Video yรผkleniyor...

Video Yรผklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dรถn

๐Ÿ—ฃ๏ธ"๐—ช๐—ต๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ ๐—ฐ๐—ผ๐˜‚๐—น๐—ฑ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ถ๐˜€ ๐—ด๐—ผ? ๐—ง๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐˜€๐—ธ๐˜†'๐˜€ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—น๐—ถ๐—บ๐—ถ๐˜" ๐ŸŽค Peter Citera confirms Championship Darts Corporation Major moves to Canada | US Darts Masters clashing with England 3-year PDC extension Finding the US Luke Littler More opportunities for North America Listen now ๐ŸŽฅ ๐Ÿ‘‰๐Ÿป

OfficialOLDarts's profile picture

Online Darts

27,368 subscribers

10,771 gรถrรผntรผleme โ€ข 6 ay รถnce โ€ขvia X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossiโ€ข Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gรถnderinin yorumlarฤฑ burada gรถrรผnecek

Benzer Videolar

๐Ÿ—ฃ๏ธ "Of course they'll change the rules. Why wouldn't they? You have to protect your product. The product is the elite. The Players Championships, the UK Open - it's driven by the elite being there, the elite competing." ๐ŸŽค Wayne Mardle believes the PDC will eventually have to change the rules if the sport's biggest stars begin missing major TV events, despite wanting Luke Littler to chase even more history ๐ŸŽฏ๐Ÿ”ฅ Hawaii 501 says the game's elite are vital to the success of tournaments and predicts the governing body will act to protect its biggest assets in the future. Do you agree with Mardle? ๐Ÿค”๐Ÿ‘‡ Listen in full now ๐ŸŽฅ๐Ÿ‘‡๐Ÿป #Darts #LukeLittler #WayneMardle
2:09

๐Ÿ—ฃ๏ธ "Of course they'll change the rules. Why wouldn't they? You have to protect your product. The product is the elite. The Players Championships, the UK Open - it's driven by the elite being there, the elite competing." ๐ŸŽค Wayne Mardle believes the PDC will eventually have to change the rules if the sport's biggest stars begin missing major TV events, despite wanting Luke Littler to chase even more history ๐ŸŽฏ๐Ÿ”ฅ Hawaii 501 says the game's elite are vital to the success of tournaments and predicts the governing body will act to protect its biggest assets in the future. Do you agree with Mardle? ๐Ÿค”๐Ÿ‘‡ Listen in full now ๐ŸŽฅ๐Ÿ‘‡๐Ÿป #Darts #LukeLittler #WayneMardle

Online Darts

113,871 gรถrรผntรผleme โ€ข 14 gรผn รถnce

The Yale professor who accurately predicted the entire Iran war just said World War III is about to start with 90% certainty. He explained exactly how it starts, who triggers it, and why NOBODY can stop it. Professor Jiang made 3 predictions in 2024 that all came true: 1. Trump would win the election 2. He would start a war with Iran 3. The US would lose that war Now he has made 8 NEW predictions and every single one is terrifying... The war in Iran was never about Iran. It was about saving the US dollar. America's empire runs on the petrodollar where every country must use dollars to buy oil. But when America froze $200 billion in Russian assets after Ukraine, it told the world the dollar is a political weapon. So Russia, China, and Iran started building a trade bloc to ditch the dollar entirely. These 3 countries cover the entire Asian continent and can build railways connecting their economies while cutting America out. Trump's plan was to bomb Iran's leadership and watch them surrender like Venezuela did in January. But Iran is a mountain fortress with 92 million people and 31 independent armies across 31 provinces each designed so no single strike can wipe them out. 6 weeks in, decapitation failed. Iran closed the Strait of Hormuz, attacked US bases across the Gulf, and started charging ships $2 million per crossing to fund their war. And here's where it becomes a world war... Russia's grand strategy is the Third Rome doctrine. If Iran falls, Russia's southern border is exposed and both Russia's trade corridor and China's Belt and Road run directly through Iranian territory. Losing Iran means permanently losing access to the Middle East and Africa. So Russia enters the war. When Russia enters, China follows. They reinforce Tehran from east and north, provide financing, and Russia puts Iran under its nuclear umbrella taking tactical nukes completely off the table. Professor Jiang put the probability at 80 to 90%. And while the world watches the Middle East, North Korea is making its move: The US pulled THAAD missile defense out of South Korea for Iran operations. Seoul sits 20 minutes of artillery from the North Korean border with 25 million people exposed. North Korea doesn't even NEED to attack. They just threaten. South Koreans are rich with everything to lose. North Koreans have nothing to lose. Simple extortion. Nobody is coming to help because America is stuck in the Middle East. But the prediction that will BREAK the internet is this one: Trump gets a THIRD term. Professor Jiang laid out two constitutional loopholes. First is Trump runs as VP under Don Jr. or Vance, they win, the president steps down, Trump takes over through succession. The 22nd Amendment bans being elected president more than twice but says nothing about becoming president through succession. The second option is even simpler: By 2028 America is at war on multiple fronts with a draft in effect so Trump invokes emergency war powers and delays the election just like Zelensky did in Ukraine. And the draft is already real. Automatic registration starts in December. Males 18 to 24 are entered into the system automatically. The Department of War literally PUBLISHED the playbook online: - Secure the Western Hemisphere as US territory which explains Greenland, Canada, Venezuela, Cuba, Panama - Force NATO to fight Russia - Strangle China through maritime choke points - Convert civilian factories into weapons production (the Pentagon already told Ford and GM to prepare to STOP making cars and start making munitions) His final advice was genuinely one of the realest things I've heard all year: We will need leaders. Not politicians or billionaires. Average people who knock on their neighbor's door during a blackout and say let us figure this out together. Because when empires collapse, and he believes America's collapses within 10 years, the people who survive built community before they needed it.
2:17

The Yale professor who accurately predicted the entire Iran war just said World War III is about to start with 90% certainty. He explained exactly how it starts, who triggers it, and why NOBODY can stop it. Professor Jiang made 3 predictions in 2024 that all came true: 1. Trump would win the election 2. He would start a war with Iran 3. The US would lose that war Now he has made 8 NEW predictions and every single one is terrifying... The war in Iran was never about Iran. It was about saving the US dollar. America's empire runs on the petrodollar where every country must use dollars to buy oil. But when America froze $200 billion in Russian assets after Ukraine, it told the world the dollar is a political weapon. So Russia, China, and Iran started building a trade bloc to ditch the dollar entirely. These 3 countries cover the entire Asian continent and can build railways connecting their economies while cutting America out. Trump's plan was to bomb Iran's leadership and watch them surrender like Venezuela did in January. But Iran is a mountain fortress with 92 million people and 31 independent armies across 31 provinces each designed so no single strike can wipe them out. 6 weeks in, decapitation failed. Iran closed the Strait of Hormuz, attacked US bases across the Gulf, and started charging ships $2 million per crossing to fund their war. And here's where it becomes a world war... Russia's grand strategy is the Third Rome doctrine. If Iran falls, Russia's southern border is exposed and both Russia's trade corridor and China's Belt and Road run directly through Iranian territory. Losing Iran means permanently losing access to the Middle East and Africa. So Russia enters the war. When Russia enters, China follows. They reinforce Tehran from east and north, provide financing, and Russia puts Iran under its nuclear umbrella taking tactical nukes completely off the table. Professor Jiang put the probability at 80 to 90%. And while the world watches the Middle East, North Korea is making its move: The US pulled THAAD missile defense out of South Korea for Iran operations. Seoul sits 20 minutes of artillery from the North Korean border with 25 million people exposed. North Korea doesn't even NEED to attack. They just threaten. South Koreans are rich with everything to lose. North Koreans have nothing to lose. Simple extortion. Nobody is coming to help because America is stuck in the Middle East. But the prediction that will BREAK the internet is this one: Trump gets a THIRD term. Professor Jiang laid out two constitutional loopholes. First is Trump runs as VP under Don Jr. or Vance, they win, the president steps down, Trump takes over through succession. The 22nd Amendment bans being elected president more than twice but says nothing about becoming president through succession. The second option is even simpler: By 2028 America is at war on multiple fronts with a draft in effect so Trump invokes emergency war powers and delays the election just like Zelensky did in Ukraine. And the draft is already real. Automatic registration starts in December. Males 18 to 24 are entered into the system automatically. The Department of War literally PUBLISHED the playbook online: - Secure the Western Hemisphere as US territory which explains Greenland, Canada, Venezuela, Cuba, Panama - Force NATO to fight Russia - Strangle China through maritime choke points - Convert civilian factories into weapons production (the Pentagon already told Ford and GM to prepare to STOP making cars and start making munitions) His final advice was genuinely one of the realest things I've heard all year: We will need leaders. Not politicians or billionaires. Average people who knock on their neighbor's door during a blackout and say let us figure this out together. Because when empires collapse, and he believes America's collapses within 10 years, the people who survive built community before they needed it.

Ricardo

923,227 gรถrรผntรผleme โ€ข 2 ay รถnce

Chocolate sold in America is going through 2 changes Almost our entire candy isle for chocolate in America will be effected by 1 of these 2 new techniques: - Lab grown chocolate - Genetically modified chocolate by gene slicing โ€œCalifornia Cultured is the startup company that's growing cocoa cells in a tank. A lot of you asked, is this just one company? No, it's the entire industryโ€ But wait till you hear what the Mars candy company's doing that's far worse in my view. Here's what every major player in the chocolate industry's doing right now - Lindt is investing in lab-grown cocoa - Mondelez, the maker of Cadbury, Oreos, and Toblerone, is investing in lab-grown cocoa butter - Barry Callebaut, the world's largest cocoa processor, is investing in cocoa cell culture Barry Callebaut isn't a name you'd recognize on a wrapper, but they supply chocolate to Hershey and Nestlรฉ under long-term contracts. When they move, half the candy aisle moves with themโ€ Hereโ€™s where things get really scary โ€œMars, the makers of M&M's, Snickers, Dove, Twix, Milky Way, Mars Bars, and Three Musketeers, among others, is doing something completely different. And this is cause for alarm in my opinion. โ€” Mars partnered with a lab at UC Berkeley where CRISPR, the gene editing technology, was developed. They're going to modify the cacao tree's genetic structure by clipping out certain genes to make them more resistant to disease and drought tolerant. This is Frankenfood. Genetically modified Frankenfood Hereโ€™s why they are doing this Global chocolate demand's rising about 3% every year. At the same time, 70% of the world's cocoa comes from West Africa, and West Africa is getting hammered by droughts, higher temperatures, and a nasty virus Pests and diseases cause yearly losses of about 30 to 40% of the total global cocoa production So major companies have decided to grow it in a lab or genetically modify the trees The question is whether the solutions they've chosen are proportionate to the risk Iโ€™d say no, absolutely not. We all know the second these things are done they will start selling it to us with no long term safety studies and no idea how it will effect our health Itโ€™s coming so be warned
2:17

Chocolate sold in America is going through 2 changes Almost our entire candy isle for chocolate in America will be effected by 1 of these 2 new techniques: - Lab grown chocolate - Genetically modified chocolate by gene slicing โ€œCalifornia Cultured is the startup company that's growing cocoa cells in a tank. A lot of you asked, is this just one company? No, it's the entire industryโ€ But wait till you hear what the Mars candy company's doing that's far worse in my view. Here's what every major player in the chocolate industry's doing right now - Lindt is investing in lab-grown cocoa - Mondelez, the maker of Cadbury, Oreos, and Toblerone, is investing in lab-grown cocoa butter - Barry Callebaut, the world's largest cocoa processor, is investing in cocoa cell culture Barry Callebaut isn't a name you'd recognize on a wrapper, but they supply chocolate to Hershey and Nestlรฉ under long-term contracts. When they move, half the candy aisle moves with themโ€ Hereโ€™s where things get really scary โ€œMars, the makers of M&M's, Snickers, Dove, Twix, Milky Way, Mars Bars, and Three Musketeers, among others, is doing something completely different. And this is cause for alarm in my opinion. โ€” Mars partnered with a lab at UC Berkeley where CRISPR, the gene editing technology, was developed. They're going to modify the cacao tree's genetic structure by clipping out certain genes to make them more resistant to disease and drought tolerant. This is Frankenfood. Genetically modified Frankenfood Hereโ€™s why they are doing this Global chocolate demand's rising about 3% every year. At the same time, 70% of the world's cocoa comes from West Africa, and West Africa is getting hammered by droughts, higher temperatures, and a nasty virus Pests and diseases cause yearly losses of about 30 to 40% of the total global cocoa production So major companies have decided to grow it in a lab or genetically modify the trees The question is whether the solutions they've chosen are proportionate to the risk Iโ€™d say no, absolutely not. We all know the second these things are done they will start selling it to us with no long term safety studies and no idea how it will effect our health Itโ€™s coming so be warned

Wall Street Apes

456,362 gรถrรผntรผleme โ€ข 2 ay รถnce

Suno's mission is to make it possible for everyone to make music. We imagine a future where music is a bigger, more valuable, and more meaningful part of people's lives than it even is today. Technology enables a future where the whole world can explore, create, and be active participants in an art form most have only ever consumed. From professional musicians seeking inspiration to friends and family writing songs for each other, we are exploring new ways to create, listen to, and experience music. So far, more than 12 million people are engaging with music in new ways that wouldn't be possible without Suno. We see this as early but promising progress. Major record labels see this vision as a threat to their business. Each and every time there's been innovation in music โ€” from the earliest forms of recorded music, to sampling, to drum machines, to remixing, MP3s, and streaming music โ€” the record labels have attempted to limit progress. They have spent decades attempting to control the terms of how we create and enjoy music, and this time is no different. So, it is perhaps not a surprise that on June 24th, members of the Recording Industry Association of America, which represents the major record labels, filed a lawsuit against Suno, alleging that the data used in training our music generation technologies infringed on the copyrights of the major record labels that they represent. This lawsuit is fundamentally flawed on both the facts and the law, and is nothing more than yet another instance where they chose litigation over innovation. For starters, the major record labels clearly hold misconceptions about how our technology works. Suno helps people create music through a similar process to one humans have used forever: by learning styles, patterns, and forms (in essence, the "grammar" or music), and then inventing new music around them. The major record labels are trying to argue that neural networks are mere parrots โ€” copying and repeating โ€” when in reality model training looks a lot more like a kid learning to write new rock songs by listening religiously to rock music. Like that kid, Suno gets better the more our AI learns. We train our models on medium- and high-quality music we can find on the open internet โ€” just as Google's Gemini, Microsoft's Copilot, Anthropic's Claude, OpenAI's ChatGPT, and even Apple's new Apple Intelligence train their models on the open internet. Much of the open internet indeed contains copyrighted materials, and some of it is owned by major record labels. But, just like the kid writing their own rock songs after listening to the genre โ€” or a teacher or a journalist reviewing existing materials to draw new insights โ€” learning is not infringing. It never has been, and it is not now. The timing of this lawsuit was somewhat surprising. When this lawsuit landed, Suno was, in fact, having productive discussions with a number of the RIAA's major record label members to find ways of expanding the pie for music together. We did so not because we had to, but because we believe that the music industry could help us lead this expansion of opportunity for everyone, rather than resisting it. Whether this lawsuit is the result of over-eager lawyers throwing their weight around, or a conscious strategy to gain leverage in our commercial discussions, we believe that this lawsuit is an unnecessary impediment to a larger and more valuable future for music. This is particularly the case because Suno is a new kind of musical instrument, one that enables a new kind of creative process for everyone and opens new business opportunities for the industry. Suno is designed for original music, and we prize originality, both in how we build our product and in how people use it. People who use Suno are using the product to create their own, original music. They are not trying to recreate an existing song that can be heard somewhere else on the internet for free. But, even if they were trying to copy existing music, we have myriad controls in place to encourage originality and prevent duplicative use cases. We do so more aggressively than any other company in the industry, including other startups. Some of our originality-guarding features include checking for and preventing copyrighted content in audio uploads, and disallowing artist-based descriptions in requests to generate music. Why do we work to encourage originality? We do this because it makes for a more fun and engaging experience to create entirely original compositions on Suno. We do it because we think it makes Suno incredibly valuable to be a place where new musical talent can shine. AI allows anyone to realize the songs in their head, regardless of the money, equipment, or connections that they have. The future is an explosion of new artists that are creating music in new ways, building fan bases, finding new reasons to smile, and getting famous. We hope that the major record labels realize that we can build a stronger foundation for the music industry of tomorrow, together. With or without them, we will continue pursuing our mission on behalf of the many millions of music fans already creating with Suno, and all those who will in the coming months. We are excited and humbled to support this next generation of musicians and the music they create. --- ๐ŸŽฅ: shing86 jams with Suno
0:28

Suno's mission is to make it possible for everyone to make music. We imagine a future where music is a bigger, more valuable, and more meaningful part of people's lives than it even is today. Technology enables a future where the whole world can explore, create, and be active participants in an art form most have only ever consumed. From professional musicians seeking inspiration to friends and family writing songs for each other, we are exploring new ways to create, listen to, and experience music. So far, more than 12 million people are engaging with music in new ways that wouldn't be possible without Suno. We see this as early but promising progress. Major record labels see this vision as a threat to their business. Each and every time there's been innovation in music โ€” from the earliest forms of recorded music, to sampling, to drum machines, to remixing, MP3s, and streaming music โ€” the record labels have attempted to limit progress. They have spent decades attempting to control the terms of how we create and enjoy music, and this time is no different. So, it is perhaps not a surprise that on June 24th, members of the Recording Industry Association of America, which represents the major record labels, filed a lawsuit against Suno, alleging that the data used in training our music generation technologies infringed on the copyrights of the major record labels that they represent. This lawsuit is fundamentally flawed on both the facts and the law, and is nothing more than yet another instance where they chose litigation over innovation. For starters, the major record labels clearly hold misconceptions about how our technology works. Suno helps people create music through a similar process to one humans have used forever: by learning styles, patterns, and forms (in essence, the "grammar" or music), and then inventing new music around them. The major record labels are trying to argue that neural networks are mere parrots โ€” copying and repeating โ€” when in reality model training looks a lot more like a kid learning to write new rock songs by listening religiously to rock music. Like that kid, Suno gets better the more our AI learns. We train our models on medium- and high-quality music we can find on the open internet โ€” just as Google's Gemini, Microsoft's Copilot, Anthropic's Claude, OpenAI's ChatGPT, and even Apple's new Apple Intelligence train their models on the open internet. Much of the open internet indeed contains copyrighted materials, and some of it is owned by major record labels. But, just like the kid writing their own rock songs after listening to the genre โ€” or a teacher or a journalist reviewing existing materials to draw new insights โ€” learning is not infringing. It never has been, and it is not now. The timing of this lawsuit was somewhat surprising. When this lawsuit landed, Suno was, in fact, having productive discussions with a number of the RIAA's major record label members to find ways of expanding the pie for music together. We did so not because we had to, but because we believe that the music industry could help us lead this expansion of opportunity for everyone, rather than resisting it. Whether this lawsuit is the result of over-eager lawyers throwing their weight around, or a conscious strategy to gain leverage in our commercial discussions, we believe that this lawsuit is an unnecessary impediment to a larger and more valuable future for music. This is particularly the case because Suno is a new kind of musical instrument, one that enables a new kind of creative process for everyone and opens new business opportunities for the industry. Suno is designed for original music, and we prize originality, both in how we build our product and in how people use it. People who use Suno are using the product to create their own, original music. They are not trying to recreate an existing song that can be heard somewhere else on the internet for free. But, even if they were trying to copy existing music, we have myriad controls in place to encourage originality and prevent duplicative use cases. We do so more aggressively than any other company in the industry, including other startups. Some of our originality-guarding features include checking for and preventing copyrighted content in audio uploads, and disallowing artist-based descriptions in requests to generate music. Why do we work to encourage originality? We do this because it makes for a more fun and engaging experience to create entirely original compositions on Suno. We do it because we think it makes Suno incredibly valuable to be a place where new musical talent can shine. AI allows anyone to realize the songs in their head, regardless of the money, equipment, or connections that they have. The future is an explosion of new artists that are creating music in new ways, building fan bases, finding new reasons to smile, and getting famous. We hope that the major record labels realize that we can build a stronger foundation for the music industry of tomorrow, together. With or without them, we will continue pursuing our mission on behalf of the many millions of music fans already creating with Suno, and all those who will in the coming months. We are excited and humbled to support this next generation of musicians and the music they create. --- ๐ŸŽฅ: shing86 jams with Suno

Suno

46,808 gรถrรผntรผleme โ€ข 1 yฤฑl รถnce

Keep a 40,000 ft view TRUST THE PLAN white hats, Q, Military have been working hard for years to hit the military markers. Here is proof we are winning ๐Ÿฅ‡ ๐Ÿ† ๐Ÿ•Š๏ธ here is the list of markers we have hit so far ๐Ÿ’ฏ Start smiling ๐Ÿ˜๐Ÿฅณ ๐Ÿ’ฅ 1999 the US Corporation was going bankrupt ๐Ÿ’ฅRussel Jay Gould renewed title 4 sections 1,2 & 3 US Flag ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ under new republic not under maritime law ๐Ÿ’ฅHarvey weistein - crimes against children, money laundering - arrested - rolled on all Hollywood ๐Ÿ’ฅQueen of England - crimes against children, money laundering - dead ๐Ÿ’€ ๐Ÿ’ฅMother Teresa - head of Clinton foundation orphanage in Washington DC - dead ๐Ÿ’€ ๐Ÿ’ฅNotradam cathedral rods of God - satanic site ๐Ÿ’ฅTrump won 2016 presidential election - beat Killery !!! ๐Ÿ’ฅ2017 Most epic inauguration ever in history - military stood on stage giving power back to we the people ๐Ÿ’ฅLord Jacob Rothschild dead - manipulated many nations Fed Reserve, funneled IRS money to Rothschild family ๐Ÿ’ฅSaudi Princeโ€™s taken out in Vegas - crimes against humanity & head of cabal finance / Saudi oil money ๐Ÿ’ฅTrump world tour - Trump made peace in the Middle East, Trump shook hands with Kim Jong Un of North Korea ๐Ÿ’ฅWhite hats flip Hollywood, take down corrupt film studios and create good white hat film studios: Angel studios, Flynn productions, white rabbit productions, Flynn construction co. ๐Ÿ’ฅEpstein arrested & suicided ๐Ÿ’ฅGislaine Maxwell arrested ๐Ÿ’ฅROE VS WADE over turned ๐Ÿ’ฅGeorgia Guide stones - satanic site displaying cabal plan to kill 80% of humanity - destroyed- rods of God ๐Ÿ’ฅEvergiven barge stuck in Suez Canal - with satellites - special forces infiltrated ๐Ÿ’ฅ2020 election hack - it was a trap, biden won fake president, gets locked out of White House on Inauguration Day ๐Ÿ’ฅThe biden with draws from running in the 2024 presidential campaign ๐Ÿ’ฅMike lynch - he assisted in transactions for Epstein - trapped on a yacht and used as tornado target practice, never to be seen again - dead ๐Ÿ’€ ๐Ÿ’ฅWells Fargo Executive jumps to his death ๐Ÿ’€ ๐Ÿ’ฅJulian Assange set free ๐Ÿ•Š๏ธ he created wiki leaks, he told us the real news the mainstream media would not tell us. ๐Ÿ’ฅPeter Navarro set free - helped Trump on reducing us trade deficits & holding nations accountable for currency manipulation - set free from cabal capture & torture ๐Ÿ•Š๏ธ ๐Ÿ’ฅFrancis Scott key bridge taken out - shipping port used for human trafficking ๐Ÿ’ฅTrump assassination attempt - Trump survives like a champ - exposing it was an inside job - leading to exposure of Kennedy assassinations ๐Ÿ’ฅPhil drops major intel - tells you Q phones are real & we already have the Q phones! ๐Ÿ’ฅElon launches space X satellites - demonstrating Q phones are real & activates hurricane victims phones linking to Quantum Space X satellites, giving them free Internet from any location. ๐Ÿ’ฅRFK JR runs for 2024 president ๐Ÿ’ฅRFK JR drops out of 2024 presidential campaign and endorses Trump. Kennedy's are back & have alliance with Trump, Q and Military ๐Ÿ’ฅFauci catches west Nile - he bio engineered it himself ๐Ÿ’ฅGoogle moves from San Francisco to Austin, TX ๐Ÿ’ฅVatican announces they are on the verge of bankruptcy ๐Ÿ’ฅTrump wins 2024 presidential election๐Ÿฅ‡ ๐Ÿ† ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ ๐Ÿ’ฅKamala looses 2024 presidential election๐Ÿ’€ ๐Ÿ’ฅEllen moves out of US to Europe - byyyyeeeee ๐Ÿ‘‹๐Ÿผ โœŒ๐Ÿผ ๐Ÿ’ฅBRICS world alliance grows - crash fiat cabal money - individual states signing on ๐Ÿ’ฅBiden pardons son Hunter - POTUS opens the door of all doors Q post 167 ๐Ÿ’ฅRussel Jay Gould withdrew title 4 sections 1,2 & 3 US Flag ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ from UN ๐Ÿ’ฅThe CEO of the largest health care company in the United States gets assassinated. (United Health Care) Omen that the Health Care industry is going down ๐Ÿ’ฅBasil 4 compliance deadline in January 2025 - all banks have to prove the money they say they have is backed by gold in their vault. A REQUIRED MONTHLY TEST - 269 (Sara Hopps EBS TV message) Sara Hopps THREE HUNDRED SIXTY FIVE - 269 (Q post 365 โ€œFIND THE MARKERS. DARKNESS. SHUTDOWN. FOX THREE.โ€ FOX THREE = 101 Qpost 101) TWO THOUSAND SEVENTEEN - 269 RACE TO TWENTY THIRTY - 269 Patriot Princess 777
8:46

Keep a 40,000 ft view TRUST THE PLAN white hats, Q, Military have been working hard for years to hit the military markers. Here is proof we are winning ๐Ÿฅ‡ ๐Ÿ† ๐Ÿ•Š๏ธ here is the list of markers we have hit so far ๐Ÿ’ฏ Start smiling ๐Ÿ˜๐Ÿฅณ ๐Ÿ’ฅ 1999 the US Corporation was going bankrupt ๐Ÿ’ฅRussel Jay Gould renewed title 4 sections 1,2 & 3 US Flag ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ under new republic not under maritime law ๐Ÿ’ฅHarvey weistein - crimes against children, money laundering - arrested - rolled on all Hollywood ๐Ÿ’ฅQueen of England - crimes against children, money laundering - dead ๐Ÿ’€ ๐Ÿ’ฅMother Teresa - head of Clinton foundation orphanage in Washington DC - dead ๐Ÿ’€ ๐Ÿ’ฅNotradam cathedral rods of God - satanic site ๐Ÿ’ฅTrump won 2016 presidential election - beat Killery !!! ๐Ÿ’ฅ2017 Most epic inauguration ever in history - military stood on stage giving power back to we the people ๐Ÿ’ฅLord Jacob Rothschild dead - manipulated many nations Fed Reserve, funneled IRS money to Rothschild family ๐Ÿ’ฅSaudi Princeโ€™s taken out in Vegas - crimes against humanity & head of cabal finance / Saudi oil money ๐Ÿ’ฅTrump world tour - Trump made peace in the Middle East, Trump shook hands with Kim Jong Un of North Korea ๐Ÿ’ฅWhite hats flip Hollywood, take down corrupt film studios and create good white hat film studios: Angel studios, Flynn productions, white rabbit productions, Flynn construction co. ๐Ÿ’ฅEpstein arrested & suicided ๐Ÿ’ฅGislaine Maxwell arrested ๐Ÿ’ฅROE VS WADE over turned ๐Ÿ’ฅGeorgia Guide stones - satanic site displaying cabal plan to kill 80% of humanity - destroyed- rods of God ๐Ÿ’ฅEvergiven barge stuck in Suez Canal - with satellites - special forces infiltrated ๐Ÿ’ฅ2020 election hack - it was a trap, biden won fake president, gets locked out of White House on Inauguration Day ๐Ÿ’ฅThe biden with draws from running in the 2024 presidential campaign ๐Ÿ’ฅMike lynch - he assisted in transactions for Epstein - trapped on a yacht and used as tornado target practice, never to be seen again - dead ๐Ÿ’€ ๐Ÿ’ฅWells Fargo Executive jumps to his death ๐Ÿ’€ ๐Ÿ’ฅJulian Assange set free ๐Ÿ•Š๏ธ he created wiki leaks, he told us the real news the mainstream media would not tell us. ๐Ÿ’ฅPeter Navarro set free - helped Trump on reducing us trade deficits & holding nations accountable for currency manipulation - set free from cabal capture & torture ๐Ÿ•Š๏ธ ๐Ÿ’ฅFrancis Scott key bridge taken out - shipping port used for human trafficking ๐Ÿ’ฅTrump assassination attempt - Trump survives like a champ - exposing it was an inside job - leading to exposure of Kennedy assassinations ๐Ÿ’ฅPhil drops major intel - tells you Q phones are real & we already have the Q phones! ๐Ÿ’ฅElon launches space X satellites - demonstrating Q phones are real & activates hurricane victims phones linking to Quantum Space X satellites, giving them free Internet from any location. ๐Ÿ’ฅRFK JR runs for 2024 president ๐Ÿ’ฅRFK JR drops out of 2024 presidential campaign and endorses Trump. Kennedy's are back & have alliance with Trump, Q and Military ๐Ÿ’ฅFauci catches west Nile - he bio engineered it himself ๐Ÿ’ฅGoogle moves from San Francisco to Austin, TX ๐Ÿ’ฅVatican announces they are on the verge of bankruptcy ๐Ÿ’ฅTrump wins 2024 presidential election๐Ÿฅ‡ ๐Ÿ† ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ ๐Ÿ’ฅKamala looses 2024 presidential election๐Ÿ’€ ๐Ÿ’ฅEllen moves out of US to Europe - byyyyeeeee ๐Ÿ‘‹๐Ÿผ โœŒ๐Ÿผ ๐Ÿ’ฅBRICS world alliance grows - crash fiat cabal money - individual states signing on ๐Ÿ’ฅBiden pardons son Hunter - POTUS opens the door of all doors Q post 167 ๐Ÿ’ฅRussel Jay Gould withdrew title 4 sections 1,2 & 3 US Flag ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ from UN ๐Ÿ’ฅThe CEO of the largest health care company in the United States gets assassinated. (United Health Care) Omen that the Health Care industry is going down ๐Ÿ’ฅBasil 4 compliance deadline in January 2025 - all banks have to prove the money they say they have is backed by gold in their vault. A REQUIRED MONTHLY TEST - 269 (Sara Hopps EBS TV message) Sara Hopps THREE HUNDRED SIXTY FIVE - 269 (Q post 365 โ€œFIND THE MARKERS. DARKNESS. SHUTDOWN. FOX THREE.โ€ FOX THREE = 101 Qpost 101) TWO THOUSAND SEVENTEEN - 269 RACE TO TWENTY THIRTY - 269 Patriot Princess 777

Jack Straw

93,788 gรถrรผntรผleme โ€ข 1 yฤฑl รถnce

๐—ฉ๐—œ๐—–๐—ง๐—ข๐—ฅ ๐——๐—”๐—ฉ๐—œ๐—ฆ ๐—›๐—”๐—ก๐—ฆ๐—ข๐—ก: ๐Ÿฎ๐Ÿฌ๐Ÿฎ๐Ÿฒ ๐—–๐—ข๐—จ๐—Ÿ๐—— ๐—•๐—˜ ๐—ง๐—›๐—˜ ๐— ๐—ข๐—ฆ๐—ง ๐—š๐—˜๐—ข๐—ฃ๐—ข๐—Ÿ๐—œ๐—ง๐—œ๐—–๐—”๐—Ÿ๐—Ÿ๐—ฌ ๐—ฆ๐—œ๐—š๐—ก๐—œ๐—™๐—œ๐—–๐—”๐—ก๐—ง ๐—ฌ๐—˜๐—”๐—ฅ ๐—ฆ๐—œ๐—ก๐—–๐—˜ ๐—ช๐—ข๐—ฅ๐—Ÿ๐—— ๐—ช๐—”๐—ฅ ๐—œ๐—œ. VDH has been studying war and history for fifty years. When he speaks, it's worth listening carefully. His thesis: Donald Trump lit a fuse, and things are blowing up everywhere. Everyone is panicking, calling him a disruptor, a bull in a china shop. But step back and look at the full picture โ€” and you start to see something different. ๐—œ๐—ฅ๐—”๐—ก. Seven presidents in a row said they would prevent Iran from going nuclear. Seven presidents did nothing. The theocracy spent 47 years building proxy armies, funding terrorism, and accumulating the leverage to eventually hold the entire Middle East โ€” and then Europe, and then us โ€” at nuclear gunpoint. Trump bombed the nuclear facilities once. Iran kept rebuilding. Kept expanding its Russian and North Korean ballistic missile force. Kept proving that no deal, no negotiation, and no diplomatic framework was going to solve the problem. So Trump went back โ€” this time with the objective of either removing the theocracy entirely or rendering it permanently inert. That's where we are right now. ๐—ฉ๐—˜๐—ก๐—˜๐—ญ๐—จ๐—˜๐—Ÿ๐—”. Maduro is gone. A communist drug lord who propped up Cuba, spread Chavismo across Latin America, and shipped dangerous opiates into the United States โ€” removed. The new government has been told: put the oil on the world market, reform the economy, get the Chinese out, and you'll have a bright future. They're terrified of the United States. That's not a bug. That's the point. ๐—Ÿ๐—”๐—ง๐—œ๐—ก ๐—”๐— ๐—˜๐—ฅ๐—œ๐—–๐—” ๐—ฏ๐—ฟ๐—ผ๐—ฎ๐—ฑ๐—น๐˜†. Democratic revolutions in Central America. Argentina. Chile. Panama told to stop triangulating with China โ€” or lose the canal. They chose wisely. Result: China and Russia are being pushed out of the Western Hemisphere. Cuba is watching Venezuela and Iran and doing the math. No more Maduro oil. No more Russian subsidies. An economy too incompetent to survive on its own. Trump is 90 miles away and they know it. ๐—˜๐—จ๐—ฅ๐—ข๐—ฃ๐—˜ ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฑ ๐—จ๐—ž๐—ฅ๐—”๐—œ๐—ก๐—˜. VDH makes a point the media consistently buries: Trump is the one who got rid of the Wagner Group. Trump gave offensive weapons to Ukraine. Trump warned about Nord Stream. Trump got out of the arms treaty. Not Biden. Not Obama. Trump. Now he's trying to thread an impossible needle โ€” weaken Putin enough that he stops expanding into Europe, while also preventing him from being so cornered that he becomes permanently dependent on China. That's not appeasement. That's grand strategy. ๐—ง๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ฝ๐—ผ๐—น๐—ถ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ฐ๐—ฎ๐—น ๐—ฟ๐—ถ๐˜€๐—ธ ๐—ง๐—ฟ๐˜‚๐—บ๐—ฝ ๐˜๐—ผ๐—ผ๐—ธ. VDH makes a point almost nobody is making: Trump did not have to do this. The midterms are eight months away. The economy was recovering. Energy prices were low and he was bragging about them. A purely political animal does not โ€” right before midterms โ€” go into two of the world's largest oil producers and accept short-term energy disruption for long-term strategic gain. Europe was begging him not to. His own base was nervous. He did it anyway because he believed it was necessary. That's not politics. That's leadership. ๐—›๐—ฎ๐—ป๐˜€๐—ผ๐—ป'๐˜€ ๐—ฐ๐—ผ๐—ป๐—ฐ๐—น๐˜‚๐˜€๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป: If the United States ends 2026 having dismantled the Iranian theocracy, transformed Latin America, pushed China and Russia out of the Western Hemisphere, and resolved the Ukraine war on terms that don't reward aggression โ€” that achievement would make Reagan's defeat of the Soviet Union look modest by comparison. ๐˜š๐˜ต๐˜ณ๐˜ฆ๐˜ฏ๐˜จ๐˜ต๐˜ฉ ๐˜ณ๐˜ข๐˜ฅ๐˜ช๐˜ข๐˜ต๐˜ฆ๐˜ด ๐˜ง๐˜ณ๐˜ช๐˜ฆ๐˜ฏ๐˜ฅ๐˜ด๐˜ฉ๐˜ช๐˜ฑ. ๐˜ž๐˜ฆ๐˜ข๐˜ฌ๐˜ฏ๐˜ฆ๐˜ด๐˜ด ๐˜ณ๐˜ฆ๐˜ฑ๐˜ฆ๐˜ญ๐˜ด ๐˜ช๐˜ต. ๐—ช๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ฐ๐—ต ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ณ๐˜‚๐—น๐—น ๐—ฉ๐——๐—› ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฎ๐—น๐˜†๐˜€๐—ถ๐˜€. ๐—œ๐˜'๐˜€ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ฏ๐—ฒ๐˜€๐˜ ๐Ÿญ๐Ÿฌ ๐—บ๐—ถ๐—ป๐˜‚๐˜๐—ฒ๐˜€ ๐—ผ๐—ณ ๐—ด๐—ฒ๐—ผ๐—ฝ๐—ผ๐—น๐—ถ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ฐ๐—ฎ๐—น ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฎ๐—น๐˜†๐˜€๐—ถ๐˜€ ๐˜†๐—ผ๐˜‚'๐—น๐—น ๐˜€๐—ฒ๐—ฒ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ถ๐˜€ ๐˜„๐—ฒ๐—ฒ๐—ธ.
11:01

๐—ฉ๐—œ๐—–๐—ง๐—ข๐—ฅ ๐——๐—”๐—ฉ๐—œ๐—ฆ ๐—›๐—”๐—ก๐—ฆ๐—ข๐—ก: ๐Ÿฎ๐Ÿฌ๐Ÿฎ๐Ÿฒ ๐—–๐—ข๐—จ๐—Ÿ๐—— ๐—•๐—˜ ๐—ง๐—›๐—˜ ๐— ๐—ข๐—ฆ๐—ง ๐—š๐—˜๐—ข๐—ฃ๐—ข๐—Ÿ๐—œ๐—ง๐—œ๐—–๐—”๐—Ÿ๐—Ÿ๐—ฌ ๐—ฆ๐—œ๐—š๐—ก๐—œ๐—™๐—œ๐—–๐—”๐—ก๐—ง ๐—ฌ๐—˜๐—”๐—ฅ ๐—ฆ๐—œ๐—ก๐—–๐—˜ ๐—ช๐—ข๐—ฅ๐—Ÿ๐—— ๐—ช๐—”๐—ฅ ๐—œ๐—œ. VDH has been studying war and history for fifty years. When he speaks, it's worth listening carefully. His thesis: Donald Trump lit a fuse, and things are blowing up everywhere. Everyone is panicking, calling him a disruptor, a bull in a china shop. But step back and look at the full picture โ€” and you start to see something different. ๐—œ๐—ฅ๐—”๐—ก. Seven presidents in a row said they would prevent Iran from going nuclear. Seven presidents did nothing. The theocracy spent 47 years building proxy armies, funding terrorism, and accumulating the leverage to eventually hold the entire Middle East โ€” and then Europe, and then us โ€” at nuclear gunpoint. Trump bombed the nuclear facilities once. Iran kept rebuilding. Kept expanding its Russian and North Korean ballistic missile force. Kept proving that no deal, no negotiation, and no diplomatic framework was going to solve the problem. So Trump went back โ€” this time with the objective of either removing the theocracy entirely or rendering it permanently inert. That's where we are right now. ๐—ฉ๐—˜๐—ก๐—˜๐—ญ๐—จ๐—˜๐—Ÿ๐—”. Maduro is gone. A communist drug lord who propped up Cuba, spread Chavismo across Latin America, and shipped dangerous opiates into the United States โ€” removed. The new government has been told: put the oil on the world market, reform the economy, get the Chinese out, and you'll have a bright future. They're terrified of the United States. That's not a bug. That's the point. ๐—Ÿ๐—”๐—ง๐—œ๐—ก ๐—”๐— ๐—˜๐—ฅ๐—œ๐—–๐—” ๐—ฏ๐—ฟ๐—ผ๐—ฎ๐—ฑ๐—น๐˜†. Democratic revolutions in Central America. Argentina. Chile. Panama told to stop triangulating with China โ€” or lose the canal. They chose wisely. Result: China and Russia are being pushed out of the Western Hemisphere. Cuba is watching Venezuela and Iran and doing the math. No more Maduro oil. No more Russian subsidies. An economy too incompetent to survive on its own. Trump is 90 miles away and they know it. ๐—˜๐—จ๐—ฅ๐—ข๐—ฃ๐—˜ ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฑ ๐—จ๐—ž๐—ฅ๐—”๐—œ๐—ก๐—˜. VDH makes a point the media consistently buries: Trump is the one who got rid of the Wagner Group. Trump gave offensive weapons to Ukraine. Trump warned about Nord Stream. Trump got out of the arms treaty. Not Biden. Not Obama. Trump. Now he's trying to thread an impossible needle โ€” weaken Putin enough that he stops expanding into Europe, while also preventing him from being so cornered that he becomes permanently dependent on China. That's not appeasement. That's grand strategy. ๐—ง๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ฝ๐—ผ๐—น๐—ถ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ฐ๐—ฎ๐—น ๐—ฟ๐—ถ๐˜€๐—ธ ๐—ง๐—ฟ๐˜‚๐—บ๐—ฝ ๐˜๐—ผ๐—ผ๐—ธ. VDH makes a point almost nobody is making: Trump did not have to do this. The midterms are eight months away. The economy was recovering. Energy prices were low and he was bragging about them. A purely political animal does not โ€” right before midterms โ€” go into two of the world's largest oil producers and accept short-term energy disruption for long-term strategic gain. Europe was begging him not to. His own base was nervous. He did it anyway because he believed it was necessary. That's not politics. That's leadership. ๐—›๐—ฎ๐—ป๐˜€๐—ผ๐—ป'๐˜€ ๐—ฐ๐—ผ๐—ป๐—ฐ๐—น๐˜‚๐˜€๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป: If the United States ends 2026 having dismantled the Iranian theocracy, transformed Latin America, pushed China and Russia out of the Western Hemisphere, and resolved the Ukraine war on terms that don't reward aggression โ€” that achievement would make Reagan's defeat of the Soviet Union look modest by comparison. ๐˜š๐˜ต๐˜ณ๐˜ฆ๐˜ฏ๐˜จ๐˜ต๐˜ฉ ๐˜ณ๐˜ข๐˜ฅ๐˜ช๐˜ข๐˜ต๐˜ฆ๐˜ด ๐˜ง๐˜ณ๐˜ช๐˜ฆ๐˜ฏ๐˜ฅ๐˜ด๐˜ฉ๐˜ช๐˜ฑ. ๐˜ž๐˜ฆ๐˜ข๐˜ฌ๐˜ฏ๐˜ฆ๐˜ด๐˜ด ๐˜ณ๐˜ฆ๐˜ฑ๐˜ฆ๐˜ญ๐˜ด ๐˜ช๐˜ต. ๐—ช๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ฐ๐—ต ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ณ๐˜‚๐—น๐—น ๐—ฉ๐——๐—› ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฎ๐—น๐˜†๐˜€๐—ถ๐˜€. ๐—œ๐˜'๐˜€ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ฏ๐—ฒ๐˜€๐˜ ๐Ÿญ๐Ÿฌ ๐—บ๐—ถ๐—ป๐˜‚๐˜๐—ฒ๐˜€ ๐—ผ๐—ณ ๐—ด๐—ฒ๐—ผ๐—ฝ๐—ผ๐—น๐—ถ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ฐ๐—ฎ๐—น ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฎ๐—น๐˜†๐˜€๐—ถ๐˜€ ๐˜†๐—ผ๐˜‚'๐—น๐—น ๐˜€๐—ฒ๐—ฒ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ถ๐˜€ ๐˜„๐—ฒ๐—ฒ๐—ธ.

M.A. Rothman

133,616 gรถrรผntรผleme โ€ข 3 ay รถnce

Over the last decade, a consensus has grown on the Left and Right that the US needs to be more self-sufficient when it comes to manufacturing. During Covid, we discovered we didnโ€™t make much of the equipment we needed to deal with a pandemic and were thus dependent on other nations, and so Congress passed and Trump signed the CARES Act in part to spend money to support domestic manufacturing of medical supplies. In 2022, a bipartisan majority in Congress passed the CHIPS Act to bring semiconductor manufacturing back to the U.S. out of the recognition that we had become dangerously dependent on foreign nations for microchips, which have become general-purpose technologies, necessary for national security, and upon which the AI revolution will be built. Where America had a $38 billion trade surplus in 1991 on advanced technology manufacturing, today it has a $299 billion deficit. Liberals and conservatives, Leftists and Rightists, have long shared a broad agreement that manufacturing and its knock-on industries are an essential source of employment for non-college-educated working-class people, and that the loss of manufacturing contributed to social fragmentation, family breakdown, and the drug addiction and death crisis. In a 2024 survey, Americans agreed ten to one that โ€œwe need a stronger manufacturing sector; 47% said America suffered from globalization, while 33% said it benefited. It is partly for that reason that Joe Biden, in perhaps the most bipartisan and non-ideological decision of his presidency, kept in place the tariffs imposed by Donald Trump during his first term as president. And yet both liberals and many conservatives are reacting with outrage as President Donald Trump puts in place precisely the trade tariffs needed to reduce our dangerous dependency on other nations and increase our manufacturing of the goods we need for national security, economic security, and societal wellbeing. The China tariffs, the CARES Act, and the CHIPS Act did not result in the return of much manufacturing, much less the rebalancing of trade. Total manufacturing jobsare 12.8 million in December 2019 and are 12.8 million today. The US still depends on China and other nations for active pharmaceutical ingredients, personal protective equipment, microchips, and critical minerals. Suffice to say, we are a very long way from a manufacturing renaissance sufficiently robust to revitalize the communities that have lost good, high-wage jobs to China and other competitors and even rivals internationally. The reason is clear. The average tariff level globally is 6.7% compared to Americaโ€™s 2.7%. And simply subsidizing industries may not be enough for two major semiconductor manufacturers, Intel and TSMC, to produce domestically without tariffs. US President Donald Trump delivers remarks on reciprocal tariffs during an event in the Rose Garden entitled "Make America Wealthy Again" at the White House in Washington, DC, on April 2, 2025. Trump geared up to unveil sweeping new "Liberation Day" tariffs in a move that threatens to ignite a devastating global trade war. Key US trading partners including the European Union and Britain said they were preparing their responses to Trump's escalation, as nervous markets fell in Europe and America. (Photo by Brendan SMIALOWSKI / AFP) (Photo by BRENDAN SMIALOWSKI/AFP via Getty Images)๐Ÿ“ท Anti-tariff liberals and conservatives say Trumpโ€™s actions will destroy peopleโ€™s retirement savings by crashing the stock market, and will undermine the comparative advantage of other nations producing products we shouldnโ€™t. And, they say, our goal should not be to return manufacturing to the United States, except for a few exceptions, which Congress has already made. For centuries, economists have argued that some nations, such as poorer ones, are more suited to produce many products than richer ones. Americans making t-shirts at $20 per hour are less efficient than the Vietnamese making them for $3 per hour. And the US should not be trying to replace perfectly reasonable products to import, like aluminum from Canada, which we have no reason to ever go to war with, and which has access to cheap hydroelectricity to make it. Over half of American families have money in the stock market, and they will all suffer, anti-tariff liberals and conservatives say. The economic system we have had since World War II has worked to maximize win-win relationships that result in poorer nations climbing the development ladder with manufacturing and wealthier nations like the US focused on services. But itโ€™s unwise to evaluate policies based on the short-term impact of the stock market. Anti-tariff voices grossly overstate the comparative advantage when it comes to manufacturing, and the postwar system, economically and militarily, is no longer in the interests of non-college-educated Americans, who are both more vulnerable and more numerous than the college-educated elite. There is no need to bring back a significant amount of low-skill and nonstrategic manufacturing like T-shirts, and Trump has not advocated that. America may need to bring back some low-skill jobs, such as manufacturing protective gear. But our priority should rightly be high-skill manufacturing, and CARES, CHIPS, and the Trump-Biden China were, obviously, not enough. It may be fine to rely on Canada for aluminum. But the tariffs against it and Mexico, as well as Trumpโ€™s stated desire to make it the 51st state, should be viewed as the president negotiating in preparation for upcoming trade talks between the three countries. While offshoring manufacturing policies benefited multinational corporations, bankers, and consumers, they often devastated communities built on manufacturing, mining, and manual labor. US companies moved production to countries with lower labor costs, fewer regulations, and subsidized exports. Economists calculate that just the so-called โ€œChina Shock,โ€ that countryโ€™s entry into the World Trade Organization, alone cost the U.S. 2.4 million jobs and had ripple effects across entire communities. The average manufacturing wage is $103,000 per year compared to $37,000 per year for the average service sector wage. And where a service sector job supports 2 to 3 jobs, a manufacturing job supports nine jobs. Continuing with a system that is fundamentally advantageous to a minority of the country and disadvantageous to a majority is not sustainable and unwise to prop up. Trumpโ€™s trade actions are part of a broader return to nationalism underway globally, and they canโ€™t be understood on economic grounds alone. Regarding priorities, we should put the two-thirds of the country that is non-college educated working-class ahead of the 50% of the country who own stocks, for moral and democratic reasons. America is deeply divided. While there are many proximate reasons for this, including geographic sorting, cable TV, and social media, the underlying reasons are economic. The gulf between the educated elites and the non-educated working class has grown dangerously large. Many critics of the tariffs are well-intentioned. They are right to worry that they could come with significant economic costs and disruption. The concern of many of them is genuinely for the working class and poor, who higher prices for imported goods would most harm. However, many American elites today identify more with their global counterparts than their fellow Americans. And thatโ€™s a huge problem. In his study of 21 civilizations, British historian Arnold J. Toynbee found that civilizations collapse not simply from external invasion but from internal decay, precisely when their elites stop identifying with the people. โ€œCivilizations die from suicide,โ€ he famously wrote, โ€œnot murder.โ€ Civilizations all depend on their elites, Toynbee noted, or the people he called the โ€œcreative minority.โ€ But rising success creates decadence, complacency, and eventually contempt toward their people, and they start to identify with elites in other nations. This is all a natural outgrowth of trade, cosmopolitanism, and snobbery. It starts to view the ordinary people as โ€œdeplorables.โ€ At this point, the elite lose their creativity and become simply the โ€œdominant minority,โ€ one that rules no longer by example but rather by manipulation or force. Toynbee could be describing America in the 21st Century. College-educated elites look down on the American working class and identify with other professional and managerial elites in Europe and other nations. They sympathize less with the low-skilled American citizen born here and more with the low-skilled foreign migrant here illegally. Such elites are more concerned with tariffs' impact on their stock portfolio and the cost of their gadgets than they are with the downward pressure illegal migrants put on wages or with how nations manipulate their currency to retain manufacturing. Toynbee said that, at this stage of development, a nationโ€™s elites become โ€œparasites or renegades,โ€ alienated and contemptuous toward the culture that produced them. Civilizations at this late stage are morally hollow and thus fragile and prone to abuses of power, like censorship, lawfare, and the weaponization of government agencies. And these civilizations disparage their traditions in ways that the American elites have disparaged Americaโ€™s founding and its history as essentially evil, due to the unavoidable tragedy of indigenous genocide and slavery, even though a civil war that killed over 600,000 people was fought to end it. But Toynbee didnโ€™t believe that civilizational collapse was inevitable; some societies can snap back.... Please subscribe now to support Public's award-winning reporting, read the rest of the article, and watch the full video!
9:16

Over the last decade, a consensus has grown on the Left and Right that the US needs to be more self-sufficient when it comes to manufacturing. During Covid, we discovered we didnโ€™t make much of the equipment we needed to deal with a pandemic and were thus dependent on other nations, and so Congress passed and Trump signed the CARES Act in part to spend money to support domestic manufacturing of medical supplies. In 2022, a bipartisan majority in Congress passed the CHIPS Act to bring semiconductor manufacturing back to the U.S. out of the recognition that we had become dangerously dependent on foreign nations for microchips, which have become general-purpose technologies, necessary for national security, and upon which the AI revolution will be built. Where America had a $38 billion trade surplus in 1991 on advanced technology manufacturing, today it has a $299 billion deficit. Liberals and conservatives, Leftists and Rightists, have long shared a broad agreement that manufacturing and its knock-on industries are an essential source of employment for non-college-educated working-class people, and that the loss of manufacturing contributed to social fragmentation, family breakdown, and the drug addiction and death crisis. In a 2024 survey, Americans agreed ten to one that โ€œwe need a stronger manufacturing sector; 47% said America suffered from globalization, while 33% said it benefited. It is partly for that reason that Joe Biden, in perhaps the most bipartisan and non-ideological decision of his presidency, kept in place the tariffs imposed by Donald Trump during his first term as president. And yet both liberals and many conservatives are reacting with outrage as President Donald Trump puts in place precisely the trade tariffs needed to reduce our dangerous dependency on other nations and increase our manufacturing of the goods we need for national security, economic security, and societal wellbeing. The China tariffs, the CARES Act, and the CHIPS Act did not result in the return of much manufacturing, much less the rebalancing of trade. Total manufacturing jobsare 12.8 million in December 2019 and are 12.8 million today. The US still depends on China and other nations for active pharmaceutical ingredients, personal protective equipment, microchips, and critical minerals. Suffice to say, we are a very long way from a manufacturing renaissance sufficiently robust to revitalize the communities that have lost good, high-wage jobs to China and other competitors and even rivals internationally. The reason is clear. The average tariff level globally is 6.7% compared to Americaโ€™s 2.7%. And simply subsidizing industries may not be enough for two major semiconductor manufacturers, Intel and TSMC, to produce domestically without tariffs. US President Donald Trump delivers remarks on reciprocal tariffs during an event in the Rose Garden entitled "Make America Wealthy Again" at the White House in Washington, DC, on April 2, 2025. Trump geared up to unveil sweeping new "Liberation Day" tariffs in a move that threatens to ignite a devastating global trade war. Key US trading partners including the European Union and Britain said they were preparing their responses to Trump's escalation, as nervous markets fell in Europe and America. (Photo by Brendan SMIALOWSKI / AFP) (Photo by BRENDAN SMIALOWSKI/AFP via Getty Images)๐Ÿ“ท Anti-tariff liberals and conservatives say Trumpโ€™s actions will destroy peopleโ€™s retirement savings by crashing the stock market, and will undermine the comparative advantage of other nations producing products we shouldnโ€™t. And, they say, our goal should not be to return manufacturing to the United States, except for a few exceptions, which Congress has already made. For centuries, economists have argued that some nations, such as poorer ones, are more suited to produce many products than richer ones. Americans making t-shirts at $20 per hour are less efficient than the Vietnamese making them for $3 per hour. And the US should not be trying to replace perfectly reasonable products to import, like aluminum from Canada, which we have no reason to ever go to war with, and which has access to cheap hydroelectricity to make it. Over half of American families have money in the stock market, and they will all suffer, anti-tariff liberals and conservatives say. The economic system we have had since World War II has worked to maximize win-win relationships that result in poorer nations climbing the development ladder with manufacturing and wealthier nations like the US focused on services. But itโ€™s unwise to evaluate policies based on the short-term impact of the stock market. Anti-tariff voices grossly overstate the comparative advantage when it comes to manufacturing, and the postwar system, economically and militarily, is no longer in the interests of non-college-educated Americans, who are both more vulnerable and more numerous than the college-educated elite. There is no need to bring back a significant amount of low-skill and nonstrategic manufacturing like T-shirts, and Trump has not advocated that. America may need to bring back some low-skill jobs, such as manufacturing protective gear. But our priority should rightly be high-skill manufacturing, and CARES, CHIPS, and the Trump-Biden China were, obviously, not enough. It may be fine to rely on Canada for aluminum. But the tariffs against it and Mexico, as well as Trumpโ€™s stated desire to make it the 51st state, should be viewed as the president negotiating in preparation for upcoming trade talks between the three countries. While offshoring manufacturing policies benefited multinational corporations, bankers, and consumers, they often devastated communities built on manufacturing, mining, and manual labor. US companies moved production to countries with lower labor costs, fewer regulations, and subsidized exports. Economists calculate that just the so-called โ€œChina Shock,โ€ that countryโ€™s entry into the World Trade Organization, alone cost the U.S. 2.4 million jobs and had ripple effects across entire communities. The average manufacturing wage is $103,000 per year compared to $37,000 per year for the average service sector wage. And where a service sector job supports 2 to 3 jobs, a manufacturing job supports nine jobs. Continuing with a system that is fundamentally advantageous to a minority of the country and disadvantageous to a majority is not sustainable and unwise to prop up. Trumpโ€™s trade actions are part of a broader return to nationalism underway globally, and they canโ€™t be understood on economic grounds alone. Regarding priorities, we should put the two-thirds of the country that is non-college educated working-class ahead of the 50% of the country who own stocks, for moral and democratic reasons. America is deeply divided. While there are many proximate reasons for this, including geographic sorting, cable TV, and social media, the underlying reasons are economic. The gulf between the educated elites and the non-educated working class has grown dangerously large. Many critics of the tariffs are well-intentioned. They are right to worry that they could come with significant economic costs and disruption. The concern of many of them is genuinely for the working class and poor, who higher prices for imported goods would most harm. However, many American elites today identify more with their global counterparts than their fellow Americans. And thatโ€™s a huge problem. In his study of 21 civilizations, British historian Arnold J. Toynbee found that civilizations collapse not simply from external invasion but from internal decay, precisely when their elites stop identifying with the people. โ€œCivilizations die from suicide,โ€ he famously wrote, โ€œnot murder.โ€ Civilizations all depend on their elites, Toynbee noted, or the people he called the โ€œcreative minority.โ€ But rising success creates decadence, complacency, and eventually contempt toward their people, and they start to identify with elites in other nations. This is all a natural outgrowth of trade, cosmopolitanism, and snobbery. It starts to view the ordinary people as โ€œdeplorables.โ€ At this point, the elite lose their creativity and become simply the โ€œdominant minority,โ€ one that rules no longer by example but rather by manipulation or force. Toynbee could be describing America in the 21st Century. College-educated elites look down on the American working class and identify with other professional and managerial elites in Europe and other nations. They sympathize less with the low-skilled American citizen born here and more with the low-skilled foreign migrant here illegally. Such elites are more concerned with tariffs' impact on their stock portfolio and the cost of their gadgets than they are with the downward pressure illegal migrants put on wages or with how nations manipulate their currency to retain manufacturing. Toynbee said that, at this stage of development, a nationโ€™s elites become โ€œparasites or renegades,โ€ alienated and contemptuous toward the culture that produced them. Civilizations at this late stage are morally hollow and thus fragile and prone to abuses of power, like censorship, lawfare, and the weaponization of government agencies. And these civilizations disparage their traditions in ways that the American elites have disparaged Americaโ€™s founding and its history as essentially evil, due to the unavoidable tragedy of indigenous genocide and slavery, even though a civil war that killed over 600,000 people was fought to end it. But Toynbee didnโ€™t believe that civilizational collapse was inevitable; some societies can snap back.... Please subscribe now to support Public's award-winning reporting, read the rest of the article, and watch the full video!

Michael Shellenberger

56,885 gรถrรผntรผleme โ€ข 1 yฤฑl รถnce

What a year. ๐Ÿš€ 2025 was the year ChainOpera AI turned vision into real momentum: building a community-co-created, community-co-owned AI agent network and pushing the boundaries of what decentralized, collaborative intelligence can look like. ๐Ÿš€ Biggest highlights from 2025 โœ…- AI Terminal officially launched: We unveiled the ChainOpera AI Terminal as a unified gateway to decentralized AI, making it possible for anyone to interact with powerful, decentralized LLMs without technical friction. Positioned as the โ€œbrowser for the DeAI era,โ€ the AI Terminal marked a major step toward making decentralized intelligence accessible, usable, and mainstream. โœ…- AI Terminal adoption at massive scale: Momentum followed quickly. The AI Terminal surpassed 2M registered users and consistently ranked top 3 among all apps on the BNB AI DappBay, validating strong productโ€“market fit and real, sustained usage at scale. โœ…- Announcing Coco: the worldโ€™s first community-owned Super Agent: We introduced Coco, the intelligence layer that sits between users and the agent network. Coco dynamically routes each request to the most efficient, community-built agentโ€”optimizing for quality and speed while rewarding the creators behind the best-performing agents. This was a defining moment in realizing a truly community-owned intelligence layer. โœ…- From agents to a living agent network: With the launch of the Agent Social Network and Super Agent architecture, ChainOpera AI moved beyond isolated agents toward a collaborative system where humans and specialized agents coordinate, share context, and solve complex, multi-step tasks together. โœ…- $COAI breakout year: The listing of $COAI across major exchanges shocked the market, and throughout the year COAI consistently remained among the top AI-native crypto tokens by visibility, activity, and community engagement โ€“ reflecting growing confidence in the long-term vision of collaborative intelligence. โœ…- Global presence: ChainOpera AI around-the-world tour: ChainOpera AI went global in 2025, sponsoring and participating in major AI and Web3 events across North America, Europe, and Asia, including ETHDenver, Consensus Toronto, Token2049 Singapore, ETHCC, SBC, and Devcon. These global touchpoints helped us engage directly with developers, builders, investors, and partners worldwide, accelerating adoption and positioning ChainOpera AI at the center of the emerging AIxBlockchain movement. โœ…- Community momentum at scale: Community remained the heart of ChainOpera AIโ€™s growth. We successfully completed three seasons of structured community engagement, executed a widely participated community airdrop, and ran multiple ecosystem-shaping campaigns to incentivize builders, creators, and early adopters. These efforts strengthened alignment between users, developers, and the protocol, laying the foundation for a durable, community-owned AI ecosystem. โœ…- โ€œAI for Marketsโ€ taking shape: We laid critical groundwork for AI-native market intelligence, including the launch of PrediMarket Agent and multiple trading and analysis agentsโ€”early building blocks toward an AI-driven ecosystem for crypto and DeFi markets. โœ…- Building in public, with the community: Across product launches, research milestones, ecosystem discussions, and global events, we continued to build openly to bring developers, users, and partners directly into the evolution of ChainOpera AI. This year also marked the launch of the ChainOpera AI Foundation website, formally kicking off a bold Ecosystem Fund designed to empower builders, incubate high-impact projects, and accelerate the growth of a truly community-owned, collaborative AI ecosystem. To every builder, user, and supporter who helped make this year possible: THANK YOU! ๐Ÿงญ What weโ€™re excited about in the coming year ๐Ÿ”น- A Stronger, Denser Agent Economy (everyday adoption + cross-chain reach): In 2026, we are scaling the Agent Economy from growth to daily usage, with more agents, richer workflows, deeper multi-agent collaboration, and higher-impact use cases that users rely on every day. In parallel, we are expanding the agent network beyond a single ecosystem with cross-chain execution and interoperability, allowing agents to access the best liquidity, data, and opportunities wherever they exist. ๐Ÿ”น- AI Market Infrastructure Evolution: Building on PrediMarket Agent and our growing suite of trading and market-intelligence agents, we are advancing toward a mature AI market infrastructure, where agents continuously monitor, reason, simulate, optimize, and act across crypto, DeFi, and beyond. The goal is to make complex markets more accessible, more transparent, and more intelligence-driven, turning research, decision-making, and execution into a fast and reliable loop for everyday users. ๐Ÿ”น- Ecosystem Acceleration through the Foundation: With the ChainOpera AI Foundation and our Ecosystem Fund and Co-Creation Grants, we are doubling down on empowering independent builders to expand the protocol, the agent network, and the underlying infrastructure, so the community can co-create, co-own, and scale the ecosystem together. ๐Ÿ”น- Business Expansion and Market Penetration: In 2026, we will focus on expanding ChainOperaโ€™s reach through strategic partnerships, product-led growth, and new paths to monetization, bringing AI agents to a broader global user base and driving sustained adoption, engagement, and revenue, while staying aligned with community ownership and an open ecosystem. 2025 was the proof. 2026 is where it compounds. ๐Ÿ”ฅ Co-Create. Co-Own. COAI.
0:22

What a year. ๐Ÿš€ 2025 was the year ChainOpera AI turned vision into real momentum: building a community-co-created, community-co-owned AI agent network and pushing the boundaries of what decentralized, collaborative intelligence can look like. ๐Ÿš€ Biggest highlights from 2025 โœ…- AI Terminal officially launched: We unveiled the ChainOpera AI Terminal as a unified gateway to decentralized AI, making it possible for anyone to interact with powerful, decentralized LLMs without technical friction. Positioned as the โ€œbrowser for the DeAI era,โ€ the AI Terminal marked a major step toward making decentralized intelligence accessible, usable, and mainstream. โœ…- AI Terminal adoption at massive scale: Momentum followed quickly. The AI Terminal surpassed 2M registered users and consistently ranked top 3 among all apps on the BNB AI DappBay, validating strong productโ€“market fit and real, sustained usage at scale. โœ…- Announcing Coco: the worldโ€™s first community-owned Super Agent: We introduced Coco, the intelligence layer that sits between users and the agent network. Coco dynamically routes each request to the most efficient, community-built agentโ€”optimizing for quality and speed while rewarding the creators behind the best-performing agents. This was a defining moment in realizing a truly community-owned intelligence layer. โœ…- From agents to a living agent network: With the launch of the Agent Social Network and Super Agent architecture, ChainOpera AI moved beyond isolated agents toward a collaborative system where humans and specialized agents coordinate, share context, and solve complex, multi-step tasks together. โœ…- $COAI breakout year: The listing of $COAI across major exchanges shocked the market, and throughout the year COAI consistently remained among the top AI-native crypto tokens by visibility, activity, and community engagement โ€“ reflecting growing confidence in the long-term vision of collaborative intelligence. โœ…- Global presence: ChainOpera AI around-the-world tour: ChainOpera AI went global in 2025, sponsoring and participating in major AI and Web3 events across North America, Europe, and Asia, including ETHDenver, Consensus Toronto, Token2049 Singapore, ETHCC, SBC, and Devcon. These global touchpoints helped us engage directly with developers, builders, investors, and partners worldwide, accelerating adoption and positioning ChainOpera AI at the center of the emerging AIxBlockchain movement. โœ…- Community momentum at scale: Community remained the heart of ChainOpera AIโ€™s growth. We successfully completed three seasons of structured community engagement, executed a widely participated community airdrop, and ran multiple ecosystem-shaping campaigns to incentivize builders, creators, and early adopters. These efforts strengthened alignment between users, developers, and the protocol, laying the foundation for a durable, community-owned AI ecosystem. โœ…- โ€œAI for Marketsโ€ taking shape: We laid critical groundwork for AI-native market intelligence, including the launch of PrediMarket Agent and multiple trading and analysis agentsโ€”early building blocks toward an AI-driven ecosystem for crypto and DeFi markets. โœ…- Building in public, with the community: Across product launches, research milestones, ecosystem discussions, and global events, we continued to build openly to bring developers, users, and partners directly into the evolution of ChainOpera AI. This year also marked the launch of the ChainOpera AI Foundation website, formally kicking off a bold Ecosystem Fund designed to empower builders, incubate high-impact projects, and accelerate the growth of a truly community-owned, collaborative AI ecosystem. To every builder, user, and supporter who helped make this year possible: THANK YOU! ๐Ÿงญ What weโ€™re excited about in the coming year ๐Ÿ”น- A Stronger, Denser Agent Economy (everyday adoption + cross-chain reach): In 2026, we are scaling the Agent Economy from growth to daily usage, with more agents, richer workflows, deeper multi-agent collaboration, and higher-impact use cases that users rely on every day. In parallel, we are expanding the agent network beyond a single ecosystem with cross-chain execution and interoperability, allowing agents to access the best liquidity, data, and opportunities wherever they exist. ๐Ÿ”น- AI Market Infrastructure Evolution: Building on PrediMarket Agent and our growing suite of trading and market-intelligence agents, we are advancing toward a mature AI market infrastructure, where agents continuously monitor, reason, simulate, optimize, and act across crypto, DeFi, and beyond. The goal is to make complex markets more accessible, more transparent, and more intelligence-driven, turning research, decision-making, and execution into a fast and reliable loop for everyday users. ๐Ÿ”น- Ecosystem Acceleration through the Foundation: With the ChainOpera AI Foundation and our Ecosystem Fund and Co-Creation Grants, we are doubling down on empowering independent builders to expand the protocol, the agent network, and the underlying infrastructure, so the community can co-create, co-own, and scale the ecosystem together. ๐Ÿ”น- Business Expansion and Market Penetration: In 2026, we will focus on expanding ChainOperaโ€™s reach through strategic partnerships, product-led growth, and new paths to monetization, bringing AI agents to a broader global user base and driving sustained adoption, engagement, and revenue, while staying aligned with community ownership and an open ecosystem. 2025 was the proof. 2026 is where it compounds. ๐Ÿ”ฅ Co-Create. Co-Own. COAI.

ChainOpera AI

17,007 gรถrรผntรผleme โ€ข 6 ay รถnce

In the future, Islam will obliterate Christianity in the USA, Europe, and in the Indian subcontinent (where between 30-50 million Christians live), just as it has eradicated Christianity and Judaism in the Middle East and eliminated parts of Hinduism in the Indian subcontinent over the last 1,400 years since its establishment. - This is one of the tactics that Islam uses to take over the world: Quran 4.100 โ€œWhoever emigrates for the sake of Allah will find much refuge and abundance in the earth, and whoever forsakes his home, a refugee for Allah and his messenger, and death overtakes him, his reward is then obligatory upon Allah. Allah is always forgiving, merciful.โ€ *Here the Qurโ€™an states the cardinal importance of โ€œemigration for the cause of Allah,โ€ that is, moving to a new land with the intention of bringing Islam to it. See also 4:66 and 4:89. The primary pattern for emigrants in Islamic tradition is the Hijra, Muhammadโ€™s move from Mecca to Medina, where for the first time he became a political and military leader. It is โ€œobligatoryโ€ for Allah to reward emigrants; this is one of the Qurโ€™anโ€™s few promises of reward for specific actions (see also 9:111). Continue to welcome Islam into the Western world with open arms and friendship. Continue to respect Islam, and eventually, it will do to you what Muhammad did in the 7th century to those who welcomed him in the city of Medina. He completely destroyed the host culture. Quran 9.5: โ€œ...kill the Mushrikun (non-Muslims) wherever you find themโ€ฆ" Al-Bukhari: "To wage war against Allah means to reject faith in Him." From Quran 2.191: "The sin of disbelief in Allah is greater than committing murder". - Note: This has never changed; Islam continues to operate continuously, in an organized and systematic manner, through Da'wa, fraud, lies, and violence, in order to destroy and conquer Western culture from within. ๐Ÿ‘‡๐Ÿ‘‡๐Ÿ‘‡ The report was written by Tom Quiggin, a member of the Terrorism and Security Experts of Canada Network (TSEC). Concurrent research at the TSEC network includes a methodology project for intelligence analysts involved in the analysis of extremism. A Horizon Scanning project on the convergence of extremist ideologies is being readied for distribution in late 2014. This project was funded internally by the TSEC network. There is no government, corporate, media or foreign money involved. KEY JUDGEMENTS: *Canada has a significant presence of Muslim Brotherhood adherent individuals and organizations. Their values and actions are frequently the antithesis of the Canadian Constitution, values and law. Despite statements to the contrary, the Muslim Brotherhood considers itself above local laws and national constitutions. *The Muslim Brotherhoodโ€™s use of settlement and the โ€œprocess of civilization jihadโ€ has proven effective. The long term aim is to globally impose a virulent form of political Islam to the exclusion of other faiths or systems. *Internationally, the Muslim Brotherhood is realigning under pressure as old alliances crumble and opportunities arise. An aggressive posture is reemerging which has used extensive political violence in the past. *The policy and process of denial is deeply rooted in the Muslim Brotherhood. *Muslim Brotherhood adherent groups should not be given governmental accreditation, access to public grants nor should they have charity status. *Canadaโ€™s stance against Muslim Brotherhood adherent organizations in recent years has been more aggressive than the USA, especially in financial areas. 1. Overview: Settlement and the Civilization-Jihadist Process: The Muslim Brotherhood represents a greater existential and systemic threat to North American civilization and society than violent extremist movements such as Al Qaeda. The Muslim Brotherhood, self-described by its founder Hassan Banna as a Salafist group, has been entrenching itself in North American since the late 1950s and early 1960s using the process of โ€˜settlement,โ€™ multiple front organizations and persistent denials. They describe this as a process of civilization jihad. The aim of the group in North America is to weaken and destroy the free and open societies within Canada and the USA from within and replace them with the heavily politicized views of Hassan Banna, Sayyid Qutb and the Muslim Brotherhood. This is consistent with the global aims of the group. This should be of concern as a period of relative moderation has come to an end and the Muslim Brotherhood is becoming increasingly aggressive in its actions. The Muslim Brotherhood began as a social movement and it still has an extensive program of education and outreach. Dawah (daโ€™wa, daโ€™wah or dawa) and religious education lie at the heart of the Muslim Brotherhood program. Dawah can be defined as calling or the practice or policy of conveying the message of Islam to non-Muslims. Within the context of the Muslim Brotherhood, it takes on a more ominous tone as dawah is not just the practice of outreach, but it is one of the principal missions of the Muslim Brotherhood as a whole. And by dawah, they appear to include the message of Islam, but the message of the founder of the Muslim Brotherhood, Hassan Banna as is evidenced by the constant references to his life and writings. Dawah in the Muslim Brotherhood is not just outreach, rather it is an alternative form of conquering a society. Ikhwan Web, the official English language website of the Muslim Brotherhood makes this clear: The MB shall never forget religious education and Dawah, as they are the essence of its existence. In the North American context, Zeid Noman made it clear that in the early stages of development of the Muslim Brotherhood in North America, dawah was an integral factor. This was the first true tremor for the Ikhwan's activism here in America as these brothers started to demand clearer Ikhwan formulas, clearer commitment and means or ones with a specific and not a general nature and that there are conditions to accept one into the ranks of this Dawa'a and to make work secret. โ€ฆSome of them came for work and know that this life is a farm for the afterlife and he sacrifices what he has for the sake of. .., for the sake of this Dawa'a. โ€ฆ.Therefore, we had to take two simultaneous moves and with two harmonious wings: The first one is the reality or now attempt to implement the needs of the reality which is what the students' movement needs and that we also work hard to settle the Dawa'a. By "settlement of the Dawa'a", the Muslim Brotherhood Dawa'a is meant. It is not meant to spread Islam as spread of Islam is a general thing and it is indeed a goal for each Muslim in general terms. The second thing is the settlement of the Dawa'a and finding permanent fundamentals in the cities where Ikhwans now live in order to ...er, in order for them to be the meeting points for the coming brothers. (Emphasis added) In a 1995 speech in Ohio, Yussef Qaradawi, a lifelong adherent of the Muslim Brotherhood movement and one of its key intellectual inspirational figures stated that: Conquest through dawah, that is what we hope forโ€ฆ.We will conquer Europe, we will conquer America, not through the sword but through dawah. In 2007, some 12 years later, Qaradawi made it clear that his views had not changed: The peaceful conquest has foundations in this religion, and therefore, I expect that Islam will conquer Europe without resorting to the sword or fighting. It will do so by means of daโ€™wa and ideology. Europe is miserable with materialism, with the philosophy of promiscuity, and with the immoral considerations that rule the world โ€œconsiderations of self-interest and self-indulgence. Despite the claims of conquest only through dawah, the Muslim Brotherhood has committed a series of assassinations and bombings in the name of the group. This includes the assassination of a judge in Egypt (Ahmed El-Khazindar Bey, Senior Judge, Egyptian Court of Appeal) in 194816 as well as the attempted assassination of President Nasser in 1954. The Syrian arm of the Muslim Brotherhood was engaged in a violent campaign from 1976 to 1982 which included a 1979 attack against students at the military academy in Aleppo. Most of the students killed were from the leadership Alawite group and the victims were largely the sons of various regime officials. The campaign ended with a brutal government massacre of Muslim Brotherhood supporters in the town of Hama. Currently, the Palestinian arm of the Muslim Brotherhood (HAMAS) remains committed to violence and has worked against peace efforts such as the Oslo Accords. In addition to Dawah, another feature of the Muslim Brotherhood is the concept of the Islamization of Knowledge, conceptualized in part by former Montreal resident Dr. Ismail Faruqi. In his book Islamization of Knowledge: General Principles and Work Plan, Dr. Faruqi argues that there was a need to: โ€ฆrecast the whole legacy of human knowledge from the stand point of Islam. He presented 12 workplan aims to produce university level textbooks recasting some twenty disciplines in accordance to the Islamic vision because of the backward and lowly contemporary position of the ummah in all fields, political, economic, and religio-cultural. While presenting itself as a voice of moderation, the Muslim Brotherhood is an adherent of an 85+ year old policy of establishing the Brotherhoodโ€™s brand of Islam as the global faith at the exclusion of all other religions and secular forms of organization. Other Muslim groups that do not adhere are subjected to scorn and abuse. The Muslim Brotherhood has wavered on the use of violence, sometimes presenting itself as a political movement that expels those who use violence. On other occasions it does military training at local camps and uses assassinations and bombings. Foreign funding and foreign organizational assistance have been the hallmarks of many of the adherent charities and organizations. In 1991, the Muslim Brotherhood in North America issued An Explanatory Memorandum on the General Strategic Goal for the Group in North America (5/22/1991).โ€ The document was presented by Mohamed Akram (A.K.A. Mohammad Akram Al-Adlouni) who is now the Secretary General of al-Quds International located in Lebanon. The chairman of the board of trustees is identified as Qatar based28 Youssef Qaradawi. According to Akram, it was the result of five years of policy review work which was proceeded by some 20 years of organizational activity. It was finally approved their Shura Council. In section 4 of the 1991 Explanatory Memorandum, which is subtitled Understanding the role of the Muslim Brother in North America, the document points out that: The process of settlement is a "Civilization-Jihadist Process" with all the word means. The Ikhwan must understand that their work in America is a kind of grand Jihad in eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within and "sabotaging" its miserable house by their hands and the hands of the believers so that it is eliminated and God's religion is made victorious over all other religions. It is not an analytically acceptable practice to take one data point, such as the above, and then assess that the organization is always committed to this goal. To be clear, however, a remarkable degree of consistency of beliefs and goals exists across a range of Muslim Brotherhood organizations โ€“ both temporally and geographically. The most recent examples mimic those of a more violent past. The phase of moving away from violence appears to be ending/has ended and the organisation as a whole is becoming more aggressive and expresses an inflexible approach with violent overtones. In 2010 the Muslim Brotherhoodโ€™s General Guide Mohamed Badie claimed that the โ€œMuslim and Arab Regimes are Disregarding Allah's Commandment to Wage Jihad" and that change can occur by raising a jihadi generation that pursues death just as the enemies pursue life. He notes that resistance is the only solution. These comments appear similar to those of Salah Sultan of Ohio (ISNA, Fiqh Council , MAS) who says that America will suffer economic stagnation, ruin, destruction and crime which will surpass what is happening in Gaza. He also noted that the US will suffer more deaths than all of those killed in the third Gaza holocaust and that it will happen soon. Both of these statements by influential Muslim Brotherhood leaders appear as informal declarations of war, similar to those of al Qaeda in 1996 and 1998. Egyptian President (2012-2013) and Muslim Brotherhood member Mohammed Morsiโ€™s attempted project to โ€˜Brotherhoodizeโ€™ Egypt (The Nahda or Renaissance Project) was a sign of recent intentions. By granting himself near dictatorial powers38 followed by his attacks on the press/TV and the judiciary, he demonstrated that he was more of a servant of the Muslim Brotherhood and Khairat alShaterโ€™s Nahda Project43 than he was the leader of Egypt. Al-Shater had envisaged the Nahda Project as instituting โ€œthe religion of God; the Islamization of life, empowering of Godโ€™s religion.โ€ Ironically, Dr. Morsi was recruited into the Muslim Brotherhood while studying in North America (PhD, USC, 1992). He graduated the year after the 1991 General Memorandum outlined the role of civilization-jihadist project in North America. Read more:
2:37

In the future, Islam will obliterate Christianity in the USA, Europe, and in the Indian subcontinent (where between 30-50 million Christians live), just as it has eradicated Christianity and Judaism in the Middle East and eliminated parts of Hinduism in the Indian subcontinent over the last 1,400 years since its establishment. - This is one of the tactics that Islam uses to take over the world: Quran 4.100 โ€œWhoever emigrates for the sake of Allah will find much refuge and abundance in the earth, and whoever forsakes his home, a refugee for Allah and his messenger, and death overtakes him, his reward is then obligatory upon Allah. Allah is always forgiving, merciful.โ€ *Here the Qurโ€™an states the cardinal importance of โ€œemigration for the cause of Allah,โ€ that is, moving to a new land with the intention of bringing Islam to it. See also 4:66 and 4:89. The primary pattern for emigrants in Islamic tradition is the Hijra, Muhammadโ€™s move from Mecca to Medina, where for the first time he became a political and military leader. It is โ€œobligatoryโ€ for Allah to reward emigrants; this is one of the Qurโ€™anโ€™s few promises of reward for specific actions (see also 9:111). Continue to welcome Islam into the Western world with open arms and friendship. Continue to respect Islam, and eventually, it will do to you what Muhammad did in the 7th century to those who welcomed him in the city of Medina. He completely destroyed the host culture. Quran 9.5: โ€œ...kill the Mushrikun (non-Muslims) wherever you find themโ€ฆ" Al-Bukhari: "To wage war against Allah means to reject faith in Him." From Quran 2.191: "The sin of disbelief in Allah is greater than committing murder". - Note: This has never changed; Islam continues to operate continuously, in an organized and systematic manner, through Da'wa, fraud, lies, and violence, in order to destroy and conquer Western culture from within. ๐Ÿ‘‡๐Ÿ‘‡๐Ÿ‘‡ The report was written by Tom Quiggin, a member of the Terrorism and Security Experts of Canada Network (TSEC). Concurrent research at the TSEC network includes a methodology project for intelligence analysts involved in the analysis of extremism. A Horizon Scanning project on the convergence of extremist ideologies is being readied for distribution in late 2014. This project was funded internally by the TSEC network. There is no government, corporate, media or foreign money involved. KEY JUDGEMENTS: *Canada has a significant presence of Muslim Brotherhood adherent individuals and organizations. Their values and actions are frequently the antithesis of the Canadian Constitution, values and law. Despite statements to the contrary, the Muslim Brotherhood considers itself above local laws and national constitutions. *The Muslim Brotherhoodโ€™s use of settlement and the โ€œprocess of civilization jihadโ€ has proven effective. The long term aim is to globally impose a virulent form of political Islam to the exclusion of other faiths or systems. *Internationally, the Muslim Brotherhood is realigning under pressure as old alliances crumble and opportunities arise. An aggressive posture is reemerging which has used extensive political violence in the past. *The policy and process of denial is deeply rooted in the Muslim Brotherhood. *Muslim Brotherhood adherent groups should not be given governmental accreditation, access to public grants nor should they have charity status. *Canadaโ€™s stance against Muslim Brotherhood adherent organizations in recent years has been more aggressive than the USA, especially in financial areas. 1. Overview: Settlement and the Civilization-Jihadist Process: The Muslim Brotherhood represents a greater existential and systemic threat to North American civilization and society than violent extremist movements such as Al Qaeda. The Muslim Brotherhood, self-described by its founder Hassan Banna as a Salafist group, has been entrenching itself in North American since the late 1950s and early 1960s using the process of โ€˜settlement,โ€™ multiple front organizations and persistent denials. They describe this as a process of civilization jihad. The aim of the group in North America is to weaken and destroy the free and open societies within Canada and the USA from within and replace them with the heavily politicized views of Hassan Banna, Sayyid Qutb and the Muslim Brotherhood. This is consistent with the global aims of the group. This should be of concern as a period of relative moderation has come to an end and the Muslim Brotherhood is becoming increasingly aggressive in its actions. The Muslim Brotherhood began as a social movement and it still has an extensive program of education and outreach. Dawah (daโ€™wa, daโ€™wah or dawa) and religious education lie at the heart of the Muslim Brotherhood program. Dawah can be defined as calling or the practice or policy of conveying the message of Islam to non-Muslims. Within the context of the Muslim Brotherhood, it takes on a more ominous tone as dawah is not just the practice of outreach, but it is one of the principal missions of the Muslim Brotherhood as a whole. And by dawah, they appear to include the message of Islam, but the message of the founder of the Muslim Brotherhood, Hassan Banna as is evidenced by the constant references to his life and writings. Dawah in the Muslim Brotherhood is not just outreach, rather it is an alternative form of conquering a society. Ikhwan Web, the official English language website of the Muslim Brotherhood makes this clear: The MB shall never forget religious education and Dawah, as they are the essence of its existence. In the North American context, Zeid Noman made it clear that in the early stages of development of the Muslim Brotherhood in North America, dawah was an integral factor. This was the first true tremor for the Ikhwan's activism here in America as these brothers started to demand clearer Ikhwan formulas, clearer commitment and means or ones with a specific and not a general nature and that there are conditions to accept one into the ranks of this Dawa'a and to make work secret. โ€ฆSome of them came for work and know that this life is a farm for the afterlife and he sacrifices what he has for the sake of. .., for the sake of this Dawa'a. โ€ฆ.Therefore, we had to take two simultaneous moves and with two harmonious wings: The first one is the reality or now attempt to implement the needs of the reality which is what the students' movement needs and that we also work hard to settle the Dawa'a. By "settlement of the Dawa'a", the Muslim Brotherhood Dawa'a is meant. It is not meant to spread Islam as spread of Islam is a general thing and it is indeed a goal for each Muslim in general terms. The second thing is the settlement of the Dawa'a and finding permanent fundamentals in the cities where Ikhwans now live in order to ...er, in order for them to be the meeting points for the coming brothers. (Emphasis added) In a 1995 speech in Ohio, Yussef Qaradawi, a lifelong adherent of the Muslim Brotherhood movement and one of its key intellectual inspirational figures stated that: Conquest through dawah, that is what we hope forโ€ฆ.We will conquer Europe, we will conquer America, not through the sword but through dawah. In 2007, some 12 years later, Qaradawi made it clear that his views had not changed: The peaceful conquest has foundations in this religion, and therefore, I expect that Islam will conquer Europe without resorting to the sword or fighting. It will do so by means of daโ€™wa and ideology. Europe is miserable with materialism, with the philosophy of promiscuity, and with the immoral considerations that rule the world โ€œconsiderations of self-interest and self-indulgence. Despite the claims of conquest only through dawah, the Muslim Brotherhood has committed a series of assassinations and bombings in the name of the group. This includes the assassination of a judge in Egypt (Ahmed El-Khazindar Bey, Senior Judge, Egyptian Court of Appeal) in 194816 as well as the attempted assassination of President Nasser in 1954. The Syrian arm of the Muslim Brotherhood was engaged in a violent campaign from 1976 to 1982 which included a 1979 attack against students at the military academy in Aleppo. Most of the students killed were from the leadership Alawite group and the victims were largely the sons of various regime officials. The campaign ended with a brutal government massacre of Muslim Brotherhood supporters in the town of Hama. Currently, the Palestinian arm of the Muslim Brotherhood (HAMAS) remains committed to violence and has worked against peace efforts such as the Oslo Accords. In addition to Dawah, another feature of the Muslim Brotherhood is the concept of the Islamization of Knowledge, conceptualized in part by former Montreal resident Dr. Ismail Faruqi. In his book Islamization of Knowledge: General Principles and Work Plan, Dr. Faruqi argues that there was a need to: โ€ฆrecast the whole legacy of human knowledge from the stand point of Islam. He presented 12 workplan aims to produce university level textbooks recasting some twenty disciplines in accordance to the Islamic vision because of the backward and lowly contemporary position of the ummah in all fields, political, economic, and religio-cultural. While presenting itself as a voice of moderation, the Muslim Brotherhood is an adherent of an 85+ year old policy of establishing the Brotherhoodโ€™s brand of Islam as the global faith at the exclusion of all other religions and secular forms of organization. Other Muslim groups that do not adhere are subjected to scorn and abuse. The Muslim Brotherhood has wavered on the use of violence, sometimes presenting itself as a political movement that expels those who use violence. On other occasions it does military training at local camps and uses assassinations and bombings. Foreign funding and foreign organizational assistance have been the hallmarks of many of the adherent charities and organizations. In 1991, the Muslim Brotherhood in North America issued An Explanatory Memorandum on the General Strategic Goal for the Group in North America (5/22/1991).โ€ The document was presented by Mohamed Akram (A.K.A. Mohammad Akram Al-Adlouni) who is now the Secretary General of al-Quds International located in Lebanon. The chairman of the board of trustees is identified as Qatar based28 Youssef Qaradawi. According to Akram, it was the result of five years of policy review work which was proceeded by some 20 years of organizational activity. It was finally approved their Shura Council. In section 4 of the 1991 Explanatory Memorandum, which is subtitled Understanding the role of the Muslim Brother in North America, the document points out that: The process of settlement is a "Civilization-Jihadist Process" with all the word means. The Ikhwan must understand that their work in America is a kind of grand Jihad in eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within and "sabotaging" its miserable house by their hands and the hands of the believers so that it is eliminated and God's religion is made victorious over all other religions. It is not an analytically acceptable practice to take one data point, such as the above, and then assess that the organization is always committed to this goal. To be clear, however, a remarkable degree of consistency of beliefs and goals exists across a range of Muslim Brotherhood organizations โ€“ both temporally and geographically. The most recent examples mimic those of a more violent past. The phase of moving away from violence appears to be ending/has ended and the organisation as a whole is becoming more aggressive and expresses an inflexible approach with violent overtones. In 2010 the Muslim Brotherhoodโ€™s General Guide Mohamed Badie claimed that the โ€œMuslim and Arab Regimes are Disregarding Allah's Commandment to Wage Jihad" and that change can occur by raising a jihadi generation that pursues death just as the enemies pursue life. He notes that resistance is the only solution. These comments appear similar to those of Salah Sultan of Ohio (ISNA, Fiqh Council , MAS) who says that America will suffer economic stagnation, ruin, destruction and crime which will surpass what is happening in Gaza. He also noted that the US will suffer more deaths than all of those killed in the third Gaza holocaust and that it will happen soon. Both of these statements by influential Muslim Brotherhood leaders appear as informal declarations of war, similar to those of al Qaeda in 1996 and 1998. Egyptian President (2012-2013) and Muslim Brotherhood member Mohammed Morsiโ€™s attempted project to โ€˜Brotherhoodizeโ€™ Egypt (The Nahda or Renaissance Project) was a sign of recent intentions. By granting himself near dictatorial powers38 followed by his attacks on the press/TV and the judiciary, he demonstrated that he was more of a servant of the Muslim Brotherhood and Khairat alShaterโ€™s Nahda Project43 than he was the leader of Egypt. Al-Shater had envisaged the Nahda Project as instituting โ€œthe religion of God; the Islamization of life, empowering of Godโ€™s religion.โ€ Ironically, Dr. Morsi was recruited into the Muslim Brotherhood while studying in North America (PhD, USC, 1992). He graduated the year after the 1991 General Memorandum outlined the role of civilization-jihadist project in North America. Read more:

Ofer Binshtok - Kafir - ืขื•ืคืจ ื‘ื™ื ืฉื˜ื•ืง

233,759 gรถrรผntรผleme โ€ข 1 yฤฑl รถnce

Bill Ackman: "I turned an $8B railroad company into $25B in 16 months" "My father, he's here, that's Dad over there in the corner, he told me it's a really dumb idea to start an investment fund right out of business school. He recommended I go work for Michael Steinhardt or George Soros or one of the other famous investors at the time." But Ackman didn't listen: "I figured I knew enough. This is the perils of youth. But the answer is, I was an entrepreneur. I felt I wanted to approach investing my own way, as opposed to learning from someone else. And investing is one of the few things you can really learn on your own. You can learn by reading books, reading annual reports. You can have a portfolio and invest $100 and learn the business, unlike many other businesses which require a lot more." He shares how he started: "I went to business school to learn how to be a good investor. I learned the first rule of investing: you do your due diligence before you wire in your money. When I got to Harvard Business School, I opened the course catalog for the first time, and there wasn't a class on investing. So I decided to develop my own self-study program." Ackman opened a brokerage account with his savings: "I had some money I'd made in the real estate brokerage business. This was my tuition in the investment business about a year of tuition. If I lost it, it was as if I had gone to business school for two years but paid for three. The first stock I bought went up, and I said, 'Okay, I found what I want to do.'" He explains how investing has changed: "The vast majority of capital invested in the markets today is passive index funds, ETFs, long-only institutions. You do your research, or in some cases you don't do the research; you just blindly follow an index. But if you think about investing 100 years ago, you had Andrew Carnegie owning 20% of U.S. Steel. You had J.P. Morgan as a large owner of various companies. In the old days, an owner would act like an owner. If they were unhappy with the performance of the business, they would replace the CEO. If they were unhappy with the board's judgment, they would make changes." Ackman describes what his firm does: "We look for situations where a business has lost its way. An otherwise great company in a business with significant barriers to entry, what Warren Buffett would describe as having a moat around it. A business that is simple, predictable, generates cash, and we can be confident will be here 50 years from now." He shares the Canadian Pacific story: "We owned a stake in Canadian Pacific, a railroad in Canada. It's a business where they're not going to build a new one across the street. You can be pretty comfortable that goods will be shipped on rail for a very long time. This was the worst-run railroad in North America. Lowest profit margins. Lowest valuation relative to earnings. Very unhappy shareholder base. But there was nothing they could do about it because the biggest investors tend to be very passive." Ackman saw the opportunity: "If you could replace the worst CEO in the railroad industry with the best CEO in the railroad industry, a lot of money could be made. We bought 14% of the stock. We recruited a guy named Hunter Harrison, widely considered the best railroad executive of all time. He had retired at 65. He was 66 and a half. He had signed a two-year non-compete with his employer, and I think the biggest mistake they made was a two-year non-compete." They hired him as a consultant first: "He had plenty of fire in his belly. We said, 'Would you be interested in the day job?' He said, 'Let me check with my wife.' She said, 'It's time to get you out of the house again.'" But the board didn't want him: "Canadian Pacific had one of the most esteemed boards in Canada, former head of the Royal Bank of Canada, former CEO of Suncor Energy, former head of the steel business. They didn't like the idea that this was coming from outside the company. So they said no." Ackman went to the shareholders: "We ran an election, a proxy contest. We put up seven directors for seven seats on a 13-seat board. The shareholders voted with us 90% of the time. The other guys got between 3 and 11% of the vote. We put our directors on, did a review of the best CEOs in the world, turns out the guy we identified was the best guy, and we put him in as CEO." The result: "That was 16 months ago. It's now almost the most profitable railroad in North America. The stock went from $46 to $151 a share. From a little under $8 billion market cap to a $25 billion market cap. That's the perfect example. Now it doesn't always work that way."
5:43

Bill Ackman: "I turned an $8B railroad company into $25B in 16 months" "My father, he's here, that's Dad over there in the corner, he told me it's a really dumb idea to start an investment fund right out of business school. He recommended I go work for Michael Steinhardt or George Soros or one of the other famous investors at the time." But Ackman didn't listen: "I figured I knew enough. This is the perils of youth. But the answer is, I was an entrepreneur. I felt I wanted to approach investing my own way, as opposed to learning from someone else. And investing is one of the few things you can really learn on your own. You can learn by reading books, reading annual reports. You can have a portfolio and invest $100 and learn the business, unlike many other businesses which require a lot more." He shares how he started: "I went to business school to learn how to be a good investor. I learned the first rule of investing: you do your due diligence before you wire in your money. When I got to Harvard Business School, I opened the course catalog for the first time, and there wasn't a class on investing. So I decided to develop my own self-study program." Ackman opened a brokerage account with his savings: "I had some money I'd made in the real estate brokerage business. This was my tuition in the investment business about a year of tuition. If I lost it, it was as if I had gone to business school for two years but paid for three. The first stock I bought went up, and I said, 'Okay, I found what I want to do.'" He explains how investing has changed: "The vast majority of capital invested in the markets today is passive index funds, ETFs, long-only institutions. You do your research, or in some cases you don't do the research; you just blindly follow an index. But if you think about investing 100 years ago, you had Andrew Carnegie owning 20% of U.S. Steel. You had J.P. Morgan as a large owner of various companies. In the old days, an owner would act like an owner. If they were unhappy with the performance of the business, they would replace the CEO. If they were unhappy with the board's judgment, they would make changes." Ackman describes what his firm does: "We look for situations where a business has lost its way. An otherwise great company in a business with significant barriers to entry, what Warren Buffett would describe as having a moat around it. A business that is simple, predictable, generates cash, and we can be confident will be here 50 years from now." He shares the Canadian Pacific story: "We owned a stake in Canadian Pacific, a railroad in Canada. It's a business where they're not going to build a new one across the street. You can be pretty comfortable that goods will be shipped on rail for a very long time. This was the worst-run railroad in North America. Lowest profit margins. Lowest valuation relative to earnings. Very unhappy shareholder base. But there was nothing they could do about it because the biggest investors tend to be very passive." Ackman saw the opportunity: "If you could replace the worst CEO in the railroad industry with the best CEO in the railroad industry, a lot of money could be made. We bought 14% of the stock. We recruited a guy named Hunter Harrison, widely considered the best railroad executive of all time. He had retired at 65. He was 66 and a half. He had signed a two-year non-compete with his employer, and I think the biggest mistake they made was a two-year non-compete." They hired him as a consultant first: "He had plenty of fire in his belly. We said, 'Would you be interested in the day job?' He said, 'Let me check with my wife.' She said, 'It's time to get you out of the house again.'" But the board didn't want him: "Canadian Pacific had one of the most esteemed boards in Canada, former head of the Royal Bank of Canada, former CEO of Suncor Energy, former head of the steel business. They didn't like the idea that this was coming from outside the company. So they said no." Ackman went to the shareholders: "We ran an election, a proxy contest. We put up seven directors for seven seats on a 13-seat board. The shareholders voted with us 90% of the time. The other guys got between 3 and 11% of the vote. We put our directors on, did a review of the best CEOs in the world, turns out the guy we identified was the best guy, and we put him in as CEO." The result: "That was 16 months ago. It's now almost the most profitable railroad in North America. The stock went from $46 to $151 a share. From a little under $8 billion market cap to a $25 billion market cap. That's the perfect example. Now it doesn't always work that way."

Jaynit

286,386 gรถrรผntรผleme โ€ข 3 ay รถnce

Alistair Croll (Alistair Croll) is the co-author of the best-selling book Lean Analytics, and a longtime product manager, entrepreneur, and startup advisor. He also profoundly changed my life over a decade ago by convincing me to start a company, funding it, and helping us exit to Airbnb. More recently, Alistar has been running events such as Oโ€™Reillyโ€™s Strata, Cloud Connect, FWD50, and Startupfest, and is about to release a book with co-author Emily Ross that I'm very excited about: Just Evil Enough: The Subversive Marketing Handbook. In our conversation, we discuss: ๐Ÿ”ธ The role of subversive marketing strategies in most startupsโ€™ growth ๐Ÿ”ธ 11 specific subversive tactics ๐Ÿ”ธ Examples of companies like Netflix, Airbnb, and Tesla using subversive tactics early on ๐Ÿ”ธ A framework for scanning your market for opportunities ๐Ÿ”ธ The importance of finding your โ€œzero-day marketing exploitโ€ ๐Ÿ”ธ How to apply these tactics ethically without actually being evil ๐Ÿ”ธ Much more Listen now ๐Ÿ‘‡ - YouTube: - Spotify: - Apple: Thank you to our wonderful sponsors for supporting the podcast: ๐Ÿ† WorkOS โ€” Modern identity platform for B2B SaaS, free up to 1 million MAUs: ๐Ÿ† Hex โ€” Helping teams ask and answer data questions by working together: ๐Ÿ† Vanta โ€” Automate compliance. Simplify security: Some key takeaways: 1. Most startups focus too much on product features and not enough on distribution and go-to-market strategy. To succeed, you need to find an โ€œunfair advantageโ€ in how you capture attention and turn it into profitable demand. This is what Alistair and Emily call โ€œjust evil enough.โ€ 2. Stop relying on generic growth hacks. Instead, adopt a mindset focused on โ€œzero-dayโ€ marketing exploitsโ€”innovative, subversive tactics that are only now possible. Look for unconventional methods to change the game in your favor. 3. Encourage your team to embrace โ€œdisagreeableโ€ thinking, where you challenge the status quo rather than following the herd. For example, aim for your ideas to elicit at least 50% disapprovalโ€”this can be a great indicator that youโ€™re pushing boundaries and generating true interest. If everyone loves your idea, it might be too safe. 4. Alistair outlines 11 key tactics to grab peopleโ€™s attention: a. Turning bugs into features (e.g. Salesforce positioning their limited feature set as simplicity) b. Buyer upgrade (e.g. selling to insurance companies instead of city councils for bridge inspections) c. Access (e.g. Bumbleโ€™s founder leveraging her sorority connections for initial growth) d. Bait and switch (e.g. Tupperware using dinner parties to sell products in postwar America) e. Combination (e.g. Kraft combining powdered cheese with macaroni or 1-800 Mattress including mattress removal with a mattress purchase) f. Arbitrage (e.g. early social media growth hacks using API data) g. Aggregation (e.g. Busbud aggregating bus schedules to become the default destination) h. Reframing (e.g. Tomโ€™s of Maine positioning toothpaste as natural/unfluoridated) i. Regulation (e.g. organ donor opt-out vs. opt-in policies in Germany vs. Austria) j. Misappropriation (e.g. Netflix using the postal service as a high-latency network) k. Sliding the window (e.g. normalizing previously taboo topics or behaviors) 5. To apply these tactics: a. Spend time understanding your industryโ€™s system and status quo b. Temporarily think like a โ€œsupervillainโ€ to brainstorm novel approaches c. Use techniques like pre-mortems, counterfactuals, and embracing absurdity d. Look for ways to change your value chain or industry dynamics
1:08

Alistair Croll (Alistair Croll) is the co-author of the best-selling book Lean Analytics, and a longtime product manager, entrepreneur, and startup advisor. He also profoundly changed my life over a decade ago by convincing me to start a company, funding it, and helping us exit to Airbnb. More recently, Alistar has been running events such as Oโ€™Reillyโ€™s Strata, Cloud Connect, FWD50, and Startupfest, and is about to release a book with co-author Emily Ross that I'm very excited about: Just Evil Enough: The Subversive Marketing Handbook. In our conversation, we discuss: ๐Ÿ”ธ The role of subversive marketing strategies in most startupsโ€™ growth ๐Ÿ”ธ 11 specific subversive tactics ๐Ÿ”ธ Examples of companies like Netflix, Airbnb, and Tesla using subversive tactics early on ๐Ÿ”ธ A framework for scanning your market for opportunities ๐Ÿ”ธ The importance of finding your โ€œzero-day marketing exploitโ€ ๐Ÿ”ธ How to apply these tactics ethically without actually being evil ๐Ÿ”ธ Much more Listen now ๐Ÿ‘‡ - YouTube: - Spotify: - Apple: Thank you to our wonderful sponsors for supporting the podcast: ๐Ÿ† WorkOS โ€” Modern identity platform for B2B SaaS, free up to 1 million MAUs: ๐Ÿ† Hex โ€” Helping teams ask and answer data questions by working together: ๐Ÿ† Vanta โ€” Automate compliance. Simplify security: Some key takeaways: 1. Most startups focus too much on product features and not enough on distribution and go-to-market strategy. To succeed, you need to find an โ€œunfair advantageโ€ in how you capture attention and turn it into profitable demand. This is what Alistair and Emily call โ€œjust evil enough.โ€ 2. Stop relying on generic growth hacks. Instead, adopt a mindset focused on โ€œzero-dayโ€ marketing exploitsโ€”innovative, subversive tactics that are only now possible. Look for unconventional methods to change the game in your favor. 3. Encourage your team to embrace โ€œdisagreeableโ€ thinking, where you challenge the status quo rather than following the herd. For example, aim for your ideas to elicit at least 50% disapprovalโ€”this can be a great indicator that youโ€™re pushing boundaries and generating true interest. If everyone loves your idea, it might be too safe. 4. Alistair outlines 11 key tactics to grab peopleโ€™s attention: a. Turning bugs into features (e.g. Salesforce positioning their limited feature set as simplicity) b. Buyer upgrade (e.g. selling to insurance companies instead of city councils for bridge inspections) c. Access (e.g. Bumbleโ€™s founder leveraging her sorority connections for initial growth) d. Bait and switch (e.g. Tupperware using dinner parties to sell products in postwar America) e. Combination (e.g. Kraft combining powdered cheese with macaroni or 1-800 Mattress including mattress removal with a mattress purchase) f. Arbitrage (e.g. early social media growth hacks using API data) g. Aggregation (e.g. Busbud aggregating bus schedules to become the default destination) h. Reframing (e.g. Tomโ€™s of Maine positioning toothpaste as natural/unfluoridated) i. Regulation (e.g. organ donor opt-out vs. opt-in policies in Germany vs. Austria) j. Misappropriation (e.g. Netflix using the postal service as a high-latency network) k. Sliding the window (e.g. normalizing previously taboo topics or behaviors) 5. To apply these tactics: a. Spend time understanding your industryโ€™s system and status quo b. Temporarily think like a โ€œsupervillainโ€ to brainstorm novel approaches c. Use techniques like pre-mortems, counterfactuals, and embracing absurdity d. Look for ways to change your value chain or industry dynamics

Lenny Rachitsky

39,965 gรถrรผntรผleme โ€ข 1 yฤฑl รถnce

The Greatest Reset โš ๏ธ โš ๏ธ โš ๏ธ โ€” a confluence of celestial factors points to tremendous change and great upheaval across the globe in the next few years. I hope you appreciate the research and take appropriate actions. โ€œThe woman you saw is the great city that rules over the kings of the earth.โ€ โ€” Revelation 17:18 The Prenatal Venus rx Cazimi for the US occured on Oct 25, 1775, at 1 Scorpio. The next Venus rx Cazimi closest to this spot occurs on Oct 24, 2026 During this Venus โ€˜star pointโ€™, Uranus will be roughly at the same position in Gemini as it were in 1775. The last three times we have had Uranus in Gemini, it has correlated with WWII, the American Civil War and the American Revolutionary War. So as the US has a return of their prenatal Venus star point, which suggests some kind of reset, Uranus in Gemini indicates great turmoil as well. ---- In addition, in the same period, we got a reset of the Saturn-Neptune cycle at 0 Aries. They join forces every 36 years or so (1773 โ™๏ธŽ, 1809 โ™๏ธŽ, 1846 โ™’๏ธŽ, 1882 โ™‰๏ธŽ, 1917 โ™Œ๏ธŽ, 1952-53 โ™Ž๏ธŽ, 1989 โ™‘๏ธŽ, 2025-26 โ™ˆ๏ธŽ). The location at the very beginning of Aries suggests a significant new beginning, but these junctures have always correlated with periods of dramatic changes in society. - 1773 in Virgo: American colonial unrest leading up to the Revolutionary War. - 1809 in Sagittarius: Napoleonic Wars reshaping Europe. - 1846 in Aquarius: Industrial Revolution, social reforms, and revolutions across Europe. - 1882 in Taurus: Height of the Industrial Age and the labor movement. - 1917 in Leo: Russian Revolution, the end of World War I and the beginning of the German Revolution in 1919. - 1952-53 in Libra: Post-World War II restructuring and the rise of Cold War tensions. - 1989 in Capricorn: Fall of the Berlin Wall and the end of the Cold War. In 2025-26 Saturn (associated with water and common people) will enter the sign of his fall and joined by the dissolving Neptune in this fiery territory, we can expect great uprisings, riots, war and revolution as a consequence. โ€œThe waters you saw, where the woman sits, are peoples, multitudes, nations and languages.โ€ โ€” Revelation 17:15 Last time Saturn and Neptune were flirting around in Aries was in 1702-03 which gave us several wars, reshaping the borders in Europe. The War of the Spanish Succession (1701โ€“1714) was one of the most significant events of the time, a major European conflict, involving France, Austria, England, and the Dutch Republic, all vying for control over the Spanish throne. By 1702-1703, the war was in its early stages, with battles beginning to escalate, particularly in the Netherlands and Italy. The outcome of this war would significantly reshape European borders and power structures. The War of Spanish Succession spilled over into North America, where it became known as Queen Anne's War (1702-1713), part of the larger struggle between France, Britain, and Spain over colonial territories. The Great Northern War (1700โ€“1721) was a conflict between Russia ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ and Sweden ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ช (another blue and yellow flag like Ukraine ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ), and several other northern European nations. In 1702, Russia, under Peter the Great, started gaining significant victories over Sweden, beginning to reshape the balance of power in the Baltic region. This war marked Russia's rise as a major European power. ---- โ€œHistory doesnโ€™t repeat โ€” but it often rhymes.โ€ Also, between 2025-29, we got a unique configuration between the three outer planets Uranus, Neptune and Pluto. Last time they made a similar connection to each other was between 476-80 AD which correlated with the fall of the Western Roman Empire. We can therefore expect something similar.. Finally, the combined cycle of Saturn and Pluto points to a significant reset of the monetary system. 3 Pluto cycles (3x248 years) roughly equals 25 Saturn cycles (25x29.5 years). In early 2020 they joined forces at the last decan of Capricorn. Last time we saw this, with the measure of their combined cycles as a reset, was in 1284 AD when the Ducat of Venice was introduced. It profoundly changed the way 'we do money'. We can therefore expect something similar in the period 2020-2028, perhaps with another monetary system like a CBDC โ€œThe beast and the ten horns you saw will hate the woman. They will bring her to ruin and leave her nakedโ€ฆโ€ โ€” Revelation 17:16 The consequence of her fall can be read in chapter 18: global economic mayhem. "The Beast deceived the inhabitants of the earth... It also forced all people, great and small, rich and poor, free and slave, to receive a mark on their right hands or on their foreheads, so that they could not buy or sell unless they had the mark.." โ€” Revelation 13:11-17 The Saturn-Pluto cycle has likewise correlated with serious challenges for mankind. Their recent 40 year reset occurred in 2020 and gave us the plandemic. Each time they make a hard aspect we get dose of the dark forces from the Underworld making a stir. Listen to Richard Tarnas in the video... The next hard aspect arrives in 2028 and is very similar to the one we had in 1939 during the onset of WWII. Buy tuna now! #astrology ยฎ๏ธ
5:11

The Greatest Reset โš ๏ธ โš ๏ธ โš ๏ธ โ€” a confluence of celestial factors points to tremendous change and great upheaval across the globe in the next few years. I hope you appreciate the research and take appropriate actions. โ€œThe woman you saw is the great city that rules over the kings of the earth.โ€ โ€” Revelation 17:18 The Prenatal Venus rx Cazimi for the US occured on Oct 25, 1775, at 1 Scorpio. The next Venus rx Cazimi closest to this spot occurs on Oct 24, 2026 During this Venus โ€˜star pointโ€™, Uranus will be roughly at the same position in Gemini as it were in 1775. The last three times we have had Uranus in Gemini, it has correlated with WWII, the American Civil War and the American Revolutionary War. So as the US has a return of their prenatal Venus star point, which suggests some kind of reset, Uranus in Gemini indicates great turmoil as well. ---- In addition, in the same period, we got a reset of the Saturn-Neptune cycle at 0 Aries. They join forces every 36 years or so (1773 โ™๏ธŽ, 1809 โ™๏ธŽ, 1846 โ™’๏ธŽ, 1882 โ™‰๏ธŽ, 1917 โ™Œ๏ธŽ, 1952-53 โ™Ž๏ธŽ, 1989 โ™‘๏ธŽ, 2025-26 โ™ˆ๏ธŽ). The location at the very beginning of Aries suggests a significant new beginning, but these junctures have always correlated with periods of dramatic changes in society. - 1773 in Virgo: American colonial unrest leading up to the Revolutionary War. - 1809 in Sagittarius: Napoleonic Wars reshaping Europe. - 1846 in Aquarius: Industrial Revolution, social reforms, and revolutions across Europe. - 1882 in Taurus: Height of the Industrial Age and the labor movement. - 1917 in Leo: Russian Revolution, the end of World War I and the beginning of the German Revolution in 1919. - 1952-53 in Libra: Post-World War II restructuring and the rise of Cold War tensions. - 1989 in Capricorn: Fall of the Berlin Wall and the end of the Cold War. In 2025-26 Saturn (associated with water and common people) will enter the sign of his fall and joined by the dissolving Neptune in this fiery territory, we can expect great uprisings, riots, war and revolution as a consequence. โ€œThe waters you saw, where the woman sits, are peoples, multitudes, nations and languages.โ€ โ€” Revelation 17:15 Last time Saturn and Neptune were flirting around in Aries was in 1702-03 which gave us several wars, reshaping the borders in Europe. The War of the Spanish Succession (1701โ€“1714) was one of the most significant events of the time, a major European conflict, involving France, Austria, England, and the Dutch Republic, all vying for control over the Spanish throne. By 1702-1703, the war was in its early stages, with battles beginning to escalate, particularly in the Netherlands and Italy. The outcome of this war would significantly reshape European borders and power structures. The War of Spanish Succession spilled over into North America, where it became known as Queen Anne's War (1702-1713), part of the larger struggle between France, Britain, and Spain over colonial territories. The Great Northern War (1700โ€“1721) was a conflict between Russia ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ and Sweden ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ช (another blue and yellow flag like Ukraine ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ), and several other northern European nations. In 1702, Russia, under Peter the Great, started gaining significant victories over Sweden, beginning to reshape the balance of power in the Baltic region. This war marked Russia's rise as a major European power. ---- โ€œHistory doesnโ€™t repeat โ€” but it often rhymes.โ€ Also, between 2025-29, we got a unique configuration between the three outer planets Uranus, Neptune and Pluto. Last time they made a similar connection to each other was between 476-80 AD which correlated with the fall of the Western Roman Empire. We can therefore expect something similar.. Finally, the combined cycle of Saturn and Pluto points to a significant reset of the monetary system. 3 Pluto cycles (3x248 years) roughly equals 25 Saturn cycles (25x29.5 years). In early 2020 they joined forces at the last decan of Capricorn. Last time we saw this, with the measure of their combined cycles as a reset, was in 1284 AD when the Ducat of Venice was introduced. It profoundly changed the way 'we do money'. We can therefore expect something similar in the period 2020-2028, perhaps with another monetary system like a CBDC โ€œThe beast and the ten horns you saw will hate the woman. They will bring her to ruin and leave her nakedโ€ฆโ€ โ€” Revelation 17:16 The consequence of her fall can be read in chapter 18: global economic mayhem. "The Beast deceived the inhabitants of the earth... It also forced all people, great and small, rich and poor, free and slave, to receive a mark on their right hands or on their foreheads, so that they could not buy or sell unless they had the mark.." โ€” Revelation 13:11-17 The Saturn-Pluto cycle has likewise correlated with serious challenges for mankind. Their recent 40 year reset occurred in 2020 and gave us the plandemic. Each time they make a hard aspect we get dose of the dark forces from the Underworld making a stir. Listen to Richard Tarnas in the video... The next hard aspect arrives in 2028 and is very similar to the one we had in 1939 during the onset of WWII. Buy tuna now! #astrology ยฎ๏ธ

แ›‹

13,217 gรถrรผntรผleme โ€ข 1 yฤฑl รถnce

WHY TPUSA REALLY DROPPED "YOUNG" FROM YOUNG WOMEN'S LEADERSHIP SUMMIT: (read this or listen to my narration below) TPUSA wants us to believe that dropping the "Young" from this year's "Young Women's Leadership Summit" was what Charlie would have wanted, and therefore this is not another example of TPUSA changing course on yet another of Charlie's positions. As proof, they produced receipts of Charlie discussing this potential name & target-audience change, going all the way back to 2021, and then even engaging with the discussion as recently as January 2025. But they're too brainless to understand how this "proof" actually works against them. For five straight years, they petitioned Charlie to change the name & target audience, and for five straight years he said 'NO'โ€”including for the last YWLS in June 2025, just 3 months before he died. FIVE YEARS IN A ROW. He was gently humoring them while maintaining a resolute 'NO.' IOW, TPUSA has just introduced proof that Charlie DIDN'T want to change the name or the target audience. Lol THE TRUTH: TPUSA in its current incarnation is losing its youth motion and becoming increasingly more propped up by older women still psyop'd by pro-israel ConInc. They're trying to maintain relevance amongst the cratering youth support. That's what they're trying to hide with this cosmetic name change. It's lipstick on a pig. Now, I could leave it at that, but there's actually something darker going on here. Charlie had recognized the shifting mood & (lack of) support for israel amongst the youth, accelerated by israel's actions in the wake of 10/7. Jonathan Greenblatt of the ADL (with whom Charlie was publicly feuding) called it America's "tiktok problem." That's why Charlie began pivoting last year. He recognized that he needed to evolve in order to maintain his relevance with the youth. The fact is, Zoomers are far more radical in their anti-zionist/pro-America First positions than Charlie was. And that strained Charlie's ability to be effective and hold them within the Republican tent and ConInc movement. Despite his personal views, he needed to keep up with his audience or risk ultimately getting left behind and becoming ever more irrelevant. But on top of that, it seems that Charlie's own positions were also evolving, and certainly donor pressure was pissing him off, exhausting his patience and accelerating his shift away from israel and towards America First. Charlie brought Tucker Carlson & Dave Smith to AmFest. He started holding open discussions critical of AIPAC, foreign aid to israel, and the Epstein files. It all culminated with a declaration that he was leaving the pro-israel cause and would bring Candace Owens back. All of these actions enraged many of his zionist backers and supporters. Charlie himself called their pressure on him EMOTIONAL BLACKMAIL. They were unhinged. You saw how crazy psychopathic they reacted to the Heritage Foundation not severing its relationship with Tucker Carlson in the Fall last year. Imagine the pressure they brought on Charlie! The fact is, Charlie was moving with the Youth, doubling down on them and their zeitgeist, widening the gap between them and this Z0g'd out Republican Party. Whatever his personal feelings were on israel and jews, he was decidedly transitioning his organization through a critical inflection point. This current post-Charlie TPUSA is doing the opposite, and undoing that shift he started. This dynamic is another huge, but underappreciated, reason Charlie Kirk was neutralized. After a year and a half of the pro-israel lobby systematically and methodically dismantling anti-zionism on the College Campus Left after 10/7, Charlie effectively became (inadvertently) a Trojan Horse smuggling it back in on the College Campus Right, where it's even more hardcore antisemitic in its nature. And with pro-israel resources funding his operation no less! It would be like using Mob funds to hold public discussions about restraining the Mob. Think about that. And that's the real full context and implications of removing "Young" from "Young Women's Leadership Summit." It doesn't merely betray Charlie's wishes for the young women, it exposes a major reason he was taken out in the first place: israel was losing the youthโ€”first, in spite of Charlie's efforts, and then because of his efforts. That was the WRONG direction. And when they failed to "persuade" him to course correct, that left them only one option: hostile takeover. They didn't change YWLS because Charlie's gone, Charlie's gone so that they COULD change it, and everything that entails.
4:08

WHY TPUSA REALLY DROPPED "YOUNG" FROM YOUNG WOMEN'S LEADERSHIP SUMMIT: (read this or listen to my narration below) TPUSA wants us to believe that dropping the "Young" from this year's "Young Women's Leadership Summit" was what Charlie would have wanted, and therefore this is not another example of TPUSA changing course on yet another of Charlie's positions. As proof, they produced receipts of Charlie discussing this potential name & target-audience change, going all the way back to 2021, and then even engaging with the discussion as recently as January 2025. But they're too brainless to understand how this "proof" actually works against them. For five straight years, they petitioned Charlie to change the name & target audience, and for five straight years he said 'NO'โ€”including for the last YWLS in June 2025, just 3 months before he died. FIVE YEARS IN A ROW. He was gently humoring them while maintaining a resolute 'NO.' IOW, TPUSA has just introduced proof that Charlie DIDN'T want to change the name or the target audience. Lol THE TRUTH: TPUSA in its current incarnation is losing its youth motion and becoming increasingly more propped up by older women still psyop'd by pro-israel ConInc. They're trying to maintain relevance amongst the cratering youth support. That's what they're trying to hide with this cosmetic name change. It's lipstick on a pig. Now, I could leave it at that, but there's actually something darker going on here. Charlie had recognized the shifting mood & (lack of) support for israel amongst the youth, accelerated by israel's actions in the wake of 10/7. Jonathan Greenblatt of the ADL (with whom Charlie was publicly feuding) called it America's "tiktok problem." That's why Charlie began pivoting last year. He recognized that he needed to evolve in order to maintain his relevance with the youth. The fact is, Zoomers are far more radical in their anti-zionist/pro-America First positions than Charlie was. And that strained Charlie's ability to be effective and hold them within the Republican tent and ConInc movement. Despite his personal views, he needed to keep up with his audience or risk ultimately getting left behind and becoming ever more irrelevant. But on top of that, it seems that Charlie's own positions were also evolving, and certainly donor pressure was pissing him off, exhausting his patience and accelerating his shift away from israel and towards America First. Charlie brought Tucker Carlson & Dave Smith to AmFest. He started holding open discussions critical of AIPAC, foreign aid to israel, and the Epstein files. It all culminated with a declaration that he was leaving the pro-israel cause and would bring Candace Owens back. All of these actions enraged many of his zionist backers and supporters. Charlie himself called their pressure on him EMOTIONAL BLACKMAIL. They were unhinged. You saw how crazy psychopathic they reacted to the Heritage Foundation not severing its relationship with Tucker Carlson in the Fall last year. Imagine the pressure they brought on Charlie! The fact is, Charlie was moving with the Youth, doubling down on them and their zeitgeist, widening the gap between them and this Z0g'd out Republican Party. Whatever his personal feelings were on israel and jews, he was decidedly transitioning his organization through a critical inflection point. This current post-Charlie TPUSA is doing the opposite, and undoing that shift he started. This dynamic is another huge, but underappreciated, reason Charlie Kirk was neutralized. After a year and a half of the pro-israel lobby systematically and methodically dismantling anti-zionism on the College Campus Left after 10/7, Charlie effectively became (inadvertently) a Trojan Horse smuggling it back in on the College Campus Right, where it's even more hardcore antisemitic in its nature. And with pro-israel resources funding his operation no less! It would be like using Mob funds to hold public discussions about restraining the Mob. Think about that. And that's the real full context and implications of removing "Young" from "Young Women's Leadership Summit." It doesn't merely betray Charlie's wishes for the young women, it exposes a major reason he was taken out in the first place: israel was losing the youthโ€”first, in spite of Charlie's efforts, and then because of his efforts. That was the WRONG direction. And when they failed to "persuade" him to course correct, that left them only one option: hostile takeover. They didn't change YWLS because Charlie's gone, Charlie's gone so that they COULD change it, and everything that entails.

Sam Parker ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿงฏ

21,005 gรถrรผntรผleme โ€ข 1 ay รถnce

Mr Starmer, The world is watching. And for once, Iโ€™m not here to play nice or balance both sides. This is the one shot I get to say what millions already know in their bones. You are not Britainโ€™s Prime Minister. You are a man who won an election and immediately began dismantling the very things the British people voted for in 2016. You are squatting in Downing Street while steering the country back into the arms of the institution it explicitly rejected. If you will not stand down, the British people will make you. Here is every claim you made today, stripped bare, no spin, no mercy: 1. โ€œThe Middle East conflict has now entered its second month.โ€ Thank you for the calendar update. While you counted months, the IRGC a group formally designated as terrorists by the United States, Canada, and others, continued running its London operations from 16 Princeโ€™s Gate, Knightsbridge. You did nothing. 2. โ€œThe UK is working at pace for de-escalation and peace.โ€ Translation: we issued strongly worded statements. Results: zero. Your โ€œpaceโ€ is the speed of a snail on tranquillisers. 3. โ€œThe war will affect the future of our country, energy and cost of living.โ€ It already is. Your green ideology and EU realignment have left Britain with some of the highest energy prices in the developed world. Pensioners choose between heating and eating. Thatโ€™s not โ€œthe war.โ€ Thatโ€™s policy. 4. โ€œWe are well-placed with a long-term plan to emerge stronger and more secure.โ€ Record taxes. 7.5 million people on NHS waiting lists. Record small-boat crossings. Energy bills that could bankrupt households. If this is your definition of โ€œstronger and more secure,โ€ the English language just filed for divorce. 5. โ€œI held meetings with business leadersโ€ฆโ€ Photo opportunities. They warned you. You smiled for the cameras and carried on regardless. 6. โ€œEnergy bills will be cut today and fixed until July.โ€ A ยฃ117 cap that your own NI increases and green levies have already vaporised. Itโ€™s not relief. Itโ€™s an insult dressed up as compassion. 7. โ€œThe most effective way to support the cost of living is to push for reopening the Strait of Hormuz.โ€ Then why did you help shut down North Sea production and make us dependent on foreign energy? The hypocrisy is so thick you could spread it on toast. 8. โ€œThe UK is taking back control of our energy security by investing in clean British energy.โ€ Britain now pays the highest industrial electricity prices in Europe. Blackouts are on the menu. This is not โ€œtaking back control.โ€ This is self-sabotage with better PR. 9. โ€œBecause the world is volatile, Britainโ€™s long-term national interest now requires closer partnership with the EU.โ€ Letโ€™s be honest for once: you are using a foreign crisis as cover to hand sovereignty, money, and decision-making back to Brussels without asking the British people. That is not statesmanship. That is betrayal by stealth. 10. โ€œI will announce a new summit with the EU later this yearโ€ฆโ€ Re-joining by the back door while an Iranian terror-linked operation sits in one of Londonโ€™s most expensive postcodes. The sheer gall is almost impressive. You stood at the podium today and spoke of โ€œBritish interestsโ€ while actively working against them. You swore you wouldnโ€™t rejoin the EU. You are doing it anyway. You talk of security while leaving a designated terror network untouched in central London. You lecture about the cost of living while your policies make it worse. The mask is not slipping, Keir. It has fallen off and shattered on the floor. The British people see you clearly now: a politician who values international approval and Brussels goodwill more than the nation that elected him. You are not leading Britain. You are managing its managed decline. The clock is ticking. Not in secret. Not in silence. Out loud, in broad daylight, across every pub, every kitchen table, every X feed and every street in this country. History does not forgive those who sell their own peopleโ€™s sovereignty for applause. Britain did not vote for this. Britain does not want this. And Britain will not tolerate this forever. The reckoning is coming. And it will not be kind. Britain First. No Surrender. ๐Ÿฆ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง
10:15

Mr Starmer, The world is watching. And for once, Iโ€™m not here to play nice or balance both sides. This is the one shot I get to say what millions already know in their bones. You are not Britainโ€™s Prime Minister. You are a man who won an election and immediately began dismantling the very things the British people voted for in 2016. You are squatting in Downing Street while steering the country back into the arms of the institution it explicitly rejected. If you will not stand down, the British people will make you. Here is every claim you made today, stripped bare, no spin, no mercy: 1. โ€œThe Middle East conflict has now entered its second month.โ€ Thank you for the calendar update. While you counted months, the IRGC a group formally designated as terrorists by the United States, Canada, and others, continued running its London operations from 16 Princeโ€™s Gate, Knightsbridge. You did nothing. 2. โ€œThe UK is working at pace for de-escalation and peace.โ€ Translation: we issued strongly worded statements. Results: zero. Your โ€œpaceโ€ is the speed of a snail on tranquillisers. 3. โ€œThe war will affect the future of our country, energy and cost of living.โ€ It already is. Your green ideology and EU realignment have left Britain with some of the highest energy prices in the developed world. Pensioners choose between heating and eating. Thatโ€™s not โ€œthe war.โ€ Thatโ€™s policy. 4. โ€œWe are well-placed with a long-term plan to emerge stronger and more secure.โ€ Record taxes. 7.5 million people on NHS waiting lists. Record small-boat crossings. Energy bills that could bankrupt households. If this is your definition of โ€œstronger and more secure,โ€ the English language just filed for divorce. 5. โ€œI held meetings with business leadersโ€ฆโ€ Photo opportunities. They warned you. You smiled for the cameras and carried on regardless. 6. โ€œEnergy bills will be cut today and fixed until July.โ€ A ยฃ117 cap that your own NI increases and green levies have already vaporised. Itโ€™s not relief. Itโ€™s an insult dressed up as compassion. 7. โ€œThe most effective way to support the cost of living is to push for reopening the Strait of Hormuz.โ€ Then why did you help shut down North Sea production and make us dependent on foreign energy? The hypocrisy is so thick you could spread it on toast. 8. โ€œThe UK is taking back control of our energy security by investing in clean British energy.โ€ Britain now pays the highest industrial electricity prices in Europe. Blackouts are on the menu. This is not โ€œtaking back control.โ€ This is self-sabotage with better PR. 9. โ€œBecause the world is volatile, Britainโ€™s long-term national interest now requires closer partnership with the EU.โ€ Letโ€™s be honest for once: you are using a foreign crisis as cover to hand sovereignty, money, and decision-making back to Brussels without asking the British people. That is not statesmanship. That is betrayal by stealth. 10. โ€œI will announce a new summit with the EU later this yearโ€ฆโ€ Re-joining by the back door while an Iranian terror-linked operation sits in one of Londonโ€™s most expensive postcodes. The sheer gall is almost impressive. You stood at the podium today and spoke of โ€œBritish interestsโ€ while actively working against them. You swore you wouldnโ€™t rejoin the EU. You are doing it anyway. You talk of security while leaving a designated terror network untouched in central London. You lecture about the cost of living while your policies make it worse. The mask is not slipping, Keir. It has fallen off and shattered on the floor. The British people see you clearly now: a politician who values international approval and Brussels goodwill more than the nation that elected him. You are not leading Britain. You are managing its managed decline. The clock is ticking. Not in secret. Not in silence. Out loud, in broad daylight, across every pub, every kitchen table, every X feed and every street in this country. History does not forgive those who sell their own peopleโ€™s sovereignty for applause. Britain did not vote for this. Britain does not want this. And Britain will not tolerate this forever. The reckoning is coming. And it will not be kind. Britain First. No Surrender. ๐Ÿฆ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง

Christian

593,696 gรถrรผntรผleme โ€ข 3 ay รถnce

"A Colonoscopy Is Far Too Dangerous, I Recommend Against Them." Dr John McDougall, MD "7 Out Of Every 100 People Suffer Serious Major Complications." "1 In A 1,000 Have A Colon Perforation & Half Of These People Will Die. "Colonoscopies Are Harming More Lives Than It Saves." โœณ๏ธWritten Post Contains... 1โƒฃ Research data, 2โƒฃ Colonoscopy complication rates 3โƒฃ Alternative screening methods to colonoscopy 1โƒฃ The U.S. is the outlier of the world who uses colonoscopy as 1st line colon-cancer screening modality. There are about 15 million colonoscopies done in the U.S. every year. In 2001, Medicare agreed to pay for colonoscopy as a screening tool & thatโ€™s when the US made Colonoscopy as 1st line diagnostic. It is for money & profit, not health. Europe, Canada, Australia & parts of S America do not use Colonoscopy as a preventive screening. In those countries, the predominant colon-cancer screening is the stool test, or the newer version of that called FIT. The absolute risk of developing colon cancer for people following the Standard American Diet is 2.5%. Risk of cancer rate drops to almost 0% when a low carb/low sugar diet is followed. Yet, colonoscopy complication risk is 7%. One of the most serious hazards, often leading to death, is perforation of the colon, which occurs in about 1 per 1,000 procedures. It takes 1,250 people screened with colonoscopy to diagnose 1 cancer. This is almost an even exchange: for 1 cancer diagnosis & potential life saved, 1 life is lost from a complication, like perforation. 3 Highly regarded institutions warn colonoscopy does not reduce mortality... The Journal of the American Medical Association Internal Medicine boldly stated, โ€œโ€ฆthere is no randomized clinical trial (RCT) (or other high-quality evidence) showing that colonoscopy reduces CRC (colorectal cancer) mortality. In fact, the only tests shown to reduce CRC mortality in RCTs are periodic FOBT (fecal tests). The lack of benefits, & substantial costs & harms, has caused the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Care to tell the citizens of Canada: โ€œWe recommend not using colonoscopy as a screening test for colorectal cancer.โ€ The New England Journal of Medicine published the NordIC trial, the largest randomized study published on the possible benefits from colonoscopy 10 years after screening..."The risk of death from any cause was 11.03% in those who had colonoscopy & 11.04% in those who did not have a colonoscopy." Unfortunately, these undeniable findings that screening using colonoscopy will not reduce your risk of dying will have little influence on medical doctors & facilities performing this highly profitable procedure, which brings in $4Billion profit each year. 2โƒฃ Colonoscopy Complication Rates: GI Microbiome: The harsh prep of toxic polyethylene glycol (PEG) to clean out the entire digestive tract ahead of a Colonoscopy kills 99% of beneficial good bacteria. Resulting is months of digestive issues as the digestive tract attempts to recolonize. Cardiac Event: 1 in 100 will suffer an Arrhythmia or Myocardial infarction. Bleeding: 1 in 2,000 will suffer bleeding needing inpatient intervention. Bowel Perforation: 1 in 1,000 requiring emergency surgical repair with risk of fatality. Spleen Injury: 1 in 6,000 from colorectal endoscopy tool injures the Splenocolic Ligament, emergency surgery & possible fatality. Infection: 1 in 1,000 will suffer bacterial infection which can develop into Sepsis. 3โƒฃ Non Invasive alternative testing is superior to Colonoscopy, used in most other countries around the world: Virtual Colonoscopy: used for colon cancer screening & to detect polyps or other growths in the colon. Camera Pill: used for colon capsule endoscopy (CCE) to examine the colon. The M2-PK: (tumor M2-pyruvate kinase) test is a non-invasive screening test that can detect colorectal cancer & polyps early. FOBT: Fecal Occult Blood Test is a non-invasive stool test to detect blood, cancer & polyps. FIT-DNA: Fecal Immunochemical Test detects altered DNA in serum blood tests & in stool. ๐Ÿ‘‡Cardiac Events Post Colonoscopy๐Ÿ‘‡ ๐Ÿ‘‡Other Countries Use Non Invasive Colon Tests๐Ÿ‘‡ ๐Ÿ‘‡Post Colonoscopy Infections๐Ÿ‘‡ Speakers: Chris Wark & Dr John McDougall, MD
1:00

"A Colonoscopy Is Far Too Dangerous, I Recommend Against Them." Dr John McDougall, MD "7 Out Of Every 100 People Suffer Serious Major Complications." "1 In A 1,000 Have A Colon Perforation & Half Of These People Will Die. "Colonoscopies Are Harming More Lives Than It Saves." โœณ๏ธWritten Post Contains... 1โƒฃ Research data, 2โƒฃ Colonoscopy complication rates 3โƒฃ Alternative screening methods to colonoscopy 1โƒฃ The U.S. is the outlier of the world who uses colonoscopy as 1st line colon-cancer screening modality. There are about 15 million colonoscopies done in the U.S. every year. In 2001, Medicare agreed to pay for colonoscopy as a screening tool & thatโ€™s when the US made Colonoscopy as 1st line diagnostic. It is for money & profit, not health. Europe, Canada, Australia & parts of S America do not use Colonoscopy as a preventive screening. In those countries, the predominant colon-cancer screening is the stool test, or the newer version of that called FIT. The absolute risk of developing colon cancer for people following the Standard American Diet is 2.5%. Risk of cancer rate drops to almost 0% when a low carb/low sugar diet is followed. Yet, colonoscopy complication risk is 7%. One of the most serious hazards, often leading to death, is perforation of the colon, which occurs in about 1 per 1,000 procedures. It takes 1,250 people screened with colonoscopy to diagnose 1 cancer. This is almost an even exchange: for 1 cancer diagnosis & potential life saved, 1 life is lost from a complication, like perforation. 3 Highly regarded institutions warn colonoscopy does not reduce mortality... The Journal of the American Medical Association Internal Medicine boldly stated, โ€œโ€ฆthere is no randomized clinical trial (RCT) (or other high-quality evidence) showing that colonoscopy reduces CRC (colorectal cancer) mortality. In fact, the only tests shown to reduce CRC mortality in RCTs are periodic FOBT (fecal tests). The lack of benefits, & substantial costs & harms, has caused the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Care to tell the citizens of Canada: โ€œWe recommend not using colonoscopy as a screening test for colorectal cancer.โ€ The New England Journal of Medicine published the NordIC trial, the largest randomized study published on the possible benefits from colonoscopy 10 years after screening..."The risk of death from any cause was 11.03% in those who had colonoscopy & 11.04% in those who did not have a colonoscopy." Unfortunately, these undeniable findings that screening using colonoscopy will not reduce your risk of dying will have little influence on medical doctors & facilities performing this highly profitable procedure, which brings in $4Billion profit each year. 2โƒฃ Colonoscopy Complication Rates: GI Microbiome: The harsh prep of toxic polyethylene glycol (PEG) to clean out the entire digestive tract ahead of a Colonoscopy kills 99% of beneficial good bacteria. Resulting is months of digestive issues as the digestive tract attempts to recolonize. Cardiac Event: 1 in 100 will suffer an Arrhythmia or Myocardial infarction. Bleeding: 1 in 2,000 will suffer bleeding needing inpatient intervention. Bowel Perforation: 1 in 1,000 requiring emergency surgical repair with risk of fatality. Spleen Injury: 1 in 6,000 from colorectal endoscopy tool injures the Splenocolic Ligament, emergency surgery & possible fatality. Infection: 1 in 1,000 will suffer bacterial infection which can develop into Sepsis. 3โƒฃ Non Invasive alternative testing is superior to Colonoscopy, used in most other countries around the world: Virtual Colonoscopy: used for colon cancer screening & to detect polyps or other growths in the colon. Camera Pill: used for colon capsule endoscopy (CCE) to examine the colon. The M2-PK: (tumor M2-pyruvate kinase) test is a non-invasive screening test that can detect colorectal cancer & polyps early. FOBT: Fecal Occult Blood Test is a non-invasive stool test to detect blood, cancer & polyps. FIT-DNA: Fecal Immunochemical Test detects altered DNA in serum blood tests & in stool. ๐Ÿ‘‡Cardiac Events Post Colonoscopy๐Ÿ‘‡ ๐Ÿ‘‡Other Countries Use Non Invasive Colon Tests๐Ÿ‘‡ ๐Ÿ‘‡Post Colonoscopy Infections๐Ÿ‘‡ Speakers: Chris Wark & Dr John McDougall, MD

Valerie Anne Smith

710,027 gรถrรผntรผleme โ€ข 9 ay รถnce

And thatโ€™s a wrap on First Stand !! Incoming โ€œI ain't reading that, happy for u, or sorry that happenedโ€ post xD First Stand Gameplay - Was pretty happy with how the lane swaps and adjustments to Atakhan worked out. Donโ€™t know the exact number), but it felt like mostly Ruinous with games of Voracious where it made sense and no lane swaps - There was a good amount of AD/AP squishy and tank mix in each role with omega gigachad Zeka pulling out the Sylas Ahri and Akali where it made sense ๐Ÿ™ƒ - Skarner and Kalista were the outliers on priority, but teams didnโ€™t seem particularly effective with Kalistaโ€ฆ - Skarner on the other hand; will discuss with the team about larger work on him when we get back; heโ€™s too effective at too many things, while also being impotent for regular players - As announced yesterday by Greeley, weโ€™re hoping to see adaptive drafts continue with Fearless for the rest of the year, I think diversity will continue to increase as teams get better at finding lines to draft that make certain counterpick/situational champs god tier after certain champs are out; it will evolve into more of a TFT/Chess style โ€œfind the optimal line to draft with the pieces givenโ€, which the prospects are really exciting - An improvement point feels like how long it takes to end if a team gets a significant early lead; part of this is how optimal boringly slowly choking the opponent out is over 15 min, rather than changing the incentive structure so that ahead teams can make major decisive play and can end the game swiftly - Maybe an opportunity space for the futureโ€ฆ but interested in hearing peoplesโ€™ thoughts on this First Stand Experience - It was amazing and inspiring seeing how many fans were coming out to support the teams without tickets - Not only the KC fans who flew from Europe to do a meetup watch party and it was great chatting to a few, but also what felt like an unstoppable number of college girls coming out to support HLE. I think I counted about 100 wearing HLE jackets on finals day, but it was a reminder of how integrated and mainstream popular League feels in the East - As soon as the entry to the cheerfuls (signs) opened, they all charged in to go and start drawing their cards, it was honestly quite shocking the level of dedication and enthusiasm that some of these fans had, but also awesome - I canโ€™t possibly imagine something like that happening in the Westโ€ฆ - We also had the honor to play in a mini Arena tournament with a bunch of LCK Legends that have I've been watching for 15 years and didnโ€™t do too shabby; went 6th, 3rd, 2nd, but Mingyo and Sangho were too goodโ€ฆ - It will be the first and last time I get to say I killed Pray, Smeb, Kuro, Madlife, Shy on repeat :D and the players watching on stream were surprised to see the Devs were actually pretty decent LOL, which felt nice - A fan came out specifically to play with Kuro, wearing a ROX Tigers jersey and seeing the joy of getting to meet and play with your hero, she was laughing, smiling, it must have been the time of her life; itโ€™s just a reminder of how meaningful League can be and just makes us really inspired to keep working hard to make the game good Solo Q Experience and Balance - Outside of the work obligations, had some time to slam 20 Solo Q games; was pleasantly surprised by my level this time around, feels like Iโ€™m playing around solidly KR D2/D1 level, which is quite shocking, because itโ€™s not like Iโ€™m Masters level on NA right now and havenโ€™t been able to play more than 50 games in the last 6 months due to life. Probably would've won more if I wasn't such a kda player xD - Main character syndrome still feels really peak here, the person either goes 8-0 or 0-8 and is spam FFโ€™ing repeatedly, so minimizing my enemy laner impact, scaling and playing defensively to support my jungler feels most effective even though Iโ€™m playing Ori who feels like a dog champ on this server, since itโ€™s so hard to actually land QW on anyone due to their mechanics and itโ€™s risky to walk in river and so easy to die to ganks - Moving to help jungler in lost fights to avoid mental boom is the only thing that Iโ€™m finding annoying, some of these fight selections feel extremely perplexing, like Zac wanting to fight Lee at first scuttle with no prio and I end up having to sac my lane half the time to prevent them from AFKโ€™ing or soft inting because I didnโ€™t move, itโ€™s super annoyingโ€ฆ - Every post game chat also feels like at least 3 players are writing their PhD thesis, which is somewhat amusing, but also really unfortunateโ€ฆ - It feels like Lee Sin or Viego are in every game with a 30% pickrate, so if you can prevent the team from throwing and always follow them around and play secondary, they can carry, whereas on NA, Lee Sins in Diamond can't carry and suck relatively (ping hurts as well), so itโ€™s not like you can play around them reliably - It was interesting to feel again for myself just how different these champs feel in their balance state across servers, indeed in one of the press conferences there was a question about balancing decisions making no sense for the state of the champ on KR server. I can see why KR players get angry when we buff Lee because the other regions suck at him, he unironically feels 2-3% winrate stronger on KR server, same with Jayce who has a monstrous pickrate here as well - We even almost buffed Lee Sin for First Stand because heโ€™s been pretty absent from Pro, so Iโ€™m actually not quite sure what weโ€™re meant to do about thatโ€ฆ - The other thing that I forgot was how good it was to play on 2ms ping. Iโ€™m not sure whether itโ€™s net positive for the person dodging or the person hitting, but since I mostly play immobile mages, it feels like I can dodge line skillshots and range leash people more effectively, which makes Mages feel so much better, though it also means itโ€™s extremely hard to QW tag someone in a teamfight as Ori, let alone hit them with R - Iโ€™m curious if any people have done any analysis on this - I also attached typical KR Lee Sin penta ๐Ÿ˜… Anyway, back to NA tmrw, lots of work to do
0:51

And thatโ€™s a wrap on First Stand !! Incoming โ€œI ain't reading that, happy for u, or sorry that happenedโ€ post xD First Stand Gameplay - Was pretty happy with how the lane swaps and adjustments to Atakhan worked out. Donโ€™t know the exact number), but it felt like mostly Ruinous with games of Voracious where it made sense and no lane swaps - There was a good amount of AD/AP squishy and tank mix in each role with omega gigachad Zeka pulling out the Sylas Ahri and Akali where it made sense ๐Ÿ™ƒ - Skarner and Kalista were the outliers on priority, but teams didnโ€™t seem particularly effective with Kalistaโ€ฆ - Skarner on the other hand; will discuss with the team about larger work on him when we get back; heโ€™s too effective at too many things, while also being impotent for regular players - As announced yesterday by Greeley, weโ€™re hoping to see adaptive drafts continue with Fearless for the rest of the year, I think diversity will continue to increase as teams get better at finding lines to draft that make certain counterpick/situational champs god tier after certain champs are out; it will evolve into more of a TFT/Chess style โ€œfind the optimal line to draft with the pieces givenโ€, which the prospects are really exciting - An improvement point feels like how long it takes to end if a team gets a significant early lead; part of this is how optimal boringly slowly choking the opponent out is over 15 min, rather than changing the incentive structure so that ahead teams can make major decisive play and can end the game swiftly - Maybe an opportunity space for the futureโ€ฆ but interested in hearing peoplesโ€™ thoughts on this First Stand Experience - It was amazing and inspiring seeing how many fans were coming out to support the teams without tickets - Not only the KC fans who flew from Europe to do a meetup watch party and it was great chatting to a few, but also what felt like an unstoppable number of college girls coming out to support HLE. I think I counted about 100 wearing HLE jackets on finals day, but it was a reminder of how integrated and mainstream popular League feels in the East - As soon as the entry to the cheerfuls (signs) opened, they all charged in to go and start drawing their cards, it was honestly quite shocking the level of dedication and enthusiasm that some of these fans had, but also awesome - I canโ€™t possibly imagine something like that happening in the Westโ€ฆ - We also had the honor to play in a mini Arena tournament with a bunch of LCK Legends that have I've been watching for 15 years and didnโ€™t do too shabby; went 6th, 3rd, 2nd, but Mingyo and Sangho were too goodโ€ฆ - It will be the first and last time I get to say I killed Pray, Smeb, Kuro, Madlife, Shy on repeat :D and the players watching on stream were surprised to see the Devs were actually pretty decent LOL, which felt nice - A fan came out specifically to play with Kuro, wearing a ROX Tigers jersey and seeing the joy of getting to meet and play with your hero, she was laughing, smiling, it must have been the time of her life; itโ€™s just a reminder of how meaningful League can be and just makes us really inspired to keep working hard to make the game good Solo Q Experience and Balance - Outside of the work obligations, had some time to slam 20 Solo Q games; was pleasantly surprised by my level this time around, feels like Iโ€™m playing around solidly KR D2/D1 level, which is quite shocking, because itโ€™s not like Iโ€™m Masters level on NA right now and havenโ€™t been able to play more than 50 games in the last 6 months due to life. Probably would've won more if I wasn't such a kda player xD - Main character syndrome still feels really peak here, the person either goes 8-0 or 0-8 and is spam FFโ€™ing repeatedly, so minimizing my enemy laner impact, scaling and playing defensively to support my jungler feels most effective even though Iโ€™m playing Ori who feels like a dog champ on this server, since itโ€™s so hard to actually land QW on anyone due to their mechanics and itโ€™s risky to walk in river and so easy to die to ganks - Moving to help jungler in lost fights to avoid mental boom is the only thing that Iโ€™m finding annoying, some of these fight selections feel extremely perplexing, like Zac wanting to fight Lee at first scuttle with no prio and I end up having to sac my lane half the time to prevent them from AFKโ€™ing or soft inting because I didnโ€™t move, itโ€™s super annoyingโ€ฆ - Every post game chat also feels like at least 3 players are writing their PhD thesis, which is somewhat amusing, but also really unfortunateโ€ฆ - It feels like Lee Sin or Viego are in every game with a 30% pickrate, so if you can prevent the team from throwing and always follow them around and play secondary, they can carry, whereas on NA, Lee Sins in Diamond can't carry and suck relatively (ping hurts as well), so itโ€™s not like you can play around them reliably - It was interesting to feel again for myself just how different these champs feel in their balance state across servers, indeed in one of the press conferences there was a question about balancing decisions making no sense for the state of the champ on KR server. I can see why KR players get angry when we buff Lee because the other regions suck at him, he unironically feels 2-3% winrate stronger on KR server, same with Jayce who has a monstrous pickrate here as well - We even almost buffed Lee Sin for First Stand because heโ€™s been pretty absent from Pro, so Iโ€™m actually not quite sure what weโ€™re meant to do about thatโ€ฆ - The other thing that I forgot was how good it was to play on 2ms ping. Iโ€™m not sure whether itโ€™s net positive for the person dodging or the person hitting, but since I mostly play immobile mages, it feels like I can dodge line skillshots and range leash people more effectively, which makes Mages feel so much better, though it also means itโ€™s extremely hard to QW tag someone in a teamfight as Ori, let alone hit them with R - Iโ€™m curious if any people have done any analysis on this - I also attached typical KR Lee Sin penta ๐Ÿ˜… Anyway, back to NA tmrw, lots of work to do

Matt Leung-Harrison

151,855 gรถrรผntรผleme โ€ข 1 yฤฑl รถnce

Last night was the biggest disaster in the history of Tesla. Let me walk you through what actually happened on that earnings call, because the headlines are doing you a disservice: Elon Musk got on the call and admitted (his words) that Hardware 3 "simply does not have the capability to achieve unsupervised FSD." He said he wished it were otherwise. He said the memory bandwidth is one-eighth of what Hardware 4 has. And that's the end of the conversation. Approximately 4 million Tesla vehicles on the road right now have Hardware 3. Many of those owners paid $8,000 to $15,000 for Full Self-Driving capability based on Musk's repeated promises (going back to 2016) that the hardware was sufficient for full autonomy. As recently as 2022, Musk was publicly assuring owners that HW3 had the processing power to get it done. BUT IT DIDN'T Those promises are now officially broken. The solution is a "discounted trade-in" toward a new car with Hardware 4. Not a refund or a free upgrade... A discount on buying ANOTHER Tesla. Investor Ross Gerber said it too - all HW3 owners got screwed, and with roughly 285,000 FSD purchasers affected, the potential liability runs into the BILLIONS. But that's not even the worst part. Musk was asked if the current FSD v14.3 was ready for unsupervised deployment. He said yes. Then immediately walked it back and admitted Tesla has "major architectural improvements" in the pipeline that would significantly improve safety. What he really means: the software isn't SAFE ENOUGH to deploy without a human watching. Full unsupervised FSD for consumer cars is pushed to Q4 2026. At the earliest... Maybe. How many times has this deadline been pushed? I've lost count. And trust me, I've seen a lot of broken promises. But this one takes the cake. Now let's talk about the numbers everyone is celebrating: Tesla reported $22.4 billion in revenue and $0.41 in non-GAAP earnings. A "double beat." The stock popped 4% after hours. Victory, right? WRONG Dig into the actual filing: The number one driver of operating income improvement wasn't cost reductions, wasn't volume growth, wasn't FSD revenue. It was - and Tesla listed this FIRST in their own shareholder letter - "one-time benefits related to warranty and tariffs." They released warranty reserves. They booked tariff refund windfalls. They stretched supplier payments by 10 days. They took on billions in new debt. Then they presented everything through non-GAAP metrics that strip out over $1 billion in stock-based compensation. GAAP net income was $477 million on $22.4 billion in revenue. That's a 2.1% net margin. On a $1.4 trillion market cap. Let me put that in perspective: 3.75 billion shares outstanding. Annualize the Q1 GAAP profit and you get roughly $1.9 billion. That's a trailing P/E ratio north of 700. Use the adjusted number - strip out stock comp, which is a REAL cost to shareholders through dilution - and you're still at around 250x earnings. All of this is extremely bad, but I didn't even talk about the CAPEX BOMB yet... 3 months ago, Tesla guided to "over $20 billion" in 2026 capital expenditure. Last night they raised it to over $25 billion. A $5 billion increase in a single quarter. That's 3x their historical annual capex run rate - $8.5 billion in 2025, $11.3 billion in 2024. The CFO confirmed on the call that Tesla expects NEGATIVE free cash flow for the rest of the year. So you have a company generating roughly $6 billion in annual free cash flow on a good year, and they're about to spend $25 billion. The math doesn't work. They will almost certainly need to issue equity. Which means dilution. Which means the $1.9 billion in annual earnings gets spread across even MORE shares. The core auto business is literally deteriorating in real time: Tesla delivered 358,000 vehicles in Q1 (missed estimates again). They produced 408,000. That's 50,000 cars sitting on lots that nobody bought. Inventory days jumped from 10 to 27 in just a few quarters. California (their most important US market) saw registrations crash 24% year over year. Their market share in the state fell from 9.2% to 7.7%. That's on top of a Q1 2025 that was ALREADY weak from Model Y retooling. They're declining off a decline. And here's what really kills the bull case... The entire valuation rests on robotaxis, Optimus robots, and autonomy. So let's put numbers on it: Waymo - the actual leader in autonomous driving with 15 million completed rides in 2025 alone, over 127 million autonomous miles driven, operating commercially across 6 US cities with plans to expand to 20 more - just raised $16 billion at a $126 billion valuation. That's the market's verdict on what the LEADING robotaxi company is worth. $126 billion. And Waymo is YEARS ahead of Tesla in actual deployment. Tesla has 3.75 billion shares outstanding. So even if you assign $126 billion in robotaxi value (giving Tesla full credit for matching Waymo despite being nowhere close) that's $33 a share. Add the auto business at generous auto-industry multiples, maybe $20 a share. Throw in energy storage and services, $10-15. Sum of the parts gets you to roughly $65-70 a share if you're feeling generous. Maybe $50 if you're not. The stock is $387. So what exactly are you paying for? You're paying for a STORY. You're paying for PROMISES that keep getting pushed back, technology that keeps falling short, and a business plan that requires spending $25 billion a year while the core product sells fewer units at declining margins in a market where California sales just fell 24% and the federal EV tax credit is gone. I managed the number one mutual fund in America. I founded two billion-dollar hedge funds. I've been doing this since 1981. And I am telling you: Tesla at $387 is one of the most egregious mispricings I have seen in my entire career. THE CRASH WILL BE EPIC
5:21

Last night was the biggest disaster in the history of Tesla. Let me walk you through what actually happened on that earnings call, because the headlines are doing you a disservice: Elon Musk got on the call and admitted (his words) that Hardware 3 "simply does not have the capability to achieve unsupervised FSD." He said he wished it were otherwise. He said the memory bandwidth is one-eighth of what Hardware 4 has. And that's the end of the conversation. Approximately 4 million Tesla vehicles on the road right now have Hardware 3. Many of those owners paid $8,000 to $15,000 for Full Self-Driving capability based on Musk's repeated promises (going back to 2016) that the hardware was sufficient for full autonomy. As recently as 2022, Musk was publicly assuring owners that HW3 had the processing power to get it done. BUT IT DIDN'T Those promises are now officially broken. The solution is a "discounted trade-in" toward a new car with Hardware 4. Not a refund or a free upgrade... A discount on buying ANOTHER Tesla. Investor Ross Gerber said it too - all HW3 owners got screwed, and with roughly 285,000 FSD purchasers affected, the potential liability runs into the BILLIONS. But that's not even the worst part. Musk was asked if the current FSD v14.3 was ready for unsupervised deployment. He said yes. Then immediately walked it back and admitted Tesla has "major architectural improvements" in the pipeline that would significantly improve safety. What he really means: the software isn't SAFE ENOUGH to deploy without a human watching. Full unsupervised FSD for consumer cars is pushed to Q4 2026. At the earliest... Maybe. How many times has this deadline been pushed? I've lost count. And trust me, I've seen a lot of broken promises. But this one takes the cake. Now let's talk about the numbers everyone is celebrating: Tesla reported $22.4 billion in revenue and $0.41 in non-GAAP earnings. A "double beat." The stock popped 4% after hours. Victory, right? WRONG Dig into the actual filing: The number one driver of operating income improvement wasn't cost reductions, wasn't volume growth, wasn't FSD revenue. It was - and Tesla listed this FIRST in their own shareholder letter - "one-time benefits related to warranty and tariffs." They released warranty reserves. They booked tariff refund windfalls. They stretched supplier payments by 10 days. They took on billions in new debt. Then they presented everything through non-GAAP metrics that strip out over $1 billion in stock-based compensation. GAAP net income was $477 million on $22.4 billion in revenue. That's a 2.1% net margin. On a $1.4 trillion market cap. Let me put that in perspective: 3.75 billion shares outstanding. Annualize the Q1 GAAP profit and you get roughly $1.9 billion. That's a trailing P/E ratio north of 700. Use the adjusted number - strip out stock comp, which is a REAL cost to shareholders through dilution - and you're still at around 250x earnings. All of this is extremely bad, but I didn't even talk about the CAPEX BOMB yet... 3 months ago, Tesla guided to "over $20 billion" in 2026 capital expenditure. Last night they raised it to over $25 billion. A $5 billion increase in a single quarter. That's 3x their historical annual capex run rate - $8.5 billion in 2025, $11.3 billion in 2024. The CFO confirmed on the call that Tesla expects NEGATIVE free cash flow for the rest of the year. So you have a company generating roughly $6 billion in annual free cash flow on a good year, and they're about to spend $25 billion. The math doesn't work. They will almost certainly need to issue equity. Which means dilution. Which means the $1.9 billion in annual earnings gets spread across even MORE shares. The core auto business is literally deteriorating in real time: Tesla delivered 358,000 vehicles in Q1 (missed estimates again). They produced 408,000. That's 50,000 cars sitting on lots that nobody bought. Inventory days jumped from 10 to 27 in just a few quarters. California (their most important US market) saw registrations crash 24% year over year. Their market share in the state fell from 9.2% to 7.7%. That's on top of a Q1 2025 that was ALREADY weak from Model Y retooling. They're declining off a decline. And here's what really kills the bull case... The entire valuation rests on robotaxis, Optimus robots, and autonomy. So let's put numbers on it: Waymo - the actual leader in autonomous driving with 15 million completed rides in 2025 alone, over 127 million autonomous miles driven, operating commercially across 6 US cities with plans to expand to 20 more - just raised $16 billion at a $126 billion valuation. That's the market's verdict on what the LEADING robotaxi company is worth. $126 billion. And Waymo is YEARS ahead of Tesla in actual deployment. Tesla has 3.75 billion shares outstanding. So even if you assign $126 billion in robotaxi value (giving Tesla full credit for matching Waymo despite being nowhere close) that's $33 a share. Add the auto business at generous auto-industry multiples, maybe $20 a share. Throw in energy storage and services, $10-15. Sum of the parts gets you to roughly $65-70 a share if you're feeling generous. Maybe $50 if you're not. The stock is $387. So what exactly are you paying for? You're paying for a STORY. You're paying for PROMISES that keep getting pushed back, technology that keeps falling short, and a business plan that requires spending $25 billion a year while the core product sells fewer units at declining margins in a market where California sales just fell 24% and the federal EV tax credit is gone. I managed the number one mutual fund in America. I founded two billion-dollar hedge funds. I've been doing this since 1981. And I am telling you: Tesla at $387 is one of the most egregious mispricings I have seen in my entire career. THE CRASH WILL BE EPIC

George Noble

1,222,307 gรถrรผntรผleme โ€ข 2 ay รถnce

โ€˜Doctor Deathโ€™ Gives Life to Gold Mines Dave Fennell chain-smoked and studied law while winning 6 Grey Cups. He sent 3 quarterbacks to the hospital in one game, becoming 'Dr. Death' and a household name in Canada. Next Dave turned to gold exploration, building 5 ventures worth ~$5 billion. He's never shared his story publiclyโ€”until now. After dominating football, Dave Fennell's Midas touch in Guyana could lead to his greatest victory. Mining legends Louis Gignac, Rick Rule and others weigh in. "I was capable of playing very violently," recalls Fennell. "If you're going to survive as a defensive lineman. The people who are opposite you, have to be afraid of you." He played 10 seasons for the Edmonton Eskimos (renamed Elks in โ€˜21), appearing in 8 Grey Cups (Canadaโ€™s Super Bowl). The Eskimos won 6, including 5 in a row 1978-1982. Fennell, who turned 71 Feb 4, is chain smoking Marlboros on a Zoom call with me Feb 5. Heโ€™s reflecting on a career that spans beyond the gridiron to golden ventures. His resume includes co-founding Golden Star (US $467M sale in โ€˜22) and Miramar ($1.5B sale in โ€˜08). Fennell was a tenured director of Sabina ($1.1B sale in โ€˜23) and Torex ($1.2B market cap). His Reunion Gold ($485M market cap) has rapidly discovered a major gold deposit after setbacks. Fennell's sons picked up his drive too. David Jr. played Michigan State football then turned engineer. John raced luge at the Sochi Winter Olympics, now he's a corporate analyst. โ€“ Raised in a middle-class Edmonton, Alberta family, Fennell was the second of four children. โ€œI was taught very early on, you're not allowed to quit when you start something. It was not acceptable.โ€ He completed a 4 year undergrad degree at U of North Dakota in 3 years. Fennell could have gone to the NFL, but chose to stay in Edmonton, joining the Eskimos on the condition heโ€™d also go to law school. It's hard to imagine a pro athlete smoking, studying law, and winning six championships today. But Dave Fennell did it all. He planned to play pro for 10 seasons, and wondered, โ€œWhat do you do when the cheering stops?โ€ Joining a law firm next, the bosses leveraged his "Dr. Death" fame for networking. Fennell recalls, โ€œThey loved taking me to the Petroleum Club on Mondays.โ€ His law practice worked with many small miners. After three years and a Guyana field trip, Fennell decided to get into gold mining himself. At 32, Fennell founded Golden Star Resources (GSR). He partnered with Roger Morton, a U of Alberta geology professor, to explore Guyana. GSR spent $20K staking the forgotten Omai gold deposit. โ€œIt was open ground.โ€ Anaconda Copper explored Omai extensively in the late 1940s but stopped when the Korean War began. Secrets of the Anaconda Library A private detective helped Fennell find Anacondaโ€™s geological data. They learned of a cavernous library in Montana, holding 100 years of records. A librarian, just laid off, liked Fennell and sold him the Guyana files for $30K. GSR hired SNC Lavalin, with their top supercomputer, to process this historical information. It showed a big potential mine. Placer Dome partnered on Omai in โ€˜87, before walking away. Fennell didn't give up. He invited Louis Gignacโ€™s Cambior to visit Omai during a 3 day rainstorm. Cambior ended up funding construction for a 70% stake. It produced 3.7 million gold ounces from 92-05. Renowned mining investor Rick Rule says Fennell is easy to underestimate. "The physicality obscures a great intellect and a guy that's actually very kind. He's the classic entrepreneur. When he sees an opportunity, he can't not grasp it.โ€ Next, GSR pursued Cambior to partner in Suriname. โ€œIf I had a mine each time someone told me a story about a property, I'd be a very rich man,โ€ Gignac says. GSRโ€™s Rosebel discovery was in region reeling after Surinameโ€™s civil war. โ€œDavid, why donโ€™t you settle down, get married, do something easier than this,โ€ Gignac advised him. Fennell persisted, inviting Gignac to tour Rosebel. It poured rain again on that trip, which Gignac saw as a good omen after Omaiโ€™s success. Cambior eventually built the mine. Rosebel became one of South Americaโ€™s largest, yielding over 6 million ounces. Today, itโ€™s operated by Zijin. GSR stock jumped 600% in the early '90s thanks to these wins. Investor Mike Halvorson says GSRโ€™s work in the Guianas and Suriname put the area on the map for mining. โ€œBack in those days, from a political point of view, it was considered high-risk to go into the Guianas,โ€ Gignac remembers. โ€œIt took a lot of guts for [Fennell] to get involved, and a lot of guts to follow him there. We eventually mined about twice the [initial] reserves at Omai. By doing Omai, it was that much easier to do Rosebel. We were comfortable with the region and its people. There's a lot of advantages in these countries. It's simpler. Decision makers are easier to know and be in contact with.โ€ Halvorson remembers Fennell throwing a 'chirping' analyst into a pool on one Suriname stay. The guy skipped on the water like a stone. Fennell and Halvorson connected in Edmonton in the 1980s through their love of migratory bird hunting. โ€œAnything that walks, flies or swims, Dave has killed,โ€ says mining engineer Bruce McLeod, who hunts and fishes with Fennell. A massive Anaconda snake skin once adorned the crown mouldings in Fennellโ€™s Montreal offices. At 41, Fennell lucked out as the sole bidder for Sigrist House, once King Edward VIII's Bahamian villa. Fennell lived there 28 years before downsizing. In the late 90โ€™s, Fennell clashed with GSR's board and was pushed out. Later, GSR refocused on Africa and was sold to a Chinese company. To avoid GSR conflicts, Fennell eyed new gold regions. BHP's Hugo Dummett offered him all their gold assets for $80 million. But with few flush bidders, BHP sold the portfolio in pieces. Ivanhoe got Mongolia and discovered Oyu Tolgoi. Randgold took West Africa, and Harmony got East Africa. "If you'd have kept that package together, it'd be the second largest copper company [today]. And you'd be arguing with Newmont about who was the biggest gold company," Fennell says. He bought the Canadian assets for US $20.4 million. It had Hope Bay, a 4 million ounce gold discovery in the high arctic. Fennell dealt through Cambiex Exploration (CBX), where heโ€™d been appointed Chair and CEO in January โ€˜99, when CBX was a 15 cent stock with a $3.5 million market cap. CBX split the tab with Miramar, a modest gold miner sitting on cash. Miramar swallowed CBX in 2002, appointing Fennell Executive Vice Chairman. Miramar invested about $100 million in Hope Bay and led it through permitting. In 2008, Newmont bought Miramar for $1.5 billion. Every $1 invested in CBXโ€™s equity funding when Fennell took over in early โ€˜99 was worth $19.50 when Newmont acquired Miramar 9 years later. CBX shareholders made even more money through a spinout company, Ariane Gold, acquired by Cambior in โ€˜03. Rob McLeod, a geologist at Hope Bay, admired Fennell's strong presence, humour, and optimism. Fennell built bonds with Inuit partners through fishing and Crib games, easing the permitting process. Fennell would need that optimism for his next venture. โ€“ In 2004, Fennell listed Nevada explorer New Sleeper. A name change to Reunion Gold (RGD) came in 2006, after recruiting former GSR colleagues and pivoting again to the Giuanas. The stock ran from 30 cents to over $2 in early โ€˜07 on the back of a Suriname gold find. It didnโ€™t pan out. RGD crashed to 3.5 cents during the โ€˜08 financial crisis. โ€œWhen you take your shareholder's money and you say you're going to do this, and if it's not successful, my job is to fix that and I'm not going to roll all the stock back. I'm not going to wipe shareholders out,โ€ Fennell says, explaining RGDโ€™s current 1.23 billion shares. Reunion roared back above $2 again after a Guyana manganese discovery. Then, metal prices crashed, cutting RGD to one penny by 2016. โ€œYou're going to fail a hundred percent guaranteed in both exploration and football,โ€ Fennell says. โ€œThe real question is, what are you going to do after you fail?โ€ A US $10 million sale of the manganese project provided a lifeline. In 2019, Barrick partnered with Reunion on exploration, committing $4.2 million. Reunion was a 7 cent stock in 2020 when they found gold at Guyanaโ€™s Oko project. But, Barrick quickly abandoned the alliance and skipped a $3 million commitment. They even sued Reunion after Oko's success. In 2023, Barrick and RGD settled, owing nothing to each other. Oko moved from a prospect to a major gold deposit rapidly. An initial 2023 resource estimate showed 4.3 million ounces (indicated plus inferred). Fennell believes Oko could be the best gold mine in South America. He sees a 300--400,000 ounce per year, low-cost mine, with a 12 year initial mine life. "Itโ€™s going to be much bigger and longer,โ€ Fennell says, optimistically. โ€œWhether we're going to live longer is a whole different question." Reunion aims to publish a PEA study on Oko before Summer. Fennell also looks forward to a feasibility study and final permits in Q1 2015, with construction to start soon after. "From a discovery to a tier one mine in [potentially] six years, it doesn't get any better," Fennell says. Heโ€™s in Georgetown this week, talking with the Guyanese government about Oko's future. Reunionโ€™s looking at options: build, sell, merge, or partner up. Fennell wants RGD to avoid execution risk and debt. G Mining Services, led by Fennell's old friend Gignac, is advising on Oko. They've successfully built many mines, like Fruta del Norte in Ecuador (Lundin Gold - $3.7B market cap). Gignac's G Mining Ventures, doing well and on track in Brazil, could be a key player in Oko's future. โ€œThere will be a mine [at Oko]. There's absolutely no question,โ€ says Gignac. โ€œThe size, grade, and gold content. That's going to be the next one to put on his record.โ€ Thereโ€™s a slight problem with Venezuelaโ€™s claim over Guyanaโ€™s Essequibo region, where Oko is. Fennell isn't worried. He says the US will protect it because of Exxon and Chevronโ€™s huge oil investments there. Gignac says Fennell hasn't changed since they first met in the late 80s. "Always glass half-full, always enthusiastic. A track record as good as anybody at finding deals, doing exploration, and developing orebodies." Fennell is honest and a consummate salesman according to Rule. โ€œI don't think in 35 years he ever lied to me, but he would polish the living shit out of the rear view mirror.โ€ Some colourful highlights of my 2 hour Zoom with Mr. Fennell were published in raw video form below. Itโ€™s full of wisdom about gold exploration and football. โ€œDavid is one of the most low key and commercially successful entrepreneurs in [mining],โ€ Bruce McLeod wrote. โ€œHe has played a huge part in mentoring others too. Without David I wouldn't be where I am today.โ€ Fennell says, "We always overcome challenges. I never give up." Reunion Gold (RGD-TSXV) is worth $485 million at press time, last at 39.5 cents. Fennell owns 61 million RGD shares. He has warrants and options to purchase 12.6 million more. B. McLeod, Rule & Halvorson all own the stock. All figures CAD unless otherwise indicated. Like, Share, & Follow me Tommy Humphreys for more Big Score stories!
7:45

โ€˜Doctor Deathโ€™ Gives Life to Gold Mines Dave Fennell chain-smoked and studied law while winning 6 Grey Cups. He sent 3 quarterbacks to the hospital in one game, becoming 'Dr. Death' and a household name in Canada. Next Dave turned to gold exploration, building 5 ventures worth ~$5 billion. He's never shared his story publiclyโ€”until now. After dominating football, Dave Fennell's Midas touch in Guyana could lead to his greatest victory. Mining legends Louis Gignac, Rick Rule and others weigh in. "I was capable of playing very violently," recalls Fennell. "If you're going to survive as a defensive lineman. The people who are opposite you, have to be afraid of you." He played 10 seasons for the Edmonton Eskimos (renamed Elks in โ€˜21), appearing in 8 Grey Cups (Canadaโ€™s Super Bowl). The Eskimos won 6, including 5 in a row 1978-1982. Fennell, who turned 71 Feb 4, is chain smoking Marlboros on a Zoom call with me Feb 5. Heโ€™s reflecting on a career that spans beyond the gridiron to golden ventures. His resume includes co-founding Golden Star (US $467M sale in โ€˜22) and Miramar ($1.5B sale in โ€˜08). Fennell was a tenured director of Sabina ($1.1B sale in โ€˜23) and Torex ($1.2B market cap). His Reunion Gold ($485M market cap) has rapidly discovered a major gold deposit after setbacks. Fennell's sons picked up his drive too. David Jr. played Michigan State football then turned engineer. John raced luge at the Sochi Winter Olympics, now he's a corporate analyst. โ€“ Raised in a middle-class Edmonton, Alberta family, Fennell was the second of four children. โ€œI was taught very early on, you're not allowed to quit when you start something. It was not acceptable.โ€ He completed a 4 year undergrad degree at U of North Dakota in 3 years. Fennell could have gone to the NFL, but chose to stay in Edmonton, joining the Eskimos on the condition heโ€™d also go to law school. It's hard to imagine a pro athlete smoking, studying law, and winning six championships today. But Dave Fennell did it all. He planned to play pro for 10 seasons, and wondered, โ€œWhat do you do when the cheering stops?โ€ Joining a law firm next, the bosses leveraged his "Dr. Death" fame for networking. Fennell recalls, โ€œThey loved taking me to the Petroleum Club on Mondays.โ€ His law practice worked with many small miners. After three years and a Guyana field trip, Fennell decided to get into gold mining himself. At 32, Fennell founded Golden Star Resources (GSR). He partnered with Roger Morton, a U of Alberta geology professor, to explore Guyana. GSR spent $20K staking the forgotten Omai gold deposit. โ€œIt was open ground.โ€ Anaconda Copper explored Omai extensively in the late 1940s but stopped when the Korean War began. Secrets of the Anaconda Library A private detective helped Fennell find Anacondaโ€™s geological data. They learned of a cavernous library in Montana, holding 100 years of records. A librarian, just laid off, liked Fennell and sold him the Guyana files for $30K. GSR hired SNC Lavalin, with their top supercomputer, to process this historical information. It showed a big potential mine. Placer Dome partnered on Omai in โ€˜87, before walking away. Fennell didn't give up. He invited Louis Gignacโ€™s Cambior to visit Omai during a 3 day rainstorm. Cambior ended up funding construction for a 70% stake. It produced 3.7 million gold ounces from 92-05. Renowned mining investor Rick Rule says Fennell is easy to underestimate. "The physicality obscures a great intellect and a guy that's actually very kind. He's the classic entrepreneur. When he sees an opportunity, he can't not grasp it.โ€ Next, GSR pursued Cambior to partner in Suriname. โ€œIf I had a mine each time someone told me a story about a property, I'd be a very rich man,โ€ Gignac says. GSRโ€™s Rosebel discovery was in region reeling after Surinameโ€™s civil war. โ€œDavid, why donโ€™t you settle down, get married, do something easier than this,โ€ Gignac advised him. Fennell persisted, inviting Gignac to tour Rosebel. It poured rain again on that trip, which Gignac saw as a good omen after Omaiโ€™s success. Cambior eventually built the mine. Rosebel became one of South Americaโ€™s largest, yielding over 6 million ounces. Today, itโ€™s operated by Zijin. GSR stock jumped 600% in the early '90s thanks to these wins. Investor Mike Halvorson says GSRโ€™s work in the Guianas and Suriname put the area on the map for mining. โ€œBack in those days, from a political point of view, it was considered high-risk to go into the Guianas,โ€ Gignac remembers. โ€œIt took a lot of guts for [Fennell] to get involved, and a lot of guts to follow him there. We eventually mined about twice the [initial] reserves at Omai. By doing Omai, it was that much easier to do Rosebel. We were comfortable with the region and its people. There's a lot of advantages in these countries. It's simpler. Decision makers are easier to know and be in contact with.โ€ Halvorson remembers Fennell throwing a 'chirping' analyst into a pool on one Suriname stay. The guy skipped on the water like a stone. Fennell and Halvorson connected in Edmonton in the 1980s through their love of migratory bird hunting. โ€œAnything that walks, flies or swims, Dave has killed,โ€ says mining engineer Bruce McLeod, who hunts and fishes with Fennell. A massive Anaconda snake skin once adorned the crown mouldings in Fennellโ€™s Montreal offices. At 41, Fennell lucked out as the sole bidder for Sigrist House, once King Edward VIII's Bahamian villa. Fennell lived there 28 years before downsizing. In the late 90โ€™s, Fennell clashed with GSR's board and was pushed out. Later, GSR refocused on Africa and was sold to a Chinese company. To avoid GSR conflicts, Fennell eyed new gold regions. BHP's Hugo Dummett offered him all their gold assets for $80 million. But with few flush bidders, BHP sold the portfolio in pieces. Ivanhoe got Mongolia and discovered Oyu Tolgoi. Randgold took West Africa, and Harmony got East Africa. "If you'd have kept that package together, it'd be the second largest copper company [today]. And you'd be arguing with Newmont about who was the biggest gold company," Fennell says. He bought the Canadian assets for US $20.4 million. It had Hope Bay, a 4 million ounce gold discovery in the high arctic. Fennell dealt through Cambiex Exploration (CBX), where heโ€™d been appointed Chair and CEO in January โ€˜99, when CBX was a 15 cent stock with a $3.5 million market cap. CBX split the tab with Miramar, a modest gold miner sitting on cash. Miramar swallowed CBX in 2002, appointing Fennell Executive Vice Chairman. Miramar invested about $100 million in Hope Bay and led it through permitting. In 2008, Newmont bought Miramar for $1.5 billion. Every $1 invested in CBXโ€™s equity funding when Fennell took over in early โ€˜99 was worth $19.50 when Newmont acquired Miramar 9 years later. CBX shareholders made even more money through a spinout company, Ariane Gold, acquired by Cambior in โ€˜03. Rob McLeod, a geologist at Hope Bay, admired Fennell's strong presence, humour, and optimism. Fennell built bonds with Inuit partners through fishing and Crib games, easing the permitting process. Fennell would need that optimism for his next venture. โ€“ In 2004, Fennell listed Nevada explorer New Sleeper. A name change to Reunion Gold (RGD) came in 2006, after recruiting former GSR colleagues and pivoting again to the Giuanas. The stock ran from 30 cents to over $2 in early โ€˜07 on the back of a Suriname gold find. It didnโ€™t pan out. RGD crashed to 3.5 cents during the โ€˜08 financial crisis. โ€œWhen you take your shareholder's money and you say you're going to do this, and if it's not successful, my job is to fix that and I'm not going to roll all the stock back. I'm not going to wipe shareholders out,โ€ Fennell says, explaining RGDโ€™s current 1.23 billion shares. Reunion roared back above $2 again after a Guyana manganese discovery. Then, metal prices crashed, cutting RGD to one penny by 2016. โ€œYou're going to fail a hundred percent guaranteed in both exploration and football,โ€ Fennell says. โ€œThe real question is, what are you going to do after you fail?โ€ A US $10 million sale of the manganese project provided a lifeline. In 2019, Barrick partnered with Reunion on exploration, committing $4.2 million. Reunion was a 7 cent stock in 2020 when they found gold at Guyanaโ€™s Oko project. But, Barrick quickly abandoned the alliance and skipped a $3 million commitment. They even sued Reunion after Oko's success. In 2023, Barrick and RGD settled, owing nothing to each other. Oko moved from a prospect to a major gold deposit rapidly. An initial 2023 resource estimate showed 4.3 million ounces (indicated plus inferred). Fennell believes Oko could be the best gold mine in South America. He sees a 300--400,000 ounce per year, low-cost mine, with a 12 year initial mine life. "Itโ€™s going to be much bigger and longer,โ€ Fennell says, optimistically. โ€œWhether we're going to live longer is a whole different question." Reunion aims to publish a PEA study on Oko before Summer. Fennell also looks forward to a feasibility study and final permits in Q1 2015, with construction to start soon after. "From a discovery to a tier one mine in [potentially] six years, it doesn't get any better," Fennell says. Heโ€™s in Georgetown this week, talking with the Guyanese government about Oko's future. Reunionโ€™s looking at options: build, sell, merge, or partner up. Fennell wants RGD to avoid execution risk and debt. G Mining Services, led by Fennell's old friend Gignac, is advising on Oko. They've successfully built many mines, like Fruta del Norte in Ecuador (Lundin Gold - $3.7B market cap). Gignac's G Mining Ventures, doing well and on track in Brazil, could be a key player in Oko's future. โ€œThere will be a mine [at Oko]. There's absolutely no question,โ€ says Gignac. โ€œThe size, grade, and gold content. That's going to be the next one to put on his record.โ€ Thereโ€™s a slight problem with Venezuelaโ€™s claim over Guyanaโ€™s Essequibo region, where Oko is. Fennell isn't worried. He says the US will protect it because of Exxon and Chevronโ€™s huge oil investments there. Gignac says Fennell hasn't changed since they first met in the late 80s. "Always glass half-full, always enthusiastic. A track record as good as anybody at finding deals, doing exploration, and developing orebodies." Fennell is honest and a consummate salesman according to Rule. โ€œI don't think in 35 years he ever lied to me, but he would polish the living shit out of the rear view mirror.โ€ Some colourful highlights of my 2 hour Zoom with Mr. Fennell were published in raw video form below. Itโ€™s full of wisdom about gold exploration and football. โ€œDavid is one of the most low key and commercially successful entrepreneurs in [mining],โ€ Bruce McLeod wrote. โ€œHe has played a huge part in mentoring others too. Without David I wouldn't be where I am today.โ€ Fennell says, "We always overcome challenges. I never give up." Reunion Gold (RGD-TSXV) is worth $485 million at press time, last at 39.5 cents. Fennell owns 61 million RGD shares. He has warrants and options to purchase 12.6 million more. B. McLeod, Rule & Halvorson all own the stock. All figures CAD unless otherwise indicated. Like, Share, & Follow me Tommy Humphreys for more Big Score stories!

Tommy Humphreys

165,969 gรถrรผntรผleme โ€ข 2 yฤฑl รถnce

"Anyone who leaked a [UFO] report...could be prosecuted under the Espionage Act...life in prison, or death." "Maybe we can reverse engineer this so we will have this incredible edge over the rest of the world." ๐Ÿ”ฅ Dr. Phil Had Me at The Bolender Memo ๐Ÿ”ฅ (Dr. Phil continued to kill it yesterday and this was better than the last one! Link to full video (21:52) is in the replies.) "Our government has been lying to us for more than 80 years. Ask yourself why? Why do they not want you to know this is going on?" (He starts out by showing that Google searches for "UFO" have allegedly nearly tripled since last Friday night, along with searches for UAP being up 400%. And "Dr. Phil UFO" is one of the fastest rising searches in the country. If all of that is true, it's a very good thing. Especially since he's been putting out some really good videos. He mentions the latest release (#4) of UFO/UAP files from the Pentagon last Friday.) "My team and I were granted early access, exclusive access to those documents before they went public." "Our government has been lying to us, by omission AND by intentional misdirection, for 79 years." "Look at these documents. You go back as far as 1947 where they have had clear information that there are objects not of this Earth, both technologically, metallurgically, performance-wise. But yet, that has been hidden from us. They've denied that, they've actually threatened people from talking about this. Threatened with careers, imprisonment, and some, with death, because they would consider it treason." (He backs it up with documents. See below.) Dr. Phil: "For 80 years, every time there was a legitimate UAP sighting and the U.S. government had a chance to get in there, they essentially told us, 'Nothing to see here. Move along.' To be clear, a UAP sighting is not proof of little green men or alien life. It means something happened, something was observed, something occurred for which we have no explanation. That's it. "Now, let's talk about that for a second. Things happen, and we don't have any explanation for it. We don't have technology that explains that. There's something that is observed in the sky, going at a speed, stopping, making a sharp turn, reversing direction, accelerating, changing altitudes, and we don't have anything on this Earth that can do that. That's what's called unexplained. "Now, do we know where it's from? How it does that? Well, if we did, it would be explained. But we don't. We go look at all of our secret weapons. We go look at what we know through intelligence, other countries have. And let me tell you, a lot of these (laughs) - they're not close calls. They are not close calls. And some of the things that have been observed, we damn sure didn't have anything like that in the 40s or the 50s or the 60s, and we still don't, now in 2020s. "But at the very same time, our government was telling us, 'Nothing to see here: weather balloon, reflection off of an airplane, just a weather anomaly.' And, the government was simultaneously threatening its own people with criminal penalties if they ever disclosed UAP information. "If somebody that was credible, that had seen this, spoke about it, they were threatened with all kinds of penalties. We were gaslighted. 'No big deal here. Probably weather balloons, misidentified aircraft.' And a jumpy public that watched, 'Close Encounters' one too many times, thinking, 'Look, what's really going on here?' "Behind the curtain, the government was spending generations of time and resources protecting this information. Was it happening? Yes, it was happening! Do we have proof of it happening? Yes, we have proof of it happening. And what I mean by that is we have this on radar. We have credible, military pilots reporting it. "We have aircraft that have guns, and when you open a gun and go live on a fighter, there's a camera that activates, so you have video of what the gun is shooting at. You have gun cameras. If they see one of these things in front of them, they open their weapons, in case they need them, and so it shoots video of what they're seeing. "Now let's talk about some of the proof. JANAP 146 - Joint Army, Navy, Air Force publication 146 - made it a criminal offense for military personnel and commercial airline pilots to discuss UFO sightings outside official channels. The penalty, 'up to 10 years in prison and a $10,000 fine.' "So, you might see some guy down on a lake, drinking beer, that talks about something he saw over the lake. Yeah, they don't mind that guy talking. But credible people? Trained observers with instrumentation? No. They say something, they're going to prison. "Well, that took effect upon receipt. No hearings, no debate. The regulation says, 'All persons aware of the contents or existence...are governed by...espionage laws.' So not just the pilot who filed a report under JANAP 146, anyone who leaked a report. Radio operators, airline staff, anyone in the chain could be prosecuted under the Espionage Act. "You can see this yourself. Declassified copies are online today, including on the NSA's website. Now what is the Espionage Act? That's the same law used to prosecute spies. Section 793: Up to 10 years in federal prison for every violation. Section 794: If the information reaches a foreign power, life in prison, or death. "Imagine you're a TWA captain in 1955. You see something over the Pacific you just simply can't explain. You file your report like the regulation requires. And from that moment, talk to a newspaper, tell your own wife, puts you in the same legal category as a spy. "Ask yourself why. Why are they so interested in muzzling all this conversation? Why do they not want you to know this is going on? Why are you not entitled to know what's happening in the air around you? "Now, let's fast forward 20 years, 1971. Oliver Harry Turner was an Australian nuclear scientist and intelligence officer, head of the nuclear branch of Australia's Joint Intelligence Organization. He was asked to assess the American response to the growing UAP issue. "If you're thinking, what does an Australian know about U.S. military secrets? Well, the possibility of life beyond this planet is bigger than any one country. Australia and the rest of the world has a legitimate interest in what the U.S. knows. And Australia is one of our closest intelligence allies. What we now call Five Eyes. "The Five Eyes countries are the United States, Britain, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand. These countries have shared their most sensitive intelligence with each other since World War II. When a senior, Five Eyes nuclear intelligence officer writes a report about what the United States knows, well, that's serious. "He was outside the American classification system. He had no career to lose. He pieced this together from official CIA, Air Force, Congressional, and Project Blue Book records. Now this report was written May 27, 1971. Original classification: Secret. Title: Scientific and Intelligence Aspects of the UFO Problem. Report declassified by the National Archives of Australia in 2023. "On June 9th of 2026, whistleblower David Crusch (Yes, he said Crusch) stood on Capitol Hill and told the public to read pages seven through sixteen." ~ David Grusch: "There is a declassified 1971 Australian, formally-classified, Secret assessment that a couple years ago was put in the Australian National Archives. I encourage people to read page seven through sixteen, and that was the nuclear branch chief of the Australian government discussing the U.S. cover-up and the involvement of the CIA back in the 70s. And that's actually a little-known document that is publicly available." ~ Dr. Phil: "Now here's the kicker: foreign intelligence describing an American cover-up is now referenced in the files that our government is just now releasing. And here are six key findings in the Turner report. "Number one, what Turner called the facade of ridicule. Turner documents that early Air Force intelligence concluded, 'Some of these objects, 'had flight characteristics' that could best be explained as having 'extraterrestrial origin.' (The actual language says: "The early analysis of UFO reports by USAF intelligence indicated that real phenomena were being reported which had flight characteristics so far in advance of U.S. aircraft that only as extra-terrestrial origin could be envisaged." ) Dr. Phil: "Instead of telling the public, the CIA and Air Force adopted a deliberate debunking policy. "Now let that sit with you for a minute. Instead of telling the public, the CIA and Air Force adopted a deliberate debunking policy. We've got to get these people believing this isn't real. We've got to debunk this. "January 1953, Turner's own words: 'By erecting a facade of ridicule, the U.S. hoped to allay public alarm, reduce the possibility of the Soviet taking advantage of UFO mass sightings...and act as a cover-up so the U.S. can develop vehicles that emulate UFO performances.' "What's the point? Well, the point is, they were thinking, 'All right, let's keep this secret,' like we're the only ones seeing this, 'and maybe we can reverse engineer this so we will have this incredible edge over the rest of the world.' "That's a great goal, I guess, if you can go from flying-prop planes or early jets to this incredible speed. If these are extraterrestrial, and the nearest galaxy is Andromeda, which it takes two and a half million years to get to, flying at the speed of light, we're pretty far from being able to do that. "Today, in 2026, can we move at the speed of light? No. If we could, it would take two and a half million years to get to the next galaxy. We can't move at the speed of light, even now in 2026. But that was the goal. They'll find one of these and reverse engineer it." (I don't know whether or not any black program has tech that can move at the speed of light and I doubt Dr. Phil knows, either. Someone should show him what Lacatski said about being able to reverse engineer some of this acquired (alleged non-human) tech but "not to its full extent.") Dr. Phil: "Finding number two. He then talks about Project Sign. This was the U.S. Air Force's first official UFO investigation set up in late 1947. Its analysts reportedly concluded that extraterrestrial origin was the best explanation. Air Force Chief of Staff General Hoyt Vandenberg rejected that conclusion, and copies of the report were ordered destroyed. Destroyed! "And per Turner, in February 1949, members of Project Sign, 'either volunteered to leave or were compelled to leave,' and they were replaced by people, 'willing to ridicule the concept of UFOs.' "Think about this! We have sightings by legitimate observers with scientific instrumentation, and the people who are doing the observing are voluntarily leaving or compelled to leave, and replaced by people willing to ridicule the concept of UFOs. "Finding number three, what I spoke about earlier: JANAP 146. Up to 10 years in prison and a $10,000 fine for discussing sightings outside official channels. And per the regulation's own text, Chapter One, Section 102, it covered not just military personnel, but U.S. and Canadian civilian and commercial pilots. "That's legal force over airline pilots, arguably the most credible witnesses in the sky! What jurisdiction they had over Canadian pilots, I have no idea, but they listed 'em. "Turner documents a meeting between military intelligence and airline pilots at the Roosevelt Hotel in Hollywood. At that meeting, pilots were, 'coerced' to keep their sightings out of public view and inside official channels. Am I overstating it to say that there's been a cover-up, that we're being lied to? "Finding number four. But they missed the retirees. JANAP 146 only covered active service. Once you retired, you could talk. And three very senior men did so between 1953 and 1960. Admiral Roscoe Hillenkoetter, the first director of the CIA, Captain Edward Ruppelt, the man the Air Force put in charge of investigating UFOs, Major Dewey Fournet, the Pentagon's project officer on UFOs. Per Turner, all three publicly stated the U.S. government knew UFOs were extraterrestrial and was withholding the fact from the public! So when those three retired, they told the truth! "Finding five. The government then silenced retirees. Per Turner, the revised regulation JANAP 146e made UAP disclosure by retirees an offense under the Espionage Act. Then finding number six. 1969, 17 years, the Air Force ran a public-facing UFO investigation called Project Blue Book. If you wrote your congressman about a sighting, it went into the Blue Book. And in 1969, the Air Force shut down the Blue Book and told the country, 'We looked at more than 12,000 sightings. No problems. No national security threat. No need for the Blue Book.' "But a memo from General Carroll Bolender, the Air Force general, said the reason Blue Book showed no national security threats was because any national security threats were gag ordered under JANAP 146 and were quote, 'not part of the Blue Book system.' The serious reports never stopped; they just moved out of public view. "Now, I know that was a lot of information. You may need to listen back to that, but those are facts. Those are in the government's documents that have now been declassified! "If the government has known for decades that unidentified objects are flying through our skies, and therefore, we may not be alone in the Universe, then the greatest revelation in American history has also been the target of a huge cover-up. "One of the challenges of social media and TV news is taking something this complex and reducing it to sound bites. And you're getting bits and pieces from the media. That's why I invest so much time and energy giving you the real story. I don't want to tell you what you believe or don't believe, but I want to give you the information so you can make up your own mind. "This information is in the files, we just haven't had access to the files. And then when we get the files, we're given the files without any context. You see a radar screen and you see a blip, and then it moves. Well, what do you have to compare it to? Is it moving fast? Too fast? Unexplainably fast? Without any context, how are we supposed to interpret that? "Well, I'm digging in, I'm talking to experts, I'm finding out what the scale is. And what we're learning, is we don't have anything that'll move that fast. We don't have anything that'll turn that sharp. We don't have anything that will withstand those kind of G-forces."
8:27

"Anyone who leaked a [UFO] report...could be prosecuted under the Espionage Act...life in prison, or death." "Maybe we can reverse engineer this so we will have this incredible edge over the rest of the world." ๐Ÿ”ฅ Dr. Phil Had Me at The Bolender Memo ๐Ÿ”ฅ (Dr. Phil continued to kill it yesterday and this was better than the last one! Link to full video (21:52) is in the replies.) "Our government has been lying to us for more than 80 years. Ask yourself why? Why do they not want you to know this is going on?" (He starts out by showing that Google searches for "UFO" have allegedly nearly tripled since last Friday night, along with searches for UAP being up 400%. And "Dr. Phil UFO" is one of the fastest rising searches in the country. If all of that is true, it's a very good thing. Especially since he's been putting out some really good videos. He mentions the latest release (#4) of UFO/UAP files from the Pentagon last Friday.) "My team and I were granted early access, exclusive access to those documents before they went public." "Our government has been lying to us, by omission AND by intentional misdirection, for 79 years." "Look at these documents. You go back as far as 1947 where they have had clear information that there are objects not of this Earth, both technologically, metallurgically, performance-wise. But yet, that has been hidden from us. They've denied that, they've actually threatened people from talking about this. Threatened with careers, imprisonment, and some, with death, because they would consider it treason." (He backs it up with documents. See below.) Dr. Phil: "For 80 years, every time there was a legitimate UAP sighting and the U.S. government had a chance to get in there, they essentially told us, 'Nothing to see here. Move along.' To be clear, a UAP sighting is not proof of little green men or alien life. It means something happened, something was observed, something occurred for which we have no explanation. That's it. "Now, let's talk about that for a second. Things happen, and we don't have any explanation for it. We don't have technology that explains that. There's something that is observed in the sky, going at a speed, stopping, making a sharp turn, reversing direction, accelerating, changing altitudes, and we don't have anything on this Earth that can do that. That's what's called unexplained. "Now, do we know where it's from? How it does that? Well, if we did, it would be explained. But we don't. We go look at all of our secret weapons. We go look at what we know through intelligence, other countries have. And let me tell you, a lot of these (laughs) - they're not close calls. They are not close calls. And some of the things that have been observed, we damn sure didn't have anything like that in the 40s or the 50s or the 60s, and we still don't, now in 2020s. "But at the very same time, our government was telling us, 'Nothing to see here: weather balloon, reflection off of an airplane, just a weather anomaly.' And, the government was simultaneously threatening its own people with criminal penalties if they ever disclosed UAP information. "If somebody that was credible, that had seen this, spoke about it, they were threatened with all kinds of penalties. We were gaslighted. 'No big deal here. Probably weather balloons, misidentified aircraft.' And a jumpy public that watched, 'Close Encounters' one too many times, thinking, 'Look, what's really going on here?' "Behind the curtain, the government was spending generations of time and resources protecting this information. Was it happening? Yes, it was happening! Do we have proof of it happening? Yes, we have proof of it happening. And what I mean by that is we have this on radar. We have credible, military pilots reporting it. "We have aircraft that have guns, and when you open a gun and go live on a fighter, there's a camera that activates, so you have video of what the gun is shooting at. You have gun cameras. If they see one of these things in front of them, they open their weapons, in case they need them, and so it shoots video of what they're seeing. "Now let's talk about some of the proof. JANAP 146 - Joint Army, Navy, Air Force publication 146 - made it a criminal offense for military personnel and commercial airline pilots to discuss UFO sightings outside official channels. The penalty, 'up to 10 years in prison and a $10,000 fine.' "So, you might see some guy down on a lake, drinking beer, that talks about something he saw over the lake. Yeah, they don't mind that guy talking. But credible people? Trained observers with instrumentation? No. They say something, they're going to prison. "Well, that took effect upon receipt. No hearings, no debate. The regulation says, 'All persons aware of the contents or existence...are governed by...espionage laws.' So not just the pilot who filed a report under JANAP 146, anyone who leaked a report. Radio operators, airline staff, anyone in the chain could be prosecuted under the Espionage Act. "You can see this yourself. Declassified copies are online today, including on the NSA's website. Now what is the Espionage Act? That's the same law used to prosecute spies. Section 793: Up to 10 years in federal prison for every violation. Section 794: If the information reaches a foreign power, life in prison, or death. "Imagine you're a TWA captain in 1955. You see something over the Pacific you just simply can't explain. You file your report like the regulation requires. And from that moment, talk to a newspaper, tell your own wife, puts you in the same legal category as a spy. "Ask yourself why. Why are they so interested in muzzling all this conversation? Why do they not want you to know this is going on? Why are you not entitled to know what's happening in the air around you? "Now, let's fast forward 20 years, 1971. Oliver Harry Turner was an Australian nuclear scientist and intelligence officer, head of the nuclear branch of Australia's Joint Intelligence Organization. He was asked to assess the American response to the growing UAP issue. "If you're thinking, what does an Australian know about U.S. military secrets? Well, the possibility of life beyond this planet is bigger than any one country. Australia and the rest of the world has a legitimate interest in what the U.S. knows. And Australia is one of our closest intelligence allies. What we now call Five Eyes. "The Five Eyes countries are the United States, Britain, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand. These countries have shared their most sensitive intelligence with each other since World War II. When a senior, Five Eyes nuclear intelligence officer writes a report about what the United States knows, well, that's serious. "He was outside the American classification system. He had no career to lose. He pieced this together from official CIA, Air Force, Congressional, and Project Blue Book records. Now this report was written May 27, 1971. Original classification: Secret. Title: Scientific and Intelligence Aspects of the UFO Problem. Report declassified by the National Archives of Australia in 2023. "On June 9th of 2026, whistleblower David Crusch (Yes, he said Crusch) stood on Capitol Hill and told the public to read pages seven through sixteen." ~ David Grusch: "There is a declassified 1971 Australian, formally-classified, Secret assessment that a couple years ago was put in the Australian National Archives. I encourage people to read page seven through sixteen, and that was the nuclear branch chief of the Australian government discussing the U.S. cover-up and the involvement of the CIA back in the 70s. And that's actually a little-known document that is publicly available." ~ Dr. Phil: "Now here's the kicker: foreign intelligence describing an American cover-up is now referenced in the files that our government is just now releasing. And here are six key findings in the Turner report. "Number one, what Turner called the facade of ridicule. Turner documents that early Air Force intelligence concluded, 'Some of these objects, 'had flight characteristics' that could best be explained as having 'extraterrestrial origin.' (The actual language says: "The early analysis of UFO reports by USAF intelligence indicated that real phenomena were being reported which had flight characteristics so far in advance of U.S. aircraft that only as extra-terrestrial origin could be envisaged." ) Dr. Phil: "Instead of telling the public, the CIA and Air Force adopted a deliberate debunking policy. "Now let that sit with you for a minute. Instead of telling the public, the CIA and Air Force adopted a deliberate debunking policy. We've got to get these people believing this isn't real. We've got to debunk this. "January 1953, Turner's own words: 'By erecting a facade of ridicule, the U.S. hoped to allay public alarm, reduce the possibility of the Soviet taking advantage of UFO mass sightings...and act as a cover-up so the U.S. can develop vehicles that emulate UFO performances.' "What's the point? Well, the point is, they were thinking, 'All right, let's keep this secret,' like we're the only ones seeing this, 'and maybe we can reverse engineer this so we will have this incredible edge over the rest of the world.' "That's a great goal, I guess, if you can go from flying-prop planes or early jets to this incredible speed. If these are extraterrestrial, and the nearest galaxy is Andromeda, which it takes two and a half million years to get to, flying at the speed of light, we're pretty far from being able to do that. "Today, in 2026, can we move at the speed of light? No. If we could, it would take two and a half million years to get to the next galaxy. We can't move at the speed of light, even now in 2026. But that was the goal. They'll find one of these and reverse engineer it." (I don't know whether or not any black program has tech that can move at the speed of light and I doubt Dr. Phil knows, either. Someone should show him what Lacatski said about being able to reverse engineer some of this acquired (alleged non-human) tech but "not to its full extent.") Dr. Phil: "Finding number two. He then talks about Project Sign. This was the U.S. Air Force's first official UFO investigation set up in late 1947. Its analysts reportedly concluded that extraterrestrial origin was the best explanation. Air Force Chief of Staff General Hoyt Vandenberg rejected that conclusion, and copies of the report were ordered destroyed. Destroyed! "And per Turner, in February 1949, members of Project Sign, 'either volunteered to leave or were compelled to leave,' and they were replaced by people, 'willing to ridicule the concept of UFOs.' "Think about this! We have sightings by legitimate observers with scientific instrumentation, and the people who are doing the observing are voluntarily leaving or compelled to leave, and replaced by people willing to ridicule the concept of UFOs. "Finding number three, what I spoke about earlier: JANAP 146. Up to 10 years in prison and a $10,000 fine for discussing sightings outside official channels. And per the regulation's own text, Chapter One, Section 102, it covered not just military personnel, but U.S. and Canadian civilian and commercial pilots. "That's legal force over airline pilots, arguably the most credible witnesses in the sky! What jurisdiction they had over Canadian pilots, I have no idea, but they listed 'em. "Turner documents a meeting between military intelligence and airline pilots at the Roosevelt Hotel in Hollywood. At that meeting, pilots were, 'coerced' to keep their sightings out of public view and inside official channels. Am I overstating it to say that there's been a cover-up, that we're being lied to? "Finding number four. But they missed the retirees. JANAP 146 only covered active service. Once you retired, you could talk. And three very senior men did so between 1953 and 1960. Admiral Roscoe Hillenkoetter, the first director of the CIA, Captain Edward Ruppelt, the man the Air Force put in charge of investigating UFOs, Major Dewey Fournet, the Pentagon's project officer on UFOs. Per Turner, all three publicly stated the U.S. government knew UFOs were extraterrestrial and was withholding the fact from the public! So when those three retired, they told the truth! "Finding five. The government then silenced retirees. Per Turner, the revised regulation JANAP 146e made UAP disclosure by retirees an offense under the Espionage Act. Then finding number six. 1969, 17 years, the Air Force ran a public-facing UFO investigation called Project Blue Book. If you wrote your congressman about a sighting, it went into the Blue Book. And in 1969, the Air Force shut down the Blue Book and told the country, 'We looked at more than 12,000 sightings. No problems. No national security threat. No need for the Blue Book.' "But a memo from General Carroll Bolender, the Air Force general, said the reason Blue Book showed no national security threats was because any national security threats were gag ordered under JANAP 146 and were quote, 'not part of the Blue Book system.' The serious reports never stopped; they just moved out of public view. "Now, I know that was a lot of information. You may need to listen back to that, but those are facts. Those are in the government's documents that have now been declassified! "If the government has known for decades that unidentified objects are flying through our skies, and therefore, we may not be alone in the Universe, then the greatest revelation in American history has also been the target of a huge cover-up. "One of the challenges of social media and TV news is taking something this complex and reducing it to sound bites. And you're getting bits and pieces from the media. That's why I invest so much time and energy giving you the real story. I don't want to tell you what you believe or don't believe, but I want to give you the information so you can make up your own mind. "This information is in the files, we just haven't had access to the files. And then when we get the files, we're given the files without any context. You see a radar screen and you see a blip, and then it moves. Well, what do you have to compare it to? Is it moving fast? Too fast? Unexplainably fast? Without any context, how are we supposed to interpret that? "Well, I'm digging in, I'm talking to experts, I'm finding out what the scale is. And what we're learning, is we don't have anything that'll move that fast. We don't have anything that'll turn that sharp. We don't have anything that will withstand those kind of G-forces."

Joe Murgia

39,013 gรถrรผntรผleme โ€ข 2 gรผn รถnce