Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

๐Ÿšจ๐ˆ๐“โ€™๐’ ๐Ž๐•๐„๐‘, ๐“๐‡๐„๐˜ ๐…๐ˆ๐๐€๐‹๐‹๐˜ ๐‚๐€๐”๐†๐‡๐“ ๐“๐‡๐„๐Œโ€ฆ..#๐Œ๐š๐ฎ๐ข๐…๐ข๐ซ๐ž ๐๐”๐“ ๐“๐‡๐„ ๐Œ๐€๐ˆ๐๐’๐“๐‘๐„๐€๐Œ ๐Œ๐„๐ƒ๐ˆ๐€ ๐–๐Ž๐โ€™๐“ ๐‘๐„๐๐Ž๐‘๐“ ๐“๐‡๐ˆ๐’โ€ฆ.๐’๐Ž ๐–๐„ ๐Œ๐”๐’๐“! ๐Ÿ’ฅ๐Ÿ’ฅ๐Ÿ’ฅ โ€ผ๏ธThe most efficient way to ignite a fire on the surface from a satellite in Earth orbit would be to paint the target in segments by pulsing the laser with an advanced targeting...

10 Comments

{Matt} $XRPatriot's profile picture
{Matt} $XRPatriot2 years ago

So I'm gonna play the scenario here. Um, lemme just show you what you're looking at here. Um, satellites always use U T C. And, uh, if you can see here, hon, the, the time in most interest is in Honolulu on August 8th, between four to 10:00 AM and the u t C time here conversion, it's really confusing converting time zones, it's about right here. So this is the, this is the area right here I wanna focus on as far as when these fires were reported in Maui. As you can see right here, this is, uh, 4:00 AM to 9:00 AM basically, and I'm gonna play the simulation here. Um, this is the time that's reported in U T C, so be sure to be aware of U T C uh, time difference. But this, uh, this satellite so far, which is under the, um, uh, 5 7 2 8 NORAD cat id, uh, NORAD tracks these things. This is all publicly available g p s data. Uh, the telemetry telemetry data, uh, is for NORAD 5 7 2 8 8, and it's an unknown payload launched by C C P. And, uh, the payload's large enough to host a space-based laser. And the physics are proven on my [email protected] slash laser. So I'm gonna play the video now. Okay, I'm gonna clear the screen now And then I'm gonna play the video. So here's a passing of it right now. Um, it's gonna come through here and pass. Again, this is NORAD CAT 5 7 2 8 8, and this is Hawaii. Over here, you can see just when the sun rose around here. This is Hawaii right here. Okay, so this is the area that we're focusing on when this satellite passes. Okay, it's about to pass now I'm gonna pause it when it, when it, uh, goes about, uh, the peak area, and I'll give you the exact time of it when it po pa, uh, po uh, passes over Maui and it's probably about peak here. It's at its apex here. And, uh, the time of U T C is about 1420 U T C, and that's about 2:20 PM uh, U T C, August eight. And, um, hon Lulu, it's about 4:00 AM Uh, so that's about 14 four. So this is early morning. So again, as this thing still passes, you can see how fast it's going and uh, that phase right there between is enough to start the fires and, uh, cause uh, damage. Basically, uh, I'll run the, I'll run it, rewind a little bit and I'll play it a little closer. I'll zoom in on, on this just so you can see the U T C, and that's about the peak of it right there. Thank you for watching. If you like this content, I'll post more validated data along with the source code.

{Matt} $XRPatriot's profile picture
{Matt} $XRPatriot2 years ago

H/T

โญ๏ธโญ๏ธโญ๏ธGeneral Eric ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿซก's profile picture
โญ๏ธโญ๏ธโญ๏ธGeneral Eric ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿซก2 years ago

You all piss me off alittle. I reported, that on 8/7/2023 the university of Hawaii astronomy class caught on their mountain top telescope a 12 minute green laser from space. Now will someone finally do some work and see if those satellites were traveling over Maui at the same times. The time stamped evidence is there for anyone who wants to read it

Lena Delaine's profile picture
Lena Delaine2 years ago

Sorryโ€ฆ but this is want โ€œtheyโ€ want you to believe! The truth has nothing to do with the CCP.

Goodymob's profile picture
Goodymob2 years ago

How do we know these were CCP satellites and not relabeled to protect our own govt from attacking its own citizens? What proof these were Chinese?

G ๐Ÿš€'s profile picture
G ๐Ÿš€2 years ago

Soon enough that website will be taken down randomlyโ€ฆ just watch!

SolaScriptura ๐ŸŒดโœ๏ธโš”๏ธโœ๏ธ๐ŸŒด's profile picture
SolaScriptura ๐ŸŒดโœ๏ธโš”๏ธโœ๏ธ๐ŸŒด2 years ago

A brilliantly crafted lie. We know who did it and why, and they werenโ€™t Chinese.

โ–ฟ Peter Antoni โ–ฟ โ˜ง ฮฉ ฯˆ ฮฃ's profile picture
โ–ฟ Peter Antoni โ–ฟ โ˜ง ฮฉ ฯˆ ฮฃ2 years ago

The real perpetrators (we know who) deliberately caused the fires at the time CCPโ€™s satellite was passing over Maui to frame them as the obvious culprits. CCP had nothing to do with it, theyโ€™re simply being framed. Itโ€™s a classic smokescreen tactic 101 by the U.S Government.

justistruth's profile picture
justistruth2 years ago

My question is this why are CCP satellites labeled NORAD with a number. NORAD sounds like ours. American and Canada security apparatus for air defense.?

Kallen's profile picture
Kallen2 years ago

Oprah's roof is blue.....

Related Videos

๐ŸšจThe CCP Had Satelites over Maui (LAHAINA, OLINDA, & KULA), at the EXACT same Time of the Fires!!!! Steve Favis, Computer Science & Advanced Robotics Expert, has compiled sufficient evidence the CCP had multiple satellites capable of an attack above Maui at the same exact time of the fires! He determined the laser would have needed to be in a wave length range to minimize scatter through the atmosphere, so a near infrared range laser would be needed to allow a more precise transmissionโ€ฆ. Andโ€ฆ.. would have minimal reaction to the color BLUE! THE OLINDA FIRE Was ignited at approximately at 10:47pm On August 7th.โ€”โ€” At this Exact Time, CCP Satellite NORAD53299 was directly over this location!!!! Holy shit! THE LAHAINA FIRE Was ignited at approximately at 6:37am on August 8th.โ€”โ€” At this exact time CCP Satellite NORAD55836 was directly this location! HOLY SHIT! THE KULA FIRE Was ignited at approximately at 11:30am on August 8th.โ€”โ€” At this exact time CCP Satellite NORAD53299 was directly this location! HOLY SHIT! Steve Favis also has calculated the CCP has up to 70 Gigawatt lasers in earth orbit right now. IN ADDITIONโ€ฆ This is not the first time CCP Satellites have been over Hawaii recently. Back in January of this year, mysterious green lasers were spotted over the skies of Maunakea. The troubling thing is that there were lots of conflicting reports from NASA the first week where they insisted it was one of their satellites, but it was ultimately declared (โ€œLikelyโ€) a Chinese satellite, Daqi-1/AEMS, a week later. This happened almost immediately before multiple Chinese spy balloons were spotted all Over America. The Fact NASA had no clue and said โ€œitโ€™s likelyโ€ a Chinese satellite is very alarming. They still to this day only speculate what China was doing.
4:34

Sensitive content

๐ŸšจThe CCP Had Satelites over Maui (LAHAINA, OLINDA, & KULA), at the EXACT same Time of the Fires!!!! Steve Favis, Computer Science & Advanced Robotics Expert, has compiled sufficient evidence the CCP had multiple satellites capable of an attack above Maui at the same exact time of the fires! He determined the laser would have needed to be in a wave length range to minimize scatter through the atmosphere, so a near infrared range laser would be needed to allow a more precise transmissionโ€ฆ. Andโ€ฆ.. would have minimal reaction to the color BLUE! THE OLINDA FIRE Was ignited at approximately at 10:47pm On August 7th.โ€”โ€” At this Exact Time, CCP Satellite NORAD53299 was directly over this location!!!! Holy shit! THE LAHAINA FIRE Was ignited at approximately at 6:37am on August 8th.โ€”โ€” At this exact time CCP Satellite NORAD55836 was directly this location! HOLY SHIT! THE KULA FIRE Was ignited at approximately at 11:30am on August 8th.โ€”โ€” At this exact time CCP Satellite NORAD53299 was directly this location! HOLY SHIT! Steve Favis also has calculated the CCP has up to 70 Gigawatt lasers in earth orbit right now. IN ADDITIONโ€ฆ This is not the first time CCP Satellites have been over Hawaii recently. Back in January of this year, mysterious green lasers were spotted over the skies of Maunakea. The troubling thing is that there were lots of conflicting reports from NASA the first week where they insisted it was one of their satellites, but it was ultimately declared (โ€œLikelyโ€) a Chinese satellite, Daqi-1/AEMS, a week later. This happened almost immediately before multiple Chinese spy balloons were spotted all Over America. The Fact NASA had no clue and said โ€œitโ€™s likelyโ€ a Chinese satellite is very alarming. They still to this day only speculate what China was doing.

MJTruthUltra

280,429 views โ€ข 2 years ago

๐Ÿšจ Report: CCP Satellites Discovered over Maui at Time of the Fires & Space Force Activated a unit Dedicated to Targeting other Foreign Satellites Soon After Computer Science & Advanced Robotics Expert, Steve Favis, has compiled evidence using public available NORAD data & found that multiple CCP Satellites were over Maui (LAHAINA, OLINDA, & KULA), at the exact time of the Maui Fires. THE OLINDA FIRE Ignited at approximately at 10:47pm On August 7th. At this Exact Time, CCP Satellite NORAD53299 was directly over this location THE LAHAINA FIRE Was ignited at approximately at 6:37am on August 8th. At this exact time CCP Satellite NORAD55836 was directly over this location THE KULA FIRE Was ignited at approximately at 11:30am on August 8th. At this exact time CCP Satellite NORAD53299 was directly over this location Did SPACE FORCE Respond? The 75th Intelligence, Surveillance and Reconnaissance Squadron (ISRS) was activated on Aug. 11 at Peterson Space Force Base in Colorado. This is the only unit (that we know of) dedicated to targeting other nations' satellites and the ground stations that support them. MY THOUGHTS: Does this prove that the CCP committed whatโ€™s essentially an act of war against the United States? No, not in this instance. Although I believe they already have through irregular warfare. The only thing this proves is that there were multiple CCP satellites over Hawaii at the times of the fires. Thatโ€™s it. Compound this with the fact that Back in January of this year, mysterious green lasers were spotted over the skies of Maunakea, Hawaii. NASA sent conflicting reports the first week where they insisted it was one of their satellites, but it was later declared (โ€œLikelyโ€) a Chinese satellite. Steve Favisโ€™s research is published here This Video

MJTruthUltra

16,271 views โ€ข 2 years ago

Thought experiment for people regarding the concept of Absolute Time. Absolute means NO EXCEPTIONS. We are NOT looking back in time when we see galaxies and stars. We are NOT looking back in time 1.25 seconds when we see the moon. We're Not looking back in time 3 minutes when we see Mars. We're Not looking back in time 8.33 minutes when we see the Sun. If an astronaut lit a matchstick on Mars, the distant observer would see predator heat waves at the top of the matchstick in real-time while the matchstick started to blacken towards the astronaut's fingers. But there would be no orange light from that chemical reaction or flame seen. If the matchstick burnt out before the packet of orange light from that particular chemical reaction made it to Earthโ€ฆ then the distant observer would just see a disembodied orange flash of light with a lag. But the Earth-bound observer would never actually see the flame associated with the orange wavelength it put out. The wavelength of color emitted by the flame is not a recording of reality. If the orange light is 650 Thz, that means there are 650 trillion individual and separate bursts of orange light pulsating in 1 second. NOT that "the same light" is "waving" 650 trillion times a second and that light is a recording of reality. There are 650 trillion brand-new lights flashing in 1 second. Each Hertz is a brand-new emission and packet unto itself. Time does not re-emit 650 trillion times a second, nor is a photon a particle or a packet of reality acting like the frame of a reel of footage. The orange light that already left the flame will continue to propagate out until it meets the electrons making up the distant observer. But remember, it is never the same light within that packet. And the electrons making up the observer will absorb all of those different lights within that packet and re-emit brand-new lights that produce the product of illumination. A photon is a massless packet of energy, spherically expanding at the rate of c from the source it comes from. Illumination is the result of that energy being absorbed and RE-emitted by any other electrons that did not output that primary packet. But time is not associated with the same light. It's never the same light and time does not re-emit between packets. Time is not relative. Do NOT allow your mind Carte Blanche to think along the lines of relative time. DROP IT for this thought experiment. We are thinking along the lines of ABSOLUTE TIME/ Galilean VARIANCE. What does absolute time mean? It means time is constant in ALL frames of reference. Any frequency shifts between atomic clocks IS a literal change in the speed of light. But relativity forbids the speed of light from Ever changing, so relativity (Lorentz INVARIANCE) invented the concept of the 4th dimension and space-time. Because Relativity doesn't allow light speed to shift.. they interpret the same frequency shift between atomic clocks as being conclusive, irrefutable evidence that time and reality itself shifts. Rather than say it's just that ONE clock being affected by Earth's gravity and the oscillation of that ONE cesium clock is being altered compared to other clocks. People don't realize that in relativity... time dilation is SYMMETRICAL! Not even most relativists know their own theory. If Clock A and Clock B are synchronized and together... and then they accelerate apart... Einstein said Clock A would see Clock B as being slower itself. And Clock B would view Clock A as slower than ITself. NOT that only one observer would see back in time and the other would see forward or not at all. No... BOTH observers are supposed to see each other BACK in time relative to each other according to Einstein and the consequence of the math. It doesn't make ANY sense!! But relativists toss that part of time dilation under their 4th dimensional rug. The rug is woven from threads of gold that only the smart people can see apparently. So... here's a thought experiment/ Gedankenexperiment for absolute time. NO paradoxes... no nonsense or confusion. What do you see in a club? You see disco lights changing and a color wheel effect. You see everyone in REAL-TIME. Not just because they are so close to the lights. Light is not a recording of reality. Light is simply color. Illuminating reality in a certain color. Just because you can't see something yet or the color hasn't reached you doesn't mean it isn't happening in real-time. Zoom out and look at the people in the club through binoculars a mile away. You are still looking at them in real-time. The colors are shifting with a delay in the club. Now look at the club through a telescope from the surface of the moon. You're still looking at the people in real-time. But now there is a lag of the colors shifting by 1.25 seconds because it takes light 1.25 seconds to travel from the Earth to the moon. Now look at the club through an even bigger telescope from the surface of Mars. You're still looking at the people in real-time, but now there is a lag of the colors shifting by 3 minutes because it takes light 3 minutes to travel from Earth to Mars. fr you are a third hypothetical observer zoomed out and watching the person from Mars AND seeing the club on Earth... you're still seeing everything happening in real-time as well. But you see the colored wavepackets traveling with a delay to the observer on Mars. And the disco color wheel effect is just lagging before it affects the observer from Mars and the observer on the Moon. It doesn't matter how far you zoom out! There is only now to observe. But there WILL be a lag and delay for a given color/wavepacket to reach distant observers. But all points in space are already illuminated by other starlight. So if you're too far away... you'll just see the club in real-time but without any disco lights. Just see them in white light because that's the source already illuminating the scene. This is where it gets the most difficult because people think light itself is a recording of reality that replays a scene from where it came from. But another punch in the gut of relativity is that in order to see REFLECTED light... that would require a TWO-WAY transit. Which means the light would have to be sent out... record the scene of a distant event and then RETURN in order to REplay the event. Which means it would take 6 minutes to see the club from Mars by that logic and 2.5 seconds to see the club from the moon by that logic. The difference in tick rates between clocks has NOTHING to do with time dilation. Wait.. what?! How can that be? Because a clock itself doesn't represent all of time and reality. The difference between clocks is a "Transverse relative time shift." If the only light in the universe was from the lighterโ€ฆ the only way a distant observer would be able to see the astronaut on Mars is if the astronaut held down the button of the lighter for longer than 3 minutes. It takes 3 minutes for the packet of light to travel from Mars to Earth. The distant observer would never be able to see Mars, unless the light stretched from Mars all the way to Earth, and illuminated the path between Mars and Earth. And that would take 3 minutes for the boundary and first part of that wave packet to reach Earth. But if the distant observer wanted to observe Mars in real-timeโ€ฆ then that packet of light would have to be on for longer than 3 minutes. So if the astronaut on Mars flicked the lighter at 12:00, the distant observer on Earth wouldn't see anything until 12:03. If the light was on for 3 minutes and 10 seconds, and the distant observer is 3 light minutes away... ๏ฟผthe distant observer would be able to see Mars in real-time for 10 seconds starting at 12:03. In the 20 second video clip of the rotating planet with shifting colors... just imagine you're a couple light minutes or light seconds away. You're still seeing the planet spin in real-time. But there is simply a delay of switching colors. You are Not looking back in time. It's just a color wheel effect from a great distance away. That's it!! There are many major flaws which tarnish people's critical thinking on this thought experiment. 1. Light does NOT ricochet or bounce. Electrons absorb, emit and re-emit ALL electromagnetic radiation. The electrons, making up the glass of a mirror will absorb the incoming light and re-emit a brand-new light as an equal and opposite reaction. NOT that "the same light" bounced off the mirror and continued on within the same frame of reference. ๏ฟผ 2. Light is NOT a recording of reality. 3. It is NOT the same light being observed from a source. It's never the same light. Each Hertz is a new light. Think of half of a sine wave as being its own emission. On an oscilloscope, a stimulus generates a peak which initiates an equal and opposite trough. Or vice versa. That repeating process is not "the same light." If you cut and paste that sine wave to another sine wave, the boundary between the waves will always be in phase. (thus refraction) 4. The speed of light is NOT the same in ALL frames of reference, no matter what. 5. Light is NOT made of particles and waves that flip back-and-forth. 6. Time is NOT connected to the speed of light. Time remains constant regardless if you accelerate towards or away from a clock. The clocks themselves will indeed be off! But that's an affect on the electrons making up the atomic clock affecting the oscillation of the isotope which is ASSUMED to ALWAYS be the same. So ANY difference in oscillation is treated as a literal distortion in space-time. 7. Space and time are not linked at all. That is a mathematical artifice under Lorentz invariance. Time is relative under Lorentz invariance. But time is absolute under Galilean VARIANCE. When people hear or see the word GALILEAN... their brains switch to auto pilot to "aether theory" and "classical physics." What people don't realize is that aether theory used Galilean INVARIANCE. Rather than space-time being used as an excuse to explain the difference in frequencies between atomic clocks... it was originally aether being used as an excuse to keep the speed of light the same. But None of those things are valid! We are thinking under the framework of Galilean VARIANCE! Completely new revolutionary model returning to Isaac Newton and Classical physics but without the corpuscular theory (particle) theory for light... without a particle-wave duality... without an aether... without a 4th dimension. Just good ol elementary math within 3D Euclidean space. Everything happening in real-time, right now. This reformulation of Galilean transformations was offered by Dr. Edward Dowdye in 1991 called The Extinction Shift Principle. Effectivity as opposed to Relativity. If light required a two-way transit, in order to travel outโ€ฆ Record an event, and travel back to replay the recordingโ€ฆ ๏ฟผ then it would take 6 minutes to see the astronaut on Mars instead of 3. ๏ฟผ Rememberโ€ฆ They say the SAME light is a recording, and must travel there and travel back in order to REplay. Relativity says time is relative: t' โ‰  t time is NOT the same from all frames of reference) and t = tโ‚’ / โˆš1 - vยฒ/cยฒ but Galilean Variance says time is not relative: t' = t (Time IS the same from all frames of reference) and ฯ„_tr = ฯ„โ‚’ / โˆš1 - vยฒ/cยฒ Relativity says c' = c (The velocity of light is the same from all frames of reference) but Galilean variance says c' โ‰  c (The velocity of light is NOT the same from all frames of reference) and that c' = c ยฑ v (The velocity of light in one frame of reference is dependent upon the velocity of the light source relative to an observer in another frame of reference. Whether that light source is approaching or receding away from that observer) Relativity says E = mcยฒ (Energy and mass are universally equivalent and literally interchangeable under All conditions.) but Galilean variance says E = ฮ”mcยฒ = mโ‚’cยฒ (Energy changes in a system are the result from changes in mass. mโ‚’ represents the original mass. Mass and energy do not literally interchange. There is an equivalence, not an interchange.) The Rebirth of Classical Physics: Time, Light & Gravity Star light and illumination: Flicking a Lighter on Mars visual example:

TheRealVerbz (Jason Verbelli)

16,608 views โ€ข 1 year ago

๐Ÿค” The rifle drop location of the leftist who assassinated Charlie Kirk has been revealed. From the video which cuts offโ€ฆwe can see him waiting at the intersection. So not to be semantical but the diagram showing him cut across the parking lot isnโ€™t accurate because he walks along the pathway. So it appears Tyler Robinson walked across the street and โ€œHIDโ€ the Mauser in that vicinity and then walked to his car. My only question is if he knew in his own words that his father would notice the gun missing and have to come back to collect it WHY NOT JUST TAKE IT WITH YOU TO YOUR VEHICLE AND REMOVE THAT FROM THE EQUATION? He seemed to smuggle the weapon in there with NO PROBLEM hidden well enough and with all the commotion getting back to your car with the weapon would be a priority. We have heard routinely that he is NOT a stupid person so he would know that after committing the most high profile ASSASSINATION in the 21st century w/ cameras everywhere of a personal friend of The President that no stone would be unturned. So DID HE REALLY THINK HE WOULD BE ABLE TO RETURN TO A CAMPUS THAT WOULD BE ON LOCKDOWN HOURS LATER TO RETRIEVE IT? That doesnโ€™t sound like a MENSA move to me. Iโ€™ll leave my post here also from 9/12 when his father turned him in where I said AT BARE MINIMUM HE WOULD HAVE KNOWN HIS DAD WOULD KNOW ITS MISSING. Why use the terminology โ€œDROP POINTโ€ as if itโ€™s an OP as opposed to saying โ€œI hid or stashed itโ€? Just little details like that stand out to me. Take it with you at this point donโ€™t drop it a hundred feet away from a crime of the century.

Johnny St.Pete

45,016 views โ€ข 9 months ago

Iโ€™m seeing a lot of questions on the launch of Chinaโ€™s Changโ€™e 6 mission yesterday to get samples - for the first time - from the far side of the moon. We donโ€™t know (afaik) why specifically theyโ€™re doing that, but we have a pretty good idea what grand vision China is working towards with their space program. How? From this 2022 video by Chas Freeman (former Assistant Secretary of Defense and Nixon's interpreter during his era-defining 1972 China visit), who imho is undoubtedly one of the most knowledgeable former US officials on China. He says that according to his own discussions with people running Chinaโ€™s space program, theyโ€™re following the vision described in the book "The high frontier" by Gerard K. O'Neill, which Freeman says has "become the bible of the Chinese space program". I read the book. So what vision does it describe? The book was written in 1976 by O'Neill who was a professor of physics at Princeton University. He also founded the Space Studies Institute, an organization devoted to funding research into space manufacturing and colonization. In other words, he knew his stuff. The book makes the very fair point that we have massive resource constraints on earth, especially given the growing population. He estimated in 1976 that we should be "about six and a half billion people in the year 2000", and we were 6.114 billion back then so he was pretty prescient. He estimates that these constraints will progressively give rise to more and more social tensions as the growing earth population competes for our limited resources as well as faces global problems like climate change. In his view, dealing with this will either require "an authoritarian regime capable of mounting the immense task of social reorganization needed to escape catastrophe" or, alternatively, โ€œmankind would [need to adopt] a static society [that would be] forced in self-defense to suppress new ideas". The 3rd alternative is of course the colonization of space. The most interesting aspect of the book is that he claims everything he writes is feasible with knowledge and technology that already existed in the late 70s. In short he calls for the establishment of large human habitats in the Earth-Moon system, located at stable Lagrange points ("parking spots" in space where gravity from different spatial bodies cancel each other out). In particular he developed the concept of what's known today as the "O'Neill cylinder" which he says "could support quite easily a population of ten million people, growing its food in agricultural cylinders near but outside the main habitat". Energy-wise, it'd simply make use of solar energy via a system of mirrors. As he describes it: "the concentration of the unvarying, intense sunlight of space by very lightweight, inexpensive mirrors can provide all the energy that industry will ever need [...] at a fraction of a cent per kilowatt-hour". He envisages building these habitats with material from the moon, shot into space via "mass drivers", a form of electromagnetic catapult. Also "the habitats would have artificial gravity similar as that of earth by rotating about twenty-eight times an hourโ€, but he also envisages low-gravity areas, especially for recreational activities such as swimming pools or dancing representations. To trade with earth, he develops the idea of beaming solar power back to earth via "microwave from solar power stations in orbit". As he describes it "the microwave beam would arrive at Earth with a beam width of about seven kilometers. Its intensity would be modest, less than half that of sunlight. In contrast to sunlight, though, it would be there all the time, even at night or in clouds or rain, and it would be in a form ready for conversion to DC current with a loss of only 10 percent. The areas receiving these beamsโ€™ output on Earth would be fenced, and outside the fence the intensity of microwave radiation would be no higher than outside a microwave oven with the door closed. He estimates that if "Satellite Solar Power Stations (SSPS) were to become the sole source of electric energy in the United States in the year 2000, the land area necessary for the SSPS antennas would still be only 0.2 percent of that of the continental United States". In short, the establishment of space colonies could lead to the fulfillment of a good share of Earth's energy needs. Last but not least he describes life in space habitats as better than that of earth, largely thanks to the level of control we'd have over the environment (total climate control which would enable an abundance of food and no natural disaster) as well as unlimited cheap energy. To conclude, Chas Freeman typically really knows his stuff when it comes to China and heโ€™s very intellectually honest (a rare trait among US officials) so I have no doubt he tells the truth when he says the Chinese told him that was the vision. And China famously thinks very big and very long term so it would be quite like them to go for something like this. There are also quite a few tangible signs that China is working towards that vision. See for instance this November 2022 news where โ€œChinaโ€™s space station will join a project to collect solar power from space and send it to Earth in a high-energy microwave beamโ€: Thatโ€™s exactly Oโ€™Neillโ€™s vision! Or check this October 2022 news that says China is developing new "electromagnetic sledges" that can propel a carriage weighing a few tonnes to a record speed, with a key application for this being โ€œaerospaceโ€: Remember: Oโ€™Neillโ€™s vision is to build his habitats with material from the moon, shot into space via "mass drivers", a form of electromagnetic catapult. So there you goโ€ฆ Or also the fact that the Chinese will build, together with the Russians, a moon base - planned for 2028 - powered by a โ€œspace nuclear reactorโ€ thatโ€™s already been developed (on Earth) and has passed review by Chinaโ€™s Ministry of Science: The space nuclear reactor can generate 1MW of electricity, enough to power 10 International Space Stations. Enough power, maybe, to undertake mining activity and power an electromagnetic catapultโ€ฆ After visions change, the world changes, so itโ€™s also possible that Chinaโ€™s view on what they want to do has evolved. In any case, Chas Freeman is right that Chinaโ€™s motivation for all its initiatives in space canโ€™t just be to โ€œboldly explore where no-one has been beforeโ€, they have to be working towards something. And Freeman is also absolutely right to lament that the U.S. decided to ban any cooperation in space with the Chinese. Those endeavors are something that could have been jointly developed as a multilateral effort to unite us all as a speciesโ€ฆ Instead China is now forced to go at it alone with Russia and we face a future where our petty divisions on Earth will be carried with us to spaceโ€ฆ

Arnaud Bertrand

265,181 views โ€ข 2 years ago

DISGUSTING: Jennifer Welch and Angie Sullivan giggle about Lindsey Graham dying, boasting he โ€œliked killing, you know, the biggest war hawk on the planet,โ€ and spent one of his final days on Earth in Ukraine holding a drone that looks like โ€œa black c***โ€... WELCH: I want to watch the wall-to-wall coverage of this. Like, this is great. [SULLIVAN LAUGHING] And then there was this photo that I saw online. This is the last known photograph that Lady Graham took because, you know, he had just been in the Ukraine. SULLIVAN: Right. WELCH: And so, he took a photograph with a drone. Kiley, pop this up. Okay, for those of you that are listening, Okay, this drone looks like a big giant black c***. SULLIVAN: It does. WELCH: All right, thereโ€™s just no other way around it. He is smiling from ear to ear. He is holding the black c***, and the interesting thing about this drone is itโ€™s called the P1 Sun, and itโ€™s like โ€” SULLIVAN: P1! WELCH: โ€” in Russian, it means they call it the p***. This drone is called the p***. SULLIVAN: What? WELCH: And so, this is the shit with, I cannot believe, like, you know, back in the day, would watch movies or shows, and you would think, oh, thatโ€™s so crazy, like, about the president or about the United States. SULLIVAN: Right. WELCH: Like that โ€” thatโ€™s crazy. Iโ€™m so glad that would never happen. Weโ€™re living in the time period. Weโ€™re like, thatโ€™s from โ€” thatโ€™s from an episode of Veep. SULLIVAN: For sure, yeah. WELCH: Thatโ€™s an episode of Veep in the Lindsey Graham. Holding a big giant black c*** that is called p*** in Russian. And thatโ€™s his last known photograph before he dies. SULLIVAN: If I saw that on Veep, I would think thatโ€™s hilarious, but that would never happen. I mean, you just would never think that would actually happen. First of all, who names drones p***? WELCH: Well, when they look like black c***s, I think you do. SULLIVAN: I guess you do. WELCH: I think thatโ€™s really not even that creative. When you look at what that drone looked like, I mean, I think c*** or p***. SULLIVAN: No, it just looks like a p***. It does. WELCH: Yeah. And look at how happy Lindsey is. SULLIVAN: Well, we know why Lindseyโ€™s so happy. WELCH: He died after he was groping a โ€” a p*** โ€” a black c*** that was made for mass destruction. SULLIVAN: Yeah. WELCH: This is like exactly what he was. Thereโ€™s one photograph that just completely consolidates exactly who he was. He liked c***, as we all know โ€” SULLIVAN: Yeah. WELCH: โ€” you know, the worst-kept secret in Washington, D.C. and he liked killing, you know, the biggest war hawk on the planet, and there he is with a black c*** that kills right before he dies. SULLIVAN: I mean, that could not be a better epitaph right there, that picture.

Curtis Houck

17,969 views โ€ข 18 days ago

This is another relatively well known USAAF B-17 interception by a Luftwaffe fighter that is worth looking at in some detail. There are no archival descriptions that I can find identifying personnel, date or location involved but much can be gleaned from the footage itself. The bomber being targeted lacks the chin turret that was specifically installed on the G model of the B-17 to counter this sort of frontal attack, identifying it as an F model. Tracers from the attacking aircraft come from both sides of the frame suggesting that the gun camera is mounted in the nose of a twin-engined aircraft, such as a Messerschmitt Bf 110 or Me 410 It is often speculated that the Luftwaffe fighter here is attacking through its own flak but it is more likely that the explosions visible are the result of the Werfer-Granate 21 rocket launcher being employed. Flak bursts usually had a distinctive shape and ground fire would typically cease when friendly fighters were attacking. The rockets were set to detonate after traveling a fixed distance of around 600 meters and while the chances of scoring a direct hit were low, their 40 kg blast-fragmentation warheads were effective in breaking up the "combat box" formation and therefore making individual bombers more vulnerable to attack. In this case however, it appears the attacking aircraft have misjudged their timing and the rockets are detonating behind the formation. This was one of the disadvantages of attacking frontally as approach speeds made targeting more of a challenge, however it was also a way of avoiding the majority of the bomber's defensive firepower. Another consideration often ignored is the effect that a head-on attack would have on projectile effectiveness. At full speed a B-17 would be traveling at around 125 meters per second, if it had to simply fly into a stationary 20mm armor piercing shell weighing 115 grams the impact energy would be 900 joules. This is significantly greater than most .45 ACP pistol rounds fired at point blank range, only from the motion of the aircraft. The speed of the attacking aircraft at the moment the projectile is fired can also be added to the muzzle velocity making for an even more devastating impact. This was of course a double-edged sword as it meant defensive fire would be similarly more effective on the attacking aircraft, and it also gave the pilot a smaller time window during which he could fire and a more complex firing solution to calculate, not to mention the increased risk of a mid-air collision. As a general rule, Luftwaffe pilots were instructed not to waste time setting up an attack from a particular angle, rather they should attack the bomber formation from whatever position it would be encountered. In this particular incident, most of the impacts are around the number 3 and 4 engines on the B-17. While air-cooled radials were more damage-resistant than liquid-cooled engines, from this angle they would not have been protected by the aircraft structure. While there is no immediate fire visible, it's likely they would both have been put out of action. Armor piercing shells would typically represent around a third of the ammunition loadout and for the MG 151/20 cannon such projectiles could penetrate almost an inch of armor at 100 meters, therefore punching through a cylinder or crankcase would not be an issue. There is also one particular projectile that appears to strike the cockpit followed by an explosion near the horizontal tail. It almost seems like a shell entered the windshield then detonated inside, however I believe this is an optical illusion and they are in fact two separate impacts. The damage inflicted would likely have prevented the bomber from returning to base although there is nothing in the clip that would allow the aircraft to be identified. One interesting detail is that other Flying Fortresses in the formation appear to be fitted with chin turrets which would date the footage to between late 1943 to early 1944.

hw97karbine

128,425 views โ€ข 9 months ago

When the "Russian Starlink" will be operational - There's a ping! 8 megabits, 9, 10! It's working, it's working! Damn it, I'm not crying, it's just the internet getting to me! - Two young developers from the company "Bureau 1440" couldn't hold back their emotions at the displays. The data transfer speed from the first three satellites has risen to 12 Mbit/s, with a delay of 41 milliseconds... This was three years ago. This eloquently shows how people interested in and concerned about this segment of the space industry have been waiting for the emergence of such a project. In the vernacular, it's immediately dubbed the "Russian Starlink". Officially - "Dawn". Broadband high-speed internet (up to 1 Gbit/sec!), which is distributed directly from the sky. The beginning was laid, although to Starlink we are still as far away as to that very sky. Until yesterday evening, six experimental satellites of the system were "hanging" in low orbit. They were used to test the concept of laser inter-satellite communication. On Monday evening, a launch vehicle deployed 16 devices at once. And this is the first batch launch of the project. But talking about creating a full-fledged satellite communication system, similar to Elon Musk's brainchild, is, of course, too premature. Twenty-two satellites will be enough for real tests and pilot operation with individual clients. The launch of the commercial service was scheduled for 2027. By that time, 292 satellites should be in orbit, which will provide global coverage of Russia with full-fledged broadband internet. Compared to Starlink's seven-thousand-satellite constellation, this seems insignificant. But "Dawn" is not yet positioning itself as a competitor to Musk. Our priority is to first provide ourselves with high-quality satellite internet. We'll conquer the world later. There, the plans are to cover more than 75 countries by 2035. But before that, it's important to ensure uninterrupted data transmission to at least our group in the Southern Military District (SMD). By the end of this year, it was planned to launch more than a hundred and fifty satellites into orbit. This is enough for partial coverage of Russia's territory. And it would have been enough for active tests in the SMD zone. However, the program's deadlines have already been shifted by a year. And everything will depend on the number of launches and spacecraft deployed into orbit. And, of course, on the production of ground terminals. The prospect of experimental connections on the front is already visible this year. But a full-scale deployment is unlikely before 2027.

๐ƒ๐š๐ฏ๐ข๐ ๐™ ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ช

65,691 views โ€ข 4 months ago

New video of what is a supposed UAP being struck by a Hellfire missile: Analysis What isnโ€™t discussed at the hearing nor anyone who doesnโ€™t have exposure to footage like this is the fact that the Hellfire missile doesnโ€™t appear to detonate. This is important as it shows the missile only clipping the object, which most likely is a drone. If the missile doesnโ€™t detonate and only clips one of the rotors of a drone (if thatโ€™s what this is), then it would explain why the drone could potentially recover and carry onโ€ฆto a distance longer than the video shows but we donโ€™t know how far that actually was. It could have eventually crashed in the water. Also, important to note that the authorization to use that munition signifies that the user was given a green light at targeting a potential threat. This isnโ€™t done lightly. This means that it was identified enough to a degree to be a potential threat (like an adversarial drone) and was intentionally targeted. That wouldnโ€™t happen if it was a truly unidentified objects or actual alien space ship. They would observe until it was deemed to be hostile in nature. This could also be a potential C-UAS test strike on the efficiencies of targeting in-flight drones with conventional munitions and how accurate they are. But more information needs to be presented to determine that. In conclusion, this appears to be nothing more than a failed strike of what was claimed to be a Hellfire missile on a traveling drone. The munition did not detonate, clipping the object but only to a degree that it still had flight capability after.

Chris Unleashed

288,723 views โ€ข 10 months ago

Marissa Mayer on scaling Google and the internal black market CEO Eric Schmidt created for new hires โ€œOne of the things that [former Google CEO Eric Schmidt] talked about a lot was that at every order of magnitude, you should expect every process to breakโ€”and you should expect to have to completely reinvent it. Itโ€™s very different to deal with tens of people versus hundreds of people versus thousands of peopleโ€ Marissa shares a story of how one time Eric reinvented Googleโ€™s hiring process in a way that initially frustrated everyone: โ€œWe had closed the year at about 200 people, and we had a plan to double the size of the company over the coming year. Eric showed up in March, looked at the plan, and said: โ€˜thereโ€™s just no way you guys are going to be able to double the number of employees and keep the quality and culture the way you want it to be.โ€™โ€ Eric then told the company that he would let them collectively hire 50 people that yearโ€”versus the 200 they were planning on hiring. And to enforce this, he created 50 laminated dollar bills with Larry Page and Sergey Brinโ€™s faces on them and distributed them to Googleโ€™s VPs. Every new hire that year would require one โ€œLarry & Sergeyโ€ bill. Naturally, a black market for these โ€œLarrys & Sergeysโ€ developed, and as Marissa describes, it became surprisingly efficient: โ€œWhat would happen is the Head of Sales would have one and he would really need a new feature to make a sale. So he would [say to the engineer]: โ€˜look, Iโ€™m going to give you this Larry & Sergey but you have to promise youโ€™re going to use it to hire someone who is going to build this feature to secure this revenue.โ€™โ€ She continues: โ€œAs painful as it was because there was way too much work to slow down our hiring like this, [the new process] was actually a really good moment for the company because it made us be really thoughtful about how we were scaling and where we were putting our resources. We had to be that much more thoughtful about what to prioritize and where the opportunities were. Yes, hypergrowth is really fun, but you also need to realize that you want that hypergrowth to happen in terms of users and revenueโ€”and not necessarily in terms of the size of the company.โ€

Startup Archive

162,101 views โ€ข 2 years ago

๐Ÿ”ฅ Exactly. โ€œ HOW DID THAT SHOOTER KNOW TO GO TO THAT EXACT LOCATION??โ€ - Matt Tardio Spot on and Iโ€™ve been wondering the same thing since day 1. The exact event location wasnโ€™t announced til 8/30 a little over a week prior. So I was saying he must have been doing recon days before and that why I said before he was caught him they need to go back a week before the event in the tapes. Also once again how would he HOW CHARLIE KIRKS EVENT AND PRESCISE LOCATION WOULD BE SET UP? So Matt is correct..it would draw attention if he was going there prior. It was AS IF KNEW THE PERFECT SPOT TO BE and it began right after the event had started so ALL EYES WOULD BE FACING FORWARD. Chris Martenson then breaks down how that rifle does not appear are all to be on his pant legs. He shows the ludicrousness of it being in his bag and the both him & Matt agree that this is NOT a rifle that comes apart easily. Matt Tardio notes that a man was arrested in the parking lot with an airsoft rifle. Compound all of this with George Zinn proclaiming he did it as a distraction and you have alot of coincidences. I agree with the guests that because the case is on going j they may not want to disrupt the case but if and when the case is concluded and we do NOT then have answers to these inconsistencies I would be alarmed as well. โ€œI BELIEVE THERE WAS A MUCH LARGER PLOT AT SCHEME HEREโ€ says Matt Tardio and I agree.

Johnny St.Pete

63,120 views โ€ข 10 months ago

//The Wire//2300Z February 5, 2026// //ROUTINE// //BLUF: ARIZONA POLICE HELICOPTER CRASHES DURING SMALL ARMS ENGAGEMENT IN FLAGSTAFF. MORE DETAILS EMERGE REGARDING CHINESE BIOLAB IN VEGAS.// -----BEGIN TEARLINE----- -HomeFront- Nevada: More details have come to light regarding the Chinese Biolab discovered in Las Vegas a few days ago. After the story became public, several eyewitnesses have come forward to local media groups, with additional testimony that provides more context. One of the housekeepers that serviced the Vegas residence where the biolab was discovered had actually previously reported the facility to the FBI on January 9, 2026. Per this testimony, herself and several other cleaning staff members became severely ill after working in the residence back in April of 2025. Analyst Comment: Eyewitness testimony must always be considered with a grain of salt, however if this report is accurate, the FBI would have been aware of this facility (and the fact that random people were being infected by whatever biological materials were there), for much longer than they let on. Arizona: Early this morning, a downed-aircraft incident was reported as one Arizona DPS helicopter crashed in the vicinity of a an active shooter situation. The incident began as officers responded to call of domestic violence on W Shellie Drive at approximately 08:31 pm last night. As officers arrived on scene, the suspect engaged the officers with small arms fire, which kicked off a protracted small arms firefight that continued over the next two hours. During this time, the suspect fired upon officers from multiple rooftops throughout the area, maneuvering between multiple positions throughout the engagement. Approximately two hours into the firefight, an Arizona DPS helicopter (Registration: N56AZ, Callsign: RANGER 56) arrived on scene to assist officers on the ground in understanding where the suspect was hiding. Shortly after the helicopter arrived on scene, the aircraft crashed in the elevated terrain a short distance from the initial reported shooting location. Both the pilot and the onboard paramedic were killed in the crash. The initial suspect that began the engagement was arrested at almost the same time as the crash, and has been hospitalized with non-life threatening small arms wounds. -----END TEARLINE----- Analyst Comments: So far, official statements by the Arizona Department of Public Safety don't confirm exactly what happened regarding the helicopter crash in Flagstaff last night. No answers were provided during this morning's press conference, nor was any causal link mentioned between the engagement on the ground, and the helicopter crash. Since the crash itself was catastrophic, it will take some time for an investigation to determine if any small arms rounds struck the helicopter or not. It would not be the first time that hardened criminals, when backed into a corner, fired off a burst of small arms fire at a police helicopter, which resulted in catastrophe. Considering the detail of the suspect being located on rooftops during this engagement, this is the most likely theory at the moment. Otherwise, there is not much information in the public realm to state with confidence that this is exactly what happened. The ADS-B feed of the flight path does not provide much context, other than one detail which might be useful for investigators. As the aircraft arrived on scene, the pilot began a low-pass flyover of the target compound, directly over the residence that the shooting was reported at. After this low-pass over the target compound, the aircraft was observed climbing out to the north and west, before flying in an erratic manner. Locals reported hearing many gunshots and explosions in the general direction of this residence, shortly before the helicopter was observed crashing. Immediately before impact, the ADS-B feed for the aircraft abruptly halts, indicating that the aircraft at least partially broke apart before impacting the ground. From the time of the low-pass (where small arms fire may have damaged the aircraft), to the very last transponder ping, approximately 10 minutes had elapsed. This is enough time for a mayday call to be made over the radio, if the crew noticed that they might have taken effective ground fire. As such, the flight data recorder information for this period of time will be crucial for determining the cause of the crash. However, due to the strategic implication of an aircraft possibly being shot down by small arms fire, it would be prudent to consider this a possible SAFIRE (Surface-to-Air Fire) incident at the present time. Analyst: S2A1 Research: Disclaimer: No LLMs were used in the writing of this report. //END REPORT//

S2 Underground

11,259 views โ€ข 5 months ago