Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

๐—œ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ธ ๐—บ๐—ผ๐˜€๐˜ ๐—ฝ๐—ฒ๐—ผ๐—ฝ๐—น๐—ฒ ๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ ๐˜‚๐—ป๐—ฑ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐˜€๐˜๐—ถ๐—บ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด ๐˜„๐—ต๐—ฎ๐˜ ๐—ฝ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—ฑ๐—ถ๐—ฐ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป ๐—บ๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐—ธ๐—ฒ๐˜๐˜€ ๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ ๐—ฎ๐—ฏ๐—ผ๐˜‚๐˜ ๐˜๐—ผ ๐—ฏ๐—ฒ๐—ฐ๐—ผ๐—บ๐—ฒ. For years, the internet trained us to consume opinions. One analyst says AI will change everything. โž  Another says weโ€™re in a bubble. โž  A CEO makes a bold prediction. โž  Twitter debates explode. โž  And...

Agentic_Alph's profile picture

The Agentic Alpha

5,017 subscribers

12,039 views โ€ข 2 months ago โ€ขvia X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossiโ€ข Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

When I was 8 years old, growing up in Taipei, I called my aunt in San Francisco and asked: What is the best science and technology school in the world? She said MIT. I went on the internet, found it, and decided that was where I was going. All because of a Steven Spielberg movie about a little robot boy who wanted to find his mom. I grew up as an only child. What stayed with me from that movie was not just the technology. It was the possibility that one day, an artificial companion could understand how I felt. That was the first time I remember being moved by a technology that could change how humans experience reality. Years later, I did get to MIT. I studied AI before it became obvious. I became a machine learning engineer, built my first company, joined a $3.5B VC fund, left to build again, failed, started again, moved to New York alone, and built through one of the hardest crypto markets as a solo founder after the collapse of FTX. I kept going because I have always been drawn to technologies that change how humans understand the world. AI was the first version of that. Crypto and prediction markets are the next. I believe the future I am building toward is inevitable. The only question is whether I get to be one of the people who helps realize it. That future is a world where markets become information-first. The old model of trading was asset-first. It rewarded people with capital, financial education, institutional access, and better tools. But the next generation of markets will be shaped by information flow, narrative, attention, politics, culture, sentiment, and collective belief. Prediction markets make this shift obvious. They are one of the first asset classes where the value is informational, not purely financial in the traditional sense. Your edge does not have to come from technical analysis or a traditional finance background. Your edge can come from knowing something before it becomes consensus. From seeing reality shift before the market prices it in. Someone with firsthand knowledge of an unfolding event can have more alpha than an institution with a much bigger balance sheet. They turn belief into price. But price alone is not enough. Polymarket shows what the market thinks will happen. ARES is built to understand why the market is changing. We are building an information-first trading platform for prediction markets and other narrative-driven assets. One that does not just show traders what is moving, but helps them understand why odds are shifting, why narratives are forming, and why the future is moving in a certain direction. But the bigger vision is not just a better trading terminal. We want to turn every trade into an information object. Every position can become a piece of content. Every market view can become a signal. Every trader can build a reputation around conviction and accuracy. Most feeds rank information by engagement. Who got the most likes. Who already has the biggest audience. Markets allow us to rank information differently. How much are you willing to stake on what you believe? How often have you been right? That creates a fundamentally different kind of media feed. One powered by conviction, track record, and market incentives. One that becomes harder to fake. One that can help people understand not just what the market thinks will happen, but why reality is changing. I also believe prediction markets are one of the few markets where humans can still have a real edge over AI. AI knows what is already on the internet. But humans experience reality before it becomes data. We see things before they become headlines. We hear things before they become reports. We feel shifts before they become consensus. If those signals can be priced, organized, and made legible, then more people can gain access to financial opportunity, information agency, and power. That is what Ares is building toward. I spent years watching founders from the VC side of the table, always thinking: I wish that was me. Now it is. I talked about this journey and the thesis behind Ares in my conversation with Dmitry on Predict Time If you are building, trading, investing, or thinking deeply about prediction markets and information markets, I would love for you to watch it. And if you want to collaborate on what we are building, contribute to the vision, or join the team, we are always open to exceptional people across functions. DMs are open.
1:42:20

When I was 8 years old, growing up in Taipei, I called my aunt in San Francisco and asked: What is the best science and technology school in the world? She said MIT. I went on the internet, found it, and decided that was where I was going. All because of a Steven Spielberg movie about a little robot boy who wanted to find his mom. I grew up as an only child. What stayed with me from that movie was not just the technology. It was the possibility that one day, an artificial companion could understand how I felt. That was the first time I remember being moved by a technology that could change how humans experience reality. Years later, I did get to MIT. I studied AI before it became obvious. I became a machine learning engineer, built my first company, joined a $3.5B VC fund, left to build again, failed, started again, moved to New York alone, and built through one of the hardest crypto markets as a solo founder after the collapse of FTX. I kept going because I have always been drawn to technologies that change how humans understand the world. AI was the first version of that. Crypto and prediction markets are the next. I believe the future I am building toward is inevitable. The only question is whether I get to be one of the people who helps realize it. That future is a world where markets become information-first. The old model of trading was asset-first. It rewarded people with capital, financial education, institutional access, and better tools. But the next generation of markets will be shaped by information flow, narrative, attention, politics, culture, sentiment, and collective belief. Prediction markets make this shift obvious. They are one of the first asset classes where the value is informational, not purely financial in the traditional sense. Your edge does not have to come from technical analysis or a traditional finance background. Your edge can come from knowing something before it becomes consensus. From seeing reality shift before the market prices it in. Someone with firsthand knowledge of an unfolding event can have more alpha than an institution with a much bigger balance sheet. They turn belief into price. But price alone is not enough. Polymarket shows what the market thinks will happen. ARES is built to understand why the market is changing. We are building an information-first trading platform for prediction markets and other narrative-driven assets. One that does not just show traders what is moving, but helps them understand why odds are shifting, why narratives are forming, and why the future is moving in a certain direction. But the bigger vision is not just a better trading terminal. We want to turn every trade into an information object. Every position can become a piece of content. Every market view can become a signal. Every trader can build a reputation around conviction and accuracy. Most feeds rank information by engagement. Who got the most likes. Who already has the biggest audience. Markets allow us to rank information differently. How much are you willing to stake on what you believe? How often have you been right? That creates a fundamentally different kind of media feed. One powered by conviction, track record, and market incentives. One that becomes harder to fake. One that can help people understand not just what the market thinks will happen, but why reality is changing. I also believe prediction markets are one of the few markets where humans can still have a real edge over AI. AI knows what is already on the internet. But humans experience reality before it becomes data. We see things before they become headlines. We hear things before they become reports. We feel shifts before they become consensus. If those signals can be priced, organized, and made legible, then more people can gain access to financial opportunity, information agency, and power. That is what Ares is building toward. I spent years watching founders from the VC side of the table, always thinking: I wish that was me. Now it is. I talked about this journey and the thesis behind Ares in my conversation with Dmitry on Predict Time If you are building, trading, investing, or thinking deeply about prediction markets and information markets, I would love for you to watch it. And if you want to collaborate on what we are building, contribute to the vision, or join the team, we are always open to exceptional people across functions. DMs are open.

Morgan Lai

302,663 views โ€ข 4 months ago

I spent hours creating this. Not because it was another content task. But because I genuinely felt there was something deeper here. The 2026 World Cup is going to be different. Not just because of football, but because billions of people will react, predict, debate, and move together in real time like never before. While working on this, I kept thinking about one thing: What happens when global emotion starts behaving like infrastructure? Thatโ€™s the feeling I wanted this video to capture. I wanted this to feel immersive, thoughtful, and cinematic from start to finish. Just a cinematic look into what the future of prediction markets could actually feel like through Pots Market(POTS MARKET). If you watch one thing today, make it this. And when you finish, tell me honestly: Does this still feel like a normal prediction platform to you? Watch below ๐Ÿ‘‡
4:59

I spent hours creating this. Not because it was another content task. But because I genuinely felt there was something deeper here. The 2026 World Cup is going to be different. Not just because of football, but because billions of people will react, predict, debate, and move together in real time like never before. While working on this, I kept thinking about one thing: What happens when global emotion starts behaving like infrastructure? Thatโ€™s the feeling I wanted this video to capture. I wanted this to feel immersive, thoughtful, and cinematic from start to finish. Just a cinematic look into what the future of prediction markets could actually feel like through Pots Market(POTS MARKET). If you watch one thing today, make it this. And when you finish, tell me honestly: Does this still feel like a normal prediction platform to you? Watch below ๐Ÿ‘‡

Edrin Valecrest

317,391 views โ€ข 3 months ago

One of my favorite things about data science is that you're constantly asking: **"What assumption is everyone making?"** Last week, China's new **Kimi K3** model got a lot of attention. Not because it's definitively the best AI model in the worldโ€”but because it raises an interesting possibility: **What if frontier AI is becoming cheaper, faster than investors expect?** If that's true, AI doesn't become less important. It becomes **less scarce.** And history says markets don't move because everyone suddenly becomes pessimistic. They move when one of the assumptions everyone agreed on starts to change. I don't know if that's what's happening here. But I do think it's the more interesting question. Curious to hear your thoughts.
0:38

One of my favorite things about data science is that you're constantly asking: **"What assumption is everyone making?"** Last week, China's new **Kimi K3** model got a lot of attention. Not because it's definitively the best AI model in the worldโ€”but because it raises an interesting possibility: **What if frontier AI is becoming cheaper, faster than investors expect?** If that's true, AI doesn't become less important. It becomes **less scarce.** And history says markets don't move because everyone suddenly becomes pessimistic. They move when one of the assumptions everyone agreed on starts to change. I don't know if that's what's happening here. But I do think it's the more interesting question. Curious to hear your thoughts.

BiancaData

14,927 views โ€ข 1 month ago

Elon Musk: In less than 10 years, work wonโ€™t be something you have to doโ€ฆ itโ€™ll be something you choose to do. He says the future of AI and robotics is heading toward a world where working becomes optional โ€” just like growing your own vegetables. You can do it, but you donโ€™t have to. Some people will still work because they enjoy it, not because they need to survive. That flips everything we know about jobs, money, and purpose. Imagine waking up and deciding to work purely because you want to, not because youโ€™re forced to. Thatโ€™s the kind of shift heโ€™s talking about. And it doesnโ€™t stop there โ€” Musk believes Teslaโ€™s Optimus robots could eventually perform highly skilled tasks like surgery, delivering medical care thatโ€™s better than what the best humans can provide today. A future where everyone, anywhere in the world, gets access to elite-level healthcare. Optional work. Superhuman doctors. AI running the backbone of society.
1:12

Elon Musk: In less than 10 years, work wonโ€™t be something you have to doโ€ฆ itโ€™ll be something you choose to do. He says the future of AI and robotics is heading toward a world where working becomes optional โ€” just like growing your own vegetables. You can do it, but you donโ€™t have to. Some people will still work because they enjoy it, not because they need to survive. That flips everything we know about jobs, money, and purpose. Imagine waking up and deciding to work purely because you want to, not because youโ€™re forced to. Thatโ€™s the kind of shift heโ€™s talking about. And it doesnโ€™t stop there โ€” Musk believes Teslaโ€™s Optimus robots could eventually perform highly skilled tasks like surgery, delivering medical care thatโ€™s better than what the best humans can provide today. A future where everyone, anywhere in the world, gets access to elite-level healthcare. Optional work. Superhuman doctors. AI running the backbone of society.

Ian Miles Cheong

23,981 views โ€ข 5 months ago

They call you racist, and think the conversation is over. News flash, this is not 1964 anymore. The American people are a lot smarter than that, and theyโ€™re not buying it. Because the reality is, people like me exist. What does that tell you? It tells you this country has made real progress. It tells you that millions of Americans are doing exactly what Martin Luther King Jr. called for, judging people not by the color of their skin, but by the content of their character. Thatโ€™s not theory, thatโ€™s reality. But instead of celebrating that progress, some want to drag us backwards, into a system where race is everything, where success is assigned, where outcomes are engineered. Thatโ€™s not empowerment, thatโ€™s limitation. The idea that someone can only succeed if a district is drawn for them, or if a box is checked for them, is an insult to the very people it claims to help. Hereโ€™s a better idea, be a great candidate. Work hard. Earn trust. Serve people. Put your name on the ballot and let voters decide.
1:27

They call you racist, and think the conversation is over. News flash, this is not 1964 anymore. The American people are a lot smarter than that, and theyโ€™re not buying it. Because the reality is, people like me exist. What does that tell you? It tells you this country has made real progress. It tells you that millions of Americans are doing exactly what Martin Luther King Jr. called for, judging people not by the color of their skin, but by the content of their character. Thatโ€™s not theory, thatโ€™s reality. But instead of celebrating that progress, some want to drag us backwards, into a system where race is everything, where success is assigned, where outcomes are engineered. Thatโ€™s not empowerment, thatโ€™s limitation. The idea that someone can only succeed if a district is drawn for them, or if a box is checked for them, is an insult to the very people it claims to help. Hereโ€™s a better idea, be a great candidate. Work hard. Earn trust. Serve people. Put your name on the ballot and let voters decide.

Wesley Hunt

267,496 views โ€ข 3 months ago

AI Overviews are showing up for more and more searches. And when they do, fewer people click. Thatโ€™s the part everyone is panicking about. Google gives the answer right there, so the user doesnโ€™t always need to visit your site. But SEO is not dead. The game just changed. Because now your job is not only to rank on Google. Your job is to become the source AI trusts enough to recommend. That means showing up in Google AI Overviews, ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, and all the other places people are asking questions. This is why tools like Ubersuggest matter even more now. You can use it to see what people are searching for, what questions theyโ€™re asking, what competitors rank for, and where your content gaps are. Then you turn that into better answers. Not generic blog posts. Real expertise. Real examples. Clear explanations. Content that both humans and AI can understand, trust, and cite. And your website still matters because thatโ€™s where attention turns into action. AI can summarize information. But it does not close the deal for you. It does not build the relationship. It does not replace your proof, your offer, or your brand. So save this action plan.
1:03

AI Overviews are showing up for more and more searches. And when they do, fewer people click. Thatโ€™s the part everyone is panicking about. Google gives the answer right there, so the user doesnโ€™t always need to visit your site. But SEO is not dead. The game just changed. Because now your job is not only to rank on Google. Your job is to become the source AI trusts enough to recommend. That means showing up in Google AI Overviews, ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, and all the other places people are asking questions. This is why tools like Ubersuggest matter even more now. You can use it to see what people are searching for, what questions theyโ€™re asking, what competitors rank for, and where your content gaps are. Then you turn that into better answers. Not generic blog posts. Real expertise. Real examples. Clear explanations. Content that both humans and AI can understand, trust, and cite. And your website still matters because thatโ€™s where attention turns into action. AI can summarize information. But it does not close the deal for you. It does not build the relationship. It does not replace your proof, your offer, or your brand. So save this action plan.

Neil Patel

10,255 views โ€ข 1 month ago

Today, I had the privilege of speaking to the HUMAIN team at our CEO Townhall. I often say this, and I mean it deeply: I am living my dream... working in a country where energy goes beyond oil. Itโ€™s in the people, the ambition, and the belief in building a better future. Saudi Arabia is unlike anywhere else. The hospitality is second to none. The vision is bold. And the commitment to shaping the future is real. What we are building at HUMAIN is foundational. We are not only participating in the AI era, but redefining it. Shifting the narrative from experimentation to real value creation. But more importantly, we are not afraid to challenge what an organization should look like in an AI-native world. In fact, we are pioneering it. We are actively reshaping how we work: - Moving toward a future where AI agents do the work - Empowering our people to focus on high-value thinking, creativity, and decision-making - Building strong foundations in security, governance, and guardrails - Continuously enhancing our models, systems, and operating frameworks This is not theory. This is happening now. What I saw today from our teams gives me absolute confidence: - Products that are not just innovative, but game-changing - Teams building at a speed and quality that challenge global norms - A culture focused on execution, ownership, and impact At #LEAP2026 this year, we will go beyond vision. We will show: Real demos. Real products. Some of them are a first of their kind in the world. And they are built right here in Saudi Arabia. I could not be more proud of this team. What they have accomplished in such a short time is remarkable. This is just the beginning. The future is not something we wait for. Itโ€™s something we build. #HUMAIN #LEAP #TheEndOfLimits #AI
1:02

Today, I had the privilege of speaking to the HUMAIN team at our CEO Townhall. I often say this, and I mean it deeply: I am living my dream... working in a country where energy goes beyond oil. Itโ€™s in the people, the ambition, and the belief in building a better future. Saudi Arabia is unlike anywhere else. The hospitality is second to none. The vision is bold. And the commitment to shaping the future is real. What we are building at HUMAIN is foundational. We are not only participating in the AI era, but redefining it. Shifting the narrative from experimentation to real value creation. But more importantly, we are not afraid to challenge what an organization should look like in an AI-native world. In fact, we are pioneering it. We are actively reshaping how we work: - Moving toward a future where AI agents do the work - Empowering our people to focus on high-value thinking, creativity, and decision-making - Building strong foundations in security, governance, and guardrails - Continuously enhancing our models, systems, and operating frameworks This is not theory. This is happening now. What I saw today from our teams gives me absolute confidence: - Products that are not just innovative, but game-changing - Teams building at a speed and quality that challenge global norms - A culture focused on execution, ownership, and impact At #LEAP2026 this year, we will go beyond vision. We will show: Real demos. Real products. Some of them are a first of their kind in the world. And they are built right here in Saudi Arabia. I could not be more proud of this team. What they have accomplished in such a short time is remarkable. This is just the beginning. The future is not something we wait for. Itโ€™s something we build. #HUMAIN #LEAP #TheEndOfLimits #AI

Tareq Amin

17,856 views โ€ข 4 months ago

Elon Musk: Information should bubble up from the people, not be decided by a few editors-in-chief. โ€œWe should have the free marketplace of ideas. People can propose an idea, people can discuss an idea. They can make a statement, people can rebut that. The people can decide. And I think it's far better for information to bubble up from the voice of the people than to be decided by a handful of editors-in-chief of newspapers. The biggest point of manipulation that occurs in the media is not when the media says something that's false or misleading โ€“ because they do that โ€“ but their choice of narrative, what are they going to talk about. By choosing to focus on one thing and not focus on another thing, they're steering what information the public receives. I think the right thing is that the narratives that are important should be the narratives that the people as a whole think are important, not what a few media oligarchs think is important. But they sure like controlling information.โ€ Town Hall in Harrisburg, October 19, 2024
1:22

Elon Musk: Information should bubble up from the people, not be decided by a few editors-in-chief. โ€œWe should have the free marketplace of ideas. People can propose an idea, people can discuss an idea. They can make a statement, people can rebut that. The people can decide. And I think it's far better for information to bubble up from the voice of the people than to be decided by a handful of editors-in-chief of newspapers. The biggest point of manipulation that occurs in the media is not when the media says something that's false or misleading โ€“ because they do that โ€“ but their choice of narrative, what are they going to talk about. By choosing to focus on one thing and not focus on another thing, they're steering what information the public receives. I think the right thing is that the narratives that are important should be the narratives that the people as a whole think are important, not what a few media oligarchs think is important. But they sure like controlling information.โ€ Town Hall in Harrisburg, October 19, 2024

ELON CLIPS

25,147 views โ€ข 11 months ago

Google just gave away the real secret to showing up in AI answers. And honestly, it contradicts a lot of the viral vidoes youโ€™ve been watching. Because Google basically said: stop obsessing over tricks like llms.txt, PerfectSchema, and all these technical hacks people are trying to sell you. Thatโ€™s not what gets you cited. Hereโ€™s what does. AI doesnโ€™t need to cite generic content. If your article says the same thing as everyone else, the AI can answer the question without you. But if your content has something original. A real test, a number you measured, a customer insight, a process you actually use, now the AI has a reason to reference you. Thatโ€™s the difference between commodity content and non-commodity content. But hereโ€™s where most people get stuck. They donโ€™t know what to create first. Thatโ€™s why tools like AnswerThePublic are useful. You can see the real questions people are already asking around your topic, then use those questions as the starting point. But donโ€™t just answer them generically. Add something only you know. Your data. Your experience. Your customer conversations. Your examples. Because in the AI era, the goal isnโ€™t just to write content. Itโ€™s to become the source AI wants to cite.
1:02

Google just gave away the real secret to showing up in AI answers. And honestly, it contradicts a lot of the viral vidoes youโ€™ve been watching. Because Google basically said: stop obsessing over tricks like llms.txt, PerfectSchema, and all these technical hacks people are trying to sell you. Thatโ€™s not what gets you cited. Hereโ€™s what does. AI doesnโ€™t need to cite generic content. If your article says the same thing as everyone else, the AI can answer the question without you. But if your content has something original. A real test, a number you measured, a customer insight, a process you actually use, now the AI has a reason to reference you. Thatโ€™s the difference between commodity content and non-commodity content. But hereโ€™s where most people get stuck. They donโ€™t know what to create first. Thatโ€™s why tools like AnswerThePublic are useful. You can see the real questions people are already asking around your topic, then use those questions as the starting point. But donโ€™t just answer them generically. Add something only you know. Your data. Your experience. Your customer conversations. Your examples. Because in the AI era, the goal isnโ€™t just to write content. Itโ€™s to become the source AI wants to cite.

Neil Patel

16,728 views โ€ข 1 month ago

THIS IS A PERFECT EXAMPLE TO PROVE THE AI BUBBLE Claude AI developer Anthropic is valued at nearly $965B, while making only $20B in revenue. For comparison: Walmart is worth nearly the same amount ($940B), but makes $725B in revenue. Let that sink in. Same valuation range. Completely different economic reality. One is built on moving real goods through real infrastructure every day. The other is built on expectations of how widely AI will be used, and how profitable it will eventually become. And thats exactly where the big danger lies. Markets are no longer just pricing what companies earn. They are pricing what companies could become if everything goes right. And when valuations start converging like this, the uncomfortable question isnโ€™t whether AI matters. Itโ€™s how much of that future has already been priced in.
0:31

THIS IS A PERFECT EXAMPLE TO PROVE THE AI BUBBLE Claude AI developer Anthropic is valued at nearly $965B, while making only $20B in revenue. For comparison: Walmart is worth nearly the same amount ($940B), but makes $725B in revenue. Let that sink in. Same valuation range. Completely different economic reality. One is built on moving real goods through real infrastructure every day. The other is built on expectations of how widely AI will be used, and how profitable it will eventually become. And thats exactly where the big danger lies. Markets are no longer just pricing what companies earn. They are pricing what companies could become if everything goes right. And when valuations start converging like this, the uncomfortable question isnโ€™t whether AI matters. Itโ€™s how much of that future has already been priced in.

CryptoGoos

14,835 views โ€ข 3 months ago

I am not a fan of Tucker Carlson. He is full of crap when he says the USA will not defend Taiwan if China invades, and that Israel has little to do with what is going on in the Middle East. This interview is still the best one out there, not because of Tucker, but because of the statement Gregory K Bovino makes right here. Most people will not watch it, or even listen to Greg Bovino, because they hate Tucker so much. I get it, but that is sad. You need to hear what Bovino says here, even if you will not sit through the whole interview. You simply cannot MAGA without deporting every single illegal alien in this country. These people do not share your values. They do not care about your history. Bovino is absolutely right that the 1A and 2A you hold dear will be gone if we do not deport every single one of them. If you do not agree, you are not MAGA. End of story.
1:47

I am not a fan of Tucker Carlson. He is full of crap when he says the USA will not defend Taiwan if China invades, and that Israel has little to do with what is going on in the Middle East. This interview is still the best one out there, not because of Tucker, but because of the statement Gregory K Bovino makes right here. Most people will not watch it, or even listen to Greg Bovino, because they hate Tucker so much. I get it, but that is sad. You need to hear what Bovino says here, even if you will not sit through the whole interview. You simply cannot MAGA without deporting every single illegal alien in this country. These people do not share your values. They do not care about your history. Bovino is absolutely right that the 1A and 2A you hold dear will be gone if we do not deport every single one of them. If you do not agree, you are not MAGA. End of story.

Kim "Katie" USA

50,548 views โ€ข 4 days ago

โ€œWhen people were saying in the testimony, that the hope they have is that what happened here 30 something years ago will never happen again. It wonโ€™t, not because those who were responsible for that dark past will not try again or are not even trying now again. It will not happen again just because there will be people who will stand up and fight. Itโ€™s not because there are fewer people who wish for us to perish or who would have wished for this country to disappear. How can people accept that? What kind of people do not stand up and fight? There is a risk of dying when you stand up and fight but if you donโ€™t, itโ€™s a sure thing: you are going to die. So why donโ€™t I try to stand up and fight with the chance that I might survive and live life as I want it, instead of giving up and you let people treat you as if for you to live, it is a favour that they are going to do for you. Why? But my message goes to other Africans who live like this on a daily basis, who are dehumanized and they accept it and they beg. I can't beg to live. I can't beg anybody. Weโ€™ll fight, If I lose, I lose. But there is a chance. There is a chance, a significant chance, that if you stand up and fight, you will live. And you will have lived a dignified life that you deserve, that anybody else deserves." President Kagame | #Kwibuka31
4:30

โ€œWhen people were saying in the testimony, that the hope they have is that what happened here 30 something years ago will never happen again. It wonโ€™t, not because those who were responsible for that dark past will not try again or are not even trying now again. It will not happen again just because there will be people who will stand up and fight. Itโ€™s not because there are fewer people who wish for us to perish or who would have wished for this country to disappear. How can people accept that? What kind of people do not stand up and fight? There is a risk of dying when you stand up and fight but if you donโ€™t, itโ€™s a sure thing: you are going to die. So why donโ€™t I try to stand up and fight with the chance that I might survive and live life as I want it, instead of giving up and you let people treat you as if for you to live, it is a favour that they are going to do for you. Why? But my message goes to other Africans who live like this on a daily basis, who are dehumanized and they accept it and they beg. I can't beg to live. I can't beg anybody. Weโ€™ll fight, If I lose, I lose. But there is a chance. There is a chance, a significant chance, that if you stand up and fight, you will live. And you will have lived a dignified life that you deserve, that anybody else deserves." President Kagame | #Kwibuka31

Presidency | Rwanda

47,115 views โ€ข 1 year ago

Sam Altman says AI leaders have done a terrible job at communicating to the public: โ€œThe, โ€˜Dear peasants, we will bequeath upon you these gifts of a cure for cancer and material wealth and great entertainment, and you stop complaining, and we'll make all the decisions about the future and just trust us, we'll be benevolent dictators.โ€™ Thatโ€™s not good. Not good.โ€ โ€œA lot of the people building AI have been saying, โ€˜There's a 25% chance we're going to destroy the world, and yet we're going to race ahead to do it because otherwise those bad guys will do it first.โ€™โ€ โ€œOr, โ€˜Man, this thing is going to be really terrible, and 50% of the jobs are going to go away in the next year, and we hope you all are okay, but it seems really scary.โ€™โ€ โ€œWe have not, as a field, done a very good job of explaining to people what the benefits are and how the downsides can be mitigatedโ€”and we certainly have not done a good job even if people have had answers like saying, โ€˜There's going to be UBI, or work will be optional.โ€™โ€ โ€œThere's been very little discussion from people about how and why it's important that people have more power and personal freedom in the world, not less. And that matters a lot to most people.โ€ โ€œThe ability of people to influence their own future and collectively design where society is going to go, and the autonomy that comes with that, is very important. I don't think a lot of people in the AI fieldโ€ฆ they feel it for themselves, but they don't spend much time thinking about it, reflecting on or acknowledging how important that is to other people.โ€
3:19

Sam Altman says AI leaders have done a terrible job at communicating to the public: โ€œThe, โ€˜Dear peasants, we will bequeath upon you these gifts of a cure for cancer and material wealth and great entertainment, and you stop complaining, and we'll make all the decisions about the future and just trust us, we'll be benevolent dictators.โ€™ Thatโ€™s not good. Not good.โ€ โ€œA lot of the people building AI have been saying, โ€˜There's a 25% chance we're going to destroy the world, and yet we're going to race ahead to do it because otherwise those bad guys will do it first.โ€™โ€ โ€œOr, โ€˜Man, this thing is going to be really terrible, and 50% of the jobs are going to go away in the next year, and we hope you all are okay, but it seems really scary.โ€™โ€ โ€œWe have not, as a field, done a very good job of explaining to people what the benefits are and how the downsides can be mitigatedโ€”and we certainly have not done a good job even if people have had answers like saying, โ€˜There's going to be UBI, or work will be optional.โ€™โ€ โ€œThere's been very little discussion from people about how and why it's important that people have more power and personal freedom in the world, not less. And that matters a lot to most people.โ€ โ€œThe ability of people to influence their own future and collectively design where society is going to go, and the autonomy that comes with that, is very important. I don't think a lot of people in the AI fieldโ€ฆ they feel it for themselves, but they don't spend much time thinking about it, reflecting on or acknowledging how important that is to other people.โ€

David Senra

32,300 views โ€ข 7 days ago

Mo Gawdat believes up to 30% of jobs in certain sectors could disappear by 2028. That stopped me in my tracks. Mo was one of the first people to come on this podcast and warn me about AI, long before most of the world was talking about it. At the time, it felt early. Now, it feels like the world is catching up to what he was seeing. Iโ€™m still trying to understand what AI actually means for our lives. Not just whether it can write emails, create images or make us more productive. I mean what it does to jobs. What it does to power. What it does to education. What it does to human connectionโ€ฆ Thatโ€™s why I wanted to have this discussion with Mo again. What makes Mo worth listening to is that he saw these systems inside Google years before most of us had even heard the term AI. His book *Scary Smart* now feels like it was written for this exact moment. Let me explain why this discussion matters. Mo believes weโ€™re not just entering an AI revolution. Weโ€™re entering a period where AI, robotics, economics, surveillance, digital currencies and global instability are all colliding at the same time. Thatโ€™s a lot for any of us to process. We spoke about: - The jobs Mo believes are most at risk from AI. - Why he believes that AI is actually underhyped! - The mistake almost everyone is making with ChatGPT. - The prediction that changed even his own view of the future. The part that stayed with me was this idea that human connection may become the real currency. Because if AI can produce the information, write the report, analyse the data, then what is left? I donโ€™t think this conversation gives neat answers. Thatโ€™s probably why itโ€™s worth watching. It helped me think more honestly about whatโ€™s coming.
1:29

Mo Gawdat believes up to 30% of jobs in certain sectors could disappear by 2028. That stopped me in my tracks. Mo was one of the first people to come on this podcast and warn me about AI, long before most of the world was talking about it. At the time, it felt early. Now, it feels like the world is catching up to what he was seeing. Iโ€™m still trying to understand what AI actually means for our lives. Not just whether it can write emails, create images or make us more productive. I mean what it does to jobs. What it does to power. What it does to education. What it does to human connectionโ€ฆ Thatโ€™s why I wanted to have this discussion with Mo again. What makes Mo worth listening to is that he saw these systems inside Google years before most of us had even heard the term AI. His book *Scary Smart* now feels like it was written for this exact moment. Let me explain why this discussion matters. Mo believes weโ€™re not just entering an AI revolution. Weโ€™re entering a period where AI, robotics, economics, surveillance, digital currencies and global instability are all colliding at the same time. Thatโ€™s a lot for any of us to process. We spoke about: - The jobs Mo believes are most at risk from AI. - Why he believes that AI is actually underhyped! - The mistake almost everyone is making with ChatGPT. - The prediction that changed even his own view of the future. The part that stayed with me was this idea that human connection may become the real currency. Because if AI can produce the information, write the report, analyse the data, then what is left? I donโ€™t think this conversation gives neat answers. Thatโ€™s probably why itโ€™s worth watching. It helped me think more honestly about whatโ€™s coming.

Steven Bartlett

27,882 views โ€ข 3 months ago

Factory CEO Matan Grinberg says all companies go through three phases of AI adoption: "Phase Zero is reluctance to adopt because developers have had the same workflows for the last 20 years and they might not want to change it." "Phase One is throw the kitchen sink and use as much AI as possible. Whatever you do, just change your workflows." "Phase Two is that people are now adopting the tech, they're proving that they can change their behavior, and use these tools. But now we need to make sure we're actually doing it efficiently and effectively. Uber and Meta are examples of this." "Yes, you'll overspend in Phase One, but the point is to get to Phase Two where then you're actually really efficient on a per-token basis, moving the needle for the business and delivering software faster."
0:56

Factory CEO Matan Grinberg says all companies go through three phases of AI adoption: "Phase Zero is reluctance to adopt because developers have had the same workflows for the last 20 years and they might not want to change it." "Phase One is throw the kitchen sink and use as much AI as possible. Whatever you do, just change your workflows." "Phase Two is that people are now adopting the tech, they're proving that they can change their behavior, and use these tools. But now we need to make sure we're actually doing it efficiently and effectively. Uber and Meta are examples of this." "Yes, you'll overspend in Phase One, but the point is to get to Phase Two where then you're actually really efficient on a per-token basis, moving the needle for the business and delivering software faster."

TBPN

25,747 views โ€ข 4 months ago

I kept thinking about one thing while creating this videoโ€ฆ What happens when the worldโ€™s biggest sports event collides with a decentralized prediction market built for real-time participation? Not just watching football anymore. Not just reacting after matches anymore. But millions of people moving with the same moments together in real time through liquidity, probability, strategy, and market participation. I wanted this video to feel like a glimpse into what that future could actually look like. The 2026 World Cup is coming. POTS MARKET is launching soon. And honestlyโ€ฆ this feels bigger than a normal prediction platform. This feels like football, market psychology, and Web3 infrastructure all colliding at the same moment. โ€œSame World Cup. Different Game.โ€ Explore more about the future of prediction markets here: Now take a few minutes to watch the video carefully from start to finish ๐Ÿ‘‡ #PotsMarket #WorldCup2026 #PredictionMarkets
3:38

I kept thinking about one thing while creating this videoโ€ฆ What happens when the worldโ€™s biggest sports event collides with a decentralized prediction market built for real-time participation? Not just watching football anymore. Not just reacting after matches anymore. But millions of people moving with the same moments together in real time through liquidity, probability, strategy, and market participation. I wanted this video to feel like a glimpse into what that future could actually look like. The 2026 World Cup is coming. POTS MARKET is launching soon. And honestlyโ€ฆ this feels bigger than a normal prediction platform. This feels like football, market psychology, and Web3 infrastructure all colliding at the same moment. โ€œSame World Cup. Different Game.โ€ Explore more about the future of prediction markets here: Now take a few minutes to watch the video carefully from start to finish ๐Ÿ‘‡ #PotsMarket #WorldCup2026 #PredictionMarkets

๐— ๐—œ๐—ฅ๐—˜๐—Ÿ ๐—ฉ๐—˜๐—š๐—”๐—ฅ

21,657 views โ€ข 3 months ago

The uncomfortable truth is that some beliefs are held for the same reason some people buy Rolexes: they look good in public. In the same way that many people buy expensive material possessions, not because they especially like the possession itself, but because they know it will impress other people, there are people who express luxury beliefs not simply because they believe them, but because they know those beliefs will bring them clout and status. So the motivation behind the luxury good and the luxury belief is often very similar. But many people convince themselves that their motives are completely sincere. Take a guy who buys a Lamborghini. If you ask him why he bought it, he might say, โ€œLook, it makes me feel confident. I like driving it. It makes me feel good. Thatโ€™s why I bought it. Iโ€™m not trying to impress anyone.โ€ And I think part of you might suspect, โ€œWell, all of that may be true. But I also think part of you likes the fact that when people see you in that Lamborghini, they think of you in a certain way.โ€ The same thing can happen with luxury beliefs. People may sincerely believe what they are saying. But part of me thinks that, somewhere deep down, there is also a sense of satisfaction that comes from expressing a belief and having your peers, your social circle, and other similarly credentialed elites applaud you for it. They think, โ€œWhat a compassionate, interesting, sophisticated person you are for holding that view.โ€ A belief can be sincerely held while also conferring status to the speaker.
1:00

The uncomfortable truth is that some beliefs are held for the same reason some people buy Rolexes: they look good in public. In the same way that many people buy expensive material possessions, not because they especially like the possession itself, but because they know it will impress other people, there are people who express luxury beliefs not simply because they believe them, but because they know those beliefs will bring them clout and status. So the motivation behind the luxury good and the luxury belief is often very similar. But many people convince themselves that their motives are completely sincere. Take a guy who buys a Lamborghini. If you ask him why he bought it, he might say, โ€œLook, it makes me feel confident. I like driving it. It makes me feel good. Thatโ€™s why I bought it. Iโ€™m not trying to impress anyone.โ€ And I think part of you might suspect, โ€œWell, all of that may be true. But I also think part of you likes the fact that when people see you in that Lamborghini, they think of you in a certain way.โ€ The same thing can happen with luxury beliefs. People may sincerely believe what they are saying. But part of me thinks that, somewhere deep down, there is also a sense of satisfaction that comes from expressing a belief and having your peers, your social circle, and other similarly credentialed elites applaud you for it. They think, โ€œWhat a compassionate, interesting, sophisticated person you are for holding that view.โ€ A belief can be sincerely held while also conferring status to the speaker.

Rob Henderson

11,894 views โ€ข 14 days ago

Bill Gates on why AI isn't a bubble, but why many AI investments will still fail: "AI is the biggest technical thing ever in my lifetime. It is so profound and therefore its influence is hard to overstate." Gates sees the underlying value as undeniable, with intelligence on demand spanning medical advice, tutoring, and drug design. "The value is extremely high, just like creating the internet ended up being in net very very valuable." But he draws a critical distinction between two types of bubbles: The tulip kind, where people look back and realise there was nothing underneath. And the internet kind, where something transformative was happening, but most companies still got wiped out. Gates is clear about which one AI is: "If what we mean is like tulips in the Netherlands... No, that's not where we are." AI is the internet, not the tulips. But just like the internet, the frenzy around it is creating enormous risk. Overpriced electricity commitments, data centers built in the wrong locations, and hardware that becomes obsolete before it pays for itself. "Some of these companies will be glad they spent all this money. Some of them, they'll commit to data centers whose electricity is too expensive." And yet, sitting it out isn't an option either. "If you want to be a tech company, you don't get to say, 'Let's check out of this race.'" The technology is transformative. But a ton of today's investments will turn out to be dead ends. And when the dust settles, the companies that built something durable will outlast the ones that spent the most trying to keep up.
1:38

Bill Gates on why AI isn't a bubble, but why many AI investments will still fail: "AI is the biggest technical thing ever in my lifetime. It is so profound and therefore its influence is hard to overstate." Gates sees the underlying value as undeniable, with intelligence on demand spanning medical advice, tutoring, and drug design. "The value is extremely high, just like creating the internet ended up being in net very very valuable." But he draws a critical distinction between two types of bubbles: The tulip kind, where people look back and realise there was nothing underneath. And the internet kind, where something transformative was happening, but most companies still got wiped out. Gates is clear about which one AI is: "If what we mean is like tulips in the Netherlands... No, that's not where we are." AI is the internet, not the tulips. But just like the internet, the frenzy around it is creating enormous risk. Overpriced electricity commitments, data centers built in the wrong locations, and hardware that becomes obsolete before it pays for itself. "Some of these companies will be glad they spent all this money. Some of them, they'll commit to data centers whose electricity is too expensive." And yet, sitting it out isn't an option either. "If you want to be a tech company, you don't get to say, 'Let's check out of this race.'" The technology is transformative. But a ton of today's investments will turn out to be dead ends. And when the dust settles, the companies that built something durable will outlast the ones that spent the most trying to keep up.

Big Brain AI

25,681 views โ€ข 6 months ago