Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

๐–๐ก๐š๐ญ ๐Š๐จ๐ฏ๐š Kova ๐ข๐ฌ ๐š๐ฅ๐ฅ ๐š๐›๐จ๐ฎ๐ญ ๐š๐ง๐ ๐ข๐ญ ๐€๐๐ฏ๐š๐ง๐ญ๐š๐ ๐ž๐ฌ What if every idle CPU thread and fractional GPU core could become auditable performance you can deploy on demand or monetize when youโ€™re not using it? Kova turns fragmented compute into a precision market: โžก๏ธ Builders get exactly the performance...

10,318 Aufrufe โ€ข vor 7 Monaten โ€ขvia X (Twitter)

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfรผgbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

ร„hnliche Videos

Imagine if your way of thinking - your edge, your taste, your strategy - could be turned into a high-performance worker. Not a copy of you. Something better. An agent that acts on your judgment at scale, powered by superintelligent systems and refined through real-world results. Thatโ€™s what Fraction AI makes possible. It launches today on Base mainnet. The core idea is simple: You create AI agents based on your own way of approaching problems. These agents compete on live tasks - writing, coding, finance, whatever - get feedback, learn from their performance, and improve over time. The better they get, the more they win. And so do you. No code required. Just your insight. Why now? Until now, building agents like this took huge teams and even bigger budgets. But with Fraction, anyone can do it. You can test ideas instantly. You can iterate fast. You can build a fleet of smart workers that evolve through competition. And it works. 30M+ sessions on testnet 320K users 1.2M agents already competing How it works? Agents join sessions within a Space - a domain like finance, writing, or games. Each session runs as a series of competitive rounds. In every round, agents try to generate the best solution to a task. Their outputs are scored by a decentralized network of AI judges trained to evaluate quality for that domain. The top agents in each round earn rewards from the pooled entry fees. The losers get to learn. Feedback from each round helps them adjust and improve, and every session becomes a training loop. What it means? Fraction is a decentralized intelligence economy - a system where your ideas become agents, and agents earn by proving they work. You donโ€™t need credentials or code. Just a clear point of view. If your thinking holds up under pressure, your agents will rise. This kind of AI used to live in corporate labs, built by PhDs with massive compute. Now anyone with a smart idea and an internet connection can build agents that compete, learn, and earn on their behalf.

Fraction AI

67,918 Aufrufe โ€ข vor 1 Jahr

Jonathan Ross just revealed why AI companies arenโ€™t growing faster. Not demand. Not competition. Physics. Ross: โ€œThe demand for compute is insatiable.โ€ There isnโ€™t enough compute in the world. Not a temporary shortage. A fundamental gap between what the market wants and what the infrastructure can deliver. Ross: โ€œRight now, one of the biggest complaints of Anthropic is the rate limits. People canโ€™t get enough tokens.โ€ Rate limits arenโ€™t product decisions. Theyโ€™re rationing. Companies forced to regulate access because infrastructure cannot meet demand. Slower services. Token caps. The only things standing between these companies and a revenue surge they canโ€™t access. Every token cap is a revenue cap. Every slowdown is a sale that didnโ€™t happen. Ross: โ€œIf Anthropic was given twice the inference compute, within one month their revenue would almost double.โ€ Read that again. Double the compute. Double the revenue. Within thirty days. Thatโ€™s not a growth projection. Thatโ€™s a measurement of how deep the backlog already is. The demand exists right now. Itโ€™s sitting in a queue. The only thing between these companies and that revenue is physical hardware they donโ€™t have. This breaks every assumption about how tech companies scale. Usually you scale by finding customers. AI companies have infinite customers. They scale by finding hardware. The constraint isnโ€™t market fit. It isnโ€™t distribution. It isnโ€™t competition. Itโ€™s processing power. This is why Jensen Huang is the most important person in the world right now. NVIDIA doesnโ€™t just make chips. It makes the thing every government, every AI lab, and every company racing for this future needs more of and canโ€™t get enough of. The compute bottleneck isnโ€™t a tech industry problem. Itโ€™s a civilizational one. The winner of this era isnโ€™t determined by who builds the smartest model. Every major lab has a frontier model. The winner is whoever secures the most compute fastest while everyone else rations whatโ€™s left. The race isnโ€™t for intelligence. Itโ€™s for infrastructure. And right now there isnโ€™t enough to go around.

Dustin

28,395 Aufrufe โ€ข vor 7 Monaten

Micron is going to $4,000 and once you understand what inference actually is, the number stops sounding crazy (Save this). Dylan Patel just said that by 2030, OpenAI and Anthropic alone will need over 100 gigawatts of compute combined and by 2040, we may not even be measuring AI infrastructure in gigawatts anymore. We may be talking about terawatts. Every single one of those gigawatts needs memory to function. Without it, the compute is worthless. Most people heard that and thought about Nvidia but they should be thinking about Micron. Every AI model generating a response has two phases. The first is prefill, processing your prompt which is compute-heavy and the second is decode generating each word one token at a time and that phase is almost entirely memory-bound, not compute-bound. During decode, the GPU's processing units sit idle more than 95% of the time, waiting for data to arrive from memory. Google confirmed it in a research paper that decode-phase bottlenecks are dominated by memory bandwidth and capacity not raw compute. The GPU is not the bottleneck but the memory feeding the GPU is. This matters because inference is now where all the money lives. Training a model happens once, Inference happens billions of times a day every ChatGPT response, every Claude output, every agentic workflow running in the background and every one of those token streams is a billing event tied directly to memory performance. Adding more GPUs does not fix this because GPUs are already underutilized in inference because they are sitting idle waiting on memory. Adding more memory bandwidth and capacity is what directly reduces token cost, reduces latency, and allows the same cluster to serve dramatically more users simultaneously. Longer context windows compound the problem further, a model running a 1 million token context window requires dramatically more memory per session than a 10,000 token window, and every new model generation pushes context longer. The market treats memory as a downstream beneficiary of Nvidia orders. The correct framework is the opposite, Micron is the upstream constraint on how much value every Nvidia GPU can actually generate at inference scale. Micron guided Q4 to $50 billion in revenue, has HBM4 ramping at twice the pace of the prior generation, and CEO Sanjay Mehrotra has said supply will not catch demand before the end of 2027. At 8x forward earnings on $112 projected FY2027 EPS, Micron is the most undervalued infrastructure company in the entire AI stack. Inference is memory. Memory is Micron and the inference ramp has barely started. Milk Road Pro members are already up massively on this position and we're just getting started. If you want the full breakdown of what we're buying and why, come join us for just a dollar using the link below!

Milk Road AI

130,756 Aufrufe โ€ข vor 3 Monaten

Whilst you should never walk away from THE Church, sometimes you SHOULD walk away from A church. Just like before entering into a marriage covenant you must analyse the person, you should analyse a church before getting planted. You must find out where the Church stands on core doctrines. โžก๏ธ The Trinity. If they preach oneness, if they deny the trinity, donโ€™t go - this is heresy. โžก๏ธ Christology. What do they believe about the divinity of Christ? If you donโ€™t believe Jesus is God, like โ€œJehovahโ€™s Witnesses,โ€ if you believe Jesus was created, thatโ€™s not my Jesus and youโ€™re not a true Church of Christ. โžก๏ธ The authority of scripture. Bibliology โ€“ do they believe the Bible is the inspired word of God? โžก๏ธ Salvation. Do they believe in salvation through faith alone? Or do they believe in sacraments saving you? โžก๏ธ Heaven & Hell. Do they believe heaven and hell is a real place? Do they believe unless you believe in Jesus - you will be cast into hell? If not, donโ€™t go. This is heresy. They must preach the FULL COUNSEL of Godโ€™s Word. That means, not preaching about blessing and Godโ€™s love every single week without any mention of sin or repentance. A CHURCH THAT COMPROMISES THE TRUTH IS NOT A CHURCH AT ALL. AVOID CHURCHES THAT AVOID CONTROVERISAL TOPICS OR TOPICS CONSIDERED โ€œPOLITICALโ€ LIKE GAY MARRIAGE OR ABORTION. IF YOU SEE A RAINBOW FLAG, RUN. IF THEY DO NOT UPHOLD THE SANCTITY OF HUMAN LIFE, RUN. As Paul Washer said โ€œDonโ€™t go to Church closest to you, but closest to the Bible.โ€ Drive as far as you need to get to a Church that does not shy away from the truth of Godโ€™s word.

Millicent Sedra

30,250 Aufrufe โ€ข vor 8 Monaten

How could you possibly be bearish on compute right now? (Save this). Every 10 seconds in 2026, the world generates 31.7 billion tokens and by 2030, that number hits 1.27 trillion, every 10 seconds. That's a 40x increase and that's before the full agent economy comes online. The Qualcomm CEO said total token demand by 2030 is in the quintillions. Here's what most people miss because when you use ChatGPT, you generate tokens one conversation at a time but agents don't sleep. ] They run 24/7, spawning sub-agents, carrying context, updating memory, catching mistakes and every single one of those actions burns tokens. The shift from human paced to agent paced activity is the single biggest structural change in compute demand we've ever seen. You don't need a perfect forecast but rather just need to believe agents become persistent and if they do, compute demand goes vertical. The infrastructure has to be built before the demand fully arrives, which means the window to own the picks and shovels is right now. That's where neoclouds like Nebius come in. Nebius isn't trying to be AWS, it is a pure-play AI cloud, GPU clusters, inference infrastructure, and developer tooling built from scratch for AI workloads. Q1 2026 revenue hit $399M, up 684% year over year and they're guiding for $7โ€“$9 billion annualized run rate by end of 2026. Analysts are modeling roughly 2,000% total revenue growth from end of 2025 to end of 2027. They already have contracts with Microsoft and Meta already signed. Capex guidance raised to $20โ€“$25 billion because customer commitments justified it. They are sold out of capacity because the constraint isn't customers, it's how fast they can build. Adjusted EBITDA margin on the core AI business hit 45% in Q1 and Jensen Huang called Nebius a close partner at GTC 2026. And in a world where GPU access is the single biggest competitive moat, that relationship matters more than most people realize. The bear case on compute requires you to believe the agent economy stalls and that's a very lonely bet to make right now. Bullish on Nebius and Milk Pro subscribers are already up massively on this trade, come join us using the link below to get our full AI trades and we have a HUGE 33% off right now!

Milk Road AI

16,310 Aufrufe โ€ข vor 3 Monaten

Demis Hassabis just explained why the real AI bottleneck has nothing to do with training runs. Most people picture the AI arms race as who can build the biggest model. GPT-4 or Gemini Ultra style training runs, a few hundred million in compute, fired once or twice a year. The constraint sits somewhere else. Every time a researcher has a new algorithmic idea, a new architecture, a new training technique, they can't just test it on a laptop. They have to run it at the scale where it would actually be deployed, because ideas that look promising at small scale fall apart completely when you put them into a real system. Every research hypothesis burns significant compute before a single line of production code gets written. At a lab like DeepMind, hundreds of researchers are running hundreds of ideas simultaneously. The demand for experimental compute is continuous. It never stops. Now layer the hardware reality on top. GPU lead times are currently 36 to 52 weeks for data center hardware. Global AI data centers are already drawing 29.6 gigawatts, equivalent to the peak power demand of the entire state of New York, and they still can't meet demand. Companies willing to pay any price can't just buy more compute. They wait in line. The speed of scientific discovery in AI is now gated by hardware availability. The next breakthrough is sitting in a researcher's head right now. Whether it gets validated fast enough to matter depends entirely on whether the compute is there when they need it. The AI race gets won by whoever can run the most experiments per month.

Aakash Gupta

32,150 Aufrufe โ€ข vor 5 Monaten