Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

𝐇𝐞𝐫𝐨𝐞𝐬 𝐚𝐫𝐞𝐧'𝐭 𝐚𝐥𝐰𝐚𝐲𝐬 𝐢𝐧 𝐮𝐧𝐢𝐟𝐨𝐫𝐦—𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐭'𝐬 𝐰𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝐦𝐚𝐤𝐞𝐬 𝐨𝐮𝐫 𝐜𝐢𝐭𝐲 𝐬𝐭𝐫𝐨𝐧𝐠𝐞𝐫. Hyderabad City Police urges every citizen: When you see someone in need, don't be a bystander. If it's safe, stop, help, and alert emergency services. 𝐀 𝐬𝐚𝐟𝐞𝐫 𝐜𝐢𝐭𝐲 𝐛𝐞𝐠𝐢𝐧𝐬 𝐰𝐢𝐭𝐡 𝐜𝐨𝐦𝐩𝐚𝐬𝐬𝐢𝐨𝐧𝐚𝐭𝐞 𝐜𝐢𝐭𝐢𝐳𝐞𝐧𝐬. #HyderabadCityPolice #EveryLifeMatters #CompassionInAction #SaferHyderab

Hyderabad City Police

544,283 subscribers

120,231 Aufrufe • vor 14 Tagen •via X (Twitter)

Nachrichten & Politik

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

I'm a Telford survivor — raped by Pakistani grooming gangs from age 12, pregnant at 13, lost my daughter to the system, and constantly hunted. My address gets doxxed/found on TikTok, by the police, social services, friends & family, thru benefits again and again. I've moved 17 times in nearly 9 years. I can't go back to my home — it's not safe. Right now in Egypt, scared and alone, I need help to finally live a SAFE life: - A secure home outside the UK where the gangs and threats can't find me - Financial support to relocate, cover living costs, and be with my son Zayaan (who's abroad to protect him from social services & the same evil) I pay for his school, food, carer, rent, clothes, medical — everything — on my own, while running for my life. I just want peace, safety, and to stop running. Jesus, please provide and give me strength for this move again. 🙏 Please donate if you can — every bit helps me rebuild: PayPal: GoFundMe (for moving/relocation/help for zayaan): Share this. Thank you from the bottom of my heart. ❤️✝️ #TelfordSurvivor #HelpZayaan #TheRapeOfBritain #ChristIsKing

Sensitive content

I'm a Telford survivor — raped by Pakistani grooming gangs from age 12, pregnant at 13, lost my daughter to the system, and constantly hunted. My address gets doxxed/found on TikTok, by the police, social services, friends & family, thru benefits again and again. I've moved 17 times in nearly 9 years. I can't go back to my home — it's not safe. Right now in Egypt, scared and alone, I need help to finally live a SAFE life: - A secure home outside the UK where the gangs and threats can't find me - Financial support to relocate, cover living costs, and be with my son Zayaan (who's abroad to protect him from social services & the same evil) I pay for his school, food, carer, rent, clothes, medical — everything — on my own, while running for my life. I just want peace, safety, and to stop running. Jesus, please provide and give me strength for this move again. 🙏 Please donate if you can — every bit helps me rebuild: PayPal: GoFundMe (for moving/relocation/help for zayaan): Share this. Thank you from the bottom of my heart. ❤️✝️ #TelfordSurvivor #HelpZayaan #TheRapeOfBritain #ChristIsKing

Correne-TelfordSurvivor

45,099 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

SPIKING ALERT – N1 NORTHBOUND TOWARDS POLOKWANE: *Issued by Live Traffic NPC: Location: N1 Northbound, closer to Carousel Plaza (Hammanskraal area), heading towards Polokwane. *Incident: A motorist hit an object (suspected spikes) on the road and did not stop. This is a known high-risk hotspot for tyre-spiking attacks, where criminals deliberately damage vehicles to force drivers to pull over for ambushes, robberies, or worse. Tragically, this stretch has seen fatal incidents in the past, including shootings after victims stopped. Motorists, please take this seriously: - *Avoid driving at night* on this route unless your travel is absolutely crucial. These attacks often occur after dark when visibility is poor. - If you suspect spiking (sudden tyre damage, loud noise, or loss of control): - *Reduce speed gently* — do not slam on brakes. - *Do NOT stop on the side of the road. - Continue slowly (even on the rims if necessary) to the nearest safe, well-lit, populated area such as a filling station (petrol station), toll plaza, or police station. - *Never attempt to change a wheel on the roadside — this is when attackers strike. - Stay vigilant: Maintain a safe following distance, scan the road ahead for suspicious objects, and consider travelling in a convoy where possible. *Share this alert far and wide — don't be selfish. You might save a life today. If you want to support our mission and help our responders keep South African roads safer, please donate a cup of coffee — every little bit helps us continue this important work. Drive defensively. Arrive alive. Stay safe out there.

SPIKING ALERT – N1 NORTHBOUND TOWARDS POLOKWANE: Issued by Live Traffic NPC: Location: N1 Northbound, closer to Carousel Plaza (Hammanskraal area), heading towards Polokwane. Incident: A motorist hit an object (suspected spikes) on the road and did not stop. This is a known high-risk hotspot for tyre-spiking attacks, where criminals deliberately damage vehicles to force drivers to pull over for ambushes, robberies, or worse. Tragically, this stretch has seen fatal incidents in the past, including shootings after victims stopped. Motorists, please take this seriously: - Avoid driving at night on this route unless your travel is absolutely crucial. These attacks often occur after dark when visibility is poor. - If you suspect spiking (sudden tyre damage, loud noise, or loss of control): - Reduce speed gently — do not slam on brakes. - Do NOT stop on the side of the road. - Continue slowly (even on the rims if necessary) to the nearest safe, well-lit, populated area such as a filling station (petrol station), toll plaza, or police station. - Never attempt to change a wheel on the roadside — this is when attackers strike. - Stay vigilant: Maintain a safe following distance, scan the road ahead for suspicious objects, and consider travelling in a convoy where possible. *Share this alert far and wide — don't be selfish. You might save a life today. If you want to support our mission and help our responders keep South African roads safer, please donate a cup of coffee — every little bit helps us continue this important work. Drive defensively. Arrive alive. Stay safe out there.

Yusuf Abramjee

22,932 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

$GM GM GM!💵\(◕⩊◕)/💜 ✨𝗧𝗢𝗗𝗔𝗬 𝗪𝗘 𝗛𝗔𝗩𝗘: 🎬Senpai Core part 3 & a BONUS since you asked for it🔻 💡𝗦𝗘𝗡𝗣𝗔𝗜 𝗟𝗘𝗦𝗦𝗢𝗡𝗦 𝗙𝗢𝗥: 🔶KOL MANAGERS & BRANDS ➤ If you hire cheap services, you will get cheap results, therefore, you yourself provide cheap, worthless services to your clients! 🔶KOLs, Creators & Writers ➤ If you offer cheap prices, you attract cheap clients. Not showcasing the value of your work will only lead to lower prices for your services, even if your skills and fame improve. Don’t complain if you’re still paid the same when you don’t want more! 🔶TRADERS ➤ It doesn’t matter if you enter a trade at 1M, 5M, or 10M market cap, what matters is the amount of money you invest & most importantly, when you 𝗘𝗫𝗜𝗧! 🔸If the coin goes down and you didn’t sell, someone else took action before you. Learn from your mistakes, don’t be greedy, and don’t complain or blame others later ~ it’s your game! 🔶CONSUMERS ( People that buy NFTs with WL or coin Presales ) ➤ If you see a founder constantly shilling every questionable project to earn a quick buck, you don’t need me to tell you to steer clear of them. This also applies to people who take paid profile picture (PFP honorary ) deals for every project. Stay away, they’ve already been paid, and you’ll end up footing the bill for the company’s payouts to them. 🔸Don't trust a billboard, it's like trusting a partner who sleeps with everyone for money and expects you to take them seriously, LMAO! 🔸Trust people who show genuine love and support for their followers and community, and don’t post just any nonsense. For example, I can only speak for myself, but we gave thousands of dollars in $ANIME coin to our supporters for free. YES, there are other real people like me in this space, so choose wisely who you follow, or you’ll end up as their exit liquidity! ⛩️𝐓𝐇𝐀𝐓'𝐒 𝐀𝐋𝐋 𝐅𝐎𝐑 𝐓𝐎𝐃𝐀𝐘 ~ 𝐒𝐓𝐀𝐘 𝐒𝐄𝐗𝐘 & 𝐄𝐍𝐉𝐎𝐘 𝐓𝐇𝐄 𝐕𝐈𝐃𝐄𝐎⛩️$

GM GM GM!💵\(◕⩊◕)/💜 ✨𝗧𝗢𝗗𝗔𝗬 𝗪𝗘 𝗛𝗔𝗩𝗘: 🎬Senpai Core part 3 & a BONUS since you asked for it🔻 💡𝗦𝗘𝗡𝗣𝗔𝗜 𝗟𝗘𝗦𝗦𝗢𝗡𝗦 𝗙𝗢𝗥: 🔶KOL MANAGERS & BRANDS ➤ If you hire cheap services, you will get cheap results, therefore, you yourself provide cheap, worthless services to your clients! 🔶KOLs, Creators & Writers ➤ If you offer cheap prices, you attract cheap clients. Not showcasing the value of your work will only lead to lower prices for your services, even if your skills and fame improve. Don’t complain if you’re still paid the same when you don’t want more! 🔶TRADERS ➤ It doesn’t matter if you enter a trade at 1M, 5M, or 10M market cap, what matters is the amount of money you invest & most importantly, when you 𝗘𝗫𝗜𝗧! 🔸If the coin goes down and you didn’t sell, someone else took action before you. Learn from your mistakes, don’t be greedy, and don’t complain or blame others later ~ it’s your game! 🔶CONSUMERS ( People that buy NFTs with WL or coin Presales ) ➤ If you see a founder constantly shilling every questionable project to earn a quick buck, you don’t need me to tell you to steer clear of them. This also applies to people who take paid profile picture (PFP honorary ) deals for every project. Stay away, they’ve already been paid, and you’ll end up footing the bill for the company’s payouts to them. 🔸Don't trust a billboard, it's like trusting a partner who sleeps with everyone for money and expects you to take them seriously, LMAO! 🔸Trust people who show genuine love and support for their followers and community, and don’t post just any nonsense. For example, I can only speak for myself, but we gave thousands of dollars in $ANIME coin to our supporters for free. YES, there are other real people like me in this space, so choose wisely who you follow, or you’ll end up as their exit liquidity! ⛩️𝐓𝐇𝐀𝐓'𝐒 𝐀𝐋𝐋 𝐅𝐎𝐑 𝐓𝐎𝐃𝐀𝐘 ~ 𝐒𝐓𝐀𝐘 𝐒𝐄𝐗𝐘 & 𝐄𝐍𝐉𝐎𝐘 𝐓𝐇𝐄 𝐕𝐈𝐃𝐄𝐎⛩️

🌸𝐒𝐄𝐍𝐏𝐀𝐈 先輩🍜

121,798 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten

Left: Head of Met Police Mark Rowley suggests that Zack Polanski undermines the ability of police officers to work Right: It seems that Zack Polanski, like many of us, was wondering why police officers kicked a man on the ground five times in the head I'm not anti police. I've never trained or worked in any part of policing. And I'm grateful every day that we have police men and women who run towards danger to protect all of us in society I can appreciate fast moving instances where officers have to act on their feet, especially when there's a dangerous person who stabbed two people, and they need to disarm them as quickly as possible But it's the five kicks to the attackers head which makes many of us wonder if that was an appropriate way to respond I've muted the video in the first playing so you can hear the commissioner. I've kept the audio in the second playing so you can hear the officers You can hear the police officers repeatedly shout 'drop the knife' as they're kicking him in the head. You can also see they're holding a taser, which presumably immobilised the attacker which is why he's on the ground not really moving. And when they pull his arm out to get him to drop the knife, his arm is shaking (taser?) We all rely on the police to keep us safe, but I don't think it's unreasonable to ask Metropolitan Police if kicking someone in the head five times is acceptable normal practice I'd welcome any clarity from any experienced police officer, or directly from the Met, just to reassure the public on the reasons why these actions were taken I'd also appreciate the integrity of responding with an explanation, not to assume that these questions are meant to demean or diminish the ability of our police to keep us safe

Left: Head of Met Police Mark Rowley suggests that Zack Polanski undermines the ability of police officers to work Right: It seems that Zack Polanski, like many of us, was wondering why police officers kicked a man on the ground five times in the head I'm not anti police. I've never trained or worked in any part of policing. And I'm grateful every day that we have police men and women who run towards danger to protect all of us in society I can appreciate fast moving instances where officers have to act on their feet, especially when there's a dangerous person who stabbed two people, and they need to disarm them as quickly as possible But it's the five kicks to the attackers head which makes many of us wonder if that was an appropriate way to respond I've muted the video in the first playing so you can hear the commissioner. I've kept the audio in the second playing so you can hear the officers You can hear the police officers repeatedly shout 'drop the knife' as they're kicking him in the head. You can also see they're holding a taser, which presumably immobilised the attacker which is why he's on the ground not really moving. And when they pull his arm out to get him to drop the knife, his arm is shaking (taser?) We all rely on the police to keep us safe, but I don't think it's unreasonable to ask Metropolitan Police if kicking someone in the head five times is acceptable normal practice I'd welcome any clarity from any experienced police officer, or directly from the Met, just to reassure the public on the reasons why these actions were taken I'd also appreciate the integrity of responding with an explanation, not to assume that these questions are meant to demean or diminish the ability of our police to keep us safe

Farrukh

98,388 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Listen To Every Single Word Of This Tucker Carlson Clip Nothing is ever about our safety. This country and the world only changes when we eliminate The CIA. “It’ll take someone willing to be assassinated” “—Shut the f*ck up. You're not protecting us, actually” “You open the southern border to anyone who wants come. You're not checking IDs. You're not doing any kind of biometrics. You're not even screening for COVID. So clearly, you don't care about my safety. Stop telling me you do. You don't. You're a criminal. Stop this, charade. You don't care about my safety. So using my safety as a pretext for spying me, it's not gonna fly because I'm not that stupid. I may be kind of stupid, I'm not that stupid. No. You're doing this for one simple reason because this is what organizations do. They protect themselves. They exist for their own benefit. All human organizations from the church bake sale committee to the Department of Justice, they all are the same. They're an organism just like any other, and an organism's main goal is to survive and reproduce to get bigger. And you just see this throughout the federal bureaucracy, which just so happens that the largest human organization in history is the federal government of the United States. And so all of this stuff benefits its it accrues to its own power. That's why, like, let's say you believed every quote piece of science or scientific claim about global climate change. You would not reach the same policy conclusions. You'd be like, well, the first thing we need is ban private air travel because obviously that doesn't make any sense. And then the second thing we need to do is, you know, whatever. You'd you'd look at it rationally for a scientific if if you bought the premise, which I don't, but if you did, you would. That no. You go through every climate, quote, climate demand. Not one of them disempowers large organizations, whether it's NGOs or the government of the United States. Not one of them. They all make the government more powerful, and they all make you less powerful. So that's when you know it's not really about the temperature of the Earth's atmosphere. It's about making them more powerful and disempowering you. And it's not about who runs those agencies. The bigger the agency, the more effective it will be in doing what all human organizations do, which is protect themselves and increase their power. It's like that it's fundamental. I guess that's what I'm saying. It's not about, oh, elect Trump. It'll change. No. It'll only change when, like, we're just eliminating the CIA, and we're gonna have, like, a small intel gathering service that feeds the president relevant information so we can make informed foreign policy decisions, but we're not gonna we're not gonna, like, overturn elections in other countries in the name of democracy because that's insane. If we believe in democracy, then we're gonna let people vote for their own leaders because we believe in democracy as a principle. Right? Right. Like, you just get rid of all this shit because it's not helping us. Us. It's only hurting us. And, um, it would take someone, uh, you know, who'd be willing to be assassinated to do anything like that. And so as as you're choosing your leaders, ask yourself, does this person mean it enough to die? And that's the same question you would ask about your own dad. Does he love me enough to die for me? About your own husband, does he love me enough to protect me from a home home invader at risk to himself? Like, the the basic prerequisite for leadership is love of the people you lead and the willingness to die for them. And if you don't have that, you shouldn't be leading, period. It's true in the military, it's true in business, it's true in your home, and it's true in the government. And so no president will fix this unless he's like literally willing to die for it. And short of that, it can't be fixed.”

Listen To Every Single Word Of This Tucker Carlson Clip Nothing is ever about our safety. This country and the world only changes when we eliminate The CIA. “It’ll take someone willing to be assassinated” “—Shut the f*ck up. You're not protecting us, actually” “You open the southern border to anyone who wants come. You're not checking IDs. You're not doing any kind of biometrics. You're not even screening for COVID. So clearly, you don't care about my safety. Stop telling me you do. You don't. You're a criminal. Stop this, charade. You don't care about my safety. So using my safety as a pretext for spying me, it's not gonna fly because I'm not that stupid. I may be kind of stupid, I'm not that stupid. No. You're doing this for one simple reason because this is what organizations do. They protect themselves. They exist for their own benefit. All human organizations from the church bake sale committee to the Department of Justice, they all are the same. They're an organism just like any other, and an organism's main goal is to survive and reproduce to get bigger. And you just see this throughout the federal bureaucracy, which just so happens that the largest human organization in history is the federal government of the United States. And so all of this stuff benefits its it accrues to its own power. That's why, like, let's say you believed every quote piece of science or scientific claim about global climate change. You would not reach the same policy conclusions. You'd be like, well, the first thing we need is ban private air travel because obviously that doesn't make any sense. And then the second thing we need to do is, you know, whatever. You'd you'd look at it rationally for a scientific if if you bought the premise, which I don't, but if you did, you would. That no. You go through every climate, quote, climate demand. Not one of them disempowers large organizations, whether it's NGOs or the government of the United States. Not one of them. They all make the government more powerful, and they all make you less powerful. So that's when you know it's not really about the temperature of the Earth's atmosphere. It's about making them more powerful and disempowering you. And it's not about who runs those agencies. The bigger the agency, the more effective it will be in doing what all human organizations do, which is protect themselves and increase their power. It's like that it's fundamental. I guess that's what I'm saying. It's not about, oh, elect Trump. It'll change. No. It'll only change when, like, we're just eliminating the CIA, and we're gonna have, like, a small intel gathering service that feeds the president relevant information so we can make informed foreign policy decisions, but we're not gonna we're not gonna, like, overturn elections in other countries in the name of democracy because that's insane. If we believe in democracy, then we're gonna let people vote for their own leaders because we believe in democracy as a principle. Right? Right. Like, you just get rid of all this shit because it's not helping us. Us. It's only hurting us. And, um, it would take someone, uh, you know, who'd be willing to be assassinated to do anything like that. And so as as you're choosing your leaders, ask yourself, does this person mean it enough to die? And that's the same question you would ask about your own dad. Does he love me enough to die for me? About your own husband, does he love me enough to protect me from a home home invader at risk to himself? Like, the the basic prerequisite for leadership is love of the people you lead and the willingness to die for them. And if you don't have that, you shouldn't be leading, period. It's true in the military, it's true in business, it's true in your home, and it's true in the government. And so no president will fix this unless he's like literally willing to die for it. And short of that, it can't be fixed.”

Wall Street Apes

1,879,815 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

FULL TRANSCRIPT OF ELON'S CYBERCAB AND ROBOVAN PRESENTATION 00:00 Welcome 01:16 Cybercab & Future of transportation 04:33 Cost 05:53 Timeline 07:13 Self-driving technology 10:05 Inductive charging 10:24 The cities of the future 11:04 Robovan 12:13 Optimus Welcome Welcome to the We, Robot party. We have quite a show for you tonight. I think you're going to like it. As you can see, I just arrived in the Robotaxi, the Cybercab. And there's 20 more where that came from. So they've been traveling, there's no people in them. As you can see, the car is just going by with no people. We have 50 fully autonomous cars here tonight. So you'll see model Y's and the Cybercabs, all driverless. You'll be able to take a ride in the Cybercab. There's no steering wheel or pedals. So I hope this goes well, we'll find out. You see a lot of sci-fi movies where the future is dark and dismal, where it's not a future you want to be in. So, you know, I love Blade Runner, but I don't know if we want that future. We want that duster he's wearing, but not the bleak apocalypse. We want to have a fun, exciting future that, if you could look in a crystal ball and see the future, you'd be like, yes, I wish I could be there now. That's what we want. Cybercab & Future of transportation So, when we think about transport today, there's a lot of pain that we take for granted, that we think is normal. Like having to drive around LA in 3 hours of traffic. Yeah, people that live in LA, I mean, you know, try to get from Pasadena to El Segundo during rush hour. You can fly to another city faster than you can get to LA. And you have to drive the whole way, unless you're in a Tesla. Of course, our Tesla already does quite well at this supervised self-driving. So, supervised full self-driving is actually working quite well. I'm sure there's people in the crowd who are using that. So, we'll move from supervised full self-driving to unsupervised full self-driving where the car, you could fall asleep and wake up at your destination. But there's also a challenge for a lot of people that cars cost too much. I mean, when you factor in everything that goes into a car and the car insurance and the car payments, storage of the car, it's very expensive. You say, like, how many hours a week are cars used? Your average passenger car is only used about 10 hours a week out of 168 hours. So, the vast majority of the time cars are just doing nothing. But if they're autonomous, they could be used, I don't know, five times more, maybe ten times more. So you could actually, for the same car, would have five times as much value, maybe ten times as much value. There's 168 hours in the week, and like I said, only ten of them are used for driving. And then, a bunch of those hours are looking for a parking spot, which can be pretty annoying at times. So, with autonomy, you get your time back. This is a very big deal. So it's not just, it'll save lives, like a lot of lives and prevent injuries. I think we'll see autonomous cars become ten times safer than a human. I mean, if you think of times past where there used to be an elevator operator in every elevator but once in a while, they get tired and accidentally shear somebody in half. Now, we have automated elevators. You just get an elevator and you press a button and you don't even think about it and it just takes you to the floor. And if you did see an elevator operator with a big relay switch, you'd be like, that's weird. That's how cars will be. And it's not just the lives saved in injuries, but if you think about the cumulative time that people spend in a car and the time that they will get back that they can now spend, well, I guess, on their phones or watching a movie or doing work or whatever you want to do you can think of the car in autonomous world as being like just little lounge. You're just sitting in a comfortable little lounge and you can do whatever you want while you're in this comfortable little lounge. And when you get out, you will be at your destination. So, yeah, it's gonna be awesome. Cost So, in fact, I think the cost of autonomous transport will be so low that you can think of it like individualized mass transit. The average cost of a bus per mile for a city, not the ticket price, because that is subsidized, but the average price is about a dollar a mile, whereas the cost of Cybercab we think probably over time, the operating cost is probably going to be around twenty cents a mile. Including taxes and everything else, it probably ends up being 30 or 40 cents a mile. And you will be able to buy one. And we expect the cost to be below $30,000. And I think there'll be an interesting business model where, let's say somebody is an Uber or Lyft driver today where they can actually sort of manage a fleet of cars and like, sort of manage, I don't know, 10, 20 cars and just take care of them. Like a shepherd tends their flock. You have a little flock of cars and you're the shepherd and you take care of your flock of cars. I think that would be pretty cool. I think it's going to be a glorious future. It's going to be really something special. Timeline We do expect actually to start fully autonomous unsupervised FSD in Texas and California next year. And that's obviously, that's with the Model 3 and Model Y. And then we expect to be in production with the Cybercab, which is really highly optimized for autonomous transport in probably, I tend to be a little optimistic with time frames, but in 2026. So, yeah, before 2027, let me put it that way. And we'll make this vehicle in very high volume. But well, before that, you will experience a robotic taxi via the Model 3 and Model Y program and model S and X, too. But the Model 3 and Y will achieve unsupervised full self-driving with permission, in wherever regulators essentially approve it. In the US, and then to follow outside the US. And Cybertruck, too. All our cars are basically, all cars that we make. Let's not get nuanced here. Self-driving technology One of the reasons why the computer can be so much better than a person is that we have millions of cars that are training on driving. It's like living millions of lives simultaneously and seeing very unusual situations that a person in their entire lifetime would not see. With that amount of training data, it's obviously going to be much better than what a human could be because you can't live a million lives. And it's also, it can see in all directions simultaneously and it doesn't get tired or text or any of those things. So, it will naturally be, like I said 10, 20, 30 times safer than a human, just for all those reasons. And I want to emphasize that the solution that we have is, AI and vision. So, there's no expensive equipment needed. The Model 3 and Model Y and S and X that we make today will be capable of full autonomy, unsupervised. And that means that our cost of producing the vehicle is low. Now, we are going to actually over-spec the computer for the Cybercab. So, our AI 5 computer will be somewhat over-spec'd because I think there's actually also an opportunity, sort of like an Amazon Web Services, where if the car is driving for 50 hours a week, there's still over 100 hours left and there's a potential there to have a massive amount of distributed inference compute, where if you've got like a fleet of 100 million vehicles and a kilowatt of efficient inference compute, you have 100 gigawatts of compute, which is really quite substantial. And if it's there, you might as well use it so that I think will make sense. So, our autonomous future is here. As I said, we've got 50 Teslas driving autonomously. We're trying to give you a sense of what cities will be like in the future. And when you get in, you'll see like, it's really quite a wild experience to just be in a car with no steering wheel, no pedals, no controls, and it feels great. So we have enough vehicles here, so everyone should be able to try it out and experience the set that we've built here. It's a very big set. So it's like really we've used I don't know, 20, 30 acres or something like that. It's really big. So, it goes on, the ride's long. And we set it up to feel like a ride, like a park ride. So, it'll be cool and you'll get to experience it tonight. Inductive charging Something we're also doing is and it's really high time we did this is inductive charging. So, the robotaxi has no plug. It just goes over the inductive charger and charges. So, yeah, it's kind of how it should be. The cities of the future One of the things that is really interesting is how will this affect the cities that we live in. And when you drive around a city, or when the car drives you around the city, you'll see there's a lot of parking lots. There's parking lots everywhere, parking garages. What would happen if you have an autonomous world is that you can now turn parking lots into parks. And so, from we're taking the inglot out of parking lot. You're welcome. So, there's a lot of opportunity to create green space in the cities that we live in. So, like, that would be quite fantastic. Robovan Oh, and also, what happens if you need a vehicle that is bigger than a Model Y? The Robovan. We're going to make this and it's going to look like that. Now, can you imagine going down the streets and you see this coming towards you? That'd be sick. So this can carry up to 20 people, and it can also transport goods. You can configure it for goods transport within a city. Or transport of up to 20 people at a time. The Robovan is what's gonna solve for high density. If you want to take a sports team somewhere or you're looking to really get the cost of travel down to, I don't know, 5, 10 cents a mile, then you can use the Robovan. One of the things we want to do, and we've seen this with the Cybertruck, is we want to change the look of the roads. The future should look like the future. Optimus Speaking of robots. Everything we've developed for our cars, the batteries, power electronics, the advanced motors, gearboxes, the software, the AI inference computer, it all actually applies to a humanoid robot. The same techniques. It's just a robot with arms and legs instead of a robot with wheels. We've made a lot of progress with Optimus. And as you can see, we started up with someone in a robot suit. And then, we've progressed dramatically, year after year. So, if you extrapolate this, you're really going to have something spectacular, something that anyone could own. So, you can have your own personal R2-D2-C3PO. And I think at scale, this would cost something like, I don't know, $20,000, $30,000, probably less than a car is my prediction, long-term. It'll take us a minute to get to the long term. But fundamentally, at scale, the Optimus robot, you should be able to buy an Optimus robot for, I think, probably $20,000 to $30,000, long-term. And what can it do? It'll basically do anything you want. It can be a teacher or babysit your kids, it can walk your dog, mow your lawn, get the groceries, just be your friend, serve drinks whatever you can think of, it will do. And, yeah, it's going to be awesome. I think this will be the biggest product ever of any kind, because I think everyone of the 8 billion people of Earth, I think everyone's going to want their Optimus buddy. And there's going to be maybe two. And then, they'll be producing products and services. I predict, actually, provided we address risks of digital superintelligence, 80% probability of good outcome, look on the bright side, the cup is 80% full, the cost of products and services will decline dramatically. And basically, anyone will be able to have any products and services they want. It will be an age of abundance the likes of which people have not, almost no one has envisioned. It will be something special. So now, one of the things we wanted to show tonight was that Optimus is not a canned video. It's not walled off. The Optimus robots will walk among you. Please, please be nice to the Optimus robots. You'll be able to walk right up to them and they'll serve drinks at the bar. I mean, it's a wild experience just to have humanoid robots and they're there, you're just in front of you. So yeah, with that, let's party!

FULL TRANSCRIPT OF ELON'S CYBERCAB AND ROBOVAN PRESENTATION 00:00 Welcome 01:16 Cybercab & Future of transportation 04:33 Cost 05:53 Timeline 07:13 Self-driving technology 10:05 Inductive charging 10:24 The cities of the future 11:04 Robovan 12:13 Optimus Welcome Welcome to the We, Robot party. We have quite a show for you tonight. I think you're going to like it. As you can see, I just arrived in the Robotaxi, the Cybercab. And there's 20 more where that came from. So they've been traveling, there's no people in them. As you can see, the car is just going by with no people. We have 50 fully autonomous cars here tonight. So you'll see model Y's and the Cybercabs, all driverless. You'll be able to take a ride in the Cybercab. There's no steering wheel or pedals. So I hope this goes well, we'll find out. You see a lot of sci-fi movies where the future is dark and dismal, where it's not a future you want to be in. So, you know, I love Blade Runner, but I don't know if we want that future. We want that duster he's wearing, but not the bleak apocalypse. We want to have a fun, exciting future that, if you could look in a crystal ball and see the future, you'd be like, yes, I wish I could be there now. That's what we want. Cybercab & Future of transportation So, when we think about transport today, there's a lot of pain that we take for granted, that we think is normal. Like having to drive around LA in 3 hours of traffic. Yeah, people that live in LA, I mean, you know, try to get from Pasadena to El Segundo during rush hour. You can fly to another city faster than you can get to LA. And you have to drive the whole way, unless you're in a Tesla. Of course, our Tesla already does quite well at this supervised self-driving. So, supervised full self-driving is actually working quite well. I'm sure there's people in the crowd who are using that. So, we'll move from supervised full self-driving to unsupervised full self-driving where the car, you could fall asleep and wake up at your destination. But there's also a challenge for a lot of people that cars cost too much. I mean, when you factor in everything that goes into a car and the car insurance and the car payments, storage of the car, it's very expensive. You say, like, how many hours a week are cars used? Your average passenger car is only used about 10 hours a week out of 168 hours. So, the vast majority of the time cars are just doing nothing. But if they're autonomous, they could be used, I don't know, five times more, maybe ten times more. So you could actually, for the same car, would have five times as much value, maybe ten times as much value. There's 168 hours in the week, and like I said, only ten of them are used for driving. And then, a bunch of those hours are looking for a parking spot, which can be pretty annoying at times. So, with autonomy, you get your time back. This is a very big deal. So it's not just, it'll save lives, like a lot of lives and prevent injuries. I think we'll see autonomous cars become ten times safer than a human. I mean, if you think of times past where there used to be an elevator operator in every elevator but once in a while, they get tired and accidentally shear somebody in half. Now, we have automated elevators. You just get an elevator and you press a button and you don't even think about it and it just takes you to the floor. And if you did see an elevator operator with a big relay switch, you'd be like, that's weird. That's how cars will be. And it's not just the lives saved in injuries, but if you think about the cumulative time that people spend in a car and the time that they will get back that they can now spend, well, I guess, on their phones or watching a movie or doing work or whatever you want to do you can think of the car in autonomous world as being like just little lounge. You're just sitting in a comfortable little lounge and you can do whatever you want while you're in this comfortable little lounge. And when you get out, you will be at your destination. So, yeah, it's gonna be awesome. Cost So, in fact, I think the cost of autonomous transport will be so low that you can think of it like individualized mass transit. The average cost of a bus per mile for a city, not the ticket price, because that is subsidized, but the average price is about a dollar a mile, whereas the cost of Cybercab we think probably over time, the operating cost is probably going to be around twenty cents a mile. Including taxes and everything else, it probably ends up being 30 or 40 cents a mile. And you will be able to buy one. And we expect the cost to be below $30,000. And I think there'll be an interesting business model where, let's say somebody is an Uber or Lyft driver today where they can actually sort of manage a fleet of cars and like, sort of manage, I don't know, 10, 20 cars and just take care of them. Like a shepherd tends their flock. You have a little flock of cars and you're the shepherd and you take care of your flock of cars. I think that would be pretty cool. I think it's going to be a glorious future. It's going to be really something special. Timeline We do expect actually to start fully autonomous unsupervised FSD in Texas and California next year. And that's obviously, that's with the Model 3 and Model Y. And then we expect to be in production with the Cybercab, which is really highly optimized for autonomous transport in probably, I tend to be a little optimistic with time frames, but in 2026. So, yeah, before 2027, let me put it that way. And we'll make this vehicle in very high volume. But well, before that, you will experience a robotic taxi via the Model 3 and Model Y program and model S and X, too. But the Model 3 and Y will achieve unsupervised full self-driving with permission, in wherever regulators essentially approve it. In the US, and then to follow outside the US. And Cybertruck, too. All our cars are basically, all cars that we make. Let's not get nuanced here. Self-driving technology One of the reasons why the computer can be so much better than a person is that we have millions of cars that are training on driving. It's like living millions of lives simultaneously and seeing very unusual situations that a person in their entire lifetime would not see. With that amount of training data, it's obviously going to be much better than what a human could be because you can't live a million lives. And it's also, it can see in all directions simultaneously and it doesn't get tired or text or any of those things. So, it will naturally be, like I said 10, 20, 30 times safer than a human, just for all those reasons. And I want to emphasize that the solution that we have is, AI and vision. So, there's no expensive equipment needed. The Model 3 and Model Y and S and X that we make today will be capable of full autonomy, unsupervised. And that means that our cost of producing the vehicle is low. Now, we are going to actually over-spec the computer for the Cybercab. So, our AI 5 computer will be somewhat over-spec'd because I think there's actually also an opportunity, sort of like an Amazon Web Services, where if the car is driving for 50 hours a week, there's still over 100 hours left and there's a potential there to have a massive amount of distributed inference compute, where if you've got like a fleet of 100 million vehicles and a kilowatt of efficient inference compute, you have 100 gigawatts of compute, which is really quite substantial. And if it's there, you might as well use it so that I think will make sense. So, our autonomous future is here. As I said, we've got 50 Teslas driving autonomously. We're trying to give you a sense of what cities will be like in the future. And when you get in, you'll see like, it's really quite a wild experience to just be in a car with no steering wheel, no pedals, no controls, and it feels great. So we have enough vehicles here, so everyone should be able to try it out and experience the set that we've built here. It's a very big set. So it's like really we've used I don't know, 20, 30 acres or something like that. It's really big. So, it goes on, the ride's long. And we set it up to feel like a ride, like a park ride. So, it'll be cool and you'll get to experience it tonight. Inductive charging Something we're also doing is and it's really high time we did this is inductive charging. So, the robotaxi has no plug. It just goes over the inductive charger and charges. So, yeah, it's kind of how it should be. The cities of the future One of the things that is really interesting is how will this affect the cities that we live in. And when you drive around a city, or when the car drives you around the city, you'll see there's a lot of parking lots. There's parking lots everywhere, parking garages. What would happen if you have an autonomous world is that you can now turn parking lots into parks. And so, from we're taking the inglot out of parking lot. You're welcome. So, there's a lot of opportunity to create green space in the cities that we live in. So, like, that would be quite fantastic. Robovan Oh, and also, what happens if you need a vehicle that is bigger than a Model Y? The Robovan. We're going to make this and it's going to look like that. Now, can you imagine going down the streets and you see this coming towards you? That'd be sick. So this can carry up to 20 people, and it can also transport goods. You can configure it for goods transport within a city. Or transport of up to 20 people at a time. The Robovan is what's gonna solve for high density. If you want to take a sports team somewhere or you're looking to really get the cost of travel down to, I don't know, 5, 10 cents a mile, then you can use the Robovan. One of the things we want to do, and we've seen this with the Cybertruck, is we want to change the look of the roads. The future should look like the future. Optimus Speaking of robots. Everything we've developed for our cars, the batteries, power electronics, the advanced motors, gearboxes, the software, the AI inference computer, it all actually applies to a humanoid robot. The same techniques. It's just a robot with arms and legs instead of a robot with wheels. We've made a lot of progress with Optimus. And as you can see, we started up with someone in a robot suit. And then, we've progressed dramatically, year after year. So, if you extrapolate this, you're really going to have something spectacular, something that anyone could own. So, you can have your own personal R2-D2-C3PO. And I think at scale, this would cost something like, I don't know, $20,000, $30,000, probably less than a car is my prediction, long-term. It'll take us a minute to get to the long term. But fundamentally, at scale, the Optimus robot, you should be able to buy an Optimus robot for, I think, probably $20,000 to $30,000, long-term. And what can it do? It'll basically do anything you want. It can be a teacher or babysit your kids, it can walk your dog, mow your lawn, get the groceries, just be your friend, serve drinks whatever you can think of, it will do. And, yeah, it's going to be awesome. I think this will be the biggest product ever of any kind, because I think everyone of the 8 billion people of Earth, I think everyone's going to want their Optimus buddy. And there's going to be maybe two. And then, they'll be producing products and services. I predict, actually, provided we address risks of digital superintelligence, 80% probability of good outcome, look on the bright side, the cup is 80% full, the cost of products and services will decline dramatically. And basically, anyone will be able to have any products and services they want. It will be an age of abundance the likes of which people have not, almost no one has envisioned. It will be something special. So now, one of the things we wanted to show tonight was that Optimus is not a canned video. It's not walled off. The Optimus robots will walk among you. Please, please be nice to the Optimus robots. You'll be able to walk right up to them and they'll serve drinks at the bar. I mean, it's a wild experience just to have humanoid robots and they're there, you're just in front of you. So yeah, with that, let's party!

Mario Nawfal

241,051 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Hey Democrats, can we talk like adults now? Anytime an American citizen loses their life it's a tragedy. We must uphold that sanctity of life as a society and culture. I'm just not sure that's really true, because senseless killing is all around us everyday and I rarely see these posts and solidarity moments about it. ICE must continue their task and it's difficult enough without half of America being pitted against them. I think ICE needs to operate with the upmost discretion in their use of force. But in all seriousness, when the Lt. Governor of Minnesota (Peggy Flanagan) is telling our residents to 'put their bodies on the line', I'm not sure how the left can claim there is no general opposition to deportations. Asking the Democrats, anybody care to comment? I'm willing to talk with you. 2 things are for sure, the illegals must be deported and our citizens need to be safe. If you really don't believe in borders or that crossing ours is illegal immigration, because America is stolen land... Just say that and let's get on with it. If you do believe in borders, Democrats and all the rest of you need to resist the seduction of group think and social media empathy, before this gets way worse for everybody. I heard protesters yelling 'not down with deportations', anybody care to explain? The deportations must commence and we're not backing off that one single inch. EVERY illegal that came here under Joe Biden should be deported. Another question... How do you all think we should go about deportations? And how can you say you believe in deportations, just not the method, when we heard Governors and Mayors self-proclaim sanctuary status? I'd say people who believe in deportations principally are justified in not trusting what Democrats state as their position. I think you all are rolling the dice with peace and I think it's really reckless and inconsiderate to be honest. None of you want civil war, because if you did you wouldn't want sympathy when your soldiers die. Let's get back to some sanity, this is like children who can't control themselves at a daycare. P.S. Homocides are the lowest they've been since 1900. Maybe being tough on crime is actually helping America? Royce White for U.S. Senate MN 2026 America 1st, Just Right™️

Hey Democrats, can we talk like adults now? Anytime an American citizen loses their life it's a tragedy. We must uphold that sanctity of life as a society and culture. I'm just not sure that's really true, because senseless killing is all around us everyday and I rarely see these posts and solidarity moments about it. ICE must continue their task and it's difficult enough without half of America being pitted against them. I think ICE needs to operate with the upmost discretion in their use of force. But in all seriousness, when the Lt. Governor of Minnesota (Peggy Flanagan) is telling our residents to 'put their bodies on the line', I'm not sure how the left can claim there is no general opposition to deportations. Asking the Democrats, anybody care to comment? I'm willing to talk with you. 2 things are for sure, the illegals must be deported and our citizens need to be safe. If you really don't believe in borders or that crossing ours is illegal immigration, because America is stolen land... Just say that and let's get on with it. If you do believe in borders, Democrats and all the rest of you need to resist the seduction of group think and social media empathy, before this gets way worse for everybody. I heard protesters yelling 'not down with deportations', anybody care to explain? The deportations must commence and we're not backing off that one single inch. EVERY illegal that came here under Joe Biden should be deported. Another question... How do you all think we should go about deportations? And how can you say you believe in deportations, just not the method, when we heard Governors and Mayors self-proclaim sanctuary status? I'd say people who believe in deportations principally are justified in not trusting what Democrats state as their position. I think you all are rolling the dice with peace and I think it's really reckless and inconsiderate to be honest. None of you want civil war, because if you did you wouldn't want sympathy when your soldiers die. Let's get back to some sanity, this is like children who can't control themselves at a daycare. P.S. Homocides are the lowest they've been since 1900. Maybe being tough on crime is actually helping America? Royce White for U.S. Senate MN 2026 America 1st, Just Right™️

Royce White 🇺🇸

20,734 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

Are the Regina Police taking revenge on me? The Regina Police have blocked me — and Rebel News — on Twitter, or X as it's now called. That's not just petty. It's illegal. A government agency cannot ban a citizen from a public service simply because it doesn't like their reporting. I've taken that exact fight to court four times, against four different government bullies, and won all four. So why did they block me? I think I know. Two weeks ago, I went to Regina to cover a downtown mosque and its plan to blast the Muslim call to prayer over loudspeakers — loud enough to be heard for half a mile in every direction. And the strangest part wasn't the noise. It was the police. There's been no city hall debate. No public consultation. The Regina Police simply made the call, and then put out a tweet threatening to prosecute anyone who objects the wrong way for hate crimes. Police pre-announcing arrests over a house of worship's loudspeakers. That's how it works in Pakistan, not Saskatchewan. This is the same force that just fired its chief of police, Farooq Sheikh, for cause — no severance, which tells you how bad it was. So, when I showed up at the mosque press conference and found a row of police cars, I did what a reporter does: I walked over and asked a few polite questions. They didn't like that one bit. I finished my report. And when I went back to the Regina Police account for a follow-up, I found I'd been blocked. Here's the thing. I'm a private person — I can block anyone I want. The Regina Police are a government agency, paid for by taxpayers. Their account is a public service, no different from a government phone line or a government office. They can't slam the door in your face because you criticized them. I know this because I've proven it. I chased Steven Guilbault for years over the same stunt. On the eve of trial, he panicked and settled — agreeing to unblock me for the rest of his career and to pay me $20,000 (which, naturally, he stuck taxpayers with). It's settled law now. Nobody gets to claim they didn't know. So, this week, our lawyer Chad Williamson sent the Regina Police a scorching demand letter. They have until Friday, July 17, to unblock us and promise never to do it again. If they don't, we'll sue. You can read the entire letter at — along with every other case we've won. And make no mistake: if they'll do this to me, they're doing it to other Reginans too. That's what bullies do. Unlike the Regina Police, we take no tax money. We rely on you. If you think this fight is worth having, please help me cover the legal bills at REPORT by Ezra Levant 🍁🚛:

Are the Regina Police taking revenge on me? The Regina Police have blocked me — and Rebel News — on Twitter, or X as it's now called. That's not just petty. It's illegal. A government agency cannot ban a citizen from a public service simply because it doesn't like their reporting. I've taken that exact fight to court four times, against four different government bullies, and won all four. So why did they block me? I think I know. Two weeks ago, I went to Regina to cover a downtown mosque and its plan to blast the Muslim call to prayer over loudspeakers — loud enough to be heard for half a mile in every direction. And the strangest part wasn't the noise. It was the police. There's been no city hall debate. No public consultation. The Regina Police simply made the call, and then put out a tweet threatening to prosecute anyone who objects the wrong way for hate crimes. Police pre-announcing arrests over a house of worship's loudspeakers. That's how it works in Pakistan, not Saskatchewan. This is the same force that just fired its chief of police, Farooq Sheikh, for cause — no severance, which tells you how bad it was. So, when I showed up at the mosque press conference and found a row of police cars, I did what a reporter does: I walked over and asked a few polite questions. They didn't like that one bit. I finished my report. And when I went back to the Regina Police account for a follow-up, I found I'd been blocked. Here's the thing. I'm a private person — I can block anyone I want. The Regina Police are a government agency, paid for by taxpayers. Their account is a public service, no different from a government phone line or a government office. They can't slam the door in your face because you criticized them. I know this because I've proven it. I chased Steven Guilbault for years over the same stunt. On the eve of trial, he panicked and settled — agreeing to unblock me for the rest of his career and to pay me $20,000 (which, naturally, he stuck taxpayers with). It's settled law now. Nobody gets to claim they didn't know. So, this week, our lawyer Chad Williamson sent the Regina Police a scorching demand letter. They have until Friday, July 17, to unblock us and promise never to do it again. If they don't, we'll sue. You can read the entire letter at — along with every other case we've won. And make no mistake: if they'll do this to me, they're doing it to other Reginans too. That's what bullies do. Unlike the Regina Police, we take no tax money. We rely on you. If you think this fight is worth having, please help me cover the legal bills at REPORT by Ezra Levant 🍁🚛:

Rebel News

49,794 Aufrufe • vor 24 Tagen

The most epic 13 minute AI rant I've heard in 2026 PS: My parent's heard this when I was playing it in the car and thought Jason ✨👾SaaStr.Ai✨ Lemkin went OFF like Stephen A Smith does on first take PPS: Full transcript below [17:00] Harry Stebbings: I I just wanted to ask Jason, if the people that we want are fundamentally different, the developers that we used to hire, we don't because AI writes the code for us. The marketers we don't want, the sales people we don't want—who who do we want genuinely? Like what is the attractive profile? Because your Anthropic’s and your OpenAIs are hiring, so so what are the people that we want in the companies of the future? [17:18] Jason Lemkin: Look, I know it sounds trite, but but the answer is simple. It's just the expression each year changes. We want folks that are genuinely AI fluent. It's pretty simple. Now you know, maybe last year we called them prompt engineers, right? That used to be a job. I don't know if you remember that actually used to be the hottest job on planet earth. Now no one needs a prompt engineer because it's pretty easy to prompt all these tools. That job died. Okay. Um and now we need go-to-market engineers. Um I think that job's going to die. We need—everyone needs so many forward deployed engineers. Like you can't hire enough forward deployed engineers. But uh you know um but Palantir just announced in whatever their their big their big event—they've gotten their deployment times down over 90% with forward deployed engineers. So that may become—so the this wave of disruption for the titles and the specificity, it's also exhaustingly accelerating. But it's really simple. You meet anyone for any role—sales, marketing, engineering, product, QA—they're they're either they're either they can't keep all of the ways they use AI to accelerate their job from spewing out of their mouth, or they're staring at you. It's there's nowhere in the middle. Like, and the person that comes in and says—it's it's it sounds Captain Obvious—but like, you know, you just had the whatever from Lovable, the the marketing head that was super popular on the show, right? She's just spewing AI-native insights into Lovable, right? It's not that complicated. You hire her, Elena, or whatever it is. You just hire her. It doesn't matter whether she's still in college or a junior or a senior or a middler, a left or right. And honestly, if you interview people, I would say of all even of the best startups I've invested in, maybe 30% of the management team meets this standard at best. 30%. Maybe less. And of the interviews I do in general, it's single-digit percents. It's just and in in that sense, it's the same as ever. Like you either lower the bar in hiring or you hire someone that's actually great. And someone that's actually great is so far ahead of you in how to apply to to employ the efficiencies of AI in their role, your jaw falls on the table. The difference is we used to need warm bodies. That's what's changing. We used to need warm bodies to answer the call, to do QA, to do code review, to to get the blue pixel to go from the upper left to the lower right. You laugh, but you need you literally needed to brute force this with humans. With AI, every day that goes by, the AI—you do not need brute force human beings on your team. And that's another reason they're shrinking. Why are all these new companies so efficient? They're just not brute forcing things with humans. They're just not. They're choosing not to. And so these team—all the brute forcers out there—everyone talks about how bloated teams got in 2021. I don't agree with that. I think they got as big as they needed to be when growth was high and you needed humans to do everything. All you look at these teams that that doubled—well if growth continued at 60% like the rate in early 2021 for 5 years or can help me do the math and every single thing a software company did required a human. You were understaffed by your 2021 headcount. You'd be sitting here in 2026. You every office in SoMa would be triple packed and you there wouldn't be enough humans to staff your company. It's just the world changed. [20:33] Harry Stebbings: Jason, you live on the bleeding edge. I think me and Rory see that and I think the world sees that when they hear you every week in terms of how you run SaaS. For all of the CEOs and execs who listen to the show, what would you advise them in terms of determining whether someone is AI fluent when they meet them for jobs, for talent? [20:51] Jason Lemkin: Here's I realized I was just asked this. I just did a review with a super fast startup growing just crossing 100 million and I was asked this question. And one of my favorite executives, I thought his answer was pretty dated and because he gave me an answer that was about 6 months old. The answer 6 months old is: "I look for folks in my team, I look for you know at what tools they play with." Okay, that was a great answer in like summer of 2025. Okay, I tried Lovable last week. Okay, the answer in 2026 is: "What commercial AI tool have you brought into your organization this month?" That's the test. Anyone that is on the bleeding edge that you would want to hire—now there are so many great products in the market. Okay, there is no excuse in any role to have not brought one tool a month into your organization. Okay, there—now there's going to be better and better tools and better and better products as the year goes on. What's the one you did? And you will see folks with their deer in the headlights to this question. What what sales tool? What marketing tool? What product tool? What engineering tool? What did you bring in? Why did you pick it? How does it working? Because if you're at remotely at the cutting edge, you're all over this. You're looking for the next agentic tools that will radically improve how you do business. This is—you think everyone thinks SaaS is at the bleeding edge, right? You know, you know, all we do is we're just looking for the tools and trying them. Okay? Okay, we're one year ahead of everybody else because we did the simplest thing in the world. Like we tried the tools early and we trained them. We trained them for a month. Okay, I'll give you—want hear a horrible example from this week? Super hot AI company valued at 6 billion. Okay, I'm not going to name it. Um, this week yesterday told us we had to quadruple what we spent on their product. Okay, their agent told us, right? And why did this happen? Okay. Well, at this $6 billion company, no one had trained the agent on its pricing properly. No one had tested it. They said, "Well, well, we've been in beta." And we said, "Well, when did the beta launch? A year ago." Okay, these are people asleep at at the wheel. You want somebody who the instant this comes up, they exactly know what the issue is. And "Hey, when I was at Lovable Replit, we trained the agent. This is how we did it. I brought in this tool. I brought in this tool that that Rory invested in last week. It solved all these issues." That's what you want to hear. And if they haven't brought in a tool in the last 30 days, at least deeply evaluated it. I don't really care whether they bought it, but gone so far down the funnel they can tell you—pick whatever tool: Fixie, Regie, GC, AIGC—I don't care how you went through it, you looked at it, you can tell me the eight ways it would improve the productivity of your business and three you didn't. Just don't hire that person because they're going to run your company to the ground. This is the job today. The job today is not to screw around on ChatGPT and to be a prompt engineer. The job today is to bring the best AI and agentic products into your organization and leverage all the hard work that the engineers have done building those products. That's your job. You don't have to screw around. You don't have to be a prompt engineer anymore. You have to be an agent deployment expert. A—this is the new job we're making up today. An Agentic Deployment Expert. That's your job from C-level to junior. Agentic Deployment Expert. Don't hire anybody else. You're going to regret it. They're going to stare at the camera. He's good. Stare at the camera. He's honorable. We could probably just I could slip away, get a coffee, and come back. No. And I I sound exasperated, Rory. And I—but the reason I am is I can just see I can see my best companies doing it. And I can see some companies I've invested in not doing it. And I want to cry. I just want to cry when they have no ADs on their team. I just—like you're flushing your years of your life down the toilet by not approaching your how you're building this company this way. [24:33] Rory: Yes. And at the risk of being positive, it's worth pointing out two things he didn't say. Well, something implicit why he said—Jason didn't do the only hire, you know, he didn't commit the um employment law, I think it's a civil penalty of saying only employ people below X who get the new new thing because he implicitly said anyone can do it provided you're willing to learn. And I think that's the big aha that's one of the positive statements to make here right? Look and I think it applies—I'm always wary of being "Hey, coming across, hey this this is the things that you all have to do." I think it applies to everyone including investors right? I mean I will say I have found that unless you're willing to invest the time learning these tools you actually shouldn't be investing in them. One of my partners Andy had this expression: "You know, if you decide you want to stop learning new things you probably should retire within 6 to 12 months and never write another check again." Maybe that's down to 3 to 6 months at this stage, right? And I think, you know, it's— [25:27] Harry Stebbings: Yeah, I actually I actually had a meeting with mine and Jason's biggest investor the other day and I—pretend he's not here—I said I think he's the most equipped investor for this generation of investing because I don't think anyone quite sits at the bleeding edge like he does on the investor side. [25:42] Harry Stebbings: Why in terms of using the equip stuff? Yeah. Yeah. In terms of using the stuff, understanding understanding bottlenecks, constraints. For sure. [25:51] Jason Lemkin: But can I just add one point? We can just cuz it's so important if it helps people. Okay, we are—and thank you Harry. We're going through these phases. Okay, and when AI started to blow up for real for us, uh call it early 2024, right? Maybe late '23, I wasn't equipped. It was too technical. I wasn't going to go in and figure out—I wasn't smart enough to figure out how to deal with a massively hallucinating LLM API and turn that and turn that into something magical. Kudos to investors and others that that got it in early '23, '22. I mean I remember I—I guess it was maybe SaaStr Annual '23. I was with David Sacks and I did a Q&A and I said, "How you thinking about AI at Craft?" He's like, "Well we're all in. We want 80% of '23 of investments to be AI." I'm like, "Great but like show me the show me the great ones in market." He's like, "They're all prototypes. We're all they're all they're all proof of concepts but we're all in anyway." That's where you kind of had to be in '23 if you weren't investing at like the LLM level. Okay, I wasn't smart enough. Then we went through this weird-ass prompt engineer era where like you you could torture these products to do something good, right? But you had to torture them. You had to like craft these crazy things that made no sense. Now we are in the era where mere ordinarily smart generalists can make these tools do magical things. And literally I go to these meetings and people be like, "I don't know how to like this is so scary. I don't know how to do this." And we show them our backends. Do you know how to do a workflow generator? Do you know how to do a a decision tree? Like we've been building these since software in the '90s. Okay, if you—I can show you all of our agents. The how they work is novel. They do have to be trained. You can't be lazy and have these agents work. But honestly, the the UI, the UX, the way we interact with them, it's just software. And so my point is: Pick yourself off the ground. This is your time now. If you felt lost in AI era, if you felt like you're behind, you don't understand what all these people are saying on X and Twitter and their Claude and and their and talking about all the 4.6 point Nano point and it's over—like you just it's not your world. This is your time. This is your time for the generalist that knows how to use software tools really really well. And I—this is my last point but it's so important. If ever in your recent life—and this is why you could be all you need to be is young at heart to Rory's point—if in the last three to five years you have successfully deployed a piece of enterprise software of any sort you yourself, not some agency you hired, but if you have deployed it, you can deploy any agentic tool. Any. And you can become the hero in your company and you can become the hero in your functional area. But I watch folks—I'm literally helping a company now that they're adding hundreds of sales folks this year with a new pre-IPO COO—he's not hasn't brought in a single tool, totally scared of it. Okay, it's not that hard. Did you use SalesLoft? Did you use Outreach? Did you use HubSpot? Do you know these tools? If you can deploy these tools, you can deploy a world-changing AI agent. And so this is the time for people like the folks that that were shut out of the AI revolution right now. The generalist folks that are not that know how to deploy software that don't even know how to build software. Like vibe coding for me was folks who knew how to build software, but you didn't have to be an engineer. Now, you just need to know how to deploy software to win with AI agents. That's all you need to know. So many people have these skills and they're petrified of AI. "How did you do that? How did you deploy an AI BDR?" Well, we bought a piece of software, we figured out how it worked for a day, we set it up in an afternoon, and then and then we did spend 30 months training it, which you didn't do with this old software because in the old days, we just had to manually upload all the data, right? And there was no training. The the only non-intuitive part is training these things. And it's it's it's just work. So that's why when I see folks on the management team not doing this, there's no excuse. You do not need to be technical to win with AI agents in Q2 of '26. You do not need to be even 1% technical. Not at all. So it's your time. Or you're going to get laid off. Or you're going to get laid off because you're not going to matter.

Arjun Mahadevan (Mr. LLC 🇺🇸)

37,640 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

NEW: Joe Lonsdale with Will Cain on Trump deploying the National Guard to US cities: "Conservatives for too long have said, 'Well, it's the Democrats fault. We're just going to let these things burn.' Our civilization needs functional cities, and we need to stand up for them." via Will CainShow Will Cain: What do you make of Portland, Chicago, Washington, D.C.? President Trump stepping in to provide some measure of safety to American cities... Joe Lonsdale: Thank goodness for Stephen Miller and President Trump and what they're doing... It's obvious it's a total mess. And I think conservatives for too long have said, well, it's Democrats fault. We're just going to let these things burn. Our civilization needs functional cities, and we need to stand up for them. And by the way, when you let the left take these things over, they lie and they steal, and they use that money to break everything else. Will: Your argument is you should not turn over a dysfunctional city to a political class that's uninterested in securing that city. So would you encourage President Trump to look at all cities that are having trouble with crime? Joe: I would encourage him, but I would encourage our governors as well. So, for example, Governor Stitt in Oklahoma. He went into Tulsa last month. They took out 1.9 million pounds of waste, including hazardous waste in these homeless camps. And we have illegal homeless camps in Austin. I think every one of our governors needs to step up and say, if you are a governor who believes in law and order, do not allow your blue cities to fester. You do not allow people to suffer and don't allow them to steal the money and use it for horrible things. Will: That would be governors in Georgia or Tennessee with blue cities in a largely red state. Joe, you are a big part of the University of Austin. You're a thinker. You think about civics. You think about the foundation of the American government. I know you believe in federalism, the idea that local government is best because it's where the citizen has the most control. Do you worry at all about either the president or a governor imposing their policy on local governance? Joe: So our founders definitely decided that the state should be the unit that runs our country, right? That's what federalism means. Doesn't mean cities, it means states. And so I think it's appropriate for President Trump to partner with the states as much as possible. However, when you get to a place where people are dying, where there's violence, where you have police free zones that are hurting the poor people in Chicago. Now you're trying to have ICE free zones as well. That's unacceptable. And so the state should be in charge as much as possible, but with not allowing the federal government to do things with ICE and immigration, that's when the president has to step up. Will: Why do you think these governors like J.B. Pritzker in Illinois are so opposed to help from President Trump? Joe: I don't even think they really are. I think a lot of these people know it's a mess, and the left kind of wants us to fix it. I think they want to be able to complain and show that they're fighting, because they have crazy extremist voters who've been tricked by the legacy press. And so they're kind of stuck in their bubble where they have to complain and have to pretend Trump is more authoritarian than he is. But then I think a lot of them are really grateful he actually is cutting crime, because he has.

NEW: Joe Lonsdale with Will Cain on Trump deploying the National Guard to US cities: "Conservatives for too long have said, 'Well, it's the Democrats fault. We're just going to let these things burn.' Our civilization needs functional cities, and we need to stand up for them." via Will CainShow Will Cain: What do you make of Portland, Chicago, Washington, D.C.? President Trump stepping in to provide some measure of safety to American cities... Joe Lonsdale: Thank goodness for Stephen Miller and President Trump and what they're doing... It's obvious it's a total mess. And I think conservatives for too long have said, well, it's Democrats fault. We're just going to let these things burn. Our civilization needs functional cities, and we need to stand up for them. And by the way, when you let the left take these things over, they lie and they steal, and they use that money to break everything else. Will: Your argument is you should not turn over a dysfunctional city to a political class that's uninterested in securing that city. So would you encourage President Trump to look at all cities that are having trouble with crime? Joe: I would encourage him, but I would encourage our governors as well. So, for example, Governor Stitt in Oklahoma. He went into Tulsa last month. They took out 1.9 million pounds of waste, including hazardous waste in these homeless camps. And we have illegal homeless camps in Austin. I think every one of our governors needs to step up and say, if you are a governor who believes in law and order, do not allow your blue cities to fester. You do not allow people to suffer and don't allow them to steal the money and use it for horrible things. Will: That would be governors in Georgia or Tennessee with blue cities in a largely red state. Joe, you are a big part of the University of Austin. You're a thinker. You think about civics. You think about the foundation of the American government. I know you believe in federalism, the idea that local government is best because it's where the citizen has the most control. Do you worry at all about either the president or a governor imposing their policy on local governance? Joe: So our founders definitely decided that the state should be the unit that runs our country, right? That's what federalism means. Doesn't mean cities, it means states. And so I think it's appropriate for President Trump to partner with the states as much as possible. However, when you get to a place where people are dying, where there's violence, where you have police free zones that are hurting the poor people in Chicago. Now you're trying to have ICE free zones as well. That's unacceptable. And so the state should be in charge as much as possible, but with not allowing the federal government to do things with ICE and immigration, that's when the president has to step up. Will: Why do you think these governors like J.B. Pritzker in Illinois are so opposed to help from President Trump? Joe: I don't even think they really are. I think a lot of these people know it's a mess, and the left kind of wants us to fix it. I think they want to be able to complain and show that they're fighting, because they have crazy extremist voters who've been tricked by the legacy press. And so they're kind of stuck in their bubble where they have to complain and have to pretend Trump is more authoritarian than he is. But then I think a lot of them are really grateful he actually is cutting crime, because he has.

American Optimist

58,467 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

Every night as a kid, Kobe Bryant fell asleep visualizing basketball. He’d see himself scoring 10 straight. Then 20. Then 30. “But in the dream, why would you ever interrupt that?” “So you keep dreaming.” “Before I go to sleep, I’m at 120 points.” In 2006, he scored 81. Kobe spent an hour at USC explaining what Mamba Mentality really means: He was born to play. "I started playing at like 2 years old." "My father wasn't one of these fathers that was like: you're going to play basketball. It was just I was around the game a lot and I gravitated to the ball." "I was completely geeking out about the smell of the ball. The way it sounds when it hits concrete versus how it hits a parquet floor." "The sound of the nets. The different material of the nets." "There's certain basketball hoops where the rim sits slightly above the backboard. I was geeking out if I got into a gym where they were completely parallel." "Little shit like that would freak me out." "To answer your question, I was born to do this thing, man. And I did it non-stop all day long from the age of 2 to when I retired." He explains how to know if you've found your thing. "That's the trick, isn't it? Finding what you love to do." "We talk about hard work all the time. And it's like, if you got to get up every single morning and remind yourself how hard you need to work, you probably need to choose a different profession." "That shouldn't be there." "I wake up in the morning excited to get to it. If I'm not training, I'm missing it. If I'm not watching a game of basketball, I miss it." "There's no place I'd rather be." "If you have that feeling, then you're truly doing what God has put you on this earth to do." He explains the 81-point game. "When you grow up downloading that into your brain over and over and over..." "That summer, I made 1000 shots a day. 1000. On top of weight training and conditioning." "And they weren't just shots. They were shots that you saw in that game." "Coming out of the corner. Going to the pinch post. Footwork in the post. Coming off the screen." "It was very specific." "So when you download that into your system and you go out on the court, you're just executing things that you've done thousands of times before." "And you have that dream." "Then that becomes possible." He explains why he doesn't reinvent. "Everything's been not choreographed, but it's been practiced so many times that it's second nature." "Why reinvent it?" "I don't understand that. You go out and play the game and you're just trying to create something new. No." "This is what I do. This is what I do extremely well." "You're going to have to stop me from doing that. And if you do stop me from doing that, I have a counter to that." "Done." He explains the pain. "To be honest, I wasn't even thinking about the game." "My knee was hurting so much. I didn't know then, but I had a flap of cartilage stuck in my joint line." "My mind was really trying to go to a place where I don't feel that pain." "The game started. And because of that, I was just in a different space." "I wasn't worried about what was to come. I wasn't worried about what just happened. I was just here." "When you're just there in the moment, your focus is heightened because nothing else matters." Pete Carroll asked the hard question. "What was it like for you to play with people that weren't as gritty as you were?" Kobe's response. "I'd kill them. I'd bury them." "The kind of culture that the Laker organization stood for, winning championships, is not tolerated." "You're going to show up to play. And you're going to lollygag through this scrimmage, through this drill? I'm going to beat you." "I'm going to let you know I beat you." "I'm going to want you to reconsider your professional life choice." "People will say: okay, that doesn't make a great teammate." "Well, I'm not here to be a great teammate. I'm here to help you win championships." "So it's different." He explains practice. "As a leader of a team, it's your responsibility to elevate the rest of the guys." "What people tend to get stuck on is saying: the way to make players better is to pass them the ball when they're open." "That's a very trivial way to look at things." "You have to get them emotionally to want to be better. You have to get them to an emotional space where they wake up every morning driven to be the best version of themselves." "How do you do that?" "In practice for me, it was a chance to drive them, to challenge them." "You have to know your teammates. Because then you know what nerve to touch." "Some guys, it's like: okay, come on, we can do this. That'll get them going." "Other guys, no. You got to figure out what button to push." He gives an example. "Pau was always Spain." "If I tell him how they lost in the gold medal to us and how they're going to lose again, how I'm going to beat your ass in practice just like I beat you in the gold medal game." "Oh. He would hate that. He would hate that." "But that's what practice was. You have to drive them." "If practice is more intense and harder than a game seven will be, then a game seven will be easy." "But if it's not, then that's when teams start folding and capitulating." He explains standards. "If I got to fight to get you in the gym, that's a problem. That's a problem." "You want players that are gym rats. Players that want to be in the gym, that want to work." "Then from there, you build on top of that." "But if you're lazy, man, I don't want to talk to you. I don't want to deal with you. You make me feel dumber." "You're going to lower my level. I don't think so." "You can go over there. There's plenty of teams where you'll fit right in." He explains loyalty. The Lakers offered to trade him to a contending team. His response. "We've known each other for a very long time. I'm questioning myself because I'm wondering what about me makes you think I would jump ship." "We don't do that." "As a leader, you got to be able to take the good with the bad." "You can't just because the ship's sinking all of a sudden jump off and swim to another. You don't do that." "If you can win championships in front of everybody, then you could miss the playoffs in front of everybody." "You got to be able to take both sides of it." "If you're doing something that's easy, you might want to reconsider what you're doing." He explains what he wishes he knew earlier. "Understanding empathy and compassion." "As a young kid when I came in the league, it was like: I'm driving this way and either you're going to be on the train or be on the track." "There was no such thing as understanding that people have lives outside of the game. Which apparently I did not." "If I understood that at an early age, then it helps me as a leader to communicate better." "Getting to know people on a personal level. What are their fears. What are their insecurities. What are their dreams and ambitions." "When you come to understand that about a person, then you can help them reach the best version of themselves." "I wish I'd known that earlier." He explains how he teaches his daughter. "My daughter said: Dad, can you teach me how to play basketball? I want to be better than you." "All right, cool. Let's start with 15 minutes a day." "For 15 minutes a day, we just stood right in front of the hoop and just shot. Right under the hoop. We didn't move around. We didn't do any dribbling." "Just 15 minutes a day just shoot here." "You do that for a month and a half. Then next month, you step back. Then next month, you step back again. Then you start working on dribbling." "Through actionable things is how we teach our children." "If it becomes a part of their process in sports, it'll become a part of their process in life as well." He explains dreams. "I just dream. I have dreams." "Dreams should be pure." "A lot of times when we're born into this world, we actually wind up going backwards." "The more we mature, the more responsible our dreams become. The more governors we put on ourselves and our ability to dream and to reimagine." "It's always a fight for us to make sure that our dreams always stay pure." "It's not a matter of pushing beyond your limitations or expectations." "It's really a matter of protecting your dreams. Protecting your imagination." "That's really the key." "When you do that, then the world just seems limitless."

Every night as a kid, Kobe Bryant fell asleep visualizing basketball. He’d see himself scoring 10 straight. Then 20. Then 30. “But in the dream, why would you ever interrupt that?” “So you keep dreaming.” “Before I go to sleep, I’m at 120 points.” In 2006, he scored 81. Kobe spent an hour at USC explaining what Mamba Mentality really means: He was born to play. "I started playing at like 2 years old." "My father wasn't one of these fathers that was like: you're going to play basketball. It was just I was around the game a lot and I gravitated to the ball." "I was completely geeking out about the smell of the ball. The way it sounds when it hits concrete versus how it hits a parquet floor." "The sound of the nets. The different material of the nets." "There's certain basketball hoops where the rim sits slightly above the backboard. I was geeking out if I got into a gym where they were completely parallel." "Little shit like that would freak me out." "To answer your question, I was born to do this thing, man. And I did it non-stop all day long from the age of 2 to when I retired." He explains how to know if you've found your thing. "That's the trick, isn't it? Finding what you love to do." "We talk about hard work all the time. And it's like, if you got to get up every single morning and remind yourself how hard you need to work, you probably need to choose a different profession." "That shouldn't be there." "I wake up in the morning excited to get to it. If I'm not training, I'm missing it. If I'm not watching a game of basketball, I miss it." "There's no place I'd rather be." "If you have that feeling, then you're truly doing what God has put you on this earth to do." He explains the 81-point game. "When you grow up downloading that into your brain over and over and over..." "That summer, I made 1000 shots a day. 1000. On top of weight training and conditioning." "And they weren't just shots. They were shots that you saw in that game." "Coming out of the corner. Going to the pinch post. Footwork in the post. Coming off the screen." "It was very specific." "So when you download that into your system and you go out on the court, you're just executing things that you've done thousands of times before." "And you have that dream." "Then that becomes possible." He explains why he doesn't reinvent. "Everything's been not choreographed, but it's been practiced so many times that it's second nature." "Why reinvent it?" "I don't understand that. You go out and play the game and you're just trying to create something new. No." "This is what I do. This is what I do extremely well." "You're going to have to stop me from doing that. And if you do stop me from doing that, I have a counter to that." "Done." He explains the pain. "To be honest, I wasn't even thinking about the game." "My knee was hurting so much. I didn't know then, but I had a flap of cartilage stuck in my joint line." "My mind was really trying to go to a place where I don't feel that pain." "The game started. And because of that, I was just in a different space." "I wasn't worried about what was to come. I wasn't worried about what just happened. I was just here." "When you're just there in the moment, your focus is heightened because nothing else matters." Pete Carroll asked the hard question. "What was it like for you to play with people that weren't as gritty as you were?" Kobe's response. "I'd kill them. I'd bury them." "The kind of culture that the Laker organization stood for, winning championships, is not tolerated." "You're going to show up to play. And you're going to lollygag through this scrimmage, through this drill? I'm going to beat you." "I'm going to let you know I beat you." "I'm going to want you to reconsider your professional life choice." "People will say: okay, that doesn't make a great teammate." "Well, I'm not here to be a great teammate. I'm here to help you win championships." "So it's different." He explains practice. "As a leader of a team, it's your responsibility to elevate the rest of the guys." "What people tend to get stuck on is saying: the way to make players better is to pass them the ball when they're open." "That's a very trivial way to look at things." "You have to get them emotionally to want to be better. You have to get them to an emotional space where they wake up every morning driven to be the best version of themselves." "How do you do that?" "In practice for me, it was a chance to drive them, to challenge them." "You have to know your teammates. Because then you know what nerve to touch." "Some guys, it's like: okay, come on, we can do this. That'll get them going." "Other guys, no. You got to figure out what button to push." He gives an example. "Pau was always Spain." "If I tell him how they lost in the gold medal to us and how they're going to lose again, how I'm going to beat your ass in practice just like I beat you in the gold medal game." "Oh. He would hate that. He would hate that." "But that's what practice was. You have to drive them." "If practice is more intense and harder than a game seven will be, then a game seven will be easy." "But if it's not, then that's when teams start folding and capitulating." He explains standards. "If I got to fight to get you in the gym, that's a problem. That's a problem." "You want players that are gym rats. Players that want to be in the gym, that want to work." "Then from there, you build on top of that." "But if you're lazy, man, I don't want to talk to you. I don't want to deal with you. You make me feel dumber." "You're going to lower my level. I don't think so." "You can go over there. There's plenty of teams where you'll fit right in." He explains loyalty. The Lakers offered to trade him to a contending team. His response. "We've known each other for a very long time. I'm questioning myself because I'm wondering what about me makes you think I would jump ship." "We don't do that." "As a leader, you got to be able to take the good with the bad." "You can't just because the ship's sinking all of a sudden jump off and swim to another. You don't do that." "If you can win championships in front of everybody, then you could miss the playoffs in front of everybody." "You got to be able to take both sides of it." "If you're doing something that's easy, you might want to reconsider what you're doing." He explains what he wishes he knew earlier. "Understanding empathy and compassion." "As a young kid when I came in the league, it was like: I'm driving this way and either you're going to be on the train or be on the track." "There was no such thing as understanding that people have lives outside of the game. Which apparently I did not." "If I understood that at an early age, then it helps me as a leader to communicate better." "Getting to know people on a personal level. What are their fears. What are their insecurities. What are their dreams and ambitions." "When you come to understand that about a person, then you can help them reach the best version of themselves." "I wish I'd known that earlier." He explains how he teaches his daughter. "My daughter said: Dad, can you teach me how to play basketball? I want to be better than you." "All right, cool. Let's start with 15 minutes a day." "For 15 minutes a day, we just stood right in front of the hoop and just shot. Right under the hoop. We didn't move around. We didn't do any dribbling." "Just 15 minutes a day just shoot here." "You do that for a month and a half. Then next month, you step back. Then next month, you step back again. Then you start working on dribbling." "Through actionable things is how we teach our children." "If it becomes a part of their process in sports, it'll become a part of their process in life as well." He explains dreams. "I just dream. I have dreams." "Dreams should be pure." "A lot of times when we're born into this world, we actually wind up going backwards." "The more we mature, the more responsible our dreams become. The more governors we put on ourselves and our ability to dream and to reimagine." "It's always a fight for us to make sure that our dreams always stay pure." "It's not a matter of pushing beyond your limitations or expectations." "It's really a matter of protecting your dreams. Protecting your imagination." "That's really the key." "When you do that, then the world just seems limitless."

Jaynit

17,383 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

🚨🚨🚨🚨 Dr Mike Yeadon's Austrian Testimony Please watch and share - 15 Mins --------------------------------------- My name is Dr. Mike Yeadon and in the next 10 to 15 minutes I'm going to focus on one major point which is that the purported "vaccines" against this alleged illness, COVID-19 were in my view deliberately designed intentionally to injure, kill and, and reduce fertility. Now this is an allegation I've been making for around three and a half years. In that time, if I was wrong, ladies and gentlemen, I think numerous scientists would have rebutted what I've said in writing and in video. And if I was wrong, I would have expected the drug companies whose products I am maligning to have sought and secured a court injunction to stop me repeating these allegations. Neither of those things have ever happened. What has happened instead is that I have been extraordinarily censored and smeared sideways. And I think I offer that to you as strong evidence that I may be "over the target", at least in relation to these injectable products that have definitely injured and killed many people. So first just brief few words of introduction in terms of credentials. So Mike Yeadon, I've been a professional research scientist for over 30 years in the pharmaceutical industry and in biotech. My first degree was in biochemistry and toxicology. It was a joint honours degree. I got a first, then I did a second degree, a PhD. It's a research based piece of work lasting three years and my focus was respiratory pharmacology, the study of impact of drugs on respiration and so on. And that led into my career where I became a senior research scientist responsible for new drugs to treat allergic, respiratory and later dermatology diseases. I was at one point Vice President and the most senior research person within Pfizer Global R&D, and I left in 2011. And for 10 years after that, seven of those I was founder and CEO of a biotech called ZIARCO which was acquired by Novartis in 2017, since when I've been a consultant although I've discontinued those activities in the last four and a half years or so. So I've not earned a penny from speaking out in the last four and a half years and I don't want to either. There is a longer video by me recorded a month or so ago, 22 minutes long and it's called Silver Bullet and it's on my telegram channel and I hope rather more widely. But today I'm just going to focus on the design and effects of these so called vaccines. So I've been involved all of my professional life with other talented people trying to design and test potential new treatments for respiratory disease and as I say later on dermatology applications. So I can tell you that this, with my background in toxicology and my own research experience, 30 years in the industry, this qualifies me, I think better than any other commentator to evaluate what was in the minds of the people who designed these products. Let me tell you that every component in a medicine is chosen. It's chosen to be there. It's not random. It's chosen to be there to achieve some purpose, that's normal, perhaps to help a drug dissolve, to be absorbed, to persist in your blood, or to leave your body quickly to penetrate the brain if it was a neurological drug, or to stay close to the lung if it was an inhaled drug. So it's quite normal to make choices with objectives in mind. So I believe the intentions of the designers are written into the choices they made, the structures and components, formulation of these products. So I'm going to use those skills, as it were, to back calculate what was in their mind, what objectives did they have when they chose these structures and formulations. So I'm going to just say, before I get into that, just one thing about these so called "vaccines". My experience of the industry over 30 years tells me it is formally impossible to invent, research, test, evaluate, manufacture, gain authorization for, and launch a complex new biological product in under a year. It's formally impossible. I don't care how much money and people you put on it, there are a series of linear steps which when taken together, unless you miss some out, cannot be completed under several years. So if someone told you they had brought a brand new airline to market with new engines in under a year, I think you would know it's formally impossible to do a clean sheet design, to stress test, to manufacture, to test, to flight test, optimise the engines and get regulatory clearance and be ready to take you across the Atlantic in under a year. And of course it's never been done and it's never been done with complex biological products in under a year. So whatever else they did, they didn't do what they said because it cannot be done in under a year. Secondly, and I'll come to the examples in a moment, there are in these products numerous features which in my view, my peers, people like me, people with my training and experience would know for sure would give rise to the toxicities that I pointed out in 2020. They're not, they don't require particular skills you need to know how to do drug discovery and what can go wrong. But I'm not acting like a complete genius in spotting these, just someone who is a professional from this industry that has pointed out numerous features built in by choice that I believe I think they obviously confer toxicology, toxicity to the recipients. And as I've said, people designing these, people like me in wherever they were, pharmaceutical industries or the military, knew these things were going to happen. And that's why I say it's intentional. I'm going to give you three examples that you can go and test. So the first one is these are so called gene based products, that is they've got a string of genetic information in them. Now there aren't any products like that that are in routine use anywhere in the world. So they're brand new technology. But what you'll remember they told you that they do is they cause your body to make as a protein whatever was in that genetic code. Now it's absolutely basic immunology. How is it, do you think your body knows that what's inside of you is meant to be there and you don't attack it? And yet if something gets into your body from the outside or a tumour form, something that shouldn't be in you, your body can recognise that that's foreign or non-self and can attack it. And the answer is you tolerate everything that's meant to be inside your body. When you're in your mum's womb, we, we ruled out the ability to attack ourselves. Unless you get an autoimmune disease in later life, you play nice with yourself until something gets inside you or something goes wrong inside you. So ladies and gentlemen, if you are injected with a genetic sequence that causes you to manufacture a foreign protein, whether it's a virus or something out of a computer, it's not you and it's not meant to be in you, I assure you, your body recognises that it's been invaded, something's in there that shouldn't be and it launch a fatal attack on every cell that it thinks has gone wrong. It's trying to save you. So and that autoimmune reaction that destruction which your body is trying to, is doing because it's trying to protect you, that will happen anywhere in your body, any cell, tissue, organ in your body where unluckily your dose of what was injected into you lands. So if it lands in your heart, you could get myocarditis or a heart attack. If it lands in your brain, you could get a stroke or neurological conditions. If it's in your eyes, you could go blind. If it's in your ovaries, it may sterilise you. But that explains, in my view, a lot of the enormously diverse toxicity that's been seen with these products. So that's one, your body is being made to manufacture something that does not belong in it. And when that happens, everybody with the first lecture of immunology will understand why that happens. It's not an accident, it's in the design. It's a deliberate choice. The second one, then what was encoded in the so called "vaccines", now we're told it's spike protein. I don't think there is a natural spike protein, but proteins with sequences like that are known to be acutely toxic to blood cells, prompting blood clots to nerve cells, causing them to malfunction and probably other things I don't know anything about. So that's the second thing your body was making, was forced to make not only a foreign protein, something that didn't belong in your body, you were, your body was forced to make something that was directly toxic to your body. And the person who chose that sequence knew that's what the property of it was. It's not an accident, it's intentional. Then the third one is absolutely shocking. It's normal for drugs to be formulated that is to be wrapped in something. You'll see them in capsules or tablets. They might have a coating. If it's an inhaler, there might be some liquid with it so it can be propelled. In the case of these injectables, they were wrapped in really fatty globules called lipid nanoparticles, which means tiny little particles of fat. Lipid nanoparticles. Ladies and gentlemen, there were papers published as early as 2012, which I read a couple of years ago, that said that it is well understood in the industry by formulators that the payload that's contained within lipid nanoparticles when injected into animals and people leads to a disproportionate deposition of the payload into your ovaries. I remember the day I read that paper, I really couldn't sleep. The person who chose to use lipid nanoparticles to formulate the Moderna and Pfizer products knew perfectly well that what they would do is allow them to drift all through your body, through membranes as if they weren't there, and disproportionately deposit in your ovaries. And given I've told you the first two things, which is that will induce your body to attack every cell in the body that follows the instructions. And that instruction by the way, is to make a poison, you should no longer be surprised that people have been injured and killed and had their fertility reduced. I wish I didn't have to communicate this information. But there is no possibility that the people involved in designing these products did not know that they would have the effects that I predicted and that so many people have actually experienced it is intentional. There is ample evidence that this assault, which is not the only thing that's ever happened, unfortunately it's the first I noticed. I was a so called normie until 2020. I believe everything I was told. But this is part of a long planned assault by powerful wealthy people operating above the level of nation. So I'm afraid organisations like the United Nations, the World Health Organisation, the Bank for International Settlements, the World Economic Forum are populated by the people who I believe have orchestrated this attack on humanity and they're going to do it again. There are factories all around the world busy manufacturing these so called "vaccines" and formulating them in the way I just described. And they're going to come up with contrived reasons why you need to roll your sleeve up and I'm telling you, for the love of God, please don't do it. The only way we will push these people away is by speaking out as we see it and simply refusing to follow absurd instructions no matter what ostensible reason they come up with for you to do that.. So I mentioned I have been subject to astonishing censorship and smearing. And that's true. I've always said, if you hear me, please repeat what I have said to other people. I've got a tiny reach because I'm censored and no one else is coming to save us. It's just a small number of us who are not willing to stay quiet while this is done to us. But it's part of a wider deception. The pandemic lie is a major one. I don't have time to go into it now, but see my other recording. But there wasn't a pandemic. There's never been a pandemic. They can't happen. It's a lie. The so called human induced climate change crisis, that's all a lie as well. It's the same people who put this together at the end of the 1960s, the Club of Rome, they chose these two topics of infectious disease and climate change to scare people because they realised it would force a response from above the level of nation. But I'm saying, stand on your own feet and tell them to get lost with their absurd lies. And there's a third lie which underlies these, and it's they believe. They tell us we've been told all our lives, that the world is overpopulated. And it's literally absurd if you're up in an aeroplane within a few minutes, even over a busy city, the place is just full of cities and forests and fields. So that's yet another lie. But I think that's what's driving them. They think there's too many of us little people, and they seek to control us digitally and then eventually inject us to death. Its only going to be stopped then by refusal to cooperate. And that's my testimony. I hope that was helpful to.

aussie17

78,583 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

The Victims Of The Lahaina, Maui, Hawaii Fires ARE SPEAKING OUT!! They’re Calling Out The LAND GRAB & Biden’s LIES! ‌ NEW: 2023 Maui County Council Meeting Residents Say LAHAINA IS NOT FOR SALE. CITY COUNCIL IS MEETING WITH DEVELOPERS BEHIND THEIR BACKS & UNELECTED PEOPLE MAKING DECISIONS ‌ THESE PEOPLE ARE GETTING THEIR LAND STOLEN BEFORE OUR VERY EYES: “Biden said that, you know, Maui is going to decide Maui's future. But again, one person on Oahu is currently meeting with developers, meeting with private landowners, and is not meeting with the public” ‌ “I am testifying on my concerns of the governor's emergency proclamation that happened three weeks prior to the fire and how it suspended seven state statutes of which exonerated everything that you guys are in charge of, covers county organization administration, chapter 46, collective bargaining was rescinded, school impact fees, collective bargaining was rescinded. And to my knowledge, this was the first emergency proclamation in the country that didn't have a preceding incident. ‌ Normally it's like a hurricane, boom, we got emergency proclamation but this was just, from my knowledge, was just to streamline development on Maui, and it is allocated all decision-making power to one person, the housing officer of the governor, Nani Medeiros, who's unelected, who can trump every single thing that you do and everything that you say and every item that we cover without any input from the community without any public discourse, without sunshine law. ‌ Before I go to my, you know, tomorrow I love what you said, La Jena's not for sale, please include us. But I don't see that happening. And I was able to meet with Nani Maderas. I graciously invited her into my home in order to speak with teachers from the Burn down King and they're moving forward with, they're meeting with developers, private landowners, and not a lot of community unless you know how to maneuver correctly. So before I go to my next item, I would just like to ask each council member to let me know, are you in favor of this emergency proclamation that takes away sunshine law, collective bargaining, your, all your power in decision making? ‌ —-Everything you, I just can't say enough, everything that you do can be trumped by one person who's unelected and has no community input. ‌ —- This is disaster capitalism. Five billion dollars are coming to Maui and sticky fingers are here to take it all and develop everything without any input. Lahaina needs to decide what happens in Lahaina. ‌ And but it's not just there, it's everywhere. Anything you do on this island can be trumped by one person. And more people need to be standing up and saying that this is not how government works. This is not how we teach our children how government works. And this cannot move forward. Let me see, whew. ‌ —- So Biden came and spoke with the community at the Civic Center, and Biden said that, you know, Maui is going to decide Maui's future. But again, one person on Oahu is currently meeting with developers, meeting with private landowners, and is not meeting with the public. And that should be front page everywhere. And anything you do can be trumped by one person without any notice, and you won't know until it happens. I'm thankful for Biden coming here when he did, not right away, and being there for the community. But this is a state and county issue and the state and the county are going to decide how the rebuilding efforts go. And I would really like to see the county take reconsider what they've if they've been in favor of this and pass a resolution against against the governor's emergency proclamation on affordable housing that happened three weeks prior to. the wildfire. Thank you very much. I appreciate the time to speak” ‌ DEWs, Direct Energy Weapons #Hawaii #Maui #MauiFires #Lahaina #LahainaFires #DEWs #DirectedEnergyWeapons

The Victims Of The Lahaina, Maui, Hawaii Fires ARE SPEAKING OUT!! They’re Calling Out The LAND GRAB & Biden’s LIES! ‌ NEW: 2023 Maui County Council Meeting Residents Say LAHAINA IS NOT FOR SALE. CITY COUNCIL IS MEETING WITH DEVELOPERS BEHIND THEIR BACKS & UNELECTED PEOPLE MAKING DECISIONS ‌ THESE PEOPLE ARE GETTING THEIR LAND STOLEN BEFORE OUR VERY EYES: “Biden said that, you know, Maui is going to decide Maui's future. But again, one person on Oahu is currently meeting with developers, meeting with private landowners, and is not meeting with the public” ‌ “I am testifying on my concerns of the governor's emergency proclamation that happened three weeks prior to the fire and how it suspended seven state statutes of which exonerated everything that you guys are in charge of, covers county organization administration, chapter 46, collective bargaining was rescinded, school impact fees, collective bargaining was rescinded. And to my knowledge, this was the first emergency proclamation in the country that didn't have a preceding incident. ‌ Normally it's like a hurricane, boom, we got emergency proclamation but this was just, from my knowledge, was just to streamline development on Maui, and it is allocated all decision-making power to one person, the housing officer of the governor, Nani Medeiros, who's unelected, who can trump every single thing that you do and everything that you say and every item that we cover without any input from the community without any public discourse, without sunshine law. ‌ Before I go to my, you know, tomorrow I love what you said, La Jena's not for sale, please include us. But I don't see that happening. And I was able to meet with Nani Maderas. I graciously invited her into my home in order to speak with teachers from the Burn down King and they're moving forward with, they're meeting with developers, private landowners, and not a lot of community unless you know how to maneuver correctly. So before I go to my next item, I would just like to ask each council member to let me know, are you in favor of this emergency proclamation that takes away sunshine law, collective bargaining, your, all your power in decision making? ‌ —-Everything you, I just can't say enough, everything that you do can be trumped by one person who's unelected and has no community input. ‌ —- This is disaster capitalism. Five billion dollars are coming to Maui and sticky fingers are here to take it all and develop everything without any input. Lahaina needs to decide what happens in Lahaina. ‌ And but it's not just there, it's everywhere. Anything you do on this island can be trumped by one person. And more people need to be standing up and saying that this is not how government works. This is not how we teach our children how government works. And this cannot move forward. Let me see, whew. ‌ —- So Biden came and spoke with the community at the Civic Center, and Biden said that, you know, Maui is going to decide Maui's future. But again, one person on Oahu is currently meeting with developers, meeting with private landowners, and is not meeting with the public. And that should be front page everywhere. And anything you do can be trumped by one person without any notice, and you won't know until it happens. I'm thankful for Biden coming here when he did, not right away, and being there for the community. But this is a state and county issue and the state and the county are going to decide how the rebuilding efforts go. And I would really like to see the county take reconsider what they've if they've been in favor of this and pass a resolution against against the governor's emergency proclamation on affordable housing that happened three weeks prior to. the wildfire. Thank you very much. I appreciate the time to speak” ‌ DEWs, Direct Energy Weapons #Hawaii #Maui #MauiFires #Lahaina #LahainaFires #DEWs #DirectedEnergyWeapons

Wall Street Apes

586,016 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

Dr. Mike Yeadon: "It's absolutely clear, there's really only one senior institution. It's a group of people who you can see as supranational groups, from the UN, WHO, the International Panel on Climate Change, the World Economic Forum, you know, Bilderbergs. You should see them as the same, they're different manifestations, the Trilateral Commission." "Keir Starmer is a member of the Trilateral Commission, the only elected British politician who's a member of this globalist group, at least that particular one. They're all founded by the same group of people. They've been running for decades to much longer than a century. And I believe, they believe, their destiny is to control all us little people." "They see us as useless eaters. Useless eaters. Where have you heard that phrase before? What happens to useless eaters, do you think? I think they believe it's their destiny, maybe their obligation, to take control of everyone, everywhere, forever, using digital means. So digital ID, digital money, geo-location, and an obligation to be injected, something like that. You don't need much more than that. " "The control mechanism is so frighteningly simple. I warn people, and I'm not going to sign up for digital ID. I'm probably going to regret that statement, but you don't need a new global single format editable digital biometric ID. But that's what digital ID means, single, global, editable, biometric digital ID. I'm warning you, I'm trying to help. It's the last really important decision you will get to make if you sign up for it." "The people who are taking over do not require your consent, your collaboration, to do anything after that, and this is why I'm going to tell you why. Even I, as someone who's not involved in finance, I'm clever enough to see that the debt of all major countries has been deliberately piled on and escalated to the point where it's obvious to all of us that the debts can never be repaid." "We're struggling even to service the interest on the loans. So at some point, I predict with great confidence that an event like 2008, the global financial crisis, only a thousand times worse, will occur. And that will mean every country is bankrupt at the same time. All businesses would be bankrupt at the same time." "And to find out what will happen to you, if like me, you're sort of comfortable and middle class, early retired, and you've got a bit of saving, you should be really right in what I'm going to tell you. David Rogers Webb, David Rogers Webb. He is my soul, my matching half in finance. He's a retired hedge fund manager who discovered that the laws pertaining to private property rights have been altered over the last 50 or 60 years surreptitiously in every country on the planet." "So when you think you own something, I invite you to look in. If you've got an investment account, you will find now you won't find any statements to do with ownership. You'll only find the phrase beneficial owner, beneficial ownership. It makes no difference most of the time. You can buy it and sell it. Let's say it shares, stocks, bonds. You can receive dividends and so on." "But the small print says, in the event of a large enough default, all the financial intermediaries who money, who own money to the people they borrowed it from, and then they owe money to the people they borrowed it from, in the event of a large enough default, the senior secured creditors, the people at the top, may seize the assets ever pledged as collateral by the layers below them." "That includes your house, your pension, any stocks and shares you have in an account with an intermediary like Hargreaves Lansdowne, A.J. Bell, and the like, JP Morgan. Basically, legal theft of all of your assets will occur, I think, within hours of a large enough financial crisis that I've just discussed." "So even if you didn't think anyone was plotting against you, I think you would agree with me that, in fact, I factored in it when I was doing retirement planning, I assumed there would be at least one other 2008 during my life when I set out my my affairs so that I would probably be able to survive that. But we can't survive this." "So, yes, I think I think there will come a time between now and 2030 where legally all your assets will be stolen. I remember there's a lady called Katherine Austin Fitts, is a finance lady. She says, I believe that possession, where we're talking about objects, not humans, but when it comes to objects, you really only, only if you can sit on it and defend it at the point of a gun." "I know she says it to get a laugh, but there is something to that. If you've left any assets with a third party, maybe you own some gold and it's in the bank. Maybe you do have a large pension with a financial intermediary upon a large enough financial crisis that is being engineered because, as I'll explain in a moment, look how useful this is, that the moment of that big enough financial crisis, all of the institutions will be bankrupt and all of the assets will be moved legally, stolen legally, and they will belong to the senior secured creditors because those assets have at some point been used in a financial transaction." "There's no point in you protesting that they haven't told you they've borrowed it and it's not really theirs. This has been tested in a major court in New York, where one financial institution was both the custodian and acting on behalf of senior creditors. So it stole the assets of another of its clients and it went to court and I'm afraid it was found that they were legally able to do that." "So David Rogers Webb, a free book called The Great Taking is my gift to you. You should go and read that. So that's part of the takeover. It is a takeover. It's a global coup."

Dr. Mike Yeadon: "It's absolutely clear, there's really only one senior institution. It's a group of people who you can see as supranational groups, from the UN, WHO, the International Panel on Climate Change, the World Economic Forum, you know, Bilderbergs. You should see them as the same, they're different manifestations, the Trilateral Commission." "Keir Starmer is a member of the Trilateral Commission, the only elected British politician who's a member of this globalist group, at least that particular one. They're all founded by the same group of people. They've been running for decades to much longer than a century. And I believe, they believe, their destiny is to control all us little people." "They see us as useless eaters. Useless eaters. Where have you heard that phrase before? What happens to useless eaters, do you think? I think they believe it's their destiny, maybe their obligation, to take control of everyone, everywhere, forever, using digital means. So digital ID, digital money, geo-location, and an obligation to be injected, something like that. You don't need much more than that. " "The control mechanism is so frighteningly simple. I warn people, and I'm not going to sign up for digital ID. I'm probably going to regret that statement, but you don't need a new global single format editable digital biometric ID. But that's what digital ID means, single, global, editable, biometric digital ID. I'm warning you, I'm trying to help. It's the last really important decision you will get to make if you sign up for it." "The people who are taking over do not require your consent, your collaboration, to do anything after that, and this is why I'm going to tell you why. Even I, as someone who's not involved in finance, I'm clever enough to see that the debt of all major countries has been deliberately piled on and escalated to the point where it's obvious to all of us that the debts can never be repaid." "We're struggling even to service the interest on the loans. So at some point, I predict with great confidence that an event like 2008, the global financial crisis, only a thousand times worse, will occur. And that will mean every country is bankrupt at the same time. All businesses would be bankrupt at the same time." "And to find out what will happen to you, if like me, you're sort of comfortable and middle class, early retired, and you've got a bit of saving, you should be really right in what I'm going to tell you. David Rogers Webb, David Rogers Webb. He is my soul, my matching half in finance. He's a retired hedge fund manager who discovered that the laws pertaining to private property rights have been altered over the last 50 or 60 years surreptitiously in every country on the planet." "So when you think you own something, I invite you to look in. If you've got an investment account, you will find now you won't find any statements to do with ownership. You'll only find the phrase beneficial owner, beneficial ownership. It makes no difference most of the time. You can buy it and sell it. Let's say it shares, stocks, bonds. You can receive dividends and so on." "But the small print says, in the event of a large enough default, all the financial intermediaries who money, who own money to the people they borrowed it from, and then they owe money to the people they borrowed it from, in the event of a large enough default, the senior secured creditors, the people at the top, may seize the assets ever pledged as collateral by the layers below them." "That includes your house, your pension, any stocks and shares you have in an account with an intermediary like Hargreaves Lansdowne, A.J. Bell, and the like, JP Morgan. Basically, legal theft of all of your assets will occur, I think, within hours of a large enough financial crisis that I've just discussed." "So even if you didn't think anyone was plotting against you, I think you would agree with me that, in fact, I factored in it when I was doing retirement planning, I assumed there would be at least one other 2008 during my life when I set out my my affairs so that I would probably be able to survive that. But we can't survive this." "So, yes, I think I think there will come a time between now and 2030 where legally all your assets will be stolen. I remember there's a lady called Katherine Austin Fitts, is a finance lady. She says, I believe that possession, where we're talking about objects, not humans, but when it comes to objects, you really only, only if you can sit on it and defend it at the point of a gun." "I know she says it to get a laugh, but there is something to that. If you've left any assets with a third party, maybe you own some gold and it's in the bank. Maybe you do have a large pension with a financial intermediary upon a large enough financial crisis that is being engineered because, as I'll explain in a moment, look how useful this is, that the moment of that big enough financial crisis, all of the institutions will be bankrupt and all of the assets will be moved legally, stolen legally, and they will belong to the senior secured creditors because those assets have at some point been used in a financial transaction." "There's no point in you protesting that they haven't told you they've borrowed it and it's not really theirs. This has been tested in a major court in New York, where one financial institution was both the custodian and acting on behalf of senior creditors. So it stole the assets of another of its clients and it went to court and I'm afraid it was found that they were legally able to do that." "So David Rogers Webb, a free book called The Great Taking is my gift to you. You should go and read that. So that's part of the takeover. It is a takeover. It's a global coup."

Camus

22,843 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

🚨And before someone says, “What about Trump?”… stop. 🚨 This is not about Trump. My wife and I were not asking Trump for land in Buffalo. We were not asking Trump to process paperwork in Buffalo. We were not asking Trump to help us turn vacant lots into recovery spaces. We were asking the Democrat-run City of Buffalo, and they gave us nothing but the runaround. Honest question. Do you live in a Democrat-run city? Do you have family in one? If you do, you should pay close attention to what you’re about to see because our experience in Buffalo may not be unique. Several years ago, my wife and I became tired of watching addiction destroy lives while hearing endless discussions about solutions. Rather than complain, we decided to invest our own money and our own labor into building tiny homes that could provide a stable environment for recovery. We weren’t asking the City of Buffalo to build them for us. We weren’t asking taxpayers to fund them. We were prepared to take the financial risk ourselves because we believed people’s lives were worth the effort. What surprised us was how little support we received from a city government that constantly speaks about helping vulnerable people. Buffalo has thousands of vacant lots scattered throughout its neighborhoods. We weren’t asking for a gift. We wanted the opportunity to purchase land and put it to productive use. We wanted to create places where people battling addiction could rebuild their lives. Yet despite years of talking about revitalization, recovery, and equity, the city did not help us with so much as a blade of grass. We offered to buy property with our own money. We offered to invest our own resources. Instead, we encountered attitude, delays, roadblocks, and endless runaround. It often felt as though the city simply did not want a recovery project in its neighborhoods, regardless of who was paying for it. Thankfully, others stepped forward. The Erie County Opiates Task Force supported the vision. They stood with us. Friends I have worked alongside since 2015 in the fight against overdoses stood beside us that we developed. My friend Brooks opened his manufacturing facility and helped make possible something truly innovative and cutting-edge. While the city offered mouth, excuses, these people offered solutions. That is why these homes exist today. They were built through faith, perseverance, sacrifice, and the support of people who cared more about saving lives than protecting bureaucracy. This video is not about political arguments. It is about a simple question every citizen should ask: if private citizens are willing to spend their own money and devote years of their lives to helping people recover from addiction, why would a city with several thousands of vacant lots make that mission harder instead of easier? What you are about to see is the result of ordinary people refusing to quit. The homes are real. The need is real. The recovery is real. And with God’s help, we intend to keep going. We will not lose. We can’t lose. #SilentMajoritySpeaks #AStoneGroove

🚨And before someone says, “What about Trump?”… stop. 🚨 This is not about Trump. My wife and I were not asking Trump for land in Buffalo. We were not asking Trump to process paperwork in Buffalo. We were not asking Trump to help us turn vacant lots into recovery spaces. We were asking the Democrat-run City of Buffalo, and they gave us nothing but the runaround. Honest question. Do you live in a Democrat-run city? Do you have family in one? If you do, you should pay close attention to what you’re about to see because our experience in Buffalo may not be unique. Several years ago, my wife and I became tired of watching addiction destroy lives while hearing endless discussions about solutions. Rather than complain, we decided to invest our own money and our own labor into building tiny homes that could provide a stable environment for recovery. We weren’t asking the City of Buffalo to build them for us. We weren’t asking taxpayers to fund them. We were prepared to take the financial risk ourselves because we believed people’s lives were worth the effort. What surprised us was how little support we received from a city government that constantly speaks about helping vulnerable people. Buffalo has thousands of vacant lots scattered throughout its neighborhoods. We weren’t asking for a gift. We wanted the opportunity to purchase land and put it to productive use. We wanted to create places where people battling addiction could rebuild their lives. Yet despite years of talking about revitalization, recovery, and equity, the city did not help us with so much as a blade of grass. We offered to buy property with our own money. We offered to invest our own resources. Instead, we encountered attitude, delays, roadblocks, and endless runaround. It often felt as though the city simply did not want a recovery project in its neighborhoods, regardless of who was paying for it. Thankfully, others stepped forward. The Erie County Opiates Task Force supported the vision. They stood with us. Friends I have worked alongside since 2015 in the fight against overdoses stood beside us that we developed. My friend Brooks opened his manufacturing facility and helped make possible something truly innovative and cutting-edge. While the city offered mouth, excuses, these people offered solutions. That is why these homes exist today. They were built through faith, perseverance, sacrifice, and the support of people who cared more about saving lives than protecting bureaucracy. This video is not about political arguments. It is about a simple question every citizen should ask: if private citizens are willing to spend their own money and devote years of their lives to helping people recover from addiction, why would a city with several thousands of vacant lots make that mission harder instead of easier? What you are about to see is the result of ordinary people refusing to quit. The homes are real. The need is real. The recovery is real. And with God’s help, we intend to keep going. We will not lose. We can’t lose. #SilentMajoritySpeaks #AStoneGroove

A Gene Robinson

43,519 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Vayne takes you on a hunt. you don't know why. she doesn't take anyone. she says stay behind me. don't speak unless i speak first. don't make a sound when we move. you say yes. she looks at you for a second longer than usual. "if i tell you to run, you run. you don't look back for me. are we clear" you say yes. she doesn't answer. she just turns and walks out the door. you follow her through the city streets. she moves different when she's working. shoulders lower. steps shorter. her head doesn't turn but her eyes do. you can feel her cataloguing everything. the man smoking outside the tavern. the cat under the cart. the second floor window with the curtain half drawn. she leads you through an alley you didn't know existed. stops at a brick wall. then she climbs. there are handholds carved into the mortar that you wouldn't have noticed if she hadn't used them first. she's halfway up before she realizes you're still at the bottom. she looks down at you. "up" you climb. your hands are shaking by the time you reach the top. the roof is flat. old clay tiles along the edges. a low wall you can crouch behind. the city stretches out below you in every direction. a thousand windows glowing gold in the dusk. she's already at the far side. crouched. crossbow unslung. watching a building across the square. she doesn't look at you when you come up beside her. "stay low" you crouch. "that building. third floor. second window from the left" you look. "i see it" he'll come to that window sometime tonight. i've watched him do it for three nights. i want to know who he meets you ask who he is. her jaw tightens. "a demon pretending to be a man" you don't ask what that means. you settle in beside her. the wind is up here. it pulls at her hair and she doesn't bother fixing it. the sun is going down behind her. her profile in the gold light looks like something carved. her hands on the crossbow are steady. completely still. you've never seen anyone be this still. an hour passes. she doesn't move. you try not to move. your leg falls asleep. you shift an inch. she looks at you. you go completely still again. she looks back at the window. another hour. the sun is gone. the city is blue and black. lamps are lighting up one by one. the air is getting cold. you're shivering before you realize you're shivering. she notices. she doesn't say anything. then she takes off her cloak. doesn't look at you. holds it out to the side. "take it" you say "you'll be cold" "i don't get cold. take it" you take it. it's warm from her. it smells like leather and steel and something underneath. pine. smoke. something you can't name. you put it around your shoulders. the hem pools on the tile. it's huge on you. it's not huge on her. you hadn't realized how tall she is until you were wearing her cloak. she doesn't look at you for the next ten minutes. the stars come out. she shifts closer to you. just a little. so her shoulder is almost touching yours. you don't say anything about it. she doesn't either. you can feel the heat coming off her even through the cloak. another hour. still nothing at the window. she says "tell me something" you blink. "what" "anything. i need to stay sharp. talking keeps me sharp. not about the target. something else" you didn't expect that. you tell her about a book you've been reading. she listens. actually listens. her eyes never leave the window but you can tell she's hearing every word. she asks one question. you answer. she goes quiet again. you keep talking. quieter now. she interrupts you. "shh" she's not looking at the window anymore. she's looking at the roof two buildings over. you don't see anything. you don't see anything for a long time. then you do. a shadow that moves the wrong way. her hand finds yours. she doesn't look at you when she does it. her eyes don't leave the shadow. her fingers lace through yours and LOCK. tight. too tight. knuckles going white around your hand. "don't move" she breathes. you don't move. you can feel every ounce of her focus through her grip. it's not a lover's hold. it's a predator's. every muscle in her hand coiled. ready to drop yours the instant she needs the crossbow. she's not holding you for you. she's holding you to keep track of where you are without having to look. it should scare you. it doesn't. there is something about being held that tight by someone that dangerous that makes the rest of the world go quiet. your heartbeat slows. your breathing slows. the cold stops mattering. you are not the one hunting but you are with the one who is. and nothing is going to get through her to reach you. the shadow crosses the roof and disappears into a stairwell. she watches the spot it left for another full minute. her hand is still locked around yours. she doesn't loosen it. you don't want her to. finally she lets out a breath you didn't know she was holding. "not him. but someone who works for him" her grip eases. slowly. finger by finger. like she's having to consciously tell each one to let go. the last one is her thumb. it stays against your palm for half a second longer than the rest. then she takes her hand back. the cold rushes in where she was. she glances at you. just for a second. then she looks back at the window. the rest of the night she's quieter than before. the target never shows. when the sky starts turning grey she stands up. stretches. rolls her shoulders. looks out over the city one last time. "we're done" you stand too. your legs don't work right. she catches your elbow without looking. "careful" she keeps her hand there until you're steady. then she takes it away. you start to hand her cloak back. she says "keep it for the climb down" she goes first. you follow. the handholds are easier going down once you know where they are. when you're both on the ground she turns to take the cloak. you hand it to her. her fingers brush yours. she doesn't pull back as fast as she usually does. she puts the cloak back on. it's warm now. from you. she has to notice. she doesn't say anything about it. she walks you home. at your door she stops. "don't tell anyone what you saw tonight" you say "i didn't see much" she looks at you. her eyes in the lamplight. the edge of her mouth. almost softer than it should be. "you saw enough" then she turns and walks back into the dark. you close the door. your hand still feels cold where hers was. you can still smell pine on your shirt. you don't sleep. Study the Saskio way

Tony Chau

11,734 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten