Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

“𝑩𝑬𝑺𝑻 𝑺𝑷𝑬𝑪𝑰𝑨𝑳 𝑻𝑬𝑨𝑴𝑺 𝑼𝑵𝑰𝑻 𝑰𝑵 𝑻𝑯𝑬 𝑵𝑨𝑻𝑰𝑶𝑵” National Rankings: Total ST Points (1) KO Avg (1) KOR Avg (1) Punt Avg (2) 10 Total Blocks 7/9 FG’s over 45 yards (63 longest) 12-0 Field Position Differential 100% Snap/Punt Efficiency 7 NJCAA ST Players Of The Week #HITSQUAD 🎯

jrniklos's profile picture

J.R. Niklos

10,340 subscribers

15,131 views • 1 year ago •via X (Twitter)

News & PoliticsSportsEducation
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

1 Comments

J.R. Niklos's profile picture
J.R. Niklos1 year ago

A specialist sweep! 🧹 The best Kicker in the nation: @casillas24170 The best Punter in the nation: @aaron_rice88 The best Long Snapper in the nation: @AndrewKFilm #HitSquad 🎯

Related Videos

“How good was 2013 Florida State” • 14-0 • National Champions • ACC Champions • #1 Margin of Victory (39.5) • #2 in Points Per Game (51.6) • #14 Passing Offense • #6 Total Offense (YPG) • #1 Pass Defense (YPGA) • #3 Total Defense (YPGA) • #18 Rush Defense (YPGA) • Heisman Winner • Rimington Trophy • Lou Groza Award • 23 Players were drafted Notable Wins • 63-0 over #25 Maryland • 51-14 over #3 Clemson • 41-14 over #7 Miami • 45-7 over #20 Duke • 34-31 over #2 Auburn One of the greatest teams of all time
1:56

“How good was 2013 Florida State” • 14-0 • National Champions • ACC Champions • #1 Margin of Victory (39.5) • #2 in Points Per Game (51.6) • #14 Passing Offense • #6 Total Offense (YPG) • #1 Pass Defense (YPGA) • #3 Total Defense (YPGA) • #18 Rush Defense (YPGA) • Heisman Winner • Rimington Trophy • Lou Groza Award • 23 Players were drafted Notable Wins • 63-0 over #25 Maryland • 51-14 over #3 Clemson • 41-14 over #7 Miami • 45-7 over #20 Duke • 34-31 over #2 Auburn One of the greatest teams of all time

College Football Report

306,653 views • 3 years ago

#OnThisDay in 1998, Sachin Tendulkar played his first ODI of the Year Tendulkar's score in 1998 (ODIs) 54, 67, 95, 1, 41, 8, 5, 100, 1, 15, 40, 80, 38, 143, 134, 33, 18, 100*, 65, 53, 17, 128, 77, 127*, 29, 2, 141, 8, 3, 118*, 18, 11, 124* His record in ODI in 1998 M 34 R 1894 (most ever by any) Avg 65.31 St Rt 102.15 100s 9 (most ever by any) Man of Match 12 (most ever by any) 4 hundreds in finals (all won) 787 runs in 10 knock-out games (avg 98.37)
2:19

#OnThisDay in 1998, Sachin Tendulkar played his first ODI of the Year Tendulkar's score in 1998 (ODIs) 54, 67, 95, 1, 41, 8, 5, 100, 1, 15, 40, 80, 38, 143, 134, 33, 18, 100*, 65, 53, 17, 128, 77, 127*, 29, 2, 141, 8, 3, 118*, 18, 11, 124* His record in ODI in 1998 M 34 R 1894 (most ever by any) Avg 65.31 St Rt 102.15 100s 9 (most ever by any) Man of Match 12 (most ever by any) 4 hundreds in finals (all won) 787 runs in 10 knock-out games (avg 98.37)

Cricketopia

331,300 views • 2 years ago

Which state actually lets you keep the most money in 2025? The brand-new MERIC Q3 Cost of Living Index just answered it (national avg = 100): 10 CHEAPEST (all red/red-leaning): 1. Oklahoma 84.4 2. Mississippi 85.5 3. Alabama 87.9 4. West Virginia 88.1 5. Kansas 88.9 6. Arkansas 89.0 7. Missouri 89.1 8. Georgia 89.7 9. Tennessee 90.1 10. Texas 92.1 10 MOST EXPENSIVE (all Democrat-run): 1. Hawaii 179.7 2. Massachusetts 150.8 3. California 136.7 4. New York 134.5 5. Washington 121.9 6. Oregon 118.4 7. Maryland 117.2 8. Connecticut 113.8 9. New Jersey 113.5 10. Rhode Island 112.6 Same country, same inflation, same corporations — wildly different results. If cheaper rent, groceries, and gas matter to you in 2026… why would you keep voting for the exact policies that created the most expensive states? Drop your state below — staying or moving? 👇 #CostOfLiving
1:22

Which state actually lets you keep the most money in 2025? The brand-new MERIC Q3 Cost of Living Index just answered it (national avg = 100): 10 CHEAPEST (all red/red-leaning): 1. Oklahoma 84.4 2. Mississippi 85.5 3. Alabama 87.9 4. West Virginia 88.1 5. Kansas 88.9 6. Arkansas 89.0 7. Missouri 89.1 8. Georgia 89.7 9. Tennessee 90.1 10. Texas 92.1 10 MOST EXPENSIVE (all Democrat-run): 1. Hawaii 179.7 2. Massachusetts 150.8 3. California 136.7 4. New York 134.5 5. Washington 121.9 6. Oregon 118.4 7. Maryland 117.2 8. Connecticut 113.8 9. New Jersey 113.5 10. Rhode Island 112.6 Same country, same inflation, same corporations — wildly different results. If cheaper rent, groceries, and gas matter to you in 2026… why would you keep voting for the exact policies that created the most expensive states? Drop your state below — staying or moving? 👇 #CostOfLiving

Jake

76,555 views • 10 months ago

Some may call it an upset, but Chadron St simply calls it another day at the office, beating the #9/#11 Western CO Mountaineers on Saturday (11/8/25) in OT by a score of 27-24. Chadron got it done in all three phases of the game. The Eagles’ offense presented a balanced attack, gaining 111 yards and 2 TDs passing to go along with 148 yards and 1 TD rushing. The Eagles’ defense held the Mountaineers to a mere 38 yards rushing, had 7 tackles for loss, including 3 sacks, and came up with a fumble recovery and 2 interceptions. The most impressive part of Chadron’s team on Saturday had to be its special teams. The Eagles’ special teams blocked two field goal attempts and blocked a punt. Punter Brodie Eisenbraun stuck one punt inside the 5, drew a running into the punter penalty for a 1st down, and had an amazing run off of a high snap, which while it was not a 1st down, it shows what a stud he is. Then there is Kicker Wilson Yee. Yee made an impressive 50 yard FG in the 2nd quarter. Then, in OT, with ice in his veins, Yee made the biggest kick of his collegiate career, drilling a 47 yard FG to give the Eagles the win. Also leading Chadron to the win were: 🏈 DJ Ralph, 10 Cmps on 22 Atts for 111 Yds & 2 TDs; 🏈 Tommy Thomas, 4 Recs for 66 Yds & 2 TDs; 🏈 Logan O’Brien, 10 Tackles (7 Solo & 3 Ast); 🏈 Cooper Walton, 10 Tackles (5 Solo & 5 Ast) with 1 TFL, including 1/2 a Sack; 🏈 Dax Yeradi, 4 Solo Tackles; 🏈 Aiden Kuester, 4 Tackles (1 Solo & 3 Ast) with 1/2 a TFL & 2 INTs, 🏈 William Stemler, 4 Tackles (3 Solo & 1 Ast) with 2 TFLs, including 1 Sack; & 🏈 Ryder True, 3 Tackles (1 Solo & 2 Ast) with 1.5 Sacks. Chadron will be playing for the RMAC Championship next Saturday when they travel to battle the CSU Pueblo Thunderwolves. Here are a few of Chadron’s highlights from Saturday’s OT win: #RMAC #RMACfb #CSCfb #ProtectTheRock #SoarEagles
2:58

Some may call it an upset, but Chadron St simply calls it another day at the office, beating the #9/#11 Western CO Mountaineers on Saturday (11/8/25) in OT by a score of 27-24. Chadron got it done in all three phases of the game. The Eagles’ offense presented a balanced attack, gaining 111 yards and 2 TDs passing to go along with 148 yards and 1 TD rushing. The Eagles’ defense held the Mountaineers to a mere 38 yards rushing, had 7 tackles for loss, including 3 sacks, and came up with a fumble recovery and 2 interceptions. The most impressive part of Chadron’s team on Saturday had to be its special teams. The Eagles’ special teams blocked two field goal attempts and blocked a punt. Punter Brodie Eisenbraun stuck one punt inside the 5, drew a running into the punter penalty for a 1st down, and had an amazing run off of a high snap, which while it was not a 1st down, it shows what a stud he is. Then there is Kicker Wilson Yee. Yee made an impressive 50 yard FG in the 2nd quarter. Then, in OT, with ice in his veins, Yee made the biggest kick of his collegiate career, drilling a 47 yard FG to give the Eagles the win. Also leading Chadron to the win were: 🏈 DJ Ralph, 10 Cmps on 22 Atts for 111 Yds & 2 TDs; 🏈 Tommy Thomas, 4 Recs for 66 Yds & 2 TDs; 🏈 Logan O’Brien, 10 Tackles (7 Solo & 3 Ast); 🏈 Cooper Walton, 10 Tackles (5 Solo & 5 Ast) with 1 TFL, including 1/2 a Sack; 🏈 Dax Yeradi, 4 Solo Tackles; 🏈 Aiden Kuester, 4 Tackles (1 Solo & 3 Ast) with 1/2 a TFL & 2 INTs, 🏈 William Stemler, 4 Tackles (3 Solo & 1 Ast) with 2 TFLs, including 1 Sack; & 🏈 Ryder True, 3 Tackles (1 Solo & 2 Ast) with 1.5 Sacks. Chadron will be playing for the RMAC Championship next Saturday when they travel to battle the CSU Pueblo Thunderwolves. Here are a few of Chadron’s highlights from Saturday’s OT win: #RMAC #RMACfb #CSCfb #ProtectTheRock #SoarEagles

RMAC Insider

18,617 views • 11 months ago

Chadron St went into Golden and left with a big 34-28 victory over 21/RV CO Mines, improving their conference record to 2-0! Chadron’s rushing attack came up big for the Eagles, as they racked up an impressive 261 yards on the ground. Dual threat QB Aidan Thompson led the team with 106 rushing yards and 1 rushing TD, while Quincey Ryker also went over the century mark with 101 rushing yards. Along with his 106 rushing yards, Thompson also had 144 passing yards and 3 passing TDs! Chadron’s defense was solid as always, and for the second weekend in a row, the Eagles’ punt and kickoff coverages were impressive! Leading Chadron to the win were: 🏈 Aidan Thompson, 17 Cmps on 27 Atts for 144 Yds & 3 passing TDs as well as 6 carries for 106 Yds & a rushing TD; 🏈 Quincey Ryker, 21 carries for 101 Yds & 3 Recs for 25 Yds; 🏈 Tommy Thomas, 5 Recs for 49 Yds & 2 TDs; 🏈 Devon Sundgren, 2 Recs for 16 Yds & 1 TD 🏈 Cooper Walton, 11 Tackles (7 Solo & 4 Ast) with 1/2 a TFL; & 🏈 Logan O’Brien, 8 Tackles (4 Solo & 4 Ast) with 2.5 TFLs, including 2 Sacks. Chadron will be hosting Mesa next Saturday for homecoming as they look to remain perfect in conference play. Here are a few of Chadron’s highlights from today’s (9/20/25) win: #RMAC #RMACfb #ChadronStFB #ProtectTheRock #SoarEagles #CSCFootball
2:49

Chadron St went into Golden and left with a big 34-28 victory over 21/RV CO Mines, improving their conference record to 2-0! Chadron’s rushing attack came up big for the Eagles, as they racked up an impressive 261 yards on the ground. Dual threat QB Aidan Thompson led the team with 106 rushing yards and 1 rushing TD, while Quincey Ryker also went over the century mark with 101 rushing yards. Along with his 106 rushing yards, Thompson also had 144 passing yards and 3 passing TDs! Chadron’s defense was solid as always, and for the second weekend in a row, the Eagles’ punt and kickoff coverages were impressive! Leading Chadron to the win were: 🏈 Aidan Thompson, 17 Cmps on 27 Atts for 144 Yds & 3 passing TDs as well as 6 carries for 106 Yds & a rushing TD; 🏈 Quincey Ryker, 21 carries for 101 Yds & 3 Recs for 25 Yds; 🏈 Tommy Thomas, 5 Recs for 49 Yds & 2 TDs; 🏈 Devon Sundgren, 2 Recs for 16 Yds & 1 TD 🏈 Cooper Walton, 11 Tackles (7 Solo & 4 Ast) with 1/2 a TFL; & 🏈 Logan O’Brien, 8 Tackles (4 Solo & 4 Ast) with 2.5 TFLs, including 2 Sacks. Chadron will be hosting Mesa next Saturday for homecoming as they look to remain perfect in conference play. Here are a few of Chadron’s highlights from today’s (9/20/25) win: #RMAC #RMACfb #ChadronStFB #ProtectTheRock #SoarEagles #CSCFootball

RMAC Insider

10,764 views • 1 year ago

9/11 ALCHEMY: FACING REALITY Full Documentary This is the greatest documentary on the subject. You think you know what happened on the horrific day of September, 11, 2001. You don't. Reset your mind of preconceived notions. We have directed energy weapons that are capable of turning matter into dust. You have been played. This single day changed everything. Research everything. Think for yourself. Video timestamps: 1. 0:00 - Introduction by Christian Hampton 2. 1:13 - Predictive Programming? 3. 3:52 - William Cooper 9/11 Prediction 4. 4:59 - President Eisenhower Farewell Speech 5. 6:42 - The Energy Issue 6. 7:30 - Controlled Demolitions 7. 8:30 - Missing Rubble & Seismic Impact 8. 10:54 – Black Budget 9. 13:03 – The Aether 10. 14:50 – Earth’s Magnetic Field 11. 15:46 – Hurricane Erin, Tesla Coils, & the day before 9/11 12. 20:17 – Directed Energy Weapons (DEW) 13. 24:35 – Dr. Judy Wood’s Qui Tam Case 14. 24:46 - John Hutchison 15. 27:01 – Awareness Test 16. 27:50 – “Video Fakery” Disinformation 17. 36:47 – Richard Hall’s 3D Radar Analysis 18. 40:59 – The “POD/Drone Theory” Disinfo 19. 43:25 – Dr. Morgan Reynolds Qui Tam Case 20. 51:55 – Contractors: ARA & SAIC 21. 58:04 –3D Projection Technology 22. 1:03:28 – Gelatin & Ace Baker Disinfo 23. 1:09:46 – Real Time Holographic Visualization 24. 1:12:11 – Quasicrystals 25. 1:17:30 – Qui Tam Cases Dismissal & Coverup 26. 1:19:04 – Steven Jones & Cold Fusion Coverup 27. 1:22:14 – Missile Disinfo 28. 1:25:23 – Shanksville: No Plane Debris at Crash Site 29. 1:27:44 – Flight 93 Flight Path 30. 1:32:34 – Flight 77: No Plane Debris at Pentagon 31. 1:34:27 – Pentagon Damage 32. 1:35:34 – Flight 93: Phantom Airplane 33. 1:36:35 – Shiny Lights / White Orbs Spotted and Angels 34. 1:39:46 – Mysterious White Planes 35. 1:41:09 – Disappearing Plane Wings 36. 1:42:42 – Shutter Speed vs Frame Rate 37. 1:46:40 – 1980s Holographic UFOs & Aliens 38. 1:48:12 – Gelatin in Holography 39. 1:49:09 – 2001: A Space Odyssey 40. 1:52:37 – Monolith on 1/1/2001 41. 1:53:49 – Disinfo Agents 42. 1:55:38 – Occult Numerology 43. 1:57:53 – Project Blue Beam 44. 1:59:17 – Holes 45. 2:02:18 – Jumpers 46. 2:04:09 – Star Wars in Iraq & Pentagon 47. 2:05:15 – Warped Columns 48. 2:08:35 – Elevators, Pipes, Concrete Cracking Up 49. 2:11:07 – The “Flash Frame” 50. 2:12:44 – DEW: Side Effects, Camera Glitches, Burger King Outage 51. 2:15:24 – Magnetic Camera Tape 52. 2:17:23 – Power Outages, Unburnt Paper, and Levitation 53. 2:19:08 – Transmutation: Fusion, Fuming 54. 2:22:19 – Flight 93: Cottage in Ruins 55. 2:23:00 – Fuming for Years 56. 2:24:27 – Iron-Rich Spheres: WTC, Crop Circles, Tunguska Event 57. 2:27:11 – Crop Circles: Levitation, High Energy 58. 2:30:24 – Pump Wells: Iron Contamination in Soil 59. 2:33:46 – Flight 93: Energy Effects on Trees 60. 2:35:30 – Space & Perception: Facing Reality 61. 2:38:56 – Strategic Defense Initiative & Project Blue Beam 62. 2:41:24 – Weaponization of Space 63. 2:44:25 – Ashe Conformity Experiments 64. 2:45:53 – Psychological Warfare: War of the Worlds and 9/11 65. 2:51:28 – David Rockefeller: WTC Construction & Destruction 66. 2:52:57 – A Decades Long Conspiracy 67. 2:54:36 – Credits and References Director: Christian Hampton
2:58:24

9/11 ALCHEMY: FACING REALITY Full Documentary This is the greatest documentary on the subject. You think you know what happened on the horrific day of September, 11, 2001. You don't. Reset your mind of preconceived notions. We have directed energy weapons that are capable of turning matter into dust. You have been played. This single day changed everything. Research everything. Think for yourself. Video timestamps: 1. 0:00 - Introduction by Christian Hampton 2. 1:13 - Predictive Programming? 3. 3:52 - William Cooper 9/11 Prediction 4. 4:59 - President Eisenhower Farewell Speech 5. 6:42 - The Energy Issue 6. 7:30 - Controlled Demolitions 7. 8:30 - Missing Rubble & Seismic Impact 8. 10:54 – Black Budget 9. 13:03 – The Aether 10. 14:50 – Earth’s Magnetic Field 11. 15:46 – Hurricane Erin, Tesla Coils, & the day before 9/11 12. 20:17 – Directed Energy Weapons (DEW) 13. 24:35 – Dr. Judy Wood’s Qui Tam Case 14. 24:46 - John Hutchison 15. 27:01 – Awareness Test 16. 27:50 – “Video Fakery” Disinformation 17. 36:47 – Richard Hall’s 3D Radar Analysis 18. 40:59 – The “POD/Drone Theory” Disinfo 19. 43:25 – Dr. Morgan Reynolds Qui Tam Case 20. 51:55 – Contractors: ARA & SAIC 21. 58:04 –3D Projection Technology 22. 1:03:28 – Gelatin & Ace Baker Disinfo 23. 1:09:46 – Real Time Holographic Visualization 24. 1:12:11 – Quasicrystals 25. 1:17:30 – Qui Tam Cases Dismissal & Coverup 26. 1:19:04 – Steven Jones & Cold Fusion Coverup 27. 1:22:14 – Missile Disinfo 28. 1:25:23 – Shanksville: No Plane Debris at Crash Site 29. 1:27:44 – Flight 93 Flight Path 30. 1:32:34 – Flight 77: No Plane Debris at Pentagon 31. 1:34:27 – Pentagon Damage 32. 1:35:34 – Flight 93: Phantom Airplane 33. 1:36:35 – Shiny Lights / White Orbs Spotted and Angels 34. 1:39:46 – Mysterious White Planes 35. 1:41:09 – Disappearing Plane Wings 36. 1:42:42 – Shutter Speed vs Frame Rate 37. 1:46:40 – 1980s Holographic UFOs & Aliens 38. 1:48:12 – Gelatin in Holography 39. 1:49:09 – 2001: A Space Odyssey 40. 1:52:37 – Monolith on 1/1/2001 41. 1:53:49 – Disinfo Agents 42. 1:55:38 – Occult Numerology 43. 1:57:53 – Project Blue Beam 44. 1:59:17 – Holes 45. 2:02:18 – Jumpers 46. 2:04:09 – Star Wars in Iraq & Pentagon 47. 2:05:15 – Warped Columns 48. 2:08:35 – Elevators, Pipes, Concrete Cracking Up 49. 2:11:07 – The “Flash Frame” 50. 2:12:44 – DEW: Side Effects, Camera Glitches, Burger King Outage 51. 2:15:24 – Magnetic Camera Tape 52. 2:17:23 – Power Outages, Unburnt Paper, and Levitation 53. 2:19:08 – Transmutation: Fusion, Fuming 54. 2:22:19 – Flight 93: Cottage in Ruins 55. 2:23:00 – Fuming for Years 56. 2:24:27 – Iron-Rich Spheres: WTC, Crop Circles, Tunguska Event 57. 2:27:11 – Crop Circles: Levitation, High Energy 58. 2:30:24 – Pump Wells: Iron Contamination in Soil 59. 2:33:46 – Flight 93: Energy Effects on Trees 60. 2:35:30 – Space & Perception: Facing Reality 61. 2:38:56 – Strategic Defense Initiative & Project Blue Beam 62. 2:41:24 – Weaponization of Space 63. 2:44:25 – Ashe Conformity Experiments 64. 2:45:53 – Psychological Warfare: War of the Worlds and 9/11 65. 2:51:28 – David Rockefeller: WTC Construction & Destruction 66. 2:52:57 – A Decades Long Conspiracy 67. 2:54:36 – Credits and References Director: Christian Hampton

Redpill Drifter

54,242 views • 5 months ago

9/11 ALCHEMY: FACING REALITY Full Documentary You think you know what happened on the horrific day of September, 11, 2001. You don't. Reset your mind of preconceived notions. We have directed energy weapons that are capable of turning matter into dust. You have been played Research everything. Think for yourself. The video timestamps: 1. 0:00 - Introduction by Christian Hampton 2. 1:13 - Predictive Programming? 3. 3:52 - Bill Cooper 9/11 Prediction 4. 4:59 - President Eisenhower Farewell Speech 5. 6:42 - The Energy Issue 6. 7:30 - Controlled Demolitions 7. 8:30 - Missing Rubble & Seismic Impact 8. 10:54 – Black Budget 9. 13:03 – The Aether 10. 14:50 – Earth’s Magnetic Field 11. 15:46 – Hurricane Erin, Tesla Coils, & the day before 9/11 12. 20:17 – Directed Energy Weapons (DEW) 13. 24:35 – Dr. Judy Wood’s Qui Tam Case 14. 24:46 - John Hutchison 15. 27:01 – Awareness Test 16. 27:50 – “Video Fakery” Disinformation 17. 36:47 – Richard Hall’s 3D Radar Analysis 18. 40:59 – The “POD/Drone Theory” Disinfo 19. 43:25 – Dr. Morgan Reynolds Qui Tam Case 20. 51:55 – Contractors: ARA & SAIC 21. 58:04 –3D Projection Technology 22. 1:03:28 – Gelatin & Ace Baker Disinfo 23. 1:09:46 – Real Time Holographic Visualization 24. 1:12:11 – Quasicrystals 25. 1:17:30 – Qui Tam Cases Dismissal & Coverup 26. 1:19:04 – Steven Jones & Cold Fusion Coverup 27. 1:22:14 – Missile Disinfo 28. 1:25:23 – Shanksville: No Plane Debris at Crash Site 29. 1:27:44 – Flight 93 Flight Path 30. 1:32:34 – Flight 77: No Plane Debris at Pentagon 31. 1:34:27 – Pentagon Damage 32. 1:35:34 – Flight 93: Phantom Airplane 33. 1:36:35 – Shiny Lights / White Orbs Spotted and Angels 34. 1:39:46 – Mysterious White Planes 35. 1:41:09 – Disappearing Plane Wings 36. 1:42:42 – Shutter Speed vs Frame Rate 37. 1:46:40 – 1980s Holographic UFOs & Aliens 38. 1:48:12 – Gelatin in Holography 39. 1:49:09 – 2001: A Space Odyssey 40. 1:52:37 – Monolith on 1/1/2001 41. 1:53:49 – Disinfo Agents 42. 1:55:38 – Occult Numerology 43. 1:57:53 – Project Blue Beam 44. 1:59:17 – Holes 45. 2:02:18 – Jumpers 46. 2:04:09 – Star Wars in Iraq & Pentagon 47. 2:05:15 – Warped Columns 48. 2:08:35 – Elevators, Pipes, Concrete Cracking Up 49. 2:11:07 – The “Flash Frame” 50. 2:12:44 – DEW: Side Effects, Camera Glitches, Burger King Outage 51. 2:15:24 – Magnetic Camera Tape 52. 2:17:23 – Power Outages, Unburnt Paper, and Levitation 53. 2:19:08 – Transmutation: Fusion, Fuming 54. 2:22:19 – Flight 93: Cottage in Ruins 55. 2:23:00 – Fuming for Years 56. 2:24:27 – Iron-Rich Spheres: WTC, Crop Circles, Tunguska Event 57. 2:27:11 – Crop Circles: Levitation, High Energy 58. 2:30:24 – Pump Wells: Iron Contamination in Soil 59. 2:33:46 – Flight 93: Energy Effects on Trees 60. 2:35:30 – Space & Perception: Facing Reality 61. 2:38:56 – Strategic Defense Initiative & Project Blue Beam 62. 2:41:24 – Weaponization of Space 63. 2:44:25 – Ashe Conformity Experiments 64. 2:45:53 – Psychological Warfare: War of the Worlds and 9/11 65. 2:51:28 – David Rockefeller: WTC Construction & Destruction 66. 2:52:57 – A Decades Long Conspiracy 67. 2:54:36 – Credits and References Director: Christian Hampton
2:58:24

9/11 ALCHEMY: FACING REALITY Full Documentary You think you know what happened on the horrific day of September, 11, 2001. You don't. Reset your mind of preconceived notions. We have directed energy weapons that are capable of turning matter into dust. You have been played Research everything. Think for yourself. The video timestamps: 1. 0:00 - Introduction by Christian Hampton 2. 1:13 - Predictive Programming? 3. 3:52 - Bill Cooper 9/11 Prediction 4. 4:59 - President Eisenhower Farewell Speech 5. 6:42 - The Energy Issue 6. 7:30 - Controlled Demolitions 7. 8:30 - Missing Rubble & Seismic Impact 8. 10:54 – Black Budget 9. 13:03 – The Aether 10. 14:50 – Earth’s Magnetic Field 11. 15:46 – Hurricane Erin, Tesla Coils, & the day before 9/11 12. 20:17 – Directed Energy Weapons (DEW) 13. 24:35 – Dr. Judy Wood’s Qui Tam Case 14. 24:46 - John Hutchison 15. 27:01 – Awareness Test 16. 27:50 – “Video Fakery” Disinformation 17. 36:47 – Richard Hall’s 3D Radar Analysis 18. 40:59 – The “POD/Drone Theory” Disinfo 19. 43:25 – Dr. Morgan Reynolds Qui Tam Case 20. 51:55 – Contractors: ARA & SAIC 21. 58:04 –3D Projection Technology 22. 1:03:28 – Gelatin & Ace Baker Disinfo 23. 1:09:46 – Real Time Holographic Visualization 24. 1:12:11 – Quasicrystals 25. 1:17:30 – Qui Tam Cases Dismissal & Coverup 26. 1:19:04 – Steven Jones & Cold Fusion Coverup 27. 1:22:14 – Missile Disinfo 28. 1:25:23 – Shanksville: No Plane Debris at Crash Site 29. 1:27:44 – Flight 93 Flight Path 30. 1:32:34 – Flight 77: No Plane Debris at Pentagon 31. 1:34:27 – Pentagon Damage 32. 1:35:34 – Flight 93: Phantom Airplane 33. 1:36:35 – Shiny Lights / White Orbs Spotted and Angels 34. 1:39:46 – Mysterious White Planes 35. 1:41:09 – Disappearing Plane Wings 36. 1:42:42 – Shutter Speed vs Frame Rate 37. 1:46:40 – 1980s Holographic UFOs & Aliens 38. 1:48:12 – Gelatin in Holography 39. 1:49:09 – 2001: A Space Odyssey 40. 1:52:37 – Monolith on 1/1/2001 41. 1:53:49 – Disinfo Agents 42. 1:55:38 – Occult Numerology 43. 1:57:53 – Project Blue Beam 44. 1:59:17 – Holes 45. 2:02:18 – Jumpers 46. 2:04:09 – Star Wars in Iraq & Pentagon 47. 2:05:15 – Warped Columns 48. 2:08:35 – Elevators, Pipes, Concrete Cracking Up 49. 2:11:07 – The “Flash Frame” 50. 2:12:44 – DEW: Side Effects, Camera Glitches, Burger King Outage 51. 2:15:24 – Magnetic Camera Tape 52. 2:17:23 – Power Outages, Unburnt Paper, and Levitation 53. 2:19:08 – Transmutation: Fusion, Fuming 54. 2:22:19 – Flight 93: Cottage in Ruins 55. 2:23:00 – Fuming for Years 56. 2:24:27 – Iron-Rich Spheres: WTC, Crop Circles, Tunguska Event 57. 2:27:11 – Crop Circles: Levitation, High Energy 58. 2:30:24 – Pump Wells: Iron Contamination in Soil 59. 2:33:46 – Flight 93: Energy Effects on Trees 60. 2:35:30 – Space & Perception: Facing Reality 61. 2:38:56 – Strategic Defense Initiative & Project Blue Beam 62. 2:41:24 – Weaponization of Space 63. 2:44:25 – Ashe Conformity Experiments 64. 2:45:53 – Psychological Warfare: War of the Worlds and 9/11 65. 2:51:28 – David Rockefeller: WTC Construction & Destruction 66. 2:52:57 – A Decades Long Conspiracy 67. 2:54:36 – Credits and References Director: Christian Hampton

Redpill Drifter

126,644 views • 1 year ago

⚔️ ENERGY WAR: BATTLE PASS The Energy War just got a serious power-up ⚡ Energy War Battle Pass is a 12-week reward system designed to reward your consistency and energy burned in every battle. IMPORTANT: The rewards in the battle pass are unlocked based on the total number of weeks you have participated, not based on the current Energy War Week. There are two tiers available ✅ Free Battle Pass 💎 Premium Battle Pass [100 GMT] What can you earn: 🥇 Energy War Badges 🧃 $SUT 🎫 MOOAR+ Memberships 🎮 STEPN/STEPN GO Backgrounds and FSL Game Hub Starlets 🧰 Partner War Chests 🎖️ The Premium Battle Pass unlocks tradeable Battle Badges that grant access to 2 Raffle Mints, along with rate-up bonuses: 🛡 Squire: complete a total of 3 rounds - 50 % rate-up ⚔️ Knight: complete a total of 9 rounds - 100 % rate-up 👑 Legend: complete a total of 12 rounds - 150 % rate-up 🚨 Rate ups from different badges add together. Having more than one of the same badge does not add extra rate ups. Raffle Mint Details 🎟️ There will be 2 Raffle Mints 🎟️ Each will feature 100 Polygon STEPN Sneakers 🎟️ All Sneakers come with permanent MORCHI skins 🎟️ These are not OG or Genesis Sneakers - but they are exclusive, custom, and only available through this event 🎯 Raffle Mint #1 during Week 6 Battle Round 🎯 Raffle Mint #2 during Week 12 Battle Round How to qualify: ✅ Participate in every week of the corresponding half (1–6 or 7–12) OR ✅ Hold a Squire, Knight, or Legend Badge Entry is free for all qualified users. To get your Battle Pass: 1️⃣ Launch Energy War in 2️⃣ Go to “My Dashboard” 3️⃣ Click on “My Rewards” 4️⃣ Upgrade your Battle Pass for 100 pGMT Grab your Battle Pass. Burn energy. Stay consistent.
1:00

⚔️ ENERGY WAR: BATTLE PASS The Energy War just got a serious power-up ⚡ Energy War Battle Pass is a 12-week reward system designed to reward your consistency and energy burned in every battle. IMPORTANT: The rewards in the battle pass are unlocked based on the total number of weeks you have participated, not based on the current Energy War Week. There are two tiers available ✅ Free Battle Pass 💎 Premium Battle Pass [100 GMT] What can you earn: 🥇 Energy War Badges 🧃 $SUT 🎫 MOOAR+ Memberships 🎮 STEPN/STEPN GO Backgrounds and FSL Game Hub Starlets 🧰 Partner War Chests 🎖️ The Premium Battle Pass unlocks tradeable Battle Badges that grant access to 2 Raffle Mints, along with rate-up bonuses: 🛡 Squire: complete a total of 3 rounds - 50 % rate-up ⚔️ Knight: complete a total of 9 rounds - 100 % rate-up 👑 Legend: complete a total of 12 rounds - 150 % rate-up 🚨 Rate ups from different badges add together. Having more than one of the same badge does not add extra rate ups. Raffle Mint Details 🎟️ There will be 2 Raffle Mints 🎟️ Each will feature 100 Polygon STEPN Sneakers 🎟️ All Sneakers come with permanent MORCHI skins 🎟️ These are not OG or Genesis Sneakers - but they are exclusive, custom, and only available through this event 🎯 Raffle Mint #1 during Week 6 Battle Round 🎯 Raffle Mint #2 during Week 12 Battle Round How to qualify: ✅ Participate in every week of the corresponding half (1–6 or 7–12) OR ✅ Hold a Squire, Knight, or Legend Badge Entry is free for all qualified users. To get your Battle Pass: 1️⃣ Launch Energy War in 2️⃣ Go to “My Dashboard” 3️⃣ Click on “My Rewards” 4️⃣ Upgrade your Battle Pass for 100 pGMT Grab your Battle Pass. Burn energy. Stay consistent.

MOOAR

67,078 views • 1 year ago

🇫🇷 Nathan Soliman — Scouting Report (FIBA U17 World Cup Fifth-Place Game vs Canada) 🧬 Player Profile Name: Nathan Soliman Born: 2009 Height: 6’8” (2.03m) Position: Wing Forward National Team: 🇫🇷 France U17 Archetype: Modern Two-Way Wing Forward all around ⸻ 📊 Performance vs 🇨🇦 Canada (Fifth-Place Game) Final Stat Line 37 PTS | 12 REB | 3 AST | 4 STL | 1 BLK 51 EFF | +23 +/- 29:50 MIN 🎯 Shooting Splits 15/19 FG (78.9%) 11/13 2PT (84.6%) 4/6 3PT (66.7%) 3/3 FT (100%) Rebounding 6 Offensive Rebounds 6 Defensive Rebounds 12 Total Rebounds Additional Stats 3 Assists 4 Steals 1 Block 2 Turnovers 1 Personal Foul ⸻ 🧠 Scouting Evaluation ⭐ one of the Tournament’s Most Dominant Performance Nathan Soliman closed out the FIBA U17 World Cup with one of the most dominant individual performances of the entire tournament. The 2009-born wing forward completely overwhelmed Canada on both ends of the floor, finishing with 37 points, 12 rebounds, 3 assists, 4 steals, and 1 block while posting an incredible 51 efficiency rating. Every aspect of his game was on display as he led France to a convincing victory in the fifth-place game. ➡️ Superstar-level performance. ⸻ 🎯 Elite Three-Level Scoring Soliman showcased a complete offensive package, proving he can score from anywhere on the floor. He finished an outstanding: 15/19 from the field (78.9%) 4/6 from three (66.7%) 3/3 from the free-throw line He consistently scored by: Attacking closeouts Finishing through contact Knocking down catch-and-shoot threes Creating from the wing Running the floor in transition
3:34

🇫🇷 Nathan Soliman — Scouting Report (FIBA U17 World Cup Fifth-Place Game vs Canada) 🧬 Player Profile Name: Nathan Soliman Born: 2009 Height: 6’8” (2.03m) Position: Wing Forward National Team: 🇫🇷 France U17 Archetype: Modern Two-Way Wing Forward all around ⸻ 📊 Performance vs 🇨🇦 Canada (Fifth-Place Game) Final Stat Line 37 PTS | 12 REB | 3 AST | 4 STL | 1 BLK 51 EFF | +23 +/- 29:50 MIN 🎯 Shooting Splits 15/19 FG (78.9%) 11/13 2PT (84.6%) 4/6 3PT (66.7%) 3/3 FT (100%) Rebounding 6 Offensive Rebounds 6 Defensive Rebounds 12 Total Rebounds Additional Stats 3 Assists 4 Steals 1 Block 2 Turnovers 1 Personal Foul ⸻ 🧠 Scouting Evaluation ⭐ one of the Tournament’s Most Dominant Performance Nathan Soliman closed out the FIBA U17 World Cup with one of the most dominant individual performances of the entire tournament. The 2009-born wing forward completely overwhelmed Canada on both ends of the floor, finishing with 37 points, 12 rebounds, 3 assists, 4 steals, and 1 block while posting an incredible 51 efficiency rating. Every aspect of his game was on display as he led France to a convincing victory in the fifth-place game. ➡️ Superstar-level performance. ⸻ 🎯 Elite Three-Level Scoring Soliman showcased a complete offensive package, proving he can score from anywhere on the floor. He finished an outstanding: 15/19 from the field (78.9%) 4/6 from three (66.7%) 3/3 from the free-throw line He consistently scored by: Attacking closeouts Finishing through contact Knocking down catch-and-shoot threes Creating from the wing Running the floor in transition

Scouting lab

33,479 views • 3 months ago

GANG JAILED FOR RUNNING £600K LUTON TO WORCESTER DRUGS NETWORK The Muslim ringleaders from Luton ran the ‘Nico’ line, facilitating the supply of cocaine, crack cocaine and heroin into Worcester. In total, the group made 24 journeys between the two areas supplying what is estimated to be over £600,000 worth of drugs. Members of the group openly flaunted their lavish lifestyles on social media, showcasing designer watches and large sums of cash. It resulted in the sentencing of nine people to a total of over 30 years: Hashim Malik, 29, from Roydon Close, Luton – sentenced to 9 years and 2 months. Muhiz Jamshed, 24, from Dallow Road, Luton – sentenced to 5 years and 2 months. Max Didcote, 21, from Victoria Street, Worcester – sentenced to 4 years and 10 months. Saood Ali, 24, from Lark Hill, Worcester – sentenced to 4 years and 2 months. Karim Moustati, 23, from Grasmere Drive, Worcester – sentenced to 4 years. Hussain Akhtar, 42, from St Pauls Street, Worcester – sentenced to 2 years and 7 months. Taylor Benford, from Links Way, Luton – sentenced to 1 year and 3 months. Myles Price, 20 from Worcester – handed a suspended sentence of 2 years. Amy Deacon, from Victoria Street, Worcester – handed a suspended sentence of 2 years.
1:01

GANG JAILED FOR RUNNING £600K LUTON TO WORCESTER DRUGS NETWORK The Muslim ringleaders from Luton ran the ‘Nico’ line, facilitating the supply of cocaine, crack cocaine and heroin into Worcester. In total, the group made 24 journeys between the two areas supplying what is estimated to be over £600,000 worth of drugs. Members of the group openly flaunted their lavish lifestyles on social media, showcasing designer watches and large sums of cash. It resulted in the sentencing of nine people to a total of over 30 years: Hashim Malik, 29, from Roydon Close, Luton – sentenced to 9 years and 2 months. Muhiz Jamshed, 24, from Dallow Road, Luton – sentenced to 5 years and 2 months. Max Didcote, 21, from Victoria Street, Worcester – sentenced to 4 years and 10 months. Saood Ali, 24, from Lark Hill, Worcester – sentenced to 4 years and 2 months. Karim Moustati, 23, from Grasmere Drive, Worcester – sentenced to 4 years. Hussain Akhtar, 42, from St Pauls Street, Worcester – sentenced to 2 years and 7 months. Taylor Benford, from Links Way, Luton – sentenced to 1 year and 3 months. Myles Price, 20 from Worcester – handed a suspended sentence of 2 years. Amy Deacon, from Victoria Street, Worcester – handed a suspended sentence of 2 years.

Kiera Diss

179,209 views • 1 year ago

CADE LEVELS UP TO SEND PISTONS TO EAST SEMIFINALS One week ago, Cade Cunningham faced one of the biggest tests of his young career. The No. 1 Pistons were in a 3-1 hole against the No. 8 Magic after back-to-back losses. Cunningham had shot 15-of-46 in those losses while committing 17 turnovers – his most in any two-game span this season. Six days later, he walked off Detroit’s floor to a standing ovation – Game 7 in hand, and the Pistons’ first Playoff series win since 2008 was secured. To get there, he delivered his biggest three-game playoff stretch yet. Game 5 Eruption: Looking to avoid elimination on their home floor, Cunningham carried the Pistons with a franchise Playoff-record 45 points, winning an all-time duel with Paolo Banchero (45 pts). Game 6 Rally: Facing a 24-point deficit in Orlando, Cade (32 pts, 10 reb, 4 stl) sparked Detroit’s largest comeback of the season with 24 points and 9 boards in the 2nd half, sending the series back to Detroit Then, Game 7: The first of Cunningham’s career and one that will go down in the record books, as the 2x All-Star took over with 32 points, 12 assists and 2 blocks, scoring 17 in the 2nd half to send Detroit to the East Semis. Cade averaged 36.3 PPG, 5.0 RPG and 6.7 APG while shooting 61.1% from deep in Games 5-7 – numbers he’s never matched over any three-game span in his career. “We were pushed to the limit,” said Cunningham after Game 7. “I think we got a lot better from this series. I got a lot better from this series – I learned a lot about myself.”
1:50

CADE LEVELS UP TO SEND PISTONS TO EAST SEMIFINALS One week ago, Cade Cunningham faced one of the biggest tests of his young career. The No. 1 Pistons were in a 3-1 hole against the No. 8 Magic after back-to-back losses. Cunningham had shot 15-of-46 in those losses while committing 17 turnovers – his most in any two-game span this season. Six days later, he walked off Detroit’s floor to a standing ovation – Game 7 in hand, and the Pistons’ first Playoff series win since 2008 was secured. To get there, he delivered his biggest three-game playoff stretch yet. Game 5 Eruption: Looking to avoid elimination on their home floor, Cunningham carried the Pistons with a franchise Playoff-record 45 points, winning an all-time duel with Paolo Banchero (45 pts). Game 6 Rally: Facing a 24-point deficit in Orlando, Cade (32 pts, 10 reb, 4 stl) sparked Detroit’s largest comeback of the season with 24 points and 9 boards in the 2nd half, sending the series back to Detroit Then, Game 7: The first of Cunningham’s career and one that will go down in the record books, as the 2x All-Star took over with 32 points, 12 assists and 2 blocks, scoring 17 in the 2nd half to send Detroit to the East Semis. Cade averaged 36.3 PPG, 5.0 RPG and 6.7 APG while shooting 61.1% from deep in Games 5-7 – numbers he’s never matched over any three-game span in his career. “We were pushed to the limit,” said Cunningham after Game 7. “I think we got a lot better from this series. I got a lot better from this series – I learned a lot about myself.”

NBA

76,447 views • 5 months ago

▪️ Both Taiwan and South Korea have now overtaken India in terms of total stock market capitalization. ▪️ India has slipped to the 7th position globally, down from the 5th. ▪️Current Rankings (as of June 2026): • 1. US: ~$79 trillion • 2. China: ~$16 trillion • 3. Japan: ~$8–9 trillion • 4. Hong Kong: ~$7–8 trillion • 5. Taiwan: ~$5.0–5.15 trillion • 6. South Korea: ~$5.0–5.04 trillion • 7. India: ~$4.8–4.9 trillion ▪️ Foreign investors are queuing up for South Korea and Taiwan, riding the AI boom. ▪️ In contrast, they remain bearish on India - exiting in large numbers. ▪️ In May 2026 alone, FIIs sold ₹32,963 crore worth of Indian equities. ▪️ This marked the third consecutive month of net outflows. ▪️ Over the last five months (Jan–May 2026), net FII outflows have totalled a massive ₹2.22–2.25 lakh crore. India is not just losing ground economically and financially but the erosion of faith by foreign players is a serious concern. And there’s no one else to blame but megalomaniac Modi himself!
1:15

▪️ Both Taiwan and South Korea have now overtaken India in terms of total stock market capitalization. ▪️ India has slipped to the 7th position globally, down from the 5th. ▪️Current Rankings (as of June 2026): • 1. US: ~$79 trillion • 2. China: ~$16 trillion • 3. Japan: ~$8–9 trillion • 4. Hong Kong: ~$7–8 trillion • 5. Taiwan: ~$5.0–5.15 trillion • 6. South Korea: ~$5.0–5.04 trillion • 7. India: ~$4.8–4.9 trillion ▪️ Foreign investors are queuing up for South Korea and Taiwan, riding the AI boom. ▪️ In contrast, they remain bearish on India - exiting in large numbers. ▪️ In May 2026 alone, FIIs sold ₹32,963 crore worth of Indian equities. ▪️ This marked the third consecutive month of net outflows. ▪️ Over the last five months (Jan–May 2026), net FII outflows have totalled a massive ₹2.22–2.25 lakh crore. India is not just losing ground economically and financially but the erosion of faith by foreign players is a serious concern. And there’s no one else to blame but megalomaniac Modi himself!

Supriya Shrinate

18,961 views • 4 months ago

Inside the disaster sequence by the Jets at the end of regulation: Jets could have and should have called timeout at 1:01 left and the Packers facing 4th and 5 at the +45. By doing so, the Jets force the Packers to make a decision with 1:01 left, which almost certainly would have been to punt. The average starting field position after a punt from that field position is roughly the 12 yard line. A touchback occurs ~16% of the time which would put you at the 20. For simplicity, assume the Jets have the ball from their own 12 with 51 seconds left and a timeout. One key point here is the Packers only had 2 timeouts remaining, which makes a big difference. The Jets could have run the ball on 1st down and seen what they got. If it went nowhere, they would have the ability to take the clock to 0:00 if needed because the Packers could only stop the clock twice. By not calling timeout, the Jets allowed the Packers to run the clock all the way down to 21 seconds before a delay of game. The clock decay helps one team or the other here, and in this case it clearly helps the Packers. Now comes the next clear mistake by the Jets. Once the delay of game occurred, the Jets could have and should have stopped the clock. By not electing to do so, Green Bay was able to run the clock down to 2 seconds to get a free chance at a Hail Mary. The Jets needed to stop the clock at 21 seconds to force the punt and then take it to overtime. Green Bay would not have been able to run that Hail Mary with 21 seconds. The situation was so chaotic I actually think the Packers missed an opportunity here too. Packers could have called timeout with ~8-9 seconds, tried to get the first down on 4th and 10, and if so called timeout and attempted a game winning field goal. The Packers have had a great long yardage pass offense with Love. If they failed, the Packers would have to defend one play from the ~50. Another Packers option is Trey Smack attempting a ~68 yard field goal with 2 seconds left. For some teams that would have clearly been the best option. Ultimately, this game management by the Jets was objectively incorrect in both of these instances, and the fact it sounds like they did not even talk about it on the headset is beyond alarming.
5:26

Inside the disaster sequence by the Jets at the end of regulation: Jets could have and should have called timeout at 1:01 left and the Packers facing 4th and 5 at the +45. By doing so, the Jets force the Packers to make a decision with 1:01 left, which almost certainly would have been to punt. The average starting field position after a punt from that field position is roughly the 12 yard line. A touchback occurs ~16% of the time which would put you at the 20. For simplicity, assume the Jets have the ball from their own 12 with 51 seconds left and a timeout. One key point here is the Packers only had 2 timeouts remaining, which makes a big difference. The Jets could have run the ball on 1st down and seen what they got. If it went nowhere, they would have the ability to take the clock to 0:00 if needed because the Packers could only stop the clock twice. By not calling timeout, the Jets allowed the Packers to run the clock all the way down to 21 seconds before a delay of game. The clock decay helps one team or the other here, and in this case it clearly helps the Packers. Now comes the next clear mistake by the Jets. Once the delay of game occurred, the Jets could have and should have stopped the clock. By not electing to do so, Green Bay was able to run the clock down to 2 seconds to get a free chance at a Hail Mary. The Jets needed to stop the clock at 21 seconds to force the punt and then take it to overtime. Green Bay would not have been able to run that Hail Mary with 21 seconds. The situation was so chaotic I actually think the Packers missed an opportunity here too. Packers could have called timeout with ~8-9 seconds, tried to get the first down on 4th and 10, and if so called timeout and attempted a game winning field goal. The Packers have had a great long yardage pass offense with Love. If they failed, the Packers would have to defend one play from the ~50. Another Packers option is Trey Smack attempting a ~68 yard field goal with 2 seconds left. For some teams that would have clearly been the best option. Ultimately, this game management by the Jets was objectively incorrect in both of these instances, and the fact it sounds like they did not even talk about it on the headset is beyond alarming.

Ryan Paganetti

501,113 views • 23 days ago

After Elon Musk reposted my Grok Bot guide, my friend Ryan used it to run his strip club. 7 days ago, he replaced his entire middle management with 8 Grok agents ($200/mo). Last week alone, he saved $10,000 in salaries and missed leads. Not because the club magically got better, but because he killed the middle layer that was eating his margin. Before that, the setup was classic and expensive. Back-of-house sat on 6 people: > 1 recruiter > 1 person on applications > 1 cashier > 2 shift managers > 1 person on after-close requests That layer cost about $8,400–$9,200 a week once you counted base pay, cuts, “bonuses,” and money that never made the report. The recruiter took $50–$150 per new girl. The cashier spent 1.5–2 hours closing a shift. On Friday the managers generated 80–120 messages on the schedule alone. The after-shift person held 10–15 requests in his head and lost 2–3 of them every week simply because someone did not answer in time. Ryan saw the formula fast. Those people almost never made hard decisions. They moved data. • An application came in → a person opened a chat. • A girl wrote “I can do Friday” → a person typed a row into a spreadsheet. • A client left a request → a person relayed it to a manager. • The manager opened the schedule → and texted the girl. • The shift ended → the cashier counted a stack and entered a number by hand. Every handoff leaked time and money. Applications. A live staffer used to review 40–60 incoming files a week. One file took 8–12 minutes. Total: 7–10 hours of raw review, plus another 3–4 hours on “send a reminder,” “send more,” “when can you work.” Out of 50 applications, 6–8 made it to a shift. Conversion was weak not because of the room, but because half the threads went cold for 24–48 hours. Scheduling. Friday looked like this: 12 people want on, 8 slots. 1 can start only after 21:00. 1 will not work after 00:00. 1 drops out with 40 minutes left. 1 wants a swap. A manager already promised the slot to a fifth person. One change created 5 new messages. One substitution cycle took 20–40 minutes. By the end of the night there were 3–5 holes in the grid. Money. That was the dirtiest part. By morning the count was off by $180–$400 on average. Sometimes $70. Sometimes $600. The explanations were always human: tips booked to the wrong place, a commission forgotten, a number rounded, an envelope put in the wrong pile, a shift closed from memory. The cashier was not an analyst. He was a loss point. After-shift requests. The old chain took 25–45 minutes: client → manager → spreadsheet → message to the girl → wait → reply to the client. Out of 12 requests, 2–3 died in transit. Not because of a refusal. Because of human lag. 7 days ago Ryan cut that layer and hung it on Grok. The application flow dropped into one funnel with statuses: NEW → REVIEW → APPROVED → SCHEDULED → ACTIVE → INACTIVE The bot sent the first packet itself, collected the fields, and closed the gaps. If data was missing → it asked. If there was silence for 48 hours → it nudged. Ryan no longer opened 50 chats. He opened one feed. He touched only REVIEW and exceptions by hand. First-pass review fell from 8–12 minutes per application to 30–90 seconds of control. In a week, 53 applications went through the funnel. 11 made it to a shift. That was no longer “we got lucky.” That was because no application rotted in a manager’s DMs. The schedule became a rule, not a group chat. A girl marked available slots. The system saw 8 seats, not “we’ll figure it out.” Overbook went to a waitlist. A drop with 40 minutes left no longer spawned a 5-chat mess: the slot jumped to the next person in line in 10–20 seconds. Friday noise fell from 80–120 messages to 10–15 exceptions. Shift manager as a job title became unnecessary. The register stopped being a notebook. Every operation was written immediately. Shift close produced one summary: - floor revenue - tips - commissions - payouts - adjustments - variance If the total did not match, the system did not say “error somewhere.” It pointed at the exact operation. Over 7 days, variance stayed in the $0–$25 range instead of the old $180–$400. The weekly difference was about $1,200–$2,500 on “it didn’t add up” alone. The client loop collapsed from 4 human nodes into 1 route. A request entered the bot. The bot pulled the standard fields, checked availability, pinged the girl, and after 2 confirmations closed both sides with a notification. Cycle time fell from 25–45 minutes to 2–4 minutes on a standard request. Burned requests for the week: 0. Before that, it was 2–3 lost checks every week. Ryan’s role got narrow and hard. The bot closed the rule. He closed the exception. Morning looked like a panel, not a meeting: > 3 new applications in NEW > 1 card in REVIEW > 2 shift cancellations > 1 operation for manual review > 47 automated messages already sent without him The only living parts left were him and the girls on the floor. Plus anyone who took an after-shift call. The middle layer: sourcing, screening, schedule, requests, counting → sat on a $200 subscription. In numbers, the week looked like this. Old model: > 6 people in the management loop > $8,400–$9,200 for that layer > 7–10 hours on applications > 80–120 messages on one heavy Friday > $180–$400 holes in the cash > 2–3 lost requests > 25–45 minutes per client cycle New model: > 1 person > $200 for the tool > 30–90 seconds of standard application control > 10–15 exceptions instead of a whole-floor chat storm > $0–$25 on the register > 0 lost standard requests > 2–4 minutes per standard cycle That is where the ~$10,000 in 7 days came from. Not “floor magic.” A removed human tax: - pay for 6 people - recruiter cuts - cash holes - burned requests - hours spent moving the same row from a chat into a spreadsheet In this system, those people were not the “soul of the club.” They were latency and leak. Every extra node added delay. Every live data handoff added error. Every notebook added a gap for rounding. Ryan removed the nodes. He left rules, statuses, a ledger, and one escalation point. So after 7 days the model already counted as a delta, not an experiment. $200 on top. About $10,000 in the plus. And the proof was short: the club ran. The middle-layer staff did not. Their job was done by the bot. bookmark this.
0:35

After Elon Musk reposted my Grok Bot guide, my friend Ryan used it to run his strip club. 7 days ago, he replaced his entire middle management with 8 Grok agents ($200/mo). Last week alone, he saved $10,000 in salaries and missed leads. Not because the club magically got better, but because he killed the middle layer that was eating his margin. Before that, the setup was classic and expensive. Back-of-house sat on 6 people: > 1 recruiter > 1 person on applications > 1 cashier > 2 shift managers > 1 person on after-close requests That layer cost about $8,400–$9,200 a week once you counted base pay, cuts, “bonuses,” and money that never made the report. The recruiter took $50–$150 per new girl. The cashier spent 1.5–2 hours closing a shift. On Friday the managers generated 80–120 messages on the schedule alone. The after-shift person held 10–15 requests in his head and lost 2–3 of them every week simply because someone did not answer in time. Ryan saw the formula fast. Those people almost never made hard decisions. They moved data. • An application came in → a person opened a chat. • A girl wrote “I can do Friday” → a person typed a row into a spreadsheet. • A client left a request → a person relayed it to a manager. • The manager opened the schedule → and texted the girl. • The shift ended → the cashier counted a stack and entered a number by hand. Every handoff leaked time and money. Applications. A live staffer used to review 40–60 incoming files a week. One file took 8–12 minutes. Total: 7–10 hours of raw review, plus another 3–4 hours on “send a reminder,” “send more,” “when can you work.” Out of 50 applications, 6–8 made it to a shift. Conversion was weak not because of the room, but because half the threads went cold for 24–48 hours. Scheduling. Friday looked like this: 12 people want on, 8 slots. 1 can start only after 21:00. 1 will not work after 00:00. 1 drops out with 40 minutes left. 1 wants a swap. A manager already promised the slot to a fifth person. One change created 5 new messages. One substitution cycle took 20–40 minutes. By the end of the night there were 3–5 holes in the grid. Money. That was the dirtiest part. By morning the count was off by $180–$400 on average. Sometimes $70. Sometimes $600. The explanations were always human: tips booked to the wrong place, a commission forgotten, a number rounded, an envelope put in the wrong pile, a shift closed from memory. The cashier was not an analyst. He was a loss point. After-shift requests. The old chain took 25–45 minutes: client → manager → spreadsheet → message to the girl → wait → reply to the client. Out of 12 requests, 2–3 died in transit. Not because of a refusal. Because of human lag. 7 days ago Ryan cut that layer and hung it on Grok. The application flow dropped into one funnel with statuses: NEW → REVIEW → APPROVED → SCHEDULED → ACTIVE → INACTIVE The bot sent the first packet itself, collected the fields, and closed the gaps. If data was missing → it asked. If there was silence for 48 hours → it nudged. Ryan no longer opened 50 chats. He opened one feed. He touched only REVIEW and exceptions by hand. First-pass review fell from 8–12 minutes per application to 30–90 seconds of control. In a week, 53 applications went through the funnel. 11 made it to a shift. That was no longer “we got lucky.” That was because no application rotted in a manager’s DMs. The schedule became a rule, not a group chat. A girl marked available slots. The system saw 8 seats, not “we’ll figure it out.” Overbook went to a waitlist. A drop with 40 minutes left no longer spawned a 5-chat mess: the slot jumped to the next person in line in 10–20 seconds. Friday noise fell from 80–120 messages to 10–15 exceptions. Shift manager as a job title became unnecessary. The register stopped being a notebook. Every operation was written immediately. Shift close produced one summary: - floor revenue - tips - commissions - payouts - adjustments - variance If the total did not match, the system did not say “error somewhere.” It pointed at the exact operation. Over 7 days, variance stayed in the $0–$25 range instead of the old $180–$400. The weekly difference was about $1,200–$2,500 on “it didn’t add up” alone. The client loop collapsed from 4 human nodes into 1 route. A request entered the bot. The bot pulled the standard fields, checked availability, pinged the girl, and after 2 confirmations closed both sides with a notification. Cycle time fell from 25–45 minutes to 2–4 minutes on a standard request. Burned requests for the week: 0. Before that, it was 2–3 lost checks every week. Ryan’s role got narrow and hard. The bot closed the rule. He closed the exception. Morning looked like a panel, not a meeting: > 3 new applications in NEW > 1 card in REVIEW > 2 shift cancellations > 1 operation for manual review > 47 automated messages already sent without him The only living parts left were him and the girls on the floor. Plus anyone who took an after-shift call. The middle layer: sourcing, screening, schedule, requests, counting → sat on a $200 subscription. In numbers, the week looked like this. Old model: > 6 people in the management loop > $8,400–$9,200 for that layer > 7–10 hours on applications > 80–120 messages on one heavy Friday > $180–$400 holes in the cash > 2–3 lost requests > 25–45 minutes per client cycle New model: > 1 person > $200 for the tool > 30–90 seconds of standard application control > 10–15 exceptions instead of a whole-floor chat storm > $0–$25 on the register > 0 lost standard requests > 2–4 minutes per standard cycle That is where the ~$10,000 in 7 days came from. Not “floor magic.” A removed human tax: - pay for 6 people - recruiter cuts - cash holes - burned requests - hours spent moving the same row from a chat into a spreadsheet In this system, those people were not the “soul of the club.” They were latency and leak. Every extra node added delay. Every live data handoff added error. Every notebook added a gap for rounding. Ryan removed the nodes. He left rules, statuses, a ledger, and one escalation point. So after 7 days the model already counted as a delta, not an experiment. $200 on top. About $10,000 in the plus. And the proof was short: the club ran. The middle-layer staff did not. Their job was done by the bot. bookmark this.

Ridark

188,835 views • 1 month ago

Why Michael Jordan is Overrated!!!!!!!!!!! He wasn't clutch - the opportunity to eliminate opponents in the playofts shooting % dropped a whopping 9% all the way down to 40% Rebounds decreased to 4.8 a game Assists went down to 3.2 a game 0.08 fewer steals & 0.06 fewer blocks That is not killer instinct - scored less, played less defense and didn't help his team by assisting or rebounding Jordan with his back against the wall he saved himself 41.7% of the times a record of 5-7 he regressed in major cotegories, he shot worse from the field & FT line he stole the ball 0.07 fewer times & turn the ball over 1.5 more times & 2.7 more PPG The Expansion League - those who call him the greatest fail to look at the league around him - 6 teams were added (Hornets & Heat '88, Magic & Timberwolves '89, and Raptors & Grizzlies'95 Before first playoffs & Jordan's record against them Before first playoffs & Jordan's record against them '88-93 Hornets 140-270 & Jordan was 18-3 88-92 Heat 95-233 & Jordan 14-0 *89-94 Magic 106-249 & Jordan 12-4 '89-95 Timberwolves 192-464 & Jordan 13-1 95-00 Raptors 135-243 & Jordan 10-2 *95-02 Grizzlies 101-418 & Jordan 7-1 then got cut from Wizards in 03- Grizzlies didn't make the playoffs until 04 At any given point after "88 in Jordan's career, at least 3 teams had 5 or fewer years of experience in the league This resulted in a top-heavy league with very few talented teams In Jordan 11 years after expansion only 4 seasons had more than 50% of the over .500 A league of a small number of good teams destroying bad teams & bosting their records to appear better than what they actually were In Jordan 6 title years 4 of the seasons had more losing teams in the league than winning teams He lost to His Greatest Opponents in their Prime in the postseason not including the Finals He lost to His Greatest Opponents in their Prime in the postseason not including the Finals 0-2 vs Bird, Walton, Mchale, Parrish,Dantley & DJ 1-3 vs Isiah, Dumars, Rodman, 1-1 vs Shaq 1-0 vs Dominique, Reggie & Dikembe Mutombo 2-0 vs Barkley 3-0 vs Morning 5-0 vs Ewing He face 16 HOFs on 39 occasions and posted a winning record against only 6 of the 16 & tied record with 1- that's a losing record against 9 Total record in the playoffs against HOFs was 17-22 with 10 of his 17 wins against Ewing, Barkley & Morning He beat 9 HOFs in the Finals, 20% of his his postseason wins came against 3 players who never won rings Never beat Larry Bird in the playoffs, and Jordan greatest statistical season he couldn't win 1 game against Bird He faced Isiah 4x and lost 3 straight winning only the last one when isiah never recovered from a broken wrist Jordan beat Magic in the Finals but not the ShowTime Lakers with Kareem, Scott & Worthy injured and sat out of game 5 He faced Isiah 4x and lost 3 straight winning only the last one when Isiah never recovered from a broken wrist Jordan beat Magic in the Finals but not the ShowTime Lakers with Kareem, Scott & Worthy injured and sat out of game 5 The Washington Years Failed to make the playoffs More than half of the league got into the playoffs- the so-called goat couldn't He only needed 42 games to get into the playoffs The bottom line is that he wasn't challenged enough to be name the GOAT Conclusion : JORDAN ISNT THE GOAT
0:41

Why Michael Jordan is Overrated!!!!!!!!!!! He wasn't clutch - the opportunity to eliminate opponents in the playofts shooting % dropped a whopping 9% all the way down to 40% Rebounds decreased to 4.8 a game Assists went down to 3.2 a game 0.08 fewer steals & 0.06 fewer blocks That is not killer instinct - scored less, played less defense and didn't help his team by assisting or rebounding Jordan with his back against the wall he saved himself 41.7% of the times a record of 5-7 he regressed in major cotegories, he shot worse from the field & FT line he stole the ball 0.07 fewer times & turn the ball over 1.5 more times & 2.7 more PPG The Expansion League - those who call him the greatest fail to look at the league around him - 6 teams were added (Hornets & Heat '88, Magic & Timberwolves '89, and Raptors & Grizzlies'95 Before first playoffs & Jordan's record against them Before first playoffs & Jordan's record against them '88-93 Hornets 140-270 & Jordan was 18-3 88-92 Heat 95-233 & Jordan 14-0 *89-94 Magic 106-249 & Jordan 12-4 '89-95 Timberwolves 192-464 & Jordan 13-1 95-00 Raptors 135-243 & Jordan 10-2 *95-02 Grizzlies 101-418 & Jordan 7-1 then got cut from Wizards in 03- Grizzlies didn't make the playoffs until 04 At any given point after "88 in Jordan's career, at least 3 teams had 5 or fewer years of experience in the league This resulted in a top-heavy league with very few talented teams In Jordan 11 years after expansion only 4 seasons had more than 50% of the over .500 A league of a small number of good teams destroying bad teams & bosting their records to appear better than what they actually were In Jordan 6 title years 4 of the seasons had more losing teams in the league than winning teams He lost to His Greatest Opponents in their Prime in the postseason not including the Finals He lost to His Greatest Opponents in their Prime in the postseason not including the Finals 0-2 vs Bird, Walton, Mchale, Parrish,Dantley & DJ 1-3 vs Isiah, Dumars, Rodman, 1-1 vs Shaq 1-0 vs Dominique, Reggie & Dikembe Mutombo 2-0 vs Barkley 3-0 vs Morning 5-0 vs Ewing He face 16 HOFs on 39 occasions and posted a winning record against only 6 of the 16 & tied record with 1- that's a losing record against 9 Total record in the playoffs against HOFs was 17-22 with 10 of his 17 wins against Ewing, Barkley & Morning He beat 9 HOFs in the Finals, 20% of his his postseason wins came against 3 players who never won rings Never beat Larry Bird in the playoffs, and Jordan greatest statistical season he couldn't win 1 game against Bird He faced Isiah 4x and lost 3 straight winning only the last one when isiah never recovered from a broken wrist Jordan beat Magic in the Finals but not the ShowTime Lakers with Kareem, Scott & Worthy injured and sat out of game 5 He faced Isiah 4x and lost 3 straight winning only the last one when Isiah never recovered from a broken wrist Jordan beat Magic in the Finals but not the ShowTime Lakers with Kareem, Scott & Worthy injured and sat out of game 5 The Washington Years Failed to make the playoffs More than half of the league got into the playoffs- the so-called goat couldn't He only needed 42 games to get into the playoffs The bottom line is that he wasn't challenged enough to be name the GOAT Conclusion : JORDAN ISNT THE GOAT

8/24𝕄𝕒𝕞𝕓𝕒-𝔽𝕠𝕣𝕖𝕧𝕖𝕣🐍

12,539 views • 8 months ago

🚨🚨🚨A Stark Warning 🚨🚨🚨 🚨Europe is losing its mind. 🚨Where are we going up against a nuclear power? 🚨Russia could wipe us out in a matter of minutes, they could wipe out all of Europe. 🚨Does anyone think that if Russia is massively attacked within its territory, it will just sit back and do nothing? Obviously not. So, what are we trying to achieve? That they'll get really tired and launch two or three, nuclear bombs on some of the main European capitals? Pedro Baños Retired Spanish Army Colonel: 📑 That Mrs. von der Leyen is going to give Ukraine another 3.3 BILLONES euros another because she says that everything Ukraine has already received isn't enough, right? Because she says that everything Ukraine has already received isn't enough, right? 0:08 Exactly, the problem is that they've made a huge bet on Ukraine, and it has gone badly for them 0:09 a huge bet on Ukraine, and it has gone badly for them 0:12 and now, how do they backtrack, 0:13 how do they admit that this has been a mistake 0:14 from the very start, that they've led an entire people to destruction, 0:17 that they've led an entire people to destruction, 0:18 that already two generations of Ukrainians have died, 0:20 those who haven't fled the country, 0:22 which is a total disaster. 0:23 We only have the casualty exchange numbers between Russia and Ukraine, 0:27 between Russia and Ukraine, and the figures are staggering. 0:30 We can provide them later, right? 0:32 But what's going on? 0:34 As you said, that increase ... 0:36 look, in Spain's case, 0:37 it means multiplying the Defence budget by five, 0:41 Because of course, since the United States first asked for 2%. 0:44 Since we agreed, they said, "Hey, then 3.5%.." 0:47 Since we also agreed, they said, "Well, 5%." 0:49 These people are fools, so let's go, let's ask them for more, right? 0:52 In the end, they are going to buy almost everything from me, 0:54 which I really need. 0:55 But what is the problem, Ambassador? 0:56 When you manufacture weapons, 0:59 there is only one way for that system not to fail you, 1:02 and that is to use the weapons you've produced. 1:05 Because look, 1:06 you manufacture—imagine, it's true, there was a deficit here, 1:08 for example, of artillery shells, 1:10 one hundred fifty-five, or shells for, 1:12 cannons, or, or, or tank shells. 1:15 Fine, that's all well and good, whatever we want. 1:17 You've already produced that one million, five million shells. 1:21 And once you've produced them, what do you do? 1:22 That factory you set up with public money, with subsidies, do you shut it down? 1:28 Or you have the other option, 1:30 which is to go to war to use up that ammunition 1:32 and keep producing more. 1:33 And as it happens, in Europe, 1:35 especially in the main countries, 1:37 the economy is a total mess, 1:39 it's in free fall, 1:43 they desperately need, 1:45 as they can no longer make cars, like in Germany, 1:48 to start making tanks or ammunition instead. 1:51 But France is in the same situation. 1:52 A France that has been expelled from Africa, 1:56 where what the franc meant for them, the CFA. 2:00 And not only that, but also all the resources 2:02 they extracted under more than favorable conditions from these countries, 2:06 starting with uranium from Niger, 2:08 they've run out of it. 2:09 France is having a very hard time, 2:11 with an absolutely brutal social crisis. 2:15 And now we see all this coming together 2:16 with skyrocketing energy prices, 2:19 we can already see that the price of fuels 2:21 in Germany has already surpassed 2.5 euro— 2:24 euros per liter, which is truly outrageous. 2:27 We're talking about, and we saw the news, 2:29 that filling a standard tank 2:32 of an average vehicle now means 200 euros, 2:35 200 euros, which is absolutely insane. 2:38 And what does that mean? 2:39 That they only have one solution, indeed, 2:42 which is to go to war. 2:43 And remember there's something that, 2:45 we studied it in the Command and Staff course 2:47 and when you tell people about it, 2:48 they treat it as little more than a joke too, 2:50 that there is something called the relaxing wars. 2:53 The relaxing wars that have been used throughout 2:55 history 2:57 to get rid of part of the population or to get out of an economic chaos. 3:02 And that's ... 3:03 right now it would be very convenient for them to, 3:04 on one hand, get rid of some of the population, 3:07 that is, get rid of this problem they say they won't be able to pay pensions, 3:10 because all of this increase, besides the cost, don't forget, military, 3:15 means a clear and tangible reduction of the welfare state, 3:20 of the four pillars of the welfare state. 3:22 Some of the more honest politicians, the few there are, 3:25 tell you this openly, others still keep it hidden. 3:28 But, of course, what happens? 3:29 That, in fact, it would be very convenient for them to camouflage the dire situation, 3:33 regrettable, that they have within their own country. 3:35 We see and we can talk about Macron's statements today, 3:39 where he said that we should just about go 3:41 to war because Russia is waging a hybrid war against us 3:43 which is unacceptable and that we have to be prepared. 3:46 Macron said it, as well as some of his top ministers. 3:48 Of course, but the thing is, France is in a very, 3:51 very delicate, extremely delicate situation. 3:53 And also in a France 3:55 where people are not as patient as the Spanish, 3:57 over there, as soon as people get a little heated, 3:59 they take to the streets and burn down half the streets. 4:02 But we've talked about it, the way things are in Germany, 4:04 the way things are in Sweden, the way things are in Finland, 4:07 which, ever since it joined NATO, 4:09 has completely come apart, with unemployment even higher than in Spain, 4:14 a sunken economy. 4:16 And then some only see the way out as the United Kingdom, 4:19 which now even wants to break apart, 4:21 there are already, there are small populations that are asking for independence 4:25 within the United Kingdom, even on the verge, 4:28 as many predict, of an internal civil confrontation. 4:32 And of course, what do they always find? 4:33 Well, we already know that to unite the people, 4:36 to cover up internal chaos, 4:40 you know, create an external enemy 4:42 and declare that you have to go to war against them. 4:43 The problem with all that, Ambassador, 4:44 is that when, and you know this perfectly well, 4:46 you have even much more experience than I do, 4:49 you say, you know that the problem with all this is 4:50 that when you get yourself involved in this war context, 4:53 you are making the population get used to it every day. 4:56 We just have to look at a some newspaper, 4:59 a Spanish one that every day, every single day without exception, 5:02 publishes some story to accuse Russia of anything, 5:05 or to convince the population 5:07 that we must go to war against Russia. 5:09 So, when you already have the, the, the atmosphere, the context, the narrative, 5:13 and you've already created it, all that's left is the incident. 5:15 And we're seeing incidents like these every day. 5:17 Like—now, it's a Danish helicopter, 5:20 or a frigate getting close to a Russian ship, 5:23 or the Russian ship fires a grenade, or some warning flares, 5:27 which is nonsense. 5:28 A flare is—what's even happening— 5:29 what range could it have? 300 meters. 5:31 And that's not going to bring down any helicopter. 5:34 But of course, it must be because the helicopter had come closer precisely 5:38 to the Russian warship in international waters. 5:42 But they're searching, they're only looking for the incident that will make all this blow up completely, 5:46 when, on top of that, they're deceiving us every day with the whole drone issue, 5:50 about Russian drones in the middle of Germany, 5:52 about not knowing, knowing where they came from and they just appear out of nowhere, 5:55 almost as if in, in a space-time shortcut. 5:58 And, and it's like that all the time. And we have loads of information. 6:01 But look, but the thing is there is a fact right now that strikes me as devastating 6:04 to show us how they're speeding this up by the minute, Ambassador, 6:09 Today's news 6:10 that Ukraine has launched drones 6:13 against a Russian nuclear power plant inside Russia. 6:17 Because remember that every so often, he launches strikes on Zaporizhia and 6:19 on top of that, they accuse the Russians of being the ones 6:22 launching drones at their own nuclear plant, 6:24 because they currently have it in their possession. 6:27 No, no, we're talking about inside, inside Russia, 6:31 at a nuclear power plant, Ukraine has launched drones. 6:34 In other words, what they're looking for now is for 6:36 Russia to blow up, 6:38 I mean, for them to say, look, this is where we draw the line, 6:41 I've had enough of you. 6:42 And, and, and on top of that, so that we Europeans can play the victim, see? 6:45 We had already warned you that Russia could attack us at any moment. 6:48 If they're provoking them with the, 6:51 the ones living in the Baltic states, 6:54 whose civil rights have been taken away, 6:55 who have been banned from speaking Russian. 6:57 In other words, they're constantly provoking it so that Russia finally snaps, 7:01 and specifically, 7:02 so that it's the one to take the first step in this war, 7:05 and today's statements from everyone, from Donald Tusk, 7:08 from Macron, from Merz they're honestly chilling. 7:13 That is, they're already openly talking to us about war, 7:16 they're openly talking to us about war. 7:18 And besides, the case of Poland, 7:20 which we'll discuss later too and give the exact data, 7:25 but what's happening with Poland is, is also spectacular. 7:27 And by the way, Trump, 7:30 who used to say he was going to leave Europe, 7:31 and now says no, that he's going to create a massive mega-base in Poland, 7:36 which is a plan that's already been in motion for some time. 7:39 But later, since he said he was going to leave Europe, 7:40 What is going to leave Europe? 7:41 And what we're talking about is quite the opposite, 7:43 about an absolutely warmongering Europe, 7:46 with reckless warmongering. 7:48 Because also, as you were saying, from a military point of view, 7:52 this is madness. 7:53 Where are we going up against a nuclear power? 7:56 They could wipe us out 7:58 in a matter of minutes, 8:00 in a matter of minutes, they could wipe out all of Europe. 8:02 But where are we going? 8:03 Does anyone think 8:05 that if Russia is massively attacked 8:09 within its territory, it will just sit back and do nothing? 8:12 Obviously not. So, what are we trying to achieve? 8:14 That they'll get really tired and launch two or three, 8:18 nuclear bombs on some of the main European capitals? 8:21 What are they trying to do? 8:22 I really don't know. 8:24 And you say, "But let's see." 8:25 Also, here no one, absolutely no one, is talking about diplomacy. 8:29 No one is talking... And you are a diplomat, an ambassador. 8:32 You know how important, vital, essential diplomacy is. 8:35 And let's not forget that the First World War, 8:38 which today is more than proven, was a failure of diplomacy. 8:42 It was a failure of diplomacy in entering the First World War. 8:45 So, what are they trying to do? 8:47 No one, no one speaks of negotiation, no one speaks of, of peace, 8:50 no one speaks of diplomacy, starting with the Kaja Kallas, 8:52 who is the head of European diplomacy. 8:54 So, it's a situation that's not, no, not, truly tremendously delicate, 8:58 and we're not paying enough attention to it. 9:00 But those of us who know something about these issues, 9:02 in your case as a diplomat, in my case as a soldier, 9:05 since we've traveled a lot around the world, 9:07 we know how populations are prepared psychologically for war. 9:12 And that's what they've been preparing us for, for some time now, 9:14 but right now, in an absolutely accelerated way. 9:17 That preparation is blatant now, absolutely blatant, 9:21 how they're preparing us for, 9:23 of course, because you have to convince people how positive war was. 9:27 We've already done many programs on this topic, 9:27 We've already done many programs on this topic, 9:30 about how, yes, how the adversary is demonized 9:33 so that in the end, people are convinced 9:35 that it's even, even good, 9:37 even logical, even "Christian," to, to attack, to attack the enemy 9:42 because he's so bad, so bad, truly evil, that he deserves to be attacked, right? 9:45 Without us realizing, the ones who suffer the consequences are us. 9:49 Mrs. von der Leyen, the president of the Commission, 9:52 has already said that none of her seven children will go to war, 9:54 because they're not prepared for that. 9:56 It will be the children of the poor, right, who go to war, 9:59 they're the ones who get sent. 10:00 So, of course, the, concern is immense, Ambassador. 10:04 But look, today itself, for example, the statements 10:07 from, we can talk about here, 10:10 from Figaro, it says here Macron says, 10:14 he says, "The president of the Republic's alert regarding the Russian threat." 10:19 It would be a mistake by Russia to continue 10:22 acting like this toward Europeans." 10:23 You say, "But look, you're the ones pressuring Russia." 10:26 Or the same thing, here on BFM, 10:29 it says, Macron says: 10:30 "The Russian hybrid threat towards Europeans and France has intensified." 10:36 Well, now they don't even know what to make up. 10:37 Or actually, here too, the EFE News Agency, which says: 10:40 "Macron warns of a shift in Russian aggression and threats in Europe." 10:46 In other words, they are preparing the ground, Ambassador, 10:48 they are preparing the ground. 10:50 When they haven't been able to prove anything 10:52 about these threats, not even the helicopter with the flares, 10:55 nor the drone issue. 10:57 In fact, there's information saying it's all staged. 10:59 There are no videos, no clear images, no remains of those drones. 11:04 And the only piece that exists, one from Poland, 11:06 seems to be all staged, 11:07 it's a shame I can't show the image, 11:10 but we'll talk about it later. 11:11 That is to say, but this really worries me, 11:13 knowing how wars are prepared, 11:15 knowing how populations are prepared, 11:17 specifically so they go to those wars gladly 11:21 and without understanding the goals behind them, 11:23 which certainly have nothing to do 11:25 with the evilness of Russia, 11:26 nor that Russia is out to kill us all, 11:28 they have been feeding us this story, 11:29 since when, Ambassador, for the past four years, 11:32 when they told us that Russia at any moment 11:33 was going to invade all of Europe. 11:35 Anyway, in any case, I find this issue absolutely extremely serious, Ambassador. *Pedro Baños Bajo is a retired Spanish Army colonel, writer, and prominent geopolitical analyst specializing in defense, intelligence, and international relations.
11:39

🚨🚨🚨A Stark Warning 🚨🚨🚨 🚨Europe is losing its mind. 🚨Where are we going up against a nuclear power? 🚨Russia could wipe us out in a matter of minutes, they could wipe out all of Europe. 🚨Does anyone think that if Russia is massively attacked within its territory, it will just sit back and do nothing? Obviously not. So, what are we trying to achieve? That they'll get really tired and launch two or three, nuclear bombs on some of the main European capitals? Pedro Baños Retired Spanish Army Colonel: 📑 That Mrs. von der Leyen is going to give Ukraine another 3.3 BILLONES euros another because she says that everything Ukraine has already received isn't enough, right? Because she says that everything Ukraine has already received isn't enough, right? 0:08 Exactly, the problem is that they've made a huge bet on Ukraine, and it has gone badly for them 0:09 a huge bet on Ukraine, and it has gone badly for them 0:12 and now, how do they backtrack, 0:13 how do they admit that this has been a mistake 0:14 from the very start, that they've led an entire people to destruction, 0:17 that they've led an entire people to destruction, 0:18 that already two generations of Ukrainians have died, 0:20 those who haven't fled the country, 0:22 which is a total disaster. 0:23 We only have the casualty exchange numbers between Russia and Ukraine, 0:27 between Russia and Ukraine, and the figures are staggering. 0:30 We can provide them later, right? 0:32 But what's going on? 0:34 As you said, that increase ... 0:36 look, in Spain's case, 0:37 it means multiplying the Defence budget by five, 0:41 Because of course, since the United States first asked for 2%. 0:44 Since we agreed, they said, "Hey, then 3.5%.." 0:47 Since we also agreed, they said, "Well, 5%." 0:49 These people are fools, so let's go, let's ask them for more, right? 0:52 In the end, they are going to buy almost everything from me, 0:54 which I really need. 0:55 But what is the problem, Ambassador? 0:56 When you manufacture weapons, 0:59 there is only one way for that system not to fail you, 1:02 and that is to use the weapons you've produced. 1:05 Because look, 1:06 you manufacture—imagine, it's true, there was a deficit here, 1:08 for example, of artillery shells, 1:10 one hundred fifty-five, or shells for, 1:12 cannons, or, or, or tank shells. 1:15 Fine, that's all well and good, whatever we want. 1:17 You've already produced that one million, five million shells. 1:21 And once you've produced them, what do you do? 1:22 That factory you set up with public money, with subsidies, do you shut it down? 1:28 Or you have the other option, 1:30 which is to go to war to use up that ammunition 1:32 and keep producing more. 1:33 And as it happens, in Europe, 1:35 especially in the main countries, 1:37 the economy is a total mess, 1:39 it's in free fall, 1:43 they desperately need, 1:45 as they can no longer make cars, like in Germany, 1:48 to start making tanks or ammunition instead. 1:51 But France is in the same situation. 1:52 A France that has been expelled from Africa, 1:56 where what the franc meant for them, the CFA. 2:00 And not only that, but also all the resources 2:02 they extracted under more than favorable conditions from these countries, 2:06 starting with uranium from Niger, 2:08 they've run out of it. 2:09 France is having a very hard time, 2:11 with an absolutely brutal social crisis. 2:15 And now we see all this coming together 2:16 with skyrocketing energy prices, 2:19 we can already see that the price of fuels 2:21 in Germany has already surpassed 2.5 euro— 2:24 euros per liter, which is truly outrageous. 2:27 We're talking about, and we saw the news, 2:29 that filling a standard tank 2:32 of an average vehicle now means 200 euros, 2:35 200 euros, which is absolutely insane. 2:38 And what does that mean? 2:39 That they only have one solution, indeed, 2:42 which is to go to war. 2:43 And remember there's something that, 2:45 we studied it in the Command and Staff course 2:47 and when you tell people about it, 2:48 they treat it as little more than a joke too, 2:50 that there is something called the relaxing wars. 2:53 The relaxing wars that have been used throughout 2:55 history 2:57 to get rid of part of the population or to get out of an economic chaos. 3:02 And that's ... 3:03 right now it would be very convenient for them to, 3:04 on one hand, get rid of some of the population, 3:07 that is, get rid of this problem they say they won't be able to pay pensions, 3:10 because all of this increase, besides the cost, don't forget, military, 3:15 means a clear and tangible reduction of the welfare state, 3:20 of the four pillars of the welfare state. 3:22 Some of the more honest politicians, the few there are, 3:25 tell you this openly, others still keep it hidden. 3:28 But, of course, what happens? 3:29 That, in fact, it would be very convenient for them to camouflage the dire situation, 3:33 regrettable, that they have within their own country. 3:35 We see and we can talk about Macron's statements today, 3:39 where he said that we should just about go 3:41 to war because Russia is waging a hybrid war against us 3:43 which is unacceptable and that we have to be prepared. 3:46 Macron said it, as well as some of his top ministers. 3:48 Of course, but the thing is, France is in a very, 3:51 very delicate, extremely delicate situation. 3:53 And also in a France 3:55 where people are not as patient as the Spanish, 3:57 over there, as soon as people get a little heated, 3:59 they take to the streets and burn down half the streets. 4:02 But we've talked about it, the way things are in Germany, 4:04 the way things are in Sweden, the way things are in Finland, 4:07 which, ever since it joined NATO, 4:09 has completely come apart, with unemployment even higher than in Spain, 4:14 a sunken economy. 4:16 And then some only see the way out as the United Kingdom, 4:19 which now even wants to break apart, 4:21 there are already, there are small populations that are asking for independence 4:25 within the United Kingdom, even on the verge, 4:28 as many predict, of an internal civil confrontation. 4:32 And of course, what do they always find? 4:33 Well, we already know that to unite the people, 4:36 to cover up internal chaos, 4:40 you know, create an external enemy 4:42 and declare that you have to go to war against them. 4:43 The problem with all that, Ambassador, 4:44 is that when, and you know this perfectly well, 4:46 you have even much more experience than I do, 4:49 you say, you know that the problem with all this is 4:50 that when you get yourself involved in this war context, 4:53 you are making the population get used to it every day. 4:56 We just have to look at a some newspaper, 4:59 a Spanish one that every day, every single day without exception, 5:02 publishes some story to accuse Russia of anything, 5:05 or to convince the population 5:07 that we must go to war against Russia. 5:09 So, when you already have the, the, the atmosphere, the context, the narrative, 5:13 and you've already created it, all that's left is the incident. 5:15 And we're seeing incidents like these every day. 5:17 Like—now, it's a Danish helicopter, 5:20 or a frigate getting close to a Russian ship, 5:23 or the Russian ship fires a grenade, or some warning flares, 5:27 which is nonsense. 5:28 A flare is—what's even happening— 5:29 what range could it have? 300 meters. 5:31 And that's not going to bring down any helicopter. 5:34 But of course, it must be because the helicopter had come closer precisely 5:38 to the Russian warship in international waters. 5:42 But they're searching, they're only looking for the incident that will make all this blow up completely, 5:46 when, on top of that, they're deceiving us every day with the whole drone issue, 5:50 about Russian drones in the middle of Germany, 5:52 about not knowing, knowing where they came from and they just appear out of nowhere, 5:55 almost as if in, in a space-time shortcut. 5:58 And, and it's like that all the time. And we have loads of information. 6:01 But look, but the thing is there is a fact right now that strikes me as devastating 6:04 to show us how they're speeding this up by the minute, Ambassador, 6:09 Today's news 6:10 that Ukraine has launched drones 6:13 against a Russian nuclear power plant inside Russia. 6:17 Because remember that every so often, he launches strikes on Zaporizhia and 6:19 on top of that, they accuse the Russians of being the ones 6:22 launching drones at their own nuclear plant, 6:24 because they currently have it in their possession. 6:27 No, no, we're talking about inside, inside Russia, 6:31 at a nuclear power plant, Ukraine has launched drones. 6:34 In other words, what they're looking for now is for 6:36 Russia to blow up, 6:38 I mean, for them to say, look, this is where we draw the line, 6:41 I've had enough of you. 6:42 And, and, and on top of that, so that we Europeans can play the victim, see? 6:45 We had already warned you that Russia could attack us at any moment. 6:48 If they're provoking them with the, 6:51 the ones living in the Baltic states, 6:54 whose civil rights have been taken away, 6:55 who have been banned from speaking Russian. 6:57 In other words, they're constantly provoking it so that Russia finally snaps, 7:01 and specifically, 7:02 so that it's the one to take the first step in this war, 7:05 and today's statements from everyone, from Donald Tusk, 7:08 from Macron, from Merz they're honestly chilling. 7:13 That is, they're already openly talking to us about war, 7:16 they're openly talking to us about war. 7:18 And besides, the case of Poland, 7:20 which we'll discuss later too and give the exact data, 7:25 but what's happening with Poland is, is also spectacular. 7:27 And by the way, Trump, 7:30 who used to say he was going to leave Europe, 7:31 and now says no, that he's going to create a massive mega-base in Poland, 7:36 which is a plan that's already been in motion for some time. 7:39 But later, since he said he was going to leave Europe, 7:40 What is going to leave Europe? 7:41 And what we're talking about is quite the opposite, 7:43 about an absolutely warmongering Europe, 7:46 with reckless warmongering. 7:48 Because also, as you were saying, from a military point of view, 7:52 this is madness. 7:53 Where are we going up against a nuclear power? 7:56 They could wipe us out 7:58 in a matter of minutes, 8:00 in a matter of minutes, they could wipe out all of Europe. 8:02 But where are we going? 8:03 Does anyone think 8:05 that if Russia is massively attacked 8:09 within its territory, it will just sit back and do nothing? 8:12 Obviously not. So, what are we trying to achieve? 8:14 That they'll get really tired and launch two or three, 8:18 nuclear bombs on some of the main European capitals? 8:21 What are they trying to do? 8:22 I really don't know. 8:24 And you say, "But let's see." 8:25 Also, here no one, absolutely no one, is talking about diplomacy. 8:29 No one is talking... And you are a diplomat, an ambassador. 8:32 You know how important, vital, essential diplomacy is. 8:35 And let's not forget that the First World War, 8:38 which today is more than proven, was a failure of diplomacy. 8:42 It was a failure of diplomacy in entering the First World War. 8:45 So, what are they trying to do? 8:47 No one, no one speaks of negotiation, no one speaks of, of peace, 8:50 no one speaks of diplomacy, starting with the Kaja Kallas, 8:52 who is the head of European diplomacy. 8:54 So, it's a situation that's not, no, not, truly tremendously delicate, 8:58 and we're not paying enough attention to it. 9:00 But those of us who know something about these issues, 9:02 in your case as a diplomat, in my case as a soldier, 9:05 since we've traveled a lot around the world, 9:07 we know how populations are prepared psychologically for war. 9:12 And that's what they've been preparing us for, for some time now, 9:14 but right now, in an absolutely accelerated way. 9:17 That preparation is blatant now, absolutely blatant, 9:21 how they're preparing us for, 9:23 of course, because you have to convince people how positive war was. 9:27 We've already done many programs on this topic, 9:27 We've already done many programs on this topic, 9:30 about how, yes, how the adversary is demonized 9:33 so that in the end, people are convinced 9:35 that it's even, even good, 9:37 even logical, even "Christian," to, to attack, to attack the enemy 9:42 because he's so bad, so bad, truly evil, that he deserves to be attacked, right? 9:45 Without us realizing, the ones who suffer the consequences are us. 9:49 Mrs. von der Leyen, the president of the Commission, 9:52 has already said that none of her seven children will go to war, 9:54 because they're not prepared for that. 9:56 It will be the children of the poor, right, who go to war, 9:59 they're the ones who get sent. 10:00 So, of course, the, concern is immense, Ambassador. 10:04 But look, today itself, for example, the statements 10:07 from, we can talk about here, 10:10 from Figaro, it says here Macron says, 10:14 he says, "The president of the Republic's alert regarding the Russian threat." 10:19 It would be a mistake by Russia to continue 10:22 acting like this toward Europeans." 10:23 You say, "But look, you're the ones pressuring Russia." 10:26 Or the same thing, here on BFM, 10:29 it says, Macron says: 10:30 "The Russian hybrid threat towards Europeans and France has intensified." 10:36 Well, now they don't even know what to make up. 10:37 Or actually, here too, the EFE News Agency, which says: 10:40 "Macron warns of a shift in Russian aggression and threats in Europe." 10:46 In other words, they are preparing the ground, Ambassador, 10:48 they are preparing the ground. 10:50 When they haven't been able to prove anything 10:52 about these threats, not even the helicopter with the flares, 10:55 nor the drone issue. 10:57 In fact, there's information saying it's all staged. 10:59 There are no videos, no clear images, no remains of those drones. 11:04 And the only piece that exists, one from Poland, 11:06 seems to be all staged, 11:07 it's a shame I can't show the image, 11:10 but we'll talk about it later. 11:11 That is to say, but this really worries me, 11:13 knowing how wars are prepared, 11:15 knowing how populations are prepared, 11:17 specifically so they go to those wars gladly 11:21 and without understanding the goals behind them, 11:23 which certainly have nothing to do 11:25 with the evilness of Russia, 11:26 nor that Russia is out to kill us all, 11:28 they have been feeding us this story, 11:29 since when, Ambassador, for the past four years, 11:32 when they told us that Russia at any moment 11:33 was going to invade all of Europe. 11:35 Anyway, in any case, I find this issue absolutely extremely serious, Ambassador. *Pedro Baños Bajo is a retired Spanish Army colonel, writer, and prominent geopolitical analyst specializing in defense, intelligence, and international relations.

Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

36,945 views • 25 days ago

"A severe lack of knowledge.” I wonder how our 21 year-old Senator would go with this CLIMATE QUIZ …. 1. If Australia where to go Net Zero by 2050 (and assuming C02 is the control knob for global temperatures as per the IPCC estimates) to the nearest 1/100th of a degree, what will be the difference average global temperatures at the end of this century ? 2. As a percentage, what is the level of CO2 currently in the atmosphere? 3. Australia has 21 GW of coal-fired capacity left, all of which is to be eliminated by 2050 under Net Zero. What is the total capacity in GW of the new coal-fired power stations under construction in China ? 4. Australia mines around 390 million tonnes of coal annually. How many million tonnes of coal does India mine annually, and by how many millions of tonnes are they planning to increase it by over the next 5 years 5. As a percentage of C02, what is the ideal level of Co2 in the atmosphere. 6. Explain the chemical difference between "Carbon pollution" and the CO2 that turns still water in sparkling mineral water. 7. Of Australia’s total "emissions" that are planned to be reduced to Net Zero - what percentage of these total emmissions come from electricity generation ? 8. To the nearest degree, what is the current average global temperature ? 9. To the nearest degree, what is the ideal average global temperature ? 10. Being from South Australia, in what year did the highest temperature ever record in SA occur. 11. In what year did Adelaide experience its longest run of extremely hot days ? 12. According to the peer-reviewed research, what has been trend in rainfall over past 150 years in Adelaide? 13. What has been the trend in the number of Australian cyclones (both severe and non severe) since 1970 - are they increasing, decreasing or steady 14. Over the past century, is the area of Australia beung burnt annually by bushfires increasing, decreasing or steady. 15. What is the biggest killer; extreme hot weather or extreme cold weather? 16. How will Net Zero be achieved in the agriculture sector, where the "emmissions" to be reduced to Net Zero come from the burps and farts 17. Explain how the subsidies work for roof-top solar 18. What will be the penalty payable on a new Ford Ranger in 4 years time under the so-called vehicle efficiency standards If have such a lack of knowledge, that you can’t answer questions, you have no place commenting on Net Zero and no place speaking about in Parliament.
0:35

"A severe lack of knowledge.” I wonder how our 21 year-old Senator would go with this CLIMATE QUIZ …. 1. If Australia where to go Net Zero by 2050 (and assuming C02 is the control knob for global temperatures as per the IPCC estimates) to the nearest 1/100th of a degree, what will be the difference average global temperatures at the end of this century ? 2. As a percentage, what is the level of CO2 currently in the atmosphere? 3. Australia has 21 GW of coal-fired capacity left, all of which is to be eliminated by 2050 under Net Zero. What is the total capacity in GW of the new coal-fired power stations under construction in China ? 4. Australia mines around 390 million tonnes of coal annually. How many million tonnes of coal does India mine annually, and by how many millions of tonnes are they planning to increase it by over the next 5 years 5. As a percentage of C02, what is the ideal level of Co2 in the atmosphere. 6. Explain the chemical difference between "Carbon pollution" and the CO2 that turns still water in sparkling mineral water. 7. Of Australia’s total "emissions" that are planned to be reduced to Net Zero - what percentage of these total emmissions come from electricity generation ? 8. To the nearest degree, what is the current average global temperature ? 9. To the nearest degree, what is the ideal average global temperature ? 10. Being from South Australia, in what year did the highest temperature ever record in SA occur. 11. In what year did Adelaide experience its longest run of extremely hot days ? 12. According to the peer-reviewed research, what has been trend in rainfall over past 150 years in Adelaide? 13. What has been the trend in the number of Australian cyclones (both severe and non severe) since 1970 - are they increasing, decreasing or steady 14. Over the past century, is the area of Australia beung burnt annually by bushfires increasing, decreasing or steady. 15. What is the biggest killer; extreme hot weather or extreme cold weather? 16. How will Net Zero be achieved in the agriculture sector, where the "emmissions" to be reduced to Net Zero come from the burps and farts 17. Explain how the subsidies work for roof-top solar 18. What will be the penalty payable on a new Ford Ranger in 4 years time under the so-called vehicle efficiency standards If have such a lack of knowledge, that you can’t answer questions, you have no place commenting on Net Zero and no place speaking about in Parliament.

Craig Kelly:🇦🇺Foundation for Economic Education

29,466 views • 1 year ago

My app just hit $7k/m. I'll hit 10k/m before I quit my job & fly to vietnam 🇻🇳 This is how I did it. Part One: The App. 1. Built an iOS app. 2. Found a validated niche. 3. Improved upon existing apps. 4. Read reviews to see pain points. 5. Improved everything: UI, onboarding, features. 6. With AI and good taste it's so easy to win. 7. You can build beautiful & useful product in a week. 8. Stack: Native Swift & RevenueCat. 9. Pricing of 7.99/w, 14.99/m and 49.99/y. 10. Typically weekly + yearly combo is good. 11. Adding monthly increased my conversions. 12. This will vary by niche: see what competitors do! Part Two: Apple Ads to 1k/m. 1. Used the $100 free credits to get data! 2. Measured my onboarding & paywall with posthog. 3. Already had 70% onboarding completion. 4. Reduced all friction: got it to 85%. 5. Ran AB tests using remote paywalls. 6. Kept everything compliant with Apple guidelines. 7. Achieved 8% install to paid. 8. Split campaigns by territory groups: US, AU, TH etc. 9. Used competitor names as strict keywords. 10. User searches for competitor: • My app way better so they download mine instead. 11. This relies on a really good app store page. 12. Mock up screenshots in Figma then enhance with AI. 13. ChatGPT Image-2 is free with Codex. Part Three: Scaling to 7k/m with Tikslop. 1. Scrolled in my niche, found organic viral posts. 2. Remade them myself: film with friends or use AI. 3. Seedance 2 mini is the best ROI video model I think. 4. I made ~8 formats, ~15 creatives. 5. Give each creative $50 of spend. 6. After $50, if CPA LTV then stop spend. 8. LTV is hard to calculate. You can ask Rico. 9. Better for me: Aimed for profit on first transaction. 10. This is simpler & more ambitious. 11. Expect to burn at least $500! Part Four: Scaling Ad Spend (The Big Leagues) 1. If the CPA is staying consistent. 2. Increase spend by < 30% each time. 3. My advice: ~15% each time. 4. 50, 60, 70, 90 etc. 5. Performance can be volatile. • Yesterday I made ~$170, a small loss. • A few days ago I made ~$600, big profit. 6. Measure averages over time. Remember: there are infinite ways to win, this is mine. It took me about 3 years to make a successful app. Winning is simply losing on a long enough timeline.
6:17

My app just hit $7k/m. I'll hit 10k/m before I quit my job & fly to vietnam 🇻🇳 This is how I did it. Part One: The App. 1. Built an iOS app. 2. Found a validated niche. 3. Improved upon existing apps. 4. Read reviews to see pain points. 5. Improved everything: UI, onboarding, features. 6. With AI and good taste it's so easy to win. 7. You can build beautiful & useful product in a week. 8. Stack: Native Swift & RevenueCat. 9. Pricing of 7.99/w, 14.99/m and 49.99/y. 10. Typically weekly + yearly combo is good. 11. Adding monthly increased my conversions. 12. This will vary by niche: see what competitors do! Part Two: Apple Ads to 1k/m. 1. Used the $100 free credits to get data! 2. Measured my onboarding & paywall with posthog. 3. Already had 70% onboarding completion. 4. Reduced all friction: got it to 85%. 5. Ran AB tests using remote paywalls. 6. Kept everything compliant with Apple guidelines. 7. Achieved 8% install to paid. 8. Split campaigns by territory groups: US, AU, TH etc. 9. Used competitor names as strict keywords. 10. User searches for competitor: • My app way better so they download mine instead. 11. This relies on a really good app store page. 12. Mock up screenshots in Figma then enhance with AI. 13. ChatGPT Image-2 is free with Codex. Part Three: Scaling to 7k/m with Tikslop. 1. Scrolled in my niche, found organic viral posts. 2. Remade them myself: film with friends or use AI. 3. Seedance 2 mini is the best ROI video model I think. 4. I made ~8 formats, ~15 creatives. 5. Give each creative $50 of spend. 6. After $50, if CPA LTV then stop spend. 8. LTV is hard to calculate. You can ask Rico. 9. Better for me: Aimed for profit on first transaction. 10. This is simpler & more ambitious. 11. Expect to burn at least $500! Part Four: Scaling Ad Spend (The Big Leagues) 1. If the CPA is staying consistent. 2. Increase spend by < 30% each time. 3. My advice: ~15% each time. 4. 50, 60, 70, 90 etc. 5. Performance can be volatile. • Yesterday I made ~$170, a small loss. • A few days ago I made ~$600, big profit. 6. Measure averages over time. Remember: there are infinite ways to win, this is mine. It took me about 3 years to make a successful app. Winning is simply losing on a long enough timeline.

Frederick James

112,695 views • 2 months ago