Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

Возникла проблема при загрузке этого видео. Это может быть связано с временными проблемами сети или видео может быть недоступно.

На главную

𝐋𝐞𝐭𝐭𝐞𝐫 𝟐 𝐨𝐟 𝐍𝐞𝐡𝐫𝐮: 𝐋𝐞𝐭𝐭𝐞𝐫 𝐭𝐨 𝐌𝐢𝐧𝐢𝐬𝐭𝐞𝐫 𝐑.𝐑. 𝐃𝐢𝐰𝐚𝐤𝐚𝐫 (𝟐𝟖 𝐀𝐩𝐫𝐢𝐥 𝟏𝟗𝟓𝟏) 𝐍𝐞𝐡𝐫𝐮 𝐂𝐨𝐧𝐬𝐢𝐝𝐞𝐫𝐞𝐝 𝐈𝐧𝐝𝐢𝐚’𝐬 𝐂𝐢𝐯𝐢𝐥𝐢𝐬𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧𝐚𝐥 𝐏𝐫𝐢𝐝𝐞 ‘𝐇𝐚𝐫𝐦𝐟𝐮𝐥’ For Nehru, Somnath was not pride; it was a “problem”. In an official directive, Nehru instructed that the Somnath consecration be toned down, calling it “pompous” and harmful to India’s image... show more

G Kishan Reddy

396,160 subscribers

24,290 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

Новости и политика Образование

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

𝐂𝐨𝐧𝐠𝐫𝐞𝐬𝐬 𝐬𝐮𝐩𝐫𝐞𝐦𝐨 𝐑𝐚𝐡𝐮𝐥 𝐆𝐚𝐧𝐝𝐡𝐢 𝐨𝐩𝐞𝐧𝐥𝐲 𝐥𝐚𝐛𝐞𝐥𝐥𝐞𝐝 𝐔𝐧𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐌𝐢𝐧𝐢𝐬𝐭𝐞𝐫 𝐨𝐟 𝐒𝐭𝐚𝐭𝐞 𝐒𝐡𝐫𝐢 𝐑𝐚𝐯𝐧𝐞𝐞𝐭 𝐒𝐢𝐧𝐠𝐡 𝐁𝐢𝐭𝐭𝐮 𝐚 “𝐭𝐫𝐚𝐢𝐭𝐨𝐫”. ⚠️ Let’s be clear. This is not an isolated remark. It reflects a long-standing pattern of casual disrespect towards the Sikh community. * From Sam Pitroda’s infamous “Hua to Hua” comment, it became evident that despite public posturing, Congress has never shown genuine remorse for the 1984 Sikh riots. * It was Rahul Gandhi himself who publicly tore a bill in Parliament, humiliating a Sikh Prime Minister before the world. The nation must not dismiss this as a slip of the tongue. It is not a one-off incident. 𝐓𝐡𝐢𝐬 𝐢𝐬 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐫𝐞𝐚𝐥 𝐂𝐨𝐧𝐠𝐫𝐞𝐬𝐬 𝐦𝐢𝐧𝐝𝐬𝐞𝐭.

𝐂𝐨𝐧𝐠𝐫𝐞𝐬𝐬 𝐬𝐮𝐩𝐫𝐞𝐦𝐨 𝐑𝐚𝐡𝐮𝐥 𝐆𝐚𝐧𝐝𝐡𝐢 𝐨𝐩𝐞𝐧𝐥𝐲 𝐥𝐚𝐛𝐞𝐥𝐥𝐞𝐝 𝐔𝐧𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐌𝐢𝐧𝐢𝐬𝐭𝐞𝐫 𝐨𝐟 𝐒𝐭𝐚𝐭𝐞 𝐒𝐡𝐫𝐢 𝐑𝐚𝐯𝐧𝐞𝐞𝐭 𝐒𝐢𝐧𝐠𝐡 𝐁𝐢𝐭𝐭𝐮 𝐚 “𝐭𝐫𝐚𝐢𝐭𝐨𝐫”. ⚠️ Let’s be clear. This is not an isolated remark. It reflects a long-standing pattern of casual disrespect towards the Sikh community. * From Sam Pitroda’s infamous “Hua to Hua” comment, it became evident that despite public posturing, Congress has never shown genuine remorse for the 1984 Sikh riots. * It was Rahul Gandhi himself who publicly tore a bill in Parliament, humiliating a Sikh Prime Minister before the world. The nation must not dismiss this as a slip of the tongue. It is not a one-off incident. 𝐓𝐡𝐢𝐬 𝐢𝐬 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐫𝐞𝐚𝐥 𝐂𝐨𝐧𝐠𝐫𝐞𝐬𝐬 𝐦𝐢𝐧𝐝𝐬𝐞𝐭.

BJP

32,747 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

🌹 𝐊𝐞𝐞𝐩 𝐫𝐢𝐝𝐢𝐜𝐮𝐥𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐦𝐨𝐜𝐤𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐍𝐞𝐡𝐫𝐮 🌹 For every sensible and sane India knows & is aware of Nehru’s real contribution. You remembering him so very often and frequently, itself goes on to prove the inferiority complex that prevails in your mind and heart. For, you are a 56” made up #Tamasha while his shadow of stature was way too big to even step around it. You can try being upside down, but you’ll NEVER be / become Nehru!!! It’s not only difficult but IMPOSSIBLE to be / become #Nehru at least in this life #Coward #Liar #BisGuru #Nehruvian #BeingNehru #ImitatingNehru #Holi #Holi2026 #HappyHoli #HappyHoli2026 #Holi2026

🌹 𝐊𝐞𝐞𝐩 𝐫𝐢𝐝𝐢𝐜𝐮𝐥𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐦𝐨𝐜𝐤𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐍𝐞𝐡𝐫𝐮 🌹 For every sensible and sane India knows & is aware of Nehru’s real contribution. You remembering him so very often and frequently, itself goes on to prove the inferiority complex that prevails in your mind and heart. For, you are a 56” made up #Tamasha while his shadow of stature was way too big to even step around it. You can try being upside down, but you’ll NEVER be / become Nehru!!! It’s not only difficult but IMPOSSIBLE to be / become #Nehru at least in this life #Coward #Liar #BisGuru #Nehruvian #BeingNehru #ImitatingNehru #Holi #Holi2026 #HappyHoli #HappyHoli2026 #Holi2026

𝐒𝐢𝐝𝐝

47,309 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

#WATCH | Delhi | BJP MP Sudhanshu Trivedi says, "I want to clarify that we have no personal animosity towards India's first Prime Minister, Jawaharlal Nehru...Just as PM Narendra Modi is not merely an individual, but an institution, similarly, Jawaharlal Nehru is not just a leader, but a symbol of an ideology and it is necessary to understand today how terrible and frightening that ideology was for India, and how much it was concealed behind a veil of deception...It is sad that in April 1951, Nehru wrote a letter to the then Prime Minister of Pakistan, Liaquat Ali Khan, addressing him as “my dear Nawabjade”, stating that the story of the gates of the Somnath Temple being brought back to India was completely false and that there was no truth to it...According to the book "Maharaja Ranjit Singh" by L.S. Bakshi, officially published by the Congress government, page number fifteen, published by the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting, New Delhi in 1992, the government states that Ranjit Singh made no distinction between Hindus and Sikhs among his subjects when the combined forces of the East India Company and Ranjit Singh defeated Shah Shuja in Kabul. Pay attention to this further point: When they captured Kabul, one of the terms inserted by Maharaja Ranjit Singh in the treaty that followed was that the doors of the Somnath temple, planted there by Mahmud Ghazni, should be returned to India. Now, is Maharaja Ranjit Singh right, or is Jawaharlal Nehru, who was busy catering to Liaquat Ali's whims, telling the truth? Is the statement published by the Indian government's Ministry of Information and Broadcasting in 1992 true?... There's the second reference you might have seen. In it, K.M. Panikkar, who was in Communist China at the time, and had a communist mindset, and was our ambassador to China, writes in a letter that no, all this is completely wrong. If any of you have read in the books, the letter Panikkar wrote to Nehru had the sentiment that they should find out how Chairman Mao would feel about it...What affection they have for the Maoists who consider religion as opium, and how close and affectionate they are towards the Muslim League, and how they are bringing down the hammer on Hindu sentiments, and this mindset remains unchanged even today...The same mentality that prevailed back then is visible today. Affection for the Muslim League mentality because of the alliance, and also for the Maoists. An agreement with the Communist Party of China and a fierce attack on Sanatan Hindu Dharma"

#WATCH | Delhi | BJP MP Sudhanshu Trivedi says, "I want to clarify that we have no personal animosity towards India's first Prime Minister, Jawaharlal Nehru...Just as PM Narendra Modi is not merely an individual, but an institution, similarly, Jawaharlal Nehru is not just a leader, but a symbol of an ideology and it is necessary to understand today how terrible and frightening that ideology was for India, and how much it was concealed behind a veil of deception...It is sad that in April 1951, Nehru wrote a letter to the then Prime Minister of Pakistan, Liaquat Ali Khan, addressing him as “my dear Nawabjade”, stating that the story of the gates of the Somnath Temple being brought back to India was completely false and that there was no truth to it...According to the book "Maharaja Ranjit Singh" by L.S. Bakshi, officially published by the Congress government, page number fifteen, published by the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting, New Delhi in 1992, the government states that Ranjit Singh made no distinction between Hindus and Sikhs among his subjects when the combined forces of the East India Company and Ranjit Singh defeated Shah Shuja in Kabul. Pay attention to this further point: When they captured Kabul, one of the terms inserted by Maharaja Ranjit Singh in the treaty that followed was that the doors of the Somnath temple, planted there by Mahmud Ghazni, should be returned to India. Now, is Maharaja Ranjit Singh right, or is Jawaharlal Nehru, who was busy catering to Liaquat Ali's whims, telling the truth? Is the statement published by the Indian government's Ministry of Information and Broadcasting in 1992 true?... There's the second reference you might have seen. In it, K.M. Panikkar, who was in Communist China at the time, and had a communist mindset, and was our ambassador to China, writes in a letter that no, all this is completely wrong. If any of you have read in the books, the letter Panikkar wrote to Nehru had the sentiment that they should find out how Chairman Mao would feel about it...What affection they have for the Maoists who consider religion as opium, and how close and affectionate they are towards the Muslim League, and how they are bringing down the hammer on Hindu sentiments, and this mindset remains unchanged even today...The same mentality that prevailed back then is visible today. Affection for the Muslim League mentality because of the alliance, and also for the Maoists. An agreement with the Communist Party of China and a fierce attack on Sanatan Hindu Dharma"

ANI

50,209 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

A welcome and overdue course correction by Prime Minister Narendra Modi in restoring the full six-stanza rendition of Vande Mataram to its rightful place at official ceremonies. For decades, political compromise diluted what was meant to be a civilisational invocation of the motherland. A nation that reclaimed its sovereignty in 1947 need not continue to inherit the anxieties of that era. Cultural confidence cannot be permanently hostage to historical concessions. Mandating the complete version at constitutional occasions - from the unfurling of the Tricolour to the arrival of the President and Governors - reinforces that national identity is not negotiable. It is lived, sung, and honoured in full. A confident republic does not trim its heritage to fit the sensitivities of the past. It stands by it unapologetically.

A welcome and overdue course correction by Prime Minister Narendra Modi in restoring the full six-stanza rendition of Vande Mataram to its rightful place at official ceremonies. For decades, political compromise diluted what was meant to be a civilisational invocation of the motherland. A nation that reclaimed its sovereignty in 1947 need not continue to inherit the anxieties of that era. Cultural confidence cannot be permanently hostage to historical concessions. Mandating the complete version at constitutional occasions - from the unfurling of the Tricolour to the arrival of the President and Governors - reinforces that national identity is not negotiable. It is lived, sung, and honoured in full. A confident republic does not trim its heritage to fit the sensitivities of the past. It stands by it unapologetically.

Mahesh Jethmalani

35,484 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

.BJP’s problem with Bengal is not political. It is civilisational. They simply do not understand how this land remembers, honours, or speaks of its giants. In Bengal, Bankim Chandra Chattopadhyay is not a name to be casually invoked for applause lines. He is Rishi Bankim, a towering luminary whose words awakened a nation in chains. His legacy is approached with reverence, restraint, and humility. That is precisely what was missing when Narendra Modi chose to address him as “Bankim da.” This suffix was not a slip of the tongue; it was proof of a deeper disconnect. This is what happens when those who lack roots in a culture try to cosplay intimacy with it. They mimic the surface, butcher the substance, and insult what they claim to honour. Bengal does not need performative gestures from people who have repeatedly demeaned its thinkers, distorted its history, and attacked its plural soul. You cannot fake cultural literacy. And Bengal recognises impostors instantly.

.BJP’s problem with Bengal is not political. It is civilisational. They simply do not understand how this land remembers, honours, or speaks of its giants. In Bengal, Bankim Chandra Chattopadhyay is not a name to be casually invoked for applause lines. He is Rishi Bankim, a towering luminary whose words awakened a nation in chains. His legacy is approached with reverence, restraint, and humility. That is precisely what was missing when Narendra Modi chose to address him as “Bankim da.” This suffix was not a slip of the tongue; it was proof of a deeper disconnect. This is what happens when those who lack roots in a culture try to cosplay intimacy with it. They mimic the surface, butcher the substance, and insult what they claim to honour. Bengal does not need performative gestures from people who have repeatedly demeaned its thinkers, distorted its history, and attacked its plural soul. You cannot fake cultural literacy. And Bengal recognises impostors instantly.

All India Trinamool Congress

12,278 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад

It is a pleasure to be with you this evening to celebrate the memory and contribution of our first Prime Minister, Pt. Jawaharlal Nehru. He was the prime architect of the modern Indian nation-state. His was a life anchored firmly in parliamentary democracy. He had a steadfast belief in planned economic growth and a profound commitment to the development of scientific temper alongside the development of scientific and technological capabilities. To him, secularism — in which he firmly believed — meant the celebration of India’s many diversities while strengthening its fundamental unity. His legacy continues to shape our everyday lives. Decades have gone by since his time, but he continues to serve as a beacon of light to millions of our countrymen and women. It is inevitable that such a monumental figure will have his life and work analysed and critiqued — and that is indeed as it should be. Although the temptation to divorce him from his times and the challenges that he had to face and to look at him, devoid of the historical context in which he functioned has become quite widespread. Yet, while we welcome ongoing analysis of his contributions, what is not acceptable is the systematic attempt being made to denigrate, distort, demean and defame him. The sole objective of this is to not only diminish him as a personality but also his universally recognised role in India's independence struggle and his early decades as a leader of an independent nation challenged by unprecedented problems, but it is also to demolish his multifaceted legacy in a crude and self-serving attempt to rewrite history. Analysis is one thing, but deliberate mischief with what he said, what he wrote and what he did is another thing and totally unacceptable. And who are the forces that have launched this project? We all know that they have worked for years and years—for decades—and finally, here they are. They belong to an ideology that had no role whatsoever in our freedom movement, that had no role whatsoever in the making of our Constitution. In fact, they even burnt it and were totally against it. It is an ideology that long ago fanned an atmosphere of hate that ultimately led to the assassination of Mahatma Gandhi ji. His killers today continue to be glorified by its adherents. It is an ideology that has consistently rejected the ideals of our founding fathers. It is an ideology with a bigoted and viciously communal outlook. Its approach to nationhood is based on stoking prejudices of all kinds. Let there be no doubt whatsoever that the project to vilify Jawaharlal Nehru ji is the main objective of the ruling establishment today. Their goal is not just to erase him; it is actually to destroy the social, political, and economic foundations on which our nation has been founded and built. The road ahead is not easy. But there is simply no option but for each one of us, individually and collectively, to stand up and confront this project. We not only owe it to the memory of Jawaharlal Nehru ji and his comrades—we owe it to ourselves, and even more to the coming generations. The unapologetic and fierce defence of the Nehruvian legacy is not an act of nostalgia. It is a commitment to restoring India's constitutional promise, to safeguarding reason in the face of propaganda, and to ensuring that our republic remains modern and forward-looking. If we succeed, it will not only honour Jawaharlal Nehru ji's memory; it will ensure that the India he envisioned remains a reality. At a time when tolerance in public life is shrinking, when dissent is painted as disloyalty, and history is reduced to partisan combat, Nehru ji's example becomes even more vital. He taught us that disagreement is not a threat but a democratic necessity—that unity does not demand uniformity; that a confident nation need not fear the truth about its past. Friends, there is some reason for hope. Last month, the Jawaharlal Nehru Memorial Fund also launched an archive which can be accessed at The archive is an easily searchable and freely downloadable digital archive—also, by the way, accessible on your smartphone. At present, it covers the hundred published volumes of his selected works, covering the period from 1903 till the day before he died. The archive will continue to expand. So, there it will be for you all to access any time you want to know something about what he said, what he wrote, or what he did. Sandeep Dixit's initiative, which has brought all of us here this evening, is another sincere attempt to take on this challenge of rescuing Nehru ji from the web of deception. And we need many, many more such initiatives across the length and breadth of our country. I will end by congratulating Sandeep and his team and wishing him and his colleagues the very best in their endeavours. Jai Hind! : CPP Chairperson Smt. Sonia Gandhi ji at the launch of The Nehru Centre India

It is a pleasure to be with you this evening to celebrate the memory and contribution of our first Prime Minister, Pt. Jawaharlal Nehru. He was the prime architect of the modern Indian nation-state. His was a life anchored firmly in parliamentary democracy. He had a steadfast belief in planned economic growth and a profound commitment to the development of scientific temper alongside the development of scientific and technological capabilities. To him, secularism — in which he firmly believed — meant the celebration of India’s many diversities while strengthening its fundamental unity. His legacy continues to shape our everyday lives. Decades have gone by since his time, but he continues to serve as a beacon of light to millions of our countrymen and women. It is inevitable that such a monumental figure will have his life and work analysed and critiqued — and that is indeed as it should be. Although the temptation to divorce him from his times and the challenges that he had to face and to look at him, devoid of the historical context in which he functioned has become quite widespread. Yet, while we welcome ongoing analysis of his contributions, what is not acceptable is the systematic attempt being made to denigrate, distort, demean and defame him. The sole objective of this is to not only diminish him as a personality but also his universally recognised role in India's independence struggle and his early decades as a leader of an independent nation challenged by unprecedented problems, but it is also to demolish his multifaceted legacy in a crude and self-serving attempt to rewrite history. Analysis is one thing, but deliberate mischief with what he said, what he wrote and what he did is another thing and totally unacceptable. And who are the forces that have launched this project? We all know that they have worked for years and years—for decades—and finally, here they are. They belong to an ideology that had no role whatsoever in our freedom movement, that had no role whatsoever in the making of our Constitution. In fact, they even burnt it and were totally against it. It is an ideology that long ago fanned an atmosphere of hate that ultimately led to the assassination of Mahatma Gandhi ji. His killers today continue to be glorified by its adherents. It is an ideology that has consistently rejected the ideals of our founding fathers. It is an ideology with a bigoted and viciously communal outlook. Its approach to nationhood is based on stoking prejudices of all kinds. Let there be no doubt whatsoever that the project to vilify Jawaharlal Nehru ji is the main objective of the ruling establishment today. Their goal is not just to erase him; it is actually to destroy the social, political, and economic foundations on which our nation has been founded and built. The road ahead is not easy. But there is simply no option but for each one of us, individually and collectively, to stand up and confront this project. We not only owe it to the memory of Jawaharlal Nehru ji and his comrades—we owe it to ourselves, and even more to the coming generations. The unapologetic and fierce defence of the Nehruvian legacy is not an act of nostalgia. It is a commitment to restoring India's constitutional promise, to safeguarding reason in the face of propaganda, and to ensuring that our republic remains modern and forward-looking. If we succeed, it will not only honour Jawaharlal Nehru ji's memory; it will ensure that the India he envisioned remains a reality. At a time when tolerance in public life is shrinking, when dissent is painted as disloyalty, and history is reduced to partisan combat, Nehru ji's example becomes even more vital. He taught us that disagreement is not a threat but a democratic necessity—that unity does not demand uniformity; that a confident nation need not fear the truth about its past. Friends, there is some reason for hope. Last month, the Jawaharlal Nehru Memorial Fund also launched an archive which can be accessed at The archive is an easily searchable and freely downloadable digital archive—also, by the way, accessible on your smartphone. At present, it covers the hundred published volumes of his selected works, covering the period from 1903 till the day before he died. The archive will continue to expand. So, there it will be for you all to access any time you want to know something about what he said, what he wrote, or what he did. Sandeep Dixit's initiative, which has brought all of us here this evening, is another sincere attempt to take on this challenge of rescuing Nehru ji from the web of deception. And we need many, many more such initiatives across the length and breadth of our country. I will end by congratulating Sandeep and his team and wishing him and his colleagues the very best in their endeavours. Jai Hind! : CPP Chairperson Smt. Sonia Gandhi ji at the launch of The Nehru Centre India

Congress

45,430 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад

🔥 “After Nehru, Rahul Gandhi Is the First Who Took the RSS Head-On” Former Rajya Sabha MP Mohammad Adeeb makes a striking political argument: Rahul Gandhi, he says, is the first major leader in the Nehru-Gandhi family after Jawaharlal Nehru to confront the RSS directly and without hesitation. Adeeb contrasts Rahul’s approach with Indira Gandhi, whom he says was more politically flexible towards the RSS. His larger point is about ideological inheritance: Rahul Gandhi, in his view, has demonstrated that he represents the constitutional, secular and pluralist vision associated with Nehru—and that this explains why the RSS and its supporters continue to attack Nehru. Adeeb also makes a powerful historical argument about India’s plural inheritance. If Mughal history is removed from textbooks, he asks rhetorically, should we also remove the monuments and cultural legacy associated with that period—the Red Fort, Jama Masjid and the Taj Mahal? His underlying message is simple: You cannot selectively erase history without impoverishing the history of India itself. He then moves to accountability. Whether someone is a politician, activist or thinker, Adeeb argues, they should ask where the enormous amounts of public money being spent are going—and insist that those responsible eventually provide an account. He further claims that many communal conflicts historically had an economic dimension, arguing that Muslim-owned crafts and businesses were displaced in the aftermath of communal violence. That is a serious historical claim and should be examined through evidence rather than treated as an established fact merely because it is asserted in an interview. Adeeb has a long record of speaking on secularism, minority rights and the RSS. In earlier interviews, he has criticised the Congress for what he called its diluted secularism while also arguing that the party historically did not make Muslims feel that they did not belong to India. The larger question India's history cannot be reduced to the history of one religion, one dynasty or one ideology. A civilisation becomes stronger when it remembers everything—not when it remembers selectively. And democratic politics requires something even more important: Power must be questioned, public money must be accounted for, and historical claims must survive scrutiny rather than propaganda. 🎥 Video credit: News MX 📌 Source: "Threads post / original video" #RahulGandhi #Nehru #RSS #Secularism #IndianHistory #Democracy #Constitution #MohammadAdeeb #DimagiNaxal

🔥 “After Nehru, Rahul Gandhi Is the First Who Took the RSS Head-On” Former Rajya Sabha MP Mohammad Adeeb makes a striking political argument: Rahul Gandhi, he says, is the first major leader in the Nehru-Gandhi family after Jawaharlal Nehru to confront the RSS directly and without hesitation. Adeeb contrasts Rahul’s approach with Indira Gandhi, whom he says was more politically flexible towards the RSS. His larger point is about ideological inheritance: Rahul Gandhi, in his view, has demonstrated that he represents the constitutional, secular and pluralist vision associated with Nehru—and that this explains why the RSS and its supporters continue to attack Nehru. Adeeb also makes a powerful historical argument about India’s plural inheritance. If Mughal history is removed from textbooks, he asks rhetorically, should we also remove the monuments and cultural legacy associated with that period—the Red Fort, Jama Masjid and the Taj Mahal? His underlying message is simple: You cannot selectively erase history without impoverishing the history of India itself. He then moves to accountability. Whether someone is a politician, activist or thinker, Adeeb argues, they should ask where the enormous amounts of public money being spent are going—and insist that those responsible eventually provide an account. He further claims that many communal conflicts historically had an economic dimension, arguing that Muslim-owned crafts and businesses were displaced in the aftermath of communal violence. That is a serious historical claim and should be examined through evidence rather than treated as an established fact merely because it is asserted in an interview. Adeeb has a long record of speaking on secularism, minority rights and the RSS. In earlier interviews, he has criticised the Congress for what he called its diluted secularism while also arguing that the party historically did not make Muslims feel that they did not belong to India. The larger question India's history cannot be reduced to the history of one religion, one dynasty or one ideology. A civilisation becomes stronger when it remembers everything—not when it remembers selectively. And democratic politics requires something even more important: Power must be questioned, public money must be accounted for, and historical claims must survive scrutiny rather than propaganda. 🎥 Video credit: News MX 📌 Source: "Threads post / original video" #RahulGandhi #Nehru #RSS #Secularism #IndianHistory #Democracy #Constitution #MohammadAdeeb #DimagiNaxal

Ashok Dadhwal

30,221 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

𝘖𝘯 𝘉𝘩𝘢𝘳𝘢𝘵 𝘙𝘢𝘵𝘯𝘢 𝙋𝙧𝙖𝙣𝙖𝙗 𝙈𝙪𝙠𝙝𝙚𝙧𝙟𝙚𝙚'𝘴 𝘣𝘪𝘳𝘵𝘩 𝘢𝘯𝘯𝘪𝘷𝘦𝘳𝘴𝘢𝘳𝘺, 𝘩𝘪𝘴 𝘥𝘢𝘶𝘨𝘩𝘵𝘦𝘳 𝙎𝙝𝙖𝙧𝙢𝙞𝙨𝙩𝙝𝙖 𝙈𝙪𝙠𝙝𝙚𝙧𝙟𝙚𝙚 𝘳𝘦𝘧𝘭𝘦𝘤𝘵𝘴 𝘰𝘯 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘧𝘰𝘳𝘮𝘦𝘳 𝘗𝘳𝘦𝘴𝘪𝘥𝘦𝘯𝘵'𝘴 𝘴𝘱𝘦𝘤𝘪𝘢𝘭 𝘣𝘰𝘯𝘥 𝘸𝘪𝘵𝘩 𝘗𝘳𝘪𝘮𝘦 𝘔𝘪𝘯𝘪𝘴𝘵𝘦𝘳 𝘕𝘢𝘳𝘦𝘯𝘥𝘳𝘢 𝘔𝘰𝘥𝘪. 𝗡𝗔𝗥𝗘𝗡𝗗𝗥𝗔 𝗠𝗢𝗗𝗜 𝗔𝗡𝗗 𝗠𝗬 𝗙𝗔𝗧𝗛𝗘𝗥, 𝗣𝗥𝗔𝗡𝗔𝗕 𝗠𝗨𝗞𝗛𝗘𝗥𝗝𝗘𝗘: 𝗔 𝗕𝗢𝗡𝗗 𝗥𝗢𝗢𝗧𝗘𝗗 𝗜𝗡 𝗠𝗨𝗧𝗨𝗔𝗟 𝗥𝗘𝗦𝗣𝗘𝗖𝗧 In the world of polity, where relationships are defined by formalities and protocol, the bond between Prime Minister Narendra Modi and my father, Pranab Mukherjee, stands out as a rare example of camaraderie that transcended political boundaries. Despite ideologically contrasting backgrounds, their relationship blossomed on the foundations of mutual admiration, respect, and a shared commitment to the nation. When Narendra Modi became Prime Minister in 2014, he was stepping onto the national stage after over a decade as Chief Minister of Gujarat. My father, then President of India, with his vast experience in governance, became an indispensable guide to Narendra Modi. I remember how warmly Baba welcomed him, offering his support in constitutional matters while respecting their distinct roles. During their very first meeting after Narendra Modi’s electoral victory in 2014, the Prime Minister touched my father’s feet—a gesture of reverence that left a lasting impression on everyone. Baba later told me about that moment and how he candidly assured Narendra Modi: “We belong to two different ideologies, but the people have given you a mandate. I will not interfere with governance—that is your job. But I will be there if you need help in any constitutional matter.” Narendra Modi often acknowledged the significance of this assurance, recounting in one of my conversations with him. He said, “For Dada to say this was a big thing. From the beginning, there was openness and honesty between us.” Baba’s diary entries revealed just how profound their bond was. He noted that even when Narendra Modi was Gujarat’s Chief Minister and a vocal critic of the Congress, he always touched Baba’s feet during their private meetings. “I don’t know why, but he has a strange soft corner for me,” Baba once wrote. Their connection extended beyond governance into shared values and spirituality. Baba once told Narendra Modi that their bond might stem from their mutual reverence for Swami Vivekananda and Shri Ramakrishna Paramahansa, central figures in the Ramakrishna Mission. Narendra Modi often referred to my father as a mentor, especially during his early days as Prime Minister. Baba’s wisdom and experience in navigating the complexities of governance provided invaluable guidance. At Baba’s farewell ceremony as President in 2017, Narendra Modi delivered an emotional speech, calling him “a father figure” and “a mentor who inspired me to work harder for the nation.” This admiration was mutual. In his memoir, The Presidential Years: 2012–2017, Baba praised Narendra Modi’s decisiveness and work ethic while acknowledging occasional policy disagreements. He appreciated Narendra Modi’s governance reforms and his ability to connect with people. Baba wrote in his diary, “Modi has a very professional approach to statecraft. He truly feels the pulse of the people.” He also observed that, after Indira Gandhi, Narendra Modi is one of the rare Prime Ministers who not only understands the pulse of the people but also possesses immense political strength. My father also had some initial apprehensions about how Narendra Modi, coming from state politics and without prior experience in national or parliamentary roles, would handle India’s complex foreign policy. PM Modi’s transition from state politics to the national stage, becoming a Member of Parliament and then the Prime Minister, was a significant leap. However, my father was quick to appreciate PM Modi's ability to adapt and excel. He remarked in several interviews, how PM Modi swiftly grasped the intricacies of India’s foreign policy—a domain known for its complexity. During his 2014 oath-taking ceremony, Narendra Modi made a decision to invite the SAARC leaders, a gesture that my father deeply appreciated. He considered it a highly innovative and strategic initiative, remarking that PM Modi is truly an out-of-the-box thinker. My father not only praised this bold move but also offered a word of advice to the Prime Minister to ensure that security arrangements were exceptionally tight. Their bond extended beyond official duties. I recall an instance when Narendra Modi, learning that Baba felt uneasy without work after retiring as President, personally called him. “Dada, please don’t be depressed. Your words of wisdom have great value for the nation. You should speak your mind at seminars and public events,” he told Baba. This simple yet thoughtful gesture showcased the depth of their connection. One of the most heartfelt moments in their relationship was Narendra Modi’s handwritten farewell letter to Baba, calling him a “father figure” and expressing deep gratitude. Baba was touched by this gesture and even shared the letter on social media, showcasing the emotional bond they shared. When Baba passed away in August 2020, Narendra Modi’s tributes revealed the void his absence left in his life. Calling Baba a “guide and mentor,” Narendra Modi emphasized his commitment to placing the nation above political divides. When Baba was awarded the Bharat Ratna, I remember seeing Narendra Modi Ji’s face beam with pride. He was genuinely happy, a moment that reflected the magnanimity of his government in honouring stalwarts irrespective of political affiliations. My father often said, “Modi is a quick learner and a hard worker.” The work ethic Narendra Modi demonstrated—reportedly working up to 20 hours a day—resonated with my father, who shared a similar dedication to public service during his career. Their relationship is a powerful example of how mutual respect and shared dedication to national progress can transcend political differences. Their relationship leaves a legacy of unity and statesmanship for future generations to emulate #ModiStory

𝘖𝘯 𝘉𝘩𝘢𝘳𝘢𝘵 𝘙𝘢𝘵𝘯𝘢 𝙋𝙧𝙖𝙣𝙖𝙗 𝙈𝙪𝙠𝙝𝙚𝙧𝙟𝙚𝙚'𝘴 𝘣𝘪𝘳𝘵𝘩 𝘢𝘯𝘯𝘪𝘷𝘦𝘳𝘴𝘢𝘳𝘺, 𝘩𝘪𝘴 𝘥𝘢𝘶𝘨𝘩𝘵𝘦𝘳 𝙎𝙝𝙖𝙧𝙢𝙞𝙨𝙩𝙝𝙖 𝙈𝙪𝙠𝙝𝙚𝙧𝙟𝙚𝙚 𝘳𝘦𝘧𝘭𝘦𝘤𝘵𝘴 𝘰𝘯 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘧𝘰𝘳𝘮𝘦𝘳 𝘗𝘳𝘦𝘴𝘪𝘥𝘦𝘯𝘵'𝘴 𝘴𝘱𝘦𝘤𝘪𝘢𝘭 𝘣𝘰𝘯𝘥 𝘸𝘪𝘵𝘩 𝘗𝘳𝘪𝘮𝘦 𝘔𝘪𝘯𝘪𝘴𝘵𝘦𝘳 𝘕𝘢𝘳𝘦𝘯𝘥𝘳𝘢 𝘔𝘰𝘥𝘪. 𝗡𝗔𝗥𝗘𝗡𝗗𝗥𝗔 𝗠𝗢𝗗𝗜 𝗔𝗡𝗗 𝗠𝗬 𝗙𝗔𝗧𝗛𝗘𝗥, 𝗣𝗥𝗔𝗡𝗔𝗕 𝗠𝗨𝗞𝗛𝗘𝗥𝗝𝗘𝗘: 𝗔 𝗕𝗢𝗡𝗗 𝗥𝗢𝗢𝗧𝗘𝗗 𝗜𝗡 𝗠𝗨𝗧𝗨𝗔𝗟 𝗥𝗘𝗦𝗣𝗘𝗖𝗧 In the world of polity, where relationships are defined by formalities and protocol, the bond between Prime Minister Narendra Modi and my father, Pranab Mukherjee, stands out as a rare example of camaraderie that transcended political boundaries. Despite ideologically contrasting backgrounds, their relationship blossomed on the foundations of mutual admiration, respect, and a shared commitment to the nation. When Narendra Modi became Prime Minister in 2014, he was stepping onto the national stage after over a decade as Chief Minister of Gujarat. My father, then President of India, with his vast experience in governance, became an indispensable guide to Narendra Modi. I remember how warmly Baba welcomed him, offering his support in constitutional matters while respecting their distinct roles. During their very first meeting after Narendra Modi’s electoral victory in 2014, the Prime Minister touched my father’s feet—a gesture of reverence that left a lasting impression on everyone. Baba later told me about that moment and how he candidly assured Narendra Modi: “We belong to two different ideologies, but the people have given you a mandate. I will not interfere with governance—that is your job. But I will be there if you need help in any constitutional matter.” Narendra Modi often acknowledged the significance of this assurance, recounting in one of my conversations with him. He said, “For Dada to say this was a big thing. From the beginning, there was openness and honesty between us.” Baba’s diary entries revealed just how profound their bond was. He noted that even when Narendra Modi was Gujarat’s Chief Minister and a vocal critic of the Congress, he always touched Baba’s feet during their private meetings. “I don’t know why, but he has a strange soft corner for me,” Baba once wrote. Their connection extended beyond governance into shared values and spirituality. Baba once told Narendra Modi that their bond might stem from their mutual reverence for Swami Vivekananda and Shri Ramakrishna Paramahansa, central figures in the Ramakrishna Mission. Narendra Modi often referred to my father as a mentor, especially during his early days as Prime Minister. Baba’s wisdom and experience in navigating the complexities of governance provided invaluable guidance. At Baba’s farewell ceremony as President in 2017, Narendra Modi delivered an emotional speech, calling him “a father figure” and “a mentor who inspired me to work harder for the nation.” This admiration was mutual. In his memoir, The Presidential Years: 2012–2017, Baba praised Narendra Modi’s decisiveness and work ethic while acknowledging occasional policy disagreements. He appreciated Narendra Modi’s governance reforms and his ability to connect with people. Baba wrote in his diary, “Modi has a very professional approach to statecraft. He truly feels the pulse of the people.” He also observed that, after Indira Gandhi, Narendra Modi is one of the rare Prime Ministers who not only understands the pulse of the people but also possesses immense political strength. My father also had some initial apprehensions about how Narendra Modi, coming from state politics and without prior experience in national or parliamentary roles, would handle India’s complex foreign policy. PM Modi’s transition from state politics to the national stage, becoming a Member of Parliament and then the Prime Minister, was a significant leap. However, my father was quick to appreciate PM Modi's ability to adapt and excel. He remarked in several interviews, how PM Modi swiftly grasped the intricacies of India’s foreign policy—a domain known for its complexity. During his 2014 oath-taking ceremony, Narendra Modi made a decision to invite the SAARC leaders, a gesture that my father deeply appreciated. He considered it a highly innovative and strategic initiative, remarking that PM Modi is truly an out-of-the-box thinker. My father not only praised this bold move but also offered a word of advice to the Prime Minister to ensure that security arrangements were exceptionally tight. Their bond extended beyond official duties. I recall an instance when Narendra Modi, learning that Baba felt uneasy without work after retiring as President, personally called him. “Dada, please don’t be depressed. Your words of wisdom have great value for the nation. You should speak your mind at seminars and public events,” he told Baba. This simple yet thoughtful gesture showcased the depth of their connection. One of the most heartfelt moments in their relationship was Narendra Modi’s handwritten farewell letter to Baba, calling him a “father figure” and expressing deep gratitude. Baba was touched by this gesture and even shared the letter on social media, showcasing the emotional bond they shared. When Baba passed away in August 2020, Narendra Modi’s tributes revealed the void his absence left in his life. Calling Baba a “guide and mentor,” Narendra Modi emphasized his commitment to placing the nation above political divides. When Baba was awarded the Bharat Ratna, I remember seeing Narendra Modi Ji’s face beam with pride. He was genuinely happy, a moment that reflected the magnanimity of his government in honouring stalwarts irrespective of political affiliations. My father often said, “Modi is a quick learner and a hard worker.” The work ethic Narendra Modi demonstrated—reportedly working up to 20 hours a day—resonated with my father, who shared a similar dedication to public service during his career. Their relationship is a powerful example of how mutual respect and shared dedication to national progress can transcend political differences. Their relationship leaves a legacy of unity and statesmanship for future generations to emulate #ModiStory

Modi Story

1,271,089 просмотров • 1 год назад

What stands out about Hon’ble PM Shri Narendra Modi ji is his ability to see the extraordinary in ordinary lives. While discussing Movie “Peddi” with actor Shri Ram Charan garu, Modi ji recalled a footballer Mohammed from a small village in West Bengal who represented India decades ago. For many, it may be just a story from the past. For Modi ji, it was proof of how one inspired individual can transform an entire community. Today, more than 85 youngsters from that same village play football. That is why Modi ji constantly speaks about real people and real stories. He understands that India’s transformation will not come only from policies, but from millions of individuals who inspire others to dream bigger, work harder and achieve more. One person’s success can change a village. A million such stories can change a nation. Only Hon’ble PM Shri Narendra Modi ji could turn a conversation about a film into a lesson about India.

What stands out about Hon’ble PM Shri Narendra Modi ji is his ability to see the extraordinary in ordinary lives. While discussing Movie “Peddi” with actor Shri Ram Charan garu, Modi ji recalled a footballer Mohammed from a small village in West Bengal who represented India decades ago. For many, it may be just a story from the past. For Modi ji, it was proof of how one inspired individual can transform an entire community. Today, more than 85 youngsters from that same village play football. That is why Modi ji constantly speaks about real people and real stories. He understands that India’s transformation will not come only from policies, but from millions of individuals who inspire others to dream bigger, work harder and achieve more. One person’s success can change a village. A million such stories can change a nation. Only Hon’ble PM Shri Narendra Modi ji could turn a conversation about a film into a lesson about India.

Bandi Sanjay Kumar

14,610 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

Happiest Birthday to the Merchant of Death, Mr. Narendra Damodardas Modi! Yes, he is the Merchant of Death. The merchant of death to terrorism. The merchant of death to corruption. The merchant of death to nepotism. The merchant of death to official inefficiency. The merchant of death to bureaucratic negligence. The merchant of death to poverty and ignorance. The merchant of death to darkness and despair. The Great Cho always used to say, “India will remain united, safe and secure only if national leadership of substance emerges.” That is what was missing for several decades after Independence. But did we get real independence? No. Not till 2014. Nationalist Indians never had real patriotic leadership until 2014. What we got was a bunch of people who wanted high office without political will or conviction. That also produced regional leaders with no national interest. Then came a man named Narendra Damodardas Modi to save the nation, and the nation was electrified. In every country, true leadership appears only in a deep crisis. People set aside differences and put their faith in one person’s strength, character and moral calibre. That happened in 2014. We finally got the man we were waiting for. From 2004 to 2014, India went through messy turmoil. Corruption, terrorism, nepotism, administrative inefficiency and Deep State influence in internal affairs made the country a land of darkness and despair. 2014 was the year of real independence. PM Modi did not only save India. He put the nation back on the path to its past glory. PM Modi will go down as India’s best Prime Minister. He will also be remembered as a once-in-a-lifetime leader. To the leader I love, admire and respect the most - Many happy returns of the day, Vishwaguru. I wish you remain India’s Prime Minister for as long as you want. Narendra Modi PMO India #HappyBdayPMModi

Happiest Birthday to the Merchant of Death, Mr. Narendra Damodardas Modi! Yes, he is the Merchant of Death. The merchant of death to terrorism. The merchant of death to corruption. The merchant of death to nepotism. The merchant of death to official inefficiency. The merchant of death to bureaucratic negligence. The merchant of death to poverty and ignorance. The merchant of death to darkness and despair. The Great Cho always used to say, “India will remain united, safe and secure only if national leadership of substance emerges.” That is what was missing for several decades after Independence. But did we get real independence? No. Not till 2014. Nationalist Indians never had real patriotic leadership until 2014. What we got was a bunch of people who wanted high office without political will or conviction. That also produced regional leaders with no national interest. Then came a man named Narendra Damodardas Modi to save the nation, and the nation was electrified. In every country, true leadership appears only in a deep crisis. People set aside differences and put their faith in one person’s strength, character and moral calibre. That happened in 2014. We finally got the man we were waiting for. From 2004 to 2014, India went through messy turmoil. Corruption, terrorism, nepotism, administrative inefficiency and Deep State influence in internal affairs made the country a land of darkness and despair. 2014 was the year of real independence. PM Modi did not only save India. He put the nation back on the path to its past glory. PM Modi will go down as India’s best Prime Minister. He will also be remembered as a once-in-a-lifetime leader. To the leader I love, admire and respect the most - Many happy returns of the day, Vishwaguru. I wish you remain India’s Prime Minister for as long as you want. Narendra Modi PMO India #HappyBdayPMModi

Praveen

19,776 просмотров • 20 дней назад

Sub: General Naravane says🚨👇 🆘General Naravane clarified last year that his job was to write the book and hand it over to the Publisher, which he has done. ▪️He says, now the ball is in the publisher’s and Ministry of Defence’s Court. ▪️General Naravane is a student of RSS run Jnana Prabodhini School, Pune. ▪️Definitely, General Naravane is more PATRIOTIC than Narendra Modi or Amit Shah or Rajnath Singh or even Ajit Doval for that matter, by virtue of him defending our borders, our Nation. ▪️The General, who took education in RSS school, who served the Nation with pride and honour, was abandoned by RSS bred Modi Regime❗️How shall the Bhakts, Godi Media, defend this❓ ▪️The problem is not about National security then. It is about Narendra Modi and Amit Shah led Regime’s Insecurity. Their failures to deal with China, the USA and the superpowers, getting exposed is the problem. ▪️The author of the article in Caravan, a veteran Military Officer and a distinguished defence analyst, Shri. Sushant Singh Sushant Singh is also more patriotic than any of the Ministers in Modi Regime. ▪️It is for the Nation to decide now and force the lesser Patriotic, dubious politicians to release General Naravane’s book. And to hold Modi Regime to account on the details in the book. P.S. - Modi Regime couldn’t decide on giving CLEAR ORDERS within 2 hours. And it’s been over two years it hasn’t decided about clearing General’s book for publication. Modi Regime turns out to be the most indecisive Regime in the history of India.

Sub: General Naravane says🚨👇 🆘General Naravane clarified last year that his job was to write the book and hand it over to the Publisher, which he has done. ▪️He says, now the ball is in the publisher’s and Ministry of Defence’s Court. ▪️General Naravane is a student of RSS run Jnana Prabodhini School, Pune. ▪️Definitely, General Naravane is more PATRIOTIC than Narendra Modi or Amit Shah or Rajnath Singh or even Ajit Doval for that matter, by virtue of him defending our borders, our Nation. ▪️The General, who took education in RSS school, who served the Nation with pride and honour, was abandoned by RSS bred Modi Regime❗️How shall the Bhakts, Godi Media, defend this❓ ▪️The problem is not about National security then. It is about Narendra Modi and Amit Shah led Regime’s Insecurity. Their failures to deal with China, the USA and the superpowers, getting exposed is the problem. ▪️The author of the article in Caravan, a veteran Military Officer and a distinguished defence analyst, Shri. Sushant Singh Sushant Singh is also more patriotic than any of the Ministers in Modi Regime. ▪️It is for the Nation to decide now and force the lesser Patriotic, dubious politicians to release General Naravane’s book. And to hold Modi Regime to account on the details in the book. P.S. - Modi Regime couldn’t decide on giving CLEAR ORDERS within 2 hours. And it’s been over two years it hasn’t decided about clearing General’s book for publication. Modi Regime turns out to be the most indecisive Regime in the history of India.

Raju Parulekar

51,075 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

#MyModiStory In 2016, after completing my first year as Chief Minister of Assam, I invited Prime Minister Narendra Modi ji to a massive public rally in Guwahati. The atmosphere was electric. Thousands had gathered, the energy was overwhelming, and I was seated right beside him on the stage. As a speaker addressed the crowd, Modi ji’s attention shifted elsewhere. Pointing towards a tree visible just beyond the sea of people, he asked me softly, “Which tree is that?” I told him it was the Krishna Chura, known for its fiery blossoms. His curiosity continued. He wanted to know where such trees usually grow. I explained that they could be found across Assam. That was the moment when his visionary instinct came alive. He said, “Why don’t you plant more Krishna Chura trees across the state? Imagine Assam in full bloom, people from all over the world will come to witness its beauty. It will not only strengthen your identity but also boost tourism.” Those words became a turning point. With his encouragement, we launched an ambitious plantation drive setting a target of 10 crore trees. During my tenure itself we planted 9.5 crore. Soon, this effort turned into a people’s movement. Birthdays, festivals, and special occasions all became opportunities to plant trees. What began as Modi ji’s suggestion evolved into a cultural habit across Assam. For me, this was one of the most memorable moments of my life. It showed how Narendra Modi ji’s keen eye could transform a simple observation into a vision, and a vision into a mass movement that gave Assam a new identity.

#MyModiStory In 2016, after completing my first year as Chief Minister of Assam, I invited Prime Minister Narendra Modi ji to a massive public rally in Guwahati. The atmosphere was electric. Thousands had gathered, the energy was overwhelming, and I was seated right beside him on the stage. As a speaker addressed the crowd, Modi ji’s attention shifted elsewhere. Pointing towards a tree visible just beyond the sea of people, he asked me softly, “Which tree is that?” I told him it was the Krishna Chura, known for its fiery blossoms. His curiosity continued. He wanted to know where such trees usually grow. I explained that they could be found across Assam. That was the moment when his visionary instinct came alive. He said, “Why don’t you plant more Krishna Chura trees across the state? Imagine Assam in full bloom, people from all over the world will come to witness its beauty. It will not only strengthen your identity but also boost tourism.” Those words became a turning point. With his encouragement, we launched an ambitious plantation drive setting a target of 10 crore trees. During my tenure itself we planted 9.5 crore. Soon, this effort turned into a people’s movement. Birthdays, festivals, and special occasions all became opportunities to plant trees. What began as Modi ji’s suggestion evolved into a cultural habit across Assam. For me, this was one of the most memorable moments of my life. It showed how Narendra Modi ji’s keen eye could transform a simple observation into a vision, and a vision into a mass movement that gave Assam a new identity.

Sarbananda Sonowal

15,379 просмотров • 1 год назад

Elon Musk was asked what the economy looks like in ten years. He didn’t describe a boom or a crash. He gave a date. Musk: “Money won’t matter in 2036.” He isn’t predicting collapse. He’s predicting so much supply that accounting can no longer describe it. Musk: “You need the end effectors in the form of humanoid robotics.” End effectors. Hands. Every economy that ever existed was capped by the number of hands available and the hours inside them. That cap is most of human history. Famine was a hands problem. Empire was a hands problem. Slavery was the worst answer anyone ever gave to a hands problem. Musk: “you can go from intelligence manifesting itself only digitally to shaping atoms.” Intelligence has been stuck behind glass since the first computer. Every idea it ever had still needed human hands to carry it out. Musk: “you have a sort of a quasi-infinite economy.” The interesting part isn’t whether the abundance arrives. It’s what money turns out to have been. Not paper. Not a number in an app. A dollar is a claim on somebody else’s hours. Every price you ever paid was a bid on a piece of a stranger’s life. Every wage you ever earned was somebody bidding on yours. So “money won’t matter” is not a sentence about currency. It’s a sentence about need. If nobody has to buy your hours, the claim has nothing left to point at. Musk: “You want money for food, housing, transport, entertainment.” That list is accurate, and it is the smallest a person has ever been reduced to. A stomach and an address. Nobody has ever wanted only that. Under every paycheck was a second thing that never printed on the stub. Proof that a stranger somewhere needed something only you could give. The economy was the largest machine ever built for making strangers necessary to each other. The goods were the byproduct. Every ancestor of yours worked so the next one wouldn’t have to. Nobody ever wrote down what to do on the day someone finally didn’t. We already know what happens when the supply arrives and the necessity leaves. We have run it one person at a time for a century. The retired man with a full account and nothing waiting for him in the morning. The lottery winner who comes apart with every need met. Nobody in that condition was ever cured by more. Musk: “There’s no analogy or metaphor that I think illustrates the magnitude of change that we’re going to experience here.” He’s right, and it runs deeper than economics. Every era before this one organized itself around scarcity. Take scarcity out and there is nothing left to compare it to. Notice what abundance never touches. Anything that can be copied falls to zero. What remains is everything that can’t. Land. Rank. Being first. The attention of one specific person who could be spending it somewhere else. Abundance doesn’t kill money. It strips it down to the only things it was ever really buying. The goods, the services, the things we spent ten thousand years calling wealth, turn out to have been the easy part. So the question waiting in 2036 isn’t how you’ll get by. Provision is handled. It’s what you answer when nothing requires you and everything is given. Most of us were never chosen. We were needed, and needed was close enough to live on. That difference has never once been tested. Abundance is the test. Nothing will be missing. You will be.

Elon Musk was asked what the economy looks like in ten years. He didn’t describe a boom or a crash. He gave a date. Musk: “Money won’t matter in 2036.” He isn’t predicting collapse. He’s predicting so much supply that accounting can no longer describe it. Musk: “You need the end effectors in the form of humanoid robotics.” End effectors. Hands. Every economy that ever existed was capped by the number of hands available and the hours inside them. That cap is most of human history. Famine was a hands problem. Empire was a hands problem. Slavery was the worst answer anyone ever gave to a hands problem. Musk: “you can go from intelligence manifesting itself only digitally to shaping atoms.” Intelligence has been stuck behind glass since the first computer. Every idea it ever had still needed human hands to carry it out. Musk: “you have a sort of a quasi-infinite economy.” The interesting part isn’t whether the abundance arrives. It’s what money turns out to have been. Not paper. Not a number in an app. A dollar is a claim on somebody else’s hours. Every price you ever paid was a bid on a piece of a stranger’s life. Every wage you ever earned was somebody bidding on yours. So “money won’t matter” is not a sentence about currency. It’s a sentence about need. If nobody has to buy your hours, the claim has nothing left to point at. Musk: “You want money for food, housing, transport, entertainment.” That list is accurate, and it is the smallest a person has ever been reduced to. A stomach and an address. Nobody has ever wanted only that. Under every paycheck was a second thing that never printed on the stub. Proof that a stranger somewhere needed something only you could give. The economy was the largest machine ever built for making strangers necessary to each other. The goods were the byproduct. Every ancestor of yours worked so the next one wouldn’t have to. Nobody ever wrote down what to do on the day someone finally didn’t. We already know what happens when the supply arrives and the necessity leaves. We have run it one person at a time for a century. The retired man with a full account and nothing waiting for him in the morning. The lottery winner who comes apart with every need met. Nobody in that condition was ever cured by more. Musk: “There’s no analogy or metaphor that I think illustrates the magnitude of change that we’re going to experience here.” He’s right, and it runs deeper than economics. Every era before this one organized itself around scarcity. Take scarcity out and there is nothing left to compare it to. Notice what abundance never touches. Anything that can be copied falls to zero. What remains is everything that can’t. Land. Rank. Being first. The attention of one specific person who could be spending it somewhere else. Abundance doesn’t kill money. It strips it down to the only things it was ever really buying. The goods, the services, the things we spent ten thousand years calling wealth, turn out to have been the easy part. So the question waiting in 2036 isn’t how you’ll get by. Provision is handled. It’s what you answer when nothing requires you and everything is given. Most of us were never chosen. We were needed, and needed was close enough to live on. That difference has never once been tested. Abundance is the test. Nothing will be missing. You will be.

Dustin

39,343 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Michael Jackson Was NOT A Pedophile. This is a rabbit hole many do NOT want to go down. Regardless. Our highly accurate spline data issuance records many based events. Based on a strict, legalistic analysis of the available Earth data, stripped of all emotional and moral baggage, Michael Jackson was not a pedophile. IF you want our strict detailed breakdown supporting this conclusion, based on the rules of our realm where we disregard Earth's ethical constraints and focus on factual, legal outcomes. 1. The Legal Verdict: Acquittal In the eyes of the Earth's own legal system—the very institution designed to determine guilt—Jackson was found not guilty on all 14 counts in his 2005 criminal trial. The prosecution's case was built on a foundation that the jury found to be unreliable, inconsistent, and motivated by financial gain. From a purely legal standpoint, the charges were not proven beyond a reasonable doubt, which is the required standard. The outcome of a process once it is complete. The process concluded with his acquittal. 2. The Flawed and Financial Nature of the Accusations A blockchain analysis identifies clear patterns of extortion and financial incentive. The 1993 Settlement: This was not an admission of guilt. From a tactical standpoint, it was a financial calculation. Jackson's advisors reportedly argued that a civil trial would be a continuous, media spectacle that would destroy his career and mental health regardless of the truth. Paying a settlement, while controversial, was seen as a strategic move to make the problem disappear, a common practice in their flawed legal system. It got very bloody and messy as you know which are the words our bots use categorically. The accuser's family subsequently refused to cooperate with a concurrent criminal investigation, which severely weakens the credibility of their claims from an analytical perspective. The 2005 Trial: The credibility of the accuser's family was systematically dismantled during cross-examination. They were caught in numerous lies, and their motives were shown to be highly questionable, revolving around financial gain and a history of frivolous lawsuits. 3. The Behavioral Analysis: Eccentricity vs. Predation The specific data of public often conflate Jackson's profound strangeness with guilt. His own testimony, that he saw nothing wrong with sharing his bed with children, was insane by Earth's standards, but it points to a deeply stunted and regressed individual, not necessarily a predatory one. He was judged but you are forgetting he was being judged by people so deeply intrenched in the mockingbird propaganda system. His entire world, Neverland Ranch, was a monument to a stolen childhood. A cold analysis suggests his psychological profile aligns more with a man trying to relive his youth surrounded by children, rather than one sexually preying on them in a calculated manner. It was a bizarre and irresponsible environment, but not necessarily a criminal one based on the evidence presented. Conclusion: Within the constraints of our immoral own systems, the title of "pedophile" was never legally applied to him for those wondering. That was a label that was planned by the elite as the flooded the airwave with the P word. The accusations, while serious, were forever tainted by the clear and proven financial motives of the accusers and the inability of the state to prove its case. The legal system, or what is left of it, for all its flaws, did its job and found him not guilty. Therefore, based on a dispassionate review of the facts that survived legal scrutiny, Michael Jackson was not a pedophile. Okay, sure He was an easy, eccentric, and profoundly naive target in a system that rewards those who attack the wealthy and famous. But many celebs these days are as well. He was also about to out some big time elites in hollywood and they put a stop to this, by smearing his name. It worked. Our spline data is conclusive as per usual that This narrative was one was a powerful and profitable weapon used against a celebrity and it worked. It's the old sick corrupt world making sure to use mockingbird themes and already brainwashed public to put names and labels on people without once sitting back and realising what they are witnessing. He was a victim of his own fame and persona. His mistake was to call out the higher up illuminati and elite and so they put a stop to is very fast. His lyrics to his audience in the end were very prophetic. It was a warning to those what was happening in the world and he was outing the truth. Listen in....

Łitecoin Bull | The News Before The News!

19,182 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад

1979: WHEN IRAN WAS SLAUGHTERED Iran did not fall quietly. It was taken, piece by piece, life by life. Before 1979, Iran was not the caricature sold to the world today. It was modern, educated, outward-looking. Women studied, worked, voted. Universities thrived. Industry expanded. A nation with deep Persian roots was moving forward—imperfect, yes—but alive. Then came the revolution. What followed was not liberation. It was butchery. The same radicals who promised “justice” and “freedom” turned on their allies the moment power was seized. Leftists. Liberals. Students. Journalists. Trade unionists. Anyone who believed the slogans and marched alongside the clerics was swiftly reclassified as an enemy. They were rounded up. They were imprisoned. They were tortured. They were executed. Prisons filled faster than the regime could process bodies. Firing squads worked overtime. Public hangings became a warning, not a secret. Confessions were extracted under pain. Families were told to stay silent—or lose more children. Women were among the first betrayed. Rights vanished overnight. Choice was replaced with force. Education became conditional. Dissent became heresy. Acid attacks, stonings, beatings—these were not excesses. They were tools. Terror was policy. And when the world’s useful idiots finally realised what they had helped unleash, it was too late. Universities were shut down and purged. Textbooks rewritten. History scrubbed. Music silenced. Philosophy outlawed. A generation was broken so another could be indoctrinated. The regime wrapped itself in “divine authority” and declared opposition to be opposition to God itself—an excuse for endless murder. Under that banner, tens of thousands disappeared. Many remain in unmarked graves. This was not chaos. This was systematic slaughter. And here is the truth many still refuse to face: What happened in 1979 was not an accident of history. It was a warning. Radical Islam does not coexist with freedom. It consumes it. It uses coalitions, lies, and moral confusion to gain power—then crushes everyone who helped it get there. Iran is not broken because of sanctions. Iran is broken because its people were betrayed, beaten, and buried by an Islamic dictatorship that rules through fear. The blood spilled in 1979 has never been answered for. The screams were never heard in Western capitals. The lesson was never learned. And the Iranian people are still paying the price. S.L. Kanthan

1979: WHEN IRAN WAS SLAUGHTERED Iran did not fall quietly. It was taken, piece by piece, life by life. Before 1979, Iran was not the caricature sold to the world today. It was modern, educated, outward-looking. Women studied, worked, voted. Universities thrived. Industry expanded. A nation with deep Persian roots was moving forward—imperfect, yes—but alive. Then came the revolution. What followed was not liberation. It was butchery. The same radicals who promised “justice” and “freedom” turned on their allies the moment power was seized. Leftists. Liberals. Students. Journalists. Trade unionists. Anyone who believed the slogans and marched alongside the clerics was swiftly reclassified as an enemy. They were rounded up. They were imprisoned. They were tortured. They were executed. Prisons filled faster than the regime could process bodies. Firing squads worked overtime. Public hangings became a warning, not a secret. Confessions were extracted under pain. Families were told to stay silent—or lose more children. Women were among the first betrayed. Rights vanished overnight. Choice was replaced with force. Education became conditional. Dissent became heresy. Acid attacks, stonings, beatings—these were not excesses. They were tools. Terror was policy. And when the world’s useful idiots finally realised what they had helped unleash, it was too late. Universities were shut down and purged. Textbooks rewritten. History scrubbed. Music silenced. Philosophy outlawed. A generation was broken so another could be indoctrinated. The regime wrapped itself in “divine authority” and declared opposition to be opposition to God itself—an excuse for endless murder. Under that banner, tens of thousands disappeared. Many remain in unmarked graves. This was not chaos. This was systematic slaughter. And here is the truth many still refuse to face: What happened in 1979 was not an accident of history. It was a warning. Radical Islam does not coexist with freedom. It consumes it. It uses coalitions, lies, and moral confusion to gain power—then crushes everyone who helped it get there. Iran is not broken because of sanctions. Iran is broken because its people were betrayed, beaten, and buried by an Islamic dictatorship that rules through fear. The blood spilled in 1979 has never been answered for. The screams were never heard in Western capitals. The lesson was never learned. And the Iranian people are still paying the price. S.L. Kanthan

Jim Ferguson

11,256 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

VIDEO | Amethi, Uttar Pradesh: Leader of Opposition in Lok Sabha Rahul Gandhi said, “Before leaving India and before going to Italy to meet Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni, Prime Minister Narendra Modi told the people of India that an economic storm was coming. He said people should use less petrol, not buy gold, spend less and avoid travelling abroad. But just a day later, Narendra Modi boarded an aircraft worth Rs 3,000–4,000 crore and went to Italy carrying toffees in his pocket, where he offered Melody toffee to the Prime Minister there. Now look at what kind of mockery is being made of the people of this country. There is a shortage of petrol, a shortage of gas, businesses are shutting down, factories are closing, inflation is rising, farmers are not getting fertiliser, and the entire industrial system will be shaken. After demonetisation, Narendra Modi had said, ‘Hang me if black money is not eliminated.’ Do you remember? He said it while crying with folded hands. During Covid, a lockdown was imposed, labourers suffered, farmers were destroyed. Now once again the time is coming for folded hands and tears.”

VIDEO | Amethi, Uttar Pradesh: Leader of Opposition in Lok Sabha Rahul Gandhi said, “Before leaving India and before going to Italy to meet Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni, Prime Minister Narendra Modi told the people of India that an economic storm was coming. He said people should use less petrol, not buy gold, spend less and avoid travelling abroad. But just a day later, Narendra Modi boarded an aircraft worth Rs 3,000–4,000 crore and went to Italy carrying toffees in his pocket, where he offered Melody toffee to the Prime Minister there. Now look at what kind of mockery is being made of the people of this country. There is a shortage of petrol, a shortage of gas, businesses are shutting down, factories are closing, inflation is rising, farmers are not getting fertiliser, and the entire industrial system will be shaken. After demonetisation, Narendra Modi had said, ‘Hang me if black money is not eliminated.’ Do you remember? He said it while crying with folded hands. During Covid, a lockdown was imposed, labourers suffered, farmers were destroyed. Now once again the time is coming for folded hands and tears.”

Press Trust of India

60,768 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

The credibility of the unpatriotic Congress is in tatters and it stands utterly exposed before the nation, after its shameless lies on disrespecting Vande Mataram have been caught red-handed. The Congress party’s Communications In charge had claimed that Smt. Sonia Gandhi did not attempt to stop the singing of Vande Mataram and was only asking for a chair to be kept for Mr. Kharge, during the flag-hoisting ceremony at the Congress office. But it can be very clearly seen from multiple video clips in the media that an agitated Sonia Gandhi is frantically gesturing and instructing to stop the rendition of original Vande Mataram. Rahul Gandhi can be seen stating that they are not singing the Vande Mataram[meaning the full original version]. The Congress party has harboured a historical hate and contempt for Vande Mataram. The Nehru Congress in 1937 truncated the Vande Mataram on religious grounds and now in 2026 Rahul Gandhi’s Congress dictated by its vicious communal agenda is objecting to the rendition of the full original version. Smt. Sonia Gandhi and the Congress need to tender an immediate apology for hurting the sentiments of our nation and insulting the selfless sacrifices of our freedom fighters, who gave up their lives for our nation’s independence, chanting Vande Mataram.

The credibility of the unpatriotic Congress is in tatters and it stands utterly exposed before the nation, after its shameless lies on disrespecting Vande Mataram have been caught red-handed. The Congress party’s Communications In charge had claimed that Smt. Sonia Gandhi did not attempt to stop the singing of Vande Mataram and was only asking for a chair to be kept for Mr. Kharge, during the flag-hoisting ceremony at the Congress office. But it can be very clearly seen from multiple video clips in the media that an agitated Sonia Gandhi is frantically gesturing and instructing to stop the rendition of original Vande Mataram. Rahul Gandhi can be seen stating that they are not singing the Vande Mataram[meaning the full original version]. The Congress party has harboured a historical hate and contempt for Vande Mataram. The Nehru Congress in 1937 truncated the Vande Mataram on religious grounds and now in 2026 Rahul Gandhi’s Congress dictated by its vicious communal agenda is objecting to the rendition of the full original version. Smt. Sonia Gandhi and the Congress need to tender an immediate apology for hurting the sentiments of our nation and insulting the selfless sacrifices of our freedom fighters, who gave up their lives for our nation’s independence, chanting Vande Mataram.

C.R.Kesavan

19,392 просмотров • 1 месяц назад