Video wird geladen...
Video konnte nicht geladen werden
🎸🎻𝐍𝐨𝐭𝐡𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐄𝐥𝐬𝐞 𝐌𝐚𝐭𝐭𝐞𝐫𝐬 (𝐌𝐞𝐭𝐚𝐥𝐥𝐢𝐜𝐚) : 𝐌𝐨𝐳𝐚𝐫𝐭 𝐇𝐞𝐫𝐨𝐞𝐬 (𝐎𝐟𝐟𝐢𝐜𝐢𝐚𝐥 𝐕𝐢𝐝𝐞𝐨)🌷🌷 ☘️The most beautiful acoustic rendition I’ve heard of this song! These two brilliant classical musicians took it to a completely different level! Bravo!👏👏💖💖
63,205 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr •via X (Twitter)
10 Kommentare
Gabrielvor 1 Jahr
👏🌹
Susana Alvarezvor 1 Jahr
😍
L Douglas Hicksvor 1 Jahr
This will be The Song of The Revolution
Eric Beardenvor 1 Jahr
Wow Metallica Nothing Else Matter, like A Fine Wine!
xvor 1 Jahr
Kippenvel
Mister C .كيران Paddystinianvor 1 Jahr
@FirstLadyNot Loved that…and I don’t even like Metallica!
Ⲙⲟⲗⲟϧⲏⲁvor 1 Jahr
Honestly, it's better than the original.
Ayça ◻️◽▫️vor 1 Jahr
👏👏🎶
Eric Beardenvor 1 Jahr
Again Where is your Sister that plays The Piano? Now I know what a Group of Guys Do Together!
papcio 5vor 1 Jahr
Jak pięknie przenika się twórczość.Każdy utwór muzyczny wraca,bo jest w nim siła i każde inne wykonanie ,aranżacja dodaje mu siły PRZEKAZU społecznego.
Ähnliche Videos
1:29
Sensitive content
In the last 6 weeks two of the best and most loyal friends I have ever had have left this earth. 1st Delta Dawn. She was one of those dogs that you only get once in a lifetime. I found her at a Sonic in Oklahoma in the spring of 2009. She was homeless and hungry but still full of personality. She crossed over the rainbow bridge and left this earth on April 22 , 2024. And it happened to be earth Day. I want yall to know that I’m an advocate for rescue because I live it out and everyday I am blessed with the joy of having these animals in my life. And then some days, like today, I’m so heartbroken to have lost them. To love this big you have to hurt just as big. They are worth it. Shelters all over the country are suffering from over crowdedness so this is my heart song to you. Consider a rescue or fostering or volunteering . You never know what blessing is waiting there for you. 💖🐶Delta Dawn
Miranda Lambert
113,340 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren
!["This [is] the brilliance of this bioweapon [the COVID jabs]... It goes to every part of your body—it will hit you at whatever your point of susceptibility is... [there are] 1,287 side effects... This [is] the most evil assault upon humanity that anybody could imagine." Dr. Charles Hoffe, a practicing family physician in BC, Canada, describes for Maryann Gebauer how the COVID injections are a "brilliant...bioweapon" because they cause such a staggering array of health problems. Hoffe, an outspoken critic of the injections who took on the College of Physicians and Surgeons of British Columbia (the medical board recently dropped their bogus case against Hoffe, which was based on his questioning the COVID injections in social media posts), notes that the poisonous shots "will hit you at whatever your point of susceptibility is" and highlights their use of "lipid nano capsules" that ensure their payload "[goes] to every single part of [a recipient's] body." "Every patient is different... There's no two that are the same. And and this [is] the brilliance of this bioweapon," Hoffe says. "The fact that they chose the lipid nano capsules as a delivery system ensured that this would get into every single part of your body. And so because it goes to every part of your body, it will hit you at whatever your point of susceptibility is. Whatever your point of weakness is, that's where you'll notice it the most." Hoffe adds: "For some people that were more prone to cardiac things, they're gonna get cardiac symptoms. For... people [who] are more prone to autoimmune things, that's what it'll be for them. For some people that were more easily prone to getting cancer, that's what they'll get. And so it was brilliant. If you're trying to track side effects from a new treatment, but the side effects are everything you can think of, how do you track it?" "There's no medical product that has 1287 side effects," Hoffe notes. I mean, it [the adverse events of special interest list] literally read[s] like a medical dictionary... almost everything you could think of is what Pfizer had recorded in the first 90 days as side effects." "This was the most evil assault upon humanity that anybody could imagine," Hoffe adds. "Because all of these people... were told that this was gonna keep them safe. And meanwhile, it was designed to cause harm." The physician goes on to say: "The most harmful part of the virus was the spike protein. That was the warhead on it. The fact that the vaccine turned your body into a spike protein factory...it got your body to make the most dangerous part of the virus. The fact that that was there in this [injection and it] was a patented bioweapon. For anyone to say...they were doing their best and it just went wrong: Bioweapons aren't designed to keep people safe. They are designed to cause harm."](https://image.24vids.com/tw-1901816442518991303/ext_tw_video_thumb/1901809383731847169/pu/img/2ToQYReJLzAJS4Gy.jpg)
![Francis Ford Coppola on how young children convinced him to make 'The Outsiders' (1983) & the reason why he loves the movie: "Interviewer: 'Rumble Fish' (1983) is so completely different a film from 'The Outsiders' (1983), not just in black and white and color, but in the tone. And everybody said, “Well, he’s off in Tulsa, making two films,” rather in a way that, once, people would go up to the desert and make two westerns at the same time. 'Rumble Fish' makes 'The Outsiders' seem an odder film than I thought it was when I first saw it. 'The Outsiders' almost felt like a film in which you weren't quite there all the time. Coppola: No, I don’t think so. 'The Outsiders' (1984) was the type of film that I personally liked, a melodrama with a romantic tone. I liked the book a lot when I read it; I thought it was sweet and youthful and had something in its little, simple theme that was of value, and I wanted to make the picture very much as the book was. Maybe that’s what you're interpreting as my not always being there, except that I did make the decision to make it exactly like the book. The key to 'The Outsiders' is the score; the fact that it’s this schmaltzy classical movie score indicates that I wanted a movie told in sumptuous terms, very honestly or carefully taken from the book without changing it a lot, with young actors—putting the emphasis more on that kind of 'Gone with the Wind' (1939) lyricism which was so important to the young girl [Susie Hinton] when she wrote it. I liked the film on that basis. It’s how I made it and why I made it. But if you think about my career, I’ve never made two films that were alike... maybe the two Godfathers. But every one of my films is very different from one another and I was feeling that I was in kind of a journeyman period of my life, approaching a future style of work as a more serious, older man which would be based on a tremendous amount of exploration while I had the chance to do that. To me it’s nothing to say, well, I’m going to make that film and it’s going to be that kind of film. Like 'The Outsiders'—it’s not that I couldn’t make that sixteen other ways. People suggested, “Well, are we really going to make this book like that?” “Well,” I said, “little kids wrote me a letter and wanted me to make it that way.” Of all the letters I get from movies, 'The Outsiders' is the one where all of these cute little fourteen- year-olds . . . so I’m in it for them. I feel I must have gained something, although it wasn’t as challenging, cinematically or even on the level of acting and other things as, say, the one that came afterwards. But I always had this idea that I wanted to make one film that was romantic and schmaltzy, like 'The Godfather' (1972), and one film that was more of an art film, more in the direction of 'Apocalypse Now' (1979)." (Francis Ford Coppola's interview with David Thomson & Lucy Gray, 1983)](https://image.24vids.com/tw-2010103103555600427/amplify_video_thumb/2009991376948342784/img/l_kRKFmpgrUZcjno.jpg)