Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

𝐈𝐧𝐭𝐞𝐫𝐞𝐬𝐭𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐬𝐢𝐦𝐢𝐥𝐚𝐫𝐢𝐭𝐢𝐞𝐬 𝐛𝐞𝐭𝐰𝐞𝐞𝐧 𝐇𝐢𝐭𝐥𝐞𝐫 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐄𝐫𝐝𝐨𝐠𝐚𝐧; 1) Both had problematic childhoods. 2) Both came from poor families. 3) Both Jailed; 𝐇𝐢𝐭𝐥𝐞𝐫: 1923 𝐄𝐫𝐝𝐨𝐠𝐚𝐧: 1998 4) Elected; 𝐇𝐢𝐭𝐥𝐞𝐫: 1933 𝐄𝐫𝐝𝐨𝐠𝐚𝐧: 2014 5) Chosen man of the year by Time Magazine; 𝐇𝐢𝐭𝐥𝐞𝐫: 1938 𝐄𝐫𝐝𝐨𝐠𝐚𝐧: 2010 6) Both have similar propaganda strategies;...

EnesFreedom's profile picture

Enes Kanter FREEDOM

621,496 subscribers

44,714 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren •via X (Twitter)

Nachrichten & PolitikBildung
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

9 Kommentare

Profilbild von Matthew C
Matthew Cvor 2 Jahren

@TC_Disisleri @MFATurkiye @TRMissionUN_NY @TC_VasingtonBE @USEmbassyTurkey @TC_icisleri @tcsavunma @ikalin1 @rterdogan_ar @TBMMresmi Both hate Jews and both have terrible mustaches

Profilbild von Matheus W.
Matheus W.vor 2 Jahren

@TC_Disisleri @MFATurkiye @TRMissionUN_NY @TC_VasingtonBE @USEmbassyTurkey @TC_icisleri @tcsavunma @ikalin1 @rterdogan_ar @TBMMresmi Erdogan is a modern day Hitler! A terrorist dictator.

Profilbild von Monte 👨🏼🦈 PUMPINGSHARK
Monte 👨🏼🦈 PUMPINGSHARKvor 2 Jahren

@TC_Disisleri @MFATurkiye @TRMissionUN_NY @TC_VasingtonBE @USEmbassyTurkey @TC_icisleri @tcsavunma @ikalin1 @rterdogan_ar @TBMMresmi Except hitler tried to get rid of zionists & erdo is a zionist getting rid of Palestinians

Profilbild von Hasan
Hasanvor 2 Jahren

@TC_Disisleri @MFATurkiye @TRMissionUN_NY @TC_VasingtonBE @USEmbassyTurkey @TC_icisleri @tcsavunma @ikalin1 @rterdogan_ar @TBMMresmi Both of them are Cruels

Profilbild von Dr.Tayfun Şerbetçioğlu
Dr.Tayfun Şerbetçioğluvor 2 Jahren

@TC_Disisleri @MFATurkiye @TRMissionUN_NY @TC_VasingtonBE @USEmbassyTurkey @TC_icisleri @tcsavunma @ikalin1 @rterdogan_ar @TBMMresmi If Hitler knew President Erdoğan today, he would address him as 'My President'. I don't think there is any difference between them. But Erdoğan will go one day like Hitler. #Hitler #Erdoğan

Profilbild von Freedom Seekers
Freedom Seekersvor 2 Jahren

@TC_Disisleri @MFATurkiye @TRMissionUN_NY @TC_VasingtonBE @USEmbassyTurkey @TC_icisleri @tcsavunma @ikalin1 @rterdogan_ar @TBMMresmi

Profilbild von yerrr
yerrrvor 2 Jahren

@TC_Disisleri @MFATurkiye @TRMissionUN_NY @TC_VasingtonBE @USEmbassyTurkey @TC_icisleri @tcsavunma @ikalin1 @rterdogan_ar @TBMMresmi Get the fuck out of America you fucking sellout. Go back to turkey.

Profilbild von ꅏꍟꌩ ꓄ꃅꋪꍏꌗꀘꍏ ⚓
ꅏꍟꌩ ꓄ꃅꋪꍏꌗꀘꍏ ⚓vor 2 Jahren

@TC_Disisleri @MFATurkiye @TRMissionUN_NY @TC_VasingtonBE @USEmbassyTurkey @TC_icisleri @tcsavunma @ikalin1 @rterdogan_ar @TBMMresmi have some class, mate ... this playing on emotions over hitler is such an overplayed song and cliche ...

Profilbild von Tariq M.
Tariq M.vor 2 Jahren

@TC_Disisleri @MFATurkiye @TRMissionUN_NY @TC_VasingtonBE @USEmbassyTurkey @TC_icisleri @tcsavunma @ikalin1 @rterdogan_ar @TBMMresmi Who are you?

Ähnliche Videos

🔥🚨DEVELOPING EXCLUSIVE: Michael Jackson passed on June 25, 2009 Very shortly after Jackson’s death, on September 29, 2009 Rabbi Shmuley published The Michael Jackson Tapes, If you think the timing is suspect, you are not alone. In these tapes Shmuley revealed that Michael Jackson said Hitler was a ‘genius orator’ and that he collected Nazis memorabilia while designing his outfits based on Nazi uniforms. Prior to his death Michael Jackson believed ‘Jews were out to get him’ over his protest activism against Sony. Michael Jackson was one of the most slandered figures in media of all time. On November 24, 2005, was caught on tape making anti-Semitic remarks, calling Jews "leeches." In a series of audio tapes broadcasted Wednesday on ABC's "Good Morning America," Jackson is heard using anti-Semitic language in a voice message to his former adviser Dieter Wiesner. Michael Jackson’s career accelerated to new heights when he left Detroit’s Black conservative Motown Records and signed on with the Jewish mega-media conglomerate, CBS Records in 1975. CBS Records was later renamed Sony Music Entertainment in 1991, Rabbi Shmuley had a falling out with Michael Jackson prior to his death, even on March 26, 2019 Shmuley stated ‘I don’t believe these men are lying” when referring to the men that accused Jackson of sexual assault. John Branca, Michael's long time entertainment attorney who Michael allegedly fired after Michael supposedly ordered an internal investigation of his own inner circle became one of the co- executors of the estate along with music executive John Mclain. They both receive substantial fees for administering Michael's estate. But if Michael Jackson supposedly terminated John Branca how did he become co-executor of Michael's estate? Supposedly it was in Michael's will they he drew up a long time before that Branca and McClain were to be the co-executors of is estate in the event of his death. However, the Jackson family claimed that this particular will was a forgery. Nonetheless, in 3 short years the estate reported a $475 million profit which resulted in a huge financial windfall for both McClain and Branca. And what about Sony? Just 9 months after Michael's death Sony signed a deal with Michael Jackson's estate to sell Michael's back catalogue. In addition they were given access to a large vault of unreleased songs. On January 13, 2004, The LA Times listed both John Branca and Rabbi Shmuley as members of Michael Jackson ‘inner circle.’ Rabbi Shmuley deciding to keep secret tapes of Michael Jackson is fairly suspicious but what’s worse is that on March 7, 2023 Candace Owens accused Rabbi Shmuley of blackmailing her over her beliefs as well. Shmuley went on an extensive press run after after Jackson’s death. He shared a short clip of Jackson stating he could change Hitler but allows the media to misquote the transcript about Hitler, being a genius. As of today the audio of Jackson claiming his admiration for Hitler hasn’t been released to the public. The only proof we have is an alleged transcript in Shmuley’s book which means the media ran with a story that is most likely false and Shmuley threatened Candace Owens that he would slander her in front page news which means he has media connections. Here are clips I extracted from the private tapes. His comments about Hitler are also present here. I have also revived a lot of lost media.
4:36

🔥🚨DEVELOPING EXCLUSIVE: Michael Jackson passed on June 25, 2009 Very shortly after Jackson’s death, on September 29, 2009 Rabbi Shmuley published The Michael Jackson Tapes, If you think the timing is suspect, you are not alone. In these tapes Shmuley revealed that Michael Jackson said Hitler was a ‘genius orator’ and that he collected Nazis memorabilia while designing his outfits based on Nazi uniforms. Prior to his death Michael Jackson believed ‘Jews were out to get him’ over his protest activism against Sony. Michael Jackson was one of the most slandered figures in media of all time. On November 24, 2005, was caught on tape making anti-Semitic remarks, calling Jews "leeches." In a series of audio tapes broadcasted Wednesday on ABC's "Good Morning America," Jackson is heard using anti-Semitic language in a voice message to his former adviser Dieter Wiesner. Michael Jackson’s career accelerated to new heights when he left Detroit’s Black conservative Motown Records and signed on with the Jewish mega-media conglomerate, CBS Records in 1975. CBS Records was later renamed Sony Music Entertainment in 1991, Rabbi Shmuley had a falling out with Michael Jackson prior to his death, even on March 26, 2019 Shmuley stated ‘I don’t believe these men are lying” when referring to the men that accused Jackson of sexual assault. John Branca, Michael's long time entertainment attorney who Michael allegedly fired after Michael supposedly ordered an internal investigation of his own inner circle became one of the co- executors of the estate along with music executive John Mclain. They both receive substantial fees for administering Michael's estate. But if Michael Jackson supposedly terminated John Branca how did he become co-executor of Michael's estate? Supposedly it was in Michael's will they he drew up a long time before that Branca and McClain were to be the co-executors of is estate in the event of his death. However, the Jackson family claimed that this particular will was a forgery. Nonetheless, in 3 short years the estate reported a $475 million profit which resulted in a huge financial windfall for both McClain and Branca. And what about Sony? Just 9 months after Michael's death Sony signed a deal with Michael Jackson's estate to sell Michael's back catalogue. In addition they were given access to a large vault of unreleased songs. On January 13, 2004, The LA Times listed both John Branca and Rabbi Shmuley as members of Michael Jackson ‘inner circle.’ Rabbi Shmuley deciding to keep secret tapes of Michael Jackson is fairly suspicious but what’s worse is that on March 7, 2023 Candace Owens accused Rabbi Shmuley of blackmailing her over her beliefs as well. Shmuley went on an extensive press run after after Jackson’s death. He shared a short clip of Jackson stating he could change Hitler but allows the media to misquote the transcript about Hitler, being a genius. As of today the audio of Jackson claiming his admiration for Hitler hasn’t been released to the public. The only proof we have is an alleged transcript in Shmuley’s book which means the media ran with a story that is most likely false and Shmuley threatened Candace Owens that he would slander her in front page news which means he has media connections. Here are clips I extracted from the private tapes. His comments about Hitler are also present here. I have also revived a lot of lost media.

Dom Lucre | Breaker of Narratives

10,814,620 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

🚨 EXCLUSIVE: There's an old morality question, "If you could have, would you kill baby Hitler?" No one ever asks about adult Hitler, let alone in 1943. Tucker condemned attempts to KILL HITLER in the middle of WWII & the Holocaust — because it would be un-Christian. Again: Tucker said it would have been un-Christian to kill Hitler. In the midst of World War II & the Holocaust. Specifically, Tucker on Wednesday condemned Lutheran pastor Dietrich Bonhoeffer — for supposedly rejecting Christianity by participating in covert attempts to assassinate Hitler. Tucker held up Bonhoeffer as a cautionary tale of what people today could become if you "start calling people Nazis." This is the story of the man Tucker views as a cautionary tale: Bonhoeffer was deeply involved in the German Resistance before and during WW II. He was the first public critic of Hitler, giving a radio address warning about the emerging cult of the Führer on February 1, 1933, just two days after the Nazis took power. Bonhoeffer also helped found the Confessing Church — directly in response to the Nazi push to control and Aryanize the nation's Protestant churches. In 1941, he joined the Abwehr (German military intelligence), allowing him to avoid Wehrmacht (military) service. Crucially, Bonhoeffer used his Abwehr post as a cover for his role in multiple secret plots to overthrow or assassinate Hitler. Through his official cover, Bonhoeffer was able to travel internationally and act as a courier between the Resistance and foreign contacts, such as the ecumenical movement in Switzerland and Sweden. Bonhoeffer also was involved in Operation 7, the effort launched by his brother-in-law Hans von Dohnanyi to smuggle seven Jews and their family members to safety in Switzerland. On April 5, 1943, Bonhoeffer was arrested by the Gestapo on charges related to Operation 7 — which was deemed to be both treason and an undermining of the war effort, since military intelligence resources were used to save Jews. At the time of his arrest, the Nazis did not know about the assassination plots, let alone Bonhoeffer's role in them. After Hitler survived the infamous Operation Valkyrie "briefcase bomb" plot on July 20, 1944 (the subject of the Tom Cruise movie), the Gestapo soon learned of Bonhoeffer’s deep involvement in Abwehr efforts to topple the Nazi regime. On April 8, 1945, an SS "drumhead court" completed a show trial by sentencing Bonhoeffer to death. The next day, on April 9, 1945 — just weeks before the European front of the war ended — Bonhoeffer was hanged at the Flossenbürg concentration camp, alongside several "co-conspirators." Despite Tucker's insinuation that Bonhoeffer had turned away from Christianity, his faith actually strengthened leading up to his execution. Notes found after the war show that Bonhoeffer prayed daily, wrote meditations on Psalms, and had theological discussions — even with guards. Bonhoeffer gave sermons, some of which he prepared in solitary confinement, and he held clandestine worship services for his fellow prisoners. His SS interrogators, in fact, complained that he was “too religious.” Found in Gestapo notes were these two quotes: “Bonhoeffer persists in religious delusion.” “He speaks of Christ as if Christ were alive.” Bonhoeffer’s burning, intense faith never dwindled, as further evidenced by his final recorded words: “This is the end—for me, the beginning of life.” --- With the benefit of context regarding Bonhoeffer, here is the full text of what Tucker said: "Because once you start calling people Nazis, we really have no choice but to start shooting them... to be Dietrich Bonhoeffer, to reach the end of reason, or even Christianity. Bonhoeffer decided that Christianity's not even, he was a Lutheran pastor, Christianity's not enough, we have to kill the guy [Hitler]. I'm not judging Bonhoeffer, who was a great man in some ways. But that's inevitable once we decide that some people are Nazis."
0:25

🚨 EXCLUSIVE: There's an old morality question, "If you could have, would you kill baby Hitler?" No one ever asks about adult Hitler, let alone in 1943. Tucker condemned attempts to KILL HITLER in the middle of WWII & the Holocaust — because it would be un-Christian. Again: Tucker said it would have been un-Christian to kill Hitler. In the midst of World War II & the Holocaust. Specifically, Tucker on Wednesday condemned Lutheran pastor Dietrich Bonhoeffer — for supposedly rejecting Christianity by participating in covert attempts to assassinate Hitler. Tucker held up Bonhoeffer as a cautionary tale of what people today could become if you "start calling people Nazis." This is the story of the man Tucker views as a cautionary tale: Bonhoeffer was deeply involved in the German Resistance before and during WW II. He was the first public critic of Hitler, giving a radio address warning about the emerging cult of the Führer on February 1, 1933, just two days after the Nazis took power. Bonhoeffer also helped found the Confessing Church — directly in response to the Nazi push to control and Aryanize the nation's Protestant churches. In 1941, he joined the Abwehr (German military intelligence), allowing him to avoid Wehrmacht (military) service. Crucially, Bonhoeffer used his Abwehr post as a cover for his role in multiple secret plots to overthrow or assassinate Hitler. Through his official cover, Bonhoeffer was able to travel internationally and act as a courier between the Resistance and foreign contacts, such as the ecumenical movement in Switzerland and Sweden. Bonhoeffer also was involved in Operation 7, the effort launched by his brother-in-law Hans von Dohnanyi to smuggle seven Jews and their family members to safety in Switzerland. On April 5, 1943, Bonhoeffer was arrested by the Gestapo on charges related to Operation 7 — which was deemed to be both treason and an undermining of the war effort, since military intelligence resources were used to save Jews. At the time of his arrest, the Nazis did not know about the assassination plots, let alone Bonhoeffer's role in them. After Hitler survived the infamous Operation Valkyrie "briefcase bomb" plot on July 20, 1944 (the subject of the Tom Cruise movie), the Gestapo soon learned of Bonhoeffer’s deep involvement in Abwehr efforts to topple the Nazi regime. On April 8, 1945, an SS "drumhead court" completed a show trial by sentencing Bonhoeffer to death. The next day, on April 9, 1945 — just weeks before the European front of the war ended — Bonhoeffer was hanged at the Flossenbürg concentration camp, alongside several "co-conspirators." Despite Tucker's insinuation that Bonhoeffer had turned away from Christianity, his faith actually strengthened leading up to his execution. Notes found after the war show that Bonhoeffer prayed daily, wrote meditations on Psalms, and had theological discussions — even with guards. Bonhoeffer gave sermons, some of which he prepared in solitary confinement, and he held clandestine worship services for his fellow prisoners. His SS interrogators, in fact, complained that he was “too religious.” Found in Gestapo notes were these two quotes: “Bonhoeffer persists in religious delusion.” “He speaks of Christ as if Christ were alive.” Bonhoeffer’s burning, intense faith never dwindled, as further evidenced by his final recorded words: “This is the end—for me, the beginning of life.” --- With the benefit of context regarding Bonhoeffer, here is the full text of what Tucker said: "Because once you start calling people Nazis, we really have no choice but to start shooting them... to be Dietrich Bonhoeffer, to reach the end of reason, or even Christianity. Bonhoeffer decided that Christianity's not even, he was a Lutheran pastor, Christianity's not enough, we have to kill the guy [Hitler]. I'm not judging Bonhoeffer, who was a great man in some ways. But that's inevitable once we decide that some people are Nazis."

Joel Mowbray

1,807,917 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

Scientists Social media hacks/politicians, and others seeking notoriety continue to say the people below who are missing/deceased have some sort of nexus. They even say the U.S. Government could be behind it. I am serious! That's what some say. It's just not true. Breaking down the cases 1 by 1 over the 3 to 4 year time frame alleged: Maiwald- 61 and Hicks- 59 both died of Natural causes per ME/Information from Obituaries 2 down Leureiro and Grillmar- They were murdered. Leureiro by the crazed Brown shooter who admitted to the murder later confirmed by LE. He didn't even have a clearance. He instructed about plasma for MIT for heaven's sake. Grillmair was 67. He didn't have clearance either. He taught about water vapor and infared processing. He was killed by a career criminal on a crime spree. 4 Down Jason Thomas, 46 No clearance. He was in the Bio-Med field. Likely killed himself, tragically, distraught over recent deaths in his family, according to loved ones. He was found in a lake. 5 Down Charles Eskridge died of suicide - Confirmed. No Clearance. He was a DNA analyst. 6 Down Melissa Casias was an Admin Assistant. No Clearance. Worked at Los Alamos that employs 18,000 people. She left everything behind and even reset her phone before she left. Suicide is suspected. 7 Down Anthony Chavez- 78. Suspected suicide. He left on foot leaving his personal effects behind and was an avid hiker. 78 is a high suicide catagory for males. He developed tools for planet exploration. He retired clear back in 2017, his clearance long expired. 8 Down Steve Garcia, 35. He handled procurement for the National Nuclear Security Administration. He had a clearance. He is believed to have killed himself. He left alone and with his effects with a gun. LE says he was a danger to himself per their investigation. Suspected suicide. Still missing. 9 Down Monica Reza-Jet Propulsion Laboratory. She had a clearance. She developed a special metal back in 1999/2000 time frame. She went hiking in a group. The last hiker to see her has been questioned. This is a probable hiking accident. She didn't mess with aliens. JPL employs 4,500 and NASA employs about 14,000. Again she was hiking with a group. 10 Down Finally, the man who ignited the unbelievable narrative from SM people trying to make some sort of name for themselves that there is some conspiracy to take down US scientists (most of the people in question aren't even scientists): Retired Maj. General William McCasland had health issues that he told his wife he wasn't sure if he wanted to live with. He left his home in the morning with nothing but his ID, and revolver, amd hiking boots. He wore prescription glasses and need them to see. He didn't take them or his phone or anything else. He worked at the highest levels at JLP 13 years ago. He and Reza both worked for JLP at one time decades ago, but he was levels above her. There is no conspiracy to knock of these folks. There is no connectivity, few even had a clearance, and the deaths and disappearances of most of these folks are logically explained. Occam's Razor P.S. If you want to follow a much more statistically interesting set of deaths and missing, look into Long Haul Drivers. I know, not sexy enough. P.S. Glad the government will look into this to put this to rest. #scientists #Conspiracytheorists P.S. Please don't reelect a guy who does 0 research before opening his mouth.
0:48

Scientists Social media hacks/politicians, and others seeking notoriety continue to say the people below who are missing/deceased have some sort of nexus. They even say the U.S. Government could be behind it. I am serious! That's what some say. It's just not true. Breaking down the cases 1 by 1 over the 3 to 4 year time frame alleged: Maiwald- 61 and Hicks- 59 both died of Natural causes per ME/Information from Obituaries 2 down Leureiro and Grillmar- They were murdered. Leureiro by the crazed Brown shooter who admitted to the murder later confirmed by LE. He didn't even have a clearance. He instructed about plasma for MIT for heaven's sake. Grillmair was 67. He didn't have clearance either. He taught about water vapor and infared processing. He was killed by a career criminal on a crime spree. 4 Down Jason Thomas, 46 No clearance. He was in the Bio-Med field. Likely killed himself, tragically, distraught over recent deaths in his family, according to loved ones. He was found in a lake. 5 Down Charles Eskridge died of suicide - Confirmed. No Clearance. He was a DNA analyst. 6 Down Melissa Casias was an Admin Assistant. No Clearance. Worked at Los Alamos that employs 18,000 people. She left everything behind and even reset her phone before she left. Suicide is suspected. 7 Down Anthony Chavez- 78. Suspected suicide. He left on foot leaving his personal effects behind and was an avid hiker. 78 is a high suicide catagory for males. He developed tools for planet exploration. He retired clear back in 2017, his clearance long expired. 8 Down Steve Garcia, 35. He handled procurement for the National Nuclear Security Administration. He had a clearance. He is believed to have killed himself. He left alone and with his effects with a gun. LE says he was a danger to himself per their investigation. Suspected suicide. Still missing. 9 Down Monica Reza-Jet Propulsion Laboratory. She had a clearance. She developed a special metal back in 1999/2000 time frame. She went hiking in a group. The last hiker to see her has been questioned. This is a probable hiking accident. She didn't mess with aliens. JPL employs 4,500 and NASA employs about 14,000. Again she was hiking with a group. 10 Down Finally, the man who ignited the unbelievable narrative from SM people trying to make some sort of name for themselves that there is some conspiracy to take down US scientists (most of the people in question aren't even scientists): Retired Maj. General William McCasland had health issues that he told his wife he wasn't sure if he wanted to live with. He left his home in the morning with nothing but his ID, and revolver, amd hiking boots. He wore prescription glasses and need them to see. He didn't take them or his phone or anything else. He worked at the highest levels at JLP 13 years ago. He and Reza both worked for JLP at one time decades ago, but he was levels above her. There is no conspiracy to knock of these folks. There is no connectivity, few even had a clearance, and the deaths and disappearances of most of these folks are logically explained. Occam's Razor P.S. If you want to follow a much more statistically interesting set of deaths and missing, look into Long Haul Drivers. I know, not sexy enough. P.S. Glad the government will look into this to put this to rest. #scientists #Conspiracytheorists P.S. Please don't reelect a guy who does 0 research before opening his mouth.

Jennifer Coffindaffer

29,466 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

I WILL NOW RELEASE AND CONFIRM THE ONE TRUE ACCOUNT OF ADOLF HITLER: You first need to know that Hitler was selected purposely. I will release to you exactly who recruited and groomed Hitler for his position, why that was done, and at the order of what secret organization that still exists to this day. Here goes: His name was Karl Haushofer.. As part of the Imperial German army, he was then appointed to teach at the war academy in 1903. Making a name for himself as very well versed in military operations and precision, modeled after the Persian military design, this Garnered the attention of the Japanese Empire. In 1908 after spending 5 years at the war academy he was sent to Tokyo Japan where he was to study Japanese military operations and be the acting artillery instructor for the Japanese Army starting in 1909. He was greeted by the Emperor himself, Kokuryu-Kai. This man was the leader of the Black Dragon Society. The Black Dragon Society were the controlling underground Network of powerful men that controlled all of Japan and had infiltrated powerful circles all through Eastern Asia and even into the United States. Within the Black Dragon Society was the Green Dragon society which was more exclusive. And within the Green Dragon Society was the most exclusive Society known as the Society of Green Men.. The Society of Green Men answer directly to the Alpha Draconian Reptilians. (Type A that I released last year) They had a plan to unite Japan and Germany to implement a One World Empire. They were confident that they could conquer Russia by attacking them on two fronts with Germany and Japan surrounding them. Their vision for Germany's new path forward involved finding the right figurehead who was both charismatic and intelligent but willing to implement such cold-hearted fascism. Haushofer then founded the Thule Society in Munich in 1918, which secretly took their orders directly from the Society of Green Men, one year before becoming an associate professor of geopolitics at Munich University. (He also was the one who founded the Vril Society) At the behest of Rudolf Hess, he attended Adolf Hitler's trial for treason in Munich in 1923. This is where he made his decision that Hitler was the chosen one for this plan and immediately got the approval. With the assistance of Hess who was in Hitler's inner circle, he began to indoctrinate Hitler inside his prison cell at Landsberg Prison I'm getting ready for me in 1923 and all through 1924. Then using his Thule connections, he was able to fund the rise to power after the release of Hitler and formed the Nazi party out of the existing Thule Society. Hitler then came to power in 1933. But after the fake suicide following his defeat in World War II this is what happened: He had relocated with all surviving and so-called missing SS commanders and members, but not before kidnapping and transporting tens of thousands of blonde hair blue-eyed women out of Germany to Southern Argentina. the reason why Southern Argentina was selected is because it was the closest point to Antarctica, where at that time it was decided that the Nazis would be relocated to The reptilian Base that borders the sub-ice city of Atlantis, catty corner from the Pleiadian base, the Nazis first encountered on their first trip to Antarctica which became violent. However due to his defeat, Hitler was not permitted to join them and was forced to live out the rest of his days lakeside in isolation until he died in the 1980s. THAT my friends is EXACTLY what happened and is straight from the Classified files. Hitler did NOT die at the end of World War 2, and he was selected and groomed by an individual that was selected & groomed by a secret society, within a secret society that answer to an Extra-Terrestrial species. Believe it or not? This is #facts & the United States Government KNOWS it. #hitler #jailstool
0:41

I WILL NOW RELEASE AND CONFIRM THE ONE TRUE ACCOUNT OF ADOLF HITLER: You first need to know that Hitler was selected purposely. I will release to you exactly who recruited and groomed Hitler for his position, why that was done, and at the order of what secret organization that still exists to this day. Here goes: His name was Karl Haushofer.. As part of the Imperial German army, he was then appointed to teach at the war academy in 1903. Making a name for himself as very well versed in military operations and precision, modeled after the Persian military design, this Garnered the attention of the Japanese Empire. In 1908 after spending 5 years at the war academy he was sent to Tokyo Japan where he was to study Japanese military operations and be the acting artillery instructor for the Japanese Army starting in 1909. He was greeted by the Emperor himself, Kokuryu-Kai. This man was the leader of the Black Dragon Society. The Black Dragon Society were the controlling underground Network of powerful men that controlled all of Japan and had infiltrated powerful circles all through Eastern Asia and even into the United States. Within the Black Dragon Society was the Green Dragon society which was more exclusive. And within the Green Dragon Society was the most exclusive Society known as the Society of Green Men.. The Society of Green Men answer directly to the Alpha Draconian Reptilians. (Type A that I released last year) They had a plan to unite Japan and Germany to implement a One World Empire. They were confident that they could conquer Russia by attacking them on two fronts with Germany and Japan surrounding them. Their vision for Germany's new path forward involved finding the right figurehead who was both charismatic and intelligent but willing to implement such cold-hearted fascism. Haushofer then founded the Thule Society in Munich in 1918, which secretly took their orders directly from the Society of Green Men, one year before becoming an associate professor of geopolitics at Munich University. (He also was the one who founded the Vril Society) At the behest of Rudolf Hess, he attended Adolf Hitler's trial for treason in Munich in 1923. This is where he made his decision that Hitler was the chosen one for this plan and immediately got the approval. With the assistance of Hess who was in Hitler's inner circle, he began to indoctrinate Hitler inside his prison cell at Landsberg Prison I'm getting ready for me in 1923 and all through 1924. Then using his Thule connections, he was able to fund the rise to power after the release of Hitler and formed the Nazi party out of the existing Thule Society. Hitler then came to power in 1933. But after the fake suicide following his defeat in World War II this is what happened: He had relocated with all surviving and so-called missing SS commanders and members, but not before kidnapping and transporting tens of thousands of blonde hair blue-eyed women out of Germany to Southern Argentina. the reason why Southern Argentina was selected is because it was the closest point to Antarctica, where at that time it was decided that the Nazis would be relocated to The reptilian Base that borders the sub-ice city of Atlantis, catty corner from the Pleiadian base, the Nazis first encountered on their first trip to Antarctica which became violent. However due to his defeat, Hitler was not permitted to join them and was forced to live out the rest of his days lakeside in isolation until he died in the 1980s. THAT my friends is EXACTLY what happened and is straight from the Classified files. Hitler did NOT die at the end of World War 2, and he was selected and groomed by an individual that was selected & groomed by a secret society, within a secret society that answer to an Extra-Terrestrial species. Believe it or not? This is #facts & the United States Government KNOWS it. #hitler #jailstool

WHISTLEBLOWER

117,640 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

#Bangladesh #AwamiLeague is not a banned organization. It is the oldest and largest political party in the country. This party led the nation to independence. It has the right to hold peaceful political programmes not only under the #constitution but also under int'l #humanrights laws, including the #UDHR and the #ICCPR. Additionally, no “state of emergency” currently prevails in Bangladesh. Therefore, activists of the party were fully within their constitutional, democratic, and legal rights to organize a peaceful procession to commemorate “Martyr #NurHossain Day”. The unelected interim regime led by Dr. #Yunus is happy to allow all other parties and orgs to hold political programmes almost on a daily basis, incl. #BNP, #Jamaat, and the SAD Movement. It is also providing full assistance to #Islamist orgs like #HefazateIslam and Islami Andolon in organizing programmes. Their issue only seems to be with the Awami League and its allies. The very definition of #discrimination. Pursuant to that policy, the Yunus regime publicly announced their intention to obstruct the AL from exercising its right to organise a peaceful procession on Nov 10. The unequivocal intentions were expressed by the so-called Chief Adviser of the Government of Bangladesh’s Press Secretary Shafiqul Alam (1) and Adviser Asif Mahmud (2). Both warned of strict action of law enforcement agencies against AL. (1) (2) To obstruct a legitimate and peaceful political programme by a legitimate political party, the regime deployed the police, the army and an unprecedented 191 platoons of border guards (3). The street-enforcers of Yunus’ regime, the SAD, also announced a counter political programme at the same venue just hours before where AL activists were supposed to congregate for the procession, with a clear intent to provoke a confrontation (4). The fact that the SAD Movement had violent intentions is clear from social media posts of people associated with the platform (5). (3) (4) (5) Screenshots & Video clip From the morning of Nov 10, SAD-backed thugs, with full support from BNP and Jamaat armed cadres, took positions in various key points of #Dhaka to violently obstruct AL activists and supporters from reaching the venue. They beat up around 10 people in, or around, the Gulistan area in Dhaka, including two #women. At least 43 activists and supporters of the party were arrested from Motijheel, Dilkusha, and Paltan areas (6). People were beaten up, including senior citizens and women, and handed over to the police simply for chanting the slogan “#JoyBangla”, or even on mere suspicions of being an AL supporter (7). SAD-linked students, BNP-Jamaat cadres, and the police even checked people’s mobile phones on Nov 10 (8) and the night before (9) to “identify” AL supporters and activists. (6) (7) (8) (9) AL activists celebrating the re-election of Donald J. Trump and planning to join the procession with placards and posters were also targeted specifically. The night before Nov 10, joint forces conducted raids in various areas of #Dhaka and arrested at least 10 supporters with Trump placards and U.S. flags (10). There is nothing in the law of Bangladesh which bars celebrating the election win of another country’s leader. In fact, the Yunus regime was happy to allow campaign rallies in support of Kamala Harris just a few days back (11). (10) (11) By acting as they did, the Yunus regime committed multiple violations of the constitutional and human rights of AL activists and supporters, namely, their rights to freedom of movement, expression, association, and privacy. The unelected and unconstitutional #Yunus regime has miserably failed in its test of respecting democratic values too.
1:08

#Bangladesh #AwamiLeague is not a banned organization. It is the oldest and largest political party in the country. This party led the nation to independence. It has the right to hold peaceful political programmes not only under the #constitution but also under int'l #humanrights laws, including the #UDHR and the #ICCPR. Additionally, no “state of emergency” currently prevails in Bangladesh. Therefore, activists of the party were fully within their constitutional, democratic, and legal rights to organize a peaceful procession to commemorate “Martyr #NurHossain Day”. The unelected interim regime led by Dr. #Yunus is happy to allow all other parties and orgs to hold political programmes almost on a daily basis, incl. #BNP, #Jamaat, and the SAD Movement. It is also providing full assistance to #Islamist orgs like #HefazateIslam and Islami Andolon in organizing programmes. Their issue only seems to be with the Awami League and its allies. The very definition of #discrimination. Pursuant to that policy, the Yunus regime publicly announced their intention to obstruct the AL from exercising its right to organise a peaceful procession on Nov 10. The unequivocal intentions were expressed by the so-called Chief Adviser of the Government of Bangladesh’s Press Secretary Shafiqul Alam (1) and Adviser Asif Mahmud (2). Both warned of strict action of law enforcement agencies against AL. (1) (2) To obstruct a legitimate and peaceful political programme by a legitimate political party, the regime deployed the police, the army and an unprecedented 191 platoons of border guards (3). The street-enforcers of Yunus’ regime, the SAD, also announced a counter political programme at the same venue just hours before where AL activists were supposed to congregate for the procession, with a clear intent to provoke a confrontation (4). The fact that the SAD Movement had violent intentions is clear from social media posts of people associated with the platform (5). (3) (4) (5) Screenshots & Video clip From the morning of Nov 10, SAD-backed thugs, with full support from BNP and Jamaat armed cadres, took positions in various key points of #Dhaka to violently obstruct AL activists and supporters from reaching the venue. They beat up around 10 people in, or around, the Gulistan area in Dhaka, including two #women. At least 43 activists and supporters of the party were arrested from Motijheel, Dilkusha, and Paltan areas (6). People were beaten up, including senior citizens and women, and handed over to the police simply for chanting the slogan “#JoyBangla”, or even on mere suspicions of being an AL supporter (7). SAD-linked students, BNP-Jamaat cadres, and the police even checked people’s mobile phones on Nov 10 (8) and the night before (9) to “identify” AL supporters and activists. (6) (7) (8) (9) AL activists celebrating the re-election of Donald J. Trump and planning to join the procession with placards and posters were also targeted specifically. The night before Nov 10, joint forces conducted raids in various areas of #Dhaka and arrested at least 10 supporters with Trump placards and U.S. flags (10). There is nothing in the law of Bangladesh which bars celebrating the election win of another country’s leader. In fact, the Yunus regime was happy to allow campaign rallies in support of Kamala Harris just a few days back (11). (10) (11) By acting as they did, the Yunus regime committed multiple violations of the constitutional and human rights of AL activists and supporters, namely, their rights to freedom of movement, expression, association, and privacy. The unelected and unconstitutional #Yunus regime has miserably failed in its test of respecting democratic values too.

Mohammad Ali Arafat

42,200 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

I have seen some desperate NPP propagandists share a video of the Upper West Regional Hospital, with the claim that it was started by Former President Kufour and completed by President Akufo-Addo. Although the history of the Upper West Regional Hospital is well-known and a matter of public record, it is important to set the records straight so that unsuspecting Ghanaians are not hoodwinked by this dubious propaganda. 1. The 160-bed Upper West Regional Hospital project was one of the nine (9) hospitals which were awarded to Euroget De Invest in the year 2010 by the Government of Ghana. 2. The project was conceptualized and initiated by the Kufour government as part of what is called “The Hospitals Project”. Euroget De Invest was engaged by the Government of Ghana to design and build 8 hospitals for the Ministry of Health and 1 hospital for the Ministry of Defense. 3. A Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) was signed by the Government of Ghana and Euroget De Invest for the nine (9) hospital projects in April 2008. 4. Cabinet gave approval for the Euroget hospital projects on 29th October 2008. 5. On 12th November, 2008, the Parliament of Ghana approved the loan for the Euroget hospital projects, an amount of $339 million dollars which was to be sourced from Egypt. The Kufour government was then voted out of office. See 6. The contracts for the projects were signed between the Mills government and Euroget in 2010. 7. On 31st July, 2010, then Vice President of the Republic of Ghana, H.E John Dramani Mahama cut the sod for the Upper West Regional Hospital. 8. However, construction of the project could not commence due to the inability of the company, Euroget De Invest to secure funding from Egypt. This undue delay was mainly occasioned by the Arab spring upheaval in Egypt. Thus, the Upper West regional hospital could not start on schedule due to lack of funds. See 9. Through the hard work of the Mills/Mahama government, approval was given to Euroget De Invest and funding was secured from a Barclays PLC- ABSA SA consortium to finance the project in August 2012. See 10. In November 2012, just before the elections, then running mate to Akufo-Addo, Alhaji Bawumia visited the project site with the media and mocked John Mahama and the NDC for deceiving the people of Upper West region. See 11. Actual construction began in 2014 under the Mahama/NDC government with funding from the Barclays-ABSA bank consortium. By the time John Mahama was leaving office, the project was about 95%. These facts are verifiable and indisputable. 13. It is true that the project has its roots in the Kufour government. It was in 2008, that the MoU and original loan agreement was signed and approved. However, the funding arrangement envisaged under the Kufour government didn’t materialize. The contracts were signed and the sod cut for the project by the Mills/Mahama government. More importantly, Funding was secured in August 2012 under the Mills/Mahama government. Construction began in 2014 under the Mahama government and was over 95% complete in 2016 before John Mahama left office. 14. The Upper West Regional hospital project should have been fully completed and commissioned latest by 2017 but was unduly delayed by President Akufo-Addo and commissioned in 2019. 15. While it is fair to give President Kuffuor the credit for conceptualizing and initiating the project, the chunk of the credit must go to the Mills/Mahama governments which worked with Euroget to secure funding for the project and supervised the construction of the project from ground zero to about 95% completion stage. 16. Akufo-Addo and Bawumia knows next to nothing about this project and contributed very little to its completion. SAMMY GYAMFI ESQ.
1:06

I have seen some desperate NPP propagandists share a video of the Upper West Regional Hospital, with the claim that it was started by Former President Kufour and completed by President Akufo-Addo. Although the history of the Upper West Regional Hospital is well-known and a matter of public record, it is important to set the records straight so that unsuspecting Ghanaians are not hoodwinked by this dubious propaganda. 1. The 160-bed Upper West Regional Hospital project was one of the nine (9) hospitals which were awarded to Euroget De Invest in the year 2010 by the Government of Ghana. 2. The project was conceptualized and initiated by the Kufour government as part of what is called “The Hospitals Project”. Euroget De Invest was engaged by the Government of Ghana to design and build 8 hospitals for the Ministry of Health and 1 hospital for the Ministry of Defense. 3. A Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) was signed by the Government of Ghana and Euroget De Invest for the nine (9) hospital projects in April 2008. 4. Cabinet gave approval for the Euroget hospital projects on 29th October 2008. 5. On 12th November, 2008, the Parliament of Ghana approved the loan for the Euroget hospital projects, an amount of $339 million dollars which was to be sourced from Egypt. The Kufour government was then voted out of office. See 6. The contracts for the projects were signed between the Mills government and Euroget in 2010. 7. On 31st July, 2010, then Vice President of the Republic of Ghana, H.E John Dramani Mahama cut the sod for the Upper West Regional Hospital. 8. However, construction of the project could not commence due to the inability of the company, Euroget De Invest to secure funding from Egypt. This undue delay was mainly occasioned by the Arab spring upheaval in Egypt. Thus, the Upper West regional hospital could not start on schedule due to lack of funds. See 9. Through the hard work of the Mills/Mahama government, approval was given to Euroget De Invest and funding was secured from a Barclays PLC- ABSA SA consortium to finance the project in August 2012. See 10. In November 2012, just before the elections, then running mate to Akufo-Addo, Alhaji Bawumia visited the project site with the media and mocked John Mahama and the NDC for deceiving the people of Upper West region. See 11. Actual construction began in 2014 under the Mahama/NDC government with funding from the Barclays-ABSA bank consortium. By the time John Mahama was leaving office, the project was about 95%. These facts are verifiable and indisputable. 13. It is true that the project has its roots in the Kufour government. It was in 2008, that the MoU and original loan agreement was signed and approved. However, the funding arrangement envisaged under the Kufour government didn’t materialize. The contracts were signed and the sod cut for the project by the Mills/Mahama government. More importantly, Funding was secured in August 2012 under the Mills/Mahama government. Construction began in 2014 under the Mahama government and was over 95% complete in 2016 before John Mahama left office. 14. The Upper West Regional hospital project should have been fully completed and commissioned latest by 2017 but was unduly delayed by President Akufo-Addo and commissioned in 2019. 15. While it is fair to give President Kuffuor the credit for conceptualizing and initiating the project, the chunk of the credit must go to the Mills/Mahama governments which worked with Euroget to secure funding for the project and supervised the construction of the project from ground zero to about 95% completion stage. 16. Akufo-Addo and Bawumia knows next to nothing about this project and contributed very little to its completion. SAMMY GYAMFI ESQ.

Sammy Gyamfi

147,262 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

BREAKING🚨 A shell non-profit operated by Jeffrey Epstein sold stocks after he was jailed in 2019, and moved $31,518,409 of stock in stock in 2018 without reporting any of the required transactions on the firm's federal 990 tax form that year (despite doing so every other year). Source document confirming Epstein's ownership of the non-profit (page 5 of 8) - The required tax documents as to capital gains and losses were included for every year except for the 2018 year, during which $31,518,409 in stock moved through the non-profit across three transactions without any documentation whatsoever other than a listing of three dollar amounts within section 4 of that year's 990. Source document (page 3) - The firm, called Gratitude America, still has $8.175 million worth of assets (that originally belong to Leon Black) and is operated by Richard Kahn, Darren K. Indyke and Erika A. Kellerhals (interestingly, Epstein was not listed on the firm's tax documents until 2019, at which point he was listed as "deceased"). It is unclear if these assets can be clawed back for survivors of victimization under Epstein's regime. The unaccounted for stock transactions in 2018 transactions are as follows; Bought; $9,651,059 $1,730,674 $20,136,676 Sold; $9,741,132 $1,604,011 $20,103,887 Total stock moved through Epstein's non-profit in 2018 without any supporting documentation = $31,518,409 2018 tax return source (page 3 of 22, but no indexed stock transactions as required at the end of the form) - 2017 tax return (which includes $899,417 in capital gains on page 3 of 17 --that may be insider trading-- and also includes enumerated stock trades on page 17 of 17) - 2019 tax return (which denotes $154,782 in capital gains, including 12 stocks sold after Epstein was jailed on July 6th of 2019, enumerated by sale date, purchase date and and company below or, see pages 3 and 14-15 of the source document) - Stok transactions after Epstein was jailed on July 6th, 2019: 7/10/2019 (3 sales of stock) -Cardlytics, Inc (2 sales of stock, both originally purchased 7/2/2019) - Microsoft Corp. (1 sale of stock, originally purchased 9/4/2018) - this single trade netted someone $258,911 (just in gains on the stock) after Epstein was jailed. 7/11/2019 (4 sales of stock) - Cardlytics, Inc (1 purchased 6/10/2019, 3 purchased 07/02/2019) 7/12/2019 (4 sales of stock) - Cardlytics, Inc (1 purchased 6/23/2019, 1 purchased 7/2/2019) 7/22/2019 (2 sales of stock) - Bank Of America Corp 5.475% S-KK (1 sale of stock, originally purchased 9/28/2019) - Duke Energy Corp 6.75% - A (1 sale of stock, originally purchased 3/25/2019) Further, it seems Epstein may have been involved with insider trading, in 2017, related to the Chinese commie-affiliated firm TenCent (although that was only $1,000,000 and Epstein hid his move about as well as a first year CPA figuring out they can use prediction markets to pump and dump as long as they submit a few fake cover trades before doing so). Source (page 3 and also 17) -
16:57

BREAKING🚨 A shell non-profit operated by Jeffrey Epstein sold stocks after he was jailed in 2019, and moved $31,518,409 of stock in stock in 2018 without reporting any of the required transactions on the firm's federal 990 tax form that year (despite doing so every other year). Source document confirming Epstein's ownership of the non-profit (page 5 of 8) - The required tax documents as to capital gains and losses were included for every year except for the 2018 year, during which $31,518,409 in stock moved through the non-profit across three transactions without any documentation whatsoever other than a listing of three dollar amounts within section 4 of that year's 990. Source document (page 3) - The firm, called Gratitude America, still has $8.175 million worth of assets (that originally belong to Leon Black) and is operated by Richard Kahn, Darren K. Indyke and Erika A. Kellerhals (interestingly, Epstein was not listed on the firm's tax documents until 2019, at which point he was listed as "deceased"). It is unclear if these assets can be clawed back for survivors of victimization under Epstein's regime. The unaccounted for stock transactions in 2018 transactions are as follows; Bought; $9,651,059 $1,730,674 $20,136,676 Sold; $9,741,132 $1,604,011 $20,103,887 Total stock moved through Epstein's non-profit in 2018 without any supporting documentation = $31,518,409 2018 tax return source (page 3 of 22, but no indexed stock transactions as required at the end of the form) - 2017 tax return (which includes $899,417 in capital gains on page 3 of 17 --that may be insider trading-- and also includes enumerated stock trades on page 17 of 17) - 2019 tax return (which denotes $154,782 in capital gains, including 12 stocks sold after Epstein was jailed on July 6th of 2019, enumerated by sale date, purchase date and and company below or, see pages 3 and 14-15 of the source document) - Stok transactions after Epstein was jailed on July 6th, 2019: 7/10/2019 (3 sales of stock) -Cardlytics, Inc (2 sales of stock, both originally purchased 7/2/2019) - Microsoft Corp. (1 sale of stock, originally purchased 9/4/2018) - this single trade netted someone $258,911 (just in gains on the stock) after Epstein was jailed. 7/11/2019 (4 sales of stock) - Cardlytics, Inc (1 purchased 6/10/2019, 3 purchased 07/02/2019) 7/12/2019 (4 sales of stock) - Cardlytics, Inc (1 purchased 6/23/2019, 1 purchased 7/2/2019) 7/22/2019 (2 sales of stock) - Bank Of America Corp 5.475% S-KK (1 sale of stock, originally purchased 9/28/2019) - Duke Energy Corp 6.75% - A (1 sale of stock, originally purchased 3/25/2019) Further, it seems Epstein may have been involved with insider trading, in 2017, related to the Chinese commie-affiliated firm TenCent (although that was only $1,000,000 and Epstein hid his move about as well as a first year CPA figuring out they can use prediction markets to pump and dump as long as they submit a few fake cover trades before doing so). Source (page 3 and also 17) -

Grant Smith Ellis

191,806 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

The Cover Up: It is a fact that the 9/11 Commission engaged in a cover-up, and several of its members have said so on the record for more than a decade. But what exactly is being covered up? WTC Building 7: A 47-story building collapsing onto itself because of residual fires and structural damage might seem implausible at first glance, but if the building had been rigged with explosives then why were there no signature outward explosions like you would see in other controlled demolitions and why did the collapse look different from other examples? Also, if the building had been detonated, it would have been the largest and tallest building ever brought down by explosives (even today), and it would have had to be rigged over weeks if not months in absolute secrecy. Insider Trading: Just as with the collapse of WTC 7, the options trading activity on American Arlines (AMR) and United Airlines (UAL) stock in the days leading up to the 9/11 attacks may seem damning at first glance, but is it really? Here are four points to consider: (1) According to the 9/11 commission’s own report, a single U.S.-based institutional investor with “no conceivable ties to al Qaeda” purchased 95 percent of the UAL puts on September 6 as part of a trading strategy that also included BUYING 115,000 shares of AMR on September 10 (worth ~$3.4 million on the morning of 9/11). (2) Similarly, much of the seemingly suspicious trading in AMR on September 10 (resulting in an unusually high put/call ratio of 6.09) was traced to a specific U.S.-based options trading newsletter, faxed to its subscribers on Sunday, September 9, which recommended these trades. It is also worth noting that exactly one month later on November 12th, American Airlines Flight 587 crashed shortly after taking off from JFK, killing all 251 passengers and 9 crew on board. Three days before that crash the put/call ratio on American Airlines’ parent company was nearly 8. So how unusual is 6.09 really and why wasn't this crash also an example of insider trading? (3) Furthermore, the purchasing of stock options does not itself imply a directional bet. More often than not, options are used as part of a hedging strategy, so simply noticing that a company or individual has taken out a short position on a company does not itself imply that his or her portfolio will benefit financially if the stock falls and certainly not by the amount implied from the options purchase alone. (4) Lastly, it was reported by Bloomberg News on September 20, 2001 that insurance companies saw anomalous trading activities as well ahead of the attacks. Specifically, Citigroup Inc., which had estimated that its Travelers insurance unit would potentially have to pay $500 million in claims from the attacks, had about 45 times the normal volume during three trading days before the attack for options that profit if the stock falls below $40. Citigroup shares did indeed fall slightly below that target. While the options trading on AMR and UAL seem less likely to have been insider trading given the explanations provided and the easy traceability of the trades, the multi-step trade on Citigroup’s share warrants a better explanation IMO. That said, one may have already been provided, in which case, the public should be made aware of what it is if that hasn't already happened. What is Being Covered Up? While I’ve reviewed a decent amount of material on 9/11 in the last 24 years and spoken with many primary sources, the best book I can recommend that provides a more believable explanation for the nature and intentions behind some of the cover up can be found in Ray Nowosielski’s and John Duffy’s “The Watchdogs Didn't Bark”. Both authors appeared on the Hidden Forces podcast last September, as has former 9/11 commission member senator Senator Bob Kerry in 2018 and again in 2024. I should also mention that while the authors are well-intentioned, intelligent, and caring people, I’ve also received critical feedback about their interpretation of the facts from people who are in a position to know, muddying my confidence in event their own explanations. This said, it is clear that there was a cover up and that the cover up extends to the CIA and to the Saudi Royal family, but how benign the explanation may be will probably never be known conclusively. Concluding Thoughts If history is any guide, 9/11 is one of many historical events about which endless information will be reproduced, almost entirely in the form of fiction to feed an insatiable demand by the public for meaning-making and entertainment. The more interesting (and answerable) question to me, as someone who lived a mere 15-min walking distance from the twin towers on that day is why after so many years has this topic and others like it been elevated to the highest levels of public consciousness in my lifetime? I have a thoughtful answer, which is informed not only by my investigations into the subject, but also by my own life experience having been black-pilled in the early 2000s on this topic, knowing many of the early players involved in unearthing its details, and having been the creator and producer of a popular daily news program on Russia Today, on which much of today’s most popular right-wing programming would fit perfectly. If I had the time, I would write it all down, and maybe I will one day or perhaps record a podcast series on it. I'd like to, because we are living through the most profound cultural and political revolutions in American history and I don't know how many people truly understand how far back (and where) it all leads...
19:26

The Cover Up: It is a fact that the 9/11 Commission engaged in a cover-up, and several of its members have said so on the record for more than a decade. But what exactly is being covered up? WTC Building 7: A 47-story building collapsing onto itself because of residual fires and structural damage might seem implausible at first glance, but if the building had been rigged with explosives then why were there no signature outward explosions like you would see in other controlled demolitions and why did the collapse look different from other examples? Also, if the building had been detonated, it would have been the largest and tallest building ever brought down by explosives (even today), and it would have had to be rigged over weeks if not months in absolute secrecy. Insider Trading: Just as with the collapse of WTC 7, the options trading activity on American Arlines (AMR) and United Airlines (UAL) stock in the days leading up to the 9/11 attacks may seem damning at first glance, but is it really? Here are four points to consider: (1) According to the 9/11 commission’s own report, a single U.S.-based institutional investor with “no conceivable ties to al Qaeda” purchased 95 percent of the UAL puts on September 6 as part of a trading strategy that also included BUYING 115,000 shares of AMR on September 10 (worth ~$3.4 million on the morning of 9/11). (2) Similarly, much of the seemingly suspicious trading in AMR on September 10 (resulting in an unusually high put/call ratio of 6.09) was traced to a specific U.S.-based options trading newsletter, faxed to its subscribers on Sunday, September 9, which recommended these trades. It is also worth noting that exactly one month later on November 12th, American Airlines Flight 587 crashed shortly after taking off from JFK, killing all 251 passengers and 9 crew on board. Three days before that crash the put/call ratio on American Airlines’ parent company was nearly 8. So how unusual is 6.09 really and why wasn't this crash also an example of insider trading? (3) Furthermore, the purchasing of stock options does not itself imply a directional bet. More often than not, options are used as part of a hedging strategy, so simply noticing that a company or individual has taken out a short position on a company does not itself imply that his or her portfolio will benefit financially if the stock falls and certainly not by the amount implied from the options purchase alone. (4) Lastly, it was reported by Bloomberg News on September 20, 2001 that insurance companies saw anomalous trading activities as well ahead of the attacks. Specifically, Citigroup Inc., which had estimated that its Travelers insurance unit would potentially have to pay $500 million in claims from the attacks, had about 45 times the normal volume during three trading days before the attack for options that profit if the stock falls below $40. Citigroup shares did indeed fall slightly below that target. While the options trading on AMR and UAL seem less likely to have been insider trading given the explanations provided and the easy traceability of the trades, the multi-step trade on Citigroup’s share warrants a better explanation IMO. That said, one may have already been provided, in which case, the public should be made aware of what it is if that hasn't already happened. What is Being Covered Up? While I’ve reviewed a decent amount of material on 9/11 in the last 24 years and spoken with many primary sources, the best book I can recommend that provides a more believable explanation for the nature and intentions behind some of the cover up can be found in Ray Nowosielski’s and John Duffy’s “The Watchdogs Didn't Bark”. Both authors appeared on the Hidden Forces podcast last September, as has former 9/11 commission member senator Senator Bob Kerry in 2018 and again in 2024. I should also mention that while the authors are well-intentioned, intelligent, and caring people, I’ve also received critical feedback about their interpretation of the facts from people who are in a position to know, muddying my confidence in event their own explanations. This said, it is clear that there was a cover up and that the cover up extends to the CIA and to the Saudi Royal family, but how benign the explanation may be will probably never be known conclusively. Concluding Thoughts If history is any guide, 9/11 is one of many historical events about which endless information will be reproduced, almost entirely in the form of fiction to feed an insatiable demand by the public for meaning-making and entertainment. The more interesting (and answerable) question to me, as someone who lived a mere 15-min walking distance from the twin towers on that day is why after so many years has this topic and others like it been elevated to the highest levels of public consciousness in my lifetime? I have a thoughtful answer, which is informed not only by my investigations into the subject, but also by my own life experience having been black-pilled in the early 2000s on this topic, knowing many of the early players involved in unearthing its details, and having been the creator and producer of a popular daily news program on Russia Today, on which much of today’s most popular right-wing programming would fit perfectly. If I had the time, I would write it all down, and maybe I will one day or perhaps record a podcast series on it. I'd like to, because we are living through the most profound cultural and political revolutions in American history and I don't know how many people truly understand how far back (and where) it all leads...

Demetri Kofinas

31,105 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

The age of the Democratic Party blocking fringe outsiders is officially over | David Marcus, Fox News There were two events on Tuesday that offered more proof of a national Democratic Party establishment that has lost control: One was a meeting, one an election, and both are harbingers of real danger on the American left. The meeting took place in Washington, D.C., between presumptive Maine Democratic Senate nominee, the Nazi tattoed, serial sexter Graham Platner and members of his party in that body. Some, mostly through wishcasting, thought this would be the end of the alleged oysters farmer’s run. Instead, it was a coronation, as was predicted in this column last week. A decade ago, one phone call from a party leader could have ended Platner’s run, but those days are gone. Today, the Democratic Socialists of America will no longer allow it. Here is what brave Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer had to say about the scandal-ridden candidate: "I met with Graham Platner today. We’re going to beat Susan Collins and take back the Senate." No, if, ands, or buts. This was echoed by almost every smiling Democrat leaving the meeting. There will be no last-minute coup to oust the socialist. Instead, the party is pretending to be one big happy family. That, as they say, is that, and the reason for it is clear. Schumer and grand poobahs of the party simply no longer have any leverage over the socialist candidates storming their keep. Platner doesn’t need establishment endorsements. He has Rep. Ro Khanna, D-Calif., and, Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., and commie podcaster Hasan Pike. He doesn’t need establishment money, as there are progressive billionaires more than happy to donate. Even the left-leaning media, always in lockstep with the establishment, have little influence over voters these days. As in Maine, in New Jersey’s 12th congressional district, the Democratic Party elites were unable to fend off the radical Muslim (and socialist) candidate Adam Hamawy, who not only testified on behalf of the terrorist behind the 1993 World Trade Center bombing, but also volunteered for an Al Qaeda-linked group in Eastern Europe. At best here, the Democratic primary voters in the Garden State are trying to send a terrorist sympathizer to the halls of Congress. At worst, he is just a flat-out terrorist. At his point, Sen. John Fetterman, D-Pa., who has been sounding the alarm about the craziness overtaking his party, isn’t just on an island. He’s on a whole different planet. Put bluntly, the far-left socialist extremists, with their Nazi and radical Islamic ties, are outflanking, often outspending, and absolutely outperforming the terrified geriatric leadership of the party. It’s become such a party of lunatics that, among the only partial wins the establishment notched Tuesday, in the primary to replace former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi in California’s 11th district, was a weak first place finish for Scott Wiener, himself a leftist lunatic, now headed to a runoff. Wiener thinks that putting people on sex offender lists after sexual crimes is somehow anti-gay and would trans your toddler at the drop of a hat. But among his opponents was the former chief of staff for Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y., and Democratic Socialists of America star Saikat Chakrabarti, who finished in third, failing to make the runoff. Even this seeming victory is hollow, though. Pelosi endorsed Wiener just two years after she wielded the power to tell then-President Joe Biden that his career was over. Today, she can’t get the candidate she endorsed in her own district over 50%. This realignment of Democratic Party power, away from the old-school, Ivy League establishment, into the hands of the socialists, the radical Muslims and the guys with Nazi tats, will have profound implications for the 2028 presidential race. In the last two competitive Democratic Party primary cycles, 2016 and 2020, Bernie Sanders was iced out by party leadership. Remember how, in 2020, after Biden’s surprise win in South Carolina, all the non-socialist candidates suddenly dropped out? That is how it used to work. A decade ago, the Republican Party was overtaken by Donald Trump, and the GOP establishment was left like Wile E. Coyote frantically running in the air, unaware it was already over the cliff. But Trump was part of something much bigger. In fact, he had been a member of the Reform Party, founded by H. Ross Perot in his historic 1992 third-party run and later championed by Pat Buchanan. This was a long-running populist ascendency. Today, it is the Democratic Party establishment losing touch and losing power, seeing their neoliberalism fade next to leftist populism, a populism of wealth redistribution, antisemitism and, to quote Trump, "Trans for everybody." Biden was fond of saying that today’s GOP is not "the Republican Party of your grandfather." Well, I have some news for you, Grandpa Joe: The socialist Democratic Party you left behind and the socialist barbarians you have left at the gates, don’t look a whole lot like the party that made Bill Clinton president, either. And likely, it never will again.
0:59

The age of the Democratic Party blocking fringe outsiders is officially over | David Marcus, Fox News There were two events on Tuesday that offered more proof of a national Democratic Party establishment that has lost control: One was a meeting, one an election, and both are harbingers of real danger on the American left. The meeting took place in Washington, D.C., between presumptive Maine Democratic Senate nominee, the Nazi tattoed, serial sexter Graham Platner and members of his party in that body. Some, mostly through wishcasting, thought this would be the end of the alleged oysters farmer’s run. Instead, it was a coronation, as was predicted in this column last week. A decade ago, one phone call from a party leader could have ended Platner’s run, but those days are gone. Today, the Democratic Socialists of America will no longer allow it. Here is what brave Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer had to say about the scandal-ridden candidate: "I met with Graham Platner today. We’re going to beat Susan Collins and take back the Senate." No, if, ands, or buts. This was echoed by almost every smiling Democrat leaving the meeting. There will be no last-minute coup to oust the socialist. Instead, the party is pretending to be one big happy family. That, as they say, is that, and the reason for it is clear. Schumer and grand poobahs of the party simply no longer have any leverage over the socialist candidates storming their keep. Platner doesn’t need establishment endorsements. He has Rep. Ro Khanna, D-Calif., and, Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., and commie podcaster Hasan Pike. He doesn’t need establishment money, as there are progressive billionaires more than happy to donate. Even the left-leaning media, always in lockstep with the establishment, have little influence over voters these days. As in Maine, in New Jersey’s 12th congressional district, the Democratic Party elites were unable to fend off the radical Muslim (and socialist) candidate Adam Hamawy, who not only testified on behalf of the terrorist behind the 1993 World Trade Center bombing, but also volunteered for an Al Qaeda-linked group in Eastern Europe. At best here, the Democratic primary voters in the Garden State are trying to send a terrorist sympathizer to the halls of Congress. At worst, he is just a flat-out terrorist. At his point, Sen. John Fetterman, D-Pa., who has been sounding the alarm about the craziness overtaking his party, isn’t just on an island. He’s on a whole different planet. Put bluntly, the far-left socialist extremists, with their Nazi and radical Islamic ties, are outflanking, often outspending, and absolutely outperforming the terrified geriatric leadership of the party. It’s become such a party of lunatics that, among the only partial wins the establishment notched Tuesday, in the primary to replace former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi in California’s 11th district, was a weak first place finish for Scott Wiener, himself a leftist lunatic, now headed to a runoff. Wiener thinks that putting people on sex offender lists after sexual crimes is somehow anti-gay and would trans your toddler at the drop of a hat. But among his opponents was the former chief of staff for Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y., and Democratic Socialists of America star Saikat Chakrabarti, who finished in third, failing to make the runoff. Even this seeming victory is hollow, though. Pelosi endorsed Wiener just two years after she wielded the power to tell then-President Joe Biden that his career was over. Today, she can’t get the candidate she endorsed in her own district over 50%. This realignment of Democratic Party power, away from the old-school, Ivy League establishment, into the hands of the socialists, the radical Muslims and the guys with Nazi tats, will have profound implications for the 2028 presidential race. In the last two competitive Democratic Party primary cycles, 2016 and 2020, Bernie Sanders was iced out by party leadership. Remember how, in 2020, after Biden’s surprise win in South Carolina, all the non-socialist candidates suddenly dropped out? That is how it used to work. A decade ago, the Republican Party was overtaken by Donald Trump, and the GOP establishment was left like Wile E. Coyote frantically running in the air, unaware it was already over the cliff. But Trump was part of something much bigger. In fact, he had been a member of the Reform Party, founded by H. Ross Perot in his historic 1992 third-party run and later championed by Pat Buchanan. This was a long-running populist ascendency. Today, it is the Democratic Party establishment losing touch and losing power, seeing their neoliberalism fade next to leftist populism, a populism of wealth redistribution, antisemitism and, to quote Trump, "Trans for everybody." Biden was fond of saying that today’s GOP is not "the Republican Party of your grandfather." Well, I have some news for you, Grandpa Joe: The socialist Democratic Party you left behind and the socialist barbarians you have left at the gates, don’t look a whole lot like the party that made Bill Clinton president, either. And likely, it never will again.

Owen Gregorian

26,711 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Kamala Harris, Tim Walz, And Barack Obama Back Brazil-Style Censorship Next Democratic president and vice president may implement sweeping plan for "fighting misinformation" and "hate speech" Brazil’s banning and blocking of the social media platform X is far more extreme than anything being proposed in the United States, social media regulation experts are telling the New York Times, Washington Post, and other publications. One implication is that we need not be concerned that Brazil-style censorship will ever happen in the US. In fact, Democratic presidential candidate Kamala Harris and vice presidential candidate Tim Walz both repeatedly endorsed the three main censorship tactics used by the Brazilian government: censorship of election “misinformation,” de-platforming political opponents, and cross-platform bans, which ban a person not just from one social media platform but from many or even all of them. Harris repeatedly called for the US government to deplatform then-President Donald Trump. In an October 2019 debate, Harris said, “His Twitter account should be shut down.” After the debate she said, “You can't say that you have one rule for Facebook and you have a different rule for Twitter. The same rule has to apply. There has to be a responsibility that is placed on these social media sites…They are directly speaking to millions and millions of people without any level of oversight or regulation. And that has to stop.” When Walz in 2022 called for censorship of election misinformation, he claimed, falsely, that the First Amendment does not protect hate speech and misinformation. “There's no guarantee to free speech on misinformation or hate speech,” said Walz on MSNBC, “and especially around our democracy.” In fact, the US Supreme Court has consistently ruled that hate speech, misinformation, disinformation, or deliberate lying are allowed in most circumstances. First Amendment scholar Jeff Koseff last year published a book, Liar In A Crowded Theater, documenting this history. It’s true that Harris and Walz have not recently repeated their calls for government censorship and that what they called for was not as extreme as what Brazil is doing. They made their statements two to five years ago. And neither Harris nor Walz called for completely banning and blocking social media platforms as the Brazilian government did. But none of that takes away from the severity of their calls for industry-wide, cross-platform deplatforming through government regulation of social media platforms. Before the Brazilian Supreme Court Judge Alexandre de Moraes banned and blocked X in Brazil, he sought cross-platform deplatforming of opposition politicians and independent journalists. Indeed, it was precisely his demands for such cross-platform bans that X owner Elon Musk rejected, which led to Moraes’ decision to block the whole platform. For years, Democrats have sought to regulate social media platforms both directly through the executive branch and through Congress. In 2021 and 2022, Democrats in the House and Senate introduced the “Justice Against Malicious Algorithms Act,” “Algorithmic Justice Act,” and the “Social Media NUDGE Act” to require social media companies to censor content that could cause “emotional injury,” ban algorithms that result in “discrimination or similar harms,” and impose “limits on account creation and content sharing” of disfavored individuals and their views. While some of these bills have good goals, including protecting privacy, preventing harassment, and increasing transparency, they all give the government far too much power to censor disfavored speech. In the spring of 2022, the Biden Administration’s Department of Homeland Security (DHS) announced a “Disinformation Governance Board.” One week prior, former President Barack Obama advocated for sweeping US government censorship of social media platforms in a major speech at Stanford University, which appeared timed to support the Disinformation Governance Board and advocate for Congress to regulate social media content for disfavored content. Obama’s speech gave a clear picture of the censorship a Harris-Walz administration may impose. He claimed that “social media platforms tend not to wanna do anything,” and “a regulatory structure, a smart one, needs to be in place” for “slowing the spread of harmful content.” Obama stressed that government “regulation has to be part of the answer.” In his speech, Obama praised the aggressive social censorship that the European Union is currently pursuing through its Digital Services Act (DSA). For decades, the Democrats were the party of free speech in the United States. What changed? How did Harris, Walz, Obama, and dozens of Democratic Senators and members of Congress come to support Brazil-style censorship? Please subscribe now to support Public's investigative reporting, read the rest of the article, and watch the rest of the video!
4:56

Kamala Harris, Tim Walz, And Barack Obama Back Brazil-Style Censorship Next Democratic president and vice president may implement sweeping plan for "fighting misinformation" and "hate speech" Brazil’s banning and blocking of the social media platform X is far more extreme than anything being proposed in the United States, social media regulation experts are telling the New York Times, Washington Post, and other publications. One implication is that we need not be concerned that Brazil-style censorship will ever happen in the US. In fact, Democratic presidential candidate Kamala Harris and vice presidential candidate Tim Walz both repeatedly endorsed the three main censorship tactics used by the Brazilian government: censorship of election “misinformation,” de-platforming political opponents, and cross-platform bans, which ban a person not just from one social media platform but from many or even all of them. Harris repeatedly called for the US government to deplatform then-President Donald Trump. In an October 2019 debate, Harris said, “His Twitter account should be shut down.” After the debate she said, “You can't say that you have one rule for Facebook and you have a different rule for Twitter. The same rule has to apply. There has to be a responsibility that is placed on these social media sites…They are directly speaking to millions and millions of people without any level of oversight or regulation. And that has to stop.” When Walz in 2022 called for censorship of election misinformation, he claimed, falsely, that the First Amendment does not protect hate speech and misinformation. “There's no guarantee to free speech on misinformation or hate speech,” said Walz on MSNBC, “and especially around our democracy.” In fact, the US Supreme Court has consistently ruled that hate speech, misinformation, disinformation, or deliberate lying are allowed in most circumstances. First Amendment scholar Jeff Koseff last year published a book, Liar In A Crowded Theater, documenting this history. It’s true that Harris and Walz have not recently repeated their calls for government censorship and that what they called for was not as extreme as what Brazil is doing. They made their statements two to five years ago. And neither Harris nor Walz called for completely banning and blocking social media platforms as the Brazilian government did. But none of that takes away from the severity of their calls for industry-wide, cross-platform deplatforming through government regulation of social media platforms. Before the Brazilian Supreme Court Judge Alexandre de Moraes banned and blocked X in Brazil, he sought cross-platform deplatforming of opposition politicians and independent journalists. Indeed, it was precisely his demands for such cross-platform bans that X owner Elon Musk rejected, which led to Moraes’ decision to block the whole platform. For years, Democrats have sought to regulate social media platforms both directly through the executive branch and through Congress. In 2021 and 2022, Democrats in the House and Senate introduced the “Justice Against Malicious Algorithms Act,” “Algorithmic Justice Act,” and the “Social Media NUDGE Act” to require social media companies to censor content that could cause “emotional injury,” ban algorithms that result in “discrimination or similar harms,” and impose “limits on account creation and content sharing” of disfavored individuals and their views. While some of these bills have good goals, including protecting privacy, preventing harassment, and increasing transparency, they all give the government far too much power to censor disfavored speech. In the spring of 2022, the Biden Administration’s Department of Homeland Security (DHS) announced a “Disinformation Governance Board.” One week prior, former President Barack Obama advocated for sweeping US government censorship of social media platforms in a major speech at Stanford University, which appeared timed to support the Disinformation Governance Board and advocate for Congress to regulate social media content for disfavored content. Obama’s speech gave a clear picture of the censorship a Harris-Walz administration may impose. He claimed that “social media platforms tend not to wanna do anything,” and “a regulatory structure, a smart one, needs to be in place” for “slowing the spread of harmful content.” Obama stressed that government “regulation has to be part of the answer.” In his speech, Obama praised the aggressive social censorship that the European Union is currently pursuing through its Digital Services Act (DSA). For decades, the Democrats were the party of free speech in the United States. What changed? How did Harris, Walz, Obama, and dozens of Democratic Senators and members of Congress come to support Brazil-style censorship? Please subscribe now to support Public's investigative reporting, read the rest of the article, and watch the rest of the video!

Michael Shellenberger

131,422 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Don't be surprised that Russia uses international cinema fest to push narratives in favour of Russian genocidal war in Ukraine with propaganda film "Russians At War". We already seen these tries earlier. A terrible and despicable example of how the Western journalist Sean Langan used his story about the Russian war in Ukraine, filmed in the occupied part of Ukraine together with the Russian military, to promote Russian propaganda narratives, cynically covering himself with the slogan "all sides are entitled to their opinion". 1) 5:20 An attempt to emphasize that the local military separatist in this Russian war "protects the family and children", and is not part of the Russian proxy army in the war launched by Russia in Ukraine in 2014. 2) 6:34 An attempt to cast doubt on the DOCUMENTED crimes of the Russian military in Bucha by asking the Russian military "if they are really committed war crimes there." Will any criminal answer such a question honestly? 3) 11:12 In a conversation with a Russian soldier with the call sign "VAL", an attempt is made to show that the Russian soldiers are tired of the war and want it to end. But not a word how they see this "end". 4) 14:25 An attempt to evoke sympathy for a young guy, an army contractor, to whom, on the one hand, he tells with a smile about the war in Ukraine, and then makes a tragic face when talking about the death of his friends in the war, but he has no sympathy for the Ukrainians whom he attacked 5) 17:10 A local military man is shown again, promoting narratives in Russian about "State armed rebellion in Kyiv, which was carried out by the Americans!" 6) 18:30 A Russian military man is shown promoting the narrative "Ukrainians throw away Western weapons when retreating." In fact, you can see in the video that these are FIRED (used) disposable cartridges from anti-tank weapons, which are no longer weapons. 7) 20:10 The Russian military is constantly given the opportunity to promote the narrative in interviews about "Russians never want war. Russia never attacks, only ends wars. Ukrainians are also called "fascists". 8) 23:05 By showing a video of soldiers on the phone with their wives and children, the journalist allows the Russian occupier to promote the narrative "we are here fighting for our families and children", instead of emphasizing that these soldiers are from the country of the aggressor, who came to kill people in a foreign country and seize territory. This is a frank attempt to "humanize" the occupiers. 9) 23:28 The journalist leaves without comment the statement of the military that "for them, the holiday is a victory." What is the victory? In what form? In the destruction of all Ukrainians and capture of Ukraine? 10) 25:12 Under tragic music, without commentary, shows a dead civilian in a car in occupied Donetsk, without commenting behind the scenes that the Russian military most often uses residential areas of Donetsk for shelling of the Ukrainian army, hiding behind local residents and then return fire can kill civilians. 11) 26:24 Enables the Russian occupier to tell that "they are not monsters, but just people who protect their people here and that this is their Motherland and this land is historically theirs." 12) 26:55 The occupier-propagandist is freely allowed to talk about the planned capture of Kyiv and the creation of a Kremlin puppet regime in Ukraine and the transformation of independent Ukraine into a Russian enclave. 13) 27:55 Allows the occupier-propagandist to say, without comment, "that they are simply taking their land and will do so until the last Ukrainian Nazi is killed." And journalist even says "Yes" agreeing with occupier. 14) 30:00 An attempt to show locals suffering from shelling without telling the context of where this shelling came from. 15) 30:50 I show a elderly woman who supports Russia and criticizes Zelensky. It's amazing what people who have been consuming 24/7 Russian propaganda from Russian TV for 9 years can say? 16) 41:40 The journalist asks the Russian occupiers "Do they feel that the world and the West do not understand them?". To which the occupier replies "Of course. If they (the West) understood, EVERYTHING would have ended a long time ago" (referring to the suspension of aid to Ukraine and the capture of Ukraine by Russia). Allows the occupier to promote the narrative "We are not invaders, we are just defending our own!" CONCLUSIONS: There is no "other side of the war" in giving a public opportunity to the soldiers of the army of the aggressor country, which attacked a neighboring country with the aim of capturing and turning it into a Russian enclave, the opportunity to publicly express in Russian narratives about "The West does not understand this war", "We here we protect our loved ones and children", "This is Russian historical territory and we will return it all", "We will not seize Kyiv, but simply change the Ukrainian government by force and turn Ukraine into a part of Russia". This is an attempt to "humanize" the military of the aggressor country, including those who committed terrible war crimes in Ukrainian Buchi, which are fully documented and captured on video. It was also frankly manipulative to show a pro-Russian elderly woman in Donetsk without providing the context that almost the entire pro-Ukrainian population (millions from Donbas region) was forced to flee Donetsk occupied by the Russians, and even those who have a pro-Ukrainian opinion and stayed there will never say anything on camera what he really thinks about Russia, because otherwise he will immediately go to prison or be killed altogether. And an important reminder that Russia NEVER allows real journalists into the occupied territories, except for rare exceptions, when the journalists, in a supposedly balanced story, still push underline the narratives that the Russian government needs (as was the case with a recent video from a propagandist from a German channel who went to show " reconstruction of Mariupol by Russia").
5:18

Don't be surprised that Russia uses international cinema fest to push narratives in favour of Russian genocidal war in Ukraine with propaganda film "Russians At War". We already seen these tries earlier. A terrible and despicable example of how the Western journalist Sean Langan used his story about the Russian war in Ukraine, filmed in the occupied part of Ukraine together with the Russian military, to promote Russian propaganda narratives, cynically covering himself with the slogan "all sides are entitled to their opinion". 1) 5:20 An attempt to emphasize that the local military separatist in this Russian war "protects the family and children", and is not part of the Russian proxy army in the war launched by Russia in Ukraine in 2014. 2) 6:34 An attempt to cast doubt on the DOCUMENTED crimes of the Russian military in Bucha by asking the Russian military "if they are really committed war crimes there." Will any criminal answer such a question honestly? 3) 11:12 In a conversation with a Russian soldier with the call sign "VAL", an attempt is made to show that the Russian soldiers are tired of the war and want it to end. But not a word how they see this "end". 4) 14:25 An attempt to evoke sympathy for a young guy, an army contractor, to whom, on the one hand, he tells with a smile about the war in Ukraine, and then makes a tragic face when talking about the death of his friends in the war, but he has no sympathy for the Ukrainians whom he attacked 5) 17:10 A local military man is shown again, promoting narratives in Russian about "State armed rebellion in Kyiv, which was carried out by the Americans!" 6) 18:30 A Russian military man is shown promoting the narrative "Ukrainians throw away Western weapons when retreating." In fact, you can see in the video that these are FIRED (used) disposable cartridges from anti-tank weapons, which are no longer weapons. 7) 20:10 The Russian military is constantly given the opportunity to promote the narrative in interviews about "Russians never want war. Russia never attacks, only ends wars. Ukrainians are also called "fascists". 8) 23:05 By showing a video of soldiers on the phone with their wives and children, the journalist allows the Russian occupier to promote the narrative "we are here fighting for our families and children", instead of emphasizing that these soldiers are from the country of the aggressor, who came to kill people in a foreign country and seize territory. This is a frank attempt to "humanize" the occupiers. 9) 23:28 The journalist leaves without comment the statement of the military that "for them, the holiday is a victory." What is the victory? In what form? In the destruction of all Ukrainians and capture of Ukraine? 10) 25:12 Under tragic music, without commentary, shows a dead civilian in a car in occupied Donetsk, without commenting behind the scenes that the Russian military most often uses residential areas of Donetsk for shelling of the Ukrainian army, hiding behind local residents and then return fire can kill civilians. 11) 26:24 Enables the Russian occupier to tell that "they are not monsters, but just people who protect their people here and that this is their Motherland and this land is historically theirs." 12) 26:55 The occupier-propagandist is freely allowed to talk about the planned capture of Kyiv and the creation of a Kremlin puppet regime in Ukraine and the transformation of independent Ukraine into a Russian enclave. 13) 27:55 Allows the occupier-propagandist to say, without comment, "that they are simply taking their land and will do so until the last Ukrainian Nazi is killed." And journalist even says "Yes" agreeing with occupier. 14) 30:00 An attempt to show locals suffering from shelling without telling the context of where this shelling came from. 15) 30:50 I show a elderly woman who supports Russia and criticizes Zelensky. It's amazing what people who have been consuming 24/7 Russian propaganda from Russian TV for 9 years can say? 16) 41:40 The journalist asks the Russian occupiers "Do they feel that the world and the West do not understand them?". To which the occupier replies "Of course. If they (the West) understood, EVERYTHING would have ended a long time ago" (referring to the suspension of aid to Ukraine and the capture of Ukraine by Russia). Allows the occupier to promote the narrative "We are not invaders, we are just defending our own!" CONCLUSIONS: There is no "other side of the war" in giving a public opportunity to the soldiers of the army of the aggressor country, which attacked a neighboring country with the aim of capturing and turning it into a Russian enclave, the opportunity to publicly express in Russian narratives about "The West does not understand this war", "We here we protect our loved ones and children", "This is Russian historical territory and we will return it all", "We will not seize Kyiv, but simply change the Ukrainian government by force and turn Ukraine into a part of Russia". This is an attempt to "humanize" the military of the aggressor country, including those who committed terrible war crimes in Ukrainian Buchi, which are fully documented and captured on video. It was also frankly manipulative to show a pro-Russian elderly woman in Donetsk without providing the context that almost the entire pro-Ukrainian population (millions from Donbas region) was forced to flee Donetsk occupied by the Russians, and even those who have a pro-Ukrainian opinion and stayed there will never say anything on camera what he really thinks about Russia, because otherwise he will immediately go to prison or be killed altogether. And an important reminder that Russia NEVER allows real journalists into the occupied territories, except for rare exceptions, when the journalists, in a supposedly balanced story, still push underline the narratives that the Russian government needs (as was the case with a recent video from a propagandist from a German channel who went to show " reconstruction of Mariupol by Russia").

Maksym Borodin

102,361 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

ICYMI: An unknown man entered my private home and made his way to my home office door during Monday's livestream. This happened as I was looking into $31,518,409 in missing stock transactions from a shadow non-profit operated by Jeffrey Epstein until his death in 2019. I eventually found that Epstein sold stocks after he was jailed in 2019, and moved $31,518,409 of stock 2018 without reporting any of the required transactions on the firm's federal 990 tax form that year (despite doing so every other year). I refused to be intimidated during the livestream, demanded the man leave, and continued my investigation until I found the discrepancy in a 2018 tax return filed by Epstein's Gratitude America, LTD non-profit that confirmed the unaccounted-for 2018 stock trades totaling $31,518,409. The unaccounted for stock transactions in 2018 transactions are as follows; Bought; $9,651,059 $1,730,674 $20,136,676 Sold; $9,741,132 $1,604,011 $20,103,887 Total stock moved through Epstein's non-profit in 2018 without any supporting documentation = $31,518,409 Stock transactions after Epstein was jailed on July 6th, 2019: 7/10/2019 (3 sales of stock) -Cardlytics, Inc (2 sales of stock, both originally purchased 7/2/2019) - Microsoft Corp. (1 sale of stock, originally purchased 9/4/2018) - this single trade netted someone $258,911 (just in gains on the stock) after Epstein was jailed. 7/11/2019 (4 sales of stock) - Cardlytics, Inc (1 purchased 6/10/2019, 3 purchased 07/02/2019) 7/12/2019 (4 sales of stock) - Cardlytics, Inc (1 purchased 6/23/2019, 1 purchased 7/2/2019) 7/22/2019 (2 sales of stock) - Bank Of America Corp 5.475% S-KK (1 sale of stock, originally purchased 9/28/2019) - Duke Energy Corp 6.75% - A (1 sale of stock, originally purchased 3/25/2019) Further, it seems Epstein may have been involved with insider trading, in 2017, related to the Chinese commie-affiliated firm TenCent (although that was only $1,000,000 and Epstein hid his move about as well as a first year CPA figuring out they can use prediction markets to pump and dump as long as they submit a few fake cover trades before doing so). The company still has roughly $8.175 million in accounts that could potentially be clawed-back and disbursed to survivors of Epstein's child sexual abuse ring. Also, here are some of the charities Epstein was donating money to using the non-profit (the non-profit appears to have used donations, sourced from a $10,000,000 "gift" from Leon Black, as cover for insider trading and money laundering via stock purchases and sales); Bruce Marsha Moskowitz Foundation (Florida) $100,000 in 2016, $50,000 Melanoma Research Alliance Foundation (Washington D.C.) $225,000 in 2016 The Hasty Pudding Institute (New York) $50,000 in 2016 (Confirm this is Harvard's thing with the weird parade) Chron's Colitis Foundation Of American (New York) $10,000 in 2016, $10,000 Verse Video Education (Cambridge Ma) $110,000 in 2016 Women's Global Cancer Initiative $10,000 in 2016 New York Concert Artists Association (New Jersey) $50,000 in 2016 Icahn School Of Medicine Mt. Sinai (New York) $10,000 in 2016 The Hewitt School $15,000 (New York) $15,000 in 2016 Association Mind Education (Rome, New York), $60,000 in 2017 Cancer Research Wellness Institute (California) $75,000 in 2017 Chopra Foundation (California) $50,000 in 2017 Friends Of Elton John (London, UK) $15,000 in 2017 Independent Feature Project (New York) $10,000 in 2017 International Peace (New York) $375,000 in 2017 "IPI was founded in 1970 by US philanthropist Ruth Forbes Young and Indian Major General Indar Jit Rikhye, in close consultation with then-UN Secretary-General U Thant. They recognized that a thoroughly independent institution, free from official constraints, could make a unique contribution to multilateral efforts to prevent and resolve armed conflict around the world." Junior Tennis Champions Center (Maryland) $25,000 in 2017 Kuhn Foundation (California) $150,000 in 2017 MET Orchestra (New York) $50,000 in 2017 MIT (Cambridge, Mass.) $150,000 in 2017 Nautilus Think Tank (New York) $25,000 in 2017 Run by Tom Miller who knew Robert Kennedy (the original RFK) the Film Society Of Lincoln Center (New York) $25,000 in 2017 The International Police And Fire Chaplains Association (Michigan) $50,000 in 2017 The Leukemia and Lymphoma Society (New York) $5,000 in 2017 The O'Gorman Garden (New York) $30,000 in 2017 UJA Federation Of New York (New York) $50,000 in 2017 University of Arizona Foundation (Arizona) $50,000 in 2017 Walk MS (New Jersey) $5,000 in 2017
11:34

ICYMI: An unknown man entered my private home and made his way to my home office door during Monday's livestream. This happened as I was looking into $31,518,409 in missing stock transactions from a shadow non-profit operated by Jeffrey Epstein until his death in 2019. I eventually found that Epstein sold stocks after he was jailed in 2019, and moved $31,518,409 of stock 2018 without reporting any of the required transactions on the firm's federal 990 tax form that year (despite doing so every other year). I refused to be intimidated during the livestream, demanded the man leave, and continued my investigation until I found the discrepancy in a 2018 tax return filed by Epstein's Gratitude America, LTD non-profit that confirmed the unaccounted-for 2018 stock trades totaling $31,518,409. The unaccounted for stock transactions in 2018 transactions are as follows; Bought; $9,651,059 $1,730,674 $20,136,676 Sold; $9,741,132 $1,604,011 $20,103,887 Total stock moved through Epstein's non-profit in 2018 without any supporting documentation = $31,518,409 Stock transactions after Epstein was jailed on July 6th, 2019: 7/10/2019 (3 sales of stock) -Cardlytics, Inc (2 sales of stock, both originally purchased 7/2/2019) - Microsoft Corp. (1 sale of stock, originally purchased 9/4/2018) - this single trade netted someone $258,911 (just in gains on the stock) after Epstein was jailed. 7/11/2019 (4 sales of stock) - Cardlytics, Inc (1 purchased 6/10/2019, 3 purchased 07/02/2019) 7/12/2019 (4 sales of stock) - Cardlytics, Inc (1 purchased 6/23/2019, 1 purchased 7/2/2019) 7/22/2019 (2 sales of stock) - Bank Of America Corp 5.475% S-KK (1 sale of stock, originally purchased 9/28/2019) - Duke Energy Corp 6.75% - A (1 sale of stock, originally purchased 3/25/2019) Further, it seems Epstein may have been involved with insider trading, in 2017, related to the Chinese commie-affiliated firm TenCent (although that was only $1,000,000 and Epstein hid his move about as well as a first year CPA figuring out they can use prediction markets to pump and dump as long as they submit a few fake cover trades before doing so). The company still has roughly $8.175 million in accounts that could potentially be clawed-back and disbursed to survivors of Epstein's child sexual abuse ring. Also, here are some of the charities Epstein was donating money to using the non-profit (the non-profit appears to have used donations, sourced from a $10,000,000 "gift" from Leon Black, as cover for insider trading and money laundering via stock purchases and sales); Bruce Marsha Moskowitz Foundation (Florida) $100,000 in 2016, $50,000 Melanoma Research Alliance Foundation (Washington D.C.) $225,000 in 2016 The Hasty Pudding Institute (New York) $50,000 in 2016 (Confirm this is Harvard's thing with the weird parade) Chron's Colitis Foundation Of American (New York) $10,000 in 2016, $10,000 Verse Video Education (Cambridge Ma) $110,000 in 2016 Women's Global Cancer Initiative $10,000 in 2016 New York Concert Artists Association (New Jersey) $50,000 in 2016 Icahn School Of Medicine Mt. Sinai (New York) $10,000 in 2016 The Hewitt School $15,000 (New York) $15,000 in 2016 Association Mind Education (Rome, New York), $60,000 in 2017 Cancer Research Wellness Institute (California) $75,000 in 2017 Chopra Foundation (California) $50,000 in 2017 Friends Of Elton John (London, UK) $15,000 in 2017 Independent Feature Project (New York) $10,000 in 2017 International Peace (New York) $375,000 in 2017 "IPI was founded in 1970 by US philanthropist Ruth Forbes Young and Indian Major General Indar Jit Rikhye, in close consultation with then-UN Secretary-General U Thant. They recognized that a thoroughly independent institution, free from official constraints, could make a unique contribution to multilateral efforts to prevent and resolve armed conflict around the world." Junior Tennis Champions Center (Maryland) $25,000 in 2017 Kuhn Foundation (California) $150,000 in 2017 MET Orchestra (New York) $50,000 in 2017 MIT (Cambridge, Mass.) $150,000 in 2017 Nautilus Think Tank (New York) $25,000 in 2017 Run by Tom Miller who knew Robert Kennedy (the original RFK) the Film Society Of Lincoln Center (New York) $25,000 in 2017 The International Police And Fire Chaplains Association (Michigan) $50,000 in 2017 The Leukemia and Lymphoma Society (New York) $5,000 in 2017 The O'Gorman Garden (New York) $30,000 in 2017 UJA Federation Of New York (New York) $50,000 in 2017 University of Arizona Foundation (Arizona) $50,000 in 2017 Walk MS (New Jersey) $5,000 in 2017

Grant Smith Ellis

554,590 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

Mark Levin is a National Treasure: Megyn Kelly is an Unserious Amateur Podcaster! Compare Kelly’s credentials to Mark Levin; hands down he wins! Mark Levin is a former Chief of Staff for the Attorney General, a conservative American lawyer, NYT best selling author, political commentator, and #1 radio/television host. Levin has authored at least 11 non-fiction books**, most of which are *New York Times* bestsellers. Sources vary slightly on the exact count of "#1" bestsellers (often cited as 7–8 consecutive ones), but the full list of his major works includes: Liberty and Tyranny: A Conservative Manifesto* (2009, often listed with 2004 in some contexts but widely 2009; massive bestseller with over 1.5 million copies sold). Men in Black: How the Supreme Court Is Destroying America* (2005). Rescuing Sprite: A Dog Lover's Story of Joy and Anguish* (2007). Ameritopia: The Unmaking of America (2012). The Liberty Amendments: Restoring the American Republic* (2013). Plunder and Deceit: Big Government's Exploitation of Young People and the Future* (2015). Rediscovering Americanism: And the Tyranny of Progressivism* (2017). Unfreedom of the Press (2019). American Marxism (2021). The Democrat Party Hates America (2023). On Power (2025) His earlier books like *Men in Black* and *Rescuing Sprite* were also *New York Times* bestsellers. He is frequently described as the author of seven or eight consecutive #1 *New York Times* bestsellers, with additional titles bringing the total higher. Levin began his radio career in 2002 with a local Sunday afternoon slot on WABC-AM in New York City. He took over a weekday evening timeslot (initially 6–8 p.m.) on September 2, 2003, and the show quickly rose to #1 in its slot. National syndication of The Mark Levin Show launched in 2006 via Cumulus Media Networks (later Westwood One). The program expanded to three hours (6–9 p.m. ET) in 2009 and continues today on nearly 400 stations, heard by millions weekly. As of 2026, he has been on air for approximately 24 years, and nationally syndicated for about 20 years. Levin has signed multiple contract extensions, including one in 2024, and is a National Radio Hall of Fame inductee. He earned a B.A. in political science (magna cum laude) from Temple University at age 19 and a J.D. from Temple University Beasley School of Law in 1980. Levin worked in the Reagan administration starting in 1981, serving in roles such as Deputy Assistant Secretary at the U.S. Department of Education, Deputy Solicitor at the U.S. Department of the Interior, and ultimately as Chief of Staff to Attorney General Edwin Meese. He was a top adviser to several cabinet members. He later served as president (or chairman emeritus) of the Landmark Legal Foundation, a conservative public interest law firm, and has practiced law privately. He also clerked early in his career. Before his own show, Levin was a frequent guest and legal contributor on shows like *The Rush Limbaugh Show* and Sean Hannity's program. His radio success led to television: He hosts *Life, Liberty & Levin* on Fox News and previously launched LevinTV. He has contributed to outlets like National Review Online and was the first Editor-in-Chief of Conservative Review in 2015. Levin is known for his passionate, constitutionally focused conservative commentary, often emphasizing originalism, limited government, and critiques of progressivism. Levin combines legal scholarship with broadcasting and authorship, earning awards like the American Conservative Union's Ronald Reagan Award and the Media Research Center's William F. Buckley Award for Media Excellence. His career spans law, government service under Reagan, bestselling authorship, and dominant talk radio/TV presence, making him one of the most influential voices in conservative media for over two decades.
0:46

Mark Levin is a National Treasure: Megyn Kelly is an Unserious Amateur Podcaster! Compare Kelly’s credentials to Mark Levin; hands down he wins! Mark Levin is a former Chief of Staff for the Attorney General, a conservative American lawyer, NYT best selling author, political commentator, and #1 radio/television host. Levin has authored at least 11 non-fiction books**, most of which are *New York Times* bestsellers. Sources vary slightly on the exact count of "#1" bestsellers (often cited as 7–8 consecutive ones), but the full list of his major works includes: Liberty and Tyranny: A Conservative Manifesto* (2009, often listed with 2004 in some contexts but widely 2009; massive bestseller with over 1.5 million copies sold). Men in Black: How the Supreme Court Is Destroying America* (2005). Rescuing Sprite: A Dog Lover's Story of Joy and Anguish* (2007). Ameritopia: The Unmaking of America (2012). The Liberty Amendments: Restoring the American Republic* (2013). Plunder and Deceit: Big Government's Exploitation of Young People and the Future* (2015). Rediscovering Americanism: And the Tyranny of Progressivism* (2017). Unfreedom of the Press (2019). American Marxism (2021). The Democrat Party Hates America (2023). On Power (2025) His earlier books like *Men in Black* and *Rescuing Sprite* were also *New York Times* bestsellers. He is frequently described as the author of seven or eight consecutive #1 *New York Times* bestsellers, with additional titles bringing the total higher. Levin began his radio career in 2002 with a local Sunday afternoon slot on WABC-AM in New York City. He took over a weekday evening timeslot (initially 6–8 p.m.) on September 2, 2003, and the show quickly rose to #1 in its slot. National syndication of The Mark Levin Show launched in 2006 via Cumulus Media Networks (later Westwood One). The program expanded to three hours (6–9 p.m. ET) in 2009 and continues today on nearly 400 stations, heard by millions weekly. As of 2026, he has been on air for approximately 24 years, and nationally syndicated for about 20 years. Levin has signed multiple contract extensions, including one in 2024, and is a National Radio Hall of Fame inductee. He earned a B.A. in political science (magna cum laude) from Temple University at age 19 and a J.D. from Temple University Beasley School of Law in 1980. Levin worked in the Reagan administration starting in 1981, serving in roles such as Deputy Assistant Secretary at the U.S. Department of Education, Deputy Solicitor at the U.S. Department of the Interior, and ultimately as Chief of Staff to Attorney General Edwin Meese. He was a top adviser to several cabinet members. He later served as president (or chairman emeritus) of the Landmark Legal Foundation, a conservative public interest law firm, and has practiced law privately. He also clerked early in his career. Before his own show, Levin was a frequent guest and legal contributor on shows like *The Rush Limbaugh Show* and Sean Hannity's program. His radio success led to television: He hosts *Life, Liberty & Levin* on Fox News and previously launched LevinTV. He has contributed to outlets like National Review Online and was the first Editor-in-Chief of Conservative Review in 2015. Levin is known for his passionate, constitutionally focused conservative commentary, often emphasizing originalism, limited government, and critiques of progressivism. Levin combines legal scholarship with broadcasting and authorship, earning awards like the American Conservative Union's Ronald Reagan Award and the Media Research Center's William F. Buckley Award for Media Excellence. His career spans law, government service under Reagan, bestselling authorship, and dominant talk radio/TV presence, making him one of the most influential voices in conservative media for over two decades.

Andrea Shaffer, Anti-Marxist Warrior

15,227 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

President Donald Trump is abandoning Ukraine and putting Europe in danger by negotiating directly with Russian President Vladimir Putin and criticizing Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, say the media, many European leaders, and some in Congress. But it is not in the interests of the United States to be involved in another endless war like Afghanistan that ultimately has the same outcome. Russians retain their numerical advantage. The supplies and capacities of Ukrainians and the European nations that support them are dwindling. The war has ended the lives of 200,000 people at a total cost of trillions. The US has spent $64 billion, and Europe has spent $62 billion on military aid for Ukraine, and another $50 billion and $70 billion, respectively, on other forms of aid. It’s true that Trump’s actions since taking office for his second term suggest an effort to end the so-called “international rules-based order” that has existed since World War II. And France and the UK have proposed continuing that order by sending 30,000 European peacekeeping troops to deter Russia, with US fighter jets and missiles to support them. But there is little appetite among Europeans or Americans for a long-term Western military occupation of Ukraine that is not guaranteed to work and may still trigger conflict with a nuclear-armed Russia. A Russian government representative has already rejected the proposal as a “dangerous provocation.” And the people who are demanding the US continue the war in Ukraine are the same people who got us into the war. Many are loyalists to past US presidents, including the last one, whose policies helped lead to the war by expanding NATO. Moreover, it is dishonest to call the Pax Americana that has existed since World War II an “international rules-based order.” From CIA interference in the Italian elections of 1947 to wars in Southeast Asia, Latin America, and Africa in the 1960s and 1980s to George W. Bush’s illegal invasion of Iraq in 2003, the US government has exemplified what most every foreign policy realist and International Studies professor knows, which is that the global system is anarchic and governed by power, not morality. And, from 2016 until now, the joint effort by the US government and our allies in Europe to uphold the entirely fictitious “rules-based order” had become totalitarian. The globalists turned the regime change guns inward. The US government, alongside NATO, the EU, and the governments of Britain, Germany, and others, funded the creation of a Censorship Industrial Complex to finance wrongly named “nongovernmental organizations” that “flagged” to social media companies alleged “misinformation” and demanded its removal. Government-backed NGOs and media organizations conducted sophisticated “information operations,” to falsely label nationalist political parties in Europe as “fascist” and “far right,” to frame Trump as a Putin-controlled Hitler, and to smear ordinary citizens as Nazis. These coordinated propaganda and disinformation tactics were coupled with viewpoint-based censorship, thereby undermining the democratic process. Last year, NGOs funded by USAID and the State Department even pushed for the annulment of an election in Romania to prevent the victory of a nationalist candidate. Many American historians and sociologists have observed that the American people are, by nature and geography, more isolationist than globalist. We very much enjoy having large oceans to separate us from the wars in Europe and Asia. And, our rational response to being repeatedly wounded, shamed, and humiliated for our oft-disastrous foreign interventions is to turn inward and seek to heal our internal wounds. We have many. Americans on the Right and the Left have all rightly soured on foreign intervention. Indeed, opposition to more foreign wars is one of the few positive things both the radical Left and the “far right” can agree on. Afghanistan was an end-of-empire mistake that Americans do not want to repeat, and certainly not in Eastern Europe on the border with a territorial and nuclear-armed superpower. Trump was elected twice on a platform of anti-globalist nationalism. Its clear internal logic, America First, is wholly consistent with Left-wing opposition to the kinds of foreign interventions that Noam Chomsky rightly taught several generations of students not only failed on their own terms but were also fundamentally immoral. The nationalists who voters elected to the White House and Congress are not anti-imperialists, in that they still have global ambition, but their aversion to new foreign entanglements overlaps with the 20th-century Left more than the Right. We should critically evaluate whatever agreement they negotiate, and even their behavior during negotiations, but we should also keep in mind that the American people have given a clear mandate to Trump and Vance to end the war in Ukraine and significantly pull back from our two-decades-long role in overthrowing governments across Eastern Europe and the Middle East. Both the national mood and the popular mandate for the Trump administration to disentangle the US from the conflict in Ukraine and to transition our allies to greater security independence are clear. And yet many global media and governing elites — the cross-Atlantic foreign policy establishment, most European leaders, and most Democrats and many Republicans in Congress — are attacking the Trump administration’s efforts to negotiate peace in Ukraine. Why is that? Why won’t they just give peace a chance? Please subscribe now to support Public's award-winning journalism, read the rest of the article, and watch the rest of the video!
6:09

President Donald Trump is abandoning Ukraine and putting Europe in danger by negotiating directly with Russian President Vladimir Putin and criticizing Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, say the media, many European leaders, and some in Congress. But it is not in the interests of the United States to be involved in another endless war like Afghanistan that ultimately has the same outcome. Russians retain their numerical advantage. The supplies and capacities of Ukrainians and the European nations that support them are dwindling. The war has ended the lives of 200,000 people at a total cost of trillions. The US has spent $64 billion, and Europe has spent $62 billion on military aid for Ukraine, and another $50 billion and $70 billion, respectively, on other forms of aid. It’s true that Trump’s actions since taking office for his second term suggest an effort to end the so-called “international rules-based order” that has existed since World War II. And France and the UK have proposed continuing that order by sending 30,000 European peacekeeping troops to deter Russia, with US fighter jets and missiles to support them. But there is little appetite among Europeans or Americans for a long-term Western military occupation of Ukraine that is not guaranteed to work and may still trigger conflict with a nuclear-armed Russia. A Russian government representative has already rejected the proposal as a “dangerous provocation.” And the people who are demanding the US continue the war in Ukraine are the same people who got us into the war. Many are loyalists to past US presidents, including the last one, whose policies helped lead to the war by expanding NATO. Moreover, it is dishonest to call the Pax Americana that has existed since World War II an “international rules-based order.” From CIA interference in the Italian elections of 1947 to wars in Southeast Asia, Latin America, and Africa in the 1960s and 1980s to George W. Bush’s illegal invasion of Iraq in 2003, the US government has exemplified what most every foreign policy realist and International Studies professor knows, which is that the global system is anarchic and governed by power, not morality. And, from 2016 until now, the joint effort by the US government and our allies in Europe to uphold the entirely fictitious “rules-based order” had become totalitarian. The globalists turned the regime change guns inward. The US government, alongside NATO, the EU, and the governments of Britain, Germany, and others, funded the creation of a Censorship Industrial Complex to finance wrongly named “nongovernmental organizations” that “flagged” to social media companies alleged “misinformation” and demanded its removal. Government-backed NGOs and media organizations conducted sophisticated “information operations,” to falsely label nationalist political parties in Europe as “fascist” and “far right,” to frame Trump as a Putin-controlled Hitler, and to smear ordinary citizens as Nazis. These coordinated propaganda and disinformation tactics were coupled with viewpoint-based censorship, thereby undermining the democratic process. Last year, NGOs funded by USAID and the State Department even pushed for the annulment of an election in Romania to prevent the victory of a nationalist candidate. Many American historians and sociologists have observed that the American people are, by nature and geography, more isolationist than globalist. We very much enjoy having large oceans to separate us from the wars in Europe and Asia. And, our rational response to being repeatedly wounded, shamed, and humiliated for our oft-disastrous foreign interventions is to turn inward and seek to heal our internal wounds. We have many. Americans on the Right and the Left have all rightly soured on foreign intervention. Indeed, opposition to more foreign wars is one of the few positive things both the radical Left and the “far right” can agree on. Afghanistan was an end-of-empire mistake that Americans do not want to repeat, and certainly not in Eastern Europe on the border with a territorial and nuclear-armed superpower. Trump was elected twice on a platform of anti-globalist nationalism. Its clear internal logic, America First, is wholly consistent with Left-wing opposition to the kinds of foreign interventions that Noam Chomsky rightly taught several generations of students not only failed on their own terms but were also fundamentally immoral. The nationalists who voters elected to the White House and Congress are not anti-imperialists, in that they still have global ambition, but their aversion to new foreign entanglements overlaps with the 20th-century Left more than the Right. We should critically evaluate whatever agreement they negotiate, and even their behavior during negotiations, but we should also keep in mind that the American people have given a clear mandate to Trump and Vance to end the war in Ukraine and significantly pull back from our two-decades-long role in overthrowing governments across Eastern Europe and the Middle East. Both the national mood and the popular mandate for the Trump administration to disentangle the US from the conflict in Ukraine and to transition our allies to greater security independence are clear. And yet many global media and governing elites — the cross-Atlantic foreign policy establishment, most European leaders, and most Democrats and many Republicans in Congress — are attacking the Trump administration’s efforts to negotiate peace in Ukraine. Why is that? Why won’t they just give peace a chance? Please subscribe now to support Public's award-winning journalism, read the rest of the article, and watch the rest of the video!

Michael Shellenberger

261,515 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Charlie Kirk either deserved to die or was asking for it, said many on the Left yesterday about the popular 31-year-old conservative leader who was famous for debating college students. “He’s been one of the most divisive — especially divisive — younger figures who is constantly pushing hate speech aimed at certain groups,” said MSNBC political commentator Matthew Dowd, just moments after a sniper shot Kirk in Utah. “You can’t stop with these sort of awful thoughts you have and then saying these awful words and not expect awful actions to take place.” The author of a new Batman comic book spinoff, Gretchen Felker-Martin, posted “Thoughts and prayers you Nazi bitch. Hope the bullet’s okay after touching Charlie Kirk.” And some in the news media referred to Kirk as “far-right." But Kirk was not “far-Right” or a “Nazi,” and he did not spread “hate speech.” Kirk was critical of transgender ideology, the Left’s dishonesty about race and crime, and the message of contemporary feminists. Consistent with his Christianity and his commitment to the American Constitution, Kirk believed that he had the right and a moral obligation to speak unpopular truths, including that it is not possible to change one’s sex, that the rate of crime among black men is disproportionate, and that families provide social stability and fulfillment. Many on the Left expressed upset at Kirk’s assassination, and MSNBC and DC Comics fired Dowd and Felker-Martin. “I apologize for my tone and words,” Dowd said at BlueSky. “Let me be clear, I in no way intended for my comments to blame Kirk for this horrendous attack.” Governor Gavin Newsom immediately condemned the assassination of Kirk, whom Newsom had debated on a podcast earlier this year. Other Democratic politicians did the same. New York Times columnist Ezra Klein wrote about how one could vehemently disagree with Kirk, as he did, and still not believe he should be killed. But the extent to which people on the Left expressed joy at the killing of Kirk nonetheless remains disturbing. Many progressives agree with Dowd that Kirk is responsible for having created the environment that led to his death. Social media is filled with videos of leftists filming themselves openly celebrating Kirk’s murder. Hundreds of thousands of people liked social media posts justifying the assassination. And the mainstream liberal view is that Kirk encouraged political violence by spreading “hate” and “misinformation.” Dowd, in his apology, defended himself by saying, “I was asked a question on the environment we are in,” and apologized for his “tone and words,” not his message, which was that Kirk had contributed to and perhaps birthed the heated atmosphere that led to his killing. “Charlie Kirk isn’t a martyr,” wrote a progressive on X yesterday. “He’s a casualty of the violence he incited.” The post has over 12 million views, 46,000 reposts, and 360,000 likes. But the environment that led to Kirk’s death was created by the Left in its decades-long demonization and dehumanization of conservatives. For 80 years, schools, universities, and the media have used Hitler, Nazism, and fascism as symbols of ultimate evil. To call someone a “Nazi,” “fascist,” or “far-Right,” is therefore to imply that they are part of this evil, and like the historical Nazis, must be eliminated. Over the last 10 years, not just the radical Left but the mainstream news media, including the New York Times, and mainstream Democrats like Newsom, repeatedly characterized Trump and his supporters as Hitler-adjacent fascists. The New Republic openly depicted Trump as Hitler. A recent South Park episode implied that Kirk was a racist and anti-Semitic influence over young people, despite Kirk’s close relationship with influential Jewish conservatives and support for Israel that many on the Right viewed as excessive. This was all part of a deliberate dehumanization campaign. Kirk, Trump, and other conservatives, Democrats argued, are white supremacists and misogynists who “hate” black people and women, who are committing “trans genocide,” and who are destroying “our democracy.” For progressives who truly believe this rhetoric, killing such individuals would be as justified as killing Hitler and his supporters 80 years ago. After all, this act would not only save the lives of black and trans people, but would also save the entire country from an authoritarian fascist dictatorship. The same leftists who had for decades produced studies, books, movies, essays, songs, and poems about how the Nazis dehumanized their enemies dehumanized, without hesitation, MAGA conservatives. They falsely claimed Trump had praised white supremacists in Charlottesville in 2017. And reporters who had for decades covered Trump’s rise to wealth and power in 2016 reported as truth the outlandish conspiracy theory that Trump was a Manchurian candidate controlled by Russian president Vladimir Putin – another alleged Hitler-like fascist. Why did the Left spread so much hatred of Kirk and other conservatives? Why did they engage in so much dehumanization for so long?... Please subscribe now to support Public's award-winning journalism and to read the rest of the story.
5:22

Charlie Kirk either deserved to die or was asking for it, said many on the Left yesterday about the popular 31-year-old conservative leader who was famous for debating college students. “He’s been one of the most divisive — especially divisive — younger figures who is constantly pushing hate speech aimed at certain groups,” said MSNBC political commentator Matthew Dowd, just moments after a sniper shot Kirk in Utah. “You can’t stop with these sort of awful thoughts you have and then saying these awful words and not expect awful actions to take place.” The author of a new Batman comic book spinoff, Gretchen Felker-Martin, posted “Thoughts and prayers you Nazi bitch. Hope the bullet’s okay after touching Charlie Kirk.” And some in the news media referred to Kirk as “far-right." But Kirk was not “far-Right” or a “Nazi,” and he did not spread “hate speech.” Kirk was critical of transgender ideology, the Left’s dishonesty about race and crime, and the message of contemporary feminists. Consistent with his Christianity and his commitment to the American Constitution, Kirk believed that he had the right and a moral obligation to speak unpopular truths, including that it is not possible to change one’s sex, that the rate of crime among black men is disproportionate, and that families provide social stability and fulfillment. Many on the Left expressed upset at Kirk’s assassination, and MSNBC and DC Comics fired Dowd and Felker-Martin. “I apologize for my tone and words,” Dowd said at BlueSky. “Let me be clear, I in no way intended for my comments to blame Kirk for this horrendous attack.” Governor Gavin Newsom immediately condemned the assassination of Kirk, whom Newsom had debated on a podcast earlier this year. Other Democratic politicians did the same. New York Times columnist Ezra Klein wrote about how one could vehemently disagree with Kirk, as he did, and still not believe he should be killed. But the extent to which people on the Left expressed joy at the killing of Kirk nonetheless remains disturbing. Many progressives agree with Dowd that Kirk is responsible for having created the environment that led to his death. Social media is filled with videos of leftists filming themselves openly celebrating Kirk’s murder. Hundreds of thousands of people liked social media posts justifying the assassination. And the mainstream liberal view is that Kirk encouraged political violence by spreading “hate” and “misinformation.” Dowd, in his apology, defended himself by saying, “I was asked a question on the environment we are in,” and apologized for his “tone and words,” not his message, which was that Kirk had contributed to and perhaps birthed the heated atmosphere that led to his killing. “Charlie Kirk isn’t a martyr,” wrote a progressive on X yesterday. “He’s a casualty of the violence he incited.” The post has over 12 million views, 46,000 reposts, and 360,000 likes. But the environment that led to Kirk’s death was created by the Left in its decades-long demonization and dehumanization of conservatives. For 80 years, schools, universities, and the media have used Hitler, Nazism, and fascism as symbols of ultimate evil. To call someone a “Nazi,” “fascist,” or “far-Right,” is therefore to imply that they are part of this evil, and like the historical Nazis, must be eliminated. Over the last 10 years, not just the radical Left but the mainstream news media, including the New York Times, and mainstream Democrats like Newsom, repeatedly characterized Trump and his supporters as Hitler-adjacent fascists. The New Republic openly depicted Trump as Hitler. A recent South Park episode implied that Kirk was a racist and anti-Semitic influence over young people, despite Kirk’s close relationship with influential Jewish conservatives and support for Israel that many on the Right viewed as excessive. This was all part of a deliberate dehumanization campaign. Kirk, Trump, and other conservatives, Democrats argued, are white supremacists and misogynists who “hate” black people and women, who are committing “trans genocide,” and who are destroying “our democracy.” For progressives who truly believe this rhetoric, killing such individuals would be as justified as killing Hitler and his supporters 80 years ago. After all, this act would not only save the lives of black and trans people, but would also save the entire country from an authoritarian fascist dictatorship. The same leftists who had for decades produced studies, books, movies, essays, songs, and poems about how the Nazis dehumanized their enemies dehumanized, without hesitation, MAGA conservatives. They falsely claimed Trump had praised white supremacists in Charlottesville in 2017. And reporters who had for decades covered Trump’s rise to wealth and power in 2016 reported as truth the outlandish conspiracy theory that Trump was a Manchurian candidate controlled by Russian president Vladimir Putin – another alleged Hitler-like fascist. Why did the Left spread so much hatred of Kirk and other conservatives? Why did they engage in so much dehumanization for so long?... Please subscribe now to support Public's award-winning journalism and to read the rest of the story.

Michael Shellenberger

352,314 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

As a resident of Donbas, I was asked to tell about the beginning of war in Donbas in 2014. But this is a long story. So I'll do it in a few threads over the next few days. I realized that before I talk about the beginning of the war in Donbas, I need to talk a little about the period before the war. In particular, about Yanukovych's term (because during his term, Russia started taking over Ukraine) and about the Revolution of Dignity. After all, for those who do not know this period, the following story may be incomplete. In addition, Russian propaganda also pays attention to this topic. I have repeatedly seen how Russian propaganda, through its Western servants, distributed the map of the presidential elections in 2010, in which Ukraine is divided in half. At the same time, they claim that this is a map of the pro-Russian population and that these regions should be given to Russia. Yanukovych focused more on economic issues and his program was populist. He spoke "for everything good and against everything bad." And the majority in his program could find something of their own and interpret it in their own way. As for the Ukrainian language, his program stated that it remains the only state language. And the Russian language and other languages ​​have the right to exist in Ukraine. That is, he repeated what was stated in the constitution and how it worked before and after his tenure. Yanukovych's pre-election program was not pro-Russian, he spoke Ukrainian and never advocated joining Russia before the election Yanukovych positioned himself as a politician who is friendly to Russia but who will cooperate closely with Europe. That is, he showed some neutrality between East and West and his neutral path. Like once President Kuchma. And the majority of Ukrainians (until 2014) supported it. The majority of Ukrainians did not support the idea of ​​joining NATO. After all, when we gave up nuclear weapons, the USA, Britain, Russia and other countries guaranteed our sovereignty and territorial integrity. As history has shown, these hopes were in vain and Russia violated the agreements. But some Ukrainians remembered well the history of the extermination of Ukrainians by the Russians and were worried about Russia's attack on Georgia in 2008, which showed that Russia has not changed and will repeat its fascist-imperialist path. They turned out to be right. The share of these Ukrainians, in my subjective opinion, was 20%-30%, including me. It should be noted that these are people who did not want a war with Russia and did not plan it. But based on historical and modern realities, it was suspected that Russia would try to seize Ukraine or part of it in one way or another. And when Yanukovych finally canceled the European integration processes in November, people took to the streets both those who were against the cancellation of this process and those who feared that Russia, through Yanukovych, had started the process of absorbing Ukraine. There was another group of people who opposed the government because of great corruption and the transformation of the state into a totalitarian one. Or those that came out due to a combination of these factors. However, the final factor that pushed the protests into the Revolution of Dignity was the beating of protesters in the center of Kyiv. Then a peaceful and legal rally, which at the time consisted mainly of young people, was surrounded and then beaten by the police. The police beat people lying down. They even beat journalists. Then on December 1, hundreds of thousands of Ukrainians came out in response to this brutality, the beginning of the establishment of a dictatorship and the suppression of people's rights. From that time, people did not leave the central square of Kyiv until Yanukovych fled to Russia. The first video shows the beating of protesters in the center of Kyiv. The second video is the start of the Revolution of Dignity in response to this.
1:16

As a resident of Donbas, I was asked to tell about the beginning of war in Donbas in 2014. But this is a long story. So I'll do it in a few threads over the next few days. I realized that before I talk about the beginning of the war in Donbas, I need to talk a little about the period before the war. In particular, about Yanukovych's term (because during his term, Russia started taking over Ukraine) and about the Revolution of Dignity. After all, for those who do not know this period, the following story may be incomplete. In addition, Russian propaganda also pays attention to this topic. I have repeatedly seen how Russian propaganda, through its Western servants, distributed the map of the presidential elections in 2010, in which Ukraine is divided in half. At the same time, they claim that this is a map of the pro-Russian population and that these regions should be given to Russia. Yanukovych focused more on economic issues and his program was populist. He spoke "for everything good and against everything bad." And the majority in his program could find something of their own and interpret it in their own way. As for the Ukrainian language, his program stated that it remains the only state language. And the Russian language and other languages ​​have the right to exist in Ukraine. That is, he repeated what was stated in the constitution and how it worked before and after his tenure. Yanukovych's pre-election program was not pro-Russian, he spoke Ukrainian and never advocated joining Russia before the election Yanukovych positioned himself as a politician who is friendly to Russia but who will cooperate closely with Europe. That is, he showed some neutrality between East and West and his neutral path. Like once President Kuchma. And the majority of Ukrainians (until 2014) supported it. The majority of Ukrainians did not support the idea of ​​joining NATO. After all, when we gave up nuclear weapons, the USA, Britain, Russia and other countries guaranteed our sovereignty and territorial integrity. As history has shown, these hopes were in vain and Russia violated the agreements. But some Ukrainians remembered well the history of the extermination of Ukrainians by the Russians and were worried about Russia's attack on Georgia in 2008, which showed that Russia has not changed and will repeat its fascist-imperialist path. They turned out to be right. The share of these Ukrainians, in my subjective opinion, was 20%-30%, including me. It should be noted that these are people who did not want a war with Russia and did not plan it. But based on historical and modern realities, it was suspected that Russia would try to seize Ukraine or part of it in one way or another. And when Yanukovych finally canceled the European integration processes in November, people took to the streets both those who were against the cancellation of this process and those who feared that Russia, through Yanukovych, had started the process of absorbing Ukraine. There was another group of people who opposed the government because of great corruption and the transformation of the state into a totalitarian one. Or those that came out due to a combination of these factors. However, the final factor that pushed the protests into the Revolution of Dignity was the beating of protesters in the center of Kyiv. Then a peaceful and legal rally, which at the time consisted mainly of young people, was surrounded and then beaten by the police. The police beat people lying down. They even beat journalists. Then on December 1, hundreds of thousands of Ukrainians came out in response to this brutality, the beginning of the establishment of a dictatorship and the suppression of people's rights. From that time, people did not leave the central square of Kyiv until Yanukovych fled to Russia. The first video shows the beating of protesters in the center of Kyiv. The second video is the start of the Revolution of Dignity in response to this.

Serhii Antonov

845,857 Aufrufe • vor 3 Jahren

Government mind control is the stuff of conspiracy theories. Many homeless people suffering from schizophrenia or meth-induced psychosis claim to be victims of it. And it is common to find people online who say they are victims of mind control, directed energy weapons, and gang-stalking by government agents. These delusions appear to have arisen after evidence emerged in the 1970s that the CIA was engaged in mind-control efforts, the subject of a congressional hearing last week. The CIA’s MKUltra program, for example, tested LSD on prisoners and hospital patients without their consent. After World War II, the CIA may have continued Nazi experiments into mind control, even using former Nazi doctors and operating a black site in Germany where some victims died, testified a journalist-turned-historian. “Kurt Blome, who was the chief of biological weapons development for the Nazi government, came to work for the CIA,” noted former New York Times reporter Stephen Kinzer, who authored Poisoner in Chief about the head of MKUltra. “So did Walter Schreiber, who was the surgeon general of the Nazi army.” The hearing that Rep. Anna Paulina Luna convened on June 30 did not receive much media attention, likely because some of it covered what is viewed in Washington, D.C., as old news. The CIA released MKUltra financial files in 1977. The two witnesses, Kinzer and Tom O’Neill, both published their books in 2019. The two testified that little new information had come to light since then. But the hearing was significant in part because O’Neill raised the possibility that the CIA’s mind control research may never have ended. “Did it continue?” O’Neill said. “I don’t know. I can’t imagine that it didn’t, though, because the technology — that they worked to establish over 20, 25 years and spent more money on than any operation the CIA ever conducted — was successful. I imagine it’s being used.” Jolly West, a doctor and MKUltra contractor, reported in 1956 that, through the use of LSD and other drugs, he could “speed the induction of the hypnotic state and deepen the trance,” after which he could replace “true memories” with “false ones” in people’s minds without them knowing it. Two years earlier, a 34-year-old Air Force sergeant with no history of violent or criminal behavior murdered a three-year-old girl in an apparent trance state. West was assigned to be the man’s psychiatric expert. It turned out that the sergeant had been, ostensibly, undergoing an experimental treatment for his migraine headaches at the base. O’Neill points to connections between the West and the Manson Family murders without drawing definitive conclusions. In his book, Chaos, O’Neill reveals that West visited the jail cell of Jack Ruby, who killed Lee Harvey Oswald, the alleged assassin of President John F. Kennedy, just hours before Ruby had a psychotic break. The CIA destroyed MKUltra evidence, lied to Congress about it, and fabricated false reports, including the one by West. But there are many MKUltra files, photos, and films still out there, said the witnesses, sitting in the archives and attics of the 80 scientific, medical, and university institutions and at least 185 non-government researchers. In fact, a large new body of documents, photographs, and films about apparent mind control and psychic warfare will soon come to light. The son of Andrija Puharich — an American physician, scientist, and inventor who used teenagers in his psychic experiments — gave documentary filmmaker Greg Mallozzi access to his father’s archive, which includes numerous recordings. “I worked as a consultant to the CIA,” Puharich says in one of them. “My boss was the chief medical director who’s in charge of all the dirty tricks stuff when it came to drugs and hypnosis and all the mind manipulation stuff.” The new documentary is called “Mind Traveler” and will be released this fall.... Please subscribe now to support Public's award-winning journalism, read the rest of the article, and watch the full video!
4:00

Government mind control is the stuff of conspiracy theories. Many homeless people suffering from schizophrenia or meth-induced psychosis claim to be victims of it. And it is common to find people online who say they are victims of mind control, directed energy weapons, and gang-stalking by government agents. These delusions appear to have arisen after evidence emerged in the 1970s that the CIA was engaged in mind-control efforts, the subject of a congressional hearing last week. The CIA’s MKUltra program, for example, tested LSD on prisoners and hospital patients without their consent. After World War II, the CIA may have continued Nazi experiments into mind control, even using former Nazi doctors and operating a black site in Germany where some victims died, testified a journalist-turned-historian. “Kurt Blome, who was the chief of biological weapons development for the Nazi government, came to work for the CIA,” noted former New York Times reporter Stephen Kinzer, who authored Poisoner in Chief about the head of MKUltra. “So did Walter Schreiber, who was the surgeon general of the Nazi army.” The hearing that Rep. Anna Paulina Luna convened on June 30 did not receive much media attention, likely because some of it covered what is viewed in Washington, D.C., as old news. The CIA released MKUltra financial files in 1977. The two witnesses, Kinzer and Tom O’Neill, both published their books in 2019. The two testified that little new information had come to light since then. But the hearing was significant in part because O’Neill raised the possibility that the CIA’s mind control research may never have ended. “Did it continue?” O’Neill said. “I don’t know. I can’t imagine that it didn’t, though, because the technology — that they worked to establish over 20, 25 years and spent more money on than any operation the CIA ever conducted — was successful. I imagine it’s being used.” Jolly West, a doctor and MKUltra contractor, reported in 1956 that, through the use of LSD and other drugs, he could “speed the induction of the hypnotic state and deepen the trance,” after which he could replace “true memories” with “false ones” in people’s minds without them knowing it. Two years earlier, a 34-year-old Air Force sergeant with no history of violent or criminal behavior murdered a three-year-old girl in an apparent trance state. West was assigned to be the man’s psychiatric expert. It turned out that the sergeant had been, ostensibly, undergoing an experimental treatment for his migraine headaches at the base. O’Neill points to connections between the West and the Manson Family murders without drawing definitive conclusions. In his book, Chaos, O’Neill reveals that West visited the jail cell of Jack Ruby, who killed Lee Harvey Oswald, the alleged assassin of President John F. Kennedy, just hours before Ruby had a psychotic break. The CIA destroyed MKUltra evidence, lied to Congress about it, and fabricated false reports, including the one by West. But there are many MKUltra files, photos, and films still out there, said the witnesses, sitting in the archives and attics of the 80 scientific, medical, and university institutions and at least 185 non-government researchers. In fact, a large new body of documents, photographs, and films about apparent mind control and psychic warfare will soon come to light. The son of Andrija Puharich — an American physician, scientist, and inventor who used teenagers in his psychic experiments — gave documentary filmmaker Greg Mallozzi access to his father’s archive, which includes numerous recordings. “I worked as a consultant to the CIA,” Puharich says in one of them. “My boss was the chief medical director who’s in charge of all the dirty tricks stuff when it came to drugs and hypnosis and all the mind manipulation stuff.” The new documentary is called “Mind Traveler” and will be released this fall.... Please subscribe now to support Public's award-winning journalism, read the rest of the article, and watch the full video!

Michael Shellenberger

45,662 Aufrufe • vor 26 Tagen

In the 1980s, Axl Rose wrote this masterpiece about the shock of moving from the nearly all-White town of Lafayette, Indiana to multi-racial Los Angeles. Most Guns N Roses lyrics were a collaborate effort, but this song was famously written solely by Axl Rose about his own personnel experiences. There is only one surviving live recording I know of. This is Guns N Roses performing it at the CBGB in New York City. They stopped performing it live when they became famous and the media attacked them over the song. It was one of the ballads in the running to be on their debut Appetite for Destruction Album. At the time, Guns N Roses was performing One In A Million, Patience, Don't Cry, and an early version of November Rain. Sweet Child of Mine was largely written inside the studio while they were recording. I have read both Michael "Duff" McKagan's and Saul "Slash" Hudson's autobiographies. McKagan was raised by a leftist mother and forced to march in leftist protests as a kid. He said he objected to the use of slurs, but also defends the song and praises Axl Rose for his bravery for wanting to sing it in public. Hudson, who is mixed-race, does not even mention it at all. He says that there is only one Guns N Roses recording that he never wants to hear again. This is a cover song on the Spaghetti Incident album, no one cares about anyway, and his reasons are purely artistic. Hudson goes into great detail about how he reached out to Michelle and wanted her permission before recording My Michelle for the AfD album. But nothing about One in A Million. In old interviews Hudson has said he took heat from his mixed race family over the song, but personally saw it as a comedy and said people were always laughing and smiling when they played it. As a child, I first listened to this song on vinyl! I checked it out the album on vinyl from the local library! I also owned a copy of Appetite for Destruction on cassette, which made me the envy of all the other neighborhood children. Even older kids were like, "your parents let you have this?" In most ways, my parents were more strict than the other kids in the neighborhood, but when it came to music it was the opposite. In fact, there was a local discount store where I would get kites for crazy cheap and then get them stuck in trees an hour later. This store sold concert t-shirts really cheap. My parents only cared that they were cheap. Not what was on them. They didn't care if the shirts had snakes, and daggers, and skulls. So I had Metallica t-shirts that were the original Metallica shirts. I was called a Satan worshipper by other kids for wearing them. Then, suddenly, one day in High School, Metallica were pop stars. The whole schools was wearing Metallica t-shirts with the faces of the band, like a pop star boy band. That taught me that everything is bullshit! Remember when Jobbik were the most extreme "nazi" and "fascist" party in Europe? The single biggest pariah in the entire EU? Even worse than Golden Dawn? Then, they joined the anti-Orban coalition and bam they were the good guys instantly. Completely re-habilitated. The media suddenly liked them! Or how the government of Canada, the America Democratic Party, and the Western media all said Azov Battalion were "nazis" and brutally occupying and oppressing the people of Mariupol? Then Russia invaded. The exact same people who said the Ukrainian militia groups were "nazis" then said it was a complete hoax that they were "nazis" after Putin called them "nazis." Everything is pure bullshit! Of course, Axl Rose and also Sebastian Bach are pathetic shells of their former selves. Both groveling to the media and claiming they are radical leftists now! Both previously displayed 3rd Reich nazi symbols in public in the 80s to be edgy, but are now claiming to be politically correct leftists!
6:26

In the 1980s, Axl Rose wrote this masterpiece about the shock of moving from the nearly all-White town of Lafayette, Indiana to multi-racial Los Angeles. Most Guns N Roses lyrics were a collaborate effort, but this song was famously written solely by Axl Rose about his own personnel experiences. There is only one surviving live recording I know of. This is Guns N Roses performing it at the CBGB in New York City. They stopped performing it live when they became famous and the media attacked them over the song. It was one of the ballads in the running to be on their debut Appetite for Destruction Album. At the time, Guns N Roses was performing One In A Million, Patience, Don't Cry, and an early version of November Rain. Sweet Child of Mine was largely written inside the studio while they were recording. I have read both Michael "Duff" McKagan's and Saul "Slash" Hudson's autobiographies. McKagan was raised by a leftist mother and forced to march in leftist protests as a kid. He said he objected to the use of slurs, but also defends the song and praises Axl Rose for his bravery for wanting to sing it in public. Hudson, who is mixed-race, does not even mention it at all. He says that there is only one Guns N Roses recording that he never wants to hear again. This is a cover song on the Spaghetti Incident album, no one cares about anyway, and his reasons are purely artistic. Hudson goes into great detail about how he reached out to Michelle and wanted her permission before recording My Michelle for the AfD album. But nothing about One in A Million. In old interviews Hudson has said he took heat from his mixed race family over the song, but personally saw it as a comedy and said people were always laughing and smiling when they played it. As a child, I first listened to this song on vinyl! I checked it out the album on vinyl from the local library! I also owned a copy of Appetite for Destruction on cassette, which made me the envy of all the other neighborhood children. Even older kids were like, "your parents let you have this?" In most ways, my parents were more strict than the other kids in the neighborhood, but when it came to music it was the opposite. In fact, there was a local discount store where I would get kites for crazy cheap and then get them stuck in trees an hour later. This store sold concert t-shirts really cheap. My parents only cared that they were cheap. Not what was on them. They didn't care if the shirts had snakes, and daggers, and skulls. So I had Metallica t-shirts that were the original Metallica shirts. I was called a Satan worshipper by other kids for wearing them. Then, suddenly, one day in High School, Metallica were pop stars. The whole schools was wearing Metallica t-shirts with the faces of the band, like a pop star boy band. That taught me that everything is bullshit! Remember when Jobbik were the most extreme "nazi" and "fascist" party in Europe? The single biggest pariah in the entire EU? Even worse than Golden Dawn? Then, they joined the anti-Orban coalition and bam they were the good guys instantly. Completely re-habilitated. The media suddenly liked them! Or how the government of Canada, the America Democratic Party, and the Western media all said Azov Battalion were "nazis" and brutally occupying and oppressing the people of Mariupol? Then Russia invaded. The exact same people who said the Ukrainian militia groups were "nazis" then said it was a complete hoax that they were "nazis" after Putin called them "nazis." Everything is pure bullshit! Of course, Axl Rose and also Sebastian Bach are pathetic shells of their former selves. Both groveling to the media and claiming they are radical leftists now! Both previously displayed 3rd Reich nazi symbols in public in the 80s to be edgy, but are now claiming to be politically correct leftists!

Renaissance Horizon

197,839 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten