Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

Возникла проблема при загрузке этого видео. Это может быть связано с временными проблемами сети или видео может быть недоступно.

На главную

𝗝𝗢𝗦𝗘𝗣𝗛 𝗔𝗢𝗨𝗡: 𝗧𝗥𝗨𝗠𝗣’𝗦 𝗢𝗕𝗘𝗗𝗜𝗘𝗡𝗧 𝗩𝗔𝗦𝗦𝗔𝗟 Trump in front of President Aoun: "We have very good relations with the President of Syria, and he wants to do some things regarding Hezbollah. He has been fighting Hezbollah for a long time. I think he will be effective." What happened in the... Oval Office wasn't diplomatic awkwardness, it was a total, pathetic abdication of duty. A foreign president sat right next to the head of the Lebanese state and casually greenlit another nation's army invading Lebanon to slaughter Lebanese citizens on Lebanese soil. And how did the President of Lebanon respond? With the passive, gutless silence of a submissive vassal. Any self-respecting leader would have cut in on the spot to slam the door on foreign aggression, assert the country's borders, and declare that Lebanese lives are not collateral for foreign operations. Instead, our presidency sat there mute, nodding along like an obedient lapdog while the sovereignty of the republic and the blood of its people were tossed around as cheap bargaining chips. This spineless surrender completely destroys the fraud of the Lebanese political class. For years, these arrogant hypocrites have stood on podiums lecturing the Lebanese public about national dignity, state authority, and the sanctity of the constitution. Yet the very second a foreign superpower openly discusses turning our home into a killing ground for outside forces, all that loud, theatrical "sovereignty" instantly turns into cowardly compliance. Sovereignty isn't a weaponized political trick you use to lecture your own citizens while groveling before foreign kings. If a president doesn't have the stomach to open his mouth when an outside power openly plots to shed Lebanese blood on Lebanese soil, he isn't a president at all, he is a disgrace, presiding over the total humiliation of a nation. Joseph Aoun must resign immediately, or he must be removed from power.show more

Ibrahim Majed

34,549 subscribers

23,100 просмотров • 1 месяц назад •via X (Twitter)

Новости и политика

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

President Trump meets with Lebanese President Joseph Aoun in the Oval Office: "It's a great pleasure to be with the President of Lebanon. He's highly respected... and the relationship is very good. I think that Lebanon has been a very mistreated country for a long period of time."

President Trump meets with Lebanese President Joseph Aoun in the Oval Office: "It's a great pleasure to be with the President of Lebanon. He's highly respected... and the relationship is very good. I think that Lebanon has been a very mistreated country for a long period of time."

Breaking911

43,504 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

.President Donald J. Trump meets with Lebanese President Joseph Aoun in the Oval Office: "It's a great pleasure to be with the President of Lebanon. He's highly respected... and the relationship is very good. I think that Lebanon has been a very mistreated country for a long period of time."

.President Donald J. Trump meets with Lebanese President Joseph Aoun in the Oval Office: "It's a great pleasure to be with the President of Lebanon. He's highly respected... and the relationship is very good. I think that Lebanon has been a very mistreated country for a long period of time."

Rapid Response 47

100,278 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

𝗧𝗛𝗘 𝗣𝗥𝗘𝗦𝗜𝗗𝗘𝗡𝗧 𝗪𝗛𝗢 𝗖𝗛𝗢𝗦𝗘 𝗜𝗦𝗥𝗔𝗘𝗟 𝗢𝗩𝗘𝗥 𝗛𝗜𝗦 𝗢𝗪𝗡 𝗣𝗘𝗢𝗣𝗟𝗘 In his recent interview with CNN, the Lebanese President turned his sights toward Iran, speaking amidst ongoing negotiations with the United States where a total ceasefire in Lebanon remains Iran’s primary condition. He declared that Lebanon is not Iran’s country, asserting ownership over our land and pointing to our destroyed homes and slaughtered citizens to claim Iran is merely using Lebanon as a cheap bargaining chip. His rhetoric collapses under the weight of a devastating reality: following the 2024 ceasefire, Israel’s army continuously bombed Lebanon, killing more than 500 Lebanese citizens over a span of 15 months. Where was this presidential outrage then? What did the he do while Lebanese blood spilled and entire villages were leveled? The President did absolutely nothing at all, nothing whatsoever. His sovereignty is a selectively deployed illusion. Next, he turned to Hezbollah, preaching that diplomacy and negotiations are the only path forward. The Lebanese people already know exactly what your version of diplomacy brings. After the 2024 ceasefire, your diplomacy brought nothing but systematic destruction, rising casualties, and the loss of even more border villages to Israel. Now, in your current round of negotiations, the president’s "diplomacy" has degenerated into outright capitulation, granting Israel the "right" to bomb Lebanon’s territory and remain stationed inside the Lebanese borders, all while demanding that the people of the South abandon their ancestral lands. The President wants to surrender to Israel and brand it as a solution. It is not a solution; it is treason. The Lebanese people will never surrender. The President also claimed that Sheikh Naim Qassem, the Secretary-General of Hezbollah, does not represent the Lebanese people. In making that claim, he seems to have forgotten the results of the last elections, where Hezbollah secured at least three times more votes than the political forces opposed to them. If there is anyone in Lebanon who fails to represent the true will, honor, and spirit of defiance of its people, it is the President himself, not Sheikh Naim Qassem. The truth is that Sheikh Naim represents the Lebanese people far more than this President ever can or ever will. it appears the President is unconsciously engineering the premature demise of his own reign. History has proven time and again that no leader can rule in defiance of their own citizens. By aligning with the demands of the enemy rather than the resilience of his people, he has signed his own political eviction notice, because no president can stand against his own people and expect to remain in power.

Ibrahim Majed

10,523 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

When asked how the U.S. is helping the Lebanese military take down Hezbollah, U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations Mike Waltz says “the U.S. contributed over $250 million to the Lebanese armed forces.” “This is a tremendous historic opportunity for Lebanon,” he says. “The Lebanese government, led by President Aoun, a former general and head of the Lebanese armed forces, to take their country back.”

When asked how the U.S. is helping the Lebanese military take down Hezbollah, U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations Mike Waltz says “the U.S. contributed over $250 million to the Lebanese armed forces.” “This is a tremendous historic opportunity for Lebanon,” he says. “The Lebanese government, led by President Aoun, a former general and head of the Lebanese armed forces, to take their country back.”

Face The Nation

29,572 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

Today, I had the honor of meeting with His Excellency President General Joseph Aoun at a decisive moment for Lebanon. We reviewed the latest developments following the framework announced in Washington on June 26 and discussed the historic opportunity now before Lebanon to restore its sovereignty, strengthen its state institutions, and reclaim its national decision-making. I reaffirmed my full support for this process because, for the first time, it provides a practical and internationally backed framework capable of returning the exclusive authority over war and peace to the Lebanese state, ending Lebanon’s role as a battleground for regional conflicts, and putting an end to all forms of foreign interference in our national affairs—particularly Iranian interference, which has undermined Lebanon’s sovereignty and drawn our country into conflicts that do not serve its national interests. I also reiterated my full support for President Joseph Aoun, Prime Minister Dr. Nawaf Salam, and the Government. Success will require a unified national position behind the constitutional institutions of the Lebanese state and a shared determination not to lose this historic opportunity. We believe the Washington framework represents a historic political and security roadmap toward a just, lasting, and internationally supported peace between Lebanon and Israel. It builds on previous agreements, particularly the Cessation of Hostilities Agreement of November 27, 2024, while introducing the political and implementation mechanisms necessary to fulfill the commitments already undertaken by the Lebanese state. Its ultimate objective is to restore the state’s exclusive authority throughout Lebanese territory, place all weapons under the sole authority of the state, and fully reestablish Lebanon’s sovereignty. It is important to recall that the Cessation of Hostilities Agreement was approved by the Government of Prime Minister Najib Mikati on behalf of the Lebanese Republic. That government rested politically and parliamentarily on the support of Hezbollah, the Amal Movement, and their allies. The framework announced in Washington does not replace those commitments; it provides the mechanisms necessary to implement them. Those who accepted these obligations yesterday cannot reject their implementation today. Respect for the continuity of the Lebanese state and its international commitments is not a political preference—it is a constitutional and national obligation. Any retreat would undermine Lebanon’s credibility and weaken its standing with both its Arab partners and the international community. Lebanon has no realistic alternative to this path. We either restore our sovereignty, rebuild confidence with the Arab world and the international community, and secure a future of stability and prosperity, or we remain trapped in conflict, isolation, and economic decline. I also proposed to His Excellency that the Government adopt, alongside the implementation of the agreed security arrangements, a comprehensive national strategy for recovery, reconstruction, and sustainable economic development in every area where the state progressively resumes its responsibilities. As the Lebanese Armed Forces deploy and the state assumes exclusive security authority, reconstruction and development must advance in parallel. Security alone will not be sufficient. The Lebanese state must return with all of its institutions. Homes and infrastructure must be rebuilt, productive investment encouraged, jobs created for young people, and quality education and healthcare restored. Only a visible and effective state presence can rebuild citizens’ confidence and establish lasting stability. Lebanon’s recent history has demonstrated that where the state withdraws, parallel institutions inevitably emerge. The responsibility of the state today is to reclaim that space completely, ensuring that no parallel structures remain and that no authority exists other than the constitutional institutions of the Lebanese Republic. The restoration of the Lebanese state is not simply a political aspiration. It is a comprehensive national project founded on full sovereignty, one state, one army, one legitimate authority over arms, strong institutions, a productive economy, equal justice under the law, and a future worthy of all Lebanese.

Today, I had the honor of meeting with His Excellency President General Joseph Aoun at a decisive moment for Lebanon. We reviewed the latest developments following the framework announced in Washington on June 26 and discussed the historic opportunity now before Lebanon to restore its sovereignty, strengthen its state institutions, and reclaim its national decision-making. I reaffirmed my full support for this process because, for the first time, it provides a practical and internationally backed framework capable of returning the exclusive authority over war and peace to the Lebanese state, ending Lebanon’s role as a battleground for regional conflicts, and putting an end to all forms of foreign interference in our national affairs—particularly Iranian interference, which has undermined Lebanon’s sovereignty and drawn our country into conflicts that do not serve its national interests. I also reiterated my full support for President Joseph Aoun, Prime Minister Dr. Nawaf Salam, and the Government. Success will require a unified national position behind the constitutional institutions of the Lebanese state and a shared determination not to lose this historic opportunity. We believe the Washington framework represents a historic political and security roadmap toward a just, lasting, and internationally supported peace between Lebanon and Israel. It builds on previous agreements, particularly the Cessation of Hostilities Agreement of November 27, 2024, while introducing the political and implementation mechanisms necessary to fulfill the commitments already undertaken by the Lebanese state. Its ultimate objective is to restore the state’s exclusive authority throughout Lebanese territory, place all weapons under the sole authority of the state, and fully reestablish Lebanon’s sovereignty. It is important to recall that the Cessation of Hostilities Agreement was approved by the Government of Prime Minister Najib Mikati on behalf of the Lebanese Republic. That government rested politically and parliamentarily on the support of Hezbollah, the Amal Movement, and their allies. The framework announced in Washington does not replace those commitments; it provides the mechanisms necessary to implement them. Those who accepted these obligations yesterday cannot reject their implementation today. Respect for the continuity of the Lebanese state and its international commitments is not a political preference—it is a constitutional and national obligation. Any retreat would undermine Lebanon’s credibility and weaken its standing with both its Arab partners and the international community. Lebanon has no realistic alternative to this path. We either restore our sovereignty, rebuild confidence with the Arab world and the international community, and secure a future of stability and prosperity, or we remain trapped in conflict, isolation, and economic decline. I also proposed to His Excellency that the Government adopt, alongside the implementation of the agreed security arrangements, a comprehensive national strategy for recovery, reconstruction, and sustainable economic development in every area where the state progressively resumes its responsibilities. As the Lebanese Armed Forces deploy and the state assumes exclusive security authority, reconstruction and development must advance in parallel. Security alone will not be sufficient. The Lebanese state must return with all of its institutions. Homes and infrastructure must be rebuilt, productive investment encouraged, jobs created for young people, and quality education and healthcare restored. Only a visible and effective state presence can rebuild citizens’ confidence and establish lasting stability. Lebanon’s recent history has demonstrated that where the state withdraws, parallel institutions inevitably emerge. The responsibility of the state today is to reclaim that space completely, ensuring that no parallel structures remain and that no authority exists other than the constitutional institutions of the Lebanese Republic. The restoration of the Lebanese state is not simply a political aspiration. It is a comprehensive national project founded on full sovereignty, one state, one army, one legitimate authority over arms, strong institutions, a productive economy, equal justice under the law, and a future worthy of all Lebanese.

Fouad Makhzoumi

135,587 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

🚨 Lebanon also wants its own "Trump" plan. Charles Jabbour, head of the public information apparatus of the Lebanese Forces party (Christians), actually really likes Trump's ultimatum approach towards Hams: I ask President Trump to set a 72-hour ultimatum for Hezbollah to disarm, dismantle its military infrastructure, and be subject to the Lebanese state - otherwise, there is no way to end this coup (by Hezbollah) against the Lebanese state.

🚨 Lebanon also wants its own "Trump" plan. Charles Jabbour, head of the public information apparatus of the Lebanese Forces party (Christians), actually really likes Trump's ultimatum approach towards Hams: I ask President Trump to set a 72-hour ultimatum for Hezbollah to disarm, dismantle its military infrastructure, and be subject to the Lebanese state - otherwise, there is no way to end this coup (by Hezbollah) against the Lebanese state.

Raylan Givens

19,518 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад

WATCH⚡️ Israel’s UN ambassador, Danny Danon, surprised the Lebanese representative by addressing the Lebanese people in Arabic, saying: “Lebanon belongs to the Lebanese, not to the Iranians.” “Israel has no desire to be in Southern Lebanon. Our goal is to protect our people, not to occupy Lebanese territory. But to prevent this from happening again, the council must ensure the right mechanisms are in place for the Lebanese Army and UNIFIL meets their obligations. I wish to address the Lebanese representative, mister Rasham. I have listened to your words and condemnations very carefully. But the truth is you should be sitting next to me, not next to the Iranian representative. Because whether you can admit it or not, Israel, Lebanon, and the free world are on the same side against the Islamic regime of Iran. All of us should declare, shoulder to shoulder, that Iran must keep its blood stained hands off Lebanon. And I would like to to approach the the Lebanese people. I will do it in Arabic. Lebanon belongs to the Lebanese, not to the Iranians.”

WATCH⚡️ Israel’s UN ambassador, Danny Danon, surprised the Lebanese representative by addressing the Lebanese people in Arabic, saying: “Lebanon belongs to the Lebanese, not to the Iranians.” “Israel has no desire to be in Southern Lebanon. Our goal is to protect our people, not to occupy Lebanese territory. But to prevent this from happening again, the council must ensure the right mechanisms are in place for the Lebanese Army and UNIFIL meets their obligations. I wish to address the Lebanese representative, mister Rasham. I have listened to your words and condemnations very carefully. But the truth is you should be sitting next to me, not next to the Iranian representative. Because whether you can admit it or not, Israel, Lebanon, and the free world are on the same side against the Islamic regime of Iran. All of us should declare, shoulder to shoulder, that Iran must keep its blood stained hands off Lebanon. And I would like to to approach the the Lebanese people. I will do it in Arabic. Lebanon belongs to the Lebanese, not to the Iranians.”

Open Source Intel

340,428 просмотров • 1 год назад

To the people of Lebanon: You deserve a future defined by opportunity, stability, and sovereignty - not by the ambitions of a foreign regime. For too long, Hezbollah has dragged Lebanon into conflicts that do not serve the interests of the Lebanese people, while advancing Iran’s agenda at Lebanon’s expense. A stronger, more prosperous Lebanon begins when its future is determined in Beirut - not Tehran. 🎥 Israel Foreign Ministry

To the people of Lebanon: You deserve a future defined by opportunity, stability, and sovereignty - not by the ambitions of a foreign regime. For too long, Hezbollah has dragged Lebanon into conflicts that do not serve the interests of the Lebanese people, while advancing Iran’s agenda at Lebanon’s expense. A stronger, more prosperous Lebanon begins when its future is determined in Beirut - not Tehran. 🎥 Israel Foreign Ministry

Embassy of Israel to the USA

23,091 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Syrian President Ahmad al-Sharaa on Trump and Lebanon: President Trump expressed his displeasure with what is currently happening in Lebanon and was looking for ways to stop the war in Lebanon. He then said that there could be a role for Syria in Lebanon in the search for a security solution. The statement was interpreted as if Syrian forces would enter Lebanon the next morning, and that is not what was meant. From President Trump’s statement, the answer is that he was expressing frustration with what is happening in Lebanon and looking for other solutions, and that there could be a positive role for Syria through the Lebanese state and Lebanese institutions.

Syrian President Ahmad al-Sharaa on Trump and Lebanon: President Trump expressed his displeasure with what is currently happening in Lebanon and was looking for ways to stop the war in Lebanon. He then said that there could be a role for Syria in Lebanon in the search for a security solution. The statement was interpreted as if Syrian forces would enter Lebanon the next morning, and that is not what was meant. From President Trump’s statement, the answer is that he was expressing frustration with what is happening in Lebanon and looking for other solutions, and that there could be a positive role for Syria through the Lebanese state and Lebanese institutions.

Clash Report

42,493 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

🇱🇧 Lebanese MTV Tells Hezbollah’s Qomati: “Stay Silent” In a sharp on-air response, Lebanese station MTV slammed Mahmoud Qomati of Hezbollah’s political council, telling him to “Stay silent” after he criticized President Joseph Aoun over negotiations with Israel. While highlighting Hezbollah’s history of unilateral decisions, citing the wars of 2006, 2023, and 2026 as examples of the group acting without consulting the Lebanese people. Source: MTV Lebanon

🇱🇧 Lebanese MTV Tells Hezbollah’s Qomati: “Stay Silent” In a sharp on-air response, Lebanese station MTV slammed Mahmoud Qomati of Hezbollah’s political council, telling him to “Stay silent” after he criticized President Joseph Aoun over negotiations with Israel. While highlighting Hezbollah’s history of unilateral decisions, citing the wars of 2006, 2023, and 2026 as examples of the group acting without consulting the Lebanese people. Source: MTV Lebanon

Political Pen

20,401 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Told i24NEWS English: 1. By demanding ceasefire for Lebanon, Iran has proven that Hezbollah started war to serve Iranian, not Lebanese, agenda. 2. Hezbollah looks desperate for a ceasefire. 3. Israel's problem of armed militias in Lebanon predates the creation of the Islamic Republic in Iran and goes back to 1969. Iran has latched on Hezbollah to serve its own interest by blackmailing Israel and the West, but nothing Lebanese about that. 4. The Lebanese government has been saying all the right things and approving all the right resolutions, but we can't tell whether the state is unwilling or unable to disband Hezbollah. At the end of the day, the final mile to finish off Hezbollah cannot be done except by the Lebanese themselves.

Told i24NEWS English: 1. By demanding ceasefire for Lebanon, Iran has proven that Hezbollah started war to serve Iranian, not Lebanese, agenda. 2. Hezbollah looks desperate for a ceasefire. 3. Israel's problem of armed militias in Lebanon predates the creation of the Islamic Republic in Iran and goes back to 1969. Iran has latched on Hezbollah to serve its own interest by blackmailing Israel and the West, but nothing Lebanese about that. 4. The Lebanese government has been saying all the right things and approving all the right resolutions, but we can't tell whether the state is unwilling or unable to disband Hezbollah. At the end of the day, the final mile to finish off Hezbollah cannot be done except by the Lebanese themselves.

Hussain Abdul-Hussain

57,404 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

Like the Lebanese army, the Internal Security Forces are unable to confront Hezbollah on the issue of weapons. The “Hezbollah state” has the power to arrest (in effect, kidnap) members of the Lebanese Internal Security Forces and negotiate with the Lebanese state for their release. On January 23, 2026, a police patrol of the Lebanese Internal Security Forces, ISF (قوى الامن الداخلي ) stopped two Hezbollah trucks in the Al-Tayoune (الطيونة) area of Beirut, near a police station and military base. The trucks were parked suspiciously, had no license plates, and had tinted windows. When the police patrol approached to check the trucks, Hezbollah operatives attacked the patrol. At the end of the confrontation, Hezbollah operatives detained one of the security forces personnel and managed to prevent the patrol from uncovering the contents of the trucks. According to local reports, the trucks were carrying Hezbollah military equipment that had been smuggled from Syria through one of the illegal border crossings with Lebanon. The Hezbollah trucks continued on their way toward the “security square” in Dahiya. In light of the incident, negotiations began between the State of Lebanon and the “State of Hezbollah.” Hezbollah's representative in the negotiations was Ali Ayoub, head of Hezbollah's Security Committee, which is in effect the independent police force of the “State of Hezbollah.” Following the negotiations, Hezbollah released the security forces officer it had detained and promised to hand over the trucks to the security forces at a “later date.” In practice, this means that the trucks and their contents will not be handed over to the security forces. The Hezbollah operatives involved were not arrested or investigated. Hezbollah does as it pleases in Lebanon. This is yet another test case, this time in the context of internal security forces, which demonstrates the inability of the Lebanese security forces in general to confront Hezbollah on the issue of weapons. Attached is a report from the Lebanese "MTV" channel about the incident.

Like the Lebanese army, the Internal Security Forces are unable to confront Hezbollah on the issue of weapons. The “Hezbollah state” has the power to arrest (in effect, kidnap) members of the Lebanese Internal Security Forces and negotiate with the Lebanese state for their release. On January 23, 2026, a police patrol of the Lebanese Internal Security Forces, ISF (قوى الامن الداخلي ) stopped two Hezbollah trucks in the Al-Tayoune (الطيونة) area of Beirut, near a police station and military base. The trucks were parked suspiciously, had no license plates, and had tinted windows. When the police patrol approached to check the trucks, Hezbollah operatives attacked the patrol. At the end of the confrontation, Hezbollah operatives detained one of the security forces personnel and managed to prevent the patrol from uncovering the contents of the trucks. According to local reports, the trucks were carrying Hezbollah military equipment that had been smuggled from Syria through one of the illegal border crossings with Lebanon. The Hezbollah trucks continued on their way toward the “security square” in Dahiya. In light of the incident, negotiations began between the State of Lebanon and the “State of Hezbollah.” Hezbollah's representative in the negotiations was Ali Ayoub, head of Hezbollah's Security Committee, which is in effect the independent police force of the “State of Hezbollah.” Following the negotiations, Hezbollah released the security forces officer it had detained and promised to hand over the trucks to the security forces at a “later date.” In practice, this means that the trucks and their contents will not be handed over to the security forces. The Hezbollah operatives involved were not arrested or investigated. Hezbollah does as it pleases in Lebanon. This is yet another test case, this time in the context of internal security forces, which demonstrates the inability of the Lebanese security forces in general to confront Hezbollah on the issue of weapons. Attached is a report from the Lebanese "MTV" channel about the incident.

Israel-Alma

13,488 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

[WATCH] THE PRESIDENT WILL NOT RESIGN. When it comes to the President, there is always a distinctive role between him being the President of the party and the state. There are many factors that influence the state in terms of governance and stability. If the President is called upon by some to resign and he keeps quiet it can throw the state into a state of turmoil. I want to make it clear that the officials agreed with the President on his approach, he took us into confidence and explained the factors that led him to make that particular pronouncement. We believe that the President did the right thing in pronouncing in the best interest of South Africa that he will not be resigning. There was nothing in terms of the judgment that warranted the President to resign it was just mere calls made by individuals and political parties that wanted to throw our country into a state of turmoil, uncertainty and anxiety. So it was imperative that he focus on that. It was correct for him to tell the country that from where he is standing there is nothing in the judgement that states he has done any wrongdoing and what he is going to do with the options in front of him and he has made this public. The President will take the Section 89 Report on review based on the outcome of the judgment and the legal advice he has received. There are no daggers out for the President to resign just opportunistic elements. These elements do not know what they want, they want to impeach and want him to resign, they do know what they actually want. The veracity of the report has not been tested in any committee so they don’t have a basis for the President to resign.

[WATCH] THE PRESIDENT WILL NOT RESIGN. When it comes to the President, there is always a distinctive role between him being the President of the party and the state. There are many factors that influence the state in terms of governance and stability. If the President is called upon by some to resign and he keeps quiet it can throw the state into a state of turmoil. I want to make it clear that the officials agreed with the President on his approach, he took us into confidence and explained the factors that led him to make that particular pronouncement. We believe that the President did the right thing in pronouncing in the best interest of South Africa that he will not be resigning. There was nothing in terms of the judgment that warranted the President to resign it was just mere calls made by individuals and political parties that wanted to throw our country into a state of turmoil, uncertainty and anxiety. So it was imperative that he focus on that. It was correct for him to tell the country that from where he is standing there is nothing in the judgement that states he has done any wrongdoing and what he is going to do with the options in front of him and he has made this public. The President will take the Section 89 Report on review based on the outcome of the judgment and the legal advice he has received. There are no daggers out for the President to resign just opportunistic elements. These elements do not know what they want, they want to impeach and want him to resign, they do know what they actually want. The veracity of the report has not been tested in any committee so they don’t have a basis for the President to resign.

ANC SECRETARY GENERAL | Fikile Mbalula

22,015 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

I would first like to reaffirm my full support for President General Joseph Aoun in the path he is leading to protect Lebanon, restore the full role of the state, and guide the country toward a just and lasting peace that preserves its sovereignty and serves the interests of its people. Any serious approach to saving Lebanon requires courage in decision-making and wisdom in managing sensitive national issues, foremost among them stability, security, and sovereignty. From this perspective, we support the option of direct negotiations with Israel in a manner that safeguards Lebanon’s supreme national interest, ensures stability in the South, and reaffirms the rights and full sovereignty of the Lebanese state and opens the way toward a real and lasting peace. We also reaffirm our full support for the government and its decisions in every sovereign step that restores the confidence of the Lebanese people and the international community in the Lebanese state and its institutions. In this context, we call on the government to move forward in dismantling the parallel and illegal economy, shutting down institutions such as “Al-Qard Al-Hassan,” preventing smuggling and illegal trade through all border crossings, ports, and the airport, and restructuring the banking sector and financial system to prevent the future financing and arming of militias by drying up their illicit financial resources. We also believe it is necessary to suspend the implementation of the 1955 boycott law, as its continued use as a tool of intimidation and fear obstructs the confidence-building measures required to achieve a genuine and lasting peace and prevents Lebanon from advancing toward realistic solutions that serve its highest national interests. I also stress the urgent need to accelerate the implementation of the decision to make Beirut a safe and weapons-free city under the sole authority of the state. The delay in beginning implementation is no longer justified and is draining the Lebanese people’s confidence in the state’s ability to enforce its decisions. Making Beirut free of weapons must be a sovereign Lebanese decision fully implemented by the Lebanese state, because the capital cannot recover its natural role and its political, economic, and cultural symbolism except under the sole authority of the state. The success of this step in Beirut would gradually pave the way for extending this process to the South, then to the North and the Bekaa, thereby consolidating the authority of the Lebanese state over all its territory and strengthening comprehensive national stability. At the same time, we call on Israel to fully abide by any understandings or arrangements reached, and to carry out a gradual withdrawal from Lebanese territory in a manner that guarantees stability and respects Lebanon’s sovereignty and territorial unity, leading to a fully sovereign Lebanese state free from any illegal or foreign military presence. In parallel, we believe that the issue of general amnesty can no longer tolerate delay or political exploitation. The adoption of a fair and comprehensive general amnesty law has become a national and humanitarian necessity, Away from political point-scoring and political disputes. What is required today is a balanced approach that preserves the rights of the wronged, takes into account the humanitarian conditions of prisoners, and at the same time safeguards the dignity of the military institution while preserving security and stability. True justice cannot be selective; it must be comprehensive and balanced—protecting the nation, preserving human dignity, and safeguarding state institutions. Lebanon today needs a strong state, genuine transparency, and responsible decisions that lead to peace and restore hope to the Lebanese people. This is what we are working for.

I would first like to reaffirm my full support for President General Joseph Aoun in the path he is leading to protect Lebanon, restore the full role of the state, and guide the country toward a just and lasting peace that preserves its sovereignty and serves the interests of its people. Any serious approach to saving Lebanon requires courage in decision-making and wisdom in managing sensitive national issues, foremost among them stability, security, and sovereignty. From this perspective, we support the option of direct negotiations with Israel in a manner that safeguards Lebanon’s supreme national interest, ensures stability in the South, and reaffirms the rights and full sovereignty of the Lebanese state and opens the way toward a real and lasting peace. We also reaffirm our full support for the government and its decisions in every sovereign step that restores the confidence of the Lebanese people and the international community in the Lebanese state and its institutions. In this context, we call on the government to move forward in dismantling the parallel and illegal economy, shutting down institutions such as “Al-Qard Al-Hassan,” preventing smuggling and illegal trade through all border crossings, ports, and the airport, and restructuring the banking sector and financial system to prevent the future financing and arming of militias by drying up their illicit financial resources. We also believe it is necessary to suspend the implementation of the 1955 boycott law, as its continued use as a tool of intimidation and fear obstructs the confidence-building measures required to achieve a genuine and lasting peace and prevents Lebanon from advancing toward realistic solutions that serve its highest national interests. I also stress the urgent need to accelerate the implementation of the decision to make Beirut a safe and weapons-free city under the sole authority of the state. The delay in beginning implementation is no longer justified and is draining the Lebanese people’s confidence in the state’s ability to enforce its decisions. Making Beirut free of weapons must be a sovereign Lebanese decision fully implemented by the Lebanese state, because the capital cannot recover its natural role and its political, economic, and cultural symbolism except under the sole authority of the state. The success of this step in Beirut would gradually pave the way for extending this process to the South, then to the North and the Bekaa, thereby consolidating the authority of the Lebanese state over all its territory and strengthening comprehensive national stability. At the same time, we call on Israel to fully abide by any understandings or arrangements reached, and to carry out a gradual withdrawal from Lebanese territory in a manner that guarantees stability and respects Lebanon’s sovereignty and territorial unity, leading to a fully sovereign Lebanese state free from any illegal or foreign military presence. In parallel, we believe that the issue of general amnesty can no longer tolerate delay or political exploitation. The adoption of a fair and comprehensive general amnesty law has become a national and humanitarian necessity, Away from political point-scoring and political disputes. What is required today is a balanced approach that preserves the rights of the wronged, takes into account the humanitarian conditions of prisoners, and at the same time safeguards the dignity of the military institution while preserving security and stability. True justice cannot be selective; it must be comprehensive and balanced—protecting the nation, preserving human dignity, and safeguarding state institutions. Lebanon today needs a strong state, genuine transparency, and responsible decisions that lead to peace and restore hope to the Lebanese people. This is what we are working for.

Fouad Makhzoumi

163,773 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Former Mossad Official: No Peace in Lebanon Without Dismantling Hezbollah Oded Ailam, former head of the Counter-Terrorism Division at the Mossad and a researcher at the Jerusalem Center for Security and Foreign Affairs (JCFA), told CBS that Israel’s objective in Lebanon is not Hezbollah’s surrender, but the dramatic reduction of its capabilities and the restoration of Lebanese sovereignty. According to Ailam, as long as Beirut is unable to disarm Hezbollah and impose its authority over the organization, no agreement will endure over time. Ailam stressed that peace is impossible with a jihadist organization whose declared goal is the destruction of Israel. “You can sign any agreement, but it will not last more than a few years,” he said. In his view, the only path to genuine stability is the complete dismantling of Hezbollah and the full restoration of Lebanese sovereignty throughout the country.

Former Mossad Official: No Peace in Lebanon Without Dismantling Hezbollah Oded Ailam, former head of the Counter-Terrorism Division at the Mossad and a researcher at the Jerusalem Center for Security and Foreign Affairs (JCFA), told CBS that Israel’s objective in Lebanon is not Hezbollah’s surrender, but the dramatic reduction of its capabilities and the restoration of Lebanese sovereignty. According to Ailam, as long as Beirut is unable to disarm Hezbollah and impose its authority over the organization, no agreement will endure over time. Ailam stressed that peace is impossible with a jihadist organization whose declared goal is the destruction of Israel. “You can sign any agreement, but it will not last more than a few years,” he said. In his view, the only path to genuine stability is the complete dismantling of Hezbollah and the full restoration of Lebanese sovereignty throughout the country.

Jerusalem Center for Security and Foreign Affairs

94,815 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

🚨🇮🇱🇱🇧 LEBANESE SOVEREIGNTY: THE ONLY PATH TO STABILITY For real peace to take hold, the democratically elected authorities in Lebanon must finally take control and disarm foreign-controlled militias. As Jonathan Conricus explains, Israel has no reason for conflict with a sovereign Lebanon that isn't used as a launchpad for terror. The relentless rocket fire from the north makes the demand for security a basic and justifiable requirement for any nation's civilians. Until the Lebanese state owns its territory, the cycle of "escapades" and military maneuvers will likely continue. Jonathan Conricus

🚨🇮🇱🇱🇧 LEBANESE SOVEREIGNTY: THE ONLY PATH TO STABILITY For real peace to take hold, the democratically elected authorities in Lebanon must finally take control and disarm foreign-controlled militias. As Jonathan Conricus explains, Israel has no reason for conflict with a sovereign Lebanon that isn't used as a launchpad for terror. The relentless rocket fire from the north makes the demand for security a basic and justifiable requirement for any nation's civilians. Until the Lebanese state owns its territory, the cycle of "escapades" and military maneuvers will likely continue. Jonathan Conricus

Mario Nawfal

41,192 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

We are witnessing a pivotal moment for the entire Middle East. The death of Hassan Nasrallah, the terrorist leader of Hezbollah, marks the potential beginning of a new chapter for Lebanon, a country long occupied by this terrorist organization through its Iranian backers. Hezbollah was born out of the chaos of the Lebanese civil war in the 1980s, created, funded, and armed by Iran to serve as its proxy in the region. Over the years, under Nasrallah's leadership, Hezbollah grew into a monstrous military force, terrorizing the entire region. By removing Hezbollah's leadership and dismantling its infrastructure, Israel is offering the Lebanese people a chance to reclaim their country. Hezbollah's crimes extend far beyond Lebanon. This terror group has been deeply involved in the Syrian civil war, helping Assad brutally massacre hundreds of thousands of innocent Syrians. While Hezbollah claims to be defending Lebanon, it is in fact only doing Iran's bidding. Despite resistance from the Lebanese people over the years, Hezbollah has persisted with its jihadi rule—until now. Nasrallah's death is not just about the removal of a terrorist leader. It is an opportunity for Lebanon to reclaim its independence for the Lebanese people. Israel's operations are about liberating the region and dismantling a terror network that threatens the entire world. Now is the time for the international community to stand with Lebanon, not by turning a blind eye to Hezbollah's terror, but by supporting efforts to finally dismantle this group once and for all. Only when Hezbollah's reign of terror is over can the Lebanese people rebuild their country.

We are witnessing a pivotal moment for the entire Middle East. The death of Hassan Nasrallah, the terrorist leader of Hezbollah, marks the potential beginning of a new chapter for Lebanon, a country long occupied by this terrorist organization through its Iranian backers. Hezbollah was born out of the chaos of the Lebanese civil war in the 1980s, created, funded, and armed by Iran to serve as its proxy in the region. Over the years, under Nasrallah's leadership, Hezbollah grew into a monstrous military force, terrorizing the entire region. By removing Hezbollah's leadership and dismantling its infrastructure, Israel is offering the Lebanese people a chance to reclaim their country. Hezbollah's crimes extend far beyond Lebanon. This terror group has been deeply involved in the Syrian civil war, helping Assad brutally massacre hundreds of thousands of innocent Syrians. While Hezbollah claims to be defending Lebanon, it is in fact only doing Iran's bidding. Despite resistance from the Lebanese people over the years, Hezbollah has persisted with its jihadi rule—until now. Nasrallah's death is not just about the removal of a terrorist leader. It is an opportunity for Lebanon to reclaim its independence for the Lebanese people. Israel's operations are about liberating the region and dismantling a terror network that threatens the entire world. Now is the time for the international community to stand with Lebanon, not by turning a blind eye to Hezbollah's terror, but by supporting efforts to finally dismantle this group once and for all. Only when Hezbollah's reign of terror is over can the Lebanese people rebuild their country.

Noa Tishby

69,477 просмотров • 1 год назад

🚨 🚨 🇱🇧 🇺🇸 Secretary Rubio on Lebanon: - And so how do you defeat Hizballah? How do you replace Hizballah? You defeat and replace them with a government that is strong enough to be the sole force of arms in the country, basically with the security of Lebanon in the hands of the Lebanese Armed Forces, and a government that’s able to provide prosperity for its citizens. So we talked about the opportunities to do that. This is not just about miliary stuff. This is about how can we attract more U.S. and international investment into Lebanon. This is about things like how can we restart direct flights between the United States and Lebanon that are – right now, you can’t do that. So we’re going to start a process with them and see if that’s possible and when that can be done. -So we had a good meeting, and I think he’ll leave on Tuesday. He’ll have a very positive meeting with President Trump. And I think President Aoun will be able to return to Lebanon and say to the people of Lebanon that he is the one that’s getting positive results for the people

🚨 🚨 🇱🇧 🇺🇸 Secretary Rubio on Lebanon: - And so how do you defeat Hizballah? How do you replace Hizballah? You defeat and replace them with a government that is strong enough to be the sole force of arms in the country, basically with the security of Lebanon in the hands of the Lebanese Armed Forces, and a government that’s able to provide prosperity for its citizens. So we talked about the opportunities to do that. This is not just about miliary stuff. This is about how can we attract more U.S. and international investment into Lebanon. This is about things like how can we restart direct flights between the United States and Lebanon that are – right now, you can’t do that. So we’re going to start a process with them and see if that’s possible and when that can be done. -So we had a good meeting, and I think he’ll leave on Tuesday. He’ll have a very positive meeting with President Trump. And I think President Aoun will be able to return to Lebanon and say to the people of Lebanon that he is the one that’s getting positive results for the people

ToniMrad

27,695 просмотров • 1 месяц назад