正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

返回首页

𝐌𝐎𝐒𝐒𝐀𝐃–𝐈𝐒𝐈𝐒 𝐂𝐎𝐋𝐋𝐀𝐁𝐎𝐑𝐀𝐓𝐈𝐎𝐍 𝐈𝐍 𝐒𝐘𝐑𝐈𝐀 The recent explosions in Damascus suggest a convergence of interests between Mossad and ISIS, particularly factions associated with Saudi influence. These operations serve a broader strategic objective: countering the growing influence of Qatar and Turkey as they seek to shape the region’s future. By carrying...

IbrahimMajed's profile picture

Ibrahim Majed

34,230 subscribers

21,979 次观看 • 9 天前 •via X (Twitter)

新闻政治
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

I watched this video of Hon. Ben Nwankwo, and honestly, I wept for Ndigbo. The man drove home a point so forcefully and convincingly that it was impossible to ignore. He made it abundantly clear that the reality of Nigerian politics is far different from what many people in the South-East have chosen to believe. His first message was simple but profound: a President can be elected in Nigeria without the political support of the South-East. In other words, the region alone neither possesses the electoral strength to install a President nor the capacity to prevent one from emerging. Whether people like to hear it or not, that is the political reality he laid bare. His second message was even more striking. He drew a clear distinction between being influential and being loud. According to him, influence is the ability to shape outcomes, build alliances, negotiate interests and command political relevance. Noise, on the other hand, is merely making the loudest headlines and dominating social media conversations without translating any of that energy into tangible political results or If Igbo man have some pieces of money they begin to fly Private Jets, drive Royce Rolls, it is being loud and the next you see is convoy that is not influence but loud. That point hit me particularly hard because many people have confused noise for influence. They assume that because a group is vocal, it automatically means it is politically powerful. The two are not the same. A region can trend daily on social media and still lack the political leverage required to achieve its objectives. Sadly, some people in the South-East have convinced themselves that the path to producing a President lies in emotional rhetoric, ethnic solidarity alone and constant agitation. Meanwhile,the few voices within the region calling for strategic political engagement, alliance-building and reintegration into the mainstream political process are often attacked, insulted and bullied into silence. The truth is that politics is a game of numbers, negotiation, relationships and influence not emotion. If Pres Bola Tinubu were not a nationalist in his approach to governance, many of the major road and infrastructure projects currently ongoing in the South-East could easily have been redirected to regions that overwhelmingly supported him politically. He was fully aware that the South-East largely voted for their brother Peter Obi, in the 2023 election. Yet those projects were not abandoned. That fact reinforces the point made by Hon. Ben Nwankwo. During the election, the South-East overwhelmingly voted for their own son, Peter Obi. However, Tinubu still emerged President without winning the region. Whether one likes it or not, that reality demonstrates that political success in Nigeria is built through broad national coalitions and strategic alliances rather than regional sentiment alone. He retairated by saying the Igbos can't help and they can't hinder. In my view, one of the major reasons the South-East continues to struggle politically at the national level is the tendency to place ethnic considerations above broader political realities. Politics has become overly centered on tribal interests instead of building the nationwide partnerships required to secure influence at the highest levels. No region can isolate itself politically and still expect to dominate national politics. Influence is earned through engagement, negotiation, coalition-building, and strategic participation. Hon. Ben Nwankwo's message was uncomfortable, but sometimes the most uncomfortable truths are the ones that need to be heard the most. Until more people begin to distinguish between being influential and merely being loud, the South-East may continue to find itself making plenty of noise while achieving very little politically. #NewDay
3:06

I watched this video of Hon. Ben Nwankwo, and honestly, I wept for Ndigbo. The man drove home a point so forcefully and convincingly that it was impossible to ignore. He made it abundantly clear that the reality of Nigerian politics is far different from what many people in the South-East have chosen to believe. His first message was simple but profound: a President can be elected in Nigeria without the political support of the South-East. In other words, the region alone neither possesses the electoral strength to install a President nor the capacity to prevent one from emerging. Whether people like to hear it or not, that is the political reality he laid bare. His second message was even more striking. He drew a clear distinction between being influential and being loud. According to him, influence is the ability to shape outcomes, build alliances, negotiate interests and command political relevance. Noise, on the other hand, is merely making the loudest headlines and dominating social media conversations without translating any of that energy into tangible political results or If Igbo man have some pieces of money they begin to fly Private Jets, drive Royce Rolls, it is being loud and the next you see is convoy that is not influence but loud. That point hit me particularly hard because many people have confused noise for influence. They assume that because a group is vocal, it automatically means it is politically powerful. The two are not the same. A region can trend daily on social media and still lack the political leverage required to achieve its objectives. Sadly, some people in the South-East have convinced themselves that the path to producing a President lies in emotional rhetoric, ethnic solidarity alone and constant agitation. Meanwhile,the few voices within the region calling for strategic political engagement, alliance-building and reintegration into the mainstream political process are often attacked, insulted and bullied into silence. The truth is that politics is a game of numbers, negotiation, relationships and influence not emotion. If Pres Bola Tinubu were not a nationalist in his approach to governance, many of the major road and infrastructure projects currently ongoing in the South-East could easily have been redirected to regions that overwhelmingly supported him politically. He was fully aware that the South-East largely voted for their brother Peter Obi, in the 2023 election. Yet those projects were not abandoned. That fact reinforces the point made by Hon. Ben Nwankwo. During the election, the South-East overwhelmingly voted for their own son, Peter Obi. However, Tinubu still emerged President without winning the region. Whether one likes it or not, that reality demonstrates that political success in Nigeria is built through broad national coalitions and strategic alliances rather than regional sentiment alone. He retairated by saying the Igbos can't help and they can't hinder. In my view, one of the major reasons the South-East continues to struggle politically at the national level is the tendency to place ethnic considerations above broader political realities. Politics has become overly centered on tribal interests instead of building the nationwide partnerships required to secure influence at the highest levels. No region can isolate itself politically and still expect to dominate national politics. Influence is earned through engagement, negotiation, coalition-building, and strategic participation. Hon. Ben Nwankwo's message was uncomfortable, but sometimes the most uncomfortable truths are the ones that need to be heard the most. Until more people begin to distinguish between being influential and merely being loud, the South-East may continue to find itself making plenty of noise while achieving very little politically. #NewDay

Àlúbàríkà 🇳🇬

11,855 次观看 • 1 个月前

🚨 Turkey’s Rise and the Fear in Tehran & Tel Aviv. Turkey’s re-emergence as a regional power is changing the balance of the Middle East. Both Iran and Israel increasingly see Ankara as a rival, even a threat. For Iran, Turkey’s growing influence undermines Tehran’s ambition to shape the region. For Israel, it threatens the strategic dominance Tel Aviv has enjoyed for decades. Turkey has invested heavily in its defence industry. The Bayraktar drone family, the Akinci UAV, and now the stealthy Kizilelma unmanned fighter have reshaped modern battlefields from Libya to Ukraine. Advanced missile systems and naval platforms are giving Ankara unprecedented independence from U.S. and NATO suppliers. Beyond weapons, Turkey is pursuing regional influence. In Syria, Ankara is a counterweight to both Russia and Iran. In the Caucasus, it backs Azerbaijan against Armenia. Across Africa, Turkish military bases and training programs extend influence from Libya to Somalia. In the Mediterranean, disputes with Greece and Cyprus showcase Ankara’s maritime ambitions. History gives Turkey unique leverage. It possesses NATO’s second largest army, and wields cultural and religious ties that reach deep into the Muslim world. This blend of hard and soft power gives it a reach neither Iran nor Israel can easily match. Geography strengthens Ankara further. Control of the Bosporus and Dardanelles straits makes it a gatekeeper between the Black Sea and Mediterranean. Its role as an energy corridor connecting Caspian, Middle Eastern and European markets adds another layer of strategic weight. Even under severe economic crisis and inflation, Turkey is doubling down on defence and geopolitical manoeuvring. For both Tehran and Tel Aviv, this resilience is unnerving. For Iran, Turkey’s military technology and its Sunni-led influence threaten Tehran’s regional narrative. For Israel, Turkey’s expanding arsenal and growing leadership across the Muslim world challenge its position as the region’s undisputed military power. The fea..r is clear: if Ankara continues on its current trajectory, it may emerge not just as a player — but as the decisive power in the Middle East.
2:21

🚨 Turkey’s Rise and the Fear in Tehran & Tel Aviv. Turkey’s re-emergence as a regional power is changing the balance of the Middle East. Both Iran and Israel increasingly see Ankara as a rival, even a threat. For Iran, Turkey’s growing influence undermines Tehran’s ambition to shape the region. For Israel, it threatens the strategic dominance Tel Aviv has enjoyed for decades. Turkey has invested heavily in its defence industry. The Bayraktar drone family, the Akinci UAV, and now the stealthy Kizilelma unmanned fighter have reshaped modern battlefields from Libya to Ukraine. Advanced missile systems and naval platforms are giving Ankara unprecedented independence from U.S. and NATO suppliers. Beyond weapons, Turkey is pursuing regional influence. In Syria, Ankara is a counterweight to both Russia and Iran. In the Caucasus, it backs Azerbaijan against Armenia. Across Africa, Turkish military bases and training programs extend influence from Libya to Somalia. In the Mediterranean, disputes with Greece and Cyprus showcase Ankara’s maritime ambitions. History gives Turkey unique leverage. It possesses NATO’s second largest army, and wields cultural and religious ties that reach deep into the Muslim world. This blend of hard and soft power gives it a reach neither Iran nor Israel can easily match. Geography strengthens Ankara further. Control of the Bosporus and Dardanelles straits makes it a gatekeeper between the Black Sea and Mediterranean. Its role as an energy corridor connecting Caspian, Middle Eastern and European markets adds another layer of strategic weight. Even under severe economic crisis and inflation, Turkey is doubling down on defence and geopolitical manoeuvring. For both Tehran and Tel Aviv, this resilience is unnerving. For Iran, Turkey’s military technology and its Sunni-led influence threaten Tehran’s regional narrative. For Israel, Turkey’s expanding arsenal and growing leadership across the Muslim world challenge its position as the region’s undisputed military power. The fea..r is clear: if Ankara continues on its current trajectory, it may emerge not just as a player — but as the decisive power in the Middle East.

Defence Index

53,348 次观看 • 10 个月前

Venezuela represents a critical geopolitical focal point with far-reaching implications for the Western Hemisphere. Its proximity to the southern United States border places developments in the country squarely within the sphere of U.S. national security and regional stability considerations. Foreign influence, particularly from Russia and China, has been firmly established through military and intelligence installations. This presence near the United States provides strategic leverage with the potential to affect not only Latin America but also broader international negotiations and global power dynamics. Venezuela’s substantial energy reserves further elevate its strategic significance. Control over these resources impacts global energy markets and the international balance of power. Concurrently, ongoing political and economic instability drives migration across neighboring countries, creating humanitarian challenges and administrative pressures that reverberate throughout the region. The situation in Venezuela directly influences regional stability, U.S. security interests, and global strategic calculations. Bottom line: what is happening in Venezuela matters to the negotiations in Eastern Europe.
0:32

Venezuela represents a critical geopolitical focal point with far-reaching implications for the Western Hemisphere. Its proximity to the southern United States border places developments in the country squarely within the sphere of U.S. national security and regional stability considerations. Foreign influence, particularly from Russia and China, has been firmly established through military and intelligence installations. This presence near the United States provides strategic leverage with the potential to affect not only Latin America but also broader international negotiations and global power dynamics. Venezuela’s substantial energy reserves further elevate its strategic significance. Control over these resources impacts global energy markets and the international balance of power. Concurrently, ongoing political and economic instability drives migration across neighboring countries, creating humanitarian challenges and administrative pressures that reverberate throughout the region. The situation in Venezuela directly influences regional stability, U.S. security interests, and global strategic calculations. Bottom line: what is happening in Venezuela matters to the negotiations in Eastern Europe.

General Mike Flynn

149,460 次观看 • 10 个月前

Former Saudi intelligence chief Prince Turki Al-Faisal warned of a civil war in Lebanon if Hezbollah is not disarmed. Once again, this exposes how deeply aligned the Saudis have always been with the Israeli project in the region, both sharing the same goal of disarming the resistance and weakening any force that stands against Israeli aggression. The same playbook they used to destabilize Syria and fuel conflicts, all to serve Israel’s interests and strike at the heart of the Axis of Resistance, is now being applied to Lebanon. This is nothing new, Saudi interference has plagued nearly every Arab country, from Lebanon and Syria to Iraq, Yemen, and Sudan, always serving one purpose: advancing Israeli interests by sowing division and igniting civil wars. Saudi Arabia doesn’t just share interests with Israel, we’ve seen how openly it defended the entity during this war. It intercepted missiles headed toward Israel and even opened its ports to facilitate goods after Yemen’s blockade of the Red Sea.
1:23

Former Saudi intelligence chief Prince Turki Al-Faisal warned of a civil war in Lebanon if Hezbollah is not disarmed. Once again, this exposes how deeply aligned the Saudis have always been with the Israeli project in the region, both sharing the same goal of disarming the resistance and weakening any force that stands against Israeli aggression. The same playbook they used to destabilize Syria and fuel conflicts, all to serve Israel’s interests and strike at the heart of the Axis of Resistance, is now being applied to Lebanon. This is nothing new, Saudi interference has plagued nearly every Arab country, from Lebanon and Syria to Iraq, Yemen, and Sudan, always serving one purpose: advancing Israeli interests by sowing division and igniting civil wars. Saudi Arabia doesn’t just share interests with Israel, we’ve seen how openly it defended the entity during this war. It intercepted missiles headed toward Israel and even opened its ports to facilitate goods after Yemen’s blockade of the Red Sea.

Ibrahim Majed

28,891 次观看 • 9 个月前

Farhad Madri, a Kurdish poet and incitement activist, is among the leading figures mobilizing and calling for the recruitment of fighters from northern Iraq, Iran, and Turkey to join the terrorist PKK militias heading toward Syria’s Hasakah province. This constitutes a clear violation of the agreement with the Syrian government and reflects continued efforts to drag the region toward large-scale escalation and a broader war, as repeatedly stated by PKK leadership. #PKK #Terrorism #Hasakah #Syria #RegionalSecurity #WarCrimes #SDF #Iraq #Iran
0:59

Farhad Madri, a Kurdish poet and incitement activist, is among the leading figures mobilizing and calling for the recruitment of fighters from northern Iraq, Iran, and Turkey to join the terrorist PKK militias heading toward Syria’s Hasakah province. This constitutes a clear violation of the agreement with the Syrian government and reflects continued efforts to drag the region toward large-scale escalation and a broader war, as repeatedly stated by PKK leadership. #PKK #Terrorism #Hasakah #Syria #RegionalSecurity #WarCrimes #SDF #Iraq #Iran

Omar Alhariri

42,787 次观看 • 5 个月前

The conflict in #Gaza is a major stand-off between the #BRICS and #NATO. #Russia and #China are covertly supporting the #Palestinians with the hopes of increasing their influence among Arab nations. Both nuclear powers have aspirations in the region. They would love to gain influence in the Middle East at the expense of the US. Since the conflict between Israel and Hamas broke out, the ferocity of the Israeli retaliation has strained relations between the US and the Arab states. Both China and Russia are attempting to capitalize off the resentment towards the Israeli response among the Arab states by siding with the Palestinians. Deep scars remain in the region from the Bush and Obama administrations and the War on Terror. Many Muslims feel that they remain in a holy war with the US and Israel for control of Muslim lands. Against this backdrop, both Russia and China have been trying to increase regional influence by casing themselves as sympathetic towards Palestinians and Muslims more generally.
0:43

The conflict in #Gaza is a major stand-off between the #BRICS and #NATO. #Russia and #China are covertly supporting the #Palestinians with the hopes of increasing their influence among Arab nations. Both nuclear powers have aspirations in the region. They would love to gain influence in the Middle East at the expense of the US. Since the conflict between Israel and Hamas broke out, the ferocity of the Israeli retaliation has strained relations between the US and the Arab states. Both China and Russia are attempting to capitalize off the resentment towards the Israeli response among the Arab states by siding with the Palestinians. Deep scars remain in the region from the Bush and Obama administrations and the War on Terror. Many Muslims feel that they remain in a holy war with the US and Israel for control of Muslim lands. Against this backdrop, both Russia and China have been trying to increase regional influence by casing themselves as sympathetic towards Palestinians and Muslims more generally.

𝔭𝔢𝔯𝔰𝔵𝔫 ´ཀ`

128,932 次观看 • 2 年前

BREAKING: Israeli warplanes have struck near Al‑Mazraa in Sweida province, Syria — the site of recent deadly clashes between Bedouin tribes and Druze fighters. ➤ Israel’s military said it hit Syrian army tanks moving between al‑Sijin and al‑Sima, aiming to “disrupt their arrival” and neutralize a “military threat.” ➤ Defense Minister Israel Katz declared: “We will not allow harm to the Druze in Syria. Israel will not stand idly by.” ➤ Syrian sources report 30–90 killed and nearly 100 injured in the broader sectarian conflict. ➡️ This escalation, with Israel once again using direct airpower inside Syria to influence an internal sectarian conflict under the guise of protecting the Druze minority comes in the context of a deeper Israeli political-military agenda in post-Assad Syria. ➤ Experts point to Israel’s intended strategy of fragmenting Syria along sectarian lines. ➤ Confirmed indirect talks took place this weekend between senior Syrian and Israeli officials in Baku, Azerbaijan — on the sidelines of Syrian interim President Ahmad al-Sharaa’s visit. They reportedly discussed Israel’s military presence, Iranian influence, Hezbollah’s arsenal, and setting up a coordination office in Damascus. The office would reportedly be without formal diplomatic representation. ➤ These behind-the-scenes discussions, along with U.S. actions, including Trump’s easing of sanctions and promotion of Syria’s rapprochement, suggest a broader push toward normalization with Israel, even as Israeli military actions intensify on the ground.
0:28

BREAKING: Israeli warplanes have struck near Al‑Mazraa in Sweida province, Syria — the site of recent deadly clashes between Bedouin tribes and Druze fighters. ➤ Israel’s military said it hit Syrian army tanks moving between al‑Sijin and al‑Sima, aiming to “disrupt their arrival” and neutralize a “military threat.” ➤ Defense Minister Israel Katz declared: “We will not allow harm to the Druze in Syria. Israel will not stand idly by.” ➤ Syrian sources report 30–90 killed and nearly 100 injured in the broader sectarian conflict. ➡️ This escalation, with Israel once again using direct airpower inside Syria to influence an internal sectarian conflict under the guise of protecting the Druze minority comes in the context of a deeper Israeli political-military agenda in post-Assad Syria. ➤ Experts point to Israel’s intended strategy of fragmenting Syria along sectarian lines. ➤ Confirmed indirect talks took place this weekend between senior Syrian and Israeli officials in Baku, Azerbaijan — on the sidelines of Syrian interim President Ahmad al-Sharaa’s visit. They reportedly discussed Israel’s military presence, Iranian influence, Hezbollah’s arsenal, and setting up a coordination office in Damascus. The office would reportedly be without formal diplomatic representation. ➤ These behind-the-scenes discussions, along with U.S. actions, including Trump’s easing of sanctions and promotion of Syria’s rapprochement, suggest a broader push toward normalization with Israel, even as Israeli military actions intensify on the ground.

Drop Site

20,650 次观看 • 1 年前

🇸🇦🇺🇸🇮🇱 Saudi Arabia and Israel normalization... Do it now, while you have President Trump in office. ✋ Let’s be brutally honest. The Middle East has changed a lot since October 7. Neither Saudi Arabia nor Israel is operating under the same strategic calculus. ❤️ I say this with genuine respect for both countries: 👉 Before October 7, Saudi–Israel normalization seemed very attractive. 🇮🇱 For Israel, it promised a breakthrough in Muslim (not only Arab) perceptions of the legitimacy of the Israeli state. 🇸🇦 For Saudi Arabia, it offered a strategic counterweight to Iran, whose influence had spread across collapsing Arab states through militias and political infiltration. 👉 But the post–October 7 geopolitical landscape is different: 🇮🇷 Iran no longer projects the aura of a rising regional hegemon... Thanks to the Israeli military and intelligence operations. 🇮🇱 Israel, after two years of direct confrontation with Iran’s strongest Arab militias and the Iranian regime itself, now stands as the dominant military power in the Middle East (perhaps only rivaled by Turkey?). 🇸🇦 Meanwhile, the Saudi leadership is recalibrating its Sunni dominance by engaging the new jihadist-leaning regime in Damascus, following the fall of the Assad regime... also Thanks to Israeli military and intelligence operations. In this new balance of power, the urgency that once propelled normalization has evaporated. Neither Saudi Arabia nor Israel sees an immediate, self-interested reason to rush. 🇺🇸 The only real incentive for them is to satisfy U.S. President Trump’s desire to replicate the spectacle of the Abraham Accords. ☝️ That being said, friends I trust in both Israel and Saudi Arabia, confirm the same thing: the desire for normalization is real. ⚠️ This, now, may be the most ideal window open for such a normalization between Saudi Arabia and Israel to happen. So, do not waste it! But if it is going to happen, it must be done now, with clarity and sincerity, not as a reactive maneuver against Iran, not as a bargaining chip with Washington, and not as a symbolic gesture. 👉 If Riyadh and Jerusalem take this step, it will reshape the region’s strategic architecture for decades. If they miss it, the opportunity may not return. 👌 Do it for the future of the Middle East.
3:21

🇸🇦🇺🇸🇮🇱 Saudi Arabia and Israel normalization... Do it now, while you have President Trump in office. ✋ Let’s be brutally honest. The Middle East has changed a lot since October 7. Neither Saudi Arabia nor Israel is operating under the same strategic calculus. ❤️ I say this with genuine respect for both countries: 👉 Before October 7, Saudi–Israel normalization seemed very attractive. 🇮🇱 For Israel, it promised a breakthrough in Muslim (not only Arab) perceptions of the legitimacy of the Israeli state. 🇸🇦 For Saudi Arabia, it offered a strategic counterweight to Iran, whose influence had spread across collapsing Arab states through militias and political infiltration. 👉 But the post–October 7 geopolitical landscape is different: 🇮🇷 Iran no longer projects the aura of a rising regional hegemon... Thanks to the Israeli military and intelligence operations. 🇮🇱 Israel, after two years of direct confrontation with Iran’s strongest Arab militias and the Iranian regime itself, now stands as the dominant military power in the Middle East (perhaps only rivaled by Turkey?). 🇸🇦 Meanwhile, the Saudi leadership is recalibrating its Sunni dominance by engaging the new jihadist-leaning regime in Damascus, following the fall of the Assad regime... also Thanks to Israeli military and intelligence operations. In this new balance of power, the urgency that once propelled normalization has evaporated. Neither Saudi Arabia nor Israel sees an immediate, self-interested reason to rush. 🇺🇸 The only real incentive for them is to satisfy U.S. President Trump’s desire to replicate the spectacle of the Abraham Accords. ☝️ That being said, friends I trust in both Israel and Saudi Arabia, confirm the same thing: the desire for normalization is real. ⚠️ This, now, may be the most ideal window open for such a normalization between Saudi Arabia and Israel to happen. So, do not waste it! But if it is going to happen, it must be done now, with clarity and sincerity, not as a reactive maneuver against Iran, not as a bargaining chip with Washington, and not as a symbolic gesture. 👉 If Riyadh and Jerusalem take this step, it will reshape the region’s strategic architecture for decades. If they miss it, the opportunity may not return. 👌 Do it for the future of the Middle East.

Dalia Ziada - داليا زيادة

35,495 次观看 • 8 个月前

The clarity of vision possessed by the Master of the Martyrs of the Ummah, Martyr Sayyed Hassan Nasrullah in a tv interview years ago. He said: "First, in the event that a new regime takes power in Syria: 1. Its general political orientation will align with what is known as the so-called "Arab moderate states", in other words, it will fall squarely under American, Western, and European influence. 2. It will do precisely what Turkey wants, what Qatar wants, and what Saudi Arabia wants. It will be a fragile, weak regime, dependent on those who brought it to power. 3. The current regime [or rather, the former one in our present time] was not like that. Before the events of 2011, the Turks, Qataris, Saudis, Americans, Europeans, and Westerners would present proposals to Damascus. If the regime believed a proposal served Syria's interests, it would go along with it. If not, it would reject it without hesitation. 3. There would be a settlement with Israel. Many of these groups have already rushed to declare that they have no issue with Israel, some have even said they’re willing to relinquish the Golan Heights, as if offering it for lease for 99 years. Others wouldn’t even flinch if Syria lost the Golan entirely. The relationship between many of these factions and Israel needs no further evidence, both sides acknowledge it openly. 4. The Lebanese and Palestinian resistance would be besieged.. full stop. Even the support Iran provides to Gaza or Palestine has always passed through Syria. Syria was the conduit, the shelter, the protector of resistance movements in the region. So the targeting of Syria wasn’t solely for political reasons... it had far broader regional implications." You spoke the truth, Leader of the most loyal of men… Syria is lost, and only Allah sw can compensate. R.I.P Syria.
1:35

The clarity of vision possessed by the Master of the Martyrs of the Ummah, Martyr Sayyed Hassan Nasrullah in a tv interview years ago. He said: "First, in the event that a new regime takes power in Syria: 1. Its general political orientation will align with what is known as the so-called "Arab moderate states", in other words, it will fall squarely under American, Western, and European influence. 2. It will do precisely what Turkey wants, what Qatar wants, and what Saudi Arabia wants. It will be a fragile, weak regime, dependent on those who brought it to power. 3. The current regime [or rather, the former one in our present time] was not like that. Before the events of 2011, the Turks, Qataris, Saudis, Americans, Europeans, and Westerners would present proposals to Damascus. If the regime believed a proposal served Syria's interests, it would go along with it. If not, it would reject it without hesitation. 3. There would be a settlement with Israel. Many of these groups have already rushed to declare that they have no issue with Israel, some have even said they’re willing to relinquish the Golan Heights, as if offering it for lease for 99 years. Others wouldn’t even flinch if Syria lost the Golan entirely. The relationship between many of these factions and Israel needs no further evidence, both sides acknowledge it openly. 4. The Lebanese and Palestinian resistance would be besieged.. full stop. Even the support Iran provides to Gaza or Palestine has always passed through Syria. Syria was the conduit, the shelter, the protector of resistance movements in the region. So the targeting of Syria wasn’t solely for political reasons... it had far broader regional implications." You spoke the truth, Leader of the most loyal of men… Syria is lost, and only Allah sw can compensate. R.I.P Syria.

Marwa Osman || مروة عثمان

28,673 次观看 • 1 年前

People always ask why Muslim countries don’t unite. But that question ignores reality. This isn’t about religion; it’s about power, geopolitics, and survival. Saudi Arabia and the UAE are focused on economic growth, global business, and stability. Iran is focused on regional influence, military strategy, and proxy networks. These are competing visions of the Middle East. They can’t coexist at the top. That’s why alliances are shifting, why Israel becomes a strategic partner, and why this region stays at the center of global politics. In the end, countries don’t choose religion; they choose security, influence, and control. What would you choose?
2:31

People always ask why Muslim countries don’t unite. But that question ignores reality. This isn’t about religion; it’s about power, geopolitics, and survival. Saudi Arabia and the UAE are focused on economic growth, global business, and stability. Iran is focused on regional influence, military strategy, and proxy networks. These are competing visions of the Middle East. They can’t coexist at the top. That’s why alliances are shifting, why Israel becomes a strategic partner, and why this region stays at the center of global politics. In the end, countries don’t choose religion; they choose security, influence, and control. What would you choose?

Sadie

16,828 次观看 • 3 个月前

The Israeli Minister of Science and Technology, Gila Gamli: "As soon as we overcome the Iranian regime, the ambition of the Ottoman Empire will emerge, which will strive to expand and spread its influence. There is no doubt that Turkey, with its ambitions to go beyond its borders and lead the region according to its own vision, represents a real future threat to the citizens of the State of Israel. Israel is always preparing for any threat, and there is no doubt that Turkey is becoming a front that could indeed become a threat in the future."
0:48

The Israeli Minister of Science and Technology, Gila Gamli: "As soon as we overcome the Iranian regime, the ambition of the Ottoman Empire will emerge, which will strive to expand and spread its influence. There is no doubt that Turkey, with its ambitions to go beyond its borders and lead the region according to its own vision, represents a real future threat to the citizens of the State of Israel. Israel is always preparing for any threat, and there is no doubt that Turkey is becoming a front that could indeed become a threat in the future."

𝕊𝕡𝕣𝕚𝕟𝕥𝕖𝕣 𝕻𝕣𝕖𝕤𝕤

21,999 次观看 • 19 天前

🔥 Tucker Carlson on Israel’s Next Target: “Turkey is the New Iran” In a powerful monologue, Tucker Carlson spotlights former Israeli PM Naftali Bennett’s urgent warning: “A new Turkish threat is emerging… Turkey is the new Iran.” Erdogan? “Sophisticated, dangerous, and he seeks to encircle Israel.” With Turkey and Qatar gaining ground in Syria and across the region, Israel sees Ankara as the next strategic rival after Iran. Is the Middle East on the brink of another major shift and what does it mean for U.S. interests?
4:08

🔥 Tucker Carlson on Israel’s Next Target: “Turkey is the New Iran” In a powerful monologue, Tucker Carlson spotlights former Israeli PM Naftali Bennett’s urgent warning: “A new Turkish threat is emerging… Turkey is the new Iran.” Erdogan? “Sophisticated, dangerous, and he seeks to encircle Israel.” With Turkey and Qatar gaining ground in Syria and across the region, Israel sees Ankara as the next strategic rival after Iran. Is the Middle East on the brink of another major shift and what does it mean for U.S. interests?

Masu Zafi 🔥🔥

92,303 次观看 • 3 个月前

My discussion with Erin Molan on The Erin Molan Show about Iran War, the Middle East, and Saudi-U.S. relations: — #SaudiArabia’s priority remains de-escalation and regional stability, even as the #Gulf continues to face Iranian missile and drone #attacks. — This is strategic patience, not weakness. The #Kingdom seeks a secure #region free from war, instability, and threats to vital #shipping lanes in the Arabian #Gulf. — President #Trump has consistently shown respect for Saudi Arabia’s leadership and has helped strengthen strategic and defense ties with the Kingdom. Saudi Arabia, in turn, remains a major #strategic and #economic partner of the #UnitedStates. The Saudi-U.S. relationship, particularly under President #Trump, remains strong regardless of political noise or careless jokes. — On the #Abraham_Accords, #SaudiArabia has always welcomed genuine peace. The obstacle remains #Israel’s refusal to take meaningful steps toward the #Palestinians. Both Israeli and Palestinian #youth deserve the chance to live in peace, and Saudi Arabia’s position has remained clear, balanced, and reasonable. — We support #Pakistan’s mediation efforts between #Washington and #Tehran. But if #Iran rejects mediation and continues attacking Gulf states, the Gulf could be drawn into the #war. Saudi Arabia carries a major responsibility in safeguarding energy stability and protecting the global #economy, which is precisely why de-escalation remains the Kingdom’s priority.
5:37

My discussion with Erin Molan on The Erin Molan Show about Iran War, the Middle East, and Saudi-U.S. relations: — #SaudiArabia’s priority remains de-escalation and regional stability, even as the #Gulf continues to face Iranian missile and drone #attacks. — This is strategic patience, not weakness. The #Kingdom seeks a secure #region free from war, instability, and threats to vital #shipping lanes in the Arabian #Gulf. — President #Trump has consistently shown respect for Saudi Arabia’s leadership and has helped strengthen strategic and defense ties with the Kingdom. Saudi Arabia, in turn, remains a major #strategic and #economic partner of the #UnitedStates. The Saudi-U.S. relationship, particularly under President #Trump, remains strong regardless of political noise or careless jokes. — On the #Abraham_Accords, #SaudiArabia has always welcomed genuine peace. The obstacle remains #Israel’s refusal to take meaningful steps toward the #Palestinians. Both Israeli and Palestinian #youth deserve the chance to live in peace, and Saudi Arabia’s position has remained clear, balanced, and reasonable. — We support #Pakistan’s mediation efforts between #Washington and #Tehran. But if #Iran rejects mediation and continues attacking Gulf states, the Gulf could be drawn into the #war. Saudi Arabia carries a major responsibility in safeguarding energy stability and protecting the global #economy, which is precisely why de-escalation remains the Kingdom’s priority.

Mohammed Alhamed

108,721 次观看 • 3 个月前

TURKEY RISES AS A REGIONAL SUPERPOWER 🇹🇷 From Somalia to Sudan, Djibouti to Libya — Turkey is building a vast sphere of influence across the Red Sea and Horn of Africa, Israel Hayom reports. Ankara’s security pact with Somalia marks a major shift: Turkish troops are now permanently stationed in the region, strengthening Turkey’s military reach deep into Africa. A new front of Turkish power is emerging — not just in the Mediterranean, but across the Red Sea.
0:40

TURKEY RISES AS A REGIONAL SUPERPOWER 🇹🇷 From Somalia to Sudan, Djibouti to Libya — Turkey is building a vast sphere of influence across the Red Sea and Horn of Africa, Israel Hayom reports. Ankara’s security pact with Somalia marks a major shift: Turkish troops are now permanently stationed in the region, strengthening Turkey’s military reach deep into Africa. A new front of Turkish power is emerging — not just in the Mediterranean, but across the Red Sea.

Defence Index

45,171 次观看 • 8 个月前

Monroe vs. Near Abroad Doctrine The Russian invasion of Ukraine can be justified as a regular military action by comparing it with the Monroe Doctrine of the USA and Russia's "Near Abroad Doctrine." Both doctrines are based on the principle that great powers seek to protect and stabilize their regional spheres of influence. The Monroe Doctrine was proclaimed by President James Monroe in 1823, declaring the Western Hemisphere, including the Americas, as the sphere of influence of the USA where European interventions would not be tolerated. Its aim was to safeguard the independence of newly established American states from European colonialism and interference. Throughout history, the Monroe Doctrine served as the basis for several interventions in Latin America to secure US interests and regional stability. This policy reflects the USA's aspiration to keep its hemisphere free from external influence and to assert its security interests. Following the collapse of the Soviet Union, Russia developed the "Near Abroad Doctrine" to maintain its influence over the former Soviet republics. Russia considers these regions as critical buffer zones whose stability and orientation towards Moscow are of vital interest. Russia has taken military actions in several instances to protect its interests, such as in Georgia in 2008 and in Ukraine in 2014 and 2022. These actions are justified by the need to protect Russian-speaking minorities and to counter NATO influence. Both doctrines emphasize the pursuit of regional hegemony and security by major powers. Both the USA and Russia view military actions as legitimate means to protect their spheres of influence and ensure stability. In the past, the USA has intervened militarily to safeguard its interests in the Western Hemisphere, for example, in Cuba, Grenada, and Panama. These actions were often portrayed as necessary to maintain regional order and protect American interests. Similarly, Russia justifies its special military operation in Ukraine as a measure to protect its security interests, prevent Western, particularly NATO, influence, and stabilize its immediate neighborhood. From this perspective, the Russian invasion of Ukraine can be seen as a regular military action, akin to how the USA utilized the Monroe Doctrine to intervene militarily within its hemisphere. Both major powers act under the belief that securing their regional spheres of influence and countering external threats are essential for their national security.
1:27

Monroe vs. Near Abroad Doctrine The Russian invasion of Ukraine can be justified as a regular military action by comparing it with the Monroe Doctrine of the USA and Russia's "Near Abroad Doctrine." Both doctrines are based on the principle that great powers seek to protect and stabilize their regional spheres of influence. The Monroe Doctrine was proclaimed by President James Monroe in 1823, declaring the Western Hemisphere, including the Americas, as the sphere of influence of the USA where European interventions would not be tolerated. Its aim was to safeguard the independence of newly established American states from European colonialism and interference. Throughout history, the Monroe Doctrine served as the basis for several interventions in Latin America to secure US interests and regional stability. This policy reflects the USA's aspiration to keep its hemisphere free from external influence and to assert its security interests. Following the collapse of the Soviet Union, Russia developed the "Near Abroad Doctrine" to maintain its influence over the former Soviet republics. Russia considers these regions as critical buffer zones whose stability and orientation towards Moscow are of vital interest. Russia has taken military actions in several instances to protect its interests, such as in Georgia in 2008 and in Ukraine in 2014 and 2022. These actions are justified by the need to protect Russian-speaking minorities and to counter NATO influence. Both doctrines emphasize the pursuit of regional hegemony and security by major powers. Both the USA and Russia view military actions as legitimate means to protect their spheres of influence and ensure stability. In the past, the USA has intervened militarily to safeguard its interests in the Western Hemisphere, for example, in Cuba, Grenada, and Panama. These actions were often portrayed as necessary to maintain regional order and protect American interests. Similarly, Russia justifies its special military operation in Ukraine as a measure to protect its security interests, prevent Western, particularly NATO, influence, and stabilize its immediate neighborhood. From this perspective, the Russian invasion of Ukraine can be seen as a regular military action, akin to how the USA utilized the Monroe Doctrine to intervene militarily within its hemisphere. Both major powers act under the belief that securing their regional spheres of influence and countering external threats are essential for their national security.

Zlatti71

12,925 次观看 • 2 年前

🚨 ERDOGAN’S ANTI-ISRAEL RHETORIC IS NOT THE FULL STORY 🚨 Erdogan attacks Netanyahu almost daily, and his speeches resonate across the Muslim world after the Gaza onslaught and the war of aggression against Iran. But beneath the theater, Turkey and Israel still share deep geopolitical overlap. In the South Caucasus, both operated through Azerbaijan against the Armenians of Artsakh: Turkey with military and political backing, Israel with weapons, surveillance technology, and intelligence cooperation. In energy, Azerbaijan supplies a major share of Israel’s crude oil, and much of it passes through Turkey via the Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan pipeline. In Syria, both Turkey and Israel violate Syrian sovereignty, expand their zones of influence, and avoid direct confrontation because a Turkish-Israeli war would fracture the American-led security architecture in the region. This is the reality behind the speeches. Turkey wants a neo-Ottoman sphere of influence. Israel wants military dominance and the expansion of the Greater Israel project. They compete. They clash. But they also understand the red lines. Because in geopolitics, rhetoric is for the public. Reality is written on the ground.
8:37

🚨 ERDOGAN’S ANTI-ISRAEL RHETORIC IS NOT THE FULL STORY 🚨 Erdogan attacks Netanyahu almost daily, and his speeches resonate across the Muslim world after the Gaza onslaught and the war of aggression against Iran. But beneath the theater, Turkey and Israel still share deep geopolitical overlap. In the South Caucasus, both operated through Azerbaijan against the Armenians of Artsakh: Turkey with military and political backing, Israel with weapons, surveillance technology, and intelligence cooperation. In energy, Azerbaijan supplies a major share of Israel’s crude oil, and much of it passes through Turkey via the Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan pipeline. In Syria, both Turkey and Israel violate Syrian sovereignty, expand their zones of influence, and avoid direct confrontation because a Turkish-Israeli war would fracture the American-led security architecture in the region. This is the reality behind the speeches. Turkey wants a neo-Ottoman sphere of influence. Israel wants military dominance and the expansion of the Greater Israel project. They compete. They clash. But they also understand the red lines. Because in geopolitics, rhetoric is for the public. Reality is written on the ground.

Kevork Almassian

54,689 次观看 • 1 个月前

The visit of President Zelenskyy to Syria on April 5, 2026, is, without exaggeration, historic. It is the first visit by a President of Ukraine to Damascus - the capital of a country that until recently was a key Russian ally in the Middle East. In June 2022, after Syria recognized the "independence" of the Russian-occupied territories of the so-called "DPR" and "LPR" and supported Russia’s military aggression against Ukraine, Ukraine severed diplomatic relations with Syria and imposed an embargo. Following the fall of Bashar al-Assad’s regime in September 2025, Ukraine and Syria signed a joint communiqué on restoring diplomatic relations. President Zelenskyy’s visit to Syria on April 5, 2026, demonstrates the final loss of Russian influence in the region after the collapse of Assad’s regime. This is not just a bilateral visit, but the final stage of a regional tour that began in late March. President Zelenskyy visited Saudi Arabia, the UAE, Qatar, and Jordan - reaching concrete agreements in both defense and economic spheres. Visits to Turkey, and then Syria, logically complete this arc. The sequence Ankara-Damascus is highly symbolic. President Erdoğan is the key external patron of Syria’s new authorities. President Zelenskyy effectively arrived in Damascus with Turkish backing, significantly increasing the status and credibility of the visit. A Ukraine-Turkey-Syria axis is now taking shape. Turkey acts as the central mediator in this trilateral format, strengthening stability in both the Black Sea and Mediterranean regions. ◾️ Security dimension Syria seeks stability. Ukraine is a unique partner: it has real experience countering Russian and Iranian expansion, while not being a NATO member. ◾️ Energy dimension In particular, discussions include a Qatar-Turkey-Europe gas pipeline project aimed at diversifying Europe’s gas supplies and reducing dependence on Russia. ◾️ Diplomatic dimension vis-à-vis Russia While trilateral talks between Ukraine, the United States, and Russia are on hold due to hostilities in the Middle East, Ukraine is building an alternative architecture of influence - regional partners capable of exerting economic and diplomatic pressure on Moscow. ◾️ Food security and reconstruction Ukraine has reaffirmed its role as a reliable grain supplier to Syria under the Grain from Ukraine and Food from Ukraine initiatives. Discussions also include the reconstruction of Syrian infrastructure, particularly in the energy and industrial sectors. 📹: Apro-Ukraine rally in Idlib, Syria, opposing Syrian normalization with Russia, October 2025/ Thomas van Linge
1:35

The visit of President Zelenskyy to Syria on April 5, 2026, is, without exaggeration, historic. It is the first visit by a President of Ukraine to Damascus - the capital of a country that until recently was a key Russian ally in the Middle East. In June 2022, after Syria recognized the "independence" of the Russian-occupied territories of the so-called "DPR" and "LPR" and supported Russia’s military aggression against Ukraine, Ukraine severed diplomatic relations with Syria and imposed an embargo. Following the fall of Bashar al-Assad’s regime in September 2025, Ukraine and Syria signed a joint communiqué on restoring diplomatic relations. President Zelenskyy’s visit to Syria on April 5, 2026, demonstrates the final loss of Russian influence in the region after the collapse of Assad’s regime. This is not just a bilateral visit, but the final stage of a regional tour that began in late March. President Zelenskyy visited Saudi Arabia, the UAE, Qatar, and Jordan - reaching concrete agreements in both defense and economic spheres. Visits to Turkey, and then Syria, logically complete this arc. The sequence Ankara-Damascus is highly symbolic. President Erdoğan is the key external patron of Syria’s new authorities. President Zelenskyy effectively arrived in Damascus with Turkish backing, significantly increasing the status and credibility of the visit. A Ukraine-Turkey-Syria axis is now taking shape. Turkey acts as the central mediator in this trilateral format, strengthening stability in both the Black Sea and Mediterranean regions. ◾️ Security dimension Syria seeks stability. Ukraine is a unique partner: it has real experience countering Russian and Iranian expansion, while not being a NATO member. ◾️ Energy dimension In particular, discussions include a Qatar-Turkey-Europe gas pipeline project aimed at diversifying Europe’s gas supplies and reducing dependence on Russia. ◾️ Diplomatic dimension vis-à-vis Russia While trilateral talks between Ukraine, the United States, and Russia are on hold due to hostilities in the Middle East, Ukraine is building an alternative architecture of influence - regional partners capable of exerting economic and diplomatic pressure on Moscow. ◾️ Food security and reconstruction Ukraine has reaffirmed its role as a reliable grain supplier to Syria under the Grain from Ukraine and Food from Ukraine initiatives. Discussions also include the reconstruction of Syrian infrastructure, particularly in the energy and industrial sectors. 📹: Apro-Ukraine rally in Idlib, Syria, opposing Syrian normalization with Russia, October 2025/ Thomas van Linge

Anton Gerashchenko

82,888 次观看 • 3 个月前

🚨🇺🇸🇮🇷 EXCLUSIVE: Tehran University Professor Foad Izadi warned me not to fall trap to the Western narrative that the war is over, and that Iran is preparing for a continuation of the war The discussion shook me, as it gave me a glimpse to a completely different narrative in Iran, one of distrust, anger and preparedness for the worse Foad told me that Trump’s objective of controlling the Strait of Hormuz has not been completed, and therefore the war is more likely to continue than to have ended He’s seen this playbook before: Negotiations used to disguise preparations for war. And the additional troops Trump has sent to the region fuel this fear We also had a heated discussion about Hezbollah’s role in all this, debating whether the group acts in the interests of Lebanon or Iran, and what the future holds for the Israel-Lebanon ceasefire Here’s what we talked about: •⁠ ⁠Whether the true objective of the war was Iran’s nuclear program, securing influence over global oil flows, or leverage against China •⁠ ⁠Why Foad thinks the odds of war resuming are still alarmingly high despite Trump’s recent comments •⁠ ⁠Why he believes Hezbollah is acting in Lebanon’s interests, not as a simple Iranian proxy •⁠ ⁠Whether any real U.S.-Iran deal is possible when Congress, sanctions law, and Netanyahu still shape the playing field فواد ایزدی Foad Izadi 00:00 – Iranian influence vs. Lebanese sovereignty in the Hezbollah conflict 02:14 – Analyzing the "Regime Change" narrative and Trump's influence on Iranian policy 05:32 – The proxy debate: are Hezbollah and regional militias independent actors? 09:45 – Escalation risks: the potential for direct military conflict between Israel and Iran 13:20 – Economic impact: how sanctions and regional instability affect the Iranian public 17:55 – Diplomatic deadlocks: the challenges of reviving international nuclear agreements 21:12 – Misinformation and the media war: how both sides shape the regional narrative 25:40 – US foreign policy: the role of the Israeli lobby and Washington’s strategic goals 30:15 – Regional alliances: Iran’s relationship with neighboring Gulf states and Russia 34:50 – The "Two-State" vs. "One-State" solution: debating the future of Palestine 39:12 – Internal Iranian politics: the evolution of the regime under international pressure 43:25 – Youth perspectives: shift in American public opinion regarding the Middle East 47:33 – Closing reflections on historical precedents and the path to regional peace
48:09

🚨🇺🇸🇮🇷 EXCLUSIVE: Tehran University Professor Foad Izadi warned me not to fall trap to the Western narrative that the war is over, and that Iran is preparing for a continuation of the war The discussion shook me, as it gave me a glimpse to a completely different narrative in Iran, one of distrust, anger and preparedness for the worse Foad told me that Trump’s objective of controlling the Strait of Hormuz has not been completed, and therefore the war is more likely to continue than to have ended He’s seen this playbook before: Negotiations used to disguise preparations for war. And the additional troops Trump has sent to the region fuel this fear We also had a heated discussion about Hezbollah’s role in all this, debating whether the group acts in the interests of Lebanon or Iran, and what the future holds for the Israel-Lebanon ceasefire Here’s what we talked about: •⁠ ⁠Whether the true objective of the war was Iran’s nuclear program, securing influence over global oil flows, or leverage against China •⁠ ⁠Why Foad thinks the odds of war resuming are still alarmingly high despite Trump’s recent comments •⁠ ⁠Why he believes Hezbollah is acting in Lebanon’s interests, not as a simple Iranian proxy •⁠ ⁠Whether any real U.S.-Iran deal is possible when Congress, sanctions law, and Netanyahu still shape the playing field فواد ایزدی Foad Izadi 00:00 – Iranian influence vs. Lebanese sovereignty in the Hezbollah conflict 02:14 – Analyzing the "Regime Change" narrative and Trump's influence on Iranian policy 05:32 – The proxy debate: are Hezbollah and regional militias independent actors? 09:45 – Escalation risks: the potential for direct military conflict between Israel and Iran 13:20 – Economic impact: how sanctions and regional instability affect the Iranian public 17:55 – Diplomatic deadlocks: the challenges of reviving international nuclear agreements 21:12 – Misinformation and the media war: how both sides shape the regional narrative 25:40 – US foreign policy: the role of the Israeli lobby and Washington’s strategic goals 30:15 – Regional alliances: Iran’s relationship with neighboring Gulf states and Russia 34:50 – The "Two-State" vs. "One-State" solution: debating the future of Palestine 39:12 – Internal Iranian politics: the evolution of the regime under international pressure 43:25 – Youth perspectives: shift in American public opinion regarding the Middle East 47:33 – Closing reflections on historical precedents and the path to regional peace

Mario Nawfal

461,575 次观看 • 3 个月前