Video yรผkleniyor...

Video Yรผklenemedi

๐—ช๐—ฒ ๐—ฎ๐—ด๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—ฒ๐—ฑ ๐˜„๐—ถ๐˜๐—ต ๐˜๐—ต๐—ถ๐˜€ ๐—ณ๐—ฟ๐—ผ๐—บ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐˜€๐˜๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐˜, blockchain wasnโ€™t chosen for hype, it was chosen because it makes investing work better at scale. In traditional systems, the more investors you add, the harder everything becomes. Thereโ€™s more paperwork, more manual tracking, more delays, and higher costs. ๐Œ๐š๐ง๐š๐ ๐ข๐ง๐  ๐ฆ๐š๐ง๐ฒ ๐ข๐ง๐ฏ๐ž๐ฌ๐ญ๐จ๐ซ๐ฌ...

43,668 gรถrรผntรผleme โ€ข 6 ay รถnce โ€ขvia X (Twitter)

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gรถnderinin yorumlarฤฑ burada gรถrรผnecek

Benzer Videolar

From Morgan Stanley to Ripple to Hedera: Building the Shopify of Institutional Asset Tokenization The world is moving toward a system where everyone, not just millionaires, can access high-quality real world assets. In our conversation with Anil, the founder of cSigma Finance, he explained how global investors and real businesses are being left out of traditional financial systems, and why DLT such as Hedera finally makes this possible. Anil spent nearly two decades in financial services, from Morgan Stanley to building institutional grade credit products Ripple, before launching cSigma in 2023. Today his team is building the full infrastructure layer for asset originators to bring institutional grade financial assets onchain. Here are the key insights straight from the interview: โ€ข Investors outside financial centers struggle to access high quality assets. โ€ข Even in developed countries, most people are shut out of institutional opportunities. โ€ข Mid-market businesses often pay extremely high APR because traditional lenders cannot efficiently serve smaller ticket credit. โ€ข cSigma connects these businesses directly with global stablecoin liquidity using a compliant, blockchain native process. โ€ข More than 80 million dollars in fully collateralized, legally enforceable real world assets have already been originated. โ€ข Higher yields are possible without speculative token incentives. โ€ข Asset originators are reducing their cost of capital by 20 to 30 percent. โ€ข cSigma built a complete stack: AI credit analysis, legal and compliance rails, risk monitoring, tokenization standards, and real settlement workflows. โ€ข Permissioned institutional capital and permissionless global liquidity now interact through one architecture designed for regulation and scale. Anilโ€™s thoughts on 2026 were clear: Anyone with even 1000 dollars should be able to build a diversified portfolio of institutional grade assets. Tokenization makes this possible. Hedera makes this possible. This is what democratizing finance actually looks like. Podcast supported by HashPack Wallet Hedera Hashgraph Hedera Foundation

Generation Infinity

161,084 gรถrรผntรผleme โ€ข 7 ay รถnce

Marc Andreessen: โ€œIโ€™m always urging founders to raise prices, raise prices, raise prices.โ€ โ€œWe spend a lot of time working with our companies on pricing,โ€ a16z co-founder Marc Andreessen explains. โ€œItโ€™s really this magical art and science that a lot of companies donโ€™t take seriously enough.โ€ Marc continues: โ€œA core principle of pricing is that you donโ€™t want to price by cost if you can avoid it. You want to price by value. Especially when youโ€™re selling to businesses, you want to price as a percentage of the business value youโ€™re creating.โ€ He gives the example of building an AI that can do the job of a programmer, a lawyer, or a radiologist: โ€œCan you price by value and get a percentage of what otherwise wouldโ€™ve literally been a person? Or equivalently can you price by marginal productivity? If you can take a human doctor and make them much more productive because you give them AI, can you price as a percentage of the productivity uplift?โ€ Marc argues that high prices are under-appreciated by founders: โ€œThe naive view on pricing is the lower the pricing, the better it is for the customer. The more sophisticated way of looking at it is that higher prices are often good for the customer because the higher price means the vendor can make the product better, faster. Companies with higher prices and higher margins can actually invest more in R&D and make the product better. Most people who buy things arenโ€™t just looking for the cheapest price. They want something thatโ€™s going to work really well.โ€ Marc also emphasizes this point in an interview in Elad Gilโ€™s High Growth Handbook: โ€œWhat I hear from companies is, โ€˜Oh, we have an awesome moat, and weโ€™re still going to price our product cheap, because we think thatโ€™s somehow going to maximize our business.โ€™ Iโ€™m always urging founders to raise prices, raise prices, raise prices. Iโ€™m always urging founders to raise prices, raise prices, raise prices. First of all, raising prices is a great way to flesh out whether you actually do have a moat. If you do have a moat, the customers will still buy, because they have to. The definition of a moat is the ability to charge more. And so number one, itโ€™s just a good way to flesh out that topic and really expose it to sunlight. And then number two, companies that charge more can better fund both their distribution efforts and their ongoing R&D efforts. Charging more is a key lever to be able to grow. And the companies that charge more therefore tend to grow faster. Thatโ€™s counterintuitive to a lot of engineers. A lot of engineers think thereโ€™s a one-dimensional relationship between price and value. They have this mental model of commerce like theyโ€™re selling rice or something. Itโ€™s like, โ€œMy product is magical and nobody can replicate it, and I need to price it like itโ€™s a commodity.โ€ No, you donโ€™t. In fact, quite the opposite. If you price it high, then you can fund a much more expensive sales and marketing effort, which means youโ€™re much more likely to win the market, which means youโ€™re much more likely to be able afford to do all the R&D and acquisitions youโ€™re going to want to do. And so we always try to snap people into a two-dimensional mindset, where higher prices equals faster growth.โ€ Video source: a16z (2026)

Startup Archive

422,892 gรถrรผntรผleme โ€ข 6 ay รถnce

#ZeePrukLiveBD2025 ๐Ÿบ: "Is 23 years old different from 33?" Back then, at 23, I had already graduated. By the time I entered DomundiTV, I was around 23, if I remember correctly. At that time, it was really different, because I didn't know how to do anything at all. I didn't even know what working really was. Simply put, that was the stage of life when I had just graduated from university. I didn't know how to work yet, because when I studied, I only studied. The kind of work I did was just university assignments, not real working life. So after graduation, I started to learn more about working. I met more people, encountered more personalities, which is normal. I faced more kinds of work, more things I had to learn. I just tried to learn along the way, tried to be the best version of myself and gradually learning. It was actually fun, because the more people you meet, the more you grow. The more diverse the work or society you face, the more you grow, and you gain new perspectives and insights. I really like one phrase from my mom: "When you grow up, you'll understand it yourself." Back then, I didn't believe it at all, but they turned out to be so true. Because age has no boundaries, but age automatically makes us precipitate many things. No matter who we are, what type of person, what kind of character we have, in the end, our age will help us crystallize many thoughts about which path we want to choose in life, whether it's good or bad, or whether we want to be this or that. Butโ€ฆ how to sayโ€ฆ we shouldn't take advantage of anyone, because everyone is different. That's right. #ZeePruk Z #ZunShine

Zee Pruk Vietnam | เธšเน‰เธฒเธ™ เธ‹เธต เธžเธคเธเธฉเนŒ เธžเธฒเธ™เธดเธŠ เน€เธงเธตเธขเธ”เธ™เธฒเธก

11,238 gรถrรผntรผleme โ€ข 10 ay รถnce

I miss building simple, working software. At some point, we decided to complicate everything for no reason. Today, people can't build anything without using three frameworks, 17 libraries, and a swarm of microservices. And here is a funny paradox: To understand how these complex systems work, we've had to build systems and tools that generate data we can later analyze. But the more data we produce, the harder it is to process and make sense of it. We are in the middle of an observability crisis. The tools we have are inefficient, and we don't have enough people to keep systems running. A few weeks ago, I met the team Resolve AI, and they have built a fundamentally new approach to observability and incident management: Instead of depending on humans to run a system, Resolve built a Production Software Engineer who runs the system using AI while letting people supervise. And it's not only crazy, but I think this will fundamentally change how we monitor and maintain systems in production for years to come. I recorded a quick video to showcase a simple example of how Resolve works behind the scenes. There are two main things I'd like you to notice: 1. The tool can correlate data across logs, metrics, and traces coming from different systems. You don't have to do any work to get the information that matters right in front of you. 2. (This is the big one!) The tool can diagnose what's happening and give you instructions on how to solve it. It can produce causal relationships across the entire system stack. Resolve is backed by investors like Replit's founder Amjad Masad, Reid Hoffman, Jeff Dean, Fei Fei Li, Andy Price, among others. They are currently working with a select number of companies and want to onboard a few more. If you are interested in trying them out, go to this link: Honestly, this is one of the most impressive uses of AI I've seen.

Santiago

82,074 gรถrรผntรผleme โ€ข 1 yฤฑl รถnce

Is this a financial hallucination? Elon Musk was not even in the worldโ€™s top ten richest people until 2020. Now he is the worldโ€™s first trillionaire. It is absurd, but not fake. This was not some slow, stately climb through the billionaire league table. Musk crashed into the top ten during Covid, rode the Tesla mania, fell back when markets turned, then launched into another universe as SpaceX was marked at a much higher valuation. As others have pointed out to me, this wasn't luck. This was 24 years of SpaceX history being priced in by public markets, helped a bit by the addition of an AI business. That is the story in this animation. These are shares, private valuations, collateral, market mood and a huge wager on the future, all compressed into one ridiculous number: $1.3 trillion as of today. Once the financial system agrees to treat paper wealth as real, it becomes real enough. It can be borrowed against. It can be pledged. It can buy control, influence and time. It can decide which companies get funded, which technologies get built and which version of the future attracts capital. That is the mad part. Muskโ€™s fortune is both real and ridiculous at the same time. Real, because markets, banks and investors have endorsed it. Ridiculous, because a large part of it can move violently when sentiment changes, a rocket explodes, Tesla rerates, or investors decide the future is worth a different price. This feels like a chart about modern wealth becoming stranger, faster and more detached from anything most people would recognise as money. What do you think? Music: Mr. C-137 by Basixx, Epidemic Sounds

James Eagle

1,622,571 gรถrรผntรผleme โ€ข 1 ay รถnce

Inside the secret societies controlling the West: The Bohemian Grove โ€˜It was founded in the 1870s largely by a small group of journalists, artists and musicians. You know, fairly harmless people. But over time it became fashionable, and it became taken over by corporate businessmen and politicians. Gradually, the membership changed. And interestingly, as the membership changed, the organisation became increasingly secretive. Now, the thing about the Bohemian Club is that it currently has somewhere around 2,500 active members. Thereโ€™s a long membership list. To get in, you must be chosen. It also supposedly costs you $25,000 in an initiation fee. And you know why thatโ€™s there? To keep out the riff-raff. These things are usually expensive. Thereโ€™s a reason why ordinary people donโ€™t get in, usually because you couldnโ€™t afford it. First of all, itโ€™s an all-male organisation. And its members include people in politics, in business, in the media; wealthy and powerful men. So hereโ€™s the interesting thing. If youโ€™re already rich and powerful, this is often the question: what more do you want? What is it that you canโ€™t already afford with more money? And how well can you eat, as someone put it? You can have enough money. Arguably, for some people, you can never have enough power or enough influence, because that involves ego. It involves the perception of self. And so since you have now been chosen to be part of an elite organisation, well, thereโ€™s no better ego stroke in the world, is there? You have been chosen to be among the high and the mighty.โ€™ -Prof. Richard Spence joins us on Mondayโ€™s Going Underground for a deep dive on the secret societies controlling the West Donโ€™t miss it, follow our Rumble channel, link below in the replies๐Ÿ‘‡

Going Underground

51,638 gรถrรผntรผleme โ€ข 7 ay รถnce

Warren Buffett: "It is a different game that requires a different type of person to enjoy it." At 94 years old, Warren Buffett has a clear preference when it comes to investing, and it's not real estate. When asked about real estate versus stocks, Buffett argues the stock market wins on almost every practical dimension. "There is simply much more opportunity in the United States security market than in real estate." His reasoning comes down to three things: speed, simplicity, and certainty of completion. In stocks, you can execute billions of dollars worth of business anonymously in five minutes, and once the trade is done, it's done. The completion rate is essentially 100% once buyer and seller agree on price. Real estate is the opposite. You're dealing with a single owner or family that may have held a property for a long time, possibly borrowed too much against it, or is facing negative trends. Every transaction becomes an enormous, drawn-out decision. "In real estate, signing the deal is just the start of another phase where people negotiate more and more things." Buffett contrasts this with the stock market: "If someone needs to sell 20,000 shares of Berkshire and the price is right, it is done in five seconds and closes every time." His late partner Charlie Munger took a different view. Munger enjoyed real estate deals and continued doing them even in the last five years of his life. But Buffett says that if Munger had to choose exclusively between the two at age 21, even he would have chosen stocks. For Buffett, the conclusion is simple: "We find it much better when people are ready to pick up the phone and you can do hundreds of millions of dollars of business in a day. I have been spoiled by this efficiency, and I like being spoiled, so we will keep it that way." Real estate can produce great returns, but the friction involved in negotiations, multiple parties, and drawn-out timelines makes it a fundamentally different game. For most investors, the stock market offers far more opportunity with far less complexity.

Big Brain Investing

42,809 gรถrรผntรผleme โ€ข 3 ay รถnce

๐Ÿ“ข Week 2 of โ€˜Real Assets, Real Impactโ€™ is here!!! ๐ŸŽ ONE WEEK ONLY - Win $250 of $CTC by completing daily missions and learning how #Creditcoin is transforming #RWA! ๐ŸŽ“ This week's topic: Creditcoin's real-world impact ๐Ÿช– Mission 1: At the end of this tweet Let's dive in ๐Ÿ‘‰ Itโ€™s our second installment and this time around, weโ€™re diving deeper into what real impact actually looks like with the help of a first-hand account from Ola and his family ๐Ÿ‘ช โ€“ check out the video to see for yourselfโ€ฆ ๐Ÿ“š Stories like this highlight the difference that organizations like Aella MFB bank, powered by the Creditcoin network, can make to the people and local communities that need it most. By extending credit and financial services to the 1.4 billion unbanked and underbanked in emerging markets across the globe, we humbly help real people by improving the countriesโ€™ economic systems. Whether itโ€™s a payment terminal to level up operations for a small business owner or a loan to fund growth at a promising startup, together, Creditcoin and the fintech lenders it supports are working hard to turn technology into what matters most โ€“ real impact on real lives. ๐Ÿ’ช Weโ€™re incredibly proud to be a key part of servicing unbanked communities. For Creditcoin ๐Ÿง, unbanked is not just a buzzword โ€“ itโ€™s a mission. Then, we complete the #RWA ecosystem by connecting TradFi and #DeFi investors to fintech lenders like Aella using our blockchain technology and the Gluwa platform. By doing so, we help everyday investors earn yield from opportunities typically reserved for high-net-worth individuals and financial institutions. Retail investors earn higher than the industry average yield โ†’ Fintech lenders gain access to more liquidity โ†’ Individuals in unbanked countries gain access to more capital. Now thatโ€™s what we call Real World Impact ๐Ÿฅณ ๐Ÿช– For todayโ€™s mission, simply watch the video, then Like & Retweet + Follow Creditcoin ๐Ÿง - simple!

Creditcoin ๐Ÿง

12,929 gรถrรผntรผleme โ€ข 3 yฤฑl รถnce

Koinos 101: Mana Do you think the internet would have taken off if you had to pay just 1 cent to visit a website? That's why we invented the Mana system which makes Koinos ... the first and only free-to-use blockchain. Owning the network Itโ€™s natural to think that holding a token like ETH, BTC, or SOL makes you an owner of those platforms, but if you were an owner, you would have a right to use those platforms forever. But you don't have that right. You only have the โ€œrightโ€ to spend those tokens down as you use the network, which isnโ€™t much of a right at all. On Koinos, the KOIN token works exactly like you think it would! Holding KOIN gives you a perpetual right to use the network, thanks to the Mana system. The more KOIN you hold, the more free usage, forever. Simple. Every KOIN token contains 1 Mana. When you use the blockchain, some of your Mana is consumed, but it regenerates in 5 days and if you only use a small percentage of your Mana it can regenerate in as little as a few minutes! Frictionless Access Mana can also be shared with people who have no tokens at all, which is what enables Koinos to deliver that familiar free-to-use experience that we get from the internet, and without forcing developers to pay the fees, because remember there are no fees. For the first time ever... developers can onboard users and allow them to the use the blockchain without first making them jump through the hoops of understanding and buying a cryptocurrency which is going to weed out the vast majority of mainstream users. Thatโ€™s why we donโ€™t have mainstream adoption! In short, KOIN has real utility; it gives you ownership over a certain amount of the networkโ€™s resources, a right which you can share with others. Koinos doesnโ€™t force you to pay ever-changing fees all the time and it does all of this while preventing people from abusing the network. Be Free Because you never have to part with your KOIN which gives you the right to a certain amount of the networkโ€™s resources, this frees you, and every other KOIN holder, to focus on what matters; adding utility and making Koinos an even greater force for good. You can learn more about Koinos at and

KoinosGroup ๐Ÿ”ฎ

337,616 gรถrรผntรผleme โ€ข 2 yฤฑl รถnce

Pedro Franceschi explains why Brex doesnโ€™t hire โ€œpeople managersโ€ anymore One day Brex founder Pedro Franceschi made a list of all of the leaders at the company who worked and didnโ€™t work. โ€œI was trying to find what was predictive of leadership success,โ€ he explains. โ€œA lot of things are important, but theyโ€™re not predictive. For example, being customer obsessed is important, but there are people who were customer obsessed who were on both sides of the list.โ€ The only trait that Pedro found to be predictive of leadership success at Brex was what he calls โ€œthe ability to operate at all levelsโ€ โ€” someone who even at the highest levels of leadership has a deep understanding of the details of execution at the individual contributor level. What this means in practice is a CTO who is actually a great engineer. A Head of Design who can actually design amazing products. And a great Head of Sales who can actually go and close deals themselves if they need to. โ€œIt doesnโ€™t mean that theyโ€™re going to do that all the time,โ€ Pedro explains, โ€œBut it means that they know the nuances of what makes someone great at the craftโ€ฆ If you donโ€™t know how to identify greatness because you donโ€™t know what the bar is yourself, thereโ€™s no way to build a team thatโ€™s great.โ€ He continues: โ€œA lot of companies develop this role over time that people call a โ€˜people manager.โ€™ Theyโ€™re Director of Engineering but they canโ€™t really code because they manage people nowโ€ฆ And that concept is just something we eliminated. At the end of the day, thereโ€™s no way to manage people divorced from the work โ€” youโ€™re managing the work itself.โ€ Pedro uses Jony Ive as an example: โ€œJony Ive wasnโ€™t managing the team that designed the iPhone. He was designing the iPhone with a group of people. Itโ€™s simple, but it is a very profound change in how you orient your relationship with the work and what you put out there in the world. And I think you have to select for people who appreciate the actual output of the work and the work itself, not the process of doing the workโ€ฆ What matters is: Do you know what great looks like? Can you do it yourself? And can you bring people along with a really high bar for doing it at all level.โ€ Video source: Kleiner Perkins (2025)

Startup Archive

45,584 gรถrรผntรผleme โ€ข 1 yฤฑl รถnce

Angelina Jolie Has Finally Woken Up To The Fact The United Nations & Governments Are Run By Heartless Criminals Thereโ€™s No Accountability For Crimes โ€œIf Thereโ€™s A Business Interest Involvedโ€ โ€œThat is the biggest that is the most disheartening thing of I think we we or I thought at least even 20 years ago when I started to work internationally that there was this I in my head, some weird idea of good guys. You know? Some idea of those whether it be certain countries or certain people's maybe it was this holdover from World War 2 and this thought that this was, like so that the lines were clear and that there was going to be these human rights goals laid out and that there would be things stood up for, and that if these things weren't done, there would be pushback, and these were the and I really thought that's what it was. I even thought that's what the United Nations wasโ€ฆ And I thought, okay. There's a there's some lines in the sand. There's some understanding. We're gonna grow and fight for improvements in these areas. And and to watch to watch and understand more and more how it's just simply that's not what it is. That's not the world. The world is not these are human rights. It is these are human rights sometimes for these people, maybe sometimes for these people, never for these people. Yeah. It's food aid, 6% for these people, 50% for these people, it's justice for these people, but not these people. Accountability for this crime, but not that crime if there's business interest. And this is truly the ugly state of of so much of the world that we are just becoming more and more aware of for just about every I mean, I don't know any countries that are are clean of it and, um, and willing to hold a line really consistently hand on behalf of the of human rights and lawsโ€

Wall Street Apes

658,860 gรถrรผntรผleme โ€ข 2 yฤฑl รถnce