Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

𝗥𝗘𝗙𝗘𝗥𝗘𝗡𝗗𝗨𝗠 𝗜𝗦 𝗖𝗢𝗠𝗜𝗡𝗚. 𝗭𝗔𝗡𝗨 𝗣𝗙 𝗜𝗦 𝗔𝗟𝗥𝗘𝗔𝗗𝗬 𝗖𝗔𝗠𝗣𝗔𝗜𝗚𝗡𝗜𝗡𝗚. 𝗔𝗥𝗘 𝗬𝗢𝗨 𝗥𝗘𝗔𝗗𝗬? All along we have all assumed that ZANU PF is afraid to have a referendum but we are told on great authority that a referendum is going to be called soon. ZANU PF has already invested millions in... show more

Rutendo Matinyarare

91,584 subscribers

56,809 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

Nachrichten & Politik

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

Julian Leeser has made a principled decision to campaign for a yes vote at the referendum, like so many people from all sides of politics who are approaching this process in good faith.

Julian Leeser has made a principled decision to campaign for a yes vote at the referendum, like so many people from all sides of politics who are approaching this process in good faith.

Anthony Albanese

208,448 Aufrufe • vor 3 Jahren

🚨Thomas Lukaszuk tells Global news that he and his Forever Canadian campaign don’t need to financially report (required under election law and as a TPA) because he now says he "isn’t campaigning". Meanwhile, Tommy boy publicly invites people to his “campaign” office, distributes campaign signage that is not compliant with Alberta Elections rules, and advertises and speaks about the referendum he asked for, posting on X and telling CTV that; • “We transformed into a referendum campaign force.” • “There will be a referendum.” • “We have to win this referendum.” Many are now wondering how long Elections Alberta will permit the mockery of Albertas democratic institutions. Lie, cheat, and steal has sadly become a very Canadian representation for Albertans whose eyes are open. Forever Canadian, and those associated with it are apparently Forever Corrupt.

🚨Thomas Lukaszuk tells Global news that he and his Forever Canadian campaign don’t need to financially report (required under election law and as a TPA) because he now says he "isn’t campaigning". Meanwhile, Tommy boy publicly invites people to his “campaign” office, distributes campaign signage that is not compliant with Alberta Elections rules, and advertises and speaks about the referendum he asked for, posting on X and telling CTV that; • “We transformed into a referendum campaign force.” • “There will be a referendum.” • “We have to win this referendum.” Many are now wondering how long Elections Alberta will permit the mockery of Albertas democratic institutions. Lie, cheat, and steal has sadly become a very Canadian representation for Albertans whose eyes are open. Forever Canadian, and those associated with it are apparently Forever Corrupt.

John Tomkinson

38,589 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

KINEW: "Wow, all this referendum talk makes me want to have a referendum, too, except in Manitoba, the question is going to be: Do you want to stay a part of Canada? And the two choices are going to be: Yeah, and Heck, yeah."

KINEW: "Wow, all this referendum talk makes me want to have a referendum, too, except in Manitoba, the question is going to be: Do you want to stay a part of Canada? And the two choices are going to be: Yeah, and Heck, yeah."

Scott Robertson

372,362 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

This is the referendum that Australia did not have to have. The proposal – and the process – should have been designed to unite Australians, not divide them. What we have seen is Australians in their millions reject the Prime Minister’s divisive referendum. The Coalition, like all Australians, want to see Indigenous disadvantage addressed. We must redouble efforts to improve outcomes for Indigenous Australians in disadvantaged communities and to close the gap. That includes an urgent need to boost law and order, school attendance and employment in many remote communities. And that means listening less to activists and more to people in those communities and those who champion them - including Senators Kerrynne Liddle and Jacinta Nampijinpa

This is the referendum that Australia did not have to have. The proposal – and the process – should have been designed to unite Australians, not divide them. What we have seen is Australians in their millions reject the Prime Minister’s divisive referendum. The Coalition, like all Australians, want to see Indigenous disadvantage addressed. We must redouble efforts to improve outcomes for Indigenous Australians in disadvantaged communities and to close the gap. That includes an urgent need to boost law and order, school attendance and employment in many remote communities. And that means listening less to activists and more to people in those communities and those who champion them - including Senators Kerrynne Liddle and Jacinta Nampijinpa

Peter Dutton

357,779 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

Thomas Lukaszuk on Alberta's referendum on a referendum: "We have to win this decisively ... [to] send a very strong signal to the premier but frankly to the rest of the world that we want to stay in Canada and that this country can't be divided."

Thomas Lukaszuk on Alberta's referendum on a referendum: "We have to win this decisively ... [to] send a very strong signal to the premier but frankly to the rest of the world that we want to stay in Canada and that this country can't be divided."

Scott Robertson

18,979 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

These old people are best described as senile they are living in ZANU-PF era. The chief has blocked the road for people. Where ever there is ZANU-PF,they want to show how much power they have. They have too much power and every ZANU-PF wants absolute power..The chief has the power to block a public road.

These old people are best described as senile they are living in ZANU-PF era. The chief has blocked the road for people. Where ever there is ZANU-PF,they want to show how much power they have. They have too much power and every ZANU-PF wants absolute power..The chief has the power to block a public road.

Mdara Gee

19,269 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

PSAKI: There are a number of people in the Democratic Party who have called for reforms to the Supreme Court. What do you think about that? SHAPIRO: "We need to be open to all of that and more."

PSAKI: There are a number of people in the Democratic Party who have called for reforms to the Supreme Court. What do you think about that? SHAPIRO: "We need to be open to all of that and more."

RNC Research

32,607 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

All the OPPOSITION folks grumbling about Amendment No. 3 should watch this video. K, THIS👇🏽 is the day ZANU PF got a FREE TICKET to amend the Constitution. Chamisa made it clear that Parliament is not the CCC’s priority… ZANU PF made it a priority & won the right to amend the constitution… It will VERY FOOLISH for ZANU PF to not utilise that victory they worked hard for….. The opposition can cry all they want for a referendum, but ZANU PF owes them NOTHING…. If u lose the political game, u won’t use the back door at a later stage…. TENDAI BITI stood there and said NOTHING, but today he is pretending to “defend” the Constitution… he lost that right the day he agreed to Chamisa’s strategy

All the OPPOSITION folks grumbling about Amendment No. 3 should watch this video. K, THIS👇🏽 is the day ZANU PF got a FREE TICKET to amend the Constitution. Chamisa made it clear that Parliament is not the CCC’s priority… ZANU PF made it a priority & won the right to amend the constitution… It will VERY FOOLISH for ZANU PF to not utilise that victory they worked hard for….. The opposition can cry all they want for a referendum, but ZANU PF owes them NOTHING…. If u lose the political game, u won’t use the back door at a later stage…. TENDAI BITI stood there and said NOTHING, but today he is pretending to “defend” the Constitution… he lost that right the day he agreed to Chamisa’s strategy

𝑲𝒖𝒅𝒛𝒂𝒊 𝑴𝒖𝒕𝒊𝒔𝒊

26,732 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

In 2016 John Major called out the lies and deception of Vote Leave, "I am angry at the way the British people are being misled. This is much more important than a general election. This referendum will affect people, their livelihoods, their future, for a very long time" "If they are given honest straight forward facts and they decide to leave, then that is the decision the British people take" "But if they decide to leave on the basis of inaccurate information, inaccurate information known to be inaccurate, then I regard that as deceitful" "That is how I see Vote Leave's campaign" "This is a deceitful campaign" "And in terms of what they're saying about immigration, they are misleading people to an extraordinary extent" "The nonsense we. hear from Vote Leave, about lets get our mojo back and become a great country. We already are a great and successful country, which is why immigrants are coming to us" "How will leaving the EU reduce immigration numbers? There are already more people coming into the country from outside the European Union than inside" "People are being invited to vote for a pig in a poke"

In 2016 John Major called out the lies and deception of Vote Leave, "I am angry at the way the British people are being misled. This is much more important than a general election. This referendum will affect people, their livelihoods, their future, for a very long time" "If they are given honest straight forward facts and they decide to leave, then that is the decision the British people take" "But if they decide to leave on the basis of inaccurate information, inaccurate information known to be inaccurate, then I regard that as deceitful" "That is how I see Vote Leave's campaign" "This is a deceitful campaign" "And in terms of what they're saying about immigration, they are misleading people to an extraordinary extent" "The nonsense we. hear from Vote Leave, about lets get our mojo back and become a great country. We already are a great and successful country, which is why immigrants are coming to us" "How will leaving the EU reduce immigration numbers? There are already more people coming into the country from outside the European Union than inside" "People are being invited to vote for a pig in a poke"

Farrukh

212,481 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Christine Jardine, "I hear it from my constituents and business people that Brexit did have an extraordinarily bad impact on the economy" Sky News, "How do you feel about a second referendum" Christine Jardine, "We don't have a deal to have another referendum on. We have to know what the British public is being offered and what a relationship with the EU would look like"

Christine Jardine, "I hear it from my constituents and business people that Brexit did have an extraordinarily bad impact on the economy" Sky News, "How do you feel about a second referendum" Christine Jardine, "We don't have a deal to have another referendum on. We have to know what the British public is being offered and what a relationship with the EU would look like"

Farrukh

21,433 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

'We're not stupid' - Ze refused to withdraw the Armed Forces of Ukraine from Donbass and hold a referendum. 'All sides must understand that the worst path is to leave Donbass. This will be a great risk for Ukraine, unacceptable for Ukrainians... And the referendum will not be positive. And if we're not stupid, we can't go to a referendum knowing that the referendum will fail. It's stupid. I think so. That's why we need to find a real peace, a real path to peace that will be acceptable to the Ukrainian nation'. - SK

'We're not stupid' - Ze refused to withdraw the Armed Forces of Ukraine from Donbass and hold a referendum. 'All sides must understand that the worst path is to leave Donbass. This will be a great risk for Ukraine, unacceptable for Ukrainians... And the referendum will not be positive. And if we're not stupid, we can't go to a referendum knowing that the referendum will fail. It's stupid. I think so. That's why we need to find a real peace, a real path to peace that will be acceptable to the Ukrainian nation'. - SK

Zlatti71

24,163 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

President Emmerson Mnangagwa's spokesman George Charamba, who is also the Deputy Chief Secretary, Presidential Communications in the Office of the President and Cabinet, has provoked a storm of controversy by claiming that parliament trumps a national referendum on constitutional amendment issues currently being debated through a legislative public consultation process. Mnangagwa and his party are using parliament to amend the constitution to extend his rule to 2030 and introduce a raft of other significant changes without going through a referendum, which civil society and opposition activists insist is a requirement in terms of the constitution. The 2013 constitution mandates that any extension of presidential term limits or removal of two five-year term limits must be approved by voters through a referendum. Critics say extending terms from five to seven years, or changing the electoral system constitutes a major subversion of this clause, requiring a referendum. However, Mnangagwa and his allies say a referendum is not needed as they are not removing term limits, but elongating the term lengths and changing the electoral cycle. Zanu PF says the amendment is not a change to the limit of two terms, but rather the length of each term (five to seven years), meaning a referendum is not constitutionally mandated. They say the amendments are meant to ensure political stability and remove "election mode toxicity," disrupting peace, governance and development. The debate centres over holding a referendum on the proposed amendments, specifically Constitution Amendment Bill No.3, which proposes extending Mnangagwa's tenure by two years andpresidential and parliamentary terms from five to seven years as well as changing the presidential election system from direct voting through popular franchise to indirect selection via parliament. The ruling Zanu PF party controls parliament, leading to calls for a popular referendum to approve these significant changes, which critics argue violate the 2013 constitution's democratic intent. Charamba said: “Those who were old enough to participate and follow proceedings of 2013 will know that even after the referendum, that outcome of the referendum still had to be processed through Parliament. What that means is that, a referendum does not usurp the power of Parliament. It simply provides a popular basis for legislative action. Otherwise, at law, the body which is recognized as responsible for any changes, be they at the level of the primary law or at the level of subsidiary laws, is Parliament. Right? So, really, you can't place the referendum in apposition to Parliament. You can't. You just cannot because the referendum does not give you a result that writes the constitution. It is parliament which is mandated to do so in terms of our law. So, really, there shouldn't be any argument at all in respect of that matter. Right?.”

President Emmerson Mnangagwa's spokesman George Charamba, who is also the Deputy Chief Secretary, Presidential Communications in the Office of the President and Cabinet, has provoked a storm of controversy by claiming that parliament trumps a national referendum on constitutional amendment issues currently being debated through a legislative public consultation process. Mnangagwa and his party are using parliament to amend the constitution to extend his rule to 2030 and introduce a raft of other significant changes without going through a referendum, which civil society and opposition activists insist is a requirement in terms of the constitution. The 2013 constitution mandates that any extension of presidential term limits or removal of two five-year term limits must be approved by voters through a referendum. Critics say extending terms from five to seven years, or changing the electoral system constitutes a major subversion of this clause, requiring a referendum. However, Mnangagwa and his allies say a referendum is not needed as they are not removing term limits, but elongating the term lengths and changing the electoral cycle. Zanu PF says the amendment is not a change to the limit of two terms, but rather the length of each term (five to seven years), meaning a referendum is not constitutionally mandated. They say the amendments are meant to ensure political stability and remove "election mode toxicity," disrupting peace, governance and development. The debate centres over holding a referendum on the proposed amendments, specifically Constitution Amendment Bill No.3, which proposes extending Mnangagwa's tenure by two years andpresidential and parliamentary terms from five to seven years as well as changing the presidential election system from direct voting through popular franchise to indirect selection via parliament. The ruling Zanu PF party controls parliament, leading to calls for a popular referendum to approve these significant changes, which critics argue violate the 2013 constitution's democratic intent. Charamba said: “Those who were old enough to participate and follow proceedings of 2013 will know that even after the referendum, that outcome of the referendum still had to be processed through Parliament. What that means is that, a referendum does not usurp the power of Parliament. It simply provides a popular basis for legislative action. Otherwise, at law, the body which is recognized as responsible for any changes, be they at the level of the primary law or at the level of subsidiary laws, is Parliament. Right? So, really, you can't place the referendum in apposition to Parliament. You can't. You just cannot because the referendum does not give you a result that writes the constitution. It is parliament which is mandated to do so in terms of our law. So, really, there shouldn't be any argument at all in respect of that matter. Right?.”

TheNewsHawks

16,586 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

ZANU-PF Information and Publicity Director, Cde Farai Marapira, stated that the issue of succession will not be on the agenda at the upcoming ZANU-PF Conference scheduled to take place in Mutare from October 10 to 23, 2025. He clarified that matters concerning succession are exclusively reserved for discussion at the ZANU-PF Congress, which is set for 2027. Marapira emphasized that the topic of succession is not currently relevant within ZANU-PF structures or among its members. Instead, he noted, it is being pushed by individuals with no historical ties to the party—outsiders who are not members of ZANU-PF. As such, he affirmed, ZANU-PF will not adopt agendas driven by external voices. ___________ Distributed by ZANU PF Headquarters:: INFORMATION AND PUBLICITY DEPARTMENT Follow us: Website: Facebook: ZANU PF PARTY X: ZANU PF Tiktok: Instagram: Officialzanupf Telegram: zanupfofficial

ZANU-PF Information and Publicity Director, Cde Farai Marapira, stated that the issue of succession will not be on the agenda at the upcoming ZANU-PF Conference scheduled to take place in Mutare from October 10 to 23, 2025. He clarified that matters concerning succession are exclusively reserved for discussion at the ZANU-PF Congress, which is set for 2027. Marapira emphasized that the topic of succession is not currently relevant within ZANU-PF structures or among its members. Instead, he noted, it is being pushed by individuals with no historical ties to the party—outsiders who are not members of ZANU-PF. As such, he affirmed, ZANU-PF will not adopt agendas driven by external voices. ___________ Distributed by ZANU PF Headquarters:: INFORMATION AND PUBLICITY DEPARTMENT Follow us: Website: Facebook: ZANU PF PARTY X: ZANU PF Tiktok: Instagram: Officialzanupf Telegram: zanupfofficial

ZANU PF

32,208 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

I have listened to the debate on Constitutional Amendment Bill No. 3 between legal scholar Dr Justice Mavedzenge and political scientist Prof Jonathan Moyo today on Twitter. Without any doubt, Dr Justice Mavedzenge explained, clarified, and made ordinary people understand the issues, and more importantly, in my humble view, he won the debate on whether there is need for Constitutional Amendment Bill No. 3 to be subjected to a referendum or not. Anything done for the people, as Prof Jonathan Moyo says these monumental amendments are, should be subjected to the people. The Constitution is not ambiguous on this. It is clear that term limits should be subjected to a referendum for any change to be done legally. Under Section 328 of the Constitution of Zimbabwe, any amendment that seeks to extend the length of time a President may hold office, or to remove or alter term limits in a way that benefits an incumbent, cannot apply to the sitting President and must be subjected to constitutional safeguards. You cannot claim to be doing something for the people and yet deny those same people the right to have a say. Prof Jonathan Moyo has a right to his views, but those views must be subjected to the law for the amendments to be implemented legally, and based on what I have read in our Constitution, his views are not aligned with the law. And I am not making this up. It is in the Constitution. Even veteran Zimbabwean lawyer and former ZANUPF legal secretary, Patrick Chinamasa, has said so. In this video, he explains in front of President Mnangagwa that what they are attempting to do today, which Prof Jonathan Moyo argues does not require a referendum, would in fact require two referendums. One to remove or alter presidential term limits from five to seven years, and another to extend the sitting president’s tenure to 2030. This position was declared, and not contradicted, at a ZANUPF conference in Bulawayo. What the broader legal fraternity in Zimbabwe is saying, save for a few lawyers who have since revised their positions and now echo the same view, is that the Constitution is explicit on these prescripts. Anything else is political propaganda to win hearts and minds. The problem with propaganda is that it cannot be anchored in constitutional provisions. It rests on opinion. In this instance, however, we are not expressing opinions. We are stating what is contained in the Constitution and what ZANUPF itself has previously acknowledged. You can decide today that you want a 20-year presidential term. That is your right to hold that view, but you must subject that proposition to the law. If you believe in it, take it to the citizens in the manner prescribed by the Constitution. You cannot decide, through opinion or political argument, whether a referendum is required or not. That question is not settled by what anyone thinks. It is settled by what the law says. If the Constitution requires a referendum, then you must subject yourself to it. That is how constitutional democracy works. We know that the judiciary in Zimbabwe is captured. We know how they are going to rule, but the whole world knows the truth, that if they rule in favour of these amendments going ahead without a referendum, they are simply a captured judiciary without the respect that is required for anyone holding such an important office, and history will remember them as such.

I have listened to the debate on Constitutional Amendment Bill No. 3 between legal scholar Dr Justice Mavedzenge and political scientist Prof Jonathan Moyo today on Twitter. Without any doubt, Dr Justice Mavedzenge explained, clarified, and made ordinary people understand the issues, and more importantly, in my humble view, he won the debate on whether there is need for Constitutional Amendment Bill No. 3 to be subjected to a referendum or not. Anything done for the people, as Prof Jonathan Moyo says these monumental amendments are, should be subjected to the people. The Constitution is not ambiguous on this. It is clear that term limits should be subjected to a referendum for any change to be done legally. Under Section 328 of the Constitution of Zimbabwe, any amendment that seeks to extend the length of time a President may hold office, or to remove or alter term limits in a way that benefits an incumbent, cannot apply to the sitting President and must be subjected to constitutional safeguards. You cannot claim to be doing something for the people and yet deny those same people the right to have a say. Prof Jonathan Moyo has a right to his views, but those views must be subjected to the law for the amendments to be implemented legally, and based on what I have read in our Constitution, his views are not aligned with the law. And I am not making this up. It is in the Constitution. Even veteran Zimbabwean lawyer and former ZANUPF legal secretary, Patrick Chinamasa, has said so. In this video, he explains in front of President Mnangagwa that what they are attempting to do today, which Prof Jonathan Moyo argues does not require a referendum, would in fact require two referendums. One to remove or alter presidential term limits from five to seven years, and another to extend the sitting president’s tenure to 2030. This position was declared, and not contradicted, at a ZANUPF conference in Bulawayo. What the broader legal fraternity in Zimbabwe is saying, save for a few lawyers who have since revised their positions and now echo the same view, is that the Constitution is explicit on these prescripts. Anything else is political propaganda to win hearts and minds. The problem with propaganda is that it cannot be anchored in constitutional provisions. It rests on opinion. In this instance, however, we are not expressing opinions. We are stating what is contained in the Constitution and what ZANUPF itself has previously acknowledged. You can decide today that you want a 20-year presidential term. That is your right to hold that view, but you must subject that proposition to the law. If you believe in it, take it to the citizens in the manner prescribed by the Constitution. You cannot decide, through opinion or political argument, whether a referendum is required or not. That question is not settled by what anyone thinks. It is settled by what the law says. If the Constitution requires a referendum, then you must subject yourself to it. That is how constitutional democracy works. We know that the judiciary in Zimbabwe is captured. We know how they are going to rule, but the whole world knows the truth, that if they rule in favour of these amendments going ahead without a referendum, they are simply a captured judiciary without the respect that is required for anyone holding such an important office, and history will remember them as such.

Hopewell Chin’ono

62,366 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

Michael Gove on June 21st 2016, two days before the Brexit referendum, "If people vote to leave, they're voting to have confidence in this country, it's institutions, and in its people" "Our side has been optimistic about Britain's potential, whereas I fear too often those arguing that we should remain have been more fearful, and to my mind, surprisingly pessimistic about Britain's potential outside the EU" "There have been moments during this campaign where Nigel Farage has said things and done things with which I disagree.. But I try not to single out any individual in this campaign for criticism" "There are legitimate public concerns about migration which are best addressed if we vote to leave the European Union" "Not because I'm opposed to migration, quite the opposite. Our economy and our culture benefit from new people arriving here" "But if we're to maintain the benefits of migration then people need to feel confident that the numbers are being controlled and we can't do that in the EU" "The facts are Britain has a trade deficit with the EU, so it wouldn't be in the EU's interest to erect any trade barriers" "By voting to leave, we can not only take back control of hundreds of millions that we sent to the European Union, we will also be detaching ourselves from the sinking ship that is the European Union economy"

Michael Gove on June 21st 2016, two days before the Brexit referendum, "If people vote to leave, they're voting to have confidence in this country, it's institutions, and in its people" "Our side has been optimistic about Britain's potential, whereas I fear too often those arguing that we should remain have been more fearful, and to my mind, surprisingly pessimistic about Britain's potential outside the EU" "There have been moments during this campaign where Nigel Farage has said things and done things with which I disagree.. But I try not to single out any individual in this campaign for criticism" "There are legitimate public concerns about migration which are best addressed if we vote to leave the European Union" "Not because I'm opposed to migration, quite the opposite. Our economy and our culture benefit from new people arriving here" "But if we're to maintain the benefits of migration then people need to feel confident that the numbers are being controlled and we can't do that in the EU" "The facts are Britain has a trade deficit with the EU, so it wouldn't be in the EU's interest to erect any trade barriers" "By voting to leave, we can not only take back control of hundreds of millions that we sent to the European Union, we will also be detaching ourselves from the sinking ship that is the European Union economy"

Farrukh

21,387 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

$HIMS $ENHA 🚨 MAX MARTIN & Christian Angermayer SAY ENHANCED WILL BE 'READY TO GO' AS SOON AS THE FDA MOVES PEPTIDES TO CATEGORY 1 "The goal is to be ready immediately after, yes." "Because think about it like this: What actually happens is that when 503A pharmacies are again able to compound those peptides, those are the pharmacies that we are already working with, that we already have the delivery and operational chain set up." "The doctors that are going to be able to prescribe those [peptides] are going to be the same doctors we are already working with." "And so from an infrastructure perspective, not much changes." "So from an infrastructure perspective, we are ready to go as soon as that change happens."

$HIMS $ENHA 🚨 MAX MARTIN & Christian Angermayer SAY ENHANCED WILL BE 'READY TO GO' AS SOON AS THE FDA MOVES PEPTIDES TO CATEGORY 1 "The goal is to be ready immediately after, yes." "Because think about it like this: What actually happens is that when 503A pharmacies are again able to compound those peptides, those are the pharmacies that we are already working with, that we already have the delivery and operational chain set up." "The doctors that are going to be able to prescribe those [peptides] are going to be the same doctors we are already working with." "And so from an infrastructure perspective, not much changes." "So from an infrastructure perspective, we are ready to go as soon as that change happens."

Hims House

28,393 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Christianity is a National Security Threat: "We have a Bible mandate to be a comfort to the Jewish people because they have been through the hell of the Holocaust" "God has never called the Gentile people in the Old Testament his people. These are the Jewish people" "We are doing what we are doing in order to ensure that America continues to survive and thrive because the Bible says, "I will bless those who bless you, Israel. I will curse those who curse you, Israel." "History has shown us that both biblical and otherwise. And whether we like it or not, the modern state of Israel is proof positive that the Bible is true and that God is real." "And that is why we do what we do. If the nation of is Israel ceased to exist, then the Bible is a lie. And so we are not lobbying for a foreign nation. We are exercising what we believe is our biblical mandate to do what we can to bless the nation of Israel and its people"

Christianity is a National Security Threat: "We have a Bible mandate to be a comfort to the Jewish people because they have been through the hell of the Holocaust" "God has never called the Gentile people in the Old Testament his people. These are the Jewish people" "We are doing what we are doing in order to ensure that America continues to survive and thrive because the Bible says, "I will bless those who bless you, Israel. I will curse those who curse you, Israel." "History has shown us that both biblical and otherwise. And whether we like it or not, the modern state of Israel is proof positive that the Bible is true and that God is real." "And that is why we do what we do. If the nation of is Israel ceased to exist, then the Bible is a lie. And so we are not lobbying for a foreign nation. We are exercising what we believe is our biblical mandate to do what we can to bless the nation of Israel and its people"

Seethroughitall

23,716 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

As the Mayors of Alberta’s largest cities, we are standing up against the referendum for a referendum and encouraging Albertans to vote this October. Leaving Canada would create uncertainty for Alberta’s economy, threaten jobs and investment, and put at risk the quality of life we’ve worked so hard to build. Our country is stronger together. The diversity of our people, communities, and regions is one of our greatest strengths. On October 19, stand up against the referendum for a referendum and vote for a strong Alberta in a strong Canada

As the Mayors of Alberta’s largest cities, we are standing up against the referendum for a referendum and encouraging Albertans to vote this October. Leaving Canada would create uncertainty for Alberta’s economy, threaten jobs and investment, and put at risk the quality of life we’ve worked so hard to build. Our country is stronger together. The diversity of our people, communities, and regions is one of our greatest strengths. On October 19, stand up against the referendum for a referendum and vote for a strong Alberta in a strong Canada

Jeromy (Pathfinder) Farkas

53,335 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten