Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

🚨𝗧𝗛𝗘 𝗘𝗡𝗧𝗜𝗥𝗘 “𝗣𝗢𝗜𝗟𝗜𝗘𝗩𝗥𝗘 𝗜𝗦 𝗙𝗜𝗡𝗜𝗦𝗛𝗘𝗗 𝗦𝗧𝗢𝗥𝗬 𝗜𝗦: • 86 people polled by Léger in ATL CANADA! 𝗬𝗘𝗦 𝟴𝟲! • 17 anonymous MPs • Not voters • Not an election That’s their whole collapse! Classic bandwagon smear playbook. Let me show you‼️

116,408 views • 25 days ago •via X (Twitter)

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

Mr. William Ruto has spent over Kshs. 1 billion on bribes in Ol Kalou Constituency, and it is not working. And it will not work! He has spent Kshs. 10 billion on projects, and it is not working. And it will not work! Simple! He is now pushing the IEBC to postpone the election and give him time to splash more money and see whether it will work. The new plan is to unleash goons this weekend to cause violence and give the IEBC the reason they so desperately need to postpone the election slated for 16th July 2026. If the IEBC cannot handle a simple by-election, claiming electoral malpractices, how do they plan to convince Kenyans that they can oversee the General Election? It is absurd that the IEBC has looked the other way as Cabinet Ministers and Principal Secretaries openly bribe voters and campaign in violation of the Electoral Code of Conduct. The IEBC Chairperson is clearly an appendage of Mr. William Ruto. I have information that Mr. William Ruto has demanded that the IEBC either assure him that they will announce the UDA candidate as the winner or postpone the by-election. From where I sit, I believe they will postpone the by-election after an orgy of violence by state-sponsored militia. The IEBC should NOT and must NOT postpone the Ol Kalou by-election. The people of Ol Kalou are ready to elect their new Member of Parliament and have a constitutional right to be represented in the National Assembly. The IEBC should conduct the by-election in accordance with the law and ensure there is no violence or ballot stuffing. If the IEBC has no capacity to conduct a single by-election, then Kenyans will conclude that it cannot conduct the 10th August 2027 General Election, and all the commissioners must resign with immediate effect. IEBC, you must let the people of Ol Kalou elect their Member of Parliament on Thursday, 16th July 2026. You must not play ping-pong with the rights of the people of Ol Kalou at the behest of your master! |Video Courtesy of TV47|

Rigathi Gachagua

123,263 views • 2 months ago

Spencer Pratt voters are reporting that their ballots have been rejected. This is from an independent journalist in San Diego named Amy Reichert: "Multiple Spencer Pratt voters have contacted me saying their signatures were rejected and their ballots were not counted. Here is the letter they get. “More than 200,000 Californians have had their ballots rejected since 2020. This is what happens when you don’t require voter ID. If a machine can identify your party registration, people have every right to question whether the process can be manipulated." This is from a man who lives in Southern California named Russ. He said, "Today I received a letter, just like my neighbor did, informing me that my California ballot was not counted because my ‘signature verification’ supposedly didn't match the state's records. I've been voting in California for 20 years." Leftists are engaging in a series of talking points to defend the California election system. They say things like, “Well, you need to sign the ballots, so there will be signature verification” or “We check those signatures” or “It has to be postmarked by Election Day” or “Ballot harvesters have to put their signature on the ballot envelope, so it's not done anonymously. There's still a chain of custody for these ballots.” They're saying these things to try to instill confidence in voters, when none of us have any confidence in the California election system. Each and every one of their talking points is contradicted by the actual election procedure and the laws on the books that guide Los Angeles elections. So they say “You need to sign it.” OK, but does a smiley face count? Oh, it counts. And they say, “We checked these signatures.” OK, do you check them on any ballots other than Republican ballots? Because there have been reports of Los Angeles election workers telling journalists, “Actually, we don't really check these ballots.” So do you or don't you? The mail-in ballots that come in late, the left says, “They have to be postmarked by Election Day. These are not people that are casting ballots after Election Day tallies have been made public.” Actually, you don't need a postmark. If you look at California election law, you don't have to have a postmark by Election Day. You can simply handwrite any date that is either on or before Election Day, and the ballot is counted. What happens to the ballots that have been ballot-harvested and are turned in to be counted if the ballot harvester doesn't put his or her name on that ballot? Is that ballot rejected? Oh, no, it's not rejected. That ballot is still counted, even if the ballot harvester doesn't sign the ballot envelope. So all of these talking points that are thrown at us by the left are…lies.

Liz Wheeler

84,957 views • 2 months ago

Alberta just opened the door to separation—and we’re done getting screwed Let me (Sheila Gunn Reid) be clear: This isn’t a meme. It’s not wishful thinking. This is a legal path to independence. And it just became achievable. Mark Carney is Prime Minister. Ontario, Quebec, and Atlantic Canada handed him a majority. The West? Irrelevant again. We’ve been here before—forced into policies we didn’t vote for, led by a man we didn’t elect, governed by people who think Alberta exists to be taxed, scolded, and shut down. But this time, Alberta did something different. Because the very next day, Danielle Smith’s government introduced a bill that could change everything. Buried in Alberta's Election Statutes Amendment Act, 2025 is a change that makes it possible—finally—for regular Albertans to trigger a binding referendum on separation. The Citizen Initiative Act has been in the books for years. But it was a fraud. It required 600,000 signatures in 90 days—20% of all eligible voters. That’s not a citizen petition. That’s a brick wall. But now? Smith’s government just cut the threshold in half, and changed the calculation to 10% of voters from the last election. According to constitutional lawyer Keith Wilson, that’s fewer than 200,000 signatures. Let me be clear: This isn’t a meme. It’s not wishful thinking. This is a legal path to independence. And it just became achievable. This isn’t about bluster—it’s about options. It’s about leverage. It’s about Alberta saying: we’re done getting screwed. And that’s why we’re launching It’s where you can support fair-minded journalism on Western alienation and the growing push for real autonomy—or even independence. It’s where you’ll find honest reporting that the Laurentian press won’t touch. It’s where you can say: we’ve had enough. We’re not here to blow smoke. We’re here to tell the truth. Because the next time Ottawa tries to grab our guns, kill our industries, or ram through their globalist vision—we’ll remind them of one number: 177,000. That’s all it takes now. And the West? We’re done getting screwed. And we are not going to tell people who want out, 1/3 in the West, to shut up. They are not fringe, not radical. They are bigger than those who vote for the NDP and Carney in the West. And you ignore them at your peril. Go to to learn more, buy your Western First merch and support our journalism.

Rebel News

167,030 views • 1 year ago

POLL: Nearly half of First Nations voters in Alberta back independence A poll commissioned by @ActForAlberta found 46% of First Nations respondents said they'd vote to leave Canada in a referendum on independence. Sheila Gunn Reid shares details from a poll commissioned by Act For Alberta, which found 46% of First Nations respondents would support independence if a referendum were held on the matter. For months, we’ve been told Alberta independence is fringe. That Indigenous people oppose it. That claim is doing a lot of work right now, especially in court. And then this lands: Nearly half of indigenous voters support independence. Someone tell the activist chiefs — the narrative just blew apart. According to exclusive polling commissioned by Act For Alberta, and full disclosure, I’m the listed contact for that third-party advertiser, 46% of First Nations respondents say they would vote to leave Canada. Nearly half. That's higher than support in the general Alberta population, which sits at one in three. That alone should force a rethink. Now layer this on top: 301,000 signatures, collected by 7,000 volunteers. In a long, bitterly cold Alberta winter. And what happens next? They don’t get verified. Not counted. Not certified. They're stopped, wrapped in evidence tape like some crime scene because a judge has issued a stay blocking the validation process while a legal challenge from First Nations groups plays out. So, line this up. Nearly half of First Nations respondents are open to independence. But activist chiefs claiming to speak for all Indigenous Albertans want to protect the failing federalist status quo, not just for their people, but for all of us. Hundreds of thousands of Albertans signed a petition to at least ask the question. And the activist chiefs involved in the lawsuit are asking the court to freeze the process before it reaches a result. That’s the moment we’re in. A political question with massive public engagement, halted before it could be measured. There’s a gap here. Between what’s being argued in court by gatekeepers and what people are actually saying when you ask them directly. And it is not a small gap. Indigenous communities are not one voice. Albertans are not one voice. That is the whole point of a vote. Everyone gets their say on referendum day. So, here’s the question that does not go away: if the answer is so obvious, why not let the process finish? Why not count the signatures and drop the lawsuit? Why not let people speak? Because once it becomes one person, one vote, the outcome is not controlled anymore, and the narrative is shattered for good.

Rebel News

37,293 views • 4 months ago