正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

𝐏𝐫𝐨𝐭𝐞𝐜𝐭𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐈𝐧𝐝𝐢𝐚'𝐬 𝐝𝐞𝐦𝐨𝐜𝐫𝐚𝐜𝐲, 𝐬𝐨𝐯𝐞𝐫𝐞𝐢𝐠𝐧𝐭𝐲, 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐟𝐮𝐭𝐮𝐫𝐞. 🇮🇳 The FCRA Amendment Bill 2026 strengthens transparency and accountability in foreign funding: 🏛️ Foreign-funded assets remain protected if licences are cancelled or surrendered. 🚫 No foreign funding after licence expiry. ⚖️ Individuals can be held directly accountable for violations. 🛡️ Foreign funds...

186,493 次观看 • 1 天前 •via X (Twitter)

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

The Modi government has brought in amendments to the FCRA Act which effectively allow the government to take control of assets created by NGOs and institutions using foreign donations, even if the foreign contribution was minimal, once their FCRA licence is cancelled or expires. This has triggered a huge uproar across the country. Naturally, one might assume that since FCRA applies to political parties as well, these rules would apply uniformly to all. We’re sorry to say, you’ve completely underestimated the Sangh Parivar. In 2018, through a small clause introduced as part of the Union Budget, an amendment was passed that allows political parties to receive unlimited foreign donations, including from foreign companies. Shockingly, this change was made retrospective all the way back to 1976. Why make it retrospective from 1976? That’s where things get interesting. There have been long-standing allegations regarding foreign funding of Sangh Parivar leaders. For instance, Morarji Desai was reported by Seymour M. Hersh, formerly of The New York Times, to have received $20,000 annually from the CIA in exchange for information, as mentioned in his writings. Now you can see how strategically these changes have been made, and it raises serious questions about the sources of political funding of the BJP. And there are other allegations regarding a CIA agent from India who got trained in the US. Connect the dots yourself. Nisha Soman Thettayil explains.

Congress Kerala

10,766 次观看 • 3 个月前

When you know American funded NGOs were stopping nuclear plants, changing election narratives and funding religious conversions until India passed one law to track the money, the outrage from Washington suddenly makes complete sense. India did not ban foreign funding. It simply asked two questions. Who is sending the money and where is it going. That is all. Two questions. And the reaction from American lawmakers and Christian advocacy groups has been explosive enough to send the US Ambassador rushing to Amit Shah's office straight off an international flight. Ask yourself why those two questions are so threatening. The pattern that intelligence reports flagged over years was consistent. Foreign money flows in through NGO structures. Agendas flow out through activism, narratives and on-the-ground operations. The Kudankulam Nuclear Power Plant protests, one of India's most strategically critical energy projects, faced sustained opposition funded through networks that traced back to foreign sources. Election narratives were being shaped through civil society organisations whose actual funders sat in offices thousands of kilometres away. And in tribal and economically vulnerable regions, significant foreign money was being directed toward systematic religious conversion campaigns that security agencies assessed as a deliberate demographic strategy rather than genuine humanitarian work. The FCRA was not a new idea. India first passed it in 1976. The 2026 amendments simply tightened what was already there. Assets of NGOs with cancelled licences now come under direct government oversight. Foreign funds must be spent within defined time windows to prevent money laundering and election interference. The accountability mechanisms that any sovereign nation should have over foreign influence operations inside its borders. None of this stops a single rupee of genuine charitable work from happening. It stops money from arriving without accountability and being deployed against India's own strategic and democratic interests. The countries that are furious about this are not furious about charity being disrupted. Genuine charity does not require opacity. Genuine humanitarian work does not resist transparency about who funds it and how it is spent. The fury is about something else entirely. And India just made that something else impossible to hide.

Karan Datta 🇮🇳

26,618 次观看 • 29 天前

Carney wants sweeping powers over your phone while using a foreign one himself 🇨🇦 Sheila Gunn Reid According to the Wall Street Journal, Carney has continued using a British cellphone while speaking with foreign leaders. Prime Minister Mark Carney wants sweeping new powers over Canada's telecommunications system. But according to a recent Wall Street Journal report, when it comes to his own communications, he's reportedly relying on a U.K.-based cellphone to communicate with foreign leaders. If true, the irony is impossible to ignore. The Carney government is pushing Bill C-22, legislation that would significantly expand Ottawa's authority over Canada's telecommunications sector in the name of national security. The bill would give the federal government broad powers to issue security orders to telecommunications companies, require providers to comply with government directives, and increase federal oversight of Canada's communications infrastructure. Canadians are being told these extraordinary powers are necessary because secure communications matter. Apparently, that principle may not apply to the Prime Minister himself. According to the Wall Street Journal, Carney has continued using a British cellphone while speaking with foreign leaders. If that reporting is accurate, Canadians deserve answers. The issue isn't simply where the phone was purchased; it's about whether the Prime Minister is following the same security, transparency, and record-keeping standards imposed on everyone else in government, and now on the public. Among the questions that should be answered: ➢ Communications security: Was the device approved for sensitive government communications under standards established by the Communications Security Establishment (CSE) and Treasury Board? ➢ Government records: Were official calls, text messages and other communications retained in accordance with the Library and Archives of Canada Act and federal information management policies? ➢ Access to Information: If government business was conducted using a foreign device or foreign telecommunications provider, are those records preserved in a manner that complies with the Access to Information Act, or could they be more difficult for Canadians to obtain? ➢ Government device policies: Was the phone issued, managed and secured by the Government of Canada, or was it a personal device used for official business? Foreign jurisdiction: Were official communications routed or stored through infrastructure subject to U.K. law, and what security assessment was conducted before using that device to communicate with foreign leaders? ➢ Bill C-22: Why is the government demanding unprecedented oversight of Canadian telecommunications providers on national security grounds while the Prime Minister reportedly relies on a foreign telecommunications provider for his own communications? Ottawa insists foreign technology, foreign influence and foreign infrastructure pose national security concerns. Yet the Prime Minister himself reportedly chose a foreign cellphone and foreign carrier while conducting international diplomacy. Rules for thee, but not for me. The contradiction remains glaring: a Prime Minister seeking sweeping new powers over Canadians' communications while reportedly placing his own trust in a foreign telecommunications provider.

Rebel News

60,185 次观看 • 13 天前

President Donald Trump asked Congress on Tuesday to take back $9.4 billion in federal funding for foreign aid, the State Department and public media. The rescission request would codify the work of the Department of Government Efficiency, which sought to shutter the U.S. Agency for International Development, eliminate foreign aid programs it deemed wasteful and cease funding for other international institutions. The rescission request would affect USAID and the PEPFAR program for HIV/AIDS relief, among other programs. It also includes almost $1.1 billion in funds that were previously approved by Congress to support the Corporation for Public Broadcasting (CPB). CPB distributes funds to NPR and PBS local stations, which combine federal money and their own fundraising efforts to support the public media networks. CPB funding is typically approved two years in advance to discourage political influence over the budgeting process. Congress now has 45 days to act on the request. The move is the Trump administration's latest effort to defund PBS and NPR. Last month, Trump issued an executive order to end federal funding for both organizations, accusing them of bias and arguing they should not be supported by taxpayer dollars. PBS and NPR have filed separate lawsuits against the executive order, citing First Amendment violations. Both the House and Senate need to approve the request for the funding to be rescinded. If either chamber denies or ignores the request, the Trump administration will be legally required to release the money. Lisa Desjardins takes a closer look at what's in the request.

PBS News

52,594 次观看 • 1 年前

🚨 TEXAS — ENOUGH IS ENOUGH: BAN CAIR FROM OUR CAPITOL! This video is from 2010, back then Americans were already warned: 📢 CAIR — the Council on American-Islamic Relations — is NOT a civil rights group. It is a terror-tied, foreign-funded propaganda machine. FACTS that were known then — and are still true today: ✔️ CAIR was named an unindicted co-conspirator in the largest terrorism finance trial in American history—the Holy Land Foundation trial held right here in TEXAS. ✔️ CAIR Leaders have been convicted of felonies, including terrorism. ✔️ CAIR was sued by Muslim, African-American, and Hispanic families for defrauding them instead of providing promised legal help. ✔️ Only 1% of CAIR’s revenue came from American Muslim members—while millions of dollars poured in from foreign governments like Saudi Arabia, Iran, the UAE, and Kuwait. (***UPDATE - The United Arab Emirates, placed CAIR on the country’s terrorism list in 2014. Further, President Biden’s administration has “disavowed” CAIR over comments made by its executive director at an event following the October 7 attack) ✔️ The Foreign Agents Registration Act (FARA) requires foreign-funded organizations that engage in political activities to register with the U.S. government. CAIR has not reported their foreign funding, foreign meetings, or political operations—despite the law. 🔎 The truth was exposed back in 2010: CAIR received over $6 million in cash and loans from foreign donors—and pledged over $50 million more. CAIR held over 30 meetings with foreign officials from those same regimes. CAIR conducted over 50 political and propaganda operations to advance their goals—without reporting them to the U.S. government. And now—because Texans are waking up and grassroots pressure is exposing them— CAIR is desperate. They're trying to smear, intimidate, and malign Texans who dare to speak the truth. 🚫 HEY CAIR: You cannot intimidate us into silence anymore. The American people have a right to know exactly who you are—and Texas has the right to say: NO MORE. On April 29, 2025—Texans must send a clear message: 👉 NO MORE ACCESS. NO MORE LIES. NO MORE CAIR IN OUR CAPITOL.

Amy Mek

16,254 次观看 • 1 年前

⭕️Today 22 April 2025, Approximately 19:30 While standing near a pro-Palestinian gathering in London, I was peacefully observing and listening to the speakers. A woman, visible in the attached image, asked her companion whether I was Iranian. She then stated her intention to photograph me and send the image to the Iranian embassy. Subsequently, as captured in the video evidence, she spat at me, an act that I perceive as both an insult and an assault based on my nationality. The police intervened and arrested her. Under the UK’s National Security Act 2023, the Foreign Influence Registration Scheme (FIRS) mandates that individuals acting under the direction of a foreign power—such as the Islamic Republic of Iran—must register their activities with the Home Office. Failure to do so constitutes a criminal offence, punishable by up to five years’ imprisonment. This scheme aims to increase transparency and protect UK democracy from covert foreign influence. Given that Iran has been designated under the enhanced tier of FIRS due to its aggressive activities against UK-based individuals, any person collaborating with Iranian authorities, including embassies, is required to register their activities. The incident raises serious concerns about the safety of individuals of Iranian descent residing in the UK. The woman’s threat to report me to the Iranian embassy, coupled with her physical aggression, suggests potential coordination with foreign entities. If she is acting on behalf of the Iranian government without proper registration, this could be a violation of UK law. It is imperative for UK authorities to investigate whether she has registered under FIRS. This will determine if her actions constitute a breach of national security regulations. This incident underscores the importance of enforcing FIRS to safeguard individuals from covert foreign influence and intimidation. Ensuring that all individuals acting on behalf of foreign powers are properly registered is crucial for maintaining public safety and upholding the integrity of UK laws. Metropolitan Police

Niyak Ghorbani (نیاک)

78,626 次观看 • 1 年前

James, I don’t think people fully grasp the scale of what’s unfolding. It is a national security threat, especially with elections approaching. In this clip, Elijah Schaeffer openly admits he was approached by RT (Russia Today) twice to distribute disinformation inside the US. This isn’t isolated. Thousands of influencers and alt-media figures have received similar offers, with large payouts to seed and circulate Russian state-aligned narratives through podcasts, tweets, videos, and livestreams. That content is then strategically amplified by coordinated bot networks and signal-boosted by adjacent influencers here on X. They retweet each other in closed loops, creating a false-consensus echo chamber that simulates mass legitimacy. An alternate reality. It's a cognitive warfare operation being run by a hostile foreign actor (Russia) The DOJ and FBI need to act. Investigate these actors for foreign malign influence, FARA violations, and opaque funding flows including crypto transactions. If they are taking direction or money from foreign sources to shape US public opinion, they are functioning as undeclared foreign agents and need to be held accountable. They need to reopen the Global Engagement Center (GEC) and the Foreign Malign Influence Center (FMIC) and staff them with the right people to manage these threats. National Security Division, U.S. Dept of Justice Rep. Don Bacon 🇺🇸✈️🏍️⭐️🎖️ FBI Director Kash Patel Attorney General Pamela Bondi

Restitutor

103,043 次观看 • 8 个月前

AG PAM BONDI CLEARED THE WAY FOR ISRAEL’S FOREIGN INFLUENCE OPERATION On her 1st day, newly appointed AG Pam Bondi, disbanded the Foreign Influence Task Force, the DOJ office responsible for enforcing FARA. The change specifically limits DOJ prosecutors from criminally charging those involved in public-relations work & policy advocacy on behalf of foreign businesses & nonprofits. This is key to understanding how Israel’s current foreign influence campaign is structured. The Foreign Agent Registration Act (FARA) states a Foreign Agent is "an individual who agrees to operate within the US subject to the direction of a foreign gov or official." The penalty for unregistered Foreign Agents is 10yrs in prison. FARA documents show money and direction flow from Israel’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs to Havas Media Group to entities operating in the US (Clock Tower X, Bridges Partners & Show Faith By Works). Employees of the entities are also registered under FARA but what’s not registered are independent contractors (also known as 1099 Contractors) and subcontractors. Since Pam Bondi has directed the DOJ to only prosecute individuals who fall under the definition of the Espionage Act from 1917 (123 years ago), FARA violations involving PR firms and nonprofits engaged in Israeli influence campaigns online and via social media & media have free reign to propagandize Americans. That also means, unregistered 1099 contractors and subcontractors will also not be prosecuted. Furthermore, the penalty for not registering (should this become an issue) is no longer criminal charges leading to 10 year prison sentences. It is a simple slap on the wrist and a reminder to register. This deliberate incapacitation of DOJ’s enforcement mechanism gives a green light to foreign influence operatives, ensuring that the Knesset's 2018 plan to skirt FARA can proceed with minimal risk of prosecution. I will do a separate thread to show how this memo was also used to dismiss one of the biggest FARA cases of our lifetime, NYC Mayor, Eric Adams.

GenXGirl

842,338 次观看 • 9 个月前

🚨What is this, AG Pam Bondi? AG PAM BONDI CLEARED THE WAY FOR ISRAEL’S FOREIGN INFLUENCE OPERATION On her 1st day, newly appointed AG Pam Bondi, disbanded the Foreign Influence Task Force, the DOJ office responsible for enforcing FARA. The change specifically limits DOJ prosecutors from criminally charging those involved in public-relations work & policy advocacy on behalf of foreign businesses & nonprofits. This is key to understanding how Israel’s current foreign influence campaign is structured. The Foreign Agent Registration Act (FARA) states a Foreign Agent is "an individual who agrees to operate within the US subject to the direction of a foreign gov or official." The penalty for unregistered Foreign Agents is 10yrs in prison. FARA documents show money and direction flow from Israel’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs to Havas Media Group to entities operating in the US (Clock Tower X, Bridges Partners & Show Faith By Works). Employees of the entities are also registered under FARA but what’s not registered are independent contractors (also known as 1099 Contractors) and subcontractors. Since Pam Bondi has directed the DOJ to only prosecute individuals who fall under the definition of the Espionage Act from 1917 (123 years ago), FARA violations involving PR firms and nonprofits engaged in Israeli influence campaigns online and via social media & media have free reign to propagandize Americans. That also means, unregistered 1099 contractors and subcontractors will also not be prosecuted. Furthermore, the penalty for not registering (should this become an issue) is no longer criminal charges leading to 10 year prison sentences. It is a simple slap on the wrist and a reminder to register. This deliberate incapacitation of DOJ’s enforcement mechanism gives a green light to foreign influence operatives, ensuring that the Knesset's 2018 plan to skirt FARA can proceed with minimal risk of prosecution. I will do a separate thread to show how this memo was also used to dismiss one of the biggest FARA cases of our lifetime, NYC Mayor, Eric Adams. Ht genxgirl WWG1WGA Melissa Redpill - Freedom Force

Melissa Redpill - Freedom Force

66,796 次观看 • 7 个月前