正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

🚨𝐍𝐙’𝐒 𝐍𝐄𝐖𝐒 𝐌𝐄𝐃𝐈𝐀 𝐓𝐇𝐈𝐍𝐊 𝐘𝐎𝐔’𝐑𝐄 𝐂𝐎𝐌𝐏𝐋𝐄𝐓𝐄 & 𝐔𝐓𝐓𝐄𝐑 𝐈𝐃𝐈𝐎𝐓𝐒 Once again, the news media in NZ has blatantly misled the public. Last night they completely misrepresented Trump’s comments regarding “protecting women” – with both 6pm news bulletins trying desperately to link it to abortion, even though Trump never even... broached the subject at the rally. This morning the headlines all screamed about Trump’s comments that Liz Cheney should be fired upon with guns. Shocking comments. So as with any coverage of Trump by the media, I went and found the actual clip to get the context. Have a watch (below) Trump effectively said (paraphrased): “when the Wyoming Republican was in House Republican leadership, she always wanted to go to war with people. She’s a war hawk, let’s see how she likes war if you give her a rifle and she’s got 9 barrels shooting at her. They’re all war hawks when they’re sitting in Washington saying let’s send 10,000 troops to fight the enemy.” Now let’s watch ThreeNews (Stuff.co.nz Politics) coverage. 𝐖𝐚𝐭𝐜𝐡 𝐰𝐡𝐞𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐲 𝐜𝐮𝐭 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐜𝐨𝐯𝐞𝐫𝐚𝐠𝐞. And even later in the report when he’s explaining the comments at a restaurant, the reporter speaks over him. Now watch 1News coverage with Jack Tame. 𝐖𝐚𝐭𝐜𝐡 𝐰𝐡𝐞𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐲 𝐜𝐮𝐭 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐜𝐨𝐯𝐞𝐫𝐚𝐠𝐞. Interestingly they didn’t cover the homophobic bigoted statements of Tampon Tim Walz against Elon Musk. Even the liberal commentator Bill Maher said the media coverage was a hoax. “𝐻𝑒 𝑤𝑎𝑠 𝑠𝑎𝑦𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑠𝑜𝑚𝑒𝑡ℎ𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑡ℎ𝑎𝑡, 𝑏𝑦 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑤𝑎𝑦... 𝑠𝑜𝑢𝑛𝑑𝑠 𝑙𝑖𝑘𝑒 𝑤ℎ𝑎𝑡 ℎ𝑖𝑝𝑝𝑖𝑒𝑠 𝑢𝑠𝑒𝑑 𝑡𝑜 𝑠𝑎𝑦 𝑎𝑏𝑜𝑢𝑡 𝑛𝑜𝑡 𝑠𝑒𝑛𝑑𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑝𝑒𝑜𝑝𝑙𝑒 𝑡𝑜 𝑑𝑖𝑒.” Summary: MEDIA: Trump says he wants to place Liz Cheney in front of a firing squad. REALITY: Trump is talking about how DC politicians send our kids off to war from comfortable offices while never putting themselves in those war zones. 𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐍𝐙 𝐧𝐞𝐰𝐬 𝐦𝐞𝐝𝐢𝐚 𝐭𝐡𝐢𝐧𝐤 𝐍𝐞𝐰 𝐙𝐞𝐚𝐥𝐚𝐧𝐝𝐞𝐫𝐬 𝐚𝐫𝐞 𝐚𝐥𝐥 𝐜𝐨𝐦𝐩𝐥𝐞𝐭𝐞 𝐢𝐝𝐢𝐨𝐭𝐬 𝐰𝐡𝐨 𝐜𝐚𝐧 𝐛𝐞 𝐟𝐨𝐨𝐥𝐞𝐝. The real question is: 𝐂𝐚𝐧 𝐲𝐨𝐮?show more

𝓑𝓸𝓫 𝓜𝓬𝓒𝓸𝓼𝓴𝓻𝓲𝓮 🇳🇿

7,142 subscribers

14,000 次观看 • 1 年前 •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

Feels like I’m living in an alternate reality from mainstream media Just saw headlines about Trump’s comments about Liz Cheney being shot and thought “damn that’s bad, wtf did he say now” So I went and found the actual clip to get the context (attached). Trump effectively said, (and I’m paraphrasing): “she’s a war hawk, let’s see how she likes war if you give her a rifle and she’s got 9 barrels shooting at her. They’re all war hawks when they’re sitting in Washington saying let’s send 10,000 troops to fight the enemy” I thought Democrats have always used this type of example towards Republicans calling for war. Is being anti-war now a bad thing? How are major outlets publishing these types of headlines? Arizona’s top prosecutor is apparently investigating this as a possible death threat (bruh) When there is clear evidence and people can see the actual footage for themselves, they can see the mainstream media is purposefully distorting news. This does nothing to instill confidence in the public and further fuels division

Feels like I’m living in an alternate reality from mainstream media Just saw headlines about Trump’s comments about Liz Cheney being shot and thought “damn that’s bad, wtf did he say now” So I went and found the actual clip to get the context (attached). Trump effectively said, (and I’m paraphrasing): “she’s a war hawk, let’s see how she likes war if you give her a rifle and she’s got 9 barrels shooting at her. They’re all war hawks when they’re sitting in Washington saying let’s send 10,000 troops to fight the enemy” I thought Democrats have always used this type of example towards Republicans calling for war. Is being anti-war now a bad thing? How are major outlets publishing these types of headlines? Arizona’s top prosecutor is apparently investigating this as a possible death threat (bruh) When there is clear evidence and people can see the actual footage for themselves, they can see the mainstream media is purposefully distorting news. This does nothing to instill confidence in the public and further fuels division

litquidity

10,756,554 次观看 • 1 年前

The full quote with context from Trump on Liz Cheney: After calling Cheney “a very dumb individual,” he said: “She’s a radical war hawk. Let’s put her with the rifle standing there with nine barrels shooting at her. OK, let’s see how she feels about it. You know, when the guns are trained on her face. “You know they’re all war hawks when they’re sitting in Washington in a nice building saying, oh gee, well let’s send 10,000 troops right into the mouth of the enemy,” Trump said.

The full quote with context from Trump on Liz Cheney: After calling Cheney “a very dumb individual,” he said: “She’s a radical war hawk. Let’s put her with the rifle standing there with nine barrels shooting at her. OK, let’s see how she feels about it. You know, when the guns are trained on her face. “You know they’re all war hawks when they’re sitting in Washington in a nice building saying, oh gee, well let’s send 10,000 troops right into the mouth of the enemy,” Trump said.

Shermichael Singleton

1,058,845 次观看 • 1 年前

Here’s the full context of the Liz Cheney clip that’s going around. Conservatives will say Trump was talking about Liz Cheney as a war hawk, and he was. But conservatives would never, in a million years, accept this as anything other than a threat if a Democrat said the same thing. It would be clipped and stitched all over as an example of “radical leftist ideology” rooted in violence. And by the way, people do mention the hypocrisy with war hawks by saying things like, “Let’s send her off to war then,” or, “She’s calling for war, but her own children aren’t going to enlist.” “I don't blame him for sticking with his daughter. But his daughter's a very dumb individual, very dumb. She's a radical warhawk. Let's put her with a rifle standing there with nine barrels shooting at her. Okay? Let’s see how she feels about it. You know, when the guns are trained on her face. You know they're all warhawks when they're sitting in Washington in a nice building saying, oh gee, let's send 10,000 troops right into the mouth of the enemy. But she's a stupid person. I'd have meetings with a lot of people and she always wanted to go to war with people.”

Here’s the full context of the Liz Cheney clip that’s going around. Conservatives will say Trump was talking about Liz Cheney as a war hawk, and he was. But conservatives would never, in a million years, accept this as anything other than a threat if a Democrat said the same thing. It would be clipped and stitched all over as an example of “radical leftist ideology” rooted in violence. And by the way, people do mention the hypocrisy with war hawks by saying things like, “Let’s send her off to war then,” or, “She’s calling for war, but her own children aren’t going to enlist.” “I don't blame him for sticking with his daughter. But his daughter's a very dumb individual, very dumb. She's a radical warhawk. Let's put her with a rifle standing there with nine barrels shooting at her. Okay? Let’s see how she feels about it. You know, when the guns are trained on her face. You know they're all warhawks when they're sitting in Washington in a nice building saying, oh gee, let's send 10,000 troops right into the mouth of the enemy. But she's a stupid person. I'd have meetings with a lot of people and she always wanted to go to war with people.”

Yashar Ali 🐘

474,934 次观看 • 1 年前

🚨TRUMP: "Dick Cheney's daughter is a very dumb individual. She's a radical war hawk. Let's put her with a rifle standing there with 9 barrels shooting at her, let's see how she feels about it when the guns trained on her face. They're all war hawks when they're sitting in Washington in a nice building saying "Oh gee, let's send 10,000 troops into the mouths of the enemies.' She always wanted to go to war with people. I don't blame Dick Cheney for sticking with his daughter, but I was a little surprised that he didn't come with me. She's a bad person."

🚨TRUMP: "Dick Cheney's daughter is a very dumb individual. She's a radical war hawk. Let's put her with a rifle standing there with 9 barrels shooting at her, let's see how she feels about it when the guns trained on her face. They're all war hawks when they're sitting in Washington in a nice building saying "Oh gee, let's send 10,000 troops into the mouths of the enemies.' She always wanted to go to war with people. I don't blame Dick Cheney for sticking with his daughter, but I was a little surprised that he didn't come with me. She's a bad person."

Autism Capital 🧩

25,218,949 次观看 • 1 年前

🚨ELON MUSK ON DELIBERATE DEMOCRAT MISINFORMATION ELON: "The Democrats are doing all the things that they're accusing Trump of doing. The sheer number of hoaxes that the Democrat party is pushing, over and over again, is insane. When you have deliberate concerted repeated pushing of hoaxes, it's too far. And you claim to be the good guys? You can't claim to be good if you're pushing hoaxes that have been debunked thoroughly. When even Snopes says its a hoax, and you still push it, like the fine people hoax, what the flying fuck? That's a flat out goddamn fucking lie. Recently they tried to say Trump wants to execute Liz Cheney, that's not what he said at all. He said if Liz Cheney wants to go to war, she should understand what it's like to be sent to the front lines. All Trump is saying is that he wants her to understand the risk. And they're saying he wants her to be shot, which is a totally outrageous lie. And legacy media ran with that lie, big time."

🚨ELON MUSK ON DELIBERATE DEMOCRAT MISINFORMATION ELON: "The Democrats are doing all the things that they're accusing Trump of doing. The sheer number of hoaxes that the Democrat party is pushing, over and over again, is insane. When you have deliberate concerted repeated pushing of hoaxes, it's too far. And you claim to be the good guys? You can't claim to be good if you're pushing hoaxes that have been debunked thoroughly. When even Snopes says its a hoax, and you still push it, like the fine people hoax, what the flying fuck? That's a flat out goddamn fucking lie. Recently they tried to say Trump wants to execute Liz Cheney, that's not what he said at all. He said if Liz Cheney wants to go to war, she should understand what it's like to be sent to the front lines. All Trump is saying is that he wants her to understand the risk. And they're saying he wants her to be shot, which is a totally outrageous lie. And legacy media ran with that lie, big time."

Autism Capital 🧩

11,573,660 次观看 • 1 年前

Joe Rogan criticizes the corporate media's deceptive Trump bloodbath hoax and highlights the rise of independent media. "It's important to highlight how not just inaccurate but deceptive the media was in their depiction of what he said. They are taking this quote out of context and trying to say that there is going to be a civil war if he doesn't get elected, which is not what he's talking about at all. It's so disturbing that they think they can get away with it with all of the scrutiny with social media and all the independent journalists that exist now, which is one of the more interesting things about the demise of corporate media. The demise in trust in corporate media is at an all-time low, so this has led to a rise in true independent journalists. The real ones out there. The Matt Taibbi's and Glenn Greenwald's." Joe Rogan Matt Taibbi Glenn Greenwald

Joe Rogan criticizes the corporate media's deceptive Trump bloodbath hoax and highlights the rise of independent media. "It's important to highlight how not just inaccurate but deceptive the media was in their depiction of what he said. They are taking this quote out of context and trying to say that there is going to be a civil war if he doesn't get elected, which is not what he's talking about at all. It's so disturbing that they think they can get away with it with all of the scrutiny with social media and all the independent journalists that exist now, which is one of the more interesting things about the demise of corporate media. The demise in trust in corporate media is at an all-time low, so this has led to a rise in true independent journalists. The real ones out there. The Matt Taibbi's and Glenn Greenwald's." Joe Rogan Matt Taibbi Glenn Greenwald

KanekoaTheGreat

1,673,182 次观看 • 2 年前

Tennessee Brando: For the first time in my life when I hear a sitting president talk, I say to myself, "We're going to have to hear from the ones we're at war with next to see what's really going on." And I never said that, even during the Bush years when we were at war in Iraq. I wasn't saying, "Oh, well, we better hear from Saddam Hussein next." And we know Bush and Cheney was lying their asses off. But this is a level that is beyond the Bush-Cheney lies. Because with Bush and Cheney, we knew they were lying and we knew exactly what they were lying about. With Donald Trump, it's just all these off-the-wall lies from every different direction. None of it makes sense.

Tennessee Brando: For the first time in my life when I hear a sitting president talk, I say to myself, "We're going to have to hear from the ones we're at war with next to see what's really going on." And I never said that, even during the Bush years when we were at war in Iraq. I wasn't saying, "Oh, well, we better hear from Saddam Hussein next." And we know Bush and Cheney was lying their asses off. But this is a level that is beyond the Bush-Cheney lies. Because with Bush and Cheney, we knew they were lying and we knew exactly what they were lying about. With Donald Trump, it's just all these off-the-wall lies from every different direction. None of it makes sense.

MeidasClips

41,158 次观看 • 3 个月前

🚨TRUMP IN SCOTLAND: THE HAWKS HAVE WON Donald Trump once again distracts from the Epstein Files, which he promised to release, infuriating his MAGA base, and now has given in to the demands of the hawks in his administration...threatening Russia🇷🇺 and Iran🇮🇷. Donald Trump doesn't seem to know why everyone still cares about the Epstein Files, despite the fact that he promised to release them, Pam Bondi said they were on her desk, then the administration suddenly claimed they don't exist. The contents of the Epstein Files represent the elite depravity that the MAGA base absolutely detests. His solution to distract from this? Threatening Russia and all of its allies with tariffs and secondary sanctions. Washington is about to be at full-scale economic war with BRICS over a failed proxy war in Ukraine, which failed to bring Russia to its knees. Campaign Trump highlighted the risk of World War 3 and nuclear war when talking about crossing Russia's red lines...President Trump now no longer cares about the risks of nuclear escalation as NATO puppet Zelensky receives the green light and the weaponry to strike deep inside Russia, an alarming strategy not even seen during the heights of the so-called Cold War. He also threatens Iran🇮🇷 again after illegally bombing it, once again betraying his MAGA base that have been fed up for so long over endless, pointless wars in the Middle East that do nothing but stoke hatred for the United States all around the world. The 2nd Trump Presidency has only just begun, and there is plenty of time for the hawks to convince Trump to bomb Iran once again. Of course, the sideshow in all of this is the charisma vacuum that is the UK vassal state Prime Minister, Sir Keir Starmer. This embarrassment claimed that the UK has free speech, as its police force arrests people and equates them with Osama Bin Laden for even saying 'Free Gaza' and opposing a genocide that the UK is involved in.

🚨TRUMP IN SCOTLAND: THE HAWKS HAVE WON Donald Trump once again distracts from the Epstein Files, which he promised to release, infuriating his MAGA base, and now has given in to the demands of the hawks in his administration...threatening Russia🇷🇺 and Iran🇮🇷. Donald Trump doesn't seem to know why everyone still cares about the Epstein Files, despite the fact that he promised to release them, Pam Bondi said they were on her desk, then the administration suddenly claimed they don't exist. The contents of the Epstein Files represent the elite depravity that the MAGA base absolutely detests. His solution to distract from this? Threatening Russia and all of its allies with tariffs and secondary sanctions. Washington is about to be at full-scale economic war with BRICS over a failed proxy war in Ukraine, which failed to bring Russia to its knees. Campaign Trump highlighted the risk of World War 3 and nuclear war when talking about crossing Russia's red lines...President Trump now no longer cares about the risks of nuclear escalation as NATO puppet Zelensky receives the green light and the weaponry to strike deep inside Russia, an alarming strategy not even seen during the heights of the so-called Cold War. He also threatens Iran🇮🇷 again after illegally bombing it, once again betraying his MAGA base that have been fed up for so long over endless, pointless wars in the Middle East that do nothing but stoke hatred for the United States all around the world. The 2nd Trump Presidency has only just begun, and there is plenty of time for the hawks to convince Trump to bomb Iran once again. Of course, the sideshow in all of this is the charisma vacuum that is the UK vassal state Prime Minister, Sir Keir Starmer. This embarrassment claimed that the UK has free speech, as its police force arrests people and equates them with Osama Bin Laden for even saying 'Free Gaza' and opposing a genocide that the UK is involved in.

Afshin Rattansi

19,036 次观看 • 1 年前

WOW! Just WOW! Trump really just told Tucker Carlson that Former Republican Congresswoman Liz Cheney should be shot at with a rifle. His exact words were: "[Liz Cheney] is a very dumb individual — very dumb. She’s a radical war-hawk. Let’s put her there where the rifle standing there with nine barrels shooting at her. Let’s see how she feels about it, you know where the guns are trained at her face.” This is beyond disgusting. Can people really vote for this man as President of the greatest country in the world? No leader, no decent human being, should ever speak this way—especially about a former member of Congress and the daughter of a former Vice President. Trump’s words are beyond reckless; they're dangerous, divisive, and utterly unworthy of the presidency. A true president should respect others, even those with different views, and strive to bring us together, not promote violent imagery and hatred. This isn't strength, and it certainly isn't leadership. It’s time we demand better for America.

WOW! Just WOW! Trump really just told Tucker Carlson that Former Republican Congresswoman Liz Cheney should be shot at with a rifle. His exact words were: "[Liz Cheney] is a very dumb individual — very dumb. She’s a radical war-hawk. Let’s put her there where the rifle standing there with nine barrels shooting at her. Let’s see how she feels about it, you know where the guns are trained at her face.” This is beyond disgusting. Can people really vote for this man as President of the greatest country in the world? No leader, no decent human being, should ever speak this way—especially about a former member of Congress and the daughter of a former Vice President. Trump’s words are beyond reckless; they're dangerous, divisive, and utterly unworthy of the presidency. A true president should respect others, even those with different views, and strive to bring us together, not promote violent imagery and hatred. This isn't strength, and it certainly isn't leadership. It’s time we demand better for America.

Ed Krassenstein

635,016 次观看 • 1 年前

Last Tuesday: “….So here we have it. Axios reporting from sources in the intelligence community that the intelligence community, in other words, the alphabet agencies of the United States of America, at their head, the CIA, are working to undermine Trump. They always have been. And now that this peace deal has been agreed, again, they’re briefing media that they don’t believe it. The truth is, it’s these intelligence agencies that are the neocon war hawks who have been working with the globalists to undermine Trump in America all along. And they’ve been working in Britain to undermine the soon to be Prime Minister of this country, Nigel Farage. It’s the intelligence communities who are losing what is effectively a civil war within our countries between patriots, those who are anti-war patriots who put their country first and the globalist neocon warmongers, led in particular by the intelligence communities. It was the intelligence communities that started all of this war in the first place. It was they who invaded Iraq. It was they who were convinced our political leadership, back when Iraq was invaded, to do so. So it’s no surprise that the alphabet agencies in America, dominated, controlled and run by globalists as they are, have been briefing media against Trump’s peace. That comes as no surprise whatsoever.” Maajid Nawaz for WARRIOIR CREED

Last Tuesday: “….So here we have it. Axios reporting from sources in the intelligence community that the intelligence community, in other words, the alphabet agencies of the United States of America, at their head, the CIA, are working to undermine Trump. They always have been. And now that this peace deal has been agreed, again, they’re briefing media that they don’t believe it. The truth is, it’s these intelligence agencies that are the neocon war hawks who have been working with the globalists to undermine Trump in America all along. And they’ve been working in Britain to undermine the soon to be Prime Minister of this country, Nigel Farage. It’s the intelligence communities who are losing what is effectively a civil war within our countries between patriots, those who are anti-war patriots who put their country first and the globalist neocon warmongers, led in particular by the intelligence communities. It was the intelligence communities that started all of this war in the first place. It was they who invaded Iraq. It was they who were convinced our political leadership, back when Iraq was invaded, to do so. So it’s no surprise that the alphabet agencies in America, dominated, controlled and run by globalists as they are, have been briefing media against Trump’s peace. That comes as no surprise whatsoever.” Maajid Nawaz for WARRIOIR CREED

أبو عمّار

19,946 次观看 • 3 个月前

Imagine Zelensky's face after Trump's shocking answers to questions from journalists yesterday about Ukraine: a meeting with Putin, a speedy end to the war, no NATO membership or security guarantees. ▪️The president-elect initially declined to answer a question about whether he would maintain aid to Ukraine during the negotiations. “I’m not going to tell you that,” Trump said. ▪️When asked whether he would provide security guarantees to Ukraine after the war (as Zelensky demands), Trump began to criticize the idea of Ukraine joining NATO. He said that Russia had been saying that such a step was unacceptable for it "for many, many years, long before Putin said so," and that it was "written in stone" (literally, "carved in stone," but some media translate this as "an established agreement"). ➖"And about halfway through, Biden said, no, they should be able to join NATO. Well, then Russia would have somebody right on their doorstep. And I can understand their feeling about that," Trump said. ▪️Later, he made it clear that Ukraine may never join NATO (this moment was not included in the video). That is, he said nothing about security guarantees, but the context of his answer is rather negative. Plus - a clear position against Ukraine joining NATO. ▪️Regarding another of his phrases, there was a discussion in the media about what Trump meant when he said that he “hopes that this will happen much sooner than in 6 months” - about the end of the war or about a meeting with Putin. ▪️The second question from the journalist, who had previously asked about a meeting with Putin, is not clearly audible on the video. It ends with the words "... have a conversation within three to six months?" Trump responded that he expected this conversation to happen "much sooner." ▪️What conversation Trump had in mind - with Putin or about ending the war in general, is not the most important thing in his answer. What is more important is that Trump once again stated that he wants the war in Ukraine to end as soon as possible, "because many, many young people, soldiers, are being killed every day", "hundreds of thousands of soldiers on both sides are dead. They are lying in the fields and no one can even collect them. It's a disaster", "only human bodies can stop bullets" and Trump regrets that he cannot start negotiations now, but must wait until the inauguration. On the backdrop of it, the Biden administration is to announce the last large military aid package to Ukraine in Ramstein that starts tomorrow.

Imagine Zelensky's face after Trump's shocking answers to questions from journalists yesterday about Ukraine: a meeting with Putin, a speedy end to the war, no NATO membership or security guarantees. ▪️The president-elect initially declined to answer a question about whether he would maintain aid to Ukraine during the negotiations. “I’m not going to tell you that,” Trump said. ▪️When asked whether he would provide security guarantees to Ukraine after the war (as Zelensky demands), Trump began to criticize the idea of Ukraine joining NATO. He said that Russia had been saying that such a step was unacceptable for it "for many, many years, long before Putin said so," and that it was "written in stone" (literally, "carved in stone," but some media translate this as "an established agreement"). ➖"And about halfway through, Biden said, no, they should be able to join NATO. Well, then Russia would have somebody right on their doorstep. And I can understand their feeling about that," Trump said. ▪️Later, he made it clear that Ukraine may never join NATO (this moment was not included in the video). That is, he said nothing about security guarantees, but the context of his answer is rather negative. Plus - a clear position against Ukraine joining NATO. ▪️Regarding another of his phrases, there was a discussion in the media about what Trump meant when he said that he “hopes that this will happen much sooner than in 6 months” - about the end of the war or about a meeting with Putin. ▪️The second question from the journalist, who had previously asked about a meeting with Putin, is not clearly audible on the video. It ends with the words "... have a conversation within three to six months?" Trump responded that he expected this conversation to happen "much sooner." ▪️What conversation Trump had in mind - with Putin or about ending the war in general, is not the most important thing in his answer. What is more important is that Trump once again stated that he wants the war in Ukraine to end as soon as possible, "because many, many young people, soldiers, are being killed every day", "hundreds of thousands of soldiers on both sides are dead. They are lying in the fields and no one can even collect them. It's a disaster", "only human bodies can stop bullets" and Trump regrets that he cannot start negotiations now, but must wait until the inauguration. On the backdrop of it, the Biden administration is to announce the last large military aid package to Ukraine in Ramstein that starts tomorrow.

Olga Bazova

48,602 次观看 • 1 年前

In his interview with The All-In Podcast, President Trump made a number of important comments on Ukraine. First, Trump guaranteed that if he becomes the next commander-in-chief, he will not put American boots on the ground in Ukraine. If France were to do so, as French President Emmanuel Macron has been advocating for, they would be on their own. Second, President Trump acknowledged the role of NATO expansion in causing the war: TRUMP: “So for twenty years, I heard that if Ukraine goes into NATO, it's a real problem for Russia. I've heard that for a long time. And I think that's really why this war started. I'm not sure that this war would have started. Biden was saying all of the wrong things. And one of the wrong things he was saying, “no, Ukraine will go into NATO.” … It's always been understood. And that's even before Putin. It's always been understood that that was a no-no. And now you can go against their wishes, and it doesn't mean they're right when they say that. But that was very provocative, and now it's even more provocative. And… I hear routinely they're now talking about Ukraine entering NATO, and now I hear France wants to go in and fight. Well, I wish them a lot of luck.” Overall, President Trump demonstrated an understanding of the conflict and how to avoid war with Russia, whereas President Biden continues to escalate us towards WWIII.

In his interview with The All-In Podcast, President Trump made a number of important comments on Ukraine. First, Trump guaranteed that if he becomes the next commander-in-chief, he will not put American boots on the ground in Ukraine. If France were to do so, as French President Emmanuel Macron has been advocating for, they would be on their own. Second, President Trump acknowledged the role of NATO expansion in causing the war: TRUMP: “So for twenty years, I heard that if Ukraine goes into NATO, it's a real problem for Russia. I've heard that for a long time. And I think that's really why this war started. I'm not sure that this war would have started. Biden was saying all of the wrong things. And one of the wrong things he was saying, “no, Ukraine will go into NATO.” … It's always been understood. And that's even before Putin. It's always been understood that that was a no-no. And now you can go against their wishes, and it doesn't mean they're right when they say that. But that was very provocative, and now it's even more provocative. And… I hear routinely they're now talking about Ukraine entering NATO, and now I hear France wants to go in and fight. Well, I wish them a lot of luck.” Overall, President Trump demonstrated an understanding of the conflict and how to avoid war with Russia, whereas President Biden continues to escalate us towards WWIII.

David Sacks

1,428,629 次观看 • 2 年前

🚨Trump Betrayed His Voters on Behalf of a Foreign Country. 🚨"Trump could end the war in Ukraine with a single phone call" – Tucker Carlson. 🚨The same people who pushed Trump into war with Iran are pushing him to continue the war against Russia, against Putin. 📑And there was already a neocon war in progress, the war between the United States and Russia, which we mistakenly, misleadingly sometimes refer to as the Ukraine war. It's never been a Ukraine war. It's a war between NATO, which is our coalition, North Atlantic Treaty Organization, that we run and fund, and Russia. In other words, it's a war between the US and Russia. And that war, which began in the winter of 2022, was inspired by the Biden administration, which wanted it. So the United States, in the most passive-aggressive possible way, our leadership pushed Russia into this war so that the United States could defeat or weaken Russia. No one's ever defined what exactly that means. The whole project is insane. But that's what happened. And Trump knew exactly what was going on at the time and said so, and said repeatedly in interviews and in private, the main thing that we should worry about is Russia joining forces, being pushed into an alliance with China, because that would leave us where? It would leave us facing off against a coalition of the world's largest country, that would be Russia, with the world's largest population, that would be China, the world's largest economy, also China, the world's deepest military industrial capacity and resource bed, that would be Russia, against us. And we can't win. If Russia and China get together, we're done. Trump said that many times. And it's true, and it's proven to be true. And no, we can't win. So Trump knew that. And that's why he promised repeatedly on the campaign trail, when I am president, I will bring that war to a close. Watch. Before I even arrive at the Oval Office shortly after I win the presidency, I will have the war between Russia and Ukraine settled. I'll do it in 24 hours. It's not tough to do. That's easy compared to, that's easy compared to a lot of things. Well, he's right. It actually is easy compared to a lot of things. Now, you'll often hear the foreign policy establishment, the experts, people in DC, the State Department will tell you, no, it's very, very complicated. Well, it's actually not that complicated because Ukraine as a nation no longer exists. American policymakers have basically genocided the entire population of the country. More than a million people have died. Now being sent to the front in handcuffs to certain death. Apparently, that's part of the reason we're doing this. It gets very dark very fast when you start to think about it. But Ukraine itself could never prosecute a war against Russia because, well, for one thing, Russia has more than 100 million more people. So the whole thing is absurd. There is no war between Russia and Ukraine. And in practical terms, the United States, through its intel agencies, provides the targeting information for Ukrainian missiles and drones. So the war would, the war would end tomorrow if the US were actually to withdraw that support. And Trump could do that with one phone call. Hey, Director of Central Intelligence. Hey, NSA Director. No mas. Anyone caught running the war for the Ukrainians will be fired and brought up on charges. And that would end the war. And yes, Russia would wind up with a chunk of eastern Ukraine. That's going to happen no matter what. And it might be better for Ukraine to stop sending its next generation, in fact, middle-aged men and people with Down syndrome into the meat grinder. That's the only option. And Trump could do that, but he hasn't, not for two years. Now, why? Well, it's really simple. Because the same people who pushed Trump into war with Iran are pushing him to continue the war against Russia, against Putin. Now, why is that? Now, that's a really interesting question that someone ought to write a book about. Why would the same people who pushed the US into war with Iran be pushing the United States to war with Russia?

🚨Trump Betrayed His Voters on Behalf of a Foreign Country. 🚨"Trump could end the war in Ukraine with a single phone call" – Tucker Carlson. 🚨The same people who pushed Trump into war with Iran are pushing him to continue the war against Russia, against Putin. 📑And there was already a neocon war in progress, the war between the United States and Russia, which we mistakenly, misleadingly sometimes refer to as the Ukraine war. It's never been a Ukraine war. It's a war between NATO, which is our coalition, North Atlantic Treaty Organization, that we run and fund, and Russia. In other words, it's a war between the US and Russia. And that war, which began in the winter of 2022, was inspired by the Biden administration, which wanted it. So the United States, in the most passive-aggressive possible way, our leadership pushed Russia into this war so that the United States could defeat or weaken Russia. No one's ever defined what exactly that means. The whole project is insane. But that's what happened. And Trump knew exactly what was going on at the time and said so, and said repeatedly in interviews and in private, the main thing that we should worry about is Russia joining forces, being pushed into an alliance with China, because that would leave us where? It would leave us facing off against a coalition of the world's largest country, that would be Russia, with the world's largest population, that would be China, the world's largest economy, also China, the world's deepest military industrial capacity and resource bed, that would be Russia, against us. And we can't win. If Russia and China get together, we're done. Trump said that many times. And it's true, and it's proven to be true. And no, we can't win. So Trump knew that. And that's why he promised repeatedly on the campaign trail, when I am president, I will bring that war to a close. Watch. Before I even arrive at the Oval Office shortly after I win the presidency, I will have the war between Russia and Ukraine settled. I'll do it in 24 hours. It's not tough to do. That's easy compared to, that's easy compared to a lot of things. Well, he's right. It actually is easy compared to a lot of things. Now, you'll often hear the foreign policy establishment, the experts, people in DC, the State Department will tell you, no, it's very, very complicated. Well, it's actually not that complicated because Ukraine as a nation no longer exists. American policymakers have basically genocided the entire population of the country. More than a million people have died. Now being sent to the front in handcuffs to certain death. Apparently, that's part of the reason we're doing this. It gets very dark very fast when you start to think about it. But Ukraine itself could never prosecute a war against Russia because, well, for one thing, Russia has more than 100 million more people. So the whole thing is absurd. There is no war between Russia and Ukraine. And in practical terms, the United States, through its intel agencies, provides the targeting information for Ukrainian missiles and drones. So the war would, the war would end tomorrow if the US were actually to withdraw that support. And Trump could do that with one phone call. Hey, Director of Central Intelligence. Hey, NSA Director. No mas. Anyone caught running the war for the Ukrainians will be fired and brought up on charges. And that would end the war. And yes, Russia would wind up with a chunk of eastern Ukraine. That's going to happen no matter what. And it might be better for Ukraine to stop sending its next generation, in fact, middle-aged men and people with Down syndrome into the meat grinder. That's the only option. And Trump could do that, but he hasn't, not for two years. Now, why? Well, it's really simple. Because the same people who pushed Trump into war with Iran are pushing him to continue the war against Russia, against Putin. Now, why is that? Now, that's a really interesting question that someone ought to write a book about. Why would the same people who pushed the US into war with Iran be pushing the United States to war with Russia?

Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

44,950 次观看 • 20 天前

🚨The world would be catapulted into a GREAT DEPRESSION if US-Iran negotiations fail and result in a FOREVER WAR —Retired US Air Force Lt. Col. William J. Astore ‘I don’t think Iran trusts us at all. And I wouldn’t blame them. I don’t trust the news coming out of my own government. So why should Iran trust diplomats? We don’t even send diplomats. We send Trump’s son-in-law and we send a friend of Trump and a real estate developer. So we don’t even rely on the professionals within our own State Department. But I think Iran is being prudent. Iran recognises, I think, as sane people do, that diplomacy is better than a forever war where tens, if not hundreds of thousands of people may end up dead. What’s so worrisome here is that we Americans, and our president…they all talk about short wars, they all talk about mission accomplished moments. ‘Oh yes, the war will be over in a few weeks, maybe a few months.’ We heard the same kind of rhetoric during the Vietnam War that, once we sent troops in 1965, that war would be over once American troops hit the ground. Well, that war stretched for another 10 years and we ended up losing that war. So this is always the rhetoric. And what I worry about the Iran war is that, yes, we’d like to think the war will be over soon, but we also thought the Russia-Ukraine war was going to be over in a matter of weeks or months and now it’s more than four years. I perish the thought that the Iran war could last a year or two or three. It would catapult the world into something like a Great Depression.’ Watch the full interview in the quoted post below👇

🚨The world would be catapulted into a GREAT DEPRESSION if US-Iran negotiations fail and result in a FOREVER WAR —Retired US Air Force Lt. Col. William J. Astore ‘I don’t think Iran trusts us at all. And I wouldn’t blame them. I don’t trust the news coming out of my own government. So why should Iran trust diplomats? We don’t even send diplomats. We send Trump’s son-in-law and we send a friend of Trump and a real estate developer. So we don’t even rely on the professionals within our own State Department. But I think Iran is being prudent. Iran recognises, I think, as sane people do, that diplomacy is better than a forever war where tens, if not hundreds of thousands of people may end up dead. What’s so worrisome here is that we Americans, and our president…they all talk about short wars, they all talk about mission accomplished moments. ‘Oh yes, the war will be over in a few weeks, maybe a few months.’ We heard the same kind of rhetoric during the Vietnam War that, once we sent troops in 1965, that war would be over once American troops hit the ground. Well, that war stretched for another 10 years and we ended up losing that war. So this is always the rhetoric. And what I worry about the Iran war is that, yes, we’d like to think the war will be over soon, but we also thought the Russia-Ukraine war was going to be over in a matter of weeks or months and now it’s more than four years. I perish the thought that the Iran war could last a year or two or three. It would catapult the world into something like a Great Depression.’ Watch the full interview in the quoted post below👇

Going Underground

38,254 次观看 • 5 个月前

EVEN globalist-owned CNN is now getting frustrated that the Deep State is still hiding their smuggled, emergency candidate, Kamala from the media. Till this day, no interviews, no press conferences and obviously, she just expectedly turned down Trump’s offer for debate on FOX. For the records, an earlier debate was scheduled between Trump and Biden on ABC. But Biden is no longer the nominee, and Trump is in court with ABC and suing ABC’s George Stephanopoulos for defamation. That’s why Trump said, let’s have it on FOX News. But Kamala bailed. Fox is to Conservatives what CNN, ABC, MSNBC and literally all other mainstream news networks are to liberals. But Trump accepted to debate Biden on a Trump -hating network like CNN. He also accepted the invitation of the National Association of Black Journalists in Chicago on an ultra-liberal platform. The invitation was extended to both Trump and Kamala. In fact the group assured Trump that Harris was going to be there. It turned out they were lying. Kamala never showed up and from the look of things, they knew but kept it from Trump (He actually accused them of that.) And guess what? Rather than talk about Kamala running away from the first opportunity to speak to Americans on issues with Trump, they turned on Trump for things he said or didn’t say. No word on Kamala’s bailing. Well, she has bailed again and now claims she’s attending the so called ABC debate that Trump won’t be attending. So they’re gonna give her all of that air time to lie and lie and lie and there will be zero fact-checking or rebuttal from the Blackrock - owned media shills who will be interviewing her. They know as some of us do that Kamala is ten times less popular than Biden even with all cognitive decline, but of course, that’s not what the polls are saying and obviously, that’s not what you see in the media with the fake, manufacture popularity. Without registering illegals to vote, or trying to kill Trump again, or starting an international war that becomes world war 3 or triggering the breakout of another pandemic to lockdown the U.S., they know too well that Trump is their next president and it scares them to death. The desperation in their camp right now is beyond palpable. But you’ll never see that in the media. Again, that’s why they wanna still kill your man, Trump. May God keep him.

EVEN globalist-owned CNN is now getting frustrated that the Deep State is still hiding their smuggled, emergency candidate, Kamala from the media. Till this day, no interviews, no press conferences and obviously, she just expectedly turned down Trump’s offer for debate on FOX. For the records, an earlier debate was scheduled between Trump and Biden on ABC. But Biden is no longer the nominee, and Trump is in court with ABC and suing ABC’s George Stephanopoulos for defamation. That’s why Trump said, let’s have it on FOX News. But Kamala bailed. Fox is to Conservatives what CNN, ABC, MSNBC and literally all other mainstream news networks are to liberals. But Trump accepted to debate Biden on a Trump -hating network like CNN. He also accepted the invitation of the National Association of Black Journalists in Chicago on an ultra-liberal platform. The invitation was extended to both Trump and Kamala. In fact the group assured Trump that Harris was going to be there. It turned out they were lying. Kamala never showed up and from the look of things, they knew but kept it from Trump (He actually accused them of that.) And guess what? Rather than talk about Kamala running away from the first opportunity to speak to Americans on issues with Trump, they turned on Trump for things he said or didn’t say. No word on Kamala’s bailing. Well, she has bailed again and now claims she’s attending the so called ABC debate that Trump won’t be attending. So they’re gonna give her all of that air time to lie and lie and lie and there will be zero fact-checking or rebuttal from the Blackrock - owned media shills who will be interviewing her. They know as some of us do that Kamala is ten times less popular than Biden even with all cognitive decline, but of course, that’s not what the polls are saying and obviously, that’s not what you see in the media with the fake, manufacture popularity. Without registering illegals to vote, or trying to kill Trump again, or starting an international war that becomes world war 3 or triggering the breakout of another pandemic to lockdown the U.S., they know too well that Trump is their next president and it scares them to death. The desperation in their camp right now is beyond palpable. But you’ll never see that in the media. Again, that’s why they wanna still kill your man, Trump. May God keep him.

J. C. Okechukwu

14,440 次观看 • 2 年前

🇺🇸🇮🇷 Axios reporter Alex Isenstadt says Trump's own team never wanted an Iran war. Now they're trying to find a way out. Speaking about conversations with White House officials and people close to Trump, Isenstadt says there's broad frustration over how Washington ended up here. Aides openly admit this isn't what Trump campaigned on, isn't what they wanted to be doing, and isn't helping them politically. With the midterms approaching, the White House reportedly wants to shift the conversation back to the economy, inflation, and domestic issues. But that's difficult when Iran dominates the headlines and oil prices keep driving the news cycle. Isenstadt also says Trump has grown increasingly frustrated with Netanyahu. He claims Trump has privately warned the Israeli leader that he's taking military action too far and that Israel's international standing is suffering because of it. Even so, he argues Netanyahu played a major role in convincing Trump to enter the war in the first place. Perhaps the most revealing point is that Trump's own advisers, including JD Vance and Marco Rubio, reportedly warned him the campaign against Iran would be far more difficult than expected. Trump heard the arguments, but ultimately trusted his instincts instead. Isenstadt's takeaway: don't mistake this pause for a change in strategy. Inside the White House, the priority appears to be ending a war they never expected to be fighting in the first place. Alex Isenstadt

🇺🇸🇮🇷 Axios reporter Alex Isenstadt says Trump's own team never wanted an Iran war. Now they're trying to find a way out. Speaking about conversations with White House officials and people close to Trump, Isenstadt says there's broad frustration over how Washington ended up here. Aides openly admit this isn't what Trump campaigned on, isn't what they wanted to be doing, and isn't helping them politically. With the midterms approaching, the White House reportedly wants to shift the conversation back to the economy, inflation, and domestic issues. But that's difficult when Iran dominates the headlines and oil prices keep driving the news cycle. Isenstadt also says Trump has grown increasingly frustrated with Netanyahu. He claims Trump has privately warned the Israeli leader that he's taking military action too far and that Israel's international standing is suffering because of it. Even so, he argues Netanyahu played a major role in convincing Trump to enter the war in the first place. Perhaps the most revealing point is that Trump's own advisers, including JD Vance and Marco Rubio, reportedly warned him the campaign against Iran would be far more difficult than expected. Trump heard the arguments, but ultimately trusted his instincts instead. Isenstadt's takeaway: don't mistake this pause for a change in strategy. Inside the White House, the priority appears to be ending a war they never expected to be fighting in the first place. Alex Isenstadt

Mario Nawfal

245,928 次观看 • 1 个月前