Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

๐Ÿšจ๐ˆ๐“โ€™๐’ ๐Ž๐•๐„๐‘, ๐“๐‡๐„๐˜ ๐…๐ˆ๐๐€๐‹๐‹๐˜ ๐‚๐€๐”๐†๐‡๐“ ๐“๐‡๐„๐Œโ€ฆ..#๐Œ๐š๐ฎ๐ข๐…๐ข๐ซ๐ž ๐๐”๐“ ๐“๐‡๐„ ๐Œ๐€๐ˆ๐๐’๐“๐‘๐„๐€๐Œ ๐Œ๐„๐ƒ๐ˆ๐€ ๐–๐Ž๐โ€™๐“ ๐‘๐„๐๐Ž๐‘๐“ ๐“๐‡๐ˆ๐’โ€ฆ.๐’๐Ž ๐–๐„ ๐Œ๐”๐’๐“! ๐Ÿ’ฅ๐Ÿ’ฅ๐Ÿ’ฅ โ€ผ๏ธThe most efficient way to ignite a fire on the surface from a satellite in Earth orbit would be to paint the target in segments by pulsing the laser with an advanced targeting...

10 Kommentare

Profilbild von {Matt} $XRPatriot
{Matt} $XRPatriotvor 3 Jahren

So I'm gonna play the scenario here. Um, lemme just show you what you're looking at here. Um, satellites always use U T C. And, uh, if you can see here, hon, the, the time in most interest is in Honolulu on August 8th, between four to 10:00 AM and the u t C time here conversion, it's really confusing converting time zones, it's about right here. So this is the, this is the area right here I wanna focus on as far as when these fires were reported in Maui. As you can see right here, this is, uh, 4:00 AM to 9:00 AM basically, and I'm gonna play the simulation here. Um, this is the time that's reported in U T C, so be sure to be aware of U T C uh, time difference. But this, uh, this satellite so far, which is under the, um, uh, 5 7 2 8 NORAD cat id, uh, NORAD tracks these things. This is all publicly available g p s data. Uh, the telemetry telemetry data, uh, is for NORAD 5 7 2 8 8, and it's an unknown payload launched by C C P. And, uh, the payload's large enough to host a space-based laser. And the physics are proven on my [email protected] slash laser. So I'm gonna play the video now. Okay, I'm gonna clear the screen now And then I'm gonna play the video. So here's a passing of it right now. Um, it's gonna come through here and pass. Again, this is NORAD CAT 5 7 2 8 8, and this is Hawaii. Over here, you can see just when the sun rose around here. This is Hawaii right here. Okay, so this is the area that we're focusing on when this satellite passes. Okay, it's about to pass now I'm gonna pause it when it, when it, uh, goes about, uh, the peak area, and I'll give you the exact time of it when it po pa, uh, po uh, passes over Maui and it's probably about peak here. It's at its apex here. And, uh, the time of U T C is about 1420 U T C, and that's about 2:20 PM uh, U T C, August eight. And, um, hon Lulu, it's about 4:00 AM Uh, so that's about 14 four. So this is early morning. So again, as this thing still passes, you can see how fast it's going and uh, that phase right there between is enough to start the fires and, uh, cause uh, damage. Basically, uh, I'll run the, I'll run it, rewind a little bit and I'll play it a little closer. I'll zoom in on, on this just so you can see the U T C, and that's about the peak of it right there. Thank you for watching. If you like this content, I'll post more validated data along with the source code.

Profilbild von {Matt} $XRPatriot
{Matt} $XRPatriotvor 3 Jahren

H/T

Profilbild von โญ๏ธโญ๏ธโญ๏ธGeneral Eric ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿซก
โญ๏ธโญ๏ธโญ๏ธGeneral Eric ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿซกvor 3 Jahren

You all piss me off alittle. I reported, that on 8/7/2023 the university of Hawaii astronomy class caught on their mountain top telescope a 12 minute green laser from space. Now will someone finally do some work and see if those satellites were traveling over Maui at the same times. The time stamped evidence is there for anyone who wants to read it

Profilbild von Lena Delaine
Lena Delainevor 3 Jahren

Sorryโ€ฆ but this is want โ€œtheyโ€ want you to believe! The truth has nothing to do with the CCP.

Profilbild von Goodymob
Goodymobvor 3 Jahren

How do we know these were CCP satellites and not relabeled to protect our own govt from attacking its own citizens? What proof these were Chinese?

Profilbild von G ๐Ÿš€
G ๐Ÿš€vor 3 Jahren

Soon enough that website will be taken down randomlyโ€ฆ just watch!

Profilbild von SolaScriptura ๐ŸŒดโœ๏ธโš”๏ธโœ๏ธ๐ŸŒด
SolaScriptura ๐ŸŒดโœ๏ธโš”๏ธโœ๏ธ๐ŸŒดvor 3 Jahren

A brilliantly crafted lie. We know who did it and why, and they werenโ€™t Chinese.

Profilbild von โ–ฟ Peter Antoni โ–ฟ โ˜ง ฮฉ ฯˆ ฮฃ
โ–ฟ Peter Antoni โ–ฟ โ˜ง ฮฉ ฯˆ ฮฃvor 3 Jahren

The real perpetrators (we know who) deliberately caused the fires at the time CCPโ€™s satellite was passing over Maui to frame them as the obvious culprits. CCP had nothing to do with it, theyโ€™re simply being framed. Itโ€™s a classic smokescreen tactic 101 by the U.S Government.

Profilbild von justistruth
justistruthvor 3 Jahren

My question is this why are CCP satellites labeled NORAD with a number. NORAD sounds like ours. American and Canada security apparatus for air defense.?

Profilbild von Kallen
Kallenvor 3 Jahren

Oprah's roof is blue.....

ร„hnliche Videos

๐ŸšจThe CCP Had Satelites over Maui (LAHAINA, OLINDA, & KULA), at the EXACT same Time of the Fires!!!! Steve Favis, Computer Science & Advanced Robotics Expert, has compiled sufficient evidence the CCP had multiple satellites capable of an attack above Maui at the same exact time of the fires! He determined the laser would have needed to be in a wave length range to minimize scatter through the atmosphere, so a near infrared range laser would be needed to allow a more precise transmissionโ€ฆ. Andโ€ฆ.. would have minimal reaction to the color BLUE! THE OLINDA FIRE Was ignited at approximately at 10:47pm On August 7th.โ€”โ€” At this Exact Time, CCP Satellite NORAD53299 was directly over this location!!!! Holy shit! THE LAHAINA FIRE Was ignited at approximately at 6:37am on August 8th.โ€”โ€” At this exact time CCP Satellite NORAD55836 was directly this location! HOLY SHIT! THE KULA FIRE Was ignited at approximately at 11:30am on August 8th.โ€”โ€” At this exact time CCP Satellite NORAD53299 was directly this location! HOLY SHIT! Steve Favis also has calculated the CCP has up to 70 Gigawatt lasers in earth orbit right now. IN ADDITIONโ€ฆ This is not the first time CCP Satellites have been over Hawaii recently. Back in January of this year, mysterious green lasers were spotted over the skies of Maunakea. The troubling thing is that there were lots of conflicting reports from NASA the first week where they insisted it was one of their satellites, but it was ultimately declared (โ€œLikelyโ€) a Chinese satellite, Daqi-1/AEMS, a week later. This happened almost immediately before multiple Chinese spy balloons were spotted all Over America. The Fact NASA had no clue and said โ€œitโ€™s likelyโ€ a Chinese satellite is very alarming. They still to this day only speculate what China was doing.
4:34

Sensitive content

๐ŸšจThe CCP Had Satelites over Maui (LAHAINA, OLINDA, & KULA), at the EXACT same Time of the Fires!!!! Steve Favis, Computer Science & Advanced Robotics Expert, has compiled sufficient evidence the CCP had multiple satellites capable of an attack above Maui at the same exact time of the fires! He determined the laser would have needed to be in a wave length range to minimize scatter through the atmosphere, so a near infrared range laser would be needed to allow a more precise transmissionโ€ฆ. Andโ€ฆ.. would have minimal reaction to the color BLUE! THE OLINDA FIRE Was ignited at approximately at 10:47pm On August 7th.โ€”โ€” At this Exact Time, CCP Satellite NORAD53299 was directly over this location!!!! Holy shit! THE LAHAINA FIRE Was ignited at approximately at 6:37am on August 8th.โ€”โ€” At this exact time CCP Satellite NORAD55836 was directly this location! HOLY SHIT! THE KULA FIRE Was ignited at approximately at 11:30am on August 8th.โ€”โ€” At this exact time CCP Satellite NORAD53299 was directly this location! HOLY SHIT! Steve Favis also has calculated the CCP has up to 70 Gigawatt lasers in earth orbit right now. IN ADDITIONโ€ฆ This is not the first time CCP Satellites have been over Hawaii recently. Back in January of this year, mysterious green lasers were spotted over the skies of Maunakea. The troubling thing is that there were lots of conflicting reports from NASA the first week where they insisted it was one of their satellites, but it was ultimately declared (โ€œLikelyโ€) a Chinese satellite, Daqi-1/AEMS, a week later. This happened almost immediately before multiple Chinese spy balloons were spotted all Over America. The Fact NASA had no clue and said โ€œitโ€™s likelyโ€ a Chinese satellite is very alarming. They still to this day only speculate what China was doing.

MJTruthUltra

280,429 Aufrufe โ€ข vor 3 Jahren

๐Ÿšจ Report: CCP Satellites Discovered over Maui at Time of the Fires & Space Force Activated a unit Dedicated to Targeting other Foreign Satellites Soon After Computer Science & Advanced Robotics Expert, Steve Favis, has compiled evidence using public available NORAD data & found that multiple CCP Satellites were over Maui (LAHAINA, OLINDA, & KULA), at the exact time of the Maui Fires. THE OLINDA FIRE Ignited at approximately at 10:47pm On August 7th. At this Exact Time, CCP Satellite NORAD53299 was directly over this location THE LAHAINA FIRE Was ignited at approximately at 6:37am on August 8th. At this exact time CCP Satellite NORAD55836 was directly over this location THE KULA FIRE Was ignited at approximately at 11:30am on August 8th. At this exact time CCP Satellite NORAD53299 was directly over this location Did SPACE FORCE Respond? The 75th Intelligence, Surveillance and Reconnaissance Squadron (ISRS) was activated on Aug. 11 at Peterson Space Force Base in Colorado. This is the only unit (that we know of) dedicated to targeting other nations' satellites and the ground stations that support them. MY THOUGHTS: Does this prove that the CCP committed whatโ€™s essentially an act of war against the United States? No, not in this instance. Although I believe they already have through irregular warfare. The only thing this proves is that there were multiple CCP satellites over Hawaii at the times of the fires. Thatโ€™s it. Compound this with the fact that Back in January of this year, mysterious green lasers were spotted over the skies of Maunakea, Hawaii. NASA sent conflicting reports the first week where they insisted it was one of their satellites, but it was later declared (โ€œLikelyโ€) a Chinese satellite. Steve Favisโ€™s research is published here This Video

MJTruthUltra

16,271 Aufrufe โ€ข vor 3 Jahren

Thought experiment for people regarding the concept of Absolute Time. Absolute means NO EXCEPTIONS. We are NOT looking back in time when we see galaxies and stars. We are NOT looking back in time 1.25 seconds when we see the moon. We're Not looking back in time 3 minutes when we see Mars. We're Not looking back in time 8.33 minutes when we see the Sun. If an astronaut lit a matchstick on Mars, the distant observer would see predator heat waves at the top of the matchstick in real-time while the matchstick started to blacken towards the astronaut's fingers. But there would be no orange light from that chemical reaction or flame seen. If the matchstick burnt out before the packet of orange light from that particular chemical reaction made it to Earthโ€ฆ then the distant observer would just see a disembodied orange flash of light with a lag. But the Earth-bound observer would never actually see the flame associated with the orange wavelength it put out. The wavelength of color emitted by the flame is not a recording of reality. If the orange light is 650 Thz, that means there are 650 trillion individual and separate bursts of orange light pulsating in 1 second. NOT that "the same light" is "waving" 650 trillion times a second and that light is a recording of reality. There are 650 trillion brand-new lights flashing in 1 second. Each Hertz is a brand-new emission and packet unto itself. Time does not re-emit 650 trillion times a second, nor is a photon a particle or a packet of reality acting like the frame of a reel of footage. The orange light that already left the flame will continue to propagate out until it meets the electrons making up the distant observer. But remember, it is never the same light within that packet. And the electrons making up the observer will absorb all of those different lights within that packet and re-emit brand-new lights that produce the product of illumination. A photon is a massless packet of energy, spherically expanding at the rate of c from the source it comes from. Illumination is the result of that energy being absorbed and RE-emitted by any other electrons that did not output that primary packet. But time is not associated with the same light. It's never the same light and time does not re-emit between packets. Time is not relative. Do NOT allow your mind Carte Blanche to think along the lines of relative time. DROP IT for this thought experiment. We are thinking along the lines of ABSOLUTE TIME/ Galilean VARIANCE. What does absolute time mean? It means time is constant in ALL frames of reference. Any frequency shifts between atomic clocks IS a literal change in the speed of light. But relativity forbids the speed of light from Ever changing, so relativity (Lorentz INVARIANCE) invented the concept of the 4th dimension and space-time. Because Relativity doesn't allow light speed to shift.. they interpret the same frequency shift between atomic clocks as being conclusive, irrefutable evidence that time and reality itself shifts. Rather than say it's just that ONE clock being affected by Earth's gravity and the oscillation of that ONE cesium clock is being altered compared to other clocks. People don't realize that in relativity... time dilation is SYMMETRICAL! Not even most relativists know their own theory. If Clock A and Clock B are synchronized and together... and then they accelerate apart... Einstein said Clock A would see Clock B as being slower itself. And Clock B would view Clock A as slower than ITself. NOT that only one observer would see back in time and the other would see forward or not at all. No... BOTH observers are supposed to see each other BACK in time relative to each other according to Einstein and the consequence of the math. It doesn't make ANY sense!! But relativists toss that part of time dilation under their 4th dimensional rug. The rug is woven from threads of gold that only the smart people can see apparently. So... here's a thought experiment/ Gedankenexperiment for absolute time. NO paradoxes... no nonsense or confusion. What do you see in a club? You see disco lights changing and a color wheel effect. You see everyone in REAL-TIME. Not just because they are so close to the lights. Light is not a recording of reality. Light is simply color. Illuminating reality in a certain color. Just because you can't see something yet or the color hasn't reached you doesn't mean it isn't happening in real-time. Zoom out and look at the people in the club through binoculars a mile away. You are still looking at them in real-time. The colors are shifting with a delay in the club. Now look at the club through a telescope from the surface of the moon. You're still looking at the people in real-time. But now there is a lag of the colors shifting by 1.25 seconds because it takes light 1.25 seconds to travel from the Earth to the moon. Now look at the club through an even bigger telescope from the surface of Mars. You're still looking at the people in real-time, but now there is a lag of the colors shifting by 3 minutes because it takes light 3 minutes to travel from Earth to Mars. fr you are a third hypothetical observer zoomed out and watching the person from Mars AND seeing the club on Earth... you're still seeing everything happening in real-time as well. But you see the colored wavepackets traveling with a delay to the observer on Mars. And the disco color wheel effect is just lagging before it affects the observer from Mars and the observer on the Moon. It doesn't matter how far you zoom out! There is only now to observe. But there WILL be a lag and delay for a given color/wavepacket to reach distant observers. But all points in space are already illuminated by other starlight. So if you're too far away... you'll just see the club in real-time but without any disco lights. Just see them in white light because that's the source already illuminating the scene. This is where it gets the most difficult because people think light itself is a recording of reality that replays a scene from where it came from. But another punch in the gut of relativity is that in order to see REFLECTED light... that would require a TWO-WAY transit. Which means the light would have to be sent out... record the scene of a distant event and then RETURN in order to REplay the event. Which means it would take 6 minutes to see the club from Mars by that logic and 2.5 seconds to see the club from the moon by that logic. The difference in tick rates between clocks has NOTHING to do with time dilation. Wait.. what?! How can that be? Because a clock itself doesn't represent all of time and reality. The difference between clocks is a "Transverse relative time shift." If the only light in the universe was from the lighterโ€ฆ the only way a distant observer would be able to see the astronaut on Mars is if the astronaut held down the button of the lighter for longer than 3 minutes. It takes 3 minutes for the packet of light to travel from Mars to Earth. The distant observer would never be able to see Mars, unless the light stretched from Mars all the way to Earth, and illuminated the path between Mars and Earth. And that would take 3 minutes for the boundary and first part of that wave packet to reach Earth. But if the distant observer wanted to observe Mars in real-timeโ€ฆ then that packet of light would have to be on for longer than 3 minutes. So if the astronaut on Mars flicked the lighter at 12:00, the distant observer on Earth wouldn't see anything until 12:03. If the light was on for 3 minutes and 10 seconds, and the distant observer is 3 light minutes away... ๏ฟผthe distant observer would be able to see Mars in real-time for 10 seconds starting at 12:03. In the 20 second video clip of the rotating planet with shifting colors... just imagine you're a couple light minutes or light seconds away. You're still seeing the planet spin in real-time. But there is simply a delay of switching colors. You are Not looking back in time. It's just a color wheel effect from a great distance away. That's it!! There are many major flaws which tarnish people's critical thinking on this thought experiment. 1. Light does NOT ricochet or bounce. Electrons absorb, emit and re-emit ALL electromagnetic radiation. The electrons, making up the glass of a mirror will absorb the incoming light and re-emit a brand-new light as an equal and opposite reaction. NOT that "the same light" bounced off the mirror and continued on within the same frame of reference. ๏ฟผ 2. Light is NOT a recording of reality. 3. It is NOT the same light being observed from a source. It's never the same light. Each Hertz is a new light. Think of half of a sine wave as being its own emission. On an oscilloscope, a stimulus generates a peak which initiates an equal and opposite trough. Or vice versa. That repeating process is not "the same light." If you cut and paste that sine wave to another sine wave, the boundary between the waves will always be in phase. (thus refraction) 4. The speed of light is NOT the same in ALL frames of reference, no matter what. 5. Light is NOT made of particles and waves that flip back-and-forth. 6. Time is NOT connected to the speed of light. Time remains constant regardless if you accelerate towards or away from a clock. The clocks themselves will indeed be off! But that's an affect on the electrons making up the atomic clock affecting the oscillation of the isotope which is ASSUMED to ALWAYS be the same. So ANY difference in oscillation is treated as a literal distortion in space-time. 7. Space and time are not linked at all. That is a mathematical artifice under Lorentz invariance. Time is relative under Lorentz invariance. But time is absolute under Galilean VARIANCE. When people hear or see the word GALILEAN... their brains switch to auto pilot to "aether theory" and "classical physics." What people don't realize is that aether theory used Galilean INVARIANCE. Rather than space-time being used as an excuse to explain the difference in frequencies between atomic clocks... it was originally aether being used as an excuse to keep the speed of light the same. But None of those things are valid! We are thinking under the framework of Galilean VARIANCE! Completely new revolutionary model returning to Isaac Newton and Classical physics but without the corpuscular theory (particle) theory for light... without a particle-wave duality... without an aether... without a 4th dimension. Just good ol elementary math within 3D Euclidean space. Everything happening in real-time, right now. This reformulation of Galilean transformations was offered by Dr. Edward Dowdye in 1991 called The Extinction Shift Principle. Effectivity as opposed to Relativity. If light required a two-way transit, in order to travel outโ€ฆ Record an event, and travel back to replay the recordingโ€ฆ ๏ฟผ then it would take 6 minutes to see the astronaut on Mars instead of 3. ๏ฟผ Rememberโ€ฆ They say the SAME light is a recording, and must travel there and travel back in order to REplay. Relativity says time is relative: t' โ‰  t time is NOT the same from all frames of reference) and t = tโ‚’ / โˆš1 - vยฒ/cยฒ but Galilean Variance says time is not relative: t' = t (Time IS the same from all frames of reference) and ฯ„_tr = ฯ„โ‚’ / โˆš1 - vยฒ/cยฒ Relativity says c' = c (The velocity of light is the same from all frames of reference) but Galilean variance says c' โ‰  c (The velocity of light is NOT the same from all frames of reference) and that c' = c ยฑ v (The velocity of light in one frame of reference is dependent upon the velocity of the light source relative to an observer in another frame of reference. Whether that light source is approaching or receding away from that observer) Relativity says E = mcยฒ (Energy and mass are universally equivalent and literally interchangeable under All conditions.) but Galilean variance says E = ฮ”mcยฒ = mโ‚’cยฒ (Energy changes in a system are the result from changes in mass. mโ‚’ represents the original mass. Mass and energy do not literally interchange. There is an equivalence, not an interchange.) The Rebirth of Classical Physics: Time, Light & Gravity Star light and illumination: Flicking a Lighter on Mars visual example:

TheRealVerbz (Jason Verbelli)

24,471 Aufrufe โ€ข vor 2 Jahren

DISGUSTING: Jennifer Welch and Angie Sullivan giggle about Lindsey Graham dying, boasting he โ€œliked killing, you know, the biggest war hawk on the planet,โ€ and spent one of his final days on Earth in Ukraine holding a drone that looks like โ€œa black c***โ€... WELCH: I want to watch the wall-to-wall coverage of this. Like, this is great. [SULLIVAN LAUGHING] And then there was this photo that I saw online. This is the last known photograph that Lady Graham took because, you know, he had just been in the Ukraine. SULLIVAN: Right. WELCH: And so, he took a photograph with a drone. Kiley, pop this up. Okay, for those of you that are listening, Okay, this drone looks like a big giant black c***. SULLIVAN: It does. WELCH: All right, thereโ€™s just no other way around it. He is smiling from ear to ear. He is holding the black c***, and the interesting thing about this drone is itโ€™s called the P1 Sun, and itโ€™s like โ€” SULLIVAN: P1! WELCH: โ€” in Russian, it means they call it the p***. This drone is called the p***. SULLIVAN: What? WELCH: And so, this is the shit with, I cannot believe, like, you know, back in the day, would watch movies or shows, and you would think, oh, thatโ€™s so crazy, like, about the president or about the United States. SULLIVAN: Right. WELCH: Like that โ€” thatโ€™s crazy. Iโ€™m so glad that would never happen. Weโ€™re living in the time period. Weโ€™re like, thatโ€™s from โ€” thatโ€™s from an episode of Veep. SULLIVAN: For sure, yeah. WELCH: Thatโ€™s an episode of Veep in the Lindsey Graham. Holding a big giant black c*** that is called p*** in Russian. And thatโ€™s his last known photograph before he dies. SULLIVAN: If I saw that on Veep, I would think thatโ€™s hilarious, but that would never happen. I mean, you just would never think that would actually happen. First of all, who names drones p***? WELCH: Well, when they look like black c***s, I think you do. SULLIVAN: I guess you do. WELCH: I think thatโ€™s really not even that creative. When you look at what that drone looked like, I mean, I think c*** or p***. SULLIVAN: No, it just looks like a p***. It does. WELCH: Yeah. And look at how happy Lindsey is. SULLIVAN: Well, we know why Lindseyโ€™s so happy. WELCH: He died after he was groping a โ€” a p*** โ€” a black c*** that was made for mass destruction. SULLIVAN: Yeah. WELCH: This is like exactly what he was. Thereโ€™s one photograph that just completely consolidates exactly who he was. He liked c***, as we all know โ€” SULLIVAN: Yeah. WELCH: โ€” you know, the worst-kept secret in Washington, D.C. and he liked killing, you know, the biggest war hawk on the planet, and there he is with a black c*** that kills right before he dies. SULLIVAN: I mean, that could not be a better epitaph right there, that picture.

Curtis Houck

18,145 Aufrufe โ€ข vor 2 Monaten

Iโ€™m seeing a lot of questions on the launch of Chinaโ€™s Changโ€™e 6 mission yesterday to get samples - for the first time - from the far side of the moon. We donโ€™t know (afaik) why specifically theyโ€™re doing that, but we have a pretty good idea what grand vision China is working towards with their space program. How? From this 2022 video by Chas Freeman (former Assistant Secretary of Defense and Nixon's interpreter during his era-defining 1972 China visit), who imho is undoubtedly one of the most knowledgeable former US officials on China. He says that according to his own discussions with people running Chinaโ€™s space program, theyโ€™re following the vision described in the book "The high frontier" by Gerard K. O'Neill, which Freeman says has "become the bible of the Chinese space program". I read the book. So what vision does it describe? The book was written in 1976 by O'Neill who was a professor of physics at Princeton University. He also founded the Space Studies Institute, an organization devoted to funding research into space manufacturing and colonization. In other words, he knew his stuff. The book makes the very fair point that we have massive resource constraints on earth, especially given the growing population. He estimated in 1976 that we should be "about six and a half billion people in the year 2000", and we were 6.114 billion back then so he was pretty prescient. He estimates that these constraints will progressively give rise to more and more social tensions as the growing earth population competes for our limited resources as well as faces global problems like climate change. In his view, dealing with this will either require "an authoritarian regime capable of mounting the immense task of social reorganization needed to escape catastrophe" or, alternatively, โ€œmankind would [need to adopt] a static society [that would be] forced in self-defense to suppress new ideas". The 3rd alternative is of course the colonization of space. The most interesting aspect of the book is that he claims everything he writes is feasible with knowledge and technology that already existed in the late 70s. In short he calls for the establishment of large human habitats in the Earth-Moon system, located at stable Lagrange points ("parking spots" in space where gravity from different spatial bodies cancel each other out). In particular he developed the concept of what's known today as the "O'Neill cylinder" which he says "could support quite easily a population of ten million people, growing its food in agricultural cylinders near but outside the main habitat". Energy-wise, it'd simply make use of solar energy via a system of mirrors. As he describes it: "the concentration of the unvarying, intense sunlight of space by very lightweight, inexpensive mirrors can provide all the energy that industry will ever need [...] at a fraction of a cent per kilowatt-hour". He envisages building these habitats with material from the moon, shot into space via "mass drivers", a form of electromagnetic catapult. Also "the habitats would have artificial gravity similar as that of earth by rotating about twenty-eight times an hourโ€, but he also envisages low-gravity areas, especially for recreational activities such as swimming pools or dancing representations. To trade with earth, he develops the idea of beaming solar power back to earth via "microwave from solar power stations in orbit". As he describes it "the microwave beam would arrive at Earth with a beam width of about seven kilometers. Its intensity would be modest, less than half that of sunlight. In contrast to sunlight, though, it would be there all the time, even at night or in clouds or rain, and it would be in a form ready for conversion to DC current with a loss of only 10 percent. The areas receiving these beamsโ€™ output on Earth would be fenced, and outside the fence the intensity of microwave radiation would be no higher than outside a microwave oven with the door closed. He estimates that if "Satellite Solar Power Stations (SSPS) were to become the sole source of electric energy in the United States in the year 2000, the land area necessary for the SSPS antennas would still be only 0.2 percent of that of the continental United States". In short, the establishment of space colonies could lead to the fulfillment of a good share of Earth's energy needs. Last but not least he describes life in space habitats as better than that of earth, largely thanks to the level of control we'd have over the environment (total climate control which would enable an abundance of food and no natural disaster) as well as unlimited cheap energy. To conclude, Chas Freeman typically really knows his stuff when it comes to China and heโ€™s very intellectually honest (a rare trait among US officials) so I have no doubt he tells the truth when he says the Chinese told him that was the vision. And China famously thinks very big and very long term so it would be quite like them to go for something like this. There are also quite a few tangible signs that China is working towards that vision. See for instance this November 2022 news where โ€œChinaโ€™s space station will join a project to collect solar power from space and send it to Earth in a high-energy microwave beamโ€: Thatโ€™s exactly Oโ€™Neillโ€™s vision! Or check this October 2022 news that says China is developing new "electromagnetic sledges" that can propel a carriage weighing a few tonnes to a record speed, with a key application for this being โ€œaerospaceโ€: Remember: Oโ€™Neillโ€™s vision is to build his habitats with material from the moon, shot into space via "mass drivers", a form of electromagnetic catapult. So there you goโ€ฆ Or also the fact that the Chinese will build, together with the Russians, a moon base - planned for 2028 - powered by a โ€œspace nuclear reactorโ€ thatโ€™s already been developed (on Earth) and has passed review by Chinaโ€™s Ministry of Science: The space nuclear reactor can generate 1MW of electricity, enough to power 10 International Space Stations. Enough power, maybe, to undertake mining activity and power an electromagnetic catapultโ€ฆ After visions change, the world changes, so itโ€™s also possible that Chinaโ€™s view on what they want to do has evolved. In any case, Chas Freeman is right that Chinaโ€™s motivation for all its initiatives in space canโ€™t just be to โ€œboldly explore where no-one has been beforeโ€, they have to be working towards something. And Freeman is also absolutely right to lament that the U.S. decided to ban any cooperation in space with the Chinese. Those endeavors are something that could have been jointly developed as a multilateral effort to unite us all as a speciesโ€ฆ Instead China is now forced to go at it alone with Russia and we face a future where our petty divisions on Earth will be carried with us to spaceโ€ฆ

Arnaud Bertrand

265,181 Aufrufe โ€ข vor 2 Jahren

Matt Damon says Stanley Kubrick spent days lighting a miniature version of the Overlook Hotel just so he could recreate the exact same lighting on the real set of The Shining. โ€œI worked with the production designer, who the last film he did was The Talented Mr. Ripley, and he was Kubrickโ€™s guy.โ€ โ€œAnd he told me this great story about when he was designing that movie. Stanley Kubrick had a scale model of the Overlook Hotel in their production office, and they would stand around, and this is like 1978 or โ€™79, and he would set these lights on, you know, to shoot this little hotel.โ€ โ€œHe would set miniature lights, and he would get them he would take hours doing this while his production heads were standing around. And then heโ€™d take a photograph, and then heโ€™d hand it to an assistant who would go and run off, and this is before one-hour photo, and develop it and come back with an 8-by-10.โ€ โ€œAnd Kubrick would look at it for about five minutes, and then heโ€™d put it down and heโ€™d go back and heโ€™d start setting the lights.โ€ โ€œAnd this process would go on for days.โ€ โ€œBut what Roy said was incredible was when you were on the set, Kubrick had come up with some algorithm by which he could kind of transpose the numbers of the lights.โ€ โ€œSo he would set it just how he wanted, and then he would record what each light was at. He knew his sources were coming from exactly the same place in the big world when he did it, and he came up with this algorithm by which he could just go, and he had all the things set, and he would just set the lights up.โ€ โ€œAnd Roy said you could hold the 8-by-10, stand in the hallway, hold the 8-by-10 in front of your face and pull it away, and you would see the exact same thing that heโ€™d shot on the miniature model.โ€ โ€œWhich is just, like, the level of artistry slash insanity and obsession is just so beautiful.โ€

agim๐“ฏ

73,293 Aufrufe โ€ข vor 16 Tagen

On this day in 2001, the 9/11 attacks occurred bringing down the Twin Towers in New York, killing almost 3000 Americans. Americaโ€™s reaction to the tragic attacks would set the course for geopolitics in the 21st century. The War on Terror after 9/11 is estimated to have killed 4.5 million people according to the Cost of War Project at Brown University. The US would invade Afghanistan beginning a quagmire that would last over two decades, where estimated $2.13 trillion was spent, with the only winners being military-industrial complex executives. Iraq would be illegally invaded based on a pack of lies and deceit, 1 million Iraqis would die as a result of the war, with millions more displaced. Another $2 trillion was wasted in Iraq to decimate and privatise the country, leading to the rise of ISIS. The post-9/11 global War on Terror is estimated to have displaced a shocking 37 million people, fuelling anti-US sentiment around the world. By 2021, the US had spent $21 trillion on militarisation since 9/11, resulting in a draconian global military empire, diverting money away from spending on infrastructure, healthcare, and education at home. 9/11 will be remembered as one of the most consequential events in the 21st Century, where global sympathy for the US reached a global high while the US enjoyed its pinnacle of unchallenged power at the height of the unipolar world. The disaster of the ensuing War on Terror, the arrogance and wanton violation of all tenets of international law, the destruction of entire countries and imposing of American power on the global south would fuel the drive to create a multipolar world, eventually resulting in the rise of BRICS and other multipolar institutions such as the SCO.

Going Underground

33,073 Aufrufe โ€ข vor 10 Tagen

When the "Russian Starlink" will be operational - There's a ping! 8 megabits, 9, 10! It's working, it's working! Damn it, I'm not crying, it's just the internet getting to me! - Two young developers from the company "Bureau 1440" couldn't hold back their emotions at the displays. The data transfer speed from the first three satellites has risen to 12 Mbit/s, with a delay of 41 milliseconds... This was three years ago. This eloquently shows how people interested in and concerned about this segment of the space industry have been waiting for the emergence of such a project. In the vernacular, it's immediately dubbed the "Russian Starlink". Officially - "Dawn". Broadband high-speed internet (up to 1 Gbit/sec!), which is distributed directly from the sky. The beginning was laid, although to Starlink we are still as far away as to that very sky. Until yesterday evening, six experimental satellites of the system were "hanging" in low orbit. They were used to test the concept of laser inter-satellite communication. On Monday evening, a launch vehicle deployed 16 devices at once. And this is the first batch launch of the project. But talking about creating a full-fledged satellite communication system, similar to Elon Musk's brainchild, is, of course, too premature. Twenty-two satellites will be enough for real tests and pilot operation with individual clients. The launch of the commercial service was scheduled for 2027. By that time, 292 satellites should be in orbit, which will provide global coverage of Russia with full-fledged broadband internet. Compared to Starlink's seven-thousand-satellite constellation, this seems insignificant. But "Dawn" is not yet positioning itself as a competitor to Musk. Our priority is to first provide ourselves with high-quality satellite internet. We'll conquer the world later. There, the plans are to cover more than 75 countries by 2035. But before that, it's important to ensure uninterrupted data transmission to at least our group in the Southern Military District (SMD). By the end of this year, it was planned to launch more than a hundred and fifty satellites into orbit. This is enough for partial coverage of Russia's territory. And it would have been enough for active tests in the SMD zone. However, the program's deadlines have already been shifted by a year. And everything will depend on the number of launches and spacecraft deployed into orbit. And, of course, on the production of ground terminals. The prospect of experimental connections on the front is already visible this year. But a full-scale deployment is unlikely before 2027.

๐ƒ๐š๐ฏ๐ข๐ ๐™ ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ช

65,831 Aufrufe โ€ข vor 6 Monaten

Professor Glenn Diesen (Glenn Diesen) explains why the unipolar moment was destined to failโ€”and why the exhausted hegemon is now fighting Russia, China, and Iran all at once in a dangerous competition for the next world order. โ€œI think what weโ€™re witnessing is, of course, the end of the unipolar moment established after the Cold War. This era we lived through was a challenge to the entire Westphalian system. We went back to the idea of a universal hegemon which would seek to dominate. This essentially challenged the entire Westphalian international system based on a balance of power between sovereign states. After the Cold War, many had benign intentions that if we had a hegemonic peaceโ€”the US and its European allies would essentially dominate the international systemโ€”this would have many benefits. On one hand, there wouldnโ€™t be any international anarchy, any competition for security, simply because it would only be one great power, the United States. This would mitigate security competition. And since the US is a liberal democracy, the assumption would be that it could elevate the role of liberal democracy and human rights in the international system, making the system more benign as well. This is a reasonable argument. I donโ€™t subscribe to it, but itโ€™s reasonable nonetheless. I think it was destined to fail for many reasons. Simply put, if youโ€™re going to be a hegemon, itโ€™s going to be very costly over time. Youโ€™re going to spend all your resources, and you have to keep other rising powers down. Over time, this can only lead to one thing: the US would begin to exhaust itself, and the rising powers would seek to collectively balance an increasingly exhausted United States. That time is what weโ€™re seeing now. The US is exhausted. Itโ€™s reaching soon $40 trillion in debt. You see this manifest itself in economic problems at homeโ€”economic inequalities, social problems, political polarization. Meanwhile, you see the rest of the world through organizations such as the Shanghai Cooperation Organization and BRICS seeking to create a multipolar world which balances the US hegemonic aspirations. This is quite a critical time. What do we expect the hegemon to do when itโ€™s in this situation? They want to restore their position. How do you do that? First, you have to counter and defeat your opponent. So we would expect an economic war against China to try to roll back its technological and industrial development. You would expect a confrontation with Russia. Obviously, Ukraine would be the ideal front lineโ€”a massive country. Many political leaders, intelligence leaders, and military leaders have recognized since the 1990s that Ukraine in NATO would be considered an existential threat for Russia. And lastly, of course, the main central power in the Middle East which opposes US hegemony, which is Iran. You might expect them attempting to do a knockout blow against Iran. So weโ€™re seeing all of these three major powers on the Eurasian continent now essentially being in a conflict with a declining hegemon. And itโ€™s a very dangerous time because this is a competition for world order. Itโ€™s all or nothing. This is why all sides are willing to risk so much, which is why itโ€™s a very dangerous time and it might be difficult to get through.โ€

๐Ÿ…ฐpocalypsis ๐Ÿ…ฐpocalypseos ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ ๐Ÿ…‰

13,664 Aufrufe โ€ข vor 1 Monat

New video of what is a supposed UAP being struck by a Hellfire missile: Analysis What isnโ€™t discussed at the hearing nor anyone who doesnโ€™t have exposure to footage like this is the fact that the Hellfire missile doesnโ€™t appear to detonate. This is important as it shows the missile only clipping the object, which most likely is a drone. If the missile doesnโ€™t detonate and only clips one of the rotors of a drone (if thatโ€™s what this is), then it would explain why the drone could potentially recover and carry onโ€ฆto a distance longer than the video shows but we donโ€™t know how far that actually was. It could have eventually crashed in the water. Also, important to note that the authorization to use that munition signifies that the user was given a green light at targeting a potential threat. This isnโ€™t done lightly. This means that it was identified enough to a degree to be a potential threat (like an adversarial drone) and was intentionally targeted. That wouldnโ€™t happen if it was a truly unidentified objects or actual alien space ship. They would observe until it was deemed to be hostile in nature. This could also be a potential C-UAS test strike on the efficiencies of targeting in-flight drones with conventional munitions and how accurate they are. But more information needs to be presented to determine that. In conclusion, this appears to be nothing more than a failed strike of what was claimed to be a Hellfire missile on a traveling drone. The munition did not detonate, clipping the object but only to a degree that it still had flight capability after.

Chris Unleashed

288,754 Aufrufe โ€ข vor 1 Jahr