Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Bu video yüklenirken bir sorun oluştu. Bu geçici bir ağ sorunundan kaynaklanıyor olabilir veya video kullanılamıyor olabilir.

Ana Sayfaya Dön

𝗜 𝘁𝗵𝗶𝗻𝗸 𝗺𝗼𝘀𝘁 𝗽𝗲𝗼𝗽𝗹𝗲 𝗮𝗿𝗲 𝘂𝗻𝗱𝗲𝗿𝗲𝘀𝘁𝗶𝗺𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘄𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗽𝗿𝗲𝗱𝗶𝗰𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗺𝗮𝗿𝗸𝗲𝘁𝘀 𝗮𝗿𝗲 𝗮𝗯𝗼𝘂𝘁 𝘁𝗼 𝗯𝗲𝗰𝗼𝗺𝗲. For years, the internet trained us to consume opinions. One analyst says AI will change everything. ➠ Another says we’re in a bubble. ➠ A CEO makes a bold prediction. ➠ Twitter debates explode. ➠ And... somehow, everyone sounds confident. But recently, I caught myself thinking: What if instead of listening to opinions… we watched conviction? ➠ Not headlines. ➠ Not hype. ➠ But where people are actually placing belief. ➠ That’s where prediction markets become fascinating. ➠ Because suddenly, the conversation changes. Instead of asking: What are people saying? You start asking: What are people willing to bet on? And honestly? That difference matters. Looking through the Tech section on 1win Markets, what stood out to me wasn’t one single prediction. It was the sheer variety of questions people are actively thinking about in real time. Questions like: ➠ Will OpenAI release GPT-6 this year? ➠nWill Anthropic launch Claude 5? ➠ Will Apple finally release a foldable iPhone? ➠ Will AI leadership shift again? ➠ Will entirely new hardware categories emerge because of AI? These aren’t distant ideas anymore. They’re becoming measurable expectations. That shift feels important. Because technology is moving faster than ever. Every week brings another launch. Another breakthrough. Another company trying to define the future. And somewhere between the noise, something interesting happens: ➠ Collective conviction starts forming. ➠ You can literally watch where attention is moving. ➠ Where confidence is building. ➠ Where uncertainty still exists. For example: When the NVIDIA CEO says AI stocks are discounted, that’s one perspective. But when thousands of people begin forming independent views across multiple tech events? ➠ That becomes something bigger. ➠ It becomes a signal. ➠ Not perfect. ➠ Not always right. ➠ But still valuable. ➠bBecause markets don’t just reflect information. ➠ They reflect belief. ➠ And sometimes belief moves before reality catches up. That’s why I genuinely think the next phase of prediction markets could become much bigger than people expect. Not because they replace news. But because they add something news can’t: Real-time conviction. The future won’t only be discussed. It’ll increasingly be measured. And honestly? We’re probably still early. Explore the Tech markets here: 1win 1win Token #AI #Tech #PredictionMarketsshow more

The Agentic Alpha

5,017 subscribers

12,039 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

When I was 8 years old, growing up in Taipei, I called my aunt in San Francisco and asked: What is the best science and technology school in the world? She said MIT. I went on the internet, found it, and decided that was where I was going. All because of a Steven Spielberg movie about a little robot boy who wanted to find his mom. I grew up as an only child. What stayed with me from that movie was not just the technology. It was the possibility that one day, an artificial companion could understand how I felt. That was the first time I remember being moved by a technology that could change how humans experience reality. Years later, I did get to MIT. I studied AI before it became obvious. I became a machine learning engineer, built my first company, joined a $3.5B VC fund, left to build again, failed, started again, moved to New York alone, and built through one of the hardest crypto markets as a solo founder after the collapse of FTX. I kept going because I have always been drawn to technologies that change how humans understand the world. AI was the first version of that. Crypto and prediction markets are the next. I believe the future I am building toward is inevitable. The only question is whether I get to be one of the people who helps realize it. That future is a world where markets become information-first. The old model of trading was asset-first. It rewarded people with capital, financial education, institutional access, and better tools. But the next generation of markets will be shaped by information flow, narrative, attention, politics, culture, sentiment, and collective belief. Prediction markets make this shift obvious. They are one of the first asset classes where the value is informational, not purely financial in the traditional sense. Your edge does not have to come from technical analysis or a traditional finance background. Your edge can come from knowing something before it becomes consensus. From seeing reality shift before the market prices it in. Someone with firsthand knowledge of an unfolding event can have more alpha than an institution with a much bigger balance sheet. They turn belief into price. But price alone is not enough. Polymarket shows what the market thinks will happen. ARES is built to understand why the market is changing. We are building an information-first trading platform for prediction markets and other narrative-driven assets. One that does not just show traders what is moving, but helps them understand why odds are shifting, why narratives are forming, and why the future is moving in a certain direction. But the bigger vision is not just a better trading terminal. We want to turn every trade into an information object. Every position can become a piece of content. Every market view can become a signal. Every trader can build a reputation around conviction and accuracy. Most feeds rank information by engagement. Who got the most likes. Who already has the biggest audience. Markets allow us to rank information differently. How much are you willing to stake on what you believe? How often have you been right? That creates a fundamentally different kind of media feed. One powered by conviction, track record, and market incentives. One that becomes harder to fake. One that can help people understand not just what the market thinks will happen, but why reality is changing. I also believe prediction markets are one of the few markets where humans can still have a real edge over AI. AI knows what is already on the internet. But humans experience reality before it becomes data. We see things before they become headlines. We hear things before they become reports. We feel shifts before they become consensus. If those signals can be priced, organized, and made legible, then more people can gain access to financial opportunity, information agency, and power. That is what Ares is building toward. I spent years watching founders from the VC side of the table, always thinking: I wish that was me. Now it is. I talked about this journey and the thesis behind Ares in my conversation with Dmitry on Predict Time If you are building, trading, investing, or thinking deeply about prediction markets and information markets, I would love for you to watch it. And if you want to collaborate on what we are building, contribute to the vision, or join the team, we are always open to exceptional people across functions. DMs are open.

When I was 8 years old, growing up in Taipei, I called my aunt in San Francisco and asked: What is the best science and technology school in the world? She said MIT. I went on the internet, found it, and decided that was where I was going. All because of a Steven Spielberg movie about a little robot boy who wanted to find his mom. I grew up as an only child. What stayed with me from that movie was not just the technology. It was the possibility that one day, an artificial companion could understand how I felt. That was the first time I remember being moved by a technology that could change how humans experience reality. Years later, I did get to MIT. I studied AI before it became obvious. I became a machine learning engineer, built my first company, joined a $3.5B VC fund, left to build again, failed, started again, moved to New York alone, and built through one of the hardest crypto markets as a solo founder after the collapse of FTX. I kept going because I have always been drawn to technologies that change how humans understand the world. AI was the first version of that. Crypto and prediction markets are the next. I believe the future I am building toward is inevitable. The only question is whether I get to be one of the people who helps realize it. That future is a world where markets become information-first. The old model of trading was asset-first. It rewarded people with capital, financial education, institutional access, and better tools. But the next generation of markets will be shaped by information flow, narrative, attention, politics, culture, sentiment, and collective belief. Prediction markets make this shift obvious. They are one of the first asset classes where the value is informational, not purely financial in the traditional sense. Your edge does not have to come from technical analysis or a traditional finance background. Your edge can come from knowing something before it becomes consensus. From seeing reality shift before the market prices it in. Someone with firsthand knowledge of an unfolding event can have more alpha than an institution with a much bigger balance sheet. They turn belief into price. But price alone is not enough. Polymarket shows what the market thinks will happen. ARES is built to understand why the market is changing. We are building an information-first trading platform for prediction markets and other narrative-driven assets. One that does not just show traders what is moving, but helps them understand why odds are shifting, why narratives are forming, and why the future is moving in a certain direction. But the bigger vision is not just a better trading terminal. We want to turn every trade into an information object. Every position can become a piece of content. Every market view can become a signal. Every trader can build a reputation around conviction and accuracy. Most feeds rank information by engagement. Who got the most likes. Who already has the biggest audience. Markets allow us to rank information differently. How much are you willing to stake on what you believe? How often have you been right? That creates a fundamentally different kind of media feed. One powered by conviction, track record, and market incentives. One that becomes harder to fake. One that can help people understand not just what the market thinks will happen, but why reality is changing. I also believe prediction markets are one of the few markets where humans can still have a real edge over AI. AI knows what is already on the internet. But humans experience reality before it becomes data. We see things before they become headlines. We hear things before they become reports. We feel shifts before they become consensus. If those signals can be priced, organized, and made legible, then more people can gain access to financial opportunity, information agency, and power. That is what Ares is building toward. I spent years watching founders from the VC side of the table, always thinking: I wish that was me. Now it is. I talked about this journey and the thesis behind Ares in my conversation with Dmitry on Predict Time If you are building, trading, investing, or thinking deeply about prediction markets and information markets, I would love for you to watch it. And if you want to collaborate on what we are building, contribute to the vision, or join the team, we are always open to exceptional people across functions. DMs are open.

Morgan Lai

302,663 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

I spent hours creating this. Not because it was another content task. But because I genuinely felt there was something deeper here. The 2026 World Cup is going to be different. Not just because of football, but because billions of people will react, predict, debate, and move together in real time like never before. While working on this, I kept thinking about one thing: What happens when global emotion starts behaving like infrastructure? That’s the feeling I wanted this video to capture. I wanted this to feel immersive, thoughtful, and cinematic from start to finish. Just a cinematic look into what the future of prediction markets could actually feel like through Pots Market(POTS MARKET). If you watch one thing today, make it this. And when you finish, tell me honestly: Does this still feel like a normal prediction platform to you? Watch below 👇

I spent hours creating this. Not because it was another content task. But because I genuinely felt there was something deeper here. The 2026 World Cup is going to be different. Not just because of football, but because billions of people will react, predict, debate, and move together in real time like never before. While working on this, I kept thinking about one thing: What happens when global emotion starts behaving like infrastructure? That’s the feeling I wanted this video to capture. I wanted this to feel immersive, thoughtful, and cinematic from start to finish. Just a cinematic look into what the future of prediction markets could actually feel like through Pots Market(POTS MARKET). If you watch one thing today, make it this. And when you finish, tell me honestly: Does this still feel like a normal prediction platform to you? Watch below 👇

Edrin Valecrest

120,866 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

Elon Musk: In less than 10 years, work won’t be something you have to do… it’ll be something you choose to do. He says the future of AI and robotics is heading toward a world where working becomes optional — just like growing your own vegetables. You can do it, but you don’t have to. Some people will still work because they enjoy it, not because they need to survive. That flips everything we know about jobs, money, and purpose. Imagine waking up and deciding to work purely because you want to, not because you’re forced to. That’s the kind of shift he’s talking about. And it doesn’t stop there — Musk believes Tesla’s Optimus robots could eventually perform highly skilled tasks like surgery, delivering medical care that’s better than what the best humans can provide today. A future where everyone, anywhere in the world, gets access to elite-level healthcare. Optional work. Superhuman doctors. AI running the backbone of society.

Elon Musk: In less than 10 years, work won’t be something you have to do… it’ll be something you choose to do. He says the future of AI and robotics is heading toward a world where working becomes optional — just like growing your own vegetables. You can do it, but you don’t have to. Some people will still work because they enjoy it, not because they need to survive. That flips everything we know about jobs, money, and purpose. Imagine waking up and deciding to work purely because you want to, not because you’re forced to. That’s the kind of shift he’s talking about. And it doesn’t stop there — Musk believes Tesla’s Optimus robots could eventually perform highly skilled tasks like surgery, delivering medical care that’s better than what the best humans can provide today. A future where everyone, anywhere in the world, gets access to elite-level healthcare. Optional work. Superhuman doctors. AI running the backbone of society.

Ian Miles Cheong

23,981 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

They call you racist, and think the conversation is over. News flash, this is not 1964 anymore. The American people are a lot smarter than that, and they’re not buying it. Because the reality is, people like me exist. What does that tell you? It tells you this country has made real progress. It tells you that millions of Americans are doing exactly what Martin Luther King Jr. called for, judging people not by the color of their skin, but by the content of their character. That’s not theory, that’s reality. But instead of celebrating that progress, some want to drag us backwards, into a system where race is everything, where success is assigned, where outcomes are engineered. That’s not empowerment, that’s limitation. The idea that someone can only succeed if a district is drawn for them, or if a box is checked for them, is an insult to the very people it claims to help. Here’s a better idea, be a great candidate. Work hard. Earn trust. Serve people. Put your name on the ballot and let voters decide.

They call you racist, and think the conversation is over. News flash, this is not 1964 anymore. The American people are a lot smarter than that, and they’re not buying it. Because the reality is, people like me exist. What does that tell you? It tells you this country has made real progress. It tells you that millions of Americans are doing exactly what Martin Luther King Jr. called for, judging people not by the color of their skin, but by the content of their character. That’s not theory, that’s reality. But instead of celebrating that progress, some want to drag us backwards, into a system where race is everything, where success is assigned, where outcomes are engineered. That’s not empowerment, that’s limitation. The idea that someone can only succeed if a district is drawn for them, or if a box is checked for them, is an insult to the very people it claims to help. Here’s a better idea, be a great candidate. Work hard. Earn trust. Serve people. Put your name on the ballot and let voters decide.

Wesley Hunt

267,436 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

ELON: MEDIA CONTROLS YOU BY WHAT IT DOESN’T SAY “We should have the free marketplace of ideas. People can propose an idea, people can discuss an idea. They can make a statement, people can rebut that. The people can decide. And I think it's far better for information to bubble up from the voice of the people than to be decided by a handful of editors-in-chief of newspapers. The biggest point of manipulation that occurs in the media is not when the media says something that's false or misleading – because they do that – but their choice of narrative, what are they going to talk about. By choosing to focus on one thing and not focus on another thing, they're steering what information the public receives. I think the right thing is that the narratives that are important should be the narratives that the people as a whole think are important, not what a few media oligarchs think is important. But they sure like controlling information.” Source: Town Hall in Harrisburg, October 2024

ELON: MEDIA CONTROLS YOU BY WHAT IT DOESN’T SAY “We should have the free marketplace of ideas. People can propose an idea, people can discuss an idea. They can make a statement, people can rebut that. The people can decide. And I think it's far better for information to bubble up from the voice of the people than to be decided by a handful of editors-in-chief of newspapers. The biggest point of manipulation that occurs in the media is not when the media says something that's false or misleading – because they do that – but their choice of narrative, what are they going to talk about. By choosing to focus on one thing and not focus on another thing, they're steering what information the public receives. I think the right thing is that the narratives that are important should be the narratives that the people as a whole think are important, not what a few media oligarchs think is important. But they sure like controlling information.” Source: Town Hall in Harrisburg, October 2024

Mario Nawfal

36,388 görüntüleme • 10 ay önce

Today, I had the privilege of speaking to the HUMAIN team at our CEO Townhall. I often say this, and I mean it deeply: I am living my dream... working in a country where energy goes beyond oil. It’s in the people, the ambition, and the belief in building a better future. Saudi Arabia is unlike anywhere else. The hospitality is second to none. The vision is bold. And the commitment to shaping the future is real. What we are building at HUMAIN is foundational. We are not only participating in the AI era, but redefining it. Shifting the narrative from experimentation to real value creation. But more importantly, we are not afraid to challenge what an organization should look like in an AI-native world. In fact, we are pioneering it. We are actively reshaping how we work: - Moving toward a future where AI agents do the work - Empowering our people to focus on high-value thinking, creativity, and decision-making - Building strong foundations in security, governance, and guardrails - Continuously enhancing our models, systems, and operating frameworks This is not theory. This is happening now. What I saw today from our teams gives me absolute confidence: - Products that are not just innovative, but game-changing - Teams building at a speed and quality that challenge global norms - A culture focused on execution, ownership, and impact At #LEAP2026 this year, we will go beyond vision. We will show: Real demos. Real products. Some of them are a first of their kind in the world. And they are built right here in Saudi Arabia. I could not be more proud of this team. What they have accomplished in such a short time is remarkable. This is just the beginning. The future is not something we wait for. It’s something we build. #HUMAIN #LEAP #TheEndOfLimits #AI

Today, I had the privilege of speaking to the HUMAIN team at our CEO Townhall. I often say this, and I mean it deeply: I am living my dream... working in a country where energy goes beyond oil. It’s in the people, the ambition, and the belief in building a better future. Saudi Arabia is unlike anywhere else. The hospitality is second to none. The vision is bold. And the commitment to shaping the future is real. What we are building at HUMAIN is foundational. We are not only participating in the AI era, but redefining it. Shifting the narrative from experimentation to real value creation. But more importantly, we are not afraid to challenge what an organization should look like in an AI-native world. In fact, we are pioneering it. We are actively reshaping how we work: - Moving toward a future where AI agents do the work - Empowering our people to focus on high-value thinking, creativity, and decision-making - Building strong foundations in security, governance, and guardrails - Continuously enhancing our models, systems, and operating frameworks This is not theory. This is happening now. What I saw today from our teams gives me absolute confidence: - Products that are not just innovative, but game-changing - Teams building at a speed and quality that challenge global norms - A culture focused on execution, ownership, and impact At #LEAP2026 this year, we will go beyond vision. We will show: Real demos. Real products. Some of them are a first of their kind in the world. And they are built right here in Saudi Arabia. I could not be more proud of this team. What they have accomplished in such a short time is remarkable. This is just the beginning. The future is not something we wait for. It’s something we build. #HUMAIN #LEAP #TheEndOfLimits #AI

Tareq Amin

17,856 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

Elon Musk: Information should bubble up from the people, not be decided by a few editors-in-chief. “We should have the free marketplace of ideas. People can propose an idea, people can discuss an idea. They can make a statement, people can rebut that. The people can decide. And I think it's far better for information to bubble up from the voice of the people than to be decided by a handful of editors-in-chief of newspapers. The biggest point of manipulation that occurs in the media is not when the media says something that's false or misleading – because they do that – but their choice of narrative, what are they going to talk about. By choosing to focus on one thing and not focus on another thing, they're steering what information the public receives. I think the right thing is that the narratives that are important should be the narratives that the people as a whole think are important, not what a few media oligarchs think is important. But they sure like controlling information.” Town Hall in Harrisburg, October 19, 2024

Elon Musk: Information should bubble up from the people, not be decided by a few editors-in-chief. “We should have the free marketplace of ideas. People can propose an idea, people can discuss an idea. They can make a statement, people can rebut that. The people can decide. And I think it's far better for information to bubble up from the voice of the people than to be decided by a handful of editors-in-chief of newspapers. The biggest point of manipulation that occurs in the media is not when the media says something that's false or misleading – because they do that – but their choice of narrative, what are they going to talk about. By choosing to focus on one thing and not focus on another thing, they're steering what information the public receives. I think the right thing is that the narratives that are important should be the narratives that the people as a whole think are important, not what a few media oligarchs think is important. But they sure like controlling information.” Town Hall in Harrisburg, October 19, 2024

ELON CLIPS

25,147 görüntüleme • 10 ay önce

THIS IS A PERFECT EXAMPLE TO PROVE THE AI BUBBLE Claude AI developer Anthropic is valued at nearly $965B, while making only $20B in revenue. For comparison: Walmart is worth nearly the same amount ($940B), but makes $725B in revenue. Let that sink in. Same valuation range. Completely different economic reality. One is built on moving real goods through real infrastructure every day. The other is built on expectations of how widely AI will be used, and how profitable it will eventually become. And thats exactly where the big danger lies. Markets are no longer just pricing what companies earn. They are pricing what companies could become if everything goes right. And when valuations start converging like this, the uncomfortable question isn’t whether AI matters. It’s how much of that future has already been priced in.

THIS IS A PERFECT EXAMPLE TO PROVE THE AI BUBBLE Claude AI developer Anthropic is valued at nearly $965B, while making only $20B in revenue. For comparison: Walmart is worth nearly the same amount ($940B), but makes $725B in revenue. Let that sink in. Same valuation range. Completely different economic reality. One is built on moving real goods through real infrastructure every day. The other is built on expectations of how widely AI will be used, and how profitable it will eventually become. And thats exactly where the big danger lies. Markets are no longer just pricing what companies earn. They are pricing what companies could become if everything goes right. And when valuations start converging like this, the uncomfortable question isn’t whether AI matters. It’s how much of that future has already been priced in.

CryptoGoos

14,835 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

“When people were saying in the testimony, that the hope they have is that what happened here 30 something years ago will never happen again. It won’t, not because those who were responsible for that dark past will not try again or are not even trying now again. It will not happen again just because there will be people who will stand up and fight. It’s not because there are fewer people who wish for us to perish or who would have wished for this country to disappear. How can people accept that? What kind of people do not stand up and fight? There is a risk of dying when you stand up and fight but if you don’t, it’s a sure thing: you are going to die. So why don’t I try to stand up and fight with the chance that I might survive and live life as I want it, instead of giving up and you let people treat you as if for you to live, it is a favour that they are going to do for you. Why? But my message goes to other Africans who live like this on a daily basis, who are dehumanized and they accept it and they beg. I can't beg to live. I can't beg anybody. We’ll fight, If I lose, I lose. But there is a chance. There is a chance, a significant chance, that if you stand up and fight, you will live. And you will have lived a dignified life that you deserve, that anybody else deserves." President Kagame | #Kwibuka31

“When people were saying in the testimony, that the hope they have is that what happened here 30 something years ago will never happen again. It won’t, not because those who were responsible for that dark past will not try again or are not even trying now again. It will not happen again just because there will be people who will stand up and fight. It’s not because there are fewer people who wish for us to perish or who would have wished for this country to disappear. How can people accept that? What kind of people do not stand up and fight? There is a risk of dying when you stand up and fight but if you don’t, it’s a sure thing: you are going to die. So why don’t I try to stand up and fight with the chance that I might survive and live life as I want it, instead of giving up and you let people treat you as if for you to live, it is a favour that they are going to do for you. Why? But my message goes to other Africans who live like this on a daily basis, who are dehumanized and they accept it and they beg. I can't beg to live. I can't beg anybody. We’ll fight, If I lose, I lose. But there is a chance. There is a chance, a significant chance, that if you stand up and fight, you will live. And you will have lived a dignified life that you deserve, that anybody else deserves." President Kagame | #Kwibuka31

Presidency | Rwanda

47,084 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Mo Gawdat believes up to 30% of jobs in certain sectors could disappear by 2028. That stopped me in my tracks. Mo was one of the first people to come on this podcast and warn me about AI, long before most of the world was talking about it. At the time, it felt early. Now, it feels like the world is catching up to what he was seeing. I’m still trying to understand what AI actually means for our lives. Not just whether it can write emails, create images or make us more productive. I mean what it does to jobs. What it does to power. What it does to education. What it does to human connection… That’s why I wanted to have this discussion with Mo again. What makes Mo worth listening to is that he saw these systems inside Google years before most of us had even heard the term AI. His book *Scary Smart* now feels like it was written for this exact moment. Let me explain why this discussion matters. Mo believes we’re not just entering an AI revolution. We’re entering a period where AI, robotics, economics, surveillance, digital currencies and global instability are all colliding at the same time. That’s a lot for any of us to process. We spoke about: - The jobs Mo believes are most at risk from AI. - Why he believes that AI is actually underhyped! - The mistake almost everyone is making with ChatGPT. - The prediction that changed even his own view of the future. The part that stayed with me was this idea that human connection may become the real currency. Because if AI can produce the information, write the report, analyse the data, then what is left? I don’t think this conversation gives neat answers. That’s probably why it’s worth watching. It helped me think more honestly about what’s coming.

Mo Gawdat believes up to 30% of jobs in certain sectors could disappear by 2028. That stopped me in my tracks. Mo was one of the first people to come on this podcast and warn me about AI, long before most of the world was talking about it. At the time, it felt early. Now, it feels like the world is catching up to what he was seeing. I’m still trying to understand what AI actually means for our lives. Not just whether it can write emails, create images or make us more productive. I mean what it does to jobs. What it does to power. What it does to education. What it does to human connection… That’s why I wanted to have this discussion with Mo again. What makes Mo worth listening to is that he saw these systems inside Google years before most of us had even heard the term AI. His book Scary Smart now feels like it was written for this exact moment. Let me explain why this discussion matters. Mo believes we’re not just entering an AI revolution. We’re entering a period where AI, robotics, economics, surveillance, digital currencies and global instability are all colliding at the same time. That’s a lot for any of us to process. We spoke about: - The jobs Mo believes are most at risk from AI. - Why he believes that AI is actually underhyped! - The mistake almost everyone is making with ChatGPT. - The prediction that changed even his own view of the future. The part that stayed with me was this idea that human connection may become the real currency. Because if AI can produce the information, write the report, analyse the data, then what is left? I don’t think this conversation gives neat answers. That’s probably why it’s worth watching. It helped me think more honestly about what’s coming.

Steven Bartlett

27,598 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

Factory CEO Matan Grinberg says all companies go through three phases of AI adoption: "Phase Zero is reluctance to adopt because developers have had the same workflows for the last 20 years and they might not want to change it." "Phase One is throw the kitchen sink and use as much AI as possible. Whatever you do, just change your workflows." "Phase Two is that people are now adopting the tech, they're proving that they can change their behavior, and use these tools. But now we need to make sure we're actually doing it efficiently and effectively. Uber and Meta are examples of this." "Yes, you'll overspend in Phase One, but the point is to get to Phase Two where then you're actually really efficient on a per-token basis, moving the needle for the business and delivering software faster."

Factory CEO Matan Grinberg says all companies go through three phases of AI adoption: "Phase Zero is reluctance to adopt because developers have had the same workflows for the last 20 years and they might not want to change it." "Phase One is throw the kitchen sink and use as much AI as possible. Whatever you do, just change your workflows." "Phase Two is that people are now adopting the tech, they're proving that they can change their behavior, and use these tools. But now we need to make sure we're actually doing it efficiently and effectively. Uber and Meta are examples of this." "Yes, you'll overspend in Phase One, but the point is to get to Phase Two where then you're actually really efficient on a per-token basis, moving the needle for the business and delivering software faster."

TBPN

25,747 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

I kept thinking about one thing while creating this video… What happens when the world’s biggest sports event collides with a decentralized prediction market built for real-time participation? Not just watching football anymore. Not just reacting after matches anymore. But millions of people moving with the same moments together in real time through liquidity, probability, strategy, and market participation. I wanted this video to feel like a glimpse into what that future could actually look like. The 2026 World Cup is coming. POTS MARKET is launching soon. And honestly… this feels bigger than a normal prediction platform. This feels like football, market psychology, and Web3 infrastructure all colliding at the same moment. “Same World Cup. Different Game.” Explore more about the future of prediction markets here: Now take a few minutes to watch the video carefully from start to finish 👇 #PotsMarket #WorldCup2026 #PredictionMarkets

I kept thinking about one thing while creating this video… What happens when the world’s biggest sports event collides with a decentralized prediction market built for real-time participation? Not just watching football anymore. Not just reacting after matches anymore. But millions of people moving with the same moments together in real time through liquidity, probability, strategy, and market participation. I wanted this video to feel like a glimpse into what that future could actually look like. The 2026 World Cup is coming. POTS MARKET is launching soon. And honestly… this feels bigger than a normal prediction platform. This feels like football, market psychology, and Web3 infrastructure all colliding at the same moment. “Same World Cup. Different Game.” Explore more about the future of prediction markets here: Now take a few minutes to watch the video carefully from start to finish 👇 #PotsMarket #WorldCup2026 #PredictionMarkets

𝗠𝗜𝗥𝗘𝗟 𝗩𝗘𝗚𝗔𝗥

20,177 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

Sam Altman's new interview: AI should not be designed to pursue goals that are disconnected from human needs. People must remain at the center of AI development. “I have no interest in building a super-smart AI that accomplishes some non-human goals. People should react. People should say, ‘Hey, this is what I want, and this is what I do not want.’ I do not think the issue is that we have failed to explain the benefits. We say, ‘AI is going to cure a bunch of diseases,’ and people say, ‘Okay, that is great, but that is not really my question. My question is: What is my role in the future? What is my economic future? What is my agency? How do I know that my kids and my family will still be able to have fulfilling, creative expression, struggle, drive the world forward, grow, and do this thing together in a way that has worked for a long time?’ When people in AI say, ‘Sure, there are going to be no jobs,’ or ‘50% of jobs are going to go away,’ or ‘90% of jobs are going to go away,’ and ‘AI is going to be smarter than you at everything,’ and ‘We will give you some basic income, but you are not really going to have a role,’ that is horrible. And by the way, if an AI company says, ‘Maybe we are going to destroy all the jobs, and we will be the most valuable company in the world,’ people should look at you like, ‘Yeah, that is a terrible message.’ I do not think the problem is that we have not articulated the upsides. I think people actually believe us. They hear, ‘AI may cure your cancer,’ and they think, ‘That sounds great.’ I think we, as an industry, have failed to explain how people stay in control of determining the future at every step, and how people can still have a meaningful life in all the ways we care about.” ---- From "CNBC Television" YouTube channel, (link in comment)

Sam Altman's new interview: AI should not be designed to pursue goals that are disconnected from human needs. People must remain at the center of AI development. “I have no interest in building a super-smart AI that accomplishes some non-human goals. People should react. People should say, ‘Hey, this is what I want, and this is what I do not want.’ I do not think the issue is that we have failed to explain the benefits. We say, ‘AI is going to cure a bunch of diseases,’ and people say, ‘Okay, that is great, but that is not really my question. My question is: What is my role in the future? What is my economic future? What is my agency? How do I know that my kids and my family will still be able to have fulfilling, creative expression, struggle, drive the world forward, grow, and do this thing together in a way that has worked for a long time?’ When people in AI say, ‘Sure, there are going to be no jobs,’ or ‘50% of jobs are going to go away,’ or ‘90% of jobs are going to go away,’ and ‘AI is going to be smarter than you at everything,’ and ‘We will give you some basic income, but you are not really going to have a role,’ that is horrible. And by the way, if an AI company says, ‘Maybe we are going to destroy all the jobs, and we will be the most valuable company in the world,’ people should look at you like, ‘Yeah, that is a terrible message.’ I do not think the problem is that we have not articulated the upsides. I think people actually believe us. They hear, ‘AI may cure your cancer,’ and they think, ‘That sounds great.’ I think we, as an industry, have failed to explain how people stay in control of determining the future at every step, and how people can still have a meaningful life in all the ways we care about.” ---- From "CNBC Television" YouTube channel, (link in comment)

Rohan Paul

79,028 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

"Courage is far shorter in supply than genius." - Peter Thiel "One of the challenges in writing a book about entrepreneurship or teaching a class on this is that there is sort of no formula. And I think science always starts with a number two. It starts with experiments you can repeat, things you can do over and over again. But there's sort of a sense in which every moment in the history of business, every moment in the history of technology happens only once. The next Mark Zuckerberg will not be starting a social networking company. The next Larry Page will not start a search engine. The next Bill Gates will not be starting an operating system. And so if you are trying to copy these people, you're in some sense not learning from them. And so I think one of the really big challenges in teaching or writing about entrepreneurship is what can you say about being an entrepreneur at all when the key thing is always to do something new, different, that's not precisely been done before. And so the point of departure I start with in Zero to One is a somewhat indirect approach by asking a series of contrarian questions. The business question is, what great company is nobody starting? The more intellectual version of this question is, tell me something true that very few people agree with you on. And this is a fantastic interview question. It turns out to be quite a hard question, even when people can read on the internet that you ask of everybody who comes in the door, it still is a hard question. It's one of those unusual questions where if you know it's on the test, it's still hard. And it's hard not just because we sort of think that new things require brilliance or something like that, but because it's socially difficult. If I ask you that question, if you tell me something like the education system is screwed up or our political system doesn't work very well, those are true answers, but they're not actually good answers because all of us already know them to be true. The good answers are ones that are somehow uncomfortable that the person interviewing you does not actually want to hear. And I think we live in this world where courage is in far shorter supply than genius. And so it is sort of this, it is in a sense this problem of political correctness properly understood, is this very deep, very, very broad sort of a problem."

"Courage is far shorter in supply than genius." - Peter Thiel "One of the challenges in writing a book about entrepreneurship or teaching a class on this is that there is sort of no formula. And I think science always starts with a number two. It starts with experiments you can repeat, things you can do over and over again. But there's sort of a sense in which every moment in the history of business, every moment in the history of technology happens only once. The next Mark Zuckerberg will not be starting a social networking company. The next Larry Page will not start a search engine. The next Bill Gates will not be starting an operating system. And so if you are trying to copy these people, you're in some sense not learning from them. And so I think one of the really big challenges in teaching or writing about entrepreneurship is what can you say about being an entrepreneur at all when the key thing is always to do something new, different, that's not precisely been done before. And so the point of departure I start with in Zero to One is a somewhat indirect approach by asking a series of contrarian questions. The business question is, what great company is nobody starting? The more intellectual version of this question is, tell me something true that very few people agree with you on. And this is a fantastic interview question. It turns out to be quite a hard question, even when people can read on the internet that you ask of everybody who comes in the door, it still is a hard question. It's one of those unusual questions where if you know it's on the test, it's still hard. And it's hard not just because we sort of think that new things require brilliance or something like that, but because it's socially difficult. If I ask you that question, if you tell me something like the education system is screwed up or our political system doesn't work very well, those are true answers, but they're not actually good answers because all of us already know them to be true. The good answers are ones that are somehow uncomfortable that the person interviewing you does not actually want to hear. And I think we live in this world where courage is in far shorter supply than genius. And so it is sort of this, it is in a sense this problem of political correctness properly understood, is this very deep, very, very broad sort of a problem."

Founder Mode

12,339 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

Bill Gates just settled the biggest debate in Silicon Valley. Is AI a bubble? Yes. And it doesn’t matter. Gates: “If what we mean is like tulips in the Netherlands, that they went to look back and said, what the heck, there was nothing there… No, that’s not where we are.” There are two kinds of bubbles in history. The tulip craze. And the dot-com crash. Tulips left nothing. The internet left everything. Gates: “In the end something very profound happened. The world was very different.” AI is following the dot-com playbook exactly. Irrational capital. Frenzied competition. Companies burning money faster than they can build business models. And underneath all of it, a technology that is changing everything. Permanently. Gates: “AI is the biggest technical thing ever in my lifetime.” Not the internet. Not the smartphone. Not cloud computing. The biggest. Ever. In his lifetime. Gates: “Some of them will commit to data centers whose electricity is too expensive. Or they’ll buy a generation of chips and won’t have captured all their value before the next one comes along.” Billions are being set on fire right now. Not because the technology isn’t real. Because the frenzy is moving faster than the business models can catch up. The winners of the dot-com era weren’t the ones who spent the most. They were the ones who survived long enough for the dust to settle. But here’s the part nobody wants to hear. Gates: “If you want to be a tech company, you don’t get to say no. You know, let’s check out of this race.” Sitting out isn’t safety. It’s a slower death. The risk of investing blindly is losing capital. The risk of not investing is losing the company. Gates: “Absolutely. There are a ton of these investments that will be dead ends.” Some of these companies will be wiped out. Not because AI isn’t real. Because they chased the hype without the foundation to survive the correction. The technology is not the bubble. The valuations are the bubble. And like every bubble before it, when it corrects, what remains will be more valuable than what existed before the frenzy started. You don’t win this era by spending the most. You win by surviving long enough to be one of the ones left standing.

Bill Gates just settled the biggest debate in Silicon Valley. Is AI a bubble? Yes. And it doesn’t matter. Gates: “If what we mean is like tulips in the Netherlands, that they went to look back and said, what the heck, there was nothing there… No, that’s not where we are.” There are two kinds of bubbles in history. The tulip craze. And the dot-com crash. Tulips left nothing. The internet left everything. Gates: “In the end something very profound happened. The world was very different.” AI is following the dot-com playbook exactly. Irrational capital. Frenzied competition. Companies burning money faster than they can build business models. And underneath all of it, a technology that is changing everything. Permanently. Gates: “AI is the biggest technical thing ever in my lifetime.” Not the internet. Not the smartphone. Not cloud computing. The biggest. Ever. In his lifetime. Gates: “Some of them will commit to data centers whose electricity is too expensive. Or they’ll buy a generation of chips and won’t have captured all their value before the next one comes along.” Billions are being set on fire right now. Not because the technology isn’t real. Because the frenzy is moving faster than the business models can catch up. The winners of the dot-com era weren’t the ones who spent the most. They were the ones who survived long enough for the dust to settle. But here’s the part nobody wants to hear. Gates: “If you want to be a tech company, you don’t get to say no. You know, let’s check out of this race.” Sitting out isn’t safety. It’s a slower death. The risk of investing blindly is losing capital. The risk of not investing is losing the company. Gates: “Absolutely. There are a ton of these investments that will be dead ends.” Some of these companies will be wiped out. Not because AI isn’t real. Because they chased the hype without the foundation to survive the correction. The technology is not the bubble. The valuations are the bubble. And like every bubble before it, when it corrects, what remains will be more valuable than what existed before the frenzy started. You don’t win this era by spending the most. You win by surviving long enough to be one of the ones left standing.

Dustin

253,699 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

Elon Musk just said something that should terrify people more than any doomsday prediction. Not that AI will make humanity poor. That it will make us endlessly rich. Musk: “It wouldn’t be Universal Basic Income, it would be Universal High Income.” The entire AI debate has been about whether people can survive automation. Musk is the only one asking what happens after survival is solved. Infinite goods. Infinite services. No shortage of anything for anyone on Earth. Work doesn’t become scarce. It becomes optional. People hear this and picture paradise. He’s pointing at something deeper. Musk: “If the AI can do everything that you can do, but better, then what is the point of doing things?” That question will define the next century more than any technical breakthrough. For ten thousand years, human sanity was anchored to one thing. Necessity. You built because you’d freeze. You hunted because you’d starve. You provided because the people around you would die if you didn’t. The struggle was never a flaw in the system. It was the scaffolding of meaning itself. Every religion. Every philosophy. Every civilization that ever lasted more than a century built its framework for purpose on the same foundation. That life is hard. And your job is to push through it. When the machines produce everything, they don’t just take the labor. They take the scaffolding. The interviewer compared this future to the peak of Rome. Musk agreed. The same arc, powered entirely by silicon. Rome at its height didn’t collapse from invasion. It collapsed from comfort. Citizens outsourced war to mercenaries. Labor to slaves. Governance to bureaucrats. When nothing was left to struggle for, they filled the void with spectacle and consumption. The empire didn’t run out of resources. It ran out of reasons. Most people in the AI debate are still worried about extinction. Musk is already thinking one layer past everyone else. Not how to keep people alive. How to keep them whole. The machines are not going to starve us. They are going to overfeed us until we forget why we were ever here.

Elon Musk just said something that should terrify people more than any doomsday prediction. Not that AI will make humanity poor. That it will make us endlessly rich. Musk: “It wouldn’t be Universal Basic Income, it would be Universal High Income.” The entire AI debate has been about whether people can survive automation. Musk is the only one asking what happens after survival is solved. Infinite goods. Infinite services. No shortage of anything for anyone on Earth. Work doesn’t become scarce. It becomes optional. People hear this and picture paradise. He’s pointing at something deeper. Musk: “If the AI can do everything that you can do, but better, then what is the point of doing things?” That question will define the next century more than any technical breakthrough. For ten thousand years, human sanity was anchored to one thing. Necessity. You built because you’d freeze. You hunted because you’d starve. You provided because the people around you would die if you didn’t. The struggle was never a flaw in the system. It was the scaffolding of meaning itself. Every religion. Every philosophy. Every civilization that ever lasted more than a century built its framework for purpose on the same foundation. That life is hard. And your job is to push through it. When the machines produce everything, they don’t just take the labor. They take the scaffolding. The interviewer compared this future to the peak of Rome. Musk agreed. The same arc, powered entirely by silicon. Rome at its height didn’t collapse from invasion. It collapsed from comfort. Citizens outsourced war to mercenaries. Labor to slaves. Governance to bureaucrats. When nothing was left to struggle for, they filled the void with spectacle and consumption. The empire didn’t run out of resources. It ran out of reasons. Most people in the AI debate are still worried about extinction. Musk is already thinking one layer past everyone else. Not how to keep people alive. How to keep them whole. The machines are not going to starve us. They are going to overfeed us until we forget why we were ever here.

Dustin

31,272 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

Bill Gates on why AI isn't a bubble, but why many AI investments will still fail: "AI is the biggest technical thing ever in my lifetime. It is so profound and therefore its influence is hard to overstate." Gates sees the underlying value as undeniable, with intelligence on demand spanning medical advice, tutoring, and drug design. "The value is extremely high, just like creating the internet ended up being in net very very valuable." But he draws a critical distinction between two types of bubbles: The tulip kind, where people look back and realise there was nothing underneath. And the internet kind, where something transformative was happening, but most companies still got wiped out. Gates is clear about which one AI is: "If what we mean is like tulips in the Netherlands... No, that's not where we are." AI is the internet, not the tulips. But just like the internet, the frenzy around it is creating enormous risk. Overpriced electricity commitments, data centers built in the wrong locations, and hardware that becomes obsolete before it pays for itself. "Some of these companies will be glad they spent all this money. Some of them, they'll commit to data centers whose electricity is too expensive." And yet, sitting it out isn't an option either. "If you want to be a tech company, you don't get to say, 'Let's check out of this race.'" The technology is transformative. But a ton of today's investments will turn out to be dead ends. And when the dust settles, the companies that built something durable will outlast the ones that spent the most trying to keep up.

Bill Gates on why AI isn't a bubble, but why many AI investments will still fail: "AI is the biggest technical thing ever in my lifetime. It is so profound and therefore its influence is hard to overstate." Gates sees the underlying value as undeniable, with intelligence on demand spanning medical advice, tutoring, and drug design. "The value is extremely high, just like creating the internet ended up being in net very very valuable." But he draws a critical distinction between two types of bubbles: The tulip kind, where people look back and realise there was nothing underneath. And the internet kind, where something transformative was happening, but most companies still got wiped out. Gates is clear about which one AI is: "If what we mean is like tulips in the Netherlands... No, that's not where we are." AI is the internet, not the tulips. But just like the internet, the frenzy around it is creating enormous risk. Overpriced electricity commitments, data centers built in the wrong locations, and hardware that becomes obsolete before it pays for itself. "Some of these companies will be glad they spent all this money. Some of them, they'll commit to data centers whose electricity is too expensive." And yet, sitting it out isn't an option either. "If you want to be a tech company, you don't get to say, 'Let's check out of this race.'" The technology is transformative. But a ton of today's investments will turn out to be dead ends. And when the dust settles, the companies that built something durable will outlast the ones that spent the most trying to keep up.

Big Brain AI

25,681 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

Inside the Quant AI Ecosystem Where Intelligence Meets Markets The crypto and financial landscape is evolving fast, but one problem has remained constant: fragmentation. Traders and users are forced to jump between tools, charts, news feeds, analytics dashboards, sentiment trackers, just to answer one simple question: What’s actually happening in the market right now? This is exactly the gap the Quant AI ecosystem is stepping into. A unified intelligence layer for markets Quant AI is building an ecosystem where market interaction becomes simple, conversational, and accessible. Instead of navigating multiple platforms, users can interact directly with markets using chat and voice. That means: ➠ Asking for real-time market insights in plain language ➠ Tracking smart money movements across assets ➠ Understanding trends in crypto, stocks, and commodities in one place ➠ Acting faster with clearer, AI-driven context It’s not just another analytics tool, it’s an attempt to reshape how information flows in trading environments. Why the ecosystem approach matters Most platforms solve isolated problems: One for charts. One for signals. One for news. But Quant AI is moving toward something broader, an ecosystem where intelligence is centralized, and decision-making becomes faster and more intuitive. The goal is simple: Reduce complexity. Increase clarity. Improve execution. And in markets where speed and information matter, that shift is significant. Start here:👇 Quant AI #QuantAIPioneers

Inside the Quant AI Ecosystem Where Intelligence Meets Markets The crypto and financial landscape is evolving fast, but one problem has remained constant: fragmentation. Traders and users are forced to jump between tools, charts, news feeds, analytics dashboards, sentiment trackers, just to answer one simple question: What’s actually happening in the market right now? This is exactly the gap the Quant AI ecosystem is stepping into. A unified intelligence layer for markets Quant AI is building an ecosystem where market interaction becomes simple, conversational, and accessible. Instead of navigating multiple platforms, users can interact directly with markets using chat and voice. That means: ➠ Asking for real-time market insights in plain language ➠ Tracking smart money movements across assets ➠ Understanding trends in crypto, stocks, and commodities in one place ➠ Acting faster with clearer, AI-driven context It’s not just another analytics tool, it’s an attempt to reshape how information flows in trading environments. Why the ecosystem approach matters Most platforms solve isolated problems: One for charts. One for signals. One for news. But Quant AI is moving toward something broader, an ecosystem where intelligence is centralized, and decision-making becomes faster and more intuitive. The goal is simple: Reduce complexity. Increase clarity. Improve execution. And in markets where speed and information matter, that shift is significant. Start here:👇 Quant AI #QuantAIPioneers

The Agentic Alpha

16,825 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

What you're looking at started as something that most people drive past without a second thought. - Industrial - boring - overlooked And someone looked at it and saw something no one else was seeing. That's the whole game here. You don't have to invent something brand new to make serious money. You just have to see potential where everyone else sees limitations. You have to look at what already exists and imagine it just a little differently. So when you turn something familiar into something unexpected, it becomes shareable and memorable. It becomes the thing that people can't stop talking about because it's different in a world where everything feels the same. People will literally travel hours just to stay somewhere like this because different is the experience now. Nobody cares about another cookie cutter hotel room that they've seen a thousand times, but this gets filmed and posted and sent to friends with the caption "you have to see this place" And suddenly you're booked out months in advance because you gave something people can't get anywhere else. I love that the raw materials here aren't special, it's just space that was sitting there unused and cheap to acquire The success of this is found in the willingness to look at what everyone else ignored and ask "what could this become?" Instead of just accepting what currently is. That's where the opportunity is. There are thousands of: - shipping containers rotting in fields - old grain silos sitting empty - warehouses no one's using - barns that haven't been touched in decades And every single one of them could become something people would pay to experience if someone just had the vision to see it through. You don't need to build it from scratch. You just need to reimagine what's already sitting in front of you. Because the world is full of overlooked things waiting for someone to look at them differently. And I don't care if AI generated the video because the inspiration you get from it is still the same.

Chris Koerner

18,208 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce