Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

Возникла проблема при загрузке этого видео. Это может быть связано с временными проблемами сети или видео может быть недоступно.

На главную

𝗩𝗜𝗖𝗧𝗢𝗥 𝗗𝗔𝗩𝗜𝗦 𝗛𝗔𝗡𝗦𝗢𝗡: 𝗧𝗥𝗨𝗠𝗣 𝗝𝗨𝗦𝗧 𝗖𝗛𝗔𝗡𝗚𝗘𝗗 𝗧𝗛𝗘 𝗪𝗢𝗥𝗟𝗗 Victor Davis Hanson — one of the greatest military historians alive — laid out exactly why what Trump just did in Iran isn't just a military victory. It's a 𝘀𝘁𝗿𝗮𝘁𝗲𝗴𝗶𝗰 𝗿𝗲𝘃𝗼𝗹𝘂𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻. His argument is simple: 𝗴𝗲𝘁 𝗿𝗶𝗱 𝗼𝗳 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗿𝗲𝗴𝗶𝗺𝗲 𝗮𝗻𝗱... 𝗮𝗹𝗹 𝗴𝗼𝗼𝗱 𝘁𝗵𝗶𝗻𝗴𝘀 𝗵𝗮𝗽𝗽𝗲𝗻. No Iran means no money for H-z-b, no money for H-m-s, no money for the Houthis. China loses its proxy in the Middle East. Russia already lost Syria. Now it loses Iran. North Korea, Russia, and China have been supplying Iran with drones and missiles. That pipeline is now severed. And without Iranian petrodollars flowing to terror proxies across the region, Israel can finish the job at its ease. But Hanson zooms out further. This isn't haphazard. Trump is methodically dismantling the entire axis — Iran, Cuba, Venezuela — 𝗮𝗹𝗹 𝗮𝗶𝗺𝗲𝗱 𝗮𝘁 𝗼𝗻𝗲 𝗹𝗮𝗿𝗴𝗲𝗿 𝗴𝗼𝗮𝗹: breaking up the China-Russia-North Korea nexus that has been the source of global instability for decades. And the message to Beijing is unmistakable: 𝘄𝗲 𝗮𝗿𝗲 𝗻𝗼𝘁 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗔𝗺𝗲𝗿𝗶𝗰𝗮 𝘁𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗿𝗮𝗻 𝗳𝗿𝗼𝗺 𝗔𝗳𝗴𝗵𝗮𝗻𝗶𝘀𝘁𝗮𝗻. This is a new military. One that doesn't do DEI briefings and drag shows on base. One that delivers results. Peace through strength isn't a bumper sticker. It's a track record. 𝗧𝗿𝘂𝗺𝗽 𝗶𝘀 𝗱𝗲𝗹𝗶𝘃𝗲𝗿𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗶𝘁.show more

M.A. Rothman

93,645 subscribers

978,830 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

Новости и политика

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

$To understand why Trump attacked Iran, you must understand CRINK - the new Axis Powers of China, Russia, Iran, and North Korea. By taking out Iran, Trump took even more oil from China that it MUST have. He also damaged Russia's drone manufacturing capabilities (Iran designs drones for Russia. Ukraine should be thankful). And that is just a fraction of Trump's full plan. China and Russia's BRICS alliance recently lost India, a key player, to Trump. And their two greatest allies in the West - Venezuela and Cuba - have either fallen or are nearing collapse. Iran is just the latest piece of the puzzle.$

To understand why Trump attacked Iran, you must understand CRINK - the new Axis Powers of China, Russia, Iran, and North Korea. By taking out Iran, Trump took even more oil from China that it MUST have. He also damaged Russia's drone manufacturing capabilities (Iran designs drones for Russia. Ukraine should be thankful). And that is just a fraction of Trump's full plan. China and Russia's BRICS alliance recently lost India, a key player, to Trump. And their two greatest allies in the West - Venezuela and Cuba - have either fallen or are nearing collapse. Iran is just the latest piece of the puzzle.

Glenn Beck

1,294,912 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

Footage of joint Russian-Iranian drills just two weeks ago, February 19, 2026. When Iran turned to Putin for help, it was refused, even though Russia called Iran an important ally and signed a strategic partnership agreement with it a year ago. Russia used Iran as a tool to put pressure on the West and destabilize the region: ◾️ Iran supplied Russia with thousands of Shahed-136 attack drones and technology for their production on Russian territory under the name "Geran-2." ◾️ Iran supplied Russia with short-range ballistic missiles. The total value of contracts for the supply of missiles and drones at the beginning of 2023 was estimated at $1.75-3 billion. ◾️ In return, Russia supplied its own weapons to Iran, including air defense systems and aircraft, which, as we can see, did not help Tehran. ◾️ Russia helped Iran develop its nuclear program to increase instability in the region and strengthen the "anti-Western coalition." ◾️ Using its influence, Russia maintained its military bases in Syria and shared military expenses with Tehran. ◾️ Iran, which has been under sanctions for decades, helped Russia circumvent sanctions: the development of the North-South Transport Corridor through Iran allowed Russia to export goods bypassing European ports. ◾️ Iran helped Russia master methods of covert financial transactions and parallel imports. Russia's main objective now is destabilization in the region, prolonging the war, driving up oil prices, and diverting financial and military aid away from Ukraine. ‼️ It is likely that Russians helped Iran develop a plan for strikes against the Persian Gulf countries. It is only natural that Ukrainians are now being asked for help in defending against Iranian drones. Ukraine has unique experience in countering Shahed drones. And Ukraine knows very well what Russia is like, what methods it uses, and what its goals are. What finally needs to be understood about Russia is that it has never been a reliable partner! Its partnership is rhetorical. Russia pursues exclusively its own interests, setting up, deceiving, and abandoning its so-called allies and violating the terms of agreements and deals. Syria, Venezuela, and Iran are vivid examples of this. 📹: Russia-Iran drills/Radio Liberty

Footage of joint Russian-Iranian drills just two weeks ago, February 19, 2026. When Iran turned to Putin for help, it was refused, even though Russia called Iran an important ally and signed a strategic partnership agreement with it a year ago. Russia used Iran as a tool to put pressure on the West and destabilize the region: ◾️ Iran supplied Russia with thousands of Shahed-136 attack drones and technology for their production on Russian territory under the name "Geran-2." ◾️ Iran supplied Russia with short-range ballistic missiles. The total value of contracts for the supply of missiles and drones at the beginning of 2023 was estimated at $1.75-3 billion. ◾️ In return, Russia supplied its own weapons to Iran, including air defense systems and aircraft, which, as we can see, did not help Tehran. ◾️ Russia helped Iran develop its nuclear program to increase instability in the region and strengthen the "anti-Western coalition." ◾️ Using its influence, Russia maintained its military bases in Syria and shared military expenses with Tehran. ◾️ Iran, which has been under sanctions for decades, helped Russia circumvent sanctions: the development of the North-South Transport Corridor through Iran allowed Russia to export goods bypassing European ports. ◾️ Iran helped Russia master methods of covert financial transactions and parallel imports. Russia's main objective now is destabilization in the region, prolonging the war, driving up oil prices, and diverting financial and military aid away from Ukraine. ‼️ It is likely that Russians helped Iran develop a plan for strikes against the Persian Gulf countries. It is only natural that Ukrainians are now being asked for help in defending against Iranian drones. Ukraine has unique experience in countering Shahed drones. And Ukraine knows very well what Russia is like, what methods it uses, and what its goals are. What finally needs to be understood about Russia is that it has never been a reliable partner! Its partnership is rhetorical. Russia pursues exclusively its own interests, setting up, deceiving, and abandoning its so-called allies and violating the terms of agreements and deals. Syria, Venezuela, and Iran are vivid examples of this. 📹: Russia-Iran drills/Radio Liberty

Anton Gerashchenko

169,919 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

🚨Victor Gao: China🇨🇳 is NOT supplying weapons to Iran, Iran is on its way to SUCCESSFULLY DEFENDING itself against the US🇺🇸 and Israel ‘China calls for an immediate end to this war, and China applauds and very much is opposed to a war of aggression. China’s support to Iran has been unequivocal, very explicit. And this is the reason why Iran has been expressing thanks to the very strong and consistent Chinese support. China, I think, believes Iran still has enough wherewithal to defend its sovereignty and territorial integrity. And I don’t think there has been any specific request from Iran for Chinese military help. And this is the reality. So I’m firmly opposed to any allegation that China is supplying weapons to Iran. Iran is fully capable of defending itself because it keeps demonstrating and surprising many countries by the kind of weapons, either drones or missiles, or even missiles with a range of up to 4000 kilometres and all kinds of warheads that they can carry. And I think Iran is on its way to successfully defending its sovereignty and territorial integrity, regardless of the massive amount of losses, including loss of life, that the United States and Israel have inflicted on Iran. Iran has not requested for any military aid from China, and China does not supply weapons to a country at war.’ -Victor Gao, President of the Center for China and Globalisation, on the latest episode of Going Underground Watch the full interview in the quoted post below👇

🚨Victor Gao: China🇨🇳 is NOT supplying weapons to Iran, Iran is on its way to SUCCESSFULLY DEFENDING itself against the US🇺🇸 and Israel ‘China calls for an immediate end to this war, and China applauds and very much is opposed to a war of aggression. China’s support to Iran has been unequivocal, very explicit. And this is the reason why Iran has been expressing thanks to the very strong and consistent Chinese support. China, I think, believes Iran still has enough wherewithal to defend its sovereignty and territorial integrity. And I don’t think there has been any specific request from Iran for Chinese military help. And this is the reality. So I’m firmly opposed to any allegation that China is supplying weapons to Iran. Iran is fully capable of defending itself because it keeps demonstrating and surprising many countries by the kind of weapons, either drones or missiles, or even missiles with a range of up to 4000 kilometres and all kinds of warheads that they can carry. And I think Iran is on its way to successfully defending its sovereignty and territorial integrity, regardless of the massive amount of losses, including loss of life, that the United States and Israel have inflicted on Iran. Iran has not requested for any military aid from China, and China does not supply weapons to a country at war.’ -Victor Gao, President of the Center for China and Globalisation, on the latest episode of Going Underground Watch the full interview in the quoted post below👇

Going Underground

79,149 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

🇺🇸🇮🇷 Iran isn't refusing a deal out of stubbornness, but because a bad peace is more dangerous to the regime than the war itself. Military & Political Analyst Elijah Magnier just laid it all out. "The Iranians understand very well that Donald Trump is seeking a victory they cannot offer him. This is why there is no deal for now." If the war ends without sanctions lifted, Iran loses its people. They know it, and so does Washington. Elijah J. Magnier 🇪🇺

🇺🇸🇮🇷 Iran isn't refusing a deal out of stubbornness, but because a bad peace is more dangerous to the regime than the war itself. Military & Political Analyst Elijah Magnier just laid it all out. "The Iranians understand very well that Donald Trump is seeking a victory they cannot offer him. This is why there is no deal for now." If the war ends without sanctions lifted, Iran loses its people. They know it, and so does Washington. Elijah J. Magnier 🇪🇺

Mario Nawfal

52,684 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

“The US went to war in Iran because Iran made itself a Chinese weapon,” policy analyst Zineb Riboua told me during our interview. According to her, the current war against Iran is “all about China.” In fact, she believes the U.S. is waging an indirect war with China right now. Riboua is the founder of the China in MENA Project which tracks Chinese influence and expansion across the Middle East and Africa. Is there a bigger dimension to this war that many are missing? “We have this tendency to just look at the countries involved… but there's a big player, and the big player here is China… China has been investing immensely in the region in the last two decades, in courting, in coordinating, in cooperating with Gulf countries, with Iran itself, and also with its proxies.” And why, I ask her, has China been so keen on gaining strategic influence over the Middle East? It’s because the CCP understands, she said, that “China cannot rise without having the United States weakened in one of the most important regions in the world... Iran has been that tool.” Zineb Riboua Hudson Institute

“The US went to war in Iran because Iran made itself a Chinese weapon,” policy analyst Zineb Riboua told me during our interview. According to her, the current war against Iran is “all about China.” In fact, she believes the U.S. is waging an indirect war with China right now. Riboua is the founder of the China in MENA Project which tracks Chinese influence and expansion across the Middle East and Africa. Is there a bigger dimension to this war that many are missing? “We have this tendency to just look at the countries involved… but there's a big player, and the big player here is China… China has been investing immensely in the region in the last two decades, in courting, in coordinating, in cooperating with Gulf countries, with Iran itself, and also with its proxies.” And why, I ask her, has China been so keen on gaining strategic influence over the Middle East? It’s because the CCP understands, she said, that “China cannot rise without having the United States weakened in one of the most important regions in the world... Iran has been that tool.” Zineb Riboua Hudson Institute

Jan Jekielek

64,555 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

Meiselas: While Donald Trump is out there talking about how the US taxpayers will not be giving Iran any money, the MOU between the US and Iran calls for a $300B investment fund to be available to Iran. What that fund really is, is the new security architecture for Iran. When you look through the terms of this MOU, what it does is it removes all sanctions against Iran. It allows Iran to open up its markets to other countries in the Middle East in ways that it wasn't able to before. And it encourages other countries in the Middle East and other countries across the world to make major investments in Iran. The Trump regime went from saying, "We want regime change in Iran," to "Now Iran is a major global power," and Iran is going to be wielding a massive amount of economic influence.

Meiselas: While Donald Trump is out there talking about how the US taxpayers will not be giving Iran any money, the MOU between the US and Iran calls for a $300B investment fund to be available to Iran. What that fund really is, is the new security architecture for Iran. When you look through the terms of this MOU, what it does is it removes all sanctions against Iran. It allows Iran to open up its markets to other countries in the Middle East in ways that it wasn't able to before. And it encourages other countries in the Middle East and other countries across the world to make major investments in Iran. The Trump regime went from saying, "We want regime change in Iran," to "Now Iran is a major global power," and Iran is going to be wielding a massive amount of economic influence.

MeidasClips

13,439 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

"THE UNITED STATES HAS NO AIRCRAFT CARRIERS IN THE MIDDLE EAST" Most people believe that the U.S. cannot launch an attack on Iran unless it has at least one aircraft carrier in the Middle East. The U.S. usually has two aircraft carriers in place when a military intervention is launched. One of the aircraft carriers acts as a backup. That is the normal procedure. I think the military doctrine is changing. Aircraft carriers are vulnerable and I have previously written that if a conflict between the U.S. and Iran starts, the US will have its aircraft carriers at a safe distance. The issue extends beyond just Iran and the U.S.; it is also significantly related to the anticipated conflict between China and Taiwan. In my opinion, the U.S. does not wish to grant China any benefits in light of that conflict. A significant issue for the U.S. is that lacking aircraft carriers in a region at the onset of a conflict results in a loss of combat capability. This includes the ability to conduct sustained high-tempo air operations with numerous daily sorties. Without these carriers, you also miss out on integrated air defense suppression and electronic warfare in contested airspace. If the U.S. conducts strikes on Iran without the involvement of aircraft carriers, it suggests that it is assessing its military strength without these assets. This could be seen as a precursor to a confrontation with China..........

"THE UNITED STATES HAS NO AIRCRAFT CARRIERS IN THE MIDDLE EAST" Most people believe that the U.S. cannot launch an attack on Iran unless it has at least one aircraft carrier in the Middle East. The U.S. usually has two aircraft carriers in place when a military intervention is launched. One of the aircraft carriers acts as a backup. That is the normal procedure. I think the military doctrine is changing. Aircraft carriers are vulnerable and I have previously written that if a conflict between the U.S. and Iran starts, the US will have its aircraft carriers at a safe distance. The issue extends beyond just Iran and the U.S.; it is also significantly related to the anticipated conflict between China and Taiwan. In my opinion, the U.S. does not wish to grant China any benefits in light of that conflict. A significant issue for the U.S. is that lacking aircraft carriers in a region at the onset of a conflict results in a loss of combat capability. This includes the ability to conduct sustained high-tempo air operations with numerous daily sorties. Without these carriers, you also miss out on integrated air defense suppression and electronic warfare in contested airspace. If the U.S. conducts strikes on Iran without the involvement of aircraft carriers, it suggests that it is assessing its military strength without these assets. This could be seen as a precursor to a confrontation with China..........

WORLD AT WAR

188,246 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

Ukraine has its "cards"—and that is the result of the work of our military, industry, and experts, said Zelenskyy. Further statements by the Ukrainian president: The cooperation between Russia and Iran in the production of drones poses a serious threat to many countries. It could lead to a global conflict. The world is not ready for a possible Third World War. Just look at Russia, where 10,000 North Korean soldiers are already stationed on Russian territory. Yes, they are there now, but they could come to Ukraine. The same applies to Iran—Russia could send troops. Is the world ready for such an alliance? No. The Kremlin is actively investing in disinformation because it works. It is one of the tools used to exert influence on other parties. This requires a lot of money, and Russia has it. Today, I feel primarily like a president. I feel primarily a sense of responsibility. That is why I feel like a president. But after this work, I will feel more like a father. More like a father.

Ukraine has its "cards"—and that is the result of the work of our military, industry, and experts, said Zelenskyy. Further statements by the Ukrainian president: The cooperation between Russia and Iran in the production of drones poses a serious threat to many countries. It could lead to a global conflict. The world is not ready for a possible Third World War. Just look at Russia, where 10,000 North Korean soldiers are already stationed on Russian territory. Yes, they are there now, but they could come to Ukraine. The same applies to Iran—Russia could send troops. Is the world ready for such an alliance? No. The Kremlin is actively investing in disinformation because it works. It is one of the tools used to exert influence on other parties. This requires a lot of money, and Russia has it. Today, I feel primarily like a president. I feel primarily a sense of responsibility. That is why I feel like a president. But after this work, I will feel more like a father. More like a father.

Jürgen Nauditt 🇩🇪🇺🇦

13,618 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

Niall Ferguson, Historian: What we’re seeing now is that global authoritarian axis has formed — Iran, Russia, China, and North Korea. This axis is essentially Chinese-led because China is by far the largest player. China has been crucial to Putin’s war in Ukraine. It would've been very hard for Putin to sustain war effort without very large flows of dual-use goods into Russian economy from China. Russians got Shahed drone design from Iranians, then adapted it in order to fire them at Ukrainians. Russians have certainly been sharing technology with Iran. Iranian missile program is essentially a Chinese operation. All the inputs for Iranian missiles are coming from China. So this is a global authoritarian axis. They’re ideologically very different, but they have a common interest, which is in undermining international order.

Niall Ferguson, Historian: What we’re seeing now is that global authoritarian axis has formed — Iran, Russia, China, and North Korea. This axis is essentially Chinese-led because China is by far the largest player. China has been crucial to Putin’s war in Ukraine. It would've been very hard for Putin to sustain war effort without very large flows of dual-use goods into Russian economy from China. Russians got Shahed drone design from Iranians, then adapted it in order to fire them at Ukrainians. Russians have certainly been sharing technology with Iran. Iranian missile program is essentially a Chinese operation. All the inputs for Iranian missiles are coming from China. So this is a global authoritarian axis. They’re ideologically very different, but they have a common interest, which is in undermining international order.

Kate from Kharkiv

135,731 просмотров • 14 дней назад

Seyed Mohammad Marandi replies to question about Russia and China's involvement in Iran. Glenn Diesen: "The American media as well as the European is full of accusations that Russia could be assisting Iran with intelligence with possible targeting. What do we know actually about China and Russia being involved?" Mohammad Marandi: "I don't know the details, but what I do know is that the Chinese and the Russians and the Iranians have moved closer to each other. This has been ongoing for years, but after the 12-day war, they've moved even closer. Iran has 15 neighbors. It's a large country. All the transit routes really have to go through Iran in Asia that would connect West Asia and East Asia, and the the Persian Gulf to to Europe and the Caucuses and Central Asia. So, the ability for Iran to receive weapons or anything that would help with the war is there. It could be done through its eastern borders. It can be done through its northern borders and there would be nothing that the United States could do about it. And the Chinese and the Russians can easily use these routes to trade with Iran, for Iran to send what what Iran purchases. I think it's clear as day that the the Russians do not want the United States to succeed in West Asia, and the Chinese obviously don't want it either. ...Zionist expansionism would basically mean further empowerment for the Trump regime and the United States, and they would have control over all the oil that are no longer leaving the Persian Gulf as we speak, but they would have control over everything and that would put China in a very very dangerous situation. More than dangerous. So, I think it's only natural to assume that the Chinese and the Russians are going to cooperate with Iran more. What the United States has done is that it has cemented the relationship between Russia, Iran and China for the years to come. They cemented it."

Seyed Mohammad Marandi replies to question about Russia and China's involvement in Iran. Glenn Diesen: "The American media as well as the European is full of accusations that Russia could be assisting Iran with intelligence with possible targeting. What do we know actually about China and Russia being involved?" Mohammad Marandi: "I don't know the details, but what I do know is that the Chinese and the Russians and the Iranians have moved closer to each other. This has been ongoing for years, but after the 12-day war, they've moved even closer. Iran has 15 neighbors. It's a large country. All the transit routes really have to go through Iran in Asia that would connect West Asia and East Asia, and the the Persian Gulf to to Europe and the Caucuses and Central Asia. So, the ability for Iran to receive weapons or anything that would help with the war is there. It could be done through its eastern borders. It can be done through its northern borders and there would be nothing that the United States could do about it. And the Chinese and the Russians can easily use these routes to trade with Iran, for Iran to send what what Iran purchases. I think it's clear as day that the the Russians do not want the United States to succeed in West Asia, and the Chinese obviously don't want it either. ...Zionist expansionism would basically mean further empowerment for the Trump regime and the United States, and they would have control over all the oil that are no longer leaving the Persian Gulf as we speak, but they would have control over everything and that would put China in a very very dangerous situation. More than dangerous. So, I think it's only natural to assume that the Chinese and the Russians are going to cooperate with Iran more. What the United States has done is that it has cemented the relationship between Russia, Iran and China for the years to come. They cemented it."

Eva Karene Bartlett

23,102 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

🇮🇷🇮🇱 Nick Fuentes is going viral after telling viewers to “pray for Iran,” claiming that “Iran is fighting for all of humanity,” and saying, “Israel is after you. Iran is just in the way.” Iran is fighting for regime survival. But the underlying question he's circling around isn't crazy: what happens to the Middle East if Iran collapses entirely? With Iran's military gutted, no regional counterbalance exists. Israel's Defense Minister is already claiming 10% of Lebanon permanently. Netanyahu is pitching pipelines that route through Israeli-allied territory. The finance minister said Israel's border should extend to the Litani River. You don't have to romanticize the Iranian regime to recognize that its total destruction leaves one country with complete unchecked power over the entire region. And that country has shown zero interest in sharing it... Clip: The Resonance

🇮🇷🇮🇱 Nick Fuentes is going viral after telling viewers to “pray for Iran,” claiming that “Iran is fighting for all of humanity,” and saying, “Israel is after you. Iran is just in the way.” Iran is fighting for regime survival. But the underlying question he's circling around isn't crazy: what happens to the Middle East if Iran collapses entirely? With Iran's military gutted, no regional counterbalance exists. Israel's Defense Minister is already claiming 10% of Lebanon permanently. Netanyahu is pitching pipelines that route through Israeli-allied territory. The finance minister said Israel's border should extend to the Litani River. You don't have to romanticize the Iranian regime to recognize that its total destruction leaves one country with complete unchecked power over the entire region. And that country has shown zero interest in sharing it... Clip: The Resonance

Mario Nawfal

266,621 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

🇨🇳🇺🇸Iran Isn't the Enemy - It's the Battlefield in a U.S.-China Proxy War: President Donald Trump announced that U.S. forces intercepted an Iranian-flagged cargo ship, the M/V Touska, which was allegedly carrying what he described as “gifts from China” intended to restock Iran’s military. Trump appeared surprised by the contents of the Chinese cargo bound for Iran. It seems he believed he had an understanding with Chinese President Xi Jinping that China would not supply weapons or military-related materials to Iran. While Trump referred to the shipment as “gifts” from China, the cargo is likely composed of dual-use items that could support Iran’s weapons programs, missile production, or broader military sustainment. Many observers are now asking why China would send such components to Iran at this time. Doesn’t Beijing want the conflict to end? The answer is yes - but only on its own terms. China wants the fighting to stop provided the current Iranian regime remains in power. A significantly weakened Iran would not serve Chinese interests. Iran serves as a strategic node in China’s Belt and Road Initiative and acts as an important counterweight to U.S. influence in the Middle East and South Asia. In my view, the conflict has evolved into a proxy war between the United States and China.

🇨🇳🇺🇸Iran Isn't the Enemy - It's the Battlefield in a U.S.-China Proxy War: President Donald Trump announced that U.S. forces intercepted an Iranian-flagged cargo ship, the M/V Touska, which was allegedly carrying what he described as “gifts from China” intended to restock Iran’s military. Trump appeared surprised by the contents of the Chinese cargo bound for Iran. It seems he believed he had an understanding with Chinese President Xi Jinping that China would not supply weapons or military-related materials to Iran. While Trump referred to the shipment as “gifts” from China, the cargo is likely composed of dual-use items that could support Iran’s weapons programs, missile production, or broader military sustainment. Many observers are now asking why China would send such components to Iran at this time. Doesn’t Beijing want the conflict to end? The answer is yes - but only on its own terms. China wants the fighting to stop provided the current Iranian regime remains in power. A significantly weakened Iran would not serve Chinese interests. Iran serves as a strategic node in China’s Belt and Road Initiative and acts as an important counterweight to U.S. influence in the Middle East and South Asia. In my view, the conflict has evolved into a proxy war between the United States and China.

Global Strategy

20,269 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

🇮🇷🇮🇱 What just changed tonight? This is the first time Iran has struck Israel in response to an Israeli strike on a 3rd country. Not Iran itself, but Lebanon. The significance is structural. Iran's deterrence used to mean: strike Iran and Iran strikes back. Tonight it expanded to: strike Lebanon and Iran strikes back. That's a fundamentally different equation. One that extends Iranian hard power as a check on Israeli military action across the entire region, not just over Iranian territory. For decades Israel has operated with near-impunity because no regional power had both the capability and willingness to impose real costs on its military actions abroad. If that equation has genuinely shifted, every conflict in the region, including Palestine, has a new variable in it that wasn't there yesterday. If you still thought Israel is calling the shots think again. Source: Trita Parsi on Substack / Writer: Oliver

🇮🇷🇮🇱 What just changed tonight? This is the first time Iran has struck Israel in response to an Israeli strike on a 3rd country. Not Iran itself, but Lebanon. The significance is structural. Iran's deterrence used to mean: strike Iran and Iran strikes back. Tonight it expanded to: strike Lebanon and Iran strikes back. That's a fundamentally different equation. One that extends Iranian hard power as a check on Israeli military action across the entire region, not just over Iranian territory. For decades Israel has operated with near-impunity because no regional power had both the capability and willingness to impose real costs on its military actions abroad. If that equation has genuinely shifted, every conflict in the region, including Palestine, has a new variable in it that wasn't there yesterday. If you still thought Israel is calling the shots think again. Source: Trita Parsi on Substack / Writer: Oliver

Mario Nawfal

1,132,211 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

The High-Stakes Escalation in the Middle East 💥 " Trump can hit us hard... but Iran can hit back." Professor Seyed Marandi (Seyed Mohammad Marandi) lays out the stark reality of the Iran war and why the U.S. strategy is pushing the region toward a breaking point. “Iran is progressing… its missiles and drones are getting better as time goes on while the United States is facing a crisis.” “When the United States runs out of those critical weapon systems, Iran will still have missiles and drones.” He warns that if Washington strikes Iran’s infrastructure, “Iran will take out everything in the region… oil fields on fire and LNG refineries on fire.” That would trigger a global economic depression and force “millions of people… to leave the Arabian Peninsula.” And on Iran’s refusal to surrender: “If they submit… then the country is finished.” Marandi says Americans increasingly see this conflict for what it is: “This is a war for Netanyahu… Kushner’s war… not for the American people.” 👉 Watch the full clip — the stakes of the Iran war are now unmistakable.

The High-Stakes Escalation in the Middle East 💥 " Trump can hit us hard... but Iran can hit back." Professor Seyed Marandi (Seyed Mohammad Marandi) lays out the stark reality of the Iran war and why the U.S. strategy is pushing the region toward a breaking point. “Iran is progressing… its missiles and drones are getting better as time goes on while the United States is facing a crisis.” “When the United States runs out of those critical weapon systems, Iran will still have missiles and drones.” He warns that if Washington strikes Iran’s infrastructure, “Iran will take out everything in the region… oil fields on fire and LNG refineries on fire.” That would trigger a global economic depression and force “millions of people… to leave the Arabian Peninsula.” And on Iran’s refusal to surrender: “If they submit… then the country is finished.” Marandi says Americans increasingly see this conflict for what it is: “This is a war for Netanyahu… Kushner’s war… not for the American people.” 👉 Watch the full clip — the stakes of the Iran war are now unmistakable.

Daniel Davis Deep Dive

14,943 просмотров • 4 дней назад

CHINA AND RUSSIA RESTOCKING IRAN WITH WEAPONS! Trump says any country supplying weapons now to Iran will have 50% TARIFF IMMEDIATELY! It’s NOT OVER! Iran is claiming VICTORY! The battle over the narrative: Although it has lost its Supreme Leader, dozens of its senior officials, its navy, its air force, its steel industry, its petrochemical industry, most of its missile-launch capabilities, its national infrastructure, and approximately 10,000 of its personnel, the Iranian regime is sending its supporters to “celebrate victory” in order to shape and entrench the narrative from the very outset. (Abu Ali) Iranian strikes are reported in Kuwait, Jordan and UAE. What a nice ceasefire… China and Russia at the UN announced their intention to provide extensive aid to Iran within the next 24 hours, claiming that it is assistance for the country's reconstruction and not for the arms industry. Ceasefire? according to reports in the Russian media, China has already sent 3 cargo ships carrying weapons, while Russian military aid planes are currently on their way to Isfahan. And military aid planes from Belarus are on their way to Tehran!

CHINA AND RUSSIA RESTOCKING IRAN WITH WEAPONS! Trump says any country supplying weapons now to Iran will have 50% TARIFF IMMEDIATELY! It’s NOT OVER! Iran is claiming VICTORY! The battle over the narrative: Although it has lost its Supreme Leader, dozens of its senior officials, its navy, its air force, its steel industry, its petrochemical industry, most of its missile-launch capabilities, its national infrastructure, and approximately 10,000 of its personnel, the Iranian regime is sending its supporters to “celebrate victory” in order to shape and entrench the narrative from the very outset. (Abu Ali) Iranian strikes are reported in Kuwait, Jordan and UAE. What a nice ceasefire… China and Russia at the UN announced their intention to provide extensive aid to Iran within the next 24 hours, claiming that it is assistance for the country's reconstruction and not for the arms industry. Ceasefire? according to reports in the Russian media, China has already sent 3 cargo ships carrying weapons, while Russian military aid planes are currently on their way to Isfahan. And military aid planes from Belarus are on their way to Tehran!

TRUTH NOW ⭐️⭐️⭐️🗽 🎺

20,441 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

Is there a risk that Trump is merely pressuring Cuba? No. A landslide victory in Cuba holds political value for Trump capable of overriding the fiasco in Iran. Cuba is a communist island about 100km from American territory, a symbol of a decades-long dispute, and a country that confronted the U.S. by financing and arming revolutionary groups in several Latin american countries for many years. A successful invasion of Cuba would end this cycle, giving Trump something his predecessors were unable to achieve. Trump needs this and will carry out the military operation. More than that, it is a card that no one considered at a time when Trump was seen as defeated, without any chance in the elections. Cuba can provide oxygen and a victory narrative for Donald Trump, giving him new life in the midterm elections. Even with further mistakes in a new Iranian operation, closing the cycle of interventions with a victory in Cuba brings a major prize for Trump. The $100 million in aid provided by Trump is part of a plan he is working on to ensure less hostility during a military action. It is not just about reading the military apparatus and the drone and aircraft flights around Cuba that have become routine, but about an entire political juncture that is now connected to this movement. This is what distinguishes geopolitical analysis from mere military analysis. How will the Democrats handle this? Is there power to prevent an action in Cuba? That is the point today.

Is there a risk that Trump is merely pressuring Cuba? No. A landslide victory in Cuba holds political value for Trump capable of overriding the fiasco in Iran. Cuba is a communist island about 100km from American territory, a symbol of a decades-long dispute, and a country that confronted the U.S. by financing and arming revolutionary groups in several Latin american countries for many years. A successful invasion of Cuba would end this cycle, giving Trump something his predecessors were unable to achieve. Trump needs this and will carry out the military operation. More than that, it is a card that no one considered at a time when Trump was seen as defeated, without any chance in the elections. Cuba can provide oxygen and a victory narrative for Donald Trump, giving him new life in the midterm elections. Even with further mistakes in a new Iranian operation, closing the cycle of interventions with a victory in Cuba brings a major prize for Trump. The $100 million in aid provided by Trump is part of a plan he is working on to ensure less hostility during a military action. It is not just about reading the military apparatus and the drone and aircraft flights around Cuba that have become routine, but about an entire political juncture that is now connected to this movement. This is what distinguishes geopolitical analysis from mere military analysis. How will the Democrats handle this? Is there power to prevent an action in Cuba? That is the point today.

Patricia Marins

59,191 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Let's imagine a free Iran. Imagine an Iran that is secular, democratic, stable, and a strong ally of the United States and Israel. Imagine a world where the Islamic Republic is no longer funding terrorism, and instead, a government that reflects the people of Iran is working alongside its allies to hunt down terrorists. This is what the golden age of the Middle East looks like. Removing the Islamic Republic changes the entire global landscape. Imagine an Iran that is no longer a playground for Russia and China, but a major US ally with immense strategic value and energy resources. We are talking about 90 million educated, entrepreneurial people who believe in liberty and democracy. A free Iran brings unprecedented stability and wealth to the entire region. Think about how much more secure the world would be with a free Iran. A nation fighting alongside America and Israel to defeat mutual enemies.

Let's imagine a free Iran. Imagine an Iran that is secular, democratic, stable, and a strong ally of the United States and Israel. Imagine a world where the Islamic Republic is no longer funding terrorism, and instead, a government that reflects the people of Iran is working alongside its allies to hunt down terrorists. This is what the golden age of the Middle East looks like. Removing the Islamic Republic changes the entire global landscape. Imagine an Iran that is no longer a playground for Russia and China, but a major US ally with immense strategic value and energy resources. We are talking about 90 million educated, entrepreneurial people who believe in liberty and democracy. A free Iran brings unprecedented stability and wealth to the entire region. Think about how much more secure the world would be with a free Iran. A nation fighting alongside America and Israel to defeat mutual enemies.

Armin Navabi

13,902 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

Lavrov: "We all want to know what kind of world we live in. Therefore, the US must explain its plans and how this relates to the norms that existed before." Well, it's not just Lavrov; the entire world is at a loss. The old world has collapsed before our eyes. The new world isn't here yet. But I don't think the US thinks it owes anyone anything. The US is building its own unipolar world where it will dictate how everyone lives. Then everyone will know what kind of world they live in. To achieve this, the US only needs to subjugate Iran, Russia, and China. Isn't that clear? Turning a blind eye to this and pretending everything is fine won't work. Iran is now taking the US's first blow because Iran is the gateway to the conquest of Russia and China. That's what I think.

Lavrov: "We all want to know what kind of world we live in. Therefore, the US must explain its plans and how this relates to the norms that existed before." Well, it's not just Lavrov; the entire world is at a loss. The old world has collapsed before our eyes. The new world isn't here yet. But I don't think the US thinks it owes anyone anything. The US is building its own unipolar world where it will dictate how everyone lives. Then everyone will know what kind of world they live in. To achieve this, the US only needs to subjugate Iran, Russia, and China. Isn't that clear? Turning a blind eye to this and pretending everything is fine won't work. Iran is now taking the US's first blow because Iran is the gateway to the conquest of Russia and China. That's what I think.

Victor vicktop55 commentary

97,979 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад