Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

𝐌𝐨𝐤𝐰𝐞𝐧𝐚: 𝐌𝐲 𝐋𝐢𝐟𝐞 & 𝐇𝐞𝐚𝐫𝐭 𝐈𝐬 𝐖𝐲𝐝𝐚𝐝 Wydad Casablanca Head Coach Rulani Mokwena was asked if he’d visit Mamelodi Sundowns recently when they were in Morocco 🇲🇦. His response to the question 👇🏾 #Rhulani #Wydad #DimaWydad #Sundowns 🔴⚪️👆

Karabo Selebalo Phasha

15,526 subscribers

66,982 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr •via X (Twitter)

Nachrichten & Politik Sport #Rhulani #Wydad #DimaWydad #Sundowns

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

DR JOMO SONO I gave this advice to Rulani Mokwena when he was down. ▪︎ I told him that in life you fall 7 times & rise up 8 times ▪︎ You didn't fail at Sundowns. The club decided to release you. ▪︎ Don't be distracted by negativity: Look at your CV everytime. Put it up on your wall. Look at what you have achieved at your age. You will have a peaceful sleep. I do that. He got appointed at WAC and came back to thank me The reason why he didn't get along with Flemming Berg, according to me, it's the Lorch acquisition. He told me that he wants Lorch & Flemming doesn't want him. I said, "Fight for what you want, if you believe it's right." He did. They say he is arrogant. I don't blame me. It's in the genes. We are arrogant family. People in the streets love him. Those up in top can hate him. Truth will always bail him out. He must speak it He must keep his head high & leave a legacy in Morocco

DR JOMO SONO I gave this advice to Rulani Mokwena when he was down. ▪︎ I told him that in life you fall 7 times & rise up 8 times ▪︎ You didn't fail at Sundowns. The club decided to release you. ▪︎ Don't be distracted by negativity: Look at your CV everytime. Put it up on your wall. Look at what you have achieved at your age. You will have a peaceful sleep. I do that. He got appointed at WAC and came back to thank me The reason why he didn't get along with Flemming Berg, according to me, it's the Lorch acquisition. He told me that he wants Lorch & Flemming doesn't want him. I said, "Fight for what you want, if you believe it's right." He did. They say he is arrogant. I don't blame me. It's in the genes. We are arrogant family. People in the streets love him. Those up in top can hate him. Truth will always bail him out. He must speak it He must keep his head high & leave a legacy in Morocco

Constitution First 🇿🇦

90,910 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Madugu Was Asked THE BIG QUESTION Before Nigeria vs South Africa… His Answer Says It All Super Falcons head coach Justine Madugu speaks ahead of Nigeria’s crucial 2027 FIFA Women’s World Cup Play-In against South Africa, with Nigeria’s World Cup hopes now on the line. Following Nigeria’s painful 1-0 quarter-final defeat to Cameroon at WAFCON 2026, Madugu was asked about one of the biggest issues facing the Super Falcons ahead of their decisive clash with Banyana Banyana. In this press conference, Madugu addresses: ⚽ Nigeria’s defeat to Cameroon ⚽ The Super Falcons’ missed chances and finishing ⚽ What can realistically be changed before facing South Africa ⚽ Nigeria’s preparation for the crucial play-in ⚽ The pressure surrounding the team ⚽ His expectations for the South Africa match ⚽ Nigeria’s final route towards the 2027 FIFA Women’s World Cup 🇳🇬 Nigeria vs South Africa 🏆 2027 FIFA Women’s World Cup Play-In 📅 August 13, 2026 ⏰ 9:00 PM WAT 🏟️ Moulay Rachid Stadium, Casablanca, Morocco The stakes are simple: Nigeria must win to advance to the FIFA Inter-Confederation Play-Offs. A defeat ends the Super Falcons’ route to the 2027 FIFA Women’s World Cup in Brazil. After the disappointment against Cameroon, can Madugu and the Super Falcons respond when it matters most? Watch the full press conference and hear what Justine Madugu had to say before Nigeria’s biggest match of the tournament. #VictorAdemolaAtWAFCON2026 #AdemolaSports

Madugu Was Asked THE BIG QUESTION Before Nigeria vs South Africa… His Answer Says It All Super Falcons head coach Justine Madugu speaks ahead of Nigeria’s crucial 2027 FIFA Women’s World Cup Play-In against South Africa, with Nigeria’s World Cup hopes now on the line. Following Nigeria’s painful 1-0 quarter-final defeat to Cameroon at WAFCON 2026, Madugu was asked about one of the biggest issues facing the Super Falcons ahead of their decisive clash with Banyana Banyana. In this press conference, Madugu addresses: ⚽ Nigeria’s defeat to Cameroon ⚽ The Super Falcons’ missed chances and finishing ⚽ What can realistically be changed before facing South Africa ⚽ Nigeria’s preparation for the crucial play-in ⚽ The pressure surrounding the team ⚽ His expectations for the South Africa match ⚽ Nigeria’s final route towards the 2027 FIFA Women’s World Cup 🇳🇬 Nigeria vs South Africa 🏆 2027 FIFA Women’s World Cup Play-In 📅 August 13, 2026 ⏰ 9:00 PM WAT 🏟️ Moulay Rachid Stadium, Casablanca, Morocco The stakes are simple: Nigeria must win to advance to the FIFA Inter-Confederation Play-Offs. A defeat ends the Super Falcons’ route to the 2027 FIFA Women’s World Cup in Brazil. After the disappointment against Cameroon, can Madugu and the Super Falcons respond when it matters most? Watch the full press conference and hear what Justine Madugu had to say before Nigeria’s biggest match of the tournament. #VictorAdemolaAtWAFCON2026 #AdemolaSports

Dr. Victor Ademola

18,079 Aufrufe • vor 19 Tagen

Interviewer: What changed with Donald Trump? When he first came to power after his election, he was very firm, very tough, about ending the war. Then afterward, he retreated, giving Netanyahu space to do what he wanted. But recently, we have seen this shift. Palestinian-American informal mediator Bishara Bahbsh: I think Netanyahu convinced the president that he needed more time to finish the mission in Gaza militarily—to destroy Hamas. He kept persuading the president to extend the time. But recently the president said: ‘Enough. You’re playing me.’ Not exactly in those words—he used an even harsher phrase. I won’t repeat the exact wording—it was more obscene. But it was along the lines of ‘You’re screwing with me.’ Trump cannot stand the idea that someone thinks he is being fooled. So he confronted Netanyahu. During Netanyahu’s visit to the White House last week, and later phone calls, the president reached his limit. And when his patience snapped, Hamas’s diplomatic response came at exactly the right moment. He took it and went with it. Interviewer: “Was Netanyahu surprised by Trump’s reaction?” Bahbah: “One hundred percent, yes. They were stunned. The Israelis had no immediate reaction because they didn’t expect it. They tried to spin it as if they weren’t losing, but Netanyahu ended up publicly saying that Trump’s offer met all of Israel’s requirements for a ceasefire and for Israel’s withdrawal from Gaza. Interviewer: “I’ve been trying to get from you what exactly Trump said to Netanyahu. You said it was almost obscene?” Bahbah: “Yes. Trump used a vulgar word toward Netanyahu. Closer to an ‘F-word’ in that context. Exactly so.”

Interviewer: What changed with Donald Trump? When he first came to power after his election, he was very firm, very tough, about ending the war. Then afterward, he retreated, giving Netanyahu space to do what he wanted. But recently, we have seen this shift. Palestinian-American informal mediator Bishara Bahbsh: I think Netanyahu convinced the president that he needed more time to finish the mission in Gaza militarily—to destroy Hamas. He kept persuading the president to extend the time. But recently the president said: ‘Enough. You’re playing me.’ Not exactly in those words—he used an even harsher phrase. I won’t repeat the exact wording—it was more obscene. But it was along the lines of ‘You’re screwing with me.’ Trump cannot stand the idea that someone thinks he is being fooled. So he confronted Netanyahu. During Netanyahu’s visit to the White House last week, and later phone calls, the president reached his limit. And when his patience snapped, Hamas’s diplomatic response came at exactly the right moment. He took it and went with it. Interviewer: “Was Netanyahu surprised by Trump’s reaction?” Bahbah: “One hundred percent, yes. They were stunned. The Israelis had no immediate reaction because they didn’t expect it. They tried to spin it as if they weren’t losing, but Netanyahu ended up publicly saying that Trump’s offer met all of Israel’s requirements for a ceasefire and for Israel’s withdrawal from Gaza. Interviewer: “I’ve been trying to get from you what exactly Trump said to Netanyahu. You said it was almost obscene?” Bahbah: “Yes. Trump used a vulgar word toward Netanyahu. Closer to an ‘F-word’ in that context. Exactly so.”

Drop Site

17,590 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

🚨 HAIM ESHED BREAKS HIS SILENCE… & TELLS ME ABOUT HIS VISIT FROM THE MEN IN BLACK 👁️ After shocking the world in 2020, when he spoke openly to the media about the existence of extraterrestrials & the “Galactic Federation”, Haim Eshed - the former head of Israel’s space programme – seemed to very swiftly DISAPPEAR from public view. So much so, that some people worried he had been intentionally “silenced” for speaking out. So, when I recently sat down with Haim, the VERY FIRST question I asked him was: “HAIM… WHY DID YOU DISAPPEAR?” His answer was MIND-BLOWING! As you will hear in the video, he explains that – soon after his public revelations about the Galactic Federation – he received a worrying visit which led to him “stepping back” to keep a lower profile. WHY? Because he was visited by group seemingly "official" but entirely MYSTERIOUS & unidentified “MEN IN BLACK”! These men somehow knew where he lived, had detailed knowledge about him & questioned him about his work & scientific theories. Anyone who knows the history of the UFOs will understand why this is SO intriguing. Because, for DECADES, UFO researchers, witnesses, scientists etc have reported encounters with mysterious "Men in Black "who appear unexpectedly to ask questions about UFO sightings or experiences. This phenomenon is SO well known that Hollywood even made a series of WILL SMITH action films that were directly inspired by the many reports! BUT here’s the really WEIRD part – the real life Men in Black have been reported all around the world, but can NEVER be traced back to any official government branch or intelligence service, & they are very often described as having something very ODD, UNCANNY & “OFF” about them, almost as if they themselves are NOT normal human beings...or perhaps even from “here”! So, who are they? Government agents? Intelligence operatives?...Or something even STRANGER? And WHY did they make an INTIMIDATING & DISTURBING visit to Haim Eshad — right AFTER he spoke out publicly about the GALACTIC FEDERATION? Watch the video & tell me what you think: WHO do YOU think the Men in Black really are? And what do they WANT? #MenInBlack #UFO #Disclosure

Uri Geller

176,607 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Many people are targeting Samay Raina over this clip in which he said that if condition is not in your favour, then first look for survival. People are giving different opinions and examples from Mahabharat and Rajasthan and other references too and questioning him about his take. Here is my understanding about it; The rule is if condition are not favorable first try to survive, make conditions favourable and then fight. There is no point of blind fighting and hitting the head into the wall. Every great person in history did the same.. For example as taught in history books when Maharana Pratap Ji lost the first war, he didn't get and asked that I want to sacrifice my self for my mother land. He took his time, prepared and then attacked Akbar and won. When the Pandavas were exiled, they didn't choose to fight instantly. Even when the exile was over and after the Virat Yuddh, they took their time. They knew that conditions were in their favor with Bhagwan Krishna on their side yet they chose to wait until the conditions were in full favour. Do you know Bhagwan Krishna has a name: "रणछोड़"? Do you know how he got that name? Jarasandha attacked Krishna 19 times. Due to this, he moved his capital from Mathura to Dwarka. He even left the battlefield against Kalyavan, and that's how he killed him. When Dhananand insulted Chanakya, he didn't attack Dhananand and try to kill him. He waited. He waited until he got Chandragupta, and then he prepared Chandragupta and took his revenge. The point is, you have to take your time, prepare yourself, and then attack the enemy with full power. This is what everyone did and everyone will do. Battles are fought to win, and if it is about your existence, then you must win. There is no second option. At that time, no one was helping Kashmiri Pandits, neither the Kashmir government nor the central government. So what options did they have at that time except leaving? They left because that was a question of survival, and this was the best they could do. Now many of them are doing well in their fields, and it's time they started preparing to reclaim their land. Because "जननी जन्मभूमिश्च स्वर्गादपि गरीयसी"

Many people are targeting Samay Raina over this clip in which he said that if condition is not in your favour, then first look for survival. People are giving different opinions and examples from Mahabharat and Rajasthan and other references too and questioning him about his take. Here is my understanding about it; The rule is if condition are not favorable first try to survive, make conditions favourable and then fight. There is no point of blind fighting and hitting the head into the wall. Every great person in history did the same.. For example as taught in history books when Maharana Pratap Ji lost the first war, he didn't get and asked that I want to sacrifice my self for my mother land. He took his time, prepared and then attacked Akbar and won. When the Pandavas were exiled, they didn't choose to fight instantly. Even when the exile was over and after the Virat Yuddh, they took their time. They knew that conditions were in their favor with Bhagwan Krishna on their side yet they chose to wait until the conditions were in full favour. Do you know Bhagwan Krishna has a name: "रणछोड़"? Do you know how he got that name? Jarasandha attacked Krishna 19 times. Due to this, he moved his capital from Mathura to Dwarka. He even left the battlefield against Kalyavan, and that's how he killed him. When Dhananand insulted Chanakya, he didn't attack Dhananand and try to kill him. He waited. He waited until he got Chandragupta, and then he prepared Chandragupta and took his revenge. The point is, you have to take your time, prepare yourself, and then attack the enemy with full power. This is what everyone did and everyone will do. Battles are fought to win, and if it is about your existence, then you must win. There is no second option. At that time, no one was helping Kashmiri Pandits, neither the Kashmir government nor the central government. So what options did they have at that time except leaving? They left because that was a question of survival, and this was the best they could do. Now many of them are doing well in their fields, and it's time they started preparing to reclaim their land. Because "जननी जन्मभूमिश्च स्वर्गादपि गरीयसी"

कुंभकरण

15,158 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

🚨WOW!!! An Ohio principal LOST HIS JOB after refusing to abandon a homeless 16-year-old student who was sleeping in a CAR. He and his wife already had SIX KIDS… but they took him in anyway. When the boy offered to LEAVE so the principal could save his career, he refused. ❤️ His name is Rob Burnside. He had spent 31 YEARS in education and was the principal of Lakota East High School outside Cincinnati. The boy’s name is Landerius “DeDe” Hayes. During DeDe’s junior year, his home life fell apart. He says living with his mother wasn’t safe, his father was dealing with problems of his own, and there were nights when DeDe was sleeping in a car with the heater running because the mobile home where his father was staying was too cold. ...and yet, every morning, he kept showing up to school. Eventually the school learned DeDe’s mother had moved outside the district. Without a qualifying address, DeDe was withdrawn from Lakota East. That’s when Principal Burnside realized this wasn’t just an enrollment problem. This kid didn’t have a freaking HOME. Rob went home and told his wife, Angel, what was happening. Her response was basically: if he needs somewhere to live, he can live with us. Rob and Angel already had SIX CHILDREN, including two they had adopted, but there was a 16-year-old boy out there without a stable place to sleep, and they couldn’t ignore it. The couple prayed about whether they should take DeDe in. Rob has said that just minutes later, his phone buzzed. It was DeDe. “Hey, Mr. Burnside.” Rob looked at his wife and knew they had their answer. DeDe moved in with the Burnsides and suddenly had something he desperately needed: a warm house, food, stability and people who were going to show up for him. While DeDe’s custody and residency situation was being worked out, Burnside allowed him to continue attending classes even though he’d already been withdrawn. The district investigated Burnside for insubordination and raised concerns about enrollment, lunches and liability. He was eventually placed on administrative leave. After 31 YEARS in education, Rob says he was given a choice: step down or go through the termination process. The 16 year old, DeDe, realized Rob’s career was on the line and offered to LEAVE THEIR HOME so Burnside could keep his job. Rob wouldn’t allow it. He hugged DeDe and told him: "You’re part of this family. We’re not gonna turn our back on you.” So Burnside stepped away from the career he’d spent three decades building... and DeDe stayed. The Burnsides eventually became his legal family. DeDe started calling Rob and Angel “Pops and Ma.” Then this past May, Rob Burnside sat in the stands at DeDe’s high school graduation. Not as the principal, just sitting there as a dad, watching the kid he refused to abandon walk across the stage. DeDe is 18 now and is pursuing a career in aviation mechanics. When asked he regretted what happened, Rob simple said: “What value can we put on the life of a young person?” When Rob Burnside had to choose between protecting that career and protecting a homeless kid who needed somebody… He chose the kid. And when that kid offered to sacrifice his own home to repay him… Rob chose him AGAIN. THIS IS THE AMERICA I KNOW!!!! 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸

🚨WOW!!! An Ohio principal LOST HIS JOB after refusing to abandon a homeless 16-year-old student who was sleeping in a CAR. He and his wife already had SIX KIDS… but they took him in anyway. When the boy offered to LEAVE so the principal could save his career, he refused. ❤️ His name is Rob Burnside. He had spent 31 YEARS in education and was the principal of Lakota East High School outside Cincinnati. The boy’s name is Landerius “DeDe” Hayes. During DeDe’s junior year, his home life fell apart. He says living with his mother wasn’t safe, his father was dealing with problems of his own, and there were nights when DeDe was sleeping in a car with the heater running because the mobile home where his father was staying was too cold. ...and yet, every morning, he kept showing up to school. Eventually the school learned DeDe’s mother had moved outside the district. Without a qualifying address, DeDe was withdrawn from Lakota East. That’s when Principal Burnside realized this wasn’t just an enrollment problem. This kid didn’t have a freaking HOME. Rob went home and told his wife, Angel, what was happening. Her response was basically: if he needs somewhere to live, he can live with us. Rob and Angel already had SIX CHILDREN, including two they had adopted, but there was a 16-year-old boy out there without a stable place to sleep, and they couldn’t ignore it. The couple prayed about whether they should take DeDe in. Rob has said that just minutes later, his phone buzzed. It was DeDe. “Hey, Mr. Burnside.” Rob looked at his wife and knew they had their answer. DeDe moved in with the Burnsides and suddenly had something he desperately needed: a warm house, food, stability and people who were going to show up for him. While DeDe’s custody and residency situation was being worked out, Burnside allowed him to continue attending classes even though he’d already been withdrawn. The district investigated Burnside for insubordination and raised concerns about enrollment, lunches and liability. He was eventually placed on administrative leave. After 31 YEARS in education, Rob says he was given a choice: step down or go through the termination process. The 16 year old, DeDe, realized Rob’s career was on the line and offered to LEAVE THEIR HOME so Burnside could keep his job. Rob wouldn’t allow it. He hugged DeDe and told him: "You’re part of this family. We’re not gonna turn our back on you.” So Burnside stepped away from the career he’d spent three decades building... and DeDe stayed. The Burnsides eventually became his legal family. DeDe started calling Rob and Angel “Pops and Ma.” Then this past May, Rob Burnside sat in the stands at DeDe’s high school graduation. Not as the principal, just sitting there as a dad, watching the kid he refused to abandon walk across the stage. DeDe is 18 now and is pursuing a career in aviation mechanics. When asked he regretted what happened, Rob simple said: “What value can we put on the life of a young person?” When Rob Burnside had to choose between protecting that career and protecting a homeless kid who needed somebody… He chose the kid. And when that kid offered to sacrifice his own home to repay him… Rob chose him AGAIN. THIS IS THE AMERICA I KNOW!!!! 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸

Matt Van Swol

431,739 Aufrufe • vor 4 Tagen

Marcus Dudley is NOT fulfilling the basic roles of a Race Engineer, and Austria FP1 only highlighted it. His only response when Russell radioed for setup suggestions was, “𝙟𝙪𝙨𝙩 𝙩𝙝𝙞𝙣𝙠 𝙖𝙗𝙤𝙪𝙩 … 𝙬𝙝𝙖𝙩 𝘆𝗼𝘂 𝙘𝙖𝙣 𝙙𝙤 𝙬𝙞𝙩𝙝 𝘆𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝙩𝙤𝙤𝙡𝙨,” and IMMEDIATELY moved on to count down from 7 to 1. (left vid) Compare this with Bono in the same session. He had found potential problems in his data, asked the driver FIRST if he was feeling the same, and 𝗼𝗳𝗳𝗲𝗿𝗲𝗱 𝘄𝗶𝘁𝗵𝗼𝘂𝘁 𝗽𝗿𝗼𝗺𝗽𝘁𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘁𝗼 𝗳𝗶𝗻𝗱 𝗮 𝘀𝗲𝘁-𝘂𝗽 𝘀𝗼𝗹𝘂𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 – and he found one immediately. (right vid) Most Race Engineers lean more towards the latter. They also, like Bono, constantly feed their driver data on WHERE they were losing pace compared to his teammate, and HOW they could improve. They also DO NOT mess up their drivers’ Strat Modes. They constantly suggest Set-Up improvements. THEY ANSWER THEIR DRIVERS’ QUESTIONS. Marcus Dudley does none of these. Him explicitly ignoring Russell’s questions about his pitstop in the Monaco GP cost the driver not only a podium, but also a points finish. He NEVER informs Russell about a specific corner that could be hindering his pace compared to his teammate; the best he does is offer a single lap time. His teammate, on the other hand, is guided through every opportunity. There are multiple instances within any single session in F1 where Dudley prioritizes counting from 5 to 1 backwards OVER answering his driver’s question. Why he is so fixated on counting every number, I do not understand. His primary role is in communication - REPLYING TO QUESTIONS surely must be of utmost priority.

Marcus Dudley is NOT fulfilling the basic roles of a Race Engineer, and Austria FP1 only highlighted it. His only response when Russell radioed for setup suggestions was, “𝙟𝙪𝙨𝙩 𝙩𝙝𝙞𝙣𝙠 𝙖𝙗𝙤𝙪𝙩 … 𝙬𝙝𝙖𝙩 𝘆𝗼𝘂 𝙘𝙖𝙣 𝙙𝙤 𝙬𝙞𝙩𝙝 𝘆𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝙩𝙤𝙤𝙡𝙨,” and IMMEDIATELY moved on to count down from 7 to 1. (left vid) Compare this with Bono in the same session. He had found potential problems in his data, asked the driver FIRST if he was feeling the same, and 𝗼𝗳𝗳𝗲𝗿𝗲𝗱 𝘄𝗶𝘁𝗵𝗼𝘂𝘁 𝗽𝗿𝗼𝗺𝗽𝘁𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘁𝗼 𝗳𝗶𝗻𝗱 𝗮 𝘀𝗲𝘁-𝘂𝗽 𝘀𝗼𝗹𝘂𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 – and he found one immediately. (right vid) Most Race Engineers lean more towards the latter. They also, like Bono, constantly feed their driver data on WHERE they were losing pace compared to his teammate, and HOW they could improve. They also DO NOT mess up their drivers’ Strat Modes. They constantly suggest Set-Up improvements. THEY ANSWER THEIR DRIVERS’ QUESTIONS. Marcus Dudley does none of these. Him explicitly ignoring Russell’s questions about his pitstop in the Monaco GP cost the driver not only a podium, but also a points finish. He NEVER informs Russell about a specific corner that could be hindering his pace compared to his teammate; the best he does is offer a single lap time. His teammate, on the other hand, is guided through every opportunity. There are multiple instances within any single session in F1 where Dudley prioritizes counting from 5 to 1 backwards OVER answering his driver’s question. Why he is so fixated on counting every number, I do not understand. His primary role is in communication - REPLYING TO QUESTIONS surely must be of utmost priority.

셀버트

165,002 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

WATCH: Margaret Brennan gets COOKED by Israeli Ambassador to the U.S. Michael Leiter over Ro Khanna's incursion in the West Bank MARGARET BRENNAN: Well, before I let you go, there were two high-profile incidents I want to quickly touch on here. One, a CNN crew attacked in the West Bank by what they say were four settlers. There was also an incident with Ro Khanna, the congressman from California, who said he was his vehicles he was in were stopped by Israeli settlers, and then when the IDF showed up, they were on the side of the settlers, not him. He said "[i]t's not a good idea to detain longshot presidential candidates". It was a warning to your government. Do you think your government needs to apologize to both him and those CNN journalists? MICHAEL LEITER: Any violence is to be condemned. No excuses, no explanations. Okay. So if CNN crew was attacked, that needs to be condemned, and I'm doing so right now. And we need to do a better job. BRENNAN: You are condemning it [unint]-- LEITER: --If- if- if it was- actually took place as they've reported it, absolutely condemning it. We need to rein in violence on all sides. Now, in terms of Ro Khanna, we reached out to him when we heard he was going to Israel, the Israeli embassy here in Washington. As all congressmen do, they coordinate their trip with the Israeli government. We suggested he visit with- with survivors of the October 7th massacre. That he visit the borders, so he understands the, the issues that we have in our borders and so on. He ignored that and he decided to coordinate his trip not with Israel, but with Palestinian activists and with J Street, which is a anti-government, anti-Israeli government advocacy group here in Washington. So you know he coordinated-- BRENNAN: It's a Jewish lobby group… LEITER: Well, it's-- BRENNAN: …that is supportive of a different path for Israel. LEITER: Yeah, yeah. I- I play tennis once a year. That doesn't make me a tennis player. The fact that they call themselves a Jewish organization is- is irrelevant. They're- they're- an advocacy group against the government of Israel. That has to be clear. BRENNAN: The current government, Netanyahu government. LEITER: Yes. Yes-- BRENNAN: That's what you mean, the government you work for. LEITER: And Congressman Khanna, there has been no secret about his antipathy towards the government of Israel as well. So perhaps if he would have coordinated the trip- and then you know to have this incident on Wednesday and wait to release it on Saturday, maybe this had more something to do with his support of- of Graham Platner beforehand and the difficulties he had with that, and trying to shift the focus to something else. Perhaps I'm asking a question. BRENNAN: Well, we did hear from Congressman Khanna, who said that there was an alert to the embassy on his behalf, and that they asked for the news… LEITER: --There was not, there was not-- BRENNAN: …to be held until he had left the country, as well. LEITER: There was a question. There was not an alert. There was a question about visas. That's all. But when we requested that he coordinate the trip with us, he rejected that by basically staying silent. So that's unfortunate. This whole incident is unfortunate. And if- if somebody, it's kind of interesting that somebody wants to declare a presidential run by running off to Israel? Not strange? BRENNAN: Well, we're going to have to leave it there, sir. There's so much more to talk about with you, but I'm out of time. Thank you for coming. LEITER: Thank you, Margaret. Good to be with you. BRENNAN: And we'll be right back with a lot more. Face the Nation. Stay with us.

Jorge Bonilla

460,040 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

If Zohran Mamdani wins the NYC mayoral primary, it’ll be because of this video & answer. Moderator asks: “Where would your first foreign visit be as mayor of New York City?” Totally insane question. What does foreign policy have to do with filling potholes or fixing the MTA? Every candidate competes in the Politically Correct Olympics to give the same desperate answer: “I’d make my 4th trip to Israel, followed by my 5th to Ukraine.” Zohran gives the only sane (and politically lethal) answer: “I would stay in New York City. I’ll be meeting Jewish New Yorkers at their synagogues, temples, or at their subway stations.” Reminds me of the 2016 GOP primary when they asked if any candidates onstage wouldn’t blindly back the eventual nominee. Trump was the only one who raised his hand. The crowd went wild. They loved his authenticity. If Zohran wins and people are shocked a “Muslim socialist” took the NYC mayoral primary—just like they were when a “reality TV star with no political experience” took the presidency—it’ll be for the same reason: both ran on the radical idea of telling the people voting for them: “I’m here for YOU and your problems, not someone else’s.” Osama Bin Laden himself could rise from the dead, and as long as he looked into the camera and authentically said, “I’m putting New Yorkers first,” he’d beat Andrew Cuomo. It’s not always the messenger. It’s the message. And the message is: put New Yorkers first. Wild concept—for people running to be mayor of New York City.

If Zohran Mamdani wins the NYC mayoral primary, it’ll be because of this video & answer. Moderator asks: “Where would your first foreign visit be as mayor of New York City?” Totally insane question. What does foreign policy have to do with filling potholes or fixing the MTA? Every candidate competes in the Politically Correct Olympics to give the same desperate answer: “I’d make my 4th trip to Israel, followed by my 5th to Ukraine.” Zohran gives the only sane (and politically lethal) answer: “I would stay in New York City. I’ll be meeting Jewish New Yorkers at their synagogues, temples, or at their subway stations.” Reminds me of the 2016 GOP primary when they asked if any candidates onstage wouldn’t blindly back the eventual nominee. Trump was the only one who raised his hand. The crowd went wild. They loved his authenticity. If Zohran wins and people are shocked a “Muslim socialist” took the NYC mayoral primary—just like they were when a “reality TV star with no political experience” took the presidency—it’ll be for the same reason: both ran on the radical idea of telling the people voting for them: “I’m here for YOU and your problems, not someone else’s.” Osama Bin Laden himself could rise from the dead, and as long as he looked into the camera and authentically said, “I’m putting New Yorkers first,” he’d beat Andrew Cuomo. It’s not always the messenger. It’s the message. And the message is: put New Yorkers first. Wild concept—for people running to be mayor of New York City.

Caroline Sunshine

710,166 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

PRESS STATEMENT In the last 24 hours, social media has exploded over my interview with Mehdi Hassan, albeit with varied opinions. Let me set the record straight. When I signed on to the privileged job granted to me by Mr. President, I was well aware of its implications. Selling ice cream, looking fine, and seeking the praises of men were never part of it. Some of the fiercest critics of my interview can not even stand local TV anchors. But the task of promoting and defending the President and his administration is what I do with ease and joy. I am prepared to appear before any interviewer, anywhere in the world, any day and at any time, to defend this government and its policies. I have never, and will never, subscribe to ducking or dodging interviews on matters that concern promoting and defending the administration I was appointed to serve. It is the least of what is required of me. Head to Head contacted me requesting an interview, stating that they wanted to challenge our government on security, the economy, and corruption. Nowhere in our almost six months of communication did they mention that they were going to challenge my past. If that had been their plan, ethically and professionally, they were supposed to inform me so I could prepare my response. But that’s okay, ethically, that is on them, not on me. I refused to swallow the pill of Mehdi’s “opposition research-style journalism,” and even today, if you carefully compare what he read as quotes from organisations and groups, you will see that many were inaccurate and some were outright fake news. But I will leave that for another day. As for what I said about President Tinubu in the past, I am glad those were things I said when I was in the opposition saddle with such zeal. It is all politics. Half of Donald Trump’s cabinet is made up of people who once spoke against him, and quite a number of people in our own cabinet also spoke against President Tinubu in the past. Those things do not bother him if you care to know. The majority of the naysayers are members of the opposition and their sympathisers. It does not bother me one bit. Their temporary excitement over the interview has not lasted and will not last, because it does not take away their obvious problem of lack of vision, mission in conducting and managing a political party; yet they seek to manage Nigeria. Clearly they have no path to victory and no alternative policies or program for the Nigerian people. And if they say they do, they can as well go to head to head and be interrogated on that; as the saying in Hausa goes “Ga fili Ga doki” I conclude by thanking the many Nigerians and non-Nigerians who sent in their commendations over my brave defence of our government in an interview where the anchor would hardly let you answer a question unless it suited his narrative. I still have admiration and respect for Mehdi Hassan as arguably the best debater on the planet. I look forward to part two of the Head to Head interview, and I am glad that by then questions about my past will no longer be news so that we can focus on our administration’s policies, programs and what we have achieved so far. Stay tuned. – D.H Bwala Special Adviser to President on Media and Policy Communication (State House) Saturday March 7, 2026

PRESS STATEMENT In the last 24 hours, social media has exploded over my interview with Mehdi Hassan, albeit with varied opinions. Let me set the record straight. When I signed on to the privileged job granted to me by Mr. President, I was well aware of its implications. Selling ice cream, looking fine, and seeking the praises of men were never part of it. Some of the fiercest critics of my interview can not even stand local TV anchors. But the task of promoting and defending the President and his administration is what I do with ease and joy. I am prepared to appear before any interviewer, anywhere in the world, any day and at any time, to defend this government and its policies. I have never, and will never, subscribe to ducking or dodging interviews on matters that concern promoting and defending the administration I was appointed to serve. It is the least of what is required of me. Head to Head contacted me requesting an interview, stating that they wanted to challenge our government on security, the economy, and corruption. Nowhere in our almost six months of communication did they mention that they were going to challenge my past. If that had been their plan, ethically and professionally, they were supposed to inform me so I could prepare my response. But that’s okay, ethically, that is on them, not on me. I refused to swallow the pill of Mehdi’s “opposition research-style journalism,” and even today, if you carefully compare what he read as quotes from organisations and groups, you will see that many were inaccurate and some were outright fake news. But I will leave that for another day. As for what I said about President Tinubu in the past, I am glad those were things I said when I was in the opposition saddle with such zeal. It is all politics. Half of Donald Trump’s cabinet is made up of people who once spoke against him, and quite a number of people in our own cabinet also spoke against President Tinubu in the past. Those things do not bother him if you care to know. The majority of the naysayers are members of the opposition and their sympathisers. It does not bother me one bit. Their temporary excitement over the interview has not lasted and will not last, because it does not take away their obvious problem of lack of vision, mission in conducting and managing a political party; yet they seek to manage Nigeria. Clearly they have no path to victory and no alternative policies or program for the Nigerian people. And if they say they do, they can as well go to head to head and be interrogated on that; as the saying in Hausa goes “Ga fili Ga doki” I conclude by thanking the many Nigerians and non-Nigerians who sent in their commendations over my brave defence of our government in an interview where the anchor would hardly let you answer a question unless it suited his narrative. I still have admiration and respect for Mehdi Hassan as arguably the best debater on the planet. I look forward to part two of the Head to Head interview, and I am glad that by then questions about my past will no longer be news so that we can focus on our administration’s policies, programs and what we have achieved so far. Stay tuned. – D.H Bwala Special Adviser to President on Media and Policy Communication (State House) Saturday March 7, 2026

D. H Bwala

1,486,212 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

Dr Dewi Evans spoke to Radio Wales Breakfast this morning. It is a fascinating interview—in particular, Evans' response to the question of whether he'd changed his mind on what caused Baby C's death. For context: Evans testified at trial that Lucy Letby murdered several babies by forcing air down their nasogastric tubes. But there is nothing in the scientific literature supporting this as a plausible method of murder—a fact Evans himself has had to concede post-trial. Evans has since recanted his theory, telling Channel 5 last summer that, "None of the babies were killed as a direct result of the injection of air, or fluid and air deliberately injected into their stomachs." More recently, Evans has denied that he ever recanted his original murder theory in the first place. The latest about-face came in response to Letby's new lawyer, Mark McDonald, announcing that he will seek to appeal Letby's convictions—based, in part, on Evans having changed his mind about this particular method of murder. And that brings us to Evans' interview this morning with Radio Wales Breakfast. When asked if he'd changed his mind about what caused Baby C's death, Evans equivocated. He told the interviewer that Letby may have "used both mechanisms"—meaning air forced down the nasogastric tube, and air injected directly into the baby's veins—and that, "either option was possible." It's a response reflective of the impossible position Evans has put himself in. He's no longer willing to stand by 'air forced down the nasogastric tube' as a feasible method of murder, but is similarly unwilling to admit that he's changed his mind.

Dr Dewi Evans spoke to Radio Wales Breakfast this morning. It is a fascinating interview—in particular, Evans' response to the question of whether he'd changed his mind on what caused Baby C's death. For context: Evans testified at trial that Lucy Letby murdered several babies by forcing air down their nasogastric tubes. But there is nothing in the scientific literature supporting this as a plausible method of murder—a fact Evans himself has had to concede post-trial. Evans has since recanted his theory, telling Channel 5 last summer that, "None of the babies were killed as a direct result of the injection of air, or fluid and air deliberately injected into their stomachs." More recently, Evans has denied that he ever recanted his original murder theory in the first place. The latest about-face came in response to Letby's new lawyer, Mark McDonald, announcing that he will seek to appeal Letby's convictions—based, in part, on Evans having changed his mind about this particular method of murder. And that brings us to Evans' interview this morning with Radio Wales Breakfast. When asked if he'd changed his mind about what caused Baby C's death, Evans equivocated. He told the interviewer that Letby may have "used both mechanisms"—meaning air forced down the nasogastric tube, and air injected directly into the baby's veins—and that, "either option was possible." It's a response reflective of the impossible position Evans has put himself in. He's no longer willing to stand by 'air forced down the nasogastric tube' as a feasible method of murder, but is similarly unwilling to admit that he's changed his mind.

The Trials of Lucy Letby

13,094 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Robert F. Kennedy Jr answers the difficult question, "Are there any vaccines that are good?" #RFKJr says some of the live virus vaccines are probably averting more problems they are causing but there is no vaccine that is safe and effective. Here's the problem... The polio vaccine contained a virus called simian virus 40 (SV 40). It's one of the most carcinogenic materials that is known to man. It is used now by scientists in labs around the world to induce tumors in rats and guinea pigs. 98 million people who got that vaccine (including his generation) had this explosion of soft tissue cancers that killed many more people than polio ever did. Bobby says if you ask him if the polio vaccine was effective he is going to say YES. But if you ask him did it cause more death than avert he would say he doesn't know because there is no data on it. The most popular vaccine in the world is the DTP (Diphtheria, tetanus, & pertussis) vaccine. It was introduced in the United States in 1980. It caused so many injuries that the manufacturer (Wyeth) told Ronald Regan's administration that his company was paying $20 in downstream liabilities for every $1 that they were making in profits. They were going to get out of the business unless the government gave them permanent immunity from liability. Reagan asked why they didn't just make the vaccine safe. The response was "Vaccines are unavoidably unsafe". You can't make them safe. So when Reagan wrote the bill and passed it, the bill says in its preambles "Because vaccines are unavoidably unsafe." There was a Supreme Court Case (Bruesewitz) that upheld this bill and uses the same language, vaccines cannot be made safe. According to the law they are unavoidably unsafe. The DTP vaccine was discontinued in the United States and Europe because so many kids were being injured by it. However, the World Health Organization (WHO) and Bill Gates gives it to hundreds of millions African children every year. Gates went to the Danish government and asked them to support this program. He claims tens of millions of kids were saved from dying from DTP. The Danish government asked to see the data but Gates couldn't provide it. So they paid for a big study with Novo Nordisk (a Scandinavian vaccine company in West Africa) and looked at the DTP vaccine with 30 years of data. They retained the best vaccine scientists in the world from the African vaccine program including Peter Aaby, Sigrid Morganson and a bunch of others and they were shocked by what the found.... The vaccine was preventing kids from getting DTP but the girls who got the vaccine were 10 times more likely to die over the next 6 months than children who didn't get it. Why is that? They weren't dying from anything anybody ever associated with the vaccine they were dying from anemia, bilharzia, malaria, sepsis, pulmonary respiratory disease, and pneumonia. This research was found by people who were all pro-vaccine. The DTP vaccine was providing protection against the target illnesses but it had ruined the children's immune systems and they couldn't defend themselves against random infections that were harmless to most children. Bobby concludes by admitting that you can't prove this link but you can show statistically that if you get the DTP vaccine you are more likely to die over the next six months than if you don't. These types of studies, unfortunately, are not done for any other vaccines. A vote for #KennedyShanahan24 will guarantee studies like this will be done for all vaccines. #RFKJr2024 #Kennedy24

Robert F. Kennedy Jr answers the difficult question, "Are there any vaccines that are good?" #RFKJr says some of the live virus vaccines are probably averting more problems they are causing but there is no vaccine that is safe and effective. Here's the problem... The polio vaccine contained a virus called simian virus 40 (SV 40). It's one of the most carcinogenic materials that is known to man. It is used now by scientists in labs around the world to induce tumors in rats and guinea pigs. 98 million people who got that vaccine (including his generation) had this explosion of soft tissue cancers that killed many more people than polio ever did. Bobby says if you ask him if the polio vaccine was effective he is going to say YES. But if you ask him did it cause more death than avert he would say he doesn't know because there is no data on it. The most popular vaccine in the world is the DTP (Diphtheria, tetanus, & pertussis) vaccine. It was introduced in the United States in 1980. It caused so many injuries that the manufacturer (Wyeth) told Ronald Regan's administration that his company was paying $20 in downstream liabilities for every $1 that they were making in profits. They were going to get out of the business unless the government gave them permanent immunity from liability. Reagan asked why they didn't just make the vaccine safe. The response was "Vaccines are unavoidably unsafe". You can't make them safe. So when Reagan wrote the bill and passed it, the bill says in its preambles "Because vaccines are unavoidably unsafe." There was a Supreme Court Case (Bruesewitz) that upheld this bill and uses the same language, vaccines cannot be made safe. According to the law they are unavoidably unsafe. The DTP vaccine was discontinued in the United States and Europe because so many kids were being injured by it. However, the World Health Organization (WHO) and Bill Gates gives it to hundreds of millions African children every year. Gates went to the Danish government and asked them to support this program. He claims tens of millions of kids were saved from dying from DTP. The Danish government asked to see the data but Gates couldn't provide it. So they paid for a big study with Novo Nordisk (a Scandinavian vaccine company in West Africa) and looked at the DTP vaccine with 30 years of data. They retained the best vaccine scientists in the world from the African vaccine program including Peter Aaby, Sigrid Morganson and a bunch of others and they were shocked by what the found.... The vaccine was preventing kids from getting DTP but the girls who got the vaccine were 10 times more likely to die over the next 6 months than children who didn't get it. Why is that? They weren't dying from anything anybody ever associated with the vaccine they were dying from anemia, bilharzia, malaria, sepsis, pulmonary respiratory disease, and pneumonia. This research was found by people who were all pro-vaccine. The DTP vaccine was providing protection against the target illnesses but it had ruined the children's immune systems and they couldn't defend themselves against random infections that were harmless to most children. Bobby concludes by admitting that you can't prove this link but you can show statistically that if you get the DTP vaccine you are more likely to die over the next six months than if you don't. These types of studies, unfortunately, are not done for any other vaccines. A vote for #KennedyShanahan24 will guarantee studies like this will be done for all vaccines. #RFKJr2024 #Kennedy24

Kennedy4Me

14,810 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

🚨 DAY 5 LIL DURK TRIAL: OTF JAM TAKES THE STAND & IDENTIFIES DURK, DIDI & BROWN EYES 👀⚖️ OTF Jam has officially taken the stand for the prosecution. He entered the courtroom wearing tan prison clothes with a white T-shirt underneath. Here’s what has happened so far: 🔴 JAM’S GUILTY PLEAS Jam confirmed that he is detained and admitted that he previously pleaded guilty to: • Conspiracy to commit murder • Conspiracy to commit robbery, which resulted in a murder He was then asked to identify the people he says helped plan and participate in the altercation that led to Lil Pop’s death. 👉 Jam pointed to Durk Banks, Didi and Brown Eyes. 🔴 WHO WAS THE TARGET? The prosecution asked Jam if Robertson was the target. Jam said NO — he said the target was Crando Rando. They then asked if the motive was revenge for King Von. 🔴 JAM’S BACKGROUND IN THE BDs Jam testified that: • He is 34 years old • He is from South Side Chicago • He is a member of the Black Disciples • He was “blessed in” at 9 years old • He described himself as a minister within the BDs • He said he holds a significant amount of authority He explained that people can rise within the organization through money, family connections or violence. He also explained that Lamron 300 got its name from the movie 300 because the group felt they didn’t back down from anybody. 🔴 BD MEETINGS & OPERATIONS Jam testified that BD members would hold meetings every Friday. He said multiple cliques would attend and that the meetings could involve: • Addressing violations • Conflicts between BD cliques • Discussions about murders • Drug operations • Other operations involving the organization He also testified that when he was first “blessed in,” he was given three laws: 1️⃣ Sacrifice his life for the nation 2️⃣ Follow commands from leadership 3️⃣ Always bring in and dap the nation handshake 🔴 “GETBACK” & REVENGE The prosecution spent significant time having Jam explain the concept of “getback.” Jam described it as getting revenge against someone who did something wrong to you. He testified that failing to get your “lick back” could make your clique look weak or bad. He also said he has seen family members become angry when someone doesn’t retaliate after a relative is killed. The prosecution asked whether revenge for certain people can carry more importance. Jam said yes. They also asked whether respect is important. Jam again said yes, and testified that there can be danger associated with not being respected. 🔴 JAM’S HISTORY WITH VIOLENCE Jam testified that people can have different roles in the streets, including: • Scammers • Drug dealers • Hustlers • Shooters He confirmed that he was a shooter. He said he first fired a gun at 12 years old, shooting at a vehicle because he was told to shoot at it. He estimated that he was involved in approximately 12–15 shootings before turning 17. He also testified that he participated in more than 100 robberies, primarily targeting drug dealers. Jam explained that his parents were dealing with drug addiction when he was 12, and he said he turned to robbery as a way to help his family pay bills. 🔴 JAM DESCRIBES HIS FIRST MURDER One of the most serious moments so far came when Jam described his first murder. He said he went on a robbery with an older member of his gang. According to Jam, the victim was allegedly stealing money from the older member’s father. They traveled to Wisconsin to rob the man’s business. During the robbery, a fight broke out. Jam testified that the older member told him to shoot the man. After Jam shot him, he said the older member told him he had to finish him so there wouldn’t be any witnesses/problems. Jam said he shot the man in the head. He testified that this was his first murder at 17 years old. He also acknowledged that he admitted committing the murder when he was arrested in 2023.

🚨 DAY 5 LIL DURK TRIAL: OTF JAM TAKES THE STAND & IDENTIFIES DURK, DIDI & BROWN EYES 👀⚖️ OTF Jam has officially taken the stand for the prosecution. He entered the courtroom wearing tan prison clothes with a white T-shirt underneath. Here’s what has happened so far: 🔴 JAM’S GUILTY PLEAS Jam confirmed that he is detained and admitted that he previously pleaded guilty to: • Conspiracy to commit murder • Conspiracy to commit robbery, which resulted in a murder He was then asked to identify the people he says helped plan and participate in the altercation that led to Lil Pop’s death. 👉 Jam pointed to Durk Banks, Didi and Brown Eyes. 🔴 WHO WAS THE TARGET? The prosecution asked Jam if Robertson was the target. Jam said NO — he said the target was Crando Rando. They then asked if the motive was revenge for King Von. 🔴 JAM’S BACKGROUND IN THE BDs Jam testified that: • He is 34 years old • He is from South Side Chicago • He is a member of the Black Disciples • He was “blessed in” at 9 years old • He described himself as a minister within the BDs • He said he holds a significant amount of authority He explained that people can rise within the organization through money, family connections or violence. He also explained that Lamron 300 got its name from the movie 300 because the group felt they didn’t back down from anybody. 🔴 BD MEETINGS & OPERATIONS Jam testified that BD members would hold meetings every Friday. He said multiple cliques would attend and that the meetings could involve: • Addressing violations • Conflicts between BD cliques • Discussions about murders • Drug operations • Other operations involving the organization He also testified that when he was first “blessed in,” he was given three laws: 1️⃣ Sacrifice his life for the nation 2️⃣ Follow commands from leadership 3️⃣ Always bring in and dap the nation handshake 🔴 “GETBACK” & REVENGE The prosecution spent significant time having Jam explain the concept of “getback.” Jam described it as getting revenge against someone who did something wrong to you. He testified that failing to get your “lick back” could make your clique look weak or bad. He also said he has seen family members become angry when someone doesn’t retaliate after a relative is killed. The prosecution asked whether revenge for certain people can carry more importance. Jam said yes. They also asked whether respect is important. Jam again said yes, and testified that there can be danger associated with not being respected. 🔴 JAM’S HISTORY WITH VIOLENCE Jam testified that people can have different roles in the streets, including: • Scammers • Drug dealers • Hustlers • Shooters He confirmed that he was a shooter. He said he first fired a gun at 12 years old, shooting at a vehicle because he was told to shoot at it. He estimated that he was involved in approximately 12–15 shootings before turning 17. He also testified that he participated in more than 100 robberies, primarily targeting drug dealers. Jam explained that his parents were dealing with drug addiction when he was 12, and he said he turned to robbery as a way to help his family pay bills. 🔴 JAM DESCRIBES HIS FIRST MURDER One of the most serious moments so far came when Jam described his first murder. He said he went on a robbery with an older member of his gang. According to Jam, the victim was allegedly stealing money from the older member’s father. They traveled to Wisconsin to rob the man’s business. During the robbery, a fight broke out. Jam testified that the older member told him to shoot the man. After Jam shot him, he said the older member told him he had to finish him so there wouldn’t be any witnesses/problems. Jam said he shot the man in the head. He testified that this was his first murder at 17 years old. He also acknowledged that he admitted committing the murder when he was arrested in 2023.

Cousin Tino ™️

65,032 Aufrufe • vor 5 Tagen

Incidentally, it was another female police officer who threw the first punch in this insane altercation. Three officers sprung the 20 year old suspect (Mohammed Fahir Amaaz) in a car park after he’d just been fighting with another man, whom he allegedly headbutted (Abdulkareem Ismaeil) at Starbucks. The three officers approached the suspect from behind. Two female officers, one male officer. When asked in court: “It is important you identify yourselves as police officers, isn't it?” PC Ward (in the video) said: "I don't think we had any time to do that. We didn't have any time for rational discussion with this male as it turned violently quickly." The suspects brother (26 year old Muhammad Amaad) approached the officers who had hold of his younger brother and were pushing his head down. The female officer lent over and punched the older brother (who was not a suspect) in the face. After the female officer threw the first punch, the male officer also punched the suspect’s brother in the face. The suspect went into a frenzy and broke this female officers nose. The male officer then tased the suspect, kicked him in the face then stamped on his head. Had the suspect been handcuffed and taken to the station, this could have been avoided, the two female officers were unable to cuff him, despite having grabbed hold of his arms. He’s obviously a violent young man, so punching his brother in the face was an hysterical response from the first female officer. The second female officer who got her nose broken said: “I was terrified to be honest. I was absolutely terrified. I had never experienced that level of violence towards me in my life.” “I didn't know who was going to come up at me next. I was scared of going after this male again and being punched in the face again” Let me just say, I have been hit by a man, it’s an awful experience and one that women shouldn’t ever have to face. Unfortunately, feminism has convinced women that working in potentially dangerous roles where they need to tackle violent criminals is ‘liberating’. Protect women by getting them out of frontline forces.

Incidentally, it was another female police officer who threw the first punch in this insane altercation. Three officers sprung the 20 year old suspect (Mohammed Fahir Amaaz) in a car park after he’d just been fighting with another man, whom he allegedly headbutted (Abdulkareem Ismaeil) at Starbucks. The three officers approached the suspect from behind. Two female officers, one male officer. When asked in court: “It is important you identify yourselves as police officers, isn't it?” PC Ward (in the video) said: "I don't think we had any time to do that. We didn't have any time for rational discussion with this male as it turned violently quickly." The suspects brother (26 year old Muhammad Amaad) approached the officers who had hold of his younger brother and were pushing his head down. The female officer lent over and punched the older brother (who was not a suspect) in the face. After the female officer threw the first punch, the male officer also punched the suspect’s brother in the face. The suspect went into a frenzy and broke this female officers nose. The male officer then tased the suspect, kicked him in the face then stamped on his head. Had the suspect been handcuffed and taken to the station, this could have been avoided, the two female officers were unable to cuff him, despite having grabbed hold of his arms. He’s obviously a violent young man, so punching his brother in the face was an hysterical response from the first female officer. The second female officer who got her nose broken said: “I was terrified to be honest. I was absolutely terrified. I had never experienced that level of violence towards me in my life.” “I didn't know who was going to come up at me next. I was scared of going after this male again and being punched in the face again” Let me just say, I have been hit by a man, it’s an awful experience and one that women shouldn’t ever have to face. Unfortunately, feminism has convinced women that working in potentially dangerous roles where they need to tackle violent criminals is ‘liberating’. Protect women by getting them out of frontline forces.

Jayda Fransen

114,821 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

US Health Insurance companies are now charging for 2 visits if you take your child in for their regular checkup and ask a question not covered during a routine checkup This isn’t a conspiracy. This happened to this woman not once but twice, and 2 of her friends “So I call, and they're like, oh, yeah, you technically were billed for two visits. And I was like, excuse me? She's like, yeah, it says on here that there was a question asked that didn't involve the physical” “I was blown away. I was so perturbed. I was like, that's absolutely ridiculous. So yesterday when I took my son, my other son, the guy's going through all the, sign here, sign there, then gets to the last one, and then it says, you know, do you give permission to be billed if services aren't covered today. And I said, I don't want to sign this, because how do I know what will be covered, what won't? He's like, oh, that will be determined by your insurance. — So another lady comes over and she goes, well, if they ask you if you have any concerns, you have to say no. And I go, okay, but if I have concerns for my son, that's technically a second visit because it's not covered under his yearly checkup. She goes, yeah, I mind blown. Like, I don't know what this world has come to, but I am just insanely crazy about this kind of stuff. And just recently, I've had two friends post about the same exact situation.” US Health Insurance companies just keep getting worse and worse and nobody in power cares

US Health Insurance companies are now charging for 2 visits if you take your child in for their regular checkup and ask a question not covered during a routine checkup This isn’t a conspiracy. This happened to this woman not once but twice, and 2 of her friends “So I call, and they're like, oh, yeah, you technically were billed for two visits. And I was like, excuse me? She's like, yeah, it says on here that there was a question asked that didn't involve the physical” “I was blown away. I was so perturbed. I was like, that's absolutely ridiculous. So yesterday when I took my son, my other son, the guy's going through all the, sign here, sign there, then gets to the last one, and then it says, you know, do you give permission to be billed if services aren't covered today. And I said, I don't want to sign this, because how do I know what will be covered, what won't? He's like, oh, that will be determined by your insurance. — So another lady comes over and she goes, well, if they ask you if you have any concerns, you have to say no. And I go, okay, but if I have concerns for my son, that's technically a second visit because it's not covered under his yearly checkup. She goes, yeah, I mind blown. Like, I don't know what this world has come to, but I am just insanely crazy about this kind of stuff. And just recently, I've had two friends post about the same exact situation.” US Health Insurance companies just keep getting worse and worse and nobody in power cares

Wall Street Apes

3,722,308 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

SB19 QUIRKY TRAITS UNCOVERED Think you know everything about SB19? A reel by AIA Philippines, which counts SB19 among its ambassadors, recently shared a fun "Who's Who?" challenge that revealed which members are most likely to have certain habits both on and off camera. Need someone to keep your finances in check? The group pointed to Josh Cullen as the member most likely to track his expenses. Josh also tied with Pablo for the title of resident life coach, with both members earning recognition for giving the best advice. When it comes to healthy living, Stell took the crown as the member most likely to choose the healthiest meal on the menu. Meanwhile, if there's one member who probably won't be replying to late-night messages, it's Justin, who was voted most likely to sleep early. The group also showed their strong teamwork in two categories. Asked who stays calm under pressure and who saves before spending, the answer was simple: everyone. Justin, however, earned an extra nod for keeping his cool during stressful situations. From smart spending habits to healthy choices and practical life advice, the reel gave fans another reason to say they don't just stan SB19—they know them. But for ATIN, the real question remains: how many of these answers did you get right? (✍️: Denchelle Castro, 📹: AIA Philippines) #radarPHEntertainment #radarPH #SB19

SB19 QUIRKY TRAITS UNCOVERED Think you know everything about SB19? A reel by AIA Philippines, which counts SB19 among its ambassadors, recently shared a fun "Who's Who?" challenge that revealed which members are most likely to have certain habits both on and off camera. Need someone to keep your finances in check? The group pointed to Josh Cullen as the member most likely to track his expenses. Josh also tied with Pablo for the title of resident life coach, with both members earning recognition for giving the best advice. When it comes to healthy living, Stell took the crown as the member most likely to choose the healthiest meal on the menu. Meanwhile, if there's one member who probably won't be replying to late-night messages, it's Justin, who was voted most likely to sleep early. The group also showed their strong teamwork in two categories. Asked who stays calm under pressure and who saves before spending, the answer was simple: everyone. Justin, however, earned an extra nod for keeping his cool during stressful situations. From smart spending habits to healthy choices and practical life advice, the reel gave fans another reason to say they don't just stan SB19—they know them. But for ATIN, the real question remains: how many of these answers did you get right? (✍️: Denchelle Castro, 📹: AIA Philippines) #radarPHEntertainment #radarPH #SB19

radar PH

13,994 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

CAMBRIDGE 1969 (FOR JOHN) Yoko Ono: I was asked to visit Cambridge University to perform my vocal work. As the date approached, they called me asking if I was still coming, since they knew that I had recently got married and didn't know if my plans had changed or not. "Tell him you're coming with a band," John whispered loudly from the side. John and I thought it was a riot, but we didn't know how they would take it at the other end of the phone. Was it alright to bring a rocker? But the guy held his ground well. It was Cambridge, so the greeting committee was cordial but cool. John took that in, of course. He joined me on the stage and played underneath my vocal. Maybe 'I Wanna Hold Your Hand'? That would have been cute. But instead he went in for the kill and played an incredibly creative avant-garde guitar that nobody in the world had ever heard before or since. The audience didn't react to it. I was probably the only musician who was totally impressed by it. But did I express my appreciation? John loved 'Cambridge 1969'. So for awhile, he always asked for it to be played when we were in the car. I just thought "Oh, not that one again!" "How about 'Yesterday'?" (a joke). And when I tried to play something else he wouldn't hear of it. Yoko Ono: vocal John Lennon: guitar Mal Evans: Watch John Tchicai: saxophone John Stevens: percussion Produced by John Lennon & Yoko Ono From the John & Yoko album Unfinished Music No. 2: Life With The Lions. Live at 'A Natural Music Nothing Doing In London' Concert, Lady Mitchell Hall, Cambridge University, Cambridge, UK, 2 March 1969. Her biography in the programme read: YOKO ONO performed with her voice with Ornette Coleman at the Royal Albert Hall last year and with John Stevens at the Arts Laboratory in London. Her own concerts include Music of the Mind at the Saville Theatre in 1967. She contributed to Nothing Doing in London Two and published a book including music pieces called Grapefruit in Tokyo in 1964. Her Unfinished Music is on Apple Track Records.

CAMBRIDGE 1969 (FOR JOHN) Yoko Ono: I was asked to visit Cambridge University to perform my vocal work. As the date approached, they called me asking if I was still coming, since they knew that I had recently got married and didn't know if my plans had changed or not. "Tell him you're coming with a band," John whispered loudly from the side. John and I thought it was a riot, but we didn't know how they would take it at the other end of the phone. Was it alright to bring a rocker? But the guy held his ground well. It was Cambridge, so the greeting committee was cordial but cool. John took that in, of course. He joined me on the stage and played underneath my vocal. Maybe 'I Wanna Hold Your Hand'? That would have been cute. But instead he went in for the kill and played an incredibly creative avant-garde guitar that nobody in the world had ever heard before or since. The audience didn't react to it. I was probably the only musician who was totally impressed by it. But did I express my appreciation? John loved 'Cambridge 1969'. So for awhile, he always asked for it to be played when we were in the car. I just thought "Oh, not that one again!" "How about 'Yesterday'?" (a joke). And when I tried to play something else he wouldn't hear of it. Yoko Ono: vocal John Lennon: guitar Mal Evans: Watch John Tchicai: saxophone John Stevens: percussion Produced by John Lennon & Yoko Ono From the John & Yoko album Unfinished Music No. 2: Life With The Lions. Live at 'A Natural Music Nothing Doing In London' Concert, Lady Mitchell Hall, Cambridge University, Cambridge, UK, 2 March 1969. Her biography in the programme read: YOKO ONO performed with her voice with Ornette Coleman at the Royal Albert Hall last year and with John Stevens at the Arts Laboratory in London. Her own concerts include Music of the Mind at the Saville Theatre in 1967. She contributed to Nothing Doing in London Two and published a book including music pieces called Grapefruit in Tokyo in 1964. Her Unfinished Music is on Apple Track Records.

Yoko Ono

41,965 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

Doug Engelbart, inventor of the computer mouse, shares a story from his early days in Silicon Valley: After completing his thesis work at Berkeley, Engelbart had built up a portfolio of patents in what he describes as "a new phenomenon." Looking to find a home for them, he approached Hewlett-Packard directly. "I ended up with 10 to 20 patents that were in a new phenomenon and one thing I did was go to Hewlett Packard to see if they would like to buy them. Bill Hewlett and Dave Packard were still very active." HP agreed to buy a package of the patents from him. But Engelbart had a concern. He wasn't done inventing yet. "One thing I was worried about is I'm going to keep on inventing and I haven't even got all tied down yet. The package isn't all that's here in my head." Dave Packard's response won him over immediately: "I'll make you a deal. For the first six months everything you can write down will be yours, part of that deal. And after that they're ours." Engelbart describes Packard as "very pragmatic." It was a handshake style of deal-making that sealed it on the spot. But the most telling moment came on his way out the door. Engelbart asked the research director a simple question, one that, in hindsight, exposed a massive blind spot at one of the most respected technology companies of the era: "I'm assuming that Hewlett Packard will go into digital techniques for their instrumentation and likely in digital processing on computers." The answer: "Not a chance." "So that whole thing fell through right then." A man sitting on patents that anticipated the digital future walked into HP, and HP, a company that would later become synonymous with computing, told him they had no interest in going digital.

Doug Engelbart, inventor of the computer mouse, shares a story from his early days in Silicon Valley: After completing his thesis work at Berkeley, Engelbart had built up a portfolio of patents in what he describes as "a new phenomenon." Looking to find a home for them, he approached Hewlett-Packard directly. "I ended up with 10 to 20 patents that were in a new phenomenon and one thing I did was go to Hewlett Packard to see if they would like to buy them. Bill Hewlett and Dave Packard were still very active." HP agreed to buy a package of the patents from him. But Engelbart had a concern. He wasn't done inventing yet. "One thing I was worried about is I'm going to keep on inventing and I haven't even got all tied down yet. The package isn't all that's here in my head." Dave Packard's response won him over immediately: "I'll make you a deal. For the first six months everything you can write down will be yours, part of that deal. And after that they're ours." Engelbart describes Packard as "very pragmatic." It was a handshake style of deal-making that sealed it on the spot. But the most telling moment came on his way out the door. Engelbart asked the research director a simple question, one that, in hindsight, exposed a massive blind spot at one of the most respected technology companies of the era: "I'm assuming that Hewlett Packard will go into digital techniques for their instrumentation and likely in digital processing on computers." The answer: "Not a chance." "So that whole thing fell through right then." A man sitting on patents that anticipated the digital future walked into HP, and HP, a company that would later become synonymous with computing, told him they had no interest in going digital.

History Nerd

12,016 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten