ๆญฃๅœจๅŠ ่ฝฝ่ง†้ข‘...

่ง†้ข‘ๅŠ ่ฝฝๅคฑ่ดฅ

โ€œ๐—œ ๐—ฎ๐—บ ๐—ฎ ๐—น๐—ฎ๐˜„๐˜†๐—ฒ๐—ฟ ๐˜๐˜‚๐—ฟ๐—ป๐—ฒ๐—ฑ ๐—ฝ๐—ฟ๐—ผ๐—ณ๐—ฒ๐˜€๐˜€๐—ผ๐—ฟ ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฑ ๐—ฎ ๐—๐—ฒ๐˜„๐—ถ๐˜€๐—ต ๐—ฐ๐—ผ๐—ป๐˜ƒ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐˜ ๐˜๐—ผ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—–๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ต๐—ผ๐—น๐—ถ๐—ฐ ๐—ณ๐—ฎ๐—ถ๐˜๐—ต.โ€ Melissa Presser didnโ€™t drift into Catholicism. She walked straight through Judaism, Protestantism, and straight into the Church. And it cost her everything. Then it cost her again. People donโ€™t convert to Catholicism for comfort. They...

16,555 ๆฌก่ง‚็œ‹ โ€ข 7 ไธชๆœˆๅ‰ โ€ขvia X (Twitter)

0 ๆก่ฏ„่ฎบ

ๆš‚ๆ— ่ฏ„่ฎบ

ๅŽŸๅง‹ๅธ–ๅญ็š„่ฏ„่ฎบๅฐ†ๆ˜พ็คบๅœจ่ฟ™้‡Œ

็›ธๅ…ณ่ง†้ข‘

This woman walked into this ice cream shop and ordered an ice cream cone. When they handed it to her she told them she couldnโ€™t pay for it. ๐Ÿ˜ณ The employees said she had to pay for it. She didnโ€™t have any money. She asks them if they are going to call the cops. This male customer sitting there chimes in and says if they call the cops he will be a witness. The woman said she told them she wanted it for free but the man said thatโ€™s not true. He said he watched her the whole time. She tries to put it down on the countertop but the employee tells her donโ€™t leave it there. So she walks over and throws it in the trash. The witness tells her โ€œthis is what entitlement looks likeโ€ as she walks out the door. Some people said why not just buy the ice cream for her, to have a heart, because you never know what someone is going through. Others said if she had asked the right way and told them up front she didnโ€™t have any money then maybe they would have purchased it for her but to come in and order and THEN tell them you donโ€™t have any money is just wrong. This wasnโ€™t a steak or a burger or a meal, I could see buying her those things to help someone out that is hungry but an ice cream is not a necessity. No one owes anyone anything. What do you think? Should one of them have bought the ice cream for her, given it to her for free? Or do you think she was trying to get something for free and trying to take advantage of them?

๐Ÿ‘‰M-ร›-R-ฤŒ-H๐Ÿ‘ˆ

1,233,553 ๆฌก่ง‚็œ‹ โ€ข 3 ไธชๆœˆๅ‰

๐—ฆ๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ฝ๐—ฟ๐—ผ๐˜‚๐—ฑ๐—น๐˜† ๐—ฑ๐—ถ๐—ฑ ๐Ÿฏ ๐—ฑ๐—ฎ๐˜†๐˜€-๐—ฎ-๐˜„๐—ฒ๐—ฒ๐—ธ ๐—ฃ๐—ฟ๐—ผ๐˜๐—ฒ๐˜€๐˜๐—ฎ๐—ป๐˜ ๐—ฐ๐—ต๐˜‚๐—ฟ๐—ฐ๐—ตโ€ฆ until history exposed the whole system. โœ๏ธ๐Ÿ”ฅ Lesley wasnโ€™t a casual Baptist - she was the ๐˜ช๐˜ฅ๐˜ฆ๐˜ข๐˜ญ Protestant. Until she did the one thing Protestants fear most: She read the early Church. Not one Father matched modern Protestant theology. Not one believed in โ€œsymbolic communion.โ€ Not one preached โ€œBible alone.โ€ Not one supported 40,000 denominations and self-appointed pastors. The more she studied, the more obvious it became: Protestantism is a 500-year-old rebuild. Catholicism is the original blueprint. She went looking for โ€œauthentic Christianityโ€โ€ฆ and found the Church every other church came from. The Fathers destroyed sola scriptura. The Mass destroyed every substitute. The Eucharist wrecked her last objections. This wasnโ€™t a conversion. This was a homecoming. And Protestants really hate when the history is this clear.

๐š•๐š’๐š๐š๐š•๐šŽ ๐š˜๐š—๐šŽ โ™ฑ๐Ÿ‡ป๐Ÿ‡ฆ

20,267 ๆฌก่ง‚็œ‹ โ€ข 9 ไธชๆœˆๅ‰

Pauline Hansonโ€™s Nuclear Word Salad OH MY GOD. ๐Ÿ˜‚ #PaulineHanson has produced what may be her finest piece of nuclear word salad yet. She was asked a very simple question: How many nuclear reactors does #OneNation actually want, and does the government need to fund them? < AND DOES THE GOVERNMENT need to fund them? Her answer starts reasonably enough: โ› โ€œPut in a reactor.โ€ Then the Hanson sentence generator kicks in: โ› โ€œTo start with one, it all comes down to if you can afford it as well, as a nation.โ€ WHAT DOES THAT SENTENCE MEAN? ๐Ÿ˜‚ โ€œTo start with oneโ€ โ€” okay, one what? โ€œIt all comes down to if you can afford itโ€ โ€” afford WHAT? โ€œAs well, as a nationโ€ โ€” as well as WHAT? And then, without actually finishing the thought, she simply abandons the sentence and changes direction: โ€œAnd I'd like the reactor to go on the east coast.โ€ Righto. Geography solved. Then: โ€œBuild one and deliver the power.โ€ Excellent. A nuclear reactor has now been reduced to โ€œbuild one.โ€ But then comes the piรจce de rรฉsistance: โ€œThe more we can get power out to the people, we will increase industries, manufacturing, and leave the energy cost on people.โ€ ๐–ง€ LEAVE THE ENERGY COST ON PEOPLE. What? Did she mean reduce energy costs? Did she mean lower energy costs? Did she mean pass energy costs on to people? Nobody knows. Because she has started one sentence, wandered into another, thrown โ€œindustriesโ€ and โ€œmanufacturingโ€ into the middle of it, and then crashed directly into: LEAVE THE ENERGY COST ON PEOPLE. And THAT is apparently One Nation's nuclear energy policy. โ†’One reactor. โ†’Somewhere on the east coast. โ†’If we can afford it. โ†’Build one. โ†’Deliver the power. โ†’Increase industries. โ†’Manufacturing. โ†’Leave the energy cost on people. Question unanswered. Sentence unfinished. Policy missing. But hey... #nuclear ๐Ÿ˜‚ She really is DUMBER than a pie full of pimples.

The Noisy Elephant

13,544 ๆฌก่ง‚็œ‹ โ€ข 22 ๅคฉๅ‰

These politicians are so slippery. Anna Turley knows exactly what sheโ€™s doing, and itโ€™s frustrating watching her try to hide whatโ€™s actually going to happen. On Times Radio, Stig Abell put the Linton-on-Ouse plan to her: 1,200 adult male asylum seekers on the former RAF base next to a village of only 600 people. If it goes ahead, men will outnumber women five to one. He asked her straight: โ€œWould you want to live in a village where overnight thereโ€™s 5 men to every woman?โ€ Turley tried to deceive people. โ€œThey are not living in the village. They are containedโ€ฆ on these camps everything is there for them.โ€ Stig cut her off. โ€œLetโ€™s define our term โ€˜containedโ€™ here. Are they allowed out into the village, yes or no?โ€ Turley: โ€œYes, they will be allowed out.โ€ Stig: โ€œWell theyโ€™re not contained then are they!โ€ Exactly. Why lie? A blatant lie she had to walk back immediately. The locals already know whatโ€™s happening. Donโ€™t try and BS them. Then she claimed that because โ€œeverything they needโ€ is on site they wonโ€™t want to leave. Yes they will. And that puts the village in danger. Even the government knows it. Thatโ€™s why they just started handing asylum seekers booklets telling them not to attack women and children. And donโ€™t boast about food and healthcare on site. British people struggle to get by and wait months for a doctor, while people who have come here illegally get it handed to them for free. The whole thing is a disgrace.โ€‹โ€‹โ€‹โ€‹โ€‹โ€‹โ€‹โ€‹โ€‹โ€‹โ€‹โ€‹โ€‹โ€‹โ€‹โ€‹โ€‹โ€‹โ€‹โ€‹โ€‹โ€‹โ€‹โ€‹โ€‹โ€‹โ€‹โ€‹โ€‹โ€‹โ€‹โ€‹โ€‹โ€‹โ€‹โ€‹โ€‹โ€‹โ€‹โ€‹โ€‹โ€‹โ€‹โ€‹โ€‹โ€‹โ€‹โ€‹โ€‹โ€‹ ๐Ÿ˜ก

J Stewart

31,540 ๆฌก่ง‚็œ‹ โ€ข 9 ๅคฉๅ‰