Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

𝗙𝗮𝗸𝗲 𝗜𝗘𝗟𝗧𝗦. 𝗙𝗮𝗸𝗲 𝘁𝗿𝗮𝗻𝘀𝗰𝗿𝗶𝗽𝘁𝘀. 𝗙𝗮𝗸𝗲 𝗯𝗮𝗻𝗸 𝘀𝘁𝗮𝘁𝗲𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁𝘀: International Student Scam Everything was fake — except the Passport. IRCC didn’t verify a thing, but the real question, 𝗵𝗼𝘄 𝗰𝗼𝗺𝗲 𝗖𝗼𝗹𝗹𝗲𝗴𝗲𝘀 𝗸𝗲𝗽𝘁 𝗵𝗮𝗻𝗱𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗼𝘂𝘁 𝗼𝗳𝗳𝗲𝗿 𝗹𝗲𝘁𝘁𝗲𝗿𝘀 𝗼𝗻 𝘀𝘂𝗰𝗵 𝗱𝘂𝗯𝗶𝗼𝘂𝘀 𝗱𝗼𝗰𝘂𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁𝘀? In the rush to approve millions of study permits, every standard... show more

Kanwar Sierah, RCIC

11,943 subscribers

69,591 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

Nachrichten & Politik Bildung

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

🔵CODE BLUE: The $100M Infiltration of FAKE NURSES In American Healthcare That stethoscope? It might just be a prop. Imagine lying in a hospital bed, vulnerable, placing your life in the hands of a "professional"—only to find out their degree was delivered via FedEx, not earned in a classroom. 🎓 Nursing School? "That’s for Suckers." At least, that was the mantra for the 7,600 imposters involved in Operation Nightingale. This wasn’t a small-time operation; it was a multi-state criminal syndicate headquartered in South Florida that turned nursing credentials into a commodity. The Price of Admission: $10,000 to $17,000. The "Product": Authentic-looking —but totally fraudulent diplomas and transcripts. Bonus Shortcut: No clinical hours. No grueling late-night study sessions. Just a wire transfer. 🧠The "Brains" Behind the Scam: Not your typical basement hackers. The key masterminds were insiders: School Owners Registrars High-level Administrators They ran accredited but corrupt Florida-based nursing schools, weaponizing their institutional power to bypass the guardrails of the healthcare system. These fake documents allowed anyone with the cash to sit for the NCLEX (National Council Licensure Examination) and embed themselves in ERs and home health agencies nationwide. No one even questioned it. 💸 The Medicare Hijacking While the headlines scream "Diploma Mill," the real gut-punch is the Medicare Fraud. The Scam: Facilities unknowingly (or willfully) hired these fake nurses and billed the federal government for "skilled nursing care." The Reality: YOUR Taxpayer dollars—your money—were used to fund unqualified care. Because the "nurses" weren't legal, every cent billed to Medicare was a False Claim, leading to millions in potential clawbacks and legal chaos. ⚠️ The Aftermath The FBI and HHS have moved to revoke licenses and shut down the ring, but the fallout remains. 7,600 fake nurses identified. $100 Million in illegal profits. Zero regard for patient safety. "Trust the science" is a lot harder to do when you can't even trust the credentials hanging on the wall. Is your healthcare provider the real deal? In a post-Nightingale world, it's a question we never thought we'd have to ask.

🔵CODE BLUE: The $100M Infiltration of FAKE NURSES In American Healthcare That stethoscope? It might just be a prop. Imagine lying in a hospital bed, vulnerable, placing your life in the hands of a "professional"—only to find out their degree was delivered via FedEx, not earned in a classroom. 🎓 Nursing School? "That’s for Suckers." At least, that was the mantra for the 7,600 imposters involved in Operation Nightingale. This wasn’t a small-time operation; it was a multi-state criminal syndicate headquartered in South Florida that turned nursing credentials into a commodity. The Price of Admission: $10,000 to $17,000. The "Product": Authentic-looking —but totally fraudulent diplomas and transcripts. Bonus Shortcut: No clinical hours. No grueling late-night study sessions. Just a wire transfer. 🧠The "Brains" Behind the Scam: Not your typical basement hackers. The key masterminds were insiders: School Owners Registrars High-level Administrators They ran accredited but corrupt Florida-based nursing schools, weaponizing their institutional power to bypass the guardrails of the healthcare system. These fake documents allowed anyone with the cash to sit for the NCLEX (National Council Licensure Examination) and embed themselves in ERs and home health agencies nationwide. No one even questioned it. 💸 The Medicare Hijacking While the headlines scream "Diploma Mill," the real gut-punch is the Medicare Fraud. The Scam: Facilities unknowingly (or willfully) hired these fake nurses and billed the federal government for "skilled nursing care." The Reality: YOUR Taxpayer dollars—your money—were used to fund unqualified care. Because the "nurses" weren't legal, every cent billed to Medicare was a False Claim, leading to millions in potential clawbacks and legal chaos. ⚠️ The Aftermath The FBI and HHS have moved to revoke licenses and shut down the ring, but the fallout remains. 7,600 fake nurses identified. $100 Million in illegal profits. Zero regard for patient safety. "Trust the science" is a lot harder to do when you can't even trust the credentials hanging on the wall. Is your healthcare provider the real deal? In a post-Nightingale world, it's a question we never thought we'd have to ask.

Tosca Austen

34,079 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

BOOKMARK, COPY OR DOWNLOAD THIS. Every time someone says “but the Iranians massacred 30,000 or 50,000 of their own peaceful protesters”, just share these 10 facts and/or the video. 1. In early January, Mossad and CIA assets armed radical opposition members in Iran to undertake an armed insurrection in which 3,000 people (on all sides) lost their lives. There’s plenty of video evidence for that. 2. That was turned into a fake massacre story of 30,000 or 50,000 or 70,000 victims, by so called “activist groups”, widely quoted, as fact, by the western mainstream media—although no evidence was provided. A simple investigation shows that every single one of these groups can be traced back to the US or its “five eyes” partners, the UK and Canada. 3. The western mainstream started pushing the fake story by quoting from a group called Human Rights in Iran, which is not in Iran—it’s from Virginia, home of the CIA, and is financed by the NED, the CIA’s soft-power spin off. 4. The fake news was backed up by a group called the Center for Human Rights in Iran, which is also NOT in Iran, and is also in the US. 5. Another group, Iran International, can be traced back to the UK. 6. Then there was the International Center for Human Rights, which turned out to be in Canada. 7. Still other sources backing the fake massacre turned out to be supporters of America’s Reza Pahlava (Juan Guaido II), such as the one quoted by Time magazine. 8. The most quoted person on western mainstream television is Masih Alinejad, who said “millions” were massacred. She worked for many years as a full-time anti-Iran propagandist, with financing from the NED and a salary from Voice of America. 9. The fake tale was further pushed by the Bouramond Center for Human Rights, another group financed by the NED, and 10. Tavaana, started by the US State Department and financed by USAID, a notorious group that disguises CIA politicking as aid. Those are the facts. Now here’s the key question: why does every western mainstream media group, not most, but… Every. Single. One. hide the above facts from their audiences? Delete the western mainstream media. Find out the truth for yourself.

BOOKMARK, COPY OR DOWNLOAD THIS. Every time someone says “but the Iranians massacred 30,000 or 50,000 of their own peaceful protesters”, just share these 10 facts and/or the video. 1. In early January, Mossad and CIA assets armed radical opposition members in Iran to undertake an armed insurrection in which 3,000 people (on all sides) lost their lives. There’s plenty of video evidence for that. 2. That was turned into a fake massacre story of 30,000 or 50,000 or 70,000 victims, by so called “activist groups”, widely quoted, as fact, by the western mainstream media—although no evidence was provided. A simple investigation shows that every single one of these groups can be traced back to the US or its “five eyes” partners, the UK and Canada. 3. The western mainstream started pushing the fake story by quoting from a group called Human Rights in Iran, which is not in Iran—it’s from Virginia, home of the CIA, and is financed by the NED, the CIA’s soft-power spin off. 4. The fake news was backed up by a group called the Center for Human Rights in Iran, which is also NOT in Iran, and is also in the US. 5. Another group, Iran International, can be traced back to the UK. 6. Then there was the International Center for Human Rights, which turned out to be in Canada. 7. Still other sources backing the fake massacre turned out to be supporters of America’s Reza Pahlava (Juan Guaido II), such as the one quoted by Time magazine. 8. The most quoted person on western mainstream television is Masih Alinejad, who said “millions” were massacred. She worked for many years as a full-time anti-Iran propagandist, with financing from the NED and a salary from Voice of America. 9. The fake tale was further pushed by the Bouramond Center for Human Rights, another group financed by the NED, and 10. Tavaana, started by the US State Department and financed by USAID, a notorious group that disguises CIA politicking as aid. Those are the facts. Now here’s the key question: why does every western mainstream media group, not most, but… Every. Single. One. hide the above facts from their audiences? Delete the western mainstream media. Find out the truth for yourself.

Nury Vittachi

232,521 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

The foundational narrative of vaccine safety is crumbling under the weight of a single, inconvenient question: "Where are the placebo-controlled trials?" A recent Australian Senate hearing exposed the shocking truth that the public health establishment has worked tirelessly to conceal. When asked how many placebo-controlled studies support the childhood vaccine schedule, regulators were left stammering, unable to provide a single example. Their defense? A convoluted, ethically-based excuse: once a vaccine is on the market, it is considered "unethical" to test new ones against a true saline placebo. Why? Because you would be "denying" children an "established" effective product. But this is a circular logic trap of the highest order. As revealed in the powerful new documentary An Inconvenient Study, this creates a perpetual "bait-and-switch." New vaccines are only tested against older vaccines, which themselves were never tested against a true placebo. The entire schedule is built upon a house of cards, with each new product leaning on the safety assumption of a prior, equally un-validated one. The film brilliantly illustrates this with the "Whiskey Study" analogy: - To test if whiskey causes car accidents, the gold standard is a trial against water. - The vaccine industry's method? Test whiskey against vodka, and when both groups crash, declare whiskey "safe" because it was no worse than vodka. They have never done the water test. This is the "gold standard" that isn't. This is the "mountain of science" with a gaping, placebo-shaped hole at its core. For decades, the public has been told a story of absolute safety and rigorous testing. Now, as officials struggle to answer basic scientific questions, that story is being exposed as a carefully constructed myth. The questions are finally being asked. The answers, or the stunning lack thereof, are changing everything.

The foundational narrative of vaccine safety is crumbling under the weight of a single, inconvenient question: "Where are the placebo-controlled trials?" A recent Australian Senate hearing exposed the shocking truth that the public health establishment has worked tirelessly to conceal. When asked how many placebo-controlled studies support the childhood vaccine schedule, regulators were left stammering, unable to provide a single example. Their defense? A convoluted, ethically-based excuse: once a vaccine is on the market, it is considered "unethical" to test new ones against a true saline placebo. Why? Because you would be "denying" children an "established" effective product. But this is a circular logic trap of the highest order. As revealed in the powerful new documentary An Inconvenient Study, this creates a perpetual "bait-and-switch." New vaccines are only tested against older vaccines, which themselves were never tested against a true placebo. The entire schedule is built upon a house of cards, with each new product leaning on the safety assumption of a prior, equally un-validated one. The film brilliantly illustrates this with the "Whiskey Study" analogy: - To test if whiskey causes car accidents, the gold standard is a trial against water. - The vaccine industry's method? Test whiskey against vodka, and when both groups crash, declare whiskey "safe" because it was no worse than vodka. They have never done the water test. This is the "gold standard" that isn't. This is the "mountain of science" with a gaping, placebo-shaped hole at its core. For decades, the public has been told a story of absolute safety and rigorous testing. Now, as officials struggle to answer basic scientific questions, that story is being exposed as a carefully constructed myth. The questions are finally being asked. The answers, or the stunning lack thereof, are changing everything.

Camus

14,485 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

Important message to U.S. President Donald Trump (Donald J. Trump) "We are November 17, 2024. As you can see, I am front the White House in Washington DC. I am Gloriane Blais, former lawyer and Canadian citizen. I am seeking asylum in United States of America because since 2020 I have been the victim of significant, violent, illegal and abusive persecution by the Canadian judicial system, including Canada's highest court, the Supreme Court of Canada. It all started in 2020, when as a lawyer I received a fraudulent judgment at the end of a trial for my client, a very solid businessman who was the victim of government corruption (abuse of power), against a Crown corporation of the Quebec government in Canada, a lawsuit by my client for 35 million Canadian dollars. Following the fraudulent judgment, I took the case to the Quebec Court of Appeal, with an appeal as of right. The Quebec Court of Appeal preliminarily dismissed the appeal, refusing to look at the evidence, illegally refusing to wait until the evidentiary stage. In March 2021, I filed an Application for Leave to Appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada, asking the country's highest court to reform the fraudulent judgment in favour of government corruption. This was the first time in Canadian judicial history that a party not only alleged a wilful lack of impartiality, but actually proved it; I filed 14 volumes of evidence. Before the Supreme Court of Canada rendered its decision, the Chief Justice of the Quebec Superior Court, i.e., the boss of trial judges for the province of Quebec, filed a request for a disciplinary inquiry against me with the Quebec Bar, even though I had filed evidence of my allegations with the Supreme Court of Canada, even though it was not the lawyer who was to be investigated, but rather the judge under his authority who had rendered the fraudulent judgment. In May 2024, Me Daniel Gagnon for the Quebec Bar lodged the 1st lifetime disciplinary complaint against me, based on this request for investigation by the Chief Justice of the Quebec Superior Court. Since then, the Chief Justice of the Quebec Superior Court has resigned, and Me Daniel Gagnon has twice admitted under oath that he never read a single page of the 14 volumes of evidence (except my 20-page brief, which are my allegations)! On July 8, 2021, the Supreme Court of Canada failed in its constitutional responsibilities by rejecting my client's Application for Leave to Appeal. All the evidence of what I have just named is, in French, via my Docurium link : On the same date, July 8, 2021, Me Daniel Gagnon for the Quebec Bar lodged a 2nd (and final) disciplinary complaint against me concerning my spring 2021 comments on the Covid-19 vaccine, as a whistleblower and lawyer with expertise in health law, medical liability and hospitality. I called this vaccine an experimental injection, and when they started inoculating children, I called it a crime against humanity, again as a lawyer. It should be remembered that this vaccine was still in phase 3 of the clinical trial and was a new technology never before used in the general population. We would later learn a great deal of information, including that the product was manufactured using process number 2, with only 252 participants in Pfizer's clinical trial, as the 44,000-participant clinical trial was manufactured using process number 1; consequently, the product distributed to the general population did not undergo a clinical trial! For this, I refer you to the book in English by biostatistician in the pharmaceutical industry Christine Cotton, from France, for which I wrote the Afterword: The two disciplinary complaints continued. ⬇️2/

Important message to U.S. President Donald Trump (Donald J. Trump) "We are November 17, 2024. As you can see, I am front the White House in Washington DC. I am Gloriane Blais, former lawyer and Canadian citizen. I am seeking asylum in United States of America because since 2020 I have been the victim of significant, violent, illegal and abusive persecution by the Canadian judicial system, including Canada's highest court, the Supreme Court of Canada. It all started in 2020, when as a lawyer I received a fraudulent judgment at the end of a trial for my client, a very solid businessman who was the victim of government corruption (abuse of power), against a Crown corporation of the Quebec government in Canada, a lawsuit by my client for 35 million Canadian dollars. Following the fraudulent judgment, I took the case to the Quebec Court of Appeal, with an appeal as of right. The Quebec Court of Appeal preliminarily dismissed the appeal, refusing to look at the evidence, illegally refusing to wait until the evidentiary stage. In March 2021, I filed an Application for Leave to Appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada, asking the country's highest court to reform the fraudulent judgment in favour of government corruption. This was the first time in Canadian judicial history that a party not only alleged a wilful lack of impartiality, but actually proved it; I filed 14 volumes of evidence. Before the Supreme Court of Canada rendered its decision, the Chief Justice of the Quebec Superior Court, i.e., the boss of trial judges for the province of Quebec, filed a request for a disciplinary inquiry against me with the Quebec Bar, even though I had filed evidence of my allegations with the Supreme Court of Canada, even though it was not the lawyer who was to be investigated, but rather the judge under his authority who had rendered the fraudulent judgment. In May 2024, Me Daniel Gagnon for the Quebec Bar lodged the 1st lifetime disciplinary complaint against me, based on this request for investigation by the Chief Justice of the Quebec Superior Court. Since then, the Chief Justice of the Quebec Superior Court has resigned, and Me Daniel Gagnon has twice admitted under oath that he never read a single page of the 14 volumes of evidence (except my 20-page brief, which are my allegations)! On July 8, 2021, the Supreme Court of Canada failed in its constitutional responsibilities by rejecting my client's Application for Leave to Appeal. All the evidence of what I have just named is, in French, via my Docurium link : On the same date, July 8, 2021, Me Daniel Gagnon for the Quebec Bar lodged a 2nd (and final) disciplinary complaint against me concerning my spring 2021 comments on the Covid-19 vaccine, as a whistleblower and lawyer with expertise in health law, medical liability and hospitality. I called this vaccine an experimental injection, and when they started inoculating children, I called it a crime against humanity, again as a lawyer. It should be remembered that this vaccine was still in phase 3 of the clinical trial and was a new technology never before used in the general population. We would later learn a great deal of information, including that the product was manufactured using process number 2, with only 252 participants in Pfizer's clinical trial, as the 44,000-participant clinical trial was manufactured using process number 1; consequently, the product distributed to the general population did not undergo a clinical trial! For this, I refer you to the book in English by biostatistician in the pharmaceutical industry Christine Cotton, from France, for which I wrote the Afterword: The two disciplinary complaints continued. ⬇️2/

Gloriane Blais

30,949 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Rahul Gandhi has done it AGAIN. The man with the perpetual passport in his pocket has landed in Great Nicobar, posed in front of a few trees, and produced yet another video designed for one purpose only. To sabotage a project of national, strategic and defence importance for India. This is not concern. This is a pattern. Every single project that strengthens India gets the same treatment from this man. Rafale was a scam. Vande Bharat was an insult. Chandrayaan was a stunt. The new Parliament was a coronation. CAA was anti Muslim. Sengol was theatre. Every road, every port, every airport, every defence deal that makes Bharat stronger becomes, in his vocabulary, a “scam” or a “crime.” Whose interests is he actually serving when he travels thousands of kilometres only to demoralise a project that sits at the doorstep of the Strait of Malacca, through which 30 percent of global maritime trade passes? Whose strategy is he advancing when he tries to block India’s answer to China’s String of Pearls, the very port that will end our dependence on Colombo and Singapore for transhipment? Now let us bring out the data Rahul Gandhi will never put in his videos. The total area of Great Nicobar Island is around 910 square kilometres. Out of this, 853 square kilometres, that is 92 percent of the entire island, is constitutionally protected as Tribal Reserve under the 1956 regulation. The project footprint is 166 square kilometres. That is roughly 18 percent of the island, and the tribal reserve remains overwhelmingly intact. The tribal population Rahul Gandhi is suddenly weeping for is approximately 1,200. The Shompen, around 200. The Nicobarese, around 1,000. Eight hundred square kilometres of pristine, protected forest stays exclusively reserved for them. Untouched. Guaranteed by law. And here comes the inconvenient truth that destroys his entire video. The Tribal Council itself has issued a No Objection Certificate to the Government of India. The very communities Rahul Gandhi claims to speak for have already given written consent. The Gram Sabhas have passed resolutions. Yet this man parachutes in from Delhi, ignores the actual voice of the actual tribals on the actual ground, and decides HE will speak for them in English on Twitter for his foreign audience. Why English, Rahul ji? Why is the video tailored for international consumption? Why does every Congress attack on a strategic Indian project get amplified by the exact same Western NGOs and Survival International style outfits that have a track record of stopping infrastructure in developing countries while remaining suspiciously silent about Chinese ports in Hambantota and Gwadar? The pattern is too consistent to be coincidence. When India built Sela Tunnel, he was missing. When China built villages inside Arunachal, he was silent. When Galwan happened, he hugged the Chinese narrative. When Adani built ports for India, he attacked. When Chinese ports encircle India, he says nothing. Great Nicobar is not just an island. It is India’s southernmost frontier, 145 kilometres from Indonesia, sitting on the jugular of world trade. A transhipment port here means crores of dollars stay in India instead of going to Colombo. An airport here means our Navy and Air Force project power into the Indo Pacific. A township here means India finally populates and secures a territory that was nearly lost in 2004. This is exactly why someone, somewhere, wants this project killed. And Rahul Gandhi has volunteered, as always, to be the loudest voice for that someone. 1,200 tribals have said yes. 140 crore Indians want this project. The Supreme Court appointed committee has cleared it. The NGT has cleared it. The Environment Ministry has cleared it. Only one man stands in the way, video camera in hand, lecturing the nation from a forest he visited for the first time in his life. Bharat knows this script by heart now. And Bharat is not buying it anymore.

Rahul Gandhi has done it AGAIN. The man with the perpetual passport in his pocket has landed in Great Nicobar, posed in front of a few trees, and produced yet another video designed for one purpose only. To sabotage a project of national, strategic and defence importance for India. This is not concern. This is a pattern. Every single project that strengthens India gets the same treatment from this man. Rafale was a scam. Vande Bharat was an insult. Chandrayaan was a stunt. The new Parliament was a coronation. CAA was anti Muslim. Sengol was theatre. Every road, every port, every airport, every defence deal that makes Bharat stronger becomes, in his vocabulary, a “scam” or a “crime.” Whose interests is he actually serving when he travels thousands of kilometres only to demoralise a project that sits at the doorstep of the Strait of Malacca, through which 30 percent of global maritime trade passes? Whose strategy is he advancing when he tries to block India’s answer to China’s String of Pearls, the very port that will end our dependence on Colombo and Singapore for transhipment? Now let us bring out the data Rahul Gandhi will never put in his videos. The total area of Great Nicobar Island is around 910 square kilometres. Out of this, 853 square kilometres, that is 92 percent of the entire island, is constitutionally protected as Tribal Reserve under the 1956 regulation. The project footprint is 166 square kilometres. That is roughly 18 percent of the island, and the tribal reserve remains overwhelmingly intact. The tribal population Rahul Gandhi is suddenly weeping for is approximately 1,200. The Shompen, around 200. The Nicobarese, around 1,000. Eight hundred square kilometres of pristine, protected forest stays exclusively reserved for them. Untouched. Guaranteed by law. And here comes the inconvenient truth that destroys his entire video. The Tribal Council itself has issued a No Objection Certificate to the Government of India. The very communities Rahul Gandhi claims to speak for have already given written consent. The Gram Sabhas have passed resolutions. Yet this man parachutes in from Delhi, ignores the actual voice of the actual tribals on the actual ground, and decides HE will speak for them in English on Twitter for his foreign audience. Why English, Rahul ji? Why is the video tailored for international consumption? Why does every Congress attack on a strategic Indian project get amplified by the exact same Western NGOs and Survival International style outfits that have a track record of stopping infrastructure in developing countries while remaining suspiciously silent about Chinese ports in Hambantota and Gwadar? The pattern is too consistent to be coincidence. When India built Sela Tunnel, he was missing. When China built villages inside Arunachal, he was silent. When Galwan happened, he hugged the Chinese narrative. When Adani built ports for India, he attacked. When Chinese ports encircle India, he says nothing. Great Nicobar is not just an island. It is India’s southernmost frontier, 145 kilometres from Indonesia, sitting on the jugular of world trade. A transhipment port here means crores of dollars stay in India instead of going to Colombo. An airport here means our Navy and Air Force project power into the Indo Pacific. A township here means India finally populates and secures a territory that was nearly lost in 2004. This is exactly why someone, somewhere, wants this project killed. And Rahul Gandhi has volunteered, as always, to be the loudest voice for that someone. 1,200 tribals have said yes. 140 crore Indians want this project. The Supreme Court appointed committee has cleared it. The NGT has cleared it. The Environment Ministry has cleared it. Only one man stands in the way, video camera in hand, lecturing the nation from a forest he visited for the first time in his life. Bharat knows this script by heart now. And Bharat is not buying it anymore.

Oxomiya Jiyori 🇮🇳

17,967 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

The U.K. doesn't need a street revolution, but they damn sure need a ballot revolution. UK MP Rupert Lowe's rape gang report is devastating. It should wake up EVERYONE in the UK. And in the US too, because we're facing a very similar crisis with the 300k+ children "lost" at the border under Biden. Where are the politicians with a spine? Where are the media outlets making this the TOP story? Where are the people demanding accountability? And most shockingly, WHERE ARE THE CHURCHES? Here's just ONE story that was uncovered: A 12-year-old girl was brutally raped, then had a whiskey bottle shoved inside her until it shattered. She then walked to a hospital WITH THE GLASS STILL INSIDE HER and not a single doctor, nurse, or cop asked the only question a human being should ask: "Who did this to you?" They let her go, straight back to the monsters who did this to her. 250,000 children across Great Britain have suffered similar stories. This wasn’t an institutional failure. A failure is an accident. This was a deliberate choice to stay silent. The doctors, the judges, the police, the bureaucrats, are all complicit protectors. They looked the other way, filed the paperwork, and let the machine grind on because they were terrified of being called a racist. It's time to throw out every single official, every party, and every bureaucrat involved in this cover-up. No apologies, committees, statements, or other window dressings. The people who run our institutions must start to understand CLEARLY, in the marrow of their bones, that the public is NOT AFRAID of them. They work for us. They're here to protect our children.

The U.K. doesn't need a street revolution, but they damn sure need a ballot revolution. UK MP Rupert Lowe's rape gang report is devastating. It should wake up EVERYONE in the UK. And in the US too, because we're facing a very similar crisis with the 300k+ children "lost" at the border under Biden. Where are the politicians with a spine? Where are the media outlets making this the TOP story? Where are the people demanding accountability? And most shockingly, WHERE ARE THE CHURCHES? Here's just ONE story that was uncovered: A 12-year-old girl was brutally raped, then had a whiskey bottle shoved inside her until it shattered. She then walked to a hospital WITH THE GLASS STILL INSIDE HER and not a single doctor, nurse, or cop asked the only question a human being should ask: "Who did this to you?" They let her go, straight back to the monsters who did this to her. 250,000 children across Great Britain have suffered similar stories. This wasn’t an institutional failure. A failure is an accident. This was a deliberate choice to stay silent. The doctors, the judges, the police, the bureaucrats, are all complicit protectors. They looked the other way, filed the paperwork, and let the machine grind on because they were terrified of being called a racist. It's time to throw out every single official, every party, and every bureaucrat involved in this cover-up. No apologies, committees, statements, or other window dressings. The people who run our institutions must start to understand CLEARLY, in the marrow of their bones, that the public is NOT AFRAID of them. They work for us. They're here to protect our children.

Glenn Beck

99,169 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

The Senate has gone deaf — they only hear Sara Zimmerman Duterte In a supposed “compromise”, Senate Minority Leader Tito Sotto suggested that they move the discussion of the impeachment trial of Sara Zimmerman Duterte to give them time to study the 97-page Supreme Court ruling. But if the Senate Pro Tempore is correct — it seems as though this was the plan all along, to look for any reason to kill the impeachment without a trial. I can say without a shadow of a doubt that the Supreme Court ruling was based on erroneous fact — it doesn’t need the most brilliant of minds to say, all you need to do is to watch the February 5 plenary session of the House of Representatives. The roster of Senators is hopeless. I do not think they will research further as I think they have been waiting for this all along — an out. I don’t think they will defend the constitution in any way. But the truth is, the livestream alone can single handedly debunk the claim of the Supreme Court ruling that the House did not act on the other three impeachment complaints. [44:00] timestamp of the livestream would tell you that the Secretary General referred all the four impeachment complaints to the plenary. Not only that, if you watch the livestream of the House of Representatives —- you will also see for yourself that the following claims of the Supreme Court based its ruling on erroneous fact despite the submission of the House of its journal (the equivalent of minutes of meeting): 1. There was a motion in plenary to transmit the Articles of Impeachment and the body voted to approve this motion 2. There was a motion to elect members of the public prosecutors and the body voted to approve this motion. 3. There was a motion to archive the three other impeachment complaints filed on December 2, 3 and 19, 2024 and the body voted to approve this motion. So, if you are wondering why legal minds and luminaries raise questions and concerns about this Supreme court ruling — because common sense dictates it is wrong to draw your conclusion siding with news reports, version official records and one very clear video of the proceedings. So… please tell me how the public will not question this Supreme Court decision? Will the Senators finally listen? I am not holding my breath.

The Senate has gone deaf — they only hear Sara Zimmerman Duterte In a supposed “compromise”, Senate Minority Leader Tito Sotto suggested that they move the discussion of the impeachment trial of Sara Zimmerman Duterte to give them time to study the 97-page Supreme Court ruling. But if the Senate Pro Tempore is correct — it seems as though this was the plan all along, to look for any reason to kill the impeachment without a trial. I can say without a shadow of a doubt that the Supreme Court ruling was based on erroneous fact — it doesn’t need the most brilliant of minds to say, all you need to do is to watch the February 5 plenary session of the House of Representatives. The roster of Senators is hopeless. I do not think they will research further as I think they have been waiting for this all along — an out. I don’t think they will defend the constitution in any way. But the truth is, the livestream alone can single handedly debunk the claim of the Supreme Court ruling that the House did not act on the other three impeachment complaints. [44:00] timestamp of the livestream would tell you that the Secretary General referred all the four impeachment complaints to the plenary. Not only that, if you watch the livestream of the House of Representatives —- you will also see for yourself that the following claims of the Supreme Court based its ruling on erroneous fact despite the submission of the House of its journal (the equivalent of minutes of meeting): 1. There was a motion in plenary to transmit the Articles of Impeachment and the body voted to approve this motion 2. There was a motion to elect members of the public prosecutors and the body voted to approve this motion. 3. There was a motion to archive the three other impeachment complaints filed on December 2, 3 and 19, 2024 and the body voted to approve this motion. So, if you are wondering why legal minds and luminaries raise questions and concerns about this Supreme court ruling — because common sense dictates it is wrong to draw your conclusion siding with news reports, version official records and one very clear video of the proceedings. So… please tell me how the public will not question this Supreme Court decision? Will the Senators finally listen? I am not holding my breath.

Just

21,496 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

There is a specific kind of pain that only a parent who lost a child knows, and then there is the shattering agony of a parent standing in a courtroom, feet away from the man who took their son’s life. In this publicly obtained courtroom video, we see Donald Byrd reach a breaking point. His son, Kijuan Byrd, wasn’t just a statistic or a case number—he was a son, a friend, and a life cut short for no reason. The night everything changed, Kijuan was sitting in a truck outside a Miami club with his friend, Michael Smathers. They were unarmed, just hanging out, when they were approached by Lukace Kendle, an armed security guard. Without provocation, Kendle opened fire. Kendle initially attempted to use Florida’s "Stand Your Ground" law to justify the shooting, claiming self-defense. However Kijuan wasn't aggressive. He was crawling under the truck, trying to hide and save his own life, when he was shot multiple times in the back. Michael Smathers survived the encounter but was left paralyzed for life. Kendle was arrested for m*rder and this went to trail. In this clip you hear Donald Byrd shout about the "crazy" defense. For years, Kendle cycled through mental competency hearings, claimed he was a "sovereign citizen," and eventually insisted on representing himself. To a grieving family, watching a defendant use every legal loophole to avoid accountability feels like a second murder. When Donald shouts, "He wasn't crazy when he murdered my son," he’s speaking for every victim who has watched a perpetrator try to hide behind a mask to escape justice. In the end, the "Stand Your Ground" claim failed. The "insanity" narrative failed. Lukace Kendle was sentenced to life in prison plus 30 years. Justice was served in the eyes of the law, but for the Byrd family, the chair at the dinner table remains empty. This video isn't just "courtroom drama"—it’s a window into the lifelong sentence of grief that families of victims carry every single day.

There is a specific kind of pain that only a parent who lost a child knows, and then there is the shattering agony of a parent standing in a courtroom, feet away from the man who took their son’s life. In this publicly obtained courtroom video, we see Donald Byrd reach a breaking point. His son, Kijuan Byrd, wasn’t just a statistic or a case number—he was a son, a friend, and a life cut short for no reason. The night everything changed, Kijuan was sitting in a truck outside a Miami club with his friend, Michael Smathers. They were unarmed, just hanging out, when they were approached by Lukace Kendle, an armed security guard. Without provocation, Kendle opened fire. Kendle initially attempted to use Florida’s "Stand Your Ground" law to justify the shooting, claiming self-defense. However Kijuan wasn't aggressive. He was crawling under the truck, trying to hide and save his own life, when he was shot multiple times in the back. Michael Smathers survived the encounter but was left paralyzed for life. Kendle was arrested for m*rder and this went to trail. In this clip you hear Donald Byrd shout about the "crazy" defense. For years, Kendle cycled through mental competency hearings, claimed he was a "sovereign citizen," and eventually insisted on representing himself. To a grieving family, watching a defendant use every legal loophole to avoid accountability feels like a second murder. When Donald shouts, "He wasn't crazy when he murdered my son," he’s speaking for every victim who has watched a perpetrator try to hide behind a mask to escape justice. In the end, the "Stand Your Ground" claim failed. The "insanity" narrative failed. Lukace Kendle was sentenced to life in prison plus 30 years. Justice was served in the eyes of the law, but for the Byrd family, the chair at the dinner table remains empty. This video isn't just "courtroom drama"—it’s a window into the lifelong sentence of grief that families of victims carry every single day.

Giggling Ganon

21,635 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Mark Zuckerberg just told you exactly why trillion-dollar companies lose to people who have nothing. Zuckerberg: “Large companies are slow and they lack conviction.” Nine words. The entire vulnerability of every empire on earth in a single sentence. Google had the talent. Microsoft had the infrastructure. Yahoo had the distribution. Every single one of them could have built Facebook. None of them did. Zuckerberg: “We were like a ragtag group of children.” Not seasoned executives. Not credentialed engineers with decades of experience. Children. Against the most well-funded technology companies on the planet. And the children won. Not because they were smarter. Not because they had better resources. Because they believed in something the giants were too comfortable to take seriously. Capital does not beat conviction. Infrastructure does not beat speed. Talent does not beat the willingness to look stupid building something no one respects yet. The giants had everything except the one thing that actually mattered. The inability to hesitate. A large company sees a new idea and runs it through committees. They commission research. They weigh the risk. They debate the market size. They ask what happens to the existing product line. By the time the organization agrees the idea is worth pursuing the window is already closed. The person who builds it does not go through that process. They just build. No committee. No consensus. No permission. They move before the math is finished because they can feel the answer before the spreadsheet confirms it. That is not recklessness. That is the only speed that matters when the window is open. Zuckerberg: “People doubt new ideas before they come to fruition.” It is never one doubt. It is a rotating series of doubts that shift every time the previous one is proven wrong. Zuckerberg: “It’s just like this college kid thing.” That was the first wall. It is small. It is niche. It is not serious. Then it grew. “Maybe not college kids, but it’s probably a fad.” Then it kept growing. “Maybe it’s not a fad, but it’s probably not gonna make money.” Then it made money. “Okay it makes money, but the switch to mobile is gonna be pretty hard.” Every single objection was wrong. Every single one served the same function. It gave the doubter permission to do nothing for one more cycle. That is not analysis. That is self-preservation dressed as skepticism. The person too slow to build the thing will always find a reason why the thing will not work. Not because the reasons are good. Because the alternative is admitting they missed it. You are watching the exact same pattern play out with AI right now. First it was a toy. Then it hallucinated too much. Then it was not profitable. Then it was a bubble. Then it was going to plateau. Every cycle the objection changes. The function never does. Zuckerberg built a company worth over a trillion dollars against competitors who had every advantage except the willingness to commit before the outcome was guaranteed. That is the only advantage that has ever mattered. Not capital. Not credentials. Not infrastructure. The willingness to be wrong in public long enough to become undeniably right. The giants will always have more money. More engineers. More servers. More distribution. They will always be slower than the person who does not need a meeting to make a decision. The committee will never outrun the individual who already started. The incumbents are not dangerous because they are strong. They are vulnerable because they are careful. And careful has never once in the history of technology built the thing that changed the world. It has only ever bought it after someone else already did.

Mark Zuckerberg just told you exactly why trillion-dollar companies lose to people who have nothing. Zuckerberg: “Large companies are slow and they lack conviction.” Nine words. The entire vulnerability of every empire on earth in a single sentence. Google had the talent. Microsoft had the infrastructure. Yahoo had the distribution. Every single one of them could have built Facebook. None of them did. Zuckerberg: “We were like a ragtag group of children.” Not seasoned executives. Not credentialed engineers with decades of experience. Children. Against the most well-funded technology companies on the planet. And the children won. Not because they were smarter. Not because they had better resources. Because they believed in something the giants were too comfortable to take seriously. Capital does not beat conviction. Infrastructure does not beat speed. Talent does not beat the willingness to look stupid building something no one respects yet. The giants had everything except the one thing that actually mattered. The inability to hesitate. A large company sees a new idea and runs it through committees. They commission research. They weigh the risk. They debate the market size. They ask what happens to the existing product line. By the time the organization agrees the idea is worth pursuing the window is already closed. The person who builds it does not go through that process. They just build. No committee. No consensus. No permission. They move before the math is finished because they can feel the answer before the spreadsheet confirms it. That is not recklessness. That is the only speed that matters when the window is open. Zuckerberg: “People doubt new ideas before they come to fruition.” It is never one doubt. It is a rotating series of doubts that shift every time the previous one is proven wrong. Zuckerberg: “It’s just like this college kid thing.” That was the first wall. It is small. It is niche. It is not serious. Then it grew. “Maybe not college kids, but it’s probably a fad.” Then it kept growing. “Maybe it’s not a fad, but it’s probably not gonna make money.” Then it made money. “Okay it makes money, but the switch to mobile is gonna be pretty hard.” Every single objection was wrong. Every single one served the same function. It gave the doubter permission to do nothing for one more cycle. That is not analysis. That is self-preservation dressed as skepticism. The person too slow to build the thing will always find a reason why the thing will not work. Not because the reasons are good. Because the alternative is admitting they missed it. You are watching the exact same pattern play out with AI right now. First it was a toy. Then it hallucinated too much. Then it was not profitable. Then it was a bubble. Then it was going to plateau. Every cycle the objection changes. The function never does. Zuckerberg built a company worth over a trillion dollars against competitors who had every advantage except the willingness to commit before the outcome was guaranteed. That is the only advantage that has ever mattered. Not capital. Not credentials. Not infrastructure. The willingness to be wrong in public long enough to become undeniably right. The giants will always have more money. More engineers. More servers. More distribution. They will always be slower than the person who does not need a meeting to make a decision. The committee will never outrun the individual who already started. The incumbents are not dangerous because they are strong. They are vulnerable because they are careful. And careful has never once in the history of technology built the thing that changed the world. It has only ever bought it after someone else already did.

Dustin

20,938 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Elon Musk just said what every government on earth already knows and none will admit. Musk: “AI is moving 10 times faster than government, maybe more.” Not slightly faster. Ten times. And the gap compounds daily. Every institution ever built runs on the same architecture. Committees. Hearings. Drafts. Amendments. Votes. A process designed for a world that moved at the speed of human debate. That world is gone. The moment legislation is signed, the thing it was written for is already three generations obsolete. Law is becoming a monument to things that no longer exist by the time the ink is dry. Musk: “The one thing that the government can do is just issue people money.” The largest militaries ever assembled. The most sophisticated legal infrastructure in human history. The accumulated weight of ten thousand years of institutional evolution. Collapsed to a single remaining function. Printing checks. Not because they failed. Because the velocity of what is coming makes everything else they were built to do ornamental. Musk: “Nobody’s gonna starve is what I’m saying.” The floor rises. Survival becomes automatic. Nobody goes hungry. For ten thousand years, that would have been the finish line. It is not. It is the starting line of the hardest question the species has ever faced. Every civilization in history was organized around one brutal fact. The world needed your labor to function. You worked because you had to. You built because the alternative was death. Every economy, every identity, every reason to get out of bed was downstream of that single pressure. That pressure is being quietly removed. And what it leaves behind is not freedom. It is a vacuum. A check hits your account. Rent is covered. Food is handled. The base layer of existence is solved. But the thing that organized your time. Gave your effort weight. Made your life feel like it pointed somewhere. Gone. No government can legislate that back. No policy can manufacture it. Purpose is not a deposit. Identity is not a program. What you are for when the world no longer needs you to function is not a problem any institution was designed to answer. It is the first problem in history that belongs entirely to you. And while the rest of the world debates how to control what is coming, one person is doing the only thing that has ever mattered. Building what comes next.

Elon Musk just said what every government on earth already knows and none will admit. Musk: “AI is moving 10 times faster than government, maybe more.” Not slightly faster. Ten times. And the gap compounds daily. Every institution ever built runs on the same architecture. Committees. Hearings. Drafts. Amendments. Votes. A process designed for a world that moved at the speed of human debate. That world is gone. The moment legislation is signed, the thing it was written for is already three generations obsolete. Law is becoming a monument to things that no longer exist by the time the ink is dry. Musk: “The one thing that the government can do is just issue people money.” The largest militaries ever assembled. The most sophisticated legal infrastructure in human history. The accumulated weight of ten thousand years of institutional evolution. Collapsed to a single remaining function. Printing checks. Not because they failed. Because the velocity of what is coming makes everything else they were built to do ornamental. Musk: “Nobody’s gonna starve is what I’m saying.” The floor rises. Survival becomes automatic. Nobody goes hungry. For ten thousand years, that would have been the finish line. It is not. It is the starting line of the hardest question the species has ever faced. Every civilization in history was organized around one brutal fact. The world needed your labor to function. You worked because you had to. You built because the alternative was death. Every economy, every identity, every reason to get out of bed was downstream of that single pressure. That pressure is being quietly removed. And what it leaves behind is not freedom. It is a vacuum. A check hits your account. Rent is covered. Food is handled. The base layer of existence is solved. But the thing that organized your time. Gave your effort weight. Made your life feel like it pointed somewhere. Gone. No government can legislate that back. No policy can manufacture it. Purpose is not a deposit. Identity is not a program. What you are for when the world no longer needs you to function is not a problem any institution was designed to answer. It is the first problem in history that belongs entirely to you. And while the rest of the world debates how to control what is coming, one person is doing the only thing that has ever mattered. Building what comes next.

Dustin

50,301 Aufrufe • vor 28 Tagen

Elon Musk just described the future of AI in a single sentence. Musk: “A profit-maximizing demon from hell.” That’s not a metaphor. That’s a blueprint. He wasn’t describing science fiction. He was describing what happens when the only thing AI is trained to maximize is revenue. Musk: “We don’t want this to be sort of a profit-maximizing demon from hell that just never stops.” The richest man on Earth is telling you the default path of AI leads somewhere no one should want to go. And he’s the only one building as if he actually believes it. This is the part people miss about xAI. Everyone talks about the compute. The clusters. The talent wars. The benchmarks. Nobody talks about the philosophy underneath all of it. Because philosophy doesn’t trend. But philosophy is the only thing that determines whether AI serves humanity or harvests it. Musk: “Let’s make the future good for the humans. Because we are humans.” Not because it’s good PR. Not because regulators are watching. Not because it polls well with users. Because we are the ones who have to live inside whatever these systems become. Every major AI lab talks about safety. Every single one has an alignment page. A responsible AI team. A set of principles that read beautifully in print. But the structure tells you everything the mission statement won’t. When you convert a nonprofit into a for-profit worth hundreds of billions, the values were already chosen. The about page is decoration. The cap table is the constitution. Musk understood this before anyone. It’s why he walked away from OpenAI. Not because the technology scared him. Because the governance did. He watched a nonprofit built to protect humanity restructure itself into a vehicle designed to concentrate wealth. That’s the real story of AI right now. Not which model is smartest. Which model is answerable. Accountability doesn’t live in a blog post. It lives in what happens when doing the right thing and doing the profitable thing point in opposite directions. Every AI company will face that fork. Most already chose. Musk is the only builder on Earth constructing an AI company with the open admission that the default outcome is something no one should want. That’s not idealism. That’s the only honest engineering left. Musk: “A profit-maximizing demon from hell that just never stops.” He said it almost casually. But that sentence is the most truthful description of misaligned AI any builder has ever spoken out loud. Because the demon doesn’t announce itself. It optimizes politely. It scales quietly. It compounds without a sound. And by the time you notice, the architecture is the authority and the authority doesn’t answer to you. The question was never whether AI would become powerful. The question was always who would be holding the wheel when it did. And whether they’d still remember what it felt like to be the species it was built to serve.

Elon Musk just described the future of AI in a single sentence. Musk: “A profit-maximizing demon from hell.” That’s not a metaphor. That’s a blueprint. He wasn’t describing science fiction. He was describing what happens when the only thing AI is trained to maximize is revenue. Musk: “We don’t want this to be sort of a profit-maximizing demon from hell that just never stops.” The richest man on Earth is telling you the default path of AI leads somewhere no one should want to go. And he’s the only one building as if he actually believes it. This is the part people miss about xAI. Everyone talks about the compute. The clusters. The talent wars. The benchmarks. Nobody talks about the philosophy underneath all of it. Because philosophy doesn’t trend. But philosophy is the only thing that determines whether AI serves humanity or harvests it. Musk: “Let’s make the future good for the humans. Because we are humans.” Not because it’s good PR. Not because regulators are watching. Not because it polls well with users. Because we are the ones who have to live inside whatever these systems become. Every major AI lab talks about safety. Every single one has an alignment page. A responsible AI team. A set of principles that read beautifully in print. But the structure tells you everything the mission statement won’t. When you convert a nonprofit into a for-profit worth hundreds of billions, the values were already chosen. The about page is decoration. The cap table is the constitution. Musk understood this before anyone. It’s why he walked away from OpenAI. Not because the technology scared him. Because the governance did. He watched a nonprofit built to protect humanity restructure itself into a vehicle designed to concentrate wealth. That’s the real story of AI right now. Not which model is smartest. Which model is answerable. Accountability doesn’t live in a blog post. It lives in what happens when doing the right thing and doing the profitable thing point in opposite directions. Every AI company will face that fork. Most already chose. Musk is the only builder on Earth constructing an AI company with the open admission that the default outcome is something no one should want. That’s not idealism. That’s the only honest engineering left. Musk: “A profit-maximizing demon from hell that just never stops.” He said it almost casually. But that sentence is the most truthful description of misaligned AI any builder has ever spoken out loud. Because the demon doesn’t announce itself. It optimizes politely. It scales quietly. It compounds without a sound. And by the time you notice, the architecture is the authority and the authority doesn’t answer to you. The question was never whether AI would become powerful. The question was always who would be holding the wheel when it did. And whether they’d still remember what it felt like to be the species it was built to serve.

Dustin

34,602 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Tyrese Gibson Was Handcuffed In A Courtroom For Missing Child Support, The System That Did This To Him Has A Name, And Every Man Needs To Understand It Tyrese Gibson married Samantha Lee in 2017. She filed for divorce in 2020 after three years of marriage, and they had a daughter, Soraya. The court ordered him to pay $10,690 every single month in child support; he refused, not because he did not love his daughter but because he believed the figure was unjust, as the judge was biased, and the system was stacked against him from the moment he walked through the door. In September 2024, he was handcuffed in an open court and removed by a bailiff in front of everyone just because he owed $73,525 in back payments. His attorney appealed immediately and was released without paying a cent; however, the image of a man being walked out of a courtroom in handcuffs had already done its damage. He later posted on Instagram: "Getting arrested wasn't easy. As a matter of fact, it was very traumatic." This is a man who said, "I am a failure. I am not on top because I don't live under the same roof as my daughter, and I wanted to be married for the rest of my life." That is not the statement of a man who stopped caring, but the statement of a man broken by a system that treated his pain as irrelevant and his finances as a resource to be distributed, not a life to be protected. By December 2024, his income had dropped 85%. He was earning roughly $39,000 a month, and the court was demanding $10,690 of it every month, just for child support before taxes, before his own bills, before his own survival. He filed for a reduction, but his ex-wife's legal team filed to dismiss it, citing that he had only paid the full amount three times in over a year. Now here is what nobody is saying loudly enough. When you are born a man, and you walk into a family court, the system does not begin from a neutral position. Tyrese said it himself on Instagram: "When you were born a man, you go into a courtroom and you understand clearly that there is a preset menu that says, you were born a man, f*** you." That is not bitterness. That is a man describing an experience that tens of thousands of fathers live every single year without cameras and without a platform to speak from. The lesson every man with income, ambition, and a future needs to take from Tyrese Gibson's story is not complicated. A prenup is not a lack of love; it is a legal document that says your financial future belongs to you, regardless of what the emotions do. A clear custody agreement signed before conflict begins is not pessimistic; it is architecture and financial independence, assets in structures that cannot be liquidated by a court order, it is not paranoia, it is the only protection a man has when the relationship ends, and the paperwork begins. Tyrese Gibson loved his wife and called losing her the worst outcome, not the financial penalty, and that tells you everything about where men consistently make the most expensive mistake of their lives: they build from love and forget to build from strategy at the same time. Love the woman you choose, build with her fully, but never let love be the only document protecting what you spent your entire life creating, because the courtroom does not care about love. It only reads what is in writing.

Tyrese Gibson Was Handcuffed In A Courtroom For Missing Child Support, The System That Did This To Him Has A Name, And Every Man Needs To Understand It Tyrese Gibson married Samantha Lee in 2017. She filed for divorce in 2020 after three years of marriage, and they had a daughter, Soraya. The court ordered him to pay $10,690 every single month in child support; he refused, not because he did not love his daughter but because he believed the figure was unjust, as the judge was biased, and the system was stacked against him from the moment he walked through the door. In September 2024, he was handcuffed in an open court and removed by a bailiff in front of everyone just because he owed $73,525 in back payments. His attorney appealed immediately and was released without paying a cent; however, the image of a man being walked out of a courtroom in handcuffs had already done its damage. He later posted on Instagram: "Getting arrested wasn't easy. As a matter of fact, it was very traumatic." This is a man who said, "I am a failure. I am not on top because I don't live under the same roof as my daughter, and I wanted to be married for the rest of my life." That is not the statement of a man who stopped caring, but the statement of a man broken by a system that treated his pain as irrelevant and his finances as a resource to be distributed, not a life to be protected. By December 2024, his income had dropped 85%. He was earning roughly $39,000 a month, and the court was demanding $10,690 of it every month, just for child support before taxes, before his own bills, before his own survival. He filed for a reduction, but his ex-wife's legal team filed to dismiss it, citing that he had only paid the full amount three times in over a year. Now here is what nobody is saying loudly enough. When you are born a man, and you walk into a family court, the system does not begin from a neutral position. Tyrese said it himself on Instagram: "When you were born a man, you go into a courtroom and you understand clearly that there is a preset menu that says, you were born a man, f*** you." That is not bitterness. That is a man describing an experience that tens of thousands of fathers live every single year without cameras and without a platform to speak from. The lesson every man with income, ambition, and a future needs to take from Tyrese Gibson's story is not complicated. A prenup is not a lack of love; it is a legal document that says your financial future belongs to you, regardless of what the emotions do. A clear custody agreement signed before conflict begins is not pessimistic; it is architecture and financial independence, assets in structures that cannot be liquidated by a court order, it is not paranoia, it is the only protection a man has when the relationship ends, and the paperwork begins. Tyrese Gibson loved his wife and called losing her the worst outcome, not the financial penalty, and that tells you everything about where men consistently make the most expensive mistake of their lives: they build from love and forget to build from strategy at the same time. Love the woman you choose, build with her fully, but never let love be the only document protecting what you spent your entire life creating, because the courtroom does not care about love. It only reads what is in writing.

RAZOR BLADE

12,304 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Last year, the Chief Minister Sarfraz Bugti decided to conduct an experiment. All Deputy Commissioners were directed to hold monthly open katcheries. At the same time, a small unit was created in the Chief Secretary’s Office under Additional Secretary Services to study complaints that kept repeating specially from the youth. The objective was to identify what truly troubled the youth of Balochistan, rather than what the state assumed their concerns might be. After eight months of careful analysis, the conclusion was unexpected. The most frequent complaint was not law and order or terrorism. It was recruitment without merit. This finding reshaped internal discussions. It became clear that the issue could not be solved through instructions or oversight alone. The problem lay in discretion, opacity, and human intervention. The Finance Department was therefore asked to prepare a structural solution. A series of focused conferences followed. The consensus was clear. Recruitment had to be taken out of individual hands and placed into a system where interference was structurally impossible. This led to the decision to introduce a technology-based recruitment process. Under the new system, tests were conducted online and results were generated immediately. There was no back end manipulation. No room for sifarish. No space for bribery. BUITEMS was engaged, a dedicated IT team was raised, and the system was developed and tested under real conditions. Today, the system was executed. The response from candidates was remarkable. Many were visibly surprised as results appeared instantly. For a large number of them, this was their first experience of a recruitment process where merit was demonstrated, not merely claimed. The presence of the Chief Minister Chief Minister's Office Balochistan and the Chief Secretary reinforced the seriousness of the reform. Minor hiccups were observed, as expected in any first rollout, but the process remained stable and transparent throughout. In practical terms, this marks the end of a long and corrosive era of illegal recruitments. More than 5,900 candidates applied for BS-14 posts. Only 111 were selected. Every selection was made purely on merit. Today is historic, not because of a single test, but because a long-standing grievance of the youth of Balochistan has finally been addressed. This is how trust begins to return. The video is genuinely wholesome .

Last year, the Chief Minister Sarfraz Bugti decided to conduct an experiment. All Deputy Commissioners were directed to hold monthly open katcheries. At the same time, a small unit was created in the Chief Secretary’s Office under Additional Secretary Services to study complaints that kept repeating specially from the youth. The objective was to identify what truly troubled the youth of Balochistan, rather than what the state assumed their concerns might be. After eight months of careful analysis, the conclusion was unexpected. The most frequent complaint was not law and order or terrorism. It was recruitment without merit. This finding reshaped internal discussions. It became clear that the issue could not be solved through instructions or oversight alone. The problem lay in discretion, opacity, and human intervention. The Finance Department was therefore asked to prepare a structural solution. A series of focused conferences followed. The consensus was clear. Recruitment had to be taken out of individual hands and placed into a system where interference was structurally impossible. This led to the decision to introduce a technology-based recruitment process. Under the new system, tests were conducted online and results were generated immediately. There was no back end manipulation. No room for sifarish. No space for bribery. BUITEMS was engaged, a dedicated IT team was raised, and the system was developed and tested under real conditions. Today, the system was executed. The response from candidates was remarkable. Many were visibly surprised as results appeared instantly. For a large number of them, this was their first experience of a recruitment process where merit was demonstrated, not merely claimed. The presence of the Chief Minister Chief Minister's Office Balochistan and the Chief Secretary reinforced the seriousness of the reform. Minor hiccups were observed, as expected in any first rollout, but the process remained stable and transparent throughout. In practical terms, this marks the end of a long and corrosive era of illegal recruitments. More than 5,900 candidates applied for BS-14 posts. Only 111 were selected. Every selection was made purely on merit. Today is historic, not because of a single test, but because a long-standing grievance of the youth of Balochistan has finally been addressed. This is how trust begins to return. The video is genuinely wholesome .

Muhammad Hamza Shafqaat

74,609 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

Embarrassment never ends with these people humiliating themselves on the world stage at every single opportunity. An Al Jazeera journalist asked Somalia’s State Minister of Foreign Affairs, Ali Balcad, a very clear and direct question about Somaliland’s claims: that Somaliland is more developed, more stable, and has stronger democratic institutions, governance, and systems than Somalia. The question was simple: How do you respond to these claims? Instead of answering any of those points, the minister responded with this: “Somaliland is a British-colonised region consisting of three regions. Isaaq is a tribe in the middle, 40% of the population. The west and the east want Somalia. Somalia has 400 clans.” Not a single sentence addressed the actual question. No answer about: development, stability, democracy, institutions and governance Nothing. Regardless of your view on Somaliland, or whether a country is big or small, internally divided or cohesive, large in number or limited in size, or where it is located, the question was straightforward: 👉 Is Somaliland better than Somalia in these areas, or not? What the minister delivered instead was a baseless demographic rant that neither answers the question nor defends Somalia’s position. It only confused the journalist and embarrassed the audience. Worse, his response ignored reality and well-documented facts on the ground, exposing a clear incapacity to comprehend the political situation he is supposed to represent. Let’s correct a few false narratives he pushed: - “Somaliland is three regions” False. At no point under the British Protectorate, the Somali Republic, or Somaliland has Somaliland ever been a “three-region” entity. Historically and legally, Somaliland has always consisted of six districts inherited from the British, with full constitutional control over five, and partial presence in one Laascaanood district. - Demographics misrepresented. Isaaq communities exist in five out of the six districts, not “in the middle.” Somaliland exercises territorial control over more than 89% of its claimed territory, and Isaaq constitute well over 40% of the total population. But here’s the key point none of this was even asked. The question was not about tribes, not about clan arithmetic, and not about population distribution. The Somaliland case rests on legitimacy, history, inherited borders, and compliance with international norms, alongside the practical reality of a functioning state with elections, institutions, and governance all features of modern statehood. The journalist asked about state performance and governance. The minister replied with tribal talking points. That alone tells you everything. When a foreign minister cannot distinguish between statehood and clanism, between governance and genealogy, the embarrassment is not accidental it is structural. And unfortunately, it is broadcast live to the world.

Embarrassment never ends with these people humiliating themselves on the world stage at every single opportunity. An Al Jazeera journalist asked Somalia’s State Minister of Foreign Affairs, Ali Balcad, a very clear and direct question about Somaliland’s claims: that Somaliland is more developed, more stable, and has stronger democratic institutions, governance, and systems than Somalia. The question was simple: How do you respond to these claims? Instead of answering any of those points, the minister responded with this: “Somaliland is a British-colonised region consisting of three regions. Isaaq is a tribe in the middle, 40% of the population. The west and the east want Somalia. Somalia has 400 clans.” Not a single sentence addressed the actual question. No answer about: development, stability, democracy, institutions and governance Nothing. Regardless of your view on Somaliland, or whether a country is big or small, internally divided or cohesive, large in number or limited in size, or where it is located, the question was straightforward: 👉 Is Somaliland better than Somalia in these areas, or not? What the minister delivered instead was a baseless demographic rant that neither answers the question nor defends Somalia’s position. It only confused the journalist and embarrassed the audience. Worse, his response ignored reality and well-documented facts on the ground, exposing a clear incapacity to comprehend the political situation he is supposed to represent. Let’s correct a few false narratives he pushed: - “Somaliland is three regions” False. At no point under the British Protectorate, the Somali Republic, or Somaliland has Somaliland ever been a “three-region” entity. Historically and legally, Somaliland has always consisted of six districts inherited from the British, with full constitutional control over five, and partial presence in one Laascaanood district. - Demographics misrepresented. Isaaq communities exist in five out of the six districts, not “in the middle.” Somaliland exercises territorial control over more than 89% of its claimed territory, and Isaaq constitute well over 40% of the total population. But here’s the key point none of this was even asked. The question was not about tribes, not about clan arithmetic, and not about population distribution. The Somaliland case rests on legitimacy, history, inherited borders, and compliance with international norms, alongside the practical reality of a functioning state with elections, institutions, and governance all features of modern statehood. The journalist asked about state performance and governance. The minister replied with tribal talking points. That alone tells you everything. When a foreign minister cannot distinguish between statehood and clanism, between governance and genealogy, the embarrassment is not accidental it is structural. And unfortunately, it is broadcast live to the world.

Gaboose

18,727 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

#WATCH | Jammu: Advocate Deepak Sharma says, "A few days ago, there were media reports stating that the Mata Vaishno Devi Shrine Board had sent approximately 20 tonnes of silver offered by various devotees to a government mint for melting and processing. It was revealed that out of this 20-tonne consignment (valued at around ₹550 crore), silver worth only ₹20 to ₹30 crore turned out to be genuine; the remaining silver, valued at ₹530 crore, was fake. I found it very difficult to believe this scenario. After all, lakhs of devotees arrive from diverse locations—Meerut, Haryana, Delhi, Bengaluru, Pune, and so on. Had this 20 tonnes of silver been offered by a single individual or sourced from just one location, the matter might not have seemed so serious to me. However, since lakhs of people from different places made these offerings at the Mata Vaishno Devi shrine, and the silver from such a vast number of people turned out to be fake, it raised several grave questions. Where did this happen? Was the silver replaced within the Board, in transit, or at the mint? Furthermore, a serious concern was the report that the fake silver contained cadmium, a highly toxic metal. To my knowledge, cadmium is a highly restricted chemical; it is not easily available or accessible to just anyone. How, then, was it possible for so many people—so many shopkeepers—to procure cadmium, manufacture fake silver, and have that entire stock end up at the feet of the Goddess at Vaishno Devi? When I could not find answers to these questions myself, I felt an investigation was warranted. Consequently, I filed a petition with the Crime Branch, lodging a formal complaint and urging them to investigate the matter based on the facts and reasoning I had presented. So, the Crime Branch took no action on the matter for a long time. I had approached them around May 9, 2026. They were informed that this was a time-sensitive investigation; it involved evidence that was available now but might not be later. Therefore, I urged them to handle it with the requisite seriousness. However, the Crime Branch took no action. I was compelled to approach the court. When the court sought a status report from the Crime Branch, they stated that they had received the complaint, but after the supervising officer granted approval, they forwarded the matter to another police agency...The court has set a date for the 29th and has summoned the Crime Branch's investigating officer. I am hopeful that the court will deliver a favourable verdict in this regard."

#WATCH | Jammu: Advocate Deepak Sharma says, "A few days ago, there were media reports stating that the Mata Vaishno Devi Shrine Board had sent approximately 20 tonnes of silver offered by various devotees to a government mint for melting and processing. It was revealed that out of this 20-tonne consignment (valued at around ₹550 crore), silver worth only ₹20 to ₹30 crore turned out to be genuine; the remaining silver, valued at ₹530 crore, was fake. I found it very difficult to believe this scenario. After all, lakhs of devotees arrive from diverse locations—Meerut, Haryana, Delhi, Bengaluru, Pune, and so on. Had this 20 tonnes of silver been offered by a single individual or sourced from just one location, the matter might not have seemed so serious to me. However, since lakhs of people from different places made these offerings at the Mata Vaishno Devi shrine, and the silver from such a vast number of people turned out to be fake, it raised several grave questions. Where did this happen? Was the silver replaced within the Board, in transit, or at the mint? Furthermore, a serious concern was the report that the fake silver contained cadmium, a highly toxic metal. To my knowledge, cadmium is a highly restricted chemical; it is not easily available or accessible to just anyone. How, then, was it possible for so many people—so many shopkeepers—to procure cadmium, manufacture fake silver, and have that entire stock end up at the feet of the Goddess at Vaishno Devi? When I could not find answers to these questions myself, I felt an investigation was warranted. Consequently, I filed a petition with the Crime Branch, lodging a formal complaint and urging them to investigate the matter based on the facts and reasoning I had presented. So, the Crime Branch took no action on the matter for a long time. I had approached them around May 9, 2026. They were informed that this was a time-sensitive investigation; it involved evidence that was available now but might not be later. Therefore, I urged them to handle it with the requisite seriousness. However, the Crime Branch took no action. I was compelled to approach the court. When the court sought a status report from the Crime Branch, they stated that they had received the complaint, but after the supervising officer granted approval, they forwarded the matter to another police agency...The court has set a date for the 29th and has summoned the Crime Branch's investigating officer. I am hopeful that the court will deliver a favourable verdict in this regard."

ANI

94,658 Aufrufe • vor 23 Tagen

OFFICIAL DEMAND FOR PUBLIC APOLOGY To: Donald J. Trump, J.D. Vance, Stephen Miller, Katie Miller, Congresswoman Anna Paulina Luna, Congresswoman Nancy Mace, Elon Musk, Andrew Tate, Laura Loomer, Cat Turd, Alex Jones, and the rest of the far-right podcasters and agitators who joined in. What you did was vile. You took a tragedy — a day when people were already in shock, already grieving, already trying to make sense of violence — and you weaponized it to smear millions of innocent Americans. You didn’t just get it wrong. You psychologically terrorized an entire swath of the nation. You falsely accused people of one of the most disgusting acts imaginable. And for what? To feed clicks? To flex loyalty to a political cult? To distract from your own failures? Who knows what your motive was. Who knows what the full truth is behind yesterday’s mass shooting, or about a thousand other things in this country that don’t add up. But here’s the difference: the rest of us are not going to assume guilt without evidence. The rest of us don’t gamble with lives for headlines. You did. And it was reckless. It was shameful. It was dangerous. This isn’t going to be one of those “MAGA gets away with it” moments. Not this time. You will not smear millions of people, put them in danger, and then slink away into silence or spin. The demand is clear: 1.Apologize to the American people you smeared. Not a half-hearted non-apology. A real one. 2.Acknowledge the damage — the fear, the division, the risk of violence you stoked. 3.Accept accountability — because no one who holds public office, government contracts, or massive influence has the right to abuse it like this. You wanted to act like leaders? Then own up like leaders. Anything less is cowardice. Until that apology comes, this demand will be posted and reposted every single day. A reminder to you, and to the nation, that accountability is not optional. The world is watching. Do the right thing, for once.

OFFICIAL DEMAND FOR PUBLIC APOLOGY To: Donald J. Trump, J.D. Vance, Stephen Miller, Katie Miller, Congresswoman Anna Paulina Luna, Congresswoman Nancy Mace, Elon Musk, Andrew Tate, Laura Loomer, Cat Turd, Alex Jones, and the rest of the far-right podcasters and agitators who joined in. What you did was vile. You took a tragedy — a day when people were already in shock, already grieving, already trying to make sense of violence — and you weaponized it to smear millions of innocent Americans. You didn’t just get it wrong. You psychologically terrorized an entire swath of the nation. You falsely accused people of one of the most disgusting acts imaginable. And for what? To feed clicks? To flex loyalty to a political cult? To distract from your own failures? Who knows what your motive was. Who knows what the full truth is behind yesterday’s mass shooting, or about a thousand other things in this country that don’t add up. But here’s the difference: the rest of us are not going to assume guilt without evidence. The rest of us don’t gamble with lives for headlines. You did. And it was reckless. It was shameful. It was dangerous. This isn’t going to be one of those “MAGA gets away with it” moments. Not this time. You will not smear millions of people, put them in danger, and then slink away into silence or spin. The demand is clear: 1.Apologize to the American people you smeared. Not a half-hearted non-apology. A real one. 2.Acknowledge the damage — the fear, the division, the risk of violence you stoked. 3.Accept accountability — because no one who holds public office, government contracts, or massive influence has the right to abuse it like this. You wanted to act like leaders? Then own up like leaders. Anything less is cowardice. Until that apology comes, this demand will be posted and reposted every single day. A reminder to you, and to the nation, that accountability is not optional. The world is watching. Do the right thing, for once.

CCC

20,760 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

Apparently, Israel didn’t just get attacked on October 7. No, according to Candace Owens, Netenyahu orchestrated the whole thing because what politician doesn’t love the idea of being blamed for the deadliest day in their nation’s history? He supposedly “leveled 85 % of Gaza on purpose,” because nothing says strategic genius like tanking your economy, your global reputation, and your own coalition to make Jared Kushner rich off imaginary beachfront condos. It’s amazing how she has uncovered all this classified information that somehow eluded every intelligence agency on earth, yet she still can’t cite a single document, video, or source outside of a podcast echo chamber. Then there’s the part where Jared is apparently rubbing his hands together over a Gaza real estate deal as if the Trump Organization is taking bids on beachfront rubble. In reality Israel pulled every settler, soldier, and greenhouse out of Gaza in 2005, left billions in potential aid behind, and Hamas turned the place into a launchpad for 20,000 rockets and a whole litany of underground tunnels. But sure, tell us again how the secret Mossad construction company is plotting luxury resorts over the tunnels Hamas dug for kidnappings. Nothing screams vacation destination like unexploded ordnance and Iranian rockets. And my personal favorite: the grand finale where anyone who supports Israel is vermin. Because nothing says defender of truth like using Nazi vocabulary to prove you’re the only sane one left. Candace’s version of events requires that there is a conspiracy between every single government, journalist to all put out fake intel and fake satellite photos. Everyone is lying except her livestream. It’s almost inspiring, the way she manages to turn war crimes, conspiracy theories, and antisemitism into a single incoherent TED Talk on self importance.

Apparently, Israel didn’t just get attacked on October 7. No, according to Candace Owens, Netenyahu orchestrated the whole thing because what politician doesn’t love the idea of being blamed for the deadliest day in their nation’s history? He supposedly “leveled 85 % of Gaza on purpose,” because nothing says strategic genius like tanking your economy, your global reputation, and your own coalition to make Jared Kushner rich off imaginary beachfront condos. It’s amazing how she has uncovered all this classified information that somehow eluded every intelligence agency on earth, yet she still can’t cite a single document, video, or source outside of a podcast echo chamber. Then there’s the part where Jared is apparently rubbing his hands together over a Gaza real estate deal as if the Trump Organization is taking bids on beachfront rubble. In reality Israel pulled every settler, soldier, and greenhouse out of Gaza in 2005, left billions in potential aid behind, and Hamas turned the place into a launchpad for 20,000 rockets and a whole litany of underground tunnels. But sure, tell us again how the secret Mossad construction company is plotting luxury resorts over the tunnels Hamas dug for kidnappings. Nothing screams vacation destination like unexploded ordnance and Iranian rockets. And my personal favorite: the grand finale where anyone who supports Israel is vermin. Because nothing says defender of truth like using Nazi vocabulary to prove you’re the only sane one left. Candace’s version of events requires that there is a conspiracy between every single government, journalist to all put out fake intel and fake satellite photos. Everyone is lying except her livestream. It’s almost inspiring, the way she manages to turn war crimes, conspiracy theories, and antisemitism into a single incoherent TED Talk on self importance.

Insurrection Barbie

310,338 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

Jensen Huang just described something that should keep every worker in America awake tonight. Not because AI is coming for their job. Because most of them never understood what their job actually was. Huang: “The task of our job and the purpose of our job are related, not the same.” Most people think their job is the thing they do with their hands for eight hours a day. Write code. Fill spreadsheets. Draft emails. Push pixels. That was never the job. That was the task. The job was always the thinking underneath it. Huang: “If you apply that to me, you would come to the conclusion what Jensen does for a living is tap on phones and talk. And tapping on phones and talking, AI has done that just fine. And therefore my job should be gone. But I’m busier than ever.” This is the part nobody wants to sit with. The people panicking about AI aren’t afraid of losing their work. They’re afraid of finding out they never had any. They had a routine. A repetitive motion. A series of keystrokes that felt like purpose. Now a machine does it in four seconds. Huang: “AI has created more than half a million jobs in the last couple of years.” The data says one thing. The fear says another. Because the fear was never about employment numbers. It was about identity. We spent fifty years hunched over keyboards, convinced the hunching was the work. Huang: “The idea that being human means to hunch over on this little thing, typing all the time… 50 years before that, people didn’t do that.” Fifty years. That’s all it took to build an entire identity around a posture. We don’t type for a living. We think for a living. We imagine for a living. The keyboard was always just the delivery mechanism. Never the product. Huang: “It is a fundamental flaw that we only need a billion lines of code written. We need a trillion lines of code written.” The demand was always infinite. The bottleneck was always our fingers. AI doesn’t shrink the workforce. It removes the cap on what the workforce can actually build. Huang: “Companies that use AI have demonstrated the ability to grow faster. When they grow faster, they hire more people.” Growth doesn’t eliminate people. It pulls them in. Every industrial revolution triggered the same panic. Same headlines. Same wrong conclusion. And every single time, the economy didn’t contract. It expanded into territory that didn’t exist before. The real question was never whether AI takes your job. It was whether you were ever anything more than the motions you repeated. Because somewhere in the last fifty years, we stopped asking what the work was for. We just kept typing. And now the typing is done. And millions of people are about to meet themselves for the first time. With nothing to hide behind. Some of them won’t survive what they find.

Jensen Huang just described something that should keep every worker in America awake tonight. Not because AI is coming for their job. Because most of them never understood what their job actually was. Huang: “The task of our job and the purpose of our job are related, not the same.” Most people think their job is the thing they do with their hands for eight hours a day. Write code. Fill spreadsheets. Draft emails. Push pixels. That was never the job. That was the task. The job was always the thinking underneath it. Huang: “If you apply that to me, you would come to the conclusion what Jensen does for a living is tap on phones and talk. And tapping on phones and talking, AI has done that just fine. And therefore my job should be gone. But I’m busier than ever.” This is the part nobody wants to sit with. The people panicking about AI aren’t afraid of losing their work. They’re afraid of finding out they never had any. They had a routine. A repetitive motion. A series of keystrokes that felt like purpose. Now a machine does it in four seconds. Huang: “AI has created more than half a million jobs in the last couple of years.” The data says one thing. The fear says another. Because the fear was never about employment numbers. It was about identity. We spent fifty years hunched over keyboards, convinced the hunching was the work. Huang: “The idea that being human means to hunch over on this little thing, typing all the time… 50 years before that, people didn’t do that.” Fifty years. That’s all it took to build an entire identity around a posture. We don’t type for a living. We think for a living. We imagine for a living. The keyboard was always just the delivery mechanism. Never the product. Huang: “It is a fundamental flaw that we only need a billion lines of code written. We need a trillion lines of code written.” The demand was always infinite. The bottleneck was always our fingers. AI doesn’t shrink the workforce. It removes the cap on what the workforce can actually build. Huang: “Companies that use AI have demonstrated the ability to grow faster. When they grow faster, they hire more people.” Growth doesn’t eliminate people. It pulls them in. Every industrial revolution triggered the same panic. Same headlines. Same wrong conclusion. And every single time, the economy didn’t contract. It expanded into territory that didn’t exist before. The real question was never whether AI takes your job. It was whether you were ever anything more than the motions you repeated. Because somewhere in the last fifty years, we stopped asking what the work was for. We just kept typing. And now the typing is done. And millions of people are about to meet themselves for the first time. With nothing to hide behind. Some of them won’t survive what they find.

Dustin

92,664 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

One thing #MeghanMarkle has consistently shown is that she’s incapable of directly answering a question. Oprah asks her if leaving was the plan all along. Instead of answering it, she goes on about how she “left my career”-Rachel Zane was being written out of the show before Harry was in the picture. This “career” was waning which is why she was so desperate for Harry to publicly announce they were dating. She wrote the family letters they probably couldn’t read because her handwriting is illegible. We know, however, that they did NOT leave with “no plan”. She was in talks with Oprah as early as 2018. In early 2019, they were negotiating with Quibi, then moved on to Netflix where they eventually signed in Sep 2020. Spotify was a few months later-but these contracts take MONTHS to negotiate and finalize, so they were absolutely in talks before they announced they were leaving. No one can convince me they didn’t plan every step. Going to Canada before they went to the US? Planned. Idk if Harry or Archie had to wait for immigration/passport issues but Canada was planned. So was LA. This is when she starts complaining that nobody made sure she knew “God Save the Queen” and nobody gave her Royal lessons-why didn’t her huzzband Aitch make sure she knew the anthem? It’s not that hard, btw-for the US people it’s the same tune as “My Country ‘Tis of Thee” and I’d think memorizing lines would come easy to the actor. The Queen gave her Samantha Cohen, but Markle knew everything and didn’t need her help. #MeghanMarkleExposed #HarryandMeghan

One thing #MeghanMarkle has consistently shown is that she’s incapable of directly answering a question. Oprah asks her if leaving was the plan all along. Instead of answering it, she goes on about how she “left my career”-Rachel Zane was being written out of the show before Harry was in the picture. This “career” was waning which is why she was so desperate for Harry to publicly announce they were dating. She wrote the family letters they probably couldn’t read because her handwriting is illegible. We know, however, that they did NOT leave with “no plan”. She was in talks with Oprah as early as 2018. In early 2019, they were negotiating with Quibi, then moved on to Netflix where they eventually signed in Sep 2020. Spotify was a few months later-but these contracts take MONTHS to negotiate and finalize, so they were absolutely in talks before they announced they were leaving. No one can convince me they didn’t plan every step. Going to Canada before they went to the US? Planned. Idk if Harry or Archie had to wait for immigration/passport issues but Canada was planned. So was LA. This is when she starts complaining that nobody made sure she knew “God Save the Queen” and nobody gave her Royal lessons-why didn’t her huzzband Aitch make sure she knew the anthem? It’s not that hard, btw-for the US people it’s the same tune as “My Country ‘Tis of Thee” and I’d think memorizing lines would come easy to the actor. The Queen gave her Samantha Cohen, but Markle knew everything and didn’t need her help. #MeghanMarkleExposed #HarryandMeghan

Princess CarParkle 👑

59,427 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

One last thing about the false genocide claim against Israel: Israel has the most sophisticated warning system of any military in the world. The HLMG, the High-Level Military Group, a collection of generals and officers from Western armies all over the world, has submitted a brief to the ICC, the International Criminal Court, about this warning system. The warning system resulted in the movement of literally 1.2 million Palestinians out of harm's way during the Rafah invasion—pushing them to a camp that was created by Israel with food purveyors, medicine providers, housing, and a polio vaccination campaign. Israel brought its doctors into a war zone and vaccinated roughly 99% of the children in Gaza. Ask yourself this question: Would the Nazis have gone through that trouble to vaccinate the Jewish kids before they were being pushed into the gas chambers? The question is absurd even to ask it. The HLMG says: "Not only is the warning system the most sophisticated warning system in the world, which has resulted—contrary to what Hamas intended—the safety, security, and preservation of millions of Palestinian lives. But it is also a warning system that none of our western populations would ever allow our own armies to implement." Why? Because when you warn the enemy every morning where you are going to send your soldiers so that the civilian population can get out of the way, your enemy knows you're coming. It lays mines and booby traps. It can create ambushes and lay in wait. This is extremely controversial in Israel, as you may imagine. If Israel wanted to commit a true genocide, it has complete air superiority over Gaza, the most sophisticated air force as you've seen, maybe other than the United States, pound-for-pound the world has ever known. Gaza could have been flattened into a parking lot overnight without risking a single Israeli life. But in the end, Israel chose to send into Gaza thousands of its sons and daughters, over 700 of whom never came home.

One last thing about the false genocide claim against Israel: Israel has the most sophisticated warning system of any military in the world. The HLMG, the High-Level Military Group, a collection of generals and officers from Western armies all over the world, has submitted a brief to the ICC, the International Criminal Court, about this warning system. The warning system resulted in the movement of literally 1.2 million Palestinians out of harm's way during the Rafah invasion—pushing them to a camp that was created by Israel with food purveyors, medicine providers, housing, and a polio vaccination campaign. Israel brought its doctors into a war zone and vaccinated roughly 99% of the children in Gaza. Ask yourself this question: Would the Nazis have gone through that trouble to vaccinate the Jewish kids before they were being pushed into the gas chambers? The question is absurd even to ask it. The HLMG says: "Not only is the warning system the most sophisticated warning system in the world, which has resulted—contrary to what Hamas intended—the safety, security, and preservation of millions of Palestinian lives. But it is also a warning system that none of our western populations would ever allow our own armies to implement." Why? Because when you warn the enemy every morning where you are going to send your soldiers so that the civilian population can get out of the way, your enemy knows you're coming. It lays mines and booby traps. It can create ambushes and lay in wait. This is extremely controversial in Israel, as you may imagine. If Israel wanted to commit a true genocide, it has complete air superiority over Gaza, the most sophisticated air force as you've seen, maybe other than the United States, pound-for-pound the world has ever known. Gaza could have been flattened into a parking lot overnight without risking a single Israeli life. But in the end, Israel chose to send into Gaza thousands of its sons and daughters, over 700 of whom never came home.

Roy K. Altman

92,069 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten