Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

๐Œ๐Ž๐ƒ๐ˆ ๐†๐Ž๐•๐“โ€™๐’ ๐๐€๐’๐’๐๐Ž๐‘๐“ ๐๐‹๐”๐๐ƒ๐„๐‘ ๐„๐—๐๐Ž๐’๐„๐ƒ ๐๐˜ ๐…๐Ž๐‘๐Œ๐„๐‘ ๐’๐‚ ๐‰๐”๐ƒ๐†๐„! "๐“๐ก๐ข๐ฌ ๐ข๐ฌ ๐š ๐’๐„๐‘๐ˆ๐Ž๐”๐’ ๐Œ๐ˆ๐’๐“๐€๐Š๐„ โ€” ๐€๐๐Ž๐‹๐Ž๐†๐ˆ๐™๐„ ๐๐Ž๐–!" Justice Madan Lokur (former Supreme Court Judge & Chairperson, UN Internal Justice Council) has just torn into the Modi Governmentโ€™s reckless claim. ๐–๐ก๐š๐ญ ๐ญ๐ก๐ž ๐†๐จ๐ฏ๐ž๐ซ๐ง๐ฆ๐ž๐ง๐ญ ๐ฌ๐š๐ข๐ (๐‰๐ฎ๐ง๐ž ๐Ÿ๐Ÿ’) A senior MEA Official...

tanmoyofc's profile picture

เฆคเฆจเงเฆฎเฆฏเฆผ l Tอžanmoy l

32,986 subscribers

15,256 views โ€ข 1 month ago โ€ขvia X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossiโ€ข Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

#WATCH | Delhi: On passport as a document, Advocate Virag Gupta says, "... I think this is a wrong statement, as it questions the credentials of the Indian passport. India already ranks 75th globally. As per the laws, only Indian citizens can obtain an Indian passport, while nonโ€‘citizens may do so only with the central government's endorsement. If someone wrongly obtains a passport on the basis of false documents, they can be prosecuted under Section 12 of the Passport Act. Therefore, any person holding an Indian passport should be treated as an Indian citizen, as it is a valid legal proof of citizenship. The Constitution provides for single citizenship, and states have no authority to decide it. Both inclusion in the voter list and possession of an Indian passport are valid documents."
1:19

#WATCH | Delhi: On passport as a document, Advocate Virag Gupta says, "... I think this is a wrong statement, as it questions the credentials of the Indian passport. India already ranks 75th globally. As per the laws, only Indian citizens can obtain an Indian passport, while nonโ€‘citizens may do so only with the central government's endorsement. If someone wrongly obtains a passport on the basis of false documents, they can be prosecuted under Section 12 of the Passport Act. Therefore, any person holding an Indian passport should be treated as an Indian citizen, as it is a valid legal proof of citizenship. The Constitution provides for single citizenship, and states have no authority to decide it. Both inclusion in the voter list and possession of an Indian passport are valid documents."

ANI

56,839 views โ€ข 2 months ago

VIDEO | Hyderabad: On being asked about the MEA's statement that "a passport is not proof of citizenship," AIMIM chief Asaduddin Owaisi said, "The direction in which the country appears to be heading raises serious concerns. It increasingly seems that, in the coming days, BJP membership could become synonymous with citizenship. That is the impression many people are getting. Look at Section 6(2)(a) of the Passport Act. It states that a passport can only be issued to an Indian citizen. If a person is not a citizen, a passport cannot be granted. So what are people supposed to make of this situation?...We are being told that a birth certificate is not sufficient proof, an Aadhaar card is not sufficient proof, and even a voter ID card is not sufficient proof. Then the obvious question is: what exactly qualifies as proof?...These are the concerns being raised by citizens, and they deserve clear answers."
1:08

VIDEO | Hyderabad: On being asked about the MEA's statement that "a passport is not proof of citizenship," AIMIM chief Asaduddin Owaisi said, "The direction in which the country appears to be heading raises serious concerns. It increasingly seems that, in the coming days, BJP membership could become synonymous with citizenship. That is the impression many people are getting. Look at Section 6(2)(a) of the Passport Act. It states that a passport can only be issued to an Indian citizen. If a person is not a citizen, a passport cannot be granted. So what are people supposed to make of this situation?...We are being told that a birth certificate is not sufficient proof, an Aadhaar card is not sufficient proof, and even a voter ID card is not sufficient proof. Then the obvious question is: what exactly qualifies as proof?...These are the concerns being raised by citizens, and they deserve clear answers."

Press Trust of India

13,506 views โ€ข 2 months ago

When a citizen is forced to repeatedly prove that they are a citizen, democracy itself begins to stand trial. Former Election Commissioner Ashok Lavasa raises a constitutional question that deserves every Indian's attention. If Aadhaar is not conclusive proof of citizenship, PAN is not, Voter ID is not, and the Ministry of External Affairs says even a passport is only a travel document and not conclusive proof of citizenship, then what certainty does an ordinary citizen have? In a democracy, the citizen is sovereign and the State exists to serve the citizenโ€”not to keep every citizen under perpetual suspicion. Burdening millions of law-abiding people with repeatedly proving their identity and citizenship undermines trust in democratic institutions and risks excluding genuine citizens from exercising their constitutional rights. Lavasa argues that determining citizenship is not the Election Commission's role and cautions against shifting this burden onto citizens. A constitutional democracy is strengthened by inclusion, transparency and due process, not by creating uncertainty over the status of those who have lived, voted, paid taxes and contributed to the nation for decades. Video Link:
1:42

When a citizen is forced to repeatedly prove that they are a citizen, democracy itself begins to stand trial. Former Election Commissioner Ashok Lavasa raises a constitutional question that deserves every Indian's attention. If Aadhaar is not conclusive proof of citizenship, PAN is not, Voter ID is not, and the Ministry of External Affairs says even a passport is only a travel document and not conclusive proof of citizenship, then what certainty does an ordinary citizen have? In a democracy, the citizen is sovereign and the State exists to serve the citizenโ€”not to keep every citizen under perpetual suspicion. Burdening millions of law-abiding people with repeatedly proving their identity and citizenship undermines trust in democratic institutions and risks excluding genuine citizens from exercising their constitutional rights. Lavasa argues that determining citizenship is not the Election Commission's role and cautions against shifting this burden onto citizens. A constitutional democracy is strengthened by inclusion, transparency and due process, not by creating uncertainty over the status of those who have lived, voted, paid taxes and contributed to the nation for decades. Video Link:

Ashok Dadhwal

11,470 views โ€ข 2 months ago

The richest preach the loudest about nationalism while quietly buying foreign passports. Vinod Adani, brother of Gautam Adani, is among 66 Indians who acquired Cyprus citizenship through the โ€œgolden passportโ€ route. The same class that lectures the poor about โ€œBharat Mata,โ€ โ€œAtmanirbhar,โ€ and dying for the nation is busy securing exit options for itself. This is not an individual choice. It is a pattern. When the powerful treat the Indian passport as a liability and foreign citizenship as insurance, they reveal what they truly believe about the countryโ€™s future. They know the system works for them here โ€” contracts, influence, protection โ€” and still they keep a safer passport ready. Indian citizenship is being reduced to a slogan for the masses and a joke for the elite. That is the real scandal. #IndianCitizenship #IndianPassport #India
2:47

The richest preach the loudest about nationalism while quietly buying foreign passports. Vinod Adani, brother of Gautam Adani, is among 66 Indians who acquired Cyprus citizenship through the โ€œgolden passportโ€ route. The same class that lectures the poor about โ€œBharat Mata,โ€ โ€œAtmanirbhar,โ€ and dying for the nation is busy securing exit options for itself. This is not an individual choice. It is a pattern. When the powerful treat the Indian passport as a liability and foreign citizenship as insurance, they reveal what they truly believe about the countryโ€™s future. They know the system works for them here โ€” contracts, influence, protection โ€” and still they keep a safer passport ready. Indian citizenship is being reduced to a slogan for the masses and a joke for the elite. That is the real scandal. #IndianCitizenship #IndianPassport #India

Pragnya Gupta

34,497 views โ€ข 1 month ago

๐Ÿšจ Justice Alito NAILED IT in his birthright citizenship dissent: โ€œThis is one of the most important decisions in the history of the Court, and in my judgment, the Court has made a serious mistake.โ€ The 14th Amendment clearly states "All persons born or naturalized in the United States, AND SUBJECT TO THE JURISDICTION THEREOF, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside." As Justice Thomas wrote: "Children born to temporary visitors owed allegiance to another governmentโ€”the country of their domicileโ€”so they were not subject to the jurisdiction of the United States." The logical manifestation of the majority upholding birthright citizenship is that BILLIONS of foreigners -- including from HOSTILE NATIONS -- have instant access to U.S. citizenship for their children. All they must do is set foot on American soil and give birth to a child. No need to stay. This makes precious little sense, and Justice Thomas is correct: "I am not sure that todayโ€™s opinion will stand the test of time. The Citizenship Clause 'added greatly to the dignity and glory of American citizenship.' Todayโ€™s opinion devalues that citizenship." The Five Fox News โฌ‡๏ธ
2:57

๐Ÿšจ Justice Alito NAILED IT in his birthright citizenship dissent: โ€œThis is one of the most important decisions in the history of the Court, and in my judgment, the Court has made a serious mistake.โ€ The 14th Amendment clearly states "All persons born or naturalized in the United States, AND SUBJECT TO THE JURISDICTION THEREOF, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside." As Justice Thomas wrote: "Children born to temporary visitors owed allegiance to another governmentโ€”the country of their domicileโ€”so they were not subject to the jurisdiction of the United States." The logical manifestation of the majority upholding birthright citizenship is that BILLIONS of foreigners -- including from HOSTILE NATIONS -- have instant access to U.S. citizenship for their children. All they must do is set foot on American soil and give birth to a child. No need to stay. This makes precious little sense, and Justice Thomas is correct: "I am not sure that todayโ€™s opinion will stand the test of time. The Citizenship Clause 'added greatly to the dignity and glory of American citizenship.' Todayโ€™s opinion devalues that citizenship." The Five Fox News โฌ‡๏ธ

Kayleigh McEnany

207,917 views โ€ข 2 months ago

๐Ÿšจ BREAKING: The red state of Florida is about to pass its OWN SAVE AMERICA ACT and send it to Gov. Ron DeSantis for signature The bill FORTIFIES citizenship verification for all voters and marks pen and paper as the default method of voting ๐Ÿ”ฅ FLORIDA does it right again! โ˜€๏ธ CFO BLAISE INGOGLIA: "The state of Florida is on the verge of passing its own version of the SAVE Act, which is going to look for voter ID and also to verify that the people that are voting in our elections are indeed actual U.S. citizens." "Florida should have this bill passed, my guess is either today or tomorrow, and it will find its way off to the governor to be signed into law." "Now, at the same time, when Florida is doing this, we are finding that CONGRESS is having a very tough time trying to pass their version of the SAVE Act, and I will just tell you my opinion that this is a very much needed piece of legislation that Congress should be passing!" "There is zero reason, ZERO reason why the [US] Senate should not take this up and pass it into law!"
2:26

๐Ÿšจ BREAKING: The red state of Florida is about to pass its OWN SAVE AMERICA ACT and send it to Gov. Ron DeSantis for signature The bill FORTIFIES citizenship verification for all voters and marks pen and paper as the default method of voting ๐Ÿ”ฅ FLORIDA does it right again! โ˜€๏ธ CFO BLAISE INGOGLIA: "The state of Florida is on the verge of passing its own version of the SAVE Act, which is going to look for voter ID and also to verify that the people that are voting in our elections are indeed actual U.S. citizens." "Florida should have this bill passed, my guess is either today or tomorrow, and it will find its way off to the governor to be signed into law." "Now, at the same time, when Florida is doing this, we are finding that CONGRESS is having a very tough time trying to pass their version of the SAVE Act, and I will just tell you my opinion that this is a very much needed piece of legislation that Congress should be passing!" "There is zero reason, ZERO reason why the [US] Senate should not take this up and pass it into law!"

Eric Daugherty

497,604 views โ€ข 5 months ago

๐Ÿšจ BREAKING: Rep. Mark Harris (R-NC) GOES OFF on the House floor because the Senate has not passed the SAVE Act to mandate citizenship to vote nationwide "The SAVE Act has been sitting in the Senate gathering dust!" "And the question, it's clear, when will the Senate pass it? A nation that cannot secure its elections cannot preserve its liberty." "The House has already acted decisively. We passed the SAVE Act requiring documentary proof of U.S. citizenship to register for federal elections. The need for the SAVE Act couldn't be clearer!" "We must conserve the American way of life. What good is economic prosperity if our freedoms, the very soul of our nation, are eroded day by day? Let's start with the foundation of self-government. Yes, I'm talking about our elections!" "Only American citizens should vote in American elections. This is not controversial. This is common sense." "Just in my own state of North Carolina last fall, the DMV admitted to registering an unknown number of non-citizens. And this is just the tip of the iceberg. Americans, I believe, demand that we have secure elections." "And election integrity is not voter suppression. It is the bedrock of a representative government."
1:30

๐Ÿšจ BREAKING: Rep. Mark Harris (R-NC) GOES OFF on the House floor because the Senate has not passed the SAVE Act to mandate citizenship to vote nationwide "The SAVE Act has been sitting in the Senate gathering dust!" "And the question, it's clear, when will the Senate pass it? A nation that cannot secure its elections cannot preserve its liberty." "The House has already acted decisively. We passed the SAVE Act requiring documentary proof of U.S. citizenship to register for federal elections. The need for the SAVE Act couldn't be clearer!" "We must conserve the American way of life. What good is economic prosperity if our freedoms, the very soul of our nation, are eroded day by day? Let's start with the foundation of self-government. Yes, I'm talking about our elections!" "Only American citizens should vote in American elections. This is not controversial. This is common sense." "Just in my own state of North Carolina last fall, the DMV admitted to registering an unknown number of non-citizens. And this is just the tip of the iceberg. Americans, I believe, demand that we have secure elections." "And election integrity is not voter suppression. It is the bedrock of a representative government."

Eric Daugherty

157,056 views โ€ข 7 months ago

For centuries, Indiaโ€™s strength has not been uniformity but coexistence. Hindus, Muslims, Sikhs, Christians, Buddhists, Jains and countless communities have shared this land, its culture, its struggles and its dreams. Our Constitution transformed that shared inheritance into a promise of equal citizenship, where rights come from being Indian, not from religion, caste or identity. The pain expressed in this video reflects a deeper anxiety: when politics is built on division, fear and suspicion, it weakens the very foundation of the Republic. Democracies flourish when citizens are united by constitutional values, not separated into competing camps for electoral gain. India's future cannot be secured through hatred. It can only be secured through justice, equality, fraternity and respect for human dignity. Governments come and go, but the ideals of the Constitution must endure. Citizens across communities have a responsibility to reject polarization and defend the democratic values that generations before us struggled to build. The answer to divisive politics is not more divisionโ€”it is a renewed commitment to constitutional citizenship, social harmony, and democratic accountability. India belongs equally to all its people, and that principle must remain non-negotiable. Link:
8:15

For centuries, Indiaโ€™s strength has not been uniformity but coexistence. Hindus, Muslims, Sikhs, Christians, Buddhists, Jains and countless communities have shared this land, its culture, its struggles and its dreams. Our Constitution transformed that shared inheritance into a promise of equal citizenship, where rights come from being Indian, not from religion, caste or identity. The pain expressed in this video reflects a deeper anxiety: when politics is built on division, fear and suspicion, it weakens the very foundation of the Republic. Democracies flourish when citizens are united by constitutional values, not separated into competing camps for electoral gain. India's future cannot be secured through hatred. It can only be secured through justice, equality, fraternity and respect for human dignity. Governments come and go, but the ideals of the Constitution must endure. Citizens across communities have a responsibility to reject polarization and defend the democratic values that generations before us struggled to build. The answer to divisive politics is not more divisionโ€”it is a renewed commitment to constitutional citizenship, social harmony, and democratic accountability. India belongs equally to all its people, and that principle must remain non-negotiable. Link:

Ashok Dadhwal

25,731 views โ€ข 2 months ago

๐ŸšจBREAKING: In Minneapolis, ICE/Border Patrol agents are caught on video openly admitting they are demanding proof of citizenship from U.S. citizens, with no legal basis. In the video, an agent approaches a man who is filming and asks where he was born. The man answers, Somalia. The agent immediately responds, โ€œSomalia? Do you have your ID on you?โ€ The man says yes. The agent follows up by asking, โ€œWhat do you have, a passport card?โ€ โ€ฆ an especially revealing question, since obtaining a U.S. passport already requires proof of U.S. citizenship. When the agent asks to see it, the man pushes back, asking why. The agentโ€™s answer is blunt and incriminating: โ€œTo verify your citizenship.โ€ This is not routine enforcement. It is racial profiling, plain and simple. U.S. citizens are not required to carry proof of citizenship, and agents do not have the authority to demand it based solely on someoneโ€™s place of birth, accent, or appearance. This is what โ€œpapers, pleaseโ€ looks like in real time, and itโ€™s exactly what this administrationโ€™s policies are enabling. Today itโ€™s someone filming in Minneapolis. Tomorrow, itโ€™s anyone who doesnโ€™t look โ€œAmerican enough.โ€
0:39

๐ŸšจBREAKING: In Minneapolis, ICE/Border Patrol agents are caught on video openly admitting they are demanding proof of citizenship from U.S. citizens, with no legal basis. In the video, an agent approaches a man who is filming and asks where he was born. The man answers, Somalia. The agent immediately responds, โ€œSomalia? Do you have your ID on you?โ€ The man says yes. The agent follows up by asking, โ€œWhat do you have, a passport card?โ€ โ€ฆ an especially revealing question, since obtaining a U.S. passport already requires proof of U.S. citizenship. When the agent asks to see it, the man pushes back, asking why. The agentโ€™s answer is blunt and incriminating: โ€œTo verify your citizenship.โ€ This is not routine enforcement. It is racial profiling, plain and simple. U.S. citizens are not required to carry proof of citizenship, and agents do not have the authority to demand it based solely on someoneโ€™s place of birth, accent, or appearance. This is what โ€œpapers, pleaseโ€ looks like in real time, and itโ€™s exactly what this administrationโ€™s policies are enabling. Today itโ€™s someone filming in Minneapolis. Tomorrow, itโ€™s anyone who doesnโ€™t look โ€œAmerican enough.โ€

Jesus Freakin Congress

244,252 views โ€ข 8 months ago

#WATCH | Delhi | On the Supreme Court Collegium recommending transfer of Justice Yashwant Varma of the Delhi High Court to his parent High Court in Allahabad after an adverse report against him, Senior advocate and Rajya Sabha MP Kapil Sibal says, "...The issue of corruption within the judiciary is a very serious issue. This is not something that has been articulated by senior councils and lawyers in the country for the first time. It has been going on for years. It is time for the Supreme Court to start looking at issues of how the appointment process takes place. The appointment process should be more transparent and carefully done...Corruption is a very serious issue and despite what PM Modi has said the corruption has increased..."
2:52

#WATCH | Delhi | On the Supreme Court Collegium recommending transfer of Justice Yashwant Varma of the Delhi High Court to his parent High Court in Allahabad after an adverse report against him, Senior advocate and Rajya Sabha MP Kapil Sibal says, "...The issue of corruption within the judiciary is a very serious issue. This is not something that has been articulated by senior councils and lawyers in the country for the first time. It has been going on for years. It is time for the Supreme Court to start looking at issues of how the appointment process takes place. The appointment process should be more transparent and carefully done...Corruption is a very serious issue and despite what PM Modi has said the corruption has increased..."

ANI

163,132 views โ€ข 1 year ago

The Waqf Amendment Bill is a direct assault on the principles of justice, fairness, and the religious autonomy enshrined in the Constitution. Today, the ideas of equality and fairness are being challenged by the forces seeking to divide and marginalize. This is not just a legislative proposal. It's a test of our commitment to justiceโ€”a contest between fairness and discrimination, the principle of our constitution and the politics of exclusion. The proposed amendments directly violate Articles 14, 25 and 26 of the Constitution. An issue that deeply concerns me is allowing non-Muslim members into the Waqf board and council. As the Minister said, this is not like the Defence Ministry, which is a government property. This is not government property; it's governed by the Muslim law. My concern is if the government is saying it can appoint people, what is the guarantee that it will not appoint RSS-BJP people to the Waqf board, which will create permanent tensions? What is the guarantee that you will not appoint non-Hindu members to the Hindu endowment board, non-Sikh members to the Gurudwara committees, or non-Christian members to the church management? The government does not want this country to move forward. They don't want to talk about education, employment, economic growth, social justice, harmony or science, technology, and artificial intelligenceโ€”the very engines that will drive the nation forward. When people oppose the government, its leaders say, 'Go to Pakistan, go to Pakistan.' The Modi government should remember that when Indian Muslims had a choice to choose between India and Pakistan, they chose this country as their land. This imposition is not acceptable to us. Listen to Jothimani ji in Lok Sabha as she speaks on the egregious Waqf Amendment Bill and how it's going to sow the seeds of poison and destroy the harmony in India.
4:19

The Waqf Amendment Bill is a direct assault on the principles of justice, fairness, and the religious autonomy enshrined in the Constitution. Today, the ideas of equality and fairness are being challenged by the forces seeking to divide and marginalize. This is not just a legislative proposal. It's a test of our commitment to justiceโ€”a contest between fairness and discrimination, the principle of our constitution and the politics of exclusion. The proposed amendments directly violate Articles 14, 25 and 26 of the Constitution. An issue that deeply concerns me is allowing non-Muslim members into the Waqf board and council. As the Minister said, this is not like the Defence Ministry, which is a government property. This is not government property; it's governed by the Muslim law. My concern is if the government is saying it can appoint people, what is the guarantee that it will not appoint RSS-BJP people to the Waqf board, which will create permanent tensions? What is the guarantee that you will not appoint non-Hindu members to the Hindu endowment board, non-Sikh members to the Gurudwara committees, or non-Christian members to the church management? The government does not want this country to move forward. They don't want to talk about education, employment, economic growth, social justice, harmony or science, technology, and artificial intelligenceโ€”the very engines that will drive the nation forward. When people oppose the government, its leaders say, 'Go to Pakistan, go to Pakistan.' The Modi government should remember that when Indian Muslims had a choice to choose between India and Pakistan, they chose this country as their land. This imposition is not acceptable to us. Listen to Jothimani ji in Lok Sabha as she speaks on the egregious Waqf Amendment Bill and how it's going to sow the seeds of poison and destroy the harmony in India.

Congress

27,175 views โ€ข 1 year ago

What is unfolding in this country should alarm every Kenyan of goodwill. Reports that rogue immigration officials, allegedly acting on instructions from senior figures in government, facilitated the acquisition of Kenyan passports by individuals linked to Sudanโ€™s conflict including associates and family members of Mohamed Hamdan Dagalo (Hemedti), are not just disturbing. They are explosive. Mr. President William Ruto, this is not a small administrative lapse. This strikes at the heart of our sovereignty, our security, and the integrity of our Republic. Kenyan citizenship is sacred. A passport is not a political favour. It is not a tool for shielding foreign actors. It is a sovereign instrument issued in the name of the people of Kenya. Allowing internationally controversial figures, or their proxies, to quietly obtain our passports is a betrayal of public trust. You are briefed daily by the National Intelligence Service (NIS). So I ask, did the NIS inform you that individuals linked to a foreign armed conflict were being processed for Kenyan passports? If they did not inform you, then we are staring at something even more frightening, that our intelligence services are either compromised, captured, or asleep at the wheel. Are we now a safe haven for those fleeing accountability? Is our immigration system up for sale? Who authorised this? Who benefited? I demand: 1. A full public disclosure of all passports issued under this arrangement. 2. Immediate suspension and investigation of all officers involved. 3. A parliamentary inquiry to establish whether executive authority was abused. Kenya must never become a laundering ground for international actors seeking legitimacy. Leadership is about protecting the nation, not exposing it to global shame and diplomatic fallout. The people of Kenya are watching.
1:11

What is unfolding in this country should alarm every Kenyan of goodwill. Reports that rogue immigration officials, allegedly acting on instructions from senior figures in government, facilitated the acquisition of Kenyan passports by individuals linked to Sudanโ€™s conflict including associates and family members of Mohamed Hamdan Dagalo (Hemedti), are not just disturbing. They are explosive. Mr. President William Ruto, this is not a small administrative lapse. This strikes at the heart of our sovereignty, our security, and the integrity of our Republic. Kenyan citizenship is sacred. A passport is not a political favour. It is not a tool for shielding foreign actors. It is a sovereign instrument issued in the name of the people of Kenya. Allowing internationally controversial figures, or their proxies, to quietly obtain our passports is a betrayal of public trust. You are briefed daily by the National Intelligence Service (NIS). So I ask, did the NIS inform you that individuals linked to a foreign armed conflict were being processed for Kenyan passports? If they did not inform you, then we are staring at something even more frightening, that our intelligence services are either compromised, captured, or asleep at the wheel. Are we now a safe haven for those fleeing accountability? Is our immigration system up for sale? Who authorised this? Who benefited? I demand: 1. A full public disclosure of all passports issued under this arrangement. 2. Immediate suspension and investigation of all officers involved. 3. A parliamentary inquiry to establish whether executive authority was abused. Kenya must never become a laundering ground for international actors seeking legitimacy. Leadership is about protecting the nation, not exposing it to global shame and diplomatic fallout. The people of Kenya are watching.

Hon. Justin Muturi, EGH

13,089 views โ€ข 6 months ago

I stood on the steps of the Supreme Court Monday . Donald Trump has done real things for MAHA. I believe that. But when the Department of Justice shows up to defend Bayer and Monsanto against the American people, against the health of our children, I have to say: you got this one wrong. Liability protection for corporations that poison people is not a conservative value. It is not a Republican value. It is not a Democratic value. It is not an American value. It is the opposite of a free market. It is the government putting its thumb on the scale for corporations that are losing in court because their products are causing cancer. Every child in this country deserves to be healthy. That is not a political statement. That is the only statement that matters. So in the words of the President himself: we are going to fight, fight.
0:43

I stood on the steps of the Supreme Court Monday . Donald Trump has done real things for MAHA. I believe that. But when the Department of Justice shows up to defend Bayer and Monsanto against the American people, against the health of our children, I have to say: you got this one wrong. Liability protection for corporations that poison people is not a conservative value. It is not a Republican value. It is not a Democratic value. It is not an American value. It is the opposite of a free market. It is the government putting its thumb on the scale for corporations that are losing in court because their products are causing cancer. Every child in this country deserves to be healthy. That is not a political statement. That is the only statement that matters. So in the words of the President himself: we are going to fight, fight.

Del Bigtree

147,514 views โ€ข 4 months ago

โ€œTHE SAVE AMERICA ACT IS NOT SAVING AMERICA.โ€ - TERI SEWELL DEFENDS VOTE AGAINST ELECTION SECURITY BILL Rep. Terri A. Sewell is defending her vote against the SAVE AMERICA Act, legislation designed to strengthen election integrity by requiring proof of citizenship to vote in federal elections. When asked by LindellTVโ€™s Alison Steinberg why she opposed the bill, Sewell argued that requiring identification would be too burdensome for some voters. โ€œWhat the Save America Act does is it requires, in order to get a ballot, a passport or a driver's license.โ€ She went on to claim many of her constituents do not have passports and cannot afford them, calling the legislation โ€œunacceptable.โ€ โ€œThe Save America Act is not saving America.โ€ Americans are routinely required to show identification for everyday activities, yet voter ID and proof-of-citizenship requirements remain politically controversial. So... if voting is a โ€œprecious, almost sacredโ€ right, why oppose measures designed to ensure that only American citizens cast ballots?
0:51

โ€œTHE SAVE AMERICA ACT IS NOT SAVING AMERICA.โ€ - TERI SEWELL DEFENDS VOTE AGAINST ELECTION SECURITY BILL Rep. Terri A. Sewell is defending her vote against the SAVE AMERICA Act, legislation designed to strengthen election integrity by requiring proof of citizenship to vote in federal elections. When asked by LindellTVโ€™s Alison Steinberg why she opposed the bill, Sewell argued that requiring identification would be too burdensome for some voters. โ€œWhat the Save America Act does is it requires, in order to get a ballot, a passport or a driver's license.โ€ She went on to claim many of her constituents do not have passports and cannot afford them, calling the legislation โ€œunacceptable.โ€ โ€œThe Save America Act is not saving America.โ€ Americans are routinely required to show identification for everyday activities, yet voter ID and proof-of-citizenship requirements remain politically controversial. So... if voting is a โ€œprecious, almost sacredโ€ right, why oppose measures designed to ensure that only American citizens cast ballots?

LindellTV

19,160 views โ€ข 2 months ago

๐Ÿšจ JUST IN: President Trump is going HARD against the Supreme Court, getting visibly angry at the thought they'd allow birthright citizenship for foreign invaders "We're a LAUGHING STOCK! And if the Supreme Court approves that decision, they have done a GREAT disservice to the United States of America, just like they did a great disservice by costing us $149 billion on tariffs by saying do it a different way!" "We have another one coming up, birthright citizenship. It would be a DISGRACE, it would be a disgrace if the Supreme Court of the United States allows that to happen." "Remember when I said 20 to 25 percent of the people coming into our country will come in through birthright citizenship. They'll become citizens through birthright citizenship, and it'll cost us numbers that are โ€“ I don't even think they're doable!" "And it's all up to a couple of people, and I hope they do what's right. Birthright citizenship is a disgrace, the fact that โ€“ look at the people that are bringing this suit. Study the people that are bringing this suit. These are not people that love our country. I can tell you that."
1:44

๐Ÿšจ JUST IN: President Trump is going HARD against the Supreme Court, getting visibly angry at the thought they'd allow birthright citizenship for foreign invaders "We're a LAUGHING STOCK! And if the Supreme Court approves that decision, they have done a GREAT disservice to the United States of America, just like they did a great disservice by costing us $149 billion on tariffs by saying do it a different way!" "We have another one coming up, birthright citizenship. It would be a DISGRACE, it would be a disgrace if the Supreme Court of the United States allows that to happen." "Remember when I said 20 to 25 percent of the people coming into our country will come in through birthright citizenship. They'll become citizens through birthright citizenship, and it'll cost us numbers that are โ€“ I don't even think they're doable!" "And it's all up to a couple of people, and I hope they do what's right. Birthright citizenship is a disgrace, the fact that โ€“ look at the people that are bringing this suit. Study the people that are bringing this suit. These are not people that love our country. I can tell you that."

Eric Daugherty

15,406 views โ€ข 3 months ago

The Nigerian passport is slowly being ostracised from the rest of the world, and travel benefits are stripped slowly. However, no one is saying anything! Is there an organisation, an office, a ministry, or a parastatal in charge of negotiating or mediating for Nigerian travellers and how they are treated at airports and border controls? Why is Turkish Airlines selling 21-hour layovers tickets to nigerian citizens without any provision for hotel accommodations within the airport, because there are hotels within the airport. More importantly, which organisation is in charge of making sure that this does not happen to Nigerian citizens? Is Turkish Airlines allowed to keep people in the airport for 21 hours without any provision at all for them? Is it even legal? IATA ?
6:41

The Nigerian passport is slowly being ostracised from the rest of the world, and travel benefits are stripped slowly. However, no one is saying anything! Is there an organisation, an office, a ministry, or a parastatal in charge of negotiating or mediating for Nigerian travellers and how they are treated at airports and border controls? Why is Turkish Airlines selling 21-hour layovers tickets to nigerian citizens without any provision for hotel accommodations within the airport, because there are hotels within the airport. More importantly, which organisation is in charge of making sure that this does not happen to Nigerian citizens? Is Turkish Airlines allowed to keep people in the airport for 21 hours without any provision at all for them? Is it even legal? IATA ?

GIDI

2,505,109 views โ€ข 2 years ago

US has issued a travel advisory of Level 2 and has advised women, not to travel alone to India, citing various cases of rapes. Ironically while an advisory is being issued for India, no such kind of advisory has been issued for Pakistan, which is a terror hub, houses terrorists such as Masood Azhar, Hafiz Saeed, Dawood Ibrahim. Infact Pakistan's Army Chief Asim Munir is being hosted for lunch by the US President. In the last 11 years, PM Modi has spent a disproportionate amount of time pursuing foreign powers. From forced hugs to Howdy Modi, Namaste Trump, and Ab Ki Baar Trump Sarkaar. But what has that yielded for India? At a time when we need nations of the world to stand with us, America is issuing travel advisories against us, and what is the government doing about it? Absolutely nothing. Pindrop silence like always. So the question is what is the cornerstone of our foreign policy? It is to keep India's interest above everything else or is it to get the right camera angle for Mr Modi? Our foreign minister on the other hand is too busy making reels with laser red eyes.
3:08

US has issued a travel advisory of Level 2 and has advised women, not to travel alone to India, citing various cases of rapes. Ironically while an advisory is being issued for India, no such kind of advisory has been issued for Pakistan, which is a terror hub, houses terrorists such as Masood Azhar, Hafiz Saeed, Dawood Ibrahim. Infact Pakistan's Army Chief Asim Munir is being hosted for lunch by the US President. In the last 11 years, PM Modi has spent a disproportionate amount of time pursuing foreign powers. From forced hugs to Howdy Modi, Namaste Trump, and Ab Ki Baar Trump Sarkaar. But what has that yielded for India? At a time when we need nations of the world to stand with us, America is issuing travel advisories against us, and what is the government doing about it? Absolutely nothing. Pindrop silence like always. So the question is what is the cornerstone of our foreign policy? It is to keep India's interest above everything else or is it to get the right camera angle for Mr Modi? Our foreign minister on the other hand is too busy making reels with laser red eyes.

Supriya Shrinate

17,233 views โ€ข 1 year ago

The Jamiat Ulama-i-Hind has challenged the constitutional validity of the Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025, in the Supreme Court, as this law is a direct attack on the country's constitution, which not only provides equal rights to its citizens but also grants them complete religious freedom. This bill is a dangerous conspiracy to strip Muslims of their religious freedom. Therefore, we have challenged the Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025, in the Supreme Court, and the state units of Jamiat Ulama-i-Hind will also challenge the constitutional validity of this law in the High Courts of their respective states. We are confident that just as the court has delivered justice in many cases, we will also get justice in this important and unconstitutional law. #WaqfBoardAmendmentBill
3:20

The Jamiat Ulama-i-Hind has challenged the constitutional validity of the Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025, in the Supreme Court, as this law is a direct attack on the country's constitution, which not only provides equal rights to its citizens but also grants them complete religious freedom. This bill is a dangerous conspiracy to strip Muslims of their religious freedom. Therefore, we have challenged the Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025, in the Supreme Court, and the state units of Jamiat Ulama-i-Hind will also challenge the constitutional validity of this law in the High Courts of their respective states. We are confident that just as the court has delivered justice in many cases, we will also get justice in this important and unconstitutional law. #WaqfBoardAmendmentBill

Arshad Madani

70,850 views โ€ข 1 year ago