Sensitive content
This media may contain sensitive content.
ะะฐะณััะทะบะฐ ะฒะธะดะตะพ...
ะะต ัะดะฐะปะพัั ะทะฐะณััะทะธัั ะฒะธะดะตะพ
๐๐๐ฆ๐ข๐ฅ๐ฑ๐ฉ๐ฐ๐ฏ๐ฆ๐ด ๐๐๐ My ๐ณ๐ข๐ฏ๐ฌ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ will drive you ๐๐ถ๐น๐ฑ๐ฅต A lustful, rabid ๐ฎ๐ป๐ถ๐บ๐ฎ๐น~ ๐ท And once you've lost แดสส self-control ๐ตโ๐ซ, You'll kiss ๐ your ๐งbank balance ๐ง ๐๐ฎ๐-๐๐ฎ๐ ๐
18,722 ะฟัะพัะผะพััะพะฒ โข 10 ะผะตัััะตะฒ ะฝะฐะทะฐะด โขvia X (Twitter)
ะะพะผะผะตะฝัะฐัะธะธ: 0
ะะตั ะดะพัััะฟะฝัั ะบะพะผะผะตะฝัะฐัะธะตะฒ
ะะดะตัั ะฟะพัะฒัััั ะบะพะผะผะตะฝัะฐัะธะธ ะธะท ะพัะธะณะธะฝะฐะปัะฝะพะณะพ ะฟะพััะฐ
!["So the easiest thing that I want everyone listening [to do], whether you have one follower or a hundred followers, is to reject inclusive language. Every time media, social media, Hollywood, any of these legacy, left-wing legacy media, when they tell you you can't say something, that is your sign to say that. Whatever they say you can't say, say more of it. Whatever they say you can't bring that up, bring that up more. What you cannot do is to acquiesce. Because once they can control your thoughts, they can control your words and they control your words. They control your habits and your character. And if you're sick of all the things that you're seeing, it starts with you. It starts with your mind. And that's the best advice I can give because that's training your mind to make courage a habit. Reject inclusive language, guard your empathy. And when you do that and you say what they say you can't say or shouldn't say, and you say it anyway, then you've trained your brain to make courage a habit. Once you take that path you will never go back, meaning that if you make courage a habit and you start speaking truth and you start going, I don't care what anybody calls me, call me a racist bigot. It means nothing to me. You might as well say I have like three eyes. It doesn't mean anything to me. If you get to that point, then you'll never go back to self-silencing yourself. If you can overcome that then you're you're on your way to helping make it make a change in this country." Alvin Lui of Courage Is A Habit ๐ช ๐](https://image.24vids.com/tw-2002102493044748696/amplify_video_thumb/2002093069307686912/img/HvasRiBqTUP2T026.jpg)
![Richard Werner, formerly on the ECB's "Shadow Council," divulges the full plan for digital IDs: "The final stage is...it's the size of a grain of rice...[&] you've got the microchip implant under your skin...[&] the legal consequence may be that you're not classified as human" This clip of Werner (Richard Werner), who holds a First Class Honors BSc. in Economics from the London School of Economics and a doctorate in Economics from the University of Oxford, is taken from the International Science Summit (Uncensored), which took place in 2022. ----------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- "But what does central bank digital currency look like? You see, so they never talk about that because people won't actually like the looks of it because it apparently looks, and several central banks, apparently, as I heard from my sources, have already fully developed the final stage of CBDC. "I mean it comes in stages initially likely through your mobile phone, but it's only an intermediate step. And the final stage is, it's small and it's the size of a grain of rice. Now why is that? ...It's your digital ID. Your wallet. Can be your passport, your key. Now of course what we found with our debit cards or credit cards is they've already now moved to the system RFID chips. RFID technology where you just wave the thing contactless, that is sort of conditioning us in this direction that in the future you'll just wave your hand because you've got the microchip implant under your skin. "And because in each step there's a rational reason, it's easier just to wave this, isn't it? It's much faster because we always have to wait in the queues as everyone types in their numbers and all that. So just wave it, it's quicker. But the next rationalization will be, well, but you can lose your card, somebody can steal your card and then you're just waving this kind of risky. Well, wouldn't it be nice if you couldn't lose it and nobody could steal it? "But it's clear that that's sort of, it is almost a step too far for a lot of people because it is a violation of human dignity to actually inject something like that under the skin. So that's where you need some more persuasion. "And it's interesting that this concept of universal basic income has been around for around a century where everyone should get some kind of citizens payment. But the billionaire elites have so far not liked that. But since 2015 they've all come out, I mean all the big billionaires And World Economic Forum, have come out. Oh, this is a good idea. Universal Basic Income. "Well, why suddenly now? Because now we have the technology for the microchip implant. And so in 2017, Bill Gates came out and said that Universal Basic Income is a good idea, but it's too early to introduce it. Now, what was still missing? So we had the technology for the microchip implant, but what was missing was the digital ID hadn't been introduced. "Now this is where this whole Covid agenda had become very useful. And so the sequence has been that first they worked on the technology, they had what they wanted. It was completely made ready already quite a few years ago. "Then the question became, how can we introduce it? And, the usual game plan would have been to do what central banks in many countries have been working on for many decades, which is to create boom, bust cycles and economic crises. And then in the crisis you say, oh, here's a new idea. That's the solution to the crisis. That's how they've been operating. But in this case, it seems they concluded that, resistance will still be too high. People don't really want to accept this implant because it could also have consequences. "Apparently, we learned from the World Economic Forum that there is also an approach in law that once you have, what they call transhumanism, once you have electronic implants in the body, which is, you know, to persuade people to do that, they always say this will enhance your functions, you get more abilities, you know, like almost become superhuman. But at the same time, the legal consequence may be that you're not classified as human anymore. "You know, there's this movement out there talking about humanoid robots. And, you know, many years ago I thought, oh, to create a humanoid robot, that's a lot of work in electronics, in order to create this humanoid robot. Because when you're starting with electronics, there's a lot to build, but it's much faster if you start with a human. "So once you have certain implants, you may then be classified as a humanoid robot, which seems to be what for these transhumanist, people, you can use them and throw them away whenever you like. That becomes the next question. So once you're not classified as human anymore, but as humanoid robot, will you have human rights? And they've done, World Economic Forum has done surveys asking people, do you think humanoid robots should have human rights? And most people say no. Well, that could be you once you've accepted the microchip implant."](https://image.24vids.com/tw-1973205752560099514/amplify_video_thumb/1973199629723508737/img/y2CQIXARs2PvZCBI.jpg)
!["If you go back to 9/11, when Wesley Clark said, 'We're going to invade 7 countries in 5 years,' ...[those] were the countries [whose] central banks were not on board to do programmable money... I think one of the reasons we're seeing so much tension around Iran is because Iran right now is the big leakage in the system." This clip of Catherine Austin Fitts, a former Assistant Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, investment banker, and founder of the Solari Report (The Solari Report | Catherine Austin Fitts), is taken from a conversation with Tucker Carlson (Tucker Carlson) posted to YouTube on February 27, 2026. ---------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- Fitts: "Since 1913, the United States has had a governmental structure where the central bank, the Federal Reserve, which is the Board of Governors in Washington, and the 12 central banks, manage monetary policy. So they basically, working with the banks, run the financial transactions. The New York Fed runs the governmental accounts, they control the government bank accounts. "And their policies of fed funds, interest rate and money onto the reserve tracks affects the money supply and basically the money supply and how the money works, okay? So it's more complicated than that because they have lots of regulatory functions, but the people vote for their representatives. "So whether it's the State House or the Congress, they vote for elected representatives from their jurisdiction and area. And those people decide fiscal policy, which is what taxes do we collect, what tariffs do we collect, what bonds do we sell and raise money, and how does that money get spent? "So my representatives, your representatives, are determining fiscal policy, and the bankers are determining monetary policy. And it's a balance of power between the people and the bankers. Now with the digital control grid and programmable money, the bankers can assert control of fiscal policy and they can just decide what the taxes are and take them out of your account. And they can essentially determine the rules of how it all gets spent. "And so it's a veryโ it's sort of a financial coup d' etat that over time they want to assert complete control of fiscal and monetary policy. And essentially the legislatures will go to being sort of show and tell or go out of business. We're moving quickly in that direction where the legislatures in every country are becoming less powerful, in many cases irrelevant. "So here's my theory though. If you go back to 9/11, and when Wesley Clark said, 'We're going to invade seven countries in five years,' what you were talking about were the countries where those central banks were not on board to do programmable money, and their governance structures were not on board with essentially because of Epstein, I'll call it the RockefellerโRothschild model, there was an effort to say, okay, we're gonna basically assert control of the central banks in those countries. That's my interpretation. "And I think one of the reasons we're seeing so much tension around Iran is because Iran right now is the big leakage in the system." Carlson: "How? Wait, it's not about their nukes?" Fitts: "No. Well, Iran's central bank counts. One of the reasons it counts is because their oil and energy is very important, including for China. And that's very important in the BRIC system. What the BRIC system is trying to do is to create independent payment systems. "But if you're going to come out with programmable money with digital IDs that are interoperable globally and programmable money that that controls in each jurisdiction centrally. You can't afford leakage, and so you've got way too much leakage in the system to proceed with what they're trying to do. "And Iran is, and the BRIC nations are a sticking point and certainly Iran's oil feeding China gives China greater independence."](https://image.24vids.com/tw-2027470467448377612/amplify_video_thumb/2027468301073555456/img/E812SWXdkTAk8MAe.jpg)
