Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

𝗣𝗔𝗥𝗧 𝟭: 𝗘𝗫𝗣𝗟𝗔𝗜𝗡𝗜𝗡𝗚 𝗛𝗢𝗪 𝗘𝗫𝗣𝗥𝗢𝗣𝗥𝗜𝗔𝗧𝗜𝗢𝗡 𝗪𝗜𝗧𝗛𝗢𝗨𝗧 𝗖𝗢𝗠𝗣𝗘𝗡𝗦𝗔𝗧𝗜𝗢𝗡 𝗖𝗔𝗡 𝗛𝗔𝗣𝗣𝗘𝗡 𝗪𝗜𝗧𝗛𝗢𝗨𝗧 𝗔𝗡 𝗔𝗠𝗘𝗡𝗗𝗠𝗘𝗡𝗧 𝗢𝗙 𝗦𝗘𝗖𝗧𝗜𝗢𝗡 𝟮𝟱 𝗢𝗙 𝗖𝗢𝗡𝗦𝗧𝗜𝗧𝗨𝗧𝗜𝗢𝗡. It is very possible to expropriate or sequestrate stolen property without compensation in South Africa without changing the constitution. #GeniusLandExpropriation #ANCcheckmate

Rutendo Matinyarare

81,240 subscribers

65,556 views • 1 year ago •via X (Twitter)

Education News & Politics

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

11 Comments

SpotOn Fence1 year ago

Is your property too large to physically fence? Give your dog the freedom to roam freely within a designated area on your property while keeping them safely contained with the most accurate GPS fence for dogs.

Aluwani 🇿🇦1 year ago

Where was useless analysis & advice during ZanuPF's land grab that plunged Zim into a mess? Zimbabweans are today refugees & still without land. Help them instead.

Mulimisi Abel Mafoho1 year ago

A perverted Zimbabwean is an expert on South African affairs...

Gosebo 🇿🇦1 year ago

Imagine a popcorn expert from a failed State lecturing SA on land policy, wtf is this?

Conscious Caracal 🇿🇦1 year ago

Why did you flee Zimbabwe to come live in South Africa, Rutendo?

Nicolo1 year ago

White settler barons did not need any legislation to brutally take land so why should natives even need laws to get back stolen land .

Tumelo Pilane1 year ago

South Africa does not need an opinion of this coward pedophile!

Lumumba Guduza1 year ago

Shut up, you hopeless all-knowing bastard. You assume to know too much when you are just a pathetic idiot. Zimbabwe's land issue was ill addressed and manhandled due to Mugabe, who had positioned himself as life president. Same with Mnangagwa.

Melusi Maposa1 year ago

Go en tell yr wife about Expropriation Act

Mthimbani1 year ago

The irony is that this law will now also affect Black people who left huge tracts of unused land in the rural areas who reside and work in urban areas.

Rutendo Matinyarare1 year ago

The constitution says expropriation can only happen for the following reasons: 1. public purpose and public interests. What is public interest and public purpose? Land reform, sharing equitably South African resources and by deduction redress/restitution. So with 79% of land in white, colored and Indians hands that acquired it through racial laws and blacks only have 4%. How then is the aspect of land reform and redress being addressed by taking the little land in black tribal leaders hands instead of taking the illegitimately acquired land in white hands? That would be inconsistent with the spirit of the constitution and Act, surely. Moreover, it will lose them more voters.

Related Videos

𝗛𝗢𝗪 𝗪𝗜𝗟𝗟 𝗧𝗛𝗘 𝗔𝗡𝗖 𝗘𝗫𝗣𝗥𝗢𝗣𝗥𝗜𝗔𝗧𝗘 𝗪𝗜𝗧𝗛𝗢𝗨𝗧 𝗖𝗢𝗠𝗣𝗘𝗡𝗦𝗔𝗧𝗜𝗢𝗡 𝗪𝗛𝗘𝗡 𝗖𝗢𝗡𝗦𝗧𝗜𝗧𝗨𝗧𝗜𝗢𝗡 𝗣𝗥𝗢𝗛𝗜𝗕𝗜𝗧𝗦 𝗜𝗧? The way the ANC is going to expropriate without compensation will be genius and very smart. #GeniusLandExpropriation #ANCcheckmate

𝗛𝗢𝗪 𝗪𝗜𝗟𝗟 𝗧𝗛𝗘 𝗔𝗡𝗖 𝗘𝗫𝗣𝗥𝗢𝗣𝗥𝗜𝗔𝗧𝗘 𝗪𝗜𝗧𝗛𝗢𝗨𝗧 𝗖𝗢𝗠𝗣𝗘𝗡𝗦𝗔𝗧𝗜𝗢𝗡 𝗪𝗛𝗘𝗡 𝗖𝗢𝗡𝗦𝗧𝗜𝗧𝗨𝗧𝗜𝗢𝗡 𝗣𝗥𝗢𝗛𝗜𝗕𝗜𝗧𝗦 𝗜𝗧? The way the ANC is going to expropriate without compensation will be genius and very smart. #GeniusLandExpropriation #ANCcheckmate

Rutendo Matinyarare

78,097 views • 1 year ago

VIDEO: AfriForum exposes the ANC's mission to expropriate property without compensation in South Africa using the Expropriation Act. This video got over 100 000 views on YouTube, so let's see how it does on 𝕏.

VIDEO: AfriForum exposes the ANC's mission to expropriate property without compensation in South Africa using the Expropriation Act. This video got over 100 000 views on YouTube, so let's see how it does on 𝕏.

Conscious Caracal 🇿🇦

110,182 views • 1 year ago

When Trump brings this up, it’s a “false claim,” but when an actual head of state in South Africa brings it up, the legacy media is silent. “We will expropriate land without compensation whether they [White people] like it or not.”

When Trump brings this up, it’s a “false claim,” but when an actual head of state in South Africa brings it up, the legacy media is silent. “We will expropriate land without compensation whether they [White people] like it or not.”

iamyesyouareno

55,171 views • 1 year ago

The Left is the same everywhere so pay attention to this “Here's something that will send a chill down your spine” The Left wing political Party in Australia introduced a bill to steal residents private land without compensation. Every member of the Left voted in favor of it “Introduced a bill in the upper house called the Use of Vacant Land Bill, and under it, if you own any vacant land, it can be taken by the state government or local council without being paid one cent and without your permission. The problem with that bill was every single member of the Labor Party in the upper house supported it — all nine members of the Labor Party of South Australia supported a bill that was a direct attack on your private property rights and to me, that says it all.” Luckily the bill was struck down but every member of the Left party voted in favor of it to steal private land without compensation

The Left is the same everywhere so pay attention to this “Here's something that will send a chill down your spine” The Left wing political Party in Australia introduced a bill to steal residents private land without compensation. Every member of the Left voted in favor of it “Introduced a bill in the upper house called the Use of Vacant Land Bill, and under it, if you own any vacant land, it can be taken by the state government or local council without being paid one cent and without your permission. The problem with that bill was every single member of the Labor Party in the upper house supported it — all nine members of the Labor Party of South Australia supported a bill that was a direct attack on your private property rights and to me, that says it all.” Luckily the bill was struck down but every member of the Left party voted in favor of it to steal private land without compensation

Wall Street Apes

67,131 views • 9 months ago

25 Year old girl working at the Voortrekker Monument in South Africa (where basically the "Zulus" made a deal to trade cattle for land but then betrayed the deal killing hundreds of the white people including women and children in horrible ways. She explains the problems with calling the land "Stolen," and "Land reform without compensation." She mentions the radical laws against white people and that people can be sent to jail for saying ANYTHING to black people. Crazy how people think this issue and extreme violence is exclusive to South Africa, when it seems to be becoming more common through out the world.

25 Year old girl working at the Voortrekker Monument in South Africa (where basically the "Zulus" made a deal to trade cattle for land but then betrayed the deal killing hundreds of the white people including women and children in horrible ways. She explains the problems with calling the land "Stolen," and "Land reform without compensation." She mentions the radical laws against white people and that people can be sent to jail for saying ANYTHING to black people. Crazy how people think this issue and extreme violence is exclusive to South Africa, when it seems to be becoming more common through out the world.

Angela Rose

292,648 views • 4 months ago

🔥🚨BREAKING NEWS: The South African National Assembly announced that they will be confiscating the land, assets and money from White people that live on their land in response to Conservatives and DOGE pushing to cut their funding. They also mentioned the people that they claim US intelligence agencies assassinated including Gaddafi, MLK and Malcom X in addition to claims that’s the US is embracing a ‘golden age of imperialism’ with Elon Musk. “We will expropriate without compensation whether they (white Afrikaners) like it or not. If they object, they can seek refugee in America.”

🔥🚨BREAKING NEWS: The South African National Assembly announced that they will be confiscating the land, assets and money from White people that live on their land in response to Conservatives and DOGE pushing to cut their funding. They also mentioned the people that they claim US intelligence agencies assassinated including Gaddafi, MLK and Malcom X in addition to claims that’s the US is embracing a ‘golden age of imperialism’ with Elon Musk. “We will expropriate without compensation whether they (white Afrikaners) like it or not. If they object, they can seek refugee in America.”

Dom Lucre | Breaker of Narratives

5,506,498 views • 1 year ago

LEADERS COME AND GO…. Indeed, leaders serve and leave. H.E President Chakwera of Malawi joins the proud League of incumbents that respect citizens’ choices. In this concession, President Chakwera has been very exemplary. The concession by the incumbent before the official declaration of the results is exceptionally and exceedingly exemplary. It exhibits that Africa is coming of age. Malawi adds onto the basket of nations in Africa, with successful transitions, joining the likes of Botswana, Zambia, South Africa, Ghana, Mauritius—just to mention but a few. It is refreshing to have incumbents who hand over power peacefully, without drama, bullets, blood, repression, or rigging. #BallotNOTBullet #VotesNOTViolence. #CitizenocracyNotAutocracy.

LEADERS COME AND GO…. Indeed, leaders serve and leave. H.E President Chakwera of Malawi joins the proud League of incumbents that respect citizens’ choices. In this concession, President Chakwera has been very exemplary. The concession by the incumbent before the official declaration of the results is exceptionally and exceedingly exemplary. It exhibits that Africa is coming of age. Malawi adds onto the basket of nations in Africa, with successful transitions, joining the likes of Botswana, Zambia, South Africa, Ghana, Mauritius—just to mention but a few. It is refreshing to have incumbents who hand over power peacefully, without drama, bullets, blood, repression, or rigging. #BallotNOTBullet #VotesNOTViolence. #CitizenocracyNotAutocracy.

nelson chamisa

88,178 views • 10 months ago

The president of South Africa has signed the Expropriation Bill through which he seeks the power to confiscate private property without compensation. This despite the fact that his party has lost significant support in the last election and is now governing in coalition with several parties that have described this step as a red line that cannot be crossed. The question thus becomes what are these parties going to do? Is it worth being part of a "government of national unity" if that government is even more radical than the previous one. People who voted against EWC and the Bela Bill are now represented by parties involved with a government that is presiding over the implementation of these things. Should they remain in the GNU?

The president of South Africa has signed the Expropriation Bill through which he seeks the power to confiscate private property without compensation. This despite the fact that his party has lost significant support in the last election and is now governing in coalition with several parties that have described this step as a red line that cannot be crossed. The question thus becomes what are these parties going to do? Is it worth being part of a "government of national unity" if that government is even more radical than the previous one. People who voted against EWC and the Bela Bill are now represented by parties involved with a government that is presiding over the implementation of these things. Should they remain in the GNU?

Ernst Roets

133,204 views • 1 year ago

As we celebrate and reflect on Africa Day today, it is important to qualify the intervention by South Africa’s Minister of International Relations and Cooperation, Ronald Lamola. What he says is correct, the issue of immigration in South Africa is indeed a crisis, and instead of focusing on peripheral issues, attention should be directed at the root causes, the push factors driving African migrants from countries such as Zimbabwe and Mozambique into South Africa, both legally and illegally. The fact of the matter is that we all know what the problem is: misgovernance. And the African National Congress, which has governed South Africa since 1994, is fully aware of this reality. Yet it has continued politically supporting the regimes in the region that have contributed to creating this crisis inside South Africa itself. We all know that ZANUPF rigs elections. We all know that it presides over a deeply corrupt system. We also know that some within the ANC benefit politically and materially from relationships with ZANUPF. So while Minister Lamola’s comments sound correct in principle, many people across the region have become sceptical because statements are repeatedly made, yet very little changes in practice. As we saw during the recent Southern African Development Community (SADC) foreign ministers’ meeting held in South Africa, Zimbabwe’s Foreign Minister, Dr Amon Murwira, was effectively in denial, insisting there is no immigration crisis affecting Southern Africa or South Africa. As long as leaders continue issuing statements without confronting the underlying governance failures driving migration, this crisis will persist. This is fundamentally a crisis of failed leadership. That is why other parts of Africa, and indeed other regions of the world, often look at Southern Africa with disbelief. We know what the problem is, and we know what needs to be done, yet we refuse to act. Worse still, regional leaders continue defending and embracing the very political systems that are producing the collapse, namely ZANUPF in Zimbabwe and FRELIMO in Mozambique, even after disputed elections, corruption scandals, and institutional decay. It is not rocket science why Zimbabweans cross into South Africa to seek medical treatment. It is not rocket science why a significant number of women giving birth at Musina Hospital are Zimbabwean. It is because Zimbabwe’s public healthcare system has collapsed under corruption and decades of misgovernance. Zimbabwe’s largest public hospital still relies on a single maternity theatre built in 1977. The country’s public health sector has, for years, lacked a functioning radiotherapy cancer treatment machine for the entire nation. Under such conditions, desperate citizens will inevitably cross borders, legally and illegally, in search of survival and dignity. Tragically, it is ordinary poor Africans who now become pawns in political battles. Politicians exploit immigration to whip up emotions and win votes, while many of those same political actors continue protecting, legitimising, and enabling the governance failures that created the migration crisis in the first place. The Southern African Development Community (SADC) issued a scathing report on Zimbabwe’s 2023 election. Yet the first president to go and celebrate that disputed victory was South African President Cyril Ramaphosa. It therefore does not make sense for South Africa’s Minister of International Relations and Cooperation, Ronald Lamola, to correctly speak about the root causes of the immigration crisis while his own government continues supporting and legitimising the very systems creating those root causes. After the SADC report was released, the Secretary-General of the African National Congress openly declared “Viva Mnangagwa.” That kind of duplicitous behaviour does not build confidence among citizens in South Africa or across Southern Africa.

As we celebrate and reflect on Africa Day today, it is important to qualify the intervention by South Africa’s Minister of International Relations and Cooperation, Ronald Lamola. What he says is correct, the issue of immigration in South Africa is indeed a crisis, and instead of focusing on peripheral issues, attention should be directed at the root causes, the push factors driving African migrants from countries such as Zimbabwe and Mozambique into South Africa, both legally and illegally. The fact of the matter is that we all know what the problem is: misgovernance. And the African National Congress, which has governed South Africa since 1994, is fully aware of this reality. Yet it has continued politically supporting the regimes in the region that have contributed to creating this crisis inside South Africa itself. We all know that ZANUPF rigs elections. We all know that it presides over a deeply corrupt system. We also know that some within the ANC benefit politically and materially from relationships with ZANUPF. So while Minister Lamola’s comments sound correct in principle, many people across the region have become sceptical because statements are repeatedly made, yet very little changes in practice. As we saw during the recent Southern African Development Community (SADC) foreign ministers’ meeting held in South Africa, Zimbabwe’s Foreign Minister, Dr Amon Murwira, was effectively in denial, insisting there is no immigration crisis affecting Southern Africa or South Africa. As long as leaders continue issuing statements without confronting the underlying governance failures driving migration, this crisis will persist. This is fundamentally a crisis of failed leadership. That is why other parts of Africa, and indeed other regions of the world, often look at Southern Africa with disbelief. We know what the problem is, and we know what needs to be done, yet we refuse to act. Worse still, regional leaders continue defending and embracing the very political systems that are producing the collapse, namely ZANUPF in Zimbabwe and FRELIMO in Mozambique, even after disputed elections, corruption scandals, and institutional decay. It is not rocket science why Zimbabweans cross into South Africa to seek medical treatment. It is not rocket science why a significant number of women giving birth at Musina Hospital are Zimbabwean. It is because Zimbabwe’s public healthcare system has collapsed under corruption and decades of misgovernance. Zimbabwe’s largest public hospital still relies on a single maternity theatre built in 1977. The country’s public health sector has, for years, lacked a functioning radiotherapy cancer treatment machine for the entire nation. Under such conditions, desperate citizens will inevitably cross borders, legally and illegally, in search of survival and dignity. Tragically, it is ordinary poor Africans who now become pawns in political battles. Politicians exploit immigration to whip up emotions and win votes, while many of those same political actors continue protecting, legitimising, and enabling the governance failures that created the migration crisis in the first place. The Southern African Development Community (SADC) issued a scathing report on Zimbabwe’s 2023 election. Yet the first president to go and celebrate that disputed victory was South African President Cyril Ramaphosa. It therefore does not make sense for South Africa’s Minister of International Relations and Cooperation, Ronald Lamola, to correctly speak about the root causes of the immigration crisis while his own government continues supporting and legitimising the very systems creating those root causes. After the SADC report was released, the Secretary-General of the African National Congress openly declared “Viva Mnangagwa.” That kind of duplicitous behaviour does not build confidence among citizens in South Africa or across Southern Africa.

Hopewell Chin’ono

27,308 views • 2 months ago

Dr. Naledi Pandor, a highly respected and influential minister, has a significant role to play in addressing various foreign affairs matters. She is constitutionally responsible and mandated to represent SA on any matters abroad, and although SA enjoys freedom of expression, citizens have got no right to abuse that privilege as it was done by Mrs Talabi and her uninformed crew. It is crucial to address any actions that undermine the South African constitution, they must be punishable and cannot be justified under the guise of freedom of speech, Redi Tlhabi must be fined or expelled in the country if she refuses to apologize for her reckless conduct. In countries like China this will be considered terrorism or sabotage. The Department of International Relations and Cooperation (DIRCO) should take appropriate action in this regard. It is worth noting that Redi Tlhabi was not appointed to represent South Africa in the US, and her actions risk straining the friendship between South Africa and Russia. SA friendship with Russia is longstanding and will remain solid whether Mrs Talabi and US like it or not. Russia devoted her entire life and efforts to redeeming SA from the shackles of apartheid that was supported by the US, and for that we are forever grateful. South Africa should not be held hostage by the US due to any perceived benefits from the African Growth and Opportunity Act (AGOA). Instead, it is important to recognize that South Africa has its own strengths and contributions to offer. SA doesn’t need AGOA handouts, we can sustain ourselves without it, the US needs SA more than we need them. Rather, it is essential to foster respectful dialogue and seek mutual understanding with the US, the slave master relationship is over. Patriotism dictates that those who have engaged in biased propaganda campaigns should be held accountable, and we call upon President Ramaphosa to assert our country's sovereignty and demand respect from US politicians. It is disheartening to see journalists like Stevovo applauding such content, as ethical and unbiased journalism is crucial for our nation. Let us strive for respectful and constructive discussions that promote unity and progress, what Redi Tlhabi did is simply distasteful and divisive. Cc DIRCO South Africa Clayson Monyela @kasibcnews Redi Tlhabi Russian Embassy in South Africa 🇷🇺 Cyril Ramaphosa 🇿🇦

Dr. Naledi Pandor, a highly respected and influential minister, has a significant role to play in addressing various foreign affairs matters. She is constitutionally responsible and mandated to represent SA on any matters abroad, and although SA enjoys freedom of expression, citizens have got no right to abuse that privilege as it was done by Mrs Talabi and her uninformed crew. It is crucial to address any actions that undermine the South African constitution, they must be punishable and cannot be justified under the guise of freedom of speech, Redi Tlhabi must be fined or expelled in the country if she refuses to apologize for her reckless conduct. In countries like China this will be considered terrorism or sabotage. The Department of International Relations and Cooperation (DIRCO) should take appropriate action in this regard. It is worth noting that Redi Tlhabi was not appointed to represent South Africa in the US, and her actions risk straining the friendship between South Africa and Russia. SA friendship with Russia is longstanding and will remain solid whether Mrs Talabi and US like it or not. Russia devoted her entire life and efforts to redeeming SA from the shackles of apartheid that was supported by the US, and for that we are forever grateful. South Africa should not be held hostage by the US due to any perceived benefits from the African Growth and Opportunity Act (AGOA). Instead, it is important to recognize that South Africa has its own strengths and contributions to offer. SA doesn’t need AGOA handouts, we can sustain ourselves without it, the US needs SA more than we need them. Rather, it is essential to foster respectful dialogue and seek mutual understanding with the US, the slave master relationship is over. Patriotism dictates that those who have engaged in biased propaganda campaigns should be held accountable, and we call upon President Ramaphosa to assert our country's sovereignty and demand respect from US politicians. It is disheartening to see journalists like Stevovo applauding such content, as ethical and unbiased journalism is crucial for our nation. Let us strive for respectful and constructive discussions that promote unity and progress, what Redi Tlhabi did is simply distasteful and divisive. Cc DIRCO South Africa Clayson Monyela @kasibcnews Redi Tlhabi Russian Embassy in South Africa 🇷🇺 Cyril Ramaphosa 🇿🇦

Prof Moya

78,935 views • 2 years ago

📖 Article: South Africa's Expropriation Act — what it actually says, and why Trump & Musk are misleading you. Let's break it down. South Africa's Expropriation Act (signed Jan 23, 2025) is a land reform law that allows the government to acquire property for PUBLIC purposes — like building schools, hospitals, and infrastructure. It REPLACES a 1975 apartheid-era law. The most controversial part? "Nil compensation" in SPECIFIC circumstances: abandoned land, unused speculative land, land posing health risks, or land worth less than government investment in it. That's it. It is NOT a blanket seizure policy. The law also requires government to FIRST negotiate with landowners before any expropriation. Owners retain full rights to challenge decisions in court. This is standard in most democracies — the US has eminent domain laws that do the same thing. Now here's what Trump claimed: that the law enables the government to "seize ethnic minority Afrikaners' agricultural property without compensation." That is FALSE. The law applies to ALL property owners regardless of race. As of today, NOT A SINGLE piece of land has been seized without compensation under this law. Not one. The South African government confirmed this. CNN fact-checkers confirmed this. Multiple experts confirmed this. Trump also claimed there is a "genocide" against white farmers. He even played a video of white crosses at the White House during a meeting with President Ramaphosa — claiming each cross was a murdered farmer. That was ALSO misleading. Those crosses were from a 2020 memorial service for a murdered couple — NOT evidence of mass killings. Crime in South Africa affects ALL communities. There is no statistical evidence of racially targeted killings of white farmers constituting genocide. Now Elon Musk. He's been amplifying "white genocide" narratives on X and calling South Africa's Black Economic Empowerment laws "Apartheid 2.0." Why? Because Starlink can't get a licence there — a rule that applies to ALL foreign telecoms companies equally. Musk claimed Starlink is blocked "because I'm not Black." That's misleading. South African law requires 30% local Black ownership for telecoms companies — a post-apartheid policy to correct decades of economic exclusion that affected the Black majority. The South African government has called Musk's claims "lies and disinformation." Spokesperson Vincent Magwenya said his rhetoric is "harmful to the country's international reputation" and undermines any genuine engagement. Context matters: White South Africans make up 7% of the population but own ~70% of commercial farmland — a direct legacy of apartheid. The Expropriation Act is an attempt to address that imbalance WITHIN constitutional limits. So why are Trump & Musk doing this? Trump has political incentives to play to his base with a "white persecution" narrative. Musk has a direct financial grievance with SA over Starlink. Neither is giving you the full picture.

📖 Article: South Africa's Expropriation Act — what it actually says, and why Trump & Musk are misleading you. Let's break it down. South Africa's Expropriation Act (signed Jan 23, 2025) is a land reform law that allows the government to acquire property for PUBLIC purposes — like building schools, hospitals, and infrastructure. It REPLACES a 1975 apartheid-era law. The most controversial part? "Nil compensation" in SPECIFIC circumstances: abandoned land, unused speculative land, land posing health risks, or land worth less than government investment in it. That's it. It is NOT a blanket seizure policy. The law also requires government to FIRST negotiate with landowners before any expropriation. Owners retain full rights to challenge decisions in court. This is standard in most democracies — the US has eminent domain laws that do the same thing. Now here's what Trump claimed: that the law enables the government to "seize ethnic minority Afrikaners' agricultural property without compensation." That is FALSE. The law applies to ALL property owners regardless of race. As of today, NOT A SINGLE piece of land has been seized without compensation under this law. Not one. The South African government confirmed this. CNN fact-checkers confirmed this. Multiple experts confirmed this. Trump also claimed there is a "genocide" against white farmers. He even played a video of white crosses at the White House during a meeting with President Ramaphosa — claiming each cross was a murdered farmer. That was ALSO misleading. Those crosses were from a 2020 memorial service for a murdered couple — NOT evidence of mass killings. Crime in South Africa affects ALL communities. There is no statistical evidence of racially targeted killings of white farmers constituting genocide. Now Elon Musk. He's been amplifying "white genocide" narratives on X and calling South Africa's Black Economic Empowerment laws "Apartheid 2.0." Why? Because Starlink can't get a licence there — a rule that applies to ALL foreign telecoms companies equally. Musk claimed Starlink is blocked "because I'm not Black." That's misleading. South African law requires 30% local Black ownership for telecoms companies — a post-apartheid policy to correct decades of economic exclusion that affected the Black majority. The South African government has called Musk's claims "lies and disinformation." Spokesperson Vincent Magwenya said his rhetoric is "harmful to the country's international reputation" and undermines any genuine engagement. Context matters: White South Africans make up 7% of the population but own ~70% of commercial farmland — a direct legacy of apartheid. The Expropriation Act is an attempt to address that imbalance WITHIN constitutional limits. So why are Trump & Musk doing this? Trump has political incentives to play to his base with a "white persecution" narrative. Musk has a direct financial grievance with SA over Starlink. Neither is giving you the full picture.

LambChip

14,680 views • 3 months ago

SOUTH AFRICA, ZIMBABWE, AFRICA, APARTHEID, COLONIAL SEGREGATION, PRIVATE PROPERTY AND LAND REFORM Very often, when people talk about Expropriation of Land Without Compensation, or Nationalisation, etc, some people rush to the now common threat: "you will starve like Zimbabwe". To be clear, Zimbabwe's land reform was never about really giving land to Africans. Mugabe, a European puppet of note, was only caught off guard by War Veterans who had run out of patience, and he acceded only because he was on the verge of losing power. So, Zimbabwe is a bad example. Now, Chris Kunzler here makes one of the most important cases for land reform, giving Alexandra as an example, where vast tracts of land lie unused (and owned by Europeans who inherited the land from previous thieves), but the land cannot be used to resettle the crowded people of Alex. A drive around Gauteng will show that there exists these vast tracts of land around the most overpopulated townships, but the government cannot use this land because it is obscenely priced for the willing buyer and willing seller BS.

SOUTH AFRICA, ZIMBABWE, AFRICA, APARTHEID, COLONIAL SEGREGATION, PRIVATE PROPERTY AND LAND REFORM Very often, when people talk about Expropriation of Land Without Compensation, or Nationalisation, etc, some people rush to the now common threat: "you will starve like Zimbabwe". To be clear, Zimbabwe's land reform was never about really giving land to Africans. Mugabe, a European puppet of note, was only caught off guard by War Veterans who had run out of patience, and he acceded only because he was on the verge of losing power. So, Zimbabwe is a bad example. Now, Chris Kunzler here makes one of the most important cases for land reform, giving Alexandra as an example, where vast tracts of land lie unused (and owned by Europeans who inherited the land from previous thieves), but the land cannot be used to resettle the crowded people of Alex. A drive around Gauteng will show that there exists these vast tracts of land around the most overpopulated townships, but the government cannot use this land because it is obscenely priced for the willing buyer and willing seller BS.

Unathi Afrika

236,367 views • 3 years ago

"The UN's Agenda 2030 is all about control." English broadcaster Beverley Turner: "It is not possible to achieve these utopian ideals without a deliberate, perhaps forceful, redistribution of food, goods, property and rights." "Just like good old-fashioned communism, the ambition for equal outcome for everyone always results in the very rich getting supremely richer, the very poor perhaps being lifted up a little, but the billions in the middle getting colder, poorer, [and] hungrier." "This is Klaus Schwab's 'you will own nothing and you will be happy' mantra. No, you won't. You'll be miserable, you'll be weak, you'll be obedient, but hopefully sufficiently angry to try and break free." "Will the people of the world comply with this technocratic vision, or will we rebel?" Credit: Bev Turner

"The UN's Agenda 2030 is all about control." English broadcaster Beverley Turner: "It is not possible to achieve these utopian ideals without a deliberate, perhaps forceful, redistribution of food, goods, property and rights." "Just like good old-fashioned communism, the ambition for equal outcome for everyone always results in the very rich getting supremely richer, the very poor perhaps being lifted up a little, but the billions in the middle getting colder, poorer, [and] hungrier." "This is Klaus Schwab's 'you will own nothing and you will be happy' mantra. No, you won't. You'll be miserable, you'll be weak, you'll be obedient, but hopefully sufficiently angry to try and break free." "Will the people of the world comply with this technocratic vision, or will we rebel?" Credit: Bev Turner

Wide Awake Media

196,253 views • 1 year ago

This is a painful story 💔 A whole 130000km mileage reversal and vehicle was in a terrible accident yet sold accident free !! This Dealer( KOHINOOR MOTORS ) in PRETORIA has been refusing to take this car back since September last year. He sold a car to this Aunty with reversed mileage and it has endless problems. The worst part is how rude this dealer and his lawyer is. They threatened to call saps and kick us off their property if we decided to bring that car back. The lady is very fearful of this dealer 😔 We have now escalated this matter to MIOSA and it will definitely end up with The The National Consumer Commission (NCC) if Motor Industry Ombudsman of South Africa does not rule in favour of the client. All the proof is in this video. We as South African’s are tired and we need intervention. There is no way that this Dealer cannot be brought to book. There are way too many people who are being taken for a ride by dealers and they have no voice or anyone to help them. South Africa please be careful, do not buy a car without inspecting it thoroughly. Contact us to do it for you if you can’t 😀 🔗 Kindly Book Here : 📞 Contact us: 087 822 1140 📍 Nationwide | Mon–Fri 08:00–17:00 #View4You ☑ We Inspect. You Decide. Wendy Knowler

This is a painful story 💔 A whole 130000km mileage reversal and vehicle was in a terrible accident yet sold accident free !! This Dealer( KOHINOOR MOTORS ) in PRETORIA has been refusing to take this car back since September last year. He sold a car to this Aunty with reversed mileage and it has endless problems. The worst part is how rude this dealer and his lawyer is. They threatened to call saps and kick us off their property if we decided to bring that car back. The lady is very fearful of this dealer 😔 We have now escalated this matter to MIOSA and it will definitely end up with The The National Consumer Commission (NCC) if Motor Industry Ombudsman of South Africa does not rule in favour of the client. All the proof is in this video. We as South African’s are tired and we need intervention. There is no way that this Dealer cannot be brought to book. There are way too many people who are being taken for a ride by dealers and they have no voice or anyone to help them. South Africa please be careful, do not buy a car without inspecting it thoroughly. Contact us to do it for you if you can’t 😀 🔗 Kindly Book Here : 📞 Contact us: 087 822 1140 📍 Nationwide | Mon–Fri 08:00–17:00 #View4You ☑ We Inspect. You Decide. Wendy Knowler

VIEW4YOU

100,843 views • 11 months ago

Ignorance is indeed very expensive. This guy who is celebrating Donald Trump clearly does not understand what Donald Trump has done to South Africa, which the guy claims to love. Here are a few things that Donald Trump, whom he is celebrating, has done to South Africa. Donald Trump has threatened South Africa’s trade relationship with the United States and imposed punitive tariff measures on South African exports. He has also publicly and falsely accused South Africa of discriminating against white Afrikaners, falsely promoted damaging claims of a so-called “white genocide”, and runs a racist refugee programme for white South Africans. He portrays South Africa as a country persecuting minorities and has used the White House and international platforms to amplify narratives that South Africa itself says are factually inaccurate. He has linked aid and diplomatic relations to South Africa’s imagined land reform expropriation and attacked South Africa over its case against Israel at the International Court of Justice. His actions have damaged investor confidence through hostile rhetoric, increased diplomatic tensions between Washington and Pretoria, and contributed to the portrayal of South Africa as a country in crisis despite repeated objections from the South African government. The cumulative effect of these actions has been diplomatic strain, economic uncertainty, reputational damage, pressure on trade relations, and the reinforcement of international narratives that sane South Africans know are misleading, politically motivated, and harmful to South Africa’s interests. South Africa has already lost about US$439 million, around R8.5 billion due to Trump’s actions against it. The people who will suffer the most are not politicians or wealthy business owners, but ordinary South Africans. When exports decline and investment falls, companies hire fewer workers, expand less, and cut jobs. The greatest burden will fall on the poor, the unemployed, and young people trying to enter the labour market. The real victims of Donald Trump’s policies towards South Africa are ordinary South Africans. When trade is disrupted, exports fall, investment slows, and businesses become reluctant to expand, it is poor South Africans who suffer the most. The result is fewer jobs, lower economic growth, and less tax revenue to fund public services. In a country already battling high unemployment and poverty, economic punishment ultimately falls hardest on those who can least afford it. At best, this guy speaking is a useful idiot advancing someone else’s agenda without understanding the consequences. At worst, he is politically naive, economically illiterate, and acting against both his own interests and those of his fellow South Africans. Either way, he is cheering a guy harming the very country he claims to love. As I said yesterday, these groups are advancing an agenda that belongs elsewhere and is being funded from somewhere, riding on genuine concerns that have now been hijacked by South Africa’s enemies. Sadly, one cannot understand this in the absence of critical thinking. I never thought that I would live to see the day when a black South African would bootlick an American president who has done so much to harm his country. Ignorance is indeed very expensive. To understand the level of ignorance we are dealing with, this gentleman confidently informed us that the United States has more than 700 million people while arguing about immigration. The actual population of the United States is about 340 million. He overestimated it by more than 360 million people, an error greater than the population of America The irony is that he was trying to lecture others about immigration and population issues while not knowing the population of the very country he was using as an example. If you cannot get a basic demographic fact right, it becomes difficult to take seriously your analysis of immigration, labour markets, economic policy, or population dynamics. This is not a small mistake. Population size is one of the most fundamental facts in any discussion about immigration because it provides the context for understanding the scale of migration and its impact. When someone is wrong by more than 360 million people, they are not simply getting a number wrong. They are demonstrating that they do not understand the subject they are trying to explain, they are just a hammer for someone else. That is why confidence should never be mistaken for knowledge. What he did praising Trump is like a Mozambican, Angolan, Zimbabwean, or Namibian enthusiastically praising the apartheid state for one policy while ignoring that apartheid South Africa spent decades undermining the liberation and development of African countries throughout the region and killing black South Africans. At some point, admiration for a single policy has to be weighed against the totality of the damage caused. The level of ignorance is trying astounding!!

Ignorance is indeed very expensive. This guy who is celebrating Donald Trump clearly does not understand what Donald Trump has done to South Africa, which the guy claims to love. Here are a few things that Donald Trump, whom he is celebrating, has done to South Africa. Donald Trump has threatened South Africa’s trade relationship with the United States and imposed punitive tariff measures on South African exports. He has also publicly and falsely accused South Africa of discriminating against white Afrikaners, falsely promoted damaging claims of a so-called “white genocide”, and runs a racist refugee programme for white South Africans. He portrays South Africa as a country persecuting minorities and has used the White House and international platforms to amplify narratives that South Africa itself says are factually inaccurate. He has linked aid and diplomatic relations to South Africa’s imagined land reform expropriation and attacked South Africa over its case against Israel at the International Court of Justice. His actions have damaged investor confidence through hostile rhetoric, increased diplomatic tensions between Washington and Pretoria, and contributed to the portrayal of South Africa as a country in crisis despite repeated objections from the South African government. The cumulative effect of these actions has been diplomatic strain, economic uncertainty, reputational damage, pressure on trade relations, and the reinforcement of international narratives that sane South Africans know are misleading, politically motivated, and harmful to South Africa’s interests. South Africa has already lost about US$439 million, around R8.5 billion due to Trump’s actions against it. The people who will suffer the most are not politicians or wealthy business owners, but ordinary South Africans. When exports decline and investment falls, companies hire fewer workers, expand less, and cut jobs. The greatest burden will fall on the poor, the unemployed, and young people trying to enter the labour market. The real victims of Donald Trump’s policies towards South Africa are ordinary South Africans. When trade is disrupted, exports fall, investment slows, and businesses become reluctant to expand, it is poor South Africans who suffer the most. The result is fewer jobs, lower economic growth, and less tax revenue to fund public services. In a country already battling high unemployment and poverty, economic punishment ultimately falls hardest on those who can least afford it. At best, this guy speaking is a useful idiot advancing someone else’s agenda without understanding the consequences. At worst, he is politically naive, economically illiterate, and acting against both his own interests and those of his fellow South Africans. Either way, he is cheering a guy harming the very country he claims to love. As I said yesterday, these groups are advancing an agenda that belongs elsewhere and is being funded from somewhere, riding on genuine concerns that have now been hijacked by South Africa’s enemies. Sadly, one cannot understand this in the absence of critical thinking. I never thought that I would live to see the day when a black South African would bootlick an American president who has done so much to harm his country. Ignorance is indeed very expensive. To understand the level of ignorance we are dealing with, this gentleman confidently informed us that the United States has more than 700 million people while arguing about immigration. The actual population of the United States is about 340 million. He overestimated it by more than 360 million people, an error greater than the population of America The irony is that he was trying to lecture others about immigration and population issues while not knowing the population of the very country he was using as an example. If you cannot get a basic demographic fact right, it becomes difficult to take seriously your analysis of immigration, labour markets, economic policy, or population dynamics. This is not a small mistake. Population size is one of the most fundamental facts in any discussion about immigration because it provides the context for understanding the scale of migration and its impact. When someone is wrong by more than 360 million people, they are not simply getting a number wrong. They are demonstrating that they do not understand the subject they are trying to explain, they are just a hammer for someone else. That is why confidence should never be mistaken for knowledge. What he did praising Trump is like a Mozambican, Angolan, Zimbabwean, or Namibian enthusiastically praising the apartheid state for one policy while ignoring that apartheid South Africa spent decades undermining the liberation and development of African countries throughout the region and killing black South Africans. At some point, admiration for a single policy has to be weighed against the totality of the damage caused. The level of ignorance is trying astounding!!

Hopewell Chin’ono

43,550 views • 2 months ago

THIS ONGOING DEMOLITION IN DELTA STATE SHOULD TELL YOU THAT IF YOU BUILD ANYWHERE IN NIGERIA WITHOUT HAVING TITLE DOCUMENTS, YOU ARE WASTING YOUR MONEY. When it comes to real estate and demolition of properties, only a heartless person wouldn't sympathize over such a huge loss. However, let's learn to do things how it's done so that it can be how it should be. Regardless of wherever you are in Nigeria, don't buy land without title documents. They won't ask you if you are Igbo or Yoruba. They will ask for your documents. Receipts, survey plans, and contracts of land sale aren't title documents. In Europe, America, South Africa, or anywhere the principle of "Quicquid plantatur solo, solo cedit" (whatever is attached to the land belongs to the landowner) is applicable, you can't just build on land that you don't have its title document. It will end in tears. See, the law is the law. If you have title documents and your property is earmarked for demolition because the government needs it, you will be adequately compensated. But if the land isn't yours, no one will compensate you. And that's why when buying lands, you must make sure you get the title documents: either excision, C of O, or Governor's consent. With registered or provisional survey, receipts, deeds of assignments, court judgments, or gazettes that prove the seller has the right to sell what they are selling and what they are selling is in good standing. Real estate is an investment. You make better investment decisions when you have knowledge of the investment. Lastly, real estate, like all investment, is risky. You don't negate risk; you mitigate it.

THIS ONGOING DEMOLITION IN DELTA STATE SHOULD TELL YOU THAT IF YOU BUILD ANYWHERE IN NIGERIA WITHOUT HAVING TITLE DOCUMENTS, YOU ARE WASTING YOUR MONEY. When it comes to real estate and demolition of properties, only a heartless person wouldn't sympathize over such a huge loss. However, let's learn to do things how it's done so that it can be how it should be. Regardless of wherever you are in Nigeria, don't buy land without title documents. They won't ask you if you are Igbo or Yoruba. They will ask for your documents. Receipts, survey plans, and contracts of land sale aren't title documents. In Europe, America, South Africa, or anywhere the principle of "Quicquid plantatur solo, solo cedit" (whatever is attached to the land belongs to the landowner) is applicable, you can't just build on land that you don't have its title document. It will end in tears. See, the law is the law. If you have title documents and your property is earmarked for demolition because the government needs it, you will be adequately compensated. But if the land isn't yours, no one will compensate you. And that's why when buying lands, you must make sure you get the title documents: either excision, C of O, or Governor's consent. With registered or provisional survey, receipts, deeds of assignments, court judgments, or gazettes that prove the seller has the right to sell what they are selling and what they are selling is in good standing. Real estate is an investment. You make better investment decisions when you have knowledge of the investment. Lastly, real estate, like all investment, is risky. You don't negate risk; you mitigate it.

🏘️IamEri'Oluwa🇳🇬

16,501 views • 2 years ago

I agree with what South Africa’s Minister in the Presidency, Khumbudzo Ntshavheni, is saying, and it speaks directly to the crisis in which not only South Africa, but Southern Africa as a region, now finds itself. First of all, it is the responsibility of individual countries to ensure that they have government policies that grow their economies and provide jobs for their own people, so that their citizens can work at home instead of being insulted or forced into slave-like jobs in neighbouring countries. That responsibility lies with each government. That said, South Africa’s ruling party, the African National Congress, must sing from the same hymn sheet as Minister Khumbudzo Ntshavheni. You cannot have the government saying one thing while the ruling party, which constitutes part of that government, does something different. The ANC has consistently supported corrupt regimes that rig elections, and those rigged elections create the very conditions that South Africa now finds itself dealing with. I have said for more than seven years now that neighbouring countries are no longer only a foreign policy issue for South Africa. They are now a domestic issue too, because citizens from those countries live in South African communities and use South African social services, including hospitals. The South African government has said many times that 70% of women giving birth at Musina Hospital are from Zimbabwe. As such, it is important for the South African government not only to say the right words at specific moments, while privately continuing to support corrupt rule and bad governance in the region. That will not work. Yesterday’s march will achieve nothing if President Cyril Ramaphosa does not sit down with President Emmerson Mnangagwa of Zimbabwe, President Daniel Chapo of Mozambique, and President Peter Mutharika of Malawi to have these discussions honestly, because those are three countries that contribute significantly to regional migration into South Africa, both legal and illegal. Of course, he can also have conversations with President Bola Tinubu of Nigeria, because Nigeria is also part of the problem. Speaking as a citizen of Southern Africa, what the minister said is correct, but it must be followed up with action, not just words to appease journalists and viewers at a specific time because the government is under pressure. The South African government must make this its policy. The contradiction is that the South African economy benefits from migration and from shipping goods into the region. Zimbabwe’s biggest trading partner is South Africa for that very reason. So this is a complex issue that must be addressed with the intellectual weight it deserves, not reduced to talking points for politicians making fanciful declarations in their different countries without following through. Start with the SADC protocols. They determine what a free election is. But if the African National Congress publicly emboldens and supports rigged elections, it cannot then turn around and say African governments must take responsibility when it is failing to lead by example. The ANC must lead by example in regional bodies like SADC and the African Union, and say these things directly to fellow leaders. But we all know why it does not do that. It is because of personal relationships, political convenience, and money changing hands. It is time these things are put on the table, and if need be, let the truth be known. Lastly, I also agree with what the minister says regarding African countries supporting South Africa’s liberation struggle. We cannot endlessly remind South Africans that we helped them, because that support was never based on a quid pro quo arrangement. It was based on what was morally right at that time. If the same situation arose again today, we should do exactly the same. Standing against injustice should never come with an invoice.

I agree with what South Africa’s Minister in the Presidency, Khumbudzo Ntshavheni, is saying, and it speaks directly to the crisis in which not only South Africa, but Southern Africa as a region, now finds itself. First of all, it is the responsibility of individual countries to ensure that they have government policies that grow their economies and provide jobs for their own people, so that their citizens can work at home instead of being insulted or forced into slave-like jobs in neighbouring countries. That responsibility lies with each government. That said, South Africa’s ruling party, the African National Congress, must sing from the same hymn sheet as Minister Khumbudzo Ntshavheni. You cannot have the government saying one thing while the ruling party, which constitutes part of that government, does something different. The ANC has consistently supported corrupt regimes that rig elections, and those rigged elections create the very conditions that South Africa now finds itself dealing with. I have said for more than seven years now that neighbouring countries are no longer only a foreign policy issue for South Africa. They are now a domestic issue too, because citizens from those countries live in South African communities and use South African social services, including hospitals. The South African government has said many times that 70% of women giving birth at Musina Hospital are from Zimbabwe. As such, it is important for the South African government not only to say the right words at specific moments, while privately continuing to support corrupt rule and bad governance in the region. That will not work. Yesterday’s march will achieve nothing if President Cyril Ramaphosa does not sit down with President Emmerson Mnangagwa of Zimbabwe, President Daniel Chapo of Mozambique, and President Peter Mutharika of Malawi to have these discussions honestly, because those are three countries that contribute significantly to regional migration into South Africa, both legal and illegal. Of course, he can also have conversations with President Bola Tinubu of Nigeria, because Nigeria is also part of the problem. Speaking as a citizen of Southern Africa, what the minister said is correct, but it must be followed up with action, not just words to appease journalists and viewers at a specific time because the government is under pressure. The South African government must make this its policy. The contradiction is that the South African economy benefits from migration and from shipping goods into the region. Zimbabwe’s biggest trading partner is South Africa for that very reason. So this is a complex issue that must be addressed with the intellectual weight it deserves, not reduced to talking points for politicians making fanciful declarations in their different countries without following through. Start with the SADC protocols. They determine what a free election is. But if the African National Congress publicly emboldens and supports rigged elections, it cannot then turn around and say African governments must take responsibility when it is failing to lead by example. The ANC must lead by example in regional bodies like SADC and the African Union, and say these things directly to fellow leaders. But we all know why it does not do that. It is because of personal relationships, political convenience, and money changing hands. It is time these things are put on the table, and if need be, let the truth be known. Lastly, I also agree with what the minister says regarding African countries supporting South Africa’s liberation struggle. We cannot endlessly remind South Africans that we helped them, because that support was never based on a quid pro quo arrangement. It was based on what was morally right at that time. If the same situation arose again today, we should do exactly the same. Standing against injustice should never come with an invoice.

Hopewell Chin’ono

114,565 views • 1 month ago