Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

๐Ÿšจโ€œ๐–๐ก๐š๐ญ ๐‡๐š๐ฉ๐ฉ๐ž๐ง๐ฌ ๐–๐ก๐ž๐ง ๐ญ๐ก๐ž ๐–๐ข๐ง๐ ๐’๐ญ๐จ๐ฉ๐ฌ?โ€ โ€” ๐ƒ๐ซ. ๐‘๐ข๐œ๐ก๐š๐ซ๐ ๐‹๐ข๐ง๐๐ณ๐ž๐ง ๐ƒ๐ข๐ฌ๐ฆ๐š๐ง๐ญ๐ฅ๐ž๐ฌ ๐ญ๐ก๐ž ๐‘๐ž๐ง๐ž๐ฐ๐š๐›๐ฅ๐ž ๐ˆ๐ฅ๐ฅ๐ฎ๐ฌ๐ข๐จ๐ง Dr. Richard Lindzen, a distinguished atmospheric physicist and longtime professor at MIT, delivers a reality check to Net Zero fantasies: You can claim 110% renewables, but what happens when the wind doesnโ€™t blow? The sun...

18,644 views โ€ข 11 months ago โ€ขvia X (Twitter)

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

Dr. Michael Yeadon Exposes the Foundational Lie of Climate Alarmism What if everything youโ€™ve been told about climate change is not just exaggerated, but a deliberate, orchestrated lie? Former Pfizer VP & Chief Scientist Dr. Michael Yeadon delivers a stunning, evidence-based takedown of the climate change narrative that will make you question everything. He begins by tracing the origins. โ€œIf you do nothing else, have a look at the Club of Rome, the Trilateral Commission,โ€ Dr. Yeadon states. โ€œHonestly, things like climate change and pandemic diseases were decided to be used by people concerned about population... They decided at the same time to frighten you with diseases and changes to climate. It's the same group of people at the same time. And after that, there was a diaspora of propaganda.โ€ But what about the science? Dr. Yeadon, an expert in parsing complex data, did his own research. โ€œI found at least three or four people who've spent longer in atmospheric science than I've spent in pharma R&D. And there is no question that there is no significant change to the climate since pre-industrial times.โ€ He dismantles the core data itself. โ€œWhere do you think they got the temperature data from when there were virtually no thermometers? They weren't calibrated. No one checked the records. This idea that they know it's 1.5 degrees warmer? It's a lie.โ€ Then, he goes for the jugular: the alleged link between CO2 and temperature. โ€œThere is no connection between CO2 in the air and the temperature of the surface... We don't live in a greenhouse. A greenhouse is a closed system. Our atmosphere is open; energy radiates back into space.โ€ The proof? Ice core data. โ€œWhat several independent groups all show is that changes in temperature ALWAYS preceded change in atmospheric CO2. CO2 moves in response to temperature. Warm water holds less CO2. Everyone knows a warm fizzy drink goes flat. Itโ€™s basic science.โ€ His conclusion is unequivocal: โ€œWhen the Earth warms due to changes in solar output or orbital cycles, the CO2 movement takes place afterwards. All of this fear-mongering about burning fossil fuels adding CO2 and changing the climate? It is a lie. They're lying to you to frighten you and to get you to accept restrictions on your life.โ€ This isnโ€™t a conspiracy theory. Itโ€™s a call for intellectual honesty from a renowned scientist. Itโ€™s time to stop being frightened by a crisis that doesnโ€™t exist. Share if youโ€™re ready to question the narrative. Follow for more unflinching analysis from world-class experts.

Camus

20,811 views โ€ข 10 months ago

๐Ÿšจ โ€œWE ARE ALREADY IN HARMโ€™S WAYโ€ โ€” EUROPE IS BEING CONDITIONED FOR WAR ๐Ÿšจ Those words should stop every European cold. NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte has now said openly what leaders usually hint at in private: โ€œWe are Russiaโ€™s next target.โ€ This is not casual language. This is psychological preparation. When senior figures start speaking this plainly, it means governments are no longer just planning militarily โ€” they are preparing public consciousness for conflict. And it doesnโ€™t stop there. The UK has now followed suit. Ministers confirm Britain is rapidly developing plans to prepare the entire country for war โ€” not just the armed forces, but society itself. That is a line you do not cross lightly. This rhetoric isnโ€™t accidental. It comes amid mounting pressure on Europe to rearm, to spend more, to accept sacrifice โ€” and to internalise the idea that war is no longer distant, theoretical, or avoidable. This is about conditioning: โ–ช๏ธ Conditioning populations to fear โ–ช๏ธ Conditioning economies for militarisation โ–ช๏ธ Conditioning citizens to accept disruption, loss, and control The most dangerous part isnโ€™t the weapons. Itโ€™s the moment people are told โ€” quietly but firmly โ€” that war is no longer ifโ€ฆ but when. And once a population is psychologically prepared, the threshold for escalation drops dramatically. Europe is being moved โ€” step by step โ€” into a war footing. The question is no longer whether leaders are preparing. The question is whether the public understands what that preparation truly means โ€” and where it ends.

Jim Ferguson

68,753 views โ€ข 7 months ago

Two things can be stated with certainty based on the geological and paleoclimatological record. Profound and abrupt climate change will occur again, and no legislation passed in Washington or anywhere else is going to alter that. These shifts have happened too many times to count, across timescales that dwarf the entire industrial era, driven by forces that have nothing whatsoever to do with carbon dioxide concentrations in the modern atmosphere. A complete cessation of fossil fuel use tomorrow would not change that underlying reality by a single degree. The record is unambiguous on this point, and it has been unambiguous for decades for anyone willing to look at it honestly. So if the science points so clearly toward natural forcing mechanisms as the dominant driver of catastrophic climate change, why is all the attention focused elsewhere? The fossil fuel industry is being blamed for a contrived crisis while the mechanisms behind genuinely catastrophic natural climate change are being systematically kept out of public awareness. That is not an accident. There are real agendas riding on this narrative, and the manufactured climate emergency appears to be functioning as a tool to prevent people from recognizing what is actually driving conditions that have historically brought civilizations to their knees. That is not a comfortable place to land, but when you follow the evidence rather than the funding, that is where it leads.

Randall Carlson

10,662 views โ€ข 1 month ago

[Heo Seongbeom Youtube] 260305 Jin - Moon ๐ŸŒ•๐ŸŒ (part1) ๐Ÿ‘จโ€๐ŸซItโ€™s a solo song by Jin, and BTS are also preparing for a comeback in March. Iโ€™m really looking forward to it. Iโ€™m the moon, and you are the Earth. So it becomes a kind of love triangle. Earlier the sea loved the moon, but who does the moon love? The moon loves the Earth. That idea is reflected in this song, so letโ€™s try interpreting it. Since when have the moon and the Earth been together like this? Weโ€™ve been together for so long, but when did it start? About 4.51 to 4.53 billion years ago. Scientists figured this out through radioactive isotope analysis, which showed that the Moon is about 4.51 to 4.53 billion years old. โ€œShining just by existing.โ€ This line is directed at the Earth. But does the Earth actually shine just by existing? No. Because the Earth is a planet and does not produce its own light. If the Earth appears to shine, itโ€™s probably because of artificial lights made by humans. โ€œCan I stay by your side and protect you?โ€ It sounds shy, but in reality the moon canโ€™t help staying there, because itโ€™s bound by gravity. And here we see the main line of the song. โ€œYou are my Earth, and to you Iโ€™m just a moon. Your small star that lights up your heart.โ€ Itโ€™s poetic, but is the moon actually a star? No. Celestial bodies are generally divided into two categories. First, there are stars (stellar bodies). These produce their own light. Second, there are planets. Planets do not produce their own light. Instead, planets usually orbit around a star. The Earth is a planet. From our perspective, the star in our system is the Sun. So when you look at the night sky and see stars, those lights are actually other suns, each producing their own light. But sometimes when you see a particularly bright โ€œstar,โ€ it may actually be a planet like Mercury, Venus, Mars, or Jupiter. Then you might ask: if planets donโ€™t produce their own light, why do they shine? Because they reflect sunlight. The Moon also appears bright because it reflects the Sunโ€™s light. #JIN #๋ฐฉํƒ„์†Œ๋…„๋‹จ์ง„ ๋ฐฉํƒ„์†Œ๋…„๋‹จ

star_jin

19,019 views โ€ข 4 months ago