Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

Возникла проблема при загрузке этого видео. Это может быть связано с временными проблемами сети или видео может быть недоступно.

На главную

𝐒𝐇𝐄 𝐖𝐄𝐍𝐓 𝐈𝐍 𝐅𝐎𝐑 𝐀 𝐊𝐍𝐄𝐄. 𝐒𝐇𝐄 𝐂𝐀𝐌𝐄 𝐎𝐔𝐓 𝐖𝐈𝐓𝐇𝐎𝐔𝐓 𝐀 𝐋𝐄𝐆. 𝐓𝐇𝐈𝐒 𝐈𝐒 𝐖𝐇𝐀𝐓 “𝐅𝐑𝐄𝐄” 𝐇𝐄𝐀𝐋𝐓𝐇𝐂𝐀𝐑𝐄 𝐀𝐂𝐓𝐔𝐀𝐋𝐋𝐘 𝐂𝐎𝐒𝐓𝐒 Roseanne Milburn, 61, of Winnipeg, had a routine procedure turn into an amputation — not because the surgery failed, but because Canada’s government-run system couldn’t find her a bed. A... surgeon at Winnipeg’s Health Sciences Centre removed dead tissue from her knee, then sent her to Concordia Hospital with the plan to bring her back that same day so a specialist could stitch the wound (CBC News). She was never brought back. There was no bed at HSC. So she sat at Concordia with an 𝐨𝐩𝐞𝐧 𝐬𝐮𝐫𝐠𝐢𝐜𝐚𝐥 𝐰𝐨𝐮𝐧𝐝 𝐟𝐨𝐫 𝐞𝐢𝐠𝐡𝐭 𝐝𝐚𝐲𝐬, waiting for the system to make room. As the video narrator put it: “𝘌𝘪𝘨𝘩𝘵 𝘥𝘢𝘺𝘴 𝘸𝘪𝘵𝘩 𝘢𝘯 𝘰𝘱𝘦𝘯 𝘸𝘰𝘶𝘯𝘥 𝘪𝘯 𝘊𝘢𝘯𝘢𝘥𝘢. 𝘕𝘰𝘵 𝘪𝘯 𝘊𝘶𝘣𝘢, 𝘯𝘰𝘵 𝘪𝘯 𝘔𝘢𝘥𝘢𝘨𝘢𝘴𝘤𝘢𝘳, 𝘯𝘰𝘵 𝘪𝘯 𝘴𝘰𝘮𝘦 𝘧𝘢𝘳-𝘧𝘭𝘶𝘯𝘨 𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘳𝘥-𝘸𝘰𝘳𝘭𝘥 𝘤𝘰𝘶𝘯𝘵𝘳𝘺. 𝘕𝘰, 𝘯𝘰, 𝘯𝘰, 𝘪𝘯 𝘊𝘢𝘯𝘢𝘥𝘢.” By the time a bed opened, the wound had rotted past saving. The doctors told her the leg couldn’t be salvaged. On a Friday in December, Roseanne Milburn lost her 𝐫𝐢𝐠𝐡𝐭 𝐥𝐞𝐠 — over a missing hospital bed. This is not a freak accident. It is the predictable output of a system that rations care by making people wait. In 2025, the median Canadian waited 𝟐𝟖.𝟔 𝐰𝐞𝐞𝐤𝐬 from a GP referral to actual treatment (Fraser Institute). For orthopedic surgery — the exact category Milburn needed — the median wait is 𝟒𝟖.𝟔 𝐰𝐞𝐞𝐤𝐬. Nearly a full year. By design. That is 222 percent longer than the 9.3-week wait Canadians faced in 1993 (Fraser Institute). The system isn’t getting better. It’s getting slower — and the waiting list itself becomes the rationing mechanism. Defenders call it “𝘧𝘳𝘦𝘦”. It is not free. Roseanne Milburn paid for it. She paid with her leg. Every politician selling “𝘔𝘦𝘥𝘪𝘤𝘢𝘳𝘦 𝘧𝘰𝘳 𝘈𝘭𝘭” is selling this — the bed that never opens, the specialist who never comes, the wound that turns black while a bureaucrat shuffles a list. 𝐀 𝐰𝐚𝐢𝐭𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐥𝐢𝐬𝐭 𝐢𝐬 𝐣𝐮𝐬𝐭 𝐚 𝐝𝐞𝐧𝐢𝐚𝐥 𝐰𝐢𝐭𝐡 𝐚 𝐜𝐚𝐥𝐞𝐧𝐝𝐚𝐫 𝐚𝐭𝐭𝐚𝐜𝐡𝐞𝐝.show more

M.A. Rothman

93,626 subscribers

263,583 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

Здоровье и велнес

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

They have charged senior citizen Miria Matembe with sectarianism. It fits the pattern exactly. They picked sectarianism against a woman who spent her whole life fighting for every Ugandan woman regardless of tribe, and they picked it because the charge was never the point. The charge is the paperwork. It exists to give Luzira a legal sounding reason to swallow her, so that when you ask why a 72-year-old is in a maximum security prison, somebody can wave a file at you and call it due process. This is how the machine works now. We have watched it do this to Besigye, to Lukwago, to Eddie Mutwe and countless others. Matembe is just the latest name fed through it. She was brought into that courtroom held up by two people, unable to stand on her own. Days ago she sat upright in her own home, clear and strong, telling the truth about this regime out loud. Now she could not walk into a room without being helped, her body showed the signs of torture wherever they have kept her since they took her. Days missing, her family never told where she was. Then she is brought to court like this and a sane magistrate accepts the charges against her and sends her to prison. She begged. She cried in that courtroom, asking the magistrate for bail so she could simply get to a hospital and have a scan, just to know whether something inside her was broken. She said, plainly, that she would not survive a night in prison without help. This is a woman who sat in the Constituent Assembly and fought for the document that courtroom claims to operate under, reduced to pleading for a scan like a stranger begging at a gate. The magistrate looked at her and looked away, then sent her to Luzira anyway. That same constitution allows her bail. It does not protect her now, because the people running this country have decided it does not apply to whoever Muhoozi is angry with this week. So let us not pretend this is a country of laws. A country of laws does not carry a sick 72-year-old into court and remand her to prison in that condition. They abducted Matembe. They tortured her. Then they brought her before a magistrate with a charge sheet already prepared, so the whole thing would look like justice instead of what it actually was. This is the system functioning exactly as it was built to function, and that is precisely the problem. Get her out. Get her to a hospital. Whoever you support, whatever you usually scroll past, this one should reach you, because they are showing us plainly what they are, and they are doing it to one of the best of us while asking us to call it law. 🎥Misheline Mutuzo #FreeMiriaMatembe #FreeAllPoliticalPrisonersInUganda #FreeUganda

They have charged senior citizen Miria Matembe with sectarianism. It fits the pattern exactly. They picked sectarianism against a woman who spent her whole life fighting for every Ugandan woman regardless of tribe, and they picked it because the charge was never the point. The charge is the paperwork. It exists to give Luzira a legal sounding reason to swallow her, so that when you ask why a 72-year-old is in a maximum security prison, somebody can wave a file at you and call it due process. This is how the machine works now. We have watched it do this to Besigye, to Lukwago, to Eddie Mutwe and countless others. Matembe is just the latest name fed through it. She was brought into that courtroom held up by two people, unable to stand on her own. Days ago she sat upright in her own home, clear and strong, telling the truth about this regime out loud. Now she could not walk into a room without being helped, her body showed the signs of torture wherever they have kept her since they took her. Days missing, her family never told where she was. Then she is brought to court like this and a sane magistrate accepts the charges against her and sends her to prison. She begged. She cried in that courtroom, asking the magistrate for bail so she could simply get to a hospital and have a scan, just to know whether something inside her was broken. She said, plainly, that she would not survive a night in prison without help. This is a woman who sat in the Constituent Assembly and fought for the document that courtroom claims to operate under, reduced to pleading for a scan like a stranger begging at a gate. The magistrate looked at her and looked away, then sent her to Luzira anyway. That same constitution allows her bail. It does not protect her now, because the people running this country have decided it does not apply to whoever Muhoozi is angry with this week. So let us not pretend this is a country of laws. A country of laws does not carry a sick 72-year-old into court and remand her to prison in that condition. They abducted Matembe. They tortured her. Then they brought her before a magistrate with a charge sheet already prepared, so the whole thing would look like justice instead of what it actually was. This is the system functioning exactly as it was built to function, and that is precisely the problem. Get her out. Get her to a hospital. Whoever you support, whatever you usually scroll past, this one should reach you, because they are showing us plainly what they are, and they are doing it to one of the best of us while asking us to call it law. 🎥Misheline Mutuzo #FreeMiriaMatembe #FreeAllPoliticalPrisonersInUganda #FreeUganda

King Melvin

11,948 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

A girl who openly calls herself kind of stupid made $20,000 last month, and her face never appeared on screen once. She wasn't selling talent. She was running a loop with Claude that anyone reading this could start tonight. Here is the entire method. There is nothing else to it. She opened YouTube and searched baby shows. She found one with millions of views. A dancing fruit sensory video, a counting whales cartoon, the kind of thing that plays on a loop in the background of every toddler's life. She opened it, went to the transcript, and copied the whole thing. She pasted that transcript into Claude and asked it to turn the format into a prompt for a similar video. Claude wrote the prompt. She pasted the prompt into an AI video generator. A few minutes later she had a finished cartoon. Bright colors, dancing animals, big letters, cheerful music. Indistinguishable from the one she copied. She posted it. Then she did the exact same thing the next day. And the day after. And every single day for 30 days. She never wrote a script, animated a frame or recorded a single sound. She found something that already worked, fed it to Claude, let an AI rebuild it, and uploaded the result before she went to bed. Nobody knew who she was. No name, no face, no personality, no story. Just a channel quietly posting toddler cartoons every day. And YouTube paid her anyway, because YouTube does not pay you for being interesting. It pays you for watch time, and toddlers watch the same video until the battery dies. By the end of the month the payments were real. $20,000 to a girl who will tell you to your face that she is not smart. That is the part nobody wants to sit with. The barrier was never intelligence. It was never talent. The only thing standing between her and the money was whether she would run a boring 5 minute loop every day for 30 days without quitting. She did. Most people won't. The system didn't filter for smart. It filtered for showing up.

A girl who openly calls herself kind of stupid made $20,000 last month, and her face never appeared on screen once. She wasn't selling talent. She was running a loop with Claude that anyone reading this could start tonight. Here is the entire method. There is nothing else to it. She opened YouTube and searched baby shows. She found one with millions of views. A dancing fruit sensory video, a counting whales cartoon, the kind of thing that plays on a loop in the background of every toddler's life. She opened it, went to the transcript, and copied the whole thing. She pasted that transcript into Claude and asked it to turn the format into a prompt for a similar video. Claude wrote the prompt. She pasted the prompt into an AI video generator. A few minutes later she had a finished cartoon. Bright colors, dancing animals, big letters, cheerful music. Indistinguishable from the one she copied. She posted it. Then she did the exact same thing the next day. And the day after. And every single day for 30 days. She never wrote a script, animated a frame or recorded a single sound. She found something that already worked, fed it to Claude, let an AI rebuild it, and uploaded the result before she went to bed. Nobody knew who she was. No name, no face, no personality, no story. Just a channel quietly posting toddler cartoons every day. And YouTube paid her anyway, because YouTube does not pay you for being interesting. It pays you for watch time, and toddlers watch the same video until the battery dies. By the end of the month the payments were real. $20,000 to a girl who will tell you to your face that she is not smart. That is the part nobody wants to sit with. The barrier was never intelligence. It was never talent. The only thing standing between her and the money was whether she would run a boring 5 minute loop every day for 30 days without quitting. She did. Most people won't. The system didn't filter for smart. It filtered for showing up.

Marlow

28,708 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

FMC JABI, ABUJA, A HUGE MESS OF A HOSPITAL The Federal Medical Center (FMC), Jabi, is supposed to be the best government hospital in the FCT, but it is today a huge mess. Some years ago, my wife was ill and was admitted to that hospital, and I did a post about my experiences there then. It was at least ok. Four years ago, we had our son at that same hospital. My experience weren't that satisfactory, but at least, if you look at Nigeria, it was also ok. A lot of the staff were very badly behaved. We paid for a private ward but didn't get most of the services that came with it. I had to run around the hospital for one week myself even when we were supposed to get someone do all that for us as part of the package. But in all, I wasn't bothered because I have my son. Over the years, I have watched that hospital deteriorate from 'BAD to WORSE'. For a start, the compound is so small. Those who planned it didn't plan with the population of Nigeria in mind, something very common in our country. Recently, they have been squeezing structures in every corner that the hospital is now shocking. But this is not even the issue. On Monday, 14 May, we rushed a family member who is sickle cell to the FMC. This was at about 1:PM on that day. For a sickle cell patient who was in crisis and crying of pains, the FMC didn't have a bed for her at the emergency ward. They were giving her treatment, including drips, while she was sitted on a chair for hours and crying of pains. At a point, they went to create a bed space for her, only for them to tell us that another patient who obviously has also been waiting took the bed before we knew it. The services was zero, the environment, nothing to write home about. Professionalism from staff? Forgerrit. We waited for hours, and in the process, another family friend told my wife about SAHAD HOSPITAL, right inside Apo Resettlement. The same person who owned Sahad Stores owns the hospital. I have never heard of it before. My wife demanded she should be discharged. They tried to discourage it, but she insisted. She was asked to sign, which she did. We drove to Sahad Hospital, and I was really impressed. The whole environment is very neat and clean. A big hospital with a lot of parking spaces. It didn't end there. While it cost 13k to register at the FMC, which is a government hospital, it cost just 3k to register at Sahad. She was put in a bed immediately with AC and even ceiling fans working. They attended to her immediately. Their services are quite cheaper and better than the FMC. Of course, there are also a couple of issues with staff conduct, but the FMC is also worse in that regard. She was transferred to the female ward on Tuesday, and it is still the same thing, clean beds, clean rooms, 24/7 electricity, fan, and AC. In all these, i wasn't surprised. A country where the minister of health claims his ministry only got N36m so far from the 2025 budget in 2026, such shouldn't bother you. The country is sinking into debt by the day, yet all the infrastructures are decaying. They don't care about the people, so they can't care about the hospitals they and their families don't use. The likes of Sahad should be encouraged. Here👇 are videos from parts of Sahad Hospital. I am sure a lot of people don't know about the hospital just like me. #unmutedthepodcast #tegatalks

FMC JABI, ABUJA, A HUGE MESS OF A HOSPITAL The Federal Medical Center (FMC), Jabi, is supposed to be the best government hospital in the FCT, but it is today a huge mess. Some years ago, my wife was ill and was admitted to that hospital, and I did a post about my experiences there then. It was at least ok. Four years ago, we had our son at that same hospital. My experience weren't that satisfactory, but at least, if you look at Nigeria, it was also ok. A lot of the staff were very badly behaved. We paid for a private ward but didn't get most of the services that came with it. I had to run around the hospital for one week myself even when we were supposed to get someone do all that for us as part of the package. But in all, I wasn't bothered because I have my son. Over the years, I have watched that hospital deteriorate from 'BAD to WORSE'. For a start, the compound is so small. Those who planned it didn't plan with the population of Nigeria in mind, something very common in our country. Recently, they have been squeezing structures in every corner that the hospital is now shocking. But this is not even the issue. On Monday, 14 May, we rushed a family member who is sickle cell to the FMC. This was at about 1:PM on that day. For a sickle cell patient who was in crisis and crying of pains, the FMC didn't have a bed for her at the emergency ward. They were giving her treatment, including drips, while she was sitted on a chair for hours and crying of pains. At a point, they went to create a bed space for her, only for them to tell us that another patient who obviously has also been waiting took the bed before we knew it. The services was zero, the environment, nothing to write home about. Professionalism from staff? Forgerrit. We waited for hours, and in the process, another family friend told my wife about SAHAD HOSPITAL, right inside Apo Resettlement. The same person who owned Sahad Stores owns the hospital. I have never heard of it before. My wife demanded she should be discharged. They tried to discourage it, but she insisted. She was asked to sign, which she did. We drove to Sahad Hospital, and I was really impressed. The whole environment is very neat and clean. A big hospital with a lot of parking spaces. It didn't end there. While it cost 13k to register at the FMC, which is a government hospital, it cost just 3k to register at Sahad. She was put in a bed immediately with AC and even ceiling fans working. They attended to her immediately. Their services are quite cheaper and better than the FMC. Of course, there are also a couple of issues with staff conduct, but the FMC is also worse in that regard. She was transferred to the female ward on Tuesday, and it is still the same thing, clean beds, clean rooms, 24/7 electricity, fan, and AC. In all these, i wasn't surprised. A country where the minister of health claims his ministry only got N36m so far from the 2025 budget in 2026, such shouldn't bother you. The country is sinking into debt by the day, yet all the infrastructures are decaying. They don't care about the people, so they can't care about the hospitals they and their families don't use. The likes of Sahad should be encouraged. Here👇 are videos from parts of Sahad Hospital. I am sure a lot of people don't know about the hospital just like me. #unmutedthepodcast #tegatalks

Samuel Omogor

15,754 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Jeff Bezos looked at a government waiting room and priced it at a hundred billion dollars. Bezos: “This is a $100 billion business, by the way. This is huge business.” That number is not ambition. It is a measurement. A company that size does not create a hundred billion dollars of new value here. It recovers a hundred billion that is already being destroyed, on schedule, in public, by a process everyone has agreed to call normal. The size of the opportunity is the size of the wound. Bezos: “They almost always say yes, they just make you wait a long time.” So the verdict was never in question. Only the delivery date. Which means the months bought nothing. They were storage. Your project sat in a room while the word yes waited its turn to be said. Nobody in there was deciding. Someone was scheduling. And the room bills by the day. Suarez: “The daily carrying cost, one day of interest, 200 to $400,000 per day.” Now find the recipient. There isn’t one. No school funded, no inspector paid, no safety review performed. A tax at least moves money into someone’s hands. This deletes it at four hundred thousand a day, and every dollar was real before the queue touched it. Bezos: “And that doesn’t count the frustration.” Count it anyway. It lands on a body long before it lands on a spreadsheet. Suarez: “Which is infinite. I have some white hairs as a result of this stuff.” That is the invoice. The money has a rate. The rest gets charged to the man, and he pays it whether the answer comes back yes or no. No one has ever been refunded a year. Every other cost in this economy can be hedged, insured, refinanced, or written off. Waiting is the only one that is final. A man will forgive being told no. He will never get back the time he spent standing there waiting to be told yes. We built a civilization that can move a decision at the speed of light and still schedule it at the speed of a man’s hair turning white. Bezos: “It should give you a yes or a no in 10 seconds. And if the answer is no, it should tell you the 6 things you have to change to get a yes.” For four thousand years the wait was honest. Someone had to hold the entire code in one head and walk it line by line against your drawings. Reading was slow because reading was human. That stopped being true in less time than it takes to approve one building. Bezos: “Maybe with AI it can just read all the plans. And it knows all the codes. Spit it out.” The constraint is gone. The wait stayed. Anything still moving at the old speed after the cost of thinking collapsed is not slow. It is choosing. The queue never protected you from a bad building. It protected a signature from a bad outcome. Nobody gets fired for the wait. They get fired for the answer. An institution has no lifespan, so time costs it nothing. You have one, so time is the only thing it can take. Every queue is a trade between something that dies and something that doesn’t, and only one side is ever charged. That trade held for the whole of recorded history because the mortal side had no leverage. It does now. Somebody is going to build this. A hundred billion does not sit in a waiting room forever. And the day it exists, the wait stops being a fact of the world and becomes a decision with a name attached. The hundred billion was never the prize. It is the receipt for how long we agreed to stand there. We are the first people alive who get to stop signing it.

Jeff Bezos looked at a government waiting room and priced it at a hundred billion dollars. Bezos: “This is a $100 billion business, by the way. This is huge business.” That number is not ambition. It is a measurement. A company that size does not create a hundred billion dollars of new value here. It recovers a hundred billion that is already being destroyed, on schedule, in public, by a process everyone has agreed to call normal. The size of the opportunity is the size of the wound. Bezos: “They almost always say yes, they just make you wait a long time.” So the verdict was never in question. Only the delivery date. Which means the months bought nothing. They were storage. Your project sat in a room while the word yes waited its turn to be said. Nobody in there was deciding. Someone was scheduling. And the room bills by the day. Suarez: “The daily carrying cost, one day of interest, 200 to $400,000 per day.” Now find the recipient. There isn’t one. No school funded, no inspector paid, no safety review performed. A tax at least moves money into someone’s hands. This deletes it at four hundred thousand a day, and every dollar was real before the queue touched it. Bezos: “And that doesn’t count the frustration.” Count it anyway. It lands on a body long before it lands on a spreadsheet. Suarez: “Which is infinite. I have some white hairs as a result of this stuff.” That is the invoice. The money has a rate. The rest gets charged to the man, and he pays it whether the answer comes back yes or no. No one has ever been refunded a year. Every other cost in this economy can be hedged, insured, refinanced, or written off. Waiting is the only one that is final. A man will forgive being told no. He will never get back the time he spent standing there waiting to be told yes. We built a civilization that can move a decision at the speed of light and still schedule it at the speed of a man’s hair turning white. Bezos: “It should give you a yes or a no in 10 seconds. And if the answer is no, it should tell you the 6 things you have to change to get a yes.” For four thousand years the wait was honest. Someone had to hold the entire code in one head and walk it line by line against your drawings. Reading was slow because reading was human. That stopped being true in less time than it takes to approve one building. Bezos: “Maybe with AI it can just read all the plans. And it knows all the codes. Spit it out.” The constraint is gone. The wait stayed. Anything still moving at the old speed after the cost of thinking collapsed is not slow. It is choosing. The queue never protected you from a bad building. It protected a signature from a bad outcome. Nobody gets fired for the wait. They get fired for the answer. An institution has no lifespan, so time costs it nothing. You have one, so time is the only thing it can take. Every queue is a trade between something that dies and something that doesn’t, and only one side is ever charged. That trade held for the whole of recorded history because the mortal side had no leverage. It does now. Somebody is going to build this. A hundred billion does not sit in a waiting room forever. And the day it exists, the wait stops being a fact of the world and becomes a decision with a name attached. The hundred billion was never the prize. It is the receipt for how long we agreed to stand there. We are the first people alive who get to stop signing it.

Dustin

17,035 просмотров • 10 дней назад

Look like I've said in the past I'm a Trump supporter and a conservative/Republican but we all need to stop bitching about #MTG using the system that benefits her when the government had this put in place for decades! She used a system that allowed her to do insider trading allowed her to keep all of her benefits when leaving the government its the same thing Trump told Hillary on the debate floor back in 2015 if you want me to pay taxes change the tax codes I look at it this way she burned bridges now she getting out and she is taking whats hers so dont be pissed with her be pissed at our government for not changing it to allow this to happen!

Look like I've said in the past I'm a Trump supporter and a conservative/Republican but we all need to stop bitching about #MTG using the system that benefits her when the government had this put in place for decades! She used a system that allowed her to do insider trading allowed her to keep all of her benefits when leaving the government its the same thing Trump told Hillary on the debate floor back in 2015 if you want me to pay taxes change the tax codes I look at it this way she burned bridges now she getting out and she is taking whats hers so dont be pissed with her be pissed at our government for not changing it to allow this to happen!

1mZerOCool🍎🎸🤘

24,244 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

Her Daughter's Future Was Stolen by a Mandated Pfizer Shot; The Compensation 'Process' is a Cruel Joke That Begins With a 12-Month Wait For a Single Voicemail. A year ago, Shona submitted a formal compensation claim for her daughter, Brittany. The response after 12 months? A voicemail confirming only that someone had "opened and closed" the file. This is not just bureaucratic delay; it is a chilling dismissal of a life-altering injury. Brittany, now 22 and recently engaged, suffered a severe reaction to her second mandated Pfizer dose. Her family fought for three years to even have her vaccine injury acknowledged by a medical system that initially obfuscated the truth. While some doctors privately conceded early on, public silence was enforced, leaving Brittany without the help she desperately needed. The injury has left her unable to work, facing a lifetime of medical expenses. The compensation process, she was told, could drag on for several more years, navigating both legal and medical hurdles. A devastating question now hangs in the air: Is the system simply waiting for claimants to die, as a death benefit would be cheaper than covering a lifetime of care for a young woman? To compound the horror, Brittany recently suffered a shocking medical emergency. At Northern Beaches Hospital, she was treated with such staggering negligence that staff themselves called an ambulance, believing she was dying. After minimal monitoring, she was discharged with instructions to "see a cardiologist," receiving no meaningful treatment. This ordeal has exacerbated both her condition and her family's PTSD, all while incurring hundreds of thousands in new medical bills. This is the human cost of mandate and medical silence: a vibrant young woman’s future stolen, a family driven to financial ruin, and a system that seems designed to delay, deny, and wait for victims to succumb.

Her Daughter's Future Was Stolen by a Mandated Pfizer Shot; The Compensation 'Process' is a Cruel Joke That Begins With a 12-Month Wait For a Single Voicemail. A year ago, Shona submitted a formal compensation claim for her daughter, Brittany. The response after 12 months? A voicemail confirming only that someone had "opened and closed" the file. This is not just bureaucratic delay; it is a chilling dismissal of a life-altering injury. Brittany, now 22 and recently engaged, suffered a severe reaction to her second mandated Pfizer dose. Her family fought for three years to even have her vaccine injury acknowledged by a medical system that initially obfuscated the truth. While some doctors privately conceded early on, public silence was enforced, leaving Brittany without the help she desperately needed. The injury has left her unable to work, facing a lifetime of medical expenses. The compensation process, she was told, could drag on for several more years, navigating both legal and medical hurdles. A devastating question now hangs in the air: Is the system simply waiting for claimants to die, as a death benefit would be cheaper than covering a lifetime of care for a young woman? To compound the horror, Brittany recently suffered a shocking medical emergency. At Northern Beaches Hospital, she was treated with such staggering negligence that staff themselves called an ambulance, believing she was dying. After minimal monitoring, she was discharged with instructions to "see a cardiologist," receiving no meaningful treatment. This ordeal has exacerbated both her condition and her family's PTSD, all while incurring hundreds of thousands in new medical bills. This is the human cost of mandate and medical silence: a vibrant young woman’s future stolen, a family driven to financial ruin, and a system that seems designed to delay, deny, and wait for victims to succumb.

Camus

59,477 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад

This is happening more than people realize. A woman fighting breast cancer showed up for surgery today…fresh off of chemo, port in place, nothing to eat or drink, mentally preparing for the thing no one can ever truly be ready for. And then we canceled. Not because she didn’t need surgery. Not because it wasn’t medically necessary. But because the hospital said they won’t get paid without prior authorization. This is the system we’ve learned to work inside, one that denies and delays care for administrative reasons. A system where responsibility is spread everywhere and nowhere at the same time. Where having insurance doesn’t guarantee you’ll get the care you need. Where paperwork can matter more than a patient sitting in a hospital bed. Prior authorization reform may be announced, but on the front lines, it’s not what we’re seeing. Today, a cancer surgery was canceled because the system is designed to protect payment…not people.

This is happening more than people realize. A woman fighting breast cancer showed up for surgery today…fresh off of chemo, port in place, nothing to eat or drink, mentally preparing for the thing no one can ever truly be ready for. And then we canceled. Not because she didn’t need surgery. Not because it wasn’t medically necessary. But because the hospital said they won’t get paid without prior authorization. This is the system we’ve learned to work inside, one that denies and delays care for administrative reasons. A system where responsibility is spread everywhere and nowhere at the same time. Where having insurance doesn’t guarantee you’ll get the care you need. Where paperwork can matter more than a patient sitting in a hospital bed. Prior authorization reform may be announced, but on the front lines, it’s not what we’re seeing. Today, a cancer surgery was canceled because the system is designed to protect payment…not people.

Elisabeth Potter MD

324,500 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

Mabel Chinomona is not merely an embarrassment to leadership. She is a case study in how power decays when it falls into hands that mistake noise for authority. Every time she speaks, she performs her own autopsy, exposing the incompetence, greed, and ideological bankruptcy at the heart of the Emmerson Mnangagwa system she defends. This is not leadership. It is malpractice. In a nation staggering under hunger, poverty, and hopelessness, she stands on public platforms boasting about being a “thug.” That single word is her confession, a self indictment delivered with pride. While citizens scrape for survival, she celebrates the very behaviour that has brought Zimbabwe to its knees. It is a grotesque display of detachment, a declaration that the suffering of the people means nothing to those insulated by privilege and protected by impunity. She drapes herself in the title of “war veteran” as if it were armour, yet her conduct desecrates the very legacy she claims. True liberation fighters fought for dignity, justice, and the future of the ordinary person. She fights only for relevance. True veterans carried the weight of a nation. She carries only her own self interest. Her behaviour has reduced a noble history to a hollow slogan, a shield used not to defend the nation but to escape accountability. Here is the surgical truth, when the people look at her, they do not see courage, wisdom, or leadership. They see the final symptom of a system that no longer even pretends to care. They see a voice that echoes the regime’s arrogance, a mouth that opens only to remind the nation how far its leaders have fallen. History does not forget such betrayals. Her legacy is writing itself, and it is damning, loud, and irreversible. Kunyangara fesi zvese nemoyo. #mabelchinomona #dutyeremadutye #diabolical

Mabel Chinomona is not merely an embarrassment to leadership. She is a case study in how power decays when it falls into hands that mistake noise for authority. Every time she speaks, she performs her own autopsy, exposing the incompetence, greed, and ideological bankruptcy at the heart of the Emmerson Mnangagwa system she defends. This is not leadership. It is malpractice. In a nation staggering under hunger, poverty, and hopelessness, she stands on public platforms boasting about being a “thug.” That single word is her confession, a self indictment delivered with pride. While citizens scrape for survival, she celebrates the very behaviour that has brought Zimbabwe to its knees. It is a grotesque display of detachment, a declaration that the suffering of the people means nothing to those insulated by privilege and protected by impunity. She drapes herself in the title of “war veteran” as if it were armour, yet her conduct desecrates the very legacy she claims. True liberation fighters fought for dignity, justice, and the future of the ordinary person. She fights only for relevance. True veterans carried the weight of a nation. She carries only her own self interest. Her behaviour has reduced a noble history to a hollow slogan, a shield used not to defend the nation but to escape accountability. Here is the surgical truth, when the people look at her, they do not see courage, wisdom, or leadership. They see the final symptom of a system that no longer even pretends to care. They see a voice that echoes the regime’s arrogance, a mouth that opens only to remind the nation how far its leaders have fallen. History does not forget such betrayals. Her legacy is writing itself, and it is damning, loud, and irreversible. Kunyangara fesi zvese nemoyo. #mabelchinomona #dutyeremadutye #diabolical

kerina mujati

36,328 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

Another peer-to-peer call. The reviewer was kind. Really kind. But, respectfully, not my peer. He listened as I explained why my patient needs lymphovenous bypass surgery. It’s a surgery that can treat the painful swelling in her arm caused by breast cancer treatment and prevent it from getting worse. She has done everything right. Compression. Therapy. Expensive garments. She’s changed her life to spend an hour a day with every resource she can afford. It’s affecting her ability to work as a nurse. And she is getting worse. This is the window where we can fix it. Early enough that surgery can actually change the course. We can do this surgery outpatient. Two hours. CMS even has a code for it. The man on the phone agreed it would help her… But he couldn’t approve it… Because he’s not a plastic surgeon and doesn’t have the specific knowledge necessary to make this recommendation. He gave me the help he felt he could. He told me to appeal and told me not to expedite it, because that wouldn’t work in my favor. Every human involved in this case knows what we should do. But the system is inhumane.

Another peer-to-peer call. The reviewer was kind. Really kind. But, respectfully, not my peer. He listened as I explained why my patient needs lymphovenous bypass surgery. It’s a surgery that can treat the painful swelling in her arm caused by breast cancer treatment and prevent it from getting worse. She has done everything right. Compression. Therapy. Expensive garments. She’s changed her life to spend an hour a day with every resource she can afford. It’s affecting her ability to work as a nurse. And she is getting worse. This is the window where we can fix it. Early enough that surgery can actually change the course. We can do this surgery outpatient. Two hours. CMS even has a code for it. The man on the phone agreed it would help her… But he couldn’t approve it… Because he’s not a plastic surgeon and doesn’t have the specific knowledge necessary to make this recommendation. He gave me the help he felt he could. He told me to appeal and told me not to expedite it, because that wouldn’t work in my favor. Every human involved in this case knows what we should do. But the system is inhumane.

Elisabeth Potter MD

215,312 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

HORRIFIC: A Canadian woman was euthanized by the government—after telling doctors she wanted to live. She said she preferred palliative care. She cited her faith. She had doubts. But the very next day, her husband said he was tired of caring for her—and the system rushed to end her life. She had just been sent home from the ER. Hospice was denied. Her husband then pushed for a fast-track MAiD assessment. The first doctor raised red flags—about the husband’s pressure, coercion, her change of heart. That doctor pleaded for more time. The state said no. A second doctor approved her. A third signed off. And by nightfall, she was gone. Dr. Ramona Coelho condemned the case: “The focus should have been on ensuring adequate palliative care and support.” But in Ontario, same-day euthanasia is rising—and doctors can bill up to $900 per death. This wasn’t compassion. It was state-approved execution. She doubted. She hesitated. She believed in the sanctity of life. But that didn’t matter. The system had already made up its mind, and killed her anyway. Watch ZeeeMediaOfficial's full report—before we forget that life is a gift from God, not a decision for the state to make.👇

HORRIFIC: A Canadian woman was euthanized by the government—after telling doctors she wanted to live. She said she preferred palliative care. She cited her faith. She had doubts. But the very next day, her husband said he was tired of caring for her—and the system rushed to end her life. She had just been sent home from the ER. Hospice was denied. Her husband then pushed for a fast-track MAiD assessment. The first doctor raised red flags—about the husband’s pressure, coercion, her change of heart. That doctor pleaded for more time. The state said no. A second doctor approved her. A third signed off. And by nightfall, she was gone. Dr. Ramona Coelho condemned the case: “The focus should have been on ensuring adequate palliative care and support.” But in Ontario, same-day euthanasia is rising—and doctors can bill up to $900 per death. This wasn’t compassion. It was state-approved execution. She doubted. She hesitated. She believed in the sanctity of life. But that didn’t matter. The system had already made up its mind, and killed her anyway. Watch ZeeeMediaOfficial's full report—before we forget that life is a gift from God, not a decision for the state to make.👇

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

283,201 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

🚨 BREAKING NEWS 🚨 Her Name was Virginia Giuffre. ☠️ and Now She is DEAD. But her death is not the end of a tragedy; it is the beginning of a revelation that cannot be silenced, buried, or redacted. Because her life, her testimony, and her murder are part of a pattern that spans continents, generations, and empires. She was one of the very few to survive the machinery of ritualized child rape, not because she was lucky, but because she remembered and in this world, remembrance is the most dangerous thing of all. She remembered the men who used her, the hands that drugged her, the rooms that swallowed her innocence, and the names that no court would allow her to speak. She remembered the faces of power not as icons… but as violators. She saw presidents, princes, scientists, bankers, religious leaders, and intelligence agents not as symbols of order, but as predators in suits. She was one of the only ones who made it out alive… and dared to speak without a script. And now, she is gone. Not by suicide. Not by accident. But by orchestration. And her final words confirm it. “I am making it publicly known that in no way, shape or form am I suicidal. Do not let this go away. Too many evil people want to see me quieted.” That was her death pre-confession. A direct indictment of the system she knew would kill her. She gave the world one last lifeline to truth. And still, the silence deafens. The media buried it. The governments ignored it. And the people turned away… because to look into the eyes of her truth is to confront a world so broken, so backwards, and so drenched in hidden blood that denial feels safer than courage. But that era ends now. Because this story… her story; is not unique. It is the keystone of everything that’s been hidden. Virginia Giuffre was not trafficked by a random billionaire. She was trafficked by a networked empire designed to control the direction of the world through the systematic destruction of children. Her abusers were not just powerful… they were protected. Epstein and Maxwell were not lone wolves. They were the face of a global blackmail syndicate that operated through Mossad, CIA, and MI6… with diplomatic immunity, state funding, and access to every high value target on Earth. Children were not just abused… they were filmed. They were catalogued. Their trauma was encrypted into dossiers used to compromise, blackmail, and ultimately own the decisions of presidents, prime ministers, military chiefs, judges, entertainers, CEOs, and spiritual leaders. It was a system. A living organism. Designed to extract power by destroying purity. Epstein’s island was not a playground. It was a ritual site. Cameras in every room. Soundproof bunkers. Flight logs full of world leaders and household names. A sacrificial architecture masked as luxury. And behind it… binders of footage, lists of fetishes, psychological profiles, and AI-enhanced metadata to ensure that every participant could be broken on command. Maxwell wasn’t his assistant. She was a high level handler trained in psychological warfare and ritual abuse. Her father… Robert Maxwell;was Mossad. Epstein’s wealth? Synthetic. His ties to intelligence? Deep. His files? Still sealed. And the reason they remain sealed is simple… they prove that every nation, every system, every elite tier of global control is built on the trauma of children who were never meant to live long enough to speak. Virginia did. And so she died. Continued in Comments Below👇

🚨 BREAKING NEWS 🚨 Her Name was Virginia Giuffre. ☠️ and Now She is DEAD. But her death is not the end of a tragedy; it is the beginning of a revelation that cannot be silenced, buried, or redacted. Because her life, her testimony, and her murder are part of a pattern that spans continents, generations, and empires. She was one of the very few to survive the machinery of ritualized child rape, not because she was lucky, but because she remembered and in this world, remembrance is the most dangerous thing of all. She remembered the men who used her, the hands that drugged her, the rooms that swallowed her innocence, and the names that no court would allow her to speak. She remembered the faces of power not as icons… but as violators. She saw presidents, princes, scientists, bankers, religious leaders, and intelligence agents not as symbols of order, but as predators in suits. She was one of the only ones who made it out alive… and dared to speak without a script. And now, she is gone. Not by suicide. Not by accident. But by orchestration. And her final words confirm it. “I am making it publicly known that in no way, shape or form am I suicidal. Do not let this go away. Too many evil people want to see me quieted.” That was her death pre-confession. A direct indictment of the system she knew would kill her. She gave the world one last lifeline to truth. And still, the silence deafens. The media buried it. The governments ignored it. And the people turned away… because to look into the eyes of her truth is to confront a world so broken, so backwards, and so drenched in hidden blood that denial feels safer than courage. But that era ends now. Because this story… her story; is not unique. It is the keystone of everything that’s been hidden. Virginia Giuffre was not trafficked by a random billionaire. She was trafficked by a networked empire designed to control the direction of the world through the systematic destruction of children. Her abusers were not just powerful… they were protected. Epstein and Maxwell were not lone wolves. They were the face of a global blackmail syndicate that operated through Mossad, CIA, and MI6… with diplomatic immunity, state funding, and access to every high value target on Earth. Children were not just abused… they were filmed. They were catalogued. Their trauma was encrypted into dossiers used to compromise, blackmail, and ultimately own the decisions of presidents, prime ministers, military chiefs, judges, entertainers, CEOs, and spiritual leaders. It was a system. A living organism. Designed to extract power by destroying purity. Epstein’s island was not a playground. It was a ritual site. Cameras in every room. Soundproof bunkers. Flight logs full of world leaders and household names. A sacrificial architecture masked as luxury. And behind it… binders of footage, lists of fetishes, psychological profiles, and AI-enhanced metadata to ensure that every participant could be broken on command. Maxwell wasn’t his assistant. She was a high level handler trained in psychological warfare and ritual abuse. Her father… Robert Maxwell;was Mossad. Epstein’s wealth? Synthetic. His ties to intelligence? Deep. His files? Still sealed. And the reason they remain sealed is simple… they prove that every nation, every system, every elite tier of global control is built on the trauma of children who were never meant to live long enough to speak. Virginia did. And so she died. Continued in Comments Below👇

Noah B. Price

1,068,276 просмотров • 1 год назад

My last case of 2025 and my first case of 2026 tell you everything you need to know about our healthcare system. Last week, I was scheduled to do a DIEP flap for a patient who had been waiting a long time. We had asked her insurance company if we could do the surgery in network at @Redbudsurgerycenter, where we have everything needed to safely and efficiently take care of her. They hadn’t approved that, so the surgery had to be scheduled at an older hospital in town. When we arrived, the hospital was having HVAC issues. The humidity levels were not safe for surgery. We waited for hours, and ultimately the case had to be canceled. It wasn’t just her surgery. Multiple surgeries were canceled that day because operating under those conditions would have been a fire risk. We weren’t able to reschedule her surgery before the end of the year, which means her deductible resets. I could have safely done her surgery at Redbud that day but insurance rules wouldn’t allow it. This is what closed networks and rigid systems look like in real life. Now here’s the contrast. The first case I’m doing in 2026 is also a woman who needs breast reconstruction with DIEP flaps. This time, instead of traditional insurance, her employer uses a third party administrator. They came to me directly and asked what I would charge if they paid fairly and transparently. On Monday, we’re doing her bilateral DIEP flap at @Redbudsurgerycenter. I can control the environment, the costs, and the care. It’s better for the patient and significantly less expensive for the employer. This is called Direct Specialty Care. It’s not direct primary care. It’s specialty care delivered without unnecessary barriers. It’s happening. We’re starting the year this way. And I’m going to keep pushing the boundaries and keeping you informed.

My last case of 2025 and my first case of 2026 tell you everything you need to know about our healthcare system. Last week, I was scheduled to do a DIEP flap for a patient who had been waiting a long time. We had asked her insurance company if we could do the surgery in network at @Redbudsurgerycenter, where we have everything needed to safely and efficiently take care of her. They hadn’t approved that, so the surgery had to be scheduled at an older hospital in town. When we arrived, the hospital was having HVAC issues. The humidity levels were not safe for surgery. We waited for hours, and ultimately the case had to be canceled. It wasn’t just her surgery. Multiple surgeries were canceled that day because operating under those conditions would have been a fire risk. We weren’t able to reschedule her surgery before the end of the year, which means her deductible resets. I could have safely done her surgery at Redbud that day but insurance rules wouldn’t allow it. This is what closed networks and rigid systems look like in real life. Now here’s the contrast. The first case I’m doing in 2026 is also a woman who needs breast reconstruction with DIEP flaps. This time, instead of traditional insurance, her employer uses a third party administrator. They came to me directly and asked what I would charge if they paid fairly and transparently. On Monday, we’re doing her bilateral DIEP flap at @Redbudsurgerycenter. I can control the environment, the costs, and the care. It’s better for the patient and significantly less expensive for the employer. This is called Direct Specialty Care. It’s not direct primary care. It’s specialty care delivered without unnecessary barriers. It’s happening. We’re starting the year this way. And I’m going to keep pushing the boundaries and keeping you informed.

Elisabeth Potter MD

136,464 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

🚨 WATCH: WOMAN IN LABOR THROWN INTO ZOOM COURT FROM HOSPITAL BED AFTER REFUSING C-SECTION This is happening while she’s in labor. A Florida mother, who’s also a professional doula, is handed a tablet in her hospital bed… and suddenly she’s on a live Zoom court hearing with a judge, doctors, and attorneys. They’re debating whether she should undergo a C-section. And she pushes back. • Says she has no lawyer or advocate on the call • A trained doula… arguing for her own birth plan • Had 3 prior C-sections, including one with a hemorrhage • Wanted to avoid another high-risk surgery • Calls the situation “traumatizing” After hours of testimony, the judge rules: She can keep trying for a vaginal birth… unless it becomes an emergency. Then hours later… Doctors take her into surgery. The baby is delivered by C-section. Same outcome. But the path to get there? A courtroom… over Zoom… while she was in labor. At what point does this stop feeling like medical care… and start feeling like something else?

🚨 WATCH: WOMAN IN LABOR THROWN INTO ZOOM COURT FROM HOSPITAL BED AFTER REFUSING C-SECTION This is happening while she’s in labor. A Florida mother, who’s also a professional doula, is handed a tablet in her hospital bed… and suddenly she’s on a live Zoom court hearing with a judge, doctors, and attorneys. They’re debating whether she should undergo a C-section. And she pushes back. • Says she has no lawyer or advocate on the call • A trained doula… arguing for her own birth plan • Had 3 prior C-sections, including one with a hemorrhage • Wanted to avoid another high-risk surgery • Calls the situation “traumatizing” After hours of testimony, the judge rules: She can keep trying for a vaginal birth… unless it becomes an emergency. Then hours later… Doctors take her into surgery. The baby is delivered by C-section. Same outcome. But the path to get there? A courtroom… over Zoom… while she was in labor. At what point does this stop feeling like medical care… and start feeling like something else?

HustleBitch

77,330 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

Nomy lost her mother when she was just 11 years old. Her mum was a single mum and the only parent that she knew. Experiencing grief at such a young age is not something that is easy to navigate, in fact you never fully heal from it. This is why she keeps to herself because she has had to navigate this world on her own. She has had disagreements with housemates and she has never insulted anyone so passionately. Saying anything about her mum is a trigger and calling her a motherless hoe is definitely something that she wouldn’t take lightly. Using the fact that someone has lost a parent as an insult is extremely painful. No one would react positively to that. All she wishes for is to see her mum again and coming at her because of her mum’s death is a big trigger. This is why she refused to open up, somehow the housemates got wind of the fact that her mum is not alive and want to use it against her. Disagreements would always occur, but you cannot control how the other party would react. Cc: Big Brother Naija #BBNaija #NomyNation #Nomy

Nomy lost her mother when she was just 11 years old. Her mum was a single mum and the only parent that she knew. Experiencing grief at such a young age is not something that is easy to navigate, in fact you never fully heal from it. This is why she keeps to herself because she has had to navigate this world on her own. She has had disagreements with housemates and she has never insulted anyone so passionately. Saying anything about her mum is a trigger and calling her a motherless hoe is definitely something that she wouldn’t take lightly. Using the fact that someone has lost a parent as an insult is extremely painful. No one would react positively to that. All she wishes for is to see her mum again and coming at her because of her mum’s death is a big trigger. This is why she refused to open up, somehow the housemates got wind of the fact that her mum is not alive and want to use it against her. Disagreements would always occur, but you cannot control how the other party would react. Cc: Big Brother Naija #BBNaija #NomyNation #Nomy

NOMY #BBNaija

149,446 просмотров • 10 дней назад

A girl in Japan was banned from her school for having the wrong hair color. In April 2015, a fifteen-year-old enrolled at Kaifūkan, a prefectural high school in Habikino, Osaka. Her hair was naturally light brown, but the school had a rule against dyeing. For context, most Japanese have jet-black hair. Her mother flagged it before the first day, asking them to make allowance because the girl's hair was brown by birth. On the morning of her student ID photo, a teacher said she could not come to school with hair that color. The school decided that her natural hair was, indeed, black. So she dyed it black. Then she dyed it again, because the black was never quite black enough. At its peak, teachers were inspecting and correcting her hair once every four days. She was pulled from the regular classroom into a separate room, and told she would not join the school festival with everyone else. Finally the choice was put plainly: dye it black or leave. In September 2016, halfway through her second year, she stopped coming. She sued the prefecture for 2.2 million yen and won 330,000, none of it for the dyeing. That sum was awarded only because, after she left, the school removed her desk and struck her name from the register. For erasing a student, the prefecture owed her. For the dyeing that drove her out, it owed nothing. The district court, then the high court, held the rule fell within the school's discretion. Nobody with the power to rule otherwise found that unreasonable.

A girl in Japan was banned from her school for having the wrong hair color. In April 2015, a fifteen-year-old enrolled at Kaifūkan, a prefectural high school in Habikino, Osaka. Her hair was naturally light brown, but the school had a rule against dyeing. For context, most Japanese have jet-black hair. Her mother flagged it before the first day, asking them to make allowance because the girl's hair was brown by birth. On the morning of her student ID photo, a teacher said she could not come to school with hair that color. The school decided that her natural hair was, indeed, black. So she dyed it black. Then she dyed it again, because the black was never quite black enough. At its peak, teachers were inspecting and correcting her hair once every four days. She was pulled from the regular classroom into a separate room, and told she would not join the school festival with everyone else. Finally the choice was put plainly: dye it black or leave. In September 2016, halfway through her second year, she stopped coming. She sued the prefecture for 2.2 million yen and won 330,000, none of it for the dyeing. That sum was awarded only because, after she left, the school removed her desk and struck her name from the register. For erasing a student, the prefecture owed her. For the dyeing that drove her out, it owed nothing. The district court, then the high court, held the rule fell within the school's discretion. Nobody with the power to rule otherwise found that unreasonable.

Sam Szuchan

12,698 просмотров • 29 дней назад

American Surgeon shows the actual letter from UnitedHealthcare DENYING a patient in emergency condition from receiving care “This is a woman who was in the emergency room with pulmonary embolisms” “I think we all knew this would happen. I had another patient come in and share with me that UnitedHealthcare denied her inpatient's day. So this is a patient who had shortness of breath and some chest pain, and she just knew that something wasn't right in her body. She had a family history of blood clots and she'd had a deep flap surgery a couple of weeks ago. She went to the hospital and they saw her and they found that she had a life threatening condition known as pulmonary embolisms. So she was admitted to the hospital and taken care of really well by the doctors there. And they ordered all the right things. After a couple of days, she was discharged. She got a letter from UnitedHealthcare explaining that they didn't agree with the level of her care and that they would not cover it. So I'm gonna share some of the language of that letter with you, and I want you to know that my patient that we talked about previously who had her surgery denied had almost exactly the same letter shared. So there's some troubling things in this letter. I think this term is really interesting. United is saying they reviewed the request for inpatient admission. So let's all just pause and consider that. This is a woman who was in the emergency room with pulmonary embolisms, and the doctor wasn't really requesting anything. They were saying this patient needs to be in the hospital. But an insurance company sees this as a request, and that's part of this prior auth environment that we're living in. So I think it's important as patients and as physicians to just acknowledge that this is our reality now. Someone can think that there's a good medical decision for you and can write orders and wanna do the right thing for you, but your insurance company is seeing that as a request and deciding whether or not they wanna do it. One of the criteria that this insurance company used to decide whether or not to accept or deny this request was whether it's medically necessary. And it's so interesting that we're letting insurance companies and the doctors who work for insurance companies determine what's medically necessary and not just the doctor in front of the patient in the emergency room. So this is a really bold statement from UnitedHealthcare for my patient. They say you did not have to be admitted as an inpatient to the hospital for this care. I think we all need to just reflect on that. An insurance company is telling a patient and her doctor that they disagree with the plan of care to keep that patient safe. I know that this is boiling down to whether it's an inpatient admission or an observation admission, and that's really about money. But what I wanna point out to you is they're making medical decisions. This insurance company is actually weighing in and disagreeing with a doctor who made a medical decision to admit this patient for her safety. So this specific sentence, when a doctor or facility treats a patient above the recommended level of care, we cannot cover it. What the heck? That's what we do. We go above and beyond as physicians. It's clear that insurance companies don't, and they're actually saying it here.”

American Surgeon shows the actual letter from UnitedHealthcare DENYING a patient in emergency condition from receiving care “This is a woman who was in the emergency room with pulmonary embolisms” “I think we all knew this would happen. I had another patient come in and share with me that UnitedHealthcare denied her inpatient's day. So this is a patient who had shortness of breath and some chest pain, and she just knew that something wasn't right in her body. She had a family history of blood clots and she'd had a deep flap surgery a couple of weeks ago. She went to the hospital and they saw her and they found that she had a life threatening condition known as pulmonary embolisms. So she was admitted to the hospital and taken care of really well by the doctors there. And they ordered all the right things. After a couple of days, she was discharged. She got a letter from UnitedHealthcare explaining that they didn't agree with the level of her care and that they would not cover it. So I'm gonna share some of the language of that letter with you, and I want you to know that my patient that we talked about previously who had her surgery denied had almost exactly the same letter shared. So there's some troubling things in this letter. I think this term is really interesting. United is saying they reviewed the request for inpatient admission. So let's all just pause and consider that. This is a woman who was in the emergency room with pulmonary embolisms, and the doctor wasn't really requesting anything. They were saying this patient needs to be in the hospital. But an insurance company sees this as a request, and that's part of this prior auth environment that we're living in. So I think it's important as patients and as physicians to just acknowledge that this is our reality now. Someone can think that there's a good medical decision for you and can write orders and wanna do the right thing for you, but your insurance company is seeing that as a request and deciding whether or not they wanna do it. One of the criteria that this insurance company used to decide whether or not to accept or deny this request was whether it's medically necessary. And it's so interesting that we're letting insurance companies and the doctors who work for insurance companies determine what's medically necessary and not just the doctor in front of the patient in the emergency room. So this is a really bold statement from UnitedHealthcare for my patient. They say you did not have to be admitted as an inpatient to the hospital for this care. I think we all need to just reflect on that. An insurance company is telling a patient and her doctor that they disagree with the plan of care to keep that patient safe. I know that this is boiling down to whether it's an inpatient admission or an observation admission, and that's really about money. But what I wanna point out to you is they're making medical decisions. This insurance company is actually weighing in and disagreeing with a doctor who made a medical decision to admit this patient for her safety. So this specific sentence, when a doctor or facility treats a patient above the recommended level of care, we cannot cover it. What the heck? That's what we do. We go above and beyond as physicians. It's clear that insurance companies don't, and they're actually saying it here.”

Wall Street Apes

115,712 просмотров • 1 год назад

Here’s my analysis of why MEGHAN MARKLE LIES with such ease and how the Oprah interview exposed it. There are lies that come from panic. There are lies that come from confusion. Then there are lies that come from entitlement. The kind that slip out smoothly, confidently, without a flicker of worry, because the person saying them believes consequences are for other people. That is exactly what Meghan Markle displayed in the Oprah interview when she claimed she and Harry were married “three days before” their wedding, with the Archbishop of Canterbury. She didn’t frame it as a private vow or a romantic moment. She framed it as an actual marriage. And she did it on global television with a smile, like she was sharing a charming secret. But it wasn’t charming. It wasn’t harmless. And it certainly wasn’t true. It was a lie told with ease because she expected everyone else to absorb it without questioning it. The Lie Was Designed to Sound Like a Fairytale, Not a Fact This is how Meghan operates. She doesn’t just lie, she packages the lie. She wraps it in sentiment and sweetness so the audience reacts emotionally instead of logically. She didn’t say “We exchanged vows privately.” That would be plausible, normal, and not legally loaded. She said “We got married.” That choice of words matters. It changes everything. It turns a private moment into a legal and religious claim. It drags an institution into her story. And it creates pressure on other people to defend themselves. That is the real point. Meghan’s lies are never just personal. They are strategic. This Was Not a “Little Mistake” Because It Had Real Consequences Anyone trying to defend her will call it a misunderstanding. But a misunderstanding does not involve naming the Archbishop of Canterbury and implying a secret marriage happened before a globally televised wedding. Her statement instantly created two outcomes. 1) It cornered the Archbishop into cleaning up her mess By claiming he “married” them days earlier, Meghan effectively placed him in a position where silence would look like confirmation and denial would look like embarrassment. So he had to respond. That is the cruelty in it. It’s not just that she lied. It’s that she lied in a way that forced a senior religious figure to publicly correct her. She put a man of office into the role of damage control, because she wanted a romantic headline. That is not a “slip.” That is reckless and selfish. 2) It undermined the legitimacy of the official wedding Their actual wedding was not private. It was not hidden. It was a historical public event. So why tell the world the “real” marriage happened earlier? Because it reframes the real wedding into something performative, staged, and secondary. It whispers to the audience: That wasn’t for us, that was for them. It’s the same pattern every time. If the institution celebrates her, she uses it. If the institution limits her, she devalues it. Why She Lies With Ease: Because Her Lies Are Tools, Not Errors Meghan does not lie like someone afraid of being caught. She lies like someone who believes truth is flexible.

Here’s my analysis of why MEGHAN MARKLE LIES with such ease and how the Oprah interview exposed it. There are lies that come from panic. There are lies that come from confusion. Then there are lies that come from entitlement. The kind that slip out smoothly, confidently, without a flicker of worry, because the person saying them believes consequences are for other people. That is exactly what Meghan Markle displayed in the Oprah interview when she claimed she and Harry were married “three days before” their wedding, with the Archbishop of Canterbury. She didn’t frame it as a private vow or a romantic moment. She framed it as an actual marriage. And she did it on global television with a smile, like she was sharing a charming secret. But it wasn’t charming. It wasn’t harmless. And it certainly wasn’t true. It was a lie told with ease because she expected everyone else to absorb it without questioning it. The Lie Was Designed to Sound Like a Fairytale, Not a Fact This is how Meghan operates. She doesn’t just lie, she packages the lie. She wraps it in sentiment and sweetness so the audience reacts emotionally instead of logically. She didn’t say “We exchanged vows privately.” That would be plausible, normal, and not legally loaded. She said “We got married.” That choice of words matters. It changes everything. It turns a private moment into a legal and religious claim. It drags an institution into her story. And it creates pressure on other people to defend themselves. That is the real point. Meghan’s lies are never just personal. They are strategic. This Was Not a “Little Mistake” Because It Had Real Consequences Anyone trying to defend her will call it a misunderstanding. But a misunderstanding does not involve naming the Archbishop of Canterbury and implying a secret marriage happened before a globally televised wedding. Her statement instantly created two outcomes. 1) It cornered the Archbishop into cleaning up her mess By claiming he “married” them days earlier, Meghan effectively placed him in a position where silence would look like confirmation and denial would look like embarrassment. So he had to respond. That is the cruelty in it. It’s not just that she lied. It’s that she lied in a way that forced a senior religious figure to publicly correct her. She put a man of office into the role of damage control, because she wanted a romantic headline. That is not a “slip.” That is reckless and selfish. 2) It undermined the legitimacy of the official wedding Their actual wedding was not private. It was not hidden. It was a historical public event. So why tell the world the “real” marriage happened earlier? Because it reframes the real wedding into something performative, staged, and secondary. It whispers to the audience: That wasn’t for us, that was for them. It’s the same pattern every time. If the institution celebrates her, she uses it. If the institution limits her, she devalues it. Why She Lies With Ease: Because Her Lies Are Tools, Not Errors Meghan does not lie like someone afraid of being caught. She lies like someone who believes truth is flexible.

Queen Esther

110,252 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

A hospital scam made possible by a law passed by Congress you didn’t even know was happening “After a woman gives birth, there's a law put in place that doesn't allow her to sell her placenta, butthe government is allowed to” “People are finding out that after they give birth, their placenta is then taken, which is (one of) the richest source of stem cells, and it can be sold anywhere from 50,000 upwards to $500,000, but they can't sell it themselves.” “One person talks about her story at the hospital after having her baby where she had a doula there with her, and the doula had brought her own cooler and asked the doctor if she could take the placenta. The doctor agreed, so she put it in the cooler, took it, and left the hospital. Then droves of different groups of people kept coming in looking for the placenta, but didn't tell the woman that and said that they had lost something And then eventually she found out they were looking for the placenta” - A 2022 article from the Parent’s Guide to Cord Blood Foundation estimated the “street value” of a placenta at around $50,000, based on the potential market for processed placental products (e.g., amniotic membrane for wound care, stem cells for research) - A blog by Dr. Chris Centeno speculated a higher value (up to $500,000) when including amniotic fluid and other birth tissues You can use your imagination to guess what the hospital rate is…

A hospital scam made possible by a law passed by Congress you didn’t even know was happening “After a woman gives birth, there's a law put in place that doesn't allow her to sell her placenta, butthe government is allowed to” “People are finding out that after they give birth, their placenta is then taken, which is (one of) the richest source of stem cells, and it can be sold anywhere from 50,000 upwards to $500,000, but they can't sell it themselves.” “One person talks about her story at the hospital after having her baby where she had a doula there with her, and the doula had brought her own cooler and asked the doctor if she could take the placenta. The doctor agreed, so she put it in the cooler, took it, and left the hospital. Then droves of different groups of people kept coming in looking for the placenta, but didn't tell the woman that and said that they had lost something And then eventually she found out they were looking for the placenta” - A 2022 article from the Parent’s Guide to Cord Blood Foundation estimated the “street value” of a placenta at around $50,000, based on the potential market for processed placental products (e.g., amniotic membrane for wound care, stem cells for research) - A blog by Dr. Chris Centeno speculated a higher value (up to $500,000) when including amniotic fluid and other birth tissues You can use your imagination to guess what the hospital rate is…

Wall Street Apes

445,143 просмотров • 11 месяцев назад

Linda Peeno is an American physician known for being a whistleblower against the American managed healthcare industry where she gave Congress a confession that she was forced to deny a patient a life saving operation because it saved the insurance company that she worked for, $500,000. She was coerced by the financial architecture of the managed care system into denying a dying man a life saving operation, a denial that killed him and saved her employer, Humana. The investigation was swept under the rug and she was promoted, given an escalating 6 figure salary, and praised as an exemplary medical director. The system refused to punish her for letting a man die and it rewarded her for it instead. If the most honest case of how managed care operates in America had to come from a single physician's congressional confession rather than a federal investigation, what does that tell you about every death that never got a confession and was swept under the rug, especially all the Crimes Against Humanity committed during Covid-19 that we watched and reported on in real time, while they censored us for telling the truth?

Linda Peeno is an American physician known for being a whistleblower against the American managed healthcare industry where she gave Congress a confession that she was forced to deny a patient a life saving operation because it saved the insurance company that she worked for, $500,000. She was coerced by the financial architecture of the managed care system into denying a dying man a life saving operation, a denial that killed him and saved her employer, Humana. The investigation was swept under the rug and she was promoted, given an escalating 6 figure salary, and praised as an exemplary medical director. The system refused to punish her for letting a man die and it rewarded her for it instead. If the most honest case of how managed care operates in America had to come from a single physician's congressional confession rather than a federal investigation, what does that tell you about every death that never got a confession and was swept under the rug, especially all the Crimes Against Humanity committed during Covid-19 that we watched and reported on in real time, while they censored us for telling the truth?

Bridgett Fertig

12,081 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

POST OFFICE JAILED AN INNOCENT WOMAN Imagine. You run a small Post Office in Hull. You show up every day, you serve your community, you do the job. Then one day a computer program called Horizon decides you owe £59,000 that never existed. A computer program with a known glitch problem. Post Office didn't check the software. It just marched Janet Skinner into court in 2007 and got her jailed for 9 months. She served 2 behind bars. She lost her house. She lost her job. She lost her name in the eyes of her own neighbours, all because nobody in a position of power fancied questioning a machine. Here's where any decent organisation would stop digging the hole ... The Post Office kept digging. A year after she walked out of prison, they hauled her back into court again, this time chasing her for "proceeds of crime." Proceeds of a crime she never committed, calculated by a system that couldn't add up in the first place. Bold strategy from the people who broke the calculator in the first place. Less than two weeks after that fresh nightmare finally ended, Janet's body gave out completely. Neurological collapse. Paralysed from the neck down. Doctors told her she'd never walk again. She spent a year in a wheelchair and two years learning to walk. She says her own immune system turned on her. Years of fighting a system that refused to admit fault, and in the end it was her own body that surrendered first. So how does this story end? With an apology? A cheque that actually matches what she lost? Of course not. In 2025, after everything, the compensation scheme handed her an offer worth around 15% of her claim. Janet called it an insult. I'd call it a joke, except nobody's laughing, least of all the people who wrote the offer letter from the comfort of a job that still exists. 9 months in prison for a bug. 2 years in a wheelchair for the stress of proving her innocence. A payout that wouldn't cover the damage to her health, let alone her life. And somewhere, the people who signed off on her prosecution are still drawing a pension. Nobody who signed off on any of this has lost a house, a job, or a night's sleep. They got promotions. She got a wheelchair and an insulting cheque. Accountability had every chance to show up here and chose not to.. SOURCES BBC News (UK) ITV News and others.

POST OFFICE JAILED AN INNOCENT WOMAN Imagine. You run a small Post Office in Hull. You show up every day, you serve your community, you do the job. Then one day a computer program called Horizon decides you owe £59,000 that never existed. A computer program with a known glitch problem. Post Office didn't check the software. It just marched Janet Skinner into court in 2007 and got her jailed for 9 months. She served 2 behind bars. She lost her house. She lost her job. She lost her name in the eyes of her own neighbours, all because nobody in a position of power fancied questioning a machine. Here's where any decent organisation would stop digging the hole ... The Post Office kept digging. A year after she walked out of prison, they hauled her back into court again, this time chasing her for "proceeds of crime." Proceeds of a crime she never committed, calculated by a system that couldn't add up in the first place. Bold strategy from the people who broke the calculator in the first place. Less than two weeks after that fresh nightmare finally ended, Janet's body gave out completely. Neurological collapse. Paralysed from the neck down. Doctors told her she'd never walk again. She spent a year in a wheelchair and two years learning to walk. She says her own immune system turned on her. Years of fighting a system that refused to admit fault, and in the end it was her own body that surrendered first. So how does this story end? With an apology? A cheque that actually matches what she lost? Of course not. In 2025, after everything, the compensation scheme handed her an offer worth around 15% of her claim. Janet called it an insult. I'd call it a joke, except nobody's laughing, least of all the people who wrote the offer letter from the comfort of a job that still exists. 9 months in prison for a bug. 2 years in a wheelchair for the stress of proving her innocence. A payout that wouldn't cover the damage to her health, let alone her life. And somewhere, the people who signed off on her prosecution are still drawing a pension. Nobody who signed off on any of this has lost a house, a job, or a night's sleep. They got promotions. She got a wheelchair and an insulting cheque. Accountability had every chance to show up here and chose not to.. SOURCES BBC News (UK) ITV News and others.

Artur Nadolny

298,803 просмотров • 7 дней назад