Christianity. You never have our Lord approaching anything like that, nor the apostles, and particularly the apostle Paul. He sought to gain no favor with the Roman Empire whatsoever, or for that matter, with any other of the rulers that he ran into during his life. Now, that is not to say that we are indifferent to what happens in the nation. Weโ€™ve been talking about that the last couple of Sunday mornings. We have to be the people who uphold righteousness. When we come to vote, we want to vote for that which is the most righteous option. Obviously, we canโ€™t vote in righteousness, but we have to vote in a way that reflects our commitment to the righteousness of God. So we couldnโ€™t possibly elect somebody who was an abortionist, somebody who was LGBTQ or LGBTQ-affirming, or any other deviation from Godโ€™s righteous moral standard. So it gets harder, doesnโ€™t it, nowadays, because even sometimes when politicians are more conservative and anti-abortion, they may be sinful and wicked in some other categories, and itโ€™s very hard to find out who is really honest and who is simply dishonest and seeking power. But in the end, we do what we can with the understanding that the responsibility of the church is not to advance the kingdom of this world. Thatโ€™s a faulty viewpoint. Christian nationalism is usually tied to what is called post-millennialism, and that is the view that the church, somehow, by influencing the culture, can bring in the kingdom of Christ. In other words, itโ€™s the idea not that Christ returns and sets up His kingdom, but that the church establishes His kingdom and then hands it to Him. That is not what Scripture teaches. What Scripture teaches is what weโ€™re learning from the book of Revelation. Things are going to get worse and worse and worse. And the end of human history is not the church triumphant, reigning in the world and taking over the structures of human kingdoms; thatโ€™s not what happens. At the end of human history, the believers are persecuted and murdered, and thatโ€™s the very opposite of what Christian nationalism would anticipate. So we believe the Bible teaches that things get worse and worse, headed toward the wrath of God, which weโ€™re seeing in Revelation, and then our Lord returns, Himself, to establish His kingdom is clearly what we read in the book of Revelation. OK?
5:08

At a Q&A, John MacArthur is asked about Christian nationalism. The kingdom of God is not of this world. Jesus said that. He said, โ€œMy kingdom is not of this world. If My kingdom were of this world, My servants would [fight].โ€ His kingdom is not of this world. The kingdom of this world is a separate world; theyโ€™re not linked together. Let me say it another way: Nothing that happens in any nation, whether itโ€™s a Communist nation, a Muslim nation, or a โ€œquasi-Christianโ€ nation, or an atheistic nationโ€”nothing in that nation politically, socially has anything to do with the advancement of the kingdom of God, because the kingdom of God is separate from that system. God, in His sovereignty, is building His church, โ€œand the gates of Hades will not prevail against it,โ€ Jesus said. So the idea that you should link up some political effort, some political process, some social process, some gain of power or influence in a culture as part of the advance of Christianity is alien to Christianity. You never have our Lord approaching anything like that, nor the apostles, and particularly the apostle Paul. He sought to gain no favor with the Roman Empire whatsoever, or for that matter, with any other of the rulers that he ran into during his life. Now, that is not to say that we are indifferent to what happens in the nation. Weโ€™ve been talking about that the last couple of Sunday mornings. We have to be the people who uphold righteousness. When we come to vote, we want to vote for that which is the most righteous option. Obviously, we canโ€™t vote in righteousness, but we have to vote in a way that reflects our commitment to the righteousness of God. So we couldnโ€™t possibly elect somebody who was an abortionist, somebody who was LGBTQ or LGBTQ-affirming, or any other deviation from Godโ€™s righteous moral standard. So it gets harder, doesnโ€™t it, nowadays, because even sometimes when politicians are more conservative and anti-abortion, they may be sinful and wicked in some other categories, and itโ€™s very hard to find out who is really honest and who is simply dishonest and seeking power. But in the end, we do what we can with the understanding that the responsibility of the church is not to advance the kingdom of this world. Thatโ€™s a faulty viewpoint. Christian nationalism is usually tied to what is called post-millennialism, and that is the view that the church, somehow, by influencing the culture, can bring in the kingdom of Christ. In other words, itโ€™s the idea not that Christ returns and sets up His kingdom, but that the church establishes His kingdom and then hands it to Him. That is not what Scripture teaches. What Scripture teaches is what weโ€™re learning from the book of Revelation. Things are going to get worse and worse and worse. And the end of human history is not the church triumphant, reigning in the world and taking over the structures of human kingdoms; thatโ€™s not what happens. At the end of human history, the believers are persecuted and murdered, and thatโ€™s the very opposite of what Christian nationalism would anticipate. So we believe the Bible teaches that things get worse and worse, headed toward the wrath of God, which weโ€™re seeing in Revelation, and then our Lord returns, Himself, to establish His kingdom is clearly what we read in the book of Revelation. OK?

Terri Green

13,029 ะฟั€ะพัะผะพั‚ั€ะพะฒ โ€ข 1 ะผะตััั† ะฝะฐะทะฐะด

Silence isn't peace. It is preparation. This Imam in the heart of Europe is stripping away the mask. The message to his followers is chillingly pragmatic: "Do not attack now, not because it is wrong, but because we are currently too weak." He is preaching a doctrine of strategic deception. The instruction is to lay low, avoid raising alarms, and operate under the radar. This isn't integration. It is a tactical pause. They are simply biding their time, building strength quietly. Make no mistake: once the math changes and they feel "strong enough," the order will shift from "wait" to "strike." Ignoring this isn't tolerance. It is willful blindness. This is not a sermon. It is a war plan. Here is the English translation of his actual speech: "The message of Islam has to be transmitted little by little, not outright, not the whole thing. One of his companions tells him: 'if you allow it, we'll attack the inhabitants of Minnen [Mina] tomorrow.' His companions were ready. From the moment they swore and from the moment they understood the role they had to play in society, they were ready. Right away. They didn't wait two days, three days, a week, a month, a year, like we do today: we wait, we let it go. Not today: tomorrow! And we continue. From the moment they understood their role, they understood the message of Islam right away, they wanted to react; but the prophet (PBUH) tells them: 'Nothing justifies this attack for now, go back to your camps.' Because his companions, back then, they were in a situation of weakness. And when one is in a situation of weakness, one has to wait a little. First you have to acquire strength to be able to react. We today, dear brothers, dear sisters, as the Muslim community of France, we have to work slowly. Without crying wolf. We have to work to multiply our actions insh'allah, without telling everybody, without making too much noise, because today our problem is the noise, so there's sometimes nothing, there isn't much [we don't have results]. We have to follow the prophet (PBUH), how he transmitted his message, how he transmitted his dawah. The second sermon of allegiance." The Blueprint Exposed: The Islamic Art of War (Short Version) By: Ofer Binshtok Islam wages a continuous, global war against non-Muslims. This conflict varies in method and intensity but has persisted for approximately 1,400 years and continues indefinitely, as commanded by the Quran and Muhammad. Where non-Muslims grow weary of conflict and seek appeasement, believing they have achieved tranquility through treaties or migration policies, Islam sees a tactical opportunity. During these periods of โ€œpeace,โ€ Islam builds its strength from within and without, waiting for the moment it has the upper hand to attack in the most brutal way possible. This strategy is the Islamic Art of War, rooted in the Quran and the Sunnah. The Doctrine Quran 8:39 โ€“ The Goal: A world containing only Muslims through war. Quran 98:6 โ€“ The Method: Demonization of non-Muslims. Quran 3:28 โ€“ The Tactic: Deception of non-Muslims. Quran 47:35 โ€“ The Rule: Do not seek peace when you have the upper hand. Attack. Quran 8:60 โ€“ The Preparation: Use Hudna (ceasefire) to prepare for war. Quran 9:123 โ€“ The Target: Attack nearby non-Muslims first. Quran 9:5 โ€“ The Mandate: Kill every non-Muslim in the world. Historical Precedent In 622 AD, Muhammad migrated from Mecca to Medina (Yathrib), where he was received as a refugee by the Jews who controlled the region. They granted him shelter. Within eight years, after building his strength, Muhammad eliminated the Jews and other non-Muslims in the area. In 628 AD, viewing his forces as weaker than his enemies, Muhammad signed a ten-year Hudna (truce) in Hudaibiya with the Quraysh tribe. By 630 AD, once his power was sufficiently solidified, he violated the agreement, conquered Mecca with ease, and eradicated all other cultures. Muhammadโ€™s Sunnah is binding in Islam (Quran 33:21). Every Muslim is commanded to emulate these words and deeds eternally.
1:27

Silence isn't peace. It is preparation. This Imam in the heart of Europe is stripping away the mask. The message to his followers is chillingly pragmatic: "Do not attack now, not because it is wrong, but because we are currently too weak." He is preaching a doctrine of strategic deception. The instruction is to lay low, avoid raising alarms, and operate under the radar. This isn't integration. It is a tactical pause. They are simply biding their time, building strength quietly. Make no mistake: once the math changes and they feel "strong enough," the order will shift from "wait" to "strike." Ignoring this isn't tolerance. It is willful blindness. This is not a sermon. It is a war plan. Here is the English translation of his actual speech: "The message of Islam has to be transmitted little by little, not outright, not the whole thing. One of his companions tells him: 'if you allow it, we'll attack the inhabitants of Minnen [Mina] tomorrow.' His companions were ready. From the moment they swore and from the moment they understood the role they had to play in society, they were ready. Right away. They didn't wait two days, three days, a week, a month, a year, like we do today: we wait, we let it go. Not today: tomorrow! And we continue. From the moment they understood their role, they understood the message of Islam right away, they wanted to react; but the prophet (PBUH) tells them: 'Nothing justifies this attack for now, go back to your camps.' Because his companions, back then, they were in a situation of weakness. And when one is in a situation of weakness, one has to wait a little. First you have to acquire strength to be able to react. We today, dear brothers, dear sisters, as the Muslim community of France, we have to work slowly. Without crying wolf. We have to work to multiply our actions insh'allah, without telling everybody, without making too much noise, because today our problem is the noise, so there's sometimes nothing, there isn't much [we don't have results]. We have to follow the prophet (PBUH), how he transmitted his message, how he transmitted his dawah. The second sermon of allegiance." The Blueprint Exposed: The Islamic Art of War (Short Version) By: Ofer Binshtok Islam wages a continuous, global war against non-Muslims. This conflict varies in method and intensity but has persisted for approximately 1,400 years and continues indefinitely, as commanded by the Quran and Muhammad. Where non-Muslims grow weary of conflict and seek appeasement, believing they have achieved tranquility through treaties or migration policies, Islam sees a tactical opportunity. During these periods of โ€œpeace,โ€ Islam builds its strength from within and without, waiting for the moment it has the upper hand to attack in the most brutal way possible. This strategy is the Islamic Art of War, rooted in the Quran and the Sunnah. The Doctrine Quran 8:39 โ€“ The Goal: A world containing only Muslims through war. Quran 98:6 โ€“ The Method: Demonization of non-Muslims. Quran 3:28 โ€“ The Tactic: Deception of non-Muslims. Quran 47:35 โ€“ The Rule: Do not seek peace when you have the upper hand. Attack. Quran 8:60 โ€“ The Preparation: Use Hudna (ceasefire) to prepare for war. Quran 9:123 โ€“ The Target: Attack nearby non-Muslims first. Quran 9:5 โ€“ The Mandate: Kill every non-Muslim in the world. Historical Precedent In 622 AD, Muhammad migrated from Mecca to Medina (Yathrib), where he was received as a refugee by the Jews who controlled the region. They granted him shelter. Within eight years, after building his strength, Muhammad eliminated the Jews and other non-Muslims in the area. In 628 AD, viewing his forces as weaker than his enemies, Muhammad signed a ten-year Hudna (truce) in Hudaibiya with the Quraysh tribe. By 630 AD, once his power was sufficiently solidified, he violated the agreement, conquered Mecca with ease, and eradicated all other cultures. Muhammadโ€™s Sunnah is binding in Islam (Quran 33:21). Every Muslim is commanded to emulate these words and deeds eternally.

Ofer Binshtok - Kafir - ืขื•ืคืจ ื‘ื™ื ืฉื˜ื•ืง

71,924 ะฟั€ะพัะผะพั‚ั€ะพะฒ โ€ข 9 ะผะตััั†ะตะฒ ะฝะฐะทะฐะด

It's Good To Be Anti-Islam... but not anti-Muslim. 'Islam is an ideologyโ€”a set of ideas. It is not defined by what any individual Muslim wants it to be, but by what it inherently is. No ideology is above critiqueโ€”particularly one that explicitly seeks political and social dominance over every person on the planet. Additionally, ideologies are not entitled to human rights; these rights apply to individuals. As an ideology, Islam is not necessarily entitled to equal respect and acceptance. Ideas do not carry equal moral weight. The feelings or the number of those who believe do not make an idea true or good. Bad ideas should be challenged before they lead to bad consequences. Islam is not simply a belief about God. The word 'Islam' means submission. It is a set of rules that define a social hierarchy where Muslims submit to Allah, women submit to men, and all non-Muslims submit to Islamic rule. Since we do not live in a Muslim countryโ€”where censorship, intimidation, and brute force are used to protect Islam from intellectual analysisโ€”we are still somewhat free to openly exercise our right to debate the merits of the Islamic value system against Western Liberalism. Consider the following questions: Are men really superior to women as the Quran says? Are women intellectually inferior as Muhammad taught? Does propagating material that curses people of other religions amidst random calls to violence create a better social environment? Is it right to keep women as sex slaves merely because the Quran permits this practice in numerous places? Should atheists and homosexuals have to choose between the noose or an outward profession of faith in Allah? Is conformity superior to freedom? Yes, there are Muslims who take issue with these aspects of Islamic theology, but that doesn't change what Islam is. Do not confuse the ideology with the individual. Do not draw conclusions about Islam based on the Muslims that you know, whether they are terrorists or humanitarians. Islam must be understood based on what it is, as presented objectively in the Quran, Hadith, and Sira (biography of Muhammad)." Thank you to the amazing Pat Condell, who released this video ten years ago. #Respect
6:19

It's Good To Be Anti-Islam... but not anti-Muslim. 'Islam is an ideologyโ€”a set of ideas. It is not defined by what any individual Muslim wants it to be, but by what it inherently is. No ideology is above critiqueโ€”particularly one that explicitly seeks political and social dominance over every person on the planet. Additionally, ideologies are not entitled to human rights; these rights apply to individuals. As an ideology, Islam is not necessarily entitled to equal respect and acceptance. Ideas do not carry equal moral weight. The feelings or the number of those who believe do not make an idea true or good. Bad ideas should be challenged before they lead to bad consequences. Islam is not simply a belief about God. The word 'Islam' means submission. It is a set of rules that define a social hierarchy where Muslims submit to Allah, women submit to men, and all non-Muslims submit to Islamic rule. Since we do not live in a Muslim countryโ€”where censorship, intimidation, and brute force are used to protect Islam from intellectual analysisโ€”we are still somewhat free to openly exercise our right to debate the merits of the Islamic value system against Western Liberalism. Consider the following questions: Are men really superior to women as the Quran says? Are women intellectually inferior as Muhammad taught? Does propagating material that curses people of other religions amidst random calls to violence create a better social environment? Is it right to keep women as sex slaves merely because the Quran permits this practice in numerous places? Should atheists and homosexuals have to choose between the noose or an outward profession of faith in Allah? Is conformity superior to freedom? Yes, there are Muslims who take issue with these aspects of Islamic theology, but that doesn't change what Islam is. Do not confuse the ideology with the individual. Do not draw conclusions about Islam based on the Muslims that you know, whether they are terrorists or humanitarians. Islam must be understood based on what it is, as presented objectively in the Quran, Hadith, and Sira (biography of Muhammad)." Thank you to the amazing Pat Condell, who released this video ten years ago. #Respect

Amy Mek

108,407 ะฟั€ะพัะผะพั‚ั€ะพะฒ โ€ข 2 ะปะตั‚ ะฝะฐะทะฐะด

โญ•The End of the false Dilemma The Quran "The last preserved revelation" dominant over The Torah and Gospel 5:48. And We revealed to you the Book, with the truth, confirming the Book that preceded it and superseding it.. The False Claim "Fake Dilemma" : Christianity or "Constantinity" Claim that Quran confirmed the Bible, while The Bible is a collection of books written by around 40 different authors, composed over approximately 1,500 years, It's a man made history book mixed between the truth and falsehood, it's not the Torah or Gospel (Muslim's can easily show many of contradictions in bible) There is no book called the โ€˜Bibleโ€™ mentioned in the Quran, but The Quran confirms that some of the People of the Book know the truth but conceal its signs and verses, and this was proved to be true by many scripture scholers that converted to Islam like: Samawโ€™al ibn Yahya; A former Jewish rabbi who embraced Islam, And His famous book: โ€œSilencing the Jewsโ€ The first Bible "Codex Sinaiticus" is a book that was compiled in Greek about five years after the Council of Nicaea in 325 AD. Christians theologians confirm that the Gospel should be in Aramaic, and the Bible contains Ugly Greek phrases, which indecat to a bad translation from Aramaic to Greek "I attached a video about it, soon I will make separate tread about Ugly Greek in the Bible, God's willing" The current bible was โ€˜pick-and-chooseโ€™ process. They rejected any writings that directly denied the divinity of Christ, such as the Arian writings and the Gospel of Thomas "essentially rejecting several early gospels" and most of these books and manuscripts were burned, by Constantine forces, that's why it's impossible to find a carbon dated manuscript from the first century. Question : Where is the true Gospel of Jesus that contains Godโ€™s direct revelation, where's the original scripture? A: This Question should be directed to Christians and Jews, not Muslims, and even if they found it, the Quran dominant over it Question : Where does it say in the Quran that the Gospel and Torah were corrupted? A: About the corruption and distortion of the scriptures, Here's the verses : Quran 2:75 Do you covet [the hope, O believers], that they would believe for you while a party of them used to hear the words of Allah and then distort the Torah after they had understood it while they were knowing? Quran 2:79 So woe to those who write the "scripture" with their own hands, then say, "This is from Allah," in order to exchange it for a small price. Woe to them for what their hands have written and woe to them for what they earn. Quran 2:159 Indeed, those who conceal what We sent down of clear proofs and guidance after We made it clear for the people in the Scripture - those are cursed by Allah and cursed by those who curse, Quran 2:174 Indeed, they who conceal what Allah has sent down of the Book and exchange it for a small price - those consume not into their bellies except the Fire. And Allah will not speak to them on the Day of Resurrection, nor will He purify them. And they will have a painful punishment. Quran 3:78 And indeed, there is among them a party who alter the Scripture with their tongues so you may think it is from the Scripture, but it is not from the Scripture. And they say, "This is from Allah," but it is not from Allah. And they speak untruth about Allah while they know. Quran 3:187 And [mention, O Muhammad], when Allah took a covenant from those who were given the Scripture, [saying], "You must make it clear to the people and not conceal it." But they threw it away behind their backs and exchanged it for a small price. And wretched is that which they purchased. Quran 4:46 Among the Jews are those who distort words from their [proper] usages and say, "We hear and disobey" and "Hear but be not heard" and "Ra'ina," twisting their tongues and defaming the religion. And if they had said [instead], "We hear and obey" and "Wait for us [to understand]," it would have been better for them and more suitable. But Allah has cursed them for their disbelief, so they believe not, except for a few. Quran 5:13 So for their breaking of the covenant We cursed them and made their hearts hard. They distort words from their [proper] usages and have forgotten a portion of that of which they were reminded. And you will still observe deceit among them, except a few of them. But pardon them and overlook [their misdeeds]. Indeed, Allah loves the doers of good. Quran 5:14 And from those who say, "We are Christians" We took their covenant; but they forgot a portion of that of which they were reminded. So We caused among them animosity and hatred until the Day of Resurrection. And Allah is going to inform them about what they used to do. Quran 6:91 And they did not appraise Allah with true appraisal when they said, "Allah did not reveal to a human being anything." Say, "Who revealed the Scripture that Moses brought as light and guidance to the people? You [Jews] make it into pages, disclosing [some of] it and concealing much. And you were taught that which you knew not - neither you nor your fathers." Say, "Allah [revealed it]." Then leave them in their [empty] discourse, amusing themselves. Quran 7:162 But those who wronged among them changed [the words] to a statement other than that which had been said to them. So We sent upon them a punishment from the sky for the wrong that they were doing. Quran 16:118 And to those who are Jews We have prohibited that which We related to you before. And We did not wrong them [thereby], but they were wronging themselves. Quran 2:101 And when a messenger from Allah came to them confirming that which was with them, a party of those who had been given the Scripture threw the Scripture of Allah behind their backs as if they did not know [what it contained].
1:23

โญ•The End of the false Dilemma The Quran "The last preserved revelation" dominant over The Torah and Gospel 5:48. And We revealed to you the Book, with the truth, confirming the Book that preceded it and superseding it.. The False Claim "Fake Dilemma" : Christianity or "Constantinity" Claim that Quran confirmed the Bible, while The Bible is a collection of books written by around 40 different authors, composed over approximately 1,500 years, It's a man made history book mixed between the truth and falsehood, it's not the Torah or Gospel (Muslim's can easily show many of contradictions in bible) There is no book called the โ€˜Bibleโ€™ mentioned in the Quran, but The Quran confirms that some of the People of the Book know the truth but conceal its signs and verses, and this was proved to be true by many scripture scholers that converted to Islam like: Samawโ€™al ibn Yahya; A former Jewish rabbi who embraced Islam, And His famous book: โ€œSilencing the Jewsโ€ The first Bible "Codex Sinaiticus" is a book that was compiled in Greek about five years after the Council of Nicaea in 325 AD. Christians theologians confirm that the Gospel should be in Aramaic, and the Bible contains Ugly Greek phrases, which indecat to a bad translation from Aramaic to Greek "I attached a video about it, soon I will make separate tread about Ugly Greek in the Bible, God's willing" The current bible was โ€˜pick-and-chooseโ€™ process. They rejected any writings that directly denied the divinity of Christ, such as the Arian writings and the Gospel of Thomas "essentially rejecting several early gospels" and most of these books and manuscripts were burned, by Constantine forces, that's why it's impossible to find a carbon dated manuscript from the first century. Question : Where is the true Gospel of Jesus that contains Godโ€™s direct revelation, where's the original scripture? A: This Question should be directed to Christians and Jews, not Muslims, and even if they found it, the Quran dominant over it Question : Where does it say in the Quran that the Gospel and Torah were corrupted? A: About the corruption and distortion of the scriptures, Here's the verses : Quran 2:75 Do you covet [the hope, O believers], that they would believe for you while a party of them used to hear the words of Allah and then distort the Torah after they had understood it while they were knowing? Quran 2:79 So woe to those who write the "scripture" with their own hands, then say, "This is from Allah," in order to exchange it for a small price. Woe to them for what their hands have written and woe to them for what they earn. Quran 2:159 Indeed, those who conceal what We sent down of clear proofs and guidance after We made it clear for the people in the Scripture - those are cursed by Allah and cursed by those who curse, Quran 2:174 Indeed, they who conceal what Allah has sent down of the Book and exchange it for a small price - those consume not into their bellies except the Fire. And Allah will not speak to them on the Day of Resurrection, nor will He purify them. And they will have a painful punishment. Quran 3:78 And indeed, there is among them a party who alter the Scripture with their tongues so you may think it is from the Scripture, but it is not from the Scripture. And they say, "This is from Allah," but it is not from Allah. And they speak untruth about Allah while they know. Quran 3:187 And [mention, O Muhammad], when Allah took a covenant from those who were given the Scripture, [saying], "You must make it clear to the people and not conceal it." But they threw it away behind their backs and exchanged it for a small price. And wretched is that which they purchased. Quran 4:46 Among the Jews are those who distort words from their [proper] usages and say, "We hear and disobey" and "Hear but be not heard" and "Ra'ina," twisting their tongues and defaming the religion. And if they had said [instead], "We hear and obey" and "Wait for us [to understand]," it would have been better for them and more suitable. But Allah has cursed them for their disbelief, so they believe not, except for a few. Quran 5:13 So for their breaking of the covenant We cursed them and made their hearts hard. They distort words from their [proper] usages and have forgotten a portion of that of which they were reminded. And you will still observe deceit among them, except a few of them. But pardon them and overlook [their misdeeds]. Indeed, Allah loves the doers of good. Quran 5:14 And from those who say, "We are Christians" We took their covenant; but they forgot a portion of that of which they were reminded. So We caused among them animosity and hatred until the Day of Resurrection. And Allah is going to inform them about what they used to do. Quran 6:91 And they did not appraise Allah with true appraisal when they said, "Allah did not reveal to a human being anything." Say, "Who revealed the Scripture that Moses brought as light and guidance to the people? You [Jews] make it into pages, disclosing [some of] it and concealing much. And you were taught that which you knew not - neither you nor your fathers." Say, "Allah [revealed it]." Then leave them in their [empty] discourse, amusing themselves. Quran 7:162 But those who wronged among them changed [the words] to a statement other than that which had been said to them. So We sent upon them a punishment from the sky for the wrong that they were doing. Quran 16:118 And to those who are Jews We have prohibited that which We related to you before. And We did not wrong them [thereby], but they were wronging themselves. Quran 2:101 And when a messenger from Allah came to them confirming that which was with them, a party of those who had been given the Scripture threw the Scripture of Allah behind their backs as if they did not know [what it contained].

Clear Truth โš–๏ธ

15,292 ะฟั€ะพัะผะพั‚ั€ะพะฒ โ€ข 7 ะผะตััั†ะตะฒ ะฝะฐะทะฐะด

Who Do You Think The 3rd Person Is? Bill Gates? Klaus Schwab? Someone Else? โ€œNostradamus saw in his future three men that he called antichrists. One was Napoleon, the second one was Hitler, and the third one is the one that is to come, who is said to be the worst of all, because he will learn from the mistakes of the others. A very dangerous person. He didn't like the term antichrist. He said it was a Christian term, and it was not exactly what he meant. But he said, if you think of Christ as representing people, humanity, then antichrist is someone who does terrible things against humanity, against people. And it can be the type of personality like Genghis Khan or Attila the Hun, the type that doesn't care anything about what it's doing, it only wants power. So this is what he meant by an Antichrist. But the third one, he gave us a great deal of information about him because he wanted us to do something to stop the man. He said in the Bible, in the book of Revelation and other books in the Old Testament, the people saw the same things that he saw their symbolism they could understand in their time, but they all saw the same thing. And the man he refers to as the Antichrist is the number 666 in the Book of Revelation, called the Beast. Of course he said 666 also refers to his connection to his computers. So there's a lot more to it. But he has been predicted as far back as Bible times. So he said he has a destiny to fulfill. He has to come, but after he comes, what happens after that is in the hands of mankind. Do we allow it to go through the worst case scenarios or can we lessen it? That's the point fulfill. We were given a lot of information about this man because he is so important. We have his horoscope. He was born on February the 4th, 1962 in Jerusalem, but he's not Jewish. And his parents were killed during the Israeli war and when he was about six or seven years old, and he was raised by his uncle. His uncle is a very evil man, and we have had many people see him, and we have in my work, and we had one woman who was able to put together a police composite picture of the uncle and of the antichrist. She was a psychic who had worked with police on many cases, so she knew how to do the police composite kits. But the uncle took the young boy him as his own. What the young boy doesn't know was that the uncle had his parents killed, so he could have him for himself. And he has gotten together a very powerful group of rich Arabs in the Middle East, and they've been taking care of this young boy and grooming him for the role he is to take. It's a very powerful group of people that control everything that happens in the Middle East. They're the puppet masters behind the scenes. Nusrat Dhamma said, by the time seven puppets arise in the Middle East, you will realize what is happening that they are not the real leaders of the countries, but they are the puppets being manipulated by the puppet masters behind the scenes. The young Antichrist went to college in Egypt, and we were working on this at the same time he was in college, so we were shown several scenes of him in college. We knew where he was living. We had all this information.โ€
3:32

Who Do You Think The 3rd Person Is? Bill Gates? Klaus Schwab? Someone Else? โ€œNostradamus saw in his future three men that he called antichrists. One was Napoleon, the second one was Hitler, and the third one is the one that is to come, who is said to be the worst of all, because he will learn from the mistakes of the others. A very dangerous person. He didn't like the term antichrist. He said it was a Christian term, and it was not exactly what he meant. But he said, if you think of Christ as representing people, humanity, then antichrist is someone who does terrible things against humanity, against people. And it can be the type of personality like Genghis Khan or Attila the Hun, the type that doesn't care anything about what it's doing, it only wants power. So this is what he meant by an Antichrist. But the third one, he gave us a great deal of information about him because he wanted us to do something to stop the man. He said in the Bible, in the book of Revelation and other books in the Old Testament, the people saw the same things that he saw their symbolism they could understand in their time, but they all saw the same thing. And the man he refers to as the Antichrist is the number 666 in the Book of Revelation, called the Beast. Of course he said 666 also refers to his connection to his computers. So there's a lot more to it. But he has been predicted as far back as Bible times. So he said he has a destiny to fulfill. He has to come, but after he comes, what happens after that is in the hands of mankind. Do we allow it to go through the worst case scenarios or can we lessen it? That's the point fulfill. We were given a lot of information about this man because he is so important. We have his horoscope. He was born on February the 4th, 1962 in Jerusalem, but he's not Jewish. And his parents were killed during the Israeli war and when he was about six or seven years old, and he was raised by his uncle. His uncle is a very evil man, and we have had many people see him, and we have in my work, and we had one woman who was able to put together a police composite picture of the uncle and of the antichrist. She was a psychic who had worked with police on many cases, so she knew how to do the police composite kits. But the uncle took the young boy him as his own. What the young boy doesn't know was that the uncle had his parents killed, so he could have him for himself. And he has gotten together a very powerful group of rich Arabs in the Middle East, and they've been taking care of this young boy and grooming him for the role he is to take. It's a very powerful group of people that control everything that happens in the Middle East. They're the puppet masters behind the scenes. Nusrat Dhamma said, by the time seven puppets arise in the Middle East, you will realize what is happening that they are not the real leaders of the countries, but they are the puppets being manipulated by the puppet masters behind the scenes. The young Antichrist went to college in Egypt, and we were working on this at the same time he was in college, so we were shown several scenes of him in college. We knew where he was living. We had all this information.โ€

Wall Street Apes

1,338,694 ะฟั€ะพัะผะพั‚ั€ะพะฒ โ€ข 2 ะปะตั‚ ะฝะฐะทะฐะด

You can feel it, canโ€™t you? That low hum in the collective soul โ€” The quiet understanding that there is no future with Trump, because there is no future after Trump. Not for the country, not for his followers, not for the hollow movement that sold rage as redemption. MAGA was never a plan โ€” it was a performance. A show built on shouting, not solutions. On enemies, not empathy. On grievance, not growth. And deep down, people know it. You can see it in their eyes โ€” that fatigue, that quiet confession whispered in comment sections: โ€œI donโ€™t recognize my country anymore.โ€ But hereโ€™s the truth: Itโ€™s not the country that changed. Itโ€™s the con that wore a flag and called itself freedom. Trumpโ€™s America is a sinking ship โ€” and heโ€™s patching the holes with lies, lawsuits, and the bones of anyone who once believed in him. He talks about greatness, but everywhere he goes, institutions crumble, trust dies, and the people left behind are poorer, angrier, and more divided. He turned faith into a prop, law into a weapon, and truth into a hostage. He raised up false prophets, rewarded cruelty, and punished decency. And when the gold peeled off, all that was left was rust. โธป So, letโ€™s be clear. Heโ€™s not strong โ€” heโ€™s scared. Heโ€™s not rich โ€” heโ€™s leveraged. Heโ€™s not chosen โ€” heโ€™s cornered. Heโ€™s not fighting for you โ€” heโ€™s fighting for survival. ๐Ÿ’” Weakness #1: Fear of Accountability โ€” He canโ€™t face mirrors or trials. ๐Ÿ’ฐ Weakness #2: Fraudulent Empire โ€” every brick built on overvaluation and illusion. ๐Ÿง  Weakness #3: Psychological Fragility โ€” canโ€™t survive silence, mockery, or loss of control. โœ๏ธ Weakness #4: Moral Bankruptcy โ€” weaponizes faith he doesnโ€™t understand. ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ Weakness #5: Anti-Patriotism โ€” praises tyrants, attacks the Republic. ๐ŸŽญ Weakness #6: Dependency on Division โ€” without enemies, he has no purpose. ๐Ÿ”ฅ Weakness #7: Extremist Entropy โ€” his movement devours itself, because hate has no harvest. โธป This is why there is no future after him. Because everything he built was personal, not principled. And when the cult fades, thereโ€™s no creed left to stand on. But we โ€” the majority โ€” we are not lost. We are not red. We are not blue. We are the bridge โ€” the Purple Generation. We are the children of chaos who refuse to inherit war. We are the builders, the healers, the question-askers. Weโ€™ve seen the far-right rot in its rage, and the far-left fracture under its purity. Weโ€™ve learned the lesson history keeps teaching โ€” that extremism, from either side, ends in ashes. So we meet here, in the center โ€” not of politics, but of purpose. Where truth still matters. Where character still counts. Where justice isnโ€™t a slogan, and empathy isnโ€™t weakness. This is the Purple Revolution โ€” born on TikTok, spoken in living rooms, spreading through every soul tired of screaming. Weโ€™re not bowing to kings. Weโ€™re not pledging to parties. Weโ€™re rebuilding the People. Because the future isnโ€™t red. It isnโ€™t blue. Itโ€™s the color of convergence โ€” of courage โ€” of unity reborn through understanding. So when they say, โ€œCome back to the past,โ€ we answer, No. Weโ€™re walking forward โ€” hand in hand, shoulder to shoulder โ€” toward the America that finally grew up.
3:39

You can feel it, canโ€™t you? That low hum in the collective soul โ€” The quiet understanding that there is no future with Trump, because there is no future after Trump. Not for the country, not for his followers, not for the hollow movement that sold rage as redemption. MAGA was never a plan โ€” it was a performance. A show built on shouting, not solutions. On enemies, not empathy. On grievance, not growth. And deep down, people know it. You can see it in their eyes โ€” that fatigue, that quiet confession whispered in comment sections: โ€œI donโ€™t recognize my country anymore.โ€ But hereโ€™s the truth: Itโ€™s not the country that changed. Itโ€™s the con that wore a flag and called itself freedom. Trumpโ€™s America is a sinking ship โ€” and heโ€™s patching the holes with lies, lawsuits, and the bones of anyone who once believed in him. He talks about greatness, but everywhere he goes, institutions crumble, trust dies, and the people left behind are poorer, angrier, and more divided. He turned faith into a prop, law into a weapon, and truth into a hostage. He raised up false prophets, rewarded cruelty, and punished decency. And when the gold peeled off, all that was left was rust. โธป So, letโ€™s be clear. Heโ€™s not strong โ€” heโ€™s scared. Heโ€™s not rich โ€” heโ€™s leveraged. Heโ€™s not chosen โ€” heโ€™s cornered. Heโ€™s not fighting for you โ€” heโ€™s fighting for survival. ๐Ÿ’” Weakness #1: Fear of Accountability โ€” He canโ€™t face mirrors or trials. ๐Ÿ’ฐ Weakness #2: Fraudulent Empire โ€” every brick built on overvaluation and illusion. ๐Ÿง  Weakness #3: Psychological Fragility โ€” canโ€™t survive silence, mockery, or loss of control. โœ๏ธ Weakness #4: Moral Bankruptcy โ€” weaponizes faith he doesnโ€™t understand. ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ Weakness #5: Anti-Patriotism โ€” praises tyrants, attacks the Republic. ๐ŸŽญ Weakness #6: Dependency on Division โ€” without enemies, he has no purpose. ๐Ÿ”ฅ Weakness #7: Extremist Entropy โ€” his movement devours itself, because hate has no harvest. โธป This is why there is no future after him. Because everything he built was personal, not principled. And when the cult fades, thereโ€™s no creed left to stand on. But we โ€” the majority โ€” we are not lost. We are not red. We are not blue. We are the bridge โ€” the Purple Generation. We are the children of chaos who refuse to inherit war. We are the builders, the healers, the question-askers. Weโ€™ve seen the far-right rot in its rage, and the far-left fracture under its purity. Weโ€™ve learned the lesson history keeps teaching โ€” that extremism, from either side, ends in ashes. So we meet here, in the center โ€” not of politics, but of purpose. Where truth still matters. Where character still counts. Where justice isnโ€™t a slogan, and empathy isnโ€™t weakness. This is the Purple Revolution โ€” born on TikTok, spoken in living rooms, spreading through every soul tired of screaming. Weโ€™re not bowing to kings. Weโ€™re not pledging to parties. Weโ€™re rebuilding the People. Because the future isnโ€™t red. It isnโ€™t blue. Itโ€™s the color of convergence โ€” of courage โ€” of unity reborn through understanding. So when they say, โ€œCome back to the past,โ€ we answer, No. Weโ€™re walking forward โ€” hand in hand, shoulder to shoulder โ€” toward the America that finally grew up.

Carina C. C

11,840 ะฟั€ะพัะผะพั‚ั€ะพะฒ โ€ข 10 ะผะตััั†ะตะฒ ะฝะฐะทะฐะด

The child, the music , the softer speak of the pope doesnโ€™t make what he said any less Antichrist. This was an opportunity to tell this young man that YES only God decides and LEAVE IT at that ALONG with the saving gospel for all to hear โ€ฆbut he went on to call an atheist a child of God. Refuted by ๐Ÿ‘‡๐Ÿป John 1:12 Yet to all who did receive him, to those who believed in his name, he gave the right to become children of Godโ€” He went on to call his father a good man who could enter that way Refuted by ๐Ÿ‘‡๐Ÿป Romans 3:12 there is no one who does good, not even one.โ€ And the most antichrist of this whole thing is denying that he would be rejected for rejecting Christ and his good works would help him enter heaven. Refuted by ๐Ÿ‘‡๐Ÿป John 14:6 Jesus replied โ€œI am the way the truth and the life , no man comes to the father but by meโ€ Ephesians 2:8-9 For it is by grace you have been saved, through faithโ€”and this is not from yourselves, it is the gift of Godโ€” 9 not by works, so that no one can boast. This man was not the head of the true church. The head of the church would never speak lies because the head of the church is Jesus Christ. Colossians 1:18 And he is the head of the body, the church; he is the beginning and the firstborn from among the dead, so that in everything he might have the supremacy. This is scripture so if youโ€™re upset by it youโ€™re upset with the very words of God.
1:55

The child, the music , the softer speak of the pope doesnโ€™t make what he said any less Antichrist. This was an opportunity to tell this young man that YES only God decides and LEAVE IT at that ALONG with the saving gospel for all to hear โ€ฆbut he went on to call an atheist a child of God. Refuted by ๐Ÿ‘‡๐Ÿป John 1:12 Yet to all who did receive him, to those who believed in his name, he gave the right to become children of Godโ€” He went on to call his father a good man who could enter that way Refuted by ๐Ÿ‘‡๐Ÿป Romans 3:12 there is no one who does good, not even one.โ€ And the most antichrist of this whole thing is denying that he would be rejected for rejecting Christ and his good works would help him enter heaven. Refuted by ๐Ÿ‘‡๐Ÿป John 14:6 Jesus replied โ€œI am the way the truth and the life , no man comes to the father but by meโ€ Ephesians 2:8-9 For it is by grace you have been saved, through faithโ€”and this is not from yourselves, it is the gift of Godโ€” 9 not by works, so that no one can boast. This man was not the head of the true church. The head of the church would never speak lies because the head of the church is Jesus Christ. Colossians 1:18 And he is the head of the body, the church; he is the beginning and the firstborn from among the dead, so that in everything he might have the supremacy. This is scripture so if youโ€™re upset by it youโ€™re upset with the very words of God.

๐ŸŒท LIZZIE๐ŸŒท

61,548 ะฟั€ะพัะผะพั‚ั€ะพะฒ โ€ข 1 ะณะพะด ะฝะฐะทะฐะด

The antisemitism that was festering under the surface for decades, has exploded. And for those of us who stand against it, we are not the popular kids. The so called โ€œcool kidsโ€ are wearing a keffiyeh, calling for an intifada and demanding a Palestine between the river and the sea even if they canโ€™t tell you which river or which sea. Keffiyeh Karens. Thatโ€™s the mainstream now. Standing up against jihadism is now the counter-culture. Standing up for western democratic values against terror and extremism: that is now the counter-culture. Using facts and reason and knowing history: that is now the counter-culture. People! WE are the counterculture. And we are doing it. The Jewish people have found our voice because standing up for what we believe in, even when itโ€™s not popular, is part of who we are. Our tiny people havenโ€™t survived for millennia and outlived every empire that tried to destroy us by always being the cool kids. In fact, we almost never are. We know when itโ€™s time to swim against the tide because we know this playbook. We have been here before. And our message to the world is as follows: the hatred that targets is targeting you too. I have a question for you, keffiyeh Karen from campus: where would you prefer to be a woman? in Iran? In Afghanistan? or in Israel? We cannot take the freedoms that we enjoy here in the US in Israel and in the west for granted, and right now even saying just that is swimming against the tide โ€“ it is being the counterculture. This is not a war of Israelโ€™s choosing but we cannot avoid it either. They might call us the chosen people: in fact we are the people with no choice. But the entire western world needs to wake up to the fact that it has no choice either: that what is at stake is the survival, not just of the Jewish people, but of Western civilization, democracy and freedom itself. And where we do have a choice is in how we do it: and we choose to speak the truth, even when the truth isnโ€™t popular. To speak up, even when we are shouted down and to be proud even when they tell us we better hide. Thank you so much, am Israel chai
5:38

The antisemitism that was festering under the surface for decades, has exploded. And for those of us who stand against it, we are not the popular kids. The so called โ€œcool kidsโ€ are wearing a keffiyeh, calling for an intifada and demanding a Palestine between the river and the sea even if they canโ€™t tell you which river or which sea. Keffiyeh Karens. Thatโ€™s the mainstream now. Standing up against jihadism is now the counter-culture. Standing up for western democratic values against terror and extremism: that is now the counter-culture. Using facts and reason and knowing history: that is now the counter-culture. People! WE are the counterculture. And we are doing it. The Jewish people have found our voice because standing up for what we believe in, even when itโ€™s not popular, is part of who we are. Our tiny people havenโ€™t survived for millennia and outlived every empire that tried to destroy us by always being the cool kids. In fact, we almost never are. We know when itโ€™s time to swim against the tide because we know this playbook. We have been here before. And our message to the world is as follows: the hatred that targets is targeting you too. I have a question for you, keffiyeh Karen from campus: where would you prefer to be a woman? in Iran? In Afghanistan? or in Israel? We cannot take the freedoms that we enjoy here in the US in Israel and in the west for granted, and right now even saying just that is swimming against the tide โ€“ it is being the counterculture. This is not a war of Israelโ€™s choosing but we cannot avoid it either. They might call us the chosen people: in fact we are the people with no choice. But the entire western world needs to wake up to the fact that it has no choice either: that what is at stake is the survival, not just of the Jewish people, but of Western civilization, democracy and freedom itself. And where we do have a choice is in how we do it: and we choose to speak the truth, even when the truth isnโ€™t popular. To speak up, even when we are shouted down and to be proud even when they tell us we better hide. Thank you so much, am Israel chai

Noa Tishby

349,774 ะฟั€ะพัะผะพั‚ั€ะพะฒ โ€ข 1 ะณะพะด ะฝะฐะทะฐะด

๐†๐€๐ƒ ๐’๐€๐€๐ƒ ๐€๐“ ๐‚๐€๐๐€๐ƒ๐ˆ๐€๐ ๐‚๐๐€๐‚: ๐๐Œ ๐‚๐€๐‘๐๐„๐˜โ€™๐’ ๐–๐ˆ๐…๐„ ๐’๐€๐˜๐’ ๐‡๐ˆ๐’ ๐ƒ๐€๐•๐Ž๐’ ๐’๐๐„๐„๐‚๐‡ ๐ˆ๐’ ๐๐„๐ˆ๐๐† ๐“๐€๐”๐†๐‡๐“ ๐ˆ๐ ๐”๐๐ˆ๐•๐„๐‘๐’๐ˆ๐“๐ˆ๐„๐’ Gad Saad โ€” the Lebanese-Canadian evolutionary psychologist known as โ€œThe Gadfatherโ€ โ€” shared this bizarre clip from Canadaโ€™s political stage. PM Carneyโ€™s wife is publicly boasting: โ€œ๐˜ ๐˜ฉ๐˜ข๐˜ท๐˜ฆ ๐˜ฃ๐˜ฆ๐˜ฆ๐˜ฏ ๐˜ต๐˜ฐ๐˜ญ๐˜ฅ ๐˜ฐ๐˜ง ๐˜ถ๐˜ฏ๐˜ช๐˜ท๐˜ฆ๐˜ณ๐˜ด๐˜ช๐˜ต๐˜บ ๐˜ด๐˜ต๐˜ถ๐˜ฅ๐˜ฆ๐˜ฏ๐˜ต๐˜ด ๐˜ข๐˜ญ๐˜ณ๐˜ฆ๐˜ข๐˜ฅ๐˜บ ๐˜ฃ๐˜ฆ๐˜ช๐˜ฏ๐˜จ ๐˜ณ๐˜ฆ๐˜ฒ๐˜ถ๐˜ช๐˜ณ๐˜ฆ๐˜ฅ ๐˜ต๐˜ฐ ๐˜ณ๐˜ฆ๐˜ข๐˜ฅ ๐˜ฎ๐˜บ ๐˜ฉ๐˜ถ๐˜ด๐˜ฃ๐˜ข๐˜ฏ๐˜ฅโ€™๐˜ด ๐˜ฏ๐˜ฐ๐˜ธ ๐˜ฒ๐˜ถ๐˜ช๐˜ต๐˜ฆ ๐˜ง๐˜ข๐˜ฎ๐˜ฐ๐˜ถ๐˜ด ๐˜‹๐˜ข๐˜ท๐˜ฐ๐˜ด ๐˜ด๐˜ฑ๐˜ฆ๐˜ฆ๐˜ค๐˜ฉ. ๐˜–๐˜ง ๐˜ช๐˜ฏ๐˜ต๐˜ฆ๐˜ณ๐˜จ๐˜ฆ๐˜ฏ๐˜ฆ๐˜ณ๐˜ข๐˜ต๐˜ช๐˜ฐ๐˜ฏ๐˜ข๐˜ญ ๐˜ฅ๐˜ช๐˜ฏ๐˜ฏ๐˜ฆ๐˜ณ ๐˜ต๐˜ข๐˜ฃ๐˜ญ๐˜ฆ ๐˜ค๐˜ฐ๐˜ฏ๐˜ท๐˜ฆ๐˜ณ๐˜ด๐˜ข๐˜ต๐˜ช๐˜ฐ๐˜ฏ๐˜ด ๐˜ฃ๐˜ฆ๐˜ช๐˜ฏ๐˜จ ๐˜ด๐˜ฑ๐˜ข๐˜ณ๐˜ฌ๐˜ฆ๐˜ฅ ๐˜ฃ๐˜บ ๐˜ช๐˜ต๐˜ด ๐˜ค๐˜ฐ๐˜ฏ๐˜ต๐˜ฆ๐˜ฏ๐˜ต๐˜ด. ๐˜–๐˜ง ๐˜Š๐˜ข๐˜ฏ๐˜ข๐˜ฅ๐˜ข ๐˜ฃ๐˜ฆ๐˜ช๐˜ฏ๐˜จ ๐˜ต๐˜ฉ๐˜ฆ ๐˜ฏ๐˜ข๐˜ต๐˜ช๐˜ฐ๐˜ฏ ๐˜ต๐˜ฉ๐˜ข๐˜ต ๐˜ช๐˜ด ๐˜ฉ๐˜ฆ๐˜ญ๐˜ฑ๐˜ช๐˜ฏ๐˜จ ๐˜ต๐˜ฐ ๐˜ฅ๐˜ฆ๐˜ง๐˜ช๐˜ฏ๐˜ฆ ๐˜ข๐˜ฏ๐˜ฅ ๐˜ด๐˜ฉ๐˜ข๐˜ฑ๐˜ฆ ๐˜ข ๐˜ฏ๐˜ฆ๐˜ธ ๐˜ธ๐˜ฐ๐˜ณ๐˜ญ๐˜ฅ ๐˜ฐ๐˜ณ๐˜ฅ๐˜ฆ๐˜ณ.โ€ A ๐ง๐ž๐ฐ ๐ฐ๐จ๐ซ๐ฅ๐ ๐จ๐ซ๐๐ž๐ซ. Thatโ€™s a direct quote. Saadโ€™s broader thesis โ€” from his 2025 book "๐’๐ฎ๐ข๐œ๐ข๐๐š๐ฅ ๐„๐ฆ๐ฉ๐š๐ญ๐ก๐ฒ: ๐ƒ๐ฒ๐ข๐ง๐  ๐ญ๐จ ๐๐ž ๐Š๐ข๐ง๐" โ€” is that Western nations are destroying themselves through performative empathy and ideological conformity. His quote: โ€œ๐˜š๐˜ถ๐˜ช๐˜ค๐˜ช๐˜ฅ๐˜ข๐˜ญ๐˜ญ๐˜บ ๐˜ฆ๐˜ฎ๐˜ฑ๐˜ข๐˜ต๐˜ฉ๐˜ฆ๐˜ต๐˜ช๐˜ค ๐˜ฑ๐˜ณ๐˜ฐ๐˜จ๐˜ณ๐˜ฆ๐˜ด๐˜ด๐˜ช๐˜ท๐˜ฆ ๐˜ธ๐˜ฐ๐˜ฌ๐˜ฆ ๐˜ธ๐˜ฐ๐˜ฎ๐˜ฆ๐˜ฏ ๐˜ข๐˜ณ๐˜ฆ ๐˜ฐ๐˜ฏ๐˜ฆ ๐˜ฐ๐˜ง ๐˜ต๐˜ฉ๐˜ฆ ๐˜จ๐˜ณ๐˜ฆ๐˜ข๐˜ต๐˜ฆ๐˜ด๐˜ต ๐˜ต๐˜ฉ๐˜ณ๐˜ฆ๐˜ข๐˜ต๐˜ด ๐˜ต๐˜ฐ ๐˜ž๐˜ฆ๐˜ด๐˜ต๐˜ฆ๐˜ณ๐˜ฏ ๐˜ค๐˜ช๐˜ท๐˜ช๐˜ญ๐˜ช๐˜ด๐˜ข๐˜ต๐˜ช๐˜ฐ๐˜ฏ.โ€ Saadโ€™s background matters: born in Beirut in 1964 to a Lebanese-Syrian Jewish family, he ๐Ÿ๐ฅ๐ž๐ ๐‹๐ž๐›๐š๐ง๐จ๐ง ๐š๐ญ ๐š๐ ๐ž ๐Ÿ๐Ÿ when the civil war erupted. He holds degrees from ๐Œ๐œ๐†๐ข๐ฅ๐ฅ ๐š๐ง๐ ๐‚๐จ๐ซ๐ง๐ž๐ฅ๐ฅ and is a professor at Concordia University. He watched one civilization destroy itself from the inside โ€” and heโ€™s watching it happen again. ๐‚๐š๐ซ๐ง๐ž๐ฒโ€™๐ฌ ๐ฐ๐ข๐Ÿ๐ž ๐ข๐ฌ ๐›๐ซ๐š๐ ๐ ๐ข๐ง๐  ๐š๐›๐จ๐ฎ๐ญ ๐š โ€œ๐ง๐ž๐ฐ ๐ฐ๐จ๐ซ๐ฅ๐ ๐จ๐ซ๐๐ž๐ซ.โ€ ๐†๐š๐ ๐’๐š๐š๐ ๐ž๐ฌ๐œ๐š๐ฉ๐ž๐ ๐จ๐ง๐ž ๐œ๐จ๐ฅ๐ฅ๐š๐ฉ๐ฌ๐ข๐ง๐  ๐œ๐ข๐ฏ๐ข๐ฅ๐ข๐ณ๐š๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง. ๐‡๐žโ€™๐ฌ ๐ญ๐ซ๐ฒ๐ข๐ง๐  ๐ญ๐จ ๐ฐ๐š๐ซ๐ง ๐ฎ๐ฌ ๐š๐›๐จ๐ฎ๐ญ ๐ญ๐ก๐ž ๐ง๐ž๐ฑ๐ญ.
0:43

๐†๐€๐ƒ ๐’๐€๐€๐ƒ ๐€๐“ ๐‚๐€๐๐€๐ƒ๐ˆ๐€๐ ๐‚๐๐€๐‚: ๐๐Œ ๐‚๐€๐‘๐๐„๐˜โ€™๐’ ๐–๐ˆ๐…๐„ ๐’๐€๐˜๐’ ๐‡๐ˆ๐’ ๐ƒ๐€๐•๐Ž๐’ ๐’๐๐„๐„๐‚๐‡ ๐ˆ๐’ ๐๐„๐ˆ๐๐† ๐“๐€๐”๐†๐‡๐“ ๐ˆ๐ ๐”๐๐ˆ๐•๐„๐‘๐’๐ˆ๐“๐ˆ๐„๐’ Gad Saad โ€” the Lebanese-Canadian evolutionary psychologist known as โ€œThe Gadfatherโ€ โ€” shared this bizarre clip from Canadaโ€™s political stage. PM Carneyโ€™s wife is publicly boasting: โ€œ๐˜ ๐˜ฉ๐˜ข๐˜ท๐˜ฆ ๐˜ฃ๐˜ฆ๐˜ฆ๐˜ฏ ๐˜ต๐˜ฐ๐˜ญ๐˜ฅ ๐˜ฐ๐˜ง ๐˜ถ๐˜ฏ๐˜ช๐˜ท๐˜ฆ๐˜ณ๐˜ด๐˜ช๐˜ต๐˜บ ๐˜ด๐˜ต๐˜ถ๐˜ฅ๐˜ฆ๐˜ฏ๐˜ต๐˜ด ๐˜ข๐˜ญ๐˜ณ๐˜ฆ๐˜ข๐˜ฅ๐˜บ ๐˜ฃ๐˜ฆ๐˜ช๐˜ฏ๐˜จ ๐˜ณ๐˜ฆ๐˜ฒ๐˜ถ๐˜ช๐˜ณ๐˜ฆ๐˜ฅ ๐˜ต๐˜ฐ ๐˜ณ๐˜ฆ๐˜ข๐˜ฅ ๐˜ฎ๐˜บ ๐˜ฉ๐˜ถ๐˜ด๐˜ฃ๐˜ข๐˜ฏ๐˜ฅโ€™๐˜ด ๐˜ฏ๐˜ฐ๐˜ธ ๐˜ฒ๐˜ถ๐˜ช๐˜ต๐˜ฆ ๐˜ง๐˜ข๐˜ฎ๐˜ฐ๐˜ถ๐˜ด ๐˜‹๐˜ข๐˜ท๐˜ฐ๐˜ด ๐˜ด๐˜ฑ๐˜ฆ๐˜ฆ๐˜ค๐˜ฉ. ๐˜–๐˜ง ๐˜ช๐˜ฏ๐˜ต๐˜ฆ๐˜ณ๐˜จ๐˜ฆ๐˜ฏ๐˜ฆ๐˜ณ๐˜ข๐˜ต๐˜ช๐˜ฐ๐˜ฏ๐˜ข๐˜ญ ๐˜ฅ๐˜ช๐˜ฏ๐˜ฏ๐˜ฆ๐˜ณ ๐˜ต๐˜ข๐˜ฃ๐˜ญ๐˜ฆ ๐˜ค๐˜ฐ๐˜ฏ๐˜ท๐˜ฆ๐˜ณ๐˜ด๐˜ข๐˜ต๐˜ช๐˜ฐ๐˜ฏ๐˜ด ๐˜ฃ๐˜ฆ๐˜ช๐˜ฏ๐˜จ ๐˜ด๐˜ฑ๐˜ข๐˜ณ๐˜ฌ๐˜ฆ๐˜ฅ ๐˜ฃ๐˜บ ๐˜ช๐˜ต๐˜ด ๐˜ค๐˜ฐ๐˜ฏ๐˜ต๐˜ฆ๐˜ฏ๐˜ต๐˜ด. ๐˜–๐˜ง ๐˜Š๐˜ข๐˜ฏ๐˜ข๐˜ฅ๐˜ข ๐˜ฃ๐˜ฆ๐˜ช๐˜ฏ๐˜จ ๐˜ต๐˜ฉ๐˜ฆ ๐˜ฏ๐˜ข๐˜ต๐˜ช๐˜ฐ๐˜ฏ ๐˜ต๐˜ฉ๐˜ข๐˜ต ๐˜ช๐˜ด ๐˜ฉ๐˜ฆ๐˜ญ๐˜ฑ๐˜ช๐˜ฏ๐˜จ ๐˜ต๐˜ฐ ๐˜ฅ๐˜ฆ๐˜ง๐˜ช๐˜ฏ๐˜ฆ ๐˜ข๐˜ฏ๐˜ฅ ๐˜ด๐˜ฉ๐˜ข๐˜ฑ๐˜ฆ ๐˜ข ๐˜ฏ๐˜ฆ๐˜ธ ๐˜ธ๐˜ฐ๐˜ณ๐˜ญ๐˜ฅ ๐˜ฐ๐˜ณ๐˜ฅ๐˜ฆ๐˜ณ.โ€ A ๐ง๐ž๐ฐ ๐ฐ๐จ๐ซ๐ฅ๐ ๐จ๐ซ๐๐ž๐ซ. Thatโ€™s a direct quote. Saadโ€™s broader thesis โ€” from his 2025 book "๐’๐ฎ๐ข๐œ๐ข๐๐š๐ฅ ๐„๐ฆ๐ฉ๐š๐ญ๐ก๐ฒ: ๐ƒ๐ฒ๐ข๐ง๐  ๐ญ๐จ ๐๐ž ๐Š๐ข๐ง๐" โ€” is that Western nations are destroying themselves through performative empathy and ideological conformity. His quote: โ€œ๐˜š๐˜ถ๐˜ช๐˜ค๐˜ช๐˜ฅ๐˜ข๐˜ญ๐˜ญ๐˜บ ๐˜ฆ๐˜ฎ๐˜ฑ๐˜ข๐˜ต๐˜ฉ๐˜ฆ๐˜ต๐˜ช๐˜ค ๐˜ฑ๐˜ณ๐˜ฐ๐˜จ๐˜ณ๐˜ฆ๐˜ด๐˜ด๐˜ช๐˜ท๐˜ฆ ๐˜ธ๐˜ฐ๐˜ฌ๐˜ฆ ๐˜ธ๐˜ฐ๐˜ฎ๐˜ฆ๐˜ฏ ๐˜ข๐˜ณ๐˜ฆ ๐˜ฐ๐˜ฏ๐˜ฆ ๐˜ฐ๐˜ง ๐˜ต๐˜ฉ๐˜ฆ ๐˜จ๐˜ณ๐˜ฆ๐˜ข๐˜ต๐˜ฆ๐˜ด๐˜ต ๐˜ต๐˜ฉ๐˜ณ๐˜ฆ๐˜ข๐˜ต๐˜ด ๐˜ต๐˜ฐ ๐˜ž๐˜ฆ๐˜ด๐˜ต๐˜ฆ๐˜ณ๐˜ฏ ๐˜ค๐˜ช๐˜ท๐˜ช๐˜ญ๐˜ช๐˜ด๐˜ข๐˜ต๐˜ช๐˜ฐ๐˜ฏ.โ€ Saadโ€™s background matters: born in Beirut in 1964 to a Lebanese-Syrian Jewish family, he ๐Ÿ๐ฅ๐ž๐ ๐‹๐ž๐›๐š๐ง๐จ๐ง ๐š๐ญ ๐š๐ ๐ž ๐Ÿ๐Ÿ when the civil war erupted. He holds degrees from ๐Œ๐œ๐†๐ข๐ฅ๐ฅ ๐š๐ง๐ ๐‚๐จ๐ซ๐ง๐ž๐ฅ๐ฅ and is a professor at Concordia University. He watched one civilization destroy itself from the inside โ€” and heโ€™s watching it happen again. ๐‚๐š๐ซ๐ง๐ž๐ฒโ€™๐ฌ ๐ฐ๐ข๐Ÿ๐ž ๐ข๐ฌ ๐›๐ซ๐š๐ ๐ ๐ข๐ง๐  ๐š๐›๐จ๐ฎ๐ญ ๐š โ€œ๐ง๐ž๐ฐ ๐ฐ๐จ๐ซ๐ฅ๐ ๐จ๐ซ๐๐ž๐ซ.โ€ ๐†๐š๐ ๐’๐š๐š๐ ๐ž๐ฌ๐œ๐š๐ฉ๐ž๐ ๐จ๐ง๐ž ๐œ๐จ๐ฅ๐ฅ๐š๐ฉ๐ฌ๐ข๐ง๐  ๐œ๐ข๐ฏ๐ข๐ฅ๐ข๐ณ๐š๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง. ๐‡๐žโ€™๐ฌ ๐ญ๐ซ๐ฒ๐ข๐ง๐  ๐ญ๐จ ๐ฐ๐š๐ซ๐ง ๐ฎ๐ฌ ๐š๐›๐จ๐ฎ๐ญ ๐ญ๐ก๐ž ๐ง๐ž๐ฑ๐ญ.

M.A. Rothman

74,283 ะฟั€ะพัะผะพั‚ั€ะพะฒ โ€ข 4 ะผะตััั†ะตะฒ ะฝะฐะทะฐะด

Germany Is Still A Kind Of A Colony Of The United States. The Priceless Value of Old Archives โ€ผ๏ธ โ€ผ Former German MSM Journalist Udo Ulfkotte comes clean He explains how all western corporate journalists are bought by the CIA and how they must follow their agenda. If only more journalists started speaking the truth!!! Udo Ulfkotte says all major media networks controlled by CIA Ulfkotte was for a time the editor of the well-known German daily Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung (FAZ), where he was convinced first hand that the CIA and the German BND intelligence service bribe journalists to write anti-Russian and extremely pro-Western and pro-NATO articles. In his book "Journalists for hire" (โ€œGekaufte Journalistenโ€ in German), Ulfkotte explained in great detail how the propaganda campaign of the USA and NATO works. He then stated that he published under his name texts written by agents of various intelligence services, including the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA). Before his death, Ulfkotte gave an interview to the Russian television RT, in which he stated that he was "very afraid of a new war in Europe, and that the German and U.S. media want to push Europe into war and provoke war on Russian territory". "Looking at how the German and American media are bringing war to Europe, I speak up to say that what I did in the past, manipulated people, participated in anti-Russian propaganda is wrong. The war with Russia is a point of no return. What my colleagues do is wrong. I have written a book because I am very afraid of a new war in Europe. War never comes of its own accord, there are always people who stand up for it and it's not just politicians, but also journalists. We betrayed our readers, just to push the war. I don't want this anymore, I'm tired of this propaganda. We live in a banana republic, not a democratic country where we have freedom the press", Ulfkotte said at the time. He claimed that the CIA had corrupted journalists and major news outlets so much that it had become a routine thing, accepted and widespread in the Western media, and that journalists who did not adhere to it could not get a job or their careers were interrupted. The book is still not available in English, but in it, the former editor of Germanyโ€™s Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung newspaper claims that he was a part of a program where the CIA hired American and European journalists to plant false stories in the mainstream media to further a disinformation agenda. Ulfkotte claimed to have worked with the CIA and German foreign intelligence to spin the news โ€œin a way that was positive for the United States and bad for its opponents.โ€ The German journalist made no attempt to cover-up that he accepted bribes from the CIA throughout his career and that he would lose his job if he did not comply. "They paid all my expenses and introduced me to Americans I would like to meet," Ulfkotte told RT, stating that he became an honorary citizen of the state of Oklahoma because he wrote pro-American articles, and had the support of the CIA. He also said on one occasion: "I have survived three heart attacks, I no longer have children who need my support, and day by day I watch Americans on the news as they fuel the next war. This time it takes place in Ukraine against Russia, but the game is the same".
13:24

Germany Is Still A Kind Of A Colony Of The United States. The Priceless Value of Old Archives โ€ผ๏ธ โ€ผ Former German MSM Journalist Udo Ulfkotte comes clean He explains how all western corporate journalists are bought by the CIA and how they must follow their agenda. If only more journalists started speaking the truth!!! Udo Ulfkotte says all major media networks controlled by CIA Ulfkotte was for a time the editor of the well-known German daily Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung (FAZ), where he was convinced first hand that the CIA and the German BND intelligence service bribe journalists to write anti-Russian and extremely pro-Western and pro-NATO articles. In his book "Journalists for hire" (โ€œGekaufte Journalistenโ€ in German), Ulfkotte explained in great detail how the propaganda campaign of the USA and NATO works. He then stated that he published under his name texts written by agents of various intelligence services, including the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA). Before his death, Ulfkotte gave an interview to the Russian television RT, in which he stated that he was "very afraid of a new war in Europe, and that the German and U.S. media want to push Europe into war and provoke war on Russian territory". "Looking at how the German and American media are bringing war to Europe, I speak up to say that what I did in the past, manipulated people, participated in anti-Russian propaganda is wrong. The war with Russia is a point of no return. What my colleagues do is wrong. I have written a book because I am very afraid of a new war in Europe. War never comes of its own accord, there are always people who stand up for it and it's not just politicians, but also journalists. We betrayed our readers, just to push the war. I don't want this anymore, I'm tired of this propaganda. We live in a banana republic, not a democratic country where we have freedom the press", Ulfkotte said at the time. He claimed that the CIA had corrupted journalists and major news outlets so much that it had become a routine thing, accepted and widespread in the Western media, and that journalists who did not adhere to it could not get a job or their careers were interrupted. The book is still not available in English, but in it, the former editor of Germanyโ€™s Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung newspaper claims that he was a part of a program where the CIA hired American and European journalists to plant false stories in the mainstream media to further a disinformation agenda. Ulfkotte claimed to have worked with the CIA and German foreign intelligence to spin the news โ€œin a way that was positive for the United States and bad for its opponents.โ€ The German journalist made no attempt to cover-up that he accepted bribes from the CIA throughout his career and that he would lose his job if he did not comply. "They paid all my expenses and introduced me to Americans I would like to meet," Ulfkotte told RT, stating that he became an honorary citizen of the state of Oklahoma because he wrote pro-American articles, and had the support of the CIA. He also said on one occasion: "I have survived three heart attacks, I no longer have children who need my support, and day by day I watch Americans on the news as they fuel the next war. This time it takes place in Ukraine against Russia, but the game is the same".

Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

175,491 ะฟั€ะพัะผะพั‚ั€ะพะฒ โ€ข 2 ะปะตั‚ ะฝะฐะทะฐะด

Elon Musk spent a decade warning that AI could end us. He just said that if a stop button existed, he would leave it alone. Musk: โ€œEven if there was a stop button, we probably shouldnโ€™t press it, because the most likely outcome is incredible abundance for all.โ€ Nothing about him changed. The arithmetic did. Because stopping has a body count. It just never files a report. The tumor found in 2031 instead of 2029. The molecule that sits in a queue for four years. The kid in a country with three hundred doctors, none of them free that week. The risks of building get headlines. The risks of waiting get obituaries that never name a cause. We forgive the harm we allow and prosecute the harm we cause. That instinct built our reflexes, our ethics, our courts. It is also how a civilization freezes the world exactly as it is and calls it mercy. Musk: โ€œThere seems to be just inexorable progress here in AI and in robots that even if I wanted to stop it, I couldnโ€™t.โ€ That momentum isnโ€™t political. Itโ€™s thermodynamic. Intelligence moves the way heat moves. Into everything colder than itself. You can slow it in one country. You cannot stop it on one planet. And there was never a button. Not for fire. Not for print. Not for the atom. No generation has ever voted to un-know something. Every one of them was certain it stood at a fork. Whether was never on the ballot. Who builds it and what it gets aimed at always has been. A smaller lever than we wanted, and far heavier than we admit. His interviewer heard all of that as surrender. Zanny Minton Beddoes: โ€œYou seem to have decided itโ€™s inevitable, letโ€™s hope for the best and go for the ride.โ€ He corrected the verb. Musk: โ€œLetโ€™s enjoy the ride is, I think, my philosophy at this point.โ€ Hoping for the best treats the future as weather. Enjoying the ride treats it as a place you live. And what waits there is not convenience. Diseases that consumed a century of human attention, ended by minds that never sleep and never forget. Energy cheap enough that access stops being a privilege. Genius born in places that were never going to hand it a lever. Not gated by wealth or geography. Abundance as the default condition of being alive. But the deepest thing it moves isnโ€™t material. Scarcity is the operating system underneath everything we are. Property, borders, law, hierarchy, most of what we call virtue. Ethics is rationing with better branding. Every war over a river. Every empire over a trade route. Every cruelty that began as arithmetic. And none of it was necessary. The atoms were always here. So was the energy. The only thing we were ever short of was the intelligence to arrange them. Scarcity was never a law of nature. It was a wait. Every human who ever starved was early. Scarcity didnโ€™t just shape our answers. It supplied the question. Every religion, every moral code, every inherited idea about what a life is for was written by people who were hungry. That authorship is ending. We are about to be the first humans who have to answer that on a full stomach. Not obsolete. Free. And freedom has never once told anyone what to do with it. He never said the risk was zero. He said the opposite, first, and louder than anyone. He is saying the fear was aimed at the wrong thing. It was never the machine. It was the part of us that would have reached for the button and called it wisdom.
1:12

Elon Musk spent a decade warning that AI could end us. He just said that if a stop button existed, he would leave it alone. Musk: โ€œEven if there was a stop button, we probably shouldnโ€™t press it, because the most likely outcome is incredible abundance for all.โ€ Nothing about him changed. The arithmetic did. Because stopping has a body count. It just never files a report. The tumor found in 2031 instead of 2029. The molecule that sits in a queue for four years. The kid in a country with three hundred doctors, none of them free that week. The risks of building get headlines. The risks of waiting get obituaries that never name a cause. We forgive the harm we allow and prosecute the harm we cause. That instinct built our reflexes, our ethics, our courts. It is also how a civilization freezes the world exactly as it is and calls it mercy. Musk: โ€œThere seems to be just inexorable progress here in AI and in robots that even if I wanted to stop it, I couldnโ€™t.โ€ That momentum isnโ€™t political. Itโ€™s thermodynamic. Intelligence moves the way heat moves. Into everything colder than itself. You can slow it in one country. You cannot stop it on one planet. And there was never a button. Not for fire. Not for print. Not for the atom. No generation has ever voted to un-know something. Every one of them was certain it stood at a fork. Whether was never on the ballot. Who builds it and what it gets aimed at always has been. A smaller lever than we wanted, and far heavier than we admit. His interviewer heard all of that as surrender. Zanny Minton Beddoes: โ€œYou seem to have decided itโ€™s inevitable, letโ€™s hope for the best and go for the ride.โ€ He corrected the verb. Musk: โ€œLetโ€™s enjoy the ride is, I think, my philosophy at this point.โ€ Hoping for the best treats the future as weather. Enjoying the ride treats it as a place you live. And what waits there is not convenience. Diseases that consumed a century of human attention, ended by minds that never sleep and never forget. Energy cheap enough that access stops being a privilege. Genius born in places that were never going to hand it a lever. Not gated by wealth or geography. Abundance as the default condition of being alive. But the deepest thing it moves isnโ€™t material. Scarcity is the operating system underneath everything we are. Property, borders, law, hierarchy, most of what we call virtue. Ethics is rationing with better branding. Every war over a river. Every empire over a trade route. Every cruelty that began as arithmetic. And none of it was necessary. The atoms were always here. So was the energy. The only thing we were ever short of was the intelligence to arrange them. Scarcity was never a law of nature. It was a wait. Every human who ever starved was early. Scarcity didnโ€™t just shape our answers. It supplied the question. Every religion, every moral code, every inherited idea about what a life is for was written by people who were hungry. That authorship is ending. We are about to be the first humans who have to answer that on a full stomach. Not obsolete. Free. And freedom has never once told anyone what to do with it. He never said the risk was zero. He said the opposite, first, and louder than anyone. He is saying the fear was aimed at the wrong thing. It was never the machine. It was the part of us that would have reached for the button and called it wisdom.

Dustin

15,346 ะฟั€ะพัะผะพั‚ั€ะพะฒ โ€ข 25 ะดะฝะตะน ะฝะฐะทะฐะด

On the last day of campaigning, Dr P Thiaga Rajan (PTR) broke down. It is sometimes difficult to see a grown man tear up during an election campaign. Such behaviour, after all, isnโ€™t expected of politicians. We have reduced our profession into a cruel, heartless one. Yet, this rare moment of vulnerability was telling: over the last ten days, I have observed a man who leads not with his mind but his heart. Of course he has degrees from MIT, of course heโ€™s been a brilliant Finance Minister, of course heโ€™s one of the sharpest brains around - but what sets him apart is his deep kindness and commitment to a politics of care. What could be a better testament to that politics than the fact that there was not a single dry eye in the rally he addressed? As Tamil Nadu heads to the polls on the 23rd of April, I am certain that PTR will win from Madurai. What I more certain of, however, is that he will have won many hearts - not only in Madurai, but far far beyond.
1:23

On the last day of campaigning, Dr P Thiaga Rajan (PTR) broke down. It is sometimes difficult to see a grown man tear up during an election campaign. Such behaviour, after all, isnโ€™t expected of politicians. We have reduced our profession into a cruel, heartless one. Yet, this rare moment of vulnerability was telling: over the last ten days, I have observed a man who leads not with his mind but his heart. Of course he has degrees from MIT, of course heโ€™s been a brilliant Finance Minister, of course heโ€™s one of the sharpest brains around - but what sets him apart is his deep kindness and commitment to a politics of care. What could be a better testament to that politics than the fact that there was not a single dry eye in the rally he addressed? As Tamil Nadu heads to the polls on the 23rd of April, I am certain that PTR will win from Madurai. What I more certain of, however, is that he will have won many hearts - not only in Madurai, but far far beyond.

Anish Gawande

288,725 ะฟั€ะพัะผะพั‚ั€ะพะฒ โ€ข 4 ะผะตััั†ะตะฒ ะฝะฐะทะฐะด