Video yรผkleniyor...

Video Yรผklenemedi

๐—ง๐—ฅ๐—จ๐— ๐—ฃ ๐—œ๐—ฆ ๐—”๐—Ÿ๐—ฅ๐—˜๐—”๐——๐—ฌ ๐—•๐—จ๐—œ๐—Ÿ๐——๐—œ๐—ก๐—š ๐Ÿฎ๐Ÿฌ๐Ÿฎ๐Ÿด. ๐—›๐—˜ ๐—๐—จ๐—ฆ๐—ง ๐—›๐—”๐—ฆ๐—ก'๐—ง ๐—ง๐—ข๐—Ÿ๐—— ๐—ฌ๐—ข๐—จ ๐—ฌ๐—˜๐—ง. Watch what Trump actually did โ€” not what he said, but what he did. He put Marco Rubio in charge of the world. And he put JD Vance in charge of finding every dollar that was stolen from...

303,776 gรถrรผntรผleme โ€ข 5 ay รถnce โ€ขvia X (Twitter)

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gรถnderinin yorumlarฤฑ burada gรถrรผnecek

Benzer Videolar

For Those That Donโ€™t Understand Donald Trumpโ€™s VP Pick Being JD Vance, Hereโ€™s Why โ€œHeโ€™s a brilliant pickโ€ โ€œAbsolutely brilliant pick by Donald Trump to select JD Vance as his vice presidential candidate, his running mate, when he sworn into office on January 20, 2025. Now look, I know there's a lot of people who are hand ringing and don't understand the pick, but I'm here to tell you JD Vance checks a ton of boxes. More boxes than anybody else that was being looked at. And there's two things about JD Vance that nobody else brings to the table. JD Vance understands what it means to grow up in a severely depressed part of the country. He understands what modern American families deal with living paycheck to paycheck. He grew up in that environment, trying to figure out how to make your money last as long as your month does. He gets it. He made his money himself. He understands the impact of addiction on society because it ripped through his family. But the thing about JD Vance is this guy is wicked smart, and he's an incredible debater, and he knows his stuff. You put him on a stage with Kamala cackling Harris, and you watch what he does to her. He's gonna expose to the entire world how inept and unqualified Kamala Harris is, not only to be vice president, but to be president if Joe Biden were to be reelected because he ain't making it a full 4 year term. But the thing that you have to remember about JD Vance is 8 years ago, he was a never Trumper. And I know that sounds like a bad thing, and the media is gonna harp on that, but you wait until you hear JD Vance explain why he's not a never Trumper anymore and how he's gonna speak to that change that he had by watching Donald Trump keep his promises and perform exactly the way he said he was gonna perform. And as a matter of fact, do for this country what he promised to do. That's what changed JD Vance's mind. He's talked about it. He's been open about it. Donald Trump is an actions guy, and JD Vance responded to that. And I think most Americans just want to be able to believe that their candidate is gonna keep their promises. And when you put someone like JD Vance on a stage or in front of a microphone or in front of a camera, and he explains how Donald Trump changed his mind through his actions and his performance, that's gonna speak to a lot of the people that are still sitting on the fence trying to decide whether or not Donald Trump is the right candidate for them. This pick was the best pick that Donald Trump has made so far. Well done.โ€

Wall Street Apes

728,866 gรถrรผntรผleme โ€ข 2 yฤฑl รถnce

"It's not a congressional program. Only the president can say anything about this." ~Semivan Semivan: Congress Doesn't Have the Right or Need-To-Know About a Crash Retrieval Program Thoughts? Grusch decided Congress had a need-to-know, and Congress hadn't been told. "Which I don't think was true." ~Semivan ~~~ Semivan: "Some of the congressmen now that are being briefed (laughs) on it are not very happy because they think they have a right to know this. And I like to point out, I spoke to a couple of the committees and I told them, 'Look, it's not a congressional program. It's an executive program, and it's run by the president and only the president can say anything about this. I can't say anything about it, the president has to come out.'" (Note: Semivan was careful to cover his azz and say these were answers about a, hypothetical, crash retrieval program. Although, from his past comments, I'm pretty sure he knows (or at least believes) it exists. See here: Semivan Blockbuster I know where the legacy programs are located. You should take [Grusch] and everything he says to the bank. It's our inalienable right to know about this. ) ~ Semivan: "It's what Dave Grusch said. Dave Grusch...worked for AARO (He meant the UAPTF) and he went to various intelligence agencies and questioned the people that were actually working on these programs. And they all told them the same thing, the same story. So he takes this back, and he decides Congress has a need-to-know, and Congress hasn't been told. Which I don't think was true. He didn't know that, but he thought the public also had a right to know. And I'm perfectly fine... He did the exact right thing you're supposed to do if you're a government employee if you think there's something going on that's not legal. And he did it the right way. So, I give him a load of credit for that. And then he explains what it was, and then he's briefing some of the congressmen on this. Now the congressmen are upset, saying, 'Well, wait a minute, we're in charge of spending for the government and what have you. We should have the ability to know this.' But what Congress doesn't realize is these programs, you know, they exist at a very, very high classified level. They're Special Access Programs, and I would say, maybe the Gang of Eight, if them, have the clearances to basically know of these programs. And even if they were to be told of the programs, they could never discuss it, nor could they ever debate it, publicly. It's not theirs to do. They would be told, officially, but just, you know, as a professional courtesy that these things are going on. "Don't forget, the CIA works directly for the President of the United States, all right? So if the CIA would be running this program (AFAIK, they are. ~Joe), they just, basically, talk to the president and the president talks to them. And those conversations are not subject to congressional notification, approval or anything else. And when CIA goes to the oversight committees and briefs their programs, the committees can't tell them, 'We don't like what you're doing.' Well, they can say that. But the only thing they can do, they can't stop the programs. All they can do is stop the funding. "So, you know, the intelligence agencies that work directly for the president answer to him and him only, really. They do tell Congress, because Congress does give them money and there is...that's been going on since 1975 now, and it's a great thing to do. And they've been very, very open and honest with Congress, and Congress, I think, has been wonderful about it. As a matter of fact, you know, Congress has, basically, said in some of these programs, 'Holy cow, this is great! Give a round of applause, you need more money, because what you guys are doing [is] great.' The relationship has always been very good. I thought, you know, between them." (But the folks in the intelligence agencies who are aware of the alleged Legacy UAP-related programs, do NOT tell Congress about them. Except, as Semivan said, MAYBE some members of the Gang of Eight. Certainly NOT members of Congress like Rep. Anna Paulina Luna or Rep. Eric Burlison. I think they have zero chance of being read in right now.) Semivan: "But that doesn't mean if the president, like Truman or Eisenhower, issued a presidential executive-action document or something along those lines, where he said, 'This is an extraordinary circumstance. I'm creating this super-secret thing that nobody gets to know about, not even Congress.' That's, basically, his...he can do that. That's in the power, that's in the Constitution. He has that right to do that without acknowledging." (THAT is how these alleged Legacy UAP programs are protected.) Semivan: "Now, has he (a president) done that without telling somebody? Probably there's one or two people in Congress that know about it at any given time. Maybe one or two people in the National Security Council know about it. Most presidents probably got a very generalized briefing on it, you know, saying, 'Yeah, this is real. If you wanna know more, we can tell you more. But, if you know more then you don't have plausible deniability anymore. And/or, you can't do anything about it anyway, because we don't understand it. But if something happens [and] we discover something that's groundbreaking or earth shattering, we'll come back and tell ya.' "So, imagine if you're a President of the United States. Do you really want to know this? Do you really want to have that hanging on your shoulders? I think not. Particularly when you have somebody else doing the job for you."

Joe Murgia

56,992 gรถrรผntรผleme โ€ข 11 ay รถnce

Culture is genetic because behavior is genetic. This beaver never saw a dam in its life. No beavers or anything else ever taught it to build a dam. It wants to build a dam because it is a beaver. Many beavers together build a big dam. That is beaver culture. Humans are not different. Nothing is different. This is what life is. This is how life works. Your body is your mind. A caterpillar wants to build a chrysalis. A bee wants to build a hive. A lion wants to build a pride. You are not special. You are not above your nature. you are INSIDE of it. The thoughts that we think are genetic thoughts. The crimes we commit are genetic crimes. The art we create is genetic art. Just like this beaver, you can give the animal different sticks and it will build a different dam, but it will always build a dam. And you can give humans different "education," but the human will always use it to do what its genes tell it to do. This is the first big answer that you need. This is the biggest piece of the puzzle. This is how to understand people 90% of the way. You just... notice what they do, and get out of the way, and watch them do it. And if they need sticks, you give them sticks. And if you don't like what they do, you have to get away from them. You cannot train dam-building into them or out of them any more than you can with a beaver. A beaver wants to build a dam because it is a beaver. Whatever you see people build, that's what they wanted to build from the sticks they got in the river they were in. Stop pretending you can change it.

hoe_math = PsychoMath

1,189,824 gรถrรผntรผleme โ€ข 11 ay รถnce

How Jeffrey Epstein rose from maths nerd, to a financial fixer for elites, to the boss of blackmail: โ€˜If you look at Epsteinโ€™s operation, what it looks like to me is that itโ€™s a criminal operation on a number of different levels. Epstein is an interesting case because where does he come from? Well, he doesnโ€™t come from a wealthy family. He doesnโ€™t come from an influential family. He was a Long Island kid who was good at mathematicsโ€ฆhe was a kind of smart, nerdy kid who made friends by doing their math homework. Youโ€™re not popular because youโ€™re a jock. Youโ€™re not popular necessarily because youโ€™re that good-looking or you dance well. Youโ€™re popular because you can do other peopleโ€™s math homework and get them to pass. His whole career is ingratiating himself to wealthy, powerful people. What did he do as a financial advisor? Look at it. Just stand back and look at what he did. And what he did was that he helped them dodge taxes. He also helped them hide money. He could help people discover money that had been hidden abroad. He could help them hide money. If you do one, you can do the other. And thatโ€™s how he moved as a kind of fixer and arranger into the realm of the rich and powerful. And in that process, either he or other people who were working with him found out that these people can be compromised in a number of ways. And so then you start installing cameras in your residences, in the bedrooms and the bathrooms. Thereโ€™s only one reason you do that. Itโ€™s fairly simple. The only reason why you collect all of this video information on your rich and powerful friends is to potentially use it as leverage against them. You donโ€™t have to actually use it. You simply have to make them aware that you have it and could use it.โ€™ -Prof. Richard Spence on the latest episode of Going Underground FULL INTERVIEW:

Going Underground

68,766 gรถrรผntรผleme โ€ข 8 ay รถnce

Rubio is putting on a clinic for how to handle the media. When a reporter tried to justify his narrative about Iran by citing Democrat criticism, Secretary Rubio made him look like a kindergartener. REPORTER: โ€œSeveral Democrats criticize what you said andโ€”โ€ RUBIO: โ€œYeah, of course they criticize.โ€ โ€œTheyโ€™re going to always criticize! Weโ€™ve been doing this for years, guys.โ€ โ€œIโ€™ll tell you right now, theyโ€™ll come out after the briefing and say we didnโ€™t hear anything. We have more questions than answersโ€ฆโ€ โ€œYou mark my words. But we still do these briefings.โ€ โ€œGo ahead.โ€ REPORTER: โ€œTheir criticism was on the timeline. They said that Israel is dictating the timeline for the United States. And as you know, several people on the right have also agreed. How would you respond?โ€ RUBIO: โ€œThe United States made a decision โ€” under the president of the United States, made a decision. This is intolerable.โ€ โ€œIran cannot have these missiles, cannot have these drones, cannot threaten the world.โ€ โ€œThe president said this is the weakest theyโ€™ve ever been. If we donโ€™t hit them now, a year from now, a year and a half now, no one will be able to touch them and theyโ€™ll be able to do whatever they want.โ€ โ€œAnd he made a decision to go. In a joint operation, because it gave us the highest chance of success. He went first because he concluded we were not going to get hit first.โ€ โ€œWe were not going to absorb a blow from them. We were going to go first.โ€ โ€œHe wasnโ€™t going to run the risk that they could attack us before we could hit them because, in addition to costing lives, it would undermine the effectiveness of our operation.โ€

Overton

122,521 gรถrรผntรผleme โ€ข 5 ay รถnce