正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

𝐇𝐘𝐏𝐎𝐂𝐑𝐈𝐒𝐘 𝐀𝐓 𝐈𝐓𝐒 𝐏𝐄𝐀𝐊! ⚠️ Rahul Gandhi talks about “smashing patriarchy” when speaking about Manusmriti and Hindu women. But when it comes to hijab and abaya, the same principle suddenly becomes “freedom of choice.” So, Rahul Gandhi, is your fight against patriarchy selective and based on religion? 𝐈𝐟 𝐰𝐨𝐦𝐞𝐧’𝐬... show more

BJP

23,043,927 subscribers

84,090 次观看 • 1 天前 •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

Neha Singh Rathore brutally exposed herself on live television Neha : Give me a stage, I will speak on women empowerment. Reporter: Where were you when Rahul Gandhi targeted Manusmriti but stayed silent on triple talaq, halala and Muslim women's rights? Neha: I am not a Congress or Rahul Gandhi spokesperson. The moment the question became inconvenient, the activism disappeared. This is not about women, this is about selective targeting of Sanatan Dharma.

Neha Singh Rathore brutally exposed herself on live television Neha : Give me a stage, I will speak on women empowerment. Reporter: Where were you when Rahul Gandhi targeted Manusmriti but stayed silent on triple talaq, halala and Muslim women's rights? Neha: I am not a Congress or Rahul Gandhi spokesperson. The moment the question became inconvenient, the activism disappeared. This is not about women, this is about selective targeting of Sanatan Dharma.

BALA

239,468 次观看 • 1 天前

#WATCH | Hyderabad, Telangana: On the Rupee weakening against the Dollar, Telangana BJP Chief Spokesperson Ramchander Rao says, "Rahul Gandhi is always enthusiastic about speaking anything against India. Today the fall of rupee value in the international market when compared to other currencies like Japan, Canada and other countries our fall of rupee value is only nominal. But internationally, the other currencies have gone down from 9 to 20 per cent. Rahul Gandhi doesn't speak about it. In fact, our economy is very strong. We have been facing the crisis with all our might and strength, and under PM Modi's rule, our economy is very much intact. But Rahul Gandhi doesn't accept these things. He doesn't compare the other countries with our present system. Rahul Gandhi, who has tweeted with regard to the fall of the rupee as a crisis to the Indian economy, I think this is absurd..."

#WATCH | Hyderabad, Telangana: On the Rupee weakening against the Dollar, Telangana BJP Chief Spokesperson Ramchander Rao says, "Rahul Gandhi is always enthusiastic about speaking anything against India. Today the fall of rupee value in the international market when compared to other currencies like Japan, Canada and other countries our fall of rupee value is only nominal. But internationally, the other currencies have gone down from 9 to 20 per cent. Rahul Gandhi doesn't speak about it. In fact, our economy is very strong. We have been facing the crisis with all our might and strength, and under PM Modi's rule, our economy is very much intact. But Rahul Gandhi doesn't accept these things. He doesn't compare the other countries with our present system. Rahul Gandhi, who has tweeted with regard to the fall of the rupee as a crisis to the Indian economy, I think this is absurd..."

ANI

12,120 次观看 • 5 个月前

Selective Support and Cultural Sensitivity: A Matter of Responsibility We never said that Deepika insulted any religion. Our only point is that she should show respect towards every culture and promote it. Wearing a hijab or abaya is her personal and professional choice, as she is getting paid for it. Bharat has the richest culture in the world, and we all should respect and promote it. Indian Tourism will never approach her because when it comes to the bindi, she says it’s her freedom not to wear one; when it comes to the gang that says “Bharat tere tukde honge,” she supports the Tukde Tukde Gang; and when it comes to any law proposed by the Indian Government, she supports those who oppose it. NDTV Padmaja Joshi Rahul Easwar

Selective Support and Cultural Sensitivity: A Matter of Responsibility We never said that Deepika insulted any religion. Our only point is that she should show respect towards every culture and promote it. Wearing a hijab or abaya is her personal and professional choice, as she is getting paid for it. Bharat has the richest culture in the world, and we all should respect and promote it. Indian Tourism will never approach her because when it comes to the bindi, she says it’s her freedom not to wear one; when it comes to the gang that says “Bharat tere tukde honge,” she supports the Tukde Tukde Gang; and when it comes to any law proposed by the Indian Government, she supports those who oppose it. NDTV Padmaja Joshi Rahul Easwar

Amita Sachdeva, Advocate

11,837 次观看 • 10 个月前

Rahul Gandhi and the INC are questioning development today, but where were these concerns earlier? When the INC approved the Sethusamudram Shipping Canal Project, it involved cutting near Ram Setu and raised serious concerns about coral reefs and marine life, yet it was cleared at the time before being halted later. Now, the same voices oppose the Great Nicobar Development Project over environmental concerns, despite its strategic importance for ports, trade routes, and security. The real question is simple: why is there selective outrage when it comes to national projects?

Rahul Gandhi and the INC are questioning development today, but where were these concerns earlier? When the INC approved the Sethusamudram Shipping Canal Project, it involved cutting near Ram Setu and raised serious concerns about coral reefs and marine life, yet it was cleared at the time before being halted later. Now, the same voices oppose the Great Nicobar Development Project over environmental concerns, despite its strategic importance for ports, trade routes, and security. The real question is simple: why is there selective outrage when it comes to national projects?

Praffulgarg

51,725 次观看 • 3 个月前

Congress and Rahul Gandhi never miss an opportunity to sermonize about welfare, transparency, and accountability. Yet, when it comes to their own flagship schemes, the facts tell a very different story. CAG findings on Karnataka's Gruha Lakshmi Scheme: - 19,020 beneficiaries shared bank account numbers - ₹60.69 crore paid to these beneficiaries - ₹1.80 crore in repeated credits across 8,995 accounts - 10 lakh+ beneficiaries' bank accounts underwent multiple changes Rahul Gandhi owes an explanation to the people of Karnataka. The same Congress that lectures the nation every day cannot run away when its own flagship scheme is caught in a web of irregularities.

Congress and Rahul Gandhi never miss an opportunity to sermonize about welfare, transparency, and accountability. Yet, when it comes to their own flagship schemes, the facts tell a very different story. CAG findings on Karnataka's Gruha Lakshmi Scheme: - 19,020 beneficiaries shared bank account numbers - ₹60.69 crore paid to these beneficiaries - ₹1.80 crore in repeated credits across 8,995 accounts - 10 lakh+ beneficiaries' bank accounts underwent multiple changes Rahul Gandhi owes an explanation to the people of Karnataka. The same Congress that lectures the nation every day cannot run away when its own flagship scheme is caught in a web of irregularities.

Tulla Veerender Goud

13,335 次观看 • 2 个月前

My Take : The last 24 hours have exposed an uncomfortable truth: ideology may divide our political class, but misogyny unites it. Yesterday, Rahul Gandhi held a press conference attacking the Modi government’s diplomatic approach. Standing beside him was Congress leader Sandeep Dikshit. Gandhi hugged him to make a point about diplomacy. Dikshit then joked: “Did you hug me thinking I was Meloni?” — referring to Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni. Gandhi replied: “I have not reached there yet.” It was a cheap joke. And it was deeply sexist. - but casual sexism is part of our politics - Giorgia Meloni is a democratically elected world leader, not a prop for political banter. If the Congress wants to speak credibly about gender justice, Sandeep Dikshit should have apologised ... plainly and publicly. No excuses. No deflection. No double standards. The BJP was absolutely entitled to demand that apology. But then the BJP did what Indian politics does far too often: it answered misogyny with more misogyny. BJP leader Nishikant Dubey posted a photograph of Indira Gandhi embracing Fidel Castro and asked whether Rahul Gandhi would call that “lust ” Think about that choice. There are countless photographs of former PM and congress leader Rajiv Gandhi embracing foreign dignitaries. But Mr Dubey chose Indira Gandhi. And then attached a sexual insinuation to the image. So an insult to Giorgia Meloni was answered with an insult to Indira Gandhi. Different parties. Same instinct. Put a woman at the centre of the punchline. And that is the point. This is not about defending the Congress. Sandeep Dikshit was wrong. He should apologise. It is also not about defending the BJP. Nishikant Dubey’s response was equally revealing. Because misogyny does not become acceptable when it is used as political retaliation. Women should not become ammunition every time politicians run out of arguments. Not Giorgia Meloni. Not Indira Gandhi. Not any woman. So yes, ideology divides our political class. But when it comes to using women as the easiest targets in a political fight, they seem remarkably united.

My Take : The last 24 hours have exposed an uncomfortable truth: ideology may divide our political class, but misogyny unites it. Yesterday, Rahul Gandhi held a press conference attacking the Modi government’s diplomatic approach. Standing beside him was Congress leader Sandeep Dikshit. Gandhi hugged him to make a point about diplomacy. Dikshit then joked: “Did you hug me thinking I was Meloni?” — referring to Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni. Gandhi replied: “I have not reached there yet.” It was a cheap joke. And it was deeply sexist. - but casual sexism is part of our politics - Giorgia Meloni is a democratically elected world leader, not a prop for political banter. If the Congress wants to speak credibly about gender justice, Sandeep Dikshit should have apologised ... plainly and publicly. No excuses. No deflection. No double standards. The BJP was absolutely entitled to demand that apology. But then the BJP did what Indian politics does far too often: it answered misogyny with more misogyny. BJP leader Nishikant Dubey posted a photograph of Indira Gandhi embracing Fidel Castro and asked whether Rahul Gandhi would call that “lust ” Think about that choice. There are countless photographs of former PM and congress leader Rajiv Gandhi embracing foreign dignitaries. But Mr Dubey chose Indira Gandhi. And then attached a sexual insinuation to the image. So an insult to Giorgia Meloni was answered with an insult to Indira Gandhi. Different parties. Same instinct. Put a woman at the centre of the punchline. And that is the point. This is not about defending the Congress. Sandeep Dikshit was wrong. He should apologise. It is also not about defending the BJP. Nishikant Dubey’s response was equally revealing. Because misogyny does not become acceptable when it is used as political retaliation. Women should not become ammunition every time politicians run out of arguments. Not Giorgia Meloni. Not Indira Gandhi. Not any woman. So yes, ideology divides our political class. But when it comes to using women as the easiest targets in a political fight, they seem remarkably united.

Preeti Choudhry

17,795 次观看 • 11 天前

If we made a list of daft people in this country, Rahul Gandhi would top it. He is the kind of person who shuts his eyes the moment facts come up. The email he refers to is dated Dec 2014 and is in the public domain, and everyone must have read it. The real question is: has Rahul Gandhi read it? Or did he read it and ignore it? Or did he read it but fail to understand it? Anyone can read this email, and every Indian should. Rahul Gandhi talks about the Department of Justice putting out files. Fine. But what does the actual email say? It says India presents a massive opportunity for internet-based economic activity. It talks about 200 million internet users. It mentions adding 5 million users every month. It projects 500 million users by 2018. It highlights PM Modi’s ambitious rural broadband expansion to 250,000 villages. It talks about Make in India. It focuses on innovation, skill development, and India becoming a digital powerhouse. It points out that LinkedIn’s 28 million users in India make it its second-largest market. This is the so-called “scandalous” email? Congress ka Shehzada, must tell us: where is the crime? Where is the conspiracy?

If we made a list of daft people in this country, Rahul Gandhi would top it. He is the kind of person who shuts his eyes the moment facts come up. The email he refers to is dated Dec 2014 and is in the public domain, and everyone must have read it. The real question is: has Rahul Gandhi read it? Or did he read it and ignore it? Or did he read it but fail to understand it? Anyone can read this email, and every Indian should. Rahul Gandhi talks about the Department of Justice putting out files. Fine. But what does the actual email say? It says India presents a massive opportunity for internet-based economic activity. It talks about 200 million internet users. It mentions adding 5 million users every month. It projects 500 million users by 2018. It highlights PM Modi’s ambitious rural broadband expansion to 250,000 villages. It talks about Make in India. It focuses on innovation, skill development, and India becoming a digital powerhouse. It points out that LinkedIn’s 28 million users in India make it its second-largest market. This is the so-called “scandalous” email? Congress ka Shehzada, must tell us: where is the crime? Where is the conspiracy?

Amit Malviya

39,907 次观看 • 6 个月前

Those like Rahul Gandhi. who talk about patriarchy keeps mum on 4 wives, triple talaq, monly men can give Talaq, Hizab is must, Meharam & Halala. As far as Manu Smriti is concerned there is no original book available only the edition of William Jones who claimed to have translated in around 1785 from where , No original text he provided. So the party established by A O Hume which had several British officers and MPs as its president in the initial 25 years like William wedderburn , George Yule Alfred webb who assumed power by taking oath from viceroys is now trying to play the same template now it is has changed from ‘Divide and rule’ to ‘divide and destroy’ Now see what Nehru , Gandhi even Dr. Ambedkar said about Manu Smriti and when it was published with support of Government. Rahul is proving his elders wrong. My interview on this issue with IndiaToday TV.

Those like Rahul Gandhi. who talk about patriarchy keeps mum on 4 wives, triple talaq, monly men can give Talaq, Hizab is must, Meharam & Halala. As far as Manu Smriti is concerned there is no original book available only the edition of William Jones who claimed to have translated in around 1785 from where , No original text he provided. So the party established by A O Hume which had several British officers and MPs as its president in the initial 25 years like William wedderburn , George Yule Alfred webb who assumed power by taking oath from viceroys is now trying to play the same template now it is has changed from ‘Divide and rule’ to ‘divide and destroy’ Now see what Nehru , Gandhi even Dr. Ambedkar said about Manu Smriti and when it was published with support of Government. Rahul is proving his elders wrong. My interview on this issue with IndiaToday TV.

Dr. Sudhanshu Trivedi

75,647 次观看 • 1 天前

I want to start my speech by quoting your Supreme Leader Savarkar and his ideas on the Constitution of India and how he thought India should be run. Savarkar writes: ''The worst thing about the Constitution of India is that there is nothing Indian about it. Manusmriti is that scripture that is most worshippable after the Vedas, and which, from ancient times, had begun the basis of our culture, customs, thought, and practices. This book for centuries has codified the spiritual and divine march of our nation. Today, Manusmriti is law.'' These are the words of Savarkar. Those in the ruling side are defending the Constitution, but I want to ask you, do you stand by your leader's words? But when you defend the Constitution, you are ridiculing Savarkar and defaming him. : LoP Shri Rahul Gandhi in the Lok Sabha

I want to start my speech by quoting your Supreme Leader Savarkar and his ideas on the Constitution of India and how he thought India should be run. Savarkar writes: ''The worst thing about the Constitution of India is that there is nothing Indian about it. Manusmriti is that scripture that is most worshippable after the Vedas, and which, from ancient times, had begun the basis of our culture, customs, thought, and practices. This book for centuries has codified the spiritual and divine march of our nation. Today, Manusmriti is law.'' These are the words of Savarkar. Those in the ruling side are defending the Constitution, but I want to ask you, do you stand by your leader's words? But when you defend the Constitution, you are ridiculing Savarkar and defaming him. : LoP Shri Rahul Gandhi in the Lok Sabha

Congress

14,011 次观看 • 1 年前

Candace Owens says she’s going to file a report over a 92-person group chat. But where’s the evidence of a crime? Being added to a group chat isn’t proof of wrongdoing. Posting about a public figure isn’t proof of “obsessive derangement.” And if someone actually shared private information or engaged in criminal activity, show the evidence and take it to the proper authorities. And what about the double standard? Candace has spent months talking about the same people and issues, but suddenly when someone else talks a lot about her, it becomes evidence of obsession. And if the FBI is credible when they bring you a threat against your life, how can they suddenly become untrustworthy when their conclusions don’t fit your narrative? If there’s evidence, show it. If there isn’t, stop making accusations and calling them facts. I’m not going anywhere. I’m going to keep speaking the truth and defending people from claims that aren’t supported by evidence.

Candace Owens says she’s going to file a report over a 92-person group chat. But where’s the evidence of a crime? Being added to a group chat isn’t proof of wrongdoing. Posting about a public figure isn’t proof of “obsessive derangement.” And if someone actually shared private information or engaged in criminal activity, show the evidence and take it to the proper authorities. And what about the double standard? Candace has spent months talking about the same people and issues, but suddenly when someone else talks a lot about her, it becomes evidence of obsession. And if the FBI is credible when they bring you a threat against your life, how can they suddenly become untrustworthy when their conclusions don’t fit your narrative? If there’s evidence, show it. If there isn’t, stop making accusations and calling them facts. I’m not going anywhere. I’m going to keep speaking the truth and defending people from claims that aren’t supported by evidence.

Natalie Jean Beisner

10,896 次观看 • 16 天前

#WATCH | Pune, Maharashtra: On 'Kerala Story 2,' BJP National Spokesperson Shehzad Poonawalla says, "The Kerala story, which was first based on Love Jihad, and now the second part of it, is based on how women are being forced to convert and how women are being exploited. I don't know why the vote bank is under such pressure that earlier, it was Pinarayi Vijayan, who opposed it, and now the Congress is also opposing it. Similarly, this is the same group that talks about freedom of speech, freedom of films, freedom of journalism, and freedom of books. But when a film introduces this kind of rigid thinking, proves it, and uncovers it, then, in the name of the vote bank, now all those who oppose it, I want to ask, why do they try to hide this kind of truth again and again? The Catholic Church had spoken about Love Jihad. The court had spoken about Love Jihad. But the Congress has joined forces with the Jamaat-e-Islami... Now, under their pressure, they are opposing a film on women and a film against women's exploitation too."

#WATCH | Pune, Maharashtra: On 'Kerala Story 2,' BJP National Spokesperson Shehzad Poonawalla says, "The Kerala story, which was first based on Love Jihad, and now the second part of it, is based on how women are being forced to convert and how women are being exploited. I don't know why the vote bank is under such pressure that earlier, it was Pinarayi Vijayan, who opposed it, and now the Congress is also opposing it. Similarly, this is the same group that talks about freedom of speech, freedom of films, freedom of journalism, and freedom of books. But when a film introduces this kind of rigid thinking, proves it, and uncovers it, then, in the name of the vote bank, now all those who oppose it, I want to ask, why do they try to hide this kind of truth again and again? The Catholic Church had spoken about Love Jihad. The court had spoken about Love Jihad. But the Congress has joined forces with the Jamaat-e-Islami... Now, under their pressure, they are opposing a film on women and a film against women's exploitation too."

ANI

16,316 次观看 • 6 个月前

Zack Polanski, "Why do you feel so strongly about violence against women and girls?" Hannah Spencer, "When I was younger, one of our friends was murdered by her boyfriend" "I remember the reaction to that, there was a lot of victim blaming" "Gender based violence is a huge issue and no politician seems to be taking it seriously at all" "I've met so many victims and survivors of abuse who need someone to listen to them and speak up for them" "I work in a male environment and I see so many good men who are wonderful humans" "But a lot of the men struggle with emotions and feelings and having to try and support each other" "When I think about gender based violence and I think about how boys and men in society are being raised" "I see how so many are screwed over by the patriarchy, including the men" "But I think it comes out in a more extreme way as violence against women and girls" "Keir Starmer and Peter Mandelson, two men looking out for each other" "Keir Starmer says he cares about violence against women and girls, but how can he when he's surrounded by these people like Mandelson" "And we need more people with lived experienced in parliament as that's the only way we're going to change things"

Zack Polanski, "Why do you feel so strongly about violence against women and girls?" Hannah Spencer, "When I was younger, one of our friends was murdered by her boyfriend" "I remember the reaction to that, there was a lot of victim blaming" "Gender based violence is a huge issue and no politician seems to be taking it seriously at all" "I've met so many victims and survivors of abuse who need someone to listen to them and speak up for them" "I work in a male environment and I see so many good men who are wonderful humans" "But a lot of the men struggle with emotions and feelings and having to try and support each other" "When I think about gender based violence and I think about how boys and men in society are being raised" "I see how so many are screwed over by the patriarchy, including the men" "But I think it comes out in a more extreme way as violence against women and girls" "Keir Starmer and Peter Mandelson, two men looking out for each other" "Keir Starmer says he cares about violence against women and girls, but how can he when he's surrounded by these people like Mandelson" "And we need more people with lived experienced in parliament as that's the only way we're going to change things"

Farrukh

22,647 次观看 • 6 个月前

Noor Bukhari, charity begins at home, doesn’t it? Your husband, Awn Chaudhry, was a star witness and key player in the so called Iddat case against Imran Khan and Bushra Bibi. Yet you remained silent about his role, the current regime’s treatment of women and children and those thrown into jail through politically motivated and sham cases. Now you appear on social media lecturing others about the safety of the children. No one is questioning the seriousness of crimes against children but moral lectures ring hollow when your outrage is selective. Hypocrisy looks bad on anyone. Stop preaching from a high horse when you refuse to speak about the injustice happening around you and inside your own home.

Noor Bukhari, charity begins at home, doesn’t it? Your husband, Awn Chaudhry, was a star witness and key player in the so called Iddat case against Imran Khan and Bushra Bibi. Yet you remained silent about his role, the current regime’s treatment of women and children and those thrown into jail through politically motivated and sham cases. Now you appear on social media lecturing others about the safety of the children. No one is questioning the seriousness of crimes against children but moral lectures ring hollow when your outrage is selective. Hypocrisy looks bad on anyone. Stop preaching from a high horse when you refuse to speak about the injustice happening around you and inside your own home.

Salma🎀

41,541 次观看 • 1 个月前

Democrats like to clutch their pearls and cry about “separating families” at the border, but on October 16, 2024, the Biden-Harris regime had no issue with separating 𝘉𝘦𝘷𝘦𝘭𝘺𝘯 𝘞𝘪𝘭𝘭𝘪𝘢𝘮𝘴 from her young child, when she was 𝘪𝘮𝘱𝘳𝘪𝘴𝘰𝘯𝘦𝘥 𝘪𝘯 𝘢 𝘧𝘦𝘥𝘦𝘳𝘢𝘭 𝘱𝘦𝘯𝘪𝘵𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘪𝘢𝘳𝘺 𝘧𝘰𝘳... 𝙬𝙖𝙞𝙩 𝙛𝙤𝙧 𝙞𝙩... 𝐔𝐍𝐋𝐀𝐖𝐅𝐔𝐋 𝐀𝐒𝐒𝐄𝐌𝐁𝐋𝐘. Williams, who runs a ministry called, “At Well Ministries,” is accused of blocking access to an abortion clinic, but says that she was there praying and preaching the gospel. “I was persecuted as a Christian standing for my beliefs when it comes to (pro) life.” 𝐓𝐡𝐢𝐬 𝐢𝐬 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐩𝐚𝐫𝐝𝐨𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝐧𝐞𝐞𝐝𝐚 𝐭𝐨 𝐡𝐚𝐩𝐩𝐞𝐧.

Democrats like to clutch their pearls and cry about “separating families” at the border, but on October 16, 2024, the Biden-Harris regime had no issue with separating 𝘉𝘦𝘷𝘦𝘭𝘺𝘯 𝘞𝘪𝘭𝘭𝘪𝘢𝘮𝘴 from her young child, when she was 𝘪𝘮𝘱𝘳𝘪𝘴𝘰𝘯𝘦𝘥 𝘪𝘯 𝘢 𝘧𝘦𝘥𝘦𝘳𝘢𝘭 𝘱𝘦𝘯𝘪𝘵𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘪𝘢𝘳𝘺 𝘧𝘰𝘳... 𝙬𝙖𝙞𝙩 𝙛𝙤𝙧 𝙞𝙩... 𝐔𝐍𝐋𝐀𝐖𝐅𝐔𝐋 𝐀𝐒𝐒𝐄𝐌𝐁𝐋𝐘. Williams, who runs a ministry called, “At Well Ministries,” is accused of blocking access to an abortion clinic, but says that she was there praying and preaching the gospel. “I was persecuted as a Christian standing for my beliefs when it comes to (pro) life.” 𝐓𝐡𝐢𝐬 𝐢𝐬 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐩𝐚𝐫𝐝𝐨𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝐧𝐞𝐞𝐝𝐚 𝐭𝐨 𝐡𝐚𝐩𝐩𝐞𝐧.

𝒞ℴ𝓃𝓈ℯ𝓇𝓋𝒶𝓉𝒾𝓋ℯ 👑 𝒟𝒾𝓋𝒶™

14,572 次观看 • 1 年前

Becoming Rahul Gandhi is not easy. At a very young age, he lost his grandmother, and later, his father was assassinated. Experiences of such magnitude often leave people with anger, resentment, and hatred. Yet, instead of allowing tragedy to shape him in that way, Rahul Gandhi chose a different path. Raised by Sonia Gandhi with values of compassion and empathy, he learned the power of love over hate. He endured immense personal loss, years of public scrutiny, and constant political attacks, yet he continued to advocate unity rather than division. Perhaps that is why, even today, he rarely responds to hatred with hatred. Instead, he has consistently spoken about bringing people together. His commitment to this idea was reflected in the Bharat Jodo Yatra, a nationwide journey aimed at strengthening social harmony and national unity. During the yatra, he popularized the slogan "Mohabbat Ki Dukaan" emphasizing that empathy and understanding are stronger forces than hatred and polarization. When I had the opportunity to meet Rahul, he shared the same lesson with all of us: hatred cannot defeat hatred- it can only be overcome through love and compassion. This philosophy can be summed up in his guiding principle: "Be someone who listens to sorrows, feels them, and gives strength." Hatred is limited, but love is endless. Rahul Gandhi continues to inspire many young people by standing firm in his beliefs despite immense pressure and criticism. His journey serves as a reminder that no matter how powerful hatred may appear, love, empathy, and humanity ultimately prevail. Love you Rahul Gandhi 🫶🥹🫂❤️

Becoming Rahul Gandhi is not easy. At a very young age, he lost his grandmother, and later, his father was assassinated. Experiences of such magnitude often leave people with anger, resentment, and hatred. Yet, instead of allowing tragedy to shape him in that way, Rahul Gandhi chose a different path. Raised by Sonia Gandhi with values of compassion and empathy, he learned the power of love over hate. He endured immense personal loss, years of public scrutiny, and constant political attacks, yet he continued to advocate unity rather than division. Perhaps that is why, even today, he rarely responds to hatred with hatred. Instead, he has consistently spoken about bringing people together. His commitment to this idea was reflected in the Bharat Jodo Yatra, a nationwide journey aimed at strengthening social harmony and national unity. During the yatra, he popularized the slogan "Mohabbat Ki Dukaan" emphasizing that empathy and understanding are stronger forces than hatred and polarization. When I had the opportunity to meet Rahul, he shared the same lesson with all of us: hatred cannot defeat hatred- it can only be overcome through love and compassion. This philosophy can be summed up in his guiding principle: "Be someone who listens to sorrows, feels them, and gives strength." Hatred is limited, but love is endless. Rahul Gandhi continues to inspire many young people by standing firm in his beliefs despite immense pressure and criticism. His journey serves as a reminder that no matter how powerful hatred may appear, love, empathy, and humanity ultimately prevail. Love you Rahul Gandhi 🫶🥹🫂❤️

☆

22,944 次观看 • 2 个月前

#WATCH | Delhi: On the student's protest in Jharkhand, Congress MP Gaurav Gogoi says, "On the very evening that the lathi-charge against the students occurred, Rahul Gandhi condemned it immediately. He didn't wait two weeks to make an Instagram reel like Prime Minister Modi does; he condemned it right then and there. He didn't make desperate attempts to shield Dharmendra Pradhan, unlike Prime Minister Modi. Even today, Dharmendra Pradhan and this government are questioning the character and image of the students who were at Jantar Mantar. Don't we see the young women who met Rahul Gandhi and spoke about the kind of abusive language being used against them? Prime Minister Modi, when you are subjected to abuse, you feel hurt. But even today, you remain silent regarding the abuse being hurled at the girls present at Jantar Mantar."

#WATCH | Delhi: On the student's protest in Jharkhand, Congress MP Gaurav Gogoi says, "On the very evening that the lathi-charge against the students occurred, Rahul Gandhi condemned it immediately. He didn't wait two weeks to make an Instagram reel like Prime Minister Modi does; he condemned it right then and there. He didn't make desperate attempts to shield Dharmendra Pradhan, unlike Prime Minister Modi. Even today, Dharmendra Pradhan and this government are questioning the character and image of the students who were at Jantar Mantar. Don't we see the young women who met Rahul Gandhi and spoke about the kind of abusive language being used against them? Prime Minister Modi, when you are subjected to abuse, you feel hurt. But even today, you remain silent regarding the abuse being hurled at the girls present at Jantar Mantar."

ANI

26,421 次观看 • 15 天前

The battle for women vote has found a new leash of life after Rahul Gandhi spoke of fighting Shakti in Hindu dharma. Despite Congress’s several attempts to explain what Rahul Gandhi meant, the BJP charge, led by none other than Prime Minister Modi has been unrelenting. The BJP alleged that Rahul Gandhi is not just anti-Hindu but also a misogynist. Not wanting to keep Rahul’s comments limited to the divine form of Shakti alone, the Prime Minister linked it to Nari Shakti and Bharat Mata. Today, stepping up the attack, the BJP ensured that the PM was welcomed by 11 Shakti Ammas in the Salem rally. On the face of it, it may appear mere symbolism but the political messaging can’t be overlooked. The PM has quickly positioned himself as one who revers and has worked for the empowerment of Nari Shakti as opposed to the Congress, led by Rahul Gandhi, who wants to fight Shakti. Has the Congress played into the hands of BJP, once again? After all, the PM has assiduously nurtured the women vote block. Several of his social welfare programs, from Aawas to Ujjwala to Sauchalay, are all about women empowerment. The PM has specifically focused on pushing more women to be entrepreneurs. His Lakhpati Didi is an ambitious program. Besides, the Govt never tires recounting that 50% of all beneficiaries, across programs, are women. Legislating on women’s reservation bill or praising women scientists for the success of Chandrayaan3, have all been part of PM Modi’s political pitch. Given the context, it would be interesting to see how the fight for women’s vote shapes up in the days ahead. For now, the BJP and the PM have grabbed the opportunity with both hands.

The battle for women vote has found a new leash of life after Rahul Gandhi spoke of fighting Shakti in Hindu dharma. Despite Congress’s several attempts to explain what Rahul Gandhi meant, the BJP charge, led by none other than Prime Minister Modi has been unrelenting. The BJP alleged that Rahul Gandhi is not just anti-Hindu but also a misogynist. Not wanting to keep Rahul’s comments limited to the divine form of Shakti alone, the Prime Minister linked it to Nari Shakti and Bharat Mata. Today, stepping up the attack, the BJP ensured that the PM was welcomed by 11 Shakti Ammas in the Salem rally. On the face of it, it may appear mere symbolism but the political messaging can’t be overlooked. The PM has quickly positioned himself as one who revers and has worked for the empowerment of Nari Shakti as opposed to the Congress, led by Rahul Gandhi, who wants to fight Shakti. Has the Congress played into the hands of BJP, once again? After all, the PM has assiduously nurtured the women vote block. Several of his social welfare programs, from Aawas to Ujjwala to Sauchalay, are all about women empowerment. The PM has specifically focused on pushing more women to be entrepreneurs. His Lakhpati Didi is an ambitious program. Besides, the Govt never tires recounting that 50% of all beneficiaries, across programs, are women. Legislating on women’s reservation bill or praising women scientists for the success of Chandrayaan3, have all been part of PM Modi’s political pitch. Given the context, it would be interesting to see how the fight for women’s vote shapes up in the days ahead. For now, the BJP and the PM have grabbed the opportunity with both hands.

Marya Shakil

25,342 次观看 • 2 年前

For Congress and AAP when it comes to choice; they will stand with - Naxal terrorist Hidma - Anti Hindu Murder Convict Tahir Hussain - Terrorist Hafiz Saeed. Ideology of Rahul Gandhi & Kejriwal is that of URBAN Naxals! For these vote bank Netas Tahir Hussain is their poster boy who is convicted of inciting mob against Hindus in Delhi Riots; who is convicted of killing IB officer Ankit Sharma but not Haseen; Firoz and four others who are acquitted! It was not a coincidence that There was a huge crowd at Grave of Terrorist Yakub Menon; but none at ABJ Abdul Kalam! My intervention on Debate:

For Congress and AAP when it comes to choice; they will stand with - Naxal terrorist Hidma - Anti Hindu Murder Convict Tahir Hussain - Terrorist Hafiz Saeed. Ideology of Rahul Gandhi & Kejriwal is that of URBAN Naxals! For these vote bank Netas Tahir Hussain is their poster boy who is convicted of inciting mob against Hindus in Delhi Riots; who is convicted of killing IB officer Ankit Sharma but not Haseen; Firoz and four others who are acquitted! It was not a coincidence that There was a huge crowd at Grave of Terrorist Yakub Menon; but none at ABJ Abdul Kalam! My intervention on Debate:

Pradeep Bhandari(प्रदीप भंडारी)🇮🇳

86,461 次观看 • 1 个月前

#WATCH | Delhi: On Rahul Gandhi and Sandeep Dikshit controversy, Congress leader Jairam Ramesh says, "... I do not see it as an insult. Where is diplomacy now? Now it is 'huglomacy'—hug everyone, show that foreign leaders are your good friends, and ask smaller countries to give you awards and medals... I believe this is not in the interest of our foreign policy; it has weakened us. These are the questions being raised. And when it comes to discrediting people, there is no match for the Prime Minister... Whenever the Prime Minister is questioned or criticised, he becomes the victim and plays victim politics. He can question others, make jokes, and use insulting words, but when someone questions him, there are double standards..."

#WATCH | Delhi: On Rahul Gandhi and Sandeep Dikshit controversy, Congress leader Jairam Ramesh says, "... I do not see it as an insult. Where is diplomacy now? Now it is 'huglomacy'—hug everyone, show that foreign leaders are your good friends, and ask smaller countries to give you awards and medals... I believe this is not in the interest of our foreign policy; it has weakened us. These are the questions being raised. And when it comes to discrediting people, there is no match for the Prime Minister... Whenever the Prime Minister is questioned or criticised, he becomes the victim and plays victim politics. He can question others, make jokes, and use insulting words, but when someone questions him, there are double standards..."

ANI

50,225 次观看 • 10 天前