Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

🚨𝗡𝗘𝗪: 𝗲𝗦𝗮𝗳𝗲𝘁𝘆 𝗖𝗼𝗺𝗺𝗶𝘀𝘀𝗶𝗼𝗻𝗲𝗿 𝗝𝘂𝗹𝗶𝗲 𝗜𝗻𝗺𝗮𝗻 𝗚𝗿𝗮𝗻𝘁 Julie Inman Grant 𝗼𝗻 𝗯𝗲𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗰𝗮𝗹𝗹𝗲𝗱 𝗼𝘂𝘁 𝗯𝘆 Elon Musk 𝗳𝗼𝗿 𝘄𝗮𝗻𝘁𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘁𝗼 𝗰𝗲𝗻𝘀𝗼𝗿 𝗰𝗼𝗻𝘁𝗲𝗻𝘁 𝗼𝗻 𝘀𝗼𝗰𝗶𝗮𝗹 𝗺𝗲𝗱𝗶𝗮: “He issued a dog-whistle to his 181 million followers around the world, which resulted in death threats… doxing of family members including my children… So... show more

Australians vs. The Agenda

58,104 subscribers

162,322 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

🚨 Full Remarks of President Trump on Elon Musk today: "I can't speak more highly about any individual. He's an incredible guy. He's a brilliant guy. He's a wonderful person. I've seen him with his family. I've seen him with a lot of his children. He's got a lot of children. He treats him good. He's He loves His children, but he's a brilliant guy, and he was a tremendous help, both in the campaign and in what he's done with DOGE. And you know what we're talking about, almost $200 million and rising fast, because many of the things that we were looking at are now being found out to be fact. It's terrible. I mean, the fraud, the waste, the abuse, the everything that's happened is just terrible. So I also know that he was treated very unfairly by the I guess he called the public, by some of the public, not by all of it. He makes an incredible car makes everything he does is good, but they took it out on Tesla, and I just thought it was so unfair, because he's trying to help the country, but he has helped the country. I also want him to make sure that he's going to be in great shape, and I know he is. I mean, he's going to be, he's going to do great he loves the country. He didn't need to do this. He did it, and I told him, I said, you know, whenever you're ready, I'd like to keep him for a long time, but whenever you're ready, he's an exceptional that when you see those rockets go up and come back and land in the same gantry, nobody else can do that, but this man. So he's just an incredible person, and he's a friend of mine, and he's a nice person too. He's a very nice person. He really helped the country. Saved us a lot of money. And I heard him say that he'll start easing which is always, he was always, at this time, going to ease out. And when he goes back to Tesla that will be taken care of, it was just, it's artificial. These were sick people that thought they were doing something. He really, he's a great patriot, and he should, really, it should be, it shouldn't be the way that should never have happened to him. And I will tell you right now, he makes a great product. He makes a great product. It's a great car. It's great everything. Starlink is great. What he does is good. He's doing medical things that are amazing. And we have to, at some point, let him go and do that."

🚨 Full Remarks of President Trump on Elon Musk today: "I can't speak more highly about any individual. He's an incredible guy. He's a brilliant guy. He's a wonderful person. I've seen him with his family. I've seen him with a lot of his children. He's got a lot of children. He treats him good. He's He loves His children, but he's a brilliant guy, and he was a tremendous help, both in the campaign and in what he's done with DOGE. And you know what we're talking about, almost $200 million and rising fast, because many of the things that we were looking at are now being found out to be fact. It's terrible. I mean, the fraud, the waste, the abuse, the everything that's happened is just terrible. So I also know that he was treated very unfairly by the I guess he called the public, by some of the public, not by all of it. He makes an incredible car makes everything he does is good, but they took it out on Tesla, and I just thought it was so unfair, because he's trying to help the country, but he has helped the country. I also want him to make sure that he's going to be in great shape, and I know he is. I mean, he's going to be, he's going to do great he loves the country. He didn't need to do this. He did it, and I told him, I said, you know, whenever you're ready, I'd like to keep him for a long time, but whenever you're ready, he's an exceptional that when you see those rockets go up and come back and land in the same gantry, nobody else can do that, but this man. So he's just an incredible person, and he's a friend of mine, and he's a nice person too. He's a very nice person. He really helped the country. Saved us a lot of money. And I heard him say that he'll start easing which is always, he was always, at this time, going to ease out. And when he goes back to Tesla that will be taken care of, it was just, it's artificial. These were sick people that thought they were doing something. He really, he's a great patriot, and he should, really, it should be, it shouldn't be the way that should never have happened to him. And I will tell you right now, he makes a great product. He makes a great product. It's a great car. It's great everything. Starlink is great. What he does is good. He's doing medical things that are amazing. And we have to, at some point, let him go and do that."

DogeDesigner

1,128,493 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

BREAKING: U.S. banned South Africa's Ambassador to the United States Ebrahim Rasool after he said this, "What Donald Trump is launching is an assault on incumbency, those who are in power, by mobilizing a supremacism against the incumbency, at home, and — I think I’ve illustrated — abroad as well. So in terms of that, the supremacist assault on incumbency, we see it in the domestic politics of the USA, the MAGA movement, the Make America Great Again movement, as a response not simply to a supremacist instinct, but to very clear data that shows great demographic shifts in the USA in which the voting electorate in the USA is projected to become 48% white. And that the possibility of a majority of minorities is looming on the horizon. And so that needs to be factored in, so that we understand some of the things that we think are instinctive, nativist, racist things, I think that there’s data that, for example, would support that, that would go to this wall being built, the deportation movement, et cetera et cetera. So I think I’d mention that. "I think that there is also an export of the revolution. It’s no accident that Elon Musk has involved himself in UK politics, and elevated a Nigel Farage and the Reform movement, in much the same way that he was instructed that on his way to the Munich security summit, Vice President Vance addressed the Alternative für Deutschland [AfD] to strengthen them in their election campaign. And that, then, begins to say, what then was the role of Afrikaners in that whole makeup. And very clearly, it’s to project white victimhood as a dog whistle that there is a global protective movement that is beginning to envelop embattled white sommunities or apparently embattles white communities. It may not be true, it may not make sense, but that is not the dog whistle that is being heard in a global, white base. So I think we need to understand all of that. Another discontinuity — it’s almost that they are pitting a supremacist insurgency against the incumbency."

BREAKING: U.S. banned South Africa's Ambassador to the United States Ebrahim Rasool after he said this, "What Donald Trump is launching is an assault on incumbency, those who are in power, by mobilizing a supremacism against the incumbency, at home, and — I think I’ve illustrated — abroad as well. So in terms of that, the supremacist assault on incumbency, we see it in the domestic politics of the USA, the MAGA movement, the Make America Great Again movement, as a response not simply to a supremacist instinct, but to very clear data that shows great demographic shifts in the USA in which the voting electorate in the USA is projected to become 48% white. And that the possibility of a majority of minorities is looming on the horizon. And so that needs to be factored in, so that we understand some of the things that we think are instinctive, nativist, racist things, I think that there’s data that, for example, would support that, that would go to this wall being built, the deportation movement, et cetera et cetera. So I think I’d mention that. "I think that there is also an export of the revolution. It’s no accident that Elon Musk has involved himself in UK politics, and elevated a Nigel Farage and the Reform movement, in much the same way that he was instructed that on his way to the Munich security summit, Vice President Vance addressed the Alternative für Deutschland [AfD] to strengthen them in their election campaign. And that, then, begins to say, what then was the role of Afrikaners in that whole makeup. And very clearly, it’s to project white victimhood as a dog whistle that there is a global protective movement that is beginning to envelop embattled white sommunities or apparently embattles white communities. It may not be true, it may not make sense, but that is not the dog whistle that is being heard in a global, white base. So I think we need to understand all of that. Another discontinuity — it’s almost that they are pitting a supremacist insurgency against the incumbency."

Simon Ateba

19,941 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

.Morgan Housel says you can't get a crazy genius like Elon Musk without a few extreme personality traits: "This guy’s trying to go to Mars. Of course he’s not trying to remain within the box of civility. He successfully took on GM and Ford and NASA when he was like in his 30s." "He does not think like you and I. That’s what we love about him." "I struggle to think of someone who had ridiculous five-standard-deviation success and was also so polite and so easy to get along with." "A lot of these people, when you dig into their life, you might really admire them and say, ‘That person is so great. I would love to be that person.’" "But their success came at the expense of their family life, their marriage, their kids, their own mental health, their own physical health." "Musk hinted at this a couple months ago. He said something along the lines of, ‘You might think you want to be me, but you don’t. It’s a storm inside my brain. It’s chaos.'"

.Morgan Housel says you can't get a crazy genius like Elon Musk without a few extreme personality traits: "This guy’s trying to go to Mars. Of course he’s not trying to remain within the box of civility. He successfully took on GM and Ford and NASA when he was like in his 30s." "He does not think like you and I. That’s what we love about him." "I struggle to think of someone who had ridiculous five-standard-deviation success and was also so polite and so easy to get along with." "A lot of these people, when you dig into their life, you might really admire them and say, ‘That person is so great. I would love to be that person.’" "But their success came at the expense of their family life, their marriage, their kids, their own mental health, their own physical health." "Musk hinted at this a couple months ago. He said something along the lines of, ‘You might think you want to be me, but you don’t. It’s a storm inside my brain. It’s chaos.'"

sourcery

104,264 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

I am one of the harshest critics of #harryandmeghan and i refuse to give Harry a pass and blame it all on meghan which is what everybody is trying to do including President Donald J. Trump by saying he won't deport him because of his wife is terrible. I am absolutely aghast with people running with that narrative. Harry was happy to run around with Nazi uniform, say nasty vile racial slurs to his fellow soldiers, has been a bully since a young age, has never seen a day in combat, he is a sexist pig who boasts about 'mounting women'. HE IS THE ONE WHO BETRAYED HIS FAMILY AND FRIENDS. I took many beatings throughout the years because my now ex-husband didn't want my family around and I refused to betray my family. Harry a traitor, abusive, racist bully will NEVER get a pass from me even if Trump is willing to give this criminal one! Buckingham Palace whitewashed his image and did a great job. To blame meghan for his own grown ass choices is absolving him of all responsibility! Even in that speech he gave last night, he was still taking digs at his family for not allowing him to wear a uniform he has repeatedly dishonored. He was a drug addict during his time in the military yet never was subjected to a random drug test! Harry is worse than meghan, and anybody trying to make him a victim? Harry and meghan BOTH need to be held accountable.

I am one of the harshest critics of #harryandmeghan and i refuse to give Harry a pass and blame it all on meghan which is what everybody is trying to do including President Donald J. Trump by saying he won't deport him because of his wife is terrible. I am absolutely aghast with people running with that narrative. Harry was happy to run around with Nazi uniform, say nasty vile racial slurs to his fellow soldiers, has been a bully since a young age, has never seen a day in combat, he is a sexist pig who boasts about 'mounting women'. HE IS THE ONE WHO BETRAYED HIS FAMILY AND FRIENDS. I took many beatings throughout the years because my now ex-husband didn't want my family around and I refused to betray my family. Harry a traitor, abusive, racist bully will NEVER get a pass from me even if Trump is willing to give this criminal one! Buckingham Palace whitewashed his image and did a great job. To blame meghan for his own grown ass choices is absolving him of all responsibility! Even in that speech he gave last night, he was still taking digs at his family for not allowing him to wear a uniform he has repeatedly dishonored. He was a drug addict during his time in the military yet never was subjected to a random drug test! Harry is worse than meghan, and anybody trying to make him a victim? Harry and meghan BOTH need to be held accountable.

Paula Matanovich ©

127,631 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Zack Polanski, "Twitter, I still refuse to call it X" "I feel very conflicted. It's clearly an awful place to be, full of fascist content, far right content, misinformation" "How do we story tell in places where there are 35 million users on Twitter but 3.5 million users on Bluesky where I much prefer to be" Carole Cadwalladr, "I'm also conflicted with Twitter" "We are in a real conundrum" "We have to be where people are" "That's my philosophy on this" "The abuse on Twitter is a walk in the park compared to what I got in the Brexit years" "This idea that it was great in the past and now it's not, that's for the birds" "As a source of news I find Twitter still unsurpassed" "At the same time Elon Musk is a white supremacist Putin loving madman essentially" "What has happened with Grok undressing women. What I would counter slightly to be aware of" "People saying thats it, its over, I'm going to Threads, going to Instagram - Instagram is the biggest marketplace for pedophiles in the world" "We have this document which shows that Instagram is deliberately connecting pedophiles to children" "Where's the kickback on that?" "What I like about Elon Musk is that he makes the problem visible"

Zack Polanski, "Twitter, I still refuse to call it X" "I feel very conflicted. It's clearly an awful place to be, full of fascist content, far right content, misinformation" "How do we story tell in places where there are 35 million users on Twitter but 3.5 million users on Bluesky where I much prefer to be" Carole Cadwalladr, "I'm also conflicted with Twitter" "We are in a real conundrum" "We have to be where people are" "That's my philosophy on this" "The abuse on Twitter is a walk in the park compared to what I got in the Brexit years" "This idea that it was great in the past and now it's not, that's for the birds" "As a source of news I find Twitter still unsurpassed" "At the same time Elon Musk is a white supremacist Putin loving madman essentially" "What has happened with Grok undressing women. What I would counter slightly to be aware of" "People saying thats it, its over, I'm going to Threads, going to Instagram - Instagram is the biggest marketplace for pedophiles in the world" "We have this document which shows that Instagram is deliberately connecting pedophiles to children" "Where's the kickback on that?" "What I like about Elon Musk is that he makes the problem visible"

Farrukh

79,252 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

Sir Lewis Hamilton talking about Roscoe in his sit down interview with Juan Fossaroli 🥺 "Oh man, I miss him so much. I've never missed anything so much in my life. It's his birthday tomorrow. And so he would have been 13." "But it's a very, very strange kind of time in my life. Because now I go home and his bed is there. His toys are there. And I haven't moved them. So I see things that remind me of him every day. And when I meet people, the fans doing amazing drawings. And give me gifts. And so I think it's a beautiful thing. Because somehow through this grief, it's brought me closer to people. Because so many people in the world experience loss and grief." "I met someone today [who said] 'I lost two of my dogs in one month just recently.' And so many people just as I'm traveling. And it's given me a lot of hope that there are really good people in the world that feel. Because we live in a really divided time around the world. And there's a lot of people particularly in higher positions. In high power positions that clearly don't have any empathy. Don't care about people. And so it's really great to connect with people in that respect." "I'm going to miss him. And this Christmas, every Christmas I go to the mountains with him. And play in the snow. I don't have that now." "And someone asked me earlier on, 'are you going to get another dog?' I'm like, I can't replace him. It's not a car. I can't just go and get a new one. He was my son." [via ESPN and Juan Fossaroli]

Sir Lewis Hamilton talking about Roscoe in his sit down interview with Juan Fossaroli 🥺 "Oh man, I miss him so much. I've never missed anything so much in my life. It's his birthday tomorrow. And so he would have been 13." "But it's a very, very strange kind of time in my life. Because now I go home and his bed is there. His toys are there. And I haven't moved them. So I see things that remind me of him every day. And when I meet people, the fans doing amazing drawings. And give me gifts. And so I think it's a beautiful thing. Because somehow through this grief, it's brought me closer to people. Because so many people in the world experience loss and grief." "I met someone today [who said] 'I lost two of my dogs in one month just recently.' And so many people just as I'm traveling. And it's given me a lot of hope that there are really good people in the world that feel. Because we live in a really divided time around the world. And there's a lot of people particularly in higher positions. In high power positions that clearly don't have any empathy. Don't care about people. And so it's really great to connect with people in that respect." "I'm going to miss him. And this Christmas, every Christmas I go to the mountains with him. And play in the snow. I don't have that now." "And someone asked me earlier on, 'are you going to get another dog?' I'm like, I can't replace him. It's not a car. I can't just go and get a new one. He was my son." [via ESPN and Juan Fossaroli]

sim

214,245 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

John Carmack on what he admires about Elon Musk Programming legend John Carmack is asked about his relationship with Elon Musk, to which he replies: “In some ways we have a similar background. We’re almost exactly the same age, have backgrounds programming personal computers, and have even read similar books that have turned us into the people we are today.” John first met Elon when he was building Armadillo Aerospace. Elon visited Armadillo with his right-hand propulsion guy, and the three of them talked about rockets. “I think in many corners [Elon] does not get the respect he should for being a wealthy person who could just retire,” John says. “He went all-in, and he could’ve gone bust. There’s plenty of athletes or entertainers who had all the money in the world and blew it. [Elon] could’ve been the business case example of that with the things he was doing: space exploration, electrification of transportation, and Solar City type things. These are big, world-level things. And I have a great deal of admiration that he was willing to throw himself so completely into that.” John contrasts this with the way he approached his own aerospace company: “I was doing Armadillo Aerospace in this tightly-bounded way. It was ‘John’s crazy money’ at the time that had a finite limit on it. It was never going to impact me or my family if it completely failed, and I was still hedging my bets working at id Software at a time when [Elon] had been really all-in. I have a huge amount of respect for that.” It also irritates John when people call Elon “just a business guy”: “Elon was deeply involved in a lot of the [technical] decisions. Not all of them were perfect, but he cared very much about engine material selection and propellant selection. For years he’d be telling me to ‘Get off that hydrogen peroxide stuff. Liquid oxygen is the only proper oxidizer for this.’ And the times that I’ve gone through the factories with him, we talked about very detailed things like how this weld is made or how this subassembly goes together. He’s really in there a very detailed level . . . I worry a lot that he’s stretched too thin. He’s got the Boring Company and Neuralink and Twitter too whereas I know I have limits on how much I can pay attention to.” John continues: “I look back at my aerospace side of things, and I’m like, ‘I did not go all-in on that.’ I did not commit myself at a level that it would’ve taken to be successful there. And it’s a weird thing having a discussion with him. He’s the richest man in the world right now, but he operates on a level that is still very much in my wheelhouse on the technical side of things.” Video source: Lex Fridman (2022)

John Carmack on what he admires about Elon Musk Programming legend John Carmack is asked about his relationship with Elon Musk, to which he replies: “In some ways we have a similar background. We’re almost exactly the same age, have backgrounds programming personal computers, and have even read similar books that have turned us into the people we are today.” John first met Elon when he was building Armadillo Aerospace. Elon visited Armadillo with his right-hand propulsion guy, and the three of them talked about rockets. “I think in many corners [Elon] does not get the respect he should for being a wealthy person who could just retire,” John says. “He went all-in, and he could’ve gone bust. There’s plenty of athletes or entertainers who had all the money in the world and blew it. [Elon] could’ve been the business case example of that with the things he was doing: space exploration, electrification of transportation, and Solar City type things. These are big, world-level things. And I have a great deal of admiration that he was willing to throw himself so completely into that.” John contrasts this with the way he approached his own aerospace company: “I was doing Armadillo Aerospace in this tightly-bounded way. It was ‘John’s crazy money’ at the time that had a finite limit on it. It was never going to impact me or my family if it completely failed, and I was still hedging my bets working at id Software at a time when [Elon] had been really all-in. I have a huge amount of respect for that.” It also irritates John when people call Elon “just a business guy”: “Elon was deeply involved in a lot of the [technical] decisions. Not all of them were perfect, but he cared very much about engine material selection and propellant selection. For years he’d be telling me to ‘Get off that hydrogen peroxide stuff. Liquid oxygen is the only proper oxidizer for this.’ And the times that I’ve gone through the factories with him, we talked about very detailed things like how this weld is made or how this subassembly goes together. He’s really in there a very detailed level . . . I worry a lot that he’s stretched too thin. He’s got the Boring Company and Neuralink and Twitter too whereas I know I have limits on how much I can pay attention to.” John continues: “I look back at my aerospace side of things, and I’m like, ‘I did not go all-in on that.’ I did not commit myself at a level that it would’ve taken to be successful there. And it’s a weird thing having a discussion with him. He’s the richest man in the world right now, but he operates on a level that is still very much in my wheelhouse on the technical side of things.” Video source: Lex Fridman (2022)

Startup Archive

5,629,151 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

🚨 Cathie Wood on Elon Musk and Tesla: "Elon Musk was talking about autonomous mobility and his master plan years ago, and here we are, finally, he launched this year. Autonomous mobility will be the biggest revenue generator. I can drive around in St Petersburg with my current Tesla full self driving, and not touch the wheel or the accelerator or the brake, and I can park. Because, of course, Tesla's data is worldwide. The roughly seven to 8 million robots that we all drive have been collecting data for years. I got my first Tesla Model 3 in 2018 and it has been collecting data every day and sending it back to Tesla. So Tesla knows the world's roads, from a data point of view, we think better than any other auto manufacturer or technology company out there."

🚨 Cathie Wood on Elon Musk and Tesla: "Elon Musk was talking about autonomous mobility and his master plan years ago, and here we are, finally, he launched this year. Autonomous mobility will be the biggest revenue generator. I can drive around in St Petersburg with my current Tesla full self driving, and not touch the wheel or the accelerator or the brake, and I can park. Because, of course, Tesla's data is worldwide. The roughly seven to 8 million robots that we all drive have been collecting data for years. I got my first Tesla Model 3 in 2018 and it has been collecting data every day and sending it back to Tesla. So Tesla knows the world's roads, from a data point of view, we think better than any other auto manufacturer or technology company out there."

DogeDesigner

66,478 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Ethan Klein explains why he's suing iDubbbz and not Destiny "Ian has deeply aligned with the snark community that is basically responsible for and celebrated cps coming to my house..and sending human skulls to my home..on the snark discord..they have on the banner, a skull with cps on the forehead, they love it they're proud of it..iDubbbz aligns with them, shouts them out, calls them great ppl..he's in deep with them" "Even in his follow up to his content cop, he justified it, he said I think it's good CPS was called and investigated that..as someone who's been to Ethan's house" "Basically rebroadcasting this comment uncritically..he emphasizes throughout that he does think it's a serious accusation that needs to be investigated" "Ik ppl are like well why don't sue Destiny..this was a comment made in passing, Ian put it on his screen for 2 hours during his main broadcast..Destiny made it clear that he's not being serious pretty much immediately after writing it..ppl knew Destiny was being a giant f'in pos but he immediately afterwards made it clear that he didn't actually think that" "This was after CPS visited my house..with all the sh*t we been through..I've been through a lot of sh*t w ppl online..this is just unhinged..I said from the beginning that if ppl want to go after my children then the rules of engagement have changed forever" "If somebody u know who's met ur children and family said u m-lestd ur children after CPS has been to ur house..I don't see how u can say that I'm not justified..is that free speech, I don't think so?" "When my children enter the picture..said this back then..bets are off, the rules have changed..I will do everything to ensure that ppl do not talk about my children in this way..that ppl do not celebrate K'ing my children..ppl like Ian retweeting ppl that say they want to K my children which he has done" "I would just want to get this to ppl like Charlie and other commentators who are like this is an attack on free speech, it's not free speech to say that stuff..I'm pretty heavy free speech..but obviously that there's limits" "I literally don't know Destiny..it was a comment in passing he made..clarified that he's kidding..Ian who I know, who's been to my house, met my children, broadcast it over his screen for his whole show..that's kind of the difference between him and Destiny"

Ethan Klein explains why he's suing iDubbbz and not Destiny "Ian has deeply aligned with the snark community that is basically responsible for and celebrated cps coming to my house..and sending human skulls to my home..on the snark discord..they have on the banner, a skull with cps on the forehead, they love it they're proud of it..iDubbbz aligns with them, shouts them out, calls them great ppl..he's in deep with them" "Even in his follow up to his content cop, he justified it, he said I think it's good CPS was called and investigated that..as someone who's been to Ethan's house" "Basically rebroadcasting this comment uncritically..he emphasizes throughout that he does think it's a serious accusation that needs to be investigated" "Ik ppl are like well why don't sue Destiny..this was a comment made in passing, Ian put it on his screen for 2 hours during his main broadcast..Destiny made it clear that he's not being serious pretty much immediately after writing it..ppl knew Destiny was being a giant f'in pos but he immediately afterwards made it clear that he didn't actually think that" "This was after CPS visited my house..with all the sht we been through..I've been through a lot of sht w ppl online..this is just unhinged..I said from the beginning that if ppl want to go after my children then the rules of engagement have changed forever" "If somebody u know who's met ur children and family said u m-lestd ur children after CPS has been to ur house..I don't see how u can say that I'm not justified..is that free speech, I don't think so?" "When my children enter the picture..said this back then..bets are off, the rules have changed..I will do everything to ensure that ppl do not talk about my children in this way..that ppl do not celebrate K'ing my children..ppl like Ian retweeting ppl that say they want to K my children which he has done" "I would just want to get this to ppl like Charlie and other commentators who are like this is an attack on free speech, it's not free speech to say that stuff..I'm pretty heavy free speech..but obviously that there's limits" "I literally don't know Destiny..it was a comment in passing he made..clarified that he's kidding..Ian who I know, who's been to my house, met my children, broadcast it over his screen for his whole show..that's kind of the difference between him and Destiny"

yeet

186,102 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Free speech prevails: Billboard Chris and Elon Musk defeat Australian censorship Canadian activist Chris Elston joins Rebel News to discuss how he and tech mogul Elon Musk won a landmark case for free speech after Australia's eSafety Commissioner tried to force the takedown of criticism of a trans-identifying World Health Organization advisor. In today's report, I catch up with child protection activist "Billboard Chris 🌎" Elston as he reflects on a victory for freedom of expression he and Elon Musk secured—not just in Australia, but worldwide. In March 2024, Australia's eSafety Commissioner Julie Inman Grant issued a removal order over one of Elston's X posts criticizing the appointment of a controversial trans-identifying activist named Teddy Cook to the World Health Organization's panel on Health of Trans and Gender Diverse People. "She's not a doctor, she's not a health professional, she is a radical left-wing activist who herself identifies as a man. She promotes bondage, bestiality, all sorts of crazy stuff," Elston told Rebel News. According to Elston, after he called Cook a woman "because she is" and criticized her appointment, unelected the Commissioner Grant had the post geo-blocked and ordered Elon Musk's X to remove Elston's post or face a $782,500 fine unless it was taken down. Elston and Musk's legal teams both appealed the Commissioner's order, and Australia's Administrative Appeals Tribunal ruled in their favour. In a 60-page decision, the panel determined that Elston's post, while offensive, did not meet the definition of cyber abuse and that the eSafety Commissioner had acted beyond her legal authority. "This was really a crushing victory for us and it really set a precedent for Australians about whether they can call a woman a woman and a man a man," says Elston. Known for peacefully wearing signs with statements against the medical transitioning of children, such as "Children can't consent to puberty blockers," on his person in an effort to engage passersby in conversation, Elston is no stranger to confrontation. Over the years, he says he's been physically assaulted more than 40 times for his advocacy. FULL REPORT by Drea Humphrey:

Free speech prevails: Billboard Chris and Elon Musk defeat Australian censorship Canadian activist Chris Elston joins Rebel News to discuss how he and tech mogul Elon Musk won a landmark case for free speech after Australia's eSafety Commissioner tried to force the takedown of criticism of a trans-identifying World Health Organization advisor. In today's report, I catch up with child protection activist "Billboard Chris 🌎" Elston as he reflects on a victory for freedom of expression he and Elon Musk secured—not just in Australia, but worldwide. In March 2024, Australia's eSafety Commissioner Julie Inman Grant issued a removal order over one of Elston's X posts criticizing the appointment of a controversial trans-identifying activist named Teddy Cook to the World Health Organization's panel on Health of Trans and Gender Diverse People. "She's not a doctor, she's not a health professional, she is a radical left-wing activist who herself identifies as a man. She promotes bondage, bestiality, all sorts of crazy stuff," Elston told Rebel News. According to Elston, after he called Cook a woman "because she is" and criticized her appointment, unelected the Commissioner Grant had the post geo-blocked and ordered Elon Musk's X to remove Elston's post or face a $782,500 fine unless it was taken down. Elston and Musk's legal teams both appealed the Commissioner's order, and Australia's Administrative Appeals Tribunal ruled in their favour. In a 60-page decision, the panel determined that Elston's post, while offensive, did not meet the definition of cyber abuse and that the eSafety Commissioner had acted beyond her legal authority. "This was really a crushing victory for us and it really set a precedent for Australians about whether they can call a woman a woman and a man a man," says Elston. Known for peacefully wearing signs with statements against the medical transitioning of children, such as "Children can't consent to puberty blockers," on his person in an effort to engage passersby in conversation, Elston is no stranger to confrontation. Over the years, he says he's been physically assaulted more than 40 times for his advocacy. FULL REPORT by Drea Humphrey:

Rebel News

22,170 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

CIA RECRUIT IS PURSUING GLOBAL INTERNET CENSORSHIP AS "E-SAFETY" CZAR IN AUSTRALIA American–born Julie Inman Grant is a key architect of the multigovernmental “Global Online Safety Regulators Network” to censor the speech that politicians and government bureaucrats fear. X owner Elon Musk should be thrown in prison, said a senator in Australia yesterday, because he refuses to delete a video of a recent stabbing from X globally. “Whatever Elon Musk is on,” said Senator Jacqui Lambie, “it’s disgusting behavior. Quite frankly, the bloke should be jailed and the key thrown away.” But what’s truly disgusting behavior is calling for the incarceration of someone for refusing to censor the entire global Internet on behalf of a single nation. It is not the right of any nation to decide what should be on the Internet around the world. “No president, prime minister, or judge,” responded Musk on X, “has authority over all of Earth!” He’s right. It’s true that violent content online can be disturbing. I think platforms should put warning labels on them and find some way to prevent minors from seeing it. I also think there are real privacy concerns that should be addressed. But violence is not the only thing the Australian government has told X to remove. It has also targeted political speech. And nothing can justify the Australian government censoring the entire global Internet of content it does not like. Many of us, myself included, have long suspected that government censors in Ireland, Scotland, and the European Union would attempt to censor the whole of the Internet, not just in their own countries. With Brazil and now Australia demanding the power to censor the whole internet, it’s clear that our fears were more than justified. And now, Public has learned that there is a formal government censorship network called the “Global Online Safety Regulators Network,” which Australia’s top Internet censor, Julie Inman Grant, who is an American, described at World Economic Forum. The group includes censors from Australia, France, Ireland, South Africa, Korea, the UK, and Fiji. But before getting to that, it’s first important to understand just how powerful she is. Here is Julie Inman Grant, boasting of her extraordinary censorship powers. “Yes, we do regulate the platforms. We have a big stick that we can use when we want to….They’re going to be regulated in ways that they don't want to be regulated.” In a different video, Inman Grant said, “We also have some pretty significant ISP blocking powers. We just had some new powers given to us… in addition to be able to compel that takedown, to be able to fine perpetrators as a deterrent effect, and fine content hosts that don't take down this content, um, we can, um, We also have something in this new legislation called the basic online safety expectations.” She goes on to say that she is already working with Ireland, the UK, France, and other governments around the world. “We use the tools that we have, and we can be effective, but we know we're going to be, go much further, um, when we work together with other like-minded independent statutory authorities around the globe…with the U. K. With Ireland and with Fiji in November 2022, we launched the global online safety regulators network that has now grown to seven independent regulators, including France, South Korea, South Africa and a number of countries are serving as observers.” At the World Economic Forum, Inman Grant said she had launched a global censorship body called “the Global Online Safety Regulators Network” to unify governments around censorship “So that we could have a form to help us coordinate, build capacity and do just that. But also make sure that what we're going to have differences in our regulatory schemes, there would be common values that drive us together.” This global censorship body gives governments extraordinary power to invade privacy, explained Inman-Grant. “What this legislation will give us is the ability to compel basic device information and account information. And more and more and more social media companies are starting to collect phone numbers and email addresses so that our investigators can at least find a place to issue a notice or a takedown notice or infringement notice of some sort.” Inman Grant may be working with other governments to create identity requirements and to stamp out Virtual Private Networks, which millions of people in China and other totalitarian societies use to access the free Internet. “You can use VPNs, you can use burner phones,” she said, “different SIM cards every day. So it's going to be a challenge for a long time because, again, the internet's global. If there is no such thing as a kind of global identity system or even a piece of identity everybody can agree with, you know, should we all be sharing our driver's license or our passports?” At that same World Economic Forum meeting, one of the European Union’s top censors, Věra Jourová, calls for censorship to avoid events like January 6, and to fight hate speech. “The same thing, uh, reaction on the 6th of January, 2020. So, in Europe, of course, we have our history. We had to take action against hate speech. Because what it is, anti-Semitism, racism, LGBT, the menu is always the same.” Jourva explains that the EU and Australia intend to pressure social media companies to implement global censorship to simplify things. Who is Jourova? Why she’s the same person that Public caught spreading disinformation about a new Russiagate hoax two weeks ago. Who is Inman Grant?...

CIA RECRUIT IS PURSUING GLOBAL INTERNET CENSORSHIP AS "E-SAFETY" CZAR IN AUSTRALIA American–born Julie Inman Grant is a key architect of the multigovernmental “Global Online Safety Regulators Network” to censor the speech that politicians and government bureaucrats fear. X owner Elon Musk should be thrown in prison, said a senator in Australia yesterday, because he refuses to delete a video of a recent stabbing from X globally. “Whatever Elon Musk is on,” said Senator Jacqui Lambie, “it’s disgusting behavior. Quite frankly, the bloke should be jailed and the key thrown away.” But what’s truly disgusting behavior is calling for the incarceration of someone for refusing to censor the entire global Internet on behalf of a single nation. It is not the right of any nation to decide what should be on the Internet around the world. “No president, prime minister, or judge,” responded Musk on X, “has authority over all of Earth!” He’s right. It’s true that violent content online can be disturbing. I think platforms should put warning labels on them and find some way to prevent minors from seeing it. I also think there are real privacy concerns that should be addressed. But violence is not the only thing the Australian government has told X to remove. It has also targeted political speech. And nothing can justify the Australian government censoring the entire global Internet of content it does not like. Many of us, myself included, have long suspected that government censors in Ireland, Scotland, and the European Union would attempt to censor the whole of the Internet, not just in their own countries. With Brazil and now Australia demanding the power to censor the whole internet, it’s clear that our fears were more than justified. And now, Public has learned that there is a formal government censorship network called the “Global Online Safety Regulators Network,” which Australia’s top Internet censor, Julie Inman Grant, who is an American, described at World Economic Forum. The group includes censors from Australia, France, Ireland, South Africa, Korea, the UK, and Fiji. But before getting to that, it’s first important to understand just how powerful she is. Here is Julie Inman Grant, boasting of her extraordinary censorship powers. “Yes, we do regulate the platforms. We have a big stick that we can use when we want to….They’re going to be regulated in ways that they don't want to be regulated.” In a different video, Inman Grant said, “We also have some pretty significant ISP blocking powers. We just had some new powers given to us… in addition to be able to compel that takedown, to be able to fine perpetrators as a deterrent effect, and fine content hosts that don't take down this content, um, we can, um, We also have something in this new legislation called the basic online safety expectations.” She goes on to say that she is already working with Ireland, the UK, France, and other governments around the world. “We use the tools that we have, and we can be effective, but we know we're going to be, go much further, um, when we work together with other like-minded independent statutory authorities around the globe…with the U. K. With Ireland and with Fiji in November 2022, we launched the global online safety regulators network that has now grown to seven independent regulators, including France, South Korea, South Africa and a number of countries are serving as observers.” At the World Economic Forum, Inman Grant said she had launched a global censorship body called “the Global Online Safety Regulators Network” to unify governments around censorship “So that we could have a form to help us coordinate, build capacity and do just that. But also make sure that what we're going to have differences in our regulatory schemes, there would be common values that drive us together.” This global censorship body gives governments extraordinary power to invade privacy, explained Inman-Grant. “What this legislation will give us is the ability to compel basic device information and account information. And more and more and more social media companies are starting to collect phone numbers and email addresses so that our investigators can at least find a place to issue a notice or a takedown notice or infringement notice of some sort.” Inman Grant may be working with other governments to create identity requirements and to stamp out Virtual Private Networks, which millions of people in China and other totalitarian societies use to access the free Internet. “You can use VPNs, you can use burner phones,” she said, “different SIM cards every day. So it's going to be a challenge for a long time because, again, the internet's global. If there is no such thing as a kind of global identity system or even a piece of identity everybody can agree with, you know, should we all be sharing our driver's license or our passports?” At that same World Economic Forum meeting, one of the European Union’s top censors, Věra Jourová, calls for censorship to avoid events like January 6, and to fight hate speech. “The same thing, uh, reaction on the 6th of January, 2020. So, in Europe, of course, we have our history. We had to take action against hate speech. Because what it is, anti-Semitism, racism, LGBT, the menu is always the same.” Jourva explains that the EU and Australia intend to pressure social media companies to implement global censorship to simplify things. Who is Jourova? Why she’s the same person that Public caught spreading disinformation about a new Russiagate hoax two weeks ago. Who is Inman Grant?...

Michael Shellenberger

648,127 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

Mike Benz explains how when DOGE first started it was making the government work how it was supposed to work, even taking the power away from top FBI bureaucrats He says this worked because Trump deferred to Elon Musk to handle things Now Mike Benz says the cabinet has regained much of the power and it’s back to “business as usual” “What happened with DOGE and why can't we sustain the pace? And is there any hope of getting back to a fast pace?” Mike Benz “What I know from my contacts in the admin, I was told by multiple people at multiple different agencies that DOGE was a complete game changer because whereas agencies were previously ruled by careers I was talking about this, for example, with the FBI. We have four political appointees at the FBI. There's 38,000 FBI employees. So it's 4 versus 38,000. The great equalizer in the first couple of months of the admin was that DOGE were in the building and they directly had the deputized power of the Office of Management and Budget effectively to just cut the budgets of anybody in the career class, shut down any department, freeze the funding. If you were a career and you were trying to be insubordinate against the politicals, doge could come in and make the careers have to respect the politicals because if they didn't do what they were told in the chain of command, you'd get doged. That was a game changer. My contacts at state and DHS and in the early USAID were all telling me, oh my God, the agency for the first time seems to be working how it's supposed to be working because the careers are doing what the political appointees told them to do. Not because they fear the political appointees, they fear DOGE. But I think that what was imbued in DOGE was the kind of silent power of Elon Musk and the fact that Trump, I think, before the cabinet was fully filled out, kind of deferred to Elon on most things that Trump didn't care too much about in terms of beer crack management. But I think with that power going away in DOGE no longer representing the full force of Elon Musk, it began to loop moves to the cabinet level consensus, which is a lot more business as usual.”

Mike Benz explains how when DOGE first started it was making the government work how it was supposed to work, even taking the power away from top FBI bureaucrats He says this worked because Trump deferred to Elon Musk to handle things Now Mike Benz says the cabinet has regained much of the power and it’s back to “business as usual” “What happened with DOGE and why can't we sustain the pace? And is there any hope of getting back to a fast pace?” Mike Benz “What I know from my contacts in the admin, I was told by multiple people at multiple different agencies that DOGE was a complete game changer because whereas agencies were previously ruled by careers I was talking about this, for example, with the FBI. We have four political appointees at the FBI. There's 38,000 FBI employees. So it's 4 versus 38,000. The great equalizer in the first couple of months of the admin was that DOGE were in the building and they directly had the deputized power of the Office of Management and Budget effectively to just cut the budgets of anybody in the career class, shut down any department, freeze the funding. If you were a career and you were trying to be insubordinate against the politicals, doge could come in and make the careers have to respect the politicals because if they didn't do what they were told in the chain of command, you'd get doged. That was a game changer. My contacts at state and DHS and in the early USAID were all telling me, oh my God, the agency for the first time seems to be working how it's supposed to be working because the careers are doing what the political appointees told them to do. Not because they fear the political appointees, they fear DOGE. But I think that what was imbued in DOGE was the kind of silent power of Elon Musk and the fact that Trump, I think, before the cabinet was fully filled out, kind of deferred to Elon on most things that Trump didn't care too much about in terms of beer crack management. But I think with that power going away in DOGE no longer representing the full force of Elon Musk, it began to loop moves to the cabinet level consensus, which is a lot more business as usual.”

Wall Street Apes

316,873 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

🚨🚨 FOLLOW-UP: HOLDEN THORP'S LEGITIMIZATION MACHINE EXPOSED While Ioannidis Faced Death Threats to His Family & Career Destruction for Questioning Lockdowns, Thorp Used Science Magazine to Champion Them Prof. John Ioannidis (Stanford University) in his own words: “Death threats were very commonplace.” “Also to you? Of course. I think both myself and every single member in my family, we were attacked in ways that I could never have imagined…” “The environment was so toxic that the vast majority of credentialed scientists who might have some expertise that would be relevant to epidemiology… Most of those self-silenced.” “If you are attacked in such a way… we would be completely annihilated. We would disappear from the map and our careers would end. Who knows? Maybe we'll be dead.” “The vast majority of credentialed scientists… moved out and they left epidemiology to people who were not epidemiologists.” 🎥 Watch Ioannidis’ own words in full — the toxicity he describes is exactly what Thorp helped normalize. ⚠️ This is the environment Thorp actively helped create and defend. While Ioannidis and other real epidemiologists were being threatened and destroyed, Thorp’s Science Magazine editorials aggressively legitimized lockdowns as “essential science” (2022 “Thank you, Tony!” defending “masks and lockdowns” against “misinformation”; 2020 “Trump lied about science” attacking skeptics). Yet in February 2026 he now admits “anger over the pandemic lockdowns that many Americans now see as avoidable” fueled public distrust — without ever taking responsibility. 📌 Jay Bhattacharya, current NIH Director, said it best: “There is literally no way that the public will regain trust in science with Holden Thorp as the editor of Science. In his position, he embraced lockdowns and dangerous virological research and publicly denigrated scientists who opposed them.” 🔱 ScienceGuardians™ holds no preferences in any fields of science, including various aspects of epidemiology, but strongly believes that politicizing science can lead to severely dangerous consequences, including threats to public health. Donald J. Trump Secretary Kennedy Jay Bhattacharya, MD, PhD Jay Bhattacharya Elon Musk NIH Research Integrity AAAS

🚨🚨 FOLLOW-UP: HOLDEN THORP'S LEGITIMIZATION MACHINE EXPOSED While Ioannidis Faced Death Threats to His Family & Career Destruction for Questioning Lockdowns, Thorp Used Science Magazine to Champion Them Prof. John Ioannidis (Stanford University) in his own words: “Death threats were very commonplace.” “Also to you? Of course. I think both myself and every single member in my family, we were attacked in ways that I could never have imagined…” “The environment was so toxic that the vast majority of credentialed scientists who might have some expertise that would be relevant to epidemiology… Most of those self-silenced.” “If you are attacked in such a way… we would be completely annihilated. We would disappear from the map and our careers would end. Who knows? Maybe we'll be dead.” “The vast majority of credentialed scientists… moved out and they left epidemiology to people who were not epidemiologists.” 🎥 Watch Ioannidis’ own words in full — the toxicity he describes is exactly what Thorp helped normalize. ⚠️ This is the environment Thorp actively helped create and defend. While Ioannidis and other real epidemiologists were being threatened and destroyed, Thorp’s Science Magazine editorials aggressively legitimized lockdowns as “essential science” (2022 “Thank you, Tony!” defending “masks and lockdowns” against “misinformation”; 2020 “Trump lied about science” attacking skeptics). Yet in February 2026 he now admits “anger over the pandemic lockdowns that many Americans now see as avoidable” fueled public distrust — without ever taking responsibility. 📌 Jay Bhattacharya, current NIH Director, said it best: “There is literally no way that the public will regain trust in science with Holden Thorp as the editor of Science. In his position, he embraced lockdowns and dangerous virological research and publicly denigrated scientists who opposed them.” 🔱 ScienceGuardians™ holds no preferences in any fields of science, including various aspects of epidemiology, but strongly believes that politicizing science can lead to severely dangerous consequences, including threats to public health. Donald J. Trump Secretary Kennedy Jay Bhattacharya, MD, PhD Jay Bhattacharya Elon Musk NIH Research Integrity AAAS

ScienceGuardians

34,988 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

The unfounded hatred towards Elon Musk can even be found all the way up north, in Ontario Canada. WARNING: I do drop an F’bomb, please pardon my language. Today I got berated by 2 employees of my local branch of a large Tire Shop chain because they “hate Tesla” telling me Elon Musk is a “Nazi”. Of course no example could be provided, which angered them even more. One tire shop employee was so angry at Elon Musk, based on legacy media misinformation and disinformation peddled by politicians, that he actually risked his livelihood just for an opportunity to lash out at me, a customer, over how much he hates my car because he thinks Elon is a Nazi. Let that sink in! Dangerous rhetoric and outright lies spread by Politicians like Liberal-NDP party members Jagmeet Singh, Justin Trudeau, Mark Carney, Christia Freeland, and Ontario’s Primiere Doug Ford, is an abuse of their power of office to incite attitudes and behaviors of discrimination, hate, and abuse towards Canadians who own Teslas products. It’s the same state funded propaganda play they used to coerce Canadians into forced COVID Vaccinations. Extremist Political thematic narratives spread by Politicians, inciting hate and abusive behavior towards a specific group of Canadians, perpetuated by Canadian State funded media, along with media around the world recently revealed to be funded by the USA’s USAID to misinform and incite hate and abuse is a risk to public safety and security.

The unfounded hatred towards Elon Musk can even be found all the way up north, in Ontario Canada. WARNING: I do drop an F’bomb, please pardon my language. Today I got berated by 2 employees of my local branch of a large Tire Shop chain because they “hate Tesla” telling me Elon Musk is a “Nazi”. Of course no example could be provided, which angered them even more. One tire shop employee was so angry at Elon Musk, based on legacy media misinformation and disinformation peddled by politicians, that he actually risked his livelihood just for an opportunity to lash out at me, a customer, over how much he hates my car because he thinks Elon is a Nazi. Let that sink in! Dangerous rhetoric and outright lies spread by Politicians like Liberal-NDP party members Jagmeet Singh, Justin Trudeau, Mark Carney, Christia Freeland, and Ontario’s Primiere Doug Ford, is an abuse of their power of office to incite attitudes and behaviors of discrimination, hate, and abuse towards Canadians who own Teslas products. It’s the same state funded propaganda play they used to coerce Canadians into forced COVID Vaccinations. Extremist Political thematic narratives spread by Politicians, inciting hate and abusive behavior towards a specific group of Canadians, perpetuated by Canadian State funded media, along with media around the world recently revealed to be funded by the USA’s USAID to misinform and incite hate and abuse is a risk to public safety and security.

Ryan

27,181 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Tommy Robinson RISKED his life to report on Britain's GROOMING gangs Elon Musk has made hundreds of posts condemning Britain's grooming gangs, with mention of Tommy Robinson and his efforts to expose the filth. Fresh off the U.S. campaign trail, Elon Musk turns his sights on politics in the UK and Germany. The United Kingdom, of late, has become the posterchild for censorship, amid the globalist takeover of our dear ally. Over the past week, Musk has made hundreds of posts condemning Britain's r*pe gangs, with mention of Tommy Robinson 🇬🇧 and his efforts to expose the filth. Last year, Robinson was sentenced to prison for 18 months, for publishing a video on mass immigration, leading to contempt of court charges. It was published on X at great personal risk, including "mental torture" and "financial terrorism". It had nearly 60 million views, which has more than doubled following reposts by Musk, who revitalized free speech online with his purchase of X. Once a censorship cesspool, the platform has become a bastion of conservative thought — without silencing progressive ideas. Our very own Ezra Levant wrote a letter to Musk, providing some background to the story. Incredibly, Musk saw the letter and retweeted it as well! Seen more than 41 million times, Canadians and people from around the world are awakening to Robinson's struggle. "One of the things I've noticed in the United Kingdom is they have a terrible problem emanating from their mass immigration, which they call 'grooming gangs,'" said Levant, the publisher for Rebel News. These gangs are responsible for sexually exploiting hundreds of teens and children, without so much as a whimper from past and current governments. Keir Starmer, the new British prime minister, used to be the head, the chief prosecutor in the UK. He would be very familiar with these things, but there's new questions about whether or not he turned a blind eye to these r*pe gangs," Levant said. The perpetrators are overwhelmingly Muslim men of Pakistani descent, he notes. Please help us protect Tommy in prison — it might even save his life. FULL REPORT by Ezra Levant 🍁🚛:

Tommy Robinson RISKED his life to report on Britain's GROOMING gangs Elon Musk has made hundreds of posts condemning Britain's grooming gangs, with mention of Tommy Robinson and his efforts to expose the filth. Fresh off the U.S. campaign trail, Elon Musk turns his sights on politics in the UK and Germany. The United Kingdom, of late, has become the posterchild for censorship, amid the globalist takeover of our dear ally. Over the past week, Musk has made hundreds of posts condemning Britain's rpe gangs, with mention of Tommy Robinson 🇬🇧 and his efforts to expose the filth. Last year, Robinson was sentenced to prison for 18 months, for publishing a video on mass immigration, leading to contempt of court charges. It was published on X at great personal risk, including "mental torture" and "financial terrorism". It had nearly 60 million views, which has more than doubled following reposts by Musk, who revitalized free speech online with his purchase of X. Once a censorship cesspool, the platform has become a bastion of conservative thought — without silencing progressive ideas. Our very own Ezra Levant wrote a letter to Musk, providing some background to the story. Incredibly, Musk saw the letter and retweeted it as well! Seen more than 41 million times, Canadians and people from around the world are awakening to Robinson's struggle. "One of the things I've noticed in the United Kingdom is they have a terrible problem emanating from their mass immigration, which they call 'grooming gangs,'" said Levant, the publisher for Rebel News. These gangs are responsible for sexually exploiting hundreds of teens and children, without so much as a whimper from past and current governments. Keir Starmer, the new British prime minister, used to be the head, the chief prosecutor in the UK. He would be very familiar with these things, but there's new questions about whether or not he turned a blind eye to these rpe gangs," Levant said. The perpetrators are overwhelmingly Muslim men of Pakistani descent, he notes. Please help us protect Tommy in prison — it might even save his life. FULL REPORT by Ezra Levant 🍁🚛:

Rebel News

22,349 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Jake barber discusses skywatcher’s Dogwhistle technology that was designed by James Fowler “we aren't sure exactly how serious the implications are of running this equipment” “there's a potential, there's a Pandora's Box here that could be opened. And if we aren't prepared to deal with that, that could pose a number of problems.” Source -watchmojo 🔗 in comments Full Transcript for context👇🏼 Jake -“My partner, James Fowler, who's been making his way out there as of late telling his story. He was featured in Episode 2 of Sky Watcher and he's out there doing podcasts now. James is the, is the, is the engineer of our dog whistle system. That was originally, it's where our name Sky Watcher comes from. It's a Sky Watcher system that he put together in his past life, if you will, and has been deploying the dog whistle system, which we did call Sky Watcher, and has been conducting operations for a number of entities in the government and outside of the government for years now. It's been a system that's been developed, I would say mostly over the last six years and has proven itself to be unique in the, in, in the form that nobody else seems to be able to mimic its, its results, let alone the method. And I do have to say, like we are, we do keep the, the dog whistle configuration and how we do it. You know, we, we keep that pretty close to our chest. And that's not because we're being unreasonably secretive. It's, you know, it's our secret sauce. And it's something we're very proud of. And a lot of time and energy has been invested in developing that system and we aren't sure exactly how serious the implications are of running this equipment. So I think there's a, there's as much responsibility in keeping this private and trying to get as many government agencies involved who have the responsibility when it comes to national defense and also air domain awareness. And so we're trying to work with them to make sure, because there, there's a potential, there's a Pandora's Box here that could be opened. And if we aren't prepared to deal with that, that could pose a number of problems”

Jake barber discusses skywatcher’s Dogwhistle technology that was designed by James Fowler “we aren't sure exactly how serious the implications are of running this equipment” “there's a potential, there's a Pandora's Box here that could be opened. And if we aren't prepared to deal with that, that could pose a number of problems.” Source -watchmojo 🔗 in comments Full Transcript for context👇🏼 Jake -“My partner, James Fowler, who's been making his way out there as of late telling his story. He was featured in Episode 2 of Sky Watcher and he's out there doing podcasts now. James is the, is the, is the engineer of our dog whistle system. That was originally, it's where our name Sky Watcher comes from. It's a Sky Watcher system that he put together in his past life, if you will, and has been deploying the dog whistle system, which we did call Sky Watcher, and has been conducting operations for a number of entities in the government and outside of the government for years now. It's been a system that's been developed, I would say mostly over the last six years and has proven itself to be unique in the, in, in the form that nobody else seems to be able to mimic its, its results, let alone the method. And I do have to say, like we are, we do keep the, the dog whistle configuration and how we do it. You know, we, we keep that pretty close to our chest. And that's not because we're being unreasonably secretive. It's, you know, it's our secret sauce. And it's something we're very proud of. And a lot of time and energy has been invested in developing that system and we aren't sure exactly how serious the implications are of running this equipment. So I think there's a, there's as much responsibility in keeping this private and trying to get as many government agencies involved who have the responsibility when it comes to national defense and also air domain awareness. And so we're trying to work with them to make sure, because there, there's a potential, there's a Pandora's Box here that could be opened. And if we aren't prepared to deal with that, that could pose a number of problems”

neandrewthal

180,502 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr