Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

𝗦𝗵𝗲 𝘁𝗲𝘀𝘁𝗲𝗱 𝗼𝘃𝗲𝗿 𝟮𝟬 𝗰𝗵𝘂𝗿𝗰𝗵𝗲𝘀 𝘄𝗶𝘁𝗵 𝗮 𝗰𝗿𝘆𝗶𝗻𝗴 “𝗵𝘂𝗻𝗴𝗿𝘆 𝗯𝗮𝗯𝘆.” The Catholic ones said yes. 🙌 What happened next says everything about faith in action. In her social experiment, 𝗡𝗶𝗸𝗮𝗹𝗶𝗲 𝗠𝗼𝗻𝗿𝗼𝗲 called various churches pretending to be a mom who ran out of baby formula. She even played audio... of an infant crying. Protestant churches - including the famous “welcoming” mega ones - said no. But every Catholic parish she called? They said yes. Every. Single. One. And in this video, she calls Our Lady of Fatima Catholic Church in Alcoa, Tennessee, to thank them. Their reply? “𝘈𝘭𝘭 𝘱𝘳𝘢𝘪𝘴𝘦 𝘯𝘦𝘦𝘥𝘴 𝘵𝘰 𝘨𝘰 𝘵𝘰 𝘎𝘰𝘥. 𝘈𝘯𝘺𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘨𝘰𝘰𝘥 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘤𝘰𝘮𝘦𝘴 𝘰𝘶𝘵 𝘰𝘧 𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘴 𝘸𝘪𝘭𝘭 𝘩𝘦𝘭𝘱 𝘵𝘩𝘰𝘴𝘦 𝘪𝘯 𝘯𝘦𝘦𝘥.” No theatrics. No excuses. Just works of mercy. 🫶 This is the difference between faith alone in theory and faith working through love in reality. Matthew 25 is not a metaphor. Hungry babies do not need theology debates. 𝗧𝗵𝗲𝘆 𝗻𝗲𝗲𝗱 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗕𝗼𝗱𝘆 𝗼𝗳 𝗖𝗵𝗿𝗶𝘀𝘁 𝘁𝗼 𝘀𝗵𝗼𝘄 𝘂𝗽. And the Catholic Church did. Again. nikalie.monroe 𝘛𝘪𝘬𝘛𝘰𝘬show more

𝚕𝚒𝚝𝚝𝚕𝚎 𝚘𝚗𝚎 ♱🇻🇦

30,607 subscribers

58,852 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

This masterful clip from Mark A. Garcia is a MUST WATCH for all Protestants who engage with Roman Catholics. “Roman Catholic is not ever to be confused with old, or patristic, or medieval, or even pre-Reformational. We need to be very careful to avoid falling prey to that mindset which suggests Roman Catholic is everything up to the Reformation, and Protestant is everything from the Reformation forward. That, in fact, gives away the whole argument to Roman Catholics in the very context at issue of the Reformation and post-Reformation assemblies, who really is teaching, professing, believing, and worshipping in terms of the one faith, one holy catholic and apostolic church, the one faith given through scripture to the church. Roman Catholicism, technically speaking, is an innovation which takes its historic point ofdeparture at the Council of Trent. Not until the 1540s and following, at the Council of Trent, when the church represented in that assembly definitively and publicly ruled out of its communion what we now, as a result, call Protestant churches, not until they had taken this ecclesiastical action, public and objective action, to rule out of the visible church, those we now call Protestants, was there even such a thing inmeaningful terms as a Roman Catholic Church? As a result of that action, you see, they not only created Protestantism as a side, as a byproduct, as a consequence of that action, theyalso created themselves as the Roman Catholic Church.” Credits: Greystone Theological Institute - Rescuing Mary From Rome

This masterful clip from Mark A. Garcia is a MUST WATCH for all Protestants who engage with Roman Catholics. “Roman Catholic is not ever to be confused with old, or patristic, or medieval, or even pre-Reformational. We need to be very careful to avoid falling prey to that mindset which suggests Roman Catholic is everything up to the Reformation, and Protestant is everything from the Reformation forward. That, in fact, gives away the whole argument to Roman Catholics in the very context at issue of the Reformation and post-Reformation assemblies, who really is teaching, professing, believing, and worshipping in terms of the one faith, one holy catholic and apostolic church, the one faith given through scripture to the church. Roman Catholicism, technically speaking, is an innovation which takes its historic point ofdeparture at the Council of Trent. Not until the 1540s and following, at the Council of Trent, when the church represented in that assembly definitively and publicly ruled out of its communion what we now, as a result, call Protestant churches, not until they had taken this ecclesiastical action, public and objective action, to rule out of the visible church, those we now call Protestants, was there even such a thing inmeaningful terms as a Roman Catholic Church? As a result of that action, you see, they not only created Protestantism as a side, as a byproduct, as a consequence of that action, theyalso created themselves as the Roman Catholic Church.” Credits: Greystone Theological Institute - Rescuing Mary From Rome

Mason Craig

52,194 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten

Fortune tellers are not prophets – Bishop Mupandasekwa Morris Bishi GUTU – Roman Catholic Bishop for Masvingo Diocese Raymond Tadiwa Mupandasekwa has dismissed many people calling themselves prophets as nothing but fortune tellers. True prophets, he said, are people in whom God stays. They are ruled and controlled by the word of God. God stays and lives in them and they live in God. “A man can say I see Dynamos winning the game against Caps tomorrow and he becomes a prophet. Another one can say I see Arsenal taking the trophy and people call such people prophets. These are not prophets, these are just fortune tellers”. Bishop Mupandasekwa made the remarks during a sermon he gave at the official opening of St Justin Washaya Parish under Mutero Mission near Chinyika Business Centre in Chitsa, Gutu on Sunday. The beautiful church is a result of remarkable, persistent and unyielding efforts by villagers to mobilise resources locally and from locals who now live in urban areas. Built on top of a rock and in the middle of the hinterland, construction of the church started almost 11 years ago in 2015. More than 500 congregants from Mutero Mission and others from Soti Source attended the official opening. Referring to the martyr the church is named after, Bishop Mupandasekwa said Justin was a Greek philosopher who lived between 100 and 165 AD. He turned Christian and defended Christianity against pagan and Jewish criticism. He likened St Justin to prophets and deacons of the time like Philip and Stephen. He said true prophets live the word, the word live in them and the word becomes their life. He urged the congregation to emulate such life. He said many people calling themselves prophets today were just fortune tellers who do not practice what is said by the word. “Prophets are people who are ruled by the word of God, people who are controlled by the word of God. God stays and lives in them. Prophets are dominated by the word of God; their minds, their hearts, their lives etc are dominated by the word of God. God’s laws are the prophet’s law. “Philip fulfilled prophesies not through words but through deed. Prophets like Philip and Stephen were prepared to suffer for truth and what is right and for the word of God. Those are prophets,” said Bishop Mupandasekwa. Bishop Mupandasekwa said everyone who contributed towards the construction of the Church was the Biblical Solomon who built the house of God in Jerusalem. The Church project was started by the late Father Peter Mudhanganyi and it will serve 10 villages. Mutero Mission chairperson Antony Masvingise said the project reflected unity among believers and marked a major step in strengthening the church in the area. He thanked everyone who contributed and supported the project. “This is a testament of unity amongst members of our church. From the beginning people were making donations and the local community provided labour. This is an important development as far as the growth of Mutero Mission is concerned,” said Masvingise. A congregant, Angeline Mufari, said the completion of the church was a major breakthrough for worshippers who had been conducting services under a tree for years. She added that the development could also stimulate growth in the Washaya area, with some residents now pushing for shops and other facilities to be built nearby. Zimbabwe Council of Churches ZCC Mbungo 🇿🇼🌐 JabulaNLCC @zaogafifmi clayton chichewo Uebert Angel Prime Kufa Prophet T Freddy Prophetess Faith Mhembere Blessing Chiza Passion Java Edd Branson Wilson Magaya Emmanuel Makandiwa Ruth Emmanuel-Makandiwa Passion Java4 Prophet Walter Magaya National Catholic Register Catholic News Agency Catholic News Service CatholicRelief CatholicTV Catholic News Service Catholic Answers Catholic Arena U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops Catholic Church The Catholic Herald Zimbabwe UK Catholic ZimCatholicSA Zim Catholic CCJP Masvingo Caritas Caritas Europa CatholicVote Catholic Church CatholicUnity Zim-Celebs

Fortune tellers are not prophets – Bishop Mupandasekwa Morris Bishi GUTU – Roman Catholic Bishop for Masvingo Diocese Raymond Tadiwa Mupandasekwa has dismissed many people calling themselves prophets as nothing but fortune tellers. True prophets, he said, are people in whom God stays. They are ruled and controlled by the word of God. God stays and lives in them and they live in God. “A man can say I see Dynamos winning the game against Caps tomorrow and he becomes a prophet. Another one can say I see Arsenal taking the trophy and people call such people prophets. These are not prophets, these are just fortune tellers”. Bishop Mupandasekwa made the remarks during a sermon he gave at the official opening of St Justin Washaya Parish under Mutero Mission near Chinyika Business Centre in Chitsa, Gutu on Sunday. The beautiful church is a result of remarkable, persistent and unyielding efforts by villagers to mobilise resources locally and from locals who now live in urban areas. Built on top of a rock and in the middle of the hinterland, construction of the church started almost 11 years ago in 2015. More than 500 congregants from Mutero Mission and others from Soti Source attended the official opening. Referring to the martyr the church is named after, Bishop Mupandasekwa said Justin was a Greek philosopher who lived between 100 and 165 AD. He turned Christian and defended Christianity against pagan and Jewish criticism. He likened St Justin to prophets and deacons of the time like Philip and Stephen. He said true prophets live the word, the word live in them and the word becomes their life. He urged the congregation to emulate such life. He said many people calling themselves prophets today were just fortune tellers who do not practice what is said by the word. “Prophets are people who are ruled by the word of God, people who are controlled by the word of God. God stays and lives in them. Prophets are dominated by the word of God; their minds, their hearts, their lives etc are dominated by the word of God. God’s laws are the prophet’s law. “Philip fulfilled prophesies not through words but through deed. Prophets like Philip and Stephen were prepared to suffer for truth and what is right and for the word of God. Those are prophets,” said Bishop Mupandasekwa. Bishop Mupandasekwa said everyone who contributed towards the construction of the Church was the Biblical Solomon who built the house of God in Jerusalem. The Church project was started by the late Father Peter Mudhanganyi and it will serve 10 villages. Mutero Mission chairperson Antony Masvingise said the project reflected unity among believers and marked a major step in strengthening the church in the area. He thanked everyone who contributed and supported the project. “This is a testament of unity amongst members of our church. From the beginning people were making donations and the local community provided labour. This is an important development as far as the growth of Mutero Mission is concerned,” said Masvingise. A congregant, Angeline Mufari, said the completion of the church was a major breakthrough for worshippers who had been conducting services under a tree for years. She added that the development could also stimulate growth in the Washaya area, with some residents now pushing for shops and other facilities to be built nearby. Zimbabwe Council of Churches ZCC Mbungo 🇿🇼🌐 JabulaNLCC @zaogafifmi clayton chichewo Uebert Angel Prime Kufa Prophet T Freddy Prophetess Faith Mhembere Blessing Chiza Passion Java Edd Branson Wilson Magaya Emmanuel Makandiwa Ruth Emmanuel-Makandiwa Passion Java4 Prophet Walter Magaya National Catholic Register Catholic News Agency Catholic News Service CatholicRelief CatholicTV Catholic News Service Catholic Answers Catholic Arena U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops Catholic Church The Catholic Herald Zimbabwe UK Catholic ZimCatholicSA Zim Catholic CCJP Masvingo Caritas Caritas Europa CatholicVote Catholic Church CatholicUnity Zim-Celebs

The Mirror Masvingo

10,918 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Is this your "visible" Church of Christ? I recently finished compiling this 12 minute video of typical "Masses" and liturgical services in the Novus Ordo sect of which Prevost is the head. It's a very small sample of hundreds of similar clips I've saved over the past couple of years. With few exceptions, these clips only include things which are seen on a day-to-day basis in the Novus Ordo. I've taken the clips from many different countries and languages to show that these things are not merely abuses in some part of the world but are a defining characteristic of the entire Novus Ordo sect. You will see not only "priests" but many "bishops" participating in these behaviors. These are not isolated abuses opposed by the "hierarchy," as some Novus Ordo apologists claim. This is normal Novus Ordo behavior fully supported by that sect and its "hierarchy" from the lowest parish "priest" to the "pope." You'll notice the following are pretty standard: 1) Altar girls 2) Women ministers of "communion" and even of blessings and sacramentals (even giving ashes to the "priest"!) 3) Inculturation of pagan practices, secular songs, and dance into the "Mass." 4) Drums, guitars, clapping are ubiquitous. 5) Evident lack of belief in the Real Presence. These clips are nearly indistinguishable from Protestant services aside from the presence of statues of saints in some churches. In fact, it is so hard to tell the difference that it is possible I might have let a clip or two slip through that are from some Protestant denomination despite going to considerable trouble to confirm the source of each video. The plain and simple truth is that the Novus Ordo sect is just another heretical Protestant religion. If you are struggling with accepting the #sedevacante conclusion because you say that would be the end of the visible Church, I ask you to consider what makes the Catholic Church visible? Do "Masses" with drums, altar girls, laywomen ministers and faithless "priest presiders" make a church the visible Church of Christ? In that case, why don't we accept the Lutherans or Anglicans as the visible Church since they have these same things and the same appearance of order and hierarchy as the Novus Ordo does? No. The Catholic Church is visible because she has four visible, i.e. clearly identifiable, marks. Her members and her hierarchy of bishops and priests are recognizable through the outward profession of the same Faith, the same worship, and submission to the same authority, i.e., during a vacancy, the true Popes of the past and willingness to submit to the next true Pope. The mere absence of a Pope for the time being does not make the Church less visible or identifiable. But if she could ever become what you see in this video, she would indeed be visible, but not as Catholic. She would be a defected church. Christ has promised us this could never happen. Christ has promised us that the Novus Ordo is not and never can be the Catholic Church. If you believe the religion seen in this video is Christ's Church just because you can "see" it, then the modernists have succeeded in forming an entirely new idea of Christ's Church in your mind, one which is not the spotless Bride of Christ mentioned by St. Paul.

Is this your "visible" Church of Christ? I recently finished compiling this 12 minute video of typical "Masses" and liturgical services in the Novus Ordo sect of which Prevost is the head. It's a very small sample of hundreds of similar clips I've saved over the past couple of years. With few exceptions, these clips only include things which are seen on a day-to-day basis in the Novus Ordo. I've taken the clips from many different countries and languages to show that these things are not merely abuses in some part of the world but are a defining characteristic of the entire Novus Ordo sect. You will see not only "priests" but many "bishops" participating in these behaviors. These are not isolated abuses opposed by the "hierarchy," as some Novus Ordo apologists claim. This is normal Novus Ordo behavior fully supported by that sect and its "hierarchy" from the lowest parish "priest" to the "pope." You'll notice the following are pretty standard: 1) Altar girls 2) Women ministers of "communion" and even of blessings and sacramentals (even giving ashes to the "priest"!) 3) Inculturation of pagan practices, secular songs, and dance into the "Mass." 4) Drums, guitars, clapping are ubiquitous. 5) Evident lack of belief in the Real Presence. These clips are nearly indistinguishable from Protestant services aside from the presence of statues of saints in some churches. In fact, it is so hard to tell the difference that it is possible I might have let a clip or two slip through that are from some Protestant denomination despite going to considerable trouble to confirm the source of each video. The plain and simple truth is that the Novus Ordo sect is just another heretical Protestant religion. If you are struggling with accepting the #sedevacante conclusion because you say that would be the end of the visible Church, I ask you to consider what makes the Catholic Church visible? Do "Masses" with drums, altar girls, laywomen ministers and faithless "priest presiders" make a church the visible Church of Christ? In that case, why don't we accept the Lutherans or Anglicans as the visible Church since they have these same things and the same appearance of order and hierarchy as the Novus Ordo does? No. The Catholic Church is visible because she has four visible, i.e. clearly identifiable, marks. Her members and her hierarchy of bishops and priests are recognizable through the outward profession of the same Faith, the same worship, and submission to the same authority, i.e., during a vacancy, the true Popes of the past and willingness to submit to the next true Pope. The mere absence of a Pope for the time being does not make the Church less visible or identifiable. But if she could ever become what you see in this video, she would indeed be visible, but not as Catholic. She would be a defected church. Christ has promised us this could never happen. Christ has promised us that the Novus Ordo is not and never can be the Catholic Church. If you believe the religion seen in this video is Christ's Church just because you can "see" it, then the modernists have succeeded in forming an entirely new idea of Christ's Church in your mind, one which is not the spotless Bride of Christ mentioned by St. Paul.

Fr. Gabriel Lavery

24,423 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

“I can’t speak on whether he was close to converting…I do think from what I’ve been told that he was planning on signing up and starting that process [of becoming Catholic]. But I did not personally have that conversation with him…” A few things: Candace says she can’t speak on whether Charlie was close to converting to Catholicism—and then immediately goes on to speak about how she thinks he was close to converting. 🙄 Additionally, the first time she ever spoke about this (September 15th, see the 2nd clip below) she suggested he was close to converting. Because it’s Candace, she didn’t come right out and say, but she said he “was on the verge of changing some of his beliefs” and then went on to speak about how he was praying the rosary and attending mass. She also referenced him “taking that last step.” All of those things paired together imply (again without outright saying) he was close to converting. She also said in the same episode he was “too smart to be Protestant.” Mind you, this was FIVE DAYS after Charlie had been murdered. Charlie’s parents are Protestant. His wife was raised Catholic but is now Protestant. And whether you think he was close to converting or not, Charlie died Protestant. Her saying that FIVE DAYS after his murder was callous and tone deaf. This is how Candace makes things always and all about herself. This was in fact the first thing that clued me in that something was seriously wrong, after previously being her fan. Today, she doubled down on her implications that Charlie was close to converting (even though again she’d just said she couldn’t speak on that). She said she and Charlie were having conversations about it, but the only evidence she’s ever presented is a single vague text allegedly from him and dated February 2024. The problem is that Charlie went on to reiterate he was evangelical and all of his issues with the Catholic faith this year, in the months leading up to his death. Indeed, one of the final things he said on this earth the day he died was that he was evangelical. So even if he sent that text to Candace in February of 2024, it’s clear he wasn’t that convicted and that she read more into it than was actually meant. Because again, this year, in 2025, he was reaffirming his evangelical faith. Lastly, Candace admitted today that she heard from someone else that Charlie was becoming Catholic (likely Bishop Joseph Brennan). But if she and Charlie were already having conversations about the possibility of him converting (as she claims they were), why wouldn’t he tell Candace directly? Especially when again they allegedly were already having conversations about it? Please listen to what this woman actually says from one month, one week, one day to the next. And parse it out. Hear what she’s saying and also what she’s not saying. Determine what she’s implying. Compare herself to herself. And see if she makes sense to you, if she provides clarity to you, if she provides evidence. Not just on the subject of Charlie converting but on all subjects pertaining to this “investigation.” Finally, this has NOTHING to do with who murdered Charlie and why. I’m tired of talking about it, but she keeps being dishonest about what she actually said, again a mere five days after his murder.

“I can’t speak on whether he was close to converting…I do think from what I’ve been told that he was planning on signing up and starting that process [of becoming Catholic]. But I did not personally have that conversation with him…” A few things: Candace says she can’t speak on whether Charlie was close to converting to Catholicism—and then immediately goes on to speak about how she thinks he was close to converting. 🙄 Additionally, the first time she ever spoke about this (September 15th, see the 2nd clip below) she suggested he was close to converting. Because it’s Candace, she didn’t come right out and say, but she said he “was on the verge of changing some of his beliefs” and then went on to speak about how he was praying the rosary and attending mass. She also referenced him “taking that last step.” All of those things paired together imply (again without outright saying) he was close to converting. She also said in the same episode he was “too smart to be Protestant.” Mind you, this was FIVE DAYS after Charlie had been murdered. Charlie’s parents are Protestant. His wife was raised Catholic but is now Protestant. And whether you think he was close to converting or not, Charlie died Protestant. Her saying that FIVE DAYS after his murder was callous and tone deaf. This is how Candace makes things always and all about herself. This was in fact the first thing that clued me in that something was seriously wrong, after previously being her fan. Today, she doubled down on her implications that Charlie was close to converting (even though again she’d just said she couldn’t speak on that). She said she and Charlie were having conversations about it, but the only evidence she’s ever presented is a single vague text allegedly from him and dated February 2024. The problem is that Charlie went on to reiterate he was evangelical and all of his issues with the Catholic faith this year, in the months leading up to his death. Indeed, one of the final things he said on this earth the day he died was that he was evangelical. So even if he sent that text to Candace in February of 2024, it’s clear he wasn’t that convicted and that she read more into it than was actually meant. Because again, this year, in 2025, he was reaffirming his evangelical faith. Lastly, Candace admitted today that she heard from someone else that Charlie was becoming Catholic (likely Bishop Joseph Brennan). But if she and Charlie were already having conversations about the possibility of him converting (as she claims they were), why wouldn’t he tell Candace directly? Especially when again they allegedly were already having conversations about it? Please listen to what this woman actually says from one month, one week, one day to the next. And parse it out. Hear what she’s saying and also what she’s not saying. Determine what she’s implying. Compare herself to herself. And see if she makes sense to you, if she provides clarity to you, if she provides evidence. Not just on the subject of Charlie converting but on all subjects pertaining to this “investigation.” Finally, this has NOTHING to do with who murdered Charlie and why. I’m tired of talking about it, but she keeps being dishonest about what she actually said, again a mere five days after his murder.

Natalie Jean Beisner

42,513 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

Pope Leo meets with Ukrainian bishops. The Holy Synod of Bishops of the Ukrainian Greek Catholic Church, comprised of all the bishops of the UGCC, is the highest authority in the sui iuris Ukrainian Church. In remarks to the gathered bishops, Pope Leo noted that this year’s Synod takes place in the context of the Jubilee Year, “which invites all the People of God to renew themselves in hope.” Yet, although “hope does not disappoint because it is founded on the love of God in Christ Jesus”, it is difficult to speak of hope in the midst of the war that engulfs Ukraine. “It is not easy to find words of consolation for families who have lost loved ones in this senseless war,” the Pope said, especially for the Bishops “who are in daily contact with people wounded in heart and flesh.” Nonetheless, Pope Leo continued, the many testimonies of faith and hope are “a sign of God’s strength manifesting itself amid the rubble of destruction.” Recognising the many ecclesial and humanitarian needs facing the Bishops, the Holy Fahter recalled their duty “to serve Christ in every wounded and suffering person who turns to your communities for concrete help.” And he assured them of his closeness to all the Ukrainian Greek Catholic faithful, calling them to remain united “in the one faith and in the one hope”, and emphasising the “great mystery” of communion that unites us even with those “whose lives were torn from this world but welcomed by God.” In Him, the Pope insisted, “everything lives and finds its full meaning.” Pope Leo concluded his remarks with a prayer that, through the intercession of the Holy Mother of God, “peace may return” to Ukraine “as soon as possible.”

Pope Leo meets with Ukrainian bishops. The Holy Synod of Bishops of the Ukrainian Greek Catholic Church, comprised of all the bishops of the UGCC, is the highest authority in the sui iuris Ukrainian Church. In remarks to the gathered bishops, Pope Leo noted that this year’s Synod takes place in the context of the Jubilee Year, “which invites all the People of God to renew themselves in hope.” Yet, although “hope does not disappoint because it is founded on the love of God in Christ Jesus”, it is difficult to speak of hope in the midst of the war that engulfs Ukraine. “It is not easy to find words of consolation for families who have lost loved ones in this senseless war,” the Pope said, especially for the Bishops “who are in daily contact with people wounded in heart and flesh.” Nonetheless, Pope Leo continued, the many testimonies of faith and hope are “a sign of God’s strength manifesting itself amid the rubble of destruction.” Recognising the many ecclesial and humanitarian needs facing the Bishops, the Holy Fahter recalled their duty “to serve Christ in every wounded and suffering person who turns to your communities for concrete help.” And he assured them of his closeness to all the Ukrainian Greek Catholic faithful, calling them to remain united “in the one faith and in the one hope”, and emphasising the “great mystery” of communion that unites us even with those “whose lives were torn from this world but welcomed by God.” In Him, the Pope insisted, “everything lives and finds its full meaning.” Pope Leo concluded his remarks with a prayer that, through the intercession of the Holy Mother of God, “peace may return” to Ukraine “as soon as possible.”

Vatican News

30,637 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

I’ve had a lot of people say Candace will move to Russia soon. I don’t think so. Her visit didn’t go well. I watched many of the PR interviews they set up for her and they were disasters. I don’t know if it was a language barrier that made her come off as so stupid or if she didn’t want to really talk but she didn’t do well in any of them. She couldn’t even answer the questions they asked many times. One interviewer had to ask her twice many questions. She answered most every question with “family is important” for an hour. It was weird. The next interview (and I’ll post it again here) is a friend of Putin and I guess didn’t know she was Catholic. Because he basically said the Catholic Church was corrupt and satanists. They had become super liberal even so much so that they did same sex marriages. And that France and the opening of the Olympic Games proved it. You could see she was upset and instead of defending the Church as not liberal or corrupt, she went on a Bridgette and France is bad answer. I think one reason she did that is she knew this guy was Putins friend and popular in Russia. She couldn’t push back on him. She was clearly not comfortable the entire interview. 30 minutes in she cut the interview and said we need to close it here. Her interviews were a disaster, her security guy almost died (I’m still on the fence about the story on why he was sick) and Ukraine bombed close to the hotel and event. She can say all she wants Russia is amazing. She’s lying. I think she found out just how not amazing it is.

I’ve had a lot of people say Candace will move to Russia soon. I don’t think so. Her visit didn’t go well. I watched many of the PR interviews they set up for her and they were disasters. I don’t know if it was a language barrier that made her come off as so stupid or if she didn’t want to really talk but she didn’t do well in any of them. She couldn’t even answer the questions they asked many times. One interviewer had to ask her twice many questions. She answered most every question with “family is important” for an hour. It was weird. The next interview (and I’ll post it again here) is a friend of Putin and I guess didn’t know she was Catholic. Because he basically said the Catholic Church was corrupt and satanists. They had become super liberal even so much so that they did same sex marriages. And that France and the opening of the Olympic Games proved it. You could see she was upset and instead of defending the Church as not liberal or corrupt, she went on a Bridgette and France is bad answer. I think one reason she did that is she knew this guy was Putins friend and popular in Russia. She couldn’t push back on him. She was clearly not comfortable the entire interview. 30 minutes in she cut the interview and said we need to close it here. Her interviews were a disaster, her security guy almost died (I’m still on the fence about the story on why he was sick) and Ukraine bombed close to the hotel and event. She can say all she wants Russia is amazing. She’s lying. I think she found out just how not amazing it is.

Raven Grace 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸

41,792 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

A Michigan Catholic deacon stands up for Muslims in Dearborn after a Christian nationalist rally called for their removal from the country: “To the men and women protesting in the name of Jesus, hurling hate at our Muslim brothers and sisters — not in his name, and certainly not on my watch. “I count many Muslims as my friends, my neighbors, my associates, and yes, my barber. Men and women of integrity, of family, and of faith. We may not be brothers in faith, but we are certainly and absolutely brothers and sisters in humanity. “And freedom of religion is not a footnote to being an American. It is a cornerstone. The same First Amendment that protects my right to go to Mass protects your right to the mosque. “It grieves me that in the name of Jesus, the Prince of Peace is being used as a weapon to spread fear, intolerance, and hate. That is not the gospel. That is not the cross. And that certainly is not of Christ. “So let me be clear. In the name of Jesus Christ, I rebuke this spirit of hatred and division. Scripture does not leave us confused about this. We are called to rebuke evil, and tonight, this is evil — using the name of the Savior who dined with outcasts to cast out our neighbors, good people.* “John tells us exactly how Christians should be known: by this all people will know that you are my disciples, if you have love for one another — and your neighbor. “He makes it even plainer: if anyone says “I love God” and hates his brother, he is a liar. “So no. You do not speak for me. You do not speak for my church. And you do not speak for Christ when you chant hate at people of God, no matter the faith. “To my Muslim friends in this room and in this city: you are welcome here. You belong here. Your freedom to worship is my freedom to worship, and I will stand for it because my faith demands it. “We can disagree — and we probably will — on theology, and still defend each other’s dignity. That’s not weakness. That’s Christianity. That is American.”

A Michigan Catholic deacon stands up for Muslims in Dearborn after a Christian nationalist rally called for their removal from the country: “To the men and women protesting in the name of Jesus, hurling hate at our Muslim brothers and sisters — not in his name, and certainly not on my watch. “I count many Muslims as my friends, my neighbors, my associates, and yes, my barber. Men and women of integrity, of family, and of faith. We may not be brothers in faith, but we are certainly and absolutely brothers and sisters in humanity. “And freedom of religion is not a footnote to being an American. It is a cornerstone. The same First Amendment that protects my right to go to Mass protects your right to the mosque. “It grieves me that in the name of Jesus, the Prince of Peace is being used as a weapon to spread fear, intolerance, and hate. That is not the gospel. That is not the cross. And that certainly is not of Christ. “So let me be clear. In the name of Jesus Christ, I rebuke this spirit of hatred and division. Scripture does not leave us confused about this. We are called to rebuke evil, and tonight, this is evil — using the name of the Savior who dined with outcasts to cast out our neighbors, good people.* “John tells us exactly how Christians should be known: by this all people will know that you are my disciples, if you have love for one another — and your neighbor. “He makes it even plainer: if anyone says “I love God” and hates his brother, he is a liar. “So no. You do not speak for me. You do not speak for my church. And you do not speak for Christ when you chant hate at people of God, no matter the faith. “To my Muslim friends in this room and in this city: you are welcome here. You belong here. Your freedom to worship is my freedom to worship, and I will stand for it because my faith demands it. “We can disagree — and we probably will — on theology, and still defend each other’s dignity. That’s not weakness. That’s Christianity. That is American.”

Christopher Hale

405,306 Aufrufe • vor 10 Tagen

“The people around Charlie are not acting in the way that they should be acting. Their emotionality is not meeting the moment of violence that we all witnessed…They’re lying to you about where Charlie was on his faith journey. That’s hush hush. The Catholic thing must stay hush hush.” Once again: it would be so incredibly easy for Candace to verbally exonerate Charlie’s wife, but she never does. Not even once. So we’re left to assume that every single time she references those closest to Charlie, the executives at TPUSA, and the notion he was “betrayed by everyone,” she’s including Erika in all of that. Moreover, she refuses to let this Catholic thing go because for her it’s not about Charlie or having respect for him, his family, or the truth. It’s simply about hating Israel. It all ties back to Israel every single time. It’s psychotic. Charlie wasn’t Catholic. It would be fine if he were. But he wasn’t. Neither is his wife. You have no evidence he was and are simply relying on the words that come out of Candace’s mouth.

“The people around Charlie are not acting in the way that they should be acting. Their emotionality is not meeting the moment of violence that we all witnessed…They’re lying to you about where Charlie was on his faith journey. That’s hush hush. The Catholic thing must stay hush hush.” Once again: it would be so incredibly easy for Candace to verbally exonerate Charlie’s wife, but she never does. Not even once. So we’re left to assume that every single time she references those closest to Charlie, the executives at TPUSA, and the notion he was “betrayed by everyone,” she’s including Erika in all of that. Moreover, she refuses to let this Catholic thing go because for her it’s not about Charlie or having respect for him, his family, or the truth. It’s simply about hating Israel. It all ties back to Israel every single time. It’s psychotic. Charlie wasn’t Catholic. It would be fine if he were. But he wasn’t. Neither is his wife. You have no evidence he was and are simply relying on the words that come out of Candace’s mouth.

Natalie Jean Beisner

21,603 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

No faithful Catholic has any personal issue with the Vicar of Christ. Our love and respect for the Pope remain firm as for the one who holds the office instituted by Christ Himself. However, when the protector of the faith appears to deviate from the authentic deposit of faith, the faithful are not only permitted but obliged to defend the truth handed down through the Apostles. “True loyalty to the Church includes fidelity to the truth she teaches. When error arises, charity demands correction.” This is affirmed by Canon 212 §3 of the Code of Canon Law: “According to the knowledge, competence, and prestige which they possess, the Christian faithful have the right and even at times the duty to manifest to the sacred pastors their opinion on matters which pertain to the good of the Church.” Moreover, Vatican II’s Dogmatic Constitution Lumen Gentium, §12 teaches: “The whole body of the faithful, who have an anointing that comes from the Holy One, cannot err in matters of belief. They manifest this special property by means of the whole people’s supernatural discernment in matters of faith.” Therefore, when Catholics defend the authentic doctrine and correct errors in the light of the Gospel, they are not acting against the Pope or the Church—they are acting in charity and in the power of the Holy Spirit, safeguarding the faith that leads to eternal life.

No faithful Catholic has any personal issue with the Vicar of Christ. Our love and respect for the Pope remain firm as for the one who holds the office instituted by Christ Himself. However, when the protector of the faith appears to deviate from the authentic deposit of faith, the faithful are not only permitted but obliged to defend the truth handed down through the Apostles. “True loyalty to the Church includes fidelity to the truth she teaches. When error arises, charity demands correction.” This is affirmed by Canon 212 §3 of the Code of Canon Law: “According to the knowledge, competence, and prestige which they possess, the Christian faithful have the right and even at times the duty to manifest to the sacred pastors their opinion on matters which pertain to the good of the Church.” Moreover, Vatican II’s Dogmatic Constitution Lumen Gentium, §12 teaches: “The whole body of the faithful, who have an anointing that comes from the Holy One, cannot err in matters of belief. They manifest this special property by means of the whole people’s supernatural discernment in matters of faith.” Therefore, when Catholics defend the authentic doctrine and correct errors in the light of the Gospel, they are not acting against the Pope or the Church—they are acting in charity and in the power of the Holy Spirit, safeguarding the faith that leads to eternal life.

Coworkeroftruth

22,944 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

Pope Leo just gave a major catechesis on the place of religion in the public square in Spain -- celebrating Mass in front of the city's town hall, Palacio Cibeles -- and the impact that Catholic heritage of the Spanish people can have on the common good and human relationships. This is precisely what Spaniards were hoping for, which we learned in Madrid before the papal trip -- that Pope Leo would encourage Catholics in the country to be signs of hope and have courage to speak up about their faith in public. During his homily Pope Leo emphasized that a remedy for Spain's problems and wounds today is the Catholic faith lived truly and publicly by Spanish people. "The task of Spain today and in the future," Pope Leo said, is "to ensure that the religiosity which has shaped and defined this country for centuries is not a museum of the past to be visited, but a school of faith from which to draw even today." He said it's a "school that teaches us to kneel before God and before our neighbor, because no one can kneel before the Lord and despise their brother; A school that teaches us of the gratuitousness of love that becomes a gift, so that it may flow among us and break the chains of all selfishness; A school from which we learn that God is a real presence and that we too are called to be present in the realities and challenges of society, not shying away, but personally committing ourselves to the building of the common good." The historical memory of the Corpus Christi processions, he said, "is not confined to wistful nostalgia." "Instead, it stands as an invitation in the present moment, in our daily lives, in our relationships, in society, and in the building of the future," Pope Leo said before he will take to the streets to walk with the monstrance on the Solemnity of Corpus Christi in Spain. "It is not merely a matter of bringing out the monstrance, but of allowing ourselves to be brought out of our selfishness and indifference, of a comfortable, private faith, so as to respond to his invitation to conversion, to change our perspective, and to welcome his presence which transforms us and makes us builders of a new world," Pope Leo said. "Here in Madrid, as in many other parts of Spain, Corpus Christi is more than just another celebration on the liturgical calendar. It is a way of returning to the heart of the faith to renew our love and fidelity to God." "It is a profession of faith in the presence of the risen Lord, who is alive and continues to walk among us, who becomes bread to satiate our hunger for life, and visits the recesses of our hearts and history, even those shrouded in darkness." "Just as Christ gives himself as food in the Eucharistic celebration," he said, "the procession shows that he is not confined to the church, but comes out to meet us." "Jesus travels the streets, crosses the squares and visits our neighborhoods, dwelling in the settings of our daily lives. He is a God who is close to us, who walks with his people, the Lord of history. He is comfort to the weak, light for families, hope for the sick and peace for those who suffer. The Christ who processes through the streets in the monstrance is the same one who identifies with the poor, the downtrodden, those who are alone and forsaken. It is no coincidence that the Church here in Spain has long combined the Solemnity of Corpus Christi with the Day for Charity," Pope Leo said at Plaza de Cibeles. The appeal he gave at the end of Mass is in the video below: "Let us drink anew from this Eucharistic spring, which does not enclose us in private devotion, but sends us out to refresh our brothers and sisters, our families, the poor, the suffering, and those who have lost hope. Eucharistic grace transforms us and makes us protagonists of the transformation of history, a sign of hope for those we meet." "May the Lord Jesus, present in the Eucharist, transform you into bread that is broken, given, and offered, so that a life of fullness may spring forth for you, for your families, and for your country." Video: Vatican Media.

Pope Leo just gave a major catechesis on the place of religion in the public square in Spain -- celebrating Mass in front of the city's town hall, Palacio Cibeles -- and the impact that Catholic heritage of the Spanish people can have on the common good and human relationships. This is precisely what Spaniards were hoping for, which we learned in Madrid before the papal trip -- that Pope Leo would encourage Catholics in the country to be signs of hope and have courage to speak up about their faith in public. During his homily Pope Leo emphasized that a remedy for Spain's problems and wounds today is the Catholic faith lived truly and publicly by Spanish people. "The task of Spain today and in the future," Pope Leo said, is "to ensure that the religiosity which has shaped and defined this country for centuries is not a museum of the past to be visited, but a school of faith from which to draw even today." He said it's a "school that teaches us to kneel before God and before our neighbor, because no one can kneel before the Lord and despise their brother; A school that teaches us of the gratuitousness of love that becomes a gift, so that it may flow among us and break the chains of all selfishness; A school from which we learn that God is a real presence and that we too are called to be present in the realities and challenges of society, not shying away, but personally committing ourselves to the building of the common good." The historical memory of the Corpus Christi processions, he said, "is not confined to wistful nostalgia." "Instead, it stands as an invitation in the present moment, in our daily lives, in our relationships, in society, and in the building of the future," Pope Leo said before he will take to the streets to walk with the monstrance on the Solemnity of Corpus Christi in Spain. "It is not merely a matter of bringing out the monstrance, but of allowing ourselves to be brought out of our selfishness and indifference, of a comfortable, private faith, so as to respond to his invitation to conversion, to change our perspective, and to welcome his presence which transforms us and makes us builders of a new world," Pope Leo said. "Here in Madrid, as in many other parts of Spain, Corpus Christi is more than just another celebration on the liturgical calendar. It is a way of returning to the heart of the faith to renew our love and fidelity to God." "It is a profession of faith in the presence of the risen Lord, who is alive and continues to walk among us, who becomes bread to satiate our hunger for life, and visits the recesses of our hearts and history, even those shrouded in darkness." "Just as Christ gives himself as food in the Eucharistic celebration," he said, "the procession shows that he is not confined to the church, but comes out to meet us." "Jesus travels the streets, crosses the squares and visits our neighborhoods, dwelling in the settings of our daily lives. He is a God who is close to us, who walks with his people, the Lord of history. He is comfort to the weak, light for families, hope for the sick and peace for those who suffer. The Christ who processes through the streets in the monstrance is the same one who identifies with the poor, the downtrodden, those who are alone and forsaken. It is no coincidence that the Church here in Spain has long combined the Solemnity of Corpus Christi with the Day for Charity," Pope Leo said at Plaza de Cibeles. The appeal he gave at the end of Mass is in the video below: "Let us drink anew from this Eucharistic spring, which does not enclose us in private devotion, but sends us out to refresh our brothers and sisters, our families, the poor, the suffering, and those who have lost hope. Eucharistic grace transforms us and makes us protagonists of the transformation of history, a sign of hope for those we meet." "May the Lord Jesus, present in the Eucharist, transform you into bread that is broken, given, and offered, so that a life of fullness may spring forth for you, for your families, and for your country." Video: Vatican Media.

Paulina Guzik

14,659 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

𝗦𝗵𝗲 𝘀𝗮𝗶𝗱 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗾𝘂𝗶𝗲𝘁 𝗽𝗮𝗿𝘁 𝗼𝘂𝘁 𝗹𝗼𝘂𝗱. 𝗣𝗿𝗼𝘁𝗲𝘀𝘁𝗮𝗻𝘁𝘀 𝗮𝗿𝗲 𝘁𝗮𝘂𝗴𝗵𝘁 𝘁𝗼 “𝗲𝘃𝗮𝗻𝗴𝗲𝗹𝗶𝘇𝗲” 𝗖𝗮𝘁𝗵𝗼𝗹𝗶𝗰𝘀 𝗮𝘀 𝗶𝗳 𝘄𝗲 𝘄𝗼𝗿𝘀𝗵𝗶𝗽 𝗮 𝗱𝗶𝗳𝗳𝗲𝗿𝗲𝗻𝘁 𝗚𝗼𝗱. 𝗖𝗮𝘁𝗵𝗼𝗹𝗶𝗰𝘀 𝗻𝗲𝘃𝗲𝗿 𝗿𝗲𝘁𝘂𝗿𝗻 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗳𝗮𝘃𝗼𝗿. ✝️🔥 Hannah grew up reformed and Calvinist. She was trained to believe Catholics worship Mary, earn salvation, follow a dictator pope, and do not know scripture. In other words she was taught lies. Then she entered the Catholic Church and found out something shocking. 𝗖𝗮𝘁𝗵𝗼𝗹𝗶𝗰𝘀 𝗱𝗼 𝗻𝗼𝘁 𝘁𝗮𝗹𝗸 𝗮𝗯𝗼𝘂𝘁 𝗣𝗿𝗼𝘁𝗲𝘀𝘁𝗮𝗻𝘁𝘀. 𝗔𝘁 𝗮𝗹𝗹. They just worship God, go to mass, go to confession, and mind their own business. Meanwhile 𝗣𝗿𝗼𝘁𝗲𝘀𝘁𝗮𝗻𝘁𝘀 𝘀𝗽𝗲𝗻𝗱 𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗶𝗿𝗲 𝘀𝗲𝗿𝗺𝗼𝗻𝘀 𝗮𝘁𝘁𝗮𝗰𝗸𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗖𝗵𝘂𝗿𝗰𝗵 they claim is not Christian. She also learned another truth. Catholics do not church shop. Worship is not a TED talk. Mass is a sacrifice. You do not pick a parish because you want stage lights or a good feeling. You go to receive the real Body of Christ. And the one that stunned her most. Catholics are taught that many Protestants will be saved. 𝗣𝗿𝗼𝘁𝗲𝘀𝘁𝗮𝗻𝘁𝘀 𝗮𝗿𝗲 𝘁𝗮𝘂𝗴𝗵𝘁 𝘁𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗖𝗮𝘁𝗵𝗼𝗹𝗶𝗰𝘀 𝘄𝗶𝗹𝗹 𝗻𝗼𝘁. Guess who looks more like the early Church. Welcome home, Hannah. Another Protestant discovers the one Church that does not need to attack anyone. 𝗕𝗲𝗰𝗮𝘂𝘀𝗲 𝗶𝘁 𝗵𝗮𝘀 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗘𝘂𝗰𝗵𝗮𝗿𝗶𝘀𝘁 and they don’t. 💅

𝗦𝗵𝗲 𝘀𝗮𝗶𝗱 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗾𝘂𝗶𝗲𝘁 𝗽𝗮𝗿𝘁 𝗼𝘂𝘁 𝗹𝗼𝘂𝗱. 𝗣𝗿𝗼𝘁𝗲𝘀𝘁𝗮𝗻𝘁𝘀 𝗮𝗿𝗲 𝘁𝗮𝘂𝗴𝗵𝘁 𝘁𝗼 “𝗲𝘃𝗮𝗻𝗴𝗲𝗹𝗶𝘇𝗲” 𝗖𝗮𝘁𝗵𝗼𝗹𝗶𝗰𝘀 𝗮𝘀 𝗶𝗳 𝘄𝗲 𝘄𝗼𝗿𝘀𝗵𝗶𝗽 𝗮 𝗱𝗶𝗳𝗳𝗲𝗿𝗲𝗻𝘁 𝗚𝗼𝗱. 𝗖𝗮𝘁𝗵𝗼𝗹𝗶𝗰𝘀 𝗻𝗲𝘃𝗲𝗿 𝗿𝗲𝘁𝘂𝗿𝗻 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗳𝗮𝘃𝗼𝗿. ✝️🔥 Hannah grew up reformed and Calvinist. She was trained to believe Catholics worship Mary, earn salvation, follow a dictator pope, and do not know scripture. In other words she was taught lies. Then she entered the Catholic Church and found out something shocking. 𝗖𝗮𝘁𝗵𝗼𝗹𝗶𝗰𝘀 𝗱𝗼 𝗻𝗼𝘁 𝘁𝗮𝗹𝗸 𝗮𝗯𝗼𝘂𝘁 𝗣𝗿𝗼𝘁𝗲𝘀𝘁𝗮𝗻𝘁𝘀. 𝗔𝘁 𝗮𝗹𝗹. They just worship God, go to mass, go to confession, and mind their own business. Meanwhile 𝗣𝗿𝗼𝘁𝗲𝘀𝘁𝗮𝗻𝘁𝘀 𝘀𝗽𝗲𝗻𝗱 𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗶𝗿𝗲 𝘀𝗲𝗿𝗺𝗼𝗻𝘀 𝗮𝘁𝘁𝗮𝗰𝗸𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗖𝗵𝘂𝗿𝗰𝗵 they claim is not Christian. She also learned another truth. Catholics do not church shop. Worship is not a TED talk. Mass is a sacrifice. You do not pick a parish because you want stage lights or a good feeling. You go to receive the real Body of Christ. And the one that stunned her most. Catholics are taught that many Protestants will be saved. 𝗣𝗿𝗼𝘁𝗲𝘀𝘁𝗮𝗻𝘁𝘀 𝗮𝗿𝗲 𝘁𝗮𝘂𝗴𝗵𝘁 𝘁𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗖𝗮𝘁𝗵𝗼𝗹𝗶𝗰𝘀 𝘄𝗶𝗹𝗹 𝗻𝗼𝘁. Guess who looks more like the early Church. Welcome home, Hannah. Another Protestant discovers the one Church that does not need to attack anyone. 𝗕𝗲𝗰𝗮𝘂𝘀𝗲 𝗶𝘁 𝗵𝗮𝘀 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗘𝘂𝗰𝗵𝗮𝗿𝗶𝘀𝘁 and they don’t. 💅

𝚕𝚒𝚝𝚝𝚕𝚎 𝚘𝚗𝚎 ♱🇻🇦

16,072 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

"I HAVE NO MERCY FOR ANY CHURCH!" KAGAME, THE MOST ANTI-CHURCH, ANTI-CHRIST PRESIDENT SPEAKS! Please find herebelow Kagame's speech against the church and my response! On thanksgiving, Kagame met with the press and this were his remarks when asked why he has ordered the closing of 10,000 churches citing safety and keeping imposing new burdens/new requirements on churches (Most congregation had worked hard to meet new requirements but still, they were not allowed to open). ON NOVEMBER 27, 2025 KAGAME SAID: "If it were upto me, I would not allow any church to re-open...The church plays no role in development, in the survival of the country nor in resolving war issues . Does the church give jobs? Running a church is scamming and cheating from people! The church is a place full of bandits I have no mercy for any church You have been deceived by the colonizers and you let yourself be deceived! Why are we even talking about churches? Go cultivate your lands, go raise your animals As for prayer, if you need to, pray over the phone! Don't you know the origin of churches? We had mercy, if we did not, we could have closed more churches. When asked about the few remaining churches overcrowding because now there are only a handful open, Mr Kagame said, To solve the issue of overcrowding, let's close them all! We will close the ones that we allowed to remain open and as for the people, let them pray from their homes. These praying stuff... who has (bewitched you) Africans? KAGAME'S WAR WITH CHRIST'S CHURCH IN RWANDA CONTINUE! REV COLEMAN'S RESPONSE "Mr Kagame, the right to worship, to open a church and to congregate does not come from you, it is a God given right to every human being - it is a gift to humanity. Thank you for testifying before the whole world that you are the man who has stolen the rights of Rwandans but it will not end well with you. Like every thief, God will hold you accountable for stealing Rwandans freedom. Christ said, "I WILL BUILD MY CHURCH AND THE GATES OF HELL SHALL NOT PREVAIL." You are here today but one day you will be gone and God's children will congregate again soon in all freedom and liberty! Get ready Mr. Kagame, God will severely judge you for leading a nation like this for the past 30+ years; you have started a war with God and we will soon see who will win!" THE GATES OF HELL SHALL NOT PREVAIL! (Matthew 16:18)

"I HAVE NO MERCY FOR ANY CHURCH!" KAGAME, THE MOST ANTI-CHURCH, ANTI-CHRIST PRESIDENT SPEAKS! Please find herebelow Kagame's speech against the church and my response! On thanksgiving, Kagame met with the press and this were his remarks when asked why he has ordered the closing of 10,000 churches citing safety and keeping imposing new burdens/new requirements on churches (Most congregation had worked hard to meet new requirements but still, they were not allowed to open). ON NOVEMBER 27, 2025 KAGAME SAID: "If it were upto me, I would not allow any church to re-open...The church plays no role in development, in the survival of the country nor in resolving war issues . Does the church give jobs? Running a church is scamming and cheating from people! The church is a place full of bandits I have no mercy for any church You have been deceived by the colonizers and you let yourself be deceived! Why are we even talking about churches? Go cultivate your lands, go raise your animals As for prayer, if you need to, pray over the phone! Don't you know the origin of churches? We had mercy, if we did not, we could have closed more churches. When asked about the few remaining churches overcrowding because now there are only a handful open, Mr Kagame said, To solve the issue of overcrowding, let's close them all! We will close the ones that we allowed to remain open and as for the people, let them pray from their homes. These praying stuff... who has (bewitched you) Africans? KAGAME'S WAR WITH CHRIST'S CHURCH IN RWANDA CONTINUE! REV COLEMAN'S RESPONSE "Mr Kagame, the right to worship, to open a church and to congregate does not come from you, it is a God given right to every human being - it is a gift to humanity. Thank you for testifying before the whole world that you are the man who has stolen the rights of Rwandans but it will not end well with you. Like every thief, God will hold you accountable for stealing Rwandans freedom. Christ said, "I WILL BUILD MY CHURCH AND THE GATES OF HELL SHALL NOT PREVAIL." You are here today but one day you will be gone and God's children will congregate again soon in all freedom and liberty! Get ready Mr. Kagame, God will severely judge you for leading a nation like this for the past 30+ years; you have started a war with God and we will soon see who will win!" THE GATES OF HELL SHALL NOT PREVAIL! (Matthew 16:18)

Rev Christine Coleman

102,640 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

In preparation for this, I checked out Dr. Jordan Cooper's (Dr Jordan B. Cooper) video on Chemnitz's examination of traditions and he made the remark that the Catholic Church contradicts the consensus of the Fathers on communion in both kinds, and that there is "no example of" communion in one kind in the Fathers. Respectfully, I think this is a messy critique which misses what is going on at the Reformation and what the precise claim of the Reformers was. I have already made a video extensively citing examples of communion in one kind starting in the 3rd century, through Tertullian, Ss. Jerome, Basil, etc, such as the widespread practice of private communion at home with the Eucharistic bread only. I will link it below. These are usually dismissed as "extraordinary instances," but this only shows that the Fathers did not actually agree with the Reformers. Remember, the Reformers (specifically the Lutheran orthodox) said that communion in one kind can NEVER happen. Johann Adam Scherzer, for example, said that if someone cannot receive wine, “[he] should be kept away from the whole, than that he should not receive the whole” (Anti-Bellarmine, disp. 11, th. 6, obj. 9). To demonstrate that the Catholic Church "contradicts" the Fathers on communion in both kinds (which is Dr. Cooper's internal critique), one needs to show that the Fathers of any age unanimously (at least morally) taught that it was a matter of faith to hold that both kinds must be received. Certainly, no consensus ever existed. On the contrary, we know they often did make the exception and allowed Christians to receive only one kind, which shows they did not agree with the Lutherans that this is a divine precept (to receive both). Dr. Cooper conflates the ordinary liturgical practice with what Catholics mean by a "consensus on the Fathers." For more, I recommend reading St. Robert Bellarmine who has a really good response to Martin Chemnitz. Here is a helpful example. It was truly a unanimous practice to preserve the Eucharist after the liturgy and treat the elements as consecrated. The Reformed (to my knowledge) unanimously deny this is the case, and the Lutherans (from my reading of Chemnitz and Gerhard) admit that Christ's presence persists but only for taking the Eucharist to the sick. The early Church affirmed Christ's presence in the Eucharist in the Catholic sense; they preserved it even for reasons which were not for the sick and nevertheless affirmed its lasting consecration (Ss. Irenaeus, Ambrose, Jerome, to name a few). The Catholic view of tradition tells us that this practice/belief (that Christ is still present post-liturgy) must be valid and true (since the universal church cannot err), but it does not establish a precept i.e. just because the whole Church often preserved the Eucharist, it does not mean we actually have to do it; it just means we can do so validly and licitly; it also means this is a certain rule which Protestants contradicted (from a Catholic POV). Even if communion in both kinds was the universal practice (which it was not), this would not suffice to say the Tridentine Church is in contradiction, since this would only tell us it is valid (duh, so does Scripture). There would need to be a unanimous testimony from the Fathers of, let's say, the fourth century, that communion in both kinds is the only way and that to oppose this is heresy; a testimony which does not exist and is even contradicted.

In preparation for this, I checked out Dr. Jordan Cooper's (Dr Jordan B. Cooper) video on Chemnitz's examination of traditions and he made the remark that the Catholic Church contradicts the consensus of the Fathers on communion in both kinds, and that there is "no example of" communion in one kind in the Fathers. Respectfully, I think this is a messy critique which misses what is going on at the Reformation and what the precise claim of the Reformers was. I have already made a video extensively citing examples of communion in one kind starting in the 3rd century, through Tertullian, Ss. Jerome, Basil, etc, such as the widespread practice of private communion at home with the Eucharistic bread only. I will link it below. These are usually dismissed as "extraordinary instances," but this only shows that the Fathers did not actually agree with the Reformers. Remember, the Reformers (specifically the Lutheran orthodox) said that communion in one kind can NEVER happen. Johann Adam Scherzer, for example, said that if someone cannot receive wine, “[he] should be kept away from the whole, than that he should not receive the whole” (Anti-Bellarmine, disp. 11, th. 6, obj. 9). To demonstrate that the Catholic Church "contradicts" the Fathers on communion in both kinds (which is Dr. Cooper's internal critique), one needs to show that the Fathers of any age unanimously (at least morally) taught that it was a matter of faith to hold that both kinds must be received. Certainly, no consensus ever existed. On the contrary, we know they often did make the exception and allowed Christians to receive only one kind, which shows they did not agree with the Lutherans that this is a divine precept (to receive both). Dr. Cooper conflates the ordinary liturgical practice with what Catholics mean by a "consensus on the Fathers." For more, I recommend reading St. Robert Bellarmine who has a really good response to Martin Chemnitz. Here is a helpful example. It was truly a unanimous practice to preserve the Eucharist after the liturgy and treat the elements as consecrated. The Reformed (to my knowledge) unanimously deny this is the case, and the Lutherans (from my reading of Chemnitz and Gerhard) admit that Christ's presence persists but only for taking the Eucharist to the sick. The early Church affirmed Christ's presence in the Eucharist in the Catholic sense; they preserved it even for reasons which were not for the sick and nevertheless affirmed its lasting consecration (Ss. Irenaeus, Ambrose, Jerome, to name a few). The Catholic view of tradition tells us that this practice/belief (that Christ is still present post-liturgy) must be valid and true (since the universal church cannot err), but it does not establish a precept i.e. just because the whole Church often preserved the Eucharist, it does not mean we actually have to do it; it just means we can do so validly and licitly; it also means this is a certain rule which Protestants contradicted (from a Catholic POV). Even if communion in both kinds was the universal practice (which it was not), this would not suffice to say the Tridentine Church is in contradiction, since this would only tell us it is valid (duh, so does Scripture). There would need to be a unanimous testimony from the Fathers of, let's say, the fourth century, that communion in both kinds is the only way and that to oppose this is heresy; a testimony which does not exist and is even contradicted.

Kevin Fernandez

32,660 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

I don’t have the bandwidth to respond to every absurd thing said by a TV preacher or televangelist or con artist. But this is an exception. Paula White is not just a millionaire prosperity preacher. She is one of the most trusted Senior Advisors of President Trump and the newly appointed head of the White House Faith Office. In this recent video she is promising miracles, superpowers, and even your own personal guardian angel… all for the low price of $1000. You can’t make this stuff up. This is real. But it should not be normal. Do NOT give this woman your money… she has plenty already. And if you already did, please hold onto the receipt so you can get a refund. Angels are not for sale. I actually believe in angels, and miracles… but thanks be to God’s generous love, they are not for sale. Trump-evangelicalism is a cult. It is dangerous, deceptive … and apparently very expensive. This heretical version of our faith does a lot of damage to true authentic Christianity as it distorts theology for the sake of wealth and power. Rebuke it, in the name of Jesus. And don’t give Paula your money. Angels are not for sale.

I don’t have the bandwidth to respond to every absurd thing said by a TV preacher or televangelist or con artist. But this is an exception. Paula White is not just a millionaire prosperity preacher. She is one of the most trusted Senior Advisors of President Trump and the newly appointed head of the White House Faith Office. In this recent video she is promising miracles, superpowers, and even your own personal guardian angel… all for the low price of $1000. You can’t make this stuff up. This is real. But it should not be normal. Do NOT give this woman your money… she has plenty already. And if you already did, please hold onto the receipt so you can get a refund. Angels are not for sale. I actually believe in angels, and miracles… but thanks be to God’s generous love, they are not for sale. Trump-evangelicalism is a cult. It is dangerous, deceptive … and apparently very expensive. This heretical version of our faith does a lot of damage to true authentic Christianity as it distorts theology for the sake of wealth and power. Rebuke it, in the name of Jesus. And don’t give Paula your money. Angels are not for sale.

Shane Claiborne

19,602 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

🔥 Leslie Manookian told a mainstream reporter to her face why people have no faith in government, media, or corporations. Listen to this incredible exchange: “This woman [from ProPublica] called me up and said … you don’t have any faith in the government, you don’t have any faith in the media, and you don’t have any faith in corporations, I just don’t understand.” “I said, well, let me illuminate you … ” “So I shared with her a story.” “When I was working on Wall Street 25 years ago or so, I had the CEO of one of the biggest pharmaceutical companies … come into my offices and tell me that their new drug that they had in phase three clinical trials … killed a few people.” “They said, the bad news is the FDA is going to make us put a black box warning on our packaging.” “The good news is we still think we can do $7 billion in peak sales.” “This drug is on the market today.” “I shared the story with her. She didn’t even flinch.” “Then I explained to her how we had been lied to by the government about masks that CDC’s own science showed in May of 2020 that masks have zero impact on the spread of influenza-like illnesses.” “They published that in May of 2020.” “I said, they made up this whole [social] distancing.” “There’s a reason they made that up. Because all of us are electrical beings, right? And our heart energy extends out about six feet.” “So when they make you stand separate, they are literally depriving you of your humanity, your ability to connect.” “I explained this to her and then I said the media, you guys lie about us constantly. You lie about everything.” “You expect us to trust you?” “They are really in utter denial.”

🔥 Leslie Manookian told a mainstream reporter to her face why people have no faith in government, media, or corporations. Listen to this incredible exchange: “This woman [from ProPublica] called me up and said … you don’t have any faith in the government, you don’t have any faith in the media, and you don’t have any faith in corporations, I just don’t understand.” “I said, well, let me illuminate you … ” “So I shared with her a story.” “When I was working on Wall Street 25 years ago or so, I had the CEO of one of the biggest pharmaceutical companies … come into my offices and tell me that their new drug that they had in phase three clinical trials … killed a few people.” “They said, the bad news is the FDA is going to make us put a black box warning on our packaging.” “The good news is we still think we can do $7 billion in peak sales.” “This drug is on the market today.” “I shared the story with her. She didn’t even flinch.” “Then I explained to her how we had been lied to by the government about masks that CDC’s own science showed in May of 2020 that masks have zero impact on the spread of influenza-like illnesses.” “They published that in May of 2020.” “I said, they made up this whole [social] distancing.” “There’s a reason they made that up. Because all of us are electrical beings, right? And our heart energy extends out about six feet.” “So when they make you stand separate, they are literally depriving you of your humanity, your ability to connect.” “I explained this to her and then I said the media, you guys lie about us constantly. You lie about everything.” “You expect us to trust you?” “They are really in utter denial.”

Health Freedom Defense Fund

17,545 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten