Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

—“𝘝𝘪𝘣𝘦 𝘴𝘢𝘺𝘴 𝘦𝘷𝘦𝘳𝘺𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘯𝘨.”—

beyza | furtunacuklar

2,579 subscribers

37,464 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

𝘦𝘷𝘦𝘳𝘺𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘪𝘴 𝘳𝘰𝘮𝘢𝘯𝘵𝘪𝘤 #ryeji #류옞

𝘦𝘷𝘦𝘳𝘺𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘪𝘴 𝘳𝘰𝘮𝘢𝘯𝘵𝘪𝘤 #ryeji #류옞

가악

20,633 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

Game 7 can change 𝘦𝘷𝘦𝘳𝘺𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘯𝘨 for the Sixers

Game 7 can change 𝘦𝘷𝘦𝘳𝘺𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘯𝘨 for the Sixers

Jeff McDevitt

445,182 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

𝗝𝗔𝗘𝗗𝗢 𝗠𝗔𝗭𝗘 : 𝗣𝗬𝗡 𝘃𝗶𝗱𝗲𝗼 𝘁𝗲𝗮𝘀𝗲𝗿 ( 문학소녀 ) [KOR/ENG] 𝘦𝘷𝘦𝘳𝘺𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘦𝘷𝘦𝘳𝘺𝘸𝘩𝘦𝘳𝘦 𝘢𝘭𝘭 𝘢𝘵 𝘰𝘯𝘤𝘦.

𝗝𝗔𝗘𝗗𝗢 𝗠𝗔𝗭𝗘 : 𝗣𝗬𝗡 𝘃𝗶𝗱𝗲𝗼 𝘁𝗲𝗮𝘀𝗲𝗿 ( 문학소녀 ) [KOR/ENG] 𝘦𝘷𝘦𝘳𝘺𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘦𝘷𝘦𝘳𝘺𝘸𝘩𝘦𝘳𝘦 𝘢𝘭𝘭 𝘢𝘵 𝘰𝘯𝘤𝘦.

재도 미궁 : PYN

151,966 Aufrufe • vor 3 Jahren

"𝘠𝘰𝘶 𝘸𝘢𝘯𝘵 𝘵𝘰 𝘱𝘭𝘢𝘺 𝘧𝘰𝘳 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘔𝘰𝘶𝘯𝘵𝘢𝘪𝘯𝘦𝘦𝘳𝘴 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘳𝘦𝘱𝘳𝘦𝘴𝘦𝘯𝘵 𝘦𝘷𝘦𝘳𝘺𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘴 𝘶𝘯𝘪𝘷𝘦𝘳𝘴𝘪𝘵𝘺 𝘴𝘵𝘢𝘯𝘥𝘴 𝘧𝘰𝘳"

"𝘠𝘰𝘶 𝘸𝘢𝘯𝘵 𝘵𝘰 𝘱𝘭𝘢𝘺 𝘧𝘰𝘳 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘔𝘰𝘶𝘯𝘵𝘢𝘪𝘯𝘦𝘦𝘳𝘴 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘳𝘦𝘱𝘳𝘦𝘴𝘦𝘯𝘵 𝘦𝘷𝘦𝘳𝘺𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘴 𝘶𝘯𝘪𝘷𝘦𝘳𝘴𝘪𝘵𝘺 𝘴𝘵𝘢𝘯𝘥𝘴 𝘧𝘰𝘳"

WVU Baseball

20,032 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

"𝘞𝘦'𝘷𝘦 𝘣𝘦𝘦𝘯 𝘵𝘩𝘳𝘰𝘶𝘨𝘩 𝘦𝘷𝘦𝘳𝘺𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘯𝘨, 𝘐'𝘷𝘦 𝘦𝘯𝘫𝘰𝘺𝘦𝘥 𝘢𝘭𝘭 𝘰𝘧 𝘪𝘵." Goodbye 👋 for now, Owen Farrell. #YourSaracens💫

"𝘞𝘦'𝘷𝘦 𝘣𝘦𝘦𝘯 𝘵𝘩𝘳𝘰𝘶𝘨𝘩 𝘦𝘷𝘦𝘳𝘺𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘯𝘨, 𝘐'𝘷𝘦 𝘦𝘯𝘫𝘰𝘺𝘦𝘥 𝘢𝘭𝘭 𝘰𝘧 𝘪𝘵." Goodbye 👋 for now, Owen Farrell. #YourSaracens💫

Saracens Rugby Club

17,650 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

𝘜𝘴𝘦 𝘦𝘷𝘦𝘳𝘺𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘯𝘨, 𝘩𝘢𝘷𝘦 𝘢 𝘣𝘭𝘢𝘴𝘵 today and never change, Ravi bhai! 😂🔥 Happy birthday! 🎂

𝘜𝘴𝘦 𝘦𝘷𝘦𝘳𝘺𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘯𝘨, 𝘩𝘢𝘷𝘦 𝘢 𝘣𝘭𝘢𝘴𝘵 today and never change, Ravi bhai! 😂🔥 Happy birthday! 🎂

Rajasthan Royals

189,034 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

𝘛𝘩𝘦 𝘧𝘢𝘤𝘵 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘱𝘦𝘰𝘱𝘭𝘦 𝘴𝘵𝘪𝘭𝘭 𝘬𝘯𝘰𝘸 𝘶𝘴 𝘪𝘴, 𝘪𝘯 𝘮𝘺 𝘰𝘱𝘪𝘯𝘪𝘰𝘯, 𝘢 𝘳𝘦𝘴𝘶𝘭𝘵 𝘰𝘧 𝘰𝘶𝘳 𝘮𝘶𝘴𝘪𝘤 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘰𝘧 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘣𝘪𝘨 𝘮𝘰𝘯𝘦𝘺 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘳𝘶𝘯𝘴 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘮𝘶𝘴𝘪𝘤 𝘪𝘯𝘥𝘶𝘴𝘵𝘳𝘺 𝘵𝘰𝘥𝘢𝘺. 𝘛𝘩𝘦 𝘱𝘦𝘰𝘱𝘭𝘦 𝘸𝘩𝘰 𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘵𝘳𝘰𝘭 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘪𝘯𝘥𝘶𝘴𝘵𝘳𝘺 𝘢𝘳𝘦 𝘢𝘤𝘤𝘰𝘶𝘯𝘵𝘢𝘯𝘵𝘴 𝘸𝘩𝘰 𝘳𝘦𝘤𝘺𝘤𝘭𝘦 𝘦𝘷𝘦𝘳𝘺𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘪𝘯 𝘯𝘦𝘸, 𝘯𝘰𝘴𝘵𝘢𝘭𝘨𝘪𝘤 𝘱𝘢𝘤𝘬𝘢𝘨𝘦𝘴, 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘦𝘷𝘦𝘳𝘺𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘦𝘭𝘴𝘦, 𝘵𝘰 𝘮𝘢𝘬𝘦 𝘮𝘰𝘳𝘦 𝘮𝘰𝘯𝘦𝘺. - 𝙍𝙞𝙘𝙝𝙖𝙧𝙙 𝙒𝙧𝙞𝙜𝙝𝙩

𝘛𝘩𝘦 𝘧𝘢𝘤𝘵 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘱𝘦𝘰𝘱𝘭𝘦 𝘴𝘵𝘪𝘭𝘭 𝘬𝘯𝘰𝘸 𝘶𝘴 𝘪𝘴, 𝘪𝘯 𝘮𝘺 𝘰𝘱𝘪𝘯𝘪𝘰𝘯, 𝘢 𝘳𝘦𝘴𝘶𝘭𝘵 𝘰𝘧 𝘰𝘶𝘳 𝘮𝘶𝘴𝘪𝘤 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘰𝘧 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘣𝘪𝘨 𝘮𝘰𝘯𝘦𝘺 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘳𝘶𝘯𝘴 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘮𝘶𝘴𝘪𝘤 𝘪𝘯𝘥𝘶𝘴𝘵𝘳𝘺 𝘵𝘰𝘥𝘢𝘺. 𝘛𝘩𝘦 𝘱𝘦𝘰𝘱𝘭𝘦 𝘸𝘩𝘰 𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘵𝘳𝘰𝘭 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘪𝘯𝘥𝘶𝘴𝘵𝘳𝘺 𝘢𝘳𝘦 𝘢𝘤𝘤𝘰𝘶𝘯𝘵𝘢𝘯𝘵𝘴 𝘸𝘩𝘰 𝘳𝘦𝘤𝘺𝘤𝘭𝘦 𝘦𝘷𝘦𝘳𝘺𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘪𝘯 𝘯𝘦𝘸, 𝘯𝘰𝘴𝘵𝘢𝘭𝘨𝘪𝘤 𝘱𝘢𝘤𝘬𝘢𝘨𝘦𝘴, 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘦𝘷𝘦𝘳𝘺𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘦𝘭𝘴𝘦, 𝘵𝘰 𝘮𝘢𝘬𝘦 𝘮𝘰𝘳𝘦 𝘮𝘰𝘯𝘦𝘺. - 𝙍𝙞𝙘𝙝𝙖𝙧𝙙 𝙒𝙧𝙞𝙜𝙝𝙩

Prog Rock Songs

14,115 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

Could today be the last day of Tory rule? 🔷 A look back from 2010 to the present and 𝘦𝘷𝘦𝘳𝘺𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘯𝘨 in between.

Could today be the last day of Tory rule? 🔷 A look back from 2010 to the present and 𝘦𝘷𝘦𝘳𝘺𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘯𝘨 in between.

The News Agents

523,583 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

Our Dhurandhar is here! Ready to #PlayBold and 𝘵𝘢𝘬𝘦 𝘤𝘢𝘳𝘦 𝘰𝘧 𝘦𝘷𝘦𝘳𝘺𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘯𝘨. Again. ❤️🔥 PS. Watch until the end to see Jitesh being Jitesh! 👀😂 This is Emmvee presents RCB Shorts. #ನಮ್ಮRCB #IPL2026

Our Dhurandhar is here! Ready to #PlayBold and 𝘵𝘢𝘬𝘦 𝘤𝘢𝘳𝘦 𝘰𝘧 𝘦𝘷𝘦𝘳𝘺𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘯𝘨. Again. ❤️🔥 PS. Watch until the end to see Jitesh being Jitesh! 👀😂 This is Emmvee presents RCB Shorts. #ನಮ್ಮRCB #IPL2026

Royal Challengers Bengaluru

156,172 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

“𝘐𝘵’𝘴 𝘦𝘹𝘵𝘳𝘦𝘮𝘦𝘭𝘺 𝘪𝘮𝘱𝘰𝘳𝘵𝘢𝘯𝘵 𝘵𝘰 𝘧𝘪𝘯𝘪𝘴𝘩 𝘪𝘯 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘛𝘰𝘱 2. 𝘛𝘩𝘢𝘵’𝘴 𝘰𝘶𝘳 𝘢𝘪𝘮 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘸𝘦’𝘳𝘦 𝘵𝘳𝘺𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘦𝘷𝘦𝘳𝘺𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘵𝘰 𝘢𝘤𝘩𝘪𝘦𝘷𝘦 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘵!” 👊 Time for a comeback. Time to stamp the authority. Time to head to the playoffs with momentum by our side. Let’s do this, RCB! This is bigbasket presents RCB Game Day! 🎥 #PlayBold #ನಮ್ಮRCB #IPL2025

“𝘐𝘵’𝘴 𝘦𝘹𝘵𝘳𝘦𝘮𝘦𝘭𝘺 𝘪𝘮𝘱𝘰𝘳𝘵𝘢𝘯𝘵 𝘵𝘰 𝘧𝘪𝘯𝘪𝘴𝘩 𝘪𝘯 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘛𝘰𝘱 2. 𝘛𝘩𝘢𝘵’𝘴 𝘰𝘶𝘳 𝘢𝘪𝘮 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘸𝘦’𝘳𝘦 𝘵𝘳𝘺𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘦𝘷𝘦𝘳𝘺𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘵𝘰 𝘢𝘤𝘩𝘪𝘦𝘷𝘦 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘵!” 👊 Time for a comeback. Time to stamp the authority. Time to head to the playoffs with momentum by our side. Let’s do this, RCB! This is bigbasket presents RCB Game Day! 🎥 #PlayBold #ನಮ್ಮRCB #IPL2025

Royal Challengers Bengaluru

70,818 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

"𝘊𝘰𝘢𝘤𝘩𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘪𝘴 𝘢 𝘴𝘦𝘳𝘷𝘪𝘤𝘦 𝘪𝘯𝘥𝘶𝘴𝘵𝘳𝘺! 𝘐𝘵’𝘴 𝘭𝘪𝘬𝘦 𝘩𝘰𝘴𝘱𝘪𝘵𝘢𝘭𝘪𝘵𝘺. 𝘠𝘰𝘶 𝘩𝘢𝘷𝘦 𝘵𝘰 𝘸𝘰𝘳𝘬 𝘧𝘰𝘳 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘤𝘳𝘪𝘤𝘬𝘦𝘵𝘦𝘳𝘴, 𝘦𝘷𝘦𝘳𝘺𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘪𝘴 𝘢𝘣𝘰𝘶𝘵 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘮, 𝘯𝘰𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘪𝘴 𝘢𝘣𝘰𝘶𝘵 𝘺𝘰𝘶. 𝘚𝘰 𝘺𝘰𝘶 𝘵𝘢𝘬𝘦 𝘢 𝘤𝘰𝘮𝘱𝘭𝘦𝘵𝘦 𝘣𝘢𝘤𝘬 𝘴𝘦𝘢𝘵.” Dinesh Karthik has a fun take on coaching and seems to be loving his new role at RCB. Here’s our special feature on Batting Coach and Mentor Dinesh Karthik, on bigbasket presents Bold Diaries. Get groceries, electronics and more delivered in just 10 mins. Download the Big Basket Now app and start ordering! ⌚ #PlayBold #ನಮ್ಮRCB

"𝘊𝘰𝘢𝘤𝘩𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘪𝘴 𝘢 𝘴𝘦𝘳𝘷𝘪𝘤𝘦 𝘪𝘯𝘥𝘶𝘴𝘵𝘳𝘺! 𝘐𝘵’𝘴 𝘭𝘪𝘬𝘦 𝘩𝘰𝘴𝘱𝘪𝘵𝘢𝘭𝘪𝘵𝘺. 𝘠𝘰𝘶 𝘩𝘢𝘷𝘦 𝘵𝘰 𝘸𝘰𝘳𝘬 𝘧𝘰𝘳 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘤𝘳𝘪𝘤𝘬𝘦𝘵𝘦𝘳𝘴, 𝘦𝘷𝘦𝘳𝘺𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘪𝘴 𝘢𝘣𝘰𝘶𝘵 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘮, 𝘯𝘰𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘪𝘴 𝘢𝘣𝘰𝘶𝘵 𝘺𝘰𝘶. 𝘚𝘰 𝘺𝘰𝘶 𝘵𝘢𝘬𝘦 𝘢 𝘤𝘰𝘮𝘱𝘭𝘦𝘵𝘦 𝘣𝘢𝘤𝘬 𝘴𝘦𝘢𝘵.” Dinesh Karthik has a fun take on coaching and seems to be loving his new role at RCB. Here’s our special feature on Batting Coach and Mentor Dinesh Karthik, on bigbasket presents Bold Diaries. Get groceries, electronics and more delivered in just 10 mins. Download the Big Basket Now app and start ordering! ⌚ #PlayBold #ನಮ್ಮRCB

Royal Challengers Bengaluru

141,734 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

𝐓𝐇𝐄 𝐁𝐄𝐒𝐓 𝐁𝐑𝐄𝐀𝐊𝐃𝐎𝐖𝐍 𝐎𝐅 𝐂𝐀𝐏𝐈𝐓𝐀𝐋𝐈𝐒𝐌 𝐕𝐒. 𝐒𝐎𝐂𝐈𝐀𝐋𝐈𝐒𝐌 𝐕𝐒. 𝐂𝐎𝐌𝐌𝐔𝐍𝐈𝐒𝐌 𝐘𝐎𝐔’𝐋𝐋 𝐄𝐕𝐄𝐑 𝐇𝐄𝐀𝐑 This creator explained the difference using YouTube—and it’s brilliant. 𝐂𝐚𝐩𝐢𝐭𝐚𝐥𝐢𝐬𝐦: “𝘠𝘰𝘶 𝘴𝘵𝘢𝘳𝘵 𝘢 𝘠𝘰𝘶𝘛𝘶𝘣𝘦 𝘤𝘩𝘢𝘯𝘯𝘦𝘭. 𝘠𝘰𝘶 𝘤𝘰𝘮𝘦 𝘶𝘱 𝘸𝘪𝘵𝘩 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘪𝘥𝘦𝘢, 𝘺𝘰𝘶 𝘧𝘪𝘭𝘮, 𝘺𝘰𝘶 𝘦𝘥𝘪𝘵, 𝘺𝘰𝘶 𝘣𝘶𝘪𝘭𝘥 𝘢𝘯 𝘢𝘶𝘥𝘪𝘦𝘯𝘤𝘦. 𝘛𝘩𝘦 𝘱𝘭𝘢𝘵𝘧𝘰𝘳𝘮 𝘥𝘰𝘦𝘴𝘯’𝘵 𝘨𝘶𝘢𝘳𝘢𝘯𝘵𝘦𝘦 𝘴𝘶𝘤𝘤𝘦𝘴𝘴. 𝘠𝘰𝘶𝘳 𝘦𝘧𝘧𝘰𝘳𝘵 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘮𝘢𝘳𝘬𝘦𝘵 𝘥𝘦𝘤𝘪𝘥𝘦.” 𝐒𝐨𝐜𝐢𝐚𝐥𝐢𝐬𝐦: “𝘠𝘰𝘶 𝘴𝘵𝘪𝘭𝘭 𝘩𝘢𝘷𝘦 𝘺𝘰𝘶𝘳 𝘤𝘩𝘢𝘯𝘯𝘦𝘭, 𝘣𝘶𝘵 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘨𝘰𝘷𝘦𝘳𝘯𝘮𝘦𝘯𝘵 𝘴𝘵𝘦𝘱𝘴 𝘪𝘯 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘴𝘢𝘺𝘴, 𝘺𝘰𝘶 𝘮𝘢𝘥𝘦 𝘵𝘰𝘰 𝘮𝘶𝘤𝘩 𝘮𝘰𝘯𝘦𝘺. 𝘞𝘦’𝘳𝘦 𝘨𝘰𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘵𝘰 𝘳𝘦𝘥𝘪𝘴𝘵𝘳𝘪𝘣𝘶𝘵𝘦 𝘴𝘰𝘮𝘦 𝘰𝘧 𝘺𝘰𝘶𝘳 𝘳𝘦𝘷𝘦𝘯𝘶𝘦 𝘵𝘰 𝘤𝘩𝘢𝘯𝘯𝘦𝘭𝘴 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘥𝘪𝘥𝘯’𝘵 𝘱𝘦𝘳𝘧𝘰𝘳𝘮 𝘢𝘴 𝘸𝘦𝘭𝘭 𝘢𝘴 𝘺𝘰𝘶. 𝘠𝘰𝘶 𝘵𝘦𝘤𝘩𝘯𝘪𝘤𝘢𝘭𝘭𝘺 𝘴𝘵𝘪𝘭𝘭 𝘰𝘸𝘯 𝘺𝘰𝘶𝘳 𝘣𝘳𝘢𝘯𝘥, 𝘣𝘶𝘵 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘴𝘵𝘢𝘵𝘦 𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘵𝘳𝘰𝘭𝘴 𝘩𝘰𝘸 𝘮𝘶𝘤𝘩 𝘰𝘧 𝘺𝘰𝘶𝘳 𝘴𝘶𝘤𝘤𝘦𝘴𝘴 𝘺𝘰𝘶’𝘳𝘦 𝘢𝘭𝘭𝘰𝘸𝘦𝘥 𝘵𝘰 𝘬𝘦𝘦𝘱.” 𝐂𝐨𝐦𝐦𝐮𝐧𝐢𝐬𝐦: “𝘛𝘩𝘦𝘳𝘦 𝘢𝘳𝘦 𝘯𝘰 𝘱𝘳𝘪𝘷𝘢𝘵𝘦 𝘤𝘩𝘢𝘯𝘯𝘦𝘭𝘴. 𝘛𝘩𝘦 𝘴𝘵𝘢𝘵𝘦 𝘰𝘸𝘯𝘴 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘱𝘭𝘢𝘵𝘧𝘰𝘳𝘮. 𝘛𝘩𝘦 𝘴𝘵𝘢𝘵𝘦 𝘢𝘴𝘴𝘪𝘨𝘯𝘴 𝘸𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘵𝘦𝘯𝘵 𝘺𝘰𝘶’𝘳𝘦 𝘢𝘭𝘭𝘰𝘸𝘦𝘥 𝘵𝘰 𝘤𝘳𝘦𝘢𝘵𝘦. 𝘛𝘩𝘦 𝘴𝘵𝘢𝘵𝘦 𝘥𝘦𝘤𝘪𝘥𝘦𝘴 𝘩𝘰𝘸 𝘮𝘶𝘤𝘩 𝘳𝘦𝘢𝘤𝘩 𝘺𝘰𝘶 𝘨𝘦𝘵.” Then the key insight: “𝘌𝘷𝘦𝘳𝘺 𝘱𝘳𝘰𝘮𝘪𝘴𝘦 𝘰𝘧 𝘳𝘦𝘥𝘪𝘴𝘵𝘳𝘪𝘣𝘶𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯 𝘤𝘰𝘮𝘦𝘴 𝘸𝘪𝘵𝘩 𝘤𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘳𝘢𝘭𝘪𝘻𝘦𝘥 𝘱𝘰𝘸𝘦𝘳. 𝘈𝘯𝘥 𝘤𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘳𝘢𝘭𝘪𝘻𝘦𝘥 𝘱𝘰𝘸𝘦𝘳 𝘯𝘦𝘷𝘦𝘳 𝘴𝘩𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘬𝘴. 𝘐𝘵 𝘢𝘭𝘸𝘢𝘺𝘴 𝘨𝘳𝘰𝘸𝘴.” He nailed how they sell it: “𝘐𝘵’𝘴 𝘯𝘰𝘵 𝘨𝘰𝘷𝘦𝘳𝘯𝘮𝘦𝘯𝘵 𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘵𝘳𝘰𝘭—𝘪𝘵’𝘴 ’𝘦𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘰𝘮𝘪𝘤 𝘫𝘶𝘴𝘵𝘪𝘤𝘦.’ 𝘐𝘵’𝘴 𝘯𝘰𝘵 𝘳𝘦𝘥𝘪𝘴𝘵𝘳𝘪𝘣𝘶𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯—𝘪𝘵’𝘴 ’𝘱𝘢𝘺 𝘺𝘰𝘶𝘳 𝘧𝘢𝘪𝘳 𝘴𝘩𝘢𝘳𝘦.’ 𝘐𝘧 𝘺𝘰𝘶 𝘲𝘶𝘦𝘴𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯 𝘪𝘵, 𝘺𝘰𝘶 𝘮𝘶𝘴𝘵 𝘯𝘰𝘵 𝘤𝘢𝘳𝘦 𝘢𝘣𝘰𝘶𝘵 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘱𝘰𝘰𝘳.” A 2024 poll found 𝟒𝟒% 𝐨𝐟 𝐆𝐞𝐧 𝐙 viewed socialism favorably—until they were told what it actually means (Victims of Communism Memorial Foundation). 𝐂𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐫𝐚𝐥𝐢𝐳𝐞𝐝 𝐩𝐨𝐰𝐞𝐫 𝐧𝐞𝐯𝐞𝐫 𝐬𝐡𝐫𝐢𝐧𝐤𝐬. 𝐓𝐡𝐚𝐭’𝐬 𝐧𝐨𝐭 𝐚 𝐰𝐚𝐫𝐧𝐢𝐧𝐠. 𝐈𝐭’𝐬 𝐚 𝐠𝐮𝐚𝐫𝐚𝐧𝐭𝐞𝐞.

𝐓𝐇𝐄 𝐁𝐄𝐒𝐓 𝐁𝐑𝐄𝐀𝐊𝐃𝐎𝐖𝐍 𝐎𝐅 𝐂𝐀𝐏𝐈𝐓𝐀𝐋𝐈𝐒𝐌 𝐕𝐒. 𝐒𝐎𝐂𝐈𝐀𝐋𝐈𝐒𝐌 𝐕𝐒. 𝐂𝐎𝐌𝐌𝐔𝐍𝐈𝐒𝐌 𝐘𝐎𝐔’𝐋𝐋 𝐄𝐕𝐄𝐑 𝐇𝐄𝐀𝐑 This creator explained the difference using YouTube—and it’s brilliant. 𝐂𝐚𝐩𝐢𝐭𝐚𝐥𝐢𝐬𝐦: “𝘠𝘰𝘶 𝘴𝘵𝘢𝘳𝘵 𝘢 𝘠𝘰𝘶𝘛𝘶𝘣𝘦 𝘤𝘩𝘢𝘯𝘯𝘦𝘭. 𝘠𝘰𝘶 𝘤𝘰𝘮𝘦 𝘶𝘱 𝘸𝘪𝘵𝘩 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘪𝘥𝘦𝘢, 𝘺𝘰𝘶 𝘧𝘪𝘭𝘮, 𝘺𝘰𝘶 𝘦𝘥𝘪𝘵, 𝘺𝘰𝘶 𝘣𝘶𝘪𝘭𝘥 𝘢𝘯 𝘢𝘶𝘥𝘪𝘦𝘯𝘤𝘦. 𝘛𝘩𝘦 𝘱𝘭𝘢𝘵𝘧𝘰𝘳𝘮 𝘥𝘰𝘦𝘴𝘯’𝘵 𝘨𝘶𝘢𝘳𝘢𝘯𝘵𝘦𝘦 𝘴𝘶𝘤𝘤𝘦𝘴𝘴. 𝘠𝘰𝘶𝘳 𝘦𝘧𝘧𝘰𝘳𝘵 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘮𝘢𝘳𝘬𝘦𝘵 𝘥𝘦𝘤𝘪𝘥𝘦.” 𝐒𝐨𝐜𝐢𝐚𝐥𝐢𝐬𝐦: “𝘠𝘰𝘶 𝘴𝘵𝘪𝘭𝘭 𝘩𝘢𝘷𝘦 𝘺𝘰𝘶𝘳 𝘤𝘩𝘢𝘯𝘯𝘦𝘭, 𝘣𝘶𝘵 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘨𝘰𝘷𝘦𝘳𝘯𝘮𝘦𝘯𝘵 𝘴𝘵𝘦𝘱𝘴 𝘪𝘯 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘴𝘢𝘺𝘴, 𝘺𝘰𝘶 𝘮𝘢𝘥𝘦 𝘵𝘰𝘰 𝘮𝘶𝘤𝘩 𝘮𝘰𝘯𝘦𝘺. 𝘞𝘦’𝘳𝘦 𝘨𝘰𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘵𝘰 𝘳𝘦𝘥𝘪𝘴𝘵𝘳𝘪𝘣𝘶𝘵𝘦 𝘴𝘰𝘮𝘦 𝘰𝘧 𝘺𝘰𝘶𝘳 𝘳𝘦𝘷𝘦𝘯𝘶𝘦 𝘵𝘰 𝘤𝘩𝘢𝘯𝘯𝘦𝘭𝘴 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘥𝘪𝘥𝘯’𝘵 𝘱𝘦𝘳𝘧𝘰𝘳𝘮 𝘢𝘴 𝘸𝘦𝘭𝘭 𝘢𝘴 𝘺𝘰𝘶. 𝘠𝘰𝘶 𝘵𝘦𝘤𝘩𝘯𝘪𝘤𝘢𝘭𝘭𝘺 𝘴𝘵𝘪𝘭𝘭 𝘰𝘸𝘯 𝘺𝘰𝘶𝘳 𝘣𝘳𝘢𝘯𝘥, 𝘣𝘶𝘵 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘴𝘵𝘢𝘵𝘦 𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘵𝘳𝘰𝘭𝘴 𝘩𝘰𝘸 𝘮𝘶𝘤𝘩 𝘰𝘧 𝘺𝘰𝘶𝘳 𝘴𝘶𝘤𝘤𝘦𝘴𝘴 𝘺𝘰𝘶’𝘳𝘦 𝘢𝘭𝘭𝘰𝘸𝘦𝘥 𝘵𝘰 𝘬𝘦𝘦𝘱.” 𝐂𝐨𝐦𝐦𝐮𝐧𝐢𝐬𝐦: “𝘛𝘩𝘦𝘳𝘦 𝘢𝘳𝘦 𝘯𝘰 𝘱𝘳𝘪𝘷𝘢𝘵𝘦 𝘤𝘩𝘢𝘯𝘯𝘦𝘭𝘴. 𝘛𝘩𝘦 𝘴𝘵𝘢𝘵𝘦 𝘰𝘸𝘯𝘴 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘱𝘭𝘢𝘵𝘧𝘰𝘳𝘮. 𝘛𝘩𝘦 𝘴𝘵𝘢𝘵𝘦 𝘢𝘴𝘴𝘪𝘨𝘯𝘴 𝘸𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘵𝘦𝘯𝘵 𝘺𝘰𝘶’𝘳𝘦 𝘢𝘭𝘭𝘰𝘸𝘦𝘥 𝘵𝘰 𝘤𝘳𝘦𝘢𝘵𝘦. 𝘛𝘩𝘦 𝘴𝘵𝘢𝘵𝘦 𝘥𝘦𝘤𝘪𝘥𝘦𝘴 𝘩𝘰𝘸 𝘮𝘶𝘤𝘩 𝘳𝘦𝘢𝘤𝘩 𝘺𝘰𝘶 𝘨𝘦𝘵.” Then the key insight: “𝘌𝘷𝘦𝘳𝘺 𝘱𝘳𝘰𝘮𝘪𝘴𝘦 𝘰𝘧 𝘳𝘦𝘥𝘪𝘴𝘵𝘳𝘪𝘣𝘶𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯 𝘤𝘰𝘮𝘦𝘴 𝘸𝘪𝘵𝘩 𝘤𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘳𝘢𝘭𝘪𝘻𝘦𝘥 𝘱𝘰𝘸𝘦𝘳. 𝘈𝘯𝘥 𝘤𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘳𝘢𝘭𝘪𝘻𝘦𝘥 𝘱𝘰𝘸𝘦𝘳 𝘯𝘦𝘷𝘦𝘳 𝘴𝘩𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘬𝘴. 𝘐𝘵 𝘢𝘭𝘸𝘢𝘺𝘴 𝘨𝘳𝘰𝘸𝘴.” He nailed how they sell it: “𝘐𝘵’𝘴 𝘯𝘰𝘵 𝘨𝘰𝘷𝘦𝘳𝘯𝘮𝘦𝘯𝘵 𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘵𝘳𝘰𝘭—𝘪𝘵’𝘴 ’𝘦𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘰𝘮𝘪𝘤 𝘫𝘶𝘴𝘵𝘪𝘤𝘦.’ 𝘐𝘵’𝘴 𝘯𝘰𝘵 𝘳𝘦𝘥𝘪𝘴𝘵𝘳𝘪𝘣𝘶𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯—𝘪𝘵’𝘴 ’𝘱𝘢𝘺 𝘺𝘰𝘶𝘳 𝘧𝘢𝘪𝘳 𝘴𝘩𝘢𝘳𝘦.’ 𝘐𝘧 𝘺𝘰𝘶 𝘲𝘶𝘦𝘴𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯 𝘪𝘵, 𝘺𝘰𝘶 𝘮𝘶𝘴𝘵 𝘯𝘰𝘵 𝘤𝘢𝘳𝘦 𝘢𝘣𝘰𝘶𝘵 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘱𝘰𝘰𝘳.” A 2024 poll found 𝟒𝟒% 𝐨𝐟 𝐆𝐞𝐧 𝐙 viewed socialism favorably—until they were told what it actually means (Victims of Communism Memorial Foundation). 𝐂𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐫𝐚𝐥𝐢𝐳𝐞𝐝 𝐩𝐨𝐰𝐞𝐫 𝐧𝐞𝐯𝐞𝐫 𝐬𝐡𝐫𝐢𝐧𝐤𝐬. 𝐓𝐡𝐚𝐭’𝐬 𝐧𝐨𝐭 𝐚 𝐰𝐚𝐫𝐧𝐢𝐧𝐠. 𝐈𝐭’𝐬 𝐚 𝐠𝐮𝐚𝐫𝐚𝐧𝐭𝐞𝐞.

M.A. Rothman

75,206 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

𝐇𝐔𝐌𝐀𝐍 𝐑𝐈𝐆𝐇𝐓𝐒 𝐅𝐎𝐑 𝐄𝐕𝐄𝐑𝐘𝐎𝐍𝐄 𝐄𝐗𝐂𝐄𝐏𝐓 𝐓𝐇𝐄 𝐎𝐍𝐄𝐒 𝐖𝐄 𝐃𝐎𝐍’𝐓 𝐖𝐀𝐍𝐓 Joe Rogan played a clip from the “𝘕𝘰 𝘒𝘪𝘯𝘨𝘴” protest and watched the same thing happen five times in a row. A man with a beard and long hair — looking like a hippie, Rogan noted — walks up to protesters and asks the simplest possible question. 𝐀𝐫𝐞 𝐲𝐨𝐮 𝐟𝐨𝐫 𝐡𝐮𝐦𝐚𝐧 𝐫𝐢𝐠𝐡𝐭𝐬? Every single person says yes. Every single person means it. Then he asks the follow-up. “𝘏𝘰𝘸 𝘢𝘣𝘰𝘶𝘵 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘶𝘯𝘣𝘰𝘳𝘯?” First protester: “𝘍𝘰𝘳 𝘦𝘷𝘦𝘳𝘺𝘣𝘰𝘥𝘺. 𝘠𝘦𝘴, 𝘰𝘧 𝘤𝘰𝘶𝘳𝘴𝘦.” Then: “𝘌𝘷𝘦𝘯 𝘱𝘦𝘰𝘱𝘭𝘦 𝘪𝘯 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘸𝘰𝘮𝘣?” Pause. “𝘞𝘦𝘭𝘭, 𝘪𝘵 𝘢𝘭𝘭 𝘥𝘦𝘱𝘦𝘯𝘥𝘴 𝘰𝘯 𝘪𝘧 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘺’𝘳𝘦 𝘢𝘤𝘵𝘶𝘢𝘭𝘭𝘺 𝘢 𝘣𝘢𝘣𝘺 𝘰𝘳 𝘯𝘰𝘵.” The man responds: “𝘚𝘤𝘪𝘦𝘯𝘤𝘦 𝘴𝘢𝘺𝘴 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘺 𝘢𝘳𝘦.” The protester: “𝘞𝘦𝘭𝘭, 𝘪𝘵 𝘥𝘦𝘱𝘦𝘯𝘥𝘴 𝘰𝘯 𝘸𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘴𝘤𝘪𝘦𝘯𝘤𝘦 𝘺𝘰𝘶’𝘳𝘦 𝘵𝘢𝘭𝘬𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘢𝘣𝘰𝘶𝘵.” The man: 𝟗𝟔 𝐩𝐞𝐫𝐜𝐞𝐧𝐭 𝐨𝐟 𝐚𝐥𝐥 𝐛𝐢𝐨𝐥𝐨𝐠𝐢𝐬𝐭𝐬, 𝐚𝐜𝐜𝐨𝐫𝐝𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐭𝐨 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐍𝐈𝐇. Second protester. Same opener. “𝘛𝘩𝘰𝘶𝘨𝘩𝘵𝘴 𝘰𝘯 𝘩𝘶𝘮𝘢𝘯 𝘳𝘪𝘨𝘩𝘵𝘴?” — “𝘐’𝘮 𝘢𝘭𝘭 𝘧𝘰𝘳 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘮.” — “𝘍𝘰𝘳 𝘦𝘷𝘦𝘳𝘺𝘣𝘰𝘥𝘺, 𝘳𝘪𝘨𝘩𝘵?” — “𝘠𝘦𝘢𝘩.” — “𝘌𝘷𝘦𝘯 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘶𝘯𝘣𝘰𝘳𝘯?” — “𝘈𝘯 𝘶𝘯𝘣𝘰𝘳𝘯 𝘸𝘩𝘢𝘵?” Third. “𝘕𝘰 𝘳𝘪𝘨𝘩𝘵𝘴 𝘧𝘰𝘳 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘮.” Rogan watched the pattern repeat and said what every viewer was thinking: “𝘐𝘵’𝘴 𝘢𝘭𝘮𝘰𝘴𝘵 𝘭𝘪𝘬𝘦 𝘦𝘷𝘦𝘳𝘺𝘣𝘰𝘥𝘺’𝘴 𝘶𝘯𝘥𝘦𝘳 𝘢 𝘴𝘱𝘦𝘭𝘭.” That’s the line. Not angry. Not partisan. Just the observation that 𝐚 𝐜𝐫𝐨𝐰𝐝 𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝐜𝐚𝐦𝐞 𝐭𝐨 𝐦𝐚𝐫𝐜𝐡 𝐟𝐨𝐫 𝐡𝐮𝐦𝐚𝐧 𝐫𝐢𝐠𝐡𝐭𝐬 𝐜𝐨𝐮𝐥𝐝𝐧’𝐭 𝐡𝐨𝐥𝐝 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐩𝐫𝐢𝐧𝐜𝐢𝐩𝐥𝐞 𝐟𝐨𝐫 𝐭𝐡𝐢𝐫𝐭𝐲 𝐬𝐞𝐜𝐨𝐧𝐝𝐬 when applied to the people who can’t march for themselves. 𝐑𝐈𝐆𝐇𝐓𝐒 𝐓𝐇𝐀𝐓 𝐂𝐎𝐌𝐄 𝐖𝐈𝐓𝐇 𝐄𝐗𝐂𝐄𝐏𝐓𝐈𝐎𝐍𝐒 𝐀𝐑𝐄𝐍’𝐓 𝐑𝐈𝐆𝐇𝐓𝐒

𝐇𝐔𝐌𝐀𝐍 𝐑𝐈𝐆𝐇𝐓𝐒 𝐅𝐎𝐑 𝐄𝐕𝐄𝐑𝐘𝐎𝐍𝐄 𝐄𝐗𝐂𝐄𝐏𝐓 𝐓𝐇𝐄 𝐎𝐍𝐄𝐒 𝐖𝐄 𝐃𝐎𝐍’𝐓 𝐖𝐀𝐍𝐓 Joe Rogan played a clip from the “𝘕𝘰 𝘒𝘪𝘯𝘨𝘴” protest and watched the same thing happen five times in a row. A man with a beard and long hair — looking like a hippie, Rogan noted — walks up to protesters and asks the simplest possible question. 𝐀𝐫𝐞 𝐲𝐨𝐮 𝐟𝐨𝐫 𝐡𝐮𝐦𝐚𝐧 𝐫𝐢𝐠𝐡𝐭𝐬? Every single person says yes. Every single person means it. Then he asks the follow-up. “𝘏𝘰𝘸 𝘢𝘣𝘰𝘶𝘵 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘶𝘯𝘣𝘰𝘳𝘯?” First protester: “𝘍𝘰𝘳 𝘦𝘷𝘦𝘳𝘺𝘣𝘰𝘥𝘺. 𝘠𝘦𝘴, 𝘰𝘧 𝘤𝘰𝘶𝘳𝘴𝘦.” Then: “𝘌𝘷𝘦𝘯 𝘱𝘦𝘰𝘱𝘭𝘦 𝘪𝘯 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘸𝘰𝘮𝘣?” Pause. “𝘞𝘦𝘭𝘭, 𝘪𝘵 𝘢𝘭𝘭 𝘥𝘦𝘱𝘦𝘯𝘥𝘴 𝘰𝘯 𝘪𝘧 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘺’𝘳𝘦 𝘢𝘤𝘵𝘶𝘢𝘭𝘭𝘺 𝘢 𝘣𝘢𝘣𝘺 𝘰𝘳 𝘯𝘰𝘵.” The man responds: “𝘚𝘤𝘪𝘦𝘯𝘤𝘦 𝘴𝘢𝘺𝘴 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘺 𝘢𝘳𝘦.” The protester: “𝘞𝘦𝘭𝘭, 𝘪𝘵 𝘥𝘦𝘱𝘦𝘯𝘥𝘴 𝘰𝘯 𝘸𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘴𝘤𝘪𝘦𝘯𝘤𝘦 𝘺𝘰𝘶’𝘳𝘦 𝘵𝘢𝘭𝘬𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘢𝘣𝘰𝘶𝘵.” The man: 𝟗𝟔 𝐩𝐞𝐫𝐜𝐞𝐧𝐭 𝐨𝐟 𝐚𝐥𝐥 𝐛𝐢𝐨𝐥𝐨𝐠𝐢𝐬𝐭𝐬, 𝐚𝐜𝐜𝐨𝐫𝐝𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐭𝐨 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐍𝐈𝐇. Second protester. Same opener. “𝘛𝘩𝘰𝘶𝘨𝘩𝘵𝘴 𝘰𝘯 𝘩𝘶𝘮𝘢𝘯 𝘳𝘪𝘨𝘩𝘵𝘴?” — “𝘐’𝘮 𝘢𝘭𝘭 𝘧𝘰𝘳 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘮.” — “𝘍𝘰𝘳 𝘦𝘷𝘦𝘳𝘺𝘣𝘰𝘥𝘺, 𝘳𝘪𝘨𝘩𝘵?” — “𝘠𝘦𝘢𝘩.” — “𝘌𝘷𝘦𝘯 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘶𝘯𝘣𝘰𝘳𝘯?” — “𝘈𝘯 𝘶𝘯𝘣𝘰𝘳𝘯 𝘸𝘩𝘢𝘵?” Third. “𝘕𝘰 𝘳𝘪𝘨𝘩𝘵𝘴 𝘧𝘰𝘳 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘮.” Rogan watched the pattern repeat and said what every viewer was thinking: “𝘐𝘵’𝘴 𝘢𝘭𝘮𝘰𝘴𝘵 𝘭𝘪𝘬𝘦 𝘦𝘷𝘦𝘳𝘺𝘣𝘰𝘥𝘺’𝘴 𝘶𝘯𝘥𝘦𝘳 𝘢 𝘴𝘱𝘦𝘭𝘭.” That’s the line. Not angry. Not partisan. Just the observation that 𝐚 𝐜𝐫𝐨𝐰𝐝 𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝐜𝐚𝐦𝐞 𝐭𝐨 𝐦𝐚𝐫𝐜𝐡 𝐟𝐨𝐫 𝐡𝐮𝐦𝐚𝐧 𝐫𝐢𝐠𝐡𝐭𝐬 𝐜𝐨𝐮𝐥𝐝𝐧’𝐭 𝐡𝐨𝐥𝐝 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐩𝐫𝐢𝐧𝐜𝐢𝐩𝐥𝐞 𝐟𝐨𝐫 𝐭𝐡𝐢𝐫𝐭𝐲 𝐬𝐞𝐜𝐨𝐧𝐝𝐬 when applied to the people who can’t march for themselves. 𝐑𝐈𝐆𝐇𝐓𝐒 𝐓𝐇𝐀𝐓 𝐂𝐎𝐌𝐄 𝐖𝐈𝐓𝐇 𝐄𝐗𝐂𝐄𝐏𝐓𝐈𝐎𝐍𝐒 𝐀𝐑𝐄𝐍’𝐓 𝐑𝐈𝐆𝐇𝐓𝐒

M.A. Rothman

335,453 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

𝐑𝐈𝐂𝐊 𝐒𝐂𝐎𝐓𝐓 𝐁𝐘𝐏𝐀𝐒𝐒𝐄𝐒 𝐓𝐇𝐔𝐍𝐄 𝐓𝐎 𝐈𝐍𝐕𝐈𝐓𝐄 𝐓𝐑𝐔𝐌𝐏: “𝟐𝟕 𝐒𝐄𝐍𝐀𝐓𝐎𝐑𝐒 𝐂𝐎𝐔𝐋𝐃 𝐎𝐔𝐒𝐓 𝐇𝐈𝐌 𝐓𝐎𝐃𝐀𝐘 𝐀𝐓 𝐋𝐔𝐍𝐂𝐇” Rick Scott — the senator from Florida who ran against John Thune for Senate Majority Leader at the start of this Congress — just executed a move that’s sending shockwaves through the Republican conference. Scott personally invited President Trump to meet with the 𝐒𝐞𝐧𝐚𝐭𝐞 𝐒𝐭𝐞𝐞𝐫𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐂𝐨𝐦𝐦𝐢𝐭𝐭𝐞𝐞, the conservative bloc of roughly 25 senators, without clearing it with Thune. The Majority Leader wasn’t invited. He likely didn’t attend. Trump arrived in a motorcade of roughly 30 vehicles and delivered his terms directly to the conservative wing of his own party. His message: “𝘐 𝘸𝘪𝘭𝘭 𝘯𝘰𝘵 𝘴𝘪𝘨𝘯 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘩𝘰𝘶𝘴𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘭𝘦𝘨𝘪𝘴𝘭𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯 𝘶𝘯𝘵𝘪𝘭 𝘐 𝘨𝘦𝘵 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘚𝘢𝘷𝘦 𝘈𝘮𝘦𝘳𝘪𝘤𝘢 𝘈𝘤𝘵.” The housing bill signing was scheduled for today. Trump cancelled it. 𝐍𝐨 𝐒𝐀𝐕𝐄 𝐀𝐜𝐭, 𝐧𝐨 𝐡𝐨𝐮𝐬𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐛𝐢𝐥𝐥. The political reporter covering the meeting gave Thune’s situation a blunt assessment: “𝘐𝘵 𝘣𝘢𝘴𝘪𝘤𝘢𝘭𝘭𝘺 𝘴𝘢𝘺𝘴, 𝘩𝘦𝘺, 𝘺𝘰𝘶’𝘳𝘦 𝘰𝘯 𝘯𝘰𝘵𝘪𝘤𝘦, 𝘬𝘪𝘥.” And then the number that lands like a hammer: “𝘛𝘸𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘺-𝘴𝘦𝘷𝘦𝘯 𝘴𝘦𝘯𝘢𝘵𝘰𝘳𝘴 𝘤𝘰𝘶𝘭𝘥 𝘰𝘶𝘴𝘵 𝘛𝘩𝘶𝘯𝘦 𝘵𝘰𝘥𝘢𝘺 𝘢𝘵 𝘭𝘶𝘯𝘤𝘩.” The reporter added: “𝘐’𝘷𝘦 𝘯𝘦𝘷𝘦𝘳 𝘩𝘦𝘢𝘳𝘥 𝘴𝘶𝘤𝘩 𝘵𝘢𝘭𝘬 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘣𝘶𝘻𝘻 𝘢𝘣𝘰𝘶𝘵 𝘰𝘶𝘴𝘵𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘢 𝘮𝘢𝘫𝘰𝘳𝘪𝘵𝘺 𝘭𝘦𝘢𝘥𝘦𝘳 𝘪𝘯 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘮𝘪𝘥𝘥𝘭𝘦 𝘰𝘧 𝘢 𝘴𝘦𝘴𝘴𝘪𝘰𝘯 𝘪𝘯 𝘢𝘭𝘭 𝘮𝘺 𝘺𝘦𝘢𝘳𝘴 𝘰𝘧 𝘤𝘰𝘷𝘦𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘱𝘰𝘭𝘪𝘵𝘪𝘤𝘴.” The Majority Leader position is not in the Constitution. It’s a party post — 27 Republican senators can remove him at any moment. That’s the math Thune is staring at. The SAVE Act is the pressure point. Pass it or face a caucus that’s already talking about finding a replacement mid-session. 𝐓𝐫𝐮𝐦𝐩 𝐝𝐢𝐝𝐧’𝐭 𝐧𝐞𝐞𝐝 𝐓𝐡𝐮𝐧𝐞 𝐚𝐭 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐭𝐚𝐛𝐥𝐞. 𝐇𝐞 𝐰𝐞𝐧𝐭 𝐚𝐫𝐨𝐮𝐧𝐝 𝐡𝐢𝐦.

𝐑𝐈𝐂𝐊 𝐒𝐂𝐎𝐓𝐓 𝐁𝐘𝐏𝐀𝐒𝐒𝐄𝐒 𝐓𝐇𝐔𝐍𝐄 𝐓𝐎 𝐈𝐍𝐕𝐈𝐓𝐄 𝐓𝐑𝐔𝐌𝐏: “𝟐𝟕 𝐒𝐄𝐍𝐀𝐓𝐎𝐑𝐒 𝐂𝐎𝐔𝐋𝐃 𝐎𝐔𝐒𝐓 𝐇𝐈𝐌 𝐓𝐎𝐃𝐀𝐘 𝐀𝐓 𝐋𝐔𝐍𝐂𝐇” Rick Scott — the senator from Florida who ran against John Thune for Senate Majority Leader at the start of this Congress — just executed a move that’s sending shockwaves through the Republican conference. Scott personally invited President Trump to meet with the 𝐒𝐞𝐧𝐚𝐭𝐞 𝐒𝐭𝐞𝐞𝐫𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐂𝐨𝐦𝐦𝐢𝐭𝐭𝐞𝐞, the conservative bloc of roughly 25 senators, without clearing it with Thune. The Majority Leader wasn’t invited. He likely didn’t attend. Trump arrived in a motorcade of roughly 30 vehicles and delivered his terms directly to the conservative wing of his own party. His message: “𝘐 𝘸𝘪𝘭𝘭 𝘯𝘰𝘵 𝘴𝘪𝘨𝘯 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘩𝘰𝘶𝘴𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘭𝘦𝘨𝘪𝘴𝘭𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯 𝘶𝘯𝘵𝘪𝘭 𝘐 𝘨𝘦𝘵 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘚𝘢𝘷𝘦 𝘈𝘮𝘦𝘳𝘪𝘤𝘢 𝘈𝘤𝘵.” The housing bill signing was scheduled for today. Trump cancelled it. 𝐍𝐨 𝐒𝐀𝐕𝐄 𝐀𝐜𝐭, 𝐧𝐨 𝐡𝐨𝐮𝐬𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐛𝐢𝐥𝐥. The political reporter covering the meeting gave Thune’s situation a blunt assessment: “𝘐𝘵 𝘣𝘢𝘴𝘪𝘤𝘢𝘭𝘭𝘺 𝘴𝘢𝘺𝘴, 𝘩𝘦𝘺, 𝘺𝘰𝘶’𝘳𝘦 𝘰𝘯 𝘯𝘰𝘵𝘪𝘤𝘦, 𝘬𝘪𝘥.” And then the number that lands like a hammer: “𝘛𝘸𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘺-𝘴𝘦𝘷𝘦𝘯 𝘴𝘦𝘯𝘢𝘵𝘰𝘳𝘴 𝘤𝘰𝘶𝘭𝘥 𝘰𝘶𝘴𝘵 𝘛𝘩𝘶𝘯𝘦 𝘵𝘰𝘥𝘢𝘺 𝘢𝘵 𝘭𝘶𝘯𝘤𝘩.” The reporter added: “𝘐’𝘷𝘦 𝘯𝘦𝘷𝘦𝘳 𝘩𝘦𝘢𝘳𝘥 𝘴𝘶𝘤𝘩 𝘵𝘢𝘭𝘬 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘣𝘶𝘻𝘻 𝘢𝘣𝘰𝘶𝘵 𝘰𝘶𝘴𝘵𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘢 𝘮𝘢𝘫𝘰𝘳𝘪𝘵𝘺 𝘭𝘦𝘢𝘥𝘦𝘳 𝘪𝘯 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘮𝘪𝘥𝘥𝘭𝘦 𝘰𝘧 𝘢 𝘴𝘦𝘴𝘴𝘪𝘰𝘯 𝘪𝘯 𝘢𝘭𝘭 𝘮𝘺 𝘺𝘦𝘢𝘳𝘴 𝘰𝘧 𝘤𝘰𝘷𝘦𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘱𝘰𝘭𝘪𝘵𝘪𝘤𝘴.” The Majority Leader position is not in the Constitution. It’s a party post — 27 Republican senators can remove him at any moment. That’s the math Thune is staring at. The SAVE Act is the pressure point. Pass it or face a caucus that’s already talking about finding a replacement mid-session. 𝐓𝐫𝐮𝐦𝐩 𝐝𝐢𝐝𝐧’𝐭 𝐧𝐞𝐞𝐝 𝐓𝐡𝐮𝐧𝐞 𝐚𝐭 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐭𝐚𝐛𝐥𝐞. 𝐇𝐞 𝐰𝐞𝐧𝐭 𝐚𝐫𝐨𝐮𝐧𝐝 𝐡𝐢𝐦.

M.A. Rothman

129,238 Aufrufe • vor 13 Tagen

𝐌𝐄𝐋𝐀𝐍𝐈𝐄 𝐏𝐇𝐈𝐋𝐋𝐈𝐏𝐒 𝐉𝐔𝐒𝐓 𝐒𝐀𝐈𝐃 𝐖𝐇𝐀𝐓 𝐍𝐎 𝐎𝐍𝐄 𝐈𝐍 𝐓𝐇𝐄 𝐖𝐄𝐒𝐓 𝐖𝐈𝐋𝐋 𝐒𝐀𝐘 Melanie Phillips (Melanie Phillips) — former 𝘎𝘶𝘢𝘳𝘥𝘪𝘢𝘯 journalist turned one of Britain's sharpest conservative voices — just delivered the most precise diagnosis of the West's moral collapse on the Israel question that anyone has put on camera. Her argument is surgical: the entire Western framework for understanding the Israeli-Palestinian conflict is built on a lie. The lie is that indigenous Palestinian Muslims were displaced by European Jews after the Holocaust. The truth is that the Jews are the only people for whom the land of Israel was ever their national kingdom — the Kingdom of Israel under David, the Temple built by Solomon in the tenth century BCE, the Hasmonean dynasty in 165 BCE — all of it 𝐜𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐮𝐫𝐢𝐞𝐬 𝐛𝐞𝐟𝐨𝐫𝐞 𝐈𝐬𝐥𝐚𝐦 𝐞𝐯𝐞𝐧 𝐞𝐱𝐢𝐬𝐭𝐞𝐝 (American Jewish Committee). The earliest documented mention of "Israel" as a people appears on the Merneptah Stele from 𝟏𝟐𝟎𝟖 𝐁𝐂𝐄 — over 1,800 years before Muhammad was born. Phillips doesn't mince words. She calls Palestinianism an invention, and she's not the only one. Zuheir Mohsen, a PLO executive committee member, said it explicitly in 1977: 𝘛𝘩𝘦 𝘗𝘢𝘭𝘦𝘴𝘵𝘪𝘯𝘪𝘢𝘯 𝘱𝘦𝘰𝘱𝘭𝘦 𝘥𝘰𝘦𝘴 𝘯𝘰𝘵 𝘦𝘹𝘪𝘴𝘵. 𝘑𝘶𝘴𝘵 𝘧𝘰𝘳 𝘱𝘰𝘭𝘪𝘵𝘪𝘤𝘢𝘭 𝘳𝘦𝘢𝘴𝘰𝘯𝘴 𝘸𝘦 𝘤𝘢𝘳𝘦𝘧𝘶𝘭𝘭𝘺 𝘶𝘯𝘥𝘦𝘳𝘸𝘳𝘪𝘵𝘦 𝘰𝘶𝘳 𝘗𝘢𝘭𝘦𝘴𝘵𝘪𝘯𝘪𝘢𝘯 𝘪𝘥𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘪𝘵𝘺 𝘵𝘰 𝘰𝘱𝘱𝘰𝘴𝘦 𝘡𝘪𝘰𝘯𝘪𝘴𝘮. That was published in the Dutch newspaper 𝘛𝘳𝘰𝘶𝘸. Not a Zionist outlet. A mainstream European paper. And the West buried it. Phillips hammers the point that this isn't a land dispute. If it were, it would have been solved in the 1930s when Palestinian Arabs were offered their own state and chose war instead. It would have been solved at Camp David. At Taba. At Annapolis. Every single time, the answer was the same — no. She goes further than most are willing to: Israel itself bears responsibility for the misapprehension. The Jewish diaspora bears responsibility. 𝘕𝘰𝘣𝘰𝘥𝘺 𝘴𝘢𝘺𝘴 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘸𝘩𝘰𝘭𝘦 𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘪𝘴 𝘣𝘢𝘴𝘦𝘥 𝘰𝘯 𝘢 𝘭𝘪𝘦. Nobody tells the West that the two-state solution is the answer to a problem they've misidentified. And the silence has been catastrophic. Meanwhile, the EU handed 𝐄𝐔𝐑 𝟐𝟎𝟐 𝐦𝐢𝐥𝐥𝐢𝐨𝐧 to UNRWA and the Palestinian Authority (European Commission) — the same PA that funds "pay-for-slay" payments to families of terrorists. Germany's CDU just voted to 𝐟𝐫𝐞𝐞𝐳𝐞 all PA payments until they stop bankrolling terrorism and purge antisemitism from their textbooks (Jerusalem Post). One country in Europe finally noticed what they've been subsidizing. Phillips' closing line is the one that will stay with you: 𝘗𝘢𝘭𝘦𝘴𝘵𝘪𝘯𝘪𝘢𝘯𝘪𝘴𝘮 𝘪𝘴 𝘢 𝘮𝘰𝘳𝘢𝘭 𝘤𝘢𝘯𝘤𝘦𝘳 𝘪𝘯 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘞𝘦𝘴𝘵, 𝘸𝘩𝘪𝘤𝘩 𝘩𝘢𝘴 𝘤𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘶𝘱𝘵𝘦𝘥 𝘪𝘵𝘴 𝘪𝘯𝘵𝘦𝘭𝘭𝘦𝘤𝘵𝘶𝘢𝘭 𝘦𝘭𝘪𝘵𝘦𝘴, 𝘧𝘳𝘪𝘦𝘥 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘤𝘰𝘭𝘭𝘦𝘤𝘵𝘪𝘷𝘦 𝘣𝘳𝘢𝘪𝘯, 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘥𝘦𝘴𝘵𝘳𝘰𝘺𝘦𝘥 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘞𝘦𝘴𝘵'𝘴 𝘢𝘣𝘪𝘭𝘪𝘵𝘺 𝘵𝘰 𝘥𝘪𝘴𝘵𝘪𝘯𝘨𝘶𝘪𝘴𝘩 𝘵𝘳𝘶𝘵𝘩 𝘧𝘳𝘰𝘮 𝘭𝘪𝘦𝘴. She's not wrong. The West didn't lose its moral compass by accident. It handed it to people who promised to destroy it — and then wrote them a check. 𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐛𝐢𝐠𝐠𝐞𝐬𝐭 𝐥𝐢𝐞 𝐢𝐧 𝐦𝐨𝐝𝐞𝐫𝐧 𝐡𝐢𝐬𝐭𝐨𝐫𝐲 𝐬𝐮𝐫𝐯𝐢𝐯𝐞𝐝 𝐛𝐞𝐜𝐚𝐮𝐬𝐞 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐩𝐞𝐨𝐩𝐥𝐞 𝐰𝐡𝐨 𝐤𝐧𝐞𝐰 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐭𝐫𝐮𝐭𝐡 𝐬𝐭𝐚𝐲𝐞𝐝 𝐬𝐢𝐥𝐞𝐧𝐭.

𝐌𝐄𝐋𝐀𝐍𝐈𝐄 𝐏𝐇𝐈𝐋𝐋𝐈𝐏𝐒 𝐉𝐔𝐒𝐓 𝐒𝐀𝐈𝐃 𝐖𝐇𝐀𝐓 𝐍𝐎 𝐎𝐍𝐄 𝐈𝐍 𝐓𝐇𝐄 𝐖𝐄𝐒𝐓 𝐖𝐈𝐋𝐋 𝐒𝐀𝐘 Melanie Phillips (Melanie Phillips) — former 𝘎𝘶𝘢𝘳𝘥𝘪𝘢𝘯 journalist turned one of Britain's sharpest conservative voices — just delivered the most precise diagnosis of the West's moral collapse on the Israel question that anyone has put on camera. Her argument is surgical: the entire Western framework for understanding the Israeli-Palestinian conflict is built on a lie. The lie is that indigenous Palestinian Muslims were displaced by European Jews after the Holocaust. The truth is that the Jews are the only people for whom the land of Israel was ever their national kingdom — the Kingdom of Israel under David, the Temple built by Solomon in the tenth century BCE, the Hasmonean dynasty in 165 BCE — all of it 𝐜𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐮𝐫𝐢𝐞𝐬 𝐛𝐞𝐟𝐨𝐫𝐞 𝐈𝐬𝐥𝐚𝐦 𝐞𝐯𝐞𝐧 𝐞𝐱𝐢𝐬𝐭𝐞𝐝 (American Jewish Committee). The earliest documented mention of "Israel" as a people appears on the Merneptah Stele from 𝟏𝟐𝟎𝟖 𝐁𝐂𝐄 — over 1,800 years before Muhammad was born. Phillips doesn't mince words. She calls Palestinianism an invention, and she's not the only one. Zuheir Mohsen, a PLO executive committee member, said it explicitly in 1977: 𝘛𝘩𝘦 𝘗𝘢𝘭𝘦𝘴𝘵𝘪𝘯𝘪𝘢𝘯 𝘱𝘦𝘰𝘱𝘭𝘦 𝘥𝘰𝘦𝘴 𝘯𝘰𝘵 𝘦𝘹𝘪𝘴𝘵. 𝘑𝘶𝘴𝘵 𝘧𝘰𝘳 𝘱𝘰𝘭𝘪𝘵𝘪𝘤𝘢𝘭 𝘳𝘦𝘢𝘴𝘰𝘯𝘴 𝘸𝘦 𝘤𝘢𝘳𝘦𝘧𝘶𝘭𝘭𝘺 𝘶𝘯𝘥𝘦𝘳𝘸𝘳𝘪𝘵𝘦 𝘰𝘶𝘳 𝘗𝘢𝘭𝘦𝘴𝘵𝘪𝘯𝘪𝘢𝘯 𝘪𝘥𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘪𝘵𝘺 𝘵𝘰 𝘰𝘱𝘱𝘰𝘴𝘦 𝘡𝘪𝘰𝘯𝘪𝘴𝘮. That was published in the Dutch newspaper 𝘛𝘳𝘰𝘶𝘸. Not a Zionist outlet. A mainstream European paper. And the West buried it. Phillips hammers the point that this isn't a land dispute. If it were, it would have been solved in the 1930s when Palestinian Arabs were offered their own state and chose war instead. It would have been solved at Camp David. At Taba. At Annapolis. Every single time, the answer was the same — no. She goes further than most are willing to: Israel itself bears responsibility for the misapprehension. The Jewish diaspora bears responsibility. 𝘕𝘰𝘣𝘰𝘥𝘺 𝘴𝘢𝘺𝘴 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘸𝘩𝘰𝘭𝘦 𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘪𝘴 𝘣𝘢𝘴𝘦𝘥 𝘰𝘯 𝘢 𝘭𝘪𝘦. Nobody tells the West that the two-state solution is the answer to a problem they've misidentified. And the silence has been catastrophic. Meanwhile, the EU handed 𝐄𝐔𝐑 𝟐𝟎𝟐 𝐦𝐢𝐥𝐥𝐢𝐨𝐧 to UNRWA and the Palestinian Authority (European Commission) — the same PA that funds "pay-for-slay" payments to families of terrorists. Germany's CDU just voted to 𝐟𝐫𝐞𝐞𝐳𝐞 all PA payments until they stop bankrolling terrorism and purge antisemitism from their textbooks (Jerusalem Post). One country in Europe finally noticed what they've been subsidizing. Phillips' closing line is the one that will stay with you: 𝘗𝘢𝘭𝘦𝘴𝘵𝘪𝘯𝘪𝘢𝘯𝘪𝘴𝘮 𝘪𝘴 𝘢 𝘮𝘰𝘳𝘢𝘭 𝘤𝘢𝘯𝘤𝘦𝘳 𝘪𝘯 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘞𝘦𝘴𝘵, 𝘸𝘩𝘪𝘤𝘩 𝘩𝘢𝘴 𝘤𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘶𝘱𝘵𝘦𝘥 𝘪𝘵𝘴 𝘪𝘯𝘵𝘦𝘭𝘭𝘦𝘤𝘵𝘶𝘢𝘭 𝘦𝘭𝘪𝘵𝘦𝘴, 𝘧𝘳𝘪𝘦𝘥 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘤𝘰𝘭𝘭𝘦𝘤𝘵𝘪𝘷𝘦 𝘣𝘳𝘢𝘪𝘯, 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘥𝘦𝘴𝘵𝘳𝘰𝘺𝘦𝘥 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘞𝘦𝘴𝘵'𝘴 𝘢𝘣𝘪𝘭𝘪𝘵𝘺 𝘵𝘰 𝘥𝘪𝘴𝘵𝘪𝘯𝘨𝘶𝘪𝘴𝘩 𝘵𝘳𝘶𝘵𝘩 𝘧𝘳𝘰𝘮 𝘭𝘪𝘦𝘴. She's not wrong. The West didn't lose its moral compass by accident. It handed it to people who promised to destroy it — and then wrote them a check. 𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐛𝐢𝐠𝐠𝐞𝐬𝐭 𝐥𝐢𝐞 𝐢𝐧 𝐦𝐨𝐝𝐞𝐫𝐧 𝐡𝐢𝐬𝐭𝐨𝐫𝐲 𝐬𝐮𝐫𝐯𝐢𝐯𝐞𝐝 𝐛𝐞𝐜𝐚𝐮𝐬𝐞 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐩𝐞𝐨𝐩𝐥𝐞 𝐰𝐡𝐨 𝐤𝐧𝐞𝐰 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐭𝐫𝐮𝐭𝐡 𝐬𝐭𝐚𝐲𝐞𝐝 𝐬𝐢𝐥𝐞𝐧𝐭.

M.A. Rothman

167,702 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

I found Royston's comments quite interesting, like so many other commentators he's managed to place all responsibility of what occurred on William and Catherine's shoulders, as well as suggesting it is their 𝘥𝘶𝘵𝘺 to repair the relationship (meaning 'get over it') So many thoughts.. 🤔 Notice that Royston says Harry 'does talk about a lot of stuff'. And 𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘯𝘬 𝘢𝘣𝘰𝘶𝘵 everything H has talked about - what he has said, and how that has impacted his family. Especially William, Catherine and their young children. Then Royston talks about there being times Queen Elizabeth had needed to put the 'national interest' and the 'country's interest' above her feelings as a person, and above the interests as her family. And that King Charles as monarch will need to do the same. But Royston then goes on to say it's in the Royal family's interests to solve their own family problems, and that they are supposed to show 'leadership' in Britain. And that it's not leadership, or healthy, advisable or wise to let conflict escalate and escalate, and that the public think families should be able to resolve conflict. So he's suggesting the family are not fulfilling their role by having 'unresolved' issues with Harry. He said QE had put her family (Andrew) aside for the best interest of the monarchy and nation, but he seems to believe that either KC or PW putting Harry aside (after doing everything he's done) is not in the best interests. Notice the different expectations for each problematic son? (What Royston says next he's previously talked about, when discussing H+Ms work with bullying. That the issues in KP demonstrated H+M's inability to resolve issues) 🤨 I have so many issues with Royston's comments. He says it's not good to have things 'escalate'. But things 𝘢𝘳𝘦𝘯'𝘵 escalating now, certainly not by William and Catherine's doing. Grey rocking is working. Royston seems to place responsibly for what happened in those two years (and since then) on William and Catherine, and KP. But we now know there were so many other issues occurring at the same time, that the problems were bigger than simply workplace squabbles. And when you consider 𝘦𝘷𝘦𝘳𝘺𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘦𝘭𝘴𝘦 that had happened in the decades 𝗯𝗲𝗳𝗼𝗿𝗲 and the years 𝗮𝗳𝘁𝗲𝗿 2017 - 2019, it's ridiculous to suggest this can be summed up as a 'workplace issue' at KP. I place a lot of responsibility for what happened with Harry and M on QE as monarch, and KC as father. H has had a lifetime of issues, and these were poorly managed by both his family and the monarchy. He is jealous, unstable, bitter and vengeful. And she is a histrionic narcissist. Harry and M were poorly handled, from the start. It should not have been KPs responsibility to manage them or deal with them. Anyone with any awareness of what has transpired over the last 𝗻𝗶𝗻𝗲 𝘆𝗲𝗮𝗿𝘀 knows what Harry and his wife have done. William and Catherine have wisely set boundaries to protect themselves and their children. It's cruel to suggest they should risk their wellbeing, and what they are building and protecting for the children. William is not his brother's keeper. People need to stop infantilising Harry, who is in his 5th decade. He made his decisions - not every relationship can or should be repaired back to the way it was.

I found Royston's comments quite interesting, like so many other commentators he's managed to place all responsibility of what occurred on William and Catherine's shoulders, as well as suggesting it is their 𝘥𝘶𝘵𝘺 to repair the relationship (meaning 'get over it') So many thoughts.. 🤔 Notice that Royston says Harry 'does talk about a lot of stuff'. And 𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘯𝘬 𝘢𝘣𝘰𝘶𝘵 everything H has talked about - what he has said, and how that has impacted his family. Especially William, Catherine and their young children. Then Royston talks about there being times Queen Elizabeth had needed to put the 'national interest' and the 'country's interest' above her feelings as a person, and above the interests as her family. And that King Charles as monarch will need to do the same. But Royston then goes on to say it's in the Royal family's interests to solve their own family problems, and that they are supposed to show 'leadership' in Britain. And that it's not leadership, or healthy, advisable or wise to let conflict escalate and escalate, and that the public think families should be able to resolve conflict. So he's suggesting the family are not fulfilling their role by having 'unresolved' issues with Harry. He said QE had put her family (Andrew) aside for the best interest of the monarchy and nation, but he seems to believe that either KC or PW putting Harry aside (after doing everything he's done) is not in the best interests. Notice the different expectations for each problematic son? (What Royston says next he's previously talked about, when discussing H+Ms work with bullying. That the issues in KP demonstrated H+M's inability to resolve issues) 🤨 I have so many issues with Royston's comments. He says it's not good to have things 'escalate'. But things 𝘢𝘳𝘦𝘯'𝘵 escalating now, certainly not by William and Catherine's doing. Grey rocking is working. Royston seems to place responsibly for what happened in those two years (and since then) on William and Catherine, and KP. But we now know there were so many other issues occurring at the same time, that the problems were bigger than simply workplace squabbles. And when you consider 𝘦𝘷𝘦𝘳𝘺𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘦𝘭𝘴𝘦 that had happened in the decades 𝗯𝗲𝗳𝗼𝗿𝗲 and the years 𝗮𝗳𝘁𝗲𝗿 2017 - 2019, it's ridiculous to suggest this can be summed up as a 'workplace issue' at KP. I place a lot of responsibility for what happened with Harry and M on QE as monarch, and KC as father. H has had a lifetime of issues, and these were poorly managed by both his family and the monarchy. He is jealous, unstable, bitter and vengeful. And she is a histrionic narcissist. Harry and M were poorly handled, from the start. It should not have been KPs responsibility to manage them or deal with them. Anyone with any awareness of what has transpired over the last 𝗻𝗶𝗻𝗲 𝘆𝗲𝗮𝗿𝘀 knows what Harry and his wife have done. William and Catherine have wisely set boundaries to protect themselves and their children. It's cruel to suggest they should risk their wellbeing, and what they are building and protecting for the children. William is not his brother's keeper. People need to stop infantilising Harry, who is in his 5th decade. He made his decisions - not every relationship can or should be repaired back to the way it was.

mrc 🦇

11,484 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten

Me, a soccer fan of two weeks, watching Team USA lose in the round of 16

Me, a soccer fan of two weeks, watching Team USA lose in the round of 16

NFL Memes

553,420 Aufrufe • vor 1 Tag

KEJRIWAL CATCHES MODI GOVT’S E20 U-TURN LIVE 🚨 REPORTER: Hardeep Puri says E20 is still in test mode and was not suddenly imposed. KEJRIWAL 🎯: One day they tell the Supreme Court E20 is a trial. Next day they deny it and blame media. Now again they say it is in test mode. Are they running a government or a daily U-turn factory? REPORTER: Public trust? KEJRIWAL ⚡️: Earlier, people believed the government’s word. Now the government speaks and people assume it must be another lie. Every issue, one more lie.

KEJRIWAL CATCHES MODI GOVT’S E20 U-TURN LIVE 🚨 REPORTER: Hardeep Puri says E20 is still in test mode and was not suddenly imposed. KEJRIWAL 🎯: One day they tell the Supreme Court E20 is a trial. Next day they deny it and blame media. Now again they say it is in test mode. Are they running a government or a daily U-turn factory? REPORTER: Public trust? KEJRIWAL ⚡️: Earlier, people believed the government’s word. Now the government speaks and people assume it must be another lie. Every issue, one more lie.

Mr Sharma

52,192 Aufrufe • vor 18 Stunden