ะ—ะฐะณั€ัƒะทะบะฐ ะฒะธะดะตะพ...

ะะต ัƒะดะฐะปะพััŒ ะทะฐะณั€ัƒะทะธั‚ัŒ ะฒะธะดะตะพ

ะะฐ ะณะปะฐะฒะฝัƒัŽ

๐Ÿ”ด๐Ÿ”ต๐Ÿšจ๐‘๐„๐Œ๐ˆ๐๐ƒ๐„๐‘: ๐๐€๐‘๐‚๐„๐‹๐Ž๐๐€ ๐€๐‘๐„ ๐’๐“๐ˆ๐‹๐‹ ๐‹๐„๐€๐ƒ๐ˆ๐๐† ๐‘๐€๐‚๐„ ๐“๐Ž ๐’๐ˆ๐†๐ ๐‰๐„๐’๐’๐„ ๐๐ˆ๐’๐’๐ˆ๐–๐”(18)๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿฅถ! Bissiwu is Right Footed LW Came From Injury Played Vs Atletico U19(26 mins) 1 Goal๐Ÿคฏ All I See Is Left Winger Yamal๐Ÿ˜ฎโ€๐Ÿ’จ

The_Stat_Guy_10's profile picture

The Stat Guy

16,554 subscribers

55,182 ะฟั€ะพัะผะพั‚ั€ะพะฒ โ€ข 4 ะผะตััั†ะตะฒ ะฝะฐะทะฐะด โ€ขvia X (Twitter)

ะšะพะผะผะตะฝั‚ะฐั€ะธะธ: 0

ะะตั‚ ะดะพัั‚ัƒะฟะฝั‹ั… ะบะพะผะผะตะฝั‚ะฐั€ะธะตะฒ

ะ—ะดะตััŒ ะฟะพัะฒัั‚ัั ะบะพะผะผะตะฝั‚ะฐั€ะธะธ ะธะท ะพั€ะธะณะธะฝะฐะปัŒะฝะพะณะพ ะฟะพัั‚ะฐ

ะŸะพั…ะพะถะธะต ะฒะธะดะตะพ

โ€ผ๏ธ๐Ÿšจ๐Ÿ”ตPRESSER๐Ÿ”ต๐Ÿšจโ€ผ๏ธ ๐ŸŽ™ Enzo Marescaโ€™s Full Pre-AFC Bournemouth Press Conference โ€“ Part 1/2 ๐Ÿ”น Enzo Maresca on the team news: โ€œJust Moi is suspended ๐ŸŸฅ and then we donโ€™t have any new injuries.โ€ ๐Ÿ‘๐Ÿฝ ๐Ÿ”น Enzo Maresca on Lavia latest: โ€œItโ€™s a muscle problem ๐Ÿง โš ๏ธ. We donโ€™t know yet when he can be back. We donโ€™t know whether itโ€™s long or short term.โ€ ๐Ÿคท๐Ÿฝโ€โ™‚๏ธ ๐Ÿ”น Enzo Maresca on reaction from Leeds defeat: โ€œSince the end of the game, I didnโ€™t see the players because we came back from Leeds yesterday afternoon ๐Ÿš. I will see the players soon and we will have time to focus on tomorrowโ€™s game.โ€ ๐ŸŽฏ ๐Ÿ”น Enzo Maresca on Leeds: โ€œI didnโ€™t see the players yesterday but I watched the game back ๐ŸŽฅ. We did many things bad. Probably we also paid the price of playing with 10 men against Arsenal for an hour ๐Ÿ”ด๐Ÿ˜ฎโ€๐Ÿ’จ. Leeds away can be more complicated in some ways than other games.โ€ โš”๏ธ ๐Ÿ”น Enzo Maresca on rotation criticism: โ€œMost of the rotation we do is because the other ones cannot play. We have players in this moment that are not able to play every three days.โ€ ๐Ÿ”„โš ๏ธ ๐Ÿ”น Enzo Maresca on lack of leadership in the squad: โ€œItโ€™s not that. I love the young squad, I love the young players and the squad I have.โ€ ๐Ÿ’™โœจ ๐Ÿ”น Enzo Maresca on Acheampong regret: โ€œOne of the regrets I have after the game is that I didnโ€™t play with Josh. The reason why we played with Trevoh, Benoit and Tosin was because we saw long balls to their strikers, but even that, we lost most of them.โ€ ๐Ÿ˜“๐Ÿ“‰ #CFC | #Chelsea | #BOUCHE | #Interviews ๐Ÿ“ฒ Chelsea FC Updates

Miki Djan

23,432 ะฟั€ะพัะผะพั‚ั€ะพะฒ โ€ข 7 ะผะตััั†ะตะฒ ะฝะฐะทะฐะด

โ€ผ๏ธ๐Ÿšจ๐Ÿ”ตPRESSER๐Ÿ”ต๐Ÿšจโ€ผ๏ธ ๐ŸŽ™ Enzo Maresca's Full Pre-Barcelona Press Conference โ€“ Part 1/2 ๐Ÿ”น Enzo Maresca on Cole Palmer's boot: "Yes, yes. We don't know when but for sure he will be back soon. He is already on the pitch, touching the ball โšฝ and the feeling is good ๐Ÿ‘๐Ÿฝ." ๐Ÿ”น Enzo Maresca on Cole Palmer: "We are here [talking] for tomorrow's game. After that, we will start to think about Arsenal. I don't think so at the moment [that he will be available vs Arsenal]. The last time I spoke with Cole was after the session yesterday to see how he was feeling. But I didn't ask him details about the injury at all." ๐Ÿคท๐Ÿฝโ€โ™‚๏ธ ๐Ÿ”น Enzo Maresca: "It's a big week, as you said, but at the end of this week, we have Leeds away, Bournemouth away, Atalanta away ๐Ÿ›ซโ€” so it's another big week. Every game is three points ๐ŸŽฏ. Barcelona tomorrow and Arsenal on Sunday are important for different reasons but it's important for us to go game by game." ๐Ÿ“† ๐Ÿ”น Enzo Maresca on Fernandez form: "I've always thought he was a great player โญ. At the beginning, he was struggling to understand the role but he is in an important place for us on the field." ๐Ÿ”ต ๐Ÿ”น Enzo Maresca on his goal against Barcelona in Super Cup final win: "As a player it was an important moment. It was the easiest goal of my life ๐Ÿ˜…. We were winning 2-0, the penalty was in the 90th minute and there were six extra minutes. Nice feeling, but it's a completely different thing now. They are an unbelievable team ๐Ÿ’ซ but we will do our best to win the game." ๐Ÿ’ช๐Ÿฝโšฝ ๐Ÿ”น Enzo Maresca on the dream of managing Barcelona: "You know me because you are always in my press conferences, whenever you ask me what is happening in the future, I always talk about how I'm happy to be here." ๐Ÿ˜Š๐Ÿ”ต ๐Ÿ”น Enzo Maresca on Yamal/Estevao comparisons: "Estevao is already playing at a high level. He is starting for Brazil ๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ท. He is very young and for sure he can do many things better. We are very happy with him. It's nice for people who love football to watch Estevao and Lamine Yamal and Pedri โ€” this is the beauty of football โšฝโœจ. We are happy Estevao is with us, and hopefully he is going to do well." ๐Ÿ™๐Ÿฝ๐Ÿ’™ ๐Ÿ”น Enzo Maresca on Lewandowski danger: "For sure he is a fantastic player. He has shown all his life that he does the most important thing in football โ€” score goals โšฝ๐Ÿ”ฅ. We are going to try and defend as a team, be aggressive, like we always defend. But they have so many players; Lamine Yamal, Fermin, Frenkie de Jongโ€ฆ but we are going to try and win the game." ๐Ÿ’ช๐Ÿฝ๐Ÿ”ต #CFC | #Chelsea | #UCL | #Interviews ๐Ÿ“ฒ CFC_ChelseaFC via Telegram ๐Ÿ“น Beanymansports via Youtube

Miki Djan

29,456 ะฟั€ะพัะผะพั‚ั€ะพะฒ โ€ข 7 ะผะตััั†ะตะฒ ะฝะฐะทะฐะด

โ€ผ๏ธ๐Ÿšจ๐Ÿ”ตPRESSER๐Ÿ”ต๐Ÿšจโ€ผ๏ธ ๐ŸŽ™ Enzo Maresca's Full Pre-Arsenal Press Conference โ€“ Part 1/2 ๐Ÿ”น Enzo Maresca: "Cole Palmer is available for both [to start and to play] ๐Ÿ‘๐Ÿฝ. Dario Essugo took part in the session this morning โ€” good news." โœ…๐Ÿ”ต ๐Ÿ”น Enzo Maresca on Estevรฃo form causing a headache: "It's always good that the ones who start and play do the right things. They give me a doubt always for the next games โ€” and that's good. It's a good problem for the manager always." ๐Ÿ˜…๐Ÿ’™ ๐Ÿ”น Enzo Maresca on Arsenal: "For sure, they defend fantastically. Any teams struggle to score goals against them, even to create chances ๐Ÿงฑ. They have weapons when they attack โš”๏ธ. They are top in the Champions League and top in the Premier League." ๐Ÿ”ด๐Ÿ“ˆ ๐Ÿ”น Enzo Maresca on Caicedo vs Rice: "I think the Premier League is full of good players. Moi and Declan, Rodri from City, Anderson from Forest, Guimarรฃes from Newcastle โ€” the Premier League is full of very good midfielders. It's a big part [the battle] but it's 11v11." โš”๏ธโšฝ ๐Ÿ”น Enzo Maresca on title credentials: "It's too early in any case. If we win, don't winโ€ฆ it's too early โณ. We still have five or six months to go. It will be important when we're in February or March โ€” we'll see where we are then." ๐Ÿ“† ๐Ÿ”น Enzo Maresca on how Arsenal challenge differs to Barรงa: "It's another big game. We finished the Barcelona one and we won โ€” it's a good feeling ๐Ÿ”ตโœจ. If it's bigger than the last one, I don't know. For me, they are all important games. For sure, beating Barcelona and if we are able to beat Arsenal, it's a nice feeling โ€” it's three points." ๐ŸŽฏ ๐Ÿ”น Enzo Maresca on feeling in training: "The mindset and mood in this moment, for us, is very good ๐Ÿ˜Š. We are doing quite well in the Premier League and the Champions League. We are evolving and growing ๐Ÿ“ˆ. This is the best feeling for us." ๐Ÿ”น Enzo Maresca on atmosphere at Stamford Bridge: "We need that environment, the fans in the way they were ๐Ÿ”ต๐Ÿ’™. It's always nice to share that type of moment at the end of the game with everyone." ๐Ÿ™Œ๐Ÿฝ๐ŸŸ๏ธ #CFC | #Chelsea | #CHEARS | #Interviews ๐Ÿ“ฒ CFC_ChelseaFC via Telegram ๐Ÿ“ธ Greenturf via Youtube

Miki Djan

26,975 ะฟั€ะพัะผะพั‚ั€ะพะฒ โ€ข 7 ะผะตััั†ะตะฒ ะฝะฐะทะฐะด

โ€ผ๏ธ๐Ÿšจ๐Ÿ”ต PRESSER ๐Ÿ”ต๐Ÿšจโ€ผ๏ธ ๐ŸŽ™ Liam Roseniorโ€™s Full Pre-Arsenal Press Conference ๐ŸŒ€ Liam Rosenior on squad rotation & not having a โ€œbest XIโ€ โš™๏ธ โ€œI canโ€™t speak for other managers in terms of myself. I donโ€™t have a best XI. I never have done in all of the clubs that Iโ€™ve worked with. Why? Because of the demands โ€” the physical demands of the Premier League, Ligue 1 or the Championship now with 46 games. You need a squad, and you need to use the players in the correct way to challenge over the course of the season. Iโ€™ve been here three and a half weeks, Iโ€™m still getting to know the players. I try to pick the right starting team, but I also try to pick a bench that gives us the right finishing team. So far, the substitutes in every game have made a huge impact. Thatโ€™s not just tactical โ€” a big part of that is mentality.โ€ ๐Ÿง ๐Ÿ’ช ๐ŸŒ€ Liam Rosenior on Estevรฃo โค๏ธ โ€œHe is going through a really difficult time for personal reasons. I wonโ€™t put any pressure on him when he returns. It has to be right for him.โ€ ๐ŸŒ€ Liam Rosenior on facing Arsenal โš”๏ธ โ€œThe reality is Arsenal are favourites. Theyโ€™re a goal up and theyโ€™re at home, so theyโ€™ll expect to go through. We need to take it as far and as deep as we can, then hopefully the second half of the tie will be massive in terms of turning it around.โ€ ๐ŸŒ€ Liam Rosenior on Jamie Gittensโ€™ injury ๐Ÿš‘ โ€œJamie unfortunately felt his hamstring. I donโ€™t yet know the extent of the injury. Itโ€™s a real shame because I wanted to give him a start and allow him to show what he can do. Hopefully itโ€™s not too bad.โ€ ๐ŸŒ€ Liam Rosenior on Chelseaโ€™s mentality in big games ๐Ÿ”ฅ โ€œThey can play in big games and they can perform in big games โ€” and it is definitely a big game on Tuesday.โ€ ๐ŸŒ€ Liam Rosenior on focus & preparation ๐ŸงŠ โ€œTalking about what Arsenal or Mikel Arteta have or havenโ€™t done isnโ€™t my concern. My concern is resting and recovering. Itโ€™s another three-game week. Itโ€™s going to be a very physical game on Tuesday, and my job is to prepare the team as best I can.โ€ ๐ŸŒ€ Liam Rosenior on Arsenalโ€™s recent nerves ๐Ÿ˜Œ โ€œWeโ€™ll see. Weโ€™ll see. Weโ€™ll go and play our game.โ€ ๐ŸŒ€ Liam Rosenior on experience within his squad ๐Ÿ† โ€œWhen I look at my players โ€” Enzo Fernandez has won a World Cup, and the group won two trophies last year. They can play in big games, they can perform in big games. Tuesday is definitely a big game.โ€ ๐ŸŒ€ Liam Rosenior on Enzo Fernรกndez ๐Ÿง โšก โ€œHeโ€™s fit. You see him arriving in the box in the 92nd, 93rd minute. Enzo has a rare athleticism โ€” a gift โ€” where he recovers very quickly. His distances covered are top from a data point of view, and the quality and leadership he brings to the team is huge. Iโ€™m really enjoying working with him.โ€ ๐ŸŒ€ Liam Rosenior on Mamadou Sarr ๐Ÿค โ€œI donโ€™t speak about players who are at other clubs. Itโ€™s something Iโ€™ve never done, and I wonโ€™t start today.โ€ ๐ŸŒ€ Liam Rosenior on pressure & proving himself ๐ŸŽฏ โ€œIโ€™ll be really honest โ€” all this talk about proof of whether Iโ€™m right for the job or not, I donโ€™t really care. Iโ€™m here to do the job. If we get to the final, itโ€™s great for Chelsea Football Club. Itโ€™s not about me. Iโ€™ll prove in time whether Iโ€™m worthy or not, but itโ€™s not at the forefront of my mind.โ€

Miki Djan

72,283 ะฟั€ะพัะผะพั‚ั€ะพะฒ โ€ข 5 ะผะตััั†ะตะฒ ะฝะฐะทะฐะด

โ€ผ๏ธ๐Ÿšจ๐Ÿ”ต PRESSER ๐Ÿ”ต๐Ÿšจโ€ผ๏ธ ๐ŸŽ™ Liam Roseniorโ€™s Full Post-Arsenal Press Conference ๐ŸŒ€ Liam Rosenior on the game plan โš™๏ธ โ€œWeโ€™ve had a lot to contend with in the last couple of days โ€” a couple of fitness tests this morning. Our schedule has been incredible, so for the players to put in that energy, fight and spirit was pleasing. We got into the final third, but we didnโ€™t have enough quality moments and didnโ€™t take advantage.โ€ ๐ŸŒ€ Liam Rosenior on James & Neto ๐Ÿš‘ โ€œPedro and Reece both had small knocks and were in too much pain to be involved tonight.โ€ ๐ŸŒ€ Liam Rosenior on Estevรฃo & Cole Palmer ๐Ÿง โค๏ธ โ€œFor Estevรฃo to go through what he has at 18 years old says everything about the character I want in this team. With Cole, we have to take care of him and make sure heโ€™s right for the whole season.โ€ ๐ŸŒ€ Liam Rosenior on the defeat ๐Ÿ˜” โ€œIโ€™m extremely disappointed every time we lose. There were aspects of the game I was happy with, but you could see how devastated the lads were โ€” we genuinely believed we could turn it around. There were moments there for us. Iโ€™m hurting, but we have to move on.โ€ ๐ŸŒ€ Liam Rosenior on how the game unfolded ๐Ÿ”„ โ€œYou can come away from home, press high and go 2โ€“0 down. I brought Cole and Estevรฃo on around 60 minutes and the game opened up. There was a feeling in the stadium that the tie could turn, but it didnโ€™t happen. Their goal ultimately comes when we were throwing the kitchen sink at it.โ€ ๐ŸŒ€ Liam Rosenior on injuries affecting the setup ๐Ÿงฉ โ€œThe availability of your players always affects the system. Against West Ham we ran until the 97th minute trying to come back from 2โ€“0 down, then the emotions from Napoli โ€” all of that has to be taken into account.โ€ ๐ŸŒ€ Liam Rosenior on pundit criticism ๐ŸŽ™๏ธ โ€œIโ€™ve been a pundit โ€” itโ€™s easy in hindsight. If I go and attack the game and press really high, people will ask what Iโ€™m doing.โ€ ๐ŸŒ€ Liam Rosenior on reacting to setbacks ๐Ÿ”ฅ โ€œLosing is not what we wanted. Weโ€™ve played eight games in less than a month since I came in. The learning, spirit, togetherness and fight are there. Now I need to see what we look like after a setback. Weโ€™ve got a difficult game at Wolves and weโ€™ll learn more about ourselves.โ€ ๐ŸŒ€ Liam Rosenior on the overall performance ๐Ÿ‘ โ€œWe canโ€™t talk about how well the game plan went because the result didnโ€™t go our way. But not many teams come here and put in the performance we did tonight.โ€ #CFC | #Chelsea | #CarabaoCup | #Interviews ๐Ÿ“ฒ CFC_ChelseaFC via Telegram ๐ŸŽฅ Beanyman sports via YouTube

Miki Djan

44,375 ะฟั€ะพัะผะพั‚ั€ะพะฒ โ€ข 5 ะผะตััั†ะตะฒ ะฝะฐะทะฐะด

๐ŸšจUPDATE: CLAUDE traced every solana:dog1viwbb2vWDpER5FrJ4YFG6gq6XuyFohUe9TXN65u token that went to the Brand New #1 Wallet (created June 25, 2026). 12.367 BILLION tokens. 23 transactions. 1,100 individual inputs decoded on the Bitcoin blockchain. Here's what we found: The new #1 solana:dog1viwbb2vWDpER5FrJ4YFG6gq6XuyFohUe9TXN65u wallet appeared overnight on June 25/26 with 12.367B tokens - 12.37% of the entire supply - and nobody in the community knew where it came from. We've spent 75 days tracking the #Binance cluster: a confirmed network of 158+ wallets operating across 4 layers of infrastructure that we believe #Binance controls. They've been quietly accumulating solana:dog1viwbb2vWDpER5FrJ4YFG6gq6XuyFohUe9TXN65u over the past two years. So we decoded every transaction that funded the new #1 wallet. Here's the breakdown: ๐Ÿ”ด MM2 (Rank #5, Layer 2) - 47 inputs - 5.6B solana:dog1viwbb2vWDpER5FrJ4YFG6gq6XuyFohUe9TXN65u. #Binance's primary distribution node. Its entire 2.045B balance is now gone. ๐ŸŸก 158 suspicious cluster wallets - 284 inputs - 3.4B solana:dog1viwbb2vWDpER5FrJ4YFG6gq6XuyFohUe9TXN65u. Dozens of wallets sweeping simultaneously in a 22-hour window. ๐Ÿ”ต Layer 3 whales (Wh7, Wh6, Wh23, Wh31) - 29 inputs - 1.8B solana:dog1viwbb2vWDpER5FrJ4YFG6gq6XuyFohUe9TXN65u. The network's largest accumulators, all moving at once. ๐ŸŸฃ MM1 + INT2 (Layer 1 intermediary) - 15 inputs - 0.9B solana:dog1viwbb2vWDpER5FrJ4YFG6gq6XuyFohUe9TXN65u. The full 4-layer #Binance infrastructure chain is confirmed in the raw transaction data. 375 of 1,100 inputs are directly verified #Binance cluster wallets - confirmed on-chain, permanently recorded on Bitcoin. The remaining 725 are position-split addresses created in the Jun 3โ€“25 gap that themselves received from the cluster. But it gets bigger. The same night the new #1 holder appeared, we found a SECOND consolidation wallet - Rank #4 - holding 2.532B solana:dog1viwbb2vWDpER5FrJ4YFG6gq6XuyFohUe9TXN65u. Funded by Wh6. We know Wh6 was the sender because the BTC transaction change returned directly to Wh6's address. That is cryptographic proof. Updated total under #Binance cluster control as of June 25/26: 12.367B + 2.532B = 14.899B solana:dog1viwbb2vWDpER5FrJ4YFG6gq6XuyFohUe9TXN65u = 14.9% of total supply ๐Ÿ‘€ Previously we estimated 13.7%. Rank #4 was hiding in plain sight. Now about Wh6 specifically. DogData classified this wallet as Merlin Chain - a Bitcoin L2 protocol - and that was the accepted community explanation for its 2.009B position. But the on-chain data tells a different story. Wh6 had 2 direct transactions with MM2, 3 transactions with Wh7, participated in the coordinated Block 910,839 batch event, and swept its entire balance on June 25/26. It now holds essentially zero. Our hypothesis: #Binance deposited solana:dog1viwbb2vWDpER5FrJ4YFG6gq6XuyFohUe9TXN65u into Merlin Chain's bridge contract, which custodied the tokens in this wallet on #Binance's behalf. The "Merlin Chain" label was masking a #Binance position and creating the appearance of ecosystem adoption. And while all of this consolidation was happening - #Binance was simultaneously routing solana:dog1viwbb2vWDpER5FrJ4YFG6gq6XuyFohUe9TXN65u into exchanges. MM1 sent 15 transactions to MM2 sent 7. INT1 and INT2 sent directly into Bitget. Left hand selling into exchange liquidity. Right hand building the largest solana:dog1viwbb2vWDpER5FrJ4YFG6gq6XuyFohUe9TXN65u position ever seen. 14.9% of total supply. One entity. Confirmed and Verified by CLAUDE.

Vincent (Cryptolution) ๐Ÿ‘‘

13,966 ะฟั€ะพัะผะพั‚ั€ะพะฒ โ€ข 21 ะดะฝะตะน ะฝะฐะทะฐะด

$AMD is easily a $1,200 stock IMO| CPUs TAM ๐Ÿงต Not Financial Advice! DYOR! In this thread, I want to discuss the actual TAM for CPUs data center for just 2026, where many are giving different ranges, where I don't agree with. I will explain in detail why I disagree with these research firms and financial analysts using Math. And this thread should not be treated as Financial Advice. I'm just explaining my research and thought process so we can have a discussion. In 2024/2025, I gave out $620 PT for FY2026 was too conservative for AMD potential. At the time, It was early and many were just laughing, that PT was unrealistic and the AI world is run on GPUs only. Today, most of these folks are laughing with me. That is ok, I dont offer financial advice, and I do not need everyone to agree with me. I respect other opinions. If you enjoy this kind of thread, slap the like/repost/bookmark. If you want to support my work further and gain more in-depth analysis, consider subscribe! In early 2026, hyperscalers, enterprises, and OEMs are scrambling as Intel and AMD server CPUs are largely sold out for the year, with prices jumping 10โ€“20% and lead times stretching from weeks to months (or longer for certain SKUs). What was once a GPU dominated story has flipped: the shift to explosive Agentic AI with its multi-step reasoning loops, tool calling, multi-agent orchestration, real-time data movement, and reinforcement learning, is dramatically tightening CPU:GPU ratios from the old training-era 1:4โ€“8 all the way to 1:1 to 5:1 or even CPU-heavy configurations. CEOs across NVIDIA, AMD, Intel, Google, Meta, Microsoft, and public companies have been sounding the alarm on CNBC, Bloomberg, and earnings calls. CPUs are โ€œcool again,โ€ and in many agentic deployments they are becoming the new bottleneck alongside (or even ahead of) GPUs and custom ASICs. In 2025, roughly 12-15m AI GPUs + AI ASICs GPUs shipped, and is expect to be 15-20m units by 2026, where it suggesting Training demand is not going away. The actual TAM is structural, multiplicative demand that has already forced AMD to double its long-term server CPU TAM forecast to >$120 billion by 2030 (>35% CAGR), with Dr. Lisa Su noting Q2 2026 server CPU sales expected to surge 70%+ year-over-year and demand โ€œfar exceeding expectations.โ€ At the same time, AMDโ€™s secured 30โ€“40% share of TSMCโ€™s initial 2nm capacity (behind only Appleโ€™s >50%) positions it to ramp Zen 6-based EPYC Venice exactly when this agentic wave hits hardest but even that aggressive five-fab 2nm expansion (with plans scaling toward 11 total advanced facilities) cannot instantly close the gap in the near-term. Supply constraints on wafers, advanced packaging, and power are compounding the squeeze, just as hyperscalers forward-buy and lock in long-term deals. 1. The actual potential TAM Various sources and institutions are giving $50-$160-$200B CPUs TAM toward 2030, and i disagree, where supply is severely behind vs Demand by at least 2-3 years or even longer by some estimates. The actual TAM will probably be 15-20m for FY2026. The typical average selling price from low to high end is $5,000 to $15,000, but due to rising memory, and different inflationary pressures on Semi, it would be more logical to think between $7,000-17,000. A. CPU:GPU Ratio at 1:1 A basic calucation at mid range =12,000 x 15-20m CPUs= $180-$240B TAM B. CPU:GPU Ratio at 5:1 = $12,000 x 75m-100m CPUs= $900B-$1.2T TAM Of course TSMC cannot even supply 20% of this massive inflection TAM in 2026. But do we think of Demand for TAM or Supply for TAM? Hence we are seeing massive 2nm Ramp from TSMC for $AMD. IMO, conservatively, I would take down 15-20% on 1:1 or $135-$192B TAM for just 2026. Im not even talking about 2030. We are just months into this, it is impossible to estimate Cagr atm, but this is 1-5 agents running tasks, I wrote a thread on 24/7 autonomous agents thread, where companies could use 50-250 agents to run tasks for them 24/7. It would require a different structural CPU:GPU to bring down the cost of token as well as handling the Orchestration bottleneck. GPUs would be useless and sit idle waiting for CPU due to highly CPU-intensive nature. The cost per Million tokens must come down more rapidly for this 50-250 autonomous agents to work, otherwise the token cost would be too enormous. Helios Rack is estimated to bring inference cost down to $0.0003-$0.0005/M tokens with 18 EPYC Venices along with 72 MI455x and other chips+ Components. A heavier or CPUs dense rack would bring down inference cost further. EPYC Verano(2027 gen 7 AI-optimized) is expected to drive inference costs meaningfully lower than the Venice baseline likely to the $0.00002โ€“$0.00025 per million tokens range (or even sub-$0.00015 in highly optimized agentic/batch workloads). Verano have higher core counts than Venice, LPDDR5X SOCAMM2 memory support, more AI optimized and Next-Gen rack density & efficiency. 2. $AMD secured at least 30-40% of TSMC 2nm capacity and Memory from Samsung through 2028-2030. 2 2nm fabs are entering ramping phase toward 60-65k wafers per months and 5 dedicated 2nm fabs entering mass production/ramp in 2026. Will link sub threads below if you are interest for full detail. Apple is reported to secure 50%+ 2nm capacity for Iphone 18 and Mac chips and AMD secured at least 30-40% capacity while $NVDA $AVGO $ARM $AMZN $GOOGL and others are on 3nm. This broader aggressive ramp from TSMC to target up to 11 fabs is to address $AMD massive growth ahead. Where $ARM is facing massive CPUs supply constraints as they have to compete with other Mega Cap players on 3nm allocation. And $INTC is also facing supply constraints for data center CPUs and PC per management with lead times extrended to longer than 12 weeks. Dr. Su is aiming for higher than 50%+ Market share, and I believe it is achievable in 2026 or 2027 as AMD has the strongest CPUs offerings. Dr. Su did not want to take advantage of the shortage and she said during the Q1 earning call, AMD is prioritizing Units shipped while guiding margin to be inching 60%. If Jensen were in charge, I'm sure margin would be 70-75% in this kind of severe CPUs shortage condition. But that is not how Dr. Su operates for more than a decade. She wants most market share. So we will see it in revenue growth, but as TSMC ramps faster and faster, AMD Operating and FCF margin will massively improve vs prior decade. A significantly higher margin profile than before. 3. How I came up with $1,200 withint 12-18 months? At $1,200/ share, that would be around $2 Trillion MC. I expect FY2027 revenue to be $124-$144B where data center revenue dominates overall revenue. AI GPUs: I will stick to the lowest end so show u that I'm conservative at $18B for each GW vs $NVDA Rubin is $30B+ (most likely Helios Rack in the $20B+ due to memory price rising). We know deals with OpenAI and Meta are around 12GW and additional multi-customers at multi-GW scale were hinted and will be revealed as we get to July 22-23 2026 Advancing AI event. For now I will conservatively add a bit more to this model. (3-6GW Helios Rack Range) EPYC Venice is reported to be in $15,000-$20,000. However large customers will likely to enjoy $10-$12k discount. I expect AMD to be able to ramp 7m EPYC Venice for entire 2026 and 3-4m of EPYC Verano(higher price than Venice). If we take an average selling price of $10,000 to be on the conservative side. Take down another 30% to be even more conservative on projection. I like to be conservative. That would be ~ 7m EPYC CPUs(Venice + Verano) for FY2027 or 583,000 units per month or 15,000 additional 2nm wafers per month which is completely reasonable for current TSMC Ramp, and I may be too conservative here. EPYC Verano and MI500 series will also be on 2nm. AI GPUs: 3GW x $18B= $54B EPYC CPUs: $10k x 7m CPUs= $70B = Data center revenue alone is $124B Other segments= probably in the $20-$25B FY 2027. FY2027 revenue = $124-$149B At 7m EPYC CPUs for entire 2027, that would be more than 50% market share when we comp it to availability from supply side, not from total Demand. It is possible that TSMC could significantly ramp even more capacity in 2027, so we will see. Metric Q1 2026 FY2027 Gross Margin 55-56% 60-62% Operating Margin 25-26% 32-35% Net Income Margin ~22% 26-30% FCF Margin 25% 28-30% At $124-$149B Revenue FY 2027 Net Income would be $32-$44B EPS would be $20-$27 (GAAP) Non-GAAP would be $25-$31 At $1,200 a share or $2T valuation that would be: 13.4-16x Price to Sales (P/S) 38-48 P/E At this kind of growth of AI SuperCycle, I think it is very reasonable valuation. If we use today at $406/share or $661B MC: 2027 P/S = 4.4x-5.3x 2027 P/E = 13x-16x Is AMD today expensive or cheap to you? Above is already a very conservative where I trimmed 20-30% of doable units. Meaning, there could be upside if TSMC is able to ramp meaningfully like they are planning. Conclusion: A $1,200 per share valuation IMO for AMD in FY2027 is not expensive at all; it is, in fact, conservative when viewed against the structural explosion in agentic AI demand we have mapped out. With server CPU TAM potentially scaling into the $100โ€“$200B+ range in just CPU:GPU 1:1 Ratio for just 2026. AMD positioned to capture 50%+ share thanks to its 2nm TSMC allocation advantage and full-stack leadership, the company could realistically deliver $124โ€“149B in total revenue and $25โ€“$31+ non-GAAP EPS. At those levels, $1,200 implies a 2027 P/E = 13x-16x. Entirely reasonable for a company that will have become the clear Inference Queen (and in many workloads the preferred) AI infrastructure provider, with operating margins expanding above 30% and tens of billions in high-margin rack-scale AI revenue. Dr. Lisa Su was right presciently so about the Agentic AI inflection all the way back to her early 2022โ€“2023 commentary on the coming shift from pure training to inference and orchestration-heavy workloads. While the broader market only fully woke up to this in 2026 when she doubled AMDโ€™s long-term server CPU TAM forecast to >$120B by 2030 (with >35% CAGR), Dr. Su and her team have consistently positioned the company at the center of the CPU renaissance. The explosive demand we are seeing today, sold-out lines, rising ASPs, and hyperscalers forward-buying entire gigawatts of Helios-class systems is exactly the outcome she forecasted years ago. Not Financial Advice! DYOR!

Mike

301,322 ะฟั€ะพัะผะพั‚ั€ะพะฒ โ€ข 2 ะผะตััั†ะตะฒ ะฝะฐะทะฐะด

dave meltzer: youtube enthusiast ๐Ÿ’€ perfect. now we can stop pretending this was ever complicated. the real story is not that wwe is afraid of aew. the real story is not that โ€œhigh level wwe officialsโ€ are whispering scary things to dave meltzer. the real story is not even that tony khan got asked a planted question on a media call with very little distribution about the possibility of aew soon having very little distribution, although that sentence is so stupidly perfect it should be bronzed and placed outside the wrestling observer newsletter office like a war memorial for people who died pretending this was journalism. the real story is that aew is going to lose its wbd distribution deal. either it ends at the expiration of the three-year term in 2027, or it ends earlier if paramount closes wbd and decides aew has no strategic place inside the new company. and based on the board as it exists right now, the most likely landing spot for aew in 2027 is google / youtube. that is the story. everything else is laundering. tony khan wants the story to be: โ€œwhy would wwe say this about us?โ€ that is the whole operation. take my public analysis. run it through dave meltzer. assign it to wwe / tko. then let tony khan answer a canned question on a media call with very little distribution about potentially having very little distribution. a media call for a lightly viewed roh show. a planted story. a planted messenger. a rehearsed answer. a pr flack probably wrote it. tony khan performs hurt. tony khan says โ€œi donโ€™t know why wwe wouldโ€ฆโ€ tony khan denies the obvious. tony khan keeps me minimized. tony khan removes me from the public conversation about the exact thing i have repeatedly said is going to happen to aew. everyone is supposed to pretend this is organic. it is not. it is the most bubble wrapped, manufactured, artificial environment possible. aew is heading toward youtube because the domestic media rights board is closing around them. not as a troll. not as a bit. not as โ€œpr spin.โ€ as a business conclusion. aew is not leverage. wwe is not afraid of aew. the $185 million number was bullshit. the buyer universe was shrinking. paramount / skydance was coming for wbd. wbd was not going to be some permanent aew safe house. youtube was only ever a real โ€œoptionโ€ if someone at google was actually cutting a media rights check and underwriting production. not because every divorced mom with a ring light and a gmail account can upload video to the same platform. that was always the distinction. that is still the distinction. Nick LoPiccolo โ€” February 28, 2025 โ€œYouTube is an option the same way you or I could start a YT channel tomorrow. Is Jon Cruz cutting AEW a media rights check or underwriting a production budget? Hell no. Just the reality. It isnโ€™t the model. Jon is global head of sports over there.โ€ that was february, not last week. not after dave meltzer suddenly discovered youtube prelim numbers like columbus finding the new world. it is becoming inevitable now. Nick LoPiccolo โ€” April 30, 2026 โ€” 11:26 AM โ€” 251.2K Views โ€œto every journalist and every podcast who interviews tony khan from this day forward: please ask tony if wbd told him back in august they would not be renewing aew. wbd told him in august. i confirmed it directly and triple sourced it. please ask why tony has been acting like nothing is wrong for the last 8 months, and then please ask tony what his actual distribution plan is. because the only distributor left that will take aew is google/youtube. the myaew app is not realistic. the my aewapp is a death sentence in 2026 if youtube doesnโ€™t make an mg deal for aew. they started building it too late and there is no realistic way to scale it. also, who is going to sell ads for the platform? kiswe is not the best. they built the myaew app. they are new to the game. hold tonyโ€™s feet to the fire. Paramount is not real for aew. WBD passed back in August. CW/Roku is now off the table. Amazon and Fox do not want AEW. ask Tony why he's been lying to you and to the locker room and to the fans, acting like things are all great with the network? i am sure a lot of people would love to hear his answer.โ€ april 30. 251.2k views. not whispered. not hidden. not vague. not โ€œhigh level wwe officials.โ€ i said it publicly and directly: wbd passed back in august. paramount is not real for aew. cw / roku is off the table. amazon and fox do not want aew. the myaew app is not realistic. google / youtube is the only distributor left on the board that makes sense. that is the actual story tony khan does not want to answer. not โ€œwhy would wwe say this?โ€ ask tony khan if wbd told him in august that wbd would not be renewing aew. ask what his actual distribution plan is. ask who is selling ads for the myaew app. ask how a platform built this late scales in 2026. ask whether youtube is an actual rights partner with an mg, or just the place you go when the real buyers are gone. that is the question. not the fake question dave meltzer laundered into โ€œhigh level wwe officials.โ€ the real question. Nick LoPiccolo โ€” July 9, 2025 โ€” 10:51 AM โ€” 9,565 Views โ€œNo one in Hollywood believes the $185 million number.โ€ Nick LoPiccolo โ€” July 9, 2025 โ€” 11:35 AM โ€” 7,470 Views โ€œThe $185 million figure is inflated. Varietyโ€™s October 2, 2024 article was likely updated after a publicist called on AEWโ€™s behalf, as early reports placed the deal between $140 and $150 million per year. Tony Khan was also included in Varietyโ€™s Dealmakers 2024 list, which, while not officially pay to play, strongly favors those spending significant advertising dollars with the outlet. No one in Hollywood seriously believes WBD, which is in junk bond status, is paying AEW $185 million per year. Clear enough?โ€ clear enough? the number was never clean. the number was never real in the way aew fans and wrestling media pretended it was real. and when the $185 million number started getting laughed out of adult rooms, the number magically became $178 million. that is where the shell game gets funny. because $178 million was not some sacred sourced number either. it was brandon thurston taking the median between $170 million, reported by sports business journal, and $185 million, reported by variety and others. that is literally what wrestlenomics said. Wrestlenomics โ€” October 4, 2024 โ€œWhy use $178 million here for AEWโ€™s new deal when some outlets are reporting the average annual value is $185 million?โ€ Wrestlenomics โ€” October 4, 2024 โ€œI used $178 million here because it is simply the median of $170 million, as reported by Sports Business Journal, and $185 million, reported by Variety and others.โ€ there it is. arithmetic. not an all-cash rights fee. not a clean license number. not proof wbd valued aew like raw. not a finance-department document from warner bros. discovery. a midpoint between conflicting public reports. then wrestling media treated that midpoint like scripture because they needed the story to be โ€œaew is valued like raw,โ€ not โ€œaew pr inflated a number no serious person in hollywood believed.โ€ and by the way, $170 million was not the clean all-cash number either. that is the scam. float the number. repeat the number. launder the number. defend the number with people who do not understand the difference between cash rights fees, in-kind services, equity, marketing commitments, platform value, make-goods, ad inventory, and press release math. then when the number collapses, pretend the next number was always the number. that is not reporting. that is aew state news. Nick LoPiccolo โ€” July 10, 2025 โ€” 5:53 AM โ€” 12.6K Views โ€œAEW isnโ€™t leverage. Itโ€™s not competition. Itโ€™s a niche product with loud fans and limited reach.โ€ Nick LoPiccolo โ€” July 10, 2025 โ€” 8:56 AM โ€” 1,018 Views โ€œWe handle wrestling deals too, but thinking we need AEW for leverage is myopic. The landscape is changing and the game Iโ€™m playing is different.โ€ Nick LoPiccolo โ€” July 15, 2025 โ€” 25.7K Views โ€œAEW isnโ€™t leverage.โ€ that was never emotional. that was never tribal. that was never โ€œi hate aew.โ€ it was market structure. wwe did not need aew as leverage because real leverage was never โ€œanother wrestling show exists.โ€ real leverage is architecture, scale, subscriber churn, platform strategy, sports adjacency, global rights, advertising, sponsorship, live inventory, library value, data, brand safety, executive relationships, and the actual buyer universe of maybe 18-20 companies in the united states that matter for live sports rights. aew fans thought this was a wrestling argument. it was never a wrestling argument. it was a board. and the board was already moving. Nick LoPiccolo โ€” August 11, 2025 โ€” 482 Views โ€œI wasnโ€™t viewing the above in that context (TKO vs AEW counter programming), it was more of this is what Iโ€™m hearing after 2 weeks of big media deals rolling out (Skydance closing, South Park library moving) etc. Which have all been in the works for awhile.โ€ Nick LoPiccolo โ€” August 11, 2025 โ€” 388 Views โ€œBut if you were to look at it from a counter programming perspective (and I donโ€™t think this was a factor in UFC deal) - there are only so many players for these big media rights deals. PARA is likely off the board (via TKO deal) & then what if they acquire WB in 2026/27?โ€ Nick LoPiccolo โ€” August 11, 2025 โ€” 535 Views โ€œYes, of course, that wouldnโ€™t mean the end for AEW. It would make navigating their media rights deal more challenging, I would guess. But this is a hypothetical scenario & I do not believe anyone is paying $7.7b for UFC or a $40b valuation for WB w/ how do we fuck AEW, either.โ€ Nick LoPiccolo โ€” August 11, 2025 โ€œAnd hearing all weekend Paramount is still interested in WBD.โ€ Nick LoPiccolo โ€” August 11, 2025 โ€” 1.3K Views โ€œI think more interesting for what it could mean as the dominoes keep falling in terms of the still evolving landscape. The deals are massive & the number of major players at the top are shrinking as still big push for consolidation & scale.โ€ Nick LoPiccolo โ€” August 11, 2025 โ€” 12:11 PM โ€” 2,588 Views โ€œAnd Iโ€™d view AAA on Google/YouTube as directly competitive. It targets both the CMLL collab & the audience that used to watch AEW Dark on YouTube, & WWE is able to send well known stars to AAA events with an eye towards converting more of the younger, YouTube demo of viewers who donโ€™t watch streamers.โ€ again: august 11. not yesterday. not after dave meltzer tweeted a netflix prelim number. not after anyone had to retrofit the argument. the point was already there: the major players at the top were shrinking, paramount was still interested in wbd, paramount was likely off the board for aew because of the tko deal, google / youtube was becoming directly competitive for the exact audience aew used to reach through dark, and the buyer universe was consolidating around deals much bigger than tony khanโ€™s feelings. this was not mysticism. this was not inside baseball for the sake of sounding smart. this was the board. Nick LoPiccolo โ€” August 24, 2025 โ€œThis isnโ€™t fair. I misread your question. AEW will exist but likely on the Discovery Global app (if it ever launches, I would bet that it doesnโ€™t) and it will continue to do consistent ratings. If Paramount/Skydance buys WBD in a yearโ€ฆโ€ Nick LoPiccolo โ€” September 4, 2025 โ€” 76 Views โ€œNo, thatโ€™s the WBD network division (cable, news, sports) that was already announced as being spun off under Discovery Global. The article youโ€™re citing is about them selling a minority equity stake in that unit to cut debt and boost valuation ahead of the 2026 split.โ€ Nick LoPiccolo โ€” September 16, 2025 โ€” 3.6K Views โ€œThis is not just about Hollywood scale. It is the foundation of a conservative aligned media infrastructure. A Paramount/WBD merger would fold CBS, CNN, HBO, and Warner Bros IP into Ellisonโ€™s orbit under Trumpโ€™s regulatory umbrella.โ€ Nick LoPiccolo โ€” September 16, 2025 โ€” 11K Views โ€œWithin 48 hours of the rumor, WBD stock surged ~55% and Paramount Skydance rose ~24%. That market response itself boxed David Zaslav in; his board, Wall Street, and his own contract now expect movement.โ€ Nick LoPiccolo โ€” September 27, 2025 โ€” 12:16 PM โ€” 3,516 Views โ€œNah homie. Enjoy watching the show on YouTube after Ellison buys WBD and Ari who is advising Ellison and used to represent Trump and runs TKO makes the call.โ€ Nick LoPiccolo โ€” September 28, 2025 โ€” 174 Views โ€œI believe if and when Paramount acquires WBD, TKO will push to lock down a monopoly on combat sports. The long knives are already out for competitors, and the rights deals have likely been spread around town precisely to keep rivals from signing with those streamers.โ€ none of that was random. paramount / skydance, ellison, ari, tko, wbd linear assets, youtube, aaa, the tko deal, the wbd split, the shrinking rights buyer universe โ€” all of it was one connected domestic rights architecture. that is why this conversation was always over the heads of the people screaming โ€œcopeโ€ in my replies. they were arguing like fans. i was reading the cap table. Nick LoPiccolo โ€” December 6, 2025 โ€” 3:07 PM โ€” 41.4K Views โ€œYes, I always believed Paramount would walk away with WBD. I was one of the first to talk about it on here, even if I wasnโ€™t the first to hear it. The Paramount Skydance acquisition closed on August 7. I posted this on August 11, about 1 month before the The Wall Street Journal first broke the news on September 12 that Paramount Skydance was preparing a bid for WBD.โ€ Nick LoPiccolo โ€” December 6, 2025 โ€” 3:07 PM โ€” 41.4K Views โ€œThe bid was always going to be hostile. We are only in this process because it was a hostile bid. Most people in Hollywood believed Ellison long coveted WB and Jack Warnerโ€™s chair. WB was not for sale when Skydance acquired Paramount, which is much smaller in scale.โ€ Nick LoPiccolo โ€” December 6, 2025 โ€” 3:07 PM โ€” 41.4K Views โ€œNearly everyone in town assumed an Ellison acquisition of WBD was inevitable until the Netflix bid shocked everyone. Signs were there for the last two weeks, which is also when I stopped posting about what might happen. Of course, its not over yet. Paramount still has paths to winning this acquisition. The one thing thatโ€™s for certain though is an Ellison-led acquisition of WBD is no longer inevitable.โ€ Nick LoPiccolo โ€” December 8, 2025 โ€œEND CREDITSโ€ space jam is a warner bros. movie. that was the joke. and the joke was the same thing i had been saying the whole time: paramount was winning the bid, for those who did not understand. Nick LoPiccolo โ€” December 19, 2025 โ€” 4:30 PM โ€” 828 Views โ€œHere is another reference to it. So tell me how exactly is Paramount the better outcome for Daveโ€™s argument? Netflix doesnโ€™t touch the WBD linear assets. Gunnar keeps his SpinCo.โ€ Puck excerpt โ€” December 19, 2025 โ€œMany industry insiders are also skeptical about Paramountโ€™s seven-year, $7.7 billion deal for exclusive UFC rights in the U.S. Yes, it can be read as a signal that Ellison came to play. But some people see it more as Ari Emanuel having his way with the person to whom he is ostensibly an (unpaid) advisorโ€ฆโ€ that is the board. that is the relationship map. that is the thing wrestling media either does not understand or pretends not to understand, because understanding it means admitting the story is not โ€œaew has leverage.โ€ the story is that aew is sitting in the middle of a consolidating rights marketplace where the people with leverage are doing much bigger things than worrying about tony khanโ€™s feelings. Nick LoPiccolo โ€” January 21, 2026 โ€” 4:22 PM โ€” 870 Views โ€œi mean get ready to learn youtube buddyโ€ Nick LoPiccolo โ€” February 19, 2026 โ€” 2.8K Views โ€œParamount was always my bet to acquire Warner Bros. Never wavered.โ€ Nick LoPiccolo โ€” February 28, 2026 โ€” 1:27 PM โ€” 118 Views โ€œyou donโ€™t need to look under a hood I AM SAYING THE QUIET PART OUT LOUD ๐Ÿšจ๐Ÿšจ๐Ÿšจ๐Ÿšจ๐Ÿšจ I BEEN SAYING IT SINCE JULY / AUGUST ๐Ÿšจ๐Ÿšจ๐Ÿšจ๐Ÿšจ๐Ÿšจ PARAMOUNT IS COMING FOR WBD AEW WILL LOSE A TV DEAL ๐Ÿšจ๐Ÿšจ๐Ÿšจ๐Ÿšจ๐Ÿšจ GUESS WHO WAS RIGHT ๐Ÿ’€โ€ so no, this is not hindsight. this is not showing up after the fact with a flashlight and pretending i discovered the body. this is a paper trail. february: youtube is not a real rights model unless google is cutting the check. april: wbd passed back in august, the myaew app is not realistic, paramount is not real for aew, cw / roku is off the table, amazon and fox do not want aew, and google / youtube is the only distributor left that makes sense. july: the $185 million number is inflated and aew is not leverage. august: the buyer board is shrinking, paramount is still interested in wbd, and google / youtube becomes directly competitive. september: paramount / wbd folds the board into ellisonโ€™s orbit, and if ellison buys wbd, enjoy youtube. december: paramount was always the bet, the bid was always going to be hostile, and netflix does not solve dave meltzerโ€™s argument because netflix does not touch the linear assets. january: get ready to learn youtube. february: paramount is coming for wbd and aew will lose a tv deal. same board. same thesis. same answer. now here is the part tony khan and dave meltzer do not want to say out loud. tony khan and dave meltzer do not mention me publicly for a reason. because the second they say my name out loud, they admit where this conversation has actually been coming from. not wwe. not some anonymous โ€œhigh level official.โ€ not some shadowy tko whisper campaign. me. that is the problem for them. behind the scenes, ask any real insider what happens when my name comes up around this subject. there is a reaction. not because iโ€™m magic. not because iโ€™m some internet boogeyman. because they know exactly who is saying it, why iโ€™m saying it, what rooms i have been in, what companies i have dealt with, what executives i have spoken to, and why the analysis keeps landing. that is why they keep trying to non-person me publicly while reacting to me privately. they want the argument. they want the benefit of responding to the argument. they just do not want to admit whose argument it is. when i said wbd told aew back in august 2025 they were not exercising the option for the fourth year, tony khan blew up behind the scenes and forced john mcmullen to revise / update his article 2-3 weeks ago after i tweeted it. which is hilarious because that should not even be crazy or damaging โ€œnews.โ€ that is how this business works. when a distributor is not continuing, they tell you early enough so you have time to find a new home. that is not sabotage. that is not wwe. that is not nick lopiccolo hiding inside david zaslavโ€™s air vents with a clipboard. that is corporate courtesy. wbd execs privately whisper and shake their heads at tony khanโ€™s behavior because their view is very simple: why does tony khan act like everything is great and rainbows and sunshine with the studio? we told tony khan as a courtesy so tony khan would have time to find a new home. and no, this has zero to do with paramount looming as an excuse. paramount did not even make its first hostile bid for wbd until september 11 or 12. that was after tony khan was already told there would not be a wbd renewal. so what did tony khan do? tony khan turned the truth into a wrestling angle. tony khan, or one of tony khanโ€™s minions, gets dave meltzer to drop a story assigning my claims and what i have been publicly posting about tony khan to โ€œhigh level wwe officials.โ€ why? because it gives tony khan a safer enemy. tony khan does not want the story to be the actual timeline. because the actual timeline is brutal. on february 28, i said youtube was not a real media rights model unless google was actually cutting the check and underwriting production. on april 30, i said wbd passed in august, the myaew app was not realistic, paramount was not real for aew, cw / roku was off the table, amazon and fox did not want aew, and the only distributor left that made sense was google / youtube. on july 9, i said no one in hollywood believed the $185 million number. on july 10, i said aew was not leverage. on august 11, i said the major players at the top were shrinking, paramount was still interested in wbd, and google / youtube was becoming a directly competitive lane. on september 16, i said a paramount / wbd merger would fold cbs, cnn, hbo, and warner bros. ip into ellisonโ€™s orbit. on september 27, i said enjoy the show on youtube after ellison buys wbd. on september 28, i said if paramount acquires wbd, tko would push to lock down a monopoly on combat sports. on december 6, i said paramount skydance was preparing a bid for wbd long before most people admitted the obvious. on february 19, i said paramount was always my bet to acquire warner bros. and on february 28, i said it in all caps: paramount is coming for wbd. aew will lose a tv deal. that is the part tony khan cannot answer directly, because the direct answer means admitting this was never โ€œwwe is scared of us.โ€ it was always the board closing. tony khan wants the story to be: why would wwe say this about us? that is the laundering operation. take my public analysis. run it through dave meltzer. assign it to wwe / tko. then let tony khan answer a canned question on a media call with very little distribution about potentially having very little distribution. a media call for a show with very little distribution answering a canned question about aew potentially having very little distribution. based on a planted story, from a planted messenger, with a rehearsed answer, after an roh show maybe 8-15k people watched. a pr flack probably wrote it. tony khan performs hurt. tony khan says โ€œi donโ€™t know why wwe wouldโ€ฆโ€ tony khan denies the obvious. tony khan keeps me minimized. tony khan removes me from the public conversation about the very thing i have repeatedly said is going to happen to aew. everyone is supposed to pretend this is organic. it is the most bubble wrapped, manufactured, artificial environment possible. a canned and rehearsed answer at an roh media scrum about a planted dave meltzer story based on my very real and very public analysis of the media rights board. but make no mistake. tony khan was responding to my words. tony khan just laundered them through dave meltzer and assigned them to wwe / tko so tony khan could keep lying about it publicly without ever saying my name. and now, voila. dave meltzer is posting about youtube viewers and prelims. Dave Meltzer โ€” May 16, 2026 โ€œAt this moment there are 340,000 people watching prelims for Netflix on YouTube. Itโ€™s a good number.โ€ yes, dave meltzer. youtube can have good numbers. nobody said youtube cannot have good numbers. that was never the issue. the issue is whether youtube is being used as a funnel into a premium rights ecosystem or as a substitute because the premium rights ecosystem rejected you. that is the difference. that has always been the difference. netflix using youtube prelims as audience acquisition is not the same thing as aew trying to spin youtube as a media rights home because the real buyers are gone. ufc using youtube as a funnel is not the same thing as aew using youtube as a life raft. wwe sending stars to aaa on youtube to convert a younger demo is not the same thing as aew retreating to youtube after the traditional buyer board closes. and the fact that dave meltzer is now suddenly tweeting like the mayor of youtube is the punchline. because the same people who mocked the youtube outcome are now going to spend the next several months explaining why youtube is actually good. of course it can be good. for the right use case. for the right property. inside the right architecture. with the right check attached. but when you spend two years telling everyone you were valued like raw and your next stop is โ€œplease subscribe and smash that bell,โ€ maybe stop pretending this is victory formation? i told yโ€™all where this was going. the record is right there. iโ€™m still right. and tony and dave: you guys are see through translucent. thatโ€™s it for ye ๐ŸŽค๐ŸŽค๐ŸŽค

Nick LoPiccolo

99,106 ะฟั€ะพัะผะพั‚ั€ะพะฒ โ€ข 2 ะผะตััั†ะตะฒ ะฝะฐะทะฐะด

Every season, it seems like we have to say goodbye to a big name. This yearโ€ฆ well it looks to be at least 3 big losses - John Stones, Nathan Benjamin Akรฉ and Bernardo Mota Veiga de Carvalho e Silva. Wow, what an insane amount this trio has done for the club. All starters in the treble season and theyโ€™ve won the lot. Letโ€™s start with Nathan Ake, he came from Bournemouth in 2020 for a fee of ยฃ40.4m - I mean at the time that seemed a lot for a back up centre back. He was steady, he was comfortable with the ball, solid at the back, some top blocks and some great last ditch tackles. But in 22/23 he was played at left backโ€ฆ and what on earth did he become? An absolute monster. ELITE 1v1 against any right winger. Unbelievable positioning and reading of the game. Even at times, getting forwards and he chipped in with some important goals. The best left back in the league that season. Whenever called upon, between his injury-stricken City career, heโ€™s been fantastic. Most recently in the Cup final against Arsenal where many thought heโ€™d be a weak linkโ€ฆ he was absolutely absurd. Wherever he goesโ€ฆ we wish him the best of luck. John Stones, wellโ€ฆ if injury hadnโ€™t been the main factor in his career, heโ€™d not only have a statue alongside Vincent Kompany, heโ€™d have one outside Wembley. The general, the most tactical defender the game has ever seen. Whilst over his decade at City, heโ€™s grown as a player and ironed out mistakes and just become an absolute Rolls Royce of a footballer, we can only speak about the treble season. The ONE season Johnny Stones managed to stay fit we won it all. Moving into the midfield and just bossing the park in every metric. Same number of dribbles completed in a Champions League final as Lionel fricking Messi? Unreal. General John Stones, definitely a fan favourite and we will be GUTTED to see him go. Thanks for everything Johnny. Finally Bernardo, Pepโ€™s little favourite, the one everyone picks on, now finally the senior figure, the captain, the DREAM for a Pep teamโ€ฆ heโ€™s the epitome of a utility player being able to do absolutely everything on a pitch with endless running and an undeterred passion for the club. He is a true City legend. A decade at the Blues, also a decade of thinking heโ€™s leaving in the coming summer. Well this year itโ€™s finally confirmedโ€ฆ Bernie will leave the Blues being the face, alongside Kevin De Bruyne, of Manchester City under Pep Guardiola. The way his game has evolved is unbelievable. Once the tricky little attacker we signed from Monaco ten years ago, now dropping between the centre backs and a tenacious little midfielder tirelessly fighting for the team all over the pitch. His availability sees him become the only player in the modern era to be in Cityโ€™s top 10 for appearances made for the club. He had everything on the pitch, and for City he was a fantastic little shithouse. But off the pitch heโ€™s always had our hearts. Serious and passionate yet funny and joyfulโ€ฆ Bernardo, it hurts to see you go. Thank you for everything. Seeing all these players leave us will be a pain in the hearts of all Blues, three fantastic servants to the club. Always welcome back to the Etihad, back home, back to the club where they won it all, we will welcome them back with loving arms. Bernardo Silva Nathan Akรฉ Christine Murumba Once a Blue, always a Blue ๐Ÿ’™

๐“๐ก๐ž ๐‚๐ข๐ญ๐ฒ ๐‚๐ซ๐ž๐ฐ

25,718 ะฟั€ะพัะผะพั‚ั€ะพะฒ โ€ข 3 ะผะตััั†ะตะฒ ะฝะฐะทะฐะด

Ten Takeaways From 10/21/25 ONE) NBA on NBC Hello, friends. Welcome to the 2025-26 NBA season. Itโ€™s been a minute, hasnโ€™t it? A whole lot has changed since we last spoke. We were reintroduced to the NBA on NBC. Canโ€™t believe itโ€™s been almost 25 years, but here we are again. They absolutely crushed it after having some early audio difficulties. I get how clichรฉ it is, but I seriously got chills once โ€œRoundball Rockโ€ started playing. Thought Carmelo Anthony, Vince Carter, and Tracy McGrady had contagious energy in the pre-game coverage. The graphics are clean and straightforward. Really like the team fouls tracking in the score bugโ€”just a very pleasant experience. Looking forward to the โ€œPrimeโ€ experience. God, canโ€™t believe it costs $650 to watch basketball now. We need to talk about the MJ segment, though. If youโ€™ve been living under a rock, NBC shocked the world and somehow convinced Michael Jordan to sign on as a โ€œspecial contributorโ€. โ€œInsights to Excellenceโ€ is sadly everything I thought it would beโ€ฆ nothing. He wasnโ€™t in the studio or anything. Looked like some pre-recorded interview with Mike Tirico from who knows when at his house, talking about why heโ€™s come out of hiding. The thing lasted about three and a half minutes. โ€œTo pay it forward. I had the obligation to basketball.โ€ - MJ on the decision to join NBC Okay Mike. Hoping for some actual insight in future recordings. TWO) Champs Are Here OKC received their rings and raised their banner before the game. Vibes were immaculate. Dillon Jones was even in attendance. Good thing the Wizards waived him just in time for him to make his flight. Rockets werenโ€™t having it, though. Ime Udoka said that they didnโ€™t watch the ceremony and were instead focused on trying to ruin their night. Kevin Durant came out for warmups to loud boos, and so he booed them back. Everyone laughed. Meanwhile, Steven Adams still gets loud cheers because, well, who doesnโ€™t love Steven Adams? It was a rough go-around for all Thunder not named Chet Holmgren (28 points, 11-17 FG) to start, especially SGA. He had just five points at the half on 40.0% shooting (2-5 FG), but you can only contain the league and Finals MVP for so long. He scored 24 of his 35 points in the 4th quarter and overtimes. Whatโ€™s up with the four missed free throws (10-14 FT)? "I'm glad the guys enjoyed the ceremony. That's a great, great life event they had." - Mark Daigneault "It was surreal. I don't know how to describe it besides that. Seeing the banner raised was cool too... I'll remember it for the rest of my life." - SGA on the pregame ceremony THREE) Thunder Starters One of the more critical questions going into Opening Night was, โ€œWhoโ€™s the 5th Thunder starter?โ€ as we wait for JDubโ€™s wrist to get right. SGA, Dort, Chet, and IHart felt obvious. Between Alex Caruso, Aaron Wiggins, and Cason Wallace, I leaned Cason mainly because of the bigger picture. Didnโ€™t make sense to start Alex after managing him all last year, but then he started in every preseason game he played. Had to give that some sort of credit (and we did). Well, they ended up doing what they did a lot last year: change it up midway. Wallace started, and then Caruso started the second halfโ€ฆ for Hartenstein. Here we go again. Casonโ€™s playmaking looks improved. Daigneault went 11 deep (!!!) in the first quarter. Rookie, Brooks Barnhizer was the fourth sub off the bench, played about two minutes, and was never seen again. Part of that reason is Ajay Mitchell, who checked in after him (for Shai). Thereโ€™s been some buzz, going back to his standout Summer League (19.8 ppg, 5.3 apg, 4.8 rpg, 1.5 spg). He scored 12 of his 16 points in the second quarter. โ€œNot surprised. He was playing like this before he got hurt last year.โ€ - Mark Daigneault on Ajay Mitchell FOUR) Jumbo Lineup Itโ€™s not much of a surprise to see Udoka start with the Steven Adams/Alperen Sengun pairing after how dominant they looked at the end of last season (+29.9 net rating, 162 minutes)โ€”especially given the matchup, with Holmgren and Hartenstein on the other side. The real shocker is how much they leaned into it. Alpi and Adams shared the court for over 30 minutes (+8). LIKE WTF?!!! This was Adams' first time touching 37 minutes since November 9, 2022. They did just sign him to a three-year extension. Youโ€™d think they might wanna be careful with their investment. The average height of this Rockets' starting lineup is 6'10 (Thompson, Durant, Smith, Sengun, Adams), LMAO FIVE) Alpi Dominance Continues Maybe what Sengun was doing at EuroBasket 2025 (21.6 ppg, 10.1 rpg, 6.6 apg, 1.0 spg, and 1.1 bpg) translates over? Not gonna lie, I certainly had my doubts, but noโ€ฆ heโ€™s looking just as dominant (I know, one game). Alperen Sengun vs Thunder: 39 PTS 11 REB 7 AST 2 STL 5-8 3P (career-high) 10-11 FT 27.7% USG Yeah, I see it too. Second time in his career, heโ€™s attempted eight threes. Dude averaged 1.2 attempts per game last year. The hitch in his shot appears to be gone, so hey, this could be real (doubt it). All I know is that if it is, itโ€™ll do wonders for his ceiling on sites that reward threes (DK). Also, going 10 of 11 from the line is something worth paying attention to. He was a 69.2% free-throw shooter last season. On the flip side, Amen Thompson (18 pts, 4 reb, 5 ast) had seven attempts from behind the arc and missed them all. Sucks, but his shot still looks flat. Thereโ€™s no lift. While weโ€™re here on Thompson, he had to leave the game late because of cramps. SIX) The Reed Conundrum Iโ€™ll give Reed Sheppard (9 pts, 4 ast, 37.9% TS, 28 min) this; heโ€™s a confident motherfucker, and I love that about him (in a cute way). Itโ€™s hilarious how many times he looked off KD in this game. Heโ€™s gonna have stretches where heโ€™s feeling it and looks automatic, but is it really gonna be worth it if his defense looks this dreadful? He canโ€™t stay in front of anyone. The Thunder hunted and won that matchup with ease all night. Amen getting cramped up in OT1 really salvaged his minutes, cause I didnโ€™t think he was gonna see the court again. Again, I know itโ€™s only one game, but a couple more performances like this and things could get ugly. SEVEN) KD Gets Away With One Or should that say gets away with none? Kevin Durant (23 points, 9 rebounds) made his Rockets debut, and thereโ€™re gonna be two things you take away from it. Whyโ€™d you trade for him again? He was pretty much non-existent when they needed him most down the stretch, with a 12.5 USG% in both OTโ€™s. There shouldnโ€™t have been a second overtime. KD was clearly seen calling for a timeout after a rebound with about a second left on the clock. The problem is, they didnโ€™t have anyโ€“He Webberโ€™d it. He should have been Tโ€™d up, giving the Thunder a free throw to potentially end the game. Zarba and his buddies even got together to talk it over once the buzzer sounded, but did nothing. Strange, but luckily, it didnโ€™t end up mattering much since OKC won in the second overtime. โ€œKevin definitely called timeout 3 timesโ€ฆ They just missed it.โ€ - SGA The Thunder beat the Rockets 125-124. EIGHT) Kuminga Starts Gallagher and I both felt pretty confident (sounds so stupid saying that with Kerr) that had Mosey Moody been available for this one, he would have been named the fifth starter, but his calfโ€™s still bothering him. Steve Kerr decided to start Jonathan Kuminga (17 points, 9 rebounds, 6 assists, 33 minutes) instead, rewarding him for a strong preseason. There might be some more rewards coming because, whew, this is exactly what theyโ€™ve been wanting to see from him for the last couple of years, especially the boards. You wouldnโ€™t know it from looking at Lukaโ€™s box score, but JK did about as well as you could defending him; he made his threes (4-6 3PT) and consistently found the open man. Iโ€™m gonna go ahead and guess that he starts again against Denver on Thursday Let the showcasing begin. โ€œWhen you ask for opportunity, you must deliver. Heโ€™s been very vocal about his opportunity and he delivered.โ€ - Draymond Green on Jonathan Kuminga โ€œI just wanna help JK be greatโ€ฆ Weโ€™ve been kickin' it. Hanging out. Watching film and just working on our game together. I know how great he wants to be and how great he can be.โ€ - Jimmy Butler on mentoring Jonathan Kuminga NINE) Jimmy Being Jimmy One of the funnier moments of the night came post-game, when Jimmy Butler talked about a bet he made with Draymond Green. The wager is that heโ€™ll have a better free-throw percentage than Steph Curry this season. Deadass, hahaha. He admitted that itโ€™s probably a bad bet but I still love that he does this type of shit. Two years ago, he said he was playfully aiming to shoot 50.0% from three. He obviously didnโ€™t hit that mark, but he did shoot a career-best 41.4% that season. If youโ€™re wondering how the bet is looking to start after Game 1: Jimmy Butler: 16-16 FT (100.0%) Steph Curry: 8-8 FT (100.0%) Will keep you updated as the season goes. Jesus, 16 free throw attempts. โ€œNo chance.โ€ - Steph Curry when asked if Jimmy Butler has any shot at winning the bet Before weโ€™re done with GS, a shoutout to Will Richard (5 points, 14 minutes). We tease Kerr all the time about playing these randos, but this kid looks like he can actually play. TEN) All Luka and Austin The Lakers are gonna struggle hard while LeBronโ€™s out. They just donโ€™t have any other guys on the team that can create. Luka Doncic (43 points, 10 rebounds, 9 assists, 34.7% USG) and Austin Reaves (26 points, 9 assists, 30.1% USG) scored or assisted on 97 of the Lakers' 109 points. So wild. Marcus Smart (9 points) was the first sub off the bench. As for DeAndre Aytonโ€™s debut (10 points, 6 rebounds, 4 turnovers), letโ€™s just say it didnโ€™t take long for the Lakersโ€™ fan base to turn on him. Poor guy looked lost out there. "We just started. This is probably the second game we've played together." - Rui Hachimura on what the difference was for the Lakers "The trend I see is that we continue to be a terrible third-quarter team." - JJ Redick The Warriors beat the Lakers 119-109.

Establish The Run NBA

13,499 ะฟั€ะพัะผะพั‚ั€ะพะฒ โ€ข 8 ะผะตััั†ะตะฒ ะฝะฐะทะฐะด

77 Reasons Why Iโ€™ve Invested Over $8,000,000+ in MultiversX (EGLD) and Why EGLD Will Crush It in 2025 (My Investment Thesis). I publicly shared my portfolio on X. EGLD is A) Better than BTC B) Everything that ETH wants to be C) The GameStop of Crypto 1. EGLD is verifiably the most scalable (theoretically unlimited) L1 chain in the world, theoretically capable of over 10 million TPS (thanks to adaptive state sharding). 2. e-Gold is digital gold. It has the best tokenomics among all L1s, similarly scarce to BTC, with a maximum supply of 31.4 million coins. Currently, 27.68 million coins are in circulation. 3. EGLD will be the most decentralized cryptocurrency in the world thanks to sharding and minimal hardware requirements for running nodes. Itโ€™s already second only to Ethereum with 3,618 validator nodes. 4. EGLD has extremely low fees, around ~$0.002 per transaction. 5. EGLD is extremely secure. No wallet drains like on ETH/SOL; assets are owned natively (not via a smart contract). There is no MEV risk (front-running bots). 6. EGLD is the only chain in the world with an on-chain Guardian (two-phase verification), making it impossible for a hacker to steal your fundsโ€”even if they have your private keys (seed phrase). 7. EGLD is carbon-neutral and eco-friendly, not wasting energy like BTC and other PoW chains. Itโ€™s exceptionally efficient, scalable, global, and sustainable. 8. EGLD has the best UX in crypto. Download the xPortal walletโ€”itโ€™s like discovering Apple in Web3. The interface is simple, flawless, and you barely realize youโ€™re using crypto. Instead of addresses, you use HeroTags. The app features all dApps, everything runs smoothly, and the visuals are beautifully designed. The explorer, web wallet, etc. follow the same high-quality user experience. 9. EGLD supports native assets, unlike Ethereum, for example. 10. EGLD is the first chain to fully implement horizontal (theoretically unlimited) sharding without compromising on decentralizationโ€”unlike Solana and others that attempt vertical scaling, leading to multiple network downtimes (11+ times) and huge hardware demands for validators, ultimately harming decentralization. 11. EGLD makes setting up a validator agency extremely easy. Even complete IT beginners can do it. The UX and documentation are superb. I personally set up the โ€œEGLDSqueezeโ€ agency in about 30 minutes. Managing it is straightforward via the web wallet, which feels like managing a Facebook page. This simplifies decentralization enormously. 12. EGLD allows literally anyone (even your grandma) to participate in decentralization, since nodes can run on a Raspberry Pi or a relatively affordable phone. Imagine millions of people worldwide securing the network, validating transactions without even knowing it. This canโ€™t be done with BTC, where setting up profitable mining operations is prohibitively expensive. 13. WASM-Based Virtual Machine: You can write smart contracts in your favorite language, compile them, and run them via the fastest VM in the world. 14. EGLD has been tested at an incredible 263,000 TPS using its sharding mechanism and low hardware requirements. Allegedly, by mid-next year (April), theyโ€™ll demonstrate 1,000,000 TPS. (For context: Mastercard handles around 5,000 TPS; BTC handles 5โ€“7 TPS.) 15. EGLD is currently the most advanced L1 in terms of scalability, security, decentralization, UX, eco-friendliness, and tokenomics. Itโ€™s the only chain that has genuinely solved the Blockchain Trilemma and is ready to onboard 1 billion people into cryptoโ€”users who wonโ€™t even realize theyโ€™re interacting with crypto. 16. EGLD is perfectly positioned for AI projectsโ€”AI agents, AI tools, or a so-called โ€œTruth Machineโ€ that monitors other AIs on-chain, documenting whatโ€™s true and comparing different AI outputs (some of which may be censored or biased), ensuring people donโ€™t get confused or scammed in an AI-driven world. 17. The EGLD team is the hardest-working team Iโ€™ve ever encountered. I had the honor of meeting many of them personally, and can attest that their paceโ€”even during a bear marketโ€”is extraordinary. 18. EGLDโ€™s development team is exceptionally active on GitHub, continually improving their network and actively committing code. 19. EGLD plans to introduce an update reducing block time to 600ms (down from ~6 seconds), which would make the chain essentially unrivaled. 20. EGLD is effectively the only usable L1 in Europe, and the team has direct connections within the EU governmentโ€”extremely bullish for the project. 21. EGLD provides top-tier on-chain governance not only for the MultiversX (EGLD) protocol but also for DeFi projects (e.g., xExchange, MEX). 22. EGLD plans to expand to the US, likely opening offices in Austin, Texas. This could put them in direct contact with Elon Musk (if it hasnโ€™t happened already), as heโ€™s involved with If heโ€™s done his research, heโ€™d discover thereโ€™s simply no better L1 worldwide. 23. EGLD solved fully implemented sharding, perfect tokenomics, and top-tier architecture with just $5M, whereas other chains failed to do so even with $100M+. The second-best sharding network, NEAR, needed $100M, has worse tokenomics, and its sharding isnโ€™t fully implemented yet. Its UX also doesnโ€™t compare. Owning NEAR was like comparing a VW Golf R to a Porsche GT3โ€”EGLD is the Porsche GT3. 24. According to Similarweb, EGLD has significantly high traffic relative to other chains with market caps 100x larger. The market cap vs. web traffic discrepancy is huge, which is a strong indicator of EGLDโ€™s potential. 25. EGLD has the most active and dedicated community relative to its user base, with users who believe in the technology, have full faith in the team, and remain loyal despite price volatilityโ€”because they use the chain and know thereโ€™s nothing better. 26. Check other chainsโ€™ active user counts on X (Twitter) and compare it with the followers of EGLDโ€™s founders and main network accounts, versus those with 30x, 50x, or 100x larger market caps. 27. Visit the MultiversX website to observe the futuristic design and presentation, then compare it to other chains that appear nearly a decade behind in design and branding. 28. EGLD hosts the xDay Global event, showcasing updates, new builders, projects in the ecosystem, and major announcementsโ€”similar to Appleโ€™s Keynotesโ€”delivered in a highly professional, goosebump-inducing atmosphere. The next event is in Korea, the second-biggest crypto market after the US. Check out their previous xDay after-movie to see why this is extremely bullish. 29. EGLD is moving forward with plans for the first regulated, audited EU stablecoin under MiCa regulation, made possible by acquiring xMoney, which I view as a โ€œStripeโ€ for crypto/fiat, offering everything from user solutions to merchant servicesโ€”potentially the future of payments. 30. Greg Siourouni recently joined EGLD, having been an executive director at SUI Foundation. Heโ€™s now co-founder of xMoney Global. xMoney (formerly UTrust, with token UTK) is owned and founded by the MultiversX Labs team. A stablecoin might be introduced soon, which would be massively bullish given xMoneyโ€™s roadmap. They recently announced integrations with Binance Payโ€”both ways. 31. EGLD prioritizes user safety, believing itโ€™s the only feasible approach once the network scales to serve a billion peopleโ€”many of whom are retail users with little to no security awareness. 32. EGLD offers โ€œSovereign Chains,โ€ letting you effectively clone their chain without heavy development, set up your own validators, and leverage their unlimited scalability. Any blockchain (ETH, BTC, SOL) struggling with scalability, decentralization, or security could run an ultra-fast, scalable, and secure L2 on EGLDโ€™s Sovereign Chain, meeting top enterprise requirements. No one else has really done this. The Sovereign Chain demo achieved astonishing TPS and has an SDK. 33. No downtime since inception. 34. No shard takeover attacks have occurred. 35. Extremely fastโ€”soon 600ms block time will be in place. 36. ESDTs โ€“ The best token standard available: fungible, non-fungible, semi-fungible, DeFi assetsโ€”everything is native and highly customizable. 37. Top-tier composability of assets and smart contracts. 38. Integrated DNS at protocol level with HeroTags (nicknames) instead of long addresses. 39. Asynchronous calls are supported. 40. Cross-shard transfers, execution, reverts, and calls are seamlessly integrated. 41. The best staking system in the space. Secure Proof of Stake (SPoS) is far more efficient than Proof of Work (PoW). 42. Built-in Delegation and Staking Provider system, with over 125K delegators. 43. Complete support for liquid staked assets, fostering decentralization rather than centralization. 44. TransferRoles for ESDT and other advanced operations. 45. Composable tasks on-chain for more sophisticated DeFi workflows. 46. MultiTransfer and asset execution within one transaction. 47. Re-entrancy protection is built-in by design. 48. Storage for ESDT assets goes beyond a linear approach, optimizing performance. 49. No integer overflows thanks to integrated safeMath operations. 50. Integrated crypto opcodes in the VM, enhancing security and performance. 51. Support for BigFloats, BigInts, and BigDecimals, enabling advanced financial calculations on-chain. 52. No sandwich attacks, plus front-running and MEV protection. 53. Relayed Transactions, simplifying user interactions and fees. 54. Smart Accounts featuring data tries and multiple built-in functions. 55. Generalized Paymaster solutions, enabling flexible fee models. 56. Subscriptions for recurring or automated on-chain payments. 57. Web2-like usability with Web3 functionality, bridging mainstream adoption. 58. StakingV4 for improved decentralization. 59. Enhanced MEV protection rolling out to safeguard users. 60. Parallel execution is coming soon, boosting throughput. 61. 1 million TPS is on the roadmap, targeted for demonstration. 62. 600ms block time is also coming soon. 63. Reduced cross-shard processing is planned to improve efficiency. 64. ZK everywhere (PIยฒ): โ€œprove everythingโ€ approach is coming. 65. AsyncV3 is in development for more complex cross-contract interactions. 66. Scalability enhancements for Merkle Tries or a new data model are being explored. 67. Linear storage on the VM is forthcoming. 68. A dynamic language interpreter at the VM is also planned. 69. Rumors suggest that MultiversX (EGLD) is building a โ€œTruth Machineโ€ on their L1โ€”an essential, game-changing tool for AI verification and societal impact. 70. The entire team features individuals with PhDs in mathematics and physics, and many are former engineers at Google, IBM, and similar companies. 71. Over 56% of the networkโ€™s supply is staked, showcasing strong community involvement. 72. More than 6,772,347 accounts have been created on the network. 73. A total of 476,627,710 transactions have been processed on-chain without any outages or hacks. 74. EGLD has built a massive ecosystem over time. While not as numerous in project count as Solana, its market cap is ~100x smaller, yet it has far superior tokenomics and technology. The projects that do exist, like Hatom Protocol, are top-tier in UX, security, and advanced features. Hatom will soon introduce USH, a truly high-quality, decentralized stablecoin. 75. On competing chains, automated transactions arenโ€™t easily or cheaply executed, whereas on MultiversX, tools like let you do this for free (with near-zero fees). 76. No other chain combines such a strong team and long-term vision where every product meets extreme security and UX standards like MultiversX does. This is why I see it as the โ€œnext Appleโ€ in Web3. 77. MultiversX has a new CMO โ€“ Adam Bates, a former CMO at the Cardano Foundation. He was behind the success of Cardanoโ€™s huge marketing campaign and has a very good relationship with Charles Hoskinson. Thanks to him, Beniamin Mincu (the founder of MultiversX) was likely introduced, and now they will probably discuss how both blockchains can help each other, as well as any other potential collaborations we donโ€™t yet know about. This is also extremely bullish. #EGLD is undeniably the most Scalable, Advanced, Secure, and User-friendly L1 supercomputer ever created. Itโ€™s built to SHAPE THE FUTURE. 1) 2) 3) 4) 5) 27/6/2024 - EGLDSqueeze - SUMMARY: HERE IS NO 2ND BEST. EGLD IS ONLY ONE BLOCKCHAIN THAT CAN RULE THEM ALL. โœ… UNLIMITED SCALING โœ… SCARCE AS BTC โœ… PROGRAMMABLE AS ETH โœ… NO DOWNTIME AS SOL โœ… UI/UX OF Apple โœ… SHARDING DONE BEFORE NEAR & TON โœ… BEST WALLET xPortal WITH GUARDIAN Price prediction (NFA|DYOR): My reasoning is that the real market cap as of December 23, 2024...if we take into account the value of other cryptocurrencies such as BTC, SOL, ETH, AVAX, NEAR, TON, Cardano, BNB, XRP, and so forth, plus the existence of meme coins with valuations above 20 billion USD, or even games nobody plays anymore that still have valuations above 800 million shows that EGLDโ€™s current market cap of approximately 942 million USD is incredibly low. From a technological standpoint, user experience, and other relevant aspects, compared to SOL, NEAR, TON, AVAX, and other L1 protocols, EGLDโ€™s market cap should realistically be around 100 billion USD. Therefore, my prediction and investment thesis is a minimum of a 100x increase from its current price (+-SOL marketcap). MultiversX is ready to onboard 1 billion people to the blockchain. From a long-term perspective, it could even reach a market cap of 1 trillion USD, which is roughly half of where BTC is right now. That would be approximately a 1060x gain from the current market cap. 1 EGLD (MultiversX) is for $34 (only 31.4M max supply) think about this. Not financial advice. Again. There is no 2nd best L1. Position yourself where the puck is going, then wait at the goal until the goal gets there Apes together, strong. Ape alone, weak. We Don't Worry. We Just Win. Shape The Future

Daniel Veroc

50,029 ะฟั€ะพัะผะพั‚ั€ะพะฒ โ€ข 1 ะณะพะด ะฝะฐะทะฐะด

[Behavioral Scientist's Analysis] NewJeans, Now Even Stronger, HYBE in Trouble Iโ€™ll listen again. Danielle: โ€œNaturally, we all want to continue working with Daepyonim. Even before debuting as NewJeans and through all of the time that we spent together with Min Hee-jin Daepyonim, all of us felt that the music we wanted to make and the kind of world we wanted to build together, our vision, was similar in so many ways. With Min Hee-jin Daepyonim, we were able to prepare each and every task with sincere hearts, and I believe it shows in our work. Putting our sincere effort into something is only possible because the people that we're working with have trust in each other and have that same vision. Min Hee-jin Daepyonim is not only the person that produces our music, but someone who makes NewJeans who we are. She discusses even the smallest details with us and explains them in ways that we can understand clearly. NewJeans has a distinct colour and tone, and this was created with Min Hee-jin Daepyonim. She is integral to NewJeansโ€™ identity, and we all feel that she is irreplaceable.โ€ Danielle clearly stated this and also expressed it in English. So, in terms of the NewJeans issue, international fans who donโ€™t have much information may not have had a clear perception of Ms. Min Hee-jin or how to view this issue. If you look at the comments, it was very poorly organized. In Korea, we now have clear information, so NewJeans fans, Bunnies, are cheering for NewJeans and supporting Ms. Min Hee-jin. It has become clearly sorted out like this. However, internationally, it hasnโ€™t been clearly explained. But with Danielle explaining it so well in English, I expect that from now on, the international atmosphere will shift towards attacking HYBE, criticizing Bang Si-hyuk, and supporting Ms. Min Hee-jin and NewJeans worldwide. So, now that the artist has clearly stated their position and made it clear that the identity and assets of the NewJeans brand come from Ms. Min Hee-jin, regardless of any legal disputes or lawsuits, in the minds of the fans, NewJeans equals Min Hee-jin. And as for the current management of ADOR and HYBE, they will be seen as the ones attacking NewJeans and the mysterious people with no clear motive, such as Bang Si-hyuk. I think this will now be clear. Considering the nature of the entertainment industry, like many creative industries and the cultural industry, this is not manufacturing. Many things canโ€™t be determined through legal processes like patents for ideas or lawsuits. The B2C market, or the market for services and consumption of an artist's brand, is driven by sensitivity. People consume it because of the emotional connection and enjoy it because of that sensitivity. So, whatโ€™s the point of winning a legal case? Even if HYBE were to win any legal case, do you think consumers wouldnโ€™t boycott NewJeansโ€™ music or other products afterward? I believe HYBE will be punished in some way for its actions towards ADOR and its current management. The way they are handling risk management is shortsighted, as they fail to understand peopleโ€™s emotions. They seem to only rely on the advice of legal professionals and accountants, and their entire approach to this issue is so narrow-minded and misguided. It feels incredibly foolish to me. So, to summarize: NewJeansโ€™ branding was done by Ms. Min Hee-jin. The identity and assets of the NewJeans brand were created by her, and we did it together because of her. Haerin: โ€œHowever, even after our debut, there have been many unfair and incomprehensible incidents that you might not know about, and these incidents have only increased over time. As some of you may know, recently, videos from our trainee days and private records, such as medical information, were leaked. When I first saw that, I was really shocked. It was hard to understand how our company, which is supposed to protect us, failed to manage and allowed such information to be leaked. Naturally, this situation has made us worry that other strange or false information about us might spread in the future. Although we, along with our parents and Min Hee-jin Daepyonim, have raised concerns about this to HYBE, they havenโ€™t resolved the issue, nor have they taken any proactive measures. Then, in the midst of all this, our CEO was dismissed, and weโ€™re left wondering whom we can trust and rely on. Weโ€™ve come to the conclusion that if we donโ€™t speak out about this now, no one will know what weโ€™re going through. After much discussion among ourselves, we finally decided to take this step.โ€ The current situation is shocking, but this is not just about this one incident; theyโ€™ve been continuously receiving unfair treatment from HYBE. The fact that they are saying this publicly now is truly shocking. Theyโ€™ve been discussing these unfair treatments with their parents and Ms. Min Hee-jin while continuing their activities as NewJeans. They are saying that the unfair treatment from HYBE has been ongoing. Itโ€™s hard to understand as an outsider, but now the artists themselves have confirmed that there have been instances where the company has mistreated them. This is no longer a matter of speculation or exaggeration. NewJeans has officially admitted that HYBE has been continuously mistreating them. Moving forward, this changes the entire perspective on the issue. Itโ€™s no longer just NewJeans vs. HYBE or Min Hee-jin vs. Bang Si-hyuk. Itโ€™s hard to even imagine the reality of this situation. Now that the NewJeans artists have come out and said that HYBE has mistreated them, regardless of how HYBE tries to communicate going forward, they will now be framed as the ones mistreating NewJeans. How can they possibly shake off this perception now? I donโ€™t think they can. Hanni: โ€œSomething happened to me recently. The 4th floor of the HYBE building is where we get our hair and makeup done, so a lot of other artists and staff come and go there. One day, I was waiting alone in the hallway, and some staff from another team passed by. We greeted each other, but when they came back out a bit later, I heard one of their managers say, โ€œIgnore her,โ€ right in front of me. I could hear and see everything clearly. Even now, I still donโ€™t understand why I had to go through that.โ€ I still donโ€™t understand why that happened, even now. When I think about it, I feel like it was really ridiculous. This story from Hanni was so frustrating and absurd. Wow, what Hanni just shared is really shocking. She mentioned meeting an artist, and that artist's manager told them to ignore her. If this happened in middle or high school, people would probably dismiss it as childish fighting, but this happened among adults, and it's becoming a huge issue. Honestly, the NewJeans members arenโ€™t sharing these stories to stir things up. Theyโ€™re probably just speaking truthfully about their experiences and trying to be genuine with their fans, saying, โ€œItโ€™s time we express our stance honestly.โ€ The timing and approach theyโ€™ve taken are actually perfect. They started by clearly explaining their motivations and why theyโ€™re speaking out, then moved on to using English to express what NewJeansโ€™ identity is and the members' feelings, as well as their history with their manager. They made it clear how they feel about these situations. Now, they've started sharing more detailed stories. The way theyโ€™ve structured everything is so good because people remember stories more than abstract thoughts or philosophies. When you say, โ€œThis happened to me,โ€ people are much more likely to remember that than vague statements. Hanni shared her unfair experience in such an honest way, and I think itโ€™s going to spread widely. I can already imagine netizens trying to figure out which manager it was, which artist, and so on. This story will likely go viral. People remember stories like this because they stick in their minds. For example, remember when Bang Si-hyuk didnโ€™t return NewJeansโ€™ greeting, and it became a huge thing about face blindness? People donโ€™t remember the details, but they remember that someone important didnโ€™t greet them. It became a memorable story. Minji: โ€œWhen I heard about what Hanni experienced, I was really shocked. How could a manager from another team tell their members to ignore one of us, and say it so loudly that Hanni could hear it? Such unimaginable words and behavior were directed at us, yet there was no apology, nor did they even acknowledge their wrongdoing. Of course, Iโ€™m worried about how many more similar incidents might occur in the future and whether weโ€™ll be subtly ostracized without anyone there to protect us.โ€ Hanni: โ€œI hope no one else has to go through something like that, but since itโ€™s already happened once, I canโ€™t help but feel scared that other members might experience the same thing. I spoke to the new CEO about it, but since I didnโ€™t have evidence and it was considered too late, they seemed to brush it off, making me feel like thereโ€™s no one left to protect us. It really felt like the concern for us was gone, and even though I was being honest, it made me feel like I was suddenly being treated as a liar. Before, Min Heejin, our previous CEO, used to take care of us a lot. But now, while the new people say theyโ€™ll help, itโ€™s just been months of excuses... excuses... excuses... They keep saying that itโ€™s something they canโ€™t resolve. But this is something that I personally went through and experienced, yet they are trying to dismiss it as if itโ€™s my fault. Iโ€™m worried and scared about what might happen next.โ€ I want to make two points here. First, this is clearly โ€œinvisibility.โ€ Itโ€™s not physical violence, but itโ€™s about not acknowledging someoneโ€™s greeting, deliberately ignoring them, and so on. While it may not seem like a big deal, it still deeply hurts someoneโ€™s feelings. Thereโ€™s been a lot of research on how these kinds of actions negatively affect an organization, spreading like poison and making people feel bad. Itโ€™s something we should really work against. The second point is about third-party justice. Hanni raised a legitimate concern, and it wasnโ€™t handled properly within the company. This made Hanni, Minji, and others realize that the new management isnโ€™t on their side. When others witness this, theyโ€™ll also realize that this company doesnโ€™t have their best interests at heart. This realization leads to a loss of trust. People will remember these events, and once this perception sticks, itโ€™s hard to change. It affects not just NewJeans, but also other artists who will think, โ€œOh, this is how HYBE treats people.โ€ And it even affects the employees who work there. Minji: โ€œOf course, Iโ€™m worried about our future, but whatโ€™s most frightening is that the work weโ€™ve already created is being compromised. Seeing the people who have poured their lives into creating our work being treated this way makes it hard to understand how this could be happening. The new management said they would separate producing and management, but weโ€™ve always worked differently from other labels, and we thought that our way was a good one. Now, Daepyonim can no longer approve all matters, and weโ€™re left wondering how weโ€™re supposed to continue working as we did before. The recent statement from the new management also didnโ€™t make sense to me. If they really didnโ€™t intend to interfere with our production, then the recent incident with Director Shin Woo-seok should never have happened, and it should have been handled differently. We are the ones directly involved with the copyrights and likeness rights of our content, yet theyโ€™re making decisions without our consent. In their statement, they kept saying they were acting to protect us and prevent our anxiety, but why do they keep insisting on this when they havenโ€™t considered our wishes? We donโ€™t want any more unnecessary issues to arise, and we want them to show respect and consideration for Daepyonim and all the directors who have worked with us. The things theyโ€™re doing right now are not in our best interest at all.โ€ Whatโ€™s worth discussing here is the perception of hypocrisy. People really dislike hypocrisy, and when you think about it, it makes sense. When humans are surviving, if thereโ€™s an enemy or a difficult environment, they overcome it as part of life. But the most dangerous situation is when you think someone is an ally, but they turn out to be an enemy. When you thought they were on your side but they stab you in the back โ€” thatโ€™s when people are really upset. Thatโ€™s why people hate it when thereโ€™s a discrepancy between outward appearances and inward intentions. It creates a near-hatred, especially when someone claims to be acting for your benefit but itโ€™s clear that theyโ€™re not. This is what Minji is clearly pointing out โ€” these people are hypocrites. New Jeans has already reached a conclusion internally: this new management team, in less than a month, has revealed themselves to be hypocrites. And theyโ€™ve shared this with the fans and everyone else. This isnโ€™t just some interesting topic on a live broadcast; this will cause a huge impact, and I am certain of that. New Jeans has come to a solid realization โ€” these people are not working for us. They are liars and hypocrites. Therefore, the new management can no longer properly lead the company. They will not be able to continue, and this system cannot be maintained. Why? Because the artist has called them out as hypocrites. The only way they can recover is by proving they arenโ€™t hypocrites, but even then, thatโ€™s not effective โ€” New Jeans would have to say it. But the chance of that happening is zero. In short, these people have been socially branded as hypocrites. The new managementโ€™s time is up. Less than a month, and their time is over. In the creative industry, especially in culture and the arts, content production โ€” such as creating songs or music videos โ€” cannot be separated from management. Thatโ€™s how weโ€™ve always worked, and it was good for us. Min Hee-jin was a remarkable creator and artist who understood all of this. The harmony between management and artistic decision-making brought about the incredible phenomenon of New Jeans. But now, theyโ€™ve created a system where that harmony canโ€™t exist anymore. Moreover, the new management is culturally ignorant. They donโ€™t understand art, music, or creativity. They have shown this clearly, especially with their mishandling of Director Shin Woo-seokโ€™s music video and the associated fan content, like those on the Dolphiners YouTube channel. Theyโ€™ve demanded to delete content without protecting the artists, or respecting the work of those who collaborated on it. Their management decisions show a complete lack of sensitivity or empathy. So once again, I say: "the new managementโ€™s time is over." Danielle: โ€œAs I mentioned earlier, our dream was to perform the music we want to make with Daepyonim, and we were working very hard toward that goal. But now, we canโ€™t do that, and the plans weโ€™ve made might not come to fruition. As Hanni unnie said earlier, just like that, the content that we released solely for our fans, for our bunnies, was instantly erased. And I truly can't understand why anyone would do this to a group, or just anyone in general. We were just working hard for the present, so what did we do wrong? A week after Daepyonim was dismissed, we found out that we could no longer work with the director weโ€™ve been working with all this time, and weโ€™re extremely anxious because we donโ€™t know what will happen to the staff who have always worked hard for us. If they really care about us, they should stop saying that they prioritize the artists and instead let us do the music we love in an environment where we can be genuinely happy. Is that really so hard to do? Itโ€™s hard to fully express whatโ€™s in my heart, but in the end, the five of us just want to continue our activities with Min Hee-jin Daepyonim, as we have done so far.โ€ Personally, they just want to be left aloneโ€”just "Leave us alone. Don't interfere; just leave us alone.โ€ This is what theyโ€™re saying to both ADOR and HYBE. It's become clear now that HYBE and ADOR can no longer meddle with NewJeans, and I think things will flow that way from now on. The fans wonโ€™t stand still either. In entertainment, itโ€™s not about titles like "Iโ€™m the CEO," or "I own shares." These are shallow understandings of what makes the entertainment business work. The real value created in this industry is the love and recognition from the fans. No amount of shares or CEO titles matter when that love disappears in an instant. NewJeans is asking to be left alone, and because of this, the new management of HYBE and ADOR can no longer act. I believe the future will unfold accordingly. One important thing I want to emphasize is that NewJeans is a unique group. Theyโ€™re not just factory-produced idols. The distinctive nature of NewJeansโ€™ music is felt by everyone who listens to them. For example, producer 250, who played a significant role in shaping the NewJeans sound, alongside other talented producers like those from the Banana Culture label, was brought in by CEO Min Hee-jin. This collaboration birthed the unique musical style of NewJeans, which many have come to appreciate. Their latest album, which incorporated elements like New Jack Swing, wasnโ€™t just NewJeans making this musicโ€”it was 250's creative vision, drawing inspiration from 70s and 80s funk, R&B, and American black music, and reinterpreting them. If 250 no longer works with NewJeans, their music might become indistinguishable from other idol groups. The choreography, another element that set NewJeans apart, also contributed to their success. However, with the recent tensions, it's obvious that working with key figures like director Shin Woo-seok, who directed many of NewJeans' music videos, will become difficult moving forward. Director Shin wasnโ€™t even interested in music videos before but was inspired to work with NewJeans after a conversation with Min Hee-jin. If Min Hee-jin and people like director Shin are ousted from ADOR, itโ€™s inevitable that the core assets of NewJeans, including their distinctive musical and visual style, will vanish. This is not just a simple matter of one person being oustedโ€”itโ€™s about losing the core elements that made NewJeans what they are. WE STAND WITH NEWJEANS #๋ฒ„๋‹ˆ์ฆˆ_๋‰ด์ง„์Šค์™€ํ•จ๊ป˜_์ค€๋น„๊ฐˆ์™„๋ฃŒ #๋ฐฉ์‹œํ˜_2์ฃผ์ค€๋‹ค_๋ฏผํฌ์ง„_๋ณต๊ท€์‹œ์ผœ๋ผ

1tokki

39,222 ะฟั€ะพัะผะพั‚ั€ะพะฒ โ€ข 1 ะณะพะด ะฝะฐะทะฐะด

๐ŸŸขGIVEAWAY๐ŸŸข Best comments or memes about this whole circus + RT this post. 10 winners will each get $50๐Ÿ’Ž (For evidence, supporting materials, and context, read both articles and watch the video included in the article I posted yesterday) Housebets.com & Porchy pay your debts A few people told me they did not fully understand the first article because there were too many moving parts: leaderboard accounts, rewards, weekly dates, monthly bonus, Tequity, game categories, withdrawals, Provably Fair, seed changes, migration, support tickets, ledgers and founder messages. Fair enough. The evidence is already there, and I still recommend reading the full articles and, above all, watching the video, because the video shows the reward system failing live. But this text is the cleaner version: the full story explained in plain English, without assuming the reader knows anything about crypto casinos, leaderboards or lossback systems. From all the evidence Iโ€™ve gathered, the Housebets story is not a normal โ€œplayer lost moneyโ€ complaint. It looks like a full transparency failure across the whole product: leaderboard, rewards, withdrawals, game categories, Provably Fair / Tequity mapping, support, migration and founder response. Housebets sold itself as a rewards-first casino: public leaderboards, weekly/monthly bonuses, fast withdrawals, VIP treatment and Provably Fair games. But every time I asked for the records behind those systems, snapshots, ledger entries, weekly cycles, GGR/NGR, slider logs, PF seed mapping, Tequity round IDs, withdrawal approval logs, the answer became some version of โ€œforwarded to the relevant department.โ€ This started long before the public dispute. I was not some random angry player who appeared after one bad session. In January I was helping Housebets and giving product feedback. I literally told support on 27 January that I was โ€œtesting the website for George,โ€ while already dealing with a non-instant withdrawal and a 100% welcome bonus that had not applied. Support even asked me for โ€œproof about your testing job.โ€ The same chat shows the advertised 100% Welcome Bonus, the bonus not applying, and support saying the withdrawal needed internal confirmation instead of being instant. The welcome bonus issue never looked clean. Housebets advertised a 100% Welcome Bonus up to $1,000 on first deposit; I deposited, contacted support, and the bonus did not apply. Then support effectively turned a first-deposit bonus into a second-deposit workaround because the first one had not been applied properly. On 31 January I came back after another deposit and told them the bonus still had not been applied, even though I had already followed supportโ€™s instructions. Edward replied that he had โ€œforwardedโ€ the concern to the team. The same 100% welcome bonus was still being advertised in March. By April, the rewards system was already showing serious problems. I had the weekly slider at 100% lossback and told support I had lost money but the weekly did not appear. Jacky said the weekly was generated every Thursday at 00:01 UTC and gave actual internal figures: GGR $6,250, Total Bonus $6,083.99, NGR $168.31. So Housebets clearly had internal calculations when it wanted to explain why something might not pay. But when I later asked for full calculations, those same numbers suddenly became impossible to produce. Then on 18โ€“19 April, the rewards page was bugged and would not let me claim. Support could see a pending weekly bonus of $717.37, but I could not claim it from the UI. Tee said it had been forwarded to the relevant department. That $717.37 later appears in the bonus ledger as Rakeback (20 Apr) 717.37089061, so I am not saying that specific one stayed unpaid forever. The point is worse: already in April, support could see a pending weekly reward while the player-facing reward page did not work. For a casino built around rewards, that is not a small bug. That is the product. In May, the UI and account data kept failing basic trust checks. On 8 May, I deposited 400 USDT; support said it had been credited, but I could not see it, and the proposed fix was to log out, clear cookies and cache. On 16 May, I asked why total deposits and withdrawals had disappeared from the menu; support said the platform was โ€œin continuous evolution.โ€ On 17 May, I asked for my total deposits and withdrawals, and support said they did not have direct access to that consolidated summary and would email it. That full official ledger did not arrive. So when Housebets later defends itself with UI screenshots, remember: this was the same UI where deposits could be credited but invisible, totals disappeared, rewards pages bugged, and support could not access consolidated account totals. Withdrawals were also not what was advertised. On 16 May, I asked why a crypto withdrawal was pending if withdrawals were supposed to be instant. Tee answered: โ€œA few withdrawals require manual approval,โ€ then added, โ€œOur withdrawals are typically instant butโ€ฆโ€ That matters because a few days later the withdrawal delay became real damage. On 25 May, I told support before a match that I needed the funds to place a time-sensitive bet on another site in less than 20 minutes. I explained I wanted to bet around 60k at odds of 2.55. The withdrawal did not arrive in time. Later I told them the bet won and that I missed around 90k in profit because Housebets took more than two hours despite being warned before the match started. Jacky said he would raise the compensation case to the VIP team. Nobody resolved it. This was not one delayed withdrawal either. In my formal complaint I reconstructed several withdrawal delays: 23 May 02:55 โ†’ 08:03, around 5h08m; 25 May 03:05 โ†’ 08:09, around 5h04m; 17 May 03:54 โ†’ 08:02, around 4h08m; 18 May 04:46 โ†’ 08:11, around 3h25m; 16 May 05:23 โ†’ 08:12, around 2h49m. That is not โ€œinstant withdrawal.โ€ And if later marketing says withdrawals are much faster now, the obvious question is: if this was the faster version, what did slow look like? The Provably Fair / Tequity side was another major issue. On 17 May I asked support how to verify an old Blackjack round. I did not ask for a generic explanation of Provably Fair; I asked where I could see the server seed, client seed, nonce and result for previous games. Support sent me to bet history, mentioned RTP, gave a generic PF explanation and showed the current Dice seed screen. When I said that did not let me verify previous games, they told me to clear cookies/cache. After doing that, I saw a new client seed and nonce 1 even though I had not played with that seed pair. I asked if Housebets changes seeds on every login. Support could not answer and told me to contact VIP. That seed/session behaviour is important. I later recorded video evidence around the seed changing after clearing cookies/cache and asked for the exact mapping: Housebets account ID โ†’ Tequity/provider player ID โ†’ session/currency context โ†’ seed pair โ†’ server seed hash โ†’ revealed server seed โ†’ client seed โ†’ nonce/cursor โ†’ raw outcome โ†’ final result. Housebets cannot sell Provably Fair if the player cannot verify historical bets, and โ€œcontact VIPโ€ is not a verification algorithm. On 24 May, I asked for raw verification data for a specific Tequity Blackjack round: Round ID e1648d60-0da1-4433-a5ab-9ae39f5302e3, Blackjack, Tequity, bet amount 11,346 USDT, client seed O3YBZF7LBu, server seed hash starting 712875.... I asked for revealed server seed, nonce, full result JSON, card draw order and verification algorithm. I also asked about an apparent duplicate-card/deck question. Tee replied: โ€œI donโ€™t have the answers to your questions right now, but Iโ€™m forwarding your request to the relevant department.โ€ That same day, I asked for a full audit of six Dice bets of 11,400 USDT each, total 68,400 USDT. I requested bet IDs, provider round IDs, roll results, seed data, balance ledger, request/session logs, security logs, retry flags, provider records and a full technical reconciliation. Tee replied: โ€œI will forward this to the relevant department.โ€ So when I asked for raw data, the answer was not data. It was forwarding. Again. There were also many large loss clusters that required reconciliation because of those unresolved PF, Tequity, category, RTP and session questions. In my complaint I listed clusters such as 25 May 02:17โ€“02:54 Blackjack around 169,932 USDT; 16 May 12:31โ€“13:26 Dice around 90,571.92 USDT; 26 May 02:48โ€“03:58 Mines around 89,199 USDT; 24 May 06:20โ€“06:21 Dice at 68,400 USDT; 26 May 00:11โ€“01:41 Blackjack around 59,910 USDT; 25 May 22:51โ€“22:59 Dice around 59,576 USDT; and several more between 40k and 56k. I am not saying every losing cluster proves manipulation by itself. I am saying that when PF mapping, provider logs, RTP/HE, category mapping and seed/session behaviour are unresolved, these sequences need a real reconciliation. The leaderboard is where the story becomes very hard for Housebets to explain. Around 19โ€“20 May, two new accounts, elmourabut and lucasmartirini, appeared and started climbing every day at a vertiginous pace. Not normal slow leaderboard growth. Not a casual player building volume over time. They were created around that period and then started rising with huge wagering in a way that looked extremely unnatural for brand new accounts. By 29 May, I was first on both weekly and monthly leaderboards, and those two accounts were directly behind me with huge volume. In the monthly leaderboard screenshots, I was around $3.33M wagered, while elmourabut was around $1.29M and lucasmartirini around $1.08M. In the weekly leaderboard, I was around $1.096M, while those two accounts were around $635k and $578k. They were not normal accounts sitting at the bottom; they were directly behind me, applying pressure. In my formal complaint I recorded that elmourabut joined on 19 May and lucasmartirini on 20 May, that they showed zero visible withdrawals, large deposits/wagering and significant card-game volume, and I asked Housebets to confirm they were not staff, test, QA, admin, house-controlled, affiliate-controlled, internally funded, promotional, bonus-only or multi-account related accounts. This matters because a leaderboard is not passive. It is gamification. It makes players defend rank. When two new accounts appear behind you with hundreds of thousands or more than a million in volume, you are pressured to keep wagering. In my case, the disputed deposit sequence from 25 May 22:23 to 26 May 02:09 totals 91,168.375326 USDT. That sequence begins with 1,000.00 at 22:23 and continues with repeated deposits until 2,879.148969 at 02:09. The video later shows why those dates matter: there were deposits coming in, no gameplay withdrawal offsetting the sequence, a balance basically at zero, and later a leaderboard prize shown as P/L. I formally asked Housebets to confirm those two leaderboard accounts were real and eligible, and also to preserve wager logs, transaction records, balance adjustment logs, account flags, leaderboard calculation snapshots, support ticket logs, Telegram/email records and internal notes. Edward said he forwarded the request. In the same thread, he added that they were โ€œworking on fixing an issue regarding the weekly bonuses,โ€ and then said the weekly countdown was โ€œnot currently on Thursday evenings.โ€ So the leaderboard issue and the weekly bonus issue are linked in time and support context. After that, Housebets confirmed by email that elmourabut and lucasmartirini were โ€œlegitimate and eligible accounts.โ€ That email is the trap door. If they were legitimate and eligible, they should have remained in the leaderboard with their volume. If they were not, Housebets should never have confirmed them as legitimate and eligible. After that confirmation, the accounts disappeared from the leaderboard or stopped appearing in the positions their previous wagering required. I went back to support on 30 May and wrote: โ€œThere has been a material post-confirmation leaderboard change involving two accounts that Housebets had already confirmed as legitimate and eligible. I need the exact reason, timestamp, logs, and recalculation basis.โ€ Edward said the matter was flagged and that I could expect a prompt response. I am still waiting for the actual explanation. Why did they disappear? My read is simple: because every hour that passed, there was more evidence around those accounts. They had been created around the same period, they were climbing at a speed that looked anything but human, they showed no visible withdrawals in the data I could see and reported, they appeared to be generating huge volume in unclear game categories, and the games/categories tied to that volume did not even make sense from the player-facing UI. When I started asking what they were actually playing, what Card meant, whether the volume was Tequity / UnOriginals / House Games, what RTP and house edge applied, and where the logs were, the questions became uncomfortable. Keeping those accounts visible became harder than removing them. So they disappeared. The game category issue made the leaderboard even more suspicious. On 30 May, I asked support why my own stats showed almost all my volume under Slots / Tragamonedas when I did not play real slots. I told them: โ€œi dont play 3$ in unoriginals,โ€ โ€œi played all 3M in unoriginals,โ€ and โ€œive never play slots.โ€ I asked what โ€œCardโ€ was, where that game was, what RTP and house edge it had. Monica said Card was mainly Blackjack, Baccarat and Poker variants. Marcus later said the team was investigating why it showed that I mostly played slots when I had not. He could not give the exact game, RTP, HE, provider, category mapping or contribution logic. That matters because those same unclear categories were connected to leaderboard volume. If the site cannot clearly explain whether volume is Slots, Card, UnOriginals, House Games, Blackjack, Baccarat, Always 9 Baccarat or Tequity, then the leaderboard is not auditable for the player. I even asked which UnOriginals those two accounts were playing, and support told me to look at Live Bets. That is not an answer. I was not asking for gossip; I was asking what exact games generated leaderboard volume, what RTP/HE applied and whether that volume was eligible. There is also an earlier leaderboard-related precedent: Porchy had already told me in February that I would lose leaderboard places if I did not rename, because too many people were messaging support saying the site was not being fair due to my name and it โ€œdoesnโ€™t make us look good.โ€ That matters because it suggests leaderboard positioning was not treated as a sacred, untouchable system when public perception was involved. If leaderboard positions can be threatened for image reasons, then later claims that everything is purely automatic deserve scrutiny. Then Porchy made the leaderboard situation worse. Instead of producing logs or snapshots, he later said the leaderboard had โ€œabusersโ€ on it, that they were removed to help other players, and that it never affected me. Later he said they paid every single person, โ€œeven these abusers,โ€ then called me โ€œbegging for money.โ€ That creates a direct contradiction: Housebets confirmed the accounts as legitimate and eligible, then Porchy referred to leaderboard โ€œabusers.โ€ If they were abusers, why were they confirmed as legitimate and eligible? If they were eligible, why did they disappear? If they never affected me, where are the historical snapshots proving that? Once those accounts disappeared, Housebets paid the leaderboard prizes. On 1 June, the bonus ledger shows two Leaderboard entries: 5,007.46111706 and 1,001.49222341, totaling 6,008.95334047. That part was paid. But then Act Two started: the weekly and monthly rewards did not appear as separate ledger entries. The same bonus ledger shows those two 1 June entries as Leaderboard only, not Monthly Bonus, not Weekly Reload, not Lossback. The weekly timeline is a mess. On 28 May, the dashboard / UI said the weekly bonus was claimable every Thursday at 00:01 UTC, and the monthly was available on the 1st at 00:01 UTC. That same night I told support the weekly had shown as available, then reset to 6 days without paying. Later I sent screenshots and wrote: โ€œ1M wagered and 0.2$.โ€ Jacky said he had raised the issue to the technical team. So the weekly failure was reported live, not reconstructed after the fact. The next day, 29 May, Edward said they were fixing an issue regarding weekly bonuses and that the weekly countdown was โ€œnot currently on Thursday evenings.โ€ Then on 1 June, Spencer said the May weekly bonuses were 7th, 14th, 21st, and then due to migration the weekly moved to Monday, so there was one on the 25th on the new platform. He also said the 25 May weekly covered gameplay from 21โ€“24 May, and that tech was looking at that plus the monthly bonus. The ledger does show a 25 May 02:10 Rakeback entry of 1,996.08334791, which likely corresponds to that 21โ€“24 May weekly. But my major loss sequence starts about 20 hours later, on 25 May at 22:23, and continues until 26 May at 02:09. So the 25 May weekly cannot cover those losses. If weekly was still Thursday, the 25/26 losses should have been in the 28 May weekly. But the bonus ledger on 28 May shows only two tiny Rakeback entries, 0.28373945 and 0.00280958. If weekly moved to Monday because of migration, those losses should have appeared in the next weekly after 25 May. But on 1 June the ledger only shows Leaderboard entries. Then the final video shows the next Weekly Reload reaching zero, paying nothing and resetting to 6d 23h. So the same loss sequence appears to fall into no paid weekly cycle. The 4 June support conversation makes this even more ridiculous. After I recorded the weekly reset video, I asked support a very simple question: what were the last weekly dates/cycles? The dashboard / support flow again said weekly bonuses are claimable every Thursday at 00:01 UTC. Jacky confirmed: โ€œWeekly bonuses can be claimed every Thursday at 00:01 UTC in the Rewards tab,โ€ and added that if not claimed by the following Wednesday at 23:59 UTC, it expires. But when I asked for the exact last four dates, Jacky said he had to check with the relevant department. When I pressed again, he said, โ€œSorry, As I am only a CS, Let me raise your concerns to relevant department.โ€ I asked whether support did not have the information or simply could not answer. He replied: โ€œDo you have any other concerns?โ€ They use weekly cycles to decide whether to pay, but support cannot explain the weekly cycle. The monthly is missing too. The dashboard / UI said the monthly bonus is based on activity and VIP level from the previous month and is available on the 1st at 00:01 UTC. In May I had more than 3,258,023.0829 wagered according to the formal complaint data. I also have proof/video that the monthly slider was set to 50/50. On 1 June, Spencer first told me I had claimed the Monthly Bonus at 1:12am BST around the same time as the monthly leaderboard reward. I immediately said I only received leaderboard prizes. Then Spencer changed the answer: โ€œOur tech team are still actively working on issues regarding the monthly bonuses.โ€ So first the monthly was claimed, then tech was still fixing it. The ledger still shows no Monthly Bonus entry. Housebets then seems to rely on โ€œup overallโ€ as a defence. But the video and ledger show why that does not work. My weekly/monthly profile later showed around +6,008 P/L with 0 deposits, 0 wagered and around 6,008 in bonuses. That number matches exactly the two 1 June Leaderboard payments. So the UI is showing leaderboard rewards as P/L. Then support used โ€œup overallโ€ to say I was not eligible for weekly lossback. That is not a clean lossback calculation. That is using a leaderboard reward as apparent profit to deny a lossback that should be based on actual eligible losses. There were also smaller reward-confusion issues along the way. On 22 May I asked for all pending bonuses,weekly, monthly, rakeback, level-up, anything, and support said the internal team would manually verify whether everything had been credited correctly and email me. On 24 May, I asked about level-up rewards because the reward looked like $3,500 for Pearl; support clarified it was $3,500 total across all Pearl levels, $500 per level. These are not the core issues, but they are part of the same pattern: rewards marketing, unclear UI, manual verification, emails that do not arrive, and players having to chase basic explanations. Then there is the migration. On 25 May, after the delayed withdrawal, missing VIP contact and unresolved issues, support told me my account would be moved to the new platform and that this upgrade would offer a better withdrawal process and fix many issues. Before that migration, I explicitly requested that no account data, internal data, logs, balance history, bonus history, bet history, provider records or pending issues be deleted. The response: โ€œYour request has been relayed to the relevant department.โ€ Again, forwarding. But if the old data is safe, Housebets should provide the old leaderboard snapshots, old weekly states, old bonus logs, old Tequity mapping and old withdrawal approval logs. The founder response did not fix anything. When Porchy finally engaged, he did not provide the records. He framed the settlement request as โ€œso you want $100,000?โ€ and asked whether I needed it or else I was going to post on X. I had already made clear this was not money for silence; I asked for logs, snapshots, withdrawal records, calculations and a counter-calculation if Housebets disagreed. He later referred to โ€œabusers,โ€ told me I was โ€œup overall,โ€ said โ€œYou are begging for money,โ€ and suggested I โ€œjust do this to casinos.โ€ Still no ledger. Still no weekly calculation. Still no monthly entry. Still no PF/Tequity mapping. Still no leaderboard snapshots. Another player also contacted me with screenshots pointing to similar categories of issues: private deals, leaderboard payout disputes, migration/account merge problems, missing history and a tiny monthly bonus despite claimed losses. I am not using that playerโ€™s case as the foundation of my claim without his full ledger, but it matters because it suggests the same type of opacity may not be isolated: private VIP/reward deals, leaderboard eligibility, monthly bonus calculations, migration and unclear history. If Housebets has private deals that affect leaderboard eligibility or rewards, it must explain how those deals interact with public leaderboards. So the overall picture is this: Housebets sold a public leaderboard and rewards system that pressured real wagering. Two new accounts appeared directly behind me with huge volume, were confirmed as legitimate and eligible, then disappeared after I asked for logs and questioned game categories. Housebets could not explain the exact games, RTP, house edge or category mapping behind the volume. The accounts were later framed by Porchy as โ€œabusers,โ€ contradicting the earlier eligibility confirmation. Once Housebets paid me the leaderboard prizes, those prizes were shown as P/L, and that contaminated P/L was then used to claim I was โ€œup overallโ€ and not eligible for lossback. At the same time, my real 25 May 22:23 โ†’ 26 May 02:09 loss sequence of 91,168.375326 USDT appears in no clean weekly cycle. The 25 May weekly covered 21โ€“24 May according to Spencer, so it cannot cover that loss sequence. The 28 May weekly showed only tiny Rakeback entries and was already reported as broken. The 1 June ledger shows only Leaderboard entries. The later video shows Weekly Reload reaching zero, paying nothing and resetting. And when I ask support for the exact weekly calendar, they cannot answer and send it to the relevant department. The monthly is the same story. The dashboard / UI says it is based on activity and VIP. I had more than 3.25M wagered in May. Spencer first says I claimed it, then says tech is still working on monthly bonuses. The ledger shows no Monthly Bonus. If Housebets says I was not eligible, they need to show the formula, slider history, cycle, GGR/NGR, eligible loss/activity, deductions and ledger result. If they cannot, โ€œnot eligibleโ€ is just another label. And this opens another can of worms: Tequity / provider configuration. Housebets cannot hide behind โ€œthe providerโ€ whenever something goes wrong. The player does not deposit with Tequity. The player does not withdraw from Tequity. The player does not speak to Tequity support. The player does not compete in a Tequity leaderboard. The player plays on Housebets, with a Housebets wallet, Housebets UI, Housebets rewards, Housebets leaderboard and Housebets support. 1/2

Dr. W

19,784 ะฟั€ะพัะผะพั‚ั€ะพะฒ โ€ข 1 ะผะตััั† ะฝะฐะทะฐะด

In attempts to understand zionist mindset, i discovered some EXTREMELY disturbing facts; Textbooks -Palestine - genocides, murders, perversion, rape, torture, hate, death to all but "Judaism." Part 1. Transcripts (some spelling errors) In every synagogue library, we find hundreds of books. But there are a few which tower above the rest in authority. These include the Encyclopedia Judaica, the Universal Jewish Encyclopedia. The Jewish Encyclopedia. In the oldest of these, the Jewish Encyclopedia. We encounter fascinating new perspectives on the inner teachings of Judaism and perspectives, which are well known to most religious Jews, but are (UNknown) to Christians. 00:01:50:05 - 00:02:17:24 Most Christians believe that the Judaism of the Old Testament is very similar to Judaism today. Yet the Jewish Encyclopedia and its article on Judaism says modern Judaism and the Judaism of the Old Testament are very different. It says that after Nebuchadnezzar conquered Judah in the sixth century B.C. and led the Jews to distant Babylon, the Jews were faced with challenges to their faith they had never before experienced. 00:02:17:26 - 00:02:45:08 Ever since the time of Solomon. The religion of Israel had centered around the magnificent temple in Jerusalem with its sacrifices and ritual. The question now became How could one be a true Jew in a very foreign, even hostile environment? The need arose for a certain class of lay priests called scribes or so for them to interpret the law in this new setting and make it workable. 00:02:45:10 - 00:03:11:26 In time, these scribes became what the New Testament calls the scribes and Pharisees the greatest legal authorities of Israel for all ages. The Pharisees said there were really two inspired revelations to the Jews. There was the written law of Moses received atop Sinai. But there was also the oral tradition acquired by 70 elders who came to the base of the mountain but were forbidden to proceed. 00:03:11:26 - 00:03:39:03 Father. The Pharisees said that these 70 elders or Sanhedrin received a much more extensive and profound revelation than Moses. A revelation which was never written down, yet took precedent over the written law. When Jesus came on the scene, his reaction was to bitterly denounce this counterfeit tradition. Raised, said the Pharisees, by their tradition, had made the law of God have none effect. 00:03:39:06 - 00:04:10:01 He considered the Pharisees the most dangerous leadership Israel ever had. In 70 A.D., Jerusalem was destroyed by the Romans. Although Jewish sects such as the Sadducees now disappeared. The Pharisees emerged with even greater power over the Jewish people. The Jewish Encyclopedia describes the new role of the Pharisees with the destruction of the temple. The Sadducees disappeared altogether, leaving the regulation of all Jewish affairs in the hands of the Pharisees. 00:04:10:04 - 00:04:39:01 Henceforth, Jewish life was regulated by the Pharisees. The whole history of Judaism was reconstructed from the very same point of view. Parasitism shaped the character of Judaism and the life and thought of the Jew for all of the future. In 135 A.D., all Jews were expelled from Palestine. The Pharisees led most Palestinian Jews in a mass migration back to Babylon. 00:04:39:03 - 00:05:05:15 The majority of Jews were already in Babylon and had been since the time of Nebuchadnezzar 600 years earlier. Yet around 140 A.D., Babylon became the acknowledged land of refuge for world jewelry. For another thousand years, Judaism flourished in Babylon under the leadership of the Pharisees, Great academies of the rabbis were established and thousands of new laws formulated there. 00:05:05:16 - 00:05:12:01 Those same parishes who killed Jesus Christ remain the undisputed rulers of Judaism. 00:05:12:03 - 00:05:45:02 In Babylon, the Pharisees codified their oral traditions into the Babylonian Talmud. The written form of that oral tradition which Jesus so bitterly rebuked the Talmud, reveals How deep was Israel's apostasy? In her beginning, God gave the Hebrews the loftiest, the most upright literature and ethics the world has ever known. Yet when they turned their backs on him, they produced the Talmud, a work which has aptly been called a monument to human folly. 00:05:45:04 - 00:05:52:01 The Talmud also helps us understand the basis for Christ's unflattering descriptions of the Pharisees. 00:05:52:04 - 00:06:23:06 Jesus described the Pharisees as hypocrites. Children of Hell Blind Guides. Why did Sepulcher was full of dead men's bones even describe the Pharisees as children of their father, The devil? A murderer. From the beginning, the Talmud confirms Christ's words in the Talmud. In treatise Sanhedrin and extensive passage describes the right of the Pharisee to kill anyone, just as long as he did so indirectly as one of dozens of examples. 00:06:23:09 - 00:06:50:05 The Talmud tells us that if one bound his neighbor and he died of starvation, he is not liable to execution in such an indirect manner. The Pharisees also killed Christ. Manipulating the Romans to actually wield the spear and sword the Pharisees claimed, as their descendants do today, that since the Romans worthy direct cause of the death of Christ, it is the Romans, not the Jews who are guilty. 00:06:50:07 - 00:07:18:25 Christ also called the Pharisees adulterers and adulterous generation. The Talmud provides generous loopholes for adultery. It says the penalty for adultery does not include sex with a minor. The wife of a minor or the wife of a heathen. The Talmud also encourages seduction of unwed adolescent girls called designated bond maids. But it's important how such rapes are performed with the designated bond made. 00:07:18:26 - 00:07:46:03 One is guilty only in the case of natural connection, but not in the case of perverse connection. The Pharisees reasoned that rape in a perverted manner is outside of the jurisdiction of the law. Normal rape, however, was punishable. In Babylon, sexual perversion of every kind had been a way of life for millenniums. The Pharisees were deeply influenced by such practices. 00:07:46:06 - 00:08:16:00 In three of the major treatises of the Talmud are found extensive passages which give legal endorsement to seduce and marry three year old baby girls. In fact, many of the greatest rabbis of the Talmud, including Simeon Ben Yo Hai, upheld this privilege. Today in Israel, thousands of Jews go to Iran every year to venerate the memory of Simeon Daniel High, one of the most respected rabbis in the history of Judaism. 00:08:16:02 - 00:08:37:09 In one of dozens of endorsements of child sex, Simeon Ben YOHE said a process of light under the age of three years and a day is permitted to marry a priest. Agreeing with Ben YOHE, the great robber, said When a grown up man has intercourse with a little girl, it is nothing for when the girl is less than this three years and a day. 00:08:37:12 - 00:09:02:00 It is as if one put the finger into the eye. The footnote to this passage says, as tears come to the eye again and again. So does virginity come back to the little girl under three years? The same section confirms that sexual activity with small boys is in the same category. The intercourse of a small boy is not regarded as a sexual act. 00:09:02:03 - 00:09:25:21 In addition to adulterers, Christ, in the story of the Good Samaritan, portrayed the Pharisees as racial bigots, too self-righteous to respond to the suffering of one who was not a Jew. It is true because of the wickedness of the Canaanites, which included sodomy and infant sacrifice. Israel had been commanded by God to be harsh in her treatment of the inhabitants of the land. 00:09:25:24 - 00:09:43:10 God made it clear that the Canaanites were not simply to be avoided, but destroyed by the time of the New Testament. This method of preserving God's kingdom by separation and the sword had become obsolete. God no longer made a racial difference between men. 00:09:43:13 - 00:10:17:14 But the Pharisees were unfazed by God's new agenda. The Talmud was finally written down nearly five centuries after Christ hit its critical, even homicidal attitudes toward Gentiles might have been lifted out of the Book of Joshua. However, the quickest way to grasp the Talmudic view of Gentiles is not directly from the Talmud, but from the Jewish encyclopedias. If we quote an isolated opinion from the Talmud, a rabbi may quickly object, saying, But that is not the overall opinion of the Talmud. 00:10:17:16 - 00:10:35:02 That is not the definitive view of what the Jewish Encyclopedia provides us is a definitive overview of perhaps hundreds of rabbinic statements on any subject giving us accurate summaries of what the Talmud generally teaches. 00:10:35:04 - 00:10:52:00 In its article on Gentiles. The Jewish Encyclopedia begins to define what makes a Jew so different from a Gentile. According to the rabbis, only Israelites are men Gentiles. They class not as men, but as barbarians. 00:10:52:02 - 00:11:35:23 Since Gentiles are not men in the fullest sense. So the Gentile is not a neighbor of a Jew. Further, since Gentile laws were too crude to admit of reciprocity, meaning too crude to be taken seriously, the Gentile was forever beneath the Jew. Gentiles were outlawed by God from the beginning and thus had no property rights. The Almighty offered the Torah to the Gentile nations also, but since they refused to accept it, he withdrew his shining legal protection from them and transferred their property rights to Israel, who observed his law since the Talmud outlawed the child or issue of a Gentile as that of a beast. 00:11:35:29 - 00:12:04:24 A Gentile had as little legal rights than a Jewish court as did an animal. The Talmud states that if a Gentile sue an Israelite, the verdict is for the defendant. The Israelite. Conversely, if the Israelite is the plaintiff, he obtains full damages because the Talmud conspires against Gentiles. If a Jew was ever caught telling a Gentile what the Talmud really says, such a person deserves death. 00:12:04:26 - 00:12:30:06 So vile was the nature of a Gentile that the great Simeon Ben YOHE said the best among the Gentiles deserves to be killed. The best of snakes ought to have its head crushed. Jews, however, are exalted beings in the Talmud worthy of praise. Christ described the Pharisee who blessed himself, saying, I thank the Lord that I am not his other man. 00:12:30:09 - 00:12:57:19 At imminent Talmudic rabbi says, the same blessed be thou who has not made me a goy or gentile. There is a special antagonism between the Talmud and Jesus. The Talmud attacks everywhere it can. Even his mother, Mary, the Talmud, says, was a whore who mated with carpenters. She, who was the descendant of princes and governors, played the harlot with carpenters. 00:12:57:21 - 00:13:26:06 It naturally followed that the scribes declared Christ to be a bastard. In its article on Jesus. The Jewish Encyclopedia says that Jewish writings defame Christ. It is the tendency of all these sources to belittle the person of Jesus by ascribing to him illegitimate birth, magic and a shameful death. Jesus, according to this article, was considered one of the three worst enemies of Judaism who came to an ignoble end. 00:13:26:09 - 00:13:54:27 The Talmud says they subjected him to four deaths stoning, burning, decapitation and strangling. The Talmud also says he is now in hell, punished with boiling hot excrement. What is Christ advice as he speaks to us? Out of hell? The Jewish Encyclopedia quotes Jesus as telling us above all to bless the Jews. He says further their well-being do nothing to their detriment. 00:13:54:29 - 00:14:29:29 Whoever touches them touches even the apple of his eye. Christians, as followers of the false Prophet Jesus also deserve death. The Jewish Encyclopedia again recaps the Talmud to position a Gentile. Observing the Sabbath deserves death. It says the Talmud hatred was probably directed against the Christian Jews. These Judeo Christians invasively called Men Minute or Minim, were considered by the rabbis to be the most dangerous form of heretics of ancient times. 00:14:30:01 - 00:15:01:25 The New Testament gospels were writings which the rabbis considered more dangerous to the unity of Judaism and those of the pagans. A Talmudic rabbi said the writings of Christians deserved to be burned or paganism as less dangerous than minute or Christianity. The Jewish Encyclopedia, in its article on men, continues to illustrate the Talmudic hatred of Christianity. Again, we must remember venom usually indicates the Judeo Christian. 00:15:01:27 - 00:15:26:03 It was forbidden to partake of meat, bread or wine with the Christian scrolls of the law. Tefillin and mezuzah written by a Christian were burned, and animals slaughtered by a Christian was forbidden to food. The relatives of the Christian were not permitted to observe the laws of mourning after his death, but were required to assume festive garments and rejoice. 00:15:26:05 - 00:15:38:02 The testimony of a Christian was not admitted in evidence in Jewish courts and an Israelite who found anything belonging to one who was a Christian was forbidden to return it to him. 00:15:38:04 - 00:15:58:08 The Pharisees, through the Talmud, thus gave the Jews an ethic which encouraged bigotry and isolation. But they did worse than that. It invited persecution. By the 11th century, inhabitants of Babylon, growing weary of the self-righteousness and dishonesty of the Jews, expelled them to the West. 00:15:58:10 - 00:16:25:27 Migrating across North Africa and Central Europe. The great majority of Jews who had lived in Babylon for almost 600 years now began to find their destinies in the cities of the West. Yet in coming to the West, Jews found their Christian neighbors extremely intolerant of the anti-social deviations Jews had taken for granted in Babylon. In order to survive, it was necessary to abandon such Babylonian traditions. 00:16:25:29 - 00:16:53:06 But that was not as easy as it sounds. For a thousand years, the Pharisees had commanded such deviations. Most Jews could not bring themselves to defy the authority of the Pharisees. Enter one of the giants of Judaism of all time, the great Maimonides. Maimonides, a physician and philosopher, knew that no Jew who practiced Babylonian perversions could remain alive in Christian lands. 00:16:53:09 - 00:17:04:19 He attempted to harmonize Greek philosophy with the best points of Judaism. He hoped his rationalizations would enable Jews to abandon their antisocial customs. 00:17:04:22 - 00:17:21:06 Yet my monarchies was only partly successful. He was excommunicated by the Jewish community on the charge of making new laws. Nevertheless, his moderation and intellect did in fact temper the old Judaism of Babylon. 00:17:21:09 - 00:17:49:24 Gradually, over the centuries, Jews abandoned immoral practices of the Talmud. Such practices are not observed today. In fact, most Jews are so ignorant of the Talmud itself that they do not even know that such teachings exist within their sacred literature. Yet the fact remains that when the Jews came to the West in the Middle Ages and attempted to accommodate the Talmud to Christian society, a tremendous conflict was created in Babylon. 00:17:49:24 - 00:18:12:22 Judaism could be perfectly consistent with the teachings of the Pharisees, because the Babylonians were immoral as well. In the Christian lands of the West, it became necessary to pretend that many of those teachings did not exist. Even today, religious Jews continue to venerate the Pharisees and their Talmud as the greatest source of light that Judaism will ever know. 00:18:12:25 - 00:18:28:22 Yet living in Christian lands, no Jew can fully perform what the Pharisees commanded. This conflict in Jewish responsibility has created a dilemma over the last thousand years from which Jews and the West have not emerged. 00:18:28:24 - 00:18:44:02 Yet, even before my monitors came on the scene in the 12th century, another dilemma was being created in Judaism far to the east. This was a dilemma not concerning the doctrines of the Jews, but over who actually was a Jew. 00:18:44:04 - 00:19:07:12 In their articles on the Khazars. The Jewish Encyclopedia tell us that in the eighth century A.D., Jewish missionaries ventured north of Babylon to the land of the Khazars between the Caspian and the Black Seas. Azaria was a vast grassland on what is now the plains of southern Russia, inhabited by a race of merchants, artisans and warriors of honey. 00:19:07:12 - 00:19:34:23 Turkish stock. About 740 A.D., the king of the Khazars converted to Judaism and made it the state religion. Incredibly, within a few centuries, the people of Ghazaliya convinced themselves that they were not Gentiles after all, but the physical descendants of Abraham. Thus, by the 10th century A.D., a nation across the late Jews thrived in what is now central Russia. 00:19:34:25 - 00:20:05:21 During the Middle Ages, the fierce Mongols from the East and Russians from the north drove the Khazars west out of their ancient homeland. Most settled in Eastern Europe, especially Poland, where they established communities of artisans and traders. Judaism thus became divided into two basic groups which remain today the Ashkenazim, which are the Khazars of the East and the Sephardic Oriental, which are Jews of Spain, Turkey and lands bordering on the Mediterranean. 00:20:05:23 - 00:20:40:06 Today, the Ashkenazim or Khazars are the vast majority, about 80% of those who call themselves Jews. The two most recent premiers of Israel illustrate these two racial types. Shimon Perez is a Sephardic Jew from authentic Jewish stock. Yitzhak Shamir, like Menachem Begin, is Ashkenazim or Khazar in origin. In Poland, these ancestors of most modern Jews thrived. In fact, they actually became more zealous Jews than their theological cousins to the West. 00:20:40:06 - 00:21:12:18 The Sephardim, like Czars, were fascinated with that mystical aspect of Judaism called Kabbalah. Kabbalah was the Jewish form of ancient Gnosticism, a belief that God is unconscious, yet everywhere revealed in different levels of refinement throughout the universe. Of course, Judaism was always unique among ancient religions and its belief in a single conscious God, a God not only capable of creating the world's, but of punishing evil and rewarding good. 00:21:12:20 - 00:21:48:07 Like Eastern religions, however, the Polish cable has believed that God in his purest form is utterly remote, unknowable, without opinions about right and wrong. Instead, his being filtered down through many gradations or separate until it reached Israel. Israel, according to the Kabbalah, was the visible, rational emanation of God in this world. Below Israel was confusion and darkness represented by demons and the chaotic world of the Gentiles. 00:21:48:09 - 00:22:09:07 What excited the Khazars was that Kabbalah preached revolution. It said that Jews are superior beings were destined to rule the world in the Zohar, which is the written text of Kabbalistic lore. We find the arrogance and ambition of the ancient Pharisees very much alive. 00:22:09:09 - 00:22:37:24 In a typical passage, the Zohar teaches a living soul refers to Israel who have holy living souls from above and cattle and creeping thing and beasts of the earth to the other peoples who are not living soul only by the overthrow of the Gentiles, the Zohar asserts. Can Israel regain its position as God's Shekinah glory on Earth. The Zohar calls Gentiles Hammill a case in a passage typical of many. 00:22:37:28 - 00:23:04:07 The Zohar says they caused the destruction of the temple. So when God reveals himself, they will be wiped off the earth. Redemption will not be complete until al-Malaki will be exterminated. But once Israel shakes off Gentile, dominion and Christian influence, heaven will descend to earth. The Zohar says Israel will fulfill her predestined role, ruling the world under the leadership of her Messiah. 00:23:04:09 - 00:23:28:13 Since the Kabbalah or Zohar was not merely a theological system but taught the overthrow of existing order, it was natural that before long Jews should begin to put it in the practice. With the age of Voltaire and the so-called Enlightenment. During the 18th century, we see a host of Jewish lists migrating west out of Poland and penetrating the very capitals of Europe. 00:23:28:15 - 00:23:43:09 Jewish wonder workers walsham's, as they were called Saint Germain, carefully astral frank folk men of vast wealth and mystery, came upon the European scene at the end of the 18th century. 00:23:43:12 - 00:24:16:08 In Europe in the years preceding the French Revolution. The foundations were laid for a new order in the world. Cable, as such as Adam Bice, had helped establish the ultra secret Illuminati, which became a cover for plots and intrigues that would begin the erosion of Christian civilization. At the same time, beginning with Jewish philosopher Moses Mendelssohn, many Jews began to perceive their religion not simply as a means of personal salvation, but as a way to reform society at large. 00:24:16:10 - 00:24:52:29 Many Jewish activists said that starting with such revolutionaries as Moses and the prophets, Israel had always had the social objective of writing injustice and taking the part of the downtrodden. It was the duty of every Jew, they said, to come to the aid of the oppressed working masses, called the proletariat in their historic struggle against capitalistic bondage. Many Jews thus came out of the ghetto and took part in all the great revolutions of the 19th century, including the revolution of 1829 and the revolution of 1848. 00:24:53:02 - 00:25:20:00 It is thus not surprising that as the 20th century dawns, we find Jews turning their attentions to the overthrow of one of the last monarchies still opposing Jewish advancement. The Romanoff dynasty of Russia. It is well known that the Jews had long hoped to overthrow the Czar. It was natural then that Jewish philosophers such as Moses, Hess and Karl Marx should contrive a philosophy that could make such overthrow possible. 00:25:20:03 - 00:25:48:20 It was also natural that international Jewish bankers of New York, London and Hamburg should finance it. The U.S. State Department, in its three volume report on the origins of communism in Russia, published in 1931, reveals how Jewish controlled German banks under the leadership of Max Warburg, conspired as early as 1914 to send large payments to Lenin, Trotsky and others in their attempts to bring down the Czar. 00:25:48:22 - 00:26:12:21 As part of this conspiracy. Jacob Schiff, head of the New York Jewish Banking House of Could, Loeb invested at least 20 million, which would be close to $1 billion today toward the establishment of Bolshevism in Russia. In its article on socialism, the Jewish Encyclopedia published in 1905, freely admits that Jews in Russia were ripe for revolution in Russia. 00:26:12:22 - 00:26:18:23 Yet socialism has become a movement of the Jewish masses. 00:26:18:26 - 00:26:56:14 The later Encyclopedia Judaica tells us the communist movement and ideology played an important part in Jewish life, particularly in the 1920s and 1930s and during and after World War Two. The Judaica, in fact, presents an extensive list of the most powerful Jewish leaders of Bolshevism, which included Trotsky, spared La Zinoviev, Communist Lebanon, Hagana, Vic and many others. The Judaica also tells us just how many Jews filled the communist ranks. continue to..... .. PART 2 transcripts

TMJ

48,907 ะฟั€ะพัะผะพั‚ั€ะพะฒ โ€ข 2 ะปะตั‚ ะฝะฐะทะฐะด

Make Something Wonderful is 250 pages of Steve Jobs in his own words, speaking directly to you. The book contains some of Steve's ideas that I've never found anywhere else. Notes from the book: 1. He didn't care about being right. He cared about being excellent. 2. His mind was never a captive of reality. 3. He said working with great people gives you access to wisdom that you can't buy for love or money. 4. He believed technology should be streamlined and practical, simple and sophisticated, and that it should be a tool for enhancing creativity as much as productivity. 5. He believed you should ambush your customers. Meet them where they are. 6. His ideas were not arguments, but intuitions. He had a true inner freedom and an epic sense of possibility. 7. He gave an extraordinary amount of thought to how best to use our fleeting time. 8. By the time he was thirty he was the public face of a Fortune 500 company. 9. At Appleโ€™s first board meeting he put his bare feet on a conference room table. 10. He said you should think of your life as a rainbow arching across the horizon of this world. You appear, have a chance to blaze in the sky, then you disappear. 11. He possessed unbelievable rigor that he imposed first, and most strenuously, on himself. 12. He saw clearly (1) what was not there, (2) what could be there, (3) what had to be there. 13. He said early Apple employees were more like poets and painters than cold technologists. That the passion they put into their products were completely indistinguishable from other creative fields. He said their work was a form of love. 14. He had a verbal mastery that was obvious at a young age. He used simple, descriptive language, told stories, and repeated lines and ideas that were important. 15. He thought it was inevitable that computers would be the dominant medium of human communication. He said this in 1983. 16. He had a talent for spotting markets full of second-rate products. 17. He said you could tell how important a product was based on the amount of time people spent interacting with it. As a result he thought it was inevitable that more design talent would shift from the automobile (1 or 2 hours a day) to computers (6+ hours a day). He said this in the 80s. 18. He said that books kept him out of jail and that itโ€™s a shame there are so many mediocre teachers. 19. Like many great entrepreneurs before him, Steve knew what he wanted to do, but didn't know how to do it yet. He said he wanted to make an insanely great computer that was the size of a book. What he described sounded a lot like an iPad. He said this in the 80s. 20. He believed that you should use your unique set of talents to make things that make the lives of other people better. Most people just take. He said "the ability to put something back into the pool of human experience is extremely neat." 21. He would tell his team โ€œYou work for Apple first and your boss second.โ€ He felt strongly about that. 22. He was constantly placing the products he was making in a historical perspective, like comparing the Macintosh to the invention of the telephone. 23. He believed you needed to give yourself more time to make mistakes. He said his taste got more refined as he made mistakes. He said that making mistakes over a long period of time made his aesthetics better. 24. He said the key ingredient to making something great was time. 25. He said he wanted to spend his life building things. He could have retired to a beach in his 20s and thought that was disgusting. 26. He was interested in learning how to hone a company down to its essence. 27. You read this book and a thought jumps out at you: How many people are willing to go through a decade of failure without quitting? Steve had the capacity to take pain. 28. He believed it was better to focus on what you're actually passionate about, instead of what you think will make you the most money. He made the most money that way. 29. He listened to older, wiser entrepreneurs and let them shape and mold his thinking. 30. He wasn't afraid to fail, but had to coach himself to adopt that trait. He didn't want to fail, but he wasn't afraid of it. 31. He said don't let your differentiation evaporate. 32. He said if you let your differentiation evaporate the only solution is innovation. 33. He believed great ideas don't map onto corporate hierarchy. 34. He was incapable of thinking that his work and his life were different, separate things. 35. He said the most important things in life are not the goal-oriented, materialistic things. He said you should tap into the worldโ€™s magical, mystical, and artistic sides. 36. He paid attention to subtle insights. He was guided by intuition. 37. He didn't believe in the concept or a career, or think it was wise to follow well-worn paths laid out by others. 38. He said most people make the mistake of not thinking about death. He said: "For me itโ€™s the opposite: to know my arc will fall, makes me want to blaze while I am in the sky." 39. He thought Walt Disney had a great idea: Edit before you make it. 40. He said no amount of technology can turn a bad story into a good story. 41. He believed storytellers were the most powerful people in the world. 42. He believed if you didn't have great people you were doomed. 43. He found great people by looking at great results and finding out who was responsible for them. 44. This is how he interviewed people: "In an interview I will purposely upset someone: Iโ€™ll criticize their prior work. Iโ€™ll do my homework, find out what they worked on and say, โ€œGod, that really turned out to be a bomb. That really turned out to be a bozo product. Why did you work on that?โ€ The worst thing that someone can do in an interview is to agree with me and knuckle under. What I look for is for someone to come right back and say, โ€œYouโ€™re dead wrong and hereโ€™s why.โ€ 45. He believed the job of the leader was to make sure the work is as good as it should be, and to get people to stretch beyond their best. 46. He believed the job of the leader was to cajole, and beg, and plead, and threaten at timesโ€”to do whatever is necessary to get people to see things in a bigger and more profound way and to have them do better work than they thought they could do. 47. He believed the priorities of the leader were (1) recruit, (2) set an overall direction, and (3) inspire and cajole and persuade. 48. He believed a creative company should have a risk-taking, creative environment on the product side and a fiscally conservative environment on the business side. 49. He believed you have to choose what you put your love into really carefully. 50. He had a remarkably consistent set of values that he held dear: Life is short; donโ€™t waste it. Tell the truth. Technology should enhance human creativity. Process matters. Beauty matters. Details matter. The world we know is a human creationโ€”and we can push it forward. 51. He thought when deciding what to work on that you should ask yourself: "What do I give a shit about?" And then go do that. 52. He would never sell Apple. Not for all the money in the world. 53. He believed you should master the basics, simplify the product line, and focus on the gems. 54. He believed marketing was about values. That the world is noisy and you should focus on telling customers what you believe in and what you stand for. 55. He believed one way to invest in yourself is by exploring uncharted paths that are different from your past experiences. You know it's an uncharted path when you have no idea where it will lead. 56. He believed that people that think theyโ€™re following a safe path pay the highest price of all. They won't realize it for a decade or two โ€” and by then it's too late. 57. He didn't believe in resting on laurels or sleeping on wins. Make something great. Then do it again. 58. He imagined what reality lacked and set out to remedy it. 59. He believed in straight forward, clear communication. If the work isn't good enough you have to tell them straight: "This isn't good enough. I know you can do better. You need to do better. Now go do better." 60. He remained driven by a mission to "put something back into the pool of human experience." 61. He believed in the basics: great product, great marketing, great distribution. 62. He believed you must keep up with innovations in distribution. 63. He believed brands take decades to build. 64. He would capture the evolution of his own thinking by emailing himself. 65. He viewed Apple has the world's premier bridge builder between normal people and the exploding world of high technology. 66. He wanted to demystify technology. 67. He believed excellence was a habit and we are what we repeatedly do. 68. He believed you should be curious about what came before you and you should spend time to learn about it. 69. He believed you simply could not mix messages when selling something new. A customer can barely handle one great new idea, let alone several. 70. He said it's a circus world and you'll never know what's around the next corner. 71. He believed in management by values. Which means (1) find people that want the same things you want and (2) figure out the best way to get those things along the way. 72. He believed in the mantra: Finding the right people is half the battle. 73. He said you can't plan to meet the people who will change your life. 74. He believed everything is temporary โ€” there is no such thing as safety. 75. He believed that your life is a story and that you should remember that your life is a story and that you should always act like your life is a story. 76. He believed in rejecting dogma, which he defined as living with the results of other people's thinking. He said that dogma can be so loud that it can drown out your own inner voice and you should avoid this. 77. He believed a great place to start was by improving a product you hate. If you can make something you love, you can convince other people to love it too. 78. He said all glory is fleeting and you should just get back to making something wonderful. I'm really proud of the episode I made about this book. You'll learn a lot from Steve by listening to it. You can watch/listen to it in full here, or in your favorite podcast app.

David Senra

205,292 ะฟั€ะพัะผะพั‚ั€ะพะฒ โ€ข 11 ะผะตััั†ะตะฒ ะฝะฐะทะฐะด

THE TRUTH ABOUT OCTOBER 7TH: Reports confirm that Netanyahu, the Mossad and the IDF deliberately allowed the October 7th attack by Hamas to take place. They knew one year in advance of the attack and did nothing to stop it. They deliberately stood down during the attack allowing many more innocent Israelis to be slaughtered in order to get domestic and international support for war in Gaza and Iran. HOW DID OCTOBER 7TH HAPPEN? On October 7th, Hamas was able to carry out its shocking terror attack against Israel, despite Israelโ€™s intelligence, military and security apparatus commonly considered the best in the world. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu himself tweeted and quickly deleted a statement denying any foreknowledge of the October 7th attack. โ€œUnder no circumstances and at no stage was Prime Minister Netanyahu warned of war intentions on the part of Hamas" the tweet said, before it was promptly deleted. Why did Netanyahuโ€™s team delete that tweet? Because in fact he did have intelligence that there would be an attack by Hamas and tried to hide this from the world. Foreign security services, Israeli security services and the Israeli public all knew that Hamas was planning a violent, cross-border incursion where they would attempt to over-run and attack the kibbutz communities in southern Israel and take prisoners back to Gaza. And they also knew when. But it happened anyway. Why? Ten days before the attack, and then again three days before the attack, Egypt intelligence officials passed โ€œrepeated warningsโ€ to the highest levels of Israelโ€™s government. In one of these warnings, Egypts premiere intelligence minister General Abbas Kamel personally called Netanyahu and warned that Hamas was about to do โ€œsomething unusual, a terrible operation.โ€ Unnamed Egyptian officials told YNET News that they were shocked by Netanyahuโ€™s โ€œindifference to the news.โ€ But Israel didnโ€™t have to trust or believe Egypt, because actually, most of the warnings of the October 7th attack came from Israeli civilians and the Israeli military itself. The civilians and soldiers who brought these emergency warnings to the military were ignored and in some cases, strangely enough, threatened with legal action. In 2022, the IDF, through confidential sources, or spies, in Gaza, actually obtained the detailed Hamas Al Aqsa Flood attack plans. Codenamed โ€œJericho Wallโ€ by Israel, the excursion plan called for a barrage of rockets to begin the attack and for gunmen to pour into Israel en masse via para-gliders, on motorcycles and on foot and take hostages back into Gaza, all of which happened on October 7th. Hamas followed the blueprint that Israel already had with shocking precision. So Israel had the attack blueprints, but were they taken seriously by the IDF? Yes, the plans were diligently studied. A presentation on the planned attack was given to senior officers in the IDFโ€™S Gaza division. The presentation concluded with this sentence: โ€œThis invasion constitutes the gravest threat that IDF forces are facing in the defense of Israelโ€ So in response to this, did Israelโ€™s security establishment beef up and enhance their surveillance of Hamas militants on the other side of the border? No, stunningly, they actually did the exact opposite. They decided to entirely stop monitoring Hamasโ€™s handheld radio traffic. Because they saw it โ€œas a waste of effortโ€ even though during that same time in 2022, Israelis living in the kibbutz communities near the Gaza border, most of whom have some type of military training due to Israelโ€™s mandatory IDF service laws, were, according to Israeli media, picking up clear evidence that Hamas was โ€œpracticing the breaching of the fence and conquering kibbutzim and seizing hostages and destroying everything in their path.โ€ Then, In April 2023, 6 months before the attack, again according to Israeli media, the IDF โ€œrestricted the abilityโ€ of Israelis living near the border โ€œto monitor Hamasโ€™ wireless traffic.โ€ In September 2023, less than a month before the attack, the head of the IDFโ€™s โ€œDevilโ€™s Advocateโ€ intelligence unit, which challenges prevailing narratives within Israelโ€™s military, twice alerted senior decision-makers in both the army and political spheres about Hamasโ€™ plans for a large-scale cross-border military operation. He reiterated these warnings in person at Intelligence Branch strategic assessment sessions on September 26th and 27th. Just days before the attack. So it was clear to everyone that Hamas wasnโ€™t only planning to do something horrible, but it was also clear what that horrible and evil thing was. According to a female IDF soldier who spoke to Israelโ€™s channel 12 news program, she was constantly trying to warn her superiors about the gravity of Hamas training exercises. She was threatened with legal action. โ€œWe were told that if we continue to harass on this issue, you will stand trial.โ€ So, Egypt knew, the Israeli military knew, and the Israeli civilians knew. Yet, two days before October 7th, the Israeli military took two entire commando brigades, or around 100 soldiers, away from the the soon to be breached locations of the Gaza border and sent them to the other side of the country, to the West Bank village of Huwara despite no Hamas presence being in Huwara and despite there being giant Israeli dance parties taking place right along the same border fence where violent, escalating and obvious Hamas drills of breaching and kidnapping were taking place. According to Israeli media reports, Lt. Col. Sahar Fogel, an operations officer at the IDFโ€™s Gaza Division, opposed the approval of the Nova Party based on the last minute nature of its event application and the intensifying Hamas drills at the border and because if something were to happen, more soldiers were on holiday. It was the Jewish holiday of Sukkot. The Lt. Col. explained his opposition to the partyโ€™s approval to his superiors. He was instructed to allow the event. Israeli Newspaper Haaretz reported that other Gaza division officers privately โ€œtold of irregular conduct and pressure surrounding the approval of the party.โ€ In February 2024, Elkana Federman, the head of security for the Nova festival gave an interview to Israelโ€™s Channel 14 where he made a statement that hasnโ€™t been reported on by any American media. โ€œI had a guard at the festival who had served in the Reโ€™im Division [near Gaza border], and a week before the festival he sent me a voice message, basically warning me, saying, โ€˜Elkana, something is going to happen over Sukkot. I just wanted to let you know, there are a lot of warnings, I passed the voice message on to local IDF officials and they told me everything was all right.โ€ The Hamas attacks were violent and brutal. They have been likened to tragic events such as September 11th and the Holocaust, so it comes as a surprise that Benjamin Netanyahu and members of his Likud party have at times described the attacks as somewhat of a political gift. Nissim Vaturi, a member of Netanyahuโ€™s Likud party in the Knesset, referred to the attack as sort of gift from God because they are being used to justify the current ongoing war, stating: โ€œWe were meant to fight this war against Hamas, as is happening now, and luckily for us it came from the heavens.โ€ Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu explained that Israel didnโ€™t have domestic or international support to invade or destroy Gaza. He said the October 7th Hamas attack solved both of those problems for him, stating โ€œWe couldnโ€™t get the domestic consensus to make a definitive solution to the problem of Hamas. That is, no one would agree across the Israeli public to go in and basically destroy Hamas, go throughout Gaza and destroy Hamas. We didnโ€™t have the international consensus either; nobody would understand why we are doing it. Both conditions were created because of the Hamas attack on Israel on October 7th.โ€ Did the Israeli military, the Israeli intelligence community, and the political leadership of Israel allow this ghastly attack to happen to justify wiping out the population of Gaza? The evidence proves, yes. WHERE WAS THE IDF? During the October 7th attacks what did the Israeli military do? For hours they did nothing, it was a deliberate military stand down order. It's important to remember that Israel is just slightly bigger than the size of the state of New Jersey. But for some reason, once the Hamas attacks began, the time it took the Israeli army and rescue teams to arrive, fight and rescue Israelis at the different kibbutz communities and sites being attacked took anywhere from 4 hours to more than 20 hours. The New York Times has reported: โ€œThousands of soldiers were less than 40 minutes from the towns that were under attack.โ€ A video that Israeli media obtained from an army helicopter, corroborated by Israeli survivors, prove that there were more than 500 Israeli soldiers directly outside of the Kibbutz entrance, fully armed, with Humvees and tanks but it took 10 hours for those soldiers to show up. Avital, a survivor of the Beโ€™eri attack, described to Haaretz: โ€œ500 soldiers stood outside, with equipment and vehicles. I remember yelling at them, โ€˜Weโ€™re being slaughtered, come in, save us and no one said anything.โ€ So why did it take so long for help to arrive? Haaretz reported: โ€œAt 7 A.M., the party organizers called Lt. Col. Elad Zandani, the man tasked with approving the festival and told him that terrorists were shooting the partygoers. He suggested that they fend for themselves. The first IDF forces arrived at the party scene at 3 P.M., thatโ€™s an 8 hour response time for one of the most efficient, capable and well militarized security forces in the world operating in a country the size of New Jersey with their Gaza division only a few miles away. And what makes this even more strange? Around 4 hours into the Hamas assault, at 10:46AM, Israel was already launching operations and bombing targets inside of Gaza. So, if Israel could begin an offensive attack into Gaza within 4 hours, why did it take more than 6 hours and in most cases more than 10 hours and even 20 hours in some cases to mobilize inside of their own country to stop the ongoing attack and to defend the lives of their own people? The New York Times quoted Ben Zion, an Israeli military reservist who spoke to Israeli media. He said his unit voluntarily left central Israel in a convoy at 1:30PM, they got together and left for the south on their own. He expected to see the roads packed with soldiers and equipment and armored vehicles heading south. โ€œThe roads were empty!โ€ he recalled in an interview. Roughly seven hours into the fighting, he turned to the reservist next to him and asked: โ€œWhereโ€™s the IDF?โ€ The brutal and deadly Hamas terrorist attack of October 7th is so central to justifying Israelโ€™s ongoing war in Gaza that Israel is actually outlawing questioning the October 7th government narrative. Israelis who spread information counter to the October 7th government narrative, which the Israeli Knesset calls โ€œfalsehoods and propagandaโ€ could face up to 5 years in prison. Between the abundance of concrete evidence that suggests Israeli military allowed October 7th to happen by ignoring dozens of reliable and specific warnings, threatening soldiers with legal actions who tried to warn their military superiors and taking troops away from the area of the Gaza border that was attacked and now evidence that suggests there was some type of military stand down order in place on October 7th, it is important to ask, what was October 7th and what kind of war is the United States supporting? WHAT IS THE HANNIBAL DIRECTIVE? Images and videos of burnt cars, blacked and charred bodies and incinerated homes in southern Israel were plastered on every phone screen and television after the October 7th Hamas attack. The images and videos were used by the Israeli government to justify the militaryโ€™s heavy handed tactics in their ongoing war against Hamas, But were all the images and videos actually the result of the Hamas attack? Innocent Israeli civilians were brutally killed by Hamas on October 7th, but there is evidence that proves the IDF killed their own Israeli citizens in what is known as the Hannibal Directive. To understand what the Israeli military did to their own civilians on October 7th, you have to understand the political aspirations of Hamas and what the goal of taking hostages is, it is political leverage. There are over 10,000 Palestinians in Israeli jails. 3,000 of whom havenโ€™t been to trial or charged with a crime. When militant groups manage to capture Israeli civilians or soldiers it gives them leverage to force a prisoner swap and get some of their people out of Israeli prison. For example, in 1986, Hamas managed to kidnap 3 Israeli soldiers and bring them to Gaza. They demanded 1,150 Palestinian prisoners in return for these soldiers. After this, the military drafted a secret field order to prevent future kidnappings. It was called the "Hannibal Directive." The directive gets its name from the Carthaginian general who chose to poison himself rather than allow himself to be captured alive by the romans. In 2003, strangely enough on October 7th 2003, three Israeli soldiers were taken hostage and brought into Lebanon. Following the activation of the Hannibal Directive, IDF attack helicopters fired indiscriminately on 26 vehicles thus ensuring the death of their own soldiers and therefore robbing Lebanese militants of the ability to demand Israel make concessions. The Last known application of the Hannibal Directive was in 2014. In Rafah. Hamas fighters managed to capture an Israeli soldier, Lt. Hadar Goldin. Instead of allowing the lieutenant to be used as leverage by Hamas, the military killed him. Dropping bombs, missiles and shells on the area he was being held, killing the soldier and also over 100 Palestinian civilians. The scale of the Hannibal Directive on October 7th was entirely different from those of the past. A retired Israeli air force general, Nof Erez, described it during a podcast with Haaretz, an Israeli newspaper saying โ€œThe Hannibal Directive was apparently applied at a certain stage, because at the moment they understand there is a kidnapping, they immediately say, โ€˜Guys, this is Hannibal.โ€™ But the Hannibal we trained for all of the last twenty years, is for a vehicle we know at what point of the fence it enters, on what side it drives, and maybe even on which road it drives. This was a Mass Hannibal.โ€ We know the Hannibal Directive means to kill your own, so what does โ€œmass Hannibalโ€ mean? A large mainstream Israeli media outlet reported: โ€œIn the week after Black Shabbat, October 7th, soldiers of elite units, at the initiative of the Southern Command, checked about 70 vehicles that remained in the area between the Otaf settlements and the Gaza Strip. These are vehicles that did not reach Gaza, because on the way they were shot by a combat helicopter, an anti-tank missile or a tank, and at least in some cases everyone in the vehicle was killed.โ€ 70 vehicles and in some cases, everyone in the vehicle was killed. These are Israelis killed by Israel. Again, only reported on in the Israeli media. Tuval Escapa, is a member of the security team for Kibbutz Beโ€™eri. He set up a hotline so kibbutz residents could communicate with the Israeli army. He told Haaretz that โ€œthe commanders in the field made difficult decisions, including shelling houses on their occupantsโ€ in order to eliminate would-be hostages as well the terrorists. They shelled entire houses. Do we hear this in the American mainstream media? That the Israeli military targeted and destroyed over 70 cars with hellfire missiles that were filled with Israelis and that they decimated entire Israeli homes with tank shells? A report in Haaretz on October 20th notes that the Israeli military also carried out an airstrike on their own military base, the Erez crossing. That base was filled with Israeli Civil Administration officers and soldiers at the time. An Israeli woman named Yasmin Porat gave an interview with Israel Radio that the military โ€œundoubtedlyโ€ killed numerous Israeli hostages during gun battles with Hamas militants. IDF General Barak Hiram, prevented hundreds of troops from entering Kibbutz Beโ€™eri for hours on October 7th, when he finally allowed the IDF to go in, he ordered tanks to fire on multiple homes. The tank shells killed at least 12 Israeli hostages and 3 children. Recently the UN published an investigation confirming several of these facts, namely, that the IDF had in fact activated the Hannibal Directive on October 7th stating โ€œThe Commission is aware of allegations that Israeli Special Forces used the โ€œHannibal Directiveโ€ to prevent the capture of Israeli civilians and their transfer to Gaza, even at the cost of killing them" The Commission documented one statement by an ISF tank crew, confirming that the crew had applied the Hannibal Directive. The Israeli military, Israeli civilians and the United Nations all admit to the IDF purposely killing their own on October 7th. How many? Itโ€™s hard to know the exact number, but the imagery of charred bodies and incinerated cars and homes are still being used to this day to manufacture consent and support for Israelโ€™s ongoing assault of the Gaza Strip, where more than 47,000 Palestinians have been killed including 15,000 innocent children. ISRAEL'S FINANCIAL SUPPORT FOR HAMAS: Israel and Netanyahu helped funnel over $1 Billion dollars to Hamas in order to keep Palestine from being recognized as a State. It was Netanyahu and Israel who helped create Hamas thinking that they could control them and would be able to use Hamas as an excuse for their continued military operations and occupation in Gaza. ISRAEL'S SECRET NUCLEAR WEAPONS: The front lines of the war between Israel and Hamas are expanding and moving beyond Gaza. Yemenโ€™s Houthis intensified their involvement, going from simply attacking Israeli bound cargo ships to now navigating an armed drone over 1,200 miles, evading Israelโ€™s Iron Dome defense system and managed to strike inside Tel Aviv causing a massive explosions. In addition to their ongoing war in Gaza, Israel has attacked or been attacked by Iraq, Lebanon, Syria and Iran. Meanwhile, the U.S. continues to promise Israel unconditional and limitless support. But has anyone even asked if this support is LEGAL? According to the 1976 Symington and Glenn Amendments of the Armed Foreign Assistance Act, which is now a part of the Arms Export Control Act, the United States cannot give foreign aid, whether thatโ€™s economic or military, to any nuclear armed state that is not a signatory to the Non-Proliferation Treaty, or the NPT, but the United States gives billions of dollars every year to Israel and according to all international arms organizations, Israel has anywhere from 90 to 400 nuclear warheads and Israel has not signed the NPT. So how does this legally happen? The United States and Israel simply pretend Israel does not have nuclear weapons, literally, thatโ€™s whatโ€™s done. It is called โ€œNuclear Ambiguity.โ€ This nuclear ambiguity, which allows Israel to continue to receive billions from the U.S. and also operate and maintain their nuclear arsenal with absolutely no international oversight and zero regulation, is maintained and preserved through the threat of force. Due to a previously Top Secret gag order, all U.S. government agency employees and contractors are forbidden from discussing Israelโ€™s nuclear weapons program. Even insinuating or mentioning information thatโ€™s already in the public domain is forbidden for all federal employees and contractors. It sounds hard to believe but letโ€™s give an example: James Doyle used to work at Los Alamos National Laboratory as a nuclear security specialist. He violated this gag order. Doyle wrote an academic article arguing that Nuclear weapons do not do a good job at deterring countries from attacking one another, he wrote: โ€œNuclear weapons did not deter Egypt and Syria from attacking Israel in 1973, Argentina from attacking British territory in 1982 or Iraq from attacking Israel during the 1991 Gulf War.โ€ A clear reference to Israelโ€™s nuclear weapons. Doyleโ€™s security clearance was promptly withdrawn, his home was raided, his computers were seized and he was fired from the Department of Energy. So apparently thatโ€™s how it works. In 2018, The New Yorker published a stunning report in which they discuss another way Israelโ€™s nuclear ambiguity is enforced: secret presidential letters. According to former U.S. officials and former Israeli officials, every recent US administration since Clinton in 1993 has performed the same ritual as it came into office. They all agreed to undermine U.S. law by signing secret letters, brought to them by hand by their Israeli counterparts stipulating that theyโ€™ll never acknowledge what everyone knows: that Israel indeed has nuclear weapons. The National Archives is currently refusing to release the letters, arguing that even confirming their existence would violate the secrecy pact. So thereโ€™s a gag order that stops all federal employees and contractors from simply acknowledging Israelโ€™s nuclear weapons and U.S. presidents sign secret letters promising not to acknowledge or pressure Israel to do anything relating to their proliferation status. That means asking questions like these are entirely off limits enforced by the threat of government violence or law fare. But all of this information leads to a series of questions: Where does Israel dispose of the toxic waste its program generates? Are Israelโ€™s nuclear weapons ever used to coerce the U.S. into making adverse policy decisions? How about our allies? Besides apartheid South Africa, has Israel offered any of its nuclear weapons for sale to other foreign countries? To U.S. adversaries? Has Israel mounted nuclear weapons onto its German supplied Dolphin class submarines? Or their American supplied F-35 jets? No questions are allowed and what is the cost, the dollar amount, for Americans, of this โ€œnuclear ambiguityโ€ policy? To be exact, almost $240 billion dollars of military and economic aid has gone from the U.S. taxpayer since the passing of the Symington and Glenn Amendments. Thatโ€™s far more than the United States spent rebuilding Europe under the Marshall Plan. And none of that quarter of a trillion dollars should have been allowed under U.S. law. Thatโ€™s the price of keeping Israelโ€™s secret. A quarter trillion and yet where is the International Atomic Energy Agency and international nuclear inspectors? The same ones who monitor every other nuclear armed country in the world? DOES ISRAEL PERSECUTE CHRISTIANS? Before the war, Israelโ€™s Christian minority were already being targeted with dispossession and violence. In Jerusalemโ€™s Old City, narrow streets line the ancient neighborhood and Jewish Israeli civilians spitting on and attacking Christian clergy members is commonplace in Israel. Evidence of this shows a video from a few days before October 7th of Christians in the Old City of Jerusalem carrying a cross while a group of Orthodox Jewish Israelis many of them children walk by and spit at the Christians. Itโ€™s become mainstream to believe Christians donโ€™t belong in Israel and only Jewish people do. A few years ago, the mission, the Virgin Maryโ€™s place of death, was attacked and vandalized by Israelis. The graffiti on the ancient walls read โ€œDeath to heretical Christians, the enemies of Israel,โ€ and โ€œMay his name and memory be obliterated,โ€ in reference to Jesus. According to Haaretz, at a Jewish school, the leader of an anti-assimilation group Bentzi Gopstien told students that itโ€™s quote โ€œmitzvahโ€ or a โ€œgood deedโ€ to burn and destroy Christian churches. Should Americans, especially Christian Americans be allowing billions of their tax dollars to be used to ethnically cleanse, attack and bomb Holy sites and Christian civilians? What has happened since Israel has launched its war against Hamas? Israel has displaced 2.4 million Palestinians in Gaza, 80% of the buildings and homes have been reduced to rubble, at least 45,000 Palestinians have been killed with 50% being women and children. In America, weโ€™re told we should prioritize sending billions of U.S. taxpayer dollars to Israel over dealing with our own issues here at home because Israel needs to be able defend itself. Well, it seems like what initially appeared as a defensive war, is appearing more like an offensive war with the expansionist goal of the permanent military occupation of the Gaza Strip. Did the Israeli military, the Israeli intelligence community, and the political leadership of Israel allow this terrible attack to happen to justify wiping out the population of Gaza, a genocide justified by an attack that Israel could have stopped had they wanted to.

Truth Justice โ„ข

603,047 ะฟั€ะพัะผะพั‚ั€ะพะฒ โ€ข 1 ะณะพะด ะฝะฐะทะฐะด