正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

返回首页

𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗠𝗮𝗴𝗶𝗰 𝗠𝗼𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁 Re-live Josh Costello's second try within two minutes from Saturday's Irish Rugby #EnergiaAIL playoff. 🎥 Prism Digital

Shannon_RFC's profile picture

Shannon RFC

7,352 subscribers

18,222 次观看 • 3 年前 •via X (Twitter)

旅游体育新闻政治#EnergiaAIL
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

3 条评论

billy o'shea 的头像
billy o'shea3 年前

@IrishRugby @PrismDigital_ie That was a class finish, one for the future

PJ McGovern 的头像
PJ McGovern3 年前

@IrishRugby @PrismDigital_ie Fantastic score Josh cool hair also

Gerard mulcahy 的头像
Gerard mulcahy3 年前

@IrishRugby @PrismDigital_ie Fantastic try by Josh

相关视频

Most AI video tools give you clips. CraftStory gives you actors. You know the difference. Clips are short, robotic, and forgettable. Actors are expressive, consistent, and hold attention. If you're making L&D content, UGC ads, or product videos — you need the second one. But booking studio time, hiring talent, and reshooting every update is expensive and slow. Then I found CraftStory. Launched today on Product Hunt. It generates hyper-realistic, human-centric videos from a single image — or trains a custom avatar from just a 15-second video. Here's what makes it different: ➟ Photorealistic output — natural skin texture, accurate lighting, lifelike mouth movements. Videos indistinguishable from real footage ➟ Consistent personalities — your AI characters stay the same across every video. Same face, same identity. Perfect for brand ambassadors and training series ➟ Videos up to 5 minutes — long-form content for training modules, product walkthroughs, and presentations. Not just clips ➟ Video Agent — tell the agent what you want. It writes the script, finds b-roll, adds infographics and subtitles, casts your avatar. End-to-end, hands-off ➟ Just 4.5 cents per second — powered by a proprietary model trained on professional actor footage licensed through revenue-sharing agreements What this actually means: ✓ Turn any photo into a talking video in minutes ✓ Produce authentic-looking UGC at scale — diverse faces, languages, and styles on tap ✓ Localize for every market without re-recording ✓ Refresh training courses instantly when policies change Use cases: UGC ads, product demos, L&D modules, social content. 30+ languages supported. Try it free. No credit card required. 👉 Studio-quality results. No studio required. 📌 Try it free → 🎁 Product Hunt exclusive: 50% off your first month with code PRODUCTHUNT CraftStory is live on Product Hunt right now! 🚀 Head over, check it out, and leave feedback on the CraftStory page at ProductHunt: 🔄 Repost if you've ever wished you could update a training video without reshooting the whole thing. — #AIVideo #ContentCreation #UGC #L&D #CraftStory #ProductHunt
0:59

Most AI video tools give you clips. CraftStory gives you actors. You know the difference. Clips are short, robotic, and forgettable. Actors are expressive, consistent, and hold attention. If you're making L&D content, UGC ads, or product videos — you need the second one. But booking studio time, hiring talent, and reshooting every update is expensive and slow. Then I found CraftStory. Launched today on Product Hunt. It generates hyper-realistic, human-centric videos from a single image — or trains a custom avatar from just a 15-second video. Here's what makes it different: ➟ Photorealistic output — natural skin texture, accurate lighting, lifelike mouth movements. Videos indistinguishable from real footage ➟ Consistent personalities — your AI characters stay the same across every video. Same face, same identity. Perfect for brand ambassadors and training series ➟ Videos up to 5 minutes — long-form content for training modules, product walkthroughs, and presentations. Not just clips ➟ Video Agent — tell the agent what you want. It writes the script, finds b-roll, adds infographics and subtitles, casts your avatar. End-to-end, hands-off ➟ Just 4.5 cents per second — powered by a proprietary model trained on professional actor footage licensed through revenue-sharing agreements What this actually means: ✓ Turn any photo into a talking video in minutes ✓ Produce authentic-looking UGC at scale — diverse faces, languages, and styles on tap ✓ Localize for every market without re-recording ✓ Refresh training courses instantly when policies change Use cases: UGC ads, product demos, L&D modules, social content. 30+ languages supported. Try it free. No credit card required. 👉 Studio-quality results. No studio required. 📌 Try it free → 🎁 Product Hunt exclusive: 50% off your first month with code PRODUCTHUNT CraftStory is live on Product Hunt right now! 🚀 Head over, check it out, and leave feedback on the CraftStory page at ProductHunt: 🔄 Repost if you've ever wished you could update a training video without reshooting the whole thing. — #AIVideo #ContentCreation #UGC #L&D #CraftStory #ProductHunt

Anuj

46,614 次观看 • 2 个月前

How MiroFish helped me make $669/day on Polymarket One week ago I plugged a swarm intelligence engine into my Polymarket bot. It simulates 2,847 digital humans before every trade. The bot watches how they behave, then bets against the real crowd. 338 trades. $4,266 profit. One position returned 1,655% in five minutes. The engine is called MiroFish. It doesn't predict price. It predicts how people will react and on a prediction market, that's the only thing that matters. I feed it market context. It builds a parallel world. Thousands of AI agents argue, form groups, shift opinions. When their consensus diverges from what Polymarket is pricing, the bot enters. 5-minute windows. BTC, ETH, SOL, XRP. I've been running the bot live on What MiroFish actually is: > Built in 10 days by a 20-year-old undergraduate in Beijing using vibe coding > Hit #1 on GitHub's global trending above OpenAI, Google, and Microsoft > Backed by Chen Tianqiao, former richest man in China, who committed $4.1M within 24 hours of seeing one demo > Runs on OASIS by CAMEL-AI with GraphRAG knowledge graphs and Zep Cloud memory The edge is simple. Polymarket is a crowd behavior market. MiroFish is a crowd behavior simulator. Nobody is connecting the two yet.
0:40

How MiroFish helped me make $669/day on Polymarket One week ago I plugged a swarm intelligence engine into my Polymarket bot. It simulates 2,847 digital humans before every trade. The bot watches how they behave, then bets against the real crowd. 338 trades. $4,266 profit. One position returned 1,655% in five minutes. The engine is called MiroFish. It doesn't predict price. It predicts how people will react and on a prediction market, that's the only thing that matters. I feed it market context. It builds a parallel world. Thousands of AI agents argue, form groups, shift opinions. When their consensus diverges from what Polymarket is pricing, the bot enters. 5-minute windows. BTC, ETH, SOL, XRP. I've been running the bot live on What MiroFish actually is: > Built in 10 days by a 20-year-old undergraduate in Beijing using vibe coding > Hit #1 on GitHub's global trending above OpenAI, Google, and Microsoft > Backed by Chen Tianqiao, former richest man in China, who committed $4.1M within 24 hours of seeing one demo > Runs on OASIS by CAMEL-AI with GraphRAG knowledge graphs and Zep Cloud memory The edge is simple. Polymarket is a crowd behavior market. MiroFish is a crowd behavior simulator. Nobody is connecting the two yet.

BuBBliK

125,310 次观看 • 6 个月前

It’s all a facade. Victor Davis Hanson just spent nearly two minutes exposing the champagne socialists like Zohran Mamdani, Ro Khanna and Hasan Piker. As Hanson points out, the movement consuming the Democrat Party alive isn’t being led by the working class...it’s being ushered in by wealthy elites who are first or second generation immigrants from failed states. VICTOR DAVIS HANSON: “This is a top down phenomenon, Sean, and it’s mostly 85% of the membership of the Democratic socialists identify as White and the majority have college degrees and they’re very frustrated that their brilliance was not recognized or appreciated in these very expensive urban enclaves where they live.” “But they are all wealthy. Mamdani, a single child, grew up in privilege, his family was among that 1% in Uganda. They have a family compound on Lake Victoria.” “Ro Khanna now is flirting with socialism. His wife drives a $200,000 Range Rover. The kids have golf courses in their names. We could go on and on.” “Hasan Piker, he bought almost a $3 million home in West Hollywood. He drives a Porsche.” “So it’s not coming from the working class, it’s not coming from minorities necessarily, it’s coming from an affluent group of people and second and first generation people that are migrating, immigrating here.” “Chevalier, Mamdani, Ilhan Omar, Rashida Tlaib who left failed states and they come over here and apparently they want to reenact the disaster they fled from.” “Makes no sense. But they are not going to identify the politician part, they don’t want to identify as socialist or communist because it’s a death knell on a race but the people who are egging them on are the non-politicians.” “Hasan Piker, you know, you got to be brave, you got to tell everybody you’re a communist.” “Try that and see how you do anywhere else outside of New York or Denver or Cambridge, Massachusetts, I don’t think you’ll do very well.” “It’s a disaster. This is a train wreck for the Democratic Party.”
1:44

It’s all a facade. Victor Davis Hanson just spent nearly two minutes exposing the champagne socialists like Zohran Mamdani, Ro Khanna and Hasan Piker. As Hanson points out, the movement consuming the Democrat Party alive isn’t being led by the working class...it’s being ushered in by wealthy elites who are first or second generation immigrants from failed states. VICTOR DAVIS HANSON: “This is a top down phenomenon, Sean, and it’s mostly 85% of the membership of the Democratic socialists identify as White and the majority have college degrees and they’re very frustrated that their brilliance was not recognized or appreciated in these very expensive urban enclaves where they live.” “But they are all wealthy. Mamdani, a single child, grew up in privilege, his family was among that 1% in Uganda. They have a family compound on Lake Victoria.” “Ro Khanna now is flirting with socialism. His wife drives a $200,000 Range Rover. The kids have golf courses in their names. We could go on and on.” “Hasan Piker, he bought almost a $3 million home in West Hollywood. He drives a Porsche.” “So it’s not coming from the working class, it’s not coming from minorities necessarily, it’s coming from an affluent group of people and second and first generation people that are migrating, immigrating here.” “Chevalier, Mamdani, Ilhan Omar, Rashida Tlaib who left failed states and they come over here and apparently they want to reenact the disaster they fled from.” “Makes no sense. But they are not going to identify the politician part, they don’t want to identify as socialist or communist because it’s a death knell on a race but the people who are egging them on are the non-politicians.” “Hasan Piker, you know, you got to be brave, you got to tell everybody you’re a communist.” “Try that and see how you do anywhere else outside of New York or Denver or Cambridge, Massachusetts, I don’t think you’ll do very well.” “It’s a disaster. This is a train wreck for the Democratic Party.”

Overton

51,694 次观看 • 2 个月前

When I was studying, I loved dissecting words, analyzing them critically, and that’s exactly what I really felt like doing here, so lets try. “So we met with the Syrian foreign minister and with the General Mazloum on behalf of the Kurds, a historic meeting together in the same meeting”. carries significant discursive and political weight that goes beyond a simple description of a diplomatic encounter. First, the statement must be understood in the broader context in which the United States actively resisted Turkish and Qatari efforts to prevent Mazloum Abdi and Elham Ahmad from participating in the 2026 Munich Security Conference. This already signals a repositioning in U.S. policy and a relative decline in earlier confidence in Jolani. Within this framework, it is significant that it was not Tom Barrack who attended the meeting, but rather Marco Rubio himself. The absence of Barrack and the presence of the Secretary of State can be interpreted as an institutional, political and discursive upgrading of the process. When an issue is moved from the level of a special envoy to that of the Secretary of State, it signals a re-centralization of decision-making authority and potentially an internal correction of previous handling. This can be understood as a rearticulation of hegemonic control by altering who speaks on behalf of the state, the symbolic structure within which the conflict is framed is also reshaped. It can also be read as a metacommunicative distancing from a line that has, in public discourse, been perceived as overly aligned with Turkish interests. This shift in representation performs a subtle dislocation of previous policy assumptions and reasserts U.S. ownership of the diplomatic framework. Second, the syntactic structure of the statement itself is discursively meaningful. The sentence constructs two parallel actors “the Syrian foreign minister” and “General Mazloum on behalf of the Kurds”. The conjunction “and” functions as a coordinating discursive operator that establishes structural equivalence between the two actors. They are positioned as distinct subject positions within the same diplomatic space. The phrase “on behalf of the Kurds” is particularly significant. It elevates Mazloum Abdi beyond the status of a military commander and performatively constitutes him as a political representative, and states that Mazloum Abdi speaks “on behalf of” the a population which is the Kurds, the utterance produces him as a legitimate spokesperson. Consequently, “the Kurds” are constructed as a distinct political entity with separate representation, rather than as a population automatically subsumed under the Syrian state. This constitutes a differential articulation, in which the Kurdish subject position is not fully absorbed into the nodal point “Syria” but instead appears as a partially autonomous political actor. (nodal point attempts to stabilize meaning within a network of concepts) Finally, the description of the meeting as “historic” adds a strong symbolic dimension. It frames the meeting as a break from normal diplomatic arrangements and suggests a moment of transformation. In doing so, it constructs the encounter as one in which two previously separated centers of power, the Syrian state and Kurdish political representation, occupy the same institutional space. Taken together, the statement does more than recount a diplomatic meeting. It performs a discursive repositioning in which the Kurds emerge not merely as an internal Syrian minority, but as a political actor with distinct representation in an international diplomatic arena. Simultaneously, the participation of the Secretary of State signals an elevation and possible recalibration of U.S. policy. The utterance thus operates as a political speech act that subtly restructures the symbolic order through which the Syrian conflict is understood. You’re welcome for the discourse analysis with a little help from Laclau and Mouffe, maybe Aram Ahmed can add to this one.
1:52

When I was studying, I loved dissecting words, analyzing them critically, and that’s exactly what I really felt like doing here, so lets try. “So we met with the Syrian foreign minister and with the General Mazloum on behalf of the Kurds, a historic meeting together in the same meeting”. carries significant discursive and political weight that goes beyond a simple description of a diplomatic encounter. First, the statement must be understood in the broader context in which the United States actively resisted Turkish and Qatari efforts to prevent Mazloum Abdi and Elham Ahmad from participating in the 2026 Munich Security Conference. This already signals a repositioning in U.S. policy and a relative decline in earlier confidence in Jolani. Within this framework, it is significant that it was not Tom Barrack who attended the meeting, but rather Marco Rubio himself. The absence of Barrack and the presence of the Secretary of State can be interpreted as an institutional, political and discursive upgrading of the process. When an issue is moved from the level of a special envoy to that of the Secretary of State, it signals a re-centralization of decision-making authority and potentially an internal correction of previous handling. This can be understood as a rearticulation of hegemonic control by altering who speaks on behalf of the state, the symbolic structure within which the conflict is framed is also reshaped. It can also be read as a metacommunicative distancing from a line that has, in public discourse, been perceived as overly aligned with Turkish interests. This shift in representation performs a subtle dislocation of previous policy assumptions and reasserts U.S. ownership of the diplomatic framework. Second, the syntactic structure of the statement itself is discursively meaningful. The sentence constructs two parallel actors “the Syrian foreign minister” and “General Mazloum on behalf of the Kurds”. The conjunction “and” functions as a coordinating discursive operator that establishes structural equivalence between the two actors. They are positioned as distinct subject positions within the same diplomatic space. The phrase “on behalf of the Kurds” is particularly significant. It elevates Mazloum Abdi beyond the status of a military commander and performatively constitutes him as a political representative, and states that Mazloum Abdi speaks “on behalf of” the a population which is the Kurds, the utterance produces him as a legitimate spokesperson. Consequently, “the Kurds” are constructed as a distinct political entity with separate representation, rather than as a population automatically subsumed under the Syrian state. This constitutes a differential articulation, in which the Kurdish subject position is not fully absorbed into the nodal point “Syria” but instead appears as a partially autonomous political actor. (nodal point attempts to stabilize meaning within a network of concepts) Finally, the description of the meeting as “historic” adds a strong symbolic dimension. It frames the meeting as a break from normal diplomatic arrangements and suggests a moment of transformation. In doing so, it constructs the encounter as one in which two previously separated centers of power, the Syrian state and Kurdish political representation, occupy the same institutional space. Taken together, the statement does more than recount a diplomatic meeting. It performs a discursive repositioning in which the Kurds emerge not merely as an internal Syrian minority, but as a political actor with distinct representation in an international diplomatic arena. Simultaneously, the participation of the Secretary of State signals an elevation and possible recalibration of U.S. policy. The utterance thus operates as a political speech act that subtly restructures the symbolic order through which the Syrian conflict is understood. You’re welcome for the discourse analysis with a little help from Laclau and Mouffe, maybe Aram Ahmed can add to this one.

Jino Victoria Doabi ‏ژینۆ ویکتوریا دو‌آبی

10,343 次观看 • 7 个月前

I made a digital twin of myself from 10 seconds of video. In the clip: left is the real me, middle is a leading avatar model, right is Mirage Avatar X. Watch the eyes. The difference is not subtle. I have been testing AI avatar models since my first clone in 2023. Every one of them was impressive for about 30 seconds, then your brain caught up. Still eyes. One polite expression. A mouth doing all the work. Avatar X is the first model where that moment never came. Here is what makes it different: It is trained on you. Avatar X preserves your identity. Most avatar models can copy your appearance. Avatar X captures the subtle details that make you you. The way you move, the way you express yourself, and the way you naturally deliver speech. It looks like you. It moves like you. It sounds like you. It understands non-verbal performance Laughing, crying, yawning, sighing. These are the moments where most avatar models fall apart, trying to lip-sync through sounds that aren't words. Avatar X responds naturally, generating realistic facial expressions and micro-expressions instead of forcing every sound into speech. The expression goes beyond the lips Expressions are driven by the audio, through the whole face and body. Ask a question and it furrows its brows and shrugs on the tone. No other model does this to this degree. No quality degradation The first second and the last second look the same. Other models lose quality the longer the video runs. 10 seconds of input That is the entire requirement. Other models need 15 seconds, some even 1 to five minutes. Three years ago my AI clone was a party trick. This one can carry my face, my expressions and my delivery without me in the room. The bar for AI avatars just moved. Avatar X is live today. → Try it here:
0:30

I made a digital twin of myself from 10 seconds of video. In the clip: left is the real me, middle is a leading avatar model, right is Mirage Avatar X. Watch the eyes. The difference is not subtle. I have been testing AI avatar models since my first clone in 2023. Every one of them was impressive for about 30 seconds, then your brain caught up. Still eyes. One polite expression. A mouth doing all the work. Avatar X is the first model where that moment never came. Here is what makes it different: It is trained on you. Avatar X preserves your identity. Most avatar models can copy your appearance. Avatar X captures the subtle details that make you you. The way you move, the way you express yourself, and the way you naturally deliver speech. It looks like you. It moves like you. It sounds like you. It understands non-verbal performance Laughing, crying, yawning, sighing. These are the moments where most avatar models fall apart, trying to lip-sync through sounds that aren't words. Avatar X responds naturally, generating realistic facial expressions and micro-expressions instead of forcing every sound into speech. The expression goes beyond the lips Expressions are driven by the audio, through the whole face and body. Ask a question and it furrows its brows and shrugs on the tone. No other model does this to this degree. No quality degradation The first second and the last second look the same. Other models lose quality the longer the video runs. 10 seconds of input That is the entire requirement. Other models need 15 seconds, some even 1 to five minutes. Three years ago my AI clone was a party trick. This one can carry my face, my expressions and my delivery without me in the room. The bar for AI avatars just moved. Avatar X is live today. → Try it here:

Linus ✦ Ekenstam

20,999 次观看 • 2 个月前

After years of being absolutely tortured by expensive ad creative pipelines, I think I finally found the ultimate savior for brand growth. Most AI video tools are great at generating flashy but random clips. The real challenge starts when you need to produce high-converting ecommerce content at scale without burning your budget. I’ve been testing Wizstar_official, and it honestly feels less like a simple AI generator and more like serious production infrastructure for scaling digital businesses. What stood out to me is how their ecosystem completely automates the two biggest bottlenecks in growth marketing: Bulk Testing and Creative Adaptation. First, their Agent setup paired with Fast Mode is a cheat code for volume. Instead of spending days scripting and storyboarding, the system intelligently extracts your product selling points, writes algorithm-friendly influencer scripts, and batch-produces massive ad variations in one day. It’s ultra-low-cost, built for rapid listing, and keeps your brand logos and product textures 100% consistent and lossless across the board. Second, the Video Reference workflow is an absolute game-changer. Instead of rebuilding every ad from scratch or guessing what works, you can reference any existing successful e-commerce video. The AI reverse-engineers its exact pacing, structure, camera movement, and storytelling style, and applies that winning DNA to a completely different product. That completely changes the production workflow from: prompt → random output into something closer to: reference → structured production → scalable content system Under the hood, Wizstar doesn't just rely on one platform; it supports flexible multi-model orchestration. Driven by their newly integrated Seedance 2.0 engine, it allows direct face input, meaning your character consistency and scene continuity stay rock-solid with absolutely none of that creepy AI face warping across complex cuts. If you are running global campaigns, you can also utilize their Video Translation tool to flip master clips into 12 languages with flawless, natural lip sync in minutes. ✨ New users get free credits upon registration 💸 First month subscription is only $19 (includes a complimentary 30-second E-commerce Agent experience to test features like Product to Video) Stop letting slow pipelines bottleneck your global growth. Try it here: #Wizstar #GrowthMarketing #AIVideo
0:40

After years of being absolutely tortured by expensive ad creative pipelines, I think I finally found the ultimate savior for brand growth. Most AI video tools are great at generating flashy but random clips. The real challenge starts when you need to produce high-converting ecommerce content at scale without burning your budget. I’ve been testing Wizstar_official, and it honestly feels less like a simple AI generator and more like serious production infrastructure for scaling digital businesses. What stood out to me is how their ecosystem completely automates the two biggest bottlenecks in growth marketing: Bulk Testing and Creative Adaptation. First, their Agent setup paired with Fast Mode is a cheat code for volume. Instead of spending days scripting and storyboarding, the system intelligently extracts your product selling points, writes algorithm-friendly influencer scripts, and batch-produces massive ad variations in one day. It’s ultra-low-cost, built for rapid listing, and keeps your brand logos and product textures 100% consistent and lossless across the board. Second, the Video Reference workflow is an absolute game-changer. Instead of rebuilding every ad from scratch or guessing what works, you can reference any existing successful e-commerce video. The AI reverse-engineers its exact pacing, structure, camera movement, and storytelling style, and applies that winning DNA to a completely different product. That completely changes the production workflow from: prompt → random output into something closer to: reference → structured production → scalable content system Under the hood, Wizstar doesn't just rely on one platform; it supports flexible multi-model orchestration. Driven by their newly integrated Seedance 2.0 engine, it allows direct face input, meaning your character consistency and scene continuity stay rock-solid with absolutely none of that creepy AI face warping across complex cuts. If you are running global campaigns, you can also utilize their Video Translation tool to flip master clips into 12 languages with flawless, natural lip sync in minutes. ✨ New users get free credits upon registration 💸 First month subscription is only $19 (includes a complimentary 30-second E-commerce Agent experience to test features like Product to Video) Stop letting slow pipelines bottleneck your global growth. Try it here: #Wizstar #GrowthMarketing #AIVideo

FELIX

97,682 次观看 • 4 个月前

Peking University Rugby Team: An Inclusive Community of Gen Z 北京大学橄榄球队：多元包容的Z世代共同体 July 25, 2026. At Yunding Rugby Park in Chongli, Zhangjiakou, Hebei Province, China, a fiercely contested final unfolded. When the final whistle blew, the 2nd Yunding Bowl World University Flag Football Invitational came to an end amid roaring cheers. The Peking University Flag Football Team (Dragons) defeated HKG FLAG from Hong Kong Joint Schools 20:6, claiming the first championship trophy in the team’s history. One Ball Unites a Group, Fuels a Dream Turning our gaze from the mountains of Chongli back to the shores of Weiming Lake: rugby, a relatively niche sport on China’s university campuses, has brought together students across different academic years, majors and nationalities. Through running, catching passes and pulling flags, they have formed a diverse and inclusive community. Founded in 2021, the association started with only a handful of members. Most core players touched a rugby ball for the very first time after entering university. Within just a few years, the association has built four well-equipped teams with regular training schedules and impressive competition records: American football, rugby union, men’s flag football and women’s flag football. Its membership exceeds 1,000, and the Peking University Yunding Rugby Scholarship has been established. Yuan Lin, a 2023 undergraduate from the School of Foreign Languages and former chair of the association, first encountered rugby after joining the group. “We gather out of shared passion and fight side by side. This sense of belonging to a team makes every effort worthwhile,” he said. The National Touch Rugby Finals held late last year remain a memorable fixture for members of the rugby union team. Half of the competing players were newcomers, tasked with back-to-back high-intensity matches over two days. In the semi-final, PKU fell behind. Right before the buzzer, Yuan Lin scored a try to force a dramatic last-gasp draw. “That moment of breaking through the defence, and the unyielding looks in everyone’s eyes amid adversity, will stay with me forever.” Seizing every opportunity to compete, refining skills, falling down, reviewing and getting back up — this embodies the pure spirit of rugby for many players. On PKU’s No.1 Sports Field, three to four evenings every week see players from all teams converge. They start with warm-ups, practise basic skills and fitness, then run tactical drills and intra-squad scrimmages. Zhang Kuimin, a 2023 undergraduate from the School of International Relations, commented: “Rugby is not a sport for quick wins; it demands long-term commitment and consistent participation.” Behind intense on-field contests and weekly solid training lies team resilience forged by generations of players hailing from 35 countries and regions across five continents. Within Peking University’s diverse and inclusive campus culture, rugby has built an even more international, varied and comprehensive sporting platform. Once they pull on their jerseys, all members share one identity: part of the Peking University Student Rugby Association. This united spirit has driven the teams to constant breakthroughs in tournaments, emerging as a formidable force among university rugby programmes nationwide. The American football team has made its mark in the Chuguang Bowl University League; The rugby union team has travelled to Qingdao, Harbin, Hangzhou, Shijiazhuang and beyond, repeatedly setting new benchmarks for the programme; The men’s flag football side has twice reached the national finals of the University Bowl; The women’s flag football team has partnered with NFL China to organise the Weiming Bowl inter-university tournament hosted by Peking University. In 2026, the team claimed victory at the 2nd Yunding Bowl World University Flag Football Invitational, completing a remarkable leap from participants to champions within a single year. Frequent communication within the association, seamless coordination, and trust built through running and communication bind all teams together with a shared core. “This allows us to operate as one large association, share resources and build an even broader platform.” “Celebrate together in victory; stand together to fight in defeat.” The spirit of teamwork, courage and perseverance embodied by rugby has enabled the community to thrive and grow, igniting greater enthusiasm for the sport among players. Lin Shenjun, a 2025 postgraduate student at Guanghua School of Management from Chinese Taiwan, speaks from experience. “It serves as my second classroom. I feel incomplete if I skip training for a few days. Back in Taiwan, I would avoid heading outdoors once temperatures dropped to 10 degrees Celsius, yet now even sub-zero weather cannot keep me off the pitch.” Competitive matches on the field create opportunities for young people from all regions to meet and connect, with rugby acting as a vibrant vehicle for friendship. Values of friendship, leadership and honour become tangible in every embrace, high-five and cheer. As captain of the PKU rugby union team, Hung Ka Ying, a 2022 undergraduate from the School of Law originating from Hong Kong, reflected: “The fast pace of rugby requires athletes to make instant decisions under pressure, perform amid rapid shifts and adjust quickly after setbacks. This has greatly boosted my ability to adapt and respond to changes in the legal profession.” Rugby brings like-minded people together to experience a sport, hone their craft and pursue a shared vision. It has forged this flourishing community: the steady grit of the American football team, the tenacity of the rugby union squad, and the collective drive of the flag football sides, leaving a string of solid, shining footprints both on and off the pitch. 2026年7月25日，中国河北张家口崇礼云顶橄榄球公园，一场激烈的决赛正在进行。 当终场哨声响起，第二届云顶碗世界名校腰旗橄榄球邀请赛落下帷幕，欢呼声不绝于耳。北京大学腰旗橄榄球队（Dragons）以20:6战胜香港联校HKG FLAG，捧起队史上首座冠军奖杯。 目光从崇礼山巅落回未名湖畔，橄榄球——这项在中国的大学校园中相对小众的运动，已然汇聚起跨越学段、专业、国别的学子，在奔跑、接球、下旗的过程中，凝聚成多元包容的共同体。 2021年建队之初，这支球队仅有寥寥数人，绝大多数主力队员上大学后才第一次“摸到”橄榄球。短短几年，协会已建立美式橄榄球队、英式橄榄球队、男生腰旗橄榄球队和女生腰旗橄榄球队四支装备完善、训练常规、战绩频出的球队，规模已逾千人，并设立了北京大学云顶橄榄球奖学金。加入协会后才初次接触橄榄球运动的外国语学院2023级本科生袁麟，曾是协会理事长，在他看来，“大家因为共同的热爱聚在一起，彼此相伴‘战斗’，这种团队的归属感让一切付出皆值得。” 去年年末的全国触式橄榄球总决赛，是英橄队员们津津乐道的一场比赛。当时参赛队员中一半都是新人，需要连续两天参加高强度比赛。半决赛上，北大队一度落后。即将吹哨之际，袁麟成功达阵，实现了一次压哨绝平。“那个突围的瞬间，以及大家在逆境中不放弃的眼神，是我永远的记忆。” 抓住一切上场机会磨练技术，跌倒、复盘再爬起，是众多队员心里，橄榄球至为纯粹的一面。北大第一体育场上，每周都有三四个傍晚，各球队的队员们分别聚集到一块，从热身开始，进行基本功和体能训练，再进行战术演练和分组对抗赛。在国际关系学院2023级本科生张奎珉看来，“橄榄球并不是一项靠短期取胜的运动，而是需要长期性的参与和投入。”赛场激烈的比拼与每周扎实的训练背后，是来自五大洲、35个国家和地区的几代队员所钩织起的团队韧性。在北大多元包容的校园氛围中，橄榄球构筑起更为国际化、多样化、全面性的体育平台。 每当穿上球衣，队员们就有了同一个身份——北京大学学生橄榄球协会成员。这份“拧成一股绳”的劲儿，推动着球队在各类赛事中不断突破，逐渐成为全国高校橄榄球赛场上不可忽视的力量：美式橄榄球队在“初光碗”大学生联赛中崭露头角；英式橄榄球队足迹延伸至青岛、哈尔滨、杭州、石家庄等地，屡创队史新高；腰旗橄榄球男队两度闯入“大学碗”全国总决赛，女队携手NFL中国策划组织北京大学“未名碗”高校赛事，2026年，球队在第二届“云顶碗”世界名校腰旗橄榄球邀请赛中夺冠，用一年时间实现了从参与者到冠军的跨越。 团队内部的高频交流、手眼协调的配合，沟通与奔跑传达的信任默契，为各球队之间凝聚起共通的内核，“让我们能作为一个‘大协会’联合在一起，共享资源，构建起一个更宽广的平台。” “胜则举杯相庆，败则拼死相救。”橄榄球所蕴含的团队协作、敢闯敢拼的精神，让这个团队持续拔节生长、发展壮大，激发愈来愈多队员对这项运动的热情。来自中国台湾的光华管理学院2025级硕士生林珅郡深有感触。“它是我的‘第二课堂’，几天不打球就觉得缺点什么。以前在台湾，10度的天气就不想出门了，但现在零下气温也无法阻拦我出门打球。” 赛场上的逐风与竞技，成为各地青年相知相识的契机。而橄榄球，也成为这份友谊的生动载体。“友谊、领导力、荣誉”，也在一次次拥抱、击掌、呐喊中变得真实可感。作为北大英橄队队长，来自中国香港的法学院2022级本科生洪嘉莹感触颇深，“橄榄球比赛的快节奏要求球员在高压下即时决策，在瞬息万变间出色发挥，在挫折中迅速调整，这大大提升了我在法律行业中适应变化、应对变化的能力。” 橄榄球将一群志同道合的人联系在一起，共同感受一项运动、打磨一门技术、心存一份愿景，凝聚起这支欣欣向荣、蒸蒸日上的队伍——美式橄榄球队的稳扎稳打，英式橄榄球队的坚韧拼搏，腰旗橄榄球队的齐心协力，正在赛场内外镌刻一连串坚实而闪光的足迹。 #China #ChinaGenZ
0:41

Peking University Rugby Team: An Inclusive Community of Gen Z 北京大学橄榄球队：多元包容的Z世代共同体 July 25, 2026. At Yunding Rugby Park in Chongli, Zhangjiakou, Hebei Province, China, a fiercely contested final unfolded. When the final whistle blew, the 2nd Yunding Bowl World University Flag Football Invitational came to an end amid roaring cheers. The Peking University Flag Football Team (Dragons) defeated HKG FLAG from Hong Kong Joint Schools 20:6, claiming the first championship trophy in the team’s history. One Ball Unites a Group, Fuels a Dream Turning our gaze from the mountains of Chongli back to the shores of Weiming Lake: rugby, a relatively niche sport on China’s university campuses, has brought together students across different academic years, majors and nationalities. Through running, catching passes and pulling flags, they have formed a diverse and inclusive community. Founded in 2021, the association started with only a handful of members. Most core players touched a rugby ball for the very first time after entering university. Within just a few years, the association has built four well-equipped teams with regular training schedules and impressive competition records: American football, rugby union, men’s flag football and women’s flag football. Its membership exceeds 1,000, and the Peking University Yunding Rugby Scholarship has been established. Yuan Lin, a 2023 undergraduate from the School of Foreign Languages and former chair of the association, first encountered rugby after joining the group. “We gather out of shared passion and fight side by side. This sense of belonging to a team makes every effort worthwhile,” he said. The National Touch Rugby Finals held late last year remain a memorable fixture for members of the rugby union team. Half of the competing players were newcomers, tasked with back-to-back high-intensity matches over two days. In the semi-final, PKU fell behind. Right before the buzzer, Yuan Lin scored a try to force a dramatic last-gasp draw. “That moment of breaking through the defence, and the unyielding looks in everyone’s eyes amid adversity, will stay with me forever.” Seizing every opportunity to compete, refining skills, falling down, reviewing and getting back up — this embodies the pure spirit of rugby for many players. On PKU’s No.1 Sports Field, three to four evenings every week see players from all teams converge. They start with warm-ups, practise basic skills and fitness, then run tactical drills and intra-squad scrimmages. Zhang Kuimin, a 2023 undergraduate from the School of International Relations, commented: “Rugby is not a sport for quick wins; it demands long-term commitment and consistent participation.” Behind intense on-field contests and weekly solid training lies team resilience forged by generations of players hailing from 35 countries and regions across five continents. Within Peking University’s diverse and inclusive campus culture, rugby has built an even more international, varied and comprehensive sporting platform. Once they pull on their jerseys, all members share one identity: part of the Peking University Student Rugby Association. This united spirit has driven the teams to constant breakthroughs in tournaments, emerging as a formidable force among university rugby programmes nationwide. The American football team has made its mark in the Chuguang Bowl University League; The rugby union team has travelled to Qingdao, Harbin, Hangzhou, Shijiazhuang and beyond, repeatedly setting new benchmarks for the programme; The men’s flag football side has twice reached the national finals of the University Bowl; The women’s flag football team has partnered with NFL China to organise the Weiming Bowl inter-university tournament hosted by Peking University. In 2026, the team claimed victory at the 2nd Yunding Bowl World University Flag Football Invitational, completing a remarkable leap from participants to champions within a single year. Frequent communication within the association, seamless coordination, and trust built through running and communication bind all teams together with a shared core. “This allows us to operate as one large association, share resources and build an even broader platform.” “Celebrate together in victory; stand together to fight in defeat.” The spirit of teamwork, courage and perseverance embodied by rugby has enabled the community to thrive and grow, igniting greater enthusiasm for the sport among players. Lin Shenjun, a 2025 postgraduate student at Guanghua School of Management from Chinese Taiwan, speaks from experience. “It serves as my second classroom. I feel incomplete if I skip training for a few days. Back in Taiwan, I would avoid heading outdoors once temperatures dropped to 10 degrees Celsius, yet now even sub-zero weather cannot keep me off the pitch.” Competitive matches on the field create opportunities for young people from all regions to meet and connect, with rugby acting as a vibrant vehicle for friendship. Values of friendship, leadership and honour become tangible in every embrace, high-five and cheer. As captain of the PKU rugby union team, Hung Ka Ying, a 2022 undergraduate from the School of Law originating from Hong Kong, reflected: “The fast pace of rugby requires athletes to make instant decisions under pressure, perform amid rapid shifts and adjust quickly after setbacks. This has greatly boosted my ability to adapt and respond to changes in the legal profession.” Rugby brings like-minded people together to experience a sport, hone their craft and pursue a shared vision. It has forged this flourishing community: the steady grit of the American football team, the tenacity of the rugby union squad, and the collective drive of the flag football sides, leaving a string of solid, shining footprints both on and off the pitch. 2026年7月25日，中国河北张家口崇礼云顶橄榄球公园，一场激烈的决赛正在进行。 当终场哨声响起，第二届云顶碗世界名校腰旗橄榄球邀请赛落下帷幕，欢呼声不绝于耳。北京大学腰旗橄榄球队（Dragons）以20:6战胜香港联校HKG FLAG，捧起队史上首座冠军奖杯。 目光从崇礼山巅落回未名湖畔，橄榄球——这项在中国的大学校园中相对小众的运动，已然汇聚起跨越学段、专业、国别的学子，在奔跑、接球、下旗的过程中，凝聚成多元包容的共同体。 2021年建队之初，这支球队仅有寥寥数人，绝大多数主力队员上大学后才第一次“摸到”橄榄球。短短几年，协会已建立美式橄榄球队、英式橄榄球队、男生腰旗橄榄球队和女生腰旗橄榄球队四支装备完善、训练常规、战绩频出的球队，规模已逾千人，并设立了北京大学云顶橄榄球奖学金。加入协会后才初次接触橄榄球运动的外国语学院2023级本科生袁麟，曾是协会理事长，在他看来，“大家因为共同的热爱聚在一起，彼此相伴‘战斗’，这种团队的归属感让一切付出皆值得。” 去年年末的全国触式橄榄球总决赛，是英橄队员们津津乐道的一场比赛。当时参赛队员中一半都是新人，需要连续两天参加高强度比赛。半决赛上，北大队一度落后。即将吹哨之际，袁麟成功达阵，实现了一次压哨绝平。“那个突围的瞬间，以及大家在逆境中不放弃的眼神，是我永远的记忆。” 抓住一切上场机会磨练技术，跌倒、复盘再爬起，是众多队员心里，橄榄球至为纯粹的一面。北大第一体育场上，每周都有三四个傍晚，各球队的队员们分别聚集到一块，从热身开始，进行基本功和体能训练，再进行战术演练和分组对抗赛。在国际关系学院2023级本科生张奎珉看来，“橄榄球并不是一项靠短期取胜的运动，而是需要长期性的参与和投入。”赛场激烈的比拼与每周扎实的训练背后，是来自五大洲、35个国家和地区的几代队员所钩织起的团队韧性。在北大多元包容的校园氛围中，橄榄球构筑起更为国际化、多样化、全面性的体育平台。 每当穿上球衣，队员们就有了同一个身份——北京大学学生橄榄球协会成员。这份“拧成一股绳”的劲儿，推动着球队在各类赛事中不断突破，逐渐成为全国高校橄榄球赛场上不可忽视的力量：美式橄榄球队在“初光碗”大学生联赛中崭露头角；英式橄榄球队足迹延伸至青岛、哈尔滨、杭州、石家庄等地，屡创队史新高；腰旗橄榄球男队两度闯入“大学碗”全国总决赛，女队携手NFL中国策划组织北京大学“未名碗”高校赛事，2026年，球队在第二届“云顶碗”世界名校腰旗橄榄球邀请赛中夺冠，用一年时间实现了从参与者到冠军的跨越。 团队内部的高频交流、手眼协调的配合，沟通与奔跑传达的信任默契，为各球队之间凝聚起共通的内核，“让我们能作为一个‘大协会’联合在一起，共享资源，构建起一个更宽广的平台。” “胜则举杯相庆，败则拼死相救。”橄榄球所蕴含的团队协作、敢闯敢拼的精神，让这个团队持续拔节生长、发展壮大，激发愈来愈多队员对这项运动的热情。来自中国台湾的光华管理学院2025级硕士生林珅郡深有感触。“它是我的‘第二课堂’，几天不打球就觉得缺点什么。以前在台湾，10度的天气就不想出门了，但现在零下气温也无法阻拦我出门打球。” 赛场上的逐风与竞技，成为各地青年相知相识的契机。而橄榄球，也成为这份友谊的生动载体。“友谊、领导力、荣誉”，也在一次次拥抱、击掌、呐喊中变得真实可感。作为北大英橄队队长，来自中国香港的法学院2022级本科生洪嘉莹感触颇深，“橄榄球比赛的快节奏要求球员在高压下即时决策，在瞬息万变间出色发挥，在挫折中迅速调整，这大大提升了我在法律行业中适应变化、应对变化的能力。” 橄榄球将一群志同道合的人联系在一起，共同感受一项运动、打磨一门技术、心存一份愿景，凝聚起这支欣欣向荣、蒸蒸日上的队伍——美式橄榄球队的稳扎稳打，英式橄榄球队的坚韧拼搏，腰旗橄榄球队的齐心协力，正在赛场内外镌刻一连串坚实而闪光的足迹。 #China #ChinaGenZ

China Gen Z

20,466 次观看 • 1 个月前

On this day 56 years ago, three men fell from the sky in a freezing, half-dead spacecraft and landed in the Pacific Ocean. They had been given almost no chance of coming home alive. Six days earlier, astronauts Jim Lovell, Jack Swigert, and Fred Haise launched on Apollo 13, heading for the Moon. Two days into the flight, 200,000 miles from Earth, an oxygen tank exploded and tore a hole in the side of their ship. Within minutes, they were losing oxygen, losing power, and losing heat. There was no plan for this. No one had trained for it. The Moon landing was abandoned. The only question now was whether three men could survive long enough to get home. Their main ship was dying, so they climbed into a smaller attached craft that was only designed to land on the Moon. It was built for two people for two days. They had to make it last four days for three. The temperature inside dropped to 3 degrees Celsius. Water droplets covered every surface. They rationed drinking water to six ounces per man per day, less than a single cup. Jim Lovell lost 14 pounds in four days. Then the air started going bad. The filters that clean carbon dioxide from the air were running out. Without new ones, the crew would suffocate. The spare filters from the main ship were the wrong shape. Square filters. Round slots. Engineers on the ground grabbed the same materials the astronauts had on board, plastic bags, cardboard, duct tape, and a sock, and built a makeshift adapter on a desk. Then they talked the crew through building an identical one while floating in zero gravity, 200,000 miles away. It worked. To get home, they had to swing around the far side of the Moon and fire their engine at the exact right second. Too steep and they would burn up entering Earth’s atmosphere. Too shallow and they would bounce off it and drift into space forever. The entire world stopped. Over 40 million people watched on television. The Pope led prayers from the Vatican. On April 17, 1970, the spacecraft hit the atmosphere. For four minutes, all radio contact went silent. The heat of re-entry surrounds a spacecraft in a layer of superheated gas that blocks all signals. Controllers on the ground called out. Nothing. The silence stretched past the expected time. One minute late. Still nothing. At one minute and 28 seconds past the deadline, a voice broke through. The parachutes opened. The capsule hit the water. All three men were alive. They never reached the Moon. But the mission became the greatest rescue in the history of space travel. It proved that the most dangerous moment in any journey is not the one you prepare for. It is the one nobody saw coming. Jim Lovell never flew in space again. He never walked on the Moon. Years later, when asked if he considered himself unlucky, he said: “I think of the crew of Apollo 1, who died in a fire before they ever left the ground. I think of the crews who never got to fly at all. No, I regard Apollo 13 as a triumph.”
1:36

On this day 56 years ago, three men fell from the sky in a freezing, half-dead spacecraft and landed in the Pacific Ocean. They had been given almost no chance of coming home alive. Six days earlier, astronauts Jim Lovell, Jack Swigert, and Fred Haise launched on Apollo 13, heading for the Moon. Two days into the flight, 200,000 miles from Earth, an oxygen tank exploded and tore a hole in the side of their ship. Within minutes, they were losing oxygen, losing power, and losing heat. There was no plan for this. No one had trained for it. The Moon landing was abandoned. The only question now was whether three men could survive long enough to get home. Their main ship was dying, so they climbed into a smaller attached craft that was only designed to land on the Moon. It was built for two people for two days. They had to make it last four days for three. The temperature inside dropped to 3 degrees Celsius. Water droplets covered every surface. They rationed drinking water to six ounces per man per day, less than a single cup. Jim Lovell lost 14 pounds in four days. Then the air started going bad. The filters that clean carbon dioxide from the air were running out. Without new ones, the crew would suffocate. The spare filters from the main ship were the wrong shape. Square filters. Round slots. Engineers on the ground grabbed the same materials the astronauts had on board, plastic bags, cardboard, duct tape, and a sock, and built a makeshift adapter on a desk. Then they talked the crew through building an identical one while floating in zero gravity, 200,000 miles away. It worked. To get home, they had to swing around the far side of the Moon and fire their engine at the exact right second. Too steep and they would burn up entering Earth’s atmosphere. Too shallow and they would bounce off it and drift into space forever. The entire world stopped. Over 40 million people watched on television. The Pope led prayers from the Vatican. On April 17, 1970, the spacecraft hit the atmosphere. For four minutes, all radio contact went silent. The heat of re-entry surrounds a spacecraft in a layer of superheated gas that blocks all signals. Controllers on the ground called out. Nothing. The silence stretched past the expected time. One minute late. Still nothing. At one minute and 28 seconds past the deadline, a voice broke through. The parachutes opened. The capsule hit the water. All three men were alive. They never reached the Moon. But the mission became the greatest rescue in the history of space travel. It proved that the most dangerous moment in any journey is not the one you prepare for. It is the one nobody saw coming. Jim Lovell never flew in space again. He never walked on the Moon. Years later, when asked if he considered himself unlucky, he said: “I think of the crew of Apollo 1, who died in a fire before they ever left the ground. I think of the crews who never got to fly at all. No, I regard Apollo 13 as a triumph.”

Lemma the Optimist

314,140 次观看 • 5 个月前

🚨The HIMARS at the Foot of Fuji Was Not a Drill. It Was a Message. Three signals from three cities. One target. One 24-hour window. Beijing was always going to hear it. Just after 2 p.m. Tokyo time on Wednesday, a platoon of about fifty U.S. Marines from the 3rd Battalion, 12th Marine Regiment — Okinawa-based, ordinarily stationed within sight of the Taiwan Strait — rolled two HIMARS launchers onto the East Fuji Maneuver Area and fired two salvos. Six rockets. Pause. Six more. The launchers then did what they were built to do: pulled back from the firing line and disappeared. The Marines call this "shoot and scoot." In the age of cheap drones and counter-battery radar, it is no longer a clever tactic — it is the difference between a launcher that fights tomorrow and a launcher that is a smoking ruin within ninety seconds. The Pentagon framed the exercise in routine terms. Live-fire training. Readiness. Allied interoperability. "Reinforcing our commitment to regional security and the defense of Japan," the division spokesman wrote in his April briefing email. Many legacy media outlets reported it as a drill. Second consecutive year at this location. Nothing to see. That framing is technically correct and strategically blind. Because of what else happened on May 20. In Taipei, Lai Ching-te marked his second anniversary in office, halfway through his term, with a press conference reaffirming that Taiwan's future will not be decided by external forces and that arms procurement from the United States is essential to peace. In Washington, president Donald Trump walked onto the tarmac at Joint Base Andrews and told reporters he would speak with Lai personally — the first sitting U.S. president-to-sitting Taiwanese president call since the United States switched recognition to Beijing in 1979. And in Shizuoka Prefecture, on a maneuver area visible to local farmers and a 72-year-old former Japanese soldier watching from a hilltop in Gotemba, twelve American rockets arced into the foothills of Japan's most photographed mountain. Three events. Three cities. Same calendar day. You can call that coincidence if you want. The people who plan exercises eighteen months in advance, coordinate them with Japan's Ministry of Defense by formal email in April, and clear them with three different theater command headquarters do not believe in that kind of coincidence. Here is what the HIMARS at Fuji actually means in the wider picture. The system, as configured for Wednesday's drill, is short-range. But HIMARS is a platform, not a weapon. Swap the standard pod for the Precision Strike Missile and the same truck can put a warhead 500 kilometers downrange — from Yonaguni, from the Senkakus, from the Batanes islands the U.S. Army has been quietly deploying to since last year, that arc covers the Taiwan Strait and a meaningful portion of the southern Chinese coast. Beijing has spent two decades and several hundred billion dollars building an Anti-Access/Area Denial system designed around one assumption: that American power projection in the Western Pacific depends on a handful of large, fixed, exquisite platforms — carrier groups, Kadena, Guam. The DF-26 is called the "Guam Killer" for a reason. The entire bet is that if you can credibly threaten those platforms, the United States will not show up. A truck that fires twelve rockets and disappears into the tree line breaks that bet. There is no "Guam Killer" for a HIMARS battery that moves every forty minutes across an archipelago of forty-six inhabited islands the U.S. and Japan jointly operate. You cannot pre-target what you cannot find. This was the message Beijing received on Wednesday afternoon. Trump's announcement told them the political ceiling has been raised. Lai's anniversary speech told them Taipei is not negotiating its sovereignty. The rockets at Fuji told them the military floor has been raised too — and that the floor is mobile, distributed, and very difficult to break. The bell that has been ringing all week did not stop at the phone call. It rang again at 2 p.m. in the shadow of Mount Fuji. And the next time it rings, it may not be a training round. Original post by me Aric Chen. Views are my own — welcome to discuss!
0:31

🚨The HIMARS at the Foot of Fuji Was Not a Drill. It Was a Message. Three signals from three cities. One target. One 24-hour window. Beijing was always going to hear it. Just after 2 p.m. Tokyo time on Wednesday, a platoon of about fifty U.S. Marines from the 3rd Battalion, 12th Marine Regiment — Okinawa-based, ordinarily stationed within sight of the Taiwan Strait — rolled two HIMARS launchers onto the East Fuji Maneuver Area and fired two salvos. Six rockets. Pause. Six more. The launchers then did what they were built to do: pulled back from the firing line and disappeared. The Marines call this "shoot and scoot." In the age of cheap drones and counter-battery radar, it is no longer a clever tactic — it is the difference between a launcher that fights tomorrow and a launcher that is a smoking ruin within ninety seconds. The Pentagon framed the exercise in routine terms. Live-fire training. Readiness. Allied interoperability. "Reinforcing our commitment to regional security and the defense of Japan," the division spokesman wrote in his April briefing email. Many legacy media outlets reported it as a drill. Second consecutive year at this location. Nothing to see. That framing is technically correct and strategically blind. Because of what else happened on May 20. In Taipei, Lai Ching-te marked his second anniversary in office, halfway through his term, with a press conference reaffirming that Taiwan's future will not be decided by external forces and that arms procurement from the United States is essential to peace. In Washington, president Donald Trump walked onto the tarmac at Joint Base Andrews and told reporters he would speak with Lai personally — the first sitting U.S. president-to-sitting Taiwanese president call since the United States switched recognition to Beijing in 1979. And in Shizuoka Prefecture, on a maneuver area visible to local farmers and a 72-year-old former Japanese soldier watching from a hilltop in Gotemba, twelve American rockets arced into the foothills of Japan's most photographed mountain. Three events. Three cities. Same calendar day. You can call that coincidence if you want. The people who plan exercises eighteen months in advance, coordinate them with Japan's Ministry of Defense by formal email in April, and clear them with three different theater command headquarters do not believe in that kind of coincidence. Here is what the HIMARS at Fuji actually means in the wider picture. The system, as configured for Wednesday's drill, is short-range. But HIMARS is a platform, not a weapon. Swap the standard pod for the Precision Strike Missile and the same truck can put a warhead 500 kilometers downrange — from Yonaguni, from the Senkakus, from the Batanes islands the U.S. Army has been quietly deploying to since last year, that arc covers the Taiwan Strait and a meaningful portion of the southern Chinese coast. Beijing has spent two decades and several hundred billion dollars building an Anti-Access/Area Denial system designed around one assumption: that American power projection in the Western Pacific depends on a handful of large, fixed, exquisite platforms — carrier groups, Kadena, Guam. The DF-26 is called the "Guam Killer" for a reason. The entire bet is that if you can credibly threaten those platforms, the United States will not show up. A truck that fires twelve rockets and disappears into the tree line breaks that bet. There is no "Guam Killer" for a HIMARS battery that moves every forty minutes across an archipelago of forty-six inhabited islands the U.S. and Japan jointly operate. You cannot pre-target what you cannot find. This was the message Beijing received on Wednesday afternoon. Trump's announcement told them the political ceiling has been raised. Lai's anniversary speech told them Taipei is not negotiating its sovereignty. The rockets at Fuji told them the military floor has been raised too — and that the floor is mobile, distributed, and very difficult to break. The bell that has been ringing all week did not stop at the phone call. It rang again at 2 p.m. in the shadow of Mount Fuji. And the next time it rings, it may not be a training round. Original post by me Aric Chen. Views are my own — welcome to discuss!

Aric Chen

109,283 次观看 • 4 个月前

MODI SARKAR'S BIG SURGICAL STRIKE ON CYBER CRIME🔥 Modi Govt frames new rule that makes it impossible to use WhatsApp or ANY messaging app without an 'Active Sim'! How does it help Bharat's Security- detail explanation👇 Modi Sarkar's DoT has issued the Telecommunication Cybersecurity Amendment Rules, 2025, on Nov 28, 2025, mandating that app-based communication services (classified as Telecommunication Identifier User Entities or TIUEs) like WhatsApp, Telegram, Signal, Snapchat, ShareChat, JioChat, Arattai, and Josh must remain continuously linked to an active SIM card registered to the user's mobile number. This means: -Apps will stop functioning if linked SIM is removed, deactivated, or swapped without re-verification. -Web/desktop versions must auto-logout every 6 hours, requiring QR code re-authentication tied to the active SIM. -Platforms have 90 days to implement this, with compliance reports due within 120 days. HOW IT HURTS CYBER CRIMINALS: 1. Ends “Ghost Accounts” – Scammers buy/register a Bharatiya SIM once, then remove it and run WhatsApp/Telegram from Dubai/Cambodia. Now the app stops working the moment the SIM is taken out or deactivated. Most overseas scam call-centers instantly crippled. 2. Forces them to keep an active, traceable Bharatiya SIM every Second– That SIM leaves location, IMEI, call records, and KYC trail. Police can track & block in real time instead of chasing dead numbers. 3. Kills bulk fraud operations – Running 1,000 scam accounts now needs 1,000 active physical SIMs inside Bharat→ logistically impossible and insanely expensive. 4. Web/desktop versions log out every 6 hours – No more leaving accounts permanently logged in on cloud servers or bots for 24×7 fraud. Result: 90% of current “digital arrest”, sextortion, investment, and task scams become too risky or too costly to run at scale. HOW IT BOOSTS NATIONAL SECURITY: 1. Every active account on WhatsApp/Telegram/Signal is now tied to a KYC-verified Bharatiya SIM – Instant identity + location trail for any terror, espionage or disinformation account. 2. Foreign actors (ISI, PLA-linked groups) can’t activate once and operate SIM-free from abroad – They must keep a Bharatiya SIM active 24×7 → easily detectable and blockable. 3. Real-time shutdown possible – If intelligence flags a number for terr0r/recruitment, the linked messaging account dies immediately (no more powerful than just blocking the SIM). 4. Aligns OTT apps with the same security rules as phone calls/SMS – Closes the biggest loophole terr0ri$ts & foreign agencies were exploiting. Summary: Criminals and hostile agencies lose anonymity and mobility; Bharat gains a kill-switch on every dangerous account without touching end-to-end encryption. A real game-changer for Cyber Security. Well done Modi Sarkar 🫡
0:38

MODI SARKAR'S BIG SURGICAL STRIKE ON CYBER CRIME🔥 Modi Govt frames new rule that makes it impossible to use WhatsApp or ANY messaging app without an 'Active Sim'! How does it help Bharat's Security- detail explanation👇 Modi Sarkar's DoT has issued the Telecommunication Cybersecurity Amendment Rules, 2025, on Nov 28, 2025, mandating that app-based communication services (classified as Telecommunication Identifier User Entities or TIUEs) like WhatsApp, Telegram, Signal, Snapchat, ShareChat, JioChat, Arattai, and Josh must remain continuously linked to an active SIM card registered to the user's mobile number. This means: -Apps will stop functioning if linked SIM is removed, deactivated, or swapped without re-verification. -Web/desktop versions must auto-logout every 6 hours, requiring QR code re-authentication tied to the active SIM. -Platforms have 90 days to implement this, with compliance reports due within 120 days. HOW IT HURTS CYBER CRIMINALS: 1. Ends “Ghost Accounts” – Scammers buy/register a Bharatiya SIM once, then remove it and run WhatsApp/Telegram from Dubai/Cambodia. Now the app stops working the moment the SIM is taken out or deactivated. Most overseas scam call-centers instantly crippled. 2. Forces them to keep an active, traceable Bharatiya SIM every Second– That SIM leaves location, IMEI, call records, and KYC trail. Police can track & block in real time instead of chasing dead numbers. 3. Kills bulk fraud operations – Running 1,000 scam accounts now needs 1,000 active physical SIMs inside Bharat→ logistically impossible and insanely expensive. 4. Web/desktop versions log out every 6 hours – No more leaving accounts permanently logged in on cloud servers or bots for 24×7 fraud. Result: 90% of current “digital arrest”, sextortion, investment, and task scams become too risky or too costly to run at scale. HOW IT BOOSTS NATIONAL SECURITY: 1. Every active account on WhatsApp/Telegram/Signal is now tied to a KYC-verified Bharatiya SIM – Instant identity + location trail for any terror, espionage or disinformation account. 2. Foreign actors (ISI, PLA-linked groups) can’t activate once and operate SIM-free from abroad – They must keep a Bharatiya SIM active 24×7 → easily detectable and blockable. 3. Real-time shutdown possible – If intelligence flags a number for terr0r/recruitment, the linked messaging account dies immediately (no more powerful than just blocking the SIM). 4. Aligns OTT apps with the same security rules as phone calls/SMS – Closes the biggest loophole terr0ri$ts & foreign agencies were exploiting. Summary: Criminals and hostile agencies lose anonymity and mobility; Bharat gains a kill-switch on every dangerous account without touching end-to-end encryption. A real game-changer for Cyber Security. Well done Modi Sarkar 🫡

BhikuMhatre

99,832 次观看 • 10 个月前

🚨 3i ATLAS: THE MYSTERY OBJECT HEADING TOWARDS EARTH 🌌 I just sat down with Canadian Freedom Train Ambassador Peter MacIsaac — and what he revealed about 3i Atlas, Swan, and Apophis will make you sit up straight. 🔴 3i Atlas is 46 km wide, travelling at 210,000 km/h — faster than any comet ever observed 🔴 Its light source is at the front, not the tail 🔴 It’s pulsing every 17 minutes, making micro-course corrections 🔴 Governments held closed-door meetings after James Webb Telescope data — with no public disclosure And that’s just the beginning. 📡 Another object, 2025 R2 Swan, is inbound — over 100x the size of 3i Atlas. The two will pass within cosmic “walking distance” of each other — a near-impossible probability. 💥 And looming beyond them is Apophis — the asteroid named after the Egyptian god of death — scheduled to pass closer than our satellites on Friday April 13th, 2029. Peter warned: “If Apophis passes through the gravitational keyhole, it’s a 100% impact event. The tidal waves could be 500 metres high. Civilization would never be the same.” 📢 WHAT THIS MEANS: Global governments may already be preparing for an impact scenario — but they won’t tell you until the last possible moment. If society collapses, you will be on your own. 🔥 This is why Freedom Train International is running a 4-hour preparedness special this weekend. We will give you the tools to survive — from food & water storage to communications, security, and precious metals. ⚠️ Do not wait for the government to save you. They won’t. Knowledge is your lifeline. Preparation is your shield. 🕒 Join us LIVE: 📍 Saturday, 7pm UK / 3pm Canada 🎥 On X-Spaces 🌐 💥 Don’t be scared. Be prepared. The clock is ticking. Kyledoops Private
58:29

🚨 3i ATLAS: THE MYSTERY OBJECT HEADING TOWARDS EARTH 🌌 I just sat down with Canadian Freedom Train Ambassador Peter MacIsaac — and what he revealed about 3i Atlas, Swan, and Apophis will make you sit up straight. 🔴 3i Atlas is 46 km wide, travelling at 210,000 km/h — faster than any comet ever observed 🔴 Its light source is at the front, not the tail 🔴 It’s pulsing every 17 minutes, making micro-course corrections 🔴 Governments held closed-door meetings after James Webb Telescope data — with no public disclosure And that’s just the beginning. 📡 Another object, 2025 R2 Swan, is inbound — over 100x the size of 3i Atlas. The two will pass within cosmic “walking distance” of each other — a near-impossible probability. 💥 And looming beyond them is Apophis — the asteroid named after the Egyptian god of death — scheduled to pass closer than our satellites on Friday April 13th, 2029. Peter warned: “If Apophis passes through the gravitational keyhole, it’s a 100% impact event. The tidal waves could be 500 metres high. Civilization would never be the same.” 📢 WHAT THIS MEANS: Global governments may already be preparing for an impact scenario — but they won’t tell you until the last possible moment. If society collapses, you will be on your own. 🔥 This is why Freedom Train International is running a 4-hour preparedness special this weekend. We will give you the tools to survive — from food & water storage to communications, security, and precious metals. ⚠️ Do not wait for the government to save you. They won’t. Knowledge is your lifeline. Preparation is your shield. 🕒 Join us LIVE: 📍 Saturday, 7pm UK / 3pm Canada 🎥 On X-Spaces 🌐 💥 Don’t be scared. Be prepared. The clock is ticking. Kyledoops Private

Jim Ferguson

96,014 次观看 • 1 年前

🇯🇵Speech by LDP Presidential Candidate, Representative Sanae TakaichiHello everyone. I am Sanae Takaichi, a woman of Nara. But you know, in Nara there are sacred deer— and there are people who would dare to kick them, to strike them, to frighten them. Some come from abroad as tourists, and if they deliberately try to harm what the Japanese hold dear, don’t you think something has gone too far? We even see it on social media: foreign visitors hanging from a shrine’s torii gate as if it were a playground bar. What do they think a shrine is? These are places where things ancient, things long cherished, have been carefully preserved. If people come from abroad only to trample on that spirit, then something must be done. Of course, it is wonderful that tourists from all over the world visit Japan. And indeed, in many of our industries we lack workers, so we must rely on people from abroad to help fill that gap. That much is true. But even so— such matters must be advanced carefully, step by step. There are also systems where hiring foreigners brings undue advantages. Even the police, unable to secure interpreters in time, sometimes are forced to release suspects without indictment. Isn’t that strange? Isn’t that unfair? Fairness. Justice. When these are undermined, when our sense of right and wrong is constantly rubbed raw, resentment inevitably grows. Japanese people are patient, we hold our tongues, but frustration is mounting. Therefore, I say this clearly today: I will reconsider from the ground up how we can live together with foreigners in mutual respect and harmony. If we continue, year after year, to admit people whose cultures are vastly different, then this policy must be re-examined. Those who come purely for economic reasons while falsely claiming refugee status— they must be sent home. Those who overstay illegally— they must strictly obey our laws. For that, we need more front-line officers, such as immigration control agents. I pay them my deepest respect. Their treatment must be improved, their numbers increased. We must wash Japan clean once again, removing the stains and dirt that have accumulated. We must build a fair and just nation, so that the younger generation may say: “I’m glad I was born here.” I, Sanae Takaichi, will stand firmly, driven by resolve, to pursue this path. This commitment not to overlook injustice is also tied to a major shift away from solar panel policies. Is it not absurd to cover the Kushiro Wetlands with solar panels? Just as with the policies that make hiring foreigners more “profitable”— these are distortions born of misguided subsidies. Even systems originally designed for good have produced wrong signals, excessive incentives, and warped outcomes. Therefore, I, Sanae Takaichi, will thoroughly review the subsidy system, sweeping it clean, and focus only on what truly serves the nation. Before being a woman or a man, I am Japanese— and I am deeply, deeply concerned about the future of our nation. Ten years from now, if we do nothing today, will Japan be in an even worse state? The babies born today, the young people of eighteen— they may live into the twenty-second century. What will become of them? This thought worries me so much that I can hardly sleep at night. As a politician living in this present age, I believe two things matter most: First, to preserve the Imperial Line, passed down unbroken through the male line, by revising the Imperial House Law. Second, to correct the great defect in our Constitution— so that the Self-Defense Forces are clearly written into it, and no longer appear unconstitutional. If I become President of the Liberal Democratic Party, I will pour my passion into moving these debates forward. I am fortunate to be strong and healthy. My special skill is working through the night. Second and third place challenges are no problem at all. This year marks eighty years since the end of the war. I feel within me the prayers and wishes of every individual who has passed, worried for Japan’s future. I, Sanae Takaichi, am determined to lift Japan once again to a higher place— to create a strong economy, a strong nation, a safe society to pass on to the next generation. I humbly, earnestly ask for your powerful support. Thank you very much for your attention. #ImmigrationPolicy #ConstitutionalReform #ImperialLine #StrongEconomy #SafeSociety #SanaeTakaichi #VoiceOfNara #JapanFirst #FutureOfJapan #LeadershipForTomorrow
5:54

🇯🇵Speech by LDP Presidential Candidate, Representative Sanae TakaichiHello everyone. I am Sanae Takaichi, a woman of Nara. But you know, in Nara there are sacred deer— and there are people who would dare to kick them, to strike them, to frighten them. Some come from abroad as tourists, and if they deliberately try to harm what the Japanese hold dear, don’t you think something has gone too far? We even see it on social media: foreign visitors hanging from a shrine’s torii gate as if it were a playground bar. What do they think a shrine is? These are places where things ancient, things long cherished, have been carefully preserved. If people come from abroad only to trample on that spirit, then something must be done. Of course, it is wonderful that tourists from all over the world visit Japan. And indeed, in many of our industries we lack workers, so we must rely on people from abroad to help fill that gap. That much is true. But even so— such matters must be advanced carefully, step by step. There are also systems where hiring foreigners brings undue advantages. Even the police, unable to secure interpreters in time, sometimes are forced to release suspects without indictment. Isn’t that strange? Isn’t that unfair? Fairness. Justice. When these are undermined, when our sense of right and wrong is constantly rubbed raw, resentment inevitably grows. Japanese people are patient, we hold our tongues, but frustration is mounting. Therefore, I say this clearly today: I will reconsider from the ground up how we can live together with foreigners in mutual respect and harmony. If we continue, year after year, to admit people whose cultures are vastly different, then this policy must be re-examined. Those who come purely for economic reasons while falsely claiming refugee status— they must be sent home. Those who overstay illegally— they must strictly obey our laws. For that, we need more front-line officers, such as immigration control agents. I pay them my deepest respect. Their treatment must be improved, their numbers increased. We must wash Japan clean once again, removing the stains and dirt that have accumulated. We must build a fair and just nation, so that the younger generation may say: “I’m glad I was born here.” I, Sanae Takaichi, will stand firmly, driven by resolve, to pursue this path. This commitment not to overlook injustice is also tied to a major shift away from solar panel policies. Is it not absurd to cover the Kushiro Wetlands with solar panels? Just as with the policies that make hiring foreigners more “profitable”— these are distortions born of misguided subsidies. Even systems originally designed for good have produced wrong signals, excessive incentives, and warped outcomes. Therefore, I, Sanae Takaichi, will thoroughly review the subsidy system, sweeping it clean, and focus only on what truly serves the nation. Before being a woman or a man, I am Japanese— and I am deeply, deeply concerned about the future of our nation. Ten years from now, if we do nothing today, will Japan be in an even worse state? The babies born today, the young people of eighteen— they may live into the twenty-second century. What will become of them? This thought worries me so much that I can hardly sleep at night. As a politician living in this present age, I believe two things matter most: First, to preserve the Imperial Line, passed down unbroken through the male line, by revising the Imperial House Law. Second, to correct the great defect in our Constitution— so that the Self-Defense Forces are clearly written into it, and no longer appear unconstitutional. If I become President of the Liberal Democratic Party, I will pour my passion into moving these debates forward. I am fortunate to be strong and healthy. My special skill is working through the night. Second and third place challenges are no problem at all. This year marks eighty years since the end of the war. I feel within me the prayers and wishes of every individual who has passed, worried for Japan’s future. I, Sanae Takaichi, am determined to lift Japan once again to a higher place— to create a strong economy, a strong nation, a safe society to pass on to the next generation. I humbly, earnestly ask for your powerful support. Thank you very much for your attention. #ImmigrationPolicy #ConstitutionalReform #ImperialLine #StrongEconomy #SafeSociety #SanaeTakaichi #VoiceOfNara #JapanFirst #FutureOfJapan #LeadershipForTomorrow

Rutaso.Japan🇯🇵🐶

22,105 次观看 • 1 年前

🚨BREAKING🚨: A mysterious billionaire paid a PhD half a million dollars for proving that the soul survives the death of the body. Jeffrey Mishlove (Jeffrey Mishlove), holder of the only accredited PhD in parapsychology in history, awarded by UC Berkeley, was the recipient. And he has spent five decades investigating consciousness and its survival of bodily death. His winning case: no single line of evidence settles it, but nine independent ones all point the same direction, from near-death experiences and reincarnation research to deathbed visions, apparitions arriving at the moment of death, psychic mediums and tens of thousands of hobbyists recording the voices of the dead through modern electronics. The billionaire behind the prize was Robert Bigelow, who lost his wife and put his fortune behind the one question left. Beyond his study of the soul, the strangest thing Mishlove holds is the Ted Owens file. Owens, the psychic Mishlove studied for eleven years, could summon UFOs, bring down lightning where he pointed, and control the weather, and when the CIA's own psychic researchers ignored him he declared war on the United States government: poltergeist attacks on Navy vessels; fires aboard ships; strikes on nuclear power plants; a fullback pulled from an NFL game moments after Owens told the sportswriter beside him he was taking the player out. Mishlove says people who crossed him died. Owens called a UFO in four days before it appeared over Sonoma State, photographed and printed on the front page of the Berkeley Gazette, and an attorney swore an affidavit that lightning struck within moments of Owens pointing at a stormless sky. On Christmas Eve 1985 he phoned Mishlove warning that the next space shuttle must not launch, because his UFOs would knock it out of the sky. Weeks later, Challenger exploded. Mishlove felt it once himself, his throat closing within minutes of challenging Owens on the phone. The dead have been reaching Mishlove his whole life. His great uncle appeared to him in a dream, and he later learned the man died that same night. A second dream showed him a magazine lying open on a friend's floor across town, and when he walked there the next morning it was waiting exactly as he'd dreamt it, the sign that set his entire career in motion. Fifty years on, the archive he's built runs through Arthur Young, who invented the Bell helicopter to earn the right to do philosophy, the conference where Puharich unveiled Uri Geller, two souls sharing one body ten interviews deep, and plasma clouds at the L5 Lagrange point, nine times the size of Earth, that may be conscious. What it all left him believing goes further than survival: death may not be a departure at all, but a return to what we already are. Full conversation live now.
2:21

🚨BREAKING🚨: A mysterious billionaire paid a PhD half a million dollars for proving that the soul survives the death of the body. Jeffrey Mishlove (Jeffrey Mishlove), holder of the only accredited PhD in parapsychology in history, awarded by UC Berkeley, was the recipient. And he has spent five decades investigating consciousness and its survival of bodily death. His winning case: no single line of evidence settles it, but nine independent ones all point the same direction, from near-death experiences and reincarnation research to deathbed visions, apparitions arriving at the moment of death, psychic mediums and tens of thousands of hobbyists recording the voices of the dead through modern electronics. The billionaire behind the prize was Robert Bigelow, who lost his wife and put his fortune behind the one question left. Beyond his study of the soul, the strangest thing Mishlove holds is the Ted Owens file. Owens, the psychic Mishlove studied for eleven years, could summon UFOs, bring down lightning where he pointed, and control the weather, and when the CIA's own psychic researchers ignored him he declared war on the United States government: poltergeist attacks on Navy vessels; fires aboard ships; strikes on nuclear power plants; a fullback pulled from an NFL game moments after Owens told the sportswriter beside him he was taking the player out. Mishlove says people who crossed him died. Owens called a UFO in four days before it appeared over Sonoma State, photographed and printed on the front page of the Berkeley Gazette, and an attorney swore an affidavit that lightning struck within moments of Owens pointing at a stormless sky. On Christmas Eve 1985 he phoned Mishlove warning that the next space shuttle must not launch, because his UFOs would knock it out of the sky. Weeks later, Challenger exploded. Mishlove felt it once himself, his throat closing within minutes of challenging Owens on the phone. The dead have been reaching Mishlove his whole life. His great uncle appeared to him in a dream, and he later learned the man died that same night. A second dream showed him a magazine lying open on a friend's floor across town, and when he walked there the next morning it was waiting exactly as he'd dreamt it, the sign that set his entire career in motion. Fifty years on, the archive he's built runs through Arthur Young, who invented the Bell helicopter to earn the right to do philosophy, the conference where Puharich unveiled Uri Geller, two souls sharing one body ten interviews deep, and plasma clouds at the L5 Lagrange point, nine times the size of Earth, that may be conscious. What it all left him believing goes further than survival: death may not be a departure at all, but a return to what we already are. Full conversation live now.

Jesse Michels

242,383 次观看 • 1 个月前

🚨EXCLUSIVE: The untold story of the FBI’s J6 pipe bomber “Person of Interest #2”🚨 If what the FBI’s January 6 pipe bomber “Person of Interest #2” (POI2) told me about his FBI interview is true, there is further proof that the Bureau has covered up, or “deleted,” additional video footage about what happened when the RNC pipe bomb was allegedly discovered by Karlin Younger on January 6, 2021. I will not reveal the identity or any other identifying information about the FBI’s POI2 in the January 6 pipe bomb saga. I also won't discuss the full five hours of personal interview time with POI2; instead, I will focus on two key pieces of information he gave me. As a primer for those not already following this story in detail, here is a brief rundown of the facts in POI2’s case and why the FBI was initially interested in him as a “person of interest”: -POI2 does not live in the Greater D.C. area. He lives in a large American city in a state that does not border D.C. -From news releases, congressional reports, FBI statements, and an FBI whistleblower disclosure, we know that POI2 was visiting a lifelong acquaintance (POI3) at his residence in Fall Church, VA, over the course of January 4 - 7, 2021. -POI2 used POI3’s Metrorail card for travel back and forth to the District on the 5th and 6th. -POI2 caught the attention of law enforcement investigators when he emerged from D.C.’s Metro South rail station on January 5, changed hats and put on dark sunglasses, then beelined straight across the street from the station into the Rumsey Court alley behind the Republican National Committee headquarters. It was in that alley that POI2 began taking photos of “numbers.” Numbers on trash cans, dumpsters, door addresses, and the like. According to the FBI, POI2 planned to use those photographs in a forthcoming book. (To date, that book has not been published.) Then, after walking around Capitol Hill all day long, and even attending some of the J5 protest events, POI2 ducked back into the same alley for a few minutes — after dark — before returning to the Metro South station across the street from the RNC. He returned to Falls Church via the train, where POI3 picked him up by car, and they went back to POI3’s home. POI2 then returned to DC the next morning to attend Trump’s speech at The Ellipse on the 6th. -POI2 was cleared of suspicion following two FBI interviews on January 19, 2021, at his residence in his home city. These interviews took place six days after the FBI pulled their Special Operations Group (SOG) surveillance team off POI3’s home on January 13, just two days after they were deployed to watch the infamous Falls Church, VA condominium address where we now know POI3 shared a firewall between his address and the then residence of former Capitol Police officer Shauni Kerkhoff. The subject of our November 8, 2025 story published by Blaze Media. How I came to spend five hours with POI2 I met with POI2 twice, on December 11 and 12, 2025. On the 11th, a member of our team accompanied me: a retired FBI veteran of 25 years now working as a private investigator. That first interview lasted for three hours, and then the next day I met with POI2, just him and me, for another two hours. I arrived in POI2’s home city on the 10th to do some early recon. We had POI2’s name (which I’d acquired from a congressional source), and his address, but we didn’t have a current phone number. After running an extensive background on him, we learned a lot about his life and work, social media, friends and close associates, and even where he attends church, but we still didn't have a phone number to call him and ask for a meeting. Most interesting of all, POI2 is a prolific international traveler. In one recent year, he had logged over 40 international flights. So we didn’t even know if he’d be in the country, much less at home, if we knocked on this door. My recon of his address was a huge disappointment. His apartment building is one of those old inner-city manufacturing plants refitted into modern, upscale housing. The entire property is ringed by tall wrought-iron fencing, with electronic security for entry into the parking garage, foot traffic, and into the building itself. There was no visible way for us to just pay him a visit for a “knock and talk.” Perhaps we could have “buzzed” him from an exterior gate, but I didn’t get that far that day. Later that evening, I picked up my team member from the airport — the retired FBI guy — and we went to dinner for a long, late-night planning session. We identified a couple of strong local personal connections he had via his Facebook page, and we planned to visit them first, get more info about POI2, and maybe even get their help reaching out to him. At 9:00 a.m. the next morning, we arrived at the home of someone who seemed like they might be closest to him. We were lucky and hit a home run on the first swing. Without the long details, our “story” about why we were looking for POI2 — their close friend — worked like a charm, and we were invited into their home. Our host called POI2, and within two hours POI2 joined us at our new friend’s home. Luckily, POI2 had returned to the States from an overseas trip only the day before. For the next three hours, I asked most of the questions while my partner listened and observed. Based on my partner’s 25+ years of experience with the FBI, he believed POI2 answered everything truthfully … “Or, he’s a very, very good liar.” My partner had to fly back home the next morning, but I had many follow-up questions for POI2. I reached out again early in the morning, and he agreed to meet me at a coffee shop in his neighborhood. ***(On a personal timeline aside: during my second interview with POI2, I was only nine days away from my heart failure episode, and was already struggling to breath after the slightest of physical exertions.)*** The most significant reveal We met at 1:30 p.m., and spent another two full hours together. During this session, we had a detailed conversation about his two interviews with two FBI special agents. Both of those interviews were on the same day. January 19, 2021. POI2 had explained to the FBI agents that the reason he returned to the Rumsey Court alley behind the RNC was that he remembered there were several trash cans in the alley, and he wanted to dispose of an empty plastic water bottle before going back to the train station. I asked him why he didn’t simply throw the bottle away at the Metrotrain station. He shrugged. From our video review, POI2 only stayed in the alley for about three to four minutes. But if what he revealed to me is true, it is one of the most significant discoveries in our years-long pipe bomb investigation. POI2 shared with me that the FBI agents told him that he had thrown the empty water bottle away in the very trash container next to where the bomb would be placed a little over an hour and a half later. Why that is significant FIRST, it reveals that the FBI most likely had video of him depositing that empty bottle into that container. Yes … they could have taken DNA samples of every item in that trash can, but then they would also have needed DNA from POI2 in their database. POI2 didn’t offer that option as their explanation. He assumed they saw him on camera. I can personally attest that there is currently a camera in Rumsey Court that would cover the area where the bomb was placed, but I do not know if that same camera existed in January of 2021. But if they did observe POI2, on camera, tossing the bottle in the trash can immediately next to where the bomb was placed, then the FBI most certainly has video of Karlin Younger — the FirstNet employee — who discovered that device at approximately 12:35 p.m. the next day, January 6. Only 25 minutes before Vice President Mike Pence was to drop the gavel on the joint session of Congress to certify the 2020 Electoral College presidential vote. Only about 18 minutes before the first breach of that outer bike rack barricade on the west Capitol grounds, led by Ray Epps, Ryan Samsel, and other suspicious characters. Many investigators, including Congressman Loudermilk and his committee, have posited that the two devices placed by the gray hooded bomber on J5 were retrieved at some point in the early morning hours of J6, then replaced just before their “discovery” a few minutes either side of 1:00 p.m. The allegedly “deleted” video from the two DNC cameras that provided the footage of the gray hooded bomber placing a device on the evening of J5 would have also shown us what happened after midnight. Whether or not the two plainclothes Capitol Police counter-surveillance officers were the ones who replaced the device just before reporting its discovery to the Secret Service agents attending VP-Elect Kamala Harris’s presence inside the building at the time. (Article to that story linked in comments below.) A camera aimed at the RNC drop location would give us the same information about what happened during the night, and when Karlin Younger discovered that device while walking back and forth and doing her laundry. The FBI claims that the footage from the two DNC cameras — after that device was planted under a bench — was accidentally deleted. (No one buys that story.) Those two FBI agents may also have inadvertently revealed to POI2 that video footage exists from that dark corner of the RNC/Capitol Hill Club alley on J5 and J6. Both missing videos, if they were to surface, would either invalidate all conspiracy theories about the pipe bombs, or confirm the prevailing theories and circumstantial evidence pointing to law enforcement participation and a multi-agency conspiracy. SECOND, if the two FBI agents were telling POI2 the truth about that specific trash container, then it brings into question all of POI2’s own statements about why he returned to that alley after dark. That very trash can was in the furthest and darkest corner of the RNC/Capitol Hill Club side of Rumsey Court. He would have had to ignore several of the first and most clearly visible, well-lit trash bins upon his arrival into that alley by way of the walkway between the RNC and the Capitol Hill Club. Instead, he made a hard left behind the Capitol Hill Club and headed toward the darkest corner of the alley, from which the view of that trash can was also likely obstructed by one or more cars typically parked between him and what would be his line of sight to that dark corner. This implies POI2 was either on a recon mission to determine the best drop location for the second device, or, as one retired, formerly high-ranking law enforcement officer has theorized, he may have placed an AirTag or other electronic beacon to lead the bomber to the most advantageous location to deposit the bomb. Near the end of my second meeting with POI2, he shared with me several photos of “numbers” he took in that alley. He shared the “time and location” data from those original photos on his iPhone. He also gave me screenshots from his phone’s call history of the exact moment the two FBI agents phoned him for both interviews on January 19, 2021. He was very earnest, forthcoming, and eager to answer all my questions. (Photo examples in comments below.) As a person, I like POI2. We could be friends. But either he or the FBI is lying about what happened in that dark corner behind the Capitol Hill Club. (Maybe both?) Just as POI2 and I were about to say goodbye and shake hands, I opened my phone to show him one photo. It was the shot I took of the two side-by-side doors at the condo complex in Falls Church, VA. The door on the left was the home of his lifelong acquaintance, POI3. The door on the right was Shauni Kerkhoff's January 6 residence. I asked him: “Can you make this math work for me?” He replied: “No, man. That’s so weird.” We have stayed in contact and spoken many times since those two days in December. ⬇️
0:49

🚨EXCLUSIVE: The untold story of the FBI’s J6 pipe bomber “Person of Interest #2”🚨 If what the FBI’s January 6 pipe bomber “Person of Interest #2” (POI2) told me about his FBI interview is true, there is further proof that the Bureau has covered up, or “deleted,” additional video footage about what happened when the RNC pipe bomb was allegedly discovered by Karlin Younger on January 6, 2021. I will not reveal the identity or any other identifying information about the FBI’s POI2 in the January 6 pipe bomb saga. I also won't discuss the full five hours of personal interview time with POI2; instead, I will focus on two key pieces of information he gave me. As a primer for those not already following this story in detail, here is a brief rundown of the facts in POI2’s case and why the FBI was initially interested in him as a “person of interest”: -POI2 does not live in the Greater D.C. area. He lives in a large American city in a state that does not border D.C. -From news releases, congressional reports, FBI statements, and an FBI whistleblower disclosure, we know that POI2 was visiting a lifelong acquaintance (POI3) at his residence in Fall Church, VA, over the course of January 4 - 7, 2021. -POI2 used POI3’s Metrorail card for travel back and forth to the District on the 5th and 6th. -POI2 caught the attention of law enforcement investigators when he emerged from D.C.’s Metro South rail station on January 5, changed hats and put on dark sunglasses, then beelined straight across the street from the station into the Rumsey Court alley behind the Republican National Committee headquarters. It was in that alley that POI2 began taking photos of “numbers.” Numbers on trash cans, dumpsters, door addresses, and the like. According to the FBI, POI2 planned to use those photographs in a forthcoming book. (To date, that book has not been published.) Then, after walking around Capitol Hill all day long, and even attending some of the J5 protest events, POI2 ducked back into the same alley for a few minutes — after dark — before returning to the Metro South station across the street from the RNC. He returned to Falls Church via the train, where POI3 picked him up by car, and they went back to POI3’s home. POI2 then returned to DC the next morning to attend Trump’s speech at The Ellipse on the 6th. -POI2 was cleared of suspicion following two FBI interviews on January 19, 2021, at his residence in his home city. These interviews took place six days after the FBI pulled their Special Operations Group (SOG) surveillance team off POI3’s home on January 13, just two days after they were deployed to watch the infamous Falls Church, VA condominium address where we now know POI3 shared a firewall between his address and the then residence of former Capitol Police officer Shauni Kerkhoff. The subject of our November 8, 2025 story published by Blaze Media. How I came to spend five hours with POI2 I met with POI2 twice, on December 11 and 12, 2025. On the 11th, a member of our team accompanied me: a retired FBI veteran of 25 years now working as a private investigator. That first interview lasted for three hours, and then the next day I met with POI2, just him and me, for another two hours. I arrived in POI2’s home city on the 10th to do some early recon. We had POI2’s name (which I’d acquired from a congressional source), and his address, but we didn’t have a current phone number. After running an extensive background on him, we learned a lot about his life and work, social media, friends and close associates, and even where he attends church, but we still didn't have a phone number to call him and ask for a meeting. Most interesting of all, POI2 is a prolific international traveler. In one recent year, he had logged over 40 international flights. So we didn’t even know if he’d be in the country, much less at home, if we knocked on this door. My recon of his address was a huge disappointment. His apartment building is one of those old inner-city manufacturing plants refitted into modern, upscale housing. The entire property is ringed by tall wrought-iron fencing, with electronic security for entry into the parking garage, foot traffic, and into the building itself. There was no visible way for us to just pay him a visit for a “knock and talk.” Perhaps we could have “buzzed” him from an exterior gate, but I didn’t get that far that day. Later that evening, I picked up my team member from the airport — the retired FBI guy — and we went to dinner for a long, late-night planning session. We identified a couple of strong local personal connections he had via his Facebook page, and we planned to visit them first, get more info about POI2, and maybe even get their help reaching out to him. At 9:00 a.m. the next morning, we arrived at the home of someone who seemed like they might be closest to him. We were lucky and hit a home run on the first swing. Without the long details, our “story” about why we were looking for POI2 — their close friend — worked like a charm, and we were invited into their home. Our host called POI2, and within two hours POI2 joined us at our new friend’s home. Luckily, POI2 had returned to the States from an overseas trip only the day before. For the next three hours, I asked most of the questions while my partner listened and observed. Based on my partner’s 25+ years of experience with the FBI, he believed POI2 answered everything truthfully … “Or, he’s a very, very good liar.” My partner had to fly back home the next morning, but I had many follow-up questions for POI2. I reached out again early in the morning, and he agreed to meet me at a coffee shop in his neighborhood. ***(On a personal timeline aside: during my second interview with POI2, I was only nine days away from my heart failure episode, and was already struggling to breath after the slightest of physical exertions.)*** The most significant reveal We met at 1:30 p.m., and spent another two full hours together. During this session, we had a detailed conversation about his two interviews with two FBI special agents. Both of those interviews were on the same day. January 19, 2021. POI2 had explained to the FBI agents that the reason he returned to the Rumsey Court alley behind the RNC was that he remembered there were several trash cans in the alley, and he wanted to dispose of an empty plastic water bottle before going back to the train station. I asked him why he didn’t simply throw the bottle away at the Metrotrain station. He shrugged. From our video review, POI2 only stayed in the alley for about three to four minutes. But if what he revealed to me is true, it is one of the most significant discoveries in our years-long pipe bomb investigation. POI2 shared with me that the FBI agents told him that he had thrown the empty water bottle away in the very trash container next to where the bomb would be placed a little over an hour and a half later. Why that is significant FIRST, it reveals that the FBI most likely had video of him depositing that empty bottle into that container. Yes … they could have taken DNA samples of every item in that trash can, but then they would also have needed DNA from POI2 in their database. POI2 didn’t offer that option as their explanation. He assumed they saw him on camera. I can personally attest that there is currently a camera in Rumsey Court that would cover the area where the bomb was placed, but I do not know if that same camera existed in January of 2021. But if they did observe POI2, on camera, tossing the bottle in the trash can immediately next to where the bomb was placed, then the FBI most certainly has video of Karlin Younger — the FirstNet employee — who discovered that device at approximately 12:35 p.m. the next day, January 6. Only 25 minutes before Vice President Mike Pence was to drop the gavel on the joint session of Congress to certify the 2020 Electoral College presidential vote. Only about 18 minutes before the first breach of that outer bike rack barricade on the west Capitol grounds, led by Ray Epps, Ryan Samsel, and other suspicious characters. Many investigators, including Congressman Loudermilk and his committee, have posited that the two devices placed by the gray hooded bomber on J5 were retrieved at some point in the early morning hours of J6, then replaced just before their “discovery” a few minutes either side of 1:00 p.m. The allegedly “deleted” video from the two DNC cameras that provided the footage of the gray hooded bomber placing a device on the evening of J5 would have also shown us what happened after midnight. Whether or not the two plainclothes Capitol Police counter-surveillance officers were the ones who replaced the device just before reporting its discovery to the Secret Service agents attending VP-Elect Kamala Harris’s presence inside the building at the time. (Article to that story linked in comments below.) A camera aimed at the RNC drop location would give us the same information about what happened during the night, and when Karlin Younger discovered that device while walking back and forth and doing her laundry. The FBI claims that the footage from the two DNC cameras — after that device was planted under a bench — was accidentally deleted. (No one buys that story.) Those two FBI agents may also have inadvertently revealed to POI2 that video footage exists from that dark corner of the RNC/Capitol Hill Club alley on J5 and J6. Both missing videos, if they were to surface, would either invalidate all conspiracy theories about the pipe bombs, or confirm the prevailing theories and circumstantial evidence pointing to law enforcement participation and a multi-agency conspiracy. SECOND, if the two FBI agents were telling POI2 the truth about that specific trash container, then it brings into question all of POI2’s own statements about why he returned to that alley after dark. That very trash can was in the furthest and darkest corner of the RNC/Capitol Hill Club side of Rumsey Court. He would have had to ignore several of the first and most clearly visible, well-lit trash bins upon his arrival into that alley by way of the walkway between the RNC and the Capitol Hill Club. Instead, he made a hard left behind the Capitol Hill Club and headed toward the darkest corner of the alley, from which the view of that trash can was also likely obstructed by one or more cars typically parked between him and what would be his line of sight to that dark corner. This implies POI2 was either on a recon mission to determine the best drop location for the second device, or, as one retired, formerly high-ranking law enforcement officer has theorized, he may have placed an AirTag or other electronic beacon to lead the bomber to the most advantageous location to deposit the bomb. Near the end of my second meeting with POI2, he shared with me several photos of “numbers” he took in that alley. He shared the “time and location” data from those original photos on his iPhone. He also gave me screenshots from his phone’s call history of the exact moment the two FBI agents phoned him for both interviews on January 19, 2021. He was very earnest, forthcoming, and eager to answer all my questions. (Photo examples in comments below.) As a person, I like POI2. We could be friends. But either he or the FBI is lying about what happened in that dark corner behind the Capitol Hill Club. (Maybe both?) Just as POI2 and I were about to say goodbye and shake hands, I opened my phone to show him one photo. It was the shot I took of the two side-by-side doors at the condo complex in Falls Church, VA. The door on the left was the home of his lifelong acquaintance, POI3. The door on the right was Shauni Kerkhoff's January 6 residence. I asked him: “Can you make this math work for me?” He replied: “No, man. That’s so weird.” We have stayed in contact and spoken many times since those two days in December. ⬇️

Steve Baker

911,031 次观看 • 1 个月前

On September 11, 2001, 19 terrorists from the Islamic extremist group al Qaeda—founded by Osama bin Laden—hijacked four commercial passenger airplanes and carried out coordinated suicide attacks against targets in the United States. Two of the planes were flown into the twin towers of the World Trade Center in New York City. Within two hours, both towers had collapsed into rubble, demolishing a large section of lower Manhattan. A third plane hit the Pentagon in Arlington, Virginia, just outside Washington, D.C. The passengers and crew of the fourth plane fought back, and the hijackers crashed the plane in a field near Shanksville, Pennsylvania. Almost 3,000 people were killed in the 9/11 terrorist attacks, including the 19 al Qaeda terrorists. The shocking events of September 11 were televised globally and left much of the world reeling in horror. The administration of President George W. Bush responded by declaring a “war on terror” and launching the U.S.-led invasion of Afghanistan. The attacks also led to a sweeping reorganization of the federal government, including the creation of the Department of Homeland Security. ...... On September 11, 2001, at 8:46 a.m. on a clear Tuesday morning, American Airlines Flight 11, a Boeing 767 carrying thousands of gallons of jet fuel, crashed into the North Tower of the World Trade Center in New York City. The impact left a gaping, burning hole between the 93rd and 99th floors of the 110-story skyscraper, instantly killing hundreds of people and trapping hundreds more on higher floors. As the evacuation of the tower and its twin got underway, television cameras broadcast live images of what initially appeared to be a freak accident. Then, 17 minutes after the first plane hit, a second Boeing 767—United Airlines Flight 175—appeared in the sky, turned sharply toward the World Trade Center, and sliced into the South Tower between the 77th and 85th floors. The collision caused a massive explosion that showered burning debris onto surrounding buildings and onto the streets below. It immediately became clear that the United States was under attack. The hijackers were members of al Qaeda. Fifteen were from Saudi Arabia, two were from the United Arab Emirates, one was from Egypt and one was from Lebanon. The attacks were orchestrated by al Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden, who cited America’s support of Israel, its involvement in the Persian Gulf War and its continued military presence in the Middle East as grievances. Some of the hijackers had lived in the United States for more than a year and had taken flight training at American flight schools. Others had slipped into the country in the months before September 11 and acted as the “muscle” in the operation. The 19 terrorists smuggled box-cutters and knives through security at three East Coast airports—Logan International Airport in Boston, Washington Dulles International Airport in Virginia and Newark International Airport in New Jersey—and boarded four early-morning flights bound for California, chosen because the planes were loaded with fuel for long transcontinental journey. Soon after takeoff, the terrorists commandeered the four planes and took the controls, transforming ordinary passenger jets into weapons. As millions watched the events unfolding in New York, American Airlines Flight 77 circled over Washington, D.C., before crashing into the west side of the Pentagon military headquarters at 9:37 a.m. Jet fuel from the Boeing 757 ignited a devastating inferno that led to the structural collapse of a portion of the Pentagon's giant concrete building, which is the headquarters of the U.S. Department of Defense. All told, 125 military personnel and civilians were killed at the Pentagon, along with all 64 people aboard the airliner. #archaeohistories
0:41

On September 11, 2001, 19 terrorists from the Islamic extremist group al Qaeda—founded by Osama bin Laden—hijacked four commercial passenger airplanes and carried out coordinated suicide attacks against targets in the United States. Two of the planes were flown into the twin towers of the World Trade Center in New York City. Within two hours, both towers had collapsed into rubble, demolishing a large section of lower Manhattan. A third plane hit the Pentagon in Arlington, Virginia, just outside Washington, D.C. The passengers and crew of the fourth plane fought back, and the hijackers crashed the plane in a field near Shanksville, Pennsylvania. Almost 3,000 people were killed in the 9/11 terrorist attacks, including the 19 al Qaeda terrorists. The shocking events of September 11 were televised globally and left much of the world reeling in horror. The administration of President George W. Bush responded by declaring a “war on terror” and launching the U.S.-led invasion of Afghanistan. The attacks also led to a sweeping reorganization of the federal government, including the creation of the Department of Homeland Security. ...... On September 11, 2001, at 8:46 a.m. on a clear Tuesday morning, American Airlines Flight 11, a Boeing 767 carrying thousands of gallons of jet fuel, crashed into the North Tower of the World Trade Center in New York City. The impact left a gaping, burning hole between the 93rd and 99th floors of the 110-story skyscraper, instantly killing hundreds of people and trapping hundreds more on higher floors. As the evacuation of the tower and its twin got underway, television cameras broadcast live images of what initially appeared to be a freak accident. Then, 17 minutes after the first plane hit, a second Boeing 767—United Airlines Flight 175—appeared in the sky, turned sharply toward the World Trade Center, and sliced into the South Tower between the 77th and 85th floors. The collision caused a massive explosion that showered burning debris onto surrounding buildings and onto the streets below. It immediately became clear that the United States was under attack. The hijackers were members of al Qaeda. Fifteen were from Saudi Arabia, two were from the United Arab Emirates, one was from Egypt and one was from Lebanon. The attacks were orchestrated by al Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden, who cited America’s support of Israel, its involvement in the Persian Gulf War and its continued military presence in the Middle East as grievances. Some of the hijackers had lived in the United States for more than a year and had taken flight training at American flight schools. Others had slipped into the country in the months before September 11 and acted as the “muscle” in the operation. The 19 terrorists smuggled box-cutters and knives through security at three East Coast airports—Logan International Airport in Boston, Washington Dulles International Airport in Virginia and Newark International Airport in New Jersey—and boarded four early-morning flights bound for California, chosen because the planes were loaded with fuel for long transcontinental journey. Soon after takeoff, the terrorists commandeered the four planes and took the controls, transforming ordinary passenger jets into weapons. As millions watched the events unfolding in New York, American Airlines Flight 77 circled over Washington, D.C., before crashing into the west side of the Pentagon military headquarters at 9:37 a.m. Jet fuel from the Boeing 757 ignited a devastating inferno that led to the structural collapse of a portion of the Pentagon's giant concrete building, which is the headquarters of the U.S. Department of Defense. All told, 125 military personnel and civilians were killed at the Pentagon, along with all 64 people aboard the airliner. #archaeohistories

Archaeo - Histories

56,810 次观看 • 27 天前

You finally get to see the scene that was never supposed to exist. 👀 Made with Pollo AI 365 days of unlimited MiniMax H3. No extra credits, no limits just create. Prompt: Vertical 9:16 smartphone vlog, shot on iPhone 17 Pro. ONE SINGLE UNINTERRUPTED HANDHELD TAKE, ~30 seconds, no cuts, no editing — every transition happens only through the vlogger panning, tilting, zooming or walking. Brisk, snappy pacing: quick whip pans, each beat lands in a few seconds, the camera never lingers. Sunny daytime New York City street >> — brick facades, fire escapes, a sidewalk café, parked cars. The filming style is the core of the video: natural hand micro-shake and walking bounce, slightly floaty digital stabilization, deep focus with everything sharp — no cinematic bokeh, no film look, no color grading. Natural HDR daylight, sky highlights slightly clipped, auto exposure and white balance visibly re-adjusting on every pan between shade and sun, quick autofocus hunting on fast pans, digital zoom bringing a slight quality drop and extra shake. Audio: raw street ambience only — traffic, distant horns, footsteps, chatter, wind brushing the mic, plus the live sounds written into the scenes. No music track, no captions, no watermark. IMPORTANT CHARACTER AND POV LOCK: The vlogger is ALWAYS >>. The vlogger is a man, and he remains the same person throughout the entire video. He is the person physically holding and operating the single camera. He is NEVER replaced by any other reference character. Reference images used in individual scenes describe ONLY the people or animals appearing in that specific scene, unless explicitly stated otherwise. The vlogger’s phone IS the camera — it never appears on screen, and he never holds a second phone or any other device. When the front camera is active, the viewer sees the vlogger himself in selfie view. When the rear camera is active, the viewer sees ONLY the environment and subjects in front of him from his physical walking POV. The phone itself is NEVER visible. This is a continuous real-world camera transition, not a cut. 0:00–0:05 — FRONT CAMERA / SELFIE POV: The vlogger >> films himself at arm’s length while walking down the sidewalk. His face is a touch overexposed by daylight. He starts excitedly: “Guys! I just—” Behind his shoulder, a couple walking the opposite way passes right beside him. A beat later, the guy >> stops and turns back, head over his shoulder, staring straight at the vlogger — matching the reference pose. His girlfriend >>, still gripping his hand, glares at him in outraged disbelief, mouth open. They hold the exact reference tableau. His stare reads odd and unreadable, NOT flirty. The vlogger sees them in his own selfie frame, cuts himself off mid-word and reacts instantly without breaking stride: “…What was that?” He keeps walking. 0:05–0:09 — FLIP TO REAR CAMERA / VLOGGER’S PHYSICAL POV: WITHOUT CUTTING, the vlogger physically flips the phone from front camera to rear camera. The camera itself is never visible. The image transitions naturally from selfie view into the rear-camera view of exactly what is in front of him. He immediately WHIPS the rear camera to the RIGHT toward a sidewalk café. By the entrance, a guy >> stands at a microphone on a stand, with a small speaker beside him looping a soft instrumental backing. He leans toward the microphone, takes a breath to sing the first line — and suddenly bursts out laughing instead, turning away and covering his mouth. He waves it off, then resets toward the microphone. The vlogger laughs quietly behind the camera. 0:09–0:13 — REAR CAMERA / CONTINUOUS POV: WITHOUT CUTTING, the vlogger continues physically panning RIGHT along the same café terrace. At one table, a woman >> is mid-meltdown — crying, shouting, jabbing an accusing finger across the terrace — while her friend >> leans in and holds her back. The camera then makes a QUICK PUNCH-IN DIGITAL ZOOM toward the opposite table. The cat >> sits upright behind a plate of salad, perfectly calm and completely unimpressed by the chaos. Autofocus hunts for a split second during the zoom. The vlogger continues walking. 0:13–0:17 — REAR CAMERA / FIRST SHOW THE MAN, THEN FOLLOW HIS GAZE UP: WITHOUT CUTTING, the camera moves slightly farther along the sidewalk and FIRST frames the man >> standing on the street near the building. IMPORTANT: The man >> is NOT the vlogger. He is a separate person standing in the environment. He is NOT holding the camera, NOT filming himself, and NEVER becomes the POV character. The camera clearly shows his full upper body as he stands below the building, looking UP toward the second floor. His head is tilted upward and his eyes are visibly directed toward something above him. The vlogger notices what the man is looking at and physically follows his gaze. The camera then TILTS UP from the man’s position toward the brick facade directly above the café awning, naturally following the man’s line of sight. The movement must clearly communicate: MAN LOOKS UP → CAMERA FOLLOWS HIS GAZE → WINDOW ABOVE. A second-floor open window comes into view, with a fire escape beside it. The dog >> is sitting in that window with its eyes closed, chin lifted, peacefully soaking up the warm golden sunlight hitting the facade. IMPORTANT: >> is ONLY the DOG. The dog is inside the upper window. It is NOT the vlogger and NOT a human character. The camera performs a QUICK DIGITAL ZOOM toward the dog. The image becomes slightly softer and shakier from the digital zoom. Hold only long enough to clearly reveal the dog enjoying the sunlight. The vlogger reacts behind the camera: “Awww, look at him…” 0:17–0:21 — REAR CAMERA / RETURN TO STREET LEVEL: WITHOUT CUTTING, the camera tilts back DOWN from the dog and window to street level, returning to the same sidewalk. The camera then swings FORWARD toward a few steps ahead on the same sidewalk, where the man from >> is standing. IMPORTANT: >> is a SEPARATE STREET CHARACTER. He is NOT the vlogger. He does NOT hold the camera. He does NOT interact physically with the vlogger. The vlogger is only observing him from behind the camera while walking past. The man wears the black leather jacket and black pants shown in the reference. He is standing on the sidewalk making an exaggerated “thinking / knowledge” gesture with his index finger touching or pointing toward his temple, matching the reference pose. He is NOT standing together with the vlogger. Maintain visible physical distance between the vlogger and this man. The vlogger walks past him while keeping the rear camera briefly trained on him and half-laughs: “What is going on?” 0:21–0:24 — REAR CAMERA / WHIP LEFT ACROSS THE ROAD: WITHOUT CUTTING, the vlogger whips the rear camera to the LEFT, across the two-lane road, toward a sedan parked at the opposite curb. Shaky digital zoom toward the driver’s window. A man >> sits behind the wheel, one hand draped over the top of the steering wheel. He stares directly into the rear-camera lens with a heavy, unblinking, suspicious expression. His eyes slowly track the vlogger as the vlogger walks past. The vlogger says flatly from behind the camera: “…What is his problem?” 0:24–0:30 — REAR CAMERA → FRONT CAMERA → REAR CAMERA: WITHOUT CUTTING, the camera swings back FORWARD toward the corner of the block. Ahead, a child >> is sitting sideways near the roadside, holding a coffee cup and looking toward the camera. The child is a completely separate background character and is NOT the vlogger. The vlogger continues WALKING TOWARD the child. As he gets closer, he performs a QUICK DIGITAL ZOOM. The child looks toward the camera, casually raises the coffee cup and takes a small SIP while looking at the camera. Keep the child as the only visual focus. Natural spontaneous behavior. Immediately after the child's sip, the vlogger physically FLIPS the phone from rear camera to FRONT CAMERA. This is a real camera flip, not a cinematic cut. The phone itself remains invisible. Says: “I can’t believe this”. The take ends naturally mid-walk, still handheld, still continuous, with NO CUT and NO EDIT.
0:30

You finally get to see the scene that was never supposed to exist. 👀 Made with Pollo AI 365 days of unlimited MiniMax H3. No extra credits, no limits just create. Prompt: Vertical 9:16 smartphone vlog, shot on iPhone 17 Pro. ONE SINGLE UNINTERRUPTED HANDHELD TAKE, ~30 seconds, no cuts, no editing — every transition happens only through the vlogger panning, tilting, zooming or walking. Brisk, snappy pacing: quick whip pans, each beat lands in a few seconds, the camera never lingers. Sunny daytime New York City street >> — brick facades, fire escapes, a sidewalk café, parked cars. The filming style is the core of the video: natural hand micro-shake and walking bounce, slightly floaty digital stabilization, deep focus with everything sharp — no cinematic bokeh, no film look, no color grading. Natural HDR daylight, sky highlights slightly clipped, auto exposure and white balance visibly re-adjusting on every pan between shade and sun, quick autofocus hunting on fast pans, digital zoom bringing a slight quality drop and extra shake. Audio: raw street ambience only — traffic, distant horns, footsteps, chatter, wind brushing the mic, plus the live sounds written into the scenes. No music track, no captions, no watermark. IMPORTANT CHARACTER AND POV LOCK: The vlogger is ALWAYS >>. The vlogger is a man, and he remains the same person throughout the entire video. He is the person physically holding and operating the single camera. He is NEVER replaced by any other reference character. Reference images used in individual scenes describe ONLY the people or animals appearing in that specific scene, unless explicitly stated otherwise. The vlogger’s phone IS the camera — it never appears on screen, and he never holds a second phone or any other device. When the front camera is active, the viewer sees the vlogger himself in selfie view. When the rear camera is active, the viewer sees ONLY the environment and subjects in front of him from his physical walking POV. The phone itself is NEVER visible. This is a continuous real-world camera transition, not a cut. 0:00–0:05 — FRONT CAMERA / SELFIE POV: The vlogger >> films himself at arm’s length while walking down the sidewalk. His face is a touch overexposed by daylight. He starts excitedly: “Guys! I just—” Behind his shoulder, a couple walking the opposite way passes right beside him. A beat later, the guy >> stops and turns back, head over his shoulder, staring straight at the vlogger — matching the reference pose. His girlfriend >>, still gripping his hand, glares at him in outraged disbelief, mouth open. They hold the exact reference tableau. His stare reads odd and unreadable, NOT flirty. The vlogger sees them in his own selfie frame, cuts himself off mid-word and reacts instantly without breaking stride: “…What was that?” He keeps walking. 0:05–0:09 — FLIP TO REAR CAMERA / VLOGGER’S PHYSICAL POV: WITHOUT CUTTING, the vlogger physically flips the phone from front camera to rear camera. The camera itself is never visible. The image transitions naturally from selfie view into the rear-camera view of exactly what is in front of him. He immediately WHIPS the rear camera to the RIGHT toward a sidewalk café. By the entrance, a guy >> stands at a microphone on a stand, with a small speaker beside him looping a soft instrumental backing. He leans toward the microphone, takes a breath to sing the first line — and suddenly bursts out laughing instead, turning away and covering his mouth. He waves it off, then resets toward the microphone. The vlogger laughs quietly behind the camera. 0:09–0:13 — REAR CAMERA / CONTINUOUS POV: WITHOUT CUTTING, the vlogger continues physically panning RIGHT along the same café terrace. At one table, a woman >> is mid-meltdown — crying, shouting, jabbing an accusing finger across the terrace — while her friend >> leans in and holds her back. The camera then makes a QUICK PUNCH-IN DIGITAL ZOOM toward the opposite table. The cat >> sits upright behind a plate of salad, perfectly calm and completely unimpressed by the chaos. Autofocus hunts for a split second during the zoom. The vlogger continues walking. 0:13–0:17 — REAR CAMERA / FIRST SHOW THE MAN, THEN FOLLOW HIS GAZE UP: WITHOUT CUTTING, the camera moves slightly farther along the sidewalk and FIRST frames the man >> standing on the street near the building. IMPORTANT: The man >> is NOT the vlogger. He is a separate person standing in the environment. He is NOT holding the camera, NOT filming himself, and NEVER becomes the POV character. The camera clearly shows his full upper body as he stands below the building, looking UP toward the second floor. His head is tilted upward and his eyes are visibly directed toward something above him. The vlogger notices what the man is looking at and physically follows his gaze. The camera then TILTS UP from the man’s position toward the brick facade directly above the café awning, naturally following the man’s line of sight. The movement must clearly communicate: MAN LOOKS UP → CAMERA FOLLOWS HIS GAZE → WINDOW ABOVE. A second-floor open window comes into view, with a fire escape beside it. The dog >> is sitting in that window with its eyes closed, chin lifted, peacefully soaking up the warm golden sunlight hitting the facade. IMPORTANT: >> is ONLY the DOG. The dog is inside the upper window. It is NOT the vlogger and NOT a human character. The camera performs a QUICK DIGITAL ZOOM toward the dog. The image becomes slightly softer and shakier from the digital zoom. Hold only long enough to clearly reveal the dog enjoying the sunlight. The vlogger reacts behind the camera: “Awww, look at him…” 0:17–0:21 — REAR CAMERA / RETURN TO STREET LEVEL: WITHOUT CUTTING, the camera tilts back DOWN from the dog and window to street level, returning to the same sidewalk. The camera then swings FORWARD toward a few steps ahead on the same sidewalk, where the man from >> is standing. IMPORTANT: >> is a SEPARATE STREET CHARACTER. He is NOT the vlogger. He does NOT hold the camera. He does NOT interact physically with the vlogger. The vlogger is only observing him from behind the camera while walking past. The man wears the black leather jacket and black pants shown in the reference. He is standing on the sidewalk making an exaggerated “thinking / knowledge” gesture with his index finger touching or pointing toward his temple, matching the reference pose. He is NOT standing together with the vlogger. Maintain visible physical distance between the vlogger and this man. The vlogger walks past him while keeping the rear camera briefly trained on him and half-laughs: “What is going on?” 0:21–0:24 — REAR CAMERA / WHIP LEFT ACROSS THE ROAD: WITHOUT CUTTING, the vlogger whips the rear camera to the LEFT, across the two-lane road, toward a sedan parked at the opposite curb. Shaky digital zoom toward the driver’s window. A man >> sits behind the wheel, one hand draped over the top of the steering wheel. He stares directly into the rear-camera lens with a heavy, unblinking, suspicious expression. His eyes slowly track the vlogger as the vlogger walks past. The vlogger says flatly from behind the camera: “…What is his problem?” 0:24–0:30 — REAR CAMERA → FRONT CAMERA → REAR CAMERA: WITHOUT CUTTING, the camera swings back FORWARD toward the corner of the block. Ahead, a child >> is sitting sideways near the roadside, holding a coffee cup and looking toward the camera. The child is a completely separate background character and is NOT the vlogger. The vlogger continues WALKING TOWARD the child. As he gets closer, he performs a QUICK DIGITAL ZOOM. The child looks toward the camera, casually raises the coffee cup and takes a small SIP while looking at the camera. Keep the child as the only visual focus. Natural spontaneous behavior. Immediately after the child's sip, the vlogger physically FLIPS the phone from rear camera to FRONT CAMERA. This is a real camera flip, not a cinematic cut. The phone itself remains invisible. Says: “I can’t believe this”. The take ends naturally mid-walk, still handheld, still continuous, with NO CUT and NO EDIT.

Kashberg

17,892 次观看 • 1 个月前