Sensitive content

This media may contain sensitive content.

Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

Возникла проблема при загрузке этого видео. Это может быть связано с временными проблемами сети или видео может быть недоступно.

На главную

𝙀𝙢𝙚𝙧𝙜𝙚𝙣𝙘𝙮 𝙇𝙖𝙥𝙖𝙧𝙤𝙨𝙘𝙤𝙥𝙞𝙘 𝙍𝙚𝙥𝙖𝙞𝙧 𝙤𝙛 𝙎𝙩𝙧𝙖𝙣𝙜𝙪𝙡𝙖𝙩𝙚𝙙 𝙁𝙚𝙢𝙤𝙧𝙖𝙡 𝙃𝙚𝙧𝙣𝙞𝙖 𝙬𝙞𝙩𝙝 𝙎𝙢𝙖𝙡𝙡 𝘽𝙤𝙬𝙚𝙡 𝙍𝙚𝙨𝙚𝙘𝙩𝙞𝙤𝙣 𝙖𝙣𝙙 𝙄𝘾𝙂 Surgical Approach: 🔴Reduce small bowel first ➡️Gentle abdominal pressure and squeeze ➡️Atraumatic grasper to hold bowel and gently manipulate ➡️Stretch hernia ring if needed ➡️Gentle side-to-side traction without grasping useful when bowel is fragile 🔴Perform hernia... repair ➡️Suture repair safe option in strangulated small bowel requiring resection ➡️On rare occasions a biologic mesh may be an option ➡️Synthetic mesh could be considered if no resection involved 🔴ICG to assess bowel perfusion and assist in delineating length of resection ➡️Improve trainee understanding of key concepts ➡️Reduce risk of leak or stricture ➡️"See the invisible" 🔴Advanced laparoscopic skills critical 🔴Training and development of laparoscopy in EGS should be encouraged #FOAMed #GITwitter #MedEd #Hernia #Surgery #SoMe4Surgeryshow more

Derby Pancreaticobiliary & Robotic AWR Unit

10,779 subscribers

173,995 просмотров • 3 лет назад •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

𝗘𝗺𝗲𝗿𝗴𝗲𝗻𝗰𝘆 𝗥𝗼𝗯𝗼𝘁𝗶𝗰 𝗥𝗲𝗽𝗮𝗶𝗿 𝗼𝗳 𝗟𝗲𝗳𝘁 𝗜𝗻𝗴𝘂𝗶𝗻𝗮𝗹 𝗛𝗲𝗿𝗻𝗶𝗮 𝘄𝗶𝘁𝗵 𝗜𝗖𝗚 Surgical Approach: 🔴Initial assessment of small bowel with ICG 🔴Small bowel placed in pelvis with warm wet swabs overlying 🔴TAPP approach to hernia repair ➡️Critical view of MPO ➡️ICG to help delineate key structures ➡️Progrip mesh ➡️3-0 absorbable V-lock to close peritoneum 🔴Reassessment of small bowel after hernia repair ➡️ICG present in bruised area demonstrating viability ➡️Aided decision making to not resect or oversew Robotics in EGS: 🟢Case selection key 🟢MDT approach with anaesthetic and scrub teams to coordinate 🟢Minimally invasive approaches in EGS should be encouraged #FOAMed #GITwitter #MedEd #Surgery #Hernia #EGS

𝗘𝗺𝗲𝗿𝗴𝗲𝗻𝗰𝘆 𝗥𝗼𝗯𝗼𝘁𝗶𝗰 𝗥𝗲𝗽𝗮𝗶𝗿 𝗼𝗳 𝗟𝗲𝗳𝘁 𝗜𝗻𝗴𝘂𝗶𝗻𝗮𝗹 𝗛𝗲𝗿𝗻𝗶𝗮 𝘄𝗶𝘁𝗵 𝗜𝗖𝗚 Surgical Approach: 🔴Initial assessment of small bowel with ICG 🔴Small bowel placed in pelvis with warm wet swabs overlying 🔴TAPP approach to hernia repair ➡️Critical view of MPO ➡️ICG to help delineate key structures ➡️Progrip mesh ➡️3-0 absorbable V-lock to close peritoneum 🔴Reassessment of small bowel after hernia repair ➡️ICG present in bruised area demonstrating viability ➡️Aided decision making to not resect or oversew Robotics in EGS: 🟢Case selection key 🟢MDT approach with anaesthetic and scrub teams to coordinate 🟢Minimally invasive approaches in EGS should be encouraged #FOAMed #GITwitter #MedEd #Surgery #Hernia #EGS

Derby Pancreaticobiliary & Robotic AWR Unit

22,834 просмотров • 20 дней назад

Laparoscopic Ileocaecal Resection with Intracorporeal Anastomosis and ICG Patient Presentation: 🔴Sudden onset severe abdominal pain 🔴Tender abdomen 🔴No previous abdominal surgery 🔴High WCC 🔴Lactate ➡️5 on arrival down to 2 in 2 hours following fluid resuscitation 🔴CT abdomen/pelvis ➡️Red arrows show no small bowel perfusion with mural thickening ➡️Green arrows show perfused small and large bowel ➡️Mesenteric vessels patent Surgical Approach: 🔴Lap EGS approach ➡️Torsion of small bowel with Meckel's adhesion to abdominal wall acting as pivot point ➡️80cm ischaemic small bowel involving ileocaecal junction 🔴Specimen retrieved via extension of LUQ 12mm port

Laparoscopic Ileocaecal Resection with Intracorporeal Anastomosis and ICG Patient Presentation: 🔴Sudden onset severe abdominal pain 🔴Tender abdomen 🔴No previous abdominal surgery 🔴High WCC 🔴Lactate ➡️5 on arrival down to 2 in 2 hours following fluid resuscitation 🔴CT abdomen/pelvis ➡️Red arrows show no small bowel perfusion with mural thickening ➡️Green arrows show perfused small and large bowel ➡️Mesenteric vessels patent Surgical Approach: 🔴Lap EGS approach ➡️Torsion of small bowel with Meckel's adhesion to abdominal wall acting as pivot point ➡️80cm ischaemic small bowel involving ileocaecal junction 🔴Specimen retrieved via extension of LUQ 12mm port

Derby Pancreaticobiliary & Robotic AWR Unit

17,955 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

𝙇𝙖𝙥𝙖𝙧𝙤𝙨𝙘𝙤𝙥𝙞𝙘 𝙍𝙚𝙥𝙖𝙞𝙧 𝙤𝙛 𝙋𝙚𝙧𝙛𝙤𝙧𝙖𝙩𝙚𝙙 𝘿𝙪𝙤𝙙𝙚𝙣𝙖𝙡 𝙐𝙡𝙘𝙚𝙧 𝙬𝙞𝙩𝙝 𝙋𝙧𝙞𝙢𝙖𝙧𝙮 𝘾𝙡𝙤𝙨𝙪𝙧𝙚 & 𝙊𝙢𝙚𝙣𝙩𝙖𝙡 𝙋𝙖𝙩𝙘𝙝 Presentation: 🔵1 day history of sever upper abdominal pain 🔵Smoker and excess ETOH 🔵CXR ➡️Pneumoperitoneum 🔵CT ➡️Perforated duodenal ulcer 🔵Time from ED➡️theatre 3 hours Operative Approach: 🔴Thorough peritoneal lavage ➡️Lap washout allows for thorough removal of intra-abdominal contamination ➡️Modern OR table tilting can provide better view then open in select cases 🔴If fragile tissue then omental patch only ➡️This approach is a modified version of Grahams patch repair ➡️When suitable, we prefer primary closure with patch after 🔴For large perforations kocherisation of duodenum may be indicated 🔴Convert to open if: ➡️Large ulcer ➡️Associated ulcer bleed 🔴H. Pylori eradication therapy on discharge 🔴OGD in 6-8 weeks to confirm healing Key Points: 🟢Timely intervention critical 🟢Lap approach in EGS should be encouraged 🟢Compared to open, advantages of lap are: ➡️Reduced pain ➡️Reduced LOS ➡️Reduced incisional hernia rate 🟢Trainees should be exposed to lap EGS early to develop skills and confidence #FOAMed #GITwitter #MedEd #SurgEd #EGS #SoMe4Surgery

𝙇𝙖𝙥𝙖𝙧𝙤𝙨𝙘𝙤𝙥𝙞𝙘 𝙍𝙚𝙥𝙖𝙞𝙧 𝙤𝙛 𝙋𝙚𝙧𝙛𝙤𝙧𝙖𝙩𝙚𝙙 𝘿𝙪𝙤𝙙𝙚𝙣𝙖𝙡 𝙐𝙡𝙘𝙚𝙧 𝙬𝙞𝙩𝙝 𝙋𝙧𝙞𝙢𝙖𝙧𝙮 𝘾𝙡𝙤𝙨𝙪𝙧𝙚 & 𝙊𝙢𝙚𝙣𝙩𝙖𝙡 𝙋𝙖𝙩𝙘𝙝 Presentation: 🔵1 day history of sever upper abdominal pain 🔵Smoker and excess ETOH 🔵CXR ➡️Pneumoperitoneum 🔵CT ➡️Perforated duodenal ulcer 🔵Time from ED➡️theatre 3 hours Operative Approach: 🔴Thorough peritoneal lavage ➡️Lap washout allows for thorough removal of intra-abdominal contamination ➡️Modern OR table tilting can provide better view then open in select cases 🔴If fragile tissue then omental patch only ➡️This approach is a modified version of Grahams patch repair ➡️When suitable, we prefer primary closure with patch after 🔴For large perforations kocherisation of duodenum may be indicated 🔴Convert to open if: ➡️Large ulcer ➡️Associated ulcer bleed 🔴H. Pylori eradication therapy on discharge 🔴OGD in 6-8 weeks to confirm healing Key Points: 🟢Timely intervention critical 🟢Lap approach in EGS should be encouraged 🟢Compared to open, advantages of lap are: ➡️Reduced pain ➡️Reduced LOS ➡️Reduced incisional hernia rate 🟢Trainees should be exposed to lap EGS early to develop skills and confidence #FOAMed #GITwitter #MedEd #SurgEd #EGS #SoMe4Surgery

Derby Pancreaticobiliary & Robotic AWR Unit

388,248 просмотров • 9 дней назад

Tips for Transcystic Laparoscopic CBD Exploration 🔴3mm choledochoscope ➡️Direct visualisation of duct 🔴Cephalad retraction 🔴Incise cystic duct parallel to CBD stone 🔴If large CBD stone ➡️withdraw scope over wire and provide gentle traction 🔴Milk backwards 🔴Keep CBD in view 🔴Reduce speed of irrigation to trap CBDS What are your tips and tricks for transcystic LCBDE? #FOAMed #GITwitter #surgery #hpb #MedEd #SoMe4Surgery

Tips for Transcystic Laparoscopic CBD Exploration 🔴3mm choledochoscope ➡️Direct visualisation of duct 🔴Cephalad retraction 🔴Incise cystic duct parallel to CBD stone 🔴If large CBD stone ➡️withdraw scope over wire and provide gentle traction 🔴Milk backwards 🔴Keep CBD in view 🔴Reduce speed of irrigation to trap CBDS What are your tips and tricks for transcystic LCBDE? #FOAMed #GITwitter #surgery #hpb #MedEd #SoMe4Surgery

Derby Pancreaticobiliary & Robotic AWR Unit

14,575 просмотров • 11 месяцев назад

HOW IRAN OUTSMARTED AMERICA: DECADES UNDERGROUND BEAT A WAR OF CHOICE America stumbled into its Iran war with no clear objectives and no method to win. Iran had been preparing for exactly this fight for decades. One side improvised a war of choice. The other had already buried the war it expected. THE STUMBLE ➡️ America entered without settled aims or a plan to achieve them. ➡️ Iran treated the fight as existential years in advance. ➡️ It built regional allies, readied its leadership to survive a decapitation strike, and put what it valued most underground. THE 35 MISSILE CITIES ➡️ Western analysts put about 35 “missile cities” at the center of Iran’s war plans. ➡️ Their job was to shelter ballistic missiles aimed at Israel and America’s Gulf Arab partners. ➡️ February strikes knocked out many launchers. The fire rate fell by as much as 80%. ➡️ Missiles already deep underground could not be touched. ➡️ So the campaign shifted to caving in tunnel mouths. ➡️ Iran hunkered down, fired what survived more slowly, and dug the entrances back out. ➡️ Commanders admitted the bunkers were so deep that none of America’s munitions could reach them. ➡️ “Everybody is going underground.” MOSAIC COMMAND ➡️ They hardened command as well as concrete. ➡️ When senior leaders were killed on the first night, officers elsewhere already had authority to launch counterstrikes. ➡️ The same complexes stored the speedboats, drones, and missiles built to close the Strait of Hormuz. THE STOCKPILE AMERICA NEVER BUILT ➡️ Iran had built large weapons stocks. America had not. ➡️ At the start: around 1,000 ballistic missiles able to hit Israel, and as many as 4,000 that could strike the Gulf. ➡️ Even after firing and losses, enough remained to keep some operations going. ➡️ Bombing wrecked much of the capacity to make new missiles. ➡️ Small drone workshops were another matter. Those can keep producing almost indefinitely. THE BOTTOM LINE The Iranian government has survived. Guard commanders stepped into key roles. Arab capitals got a lesson in geography and in the limits of American power. Washington showed a president hooked on short-term politics and a military short of the tools for a war of survival against another state. This was never a war of choice against an insurgency. It was a prepared state versus an improvised one. #IranWar #Hormuz #MissileCities #MosaicCommand #AxisOfResistance #BabElMandeb HT: YouTube Times Originals

HOW IRAN OUTSMARTED AMERICA: DECADES UNDERGROUND BEAT A WAR OF CHOICE America stumbled into its Iran war with no clear objectives and no method to win. Iran had been preparing for exactly this fight for decades. One side improvised a war of choice. The other had already buried the war it expected. THE STUMBLE ➡️ America entered without settled aims or a plan to achieve them. ➡️ Iran treated the fight as existential years in advance. ➡️ It built regional allies, readied its leadership to survive a decapitation strike, and put what it valued most underground. THE 35 MISSILE CITIES ➡️ Western analysts put about 35 “missile cities” at the center of Iran’s war plans. ➡️ Their job was to shelter ballistic missiles aimed at Israel and America’s Gulf Arab partners. ➡️ February strikes knocked out many launchers. The fire rate fell by as much as 80%. ➡️ Missiles already deep underground could not be touched. ➡️ So the campaign shifted to caving in tunnel mouths. ➡️ Iran hunkered down, fired what survived more slowly, and dug the entrances back out. ➡️ Commanders admitted the bunkers were so deep that none of America’s munitions could reach them. ➡️ “Everybody is going underground.” MOSAIC COMMAND ➡️ They hardened command as well as concrete. ➡️ When senior leaders were killed on the first night, officers elsewhere already had authority to launch counterstrikes. ➡️ The same complexes stored the speedboats, drones, and missiles built to close the Strait of Hormuz. THE STOCKPILE AMERICA NEVER BUILT ➡️ Iran had built large weapons stocks. America had not. ➡️ At the start: around 1,000 ballistic missiles able to hit Israel, and as many as 4,000 that could strike the Gulf. ➡️ Even after firing and losses, enough remained to keep some operations going. ➡️ Bombing wrecked much of the capacity to make new missiles. ➡️ Small drone workshops were another matter. Those can keep producing almost indefinitely. THE BOTTOM LINE The Iranian government has survived. Guard commanders stepped into key roles. Arab capitals got a lesson in geography and in the limits of American power. Washington showed a president hooked on short-term politics and a military short of the tools for a war of survival against another state. This was never a war of choice against an insurgency. It was a prepared state versus an improvised one. #IranWar #Hormuz #MissileCities #MosaicCommand #AxisOfResistance #BabElMandeb HT: YouTube Times Originals

Mark

44,482 просмотров • 4 дней назад

IRAN CHECKMATED THE U.S. NAVY - NAVAL MINES IN FUJAIRAH Former U.S. Navy intelligence officer Malcolm Nance just explained the move almost nobody is naming. Two Iranian Fajr-5 rocket launchers appeared on tiny Larak Island. They were not there to pound the Strait of Hormuz. They were there to reach Fujairah — the crowded tanker parking lot the mine-clearance announcement never covered. THE SPECIAL OPERATION ➡️ Iran barged two near-18-wheeler Fajr-5 launchers onto Larak Island in a clandestine lift. ➡️ Not Hormuz Island. Not giant Qeshm. The small island that suddenly puts Fujairah inside range. THE WEAPON ➡️ These are not the old spiked sea mines people picture. ➡️ A Fajr-5 rocket carries a smart mine in the warhead, flies ballistically up to 130 kilometers, then the warhead sinks and hovers. ➡️ It listens. It reads magnetic signatures. It waits for the ship it was programmed to kill. ➡️ When it detonates it blows a gas bubble under the keel and lets physics break the hull. WHY ONLY LARAK WORKED ➡️ From inland Iran you can already hit the southern Omani traffic scheme. That was never the point. ➡️ You cannot reach Fujairah or the Ras al-Khaimah approaches from Hormuz, Qeshm, or a daylight highway run toward Bandar Jask. ➡️ Maximum range is about 90 nautical miles. Larak is the one board square that covers both UAE coasts and the cluster of ships waiting to dash around Musandam. THE FUJAIRAH TRAP ➡️ Fujairah holds a minimum of 100 oil tankers at any moment. With ship-to-ship transfers it can be 150. ➡️ Days earlier the U.S. Navy announced it had cleared every mine from the Strait of Hormuz channels. ➡️ Nance’s read was blunt: hold my tea. Mine the parking lot instead. No small boats. No dhows. Just rockets. ➡️ Ten or fifteen of those mines in Fujairah harbor and nobody knows they are there until a tanker hits one. THE STRIKE CAME LATE ➡️ The launchers were likely spotted by a thermal plume after they already fired. ➡️ That means the orders, the cave storage, the highway, the barge, and the setup were all missed. ➡️ Once the booster burns out they are just pipes falling into the water. You can draw a box. You cannot see the mine. ➡️ One to twenty-four mines may already be sitting in the approaches. The first sweeper may be a very large crude carrier. THE BOTTOM LINE Iran did not need to sink a destroyer to put America in check. It only needed invisible mines where a hundred tankers sleep — after Washington declared the strait clean. The board was already played before the strike landed. HT: YouTube Mario Nawfal #Fujairah #LarakIsland #IranMines #StraitOfHormuz #OilTankers #MalcolmNance #USNavy

IRAN CHECKMATED THE U.S. NAVY - NAVAL MINES IN FUJAIRAH Former U.S. Navy intelligence officer Malcolm Nance just explained the move almost nobody is naming. Two Iranian Fajr-5 rocket launchers appeared on tiny Larak Island. They were not there to pound the Strait of Hormuz. They were there to reach Fujairah — the crowded tanker parking lot the mine-clearance announcement never covered. THE SPECIAL OPERATION ➡️ Iran barged two near-18-wheeler Fajr-5 launchers onto Larak Island in a clandestine lift. ➡️ Not Hormuz Island. Not giant Qeshm. The small island that suddenly puts Fujairah inside range. THE WEAPON ➡️ These are not the old spiked sea mines people picture. ➡️ A Fajr-5 rocket carries a smart mine in the warhead, flies ballistically up to 130 kilometers, then the warhead sinks and hovers. ➡️ It listens. It reads magnetic signatures. It waits for the ship it was programmed to kill. ➡️ When it detonates it blows a gas bubble under the keel and lets physics break the hull. WHY ONLY LARAK WORKED ➡️ From inland Iran you can already hit the southern Omani traffic scheme. That was never the point. ➡️ You cannot reach Fujairah or the Ras al-Khaimah approaches from Hormuz, Qeshm, or a daylight highway run toward Bandar Jask. ➡️ Maximum range is about 90 nautical miles. Larak is the one board square that covers both UAE coasts and the cluster of ships waiting to dash around Musandam. THE FUJAIRAH TRAP ➡️ Fujairah holds a minimum of 100 oil tankers at any moment. With ship-to-ship transfers it can be 150. ➡️ Days earlier the U.S. Navy announced it had cleared every mine from the Strait of Hormuz channels. ➡️ Nance’s read was blunt: hold my tea. Mine the parking lot instead. No small boats. No dhows. Just rockets. ➡️ Ten or fifteen of those mines in Fujairah harbor and nobody knows they are there until a tanker hits one. THE STRIKE CAME LATE ➡️ The launchers were likely spotted by a thermal plume after they already fired. ➡️ That means the orders, the cave storage, the highway, the barge, and the setup were all missed. ➡️ Once the booster burns out they are just pipes falling into the water. You can draw a box. You cannot see the mine. ➡️ One to twenty-four mines may already be sitting in the approaches. The first sweeper may be a very large crude carrier. THE BOTTOM LINE Iran did not need to sink a destroyer to put America in check. It only needed invisible mines where a hundred tankers sleep — after Washington declared the strait clean. The board was already played before the strike landed. HT: YouTube Mario Nawfal #Fujairah #LarakIsland #IranMines #StraitOfHormuz #OilTankers #MalcolmNance #USNavy

Mark

60,161 просмотров • 19 дней назад

NO MORE RED LINES: IRAN JUST ENTERED THE MOST DESTRUCTIVE PHASE OF THE WAR On Sunday, September 6, 2026, the well-connected Prof. Mohammad Marandi from the University of Teheran — a former adviser to Iran’s nuclear negotiation team — told Glenn Diesen the war has changed shape. Washington, he said, keeps failing and then choosing a more aggressive policy instead of an off-ramp. His warning is simple and brutal: if the United States tries to strangle Iran, Tehran will strangle the Gulf. THE NEW PHASE ➡️ Marandi says every time U.S. policy fails, America does not exit. It picks a harsher offensive. ➡️ The 40-day war showed it could not win militarily. Then came siege warfare. Then attempts to take the Strait. Then an MOU that was signed and immediately undermined. Then hot war again. ➡️ Now Treasury Secretary Bessent talks of strangling the country and cutting off the head of the snake. ➡️ “He wants to strangle over 90 million Iranians,” Marandi said. Societal collapse, in his words, “basically means the death of a nation.” NO MORE RED LINES ➡️ After the United States wrecked the MOU, Iran stopped fighting a mostly defensive war. ➡️ A new chair of the Supreme National Security Council took over with a mandate for an offensive approach. ➡️ Marandi says the armed forces now intend to take the initiative. Iranian leaders, including the first vice president, have warned Americans to prepare for “very bleak times.” ➡️ He describes the latest exchange as heavier on Iran’s side: strikes toward Jordan, Kuwait, the Emirates, U.S. naval ships, and U.S.-linked tankers after Washington hit Iranian ports, Larak Island, and three tankers. ➡️ “There are no more red lines. Iran will strike whatever they deem necessary.” ➡️ The shots at U.S. ships, he argues, were a message: Tehran is prepared for total war. THE STRANGLE TRAP ➡️ Bessent can threaten banks and financial institutions. Iran cannot run that kind of sanctions war. ➡️ So Marandi’s thesis is military: if Washington tries to crush the Iranian economy, Iran hits U.S. assets, U.S.-linked assets, and the Gulf partners that fund the war with free jet fuel and paid-for bases. ➡️ Targets could be banks, oil and gas installations, U.S. businesses, even AI centers. ➡️ “If they want to strangle the Iranian economy, then the Iranians will strangle neighboring economies.” WHY THE GULF BREAKS FIRST ➡️ Marandi says the Arab states on the Persian Gulf are already in trouble. They were supposed to deliver billions. Instead they are selling stocks and bonds just to keep the status quo. ➡️ These are not ordinary countries, he said. They are deserts that live on oil and gas, and they are extremely expensive to maintain. ➡️ Saudi Arabia is exposed after hundreds of billions wasted on Yemen and mega-projects that have been shut down. Kuwait and Bahrain, he argues, are particularly vulnerable. All of them are. ➡️ If this phase goes where Bessent’s language points, “these countries will all collapse.” ➡️ Iran remains standing. “It will be ironically the US proxies that will go down.” ➡️ That, he said, would mean the end of energy supplies from the region and a global economic depression. No amount of market manipulation would work after that. THE DEAL THAT ALREADY EXISTS ➡️ The New York Times frames Iran as too confident to negotiate. Marandi’s reply: there is already an agreement. ➡️ “Someone should tell the New York Times that we do actually have an agreement and that it wasn’t Iran that walked away.” ➡️ Iran will not bargain a new deal so Washington can break the last one. The MOU is the red line. It includes Gaza, Yemen, and Iraq. Domestic critics already say Tehran gave too much. ➡️ He says the military advantage is now with Iran: a large new budget, missiles, drones, expanded underground facilities — while the United States struggles to produce air defenses and munitions. THE ELECTION CLOCK ➡️ Marandi does not claim the war is only about November 3. He does say the calendar matters. ➡️ Trump would prefer Iran stay quiet until the vote. Iran, in his view, has the incentive to do the opposite. ➡️ Escalation now, he argues, is good for Iran because a worse result for Trump makes the months after the election harder for Washington. ➡️ A second path to explosion runs through Netanyahu’s bombing in Lebanon. Either Bessent’s squeeze or Israel’s war could light the next fuse. THE BOTTOM LINE Marandi’s map is not a quick win and not a managed squeeze. It is a ladder with no off-ramp: strangle Iran and Iran strangles the Gulf, the proxies fall first, and the global economy goes with them. Unless Trump takes the exit and returns to the deal he already signed, all roads lead to economic crisis. #IranWar #Marandi #Hormuz #Bessent #GulfCollapse #NoRedLines #OilShock HT: YouTube Glenn Diesen Seyed Mohammad Marandi Glenn Diesen

NO MORE RED LINES: IRAN JUST ENTERED THE MOST DESTRUCTIVE PHASE OF THE WAR On Sunday, September 6, 2026, the well-connected Prof. Mohammad Marandi from the University of Teheran — a former adviser to Iran’s nuclear negotiation team — told Glenn Diesen the war has changed shape. Washington, he said, keeps failing and then choosing a more aggressive policy instead of an off-ramp. His warning is simple and brutal: if the United States tries to strangle Iran, Tehran will strangle the Gulf. THE NEW PHASE ➡️ Marandi says every time U.S. policy fails, America does not exit. It picks a harsher offensive. ➡️ The 40-day war showed it could not win militarily. Then came siege warfare. Then attempts to take the Strait. Then an MOU that was signed and immediately undermined. Then hot war again. ➡️ Now Treasury Secretary Bessent talks of strangling the country and cutting off the head of the snake. ➡️ “He wants to strangle over 90 million Iranians,” Marandi said. Societal collapse, in his words, “basically means the death of a nation.” NO MORE RED LINES ➡️ After the United States wrecked the MOU, Iran stopped fighting a mostly defensive war. ➡️ A new chair of the Supreme National Security Council took over with a mandate for an offensive approach. ➡️ Marandi says the armed forces now intend to take the initiative. Iranian leaders, including the first vice president, have warned Americans to prepare for “very bleak times.” ➡️ He describes the latest exchange as heavier on Iran’s side: strikes toward Jordan, Kuwait, the Emirates, U.S. naval ships, and U.S.-linked tankers after Washington hit Iranian ports, Larak Island, and three tankers. ➡️ “There are no more red lines. Iran will strike whatever they deem necessary.” ➡️ The shots at U.S. ships, he argues, were a message: Tehran is prepared for total war. THE STRANGLE TRAP ➡️ Bessent can threaten banks and financial institutions. Iran cannot run that kind of sanctions war. ➡️ So Marandi’s thesis is military: if Washington tries to crush the Iranian economy, Iran hits U.S. assets, U.S.-linked assets, and the Gulf partners that fund the war with free jet fuel and paid-for bases. ➡️ Targets could be banks, oil and gas installations, U.S. businesses, even AI centers. ➡️ “If they want to strangle the Iranian economy, then the Iranians will strangle neighboring economies.” WHY THE GULF BREAKS FIRST ➡️ Marandi says the Arab states on the Persian Gulf are already in trouble. They were supposed to deliver billions. Instead they are selling stocks and bonds just to keep the status quo. ➡️ These are not ordinary countries, he said. They are deserts that live on oil and gas, and they are extremely expensive to maintain. ➡️ Saudi Arabia is exposed after hundreds of billions wasted on Yemen and mega-projects that have been shut down. Kuwait and Bahrain, he argues, are particularly vulnerable. All of them are. ➡️ If this phase goes where Bessent’s language points, “these countries will all collapse.” ➡️ Iran remains standing. “It will be ironically the US proxies that will go down.” ➡️ That, he said, would mean the end of energy supplies from the region and a global economic depression. No amount of market manipulation would work after that. THE DEAL THAT ALREADY EXISTS ➡️ The New York Times frames Iran as too confident to negotiate. Marandi’s reply: there is already an agreement. ➡️ “Someone should tell the New York Times that we do actually have an agreement and that it wasn’t Iran that walked away.” ➡️ Iran will not bargain a new deal so Washington can break the last one. The MOU is the red line. It includes Gaza, Yemen, and Iraq. Domestic critics already say Tehran gave too much. ➡️ He says the military advantage is now with Iran: a large new budget, missiles, drones, expanded underground facilities — while the United States struggles to produce air defenses and munitions. THE ELECTION CLOCK ➡️ Marandi does not claim the war is only about November 3. He does say the calendar matters. ➡️ Trump would prefer Iran stay quiet until the vote. Iran, in his view, has the incentive to do the opposite. ➡️ Escalation now, he argues, is good for Iran because a worse result for Trump makes the months after the election harder for Washington. ➡️ A second path to explosion runs through Netanyahu’s bombing in Lebanon. Either Bessent’s squeeze or Israel’s war could light the next fuse. THE BOTTOM LINE Marandi’s map is not a quick win and not a managed squeeze. It is a ladder with no off-ramp: strangle Iran and Iran strangles the Gulf, the proxies fall first, and the global economy goes with them. Unless Trump takes the exit and returns to the deal he already signed, all roads lead to economic crisis. #IranWar #Marandi #Hormuz #Bessent #GulfCollapse #NoRedLines #OilShock HT: YouTube Glenn Diesen Seyed Mohammad Marandi Glenn Diesen

Mark

107,946 просмотров • 13 дней назад

TRUMP IS MAKING AMERICA A HIMACHAL PRADESH UNDER CONgress GOVT😂 Trump’s $5000 “Trump Dividend” may sound attractive freebie but Economically, it could be DISASTER. America already dealing with: 🔴~$1.9 TRILLION federal deficit 🔴~$40 TRILLION national debt 🔴Inflation still well above the Fed’s 2% target 🔴High interest rates & borrowing costs 🔴Uneven/slow economic growth 🔴Affordability pressures on American households On top of it, USD is losing it's sheen. Now comes a proposal that could cost $1.2–$1.35 TRILLION if every adult citizen receives $5000. And here's the problem: ➡️ More cash chasing goods can mean more inflation. ➡️ More borrowing can mean higher interest costs. ➡️ Higher rates can hurt business investment, housing and jobs. ➡️ A bigger deficit means an even heavier burden on future taxpayers. ➡️ It does little to fix America's underlying problems of productivity, affordability, debt and fiscal imbalance. And if the argument is that tariff revenue will pay for it, the numbers still don't make the math easy. The real question isn't: “Will Americans like receiving $5,000?” Of course they will. The question is: “Can an already heavily indebted economy afford to borrow another trillion-plus dollars to hand out cash just before an election?” A government cannot permanently create prosperity by handing out money it doesn't have. Short-term political dividend. Long-term economic bill. That's borrowing from tomorrow to win today. BJP Govts in Madhya Pradesh & Maharashtra also declared freebies to win State elections but fiscal position & growing revenues made it sustainable. AAP did it in Punjab, CONgress in Himachal, Telangana & Karnataka without considering Fiscal Position and Today either these States are bankrupt or the voters are still waiting for the freebies to come as promised. Trump is taking America in direction of Punjab & Himachal and that too, to win midterms. You can imagine Bad Position he's in despite 24*7 boasting of himself.

TRUMP IS MAKING AMERICA A HIMACHAL PRADESH UNDER CONgress GOVT😂 Trump’s $5000 “Trump Dividend” may sound attractive freebie but Economically, it could be DISASTER. America already dealing with: 🔴~$1.9 TRILLION federal deficit 🔴~$40 TRILLION national debt 🔴Inflation still well above the Fed’s 2% target 🔴High interest rates & borrowing costs 🔴Uneven/slow economic growth 🔴Affordability pressures on American households On top of it, USD is losing it's sheen. Now comes a proposal that could cost $1.2–$1.35 TRILLION if every adult citizen receives $5000. And here's the problem: ➡️ More cash chasing goods can mean more inflation. ➡️ More borrowing can mean higher interest costs. ➡️ Higher rates can hurt business investment, housing and jobs. ➡️ A bigger deficit means an even heavier burden on future taxpayers. ➡️ It does little to fix America's underlying problems of productivity, affordability, debt and fiscal imbalance. And if the argument is that tariff revenue will pay for it, the numbers still don't make the math easy. The real question isn't: “Will Americans like receiving $5,000?” Of course they will. The question is: “Can an already heavily indebted economy afford to borrow another trillion-plus dollars to hand out cash just before an election?” A government cannot permanently create prosperity by handing out money it doesn't have. Short-term political dividend. Long-term economic bill. That's borrowing from tomorrow to win today. BJP Govts in Madhya Pradesh & Maharashtra also declared freebies to win State elections but fiscal position & growing revenues made it sustainable. AAP did it in Punjab, CONgress in Himachal, Telangana & Karnataka without considering Fiscal Position and Today either these States are bankrupt or the voters are still waiting for the freebies to come as promised. Trump is taking America in direction of Punjab & Himachal and that too, to win midterms. You can imagine Bad Position he's in despite 24*7 boasting of himself.

BhikuMhatre

11,140 просмотров • 8 дней назад

Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf, the Iranian parliamentary speaker who led the first round of negotiations with JD Vance in Islamabad, gave an important TV interview today. In it, he lays out his narrative of the war, the diplomatic track, and signals where Iran’s political goalposts are currently. He projects firmness throughout. Iran, in his telling, will not back down from its negotiating demands. At the same time, he frames negotiations not as a retreat from conflict but as its continuation by other means, a way to consolidate gains and secure what he calls a “lasting peace.” 🔴His core framework is that military power, public mobilization, and diplomacy are inseparable: ➡️“Today, we have the ‘field,’ the ‘street,’ and ‘diplomacy of authority.’ These are not three separate things. Do not make a mistake. Today the street, the field, and diplomacy are together.” 🔴He argues this is precisely why now is the moment for diplomacy. Iran, he says, has reached a peak position militarily and in terms of social cohesion, and negotiations are meant to lock that in politically: ➡️“In the military sphere, we are at a maximum point. The street has given strength to the field. We have achieved part of our demands militarily, but they must now be stabilized and recorded politically. This is where diplomacy must take the flag in hand.” 🔴At the same time, he signals to hardliners to not be overly triumphalist. Iran’s asymmetric warfare has paid off, but he is explicit that this does not mean superiority over the United States: Iran has succeeded without being the stronger military power. 🔴On escalation, he is blunt. Iran is ready for the war to resume if necessary. He warns that the Strait of Hormuz remains a central lever and that restrictions will continue if the US “blockade” is not ended. 🔴Passage, in any case, will be governed by Iranian “protocols.” 🔴At the same time, he presents a calibrated position. Iran, he says, wants normalization in the Strait and does not seek broader disruption: ➡️“We have always sought normalization… but when commitments were not fulfilled, we restricted traffic. 🔴He adds that access will remain open to countries that are not hostile: ➡️“We want those who do not act with hostility toward us to pass easily. We are not seeking to create insecurity.” 🔴But that openness is conditional and controlled: ➡️“This Strait must be used by the world, but with the protocols that we set.” 🔴On the ceasefire and negotiations, his narrative is clear. The United States, not Iran, initiated the diplomatic shift. He says US ultimatums failed and that Washington, through Pakistan, sent a 15 point proposal. Iran rejected it and countered with its own 10 points after internal deliberations at the Supreme National Security Council and consultation with the Supreme Leader. 🔴According to him, the US accepted the "generalities" of the Iranian framework and sought a ceasefire to negotiate on that basis. 🔴On trust, his message is stark. In Islamabad, he says JD Vance spoke of "good faith", and his response was that Iran also came in good faith, but with zero trust. The burden, he says, is on the US to change that. 🔴He underscores that Iran’s negotiating positions have not shifted. They remain aligned with the framework set by Ali Khamenei: ➡️“Our strategy was those same measures the Supreme Leader has stated. We have not pursued and will not pursue anything outside that framework.” 🔴He adds that the delegation is operating fully in line with current leader Mojataba Khamenei, “neither ahead nor behind.” 🔴He repeatedly returns to the goal of a durable outcome: ➡️“We want a lasting peace, one with guarantees so this is not repeated.” 🔴He says the first round of Islamabad talks produced some movement, but major gaps remain: ➡️“We have had progress, but our distances are still great. Some fundamental points remain.” 🔴Still, he suggests one important outcome from the Islamabad talks was a more realistic understanding on both sides: ➡️“These negotiations did not resolve our mistrust, but both delegations gained a more realistic understanding of each other.” 🔴He credits the tripartite format for helping resolve misunderstandings in real time. 🔴Finally, he outlines Iran’s preferred structure for any deal going forward, a step by step process rooted in reciprocity: ➡️“Our policy is step by step action. Commitment against commitment. They must take one step, we take one step. It should not be that we fulfill our commitments and they do not.” The throughline of the interview is clear. Iran sees itself as having gained leverage through the war. Diplomacy is meant to convert that leverage into durable political outcomes. But that process will be conditional and shaped by deep mistrust, with readiness to use the Strait of Hormuz as leverage, and readiness for renewed escalation and war.

Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf, the Iranian parliamentary speaker who led the first round of negotiations with JD Vance in Islamabad, gave an important TV interview today. In it, he lays out his narrative of the war, the diplomatic track, and signals where Iran’s political goalposts are currently. He projects firmness throughout. Iran, in his telling, will not back down from its negotiating demands. At the same time, he frames negotiations not as a retreat from conflict but as its continuation by other means, a way to consolidate gains and secure what he calls a “lasting peace.” 🔴His core framework is that military power, public mobilization, and diplomacy are inseparable: ➡️“Today, we have the ‘field,’ the ‘street,’ and ‘diplomacy of authority.’ These are not three separate things. Do not make a mistake. Today the street, the field, and diplomacy are together.” 🔴He argues this is precisely why now is the moment for diplomacy. Iran, he says, has reached a peak position militarily and in terms of social cohesion, and negotiations are meant to lock that in politically: ➡️“In the military sphere, we are at a maximum point. The street has given strength to the field. We have achieved part of our demands militarily, but they must now be stabilized and recorded politically. This is where diplomacy must take the flag in hand.” 🔴At the same time, he signals to hardliners to not be overly triumphalist. Iran’s asymmetric warfare has paid off, but he is explicit that this does not mean superiority over the United States: Iran has succeeded without being the stronger military power. 🔴On escalation, he is blunt. Iran is ready for the war to resume if necessary. He warns that the Strait of Hormuz remains a central lever and that restrictions will continue if the US “blockade” is not ended. 🔴Passage, in any case, will be governed by Iranian “protocols.” 🔴At the same time, he presents a calibrated position. Iran, he says, wants normalization in the Strait and does not seek broader disruption: ➡️“We have always sought normalization… but when commitments were not fulfilled, we restricted traffic. 🔴He adds that access will remain open to countries that are not hostile: ➡️“We want those who do not act with hostility toward us to pass easily. We are not seeking to create insecurity.” 🔴But that openness is conditional and controlled: ➡️“This Strait must be used by the world, but with the protocols that we set.” 🔴On the ceasefire and negotiations, his narrative is clear. The United States, not Iran, initiated the diplomatic shift. He says US ultimatums failed and that Washington, through Pakistan, sent a 15 point proposal. Iran rejected it and countered with its own 10 points after internal deliberations at the Supreme National Security Council and consultation with the Supreme Leader. 🔴According to him, the US accepted the "generalities" of the Iranian framework and sought a ceasefire to negotiate on that basis. 🔴On trust, his message is stark. In Islamabad, he says JD Vance spoke of "good faith", and his response was that Iran also came in good faith, but with zero trust. The burden, he says, is on the US to change that. 🔴He underscores that Iran’s negotiating positions have not shifted. They remain aligned with the framework set by Ali Khamenei: ➡️“Our strategy was those same measures the Supreme Leader has stated. We have not pursued and will not pursue anything outside that framework.” 🔴He adds that the delegation is operating fully in line with current leader Mojataba Khamenei, “neither ahead nor behind.” 🔴He repeatedly returns to the goal of a durable outcome: ➡️“We want a lasting peace, one with guarantees so this is not repeated.” 🔴He says the first round of Islamabad talks produced some movement, but major gaps remain: ➡️“We have had progress, but our distances are still great. Some fundamental points remain.” 🔴Still, he suggests one important outcome from the Islamabad talks was a more realistic understanding on both sides: ➡️“These negotiations did not resolve our mistrust, but both delegations gained a more realistic understanding of each other.” 🔴He credits the tripartite format for helping resolve misunderstandings in real time. 🔴Finally, he outlines Iran’s preferred structure for any deal going forward, a step by step process rooted in reciprocity: ➡️“Our policy is step by step action. Commitment against commitment. They must take one step, we take one step. It should not be that we fulfill our commitments and they do not.” The throughline of the interview is clear. Iran sees itself as having gained leverage through the war. Diplomacy is meant to convert that leverage into durable political outcomes. But that process will be conditional and shaped by deep mistrust, with readiness to use the Strait of Hormuz as leverage, and readiness for renewed escalation and war.

Sina Toossi

24,785 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

ECKARD: $125 IS NOT A RANDOM NUMBER — THE VETERAN TRADER’S PHYSICAL-BARREL CASE Veteran oil trader Troy Eckard is not arguing that high prices always last. He is arguing that this rally is different. Secretary Bessent can talk $40 oil after the war. The barrels, the reserve, and the military tape are telling another story. THE $125 QUESTION ➡️ Eckard’s question is simple: what is the right price of oil when the disruption is real and the resolution is not? ➡️ He says $125 is not a dart throw. The probability rises every week the war does not end. ➡️ “Do I just pick that number randomly? No, I don’t.” THE $40 STORY VERSUS THE TAPE ➡️ Bessent says that once the Iran war is over, oil could fall to $40 or below. ➡️ Eckard grants the math. New supply plus a later global recession could crush demand for a time. ➡️ Then he draws the line he has been repeating for months: don’t watch the lips. Watch the actions. WHY THIS IS NOT 2008 ➡️ In 2008 T. Boone Pickens talked $300 oil. The tape ran to $145 on speculation. ➡️ Eckard was there. He says this tape is not that tape. ➡️ Today it is physical barrels. Ongoing military action. No settlement in sight. Both sides say they will slow down. The continuation happens anyway. WHAT WASHINGTON IS ACTUALLY DOING ➡️ The United States is still exporting crude it cannot refine — about five million barrels a day. ➡️ It is still draining the Strategic Petroleum Reserve instead of filling it. ➡️ If $40 after the war were the real base case, Eckard says the move would be obvious: stop the export flood and put barrels back in the SPR for financial and military security. ➡️ That is not what is happening. The actions say that without those extra barrels in the market, there is not enough oil. THE NEAR-TERM MAP ➡️ Oil is $94 — a sharp lift from two or three weeks ago, when a resolution still looked possible. ➡️ Eckard’s next checkpoint: $98 to $105 by Friday. “No more fudge factor. There’s no more room to play.” ➡️ Every “the war is about over” statement has been followed by more fire: Houthis hitting Saudi facilities, more cross-border action, more uncertainty across the Gulf. THE 90-DAY RISK ➡️ He puts midterms about 60 days out. Iran, in his read, is hoping Trump loses the House, the Senate, or both. ➡️ A divided Congress would look like weakness in Tehran — and that, he says, would invite more disruption, not less. ➡️ The only clean end he can see is boots on the ground. Nobody wants that. The other side has everything to lose and a lot to gain. That is how wars refuse to end. THE BOTTOM LINE Eckard’s call is $4 to $5 higher by Friday and $110 to $125 within 90 days — not because a trader shouted a number, but because physical supply is tight, the reserve is being emptied instead of refilled, and the war has no off-ramp. The $40 speech is a later chapter. This chapter is still being written in missing barrels. #OilPrices #TroyEckard #OilTo125 #SPR #EnergyCrisis #MiddleEastOil #CrudeOil HT: YouTube Eckard Enterprises | Oil & Gas Investing

ECKARD: $125 IS NOT A RANDOM NUMBER — THE VETERAN TRADER’S PHYSICAL-BARREL CASE Veteran oil trader Troy Eckard is not arguing that high prices always last. He is arguing that this rally is different. Secretary Bessent can talk $40 oil after the war. The barrels, the reserve, and the military tape are telling another story. THE $125 QUESTION ➡️ Eckard’s question is simple: what is the right price of oil when the disruption is real and the resolution is not? ➡️ He says $125 is not a dart throw. The probability rises every week the war does not end. ➡️ “Do I just pick that number randomly? No, I don’t.” THE $40 STORY VERSUS THE TAPE ➡️ Bessent says that once the Iran war is over, oil could fall to $40 or below. ➡️ Eckard grants the math. New supply plus a later global recession could crush demand for a time. ➡️ Then he draws the line he has been repeating for months: don’t watch the lips. Watch the actions. WHY THIS IS NOT 2008 ➡️ In 2008 T. Boone Pickens talked $300 oil. The tape ran to $145 on speculation. ➡️ Eckard was there. He says this tape is not that tape. ➡️ Today it is physical barrels. Ongoing military action. No settlement in sight. Both sides say they will slow down. The continuation happens anyway. WHAT WASHINGTON IS ACTUALLY DOING ➡️ The United States is still exporting crude it cannot refine — about five million barrels a day. ➡️ It is still draining the Strategic Petroleum Reserve instead of filling it. ➡️ If $40 after the war were the real base case, Eckard says the move would be obvious: stop the export flood and put barrels back in the SPR for financial and military security. ➡️ That is not what is happening. The actions say that without those extra barrels in the market, there is not enough oil. THE NEAR-TERM MAP ➡️ Oil is $94 — a sharp lift from two or three weeks ago, when a resolution still looked possible. ➡️ Eckard’s next checkpoint: $98 to $105 by Friday. “No more fudge factor. There’s no more room to play.” ➡️ Every “the war is about over” statement has been followed by more fire: Houthis hitting Saudi facilities, more cross-border action, more uncertainty across the Gulf. THE 90-DAY RISK ➡️ He puts midterms about 60 days out. Iran, in his read, is hoping Trump loses the House, the Senate, or both. ➡️ A divided Congress would look like weakness in Tehran — and that, he says, would invite more disruption, not less. ➡️ The only clean end he can see is boots on the ground. Nobody wants that. The other side has everything to lose and a lot to gain. That is how wars refuse to end. THE BOTTOM LINE Eckard’s call is $4 to $5 higher by Friday and $110 to $125 within 90 days — not because a trader shouted a number, but because physical supply is tight, the reserve is being emptied instead of refilled, and the war has no off-ramp. The $40 speech is a later chapter. This chapter is still being written in missing barrels. #OilPrices #TroyEckard #OilTo125 #SPR #EnergyCrisis #MiddleEastOil #CrudeOil HT: YouTube Eckard Enterprises | Oil & Gas Investing

Mark

18,769 просмотров • 10 дней назад

THE HIGH MORALITY TRAP: HOW EUROPE IS CHEERING ITS WAY TOWARD NUCLEAR CATASTROPHE Swiss journalist Roger Köppel delivers a razor-sharp warning that exposes the dangerous self-deception driving European foreign policy. European leaders have locked themselves inside a mirror cabinet where every reflection tells them they stand on the highest moral ground. The more they celebrate strikes deep inside Russia, the more they push the continent toward a disaster they refuse to see coming. THE HIGH MORALITY ILLUSION ➡️ European politicians present themselves as the moral conscience of the world while actively fueling a conflict that risks nuclear war. ➡️ They describe every drone strike on Russian refineries and residential areas as a righteous act in defense of freedom and civilization. ➡️ The simple truth is that these attacks do not bring peace any closer. They only strengthen the determination in Moscow to show Europe exactly where the hammer hangs. THE NUCLEAR THREAT ➡️ Russia holds an arsenal of 6500 nuclear warheads backed by missiles too fast to be stopped. ➡️ European leaders act as if they are still dealing with a weak opponent who will eventually back down under pressure. ➡️ Cornering a nuclear power does not produce surrender. It produces the grim resolve to prove that ultimate power still exists. THE MILITARISTS WITHOUT A MILITARY ➡️ European politicians now speak in increasingly martial tones and aggressive posturing. ➡️ Yet European defense forces in key countries have become so hollow that soldiers have been forced to use wooden sticks as rifle substitutes during major NATO exercises. ➡️ This is not strength. It is empty verbal militarism from leaders who have forgotten what real power actually requires. THE MORAL HYPOCRISY ➡️ When European-supported drones hit Russian civilian buildings it is called regrettable collateral damage. ➡️ When Russia responds it is immediately branded as systematic and criminal aggression. ➡️ This double standard is not serious analysis. It is the clear symptom of a propaganda trance that no longer recognizes its own bias. THE HISTORICAL BETRAYAL ➡️ European leaders who should carry the lessons of history have abandoned the balanced wisdom once shown by statesmen like Helmut Kohl. ➡️ Kohl understood Russia as a proud nation with a deep need for respect and kept channels open even in difficult times. ➡️ Today's approach replaces that statesmanship with moral grandstanding and dangerous historical amnesia. THE BOTTOM LINE European politicians have wrapped their reckless escalation in the language of high morality and civilization. They cheer destruction from the safety of the spectator stands while ordinary people pay the price on both sides. They are not defending peace. They are gambling with the survival of the entire continent. This is the sound of Europe sleepwalking into catastrophe behind a mask of moral superiority. HT: YouTube DIE WELTWOCHE Die Weltwoche Roger Köppel #EuropeRussia #NuclearRisk #HighMoralityIllusion #RogerKöppel #DroneEscalation #MirrorCabinet #PeaceOrProvocation

THE HIGH MORALITY TRAP: HOW EUROPE IS CHEERING ITS WAY TOWARD NUCLEAR CATASTROPHE Swiss journalist Roger Köppel delivers a razor-sharp warning that exposes the dangerous self-deception driving European foreign policy. European leaders have locked themselves inside a mirror cabinet where every reflection tells them they stand on the highest moral ground. The more they celebrate strikes deep inside Russia, the more they push the continent toward a disaster they refuse to see coming. THE HIGH MORALITY ILLUSION ➡️ European politicians present themselves as the moral conscience of the world while actively fueling a conflict that risks nuclear war. ➡️ They describe every drone strike on Russian refineries and residential areas as a righteous act in defense of freedom and civilization. ➡️ The simple truth is that these attacks do not bring peace any closer. They only strengthen the determination in Moscow to show Europe exactly where the hammer hangs. THE NUCLEAR THREAT ➡️ Russia holds an arsenal of 6500 nuclear warheads backed by missiles too fast to be stopped. ➡️ European leaders act as if they are still dealing with a weak opponent who will eventually back down under pressure. ➡️ Cornering a nuclear power does not produce surrender. It produces the grim resolve to prove that ultimate power still exists. THE MILITARISTS WITHOUT A MILITARY ➡️ European politicians now speak in increasingly martial tones and aggressive posturing. ➡️ Yet European defense forces in key countries have become so hollow that soldiers have been forced to use wooden sticks as rifle substitutes during major NATO exercises. ➡️ This is not strength. It is empty verbal militarism from leaders who have forgotten what real power actually requires. THE MORAL HYPOCRISY ➡️ When European-supported drones hit Russian civilian buildings it is called regrettable collateral damage. ➡️ When Russia responds it is immediately branded as systematic and criminal aggression. ➡️ This double standard is not serious analysis. It is the clear symptom of a propaganda trance that no longer recognizes its own bias. THE HISTORICAL BETRAYAL ➡️ European leaders who should carry the lessons of history have abandoned the balanced wisdom once shown by statesmen like Helmut Kohl. ➡️ Kohl understood Russia as a proud nation with a deep need for respect and kept channels open even in difficult times. ➡️ Today's approach replaces that statesmanship with moral grandstanding and dangerous historical amnesia. THE BOTTOM LINE European politicians have wrapped their reckless escalation in the language of high morality and civilization. They cheer destruction from the safety of the spectator stands while ordinary people pay the price on both sides. They are not defending peace. They are gambling with the survival of the entire continent. This is the sound of Europe sleepwalking into catastrophe behind a mask of moral superiority. HT: YouTube DIE WELTWOCHE Die Weltwoche Roger Köppel #EuropeRussia #NuclearRisk #HighMoralityIllusion #RogerKöppel #DroneEscalation #MirrorCabinet #PeaceOrProvocation

Mark

31,114 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

90 PERCENT PAPER GOLD: INSIDER FROM GOLDMAN AND JP MORGAN REVEALS THE REAL BACKING The Swiss Tonia Zimmermann from S spent decades structuring derivatives at Goldman Sachs, JP Morgan, and Credit Suisse before co-founding her financial platform. She just laid out exactly what paper gold really is and why the gap between paper promises and physical metal matters more than most investors realize. The numbers she shared turn conventional gold ownership on its head. What happens when everyone finally demands the real thing at once? THE PAPER GOLD EXPLAINED ➡️ Paper gold and paper silver are derivatives, mainly futures contracts that let traders buy or sell metal at a set future price without ever moving physical bars today. ➡️ These paper instruments generate daily trading volumes many times larger than the entire annual global mine production of gold or silver. ➡️ Because the paper market is so enormous, it alone drives price discovery for actual physical metal across the world. THE FRACTIONAL BACKING SHOCK ➡️ Gold accounts at banks function exactly like cash accounts and are not 100 percent backed by real metal in the vault. ➡️ Typical reserves sit between 10 and 20 percent, so for every seven ounces an investor believes they own, only about one ounce may actually exist in physical form. ➡️ Futures contracts work the same way: only a small margin is required, not the full value of the gold. THE PHYSICAL DELIVERY CRISIS ➡️ The entire system runs without issue as long as clients never actually demand physical delivery from their gold accounts or futures positions. ➡️ The moment broad physical demand hits, whether through bank accounts or major exchanges, only around 10 percent of the claimed gold is truly available in metal. ➡️ "The faster one wins," she noted, describing exactly who gets the real gold when a rush begins. THE CREDIT FOUNDATION OF EVERYTHING ➡️ Our whole economy creates assets and money through credit, meaning every piece of wealth has a matching debt created somewhere else in the system. ➡️ If debts across the board must be reset or wiped, the corresponding wealth on the other side disappears at the same moment. ➡️ This credit mechanism is why paper gold can trade at such extreme multiples of real physical supply without immediate problems. THE BOTTOM LINE Paper gold creates the comfortable feeling of ownership while resting on a thin slice of actual metal and endless credit creation. The day physical demand tests the structure, the gap between promises and reality becomes impossible to ignore. Insiders have always known the difference. The rest of the market is about to find out. HT: YouTube Rohstoff Investor #PaperGold #PhysicalGold #FractionalReserves #GoldAccounts #FuturesReality #DeliveryRisk #CreditSystem

90 PERCENT PAPER GOLD: INSIDER FROM GOLDMAN AND JP MORGAN REVEALS THE REAL BACKING The Swiss Tonia Zimmermann from S spent decades structuring derivatives at Goldman Sachs, JP Morgan, and Credit Suisse before co-founding her financial platform. She just laid out exactly what paper gold really is and why the gap between paper promises and physical metal matters more than most investors realize. The numbers she shared turn conventional gold ownership on its head. What happens when everyone finally demands the real thing at once? THE PAPER GOLD EXPLAINED ➡️ Paper gold and paper silver are derivatives, mainly futures contracts that let traders buy or sell metal at a set future price without ever moving physical bars today. ➡️ These paper instruments generate daily trading volumes many times larger than the entire annual global mine production of gold or silver. ➡️ Because the paper market is so enormous, it alone drives price discovery for actual physical metal across the world. THE FRACTIONAL BACKING SHOCK ➡️ Gold accounts at banks function exactly like cash accounts and are not 100 percent backed by real metal in the vault. ➡️ Typical reserves sit between 10 and 20 percent, so for every seven ounces an investor believes they own, only about one ounce may actually exist in physical form. ➡️ Futures contracts work the same way: only a small margin is required, not the full value of the gold. THE PHYSICAL DELIVERY CRISIS ➡️ The entire system runs without issue as long as clients never actually demand physical delivery from their gold accounts or futures positions. ➡️ The moment broad physical demand hits, whether through bank accounts or major exchanges, only around 10 percent of the claimed gold is truly available in metal. ➡️ "The faster one wins," she noted, describing exactly who gets the real gold when a rush begins. THE CREDIT FOUNDATION OF EVERYTHING ➡️ Our whole economy creates assets and money through credit, meaning every piece of wealth has a matching debt created somewhere else in the system. ➡️ If debts across the board must be reset or wiped, the corresponding wealth on the other side disappears at the same moment. ➡️ This credit mechanism is why paper gold can trade at such extreme multiples of real physical supply without immediate problems. THE BOTTOM LINE Paper gold creates the comfortable feeling of ownership while resting on a thin slice of actual metal and endless credit creation. The day physical demand tests the structure, the gap between promises and reality becomes impossible to ignore. Insiders have always known the difference. The rest of the market is about to find out. HT: YouTube Rohstoff Investor #PaperGold #PhysicalGold #FractionalReserves #GoldAccounts #FuturesReality #DeliveryRisk #CreditSystem

Mark

73,441 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

PAKISTAN FOREIGN MINISTER'S SECRET MESSAGE TO RUBIO: IRAN WILL DEMONSTRATE A NUCLEAR BOMB In a development that has flown under the radar of mainstream reporting, well-connected former CIA intelligence agent Larry Johnson has come forward with a direct warning from the highest levels. Pakistan's foreign minister personally delivered a message to Secretary Marco Rubio on Friday stating that Iran is prepared to demonstrate a nuclear weapon should the current escalation continue. This revelation, which Johnson is racing to confirm with his sources, introduces a terrifying new dimension to the conflict that few have anticipated. THE STARTLING MESSAGE DELIVERED ➡️ Pakistan's foreign minister delivered a direct message to Marco Rubio stating that Iran will do a demonstration with a nuclear weapon. ➡️ This would be detonated in a way to send a message to both Israel and the United States. ➡️ Larry Johnson explained that this move comes if the current escalation continues without resolution. THE CRITICAL UNKNOWN ➡️ It is not clear if this is a nuclear weapon developed by Iran or one given to Iran by Pakistan or North Korea. ➡️ The former CIA agent said he does not yet have the answer to that critical question. ➡️ Either way the ability to demonstrate it marks a dangerous new reality in the standoff. THE BOTTOM LINE This intelligence from a highly connected ex-CIA operative places the specter of an Iranian nuclear demonstration at the heart of the current crisis, turning what was a conventional standoff into something far more perilous. The world is now on notice that one side may soon cross a line that changes the rules of engagement forever. #IranNuclear #LarryJohnson #ExCIA #NuclearDemonstration #PakistanWarning #RubioAlert #EscalationRisk HT: YouTube Judge Napolitano

PAKISTAN FOREIGN MINISTER'S SECRET MESSAGE TO RUBIO: IRAN WILL DEMONSTRATE A NUCLEAR BOMB In a development that has flown under the radar of mainstream reporting, well-connected former CIA intelligence agent Larry Johnson has come forward with a direct warning from the highest levels. Pakistan's foreign minister personally delivered a message to Secretary Marco Rubio on Friday stating that Iran is prepared to demonstrate a nuclear weapon should the current escalation continue. This revelation, which Johnson is racing to confirm with his sources, introduces a terrifying new dimension to the conflict that few have anticipated. THE STARTLING MESSAGE DELIVERED ➡️ Pakistan's foreign minister delivered a direct message to Marco Rubio stating that Iran will do a demonstration with a nuclear weapon. ➡️ This would be detonated in a way to send a message to both Israel and the United States. ➡️ Larry Johnson explained that this move comes if the current escalation continues without resolution. THE CRITICAL UNKNOWN ➡️ It is not clear if this is a nuclear weapon developed by Iran or one given to Iran by Pakistan or North Korea. ➡️ The former CIA agent said he does not yet have the answer to that critical question. ➡️ Either way the ability to demonstrate it marks a dangerous new reality in the standoff. THE BOTTOM LINE This intelligence from a highly connected ex-CIA operative places the specter of an Iranian nuclear demonstration at the heart of the current crisis, turning what was a conventional standoff into something far more perilous. The world is now on notice that one side may soon cross a line that changes the rules of engagement forever. #IranNuclear #LarryJohnson #ExCIA #NuclearDemonstration #PakistanWarning #RubioAlert #EscalationRisk HT: YouTube Judge Napolitano

Mark

187,928 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

PAPE: IRAN JUST GRABBED THE OIL ARTERY — NEXT STOP: THE GULF BANKS AND IRAN BECOMES A WORLD POWER. University of Chicago professor Robert Pape sat down on "At the Waters Edge" on September 13 and said the last three days were not noise. In his read, Iran just tightened a grip on the oil routes that feed the world — and the next move is not more missiles. It is politics over the governments that sit on hundreds of billions in U.S. Treasuries. THE WEEKEND SHIFT ➡️ Pape says the Houthis now appear to control the Red Sea, and those three days are “shaking the world.” He calls it pretty bad, and getting worse before it gets better. ➡️ The East-West pipeline that was supposed to bypass Hormuz has been hit and shut, he says, so there are no loadings at Yanbu. That is not a side show. The host put it near 4% of global oil. Pape did not blink. THE PLAN HE SAYS WAS ALREADY ON THE CALENDAR ➡️ On June 15 he mapped Iran’s “period of maximum leverage” as three buffers running down: the U.S. SPR, China’s extra buying, and the Houthis. ➡️ Starting July 20, after IRGC advisers landed in Sanaa, the Houthis began hitting Saudi tankers — not random ships. ➡️ Hormuz shipping was already being squeezed again. Then Iran-backed militias in Iraq hit the land pipe. Pape’s line is blunt: this is a coherent, multi-prong offensive, not a weekend accident. THE BYPASS THAT ARRIVED TOO LATE Scott Bessent’s idea that Hormuz becomes “irrelevant in two years” because of new bypasses is, in Pape’s words, three months late and about $300 billion short. ➡️ “Right in front of our eyes they’re becoming a world power.” He does not mean Turkey and Pakistan. He means a Persian Gulf core, then a “security resistance belt” from the Mediterranean to the Red Sea to the Gulf. NO FLEET IS STEAMING IN Europe, he says after Brussels, is not mustering for the Red Sea. It is staring at Ukraine, Russia, and a dark winter at home. ➡️ The U.S. Navy is tapped out in Hormuz. Japan, Britain, and France cannot magically reopen Bab el-Mandeb. Flag officers talking B-2 carpet bombing miss the point he has taught for 30 years: air power without a ground or surface “anvil” just scatters the enemy. The Houthis will not sit in a kill box and wait. THE PRICE PATH HE IS WATCHING ➡️ Oil has gone “straight up” since mid-July. Trump can talk. The tape is not listening. ➡️Diesel, Pape says, is already at a historic U.S. high. Pump prices around $4.30–$4.45 a gallon jumped almost 20 cents in a week. He sees a path over $5, maybe $5.50 — with food riding diesel, not gasoline. ➡️If SPR draws keep the current pace, his sketch has the reserve effectively gone by early April. That is his scenario, not a printed date. WHAT HE SAYS COMES NEXT The last three days, in his framing, already put a tight grip on “our artery of oil.” ➡️ The next six months are political: more influence over frontline Gulf capitals — because those central banks hold the Treasuries. Regime-change logic, he says, is realism 101. If Washington treated it as fair game against Tehran, do not be shocked when Tehran treats Gulf governments the same way. He is describing a trajectory, not announcing a coup. THE BOTTOM LINE Pape’s warning is simple. The off-ramps are gone, the buffers are thinning, and the fight has moved from tankers to the map itself. First the oil artery. Then the governments that sit on the money. Iran is not waiting for a better offer. It is building the leverage while the West argues about who should sail first. #RobertPape #RedSea #Hormuz #Houthis #OilPrices #EnergyCrisis #BombingToWin HT: YouTube At the Waters Edge

PAPE: IRAN JUST GRABBED THE OIL ARTERY — NEXT STOP: THE GULF BANKS AND IRAN BECOMES A WORLD POWER. University of Chicago professor Robert Pape sat down on "At the Waters Edge" on September 13 and said the last three days were not noise. In his read, Iran just tightened a grip on the oil routes that feed the world — and the next move is not more missiles. It is politics over the governments that sit on hundreds of billions in U.S. Treasuries. THE WEEKEND SHIFT ➡️ Pape says the Houthis now appear to control the Red Sea, and those three days are “shaking the world.” He calls it pretty bad, and getting worse before it gets better. ➡️ The East-West pipeline that was supposed to bypass Hormuz has been hit and shut, he says, so there are no loadings at Yanbu. That is not a side show. The host put it near 4% of global oil. Pape did not blink. THE PLAN HE SAYS WAS ALREADY ON THE CALENDAR ➡️ On June 15 he mapped Iran’s “period of maximum leverage” as three buffers running down: the U.S. SPR, China’s extra buying, and the Houthis. ➡️ Starting July 20, after IRGC advisers landed in Sanaa, the Houthis began hitting Saudi tankers — not random ships. ➡️ Hormuz shipping was already being squeezed again. Then Iran-backed militias in Iraq hit the land pipe. Pape’s line is blunt: this is a coherent, multi-prong offensive, not a weekend accident. THE BYPASS THAT ARRIVED TOO LATE Scott Bessent’s idea that Hormuz becomes “irrelevant in two years” because of new bypasses is, in Pape’s words, three months late and about $300 billion short. ➡️ “Right in front of our eyes they’re becoming a world power.” He does not mean Turkey and Pakistan. He means a Persian Gulf core, then a “security resistance belt” from the Mediterranean to the Red Sea to the Gulf. NO FLEET IS STEAMING IN Europe, he says after Brussels, is not mustering for the Red Sea. It is staring at Ukraine, Russia, and a dark winter at home. ➡️ The U.S. Navy is tapped out in Hormuz. Japan, Britain, and France cannot magically reopen Bab el-Mandeb. Flag officers talking B-2 carpet bombing miss the point he has taught for 30 years: air power without a ground or surface “anvil” just scatters the enemy. The Houthis will not sit in a kill box and wait. THE PRICE PATH HE IS WATCHING ➡️ Oil has gone “straight up” since mid-July. Trump can talk. The tape is not listening. ➡️Diesel, Pape says, is already at a historic U.S. high. Pump prices around $4.30–$4.45 a gallon jumped almost 20 cents in a week. He sees a path over $5, maybe $5.50 — with food riding diesel, not gasoline. ➡️If SPR draws keep the current pace, his sketch has the reserve effectively gone by early April. That is his scenario, not a printed date. WHAT HE SAYS COMES NEXT The last three days, in his framing, already put a tight grip on “our artery of oil.” ➡️ The next six months are political: more influence over frontline Gulf capitals — because those central banks hold the Treasuries. Regime-change logic, he says, is realism 101. If Washington treated it as fair game against Tehran, do not be shocked when Tehran treats Gulf governments the same way. He is describing a trajectory, not announcing a coup. THE BOTTOM LINE Pape’s warning is simple. The off-ramps are gone, the buffers are thinning, and the fight has moved from tankers to the map itself. First the oil artery. Then the governments that sit on the money. Iran is not waiting for a better offer. It is building the leverage while the West argues about who should sail first. #RobertPape #RedSea #Hormuz #Houthis #OilPrices #EnergyCrisis #BombingToWin HT: YouTube At the Waters Edge

Mark

45,059 просмотров • 5 дней назад

Texans deserve the TRUTH, not deception, about the Ellis County Judge’s proposed PROPERTY TAX INCREASE! Republicans are supposed to shrink government and CUT TAXES, but this proposed budget does the opposite. Voters deserve honesty and transparency about proposed budgets and tax hikes, but have instead been subjected to ever-changing math from Ellis County officials, who started making changes to their numbers after I exposed how big of a tax hike they proposed. Thank you to the Ellis County GOP for allowing me to expose the TRUTH about this liberal budget, and I’m grateful for the hundred or so patriots who came last night to learn more. For those unable to make it, I’m posting the video. I know it’s long, and I go into great detail… hope it helps! Key FACTS: 🔴 Ellis County is trying to RAISE PROPERTY TAXES 🔴 This proposal is a staggering 12.05% INCREASE from last year’s effective tax rate (rising from an effective rate of 0.244516 last year to 0.273992 this year), and these numbers came directly from Ellis County’s own website ➡️ This increase is what matters… don’t be distracted by discussion of revenue. The tax rate is what will determine how high your tax bill is, and the tax rate is going up over 12% 🔴 This proposed tax hike is so big that if it were only 0.006 higher, then it would be ILLEGAL unless voters approved it in an election ➡️ Ask yourself: what are the odds that the proposed tax rate just happened to be 0.006 lower than a rate that would force a voter approval election and allow the voters decide?? How convenient! 🔴 This budget creates more unelected bureaucracy and will diminish the power of the duly elected County Judge, who will take office next year. ➡️ These new bureaucrats will wield power over THE PEOPLE while taking power away from the elected County Judge and will cost taxpayers an extra ONE MILLION DOLLARS! 🔴 Raising taxes is bad enough, but what makes this such an abomination is that Ellis County is proposing to raise property taxes and steal more money from your back pockets… to PUT MORE OF YOUR MONEY IN THE COUNTY COMMISSIONERS AND COUNTY JUDGE’S OWN BACK POCKETS!! ➡️ That’s right. They plan on hiking your property taxes to GIVE THEMSELVES A RAISE!! No real Republican can support a budget this liberal. If you want to make your voice heard, contact your County Commissioners and tell them to REJECT THIS TAX HIKING BUDGET! Remind them that not one single County Commissioner campaigned promising to raise property taxes, but if they vote for this, that’s exactly what they’re doing… and they’d be betraying their voters and the conservative values they claim to have. You can also speak against it at their hearing THIS Tuesday (the 18th) at 2:00pm.

Texans deserve the TRUTH, not deception, about the Ellis County Judge’s proposed PROPERTY TAX INCREASE! Republicans are supposed to shrink government and CUT TAXES, but this proposed budget does the opposite. Voters deserve honesty and transparency about proposed budgets and tax hikes, but have instead been subjected to ever-changing math from Ellis County officials, who started making changes to their numbers after I exposed how big of a tax hike they proposed. Thank you to the Ellis County GOP for allowing me to expose the TRUTH about this liberal budget, and I’m grateful for the hundred or so patriots who came last night to learn more. For those unable to make it, I’m posting the video. I know it’s long, and I go into great detail… hope it helps! Key FACTS: 🔴 Ellis County is trying to RAISE PROPERTY TAXES 🔴 This proposal is a staggering 12.05% INCREASE from last year’s effective tax rate (rising from an effective rate of 0.244516 last year to 0.273992 this year), and these numbers came directly from Ellis County’s own website ➡️ This increase is what matters… don’t be distracted by discussion of revenue. The tax rate is what will determine how high your tax bill is, and the tax rate is going up over 12% 🔴 This proposed tax hike is so big that if it were only 0.006 higher, then it would be ILLEGAL unless voters approved it in an election ➡️ Ask yourself: what are the odds that the proposed tax rate just happened to be 0.006 lower than a rate that would force a voter approval election and allow the voters decide?? How convenient! 🔴 This budget creates more unelected bureaucracy and will diminish the power of the duly elected County Judge, who will take office next year. ➡️ These new bureaucrats will wield power over THE PEOPLE while taking power away from the elected County Judge and will cost taxpayers an extra ONE MILLION DOLLARS! 🔴 Raising taxes is bad enough, but what makes this such an abomination is that Ellis County is proposing to raise property taxes and steal more money from your back pockets… to PUT MORE OF YOUR MONEY IN THE COUNTY COMMISSIONERS AND COUNTY JUDGE’S OWN BACK POCKETS!! ➡️ That’s right. They plan on hiking your property taxes to GIVE THEMSELVES A RAISE!! No real Republican can support a budget this liberal. If you want to make your voice heard, contact your County Commissioners and tell them to REJECT THIS TAX HIKING BUDGET! Remind them that not one single County Commissioner campaigned promising to raise property taxes, but if they vote for this, that’s exactly what they’re doing… and they’d be betraying their voters and the conservative values they claim to have. You can also speak against it at their hearing THIS Tuesday (the 18th) at 2:00pm.

Brian Harrison

30,864 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

🚨 BREAKING: The White House has begun releasing President Trump's 20-point peace plan between Israel and Gaza PRESIDENT TRUMP would chair the transition board Major points are as follows: ➡️ HOSTAGES & PRISONERS: All hostages, both alive and deceased, to be returned within 72 hours of Israel's acceptance. In return, Israel will release 250 life-sentence prisoners and 1,700 detainees ➡️ CEASEFIRE: All military operations suspended; IDF withdrawal tied to demilitarization milestones ➡️ GAZA'S FUTURE: To become a “deradicalized, terror-free zone” under temporary Palestinian technocratic governance with international stabilization forces. ➡️ HAMAS ROLE: No role in Gaza governance; members who disarm may receive amnesty or safe passage abroad. ➡️ AID & REBUILDING: Immediate humanitarian aid, unrestricted distribution through the UN/Red Crescent, creation of a Special Economic Zone, and a Trump-led economic development plan to rebuild Gaza. FULL RELEASE BY WHITE HOUSE: 1. Gaza will be a deradicalized terror-free zone that does not pose a threat to its neighbors. 2. Gaza will be redeveloped for the benefit of the people of Gaza, who have suffered more than enough. 3. If both sides agree to this proposal, the war will immediately end. Israeli forces will withdraw to the agreed upon line to prepare for a hostage release. During this time, all military operations, including aerial and artillery bombardment, will be suspended, and battle lines will remain frozen until conditions are met for the complete staged withdrawal. 4. Within 72 hours of Israel publicly accepting this agreement, all hostages, alive and deceased, will be returned. 5. Once all hostages are released, Israel will release 250 life sentence prisoners plus 1700 Gazans who were detained after October 7th 2023, including all women and children detained in that context. For every Israeli hostage whose remains are released, Israel will release the remains of 15 deceased Gazans. 6. Once all hostages are returned, Hamas members who commit to peaceful co-existence and to decommission their weapons will be given amnesty. Members of Hamas who wish to leave Gaza will be provided safe passage to receiving countries. 7. Upon acceptance of this agreement, full aid will be immediately sent into the Gaza Strip. At a minimum, aid quantities will be consistent with what was included in the January 19, 2025, agreement regarding humanitarian aid, including rehabilitation of infrastructure (water, electricity, sewage), rehabilitation of hospitals and bakeries, and entry of necessary equipment to remove rubble and open roads. 8. Entry of distribution and aid in the Gaza Strip will proceed without interference from the two parties through the United Nations and its agencies, and the Red Crescent, in addition to other international institutions not associated in any manner with either party. Opening the Rafah crossing in both directions will be subject to the same mechanism implemented under the January 19, 2025 agreement. 9. Gaza will be governed under the temporary transitional governance of a technocratic, apolitical Palestinian committee, responsible for delivering the day-to-day running of public services and municipalities for the people in Gaza. This committee will be made up of qualified Palestinians and international experts, with oversight and supervision by a new international transitional body, the “Board of Peace,” which will be headed and chaired by President Donald J. Trump, with other members and heads of State to be announced, including Former Prime Minister Tony Blair. This body will set the framework and handle the funding for the redevelopment of Gaza until such time as the Palestinian Authority has completed its reform program, as outlined in various proposals, including President Trump’s peace plan in 2020 and the Saudi-French proposal, and can securely and effectively take back control of Gaza. This body will call on best international standards to create modern and efficient governance that serves the people of Gaza and is conducive to attracting investment. 10. A Trump economic development plan to rebuild and energize Gaza will be created by convening a panel of experts who have helped birth some of the thriving modern miracle cities in the Middle East. Many thoughtful investment proposals and exciting development ideas have been crafted by well-meaning international groups, and will be considered to synthesize the security and governance frameworks to attract and facilitate these investments that will create jobs, opportunity, and hope for future Gaza. 11. A special economic zone will be established with preferred tariff and access rates to be negotiated with participating countries. 12. No one will be forced to leave Gaza, and those who wish to leave will be free to do so and free to return. We will encourage people to stay and offer them the opportunity to build a better Gaza. 13. Hamas and other factions agree to not have any role in the governance of Gaza, directly, indirectly, or in any form. All military, terror, and offensive infrastructure, including tunnels and weapon production facilities, will be destroyed and not rebuilt. There will be a process of demilitarization of Gaza under the supervision of independent monitors, which will include placing weapons permanently beyond use through an agreed process of decommissioning, and supported by an internationally funded buy back and reintegration program all verified by the independent monitors. New Gaza will be fully committed to building a prosperous economy and to peaceful coexistence with their neighbors. 14. A guarantee will be provided by regional partners to ensure that Hamas, and the factions, comply with their obligations and that New Gaza poses no threat to its neighbors or its people. 15. The United States will work with Arab and international partners to develop a temporary International Stabilization Force (ISF) to immediately deploy in Gaza. The ISF will train and provide support to vetted Palestinian police forces in Gaza, and will consult with Jordan and Egypt who have extensive experience in this field. This force will be the long-term internal security solution. The ISF will work with Israel and Egypt to help secure border areas, along with newly trained Palestinian police forces. It is critical to prevent munitions from entering Gaza and to facilitate the rapid and secure flow of goods to rebuild and revitalize Gaza. A deconfliction mechanism will be agreed upon by the parties. 16. Israel will not occupy or annex Gaza. As the ISF establishes control and stability, the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) will withdraw based on standards, milestones, and timeframes linked to demilitarization that will be agreed upon between the IDF, ISF, the guarantors, and the Unites States, with the objective of a secure Gaza that no longer poses a threat to Israel, Egypt, or its citizens. Practically, the IDF will progressively hand over the Gaza territory it occupies to the ISF according to an agreement they will make with the transitional authority until they are withdrawn completely from Gaza, save for a security perimeter presence that will remain until Gaza is properly secure from any resurgent terror threat. 17. In the event Hamas delays or rejects this proposal, the above, including the scaled-up aid operation, will proceed in the terror-free areas handed over from the IDF to the ISF. 18. An interfaith dialogue process will be established based on the values of tolerance and peaceful co-existence to try and change mindsets and narratives of Palestinians and Israelis by emphasizing the benefits that can be derived from peace. 19. While Gaza re-development advances and when the PA reform program is faithfully carried out, the conditions may finally be in place for a credible pathway to Palestinian self-determination and statehood, which we recognize as the aspiration of the Palestinian people. 20. The United States will establish a dialogue between Israel and the Palestinians to agree on a political horizon for peaceful and prosperous co-existence.

🚨 BREAKING: The White House has begun releasing President Trump's 20-point peace plan between Israel and Gaza PRESIDENT TRUMP would chair the transition board Major points are as follows: ➡️ HOSTAGES & PRISONERS: All hostages, both alive and deceased, to be returned within 72 hours of Israel's acceptance. In return, Israel will release 250 life-sentence prisoners and 1,700 detainees ➡️ CEASEFIRE: All military operations suspended; IDF withdrawal tied to demilitarization milestones ➡️ GAZA'S FUTURE: To become a “deradicalized, terror-free zone” under temporary Palestinian technocratic governance with international stabilization forces. ➡️ HAMAS ROLE: No role in Gaza governance; members who disarm may receive amnesty or safe passage abroad. ➡️ AID & REBUILDING: Immediate humanitarian aid, unrestricted distribution through the UN/Red Crescent, creation of a Special Economic Zone, and a Trump-led economic development plan to rebuild Gaza. FULL RELEASE BY WHITE HOUSE: 1. Gaza will be a deradicalized terror-free zone that does not pose a threat to its neighbors. 2. Gaza will be redeveloped for the benefit of the people of Gaza, who have suffered more than enough. 3. If both sides agree to this proposal, the war will immediately end. Israeli forces will withdraw to the agreed upon line to prepare for a hostage release. During this time, all military operations, including aerial and artillery bombardment, will be suspended, and battle lines will remain frozen until conditions are met for the complete staged withdrawal. 4. Within 72 hours of Israel publicly accepting this agreement, all hostages, alive and deceased, will be returned. 5. Once all hostages are released, Israel will release 250 life sentence prisoners plus 1700 Gazans who were detained after October 7th 2023, including all women and children detained in that context. For every Israeli hostage whose remains are released, Israel will release the remains of 15 deceased Gazans. 6. Once all hostages are returned, Hamas members who commit to peaceful co-existence and to decommission their weapons will be given amnesty. Members of Hamas who wish to leave Gaza will be provided safe passage to receiving countries. 7. Upon acceptance of this agreement, full aid will be immediately sent into the Gaza Strip. At a minimum, aid quantities will be consistent with what was included in the January 19, 2025, agreement regarding humanitarian aid, including rehabilitation of infrastructure (water, electricity, sewage), rehabilitation of hospitals and bakeries, and entry of necessary equipment to remove rubble and open roads. 8. Entry of distribution and aid in the Gaza Strip will proceed without interference from the two parties through the United Nations and its agencies, and the Red Crescent, in addition to other international institutions not associated in any manner with either party. Opening the Rafah crossing in both directions will be subject to the same mechanism implemented under the January 19, 2025 agreement. 9. Gaza will be governed under the temporary transitional governance of a technocratic, apolitical Palestinian committee, responsible for delivering the day-to-day running of public services and municipalities for the people in Gaza. This committee will be made up of qualified Palestinians and international experts, with oversight and supervision by a new international transitional body, the “Board of Peace,” which will be headed and chaired by President Donald J. Trump, with other members and heads of State to be announced, including Former Prime Minister Tony Blair. This body will set the framework and handle the funding for the redevelopment of Gaza until such time as the Palestinian Authority has completed its reform program, as outlined in various proposals, including President Trump’s peace plan in 2020 and the Saudi-French proposal, and can securely and effectively take back control of Gaza. This body will call on best international standards to create modern and efficient governance that serves the people of Gaza and is conducive to attracting investment. 10. A Trump economic development plan to rebuild and energize Gaza will be created by convening a panel of experts who have helped birth some of the thriving modern miracle cities in the Middle East. Many thoughtful investment proposals and exciting development ideas have been crafted by well-meaning international groups, and will be considered to synthesize the security and governance frameworks to attract and facilitate these investments that will create jobs, opportunity, and hope for future Gaza. 11. A special economic zone will be established with preferred tariff and access rates to be negotiated with participating countries. 12. No one will be forced to leave Gaza, and those who wish to leave will be free to do so and free to return. We will encourage people to stay and offer them the opportunity to build a better Gaza. 13. Hamas and other factions agree to not have any role in the governance of Gaza, directly, indirectly, or in any form. All military, terror, and offensive infrastructure, including tunnels and weapon production facilities, will be destroyed and not rebuilt. There will be a process of demilitarization of Gaza under the supervision of independent monitors, which will include placing weapons permanently beyond use through an agreed process of decommissioning, and supported by an internationally funded buy back and reintegration program all verified by the independent monitors. New Gaza will be fully committed to building a prosperous economy and to peaceful coexistence with their neighbors. 14. A guarantee will be provided by regional partners to ensure that Hamas, and the factions, comply with their obligations and that New Gaza poses no threat to its neighbors or its people. 15. The United States will work with Arab and international partners to develop a temporary International Stabilization Force (ISF) to immediately deploy in Gaza. The ISF will train and provide support to vetted Palestinian police forces in Gaza, and will consult with Jordan and Egypt who have extensive experience in this field. This force will be the long-term internal security solution. The ISF will work with Israel and Egypt to help secure border areas, along with newly trained Palestinian police forces. It is critical to prevent munitions from entering Gaza and to facilitate the rapid and secure flow of goods to rebuild and revitalize Gaza. A deconfliction mechanism will be agreed upon by the parties. 16. Israel will not occupy or annex Gaza. As the ISF establishes control and stability, the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) will withdraw based on standards, milestones, and timeframes linked to demilitarization that will be agreed upon between the IDF, ISF, the guarantors, and the Unites States, with the objective of a secure Gaza that no longer poses a threat to Israel, Egypt, or its citizens. Practically, the IDF will progressively hand over the Gaza territory it occupies to the ISF according to an agreement they will make with the transitional authority until they are withdrawn completely from Gaza, save for a security perimeter presence that will remain until Gaza is properly secure from any resurgent terror threat. 17. In the event Hamas delays or rejects this proposal, the above, including the scaled-up aid operation, will proceed in the terror-free areas handed over from the IDF to the ISF. 18. An interfaith dialogue process will be established based on the values of tolerance and peaceful co-existence to try and change mindsets and narratives of Palestinians and Israelis by emphasizing the benefits that can be derived from peace. 19. While Gaza re-development advances and when the PA reform program is faithfully carried out, the conditions may finally be in place for a credible pathway to Palestinian self-determination and statehood, which we recognize as the aspiration of the Palestinian people. 20. The United States will establish a dialogue between Israel and the Palestinians to agree on a political horizon for peaceful and prosperous co-existence.

Nick Sortor

179,901 просмотров • 11 месяцев назад

$Post 🇫🇷 & 🇺🇸 🇫🇷🚨📣 #Israel / #Iran Israël ATTAQUE l’Iran, puis se VICTIMISE quand l’Iran RIPOSTE… 🤔 L’OPINION AMÉRICAINE se fracture, car de plus en plus de citoyens REFUSENT de soutenir une guerre déclenchée une nouvelle fois par Israël. Pendant que certains membres du Congrès, sous l’influence des lobbys pro-Israël, poussent à l’escalade militaire, une partie croissante du peuple dit NON‼️ (1) ➡️ 🎥 Écoutez cette courte vidéo, traduite par mrs soins, qui reflète le positionnement de nombreux Américains et de citoyens du monde entier : 🎯 « … Ils vantaient la précision de leurs tirs, mais ont massacré plus de 50 000 femmes et enfants. Ils attaquent l’Iran, et se font passer pour les victimes…🤔 » 📎 Source : RyanMattaMedia ☢️ Israël détient des armes nucléaires non déclarées et refuse les inspections internationales. En 1963, JFK menaçait de couper les aides à Israël s’ils refusaient l’inspection du réacteur nucléaire secret de Dimona… Quelques mois plus tard, JFK est assassiné. Souvenez-vous (2) ➡️ 🎙️ Tucker Carlson ne mâche pas ses mots. Retrouvez son message dans ma publication « PAIX ou GUERRE ? Mon CHOIX est FAIT, et VOUS ? » (3) ➡️ 🕊️ AUCUN peuple ne mérite de souffrir pour les décisions de ses dirigeants ‼️ ⚠️ DÉNONCER une guerre injuste n’est pas être antisémite. C’est refuser l’hypocrisie, l’impunité et la destruction. 👉 Si VOUS voyez de la haine là où il y a un APPEL à la PAIX, alors le PROBLÈME, c’est VOUS. Pas nous‼️ Ps : Trump sait, il a exposé Netanyahou publiquement (4) ➡️ 🇺🇸🚨📣 Israel ATTACKS Iran, then plays the VICTIM when Iran STRIKES BACK… 🤔 The AMERICAN PUBLIC is increasingly DIVIDED, as more and more citizens REFUSE to support another war launched by Israel. While certain members of Congress, under the influence of pro-Israel lobbies, push for military escalation, a growing part of the people is saying NO ➡️ (linked 1 above) 🎥 Watch this short video that reflects the position of many Americans and people around the world: 🎯 “They bragged about ‘precision’, yet over 50,000 women and children lie dead in Gaza. They attack Iran and now claim to be the victims when there’s a response… 🤔” 📎 Source: ☢️ Israel possesses undeclared nuclear weapons and refuses international inspections. In 1963, JFK threatened to cut off aid to Israel unless they allowed inspection of their secret nuclear reactor in Dimona… A few months later, JFK was assassinated. Never forget ➡️ (linked 2 above) 🎙️ Tucker Carlson doesn’t mince words. Find his message in my post titled: “PEACE or WAR? I’ve MADE MY CHOICE — and YOU?” ➡️ (linked 3 above) 🕊️ NO NATION deserves to suffer because of the decisions of its leaders ‼️ ⚠️ To CONDEMN an unjust war is not antisemitism. It’s a refusal of hypocrisy, impunity, and destruction. 👉 If YOU see hate where there is a CALL FOR PEACE, then the PROBLEM is YOU. Not us‼️ PS: Trump knows — he publicly exposed Netanyahu ➡️ (linked 4 above) 🇺🇸🦅🇫🇷 Sylvia Miami 🇫🇷🦅🇺🇸 🔴 Tous mes liens en un seul clic, suivez-moi / All my links in one click, follow me ✅ Donald J. Trump Elon Musk General Mike Flynn #SylviaMiami #TuckerCarlson #Trump #Netanyahou #Netanyahu #Iran #Téhéran #Tehran #MiddleEast #Gaza #Israel #Peace #war #Dimona #JFK #PresidentKennedy$

Post 🇫🇷 & 🇺🇸 🇫🇷🚨📣 #Israel / #Iran Israël ATTAQUE l’Iran, puis se VICTIMISE quand l’Iran RIPOSTE… 🤔 L’OPINION AMÉRICAINE se fracture, car de plus en plus de citoyens REFUSENT de soutenir une guerre déclenchée une nouvelle fois par Israël. Pendant que certains membres du Congrès, sous l’influence des lobbys pro-Israël, poussent à l’escalade militaire, une partie croissante du peuple dit NON‼️ (1) ➡️ 🎥 Écoutez cette courte vidéo, traduite par mrs soins, qui reflète le positionnement de nombreux Américains et de citoyens du monde entier : 🎯 « … Ils vantaient la précision de leurs tirs, mais ont massacré plus de 50 000 femmes et enfants. Ils attaquent l’Iran, et se font passer pour les victimes…🤔 » 📎 Source : RyanMattaMedia ☢️ Israël détient des armes nucléaires non déclarées et refuse les inspections internationales. En 1963, JFK menaçait de couper les aides à Israël s’ils refusaient l’inspection du réacteur nucléaire secret de Dimona… Quelques mois plus tard, JFK est assassiné. Souvenez-vous (2) ➡️ 🎙️ Tucker Carlson ne mâche pas ses mots. Retrouvez son message dans ma publication « PAIX ou GUERRE ? Mon CHOIX est FAIT, et VOUS ? » (3) ➡️ 🕊️ AUCUN peuple ne mérite de souffrir pour les décisions de ses dirigeants ‼️ ⚠️ DÉNONCER une guerre injuste n’est pas être antisémite. C’est refuser l’hypocrisie, l’impunité et la destruction. 👉 Si VOUS voyez de la haine là où il y a un APPEL à la PAIX, alors le PROBLÈME, c’est VOUS. Pas nous‼️ Ps : Trump sait, il a exposé Netanyahou publiquement (4) ➡️ 🇺🇸🚨📣 Israel ATTACKS Iran, then plays the VICTIM when Iran STRIKES BACK… 🤔 The AMERICAN PUBLIC is increasingly DIVIDED, as more and more citizens REFUSE to support another war launched by Israel. While certain members of Congress, under the influence of pro-Israel lobbies, push for military escalation, a growing part of the people is saying NO ➡️ (linked 1 above) 🎥 Watch this short video that reflects the position of many Americans and people around the world: 🎯 “They bragged about ‘precision’, yet over 50,000 women and children lie dead in Gaza. They attack Iran and now claim to be the victims when there’s a response… 🤔” 📎 Source: ☢️ Israel possesses undeclared nuclear weapons and refuses international inspections. In 1963, JFK threatened to cut off aid to Israel unless they allowed inspection of their secret nuclear reactor in Dimona… A few months later, JFK was assassinated. Never forget ➡️ (linked 2 above) 🎙️ Tucker Carlson doesn’t mince words. Find his message in my post titled: “PEACE or WAR? I’ve MADE MY CHOICE — and YOU?” ➡️ (linked 3 above) 🕊️ NO NATION deserves to suffer because of the decisions of its leaders ‼️ ⚠️ To CONDEMN an unjust war is not antisemitism. It’s a refusal of hypocrisy, impunity, and destruction. 👉 If YOU see hate where there is a CALL FOR PEACE, then the PROBLEM is YOU. Not us‼️ PS: Trump knows — he publicly exposed Netanyahu ➡️ (linked 4 above) 🇺🇸🦅🇫🇷 Sylvia Miami 🇫🇷🦅🇺🇸 🔴 Tous mes liens en un seul clic, suivez-moi / All my links in one click, follow me ✅ Donald J. Trump Elon Musk General Mike Flynn #SylviaMiami #TuckerCarlson #Trump #Netanyahou #Netanyahu #Iran #Téhéran #Tehran #MiddleEast #Gaza #Israel #Peace #war #Dimona #JFK #PresidentKennedy

Sylvia Miami

38,986 просмотров • 1 год назад