Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Bu video yüklenirken bir sorun oluştu. Bu geçici bir ağ sorunundan kaynaklanıyor olabilir veya video kullanılamıyor olabilir.

Ana Sayfaya Dön

𝗧𝗪𝗘𝗡𝗧𝗬 𝗗𝗔𝗬𝗦 𝗕𝗘𝗙𝗢𝗥𝗘 𝗛𝗘 𝗪𝗔𝗦 𝗧𝗔𝗞𝗘𝗡 𝗙𝗥𝗢𝗠 𝗨𝗦, 𝗖𝗛𝗔𝗥𝗟𝗜𝗘 𝗞𝗜𝗥𝗞 𝗦𝗔𝗜𝗗 𝗧𝗛𝗜𝗦. "There is a corner of the internet of people that want to point and blame the Jews for all their problems. Everybody — this is demonic and it's from the pit of hell and it should not... be tolerated. Period." He didn't hedge. He didn't qualify it. He named it for what it was — demonic — and he said it should not be tolerated. Charlie also named the structural problem underneath it: an entire generation that is economically resentful, that owns nothing, isn't getting married, isn't having children, is depressed and anxious and staring at screens all day. And he warned that if the conclusion all that pain points toward is "it's the Jews' fault" — that is sloppy, shallow thinking that will destroy the person who embraces it. He was right. And he said it twenty days before he was murdered. 𝗡𝗼𝘄 𝗹𝗼𝗼𝗸 𝗮𝘁 𝘄𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗵𝗮𝘀 𝗵𝗮𝗽𝗽𝗲𝗻𝗲𝗱 𝘀𝗶𝗻𝗰𝗲. People who claim Charlie's friendship and his legacy are peddling the exact rhetoric he called demonic. Candace Owens — who converted to the Catholic faith Charlie was exploring — has spent months pushing anti-Israel content and conspiracy theories that would have earned his direct condemnation. Joe Kent is twisting his words on the Iran war to advance a narrative Charlie explicitly rejected. Tucker Carlson nods along with guests who echo the same blame-shifting framework Charlie spent his final weeks fighting against. Charlie understood something these people don't — or won't — acknowledge. Blaming Jews for civilizational failure is not edgy heterodoxy. It is not brave truth-telling. It is the oldest, laziest, most d∗adly scapegoating mechanism in human history. And he said so plainly, in the language of his faith: demonic. From the pit of hell. He also offered the alternative with the same directness. Instead of pointing at 0.02% of the world's population — the same people whose scientists cured tuberculosis, developed CPR and MRI machines, and saved 500 million lives — ask yourself what you can do in your own life. Sit up straight. Learn something. Stop being a victim. Become a victor. 𝗧𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝘄𝗮𝘀 𝗖𝗵𝗮𝗿𝗹𝗶𝗲 𝗞𝗶𝗿𝗸. 𝗧𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝘄𝗮𝘀 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗺𝗮𝗻 𝘁𝗵𝗲𝘆 𝗰𝗹𝗮𝗶𝗺 𝘁𝗼 𝗵𝗼𝗻𝗼𝗿. The people invoking his name while trafficking in the rhetoric he called demonic are not honoring him. They are using a dead man who cannot defend himself to legitimize a worldview he spent his life fighting against. And his widow, Erika Kirk — who has been smeared, harassed, and had her private purchase history leaked by a political operative the day after her husband was murdered — has had to watch it happen in real time. 𝗖𝗵𝗮𝗿𝗹𝗶𝗲 𝗸𝗻𝗲𝘄 𝗲𝘅𝗮𝗰𝘁𝗹𝘆 𝘄𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝘁𝗵𝗶𝘀 𝘄𝗮𝘀. 𝗛𝗲 𝗻𝗮𝗺𝗲𝗱 𝗶𝘁. 𝗔𝗻𝗱 𝘄𝗲 𝘀𝗵𝗼𝘂𝗹𝗱 𝗻𝗼𝘁 𝗹𝗲𝘁 𝗵𝗶𝘀 𝘄𝗼𝗿𝗱𝘀 𝗯𝗲 𝘀𝗶𝗹𝗲𝗻𝗰𝗲𝗱 𝗯𝘆 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗽𝗲𝗼𝗽𝗹𝗲 𝗵𝗲 𝗰𝗼𝗻𝗱𝗲𝗺𝗻𝗲𝗱.show more

M.A. Rothman

92,980 subscribers

16,244 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

.Jeremy Boreing pushes back on Candace’s claim that she’s fighting demons. He contrasts what IS and ISN’T demonic: “The demonic force here isn’t Erika Kirk… and it isn’t Charlie’s closest friends, either… It’s not the organization that Charlie bled to build or the mission that he poured his life into… It also isn’t Israel, which has absolutely nothing to do with Charlie’s death, and it isn’t our own federal government… It isn’t the Egyptians or the French… No, the demons here are in the man who pulled the trigger, and the demons are in Candace Owens.” He points out that the hallmark of the demonic is falsely accusing the innocent. Jeremy says that narcissism, resentment, ambition, and some actual grief have combined into something sinister: “A person who can look at a grieving widow in a courtroom full of evidence and calculate coldly that the profitable play is to set fire to both isn’t confused. She’s not misinformed. She’s doing evil, and she’s doing it on purpose. She’s doing it for money. She’s doing it for fame.” 🎥:

.Jeremy Boreing pushes back on Candace’s claim that she’s fighting demons. He contrasts what IS and ISN’T demonic: “The demonic force here isn’t Erika Kirk… and it isn’t Charlie’s closest friends, either… It’s not the organization that Charlie bled to build or the mission that he poured his life into… It also isn’t Israel, which has absolutely nothing to do with Charlie’s death, and it isn’t our own federal government… It isn’t the Egyptians or the French… No, the demons here are in the man who pulled the trigger, and the demons are in Candace Owens.” He points out that the hallmark of the demonic is falsely accusing the innocent. Jeremy says that narcissism, resentment, ambition, and some actual grief have combined into something sinister: “A person who can look at a grieving widow in a courtroom full of evidence and calculate coldly that the profitable play is to set fire to both isn’t confused. She’s not misinformed. She’s doing evil, and she’s doing it on purpose. She’s doing it for money. She’s doing it for fame.” 🎥:

Jackie Chea ⚖️

29,246 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

I’ve heard countless tributes to Charlie Kirk, but this sermon from Pastor Rob McCoy stands out as the ultimate testament to the life Charlie lived and the mission God gave him. “I look at Charlie and his life as modern-day Moses.” I strongly urge everyone to watch this full message: "One man in God constitutes a majority, and that's what Charlie was. He understood that God was the majority and he operated in that context. And he continued forward even though it wasn't popular. You'd be with him at some of these campus events. It'd be Charlie, a handful of us, and a sea of detractors." "He would just continue by the spoken word. He wasn't a violent man. He built turning point on nothing more than the spoken word, logic and reason, logos. And every day he was threatened by those who couldn't contend logically with the spoken word. And he would step forward without any fear because as the apostle Paul said, I have been crucified with Christ." "It's no longer I who live, it's Christ who lives in me. I is ego, self-preservation, Charlie had given his life to the Lord and it was in his hands and he was going to step forward courageously without fear. Because in the absence of courage, truth is an orphan. And Charlie was fearless, just like you are. And he knew every day with those threats that he was in danger, but his life belonged to God." "Like he would say, I'm immortal until God's done with me. And as he would step forward and contend, he would win hearts. And now it's not, Charlie in a sea of detractors. It was Charlie, a handful of us, and a sea of red hats and people professing having come to Christ because of him sharing his faith."

I’ve heard countless tributes to Charlie Kirk, but this sermon from Pastor Rob McCoy stands out as the ultimate testament to the life Charlie lived and the mission God gave him. “I look at Charlie and his life as modern-day Moses.” I strongly urge everyone to watch this full message: "One man in God constitutes a majority, and that's what Charlie was. He understood that God was the majority and he operated in that context. And he continued forward even though it wasn't popular. You'd be with him at some of these campus events. It'd be Charlie, a handful of us, and a sea of detractors." "He would just continue by the spoken word. He wasn't a violent man. He built turning point on nothing more than the spoken word, logic and reason, logos. And every day he was threatened by those who couldn't contend logically with the spoken word. And he would step forward without any fear because as the apostle Paul said, I have been crucified with Christ." "It's no longer I who live, it's Christ who lives in me. I is ego, self-preservation, Charlie had given his life to the Lord and it was in his hands and he was going to step forward courageously without fear. Because in the absence of courage, truth is an orphan. And Charlie was fearless, just like you are. And he knew every day with those threats that he was in danger, but his life belonged to God." "Like he would say, I'm immortal until God's done with me. And as he would step forward and contend, he would win hearts. And now it's not, Charlie in a sea of detractors. It was Charlie, a handful of us, and a sea of red hats and people professing having come to Christ because of him sharing his faith."

Benny Johnson

245,302 görüntüleme • 11 ay önce

‼️BOMBSHELL: Tucker Carlson BREAKS The Internet- FINALLY Revealing He Believes Israel ASSASINATED Charlie Kirk🤯 Charlie Kirk was murdered — and Tucker believes it was because of his evolving views on Israel. In a powerful moment, Tucker Carlson said: “Charlie Kirk was murdered. He was not murdered for his opinions on transgenderism. I believe, and most people who knew him well believe, he was most likely murdered for his evolving views on Israel.” This is a massive statement coming from someone who was genuinely close to Charlie. Tucker didn’t just say Charlie was killed — he directly pointed to Israel as the most likely reason. For months, many have been attacked, censored, and called conspiracy theorists for suggesting the same thing. Now one of the most prominent voices in conservative media is saying it plainly. Tucker made it clear: He knows there’s a lot at stake, but he feels a duty to say what he believes is true — regardless of the consequences. This changes things. FOLLOW Tucker Carlson and RT this. More people need to hear what Tucker just said. CC: Candace Owens John Mappin Buckley Carlson

‼️BOMBSHELL: Tucker Carlson BREAKS The Internet- FINALLY Revealing He Believes Israel ASSASINATED Charlie Kirk🤯 Charlie Kirk was murdered — and Tucker believes it was because of his evolving views on Israel. In a powerful moment, Tucker Carlson said: “Charlie Kirk was murdered. He was not murdered for his opinions on transgenderism. I believe, and most people who knew him well believe, he was most likely murdered for his evolving views on Israel.” This is a massive statement coming from someone who was genuinely close to Charlie. Tucker didn’t just say Charlie was killed — he directly pointed to Israel as the most likely reason. For months, many have been attacked, censored, and called conspiracy theorists for suggesting the same thing. Now one of the most prominent voices in conservative media is saying it plainly. Tucker made it clear: He knows there’s a lot at stake, but he feels a duty to say what he believes is true — regardless of the consequences. This changes things. FOLLOW Tucker Carlson and RT this. More people need to hear what Tucker just said. CC: Candace Owens John Mappin Buckley Carlson

Project Constitution

162,512 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

CONFIRMED: Andrew Kolvet from TPUSA confirms that the group chat from Cadace Owens is "AUTHENTIC." Charlie Kirk could not be bought. They tried to bribe him with money, and he turned it down. He started to notice the TRUTH, and then he started to speak the truth. Charlie could not be controlled. He was honest. Charlie was also in contact with Netanyahu, stating that the push for Israel was losing traction and intersest with the public. Charlie also refused his donors' wishes and continued to have people like Tucker Carlson at his events, and he specifically stated for them to SPEAK FREELY and for them to speak nothing but the TRUTH. Even though people who were invited by Charlie to speak, requested themselves to Charlie that they wouldn't speak of certain topics and "countries affairs" and knew he would lose more donors. Charlie stated that the truth was more important and DEMANED that they speak nothing but the TRUTH and ALL OF IT. Charlie lost even more donors and refused to lie to the people. Charlie is now no longer with us and was assassinated. There are no coincidences.

CONFIRMED: Andrew Kolvet from TPUSA confirms that the group chat from Cadace Owens is "AUTHENTIC." Charlie Kirk could not be bought. They tried to bribe him with money, and he turned it down. He started to notice the TRUTH, and then he started to speak the truth. Charlie could not be controlled. He was honest. Charlie was also in contact with Netanyahu, stating that the push for Israel was losing traction and intersest with the public. Charlie also refused his donors' wishes and continued to have people like Tucker Carlson at his events, and he specifically stated for them to SPEAK FREELY and for them to speak nothing but the TRUTH. Even though people who were invited by Charlie to speak, requested themselves to Charlie that they wouldn't speak of certain topics and "countries affairs" and knew he would lose more donors. Charlie stated that the truth was more important and DEMANED that they speak nothing but the TRUTH and ALL OF IT. Charlie lost even more donors and refused to lie to the people. Charlie is now no longer with us and was assassinated. There are no coincidences.

The SCIF

27,923 görüntüleme • 10 ay önce

Tucker Carlson: Remembering Charlie Kirk - A Life of Faith and Courage "Quickly about Charlie, I've known him since he was a teenager, and just an amazing person, but the two things that stick out, he's a Christian man. We talked about that a lot, including, you know, just the other day. There's a lot of pressure on public people, people who run huge, you know, hundred million dollar a year non-profits, and there are a lot of pitfalls and traps." "That's why so many of them are destroyed, and Charlie really did, without, you know, betraying details, like he walked the line for real. It was the topic of many conversations between us, because I've seen so many people destroyed. You know, most people are destroyed by power, and he wasn't, and I just really admire that." "I mean, to his last moments, you know, in order, he cared about God, his wife, and his children, and then his country. So, and that was totally real, completely real. I can affirm that, because I just talked to him about it so much, and I admire that, and he's a model, really." "I mean, he didn't have hate in his heart, and it was funny, and again, it's one of the reasons I couldn't stop looking at these videos last night. People were describing the opposite of what he was. He was filled with hate." "No, and if you talked to him about people who had attacked him, or who were truly his enemies, up to, and I think including the people who assassinated him yesterday, he would never, ever express hate, ever. He would always turn to, no, this person has been led astray. This person is clearly possessed by dark forces." "This person is a perpetrator, but also a victim of evil. I mean, that really was his worldview. That's the Christian worldview, and he expressed that in public, and especially in private, and I think that faith, which was completely real, not the fake faith that you see on display so often, but a real one, that was the root of his courage, and he had real courage." "He loved being with people who disagreed with him, not theoretically with them, but physically with them, you know, like close enough to smell. He would wait right in the middle of everything. I mean, I could tell you a million stories that I saw, but that was absolutely real." "Like, he loved people, even people who hated him, and people he loved, he was the rare person who was willing to tell them what he thought was true. I mean, he really believed, as a political matter, by the way, that, you know, I don't think he had animus toward anybody in no other country, but he really believed in his own country, and the obligation of his government to stand behind his country. He was truly America first in the nicest, most decent, non-ideological, but sincere way." "He was one of the only people, I mean, truly one of the only people to go to the president, whom he loved. He loved Donald Trump, like, personally as well, and I think the president really loved him in a real way, but he was one of the only people to go to the Oval Office and say, sir, I totally understand, and think Iran's really bad, but a war with Iran is not, you know, is something that could really hurt our country. I mean, boy, that was an unpopular position." "He didn't need to express it. Oh, of course, and he did it again. He didn't have some weird agenda. He wasn't mad at anybody. He was for his country, and he was for doing the right and wise and difficult thing, and he said that. He went to the Oval Office to say that." "He took massive, massive abuse from his own donors, which is also something that you don't see. He was one of the very few people, very few people I have met who combined a, like, a love for everyone involved with strong views. So, again, he was not animated by anything creepy or weird." "I mean, you knew him intimately, so you know this is true. If you talked to him off camera, he would say, you know, I really, like, I love whoever I'm talking about, but I think this is wrong. It's immoral." "It's bad for everybody involved, both sides, and he would say that, and he could say that because it was sincere. It was completely sincere, but I cannot overstate the amount of attacks he took privately over this, like, absolutely for real, and having lived in Washington most of my life and seen people run non-profits, I've never met one who was willing, stand up is too strong. He wasn't confrontational, but he would just say, no, I'm sorry that you feel that way, but I think this is the right thing." "The people we represent, which is mostly young people, they believe this, and I believe it also. It was brave, but loving at the same time, and I'm not sure he made a lot of headway, by the way. I mean, I think he made real enemies in doing that, but his view didn't change." "Anyway, he's just a wonderfully decent, loving man. That is true."

Tucker Carlson: Remembering Charlie Kirk - A Life of Faith and Courage "Quickly about Charlie, I've known him since he was a teenager, and just an amazing person, but the two things that stick out, he's a Christian man. We talked about that a lot, including, you know, just the other day. There's a lot of pressure on public people, people who run huge, you know, hundred million dollar a year non-profits, and there are a lot of pitfalls and traps." "That's why so many of them are destroyed, and Charlie really did, without, you know, betraying details, like he walked the line for real. It was the topic of many conversations between us, because I've seen so many people destroyed. You know, most people are destroyed by power, and he wasn't, and I just really admire that." "I mean, to his last moments, you know, in order, he cared about God, his wife, and his children, and then his country. So, and that was totally real, completely real. I can affirm that, because I just talked to him about it so much, and I admire that, and he's a model, really." "I mean, he didn't have hate in his heart, and it was funny, and again, it's one of the reasons I couldn't stop looking at these videos last night. People were describing the opposite of what he was. He was filled with hate." "No, and if you talked to him about people who had attacked him, or who were truly his enemies, up to, and I think including the people who assassinated him yesterday, he would never, ever express hate, ever. He would always turn to, no, this person has been led astray. This person is clearly possessed by dark forces." "This person is a perpetrator, but also a victim of evil. I mean, that really was his worldview. That's the Christian worldview, and he expressed that in public, and especially in private, and I think that faith, which was completely real, not the fake faith that you see on display so often, but a real one, that was the root of his courage, and he had real courage." "He loved being with people who disagreed with him, not theoretically with them, but physically with them, you know, like close enough to smell. He would wait right in the middle of everything. I mean, I could tell you a million stories that I saw, but that was absolutely real." "Like, he loved people, even people who hated him, and people he loved, he was the rare person who was willing to tell them what he thought was true. I mean, he really believed, as a political matter, by the way, that, you know, I don't think he had animus toward anybody in no other country, but he really believed in his own country, and the obligation of his government to stand behind his country. He was truly America first in the nicest, most decent, non-ideological, but sincere way." "He was one of the only people, I mean, truly one of the only people to go to the president, whom he loved. He loved Donald Trump, like, personally as well, and I think the president really loved him in a real way, but he was one of the only people to go to the Oval Office and say, sir, I totally understand, and think Iran's really bad, but a war with Iran is not, you know, is something that could really hurt our country. I mean, boy, that was an unpopular position." "He didn't need to express it. Oh, of course, and he did it again. He didn't have some weird agenda. He wasn't mad at anybody. He was for his country, and he was for doing the right and wise and difficult thing, and he said that. He went to the Oval Office to say that." "He took massive, massive abuse from his own donors, which is also something that you don't see. He was one of the very few people, very few people I have met who combined a, like, a love for everyone involved with strong views. So, again, he was not animated by anything creepy or weird." "I mean, you knew him intimately, so you know this is true. If you talked to him off camera, he would say, you know, I really, like, I love whoever I'm talking about, but I think this is wrong. It's immoral." "It's bad for everybody involved, both sides, and he would say that, and he could say that because it was sincere. It was completely sincere, but I cannot overstate the amount of attacks he took privately over this, like, absolutely for real, and having lived in Washington most of my life and seen people run non-profits, I've never met one who was willing, stand up is too strong. He wasn't confrontational, but he would just say, no, I'm sorry that you feel that way, but I think this is the right thing." "The people we represent, which is mostly young people, they believe this, and I believe it also. It was brave, but loving at the same time, and I'm not sure he made a lot of headway, by the way. I mean, I think he made real enemies in doing that, but his view didn't change." "Anyway, he's just a wonderfully decent, loving man. That is true."

Camus

41,966 görüntüleme • 11 ay önce

.Bari Weiss in her CBS Mornings debut, promoting her town hall tomorrow with Erika Kirk and taking aim at those who celebrated Charlie’s assassination and the conspiracy theorists claiming she had something to do it... “I think Erika Kirk is a victim of what could be a very, very disturbing version of America. In other words, her husband was speaking on a college campus. Whether you agreed with him or not, he was practicing the most fundamental of American rights, he was trying to persuade people with words and then he got a bullet to his neck as he was speaking to someone that disagreed with him. Someone, by the way, who was in the audience that night. In the days and weeks that followed, the number of people in this country and not just lunatics on the internet hiding behind anonymous accounts, but prominent people justified his death with the idea that words are violence rather than violence being violence signifies something quite alarming. The idea that he somehow had it coming because people disagreed with him.” “The second thing is that in — he was murdered three months ago. If you go on the internet and frankly it is leapt beyond the internet into real life and you talk to many seemingly sane people, they do not believe that the 22-year-old named Tyler Robinson that has been arrested and charged with his murder is the actual murderer. “They believe any number of theories. They believe Erika Kirk was his Mossad handler and he was killed by a foreign government. They believe she was tracked by Egyptian planes. They believe that the rings on her hand are signs of illuminati. The theories themselves are absurd. What matters is that because — she speaks about this in the interview, the brain rot that social media is allowing to spread, the way that it is detaching us from humanity, from our ability to talk to one another and our ability to discern the truth from just out and out lies is something that is incredibly important as a theme, I think. So, she was able to speak to both of those things in a way that’s incredibly compelling.”

.Bari Weiss in her CBS Mornings debut, promoting her town hall tomorrow with Erika Kirk and taking aim at those who celebrated Charlie’s assassination and the conspiracy theorists claiming she had something to do it... “I think Erika Kirk is a victim of what could be a very, very disturbing version of America. In other words, her husband was speaking on a college campus. Whether you agreed with him or not, he was practicing the most fundamental of American rights, he was trying to persuade people with words and then he got a bullet to his neck as he was speaking to someone that disagreed with him. Someone, by the way, who was in the audience that night. In the days and weeks that followed, the number of people in this country and not just lunatics on the internet hiding behind anonymous accounts, but prominent people justified his death with the idea that words are violence rather than violence being violence signifies something quite alarming. The idea that he somehow had it coming because people disagreed with him.” “The second thing is that in — he was murdered three months ago. If you go on the internet and frankly it is leapt beyond the internet into real life and you talk to many seemingly sane people, they do not believe that the 22-year-old named Tyler Robinson that has been arrested and charged with his murder is the actual murderer. “They believe any number of theories. They believe Erika Kirk was his Mossad handler and he was killed by a foreign government. They believe she was tracked by Egyptian planes. They believe that the rings on her hand are signs of illuminati. The theories themselves are absurd. What matters is that because — she speaks about this in the interview, the brain rot that social media is allowing to spread, the way that it is detaching us from humanity, from our ability to talk to one another and our ability to discern the truth from just out and out lies is something that is incredibly important as a theme, I think. So, she was able to speak to both of those things in a way that’s incredibly compelling.”

Curtis Houck

78,679 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce

🚨 BREAKING: Charlie Kirk’s OWN head of security just TORCHED Candace Owens and the grifter conspiracy circus: “Charlie was an ABSOLUTE supporter of Israel. He talked about being there and how it changed his life. How you can derive an ‘Israeli hitman’ out of that, I have NO idea.” Translation: Candace and her rabid followers have been caught LYING for clout. Again. Charlie Kirk was a die-hard Christian Zionist till the day he died. His wife, his kids, his closest friends, and now his personal security are ALL saying the same thing: Israel had NOTHING to do with it. Stop the blood libel. Stop the demonic conspiracy theories. Yet somehow Candace Owens knows more about Charlie’s final days than the people who were literally in the room with him? The grift is grotesque. The antisemitism is obvious. And the cope is endless. Drop a 🔥 if you’re done with these ghouls exploiting a man’s death for engagement.

🚨 BREAKING: Charlie Kirk’s OWN head of security just TORCHED Candace Owens and the grifter conspiracy circus: “Charlie was an ABSOLUTE supporter of Israel. He talked about being there and how it changed his life. How you can derive an ‘Israeli hitman’ out of that, I have NO idea.” Translation: Candace and her rabid followers have been caught LYING for clout. Again. Charlie Kirk was a die-hard Christian Zionist till the day he died. His wife, his kids, his closest friends, and now his personal security are ALL saying the same thing: Israel had NOTHING to do with it. Stop the blood libel. Stop the demonic conspiracy theories. Yet somehow Candace Owens knows more about Charlie’s final days than the people who were literally in the room with him? The grift is grotesque. The antisemitism is obvious. And the cope is endless. Drop a 🔥 if you’re done with these ghouls exploiting a man’s death for engagement.

Reverend Jordan Wells

70,060 görüntüleme • 9 ay önce

🇺🇸 TUCKER CARLSON ON CHARLIE KIRK'S MEMORIAL: “THIS IS THE WAY” “There’s sort of many stages with Charlie calling for various people to be elected, particularly Trump. And I’m proud of that. But what Charlie was really saying is that change begins, the only change that matters, when we repent of our sins. We! Me! That was the reason Charlie was truly fearless to his last moment. He was unafraid, not defensive, and had no hate in his heart.” He would always say, ‘That’s a sad person… a broken person… someone who needs Jesus.’ He said that in private, because he meant it. This gathering and God’s very obvious presence in this room, is a reminder that any attempt to extinguish the light causes it to burn brighter. This is the way. Right here. This is the way.” Source: TPUSA, Tucker Carlson

🇺🇸 TUCKER CARLSON ON CHARLIE KIRK'S MEMORIAL: “THIS IS THE WAY” “There’s sort of many stages with Charlie calling for various people to be elected, particularly Trump. And I’m proud of that. But what Charlie was really saying is that change begins, the only change that matters, when we repent of our sins. We! Me! That was the reason Charlie was truly fearless to his last moment. He was unafraid, not defensive, and had no hate in his heart.” He would always say, ‘That’s a sad person… a broken person… someone who needs Jesus.’ He said that in private, because he meant it. This gathering and God’s very obvious presence in this room, is a reminder that any attempt to extinguish the light causes it to burn brighter. This is the way. Right here. This is the way.” Source: TPUSA, Tucker Carlson

Mario Nawfal

177,929 görüntüleme • 11 ay önce

Issues of paternity have shaped our society for generations, especially in Zimbabwe. They did not start today. I remember going to a funeral with my father in the 1990s, and as we sat around the fire the men began sharing stories. One of them has stayed with me ever since. A Zimbabwean doctor had married a nurse, and they struggled to have children. As usual, when there is no child, the blame was placed on the woman. She went to see her own doctor, who told her plainly that she was not the problem, and advised her to bring her husband for testing. The husband refused, as many Zimbabwean men tend to do. Their marriage eventually collapsed, with the man insisting he could not be the problem because he had a child with another woman before marrying the nurse. That woman, he said, was also a doctor, and he was raising that child. After the divorce, the nurse remarried another doctor, and she immediately fell pregnant. Because it was a tight medical community, the whole situation became a talking point. The ex-husband had loudly declared that his former wife was barren, yet here she was having one child after another, three in total, with her new husband. Meanwhile, the ex-husband remarried, and again there were no children. One day the ex-husband and his former wife met at a gathering. During a casual conversation, as people who once knew each other, she told him directly that he was raising a child who was not his. She told him that he had no capacity to father a child and that if he finally went for tests, he would discover the truth. She reminded him how he had insulted her and her parents, and how he had refused to listen. The revelation shook him. He went for tests, and it was confirmed that he was the problem. He had spent seventeen years looking after a child who was not his. The moral of the story is simple, and I always stress this when mentoring young people. When in doubt, check. In fact, even without doubt, check. A DNA test at birth saves you from future heartbreak. Many men are raising children who are not theirs. Some women know exactly what they are doing. Others genuinely do not know because their relationships overlapped before they settled down. In those cases, even the woman cannot be sure who the father is. So when you have a child, get a DNA test. If you ask for one and a woman becomes defensive or resistant, that is a major red flag. At that point, the test is no longer optional, it is necessary. That is the reality of life today. As they say, trust is beautiful, but DNA is confirmation. In this life we live, hope is not a strategy when it comes to your children, so test your child and protect your future, as the saying goes. I have DNA stories that I could share for a whole year. If compulsory DNA testing was demanded of all of us today, you will be shocked by what will come out. This brother in the video is now going through denial. He has been told the truth, but he is still in shock, which is why he is asking for silly things from this woman. It is hard for any man to discover that the child he believed was his belongs to another man. That is why DNA testing is a necessity and why it should be compulsory.

Issues of paternity have shaped our society for generations, especially in Zimbabwe. They did not start today. I remember going to a funeral with my father in the 1990s, and as we sat around the fire the men began sharing stories. One of them has stayed with me ever since. A Zimbabwean doctor had married a nurse, and they struggled to have children. As usual, when there is no child, the blame was placed on the woman. She went to see her own doctor, who told her plainly that she was not the problem, and advised her to bring her husband for testing. The husband refused, as many Zimbabwean men tend to do. Their marriage eventually collapsed, with the man insisting he could not be the problem because he had a child with another woman before marrying the nurse. That woman, he said, was also a doctor, and he was raising that child. After the divorce, the nurse remarried another doctor, and she immediately fell pregnant. Because it was a tight medical community, the whole situation became a talking point. The ex-husband had loudly declared that his former wife was barren, yet here she was having one child after another, three in total, with her new husband. Meanwhile, the ex-husband remarried, and again there were no children. One day the ex-husband and his former wife met at a gathering. During a casual conversation, as people who once knew each other, she told him directly that he was raising a child who was not his. She told him that he had no capacity to father a child and that if he finally went for tests, he would discover the truth. She reminded him how he had insulted her and her parents, and how he had refused to listen. The revelation shook him. He went for tests, and it was confirmed that he was the problem. He had spent seventeen years looking after a child who was not his. The moral of the story is simple, and I always stress this when mentoring young people. When in doubt, check. In fact, even without doubt, check. A DNA test at birth saves you from future heartbreak. Many men are raising children who are not theirs. Some women know exactly what they are doing. Others genuinely do not know because their relationships overlapped before they settled down. In those cases, even the woman cannot be sure who the father is. So when you have a child, get a DNA test. If you ask for one and a woman becomes defensive or resistant, that is a major red flag. At that point, the test is no longer optional, it is necessary. That is the reality of life today. As they say, trust is beautiful, but DNA is confirmation. In this life we live, hope is not a strategy when it comes to your children, so test your child and protect your future, as the saying goes. I have DNA stories that I could share for a whole year. If compulsory DNA testing was demanded of all of us today, you will be shocked by what will come out. This brother in the video is now going through denial. He has been told the truth, but he is still in shock, which is why he is asking for silly things from this woman. It is hard for any man to discover that the child he believed was his belongs to another man. That is why DNA testing is a necessity and why it should be compulsory.

Hopewell Chin’ono

67,842 görüntüleme • 9 ay önce

Who Do You Think The 3rd Person Is? Bill Gates? Klaus Schwab? Someone Else? “Nostradamus saw in his future three men that he called antichrists. One was Napoleon, the second one was Hitler, and the third one is the one that is to come, who is said to be the worst of all, because he will learn from the mistakes of the others. A very dangerous person. He didn't like the term antichrist. He said it was a Christian term, and it was not exactly what he meant. But he said, if you think of Christ as representing people, humanity, then antichrist is someone who does terrible things against humanity, against people. And it can be the type of personality like Genghis Khan or Attila the Hun, the type that doesn't care anything about what it's doing, it only wants power. So this is what he meant by an Antichrist. But the third one, he gave us a great deal of information about him because he wanted us to do something to stop the man. He said in the Bible, in the book of Revelation and other books in the Old Testament, the people saw the same things that he saw their symbolism they could understand in their time, but they all saw the same thing. And the man he refers to as the Antichrist is the number 666 in the Book of Revelation, called the Beast. Of course he said 666 also refers to his connection to his computers. So there's a lot more to it. But he has been predicted as far back as Bible times. So he said he has a destiny to fulfill. He has to come, but after he comes, what happens after that is in the hands of mankind. Do we allow it to go through the worst case scenarios or can we lessen it? That's the point fulfill. We were given a lot of information about this man because he is so important. We have his horoscope. He was born on February the 4th, 1962 in Jerusalem, but he's not Jewish. And his parents were killed during the Israeli war and when he was about six or seven years old, and he was raised by his uncle. His uncle is a very evil man, and we have had many people see him, and we have in my work, and we had one woman who was able to put together a police composite picture of the uncle and of the antichrist. She was a psychic who had worked with police on many cases, so she knew how to do the police composite kits. But the uncle took the young boy him as his own. What the young boy doesn't know was that the uncle had his parents killed, so he could have him for himself. And he has gotten together a very powerful group of rich Arabs in the Middle East, and they've been taking care of this young boy and grooming him for the role he is to take. It's a very powerful group of people that control everything that happens in the Middle East. They're the puppet masters behind the scenes. Nusrat Dhamma said, by the time seven puppets arise in the Middle East, you will realize what is happening that they are not the real leaders of the countries, but they are the puppets being manipulated by the puppet masters behind the scenes. The young Antichrist went to college in Egypt, and we were working on this at the same time he was in college, so we were shown several scenes of him in college. We knew where he was living. We had all this information.”

Who Do You Think The 3rd Person Is? Bill Gates? Klaus Schwab? Someone Else? “Nostradamus saw in his future three men that he called antichrists. One was Napoleon, the second one was Hitler, and the third one is the one that is to come, who is said to be the worst of all, because he will learn from the mistakes of the others. A very dangerous person. He didn't like the term antichrist. He said it was a Christian term, and it was not exactly what he meant. But he said, if you think of Christ as representing people, humanity, then antichrist is someone who does terrible things against humanity, against people. And it can be the type of personality like Genghis Khan or Attila the Hun, the type that doesn't care anything about what it's doing, it only wants power. So this is what he meant by an Antichrist. But the third one, he gave us a great deal of information about him because he wanted us to do something to stop the man. He said in the Bible, in the book of Revelation and other books in the Old Testament, the people saw the same things that he saw their symbolism they could understand in their time, but they all saw the same thing. And the man he refers to as the Antichrist is the number 666 in the Book of Revelation, called the Beast. Of course he said 666 also refers to his connection to his computers. So there's a lot more to it. But he has been predicted as far back as Bible times. So he said he has a destiny to fulfill. He has to come, but after he comes, what happens after that is in the hands of mankind. Do we allow it to go through the worst case scenarios or can we lessen it? That's the point fulfill. We were given a lot of information about this man because he is so important. We have his horoscope. He was born on February the 4th, 1962 in Jerusalem, but he's not Jewish. And his parents were killed during the Israeli war and when he was about six or seven years old, and he was raised by his uncle. His uncle is a very evil man, and we have had many people see him, and we have in my work, and we had one woman who was able to put together a police composite picture of the uncle and of the antichrist. She was a psychic who had worked with police on many cases, so she knew how to do the police composite kits. But the uncle took the young boy him as his own. What the young boy doesn't know was that the uncle had his parents killed, so he could have him for himself. And he has gotten together a very powerful group of rich Arabs in the Middle East, and they've been taking care of this young boy and grooming him for the role he is to take. It's a very powerful group of people that control everything that happens in the Middle East. They're the puppet masters behind the scenes. Nusrat Dhamma said, by the time seven puppets arise in the Middle East, you will realize what is happening that they are not the real leaders of the countries, but they are the puppets being manipulated by the puppet masters behind the scenes. The young Antichrist went to college in Egypt, and we were working on this at the same time he was in college, so we were shown several scenes of him in college. We knew where he was living. We had all this information.”

Wall Street Apes

1,338,694 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce

Tucker Carlson reveals Charlie Kirk’s greatest “sin” — the one that cost him his life. Kirk’s death has clearly lit a fire under Carlson. This is two minutes of Tucker at his absolute best. “Charlie was not a Nazi. He was not killed because he was a Nazi. Yes, he was a defender of Israel. He didn’t die for Israel. However, why did he die? What was his life about? What was the sin, the core sin that Charlie Kirk committed against somebody, power that got him killed in the end? “And, the answer is right in front of us, certainly those of us who knew him. Charlie’s life was defined by his Christian faith, not his spirituality, but his belief in Jesus, his life as a Christian. Everything in his life flowed from those beliefs. Everything. “Everything he did, said and believed came from the fact that he was above all, a Christian. And that is and was and in fact has always been deeply provocative and offensive to the rest of the world. “And why is that? It’s worth thinking about it for just a second. Christianity doesn’t seem like the kind of religion that provoke people to anger and violence. In fact, it seems just the opposite. It’s the world’s most profoundly nonviolent religion. Maybe the world’s only truly nonviolent religion, a religion based on a man who Christians believe was also God, who, as he was being led away to be tortured to death on made up charges, scolded one of his disciples for fighting back. “This is a religion committed to love above all and to living in peace and harmony. Truly, it’s a universalist religion that believes that every person has a shot at heaven. It’s not exclusionary at all. And so you would think it would make sense that if you’re a government or if you’re in power, that you’d want a lot of Christians living in your country because they’re not going to cause massive problems. “Not a lot of sincere Christians are fomenting insurrection at any given moment. Pretty much none. Most of the time they’re tidy. They get married, they love their children, they pay their taxes. They’re commanded to pay their taxes. So why wouldn’t you want a nation full of Christians? “Why wouldn’t you encourage this religious belief, even if it wasn’t yours? Why would you hate it? Well, there are a couple of reasons. There are a couple of things about Christianity, and these were evident throughout Charlie’s public life, that are deeply provocative to the people in power. “And the first is the insistence that Christianity comes with inherently that you are not God, you are not God and neither are your leaders. God is God and all of us stand before him in the end to be judged and all of us will be found lacking. “Christians believe the only way to heaven is through Jesus. That’s the only way. But all of us, whether we believe in Jesus or not, are fallen. We are sinners, we are less than we ought to be. We are not gods, and neither are the people who lead us.”

Tucker Carlson reveals Charlie Kirk’s greatest “sin” — the one that cost him his life. Kirk’s death has clearly lit a fire under Carlson. This is two minutes of Tucker at his absolute best. “Charlie was not a Nazi. He was not killed because he was a Nazi. Yes, he was a defender of Israel. He didn’t die for Israel. However, why did he die? What was his life about? What was the sin, the core sin that Charlie Kirk committed against somebody, power that got him killed in the end? “And, the answer is right in front of us, certainly those of us who knew him. Charlie’s life was defined by his Christian faith, not his spirituality, but his belief in Jesus, his life as a Christian. Everything in his life flowed from those beliefs. Everything. “Everything he did, said and believed came from the fact that he was above all, a Christian. And that is and was and in fact has always been deeply provocative and offensive to the rest of the world. “And why is that? It’s worth thinking about it for just a second. Christianity doesn’t seem like the kind of religion that provoke people to anger and violence. In fact, it seems just the opposite. It’s the world’s most profoundly nonviolent religion. Maybe the world’s only truly nonviolent religion, a religion based on a man who Christians believe was also God, who, as he was being led away to be tortured to death on made up charges, scolded one of his disciples for fighting back. “This is a religion committed to love above all and to living in peace and harmony. Truly, it’s a universalist religion that believes that every person has a shot at heaven. It’s not exclusionary at all. And so you would think it would make sense that if you’re a government or if you’re in power, that you’d want a lot of Christians living in your country because they’re not going to cause massive problems. “Not a lot of sincere Christians are fomenting insurrection at any given moment. Pretty much none. Most of the time they’re tidy. They get married, they love their children, they pay their taxes. They’re commanded to pay their taxes. So why wouldn’t you want a nation full of Christians? “Why wouldn’t you encourage this religious belief, even if it wasn’t yours? Why would you hate it? Well, there are a couple of reasons. There are a couple of things about Christianity, and these were evident throughout Charlie’s public life, that are deeply provocative to the people in power. “And the first is the insistence that Christianity comes with inherently that you are not God, you are not God and neither are your leaders. God is God and all of us stand before him in the end to be judged and all of us will be found lacking. “Christians believe the only way to heaven is through Jesus. That’s the only way. But all of us, whether we believe in Jesus or not, are fallen. We are sinners, we are less than we ought to be. We are not gods, and neither are the people who lead us.”

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

941,914 görüntüleme • 11 ay önce

CNN’s Kristen Holmes: “I just want to point out one thing before we get into the power and influential person that Charlie Kirk was..not just a political activist. He was also a father and a husband. And you have to remember something when you talk about Donald Trump's campaign and the team that got him elected, it was a very small, very tight knit group of people. It was loyalists, people who were gathered around Donald Trump working in and out every day. And Charlie Kirk was part of that movement. So, when you're talking to these White House advisers and staffers and friends of the President, it's not just them looking at the death of an icon and a movement leader, as we've heard, it's also them looking at the death of a very close friend and somebody they spent an enormous amount of time with...[T]hat's why you're seeing such a sadness and a disbelief from so many people close to the President. And when it comes to talking strictly about his influence and his power within Washington, I mean, one of the things to keep in mind here is that this is somebody who had a direct line to President Trump who could voice his objections to President Trump at times, he could voice what he thought was important and not being covered enough by the administration. He spoke to many, if not all, of the cabinet secretaries directly. He had a finger on the pulse of the MAGA movement, even more so than some people who are here in Washington who got government positions. If you look at the crowd that had gathered around Kirk, that was just one example of the kind of crowds that Kirk would draw. He was truly a movement leader, as we've heard. He would bring thousands and thousands of people together, and that was why he was so critical beyond just the personal to the campaign to President Trump...So, there are a lot of different levels of all of this. The influence, the power, the — the connection to the base, but also the family and the relationships that Charlie Kirk had built with all of the Trumps. We have seen the children responding each individually about their relationships with Charlie Kirk saying to pray for him and his family.”

CNN’s Kristen Holmes: “I just want to point out one thing before we get into the power and influential person that Charlie Kirk was..not just a political activist. He was also a father and a husband. And you have to remember something when you talk about Donald Trump's campaign and the team that got him elected, it was a very small, very tight knit group of people. It was loyalists, people who were gathered around Donald Trump working in and out every day. And Charlie Kirk was part of that movement. So, when you're talking to these White House advisers and staffers and friends of the President, it's not just them looking at the death of an icon and a movement leader, as we've heard, it's also them looking at the death of a very close friend and somebody they spent an enormous amount of time with...[T]hat's why you're seeing such a sadness and a disbelief from so many people close to the President. And when it comes to talking strictly about his influence and his power within Washington, I mean, one of the things to keep in mind here is that this is somebody who had a direct line to President Trump who could voice his objections to President Trump at times, he could voice what he thought was important and not being covered enough by the administration. He spoke to many, if not all, of the cabinet secretaries directly. He had a finger on the pulse of the MAGA movement, even more so than some people who are here in Washington who got government positions. If you look at the crowd that had gathered around Kirk, that was just one example of the kind of crowds that Kirk would draw. He was truly a movement leader, as we've heard. He would bring thousands and thousands of people together, and that was why he was so critical beyond just the personal to the campaign to President Trump...So, there are a lot of different levels of all of this. The influence, the power, the — the connection to the base, but also the family and the relationships that Charlie Kirk had built with all of the Trumps. We have seen the children responding each individually about their relationships with Charlie Kirk saying to pray for him and his family.”

Curtis Houck

1,160,867 görüntüleme • 11 ay önce

🚨 This exchange between Tucker Carlson and Alex Bruesewitz over Charlie Kirk's murder is exactly why we don't trust or like Tucker. Tucker gets visibly irritated, frustrated and defense as Alex is pragmatically discusses the grifters and fake narrative regarding Charlie Kirk. It's the classic Tucker pivot "oh idk I didn't see that" "I never said that" "Joe Kent said this" "I've stayed out of this" " how do we know it was the tranz" All lies and bullshit ^^ Tucker knows the Joe Kent had zero authority and he tried injecting himself into an investigation. He had no authority in. We know that Tyler Robinson did it and it was over the trans issue because he said it in the discord chat. He said it in his letter he admitted to it. But of course, Tucker doesn't accept that reality so he lies he spins and he deflects. While claiming " Charlie is my friend" numerous times. You have a strange way of showing it Tucker.

🚨 This exchange between Tucker Carlson and Alex Bruesewitz over Charlie Kirk's murder is exactly why we don't trust or like Tucker. Tucker gets visibly irritated, frustrated and defense as Alex is pragmatically discusses the grifters and fake narrative regarding Charlie Kirk. It's the classic Tucker pivot "oh idk I didn't see that" "I never said that" "Joe Kent said this" "I've stayed out of this" " how do we know it was the tranz" All lies and bullshit ^^ Tucker knows the Joe Kent had zero authority and he tried injecting himself into an investigation. He had no authority in. We know that Tyler Robinson did it and it was over the trans issue because he said it in the discord chat. He said it in his letter he admitted to it. But of course, Tucker doesn't accept that reality so he lies he spins and he deflects. While claiming " Charlie is my friend" numerous times. You have a strange way of showing it Tucker.

J

15,201 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

A man who has made 19% a year for forty-five years spent most of them telling people Warren Buffett was just lucky. Then he listened to a podcast and apologised on air. "Wow, this guy is a genius, and I've been the biggest fool all along." That is Paul Tudor Jones. His original argument was never stupid, which is the part worth staying for. Buffett, he thought, was in the right place at the right time, riding the longest bull market in history. Put the same man in Japan starting in 1989 and see how well the genius holds up. It is a real objection. The Nikkei peaked in December 1989 and did not get back there until February 2024. Thirty-four years underwater. Buy and hold would have ruined you. He changed his mind anyway. He now calls Buffett the OG of compound interest, and then he says the line that should stop you. "He understood the power of compound interest at age nine, while I brilliantly avoided it throughout my entire career." That is not a man who failed at anything. So what exactly did he avoid? Selling. Run the same 19% two ways. Hold everything and pay capital gains once at the end, and forty years turns a dollar into 842. Realise your gains every year and pay tax as you go, and the same 19% turns a dollar into 287. Identical returns. Roughly three times the money, purely from not touching it. That is the price of being right often instead of being right once and then waiting. And here is what makes this honest rather than a lecture. Jones knows all of it now and still cannot do it. He says plainly he could not sit through a 50% drawdown, that his own wiring will not permit it. He wondered aloud why he couldn't just believe in America and ride it out. He can't. Fifty years of reflexes do not get argued away by arithmetic. So the lesson is not to go and be Buffett. It is to work out which one you actually are before the market tells you, because the two strategies are not interchangeable and neither are the people who run them. He is 71. He apologised to a man he had doubted for decades, and then admitted he would probably do it the same way again.

A man who has made 19% a year for forty-five years spent most of them telling people Warren Buffett was just lucky. Then he listened to a podcast and apologised on air. "Wow, this guy is a genius, and I've been the biggest fool all along." That is Paul Tudor Jones. His original argument was never stupid, which is the part worth staying for. Buffett, he thought, was in the right place at the right time, riding the longest bull market in history. Put the same man in Japan starting in 1989 and see how well the genius holds up. It is a real objection. The Nikkei peaked in December 1989 and did not get back there until February 2024. Thirty-four years underwater. Buy and hold would have ruined you. He changed his mind anyway. He now calls Buffett the OG of compound interest, and then he says the line that should stop you. "He understood the power of compound interest at age nine, while I brilliantly avoided it throughout my entire career." That is not a man who failed at anything. So what exactly did he avoid? Selling. Run the same 19% two ways. Hold everything and pay capital gains once at the end, and forty years turns a dollar into 842. Realise your gains every year and pay tax as you go, and the same 19% turns a dollar into 287. Identical returns. Roughly three times the money, purely from not touching it. That is the price of being right often instead of being right once and then waiting. And here is what makes this honest rather than a lecture. Jones knows all of it now and still cannot do it. He says plainly he could not sit through a 50% drawdown, that his own wiring will not permit it. He wondered aloud why he couldn't just believe in America and ride it out. He can't. Fifty years of reflexes do not get argued away by arithmetic. So the lesson is not to go and be Buffett. It is to work out which one you actually are before the market tells you, because the two strategies are not interchangeable and neither are the people who run them. He is 71. He apologised to a man he had doubted for decades, and then admitted he would probably do it the same way again.

Veles

48,073 görüntüleme • 25 gün önce

Tucker Carlson GOES OFF on Bibi Netanyahu for making Charlie Kirk’s death all about himself. He says Charlie never liked Bibi and believed Netanyahu was a “very destructive force.” Tucker says he has the text messages to prove it, too. “He [Charlie] did not like Bibi Netanyahu. And he said that to me many times, and he said to people around him many times he felt that Bibi Netanyahu was a very destructive force... Ee believed Netanyahu was using the United States to prosecute his wars for the benefit of his country, and that it was shameful and embarrassing and bad for the United States, and he resented it.” “And there’s no question that Bibi’s defenders, on the Internet, will call me a liar or a kook. But that’s a fact. And enough text messages exist that I think it can probably be verified in pretty short order. Not that it needs to be, because that is true.”

Tucker Carlson GOES OFF on Bibi Netanyahu for making Charlie Kirk’s death all about himself. He says Charlie never liked Bibi and believed Netanyahu was a “very destructive force.” Tucker says he has the text messages to prove it, too. “He [Charlie] did not like Bibi Netanyahu. And he said that to me many times, and he said to people around him many times he felt that Bibi Netanyahu was a very destructive force... Ee believed Netanyahu was using the United States to prosecute his wars for the benefit of his country, and that it was shameful and embarrassing and bad for the United States, and he resented it.” “And there’s no question that Bibi’s defenders, on the Internet, will call me a liar or a kook. But that’s a fact. And enough text messages exist that I think it can probably be verified in pretty short order. Not that it needs to be, because that is true.”

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

556,244 görüntüleme • 11 ay önce

In honor of Charlie Kirk: Charlie Kirk was a courageous and believing man who had his finger on the pulse of America’s youth, and who saw where they were going, what they were searching for — the ancient, unchanging Faith of the Church — as indicated in this clip from a recent interview with Tucker Carlson. Although Charlie was not an Orthodox Christian, he strove to confess and defend — as he knew it — the Christian faith and principles. We know that God is merciful and receives into eternity every soul in its best possible time. Charlie regularly publicly confessed words and truths from the Gospel of Christ and this is a witness to Truth and to God. 🎥 Tucker Carlson

In honor of Charlie Kirk: Charlie Kirk was a courageous and believing man who had his finger on the pulse of America’s youth, and who saw where they were going, what they were searching for — the ancient, unchanging Faith of the Church — as indicated in this clip from a recent interview with Tucker Carlson. Although Charlie was not an Orthodox Christian, he strove to confess and defend — as he knew it — the Christian faith and principles. We know that God is merciful and receives into eternity every soul in its best possible time. Charlie regularly publicly confessed words and truths from the Gospel of Christ and this is a witness to Truth and to God. 🎥 Tucker Carlson

Orthodox Ethos

62,955 görüntüleme • 11 ay önce

The amount of hypocrisy and delusion in this clip is astounding. 2024. After Aaron Rodgers made a joke about Kimmel and Epstein, Kimmel threatened to sue Rodgers. He also lectured on why Rodgers' joke was beyond the pale. Kimmel: You don't insinuate someone is a p*dophile. If you are part of a group of people doing that because you don't like someone, you should rethink your life. Fast forward to 2026. Jimmy Kimmel has spent the past year making countless jokes about Trump (and his children) being p*dos. The entire platform of his Democrat party in 2025 was just to smear Trump as a p*do. Here's the best part. Kimmel claimed that he doesn't smear people and that if he ever says something that is untrue, he apologizes.🤣 Kimmel smears people for a living. He does it every night. He was recently suspended for lying about the person who killed Charlie Kirk and he refused to apologize for what he said.

The amount of hypocrisy and delusion in this clip is astounding. 2024. After Aaron Rodgers made a joke about Kimmel and Epstein, Kimmel threatened to sue Rodgers. He also lectured on why Rodgers' joke was beyond the pale. Kimmel: You don't insinuate someone is a pdophile. If you are part of a group of people doing that because you don't like someone, you should rethink your life. Fast forward to 2026. Jimmy Kimmel has spent the past year making countless jokes about Trump (and his children) being pdos. The entire platform of his Democrat party in 2025 was just to smear Trump as a p*do. Here's the best part. Kimmel claimed that he doesn't smear people and that if he ever says something that is untrue, he apologizes.🤣 Kimmel smears people for a living. He does it every night. He was recently suspended for lying about the person who killed Charlie Kirk and he refused to apologize for what he said.

MAZE

1,012,477 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

The man who invented modern fantasy didn't publish his first novel until he was forty-five. By that age, J.R.R. Tolkien had already built a respectable life. He was an Oxford professor, an expert in ancient languages, with a wife and four children and a settled academic career. He was exactly the kind of man who might reasonably have decided that the shape of his life was already fixed. The work he would be remembered for, he had not yet even begun... The story, which Tolkien told himself, is that one summer he was grading examination papers, when he turned a page and found that a student had left it blank. Without quite knowing why, he wrote a single sentence on it: "In a hole in the ground there lived a hobbit." He did not know what a hobbit was. He had spent years inventing languages and mythologies as a private passion, and telling stories to his own children, never imagining any of it would reach the world. But that one line began to grow. It became a story, and then a book, and in 1937, at the age of forty-five, Tolkien published The Hobbit. It was a success, and his publisher asked for a sequel. Tolkien warned them it might take some time. It took 17 years... He wrote it in the margins of a demanding full-time job, revising endlessly, doubting it often. When The Lord of the Rings was finally published, in 1954 and 1955, he was in his early sixties. That book, begun as a middle-aged professor's private side project, went on to sell well over a hundred million copies, to invent modern fantasy as we know it, and to reshape the imagination of the entire world. Tolkien already had a full and respectable life behind him. And still, the thing he is remembered for, the thing that outlived him and reached hundreds of millions of people, was something he began at forty-five, at an age when it would have been the easiest thing in the world to tell himself he had already missed his chance. He didn't. It's never as late as it feels.

The man who invented modern fantasy didn't publish his first novel until he was forty-five. By that age, J.R.R. Tolkien had already built a respectable life. He was an Oxford professor, an expert in ancient languages, with a wife and four children and a settled academic career. He was exactly the kind of man who might reasonably have decided that the shape of his life was already fixed. The work he would be remembered for, he had not yet even begun... The story, which Tolkien told himself, is that one summer he was grading examination papers, when he turned a page and found that a student had left it blank. Without quite knowing why, he wrote a single sentence on it: "In a hole in the ground there lived a hobbit." He did not know what a hobbit was. He had spent years inventing languages and mythologies as a private passion, and telling stories to his own children, never imagining any of it would reach the world. But that one line began to grow. It became a story, and then a book, and in 1937, at the age of forty-five, Tolkien published The Hobbit. It was a success, and his publisher asked for a sequel. Tolkien warned them it might take some time. It took 17 years... He wrote it in the margins of a demanding full-time job, revising endlessly, doubting it often. When The Lord of the Rings was finally published, in 1954 and 1955, he was in his early sixties. That book, begun as a middle-aged professor's private side project, went on to sell well over a hundred million copies, to invent modern fantasy as we know it, and to reshape the imagination of the entire world. Tolkien already had a full and respectable life behind him. And still, the thing he is remembered for, the thing that outlived him and reached hundreds of millions of people, was something he began at forty-five, at an age when it would have been the easiest thing in the world to tell himself he had already missed his chance. He didn't. It's never as late as it feels.

James Lucas

93,539 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce