Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

𝐏𝐫𝐨𝐭𝐞𝐜𝐭𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐈𝐧𝐝𝐢𝐚'𝐬 𝐝𝐞𝐦𝐨𝐜𝐫𝐚𝐜𝐲, 𝐬𝐨𝐯𝐞𝐫𝐞𝐢𝐠𝐧𝐭𝐲, 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐟𝐮𝐭𝐮𝐫𝐞. 🇮🇳 The FCRA Amendment Bill 2026 strengthens transparency and accountability in foreign funding: 🏛️ Foreign-funded assets remain protected if licences are cancelled or surrendered. 🚫 No foreign funding after licence expiry. ⚖️ Individuals can be held directly accountable for violations. 🛡️ Foreign funds...

BJP4India's profile picture

BJP

23,042,937 subscribers

198,821 просмотров • 1 месяц назад •via X (Twitter)

ОбразованиеНовости и политика
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

A Congressman from Donald Trump’s Republican Party has called India’s proposed FCRA Amendment Bill a “clear attack on Christians” and claimed it could allow the government to take control of churches and religious charities. But the Bill does not target Christians or churches specifically. It applies to all organisations receiving foreign contributions. In 2019, Yair Netanyahu openly referred to countries funding NGOs that campaign against each other’s political and territorial interests. That statement showed why foreign funding cannot always be treated as neutral charity. NGOs can also become instruments of influence. The proposed FCRA framework seeks to ensure that the original foreign donor is disclosed, funds are used only for the approved purpose and region, further instalments are linked to verified utilisation, and assets created through foreign money remain accountable even after an organisation loses its FCRA registration. One concern is genuinely debatable. If an asset is built partly with foreign funds and partly with Indian funds, the authority may initially take control of the entire asset, after which the organisation must establish the domestically funded portion. Foreign funding is not automatically wrong. But transparency, accountability and national oversight are essential.
2:58

A Congressman from Donald Trump’s Republican Party has called India’s proposed FCRA Amendment Bill a “clear attack on Christians” and claimed it could allow the government to take control of churches and religious charities. But the Bill does not target Christians or churches specifically. It applies to all organisations receiving foreign contributions. In 2019, Yair Netanyahu openly referred to countries funding NGOs that campaign against each other’s political and territorial interests. That statement showed why foreign funding cannot always be treated as neutral charity. NGOs can also become instruments of influence. The proposed FCRA framework seeks to ensure that the original foreign donor is disclosed, funds are used only for the approved purpose and region, further instalments are linked to verified utilisation, and assets created through foreign money remain accountable even after an organisation loses its FCRA registration. One concern is genuinely debatable. If an asset is built partly with foreign funds and partly with Indian funds, the authority may initially take control of the entire asset, after which the organisation must establish the domestically funded portion. Foreign funding is not automatically wrong. But transparency, accountability and national oversight are essential.

Praffulgarg

13,606 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

India is witnessing a bizarre spectacle: political leaders hitting the streets to protest against transparency in foreign funding. The real reason the Opposition is rattled by the #FCRAAmendmentBill2026 is the designated authority. If these funds are for social work, why the panic over a designated authority ensuring they aren't diverted? The ruckus in Parliament today only proves how deeply the foreign-funded ecosystem has its claws in our politics. Under this Bill, for the first time, the govt can seize and manage assets built with foreign money if an NGO’s license is cancelled. So no more disappearing funds or shifting assets to shell entities. No more buying expensive jewellery or run a conversion racket. The protest at Makar Dwar today wasn't about minority rights, it was about protecting a decades-old payroll.
0:30

India is witnessing a bizarre spectacle: political leaders hitting the streets to protest against transparency in foreign funding. The real reason the Opposition is rattled by the #FCRAAmendmentBill2026 is the designated authority. If these funds are for social work, why the panic over a designated authority ensuring they aren't diverted? The ruckus in Parliament today only proves how deeply the foreign-funded ecosystem has its claws in our politics. Under this Bill, for the first time, the govt can seize and manage assets built with foreign money if an NGO’s license is cancelled. So no more disappearing funds or shifting assets to shell entities. No more buying expensive jewellery or run a conversion racket. The protest at Makar Dwar today wasn't about minority rights, it was about protecting a decades-old payroll.

Smita Deshmukh🇮🇳

108,289 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

Congress and CPM stand together in Keralam Assembly against India's national security. They passed a resolution against the FCRA amendments. They opposed amendments that strengthen transparency in foreign funding and safeguard India's national security. Sadly, this is not surprising. What respect can you have for an Assembly that once passed a resolution supporting the international terrorist Abdul Nasser Madani? During the elections, Congress ran a campaign of fear and misinformation about this amendment. They continue to do so today, at the expense of the safety and security of Keralam and India. So let me state the facts clearly: ✅ This Bill does not target any particular community. ✅ Hindu, Christian, and Muslim organisations all receive FCRA contributions. ✅ The purpose of this law is simple: to ensure foreign contributions are not misused for money laundering, unlawful activities, or threats to India's security. ✅ This is also about protecting Keralam from foreign-funded sabotage. Yet, the LDF and UDF continue to oppose it. For them, power politics comes first. For us, India comes first 🇮🇳 #APAKADAMPolitics
1:00

Congress and CPM stand together in Keralam Assembly against India's national security. They passed a resolution against the FCRA amendments. They opposed amendments that strengthen transparency in foreign funding and safeguard India's national security. Sadly, this is not surprising. What respect can you have for an Assembly that once passed a resolution supporting the international terrorist Abdul Nasser Madani? During the elections, Congress ran a campaign of fear and misinformation about this amendment. They continue to do so today, at the expense of the safety and security of Keralam and India. So let me state the facts clearly: ✅ This Bill does not target any particular community. ✅ Hindu, Christian, and Muslim organisations all receive FCRA contributions. ✅ The purpose of this law is simple: to ensure foreign contributions are not misused for money laundering, unlawful activities, or threats to India's security. ✅ This is also about protecting Keralam from foreign-funded sabotage. Yet, the LDF and UDF continue to oppose it. For them, power politics comes first. For us, India comes first 🇮🇳 #APAKADAMPolitics

Rajeev Chandrasekhar 🇮🇳

11,654 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

🚨MODI Strikes Back! India has amended FCRA rules OVERNIGHT to tighten foreign funding of NGOs 🤯 — Big middle finger to US Senators pressurising India on FCRA Bill 🤣 Key Changes: - Foreign-funded NGOs can no longer use categories like "religious education", "preservation of faith traditions", or "indigenous belief systems" for PROSELYTIZATION activities. ( Proselytization = Attempt to convert) - Explicitly inserted “excluding proselytisation” in multiple religious categories 💥 - Fresh restrictions on foreign nationals as key functionaries. - ULTIMATE DONORS must now be disclosed. - Social media accounts will be SCRUTINISED👏🏼 - Mandatory field verification of fund use. - Dormant NGOs risk losing licences. For years, many missionary networks operated under religious/social work umbrellas. These new rules directly target that ecosystem🔥 National interest and cultural security first. What will Congress say?
0:37

🚨MODI Strikes Back! India has amended FCRA rules OVERNIGHT to tighten foreign funding of NGOs 🤯 — Big middle finger to US Senators pressurising India on FCRA Bill 🤣 Key Changes: - Foreign-funded NGOs can no longer use categories like "religious education", "preservation of faith traditions", or "indigenous belief systems" for PROSELYTIZATION activities. ( Proselytization = Attempt to convert) - Explicitly inserted “excluding proselytisation” in multiple religious categories 💥 - Fresh restrictions on foreign nationals as key functionaries. - ULTIMATE DONORS must now be disclosed. - Social media accounts will be SCRUTINISED👏🏼 - Mandatory field verification of fund use. - Dormant NGOs risk losing licences. For years, many missionary networks operated under religious/social work umbrellas. These new rules directly target that ecosystem🔥 National interest and cultural security first. What will Congress say?

The Analyzer (News Updates🗞️)

438,663 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

The Modi government has brought in amendments to the FCRA Act which effectively allow the government to take control of assets created by NGOs and institutions using foreign donations, even if the foreign contribution was minimal, once their FCRA licence is cancelled or expires. This has triggered a huge uproar across the country. Naturally, one might assume that since FCRA applies to political parties as well, these rules would apply uniformly to all. We’re sorry to say, you’ve completely underestimated the Sangh Parivar. In 2018, through a small clause introduced as part of the Union Budget, an amendment was passed that allows political parties to receive unlimited foreign donations, including from foreign companies. Shockingly, this change was made retrospective all the way back to 1976. Why make it retrospective from 1976? That’s where things get interesting. There have been long-standing allegations regarding foreign funding of Sangh Parivar leaders. For instance, Morarji Desai was reported by Seymour M. Hersh, formerly of The New York Times, to have received $20,000 annually from the CIA in exchange for information, as mentioned in his writings. Now you can see how strategically these changes have been made, and it raises serious questions about the sources of political funding of the BJP. And there are other allegations regarding a CIA agent from India who got trained in the US. Connect the dots yourself. Nisha Soman Thettayil explains.
6:10

The Modi government has brought in amendments to the FCRA Act which effectively allow the government to take control of assets created by NGOs and institutions using foreign donations, even if the foreign contribution was minimal, once their FCRA licence is cancelled or expires. This has triggered a huge uproar across the country. Naturally, one might assume that since FCRA applies to political parties as well, these rules would apply uniformly to all. We’re sorry to say, you’ve completely underestimated the Sangh Parivar. In 2018, through a small clause introduced as part of the Union Budget, an amendment was passed that allows political parties to receive unlimited foreign donations, including from foreign companies. Shockingly, this change was made retrospective all the way back to 1976. Why make it retrospective from 1976? That’s where things get interesting. There have been long-standing allegations regarding foreign funding of Sangh Parivar leaders. For instance, Morarji Desai was reported by Seymour M. Hersh, formerly of The New York Times, to have received $20,000 annually from the CIA in exchange for information, as mentioned in his writings. Now you can see how strategically these changes have been made, and it raises serious questions about the sources of political funding of the BJP. And there are other allegations regarding a CIA agent from India who got trained in the US. Connect the dots yourself. Nisha Soman Thettayil explains.

Congress Kerala

10,766 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

🚨Did You know👇 St Francis Xavier letters to Rome ! 🔴 He Wrote If there were no Brahmins, We would have converted all Hindus into Christianity ! 👉 It was due to Resistance of Brahmins, We failed in India ! 👉 In my entire life time I could covert only one Brahmin ! 🚨Without Destroying Brahmins We can't Win Hindus ! 👉 You take 5 years of Any Congress Ruled States And check the Religious Conversion Happened in those States in 5 years ! 🚨Rahul Gandhi's Caste Census is Actually Joshua Project of Vatican to Convert Indians into Christianity ! 🚨Congress is Rattled by the FCRA Amendment Bill 2026 Because It exposes their deep links to foreign-funded NGOs often used for Political Campaigns, Conversions & Anti-National Activities ! 🚨This Bill is Great for India ! Time to cut the Foreign-Funded Ecosystem Propping up Opposition Politics ! ♦️Trust me….,, lion-heart PM Modi will Create The HINDU -NATION very soon ! 🚩
4:27

🚨Did You know👇 St Francis Xavier letters to Rome ! 🔴 He Wrote If there were no Brahmins, We would have converted all Hindus into Christianity ! 👉 It was due to Resistance of Brahmins, We failed in India ! 👉 In my entire life time I could covert only one Brahmin ! 🚨Without Destroying Brahmins We can't Win Hindus ! 👉 You take 5 years of Any Congress Ruled States And check the Religious Conversion Happened in those States in 5 years ! 🚨Rahul Gandhi's Caste Census is Actually Joshua Project of Vatican to Convert Indians into Christianity ! 🚨Congress is Rattled by the FCRA Amendment Bill 2026 Because It exposes their deep links to foreign-funded NGOs often used for Political Campaigns, Conversions & Anti-National Activities ! 🚨This Bill is Great for India ! Time to cut the Foreign-Funded Ecosystem Propping up Opposition Politics ! ♦️Trust me….,, lion-heart PM Modi will Create The HINDU -NATION very soon ! 🚩

Mona Patel 🇮🇳🐅🌳

48,140 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Dear ED NIA India गृहमंत्री कार्यालय, HMO India I am writing to bring to your urgent attention about serious financial irregularities, suspected benami dealings, and systematic FCRA violations involving Sodadasi Praveen Chakravarty and his network of linked NGOs and firms in Andhra Pradesh. The following FCRA-registered associations are under his control: Sylom Blind Centre (Darpan ID: AP/2017/0157272 – FCRA No. 010170248) Action in Distress (Darpan ID: TS/2021/0279097 – FCRA No. 010230131) Janavikas (Darpan ID: AP/2020/0256040 – FCRA No. 010340029) Janavikas Samastha (Darpan ID: AP/2018/0219228 – FCRA No. 010120093) Key Allegations Religious Conversions & Anti-Hindu Remarks (2021): During a controversy in Kakinada, Praveen faced allegations of conducting conversions. A viral video showed him boasting about destroying Hindu temples.Following this, CID and other agencies placed Sylom NGO under surveillance. Purchase & Misuse of NGOs: To escape scrutiny, Praveen purchased multiple pre-approved FCRA NGOs and replaced their trustees with his own benami individuals. Example: Action in Distress (purchased in 2021) had its original trustees are replaced by his Benamis, who are used for diversion of funds. Foreign Funding Misuse: Since then, he has systematically diverted foreign donations through these NGOs, fabricating social welfare projects while using the funds for religious conversions and personal luxury. Recent posts on social media confirm that foreign donors have been visiting India under the direct hosting of Praveen Chakravarty, which clearly indicates ongoing foreign funding activity and possible misuse under FCRA provisions. (Link attached) Role of Family Members: While Praveen runs KTC school, His sister Sowmya Sumalatha runs New Mother Teresa School.Tribal children are presented as “orphans” to foreign donors for sponsorship funds, while simultaneously collecting fees from parents — creating unaccounted black money. (Link attached) Pattern Similar to Previous Cases: This modus operandi closely resembles the 2020 case where Gospel for Tribals Social Service, after FCRA violations, rebranded itself as Grace Service Society. The pattern is strikingly similar to the ongoing issues you have already flagged regarding Rural Development Trust, Rayalaseema Development Trust, Accion Fraternal Trust, and Woman’s Development Trust, where suspected benami dealings, systematic FCRA violations, and financial irregularities were highlighted, demanding an ED probe. Praveen Chakravarty’s case appears to be another large-scale, organized misuse of FCRA in Andhra Pradesh. Why This Matters Large-scale money laundering and black money generation. Exploitation of tribal children under the guise of education and welfare. Religious conversions disguised as social work. Systematic misuse of FCRA approvals by acquiring multiple NGOs. Request Legal Rights Protection Forum to: Highlight this matter for public awareness. Urge the Enforcement Directorate (ED) and MHA (FCRA Division) to launch a probe into Praveen Chakravarty and the above-mentioned NGOs. Connect this with similar precedents (e.g., Gospel for Tribals Social Service case) to show the ongoing pattern of FCRA misuse in Andhra Pradesh. We believe your intervention will help expose these violations and safeguard both national security and the rights of vulnerable Hindu communities. Sincerely, Anonymous Well-wisher
1:02

Dear ED NIA India गृहमंत्री कार्यालय, HMO India I am writing to bring to your urgent attention about serious financial irregularities, suspected benami dealings, and systematic FCRA violations involving Sodadasi Praveen Chakravarty and his network of linked NGOs and firms in Andhra Pradesh. The following FCRA-registered associations are under his control: Sylom Blind Centre (Darpan ID: AP/2017/0157272 – FCRA No. 010170248) Action in Distress (Darpan ID: TS/2021/0279097 – FCRA No. 010230131) Janavikas (Darpan ID: AP/2020/0256040 – FCRA No. 010340029) Janavikas Samastha (Darpan ID: AP/2018/0219228 – FCRA No. 010120093) Key Allegations Religious Conversions & Anti-Hindu Remarks (2021): During a controversy in Kakinada, Praveen faced allegations of conducting conversions. A viral video showed him boasting about destroying Hindu temples.Following this, CID and other agencies placed Sylom NGO under surveillance. Purchase & Misuse of NGOs: To escape scrutiny, Praveen purchased multiple pre-approved FCRA NGOs and replaced their trustees with his own benami individuals. Example: Action in Distress (purchased in 2021) had its original trustees are replaced by his Benamis, who are used for diversion of funds. Foreign Funding Misuse: Since then, he has systematically diverted foreign donations through these NGOs, fabricating social welfare projects while using the funds for religious conversions and personal luxury. Recent posts on social media confirm that foreign donors have been visiting India under the direct hosting of Praveen Chakravarty, which clearly indicates ongoing foreign funding activity and possible misuse under FCRA provisions. (Link attached) Role of Family Members: While Praveen runs KTC school, His sister Sowmya Sumalatha runs New Mother Teresa School.Tribal children are presented as “orphans” to foreign donors for sponsorship funds, while simultaneously collecting fees from parents — creating unaccounted black money. (Link attached) Pattern Similar to Previous Cases: This modus operandi closely resembles the 2020 case where Gospel for Tribals Social Service, after FCRA violations, rebranded itself as Grace Service Society. The pattern is strikingly similar to the ongoing issues you have already flagged regarding Rural Development Trust, Rayalaseema Development Trust, Accion Fraternal Trust, and Woman’s Development Trust, where suspected benami dealings, systematic FCRA violations, and financial irregularities were highlighted, demanding an ED probe. Praveen Chakravarty’s case appears to be another large-scale, organized misuse of FCRA in Andhra Pradesh. Why This Matters Large-scale money laundering and black money generation. Exploitation of tribal children under the guise of education and welfare. Religious conversions disguised as social work. Systematic misuse of FCRA approvals by acquiring multiple NGOs. Request Legal Rights Protection Forum to: Highlight this matter for public awareness. Urge the Enforcement Directorate (ED) and MHA (FCRA Division) to launch a probe into Praveen Chakravarty and the above-mentioned NGOs. Connect this with similar precedents (e.g., Gospel for Tribals Social Service case) to show the ongoing pattern of FCRA misuse in Andhra Pradesh. We believe your intervention will help expose these violations and safeguard both national security and the rights of vulnerable Hindu communities. Sincerely, Anonymous Well-wisher

Tathvam-asi

13,045 просмотров • 11 месяцев назад

When you know American funded NGOs were stopping nuclear plants, changing election narratives and funding religious conversions until India passed one law to track the money, the outrage from Washington suddenly makes complete sense. India did not ban foreign funding. It simply asked two questions. Who is sending the money and where is it going. That is all. Two questions. And the reaction from American lawmakers and Christian advocacy groups has been explosive enough to send the US Ambassador rushing to Amit Shah's office straight off an international flight. Ask yourself why those two questions are so threatening. The pattern that intelligence reports flagged over years was consistent. Foreign money flows in through NGO structures. Agendas flow out through activism, narratives and on-the-ground operations. The Kudankulam Nuclear Power Plant protests, one of India's most strategically critical energy projects, faced sustained opposition funded through networks that traced back to foreign sources. Election narratives were being shaped through civil society organisations whose actual funders sat in offices thousands of kilometres away. And in tribal and economically vulnerable regions, significant foreign money was being directed toward systematic religious conversion campaigns that security agencies assessed as a deliberate demographic strategy rather than genuine humanitarian work. The FCRA was not a new idea. India first passed it in 1976. The 2026 amendments simply tightened what was already there. Assets of NGOs with cancelled licences now come under direct government oversight. Foreign funds must be spent within defined time windows to prevent money laundering and election interference. The accountability mechanisms that any sovereign nation should have over foreign influence operations inside its borders. None of this stops a single rupee of genuine charitable work from happening. It stops money from arriving without accountability and being deployed against India's own strategic and democratic interests. The countries that are furious about this are not furious about charity being disrupted. Genuine charity does not require opacity. Genuine humanitarian work does not resist transparency about who funds it and how it is spent. The fury is about something else entirely. And India just made that something else impossible to hide.
1:46

When you know American funded NGOs were stopping nuclear plants, changing election narratives and funding religious conversions until India passed one law to track the money, the outrage from Washington suddenly makes complete sense. India did not ban foreign funding. It simply asked two questions. Who is sending the money and where is it going. That is all. Two questions. And the reaction from American lawmakers and Christian advocacy groups has been explosive enough to send the US Ambassador rushing to Amit Shah's office straight off an international flight. Ask yourself why those two questions are so threatening. The pattern that intelligence reports flagged over years was consistent. Foreign money flows in through NGO structures. Agendas flow out through activism, narratives and on-the-ground operations. The Kudankulam Nuclear Power Plant protests, one of India's most strategically critical energy projects, faced sustained opposition funded through networks that traced back to foreign sources. Election narratives were being shaped through civil society organisations whose actual funders sat in offices thousands of kilometres away. And in tribal and economically vulnerable regions, significant foreign money was being directed toward systematic religious conversion campaigns that security agencies assessed as a deliberate demographic strategy rather than genuine humanitarian work. The FCRA was not a new idea. India first passed it in 1976. The 2026 amendments simply tightened what was already there. Assets of NGOs with cancelled licences now come under direct government oversight. Foreign funds must be spent within defined time windows to prevent money laundering and election interference. The accountability mechanisms that any sovereign nation should have over foreign influence operations inside its borders. None of this stops a single rupee of genuine charitable work from happening. It stops money from arriving without accountability and being deployed against India's own strategic and democratic interests. The countries that are furious about this are not furious about charity being disrupted. Genuine charity does not require opacity. Genuine humanitarian work does not resist transparency about who funds it and how it is spent. The fury is about something else entirely. And India just made that something else impossible to hide.

Karan Datta 🇮🇳

26,618 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Today One Nation will introduce our foreign fighters bill to the Australian Parliament. The first duty of government is to keep Australians safe. Labor has failed that test. Foreign terrorist fighters and ISIS-linked individuals should not be waved back into our country while Australians are kept in the dark about secret meetings, quiet understandings and backroom discussions. If the law is too weak to protect the public, then the answer is simple: change the law. That is why One Nation is introducing legislation to put community safety and national security first. Our Bill creates a new foreign terrorist fighter exclusion order, strengthens bail laws so dangerous individuals are not casually released into the community, gives the Minister stronger passport powers, and makes it an offence to facilitate the return of a foreign terrorist fighter without written ministerial permission. Labor and the Greens can hide behind excuses. I won’t. ISIS committed atrocities that shocked the world, and those who joined, aided or celebrated that barbarity should face every possible barrier before they ever come near Australia again. One Nation will not apologise for using every lawful tool available to protect Australian families. The safety of our people must come first.
4:57

Today One Nation will introduce our foreign fighters bill to the Australian Parliament. The first duty of government is to keep Australians safe. Labor has failed that test. Foreign terrorist fighters and ISIS-linked individuals should not be waved back into our country while Australians are kept in the dark about secret meetings, quiet understandings and backroom discussions. If the law is too weak to protect the public, then the answer is simple: change the law. That is why One Nation is introducing legislation to put community safety and national security first. Our Bill creates a new foreign terrorist fighter exclusion order, strengthens bail laws so dangerous individuals are not casually released into the community, gives the Minister stronger passport powers, and makes it an offence to facilitate the return of a foreign terrorist fighter without written ministerial permission. Labor and the Greens can hide behind excuses. I won’t. ISIS committed atrocities that shocked the world, and those who joined, aided or celebrated that barbarity should face every possible barrier before they ever come near Australia again. One Nation will not apologise for using every lawful tool available to protect Australian families. The safety of our people must come first.

Pauline Hanson 🇦🇺

22,436 просмотров • 29 дней назад

Dear Anuja Dhakras Sahil Joshi People of this country aren’t blind. They can see the difference between both the protests. One was inorganic, abusive, violent and didn’t have NEET students at all. Jantar Mantar was politically motivated and foreign funded. Another one is absolutely organic, isn’t abusive, peaceful and has the concerned students appearing for competitive exams. Jharkhand is neither politically motivated nor foreign funded. There are no anti national slogans raised in Jharkhand.. No dirty abuses hurled towards PM Narendra Modi Ji and Amit Shah Ji. No demand of resignation. Only demand is solution, reforms and accountability. I don’t know what narrative you guys are trying to set or trying to normalise violence, abuses and encourage anti social elements.. People of this country are smarter than you guys think. So calm down..
3:55

Dear Anuja Dhakras Sahil Joshi People of this country aren’t blind. They can see the difference between both the protests. One was inorganic, abusive, violent and didn’t have NEET students at all. Jantar Mantar was politically motivated and foreign funded. Another one is absolutely organic, isn’t abusive, peaceful and has the concerned students appearing for competitive exams. Jharkhand is neither politically motivated nor foreign funded. There are no anti national slogans raised in Jharkhand.. No dirty abuses hurled towards PM Narendra Modi Ji and Amit Shah Ji. No demand of resignation. Only demand is solution, reforms and accountability. I don’t know what narrative you guys are trying to set or trying to normalise violence, abuses and encourage anti social elements.. People of this country are smarter than you guys think. So calm down..

Sunaina Holey

26,067 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Carney wants sweeping powers over your phone while using a foreign one himself 🇨🇦 Sheila Gunn Reid According to the Wall Street Journal, Carney has continued using a British cellphone while speaking with foreign leaders. Prime Minister Mark Carney wants sweeping new powers over Canada's telecommunications system. But according to a recent Wall Street Journal report, when it comes to his own communications, he's reportedly relying on a U.K.-based cellphone to communicate with foreign leaders. If true, the irony is impossible to ignore. The Carney government is pushing Bill C-22, legislation that would significantly expand Ottawa's authority over Canada's telecommunications sector in the name of national security. The bill would give the federal government broad powers to issue security orders to telecommunications companies, require providers to comply with government directives, and increase federal oversight of Canada's communications infrastructure. Canadians are being told these extraordinary powers are necessary because secure communications matter. Apparently, that principle may not apply to the Prime Minister himself. According to the Wall Street Journal, Carney has continued using a British cellphone while speaking with foreign leaders. If that reporting is accurate, Canadians deserve answers. The issue isn't simply where the phone was purchased; it's about whether the Prime Minister is following the same security, transparency, and record-keeping standards imposed on everyone else in government, and now on the public. Among the questions that should be answered: ➢ Communications security: Was the device approved for sensitive government communications under standards established by the Communications Security Establishment (CSE) and Treasury Board? ➢ Government records: Were official calls, text messages and other communications retained in accordance with the Library and Archives of Canada Act and federal information management policies? ➢ Access to Information: If government business was conducted using a foreign device or foreign telecommunications provider, are those records preserved in a manner that complies with the Access to Information Act, or could they be more difficult for Canadians to obtain? ➢ Government device policies: Was the phone issued, managed and secured by the Government of Canada, or was it a personal device used for official business? Foreign jurisdiction: Were official communications routed or stored through infrastructure subject to U.K. law, and what security assessment was conducted before using that device to communicate with foreign leaders? ➢ Bill C-22: Why is the government demanding unprecedented oversight of Canadian telecommunications providers on national security grounds while the Prime Minister reportedly relies on a foreign telecommunications provider for his own communications? Ottawa insists foreign technology, foreign influence and foreign infrastructure pose national security concerns. Yet the Prime Minister himself reportedly chose a foreign cellphone and foreign carrier while conducting international diplomacy. Rules for thee, but not for me. The contradiction remains glaring: a Prime Minister seeking sweeping new powers over Canadians' communications while reportedly placing his own trust in a foreign telecommunications provider.
4:39

Carney wants sweeping powers over your phone while using a foreign one himself 🇨🇦 Sheila Gunn Reid According to the Wall Street Journal, Carney has continued using a British cellphone while speaking with foreign leaders. Prime Minister Mark Carney wants sweeping new powers over Canada's telecommunications system. But according to a recent Wall Street Journal report, when it comes to his own communications, he's reportedly relying on a U.K.-based cellphone to communicate with foreign leaders. If true, the irony is impossible to ignore. The Carney government is pushing Bill C-22, legislation that would significantly expand Ottawa's authority over Canada's telecommunications sector in the name of national security. The bill would give the federal government broad powers to issue security orders to telecommunications companies, require providers to comply with government directives, and increase federal oversight of Canada's communications infrastructure. Canadians are being told these extraordinary powers are necessary because secure communications matter. Apparently, that principle may not apply to the Prime Minister himself. According to the Wall Street Journal, Carney has continued using a British cellphone while speaking with foreign leaders. If that reporting is accurate, Canadians deserve answers. The issue isn't simply where the phone was purchased; it's about whether the Prime Minister is following the same security, transparency, and record-keeping standards imposed on everyone else in government, and now on the public. Among the questions that should be answered: ➢ Communications security: Was the device approved for sensitive government communications under standards established by the Communications Security Establishment (CSE) and Treasury Board? ➢ Government records: Were official calls, text messages and other communications retained in accordance with the Library and Archives of Canada Act and federal information management policies? ➢ Access to Information: If government business was conducted using a foreign device or foreign telecommunications provider, are those records preserved in a manner that complies with the Access to Information Act, or could they be more difficult for Canadians to obtain? ➢ Government device policies: Was the phone issued, managed and secured by the Government of Canada, or was it a personal device used for official business? Foreign jurisdiction: Were official communications routed or stored through infrastructure subject to U.K. law, and what security assessment was conducted before using that device to communicate with foreign leaders? ➢ Bill C-22: Why is the government demanding unprecedented oversight of Canadian telecommunications providers on national security grounds while the Prime Minister reportedly relies on a foreign telecommunications provider for his own communications? Ottawa insists foreign technology, foreign influence and foreign infrastructure pose national security concerns. Yet the Prime Minister himself reportedly chose a foreign cellphone and foreign carrier while conducting international diplomacy. Rules for thee, but not for me. The contradiction remains glaring: a Prime Minister seeking sweeping new powers over Canadians' communications while reportedly placing his own trust in a foreign telecommunications provider.

Rebel News

60,436 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

President Donald Trump asked Congress on Tuesday to take back $9.4 billion in federal funding for foreign aid, the State Department and public media. The rescission request would codify the work of the Department of Government Efficiency, which sought to shutter the U.S. Agency for International Development, eliminate foreign aid programs it deemed wasteful and cease funding for other international institutions. The rescission request would affect USAID and the PEPFAR program for HIV/AIDS relief, among other programs. It also includes almost $1.1 billion in funds that were previously approved by Congress to support the Corporation for Public Broadcasting (CPB). CPB distributes funds to NPR and PBS local stations, which combine federal money and their own fundraising efforts to support the public media networks. CPB funding is typically approved two years in advance to discourage political influence over the budgeting process. Congress now has 45 days to act on the request. The move is the Trump administration's latest effort to defund PBS and NPR. Last month, Trump issued an executive order to end federal funding for both organizations, accusing them of bias and arguing they should not be supported by taxpayer dollars. PBS and NPR have filed separate lawsuits against the executive order, citing First Amendment violations. Both the House and Senate need to approve the request for the funding to be rescinded. If either chamber denies or ignores the request, the Trump administration will be legally required to release the money. Lisa Desjardins takes a closer look at what's in the request.
2:07

President Donald Trump asked Congress on Tuesday to take back $9.4 billion in federal funding for foreign aid, the State Department and public media. The rescission request would codify the work of the Department of Government Efficiency, which sought to shutter the U.S. Agency for International Development, eliminate foreign aid programs it deemed wasteful and cease funding for other international institutions. The rescission request would affect USAID and the PEPFAR program for HIV/AIDS relief, among other programs. It also includes almost $1.1 billion in funds that were previously approved by Congress to support the Corporation for Public Broadcasting (CPB). CPB distributes funds to NPR and PBS local stations, which combine federal money and their own fundraising efforts to support the public media networks. CPB funding is typically approved two years in advance to discourage political influence over the budgeting process. Congress now has 45 days to act on the request. The move is the Trump administration's latest effort to defund PBS and NPR. Last month, Trump issued an executive order to end federal funding for both organizations, accusing them of bias and arguing they should not be supported by taxpayer dollars. PBS and NPR have filed separate lawsuits against the executive order, citing First Amendment violations. Both the House and Senate need to approve the request for the funding to be rescinded. If either chamber denies or ignores the request, the Trump administration will be legally required to release the money. Lisa Desjardins takes a closer look at what's in the request.

PBS News

52,594 просмотров • 1 год назад

"Foreign Embassies Will Fund "Cultural Events" - But Never Science And Research" - Ibrahim Traoré On October 22, 2025, Burkina Faso President Ibrahim Traoré chaired the opening ceremony of the 15th edition of the National Forum for Scientific Research and Technological Innovations (FRSIT) in Ouagadougou. While delivering the opening address, Traoré took a moment to address young people in Burkina Faso, urging them to use social media and internet access to gain knowledge and skills to better their situation, rather than waste the opportunity by fixating solely on entertainment, which he termed a "distraction." Traoré stated that there are foreign interests who would prefer that young people in Burkina Faso remain permanently distracted and over-entertained. He further pointed out that this can even be proven by examining the disparity between foreign funding that is available for "Culture and Entertainment" activities in Burkina Faso, versus that which is available to fund local research and development. Do you have a similar situation in your African country?
2:52

"Foreign Embassies Will Fund "Cultural Events" - But Never Science And Research" - Ibrahim Traoré On October 22, 2025, Burkina Faso President Ibrahim Traoré chaired the opening ceremony of the 15th edition of the National Forum for Scientific Research and Technological Innovations (FRSIT) in Ouagadougou. While delivering the opening address, Traoré took a moment to address young people in Burkina Faso, urging them to use social media and internet access to gain knowledge and skills to better their situation, rather than waste the opportunity by fixating solely on entertainment, which he termed a "distraction." Traoré stated that there are foreign interests who would prefer that young people in Burkina Faso remain permanently distracted and over-entertained. He further pointed out that this can even be proven by examining the disparity between foreign funding that is available for "Culture and Entertainment" activities in Burkina Faso, versus that which is available to fund local research and development. Do you have a similar situation in your African country?

The Spearhead

549,503 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад

🇺🇸🇮🇱 MTG says every president makes a "deal" to support Israel in order to be allowed power: "You can go president by president and look at their decisions, and you can very quickly see they made their deal to support Israel at all times. Why does the United States do that for one foreign country? We don't do it for any other." This is the conversation the Iran war unlocked. AIPAC's funding receipts are public record. The question she's raising is structural, not antisemitic. Why does one foreign country get a level of loyalty from every American president that no other ally receives? Marjorie Taylor Greene 🇺🇸 TCN
1:35

🇺🇸🇮🇱 MTG says every president makes a "deal" to support Israel in order to be allowed power: "You can go president by president and look at their decisions, and you can very quickly see they made their deal to support Israel at all times. Why does the United States do that for one foreign country? We don't do it for any other." This is the conversation the Iran war unlocked. AIPAC's funding receipts are public record. The question she's raising is structural, not antisemitic. Why does one foreign country get a level of loyalty from every American president that no other ally receives? Marjorie Taylor Greene 🇺🇸 TCN

Mario Nawfal

92,047 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

President Trump stated there are only two genders. Watch the person in charge of Georgia’s richest NGO struggle to answer the same question, now that the president of her NGO’s biggest donor country changed the position. I am sure she ‘knew’ the certain answer before but not any more. This miserable situation reveals two fundamental things: First, the foreign-funded NGOs have no values or positions of their own, let alone the societal values that they vow to represent. They are ready to adapt to any donor agenda, even if it requires their cardinal volte-face. Second, through many years of lavish foreign funding, a cohort of politically organized lobbyists of foreign interests formed, which suppressed and eventually replaced the genuine civil society. Now, instead of being a social force that glues the society together, some richly funded NGOs “serve to destabilize world peace by promoting ideas in foreign countries that are directly inverse to harmonious and stable relations internal to and among countries,” as stated in the U.S. President’s executive order on ‘Reevaluating and Realigning United States Foreign Aid.’ There are encouraging signs that the new U.S. Administration tires to face the challenge and to turn the pseudo-aid into an extended hand of mutual friendship.
0:39

President Trump stated there are only two genders. Watch the person in charge of Georgia’s richest NGO struggle to answer the same question, now that the president of her NGO’s biggest donor country changed the position. I am sure she ‘knew’ the certain answer before but not any more. This miserable situation reveals two fundamental things: First, the foreign-funded NGOs have no values or positions of their own, let alone the societal values that they vow to represent. They are ready to adapt to any donor agenda, even if it requires their cardinal volte-face. Second, through many years of lavish foreign funding, a cohort of politically organized lobbyists of foreign interests formed, which suppressed and eventually replaced the genuine civil society. Now, instead of being a social force that glues the society together, some richly funded NGOs “serve to destabilize world peace by promoting ideas in foreign countries that are directly inverse to harmonious and stable relations internal to and among countries,” as stated in the U.S. President’s executive order on ‘Reevaluating and Realigning United States Foreign Aid.’ There are encouraging signs that the new U.S. Administration tires to face the challenge and to turn the pseudo-aid into an extended hand of mutual friendship.

Shalva Papuashvili 🇬🇪

35,777 просмотров • 1 год назад

🚨 BREAKING: BIRTHRIGHT CITIZENSHIP IS ABOUT TO END! 🔥 Senator Bernie Moreno (R-OH) is charging forward with the Immigration Stabilization Act of 2026 — a powerful revival of Democrat Sen. Harry Reid’s own 1993 bill — that will FINALLY SLAM THE DOOR on automatic citizenship for children born here to mothers who are here ILLEGALLY or still under foreign jurisdiction! No more anchor babies. No more gaming the system. The bill makes it crystal clear: “Birthright citizenship does NOT apply to children born in the U.S. to mothers who are neither citizens nor lawful residents and remain subject to a foreign country’s jurisdiction.” This is COMMON SENSE finally becoming LAW. America First! 🇺🇸 Pass it NOW! RT if you want this passed immediately! #EndBirthrightCitizenship #SecureTheBorder #ImmigrationReform
1:46

🚨 BREAKING: BIRTHRIGHT CITIZENSHIP IS ABOUT TO END! 🔥 Senator Bernie Moreno (R-OH) is charging forward with the Immigration Stabilization Act of 2026 — a powerful revival of Democrat Sen. Harry Reid’s own 1993 bill — that will FINALLY SLAM THE DOOR on automatic citizenship for children born here to mothers who are here ILLEGALLY or still under foreign jurisdiction! No more anchor babies. No more gaming the system. The bill makes it crystal clear: “Birthright citizenship does NOT apply to children born in the U.S. to mothers who are neither citizens nor lawful residents and remain subject to a foreign country’s jurisdiction.” This is COMMON SENSE finally becoming LAW. America First! 🇺🇸 Pass it NOW! RT if you want this passed immediately! #EndBirthrightCitizenship #SecureTheBorder #ImmigrationReform

CONSTITUTION X 🇺🇸

99,577 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

⭕️Today 22 April 2025, Approximately 19:30 While standing near a pro-Palestinian gathering in London, I was peacefully observing and listening to the speakers. A woman, visible in the attached image, asked her companion whether I was Iranian. She then stated her intention to photograph me and send the image to the Iranian embassy. Subsequently, as captured in the video evidence, she spat at me, an act that I perceive as both an insult and an assault based on my nationality. The police intervened and arrested her. Under the UK’s National Security Act 2023, the Foreign Influence Registration Scheme (FIRS) mandates that individuals acting under the direction of a foreign power—such as the Islamic Republic of Iran—must register their activities with the Home Office. Failure to do so constitutes a criminal offence, punishable by up to five years’ imprisonment. This scheme aims to increase transparency and protect UK democracy from covert foreign influence. Given that Iran has been designated under the enhanced tier of FIRS due to its aggressive activities against UK-based individuals, any person collaborating with Iranian authorities, including embassies, is required to register their activities. The incident raises serious concerns about the safety of individuals of Iranian descent residing in the UK. The woman’s threat to report me to the Iranian embassy, coupled with her physical aggression, suggests potential coordination with foreign entities. If she is acting on behalf of the Iranian government without proper registration, this could be a violation of UK law. It is imperative for UK authorities to investigate whether she has registered under FIRS. This will determine if her actions constitute a breach of national security regulations. This incident underscores the importance of enforcing FIRS to safeguard individuals from covert foreign influence and intimidation. Ensuring that all individuals acting on behalf of foreign powers are properly registered is crucial for maintaining public safety and upholding the integrity of UK laws. Metropolitan Police
1:38

⭕️Today 22 April 2025, Approximately 19:30 While standing near a pro-Palestinian gathering in London, I was peacefully observing and listening to the speakers. A woman, visible in the attached image, asked her companion whether I was Iranian. She then stated her intention to photograph me and send the image to the Iranian embassy. Subsequently, as captured in the video evidence, she spat at me, an act that I perceive as both an insult and an assault based on my nationality. The police intervened and arrested her. Under the UK’s National Security Act 2023, the Foreign Influence Registration Scheme (FIRS) mandates that individuals acting under the direction of a foreign power—such as the Islamic Republic of Iran—must register their activities with the Home Office. Failure to do so constitutes a criminal offence, punishable by up to five years’ imprisonment. This scheme aims to increase transparency and protect UK democracy from covert foreign influence. Given that Iran has been designated under the enhanced tier of FIRS due to its aggressive activities against UK-based individuals, any person collaborating with Iranian authorities, including embassies, is required to register their activities. The incident raises serious concerns about the safety of individuals of Iranian descent residing in the UK. The woman’s threat to report me to the Iranian embassy, coupled with her physical aggression, suggests potential coordination with foreign entities. If she is acting on behalf of the Iranian government without proper registration, this could be a violation of UK law. It is imperative for UK authorities to investigate whether she has registered under FIRS. This will determine if her actions constitute a breach of national security regulations. This incident underscores the importance of enforcing FIRS to safeguard individuals from covert foreign influence and intimidation. Ensuring that all individuals acting on behalf of foreign powers are properly registered is crucial for maintaining public safety and upholding the integrity of UK laws. Metropolitan Police

Niyak Ghorbani (نیاک)

78,626 просмотров • 1 год назад

🚨ROASTED. Alex Jones just NUKED Ben Shapiro on live air after Shapiro accused him of being on a foreign payroll. JONES: "You're the one on the ISRAELI payroll." "Salem Radio that he's on, all that stuff, literally run by the Israeli government, funded directly by it." Then Jones flipped the accusation entirely. "YOU are the agent of foreign groups. Not me." "You don't point your finger at 100% Americana, bonafide, real McCoy, and tell me I work for the Russians, the Chinese, or the fucking Muslims." And then came the part that will have neocons and zionists foaming at the mouth: "It is Israel funding al-Qaeda, ISIS, and Hamas. And I've been exposing that for 30 years." "So you take your little Mossad ass, Shapiro, and you look in the mirror." "You want to see a traitor, you little beady-eyed rat?" The professional warmonger who has spent two decades supporting every foreign war that got Christian American kids killed should get deported rather than lecturing people on patriotism. It's about time to self-deport, Ben Shapiro!
1:31

🚨ROASTED. Alex Jones just NUKED Ben Shapiro on live air after Shapiro accused him of being on a foreign payroll. JONES: "You're the one on the ISRAELI payroll." "Salem Radio that he's on, all that stuff, literally run by the Israeli government, funded directly by it." Then Jones flipped the accusation entirely. "YOU are the agent of foreign groups. Not me." "You don't point your finger at 100% Americana, bonafide, real McCoy, and tell me I work for the Russians, the Chinese, or the fucking Muslims." And then came the part that will have neocons and zionists foaming at the mouth: "It is Israel funding al-Qaeda, ISIS, and Hamas. And I've been exposing that for 30 years." "So you take your little Mossad ass, Shapiro, and you look in the mirror." "You want to see a traitor, you little beady-eyed rat?" The professional warmonger who has spent two decades supporting every foreign war that got Christian American kids killed should get deported rather than lecturing people on patriotism. It's about time to self-deport, Ben Shapiro!

Dr. Simon

136,417 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

James, I don’t think people fully grasp the scale of what’s unfolding. It is a national security threat, especially with elections approaching. In this clip, Elijah Schaeffer openly admits he was approached by RT (Russia Today) twice to distribute disinformation inside the US. This isn’t isolated. Thousands of influencers and alt-media figures have received similar offers, with large payouts to seed and circulate Russian state-aligned narratives through podcasts, tweets, videos, and livestreams. That content is then strategically amplified by coordinated bot networks and signal-boosted by adjacent influencers here on X. They retweet each other in closed loops, creating a false-consensus echo chamber that simulates mass legitimacy. An alternate reality. It's a cognitive warfare operation being run by a hostile foreign actor (Russia) The DOJ and FBI need to act. Investigate these actors for foreign malign influence, FARA violations, and opaque funding flows including crypto transactions. If they are taking direction or money from foreign sources to shape US public opinion, they are functioning as undeclared foreign agents and need to be held accountable. They need to reopen the Global Engagement Center (GEC) and the Foreign Malign Influence Center (FMIC) and staff them with the right people to manage these threats. National Security Division, U.S. Dept of Justice Rep. Don Bacon 🇺🇸✈️🏍️⭐️🎖️ FBI Director Kash Patel Attorney General Pamela Bondi
5:05

James, I don’t think people fully grasp the scale of what’s unfolding. It is a national security threat, especially with elections approaching. In this clip, Elijah Schaeffer openly admits he was approached by RT (Russia Today) twice to distribute disinformation inside the US. This isn’t isolated. Thousands of influencers and alt-media figures have received similar offers, with large payouts to seed and circulate Russian state-aligned narratives through podcasts, tweets, videos, and livestreams. That content is then strategically amplified by coordinated bot networks and signal-boosted by adjacent influencers here on X. They retweet each other in closed loops, creating a false-consensus echo chamber that simulates mass legitimacy. An alternate reality. It's a cognitive warfare operation being run by a hostile foreign actor (Russia) The DOJ and FBI need to act. Investigate these actors for foreign malign influence, FARA violations, and opaque funding flows including crypto transactions. If they are taking direction or money from foreign sources to shape US public opinion, they are functioning as undeclared foreign agents and need to be held accountable. They need to reopen the Global Engagement Center (GEC) and the Foreign Malign Influence Center (FMIC) and staff them with the right people to manage these threats. National Security Division, U.S. Dept of Justice Rep. Don Bacon 🇺🇸✈️🏍️⭐️🎖️ FBI Director Kash Patel Attorney General Pamela Bondi

Restitutor

103,043 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад