Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

𝗔𝗟𝗟 𝗜 𝗡𝗘𝗘𝗗 ; One look. That’s enough. KANG DANIEL 2026 private screening event 26.4.11 in seoul 🎞️ ©D-SCOPE ticketing: 26.3.9 21:00, 22:00 #you_ALL_I_NEED #강다니엘 #KANGDANIEL

12,854 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 1

Фото профиля Susan Chan
Susan Chan7 месяцев назад

I treasured every moment that Kang Daniel was performing on stages ! 🕺🕺🕺❤️❤️

Похожие видео

明日!!遂に1号生誕!!!! ⚠️Vo.1号/ゆーりは3ステージ出演!!!!、衣装チェンジ有り⚠️ 【生誕主催&ワンマン!!】 1号リアルバースデー!!!! 2026.8.17(月)赤羽ReNY alpha presents1号生誕主催EVENT "ぼくのだいすきなひとたちへ2026" ⭐︎入場者全員にオリジナル記念フライヤーアクキー無料配布 OPEN/START 16:30/17:00 ADD/DOOR ¥5000/¥5500 【cast】 HERO 3470.mon 東京花嫁 【Special session】 ぼくのだいすきなひとたち Vo.ゆーり(イロクイ。) Gt.Yuh(vistlip) Gt.公佑(SPLENDID GOD GIRAFEE) Ba.リツ(イロクイ。) Dr.なつき/多村直紀(イロクイ。/Yeti) 【チケット】 LivePocket (販売期間)2026年6月1日(月)10:00~2026年8月16日23:59 受付URL: 2026.8.25(火)秋田LOUD AFFECTION 1号生誕2-MAN 【Day1】"Dance in the AKITA" OPEN/START 17:00/17:30 ADD/DOOR ¥6000/¥5000 2days ticket(2DAYS通し券)¥10000(特典付き) 【チケット】 2days ticket(2DAYS通し券)A:BASE先着販売 (販売期間)2026年6月13日(土)21:00~6月21日(日)23:59 (WEBチケット送付予定)6月22日(月) 受付URL: 【Day1】B:LivePocket先着販売 (販売期間)2026年6月22日(月)10:00~2026年8月24日23:59 受付URL: 2026.8.26(水)秋田LOUD AFFECTION 1号生誕ONE-MAN 【Day2】"Dance in the AKITA" OPEN/START 17:00/17:30 ADD/DOOR ¥6000/¥5000 2days ticket(2DAYS通し券)¥10000(特典付き) 【チケット】 2days ticket(2DAYS通し券)A:BASE (販売期間)2026年6月13日(土)21:00~ (WEBチケット送付予定)6月22日(月) 受付URL: 【Day2】B:LivePocket (販売期間)2026年6月22日(月)11:00~2026年8月25日23:59 受付URL: 2026.8.26(水)秋田LOUD AFFECTION 1号生誕AFTER PARTY START ONE-MAN終了後〜 食べ飲み放題(2時間制)¥5000 【チケット】 当日ONE-MAN会場にて受付のみ 【入場順】 2days ticket(2DAYS通し券)A →各日B→当日券C #ロールシャッハドットインク #rorschachinc #秋田

Rorschach.inc(ロールシャッハドットインク)official

17,863 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

NEW: Private Jets 101 — Should you buy the $75M+ Global 8000? SpaceX, OpenAI, Anthropic, Cerebras, Cursor.. we're in the biggest wealth event of all time, with $4T+ in combined value The most sought-after next step is flying private. I flew Van Nuys to SF on a Challenger 350 w/ Craft ( Part 135 charter company) founder Israel Slodowitz (Izzy) to break down what flying private actually costs We cover: › Who flies more: Elon, Sergey Brin, Jensen, Alex Karp, Taylor Swift? › PJ shortage?! › Charter vs jet card vs fractional vs own › A G650 that sold in one hour › What a jet really costs per year › Why capital gains wealth can't write off a jet › The $10M deduction w/ $2M down (+recapture trap) › Hidden fees, safety gaps, & first-timer mistakes that cost the most › Does flying private actually cure jet lag? › Starlink Video also features Captain Raz Matus. 𝐓𝐈𝐌𝐄𝐒𝐓𝐀𝐌𝐏𝐒 (00:00) Israel Slodowitz, Founder & CEO of Craft (00:58) The state of Private Aviation in 2026 (04:09) Why first time buyers are buying the biggest planes (05:14) A coming shortage of private jets (06:00) The Private Jet size chart nobody explains (08:26) When does it make sense to buy vs. charter? (11:24) The real cost of a $75M jet (13:30) Breaking down prices by jet category (15:07) Charter vs. Jet card vs. Fractional ownership (19:31) Inside Craft's exchange fund model (25:33) The most economical way to fly private (26:24) Alex Karp's $17M flight bill (28:01) How Aircraft financing actually works (29:25) The Biggest mistakes people make buying a plane (30:23) What to ask before you buy any Private Jet (33:48) The best part of being a Pilot (34:38) The Biggest misconception about Private Aviation (35:48) How Starlink changed the business (37:03) Why Commercial WiFi is so far behind (42:12) The real causes of aircraft downtime (43:48) Do plane windows actually pop out? (45:04) Why jet prices are climbing as supply shrinks (47:25) How to avoid buying the wrong Private Jet (48:58) The Tax Loophole behind $75M Private Jets (58:52) Biggest Health hacks while flying (1:00:02) The Hidden fees in Chartering (1:02:39) The Wildest onboard story (1:03:25) Safety standards and how to vet an operator (1:05:59) Why Pilots refuse to fly into Aspen at night (1:07:26) The Busiest private airports in the U.S. (1:09:39) Flying private, work culture, & the future of wealth (1:11:15) How Captain Raz became a private pilot (1:13:16) The real health hacks for surviving constant flying (1:14:13) Do you actually need a flight attendant on a private jet? (1:17:07) What to actually look for when chartering or buying a jet (1:18:04) His favorite plane vs. the hardest one to fly (1:21:05) The Wildest in-flight catering secret nobody admits

Molly O’Shea

1,160,161 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

University of Toronto mathematician Daniel Litt and a16z's Lisha Li on AI's impact on mathematics: The models are good at a narrower slice of math than the headlines suggest. They grind long computations, pull technical ideas from more papers than any human could read, and apply every known technique better than almost anyone. What they don't do is build theory, or hold a vague philosophy long enough to make it precise, which is most of what Daniel says he actually does for a living. In this conversation, he and Lisha get into how mathematicians raided an AI proof for parts and broke several other problems with them, why a thousand AI mathematicians might all turn out to be the same mathematician, and why the proof a model handed Daniel was correct but still worth nothing. 00:00 Intro 02:10 The Erdős problem AI disproved 06:20 AI's reasoning looks recognizably human 07:55 Why English beat formal proofs 10:00 Why models can't build theory 14:50 Open problems measure your ignorance 17:45 How a graph became a Millennium Prize problem 18:58 Where AI doesn't help Daniel 21:15 Why ugly proofs are worth doing 23:42 True conjectures are harder than false ones 29:32 10 pages of calculation, zero insight 34:55 The goal of math is not to produce papers 36:25 5 conjectures, 3 bad papers, 1 hour 38:05 One mathematician duplicated 1000x 40:48 Why humans matter even if models win 46:30 When cheaper and worse beats better 49:22 Why the newest AI result isn't a big deal 57:05 How mathematicians actually check a long proof 59:38 Daniel's 3-year-old is already doing math YouTube: Daniel Litt Lisha

a16z

143,631 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

BREAKING: Max Levchin (Max Levchin), Co-Founder of PayPal & CEO of Affirm — HQ Tour A Masterclass in: Espressos → Big Lebowski → PayPal lessons → Affirm → Economics of AI The Dude abides. “The net IQ of the world Is about to go up 50 points” Result: As intelligence becomes normalized, bad actors & "fine print" companies will get exposed faster. We cover: • Capitalism vs the “warm embrace” of socialism • You can’t perfectly time an IPO • The best time ever to be a CS CEO • AI collapsing the cost of intelligence • Great economic shift underway Strikes & gutters, ups & downs. Recorded at Affirm HQ, March 30, 2026 𝐓𝐈𝐌𝐄𝐒𝐓𝐀𝐌𝐏𝐒 (00:00) Max Levchin, Co-Founder & CEO at Affirm (01:35) Inside Affirm's office espresso bar (06:46) How the love for espressos started at age 5 (10:30) Truth about bad coffee beans (13:51) Strava & cycling (14:56) Meeting Alfred Lin & Tony Hsieh over poker (21:14) Onboarding 800K Shopify merchants in one week (22:59) Big Lebowski in every shareholder letter (32:11) The PayPal lesson that built Affirm (35:25) Being a technical CEO (37:57) Why this is the best time to be a technical CEO (42:10) Should engineers still learn to code? (44:48) Side quest with AI (46:59) Companies AI will destroy (49:46) How AI has changed engineering at Affirm (50:54) Agentic commerce & DoorDash (52:28) Devolution of Credit (55:06) Biggest misconceptions about BNPL (57:42) Being a public company CEO (01:07:01) Advice for private companies (01:11:09) Creating his own economy (01:14:29) Can AI help solve the $39T debt problem? (01:16:00) Learnings (01:17:46) Will average IQ rise or fall?

Molly O’Shea

380,872 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

My conversation with Tracy Britt Cool. Warren Buffett called her his "fireman" because of her reputation at Berkshire Hathaway for turning around struggling businesses. In this conversation, you'll learn exactly how she did it, how she evaluates businesses, and the mistake that most people make when hiring. (0:00) Intro, recent reading, and family life (3:04) Alan Mulally's Turnaround at Ford (4:22) The Work Test (5:03) The Pampered Chef Turnaround (7:06) How Value Creation is Changing (8:38) Why Companies Fail to Adapt (10:09) Lessons from the Farm (16:57) Lessons from Warren Buffett (18:25) Ad Break (20:57) Buying Companies at Kanbrick (22:38) The 3 Components of Long-Term Thinking (25:11) Avoiding the Complexity Trap (26:23) How to Turnaround a Declining Business (28:03) Attracting Talent to a Declining Business (30:29) Matching Structure to Time Horizon (32:00) Growing Margins (33:25) The Process: What to Focus on (35:10) The 3 Buckets of Putting People First (37:00) How to Specifically Evaluate Talent (40:16) Identifying the People to Avoid at All Costs (42:23) Sourcing Deals (43:56) 5 Lenses to Evaluate a Business (45:14) How to Evaluate a Moat (49:29) How Quantitative Analysis Misleads (50:25) A Detailed Look at Return on Invested Capital (53:18) What Makes an Attractive Market (54:33) Finding High-Potential Businesses (57:00) The Post Close Playbook (1:02:03) Repeatable Business Systems (1:04:06) Why Copying What Works is Hard (1:06:01) Mistakes in the Past 5 Years (1:10:13) Debt and Leverage (1:12:20) 3 Ways to Think about AI (1:15:13) What Most People Get Wrong When Hiring (1:21:12) Businesses to Avoid (1:22:35) What Not to Do (1:24:31) Public vs. Private Company Boards (1:27:04) How Warren Buffett Taught Katharine Graham Business (1:29:28) Each Hire is a Million Dollar Decision (1:31:02) Evaluating Integrity (1:32:36) The One Word That Keeps People Honest (1:35:52) Principles & Lessons from Business History (1:36:59) Inflation (1:40:22) Public Company Heroes (1:41:41) Companies & Political Opinions (1:42:46) What is Success for you? Tracy Britt Cool is the co-founder of Kanbrick and the former CEO of Pampered Chef. At Berkshire Hathaway, she worked directly with Warren Buffett and was on the board of Kraft Heinz, Benjamin Moore, and Dairy Queen. (Includes paid partnerships. If you're interested in sponsoring, reach out.)

Shane Parrish

430,846 просмотров • 11 месяцев назад

BREAKING: Inside Marc & Ben's Multi-Family Office — a16z Perennial Chief Investment Officer, Michel Del Buono Why wealth management is broken & how to financially prepare for a SpaceX IPO This is a closer look at how $50M–$1B+ personal portfolios are actually constructed & managed Important: Michel also explains why many founders make critical mistakes immediately after their first liquidity event, & how to avoid them. We cover: • The “no man’s land” between wealth managers & asset managers • How founders should handle liquidity events ($50M–$1B+) • Diversifying concentrated stock without killing upside • Venture returns & why manager selection matters more than exposure • Real estate, taxes, & after-tax alpha • Why volatility is an opportunity, not a risk • How to actually choose (and not get trapped by) a wealth manager Special thank you to Dave Maloney 𝐓𝐈𝐌𝐄𝐒𝐓𝐀𝐌𝐏𝐒 (00:00) Michel Del Buono, CIO a16z Perennial (01:25) The idea behind a16z Perennial (03:38) What’s broken in wealth management (09:05) How wealth has changed over time (11:57) How fee structures shape portfolios (15:26) Why single family offices are hard to run (19:47) Who wealth management is really for (23:26) What makes Perennial different (22:21) Preparing for massive liquidity events: SpaceX, OpenAI... (24:01) How to choose the right wealth manager (26:39) Why switching firms is so hard (28:01) How portfolios are actually built (31:29) Why volatility is an opportunity (32:47) Why real estate is so powerful (34:55) Taxes and the Billionaire Tax debate (38:46) Should you move to save taxes? (40:59) Chamath : SPAC losses & how they affect taxes (42:21) Secondary deals, fake Anduril SPVs & the risks (46:16) What drives returns in Venture Capital (49:42) Biggest Lesson from Marc Andreessen & Ben Horowitz (51:27) The biggest mistake founders make with money (52:53) How to invest after a big exit (54:16) Concerns around private credit (56:38) What big IPOs mean for markets (58:08) Keeping up with markets (59:35) What’s the focus this year at a16z

Molly O’Shea

384,872 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

A special new episode to finish the year: Glyn Davis & Terry Moran are two former Secretaries of the Department of Prime Minister & Cabinet -- they're two of the tiny number of Australians who have literally sat in the Cabinet Room, week after week, watching the highest-stakes decisions get made from the inside. Terry was Secretary from 2008 to 2011, including during the GFC. Glyn was Secretary from 2022 to 2025, resigning only a few months ago. As far as I know, neither has done a long-form podcast like this before -- let alone together. My goal was to ask as many naive questions as possible about the nuts and bolts of Cabinet, and how power is used, shaped and constrained in Canberra. We go into lots of tactical detail. One general takeaway for me was how surprisingly malleable the institutions in a Westminster system are -- for better or worse, the PM really can mould the government around their persona. But the flipside of this is that once they leave power, the machinery snaps back to its default state, or reconfigures around the next PM. So PM's are very powerful, but not in a lasting way. Also, given how reflexively and unfavourably we compare government to the private sector, it was interesting to invert the lens and consider the Cabinet process as an example of operational excellence -- a system refined over more than a century and stress-tested through wars, disasters and depressions. Learning about even small details -- like what the template for Cabinet submissions looks like -- was fascinating. Links below, or watch/listen wherever you get your podcasts. Enjoy! Timestamps: 0:00:00 - Introduction. 0:02:50 - What is the biggest thing Australians get wrong about how federal government works day to day? 0:06:17 - Where does power sit in Canberra? 0:12:38 - Two powerful figures: Nugget Coombs and John Monash. 0:15:44 - Have prime ministers been getting more powerful in Australia? 0:18:24 - Is Cabinet government in the UK and Canada dead? Why not Australia? 0:20:04 - Is Albanese more powerful in Australia than Trump is in the U.S.? 0:22:42 - What is the institutional or conventional source of the PM's power? 0:29:01 - What does a typical day for the PM look like? 0:38:14 - The gritty details of the Cabinet process. 1:15:54 - What are the root causes of big mistakes by governments? 1:19:00 - How often does physical exhaustion impair outcomes? 1:21:00 - How should decision-making structures change in a crisis? 1:24:40 - One thing you'd change about the machinery of government? 1:32:23 - If the PM made solving the housing crisis their top priority, how would that be reflected in the machinery of government? 1:45:15 - How are decisions about war made? 1:49:33 - Questions about "state capacity" — that is, the ability of our governments to achieve their goals. 2:22:33 - What great book remains to be written about government in Australia? (And an explanation of the Red and Blue books.)

Joseph Noel Walker

11,039 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

New episode with Dr. Steve Horvath (Prof Steve Horvath), a pioneer in the field of epigenetic aging clocks. Steve developed the original Horvath clock, one of the first tools to show that DNA methylation carries a remarkably reliable signal of aging across human tissues. In this episode, he explains what biological clocks actually measure, why different clocks can disagree, and how to interpret a biological-age result without treating it like a literal lifespan forecast. We talk about chronological age vs. biological age, and we also get into the intervention evidence on exercise and VO2 max, calorie restriction, omega-3s, vitamin D, multivitamins, and weight loss/GLP-1 therapy, among other topics! The big theme is that biological clocks can be useful dashboards, but they are not diagnoses, fortune-telling tools, or proof that one supplement has reversed aging. This was Steve's second appearance on the podcast and he did not disappoint. You won't want to miss this episode. Links to the episode on all platforms in the comments below. Timestamps: 0:00 - Introduction 1:59 - Biological vs. chronological age 7:33 - Why one clock isn't enough 13:16 - PhenoAge vs. GrimAge 15:21 - GrimAge & mortality risk 19:04 - Epigenome as stress memory 23:02 - Can stress be inherited? 25:06 - Why clocks fail in sperm 26:30 - Can lifestyle reverse GrimAge? 28:18 - DunedinPACE as an odometer 32:20 - Judging longevity interventions 34:41 - Clocks as mortality surrogates 38:28 - Most validated interventions 41:25 - 5 years younger in 7 months? 45:43 - Can GrimAge predict death? 47:30 - Translating GrimAge to lifespan 52:16 - Blind spots of aging clocks 58:20 - More than inflammation 1:00:56 - Young blood, transient effects 1:04:46 - Calorie restriction 1:08:54 - GLP-1 drugs & weight loss 1:12:24 - Can a multivitamin slow aging? 1:21:05 - Omega-3, vitamin D, & exercise 1:28:55 - Removing an aging accelerator 1:31:24 - Vegetables vs. exercise 1:36:58 - Does red meat age you? 1:38:38 - Hard training moves the clock 1:45:59 - Heat as an exercise mimetic 1:47:23 - When cold slows the clock 1:49:48 - Does poor sleep speed aging? 1:51:19 - Can friendship slow aging? 1:57:49 - Are consumer tests worth it? 2:02:46 - Choosing a reliable test 2:07:33 - Different clocks, different lenses 2:12:21 - Can AI build better clocks? 2:13:53 - Partial reprogramming 2:17:47 - What reprogramming can't fix 2:22:37 - Do DNA mutations drive aging? 2:24:53 - The silver bullet problem 2:29:23 - Limits of polygenic risk 2:33:32 - Steve's longevity routine 2:38:05 - How stress affects aging

Dr. Rhonda Patrick

87,613 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

September 24, 2026: Noam Dworman sits down with "the world's leading famine expert" and reads him his old predictions and declarations about famine in Gaza. Alex de Waal wrote the standard textbook on famine, runs the World Peace Foundation, and helped write starvation crimes into international law. When the media says "famine experts warn," this is who they mean. In January 2024, he told Owen Jones famine would probably arrive by early February. February came and went. In March 2024, he told CBS it was expected between then and May. Days later, he told Democracy Now that children were dying "likely in thousands already." In April 2024, at Harvard, he called it the most intense famine since records began. In October 2025, Democracy Now brought him back. Nobody ever asked him about any of prior predictions and declarations. On September 24, 2026, Noam Dworman did. 0:00 Alex de Waal admits to overstating catastrophes to get headlines 0:30 March 25, 2024. De Waal: The Famine Review Committee is "the ultimate arbiter, the High Court" 0:47 September 24, 2026. De Waal admits his own "high court" found no famine 1:11 March 2024: "It's too late to avert" thousands to tens of thousands of deaths 1:22 De Waal recasts it as conditional: "I said, yes, if this trajectory continues" 1:47 Dworman reads him the published wording, which was not conditional. De Waal: "We actually don't know how many have died" 2:14 Dworman to De Waal: You let Feroze Sidhwa tell my audience that 62,000 Gazans died of starvation 3:10 De Waal: We don't know the numbers. Dworman: The Gaza Ministry of Health doesn't claim anything close to your numbers 3:43 Dworman calls out the moving goalposts: "So I never said they were dying." De Waal accuses him of arguing semantics 4:21 Alex de Waal claims that the famine call "made no comment on the mortality" — What actually happened: The IPC's own Famine Review Committee, June 2024: the famine claims were "not plausible," and "the available evidence does not indicate that Famine is currently occurring." After the October 2025 ceasefire, a UNICEF-led survey found 0.5 percent acute child malnutrition in Gaza, one of the lowest rates in the region. Full interview: -- In 2024, Alex de Waal was certain enough to tell the world it was already too late. In 2026, Alex de Waal just isn't certain enough to say how many people died. Alex de Waal once wrote that you need to overstate catastrophes in order to get attention. He was not joking.

Max 📟

81,835 просмотров • 11 дней назад

Former staffer of Rep. Eric Swalwell (D-CA) vividly describes to CNN how Swalwell sexually assaulted and r*ped her. CNN reports on corroborating evidence and other victims. Exhibit A—Oral sex—(00:38) “It was in 2019, I was again driving him to an event. This was my job… I was 21 years old. We see some sort of parking lot and he says to pull over. (00:47) He pulls out his pen*s and instructs me to give him oral sex. And I started to, again. I felt incredibly uncomfortable. And I stopped and I said to him, ‘This feels really uncomfortable and anyone can see us right now.’ And he said to me, ‘You’re right. It’s probably not good for a congressman to be caught with his pants down.’” Exhibit B—NDAs—(01:29) Swalwell doesn’t deny he had NDAs he made staffers sign, but instead says, “There’s never been an allegation and there’s never been a settlement.” That’s not a denial of having NDAs. Exhibit C—Lewd photos—(01:48) “He would send short Snapchat videos of him rubbing his pen*s through his pants while on the airplane.” Exhibit D—Potential r*pe—(02:07) She woke up naked next to Swalwell and he said “last night was great.” Exhibit E—R*pe—(03:17) She says how in 2024 she met Swalwell and then he r*ped her. (03:51) “I can see flashes of that evening of him on top of me, me pushing him off. Him grabbing me… (04:07) I said, ‘No.’ In my flash that I can recall, I was pushing him off of me saying no… He didn’t stop.” Exhibit F—Corroboration—(04:44) CNN says, “Her mother confirmed her account in an interview with CNN. CNN also reviewed screenshots of texts she sent to a friend saying she was sexually assaulted, by Eric. She also shared this note from a physician’s assistant calling her a survivor after she went to get tested for STDs one week later.” Exhibit G—More victims—(05:20) “In addition to this former staffer, three other women who spoke with CNN also allege sexual misconduct by Swalwell. One said he kissed her and touched her without her consent. Two of the women said he sent them unsolicited explicit messages or nude images of himself. Something the others said Swalwell did with them as well.” Swalwell denies all these allegations.
6:39

Sensitive content

Former staffer of Rep. Eric Swalwell (D-CA) vividly describes to CNN how Swalwell sexually assaulted and r*ped her. CNN reports on corroborating evidence and other victims. Exhibit A—Oral sex—(00:38) “It was in 2019, I was again driving him to an event. This was my job… I was 21 years old. We see some sort of parking lot and he says to pull over. (00:47) He pulls out his pen*s and instructs me to give him oral sex. And I started to, again. I felt incredibly uncomfortable. And I stopped and I said to him, ‘This feels really uncomfortable and anyone can see us right now.’ And he said to me, ‘You’re right. It’s probably not good for a congressman to be caught with his pants down.’” Exhibit B—NDAs—(01:29) Swalwell doesn’t deny he had NDAs he made staffers sign, but instead says, “There’s never been an allegation and there’s never been a settlement.” That’s not a denial of having NDAs. Exhibit C—Lewd photos—(01:48) “He would send short Snapchat videos of him rubbing his pen*s through his pants while on the airplane.” Exhibit D—Potential r*pe—(02:07) She woke up naked next to Swalwell and he said “last night was great.” Exhibit E—R*pe—(03:17) She says how in 2024 she met Swalwell and then he r*ped her. (03:51) “I can see flashes of that evening of him on top of me, me pushing him off. Him grabbing me… (04:07) I said, ‘No.’ In my flash that I can recall, I was pushing him off of me saying no… He didn’t stop.” Exhibit F—Corroboration—(04:44) CNN says, “Her mother confirmed her account in an interview with CNN. CNN also reviewed screenshots of texts she sent to a friend saying she was sexually assaulted, by Eric. She also shared this note from a physician’s assistant calling her a survivor after she went to get tested for STDs one week later.” Exhibit G—More victims—(05:20) “In addition to this former staffer, three other women who spoke with CNN also allege sexual misconduct by Swalwell. One said he kissed her and touched her without her consent. Two of the women said he sent them unsolicited explicit messages or nude images of himself. Something the others said Swalwell did with them as well.” Swalwell denies all these allegations.

Paul A. Szypula 🇺🇸

192,500 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

🇺🇸 MOSSAD, MI6, THE CIA, AND PUTIN: AN EX-CIA OFFICER MAPS EVERY INTELLIGENCE LINK IN THE EPSTEIN FILES John Kiriakou spent 14 years at the CIA and went to federal prison for exposing the agency's torture program. He knows what intelligence operations look like from the inside, and he says the Epstein files are exactly that. Epstein was actively seeking access to the CIA, FBI, NSC, MI5, MI6, and even requested a private meeting with Putin. He had SCIF access in 2018. John says an uncleared civilian shouldn't even know where a SCIF is, let alone be invited inside one. Victims received death threats in Hebrew. John says that tracks with how Mossad operates. On the death, the ear doesn't match, the autopsy doesn't add up, and the body was cremated so it can never be re-examined. John also confirmed that during his time at the CIA, he was part of a conversation where officials discussed encouraging a problem asset to kill himself. We've seen 2% of what the FBI has. And someone decided that's enough. The question is who made that call, and what's in the other 98%. Full interview with John Kiriakou below 02:10 - Who’s behind the cover-up? Kiriakou weighs Mossad vs. CIA vs. the billionaire class. 04:36 - New conclusion: Epstein was actively seeking ties to CIA, FBI, MI5, MI6, and even Putin. 07:09 - Epstein enters a SCIF in 2018 despite being an uncleared convicted sex offender. 09:45 - Plotting to access billions in frozen Libyan assets with alleged MI6 and Mossad ties. 16:30 - Victims receive death threats in Hebrew: is this Mossad tradecraft? 21:30 - The prison irregularities: deleted footage, broken protocols, and missing cellmate. 24:00 - The ear, the autopsy, the “decoy body,” and unanswered forensic questions. 29:19 - Only 2% of the files released: parallels to the redacted torture report. 39:50 - Honeypot or blackmail operation? Cameras in bathrooms and coded language. 43:11 - Kiriakou recalls CIA officials discussing encouraging a liability to commit suicide.

Mario Nawfal

1,080,276 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

E160: Paradex: The Wealth Creation Engine of the Internet Economy fiddy.dime - priv/acc 🦡 is building Paradex, a perpetuals DEX he believes will become one of the five that will power onchain finance. He is back on When Shift Happens for Paradex’s upcoming Token Launch and to help you spot the difference between TGE - Token Generation Event and TGE - Team’s Gonna Exit! Timestamps: 0:00 Introduction 1:55 25 Day Fast & The Benefits 7:14 Building Businesses While Dealing With Health Issues 9:25 Partnerships: Jupiter KAST 10:05 Being A Super Entrepreneur Helps With Finding Solutions To Anything 14:04 Fixing Your Health Makes You Unstoppable When Building A Business 15:20 The Playbook To Surviving & Becoming Stronger In Crypto 18:52 The Key To Staying Motivated No Matter What 21:02 How Difficult Is It To Run A Crypto Exchange 23:14 Anand's Stance On Hiring People Who Execute 28:48 Partnerships: Paradex Zodl (fka Zashi) Sumsub 30:02 Anand’s Belief On What Crypto Represents & What It Should Be 33:48 What Do You Want Crypto To Be? 35:12 Paradex’s Privacy Aspect Explained 36:58 Has Anand Ever Thought Of Building Paradex On Solana 41:12 Do You Ever Regret Or Doubt Yourself? 44:08 Anand’s Unshakable Northstar That Drives Him Everyday 44:45 Why Anand Is Extremely Bullish On The Perp Space 47:35 Partnerships: Trezor Bitwise Sui 48:32 What Happens To The Perp Space In One Years Time 51:43 People Starting To Look Beyond Memecoins & Seeing Real Use Cases 52:56 What Are The Two Types Of TGE & How Can People Spot This In A Community 55:34 Crypto’s “Bad Rep” Comes From These Non-Serious Token Creators 56:50 Paradex Stands Out Because Of The Transparency, Alignment, & Governance Framework 59:30 How You Ensure People Won’t Use Options As An Instrument To Sell 1:01:19 What’re You Trying To Prove Here? 1:03:31 Launching A Token In A Bear Market 1:05:22 Can You Be Transparent With Us Now? 1:05:50 What Does The Little Voice In Your Head Tell You Every Day & Night 1:08:08 Closing Thoughts

MR SHIFT 🦁

111,473 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад