Video yรผkleniyor...

Video Yรผklenemedi

๐—ฃ๐—ฒ๐—ผ๐—ฝ๐—น๐—ฒ ๐—ฑ๐—ถ๐—ฑ ๐—ป๐—ผ๐˜ ๐—น๐—ผ๐˜€๐—ฒ ๐—ถ๐—ป๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐˜€๐˜ ๐—ถ๐—ป ๐—ก๐—™๐—ง๐˜€. People lost interest in NFTs that had no reason to exist after mint. That is why Wingston caught my attention. Rally is introducing Wingston as a free mint, but the interesting part is not the price. ๐—œ๐˜ ๐—ถ๐˜€ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ถ๐—ฑ๐—ฒ๐—ฎ ๐—ฏ๐—ฒ๐—ต๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ฑ ๐—ถ๐˜....

24,085 gรถrรผntรผleme โ€ข 3 ay รถnce โ€ขvia X (Twitter)

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gรถnderinin yorumlarฤฑ burada gรถrรผnecek

Benzer Videolar

I have seen too many NFT projects where the whitelist went to the deepest wallets and the holders were the first to sell when the chart turned. Wingston is built differently. July 7th is important because it shows a path forward for NFTs that does not rely on speculation as the main driver. ๐Ÿ”ฅ Free mint. 3,000 supply. On Ethereum. The access is earned by joining Rally campaigns and ranking in the top 425 weekly, not by paying gas or buying a spot. This earn do not buy approach makes the 3,000 spots mean something different. ๐Ÿ˜ They represent participation in the ecosystem rather than capital deployed early. That is the kind of scarcity that can actually last beyond the initial hype. Wingston is not just an art drop. It is a product NFT tied directly to the Rally protocol. From day one you can stake it to earn daily RLPs, enter a private token gated community for exclusive campaigns, and get a Rally Score boost that improves your overall standing and earning power. The utility is working, not theoretical. The old NFT cycle rewarded flipping and left real contributors behind. This model flips that script by making contribution the ticket in. If more projects adopted this, the market could move from pure speculation toward sustainable participation and real product value. ๐Ÿš€ I am actively joining campaigns to secure my whitelist before July 7. If you believe NFTs should reward builders instead of speculators, this is worth paying attention to. Do you think contribution based access will change how long people actually hold NFTs?

mojtaba

10,432 gรถrรผntรผleme โ€ข 3 ay รถnce

First of all you strap to bench โ€œ106kgโ€ which I donโ€™t even need for 140kg, so from the look of things we can tell who the โ€œlil boyโ€ is Second, there is no aspect of fitness you are better than me at, Be it lifting, running, calisthenics, and educating etc You lot seem to have this weird mentality that sh*tting on peopleโ€™s work and mocking their form makes you look like the better and smarter one, all for what? getting clients?, you do fitness to fill your pockets(thatโ€™s if you have people dumb enough to trust you as a trainer with your chaotic training methods) , I do fitness to shine light on the industry and create opportunities for people who want to enter the industry(I have videos to back my claim) You are not worth the back and forth โ€œPAUL BLISSโ€ cos clearly if it wasnโ€™t for me no one would have paused to see who that is, buh I just had to use this opportunity to make somethings clear, if you want to be a fitness influencer face your front and do your work, and if you must, correct people in a respectful way and not try to make them look stupid. Learn from blaakbaki weightlossmessiah iJosh๐Ÿƒ etc Cos you clearly need some training โ€œlil boyโ€ I go finish the rest for video inside give you Sia. Oh and before I forget, I am one of the best in this industry, and there is nothing you can do about it. Peace โœŒ๏ธ

Raj Explores ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ญโšก๏ธ๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ฌ

60,385 gรถrรผntรผleme โ€ข 25 gรผn รถnce

Europe is quietly becoming what the United States once promised the world. More and more people are looking at their best years ahead and choosing a place where everyday life is designed to work. Where the future feels stable enough to plan for. Where safety is not a luxury product. Where you can build a good life without gambling your health, your family, or your dignity on one bad month. In much of Europe, the โ€œdreamโ€ is not about becoming a billionaire. It is about becoming unafraid. It is the freedom of walking home at night without scanning every shadow. The comfort of knowing that if you get sick, you do not need to calculate whether you can afford to be treated. The relief of having a society that still believes children should carry backpacks, not trauma, and definitely not weapons. The calm of streets built for human beings, not just cars. The ability to take a holiday without feeling like you are committing career suicide. The basic decency of labor protections that assume you are a person first and a resource second. And then there is the part people underestimate until they live it: the texture of life. The cities are older and more beautiful than you expect. The distances are smaller. Weekends are real. Food is real. Public spaces are not just decorative, they are functional. Parks are full. Cafes are full. Trains take you somewhere, often across borders, without turning travel into a stress test. You can live in one country, work with another, and visit a third like it is normal because, in many places, it is. The European dream is also a quiet confidence in the social contract. That if you contribute, the system does not abandon you. That you can raise a family without feeling like you are one accident away from ruin. That โ€œgetting aheadโ€ does not require burning out. That a good society is one where normal people can live normal lives and still feel proud of them. This is why more and more Americans are not just visiting Europe, but staying. Some come for studies and never leave. Some arrive for a job and realise the lifestyle is the real promotion. Some originally planned a one year experiment and then cannot imagine going back to a place where stress is treated as a personality trait and insecurity is marketed as freedom. Europe is not perfect. It has bureaucracy. It has politics. It has problems that deserve criticism. But in many European countries, life is still built around a simple idea: society should reduce fear, not monetise it. That is the new dream. And people can feel it the moment they arrive. If you could choose one thing to trade for a better life, what would it be: more income, or more security? And what do you think your country would have to change for people to stop leaving, and start staying? Stay connected, Follow Gandalv Gandalv

Gandalv

989,168 gรถrรผntรผleme โ€ข 7 ay รถnce

YOUR BOT HAS A 70% WIN RATE AND IS STILL LOSING MONEY. This is more common than you think and the reason is always the same. Most people treat win rate like it's the only number that matters. It's not even close to the full picture. Here's the math nobody is putting together clearly: EV = (p ร— b) โˆ’ (1 โˆ’ p) P is your win probability, b is your payout multiplier. At a 70c entry your payout multiplier is roughly 0.43. That means even at 70% win rate your EV is basically zero. (0.70 ร— 0.43) โˆ’ 0.30 = 0.001 You are grinding for fractions of a cent per trade while thinking you have an edge. Now look at what happens when you fix the entry price. Same 70% win rate, entry drops to 50c, payout multiplier jumps to 1.0. (0.70 ร— 1.0) โˆ’ 0.30 = 0.40 EV per dollar. Same signal. Same win rate. Completely different business. This is why I keep saying win rate and entry price are one calculation not two. Your AI backtest never runs this math because it only looks at whether you won or lost. It does not care what you paid to enter. The fix is not finding a higher win rate signal, it almost never is. The fix is finding why your high win rate entries keep appearing at prices that make them unprofitable. That upstream reason is your real signal. Dig one layer deeper and build around that instead. I broke down the entry price math before and I broke down DCA before. But without understanding EV you are optimizing the wrong thing entirely. This logic is the only reason how my bot is sitting at $154k PnL. Public wallet: [ Run this formula on your last 100 live trades before you change a single line of signal logic. The answer is probably already there.

Punisher

11,034 gรถrรผntรผleme โ€ข 3 ay รถnce

Apparently, I saw this video online and I decided to share. What this worker is applying is called bitumen, or what many of us know as bituminous coating. Most people think a wall is a solid, impenetrable block, but in reality, it is more like a sponge. Concrete and blocks have microscopic pores that pull water from the earth through a process we call capillary action. This thick black substance is the shield that stops that water from climbing up into the house. It is not about making the wall look good because this part will be buried under the dirt forever. It is about creating a skin that water cannot breathe through. When do you need to do this? The need for this arises because the soil is a very aggressive environment. Water is not your only enemy.. The ground also contains salts and sulfates that want to eat away at the cement. If this moisture finds its way to the steel bars inside the columns, those bars will start to rust. And when steel rusts, it expands, and that expansion is what cracks the concrete from the inside out. This coating is the only thing standing between your foundation and that kind of slow destruction. Thats is why if you see wet patches at the bottom of your walls inside your house, it usually means someone skipped this step or did it poorly during construction. You can apply this anytime you are building parts of a structure that will stay in contact with the ground. It is common in areas where the water table is high or where the soil stays damp for most of the year. This is a one-shot opportunity. Once you backfill the soil, you can never go back to fix it without a lot of expense and a lot of digging. It is about having the foresight to protect the heart of the building while it is still exposed. Please donโ€™t ignore this if you need to. If you ignore it now to save a bit of money, you will be funding the future decay of your own home. I hope this helps.

A.Y.O

75,399 gรถrรผntรผleme โ€ข 5 ay รถnce

Elon Musk just said something that disqualifies most of Silicon Valley. Musk: โ€œIf youโ€™re gonna create a company, the first thing you should try to do is create a working prototype.โ€ Not a pitch deck. Not a business model. Not a funding narrative wrapped in 40 slides designed to make something that doesnโ€™t exist sound inevitable. A working prototype. That alone rules out most of the people who call themselves founders. Musk: โ€œEverything looks great on PowerPoint. You can make anything work on PowerPoint.โ€ Thatโ€™s not a punchline. Itโ€™s an indictment. PowerPoint has no physics. No engineering constraints. No supply chain. No thermal limits. No gravity. Nothing that forces an idea to prove it deserves to exist in the physical world. It is the most effective tool ever built for making the impossible look funded. Spend long enough in that world, and the distance between something that works and something that looks like it works stops feeling important. That is the real damage. Musk: โ€œIf you have an actual demonstration article, even if itโ€™s in primitive form, thatโ€™s much, much more effective for convincing people.โ€ Even if it barely functions. Even if half of it is held together with tape. Even if it looks like it has no business working yet. Because a crude prototype carries something a polished deck never will. Proof. Not projected proof. Not modeled proof. Not โ€œif we hit these assumptionsโ€ proof. The kind that sits on a table and either works or doesnโ€™t. No narrative saves it. No charisma rescues it. No market-sizing slide covers for it. It just has to be real. That is the gap between Musk and the rest of the industry. Not intelligence. Not capital. Not ambition. He builds first. Then talks. Everyone else talks first. Then fundraises to find out if the thing could even be built. The distance between those two sequences is the entire history of why most things never get made. The professional world is engineered to produce one type of person. Someone who can describe, in extraordinary detail, what they would build if given the resources. Not someone who builds. MBA programs train you to present. Accelerators train you to present. Pitch competitions are literally scored on who presents best. The system does not reward builders. It rewards the performance of building. And the people deepest inside that system are the last ones who will ever notice. Musk landed a rocket on a drone ship in the ocean. Then caught a 23-story booster out of the sky with mechanical arms on the launch tower. He didnโ€™t pitch that. He did it. Then the world watched and tried to process what it just saw. That is what separates someone who builds from someone who performs. PowerPoint is where ideas go to be believed. The prototype is where they go to be proven. Most careers begin and end in the first. Not because people canโ€™t build. Because the performance felt so much like progress that nobody ever stopped to check.

Dustin

16,878 gรถrรผntรผleme โ€ข 2 ay รถnce

A 19-YEAR-OLD FROM CANADA TURNED TWERK CLIPS INTO A $6,800/MONTH AI PAGE. Mint hair. Back turned to the camera. Soft daylight, a balcony view, and 12 seconds of movement built almost entirely around one thing: scroll-stopping motion. She dances, twerks, runs her hands through her hair, and gives the kind of clip that people replay before they even decide whether she is real. That is the whole edge. The operator behind the page understood that in this niche, the first win is not storytelling, it is interruption. If the movement stops the thumb for half a second, the algorithm does the rest. The page is run like a funnel, not like a normal content account. Short clips like this go out free on Instagram and TikTok, usually 3โ€“5 times a day, with the best performers pushed again in slightly different versions. One character, one recognizable look, one consistent vibe. The traffic then gets pushed into a paid page where subscriptions sit between $9.99 and $16.99, with extra revenue coming from tips and locked content. On numbers like these, a page can realistically stack up to around 410 paying subs at an average of $11.50, plus $1,900 in PPV and tips, which is how a single AI girl built around dance content gets to roughly $6,800/month. What makes this work is not just that she is attractive. Thousands of AI girls are attractive now. What works is that the content is built for rewatch. Twerking clips, especially from a back-facing angle like this, are simple, fast, and instantly understood by the viewer. There is no setup needed. No explanation. No context. Just motion, attention, and curiosity. People replay it, send it, comment on whether she is real, and that creates the exact kind of engagement these pages live on. The catch, as always, is retention. A clip like this can bring in the spike, but the money only stays if the character keeps posting and keeps feeling consistent. That is why the smarter operators lock the identity, keep the same hair, same body language, same style, and turn one good-performing angle into a repeatable system. One AI girl, one signature dance style, and one content loop that turns short clips into about $6.8K a month.

Rimi

14,537 gรถrรผntรผleme โ€ข 1 ay รถnce

The Sabotaging Practice of Over Supply and Sameness in the NFT Space. The current zeitgeist of the NFT space is that the same artists are doing the same kind of work five times a year, with project after project leaving a trail of disappointment and discontent among collectors and all of us watching in disbelief as huge resources are extracted from the space over work that feels like it could be left as an "artist study." I understand that you can do what you want with your money as collectors, but we are killing the whole space with this incestuous practice. No artist is that prolific to be able to do 5 collections of 100+ pieces each every year and actually deliver innovation and some kind of creative evolution. Of course, they can pretend play that the work has something new, but there is no precedent nor proof that that has ever happened in the speed that it happens in the NFT space. Again, people are free to through away their resources on whatever they want but with this way of doing things, we more and more are going to start seeing the consequences. Oh! There are consequences? Yes. Maybe unintended, but there are. Let's see. Let's start with the loss of belief in the NFT space as somewhere where emerging artists can come and find support for their experiments. Why even bother to bring experiments, innovation, and new ways to think of art on the blockchain if the same people have all the collectors hypnotized with their magical flutes? Why even try to come to a space where taking risks and challenging the status quo (the mission of art!!!) is overlooked? This makes the NFT space a social club and not a space for art. I guess it is fine, but IMO it is a recipe for disaster. New collectors stay away because the art will slowly but surely become stale and un-challenging. Why even bother to come and see what is happening here if you can't, as a collector, see new weird and up-and-coming artists? The amount of noise emitted by the same artists doing the same art over and over, drowns out any new voices. Again. A recipe for disaster. The NFT space is becoming a space of disappointment and doubt. We think that collections going to zero one after the other, over and over, is not damaging? I feel we are kidding ourselves. Disappointment piles up, and again, the people who will hurt are the emerging artists, the new blood, the ones who are willing to risk the most and, in return, put fire in this cold space of sameness. I love this spaceโ€”don't get me wrongโ€”it has changed my life, and I believe it has a ton of potential, but things need to change for it to become a beacon of light in art. But we need to support new voices. We need to support new ideas. The challenge is huge. I hope to contribute all I can to this change. I hope more and more see how exciting it is to go out and try to discover what else is out there and move this space forward. But again, I understand the leaps of faith needed, but if there is a space that is based on that, it's the NFT space...so there is hope. We will see. ๐Ÿ“บby Boldtron

alejandro cartagena

98,261 gรถrรผntรผleme โ€ข 2 yฤฑl รถnce

Watch These Three Videos. In the first, the Chief Minister of Assam calls a Congress politician a Gan*u. On camera. In public. Without apology. In the second, teenage girls dance to "Unki maa ka bhos*a" with hip thrusts that mime rape. In the third, a religious procession moves, thousands of men watching while women perform explicitly sexual acts while dancing on a truck (in the name of God). If you think these three things are unrelated, you haven't understood what Hindutva actually is. This is not crudeness. This is not a culture war about manners or etiquettes. This is a deliberate project, the systematic sexualization of Indian political and religious life, where the female body becomes spectacle and territory, where the language of violation becomes the language of faith and victory, where a Chief Minister and a religious procession share the same vocabulary. And it is thought out. I grew up in India, in a Hindu society. I never saw anything like this. This is not what Hinduism is. Whether you like it or not, Hinduism is part of every Indian's life. We grew up on Sunday morning Ramayan at 9 AM. The festivals of Diwali and Holi. The idea that good wins over evil. And so much more. It was simple. It was moral. It was universal. It belonged to all of us, even those of us who weren't Hindu. We had our own religions, our own prayers, but that moral code was shared. It was in the air we breathed. This is what is being hollowed out. Not just a religion, a common inheritance. That Sunday morning feeling. The idea that there is such a thing as good, and that it wins. Hindutva has taken that and replaced it with a truck, thousands of men, and women performing a sexual dance. This is Hindutva's deep perversion. It has taken a civilization's religious life and turned it into a mob spectacle. It has taken its political language and soaked it in rape. It has handed teenage girls a rape anthem and called it a dance. The slur is not a slip. The procession is not spontaneous. The choreography is not innocent. What is being built, across platforms, campaign rallies, and now religious processions is a political vocabulary where your opponent is not defeated but penetrated, where the enemy is not wrong but he is a Gan*u. When language and ritual are both sexualized to this degree, something specific happens to the people inside it: they stop seeing clearly. The violence stops feeling like violence. The degradation stops feeling like degradation. The opponent becomes pest. The procession becomes devotion. The rape joke becomes a rally cry. This is what the normalization is for. The filth is the mechanism. Run it long enough, from the Chief Minister's mouth to the temple truck to the religious procession, and an entire society quietly crosses a threshold it can never name, only feel. This is not Hinduism. This is Hindutva in it's ugliest form. And it's all connected.

Darab Farooqui

37,260 gรถrรผntรผleme โ€ข 5 ay รถnce