Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Bu video yüklenirken bir sorun oluştu. Bu geçici bir ağ sorunundan kaynaklanıyor olabilir veya video kullanılamıyor olabilir.

Ana Sayfaya Dön

🚨𝗣𝗛𝗔𝗟𝗔 𝗣𝗛𝗔𝗟𝗔 𝗖𝗔𝗦𝗘 𝗜𝗦 𝗖𝗢𝗟𝗟𝗔𝗣𝗦𝗜𝗡𝗚, 𝗘𝗠𝗕𝗔𝗥𝗥𝗔𝗦𝗦𝗜𝗡𝗚𝗟𝗬‼️ Vuyo Zungula's case against President Cyril Ramaphosa is collapsing in every minute that goes by. It happens before his eyes😭 The Western Cape High Court judges are exposing the shoddy work done by Adv Sello, Judge Masipa and CJ Sandile Ngcobo. They are... show more

Constitution First 🇿🇦

52,864 subscribers

69,022 görüntüleme • 1 gün önce •via X (Twitter)

Komedi Haberler & Politika

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

Reporter: “Mr. President, did the United States bomb a girls' elementary school in Southern Iran on the first day of the war and kill 175 people?” President Trump: “No, in my opinion, based on what I've seen, that was done by Iran.” Reporter: “Is that true, Mr. Hegseth? It was Iran who did that?” Defense Secretary Hegseth: “We are investigating, still investigating. But the only side that targets civilians is Iran.” President Trump: “We think it was done by Iran. They're very inaccurate, as you know, with their munitions. They have no accuracy whatsoever. It was done by Iran.”

Reporter: “Mr. President, did the United States bomb a girls' elementary school in Southern Iran on the first day of the war and kill 175 people?” President Trump: “No, in my opinion, based on what I've seen, that was done by Iran.” Reporter: “Is that true, Mr. Hegseth? It was Iran who did that?” Defense Secretary Hegseth: “We are investigating, still investigating. But the only side that targets civilians is Iran.” President Trump: “We think it was done by Iran. They're very inaccurate, as you know, with their munitions. They have no accuracy whatsoever. It was done by Iran.”

OSINTdefender

713,558 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

A parliamentary inquiry panel has found all 3 charges against former Delhi High Court judge Justice Yashwant Varma proved in the cash recovery case. The panel said substantial unexplained cash was found in a storeroom at his official Delhi residence after a March 14, 2025 fire, while evidence was not properly preserved and his explanations about the cash, its source and ownership were found unsatisfactory. Remember Kapil Sibal, who attempted to stall the impeachment process against Justice Yashwant Varma after over ₹15 crore in cash was reportedly found at his residence. Sibal said: “They want to destroy a judge. With all responsibility, I say Justice Varma is one of the finest judges that I have argued before. You ask any lawyer of the High Court and Supreme Court—there is not a whiff of any wrongdoing by this judge. The government wants to take control of judges’ appointments.”

A parliamentary inquiry panel has found all 3 charges against former Delhi High Court judge Justice Yashwant Varma proved in the cash recovery case. The panel said substantial unexplained cash was found in a storeroom at his official Delhi residence after a March 14, 2025 fire, while evidence was not properly preserved and his explanations about the cash, its source and ownership were found unsatisfactory. Remember Kapil Sibal, who attempted to stall the impeachment process against Justice Yashwant Varma after over ₹15 crore in cash was reportedly found at his residence. Sibal said: “They want to destroy a judge. With all responsibility, I say Justice Varma is one of the finest judges that I have argued before. You ask any lawyer of the High Court and Supreme Court—there is not a whiff of any wrongdoing by this judge. The government wants to take control of judges’ appointments.”

Megh Updates 🚨™

40,559 görüntüleme • 23 gün önce

Phillip: Should Republicans stop? Moynihan: They actually did. In Indiana, they tried to do just that. Phillip: That is not what happened. They voted against it and they were targeted by the president. And while that was happening down in Florida, Ron DeSantis, said that he was going to redistrict his state Moynihan: That was a ceasefire.

Phillip: Should Republicans stop? Moynihan: They actually did. In Indiana, they tried to do just that. Phillip: That is not what happened. They voted against it and they were targeted by the president. And while that was happening down in Florida, Ron DeSantis, said that he was going to redistrict his state Moynihan: That was a ceasefire.

Acyn

85,777 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

Today in Abuja, we received an important update from the court regarding the case between Very Dark Bully and Blord. The judge has recused herself from the case and ordered that it be reassigned to another judge. VDB appeared helpless and restless in the courtroom, as every plan he had was undermined by Sowore and his team. It is becoming clear that Verydarkbully is losing control of the situation. This is the reality of a bully....when they can no longer dominate, they grow furious. - Ctnaija

Today in Abuja, we received an important update from the court regarding the case between Very Dark Bully and Blord. The judge has recused herself from the case and ordered that it be reassigned to another judge. VDB appeared helpless and restless in the courtroom, as every plan he had was undermined by Sowore and his team. It is becoming clear that Verydarkbully is losing control of the situation. This is the reality of a bully....when they can no longer dominate, they grow furious. - Ctnaija

Death Note 📝

129,226 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

SUPREME COMEDY In 2005, the Chief Information Commissioner asked the Supreme Court to declare the assets of its judges. The Supreme Court got angry. "We don't listen to orders. We give orders." The Supreme Court appealed to the Delhi High Court against the order of the Chief Information Commissioner. But the Delhi High Court said, "You have to release the information." So the Supreme Court appealed the decision of the Delhi High Court to a 2-judge bench of the Delhi High Court. The 2-judge bench of the Delhi High Court referred the matter back to the Supreme Court, saying this is your matter, you decide. Now the Supreme Court became the judge, jury and executioner in its own case. Cricket bookies would kill to have such a fixed match. A single-judge bench of the Supreme Court took up the matter and said a 3-judge bench should decide the case. The 3-judge bench of the Supreme Court sat on the case for 8 long years and arrived at a verdict - the matter should be looked at by a 5-judge bench of the Supreme Court. Finally in 2019, the 5-judge bench of the Supreme Court gave its verdict. It did not say that Supreme Court judges should declare their assets. It merely said the Supreme Court should release any information it had. So basically if a judge does not declare his assets, then there is nothing to declare. Comedy, yes. Funny, no.

SUPREME COMEDY In 2005, the Chief Information Commissioner asked the Supreme Court to declare the assets of its judges. The Supreme Court got angry. "We don't listen to orders. We give orders." The Supreme Court appealed to the Delhi High Court against the order of the Chief Information Commissioner. But the Delhi High Court said, "You have to release the information." So the Supreme Court appealed the decision of the Delhi High Court to a 2-judge bench of the Delhi High Court. The 2-judge bench of the Delhi High Court referred the matter back to the Supreme Court, saying this is your matter, you decide. Now the Supreme Court became the judge, jury and executioner in its own case. Cricket bookies would kill to have such a fixed match. A single-judge bench of the Supreme Court took up the matter and said a 3-judge bench should decide the case. The 3-judge bench of the Supreme Court sat on the case for 8 long years and arrived at a verdict - the matter should be looked at by a 5-judge bench of the Supreme Court. Finally in 2019, the 5-judge bench of the Supreme Court gave its verdict. It did not say that Supreme Court judges should declare their assets. It merely said the Supreme Court should release any information it had. So basically if a judge does not declare his assets, then there is nothing to declare. Comedy, yes. Funny, no.

KV Iyyer - BHARAT 🇮🇳🇮🇱

220,478 görüntüleme • 7 ay önce

Chris Blake Griffith says the undeniable facts in his case are that: • he was attacked by Stefon Diggs’ brother and two associates • he is in court with his apartment building for allowing them access inside • he believes they took his phone because it has evidence of what he alleged about Diggs 🎥: The Danza Project 🔗:

Chris Blake Griffith says the undeniable facts in his case are that: • he was attacked by Stefon Diggs’ brother and two associates • he is in court with his apartment building for allowing them access inside • he believes they took his phone because it has evidence of what he alleged about Diggs 🎥: The Danza Project 🔗:

Block Topickz

26,612 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

THE LOOSE WOMEN ARE BLINDSIDED BY THE UNUSUAL DECISION BY THE JUDGE IN THE PRINCE HARRY & OTHERS VS DAILY MAIL CASE!!!! The Loose Women were unanimous in their surprise at the Judge throwing out all 97 claims (‼️) and think that it will go back before the Court of Appeal before another judge. I have to say that given that the test is a balance of probabilities rather than beyond all reasonable doubt, I am surprised too. The judge previous a defence for tabloids is concerning. Also remember it was not proven that the Daily Mail definitely did not invade the privacy of the celebrities- just that the evidence available so long after was not sufficient. I think it’s unlikely that The Sun and The Mirror who were found/admitted to have done this unlawful behaviour for gossip, did, but the Daily Mail did not. Why did they mass delete a bunch of emails? Why did a key witness change his evidence to support the mail. Shady business!

THE LOOSE WOMEN ARE BLINDSIDED BY THE UNUSUAL DECISION BY THE JUDGE IN THE PRINCE HARRY & OTHERS VS DAILY MAIL CASE!!!! The Loose Women were unanimous in their surprise at the Judge throwing out all 97 claims (‼️) and think that it will go back before the Court of Appeal before another judge. I have to say that given that the test is a balance of probabilities rather than beyond all reasonable doubt, I am surprised too. The judge previous a defence for tabloids is concerning. Also remember it was not proven that the Daily Mail definitely did not invade the privacy of the celebrities- just that the evidence available so long after was not sufficient. I think it’s unlikely that The Sun and The Mirror who were found/admitted to have done this unlawful behaviour for gossip, did, but the Daily Mail did not. Why did they mass delete a bunch of emails? Why did a key witness change his evidence to support the mail. Shady business!

Glow Lee

40,061 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

Mamdani and his team are defining the new rules of politics, in my view. His win is a demonstration of data science. He did a spectacular job in making sure none of his competitors got near him in the vote by using social media. So, he is in fact forming a new form of leadership for the Democratic Party, but above all, for all politicians going into the midterms, they have to look at his model. He did it in a way that no one has ever done it before. He knew every algorithm on every platform, how to keep every engagement in the top quartile. That's how it's done.

Mamdani and his team are defining the new rules of politics, in my view. His win is a demonstration of data science. He did a spectacular job in making sure none of his competitors got near him in the vote by using social media. So, he is in fact forming a new form of leadership for the Democratic Party, but above all, for all politicians going into the midterms, they have to look at his model. He did it in a way that no one has ever done it before. He knew every algorithm on every platform, how to keep every engagement in the top quartile. That's how it's done.

Kevin O'Leary aka Mr. Wonderful

57,411 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce

EVERY corrupt judge in America needs to watch this video today! Corrupt judges have been obstructing President Trump’s agendas, blocking his key Executive Orders to protect American citizens, in favor of protecting illegal criminals instead — and it's time for it to come to an END! These Radical Left activist judges undermines the will of the American people and threatens our sovereignty and security! "The Constitution states that the Executive Power shall be vested in a President of the United States of America. In other words, it is the President that defines the Executive Branch. When you read this language, it says that NO COURT may take over that role! No court may define or limit the scope of the duties of an official of the Executive Office of the President, the people who work in the Executive Office! In 2017 when President Trump was sworn in the first time, the courts have been used for nefarious purposes on a variety of issues. In fact, we had a hearing in our Constitutional subcommittee about how lawfare had been weaponized against President Trump, both while he was President, as well as after his Presidency!" Why are judges going against the will of the American voters by attacking President Trump's policies?!

EVERY corrupt judge in America needs to watch this video today! Corrupt judges have been obstructing President Trump’s agendas, blocking his key Executive Orders to protect American citizens, in favor of protecting illegal criminals instead — and it's time for it to come to an END! These Radical Left activist judges undermines the will of the American people and threatens our sovereignty and security! "The Constitution states that the Executive Power shall be vested in a President of the United States of America. In other words, it is the President that defines the Executive Branch. When you read this language, it says that NO COURT may take over that role! No court may define or limit the scope of the duties of an official of the Executive Office of the President, the people who work in the Executive Office! In 2017 when President Trump was sworn in the first time, the courts have been used for nefarious purposes on a variety of issues. In fact, we had a hearing in our Constitutional subcommittee about how lawfare had been weaponized against President Trump, both while he was President, as well as after his Presidency!" Why are judges going against the will of the American voters by attacking President Trump's policies?!

Bridgett Fertig

39,855 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

When asked about President Trump’s statement that a “whole civilization will die” if Iran did not agree to a ceasefire deal by his Tuesday deadline, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said, “His very tough rhetoric and his tough negotiating style is what has led to the result that you are witnessing today.” She added, “The world should take his word very seriously, and understanding that the president is always most interested in results. And it was the Iranians who backed down, not President Trump.”

When asked about President Trump’s statement that a “whole civilization will die” if Iran did not agree to a ceasefire deal by his Tuesday deadline, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said, “His very tough rhetoric and his tough negotiating style is what has led to the result that you are witnessing today.” She added, “The world should take his word very seriously, and understanding that the president is always most interested in results. And it was the Iranians who backed down, not President Trump.”

CBS News

53,709 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

🇺🇸 Trump on his cognitive test: "These are tough questions. They say take a number, any number. I say ok, 99. Multiply it by 9. Divide it by 3. Add 4293. Divide by 2. Subtract 93. Divide by 9. What is your answer? I got it right. It was actually more complex than that." In case you were wondering if Trump did the math, sure he did 😂

🇺🇸 Trump on his cognitive test: "These are tough questions. They say take a number, any number. I say ok, 99. Multiply it by 9. Divide it by 3. Add 4293. Divide by 2. Subtract 93. Divide by 9. What is your answer? I got it right. It was actually more complex than that." In case you were wondering if Trump did the math, sure he did 😂

Mario Nawfal

41,132 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

Luttig: Every single lower federal court judge has honored his or her oath to the Constitution of the United States to the letter. In almost every instance, those judges collectively have struck down as unconstitutional essentially every initiative of this president, as the Constitution required them to do. So today, the only people who can save America are the lower federal court judges of the United States, and they are determined to do so simply by honoring their oath in every one of these cases. There are hundreds of them. Every single time Donald Trump opens his mouth or takes an action, the American people are forced to go into court and litigate. That’s the tragic place America finds itself in today. But to complete the thought, at this point it is only the Supreme Court of the United States that is standing in the way of the American people saving their country.

Luttig: Every single lower federal court judge has honored his or her oath to the Constitution of the United States to the letter. In almost every instance, those judges collectively have struck down as unconstitutional essentially every initiative of this president, as the Constitution required them to do. So today, the only people who can save America are the lower federal court judges of the United States, and they are determined to do so simply by honoring their oath in every one of these cases. There are hundreds of them. Every single time Donald Trump opens his mouth or takes an action, the American people are forced to go into court and litigate. That’s the tragic place America finds itself in today. But to complete the thought, at this point it is only the Supreme Court of the United States that is standing in the way of the American people saving their country.

Acyn

441,178 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

President Cyril Ramaphosa admitted under oath, in the court case in which AfriForum is challenging the Expropriation Act, that section 19 of the new Expropriation Act is unconstitutional because it erroneously states that expropriation may take place before the landowner has had the opportunity to contest the matter in court. The Presidency 🇿🇦 Cyril Ramaphosa 🇿🇦's admission confirms that he and the ANC spread blatant lies by dismissing AfriForum’s concerns about the unconstitutionality of the Expropriation Act as the “spreading of disinformation.” Ramaphosa must be held personally responsible for the negative consequences that his signing of the Expropriation Act has for the country and its people, since he signed this law fully aware that it was unconstitutional. President Donald Trump, within ten days after Ramaphosa announced that he had signed the Expropriation Act, declared that he would impose punative measures against South Africa. There is therefore a direct link between Ramaphosa’s reckless signing of the Expropriation Act and the United States’ actions against South Africa. Any job losses and growing poverty resulting from this must therefore be laid directly at the door of Ramaphosa and other ANC leaders.

President Cyril Ramaphosa admitted under oath, in the court case in which AfriForum is challenging the Expropriation Act, that section 19 of the new Expropriation Act is unconstitutional because it erroneously states that expropriation may take place before the landowner has had the opportunity to contest the matter in court. The Presidency 🇿🇦 Cyril Ramaphosa 🇿🇦's admission confirms that he and the ANC spread blatant lies by dismissing AfriForum’s concerns about the unconstitutionality of the Expropriation Act as the “spreading of disinformation.” Ramaphosa must be held personally responsible for the negative consequences that his signing of the Expropriation Act has for the country and its people, since he signed this law fully aware that it was unconstitutional. President Donald Trump, within ten days after Ramaphosa announced that he had signed the Expropriation Act, declared that he would impose punative measures against South Africa. There is therefore a direct link between Ramaphosa’s reckless signing of the Expropriation Act and the United States’ actions against South Africa. Any job losses and growing poverty resulting from this must therefore be laid directly at the door of Ramaphosa and other ANC leaders.

Kallie Kriel

71,549 görüntüleme • 10 ay önce

VIDEO | On SC hearing in Waqf (Amendment) Act case, advocate Mujibur Rehman says, "The bench issued four points, they said that notice will be issued, they said that in Acts made by the Parliament, normally there is no stay given, but since this is an exceptional case, they said they will give interim relief. Court said that that they are dictating the interim order, the first relief was it was said that barring the ex-officio, all the members would be Muslims, if the collector goes for survey, he can't change the nature, and before going, he had to file application in court. Third was be it any property, be it Waqf by user or registered, the government will not be denotifying till we are hearing the matter. Tushar Mehta pleaded for time. Now the hearing will be done at 2 pm tomorrow. The court has understood the whole matter, sensitivity, and how the constitution was violated." #WaqfAmendmentAct #SupremeCourt

VIDEO | On SC hearing in Waqf (Amendment) Act case, advocate Mujibur Rehman says, "The bench issued four points, they said that notice will be issued, they said that in Acts made by the Parliament, normally there is no stay given, but since this is an exceptional case, they said they will give interim relief. Court said that that they are dictating the interim order, the first relief was it was said that barring the ex-officio, all the members would be Muslims, if the collector goes for survey, he can't change the nature, and before going, he had to file application in court. Third was be it any property, be it Waqf by user or registered, the government will not be denotifying till we are hearing the matter. Tushar Mehta pleaded for time. Now the hearing will be done at 2 pm tomorrow. The court has understood the whole matter, sensitivity, and how the constitution was violated." #WaqfAmendmentAct #SupremeCourt

Press Trust of India

287,525 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

YOU BE THE JUDGE! A Judge of the High Court of Kaduna State has repeatedly and vehemently refused to grant bail to Malam Nasir Nasir Ahmad El-Rufai CON. The judge presiding over one of the cases filed by the ICPC against Mallam El-Rufai has so far rejected every bail application made even though the charges against Mallam El-Rufai before the court are bailable. In denial bail, he has verbatim sided with the ICPC's position - essentially agreeing that Mallam Nasir El-Rufai is a flight risk - which is absolutely preposterous - especially in view of the fact that Mallam El-Rufai voluntarily returned to the country to honor the invitation by the anti-graft agencies. It gets more curious when one considers the fact that Mallam El-Rufai has at least two other cases - one at the Federal High Court Kaduna brought by the same ICPC and another one by the DSS at Federal High Court Abuja. In both of the above cases (including the one by the ICPC of a similar nature in FHC Kaduna), Mallam El-Rufai had been granted bail. Never mind the impossible bail conditions. That's a totally different conversation. It is more than curious that the presiding Judges in both cases (including the one by the ICPC of a similar nature in FHC Kaduna) did not consider Mallam El-Rufai a flight risk. It is the Judge in the state high court Kaduna that adjuges that Mallam El-Rufai is a flight risk and who has repeatedly denied him bail, again for clearly bailable offences. You be the judge, here. Meanwhile, aside from refusing bail, the bail rulings by the Judge in question have been characterised by the use of words that essentially amount to convicting Mallam before the trial even commences. It is for this reason that Mallam’s lawyers filed an application for the judge to recuse himself from trying the case - and rightly so - because there is zero confidence of Mallam getting a fair trial under him. We continue to demand that proper due process should be followed. Everyone is presumed innocent until proven guilty, including Mallam Nasir El-Rufai. Bail, where applicable - as it clearly is in the case of Mallam El-Rufai - is a right. Denying him bail on untenable grounds amounts to imprisonment without conviction, abuse of his fundamental rights and injustice.

YOU BE THE JUDGE! A Judge of the High Court of Kaduna State has repeatedly and vehemently refused to grant bail to Malam Nasir Nasir Ahmad El-Rufai CON. The judge presiding over one of the cases filed by the ICPC against Mallam El-Rufai has so far rejected every bail application made even though the charges against Mallam El-Rufai before the court are bailable. In denial bail, he has verbatim sided with the ICPC's position - essentially agreeing that Mallam Nasir El-Rufai is a flight risk - which is absolutely preposterous - especially in view of the fact that Mallam El-Rufai voluntarily returned to the country to honor the invitation by the anti-graft agencies. It gets more curious when one considers the fact that Mallam El-Rufai has at least two other cases - one at the Federal High Court Kaduna brought by the same ICPC and another one by the DSS at Federal High Court Abuja. In both of the above cases (including the one by the ICPC of a similar nature in FHC Kaduna), Mallam El-Rufai had been granted bail. Never mind the impossible bail conditions. That's a totally different conversation. It is more than curious that the presiding Judges in both cases (including the one by the ICPC of a similar nature in FHC Kaduna) did not consider Mallam El-Rufai a flight risk. It is the Judge in the state high court Kaduna that adjuges that Mallam El-Rufai is a flight risk and who has repeatedly denied him bail, again for clearly bailable offences. You be the judge, here. Meanwhile, aside from refusing bail, the bail rulings by the Judge in question have been characterised by the use of words that essentially amount to convicting Mallam before the trial even commences. It is for this reason that Mallam’s lawyers filed an application for the judge to recuse himself from trying the case - and rightly so - because there is zero confidence of Mallam getting a fair trial under him. We continue to demand that proper due process should be followed. Everyone is presumed innocent until proven guilty, including Mallam Nasir El-Rufai. Bail, where applicable - as it clearly is in the case of Mallam El-Rufai - is a right. Denying him bail on untenable grounds amounts to imprisonment without conviction, abuse of his fundamental rights and injustice.

uche diala

13,030 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

Asking why he isn't arrested..he is part of the system. He will not only never be arrested, he will continue to live in an unaccountable manner. Yet Alex is dead. Laid to rest on his birthday. #AlexCoughlan was living in Roderic O Gorman's small housing estate. He took a Sunday afternoon stroll on a sunny beautiful day. He didn't know it would be his last. He walked by O Gorman house that day. About a one minute walk away he was brutally attacked. Filmed. It was posted online. Alex probably knew he would die. The accused are Syrian. One hurt his hand during the attack. He was given permission to have his hand tended to at hospital. The judge said they have a right to the presumption of innocence and a right to privacy. Despite that they took pride in their "work". Took pride in the suffering they caused. Didn't have an issue exposing what they did, all by themselves. For clicks. For likes.

Asking why he isn't arrested..he is part of the system. He will not only never be arrested, he will continue to live in an unaccountable manner. Yet Alex is dead. Laid to rest on his birthday. #AlexCoughlan was living in Roderic O Gorman's small housing estate. He took a Sunday afternoon stroll on a sunny beautiful day. He didn't know it would be his last. He walked by O Gorman house that day. About a one minute walk away he was brutally attacked. Filmed. It was posted online. Alex probably knew he would die. The accused are Syrian. One hurt his hand during the attack. He was given permission to have his hand tended to at hospital. The judge said they have a right to the presumption of innocence and a right to privacy. Despite that they took pride in their "work". Took pride in the suffering they caused. Didn't have an issue exposing what they did, all by themselves. For clicks. For likes.

Susanne Delaney

27,912 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

BREAKING: High Court Judge blocks jailed teacher Enoch Burke from attending court in person Prison authorities had initially planned (as normal) to bring Enoch Burke to the High Court today. This changed after barrister for Wilson’s Hospital School Rosemary Mallon appeared in court yesterday - utterly unbeknown to Enoch Burke or his family. After this, it was ordered by Judge Cregan that Enoch Burke appear by video-link from prison. This meant he would have no legal support from family. Today Isaac Burke and Sean Burke attended the High Court in Dublin. However Judge Brian Cregan refused to give judgment in Enoch Burke’s case while Isaac Burke and his father Sean were in the courtroom. Isaac Burke had asked why Enoch Burke’s name had been removed from the Mountjoy Prison list to be produced in person for the High Court hearing. Approximately five Gardaí removed Isaac Burke from the courtroom for simply asking a question and subsequently removed Sean Burke. This is Ireland in 2025 - “justice” is being done behind closed doors, contrary to the constitutional guarantee that justice be administered in public. Enoch Burke has been slandered by Judge Cregan, who referred in his judgment last week to affidavits by “pupils and teachers in the school” in order to sully and blacken his character. These affidavits simply do not exist. This is treachery in the courts. Judge Cregan stated that Enoch Burke was “stalking the school, its teachers and its pupils”. A stalking offence under Irish criminal law carries a penalty of up to 10 years in prison. It is a matter of the utmost gravity that a High Court judge would recklessly toss such an accusation against a young man without a shred of evidence to back it up. Tragically, media present in the room — RTE, Irish Independent, Irish Daily Mail and others — are continually failing to bring true reports to the public.

BREAKING: High Court Judge blocks jailed teacher Enoch Burke from attending court in person Prison authorities had initially planned (as normal) to bring Enoch Burke to the High Court today. This changed after barrister for Wilson’s Hospital School Rosemary Mallon appeared in court yesterday - utterly unbeknown to Enoch Burke or his family. After this, it was ordered by Judge Cregan that Enoch Burke appear by video-link from prison. This meant he would have no legal support from family. Today Isaac Burke and Sean Burke attended the High Court in Dublin. However Judge Brian Cregan refused to give judgment in Enoch Burke’s case while Isaac Burke and his father Sean were in the courtroom. Isaac Burke had asked why Enoch Burke’s name had been removed from the Mountjoy Prison list to be produced in person for the High Court hearing. Approximately five Gardaí removed Isaac Burke from the courtroom for simply asking a question and subsequently removed Sean Burke. This is Ireland in 2025 - “justice” is being done behind closed doors, contrary to the constitutional guarantee that justice be administered in public. Enoch Burke has been slandered by Judge Cregan, who referred in his judgment last week to affidavits by “pupils and teachers in the school” in order to sully and blacken his character. These affidavits simply do not exist. This is treachery in the courts. Judge Cregan stated that Enoch Burke was “stalking the school, its teachers and its pupils”. A stalking offence under Irish criminal law carries a penalty of up to 10 years in prison. It is a matter of the utmost gravity that a High Court judge would recklessly toss such an accusation against a young man without a shred of evidence to back it up. Tragically, media present in the room — RTE, Irish Independent, Irish Daily Mail and others — are continually failing to bring true reports to the public.

Enoch Burke

322,482 görüntüleme • 9 ay önce

Former EFF National Organizer Patrick Sindani details how “They Must Fight Alone” “We were misled” “They are NOT our enemies” Sabotaged The EFF in KZN‼️‼️‼️ “The Programs of the President were sabotaged…you’re busy organizing a community meeting and then he (Julius Sello Malema) is told that ‘no, you must not go to the last one, that meeting is not taking place, Sindani did not organize’ Because he is informed by senior leadership [Floyd]. He passes and attend certain things…and when he checks he realizes gore ‘no mahn I was misled I was told that the meeting is not gonna materialize but here are the people.’ Why would you want to sabotage the Program of the President? Why would you sabotage the Organization? Remember last Week CIC told you Floyd was removed in KZN after the Organization discovered that he was sabotaging it. Here’s an account by Sindani, I mean why would he lie? Floyd Ke Lemenemene!🙄🚮

Former EFF National Organizer Patrick Sindani details how “They Must Fight Alone” “We were misled” “They are NOT our enemies” Sabotaged The EFF in KZN‼️‼️‼️ “The Programs of the President were sabotaged…you’re busy organizing a community meeting and then he (Julius Sello Malema) is told that ‘no, you must not go to the last one, that meeting is not taking place, Sindani did not organize’ Because he is informed by senior leadership [Floyd]. He passes and attend certain things…and when he checks he realizes gore ‘no mahn I was misled I was told that the meeting is not gonna materialize but here are the people.’ Why would you want to sabotage the Program of the President? Why would you sabotage the Organization? Remember last Week CIC told you Floyd was removed in KZN after the Organization discovered that he was sabotaging it. Here’s an account by Sindani, I mean why would he lie? Floyd Ke Lemenemene!🙄🚮

🇿🇦 Apostle Dr D Mekgwe🇹🇼

349,071 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

🚨BREAKING: Every single district and magistrate judge in the Middle District of Tennessee has just recused themselves from Brian Harpole’s defamation case against Candace Owens. Let’s be clear: this never happens. Normally, if a judge has a conflict, the case is simply reassigned to a colleague down the hall. In this instance, the entire district is totally locked out. The Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals is now being forced to bus in an outside judge from an entirely different jurisdiction. Why the retreat? Think about it. If Mitch Snow’s reporting is accurate, and that meeting at Fort Huachuca with high-ranking military officials actually took place, the establishment cannot risk this hitting discovery. If this goes to a courtroom, subpoenaing those military officials exposes exactly what they are desperate to hide.

🚨BREAKING: Every single district and magistrate judge in the Middle District of Tennessee has just recused themselves from Brian Harpole’s defamation case against Candace Owens. Let’s be clear: this never happens. Normally, if a judge has a conflict, the case is simply reassigned to a colleague down the hall. In this instance, the entire district is totally locked out. The Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals is now being forced to bus in an outside judge from an entirely different jurisdiction. Why the retreat? Think about it. If Mitch Snow’s reporting is accurate, and that meeting at Fort Huachuca with high-ranking military officials actually took place, the establishment cannot risk this hitting discovery. If this goes to a courtroom, subpoenaing those military officials exposes exactly what they are desperate to hide.

Grace Ashford

224,934 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce