Video yรผkleniyor...

Video Yรผklenemedi

โ€˜๐ˆ ๐Œ๐€๐ƒ๐„ ๐€ ๐Œ๐ˆ๐’๐“๐€๐Š๐„โ€™ โ€“ ๐’๐ž๐๐ข๐›๐ž๐ง๐  ๐ƒ๐ž๐ฉ๐ฎ๐ญ๐ฒ ๐€๐๐ฆ๐ข๐ง๐ข๐ฌ๐ญ๐ซ๐š๐ญ๐จ๐ซโ€™๐ฌ ๐“๐ž๐š๐ซ๐ฌ ๐‚๐š๐งโ€™๐ญ ๐„๐ซ๐š๐ฌ๐ž ๐‘๐Ÿ“๐ŸŽ๐ŸŽ๐ค โ€˜๐”๐ง๐๐ฎ๐žโ€™ ๐‹๐š๐ฐ ๐…๐ข๐ซ๐ฆ ๐’๐œ๐š๐ง๐๐š๐ฅ Sedibeng District Municipality deputy administrator Chantel Bell broke down in a stormy MPAC meeting on Wednesday, fighting back tears as she faced a grilling over the irregular appointment of a law firm that...

294,911 gรถrรผntรผleme โ€ข 12 gรผn รถnce โ€ขvia X (Twitter)

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gรถnderinin yorumlarฤฑ burada gรถrรผnecek

Benzer Videolar

This inquiry was initiated to address one of the most pressing issues of our time: the federal and state governmentsโ€™ responses to COVID-19. The challenges we faced over the past few years highlighted severe shortcomings in our governmentsโ€™ responses to COVID and weaknesses in our democracy. To ensure justice, accountability and financial compensation, it is imperative that a comprehensive Judicial Inquiry into the governmentโ€™s handling of COVID-19 is called. This could take the form of a Senate Commission of Inquiry or a Royal Commission. Investigations that must be robust, independent and based on data and facts, with the power to subpoena witnesses and documentation. The handling of COVID affected us all in profound ways. To fully understand the scope of these effects and to prevent this happening again in the future, we need to establish an accurate and detailed timeline of events and associated facts. Placing the most up-to-date information on the record will uncover the truth behind the decisions made and their consequences. These are essential for restoring accountability and trust in governments, and health services and departments. We must make this issue a federal election matter, with the goal being to awaken the public with clear, understandable facts. The public needs to become aware of the magnitude of the problems we faced. The mishandling of this crisis is not a matter of minor errors. It involved significant failures that demand accountability and serious repercussions. That is the only way to restore trust in our medical systems and in our government systems and processes. This issue is far from over. We owe it to ourselves and to future generationsโ€”especially our children and grandchildrenโ€”to address these failings directly, clearly and bluntly. We must hold those responsible accountable and ensure that such lapses are never repeated.

Malcolm Roberts ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡บ

21,129 gรถrรผntรผleme โ€ข 1 yฤฑl รถnce

๐Ÿ”ธI am on a break from teaching law but, based on the quality of some of the law interns and graduates that the UZ is currently producing, I wish they would go back to teaching law in the way that they used to. Even the most basic law course, Contract, cannot be taught in three or four weeks as is happening now. The law and its controversies must be read, digested, debated and understood. The historical background and philosophical underpinnings of any field must be interrogated rigorously to develop an effective, critically thinking and problem-solving legal mind. This slap dash microwave stuff, the cramming (versus comprehension) of concepts and arbitrary consolidation of different subjects (eg Property Law and Intellectual Property Law) into one will not give us the law graduates we need. Coursework must be demanding and solid feedback given to the individual students upon completion. Tutorials are a must. One must leave law school with the ability to write a cogent legal essay, to identify and analyze issues when presented with a legal problem and articulate a legal position persuasively. A law student must have the ability to state the rationale and weaknesses in the law and propose robust proposals for reform. While law school cannot teach a lawyer everything, it must offer a firm foundation to make the graduate competitive in the job market, courtroom or boardroom. They must be able to attend any world class graduate school and be comparable to those at the top. We need new leaders.๐Ÿ‡ฟ๐Ÿ‡ผ

Fadzayi Mahere๐Ÿ‡ฟ๐Ÿ‡ผ

84,115 gรถrรผntรผleme โ€ข 1 yฤฑl รถnce

Honourable Members, The Constitution empowers the President to appoint the National Director of Public Prosecutions without stipulating any criteria to that effect. Although there are no requirements in law to do so, I decided to constitute a panel to assist in the process of appointment of the next NDPP, in terms of calling for nominations, shortlisting candidates and interviewing the shortlisted candidates. This is similar to process followed when I appointed the current NDPP, Adv Shamila Batohi. This process is transparent and helps to build public confidence in a critical office. I selected a panel that would combine a variety of skills and experiences. These include public service administration, financial management, legal and jurisprudence, administration of justice, and promotion of equality and human rights. The panel I constituted that includes representatives from the National Executive, Chapter 9 institutions and legal bodies. I chose the heads of certain Chapter 9 institutions for the panel because these are independent bodies established to support and protect South Africa's constitutional democracy, the rule of law and human rights. They are required to always act impartially and subject only to the Constitution and the law, ensuring their decisions are made without fear, favour or prejudice. They are therefore well positioned to understand the qualities and capabilities expected of an NDPP. I have included legal practitioners in the advisory panel so that candidates are evaluated by people with experience in the legal and criminal justice system. In addition to their legal acumen, candidates must be able to demonstrate qualities and capabilities relating to leadership, strategic management, financial management, ethical leadership, and a broad understanding of the justice system. Based on their assessment, the panel will submit a shortlist of recommended candidates to me for consideration and appointment as empowered by the Constitution and the NPA Act. #RamaphosaQandA

Cyril Ramaphosa ๐Ÿ‡ฟ๐Ÿ‡ฆ

14,439 gรถrรผntรผleme โ€ข 8 ay รถnce

Today I set out deep concerns about how the Government has handled decisions and communications surrounding the recent China spying case and the question of whether China poses a threat to the UKโ€™s national security. The Government has made it difficult to obtain clear information about the timeline of meetings and the reasoning behind official statements. The Governmentโ€™s approach has been evasive and inconsistent, with denials later giving way to partial admissions. This lack of transparency has eroded confidence and made it harder to get to the truth. At the heart of the issue is the role of the Deputy National Security Adviser (DNSA), who told Parliament that he was simply reflecting the Governmentโ€™s position when asked whether China poses an active national security threat. I argued that this is not good enough. The question was a straightforward one, and the answer should have been equally straightforward: China does pose a threat to the UKโ€™s national security across multiple fronts, from espionage and cyberattacks to sanctions and disinformation. I raised concerns about the meeting on 1 Sept, which appears to contradict earlier statements by the Prime Minister that no further evidence or discussions took place after that date. If such a meeting did occur with senior security officials present, the Government should release the minutes, at the very least to the Intelligence and Security Committee, to clarify what was discussed. I called for honesty and clarity in how the UK defines and responds to threats from China. Those of us who have been sanctioned and targeted by the Chinese state know first-hand how that threat manifests. The Government must stop obfuscating and start treating this issue with the seriousness it deserves: by acknowledging the reality of the threat, being transparent with Parliament and the public, and taking firm, decisive action to protect our national security.

Iain Duncan Smith MP Chingford & Woodford Green

17,641 gรถrรผntรผleme โ€ข 9 ay รถnce

This is not just fake news. It is economic sabotage. The spread of fake news claiming that the Securities and Exchange Commission reported a P1.7 trillion market loss is false and malicious. According to the Philippine News Agency, the Palace has clarified that the SEC never made such a statement. This lie has caused unwarranted panic and shaken market confidence โ€” a reckless act that directly harms the nation. Now the real damage: โ€ขInvestor confidence was shaken. โ€ขBusinesses and industries lost stability. โ€ขInternational partners and investors questioned our marketโ€™s credibility. โ€ขOrdinary Filipinos โ€” from workers to small business owners โ€” bear the consequences of instability and misinformation. The Marcos administration must act swiftly and decisively. Those behind this fake news โ€” its creators, amplifiers, and online operators โ€” must face the full force of the law. Freedom of expression cannot be used as a weapon to destroy public trust and destabilise the economy. Every saboteur who spreads lies that endanger the nationโ€™s stability must be held accountable. The government must send a clear message that fake news that damages the economy is a crime, not opinion. The Filipino people deserve protection from those who thrive on chaos and deceit. Justice must be firm, and accountability must be total. These saboteurs need to be identified and hunted down.

The King

15,376 gรถrรผntรผleme โ€ข 9 ay รถnce

๐Ÿšจ EPSTEIN ADVISER WITH ROYAL APPOINTMENT FROM QUEEN ELIZABETH II BROKERED CHINA DEAL FOR CHILDREN INVEST' FIRM - WHERE RISHI SUNAK WAS A PARTNER ๐Ÿšจ And ... He's just resigned! David Stern, the most heavily quoted man in the Epstein Files, was appointed by Queen Elizabeth II for a personal contract with an unnamed company in April 2011 Following Epstein's initial conviction in 2008 for prostitution charges, putting him on the six offenders register, by 2011 he was already negotiating international finance deals for companies such as The $6bn Children Investment Fund. In an April 2011 email Epstein learns that his friend & business contact, David Stern, has just met with Prince Andrew and Is awaiting an imminent Royal Appointment sign off from 'mum's office' before leaving to China the following day. He also learns that Stern has been approached by the Chinese for a potential joint venture. The investment - a few months later - goes to The Children Investment Fund, where Rishi Sunak had been a Partner the preceding year, under Chris Hohn, before moving to Theleme (virtually a carbon copy). So we have Prince Andrew meeting with Stern; his mother giving a royal appointment and both men still intricately connected with what is now a registered sex offender in Jeffrey Epstein The story is complex but the point is blunt. Why did the 'British Royal Palace' ever allow this to happen? Particularly as shortly after, the Queen is photographed sitting next to David Stern at a palace event ! And all the time, Stern reportedly has an inauthentic CV and is working with Epstein on a deal with China and the backing of Prince Andrew... for a firm which Rishi Sunak was a partner of... It's messy but my video below includes all the references and a walkthrough which I hope will make it a little easier The point to make is that not only are the horrendous sex crimes with children abhorrent but the financial and global interference (crime) that Epstein was able to make, even after his initial conviction, has massive unturned rocks ahead. Please REPOST and enable me to continue my work to expose truth ๐Ÿ™ Diligent Denizen ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ Nick Sortor #EpsteinFiles

Moneypenny

226,102 gรถrรผntรผleme โ€ข 5 ay รถnce